Marilyn Monroe Sex Film? Collector Says It's Up for Auction

Aug. 6, 2011— -- A film purportedly showing a young Marilyn Monroe having sex while she was still a struggling young actress is due to go on the auction block Sunday, but experts in the screen legend say while the young woman may be a lookalike, it isn't Norma Jean Baker.

Spanish memorabilia collector Mikel Barsa plans to auction off the film in Buenos Aires at the Borges Cultural Center Sunday, and reportedly said he wants a whopping $500,000 for the short film.

Barsa told The Associated Press that the scratchy, black-and-white six-minute film shows the young actress before her Hollywood breakthrough. The report says the film may have been shot around 1946 or 1947, when she was "poor and desperate to break into show business."

Monroe experts and enthusiasts, however, have said the young blonde who is smiling throughout the film is not the Hollywood star.

More than a debate about whether the woman in the film is Marilyn Monroe, this could potentially turn into a legal battle.

Nancy Carlson, a spokeswoman for the brand development and licensing company Authentic Brands Group, told ABCNews.com in a statement that there is no proof the person in the video is Monroe.

"The seller would bear the responsibility of proving that it is Marilyn Monroe and if he cannot do that, he runs the risk of facing claims for perpetrating a fraud on the public," Carlson said.

She also indicated that they have notified Barsa of the claims and the connection his actions will have with the Monroe Estate.

The Monroe Estate owns all rights to Marilyn Monroe's name, likeness, image and personal throughout the world and Carlson said the Authentic Brands Group who would represent them in a potential law suit has attorneys in many countries that could assist.

"We are prepared to pursue further action against the Seller if they become necessary," Carlson said.

Still, Barsa told the AP that he'll proceed and broker the sale Sunday, and collect his 10 percent of the total selling price from the film's actual owners, whom he's refused to identify.

"It always is the same story when it comes to Marilyn -- to deny, deny, deny and to threaten," Barsa told the AP.

Michelle Morgan, author of "Marilyn Monroe: Private and Undisclosed" said she doubted the film really showed Monroe, because the young woman's figure appears far too big to be the famous actress.

"Marilyn at the time of this tape had a very slim figure, a widow's peak and perfect teeth," Morgan said.

She said she can't imagine why Barsa would think the woman in the film is Monroe, other than the fact that she may only vaguely resemble the star.

Scott Fortner, a blogger and Monroe expert who has collected several of her items like clothing, childhood possessions and an array of the star's memorabilia, shared a series of pictures with ABCNews.com where he pointed out the differences between Monroe and the woman in the film.

"For me the main aspect is the widow's peak," Fortner said. "The woman in the film has a straight hair line; Marilyn has always had her widow's peak."

He added that there is an inconsistency with Barsa's timeline with regards to when the film was made.

Monroe's modeling career started in 1945 when she was signed to Bluebook Modeling, Fortner told ABCNews.com. She signed her first film contract in 1946 with 20th Century Fox and that same year she landed two major magazine covers with Family Circle and Leader Magazine.