Health Insurance Profits: Not So Outrageous After All?

Health insurance company profits -- higher but not evil?ABC News Photo Illustration
Some health insurance companies have seen hundreds of millions in net income in the last quarter, but analysts say they're not as profitable as you might think.

Ask any bank CEO and they'll tell you: reporting great profits at the same time lawmakers and advocacy groups are clamoring for an overhaul of your industry doesn't make for great public relations. Recent positive third-quarter earnings reports by major health insurance companies may put them in the same boat -- but do they really deserve to be there?

Some analysts say no.

"Insurance companies are not money trees. They got out into the market and buy health care services and resell those services at some markup at health care consumers. I would argue that markup is not that much," said Thomas Carroll, a health care analyst at Stifel Nicolaus. "This whole notion of big bad insurance companies is rather silly."

A cursory glance at third-quarter earning results from major insurers could put the lie to the "they're not money trees" defense: WellPoint late last month reported a net income of $730.2 million, less than last year but better than expected. UnitedHealth, Aetna, Humana and Cigna all saw double-digit percentage increases in their profits. The latter three all reported earnings above $300 million each, while UnitedHealth's third-quarter earnings were just north of $1 billion.

VIDEO: Health Care Reform Would Entail Major Changes for AmericansPlay

But the companies' profits still represent a miniscule percentage of the $2.5 trillion Americans spend every year on health care.

"Insurance company profits in the large picture have very little to do with the overall rising cost of health care," said health care expert Henry Aaron, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

Carroll and others pointed out that the profit margins the health insurance companies report -- often below 5 percent -- pace some industries and lag behind many others.

"From a net margin basis, it's not that much," said Steve Shubitz, an analyst at Edward Jones. "The bottom line is any business needs to make money. That's why you're in business."

Carroll said this year's profit increases look especially large because of how poorly companies did last year, when their investment portfolios -- like everyone else's -- saw massive declines.

Take out the role investment income plays in earnings reports, he said, and you'll find earnings for UnitedHealth and WellPoint rose 7 percent and 4 percent, respectively, while Aetna's dropped 36 percent.

"It's a little mystifying why health insurance gets vilified for that profitability," Shubitz said.

Health Insurance: 'A Dirty Business'

For critics of the health insurance industry, of course, the villification is no mystery at all. They point to practices such as cancelling coverage for some sick policyholders and allegations that companies sell expensive policies that cover surprisingly little.

"Health insurance companies are in a somewhat dirty business, really," Aaron said. "They do a great deal of good by helping people to cover risks of serious illness. They also have obligations to their shareholders and they are not charities."

Aaron said that, under the current system, even if insurance companies managed to put an end to their worst practices, they would still have to continue other bottom-line driven strategies, such as charging higher premiums to older people who have been ill in the past.

"I know there are some insurers out there who are doing really egregious things, but it's the system that's the problem," he said. "Even if you got rid of the egregiously bad practices, you'd be stuck with what the companies have to do not to go bankrupt."

To Aaron, the solution to the "dirty business" lies in the health reform bill that passed the House of Representatives and in the reform legislation under consideration by the Senate.

The legislation would, under threat of financial penalty, encourage more people to buy health insurance coverage. The healthy people who sign on as a result of such a plan, Aaron said, would help companies compensate for the high costs they face for covering the sick.

But insurance companies themselves have come out against the House bill. The lobbying group America's Health Insurance Plans has argued that the bill, which stops insurers from denying coverage due to pre-existing conditions and limits age-related variations on premiums, will ultimately increase health insurance costs for American families.

Regardless of whether the reform bills become law, Stifel Nicolaus' Carroll said, insurance companies face a tough road in the months ahead.

Rising unemployment is leading more Americans to rely on COBRA coverage, which is more costly to insurers because those who elect COBRA coverage are typically less healthy than those who choose to go without.

Companies are also continuing to set aside reserves to pay for claims related to the H1N1 virus, commonly known as the swine flu.

The increase in Medicare and Medicaid rolls are posing additional challenges for the long term. Carroll said doctors, hospitals and other health care providers charge higher rates to privately-insured customers to compensate for the relatively low reimbursements paid by the government for consumers covered by Medicare and Medicaid.

As more and more in the graying U.S. population enroll in Medicare, he said, that problem will grow worse.

"As we look into the next couple of years, no matter what reform looks like, government is going to be a bigger customer," he said.