Americans (those who vote, in any event) will soon head to the polls to choose a new president. The major candidates and their running mates are pledging to steer the nation through continued prosperity. To determine which candidate is best suited to run the nation’s fiscal engine, we examined how the candidates handle their own finances, and then huddled with professional financial planners to hear their thoughts. The planners had some advice for the candidates on how to improve their portfolios. And if it doesn’t help you decide who you’re voting for, it may help you with your investments.
In terms of his personal finances, Dick Cheney confronts two problems. The first is strictly one of image: American voters like their rich public officials (and would-be officials) to appear generous, and Cheney’s record doesn’t quite meet those expectations. (For that matter, neither did Vice President Al Gore’s back in 1997, when he also came under fire for paltry charitable contributions.) Cheney, who made more than $4 million last year, caught flak when it was revealed that his direct charitable contributions over the past decade amounted to less than 1 percent of his ’99 income.
The situation is complicated by the fact that George “Rally the Armies of Compassion” Bush has said he wants charities to get more involved in providing social services. Based on Cheney’s history, you don’t exactly picture him snatching up his Santa hat and racing off to clang a bell for the wee ones. That’s problem one.
Classic Investing Mistake
Problem No. 2 — the more interesting one, for our purposes — relates to that classic investing mistake: failing to diversify.
Not surprisingly, the former CEO of Halliburton is loaded up with company stock. Michael Zabalaoui, a certified financial planner and CPA at Resource Management in Metairie, La., says Halliburton alone accounts for more than a third of Cheney’s equity investments. Throw in another holding, Anadarko Petroleum, and Cheney has 42 percent of equity investments concentrated in just two companies and one sector.
And boys, the chickens have come home to roost because, despite this year’s steep rise in oil prices, Halliburton’s looking pretty uninspiring. As Zabalaoui points out, the stock has a lofty price-to-earnings ratio of 55, although its share price still hasn’t surpassed its high from 1997. For most of that year the stock was trading in the mid-$50s. Now it’s in the $30s and recently veered uncomfortably close to its 52-week low. “Over the last couple of years, Halliburton has been a losing proposition even as the overall market has gone up,” says Zabalaoui. “He would have been much better off having invested in the S&P.”
In September, Cheney caught lots of flak for hemming and hawing about what to do with a Halliburton options package then valued at $3.6 million. Though he said he’d forgo the options, that debate is starting to look academic, since the bulk of the options have recently been underwater. On Cheney’s departure, Halliburton reportedly also gave the CEO a retirement package of stock and stock options worth $13.6 million, though the value of the package would have diminished with the stock’s decline.
The Lucrative IPO Route