WEDNESDAY, June 27 (HealthDay News) -- American surgeons-in-training stick themselves far too often with needles that could carry infection, and they often fail to report that they've done so.
That's the conclusion of a new study in the June 28 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.
"We were all alarmed at how great the magnitude of the problem appears to be," said lead author Dr. Martin A. Makary, director of the Johns Hopkins University Center for Surgical Outcomes Research.
The study of almost 700 surgeons-in-training at 17 U.S. medical centers found that 582 had experienced a needlestick injury. In more than half the cases, the needles were being used for high-risk patients -- those with particularly dangerous infections, such as hepatitis or HIV. And 297 of the 578 most recent incidents had not been reported to an employee health service, including 15 of the 91 cases involving high-risk patients.
That needlestick injuries occur in surgery and that many are not reported at once is not surprising, Makary said.
"Part of the surgical culture has been maintaining the patient first at all cost, and when an accident occurs in the operating room, the surgeon's first inclination is to continue with the operation," he said. "But the extent of the problem is much greater than we thought. Previous estimates of injuries understate the magnitude of the problem, because most of the injuries are not being recorded."
It has been estimated that one of every 50 needlesticks involving hepatitis B and one of every 100 involving HIV results in an infection, Makary said, making them "a significant public health problem." He assigned blame for the problem to both medical institutions and individual physicians.
"More hospitals need to do a better job in protection," Makary said. "They need more appropriate and more timely surgical systems so surgeons can get medical treatment immediately, not after a long bureaucratic process that takes them away from the patient."
The typical educational program about needlestick injuries "is practically worthless, it is just not working," Makary said. "What we advocate is peer-to-peer education on the topic, so it is not an outside administrator or occupational safety nurse saying that surgeons need to do a better job. Surgeons who have been stabbed should educate their fellow surgeons about what they should have done."
Needlestick incidents among surgeons could be reduced by having physician assistants and nurse practitioners do more of the work during surgery, by having hospitals require checklists of safer techniques and by using safer equipment, such as electric scalpels, clips and glues, Makary said.
In fact, up to 20 percent of surgical procedures could be done without using any sharp instruments at all, he said. However, an estimated 1 million needlestick injuries occur each year in the United States, Makary said.
Those injuries occur although the United States is the only nation that has a comprehensive needle safety program, said Ron Stoker, executive director of the International Sharps Injury Prevention Society, an organization devoted to reducing such injuries. The program came into existence when President Bill Clinton signed a bill passed by Congress in November 2000, Stoker said.