Bill O'Reilly's "No Spin Zone"

If you can't get enough of Bill O'Reilly's heated arguments, or if you just want to know if he said what you thought you heard on his show The O'Reilly Factor, you'll get what you bargained for in his latest book, No Spin Zone.

In the No-Spin Zone, "lies are rejected and equivocations are mocked," according to O'Reilly.

O'Reilly, a two-time Emmy winner with 25 years of TV experience, excerpts some of his most controversial O'Reilly Factor interviews with a number of different opponents in his new book. It's a diverse group including James Carville, P-Diddy (aka Sean Combs), Floyd Abrams, Susan Sarandon, Al Sharpton, Dr. Joycelyn Elders and many more. Read chapter one and two from No-Spin Zone:

CHAPTER ONE:

"You Kidding Me?"

Issue 1: Sexual deviants who prey on children

The Opponent: Floyd Abrams, First Amendment attorney

O'Reilly: This doesn't have anything to do with free speech.

Abrams: But of course it does.

O'Reilly: No, this has to do with aiding and abetting, promoting a crime on a Web site.

If you are thirty-five or older, chances are good that your childhood in America was pretty much like mine, no matter where you grew up. By age six I was out of the house most of the time after school and all during the summer, playing with my tight group of friends. There were limits. For example, if I was late for dinner at six o'clock, there was hell to pay.

Otherwise I was on my own in the great outdoors. My parents seemingly had no fear that I would be harmed by sinister outside forces marauding around my Long Island neighborhood. Sure, I might hurt myself roughhousing, but hey, those were the breaks. My father didn't sound like football announcer John Madden, but he had Madden's mind-set: "Play rough--take your chances."

With my dopey friends, whom you might have met in my last book, The O'Reilly Factor, I made the most of the deep woods three blocks from my house. We climbed thirty feet up into the thick leafy branches to build rickety tree houses. We tunneled underground like moles. We threw rocks at each other. We rolled around in the dirt completely unsupervised by annoying adults.

It never occurred to us that some older guy in an overcoat might drive up and try to hurt us. Yes, my father once said something about never taking a ride with a stranger. But he didn't say why, didn't make an issue out of it, and didn't seem concerned that his eldest son might be taken hostage at some point.

How times have changed. And that's the terrifying subject of this chapter's debate with a distinguished First Amendment lawyer and public figure, who I believe is absolutely wrong in putting the rights of special (read perverted) interests ahead of the safety of American children.

Parents today are rightfully worried about their children being abducted or abused, even in their own neighborhoods. But why is that? Are there more child molesters in the United States now than in my childhood years in the fifties and sixties? Are they bolder for some reason? Is it possible they are being encouraged?

Page
Join the Discussion
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...