li. Let's bring in dan rams. She is back home. She did lose temporary custody. What happens now? I would expect she'll get it back. It will be a short proceeding. Her attorney will petition the court.... See More
li. Let's bring in dan rams. She is back home. She did lose temporary custody. What happens now? I would expect she'll get it back. It will be a short proceeding. Her attorney will petition the court. There's nothing to indicate at the she's done anything wrong here. Even a judge said in his ruling, she did nothing wrong. That he was -- because he was citing acts by third parties. Which makes this all so incredibly bizarre. Pause you've got katherine saying, look, I don't know what this is all about. This is all a misunderstanding. The authorities have been to the house twice in the last week. You have a court ruling that by the actions of third parties, she was prevented as serving as forward yan. You have her grandson saying she's slurring words. We don't know what takt exactly is going on here. Let's not assume the legal system has gone nuts. Remember, number one concern is protect the kids. And if there's a question, you protect the kids. In this case, there was at the very least a question here. And the court wanted to step? A in and say, at least for now. We asked randy jackson about the will. If for some reason, even though it doesn't look like the case, that it would be thrown out, the children are still the ben factors. Some people have said the entire will should be thrown out. I think you're right. No matter what happens, these kids are going to get that money. This has been litigated all the way to the california supreme court. This is, in my view, the will is a nonissue. All right, dan, stay tuned. Thanks so much.
This transcript has been automatically generated and may not be 100% accurate.