Most Average Joes don't belong in commodities

ByABC News
August 14, 2009, 1:33 AM

— -- You've probably never thought, "My portfolio needs more pork," or, "Let's add some sugar to these stocks." And there's a reason for that. It's what farmers call "stupid." In most cases, the only ones getting rich from commodity funds are the people who sell them.

You can, however, make a modest case for adding a diversified commodity fund to your portfolio. It's a thin case, though, and it's only if you expect a return to '70s-style inflation.

Let's start with the obvious: Unless you have great insights into the sugar industry or the steel industry, you have no business investing in the insanely focused commodity investments now available. For example, iPath sells an exchange traded note that tracks the Dow Jones-UBS Tin index. It's up 45% this year. Quick, what's the price of tin? If you don't know, you probably shouldn't buy the iPath UBS Tin ETN. (For what it's worth, tin sold for $6.90 a pound on the London Metals Exchange on Thursday.)

But here's a better question: What on earth is the iPath Dow Jones-UBS Tin Total Return ETN?

An ETN is a credit obligation of the issuer in other words, it's a promise to pay a certain amount at a certain time. Its ultimate value depends on the issuer's ability to pay the note at maturity. This particular ETN is issued by Barclays Bank, which is rated AA- by Standard & Poor's. Repayment isn't guaranteed by any federal agency. Students of recent history may recall that owning long-term unsecured debt can sometimes be problematic.

Commodity ETNs are generally linked to an index in this case, the Dow Jones-UBS Tin subindex, which tracks the value of tin futures. You can buy and sell ETNs on the stock exchanges, and their market value typically follows the price of the underlying index, minus the issuer's annual fee.

You'll notice that the top-performing commodity investments the past 12 months (see chart) are all specialized ETNs. If the ETN part of the investment doesn't worry you, the fact that they are so specialized probably should, because forecasting commodity prices is tough. Just 17 people say they called the recent rise in sugar prices correctly, and you shouldn't believe 15 of them.