Tony Blair Tells 'Judgment Day' Panel He Has No Regrets on Iraq

Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair faces questions on the Iraq war.

ByABC News
January 29, 2010, 9:17 AM

LONDON, Jan. 29, 2010— -- Former British prime minister Tony Blair showed up today for what has been called his Judgment Day hearing for leading Britain into the Iraq war and said that even though no weapons of mass destruction were ever found, going to war against Saddam Hussein was a decision he "frankly would take again."

Blair arrived with heavy security two hours ahead of schedule to avoid protestors gathered near Parliament Square. A small crowd shouted, "Tony Blair, War Criminal!" and carried placards made to look like they were splattered with blood and read: "B-LIAR!"

As he sat in front of the five-member panel, made up of four knights and a baroness, the former prime minister was visible nervous, his hands shaking and his face taught. His introductory remarks included none of the confident rhetoric he is known for delivering.

But he soon warmed to the debate, conceding the floor to the chair of the committee when asked. While he never grew defensive, neither did he waver in conveying his conviction that his actions came from a morally justifiable place and that he would make many of the same decisions today.

Early on in the questioning Blair made it clear that 9/11 had a dramatic and ultimately decisive effect on the length he was willing to go to support U.S. efforts to remove Saddam Hussein from power.

"Up to Sept. 11 we thought he was a risk, but we thought it was worth trying to contain it," he said. "The crucial thing after Sept. 11 is that the calculus of risk changed."

Blair maintains that he was right to believe Saddam had weapons of mass destruction because he had used them in the past. That alone was a major and he says, justified component in taking Britain to war.

Blair has been harshly criticized for misleading the public on the WMD issue. On that note, he was clear and unapologetic.

"It is really important to understand the decision I took and frankly would take again. If there was any possibility that he could develop WMD we should stop him. That was my view then, that is my view now."