Sotomayor's schedule includes meetings those four lawmakers, Schumer, her other home state senator Kirsten Gillibrand, and Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., both important to her future as they are in charge of marshalling votes for their respective parties.
After today's marathon meetings, she is likely to start working her way through the members of the Judiciary Committee.
The meetings could take weeks, and while they may seem like an opportunity for Sotomayor to sell herself to senators, in fact it is the other way around, according to veterans of the confirmation process.
The meetings are more about senators speaking their minds and outlining for Sotomayor their own judicial philosophies. But she could get hints of the lines of questioning she will face in her confirmation hearing.
"Mostly these meetings are really as much or more about listening to the senators than necessarily sharing all your inner most thoughts," Gillespie said. "Judges aren't accustomed to being judged and that's the situation in which they find themselves, Judge Sotomayor finds herself right now."
Sotomayor is still completing the questionnaire from the Senate Judiciary Committee, a 10-page detailed document that she must hand in prior to her public hearing before the committee.
The committee documents ask questions about potential conflicts of interest, such as "Explain how you will resolve any potential conflict of interest, including the procedure you will follow in determining these areas of concern."
Sotomayor is asked to provide financial and past employment information, copies of all her published writings and statements, and her memberships in "professional, business, fraternal, scholarly, civic, charitable or other organizations."
The White House said the completed questionnaire will be sent to the Senate at some point next week.
Cutter and her team's job may be easier than expected, as the fight from the right may not be as fierce as they have been preparing for.
So far, 27 Republican senators have issued public statements on Sotomayor's nomination, and not one launched an attack.
Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., was the first, and thus far only, Republican senator to say he will vote against Sotomayor's nomination.
"I voted no in 1998," Roberts said to a Kansas radio station, referring to the vote on Sotomayor's nomination to the appeals court. "I did not feel she was appropriate on the appeals court. ... Since that time, she has made statements on the role of the appeals court I think is improper and incorrect."
The White House has made it clear that it wants a confirmation vote by the Senate's August recess.
Obama wants Sotomayor on the bench when the next court term begins in October and wants her to have August and September to familiarize herself with the cases and get settled into the new job.
Republicans have indicated that they are not in any rush to wrap the confirmation process up and want to take the time to give Sotomayor's record a "fair and thorough examination," as Sessions has said.
"Senate Republicans will treat Judge Sotomayor fairly. But we will thoroughly examine her record to ensure she understands that the role of a jurist in our democracy is to apply the law evenhandedly, despite their own feelings or personal or political preferences," said McConnell.
But the White House believes it should not take until September to bring her nomination to the Senate floor.
"I think the president believes there is ample time to get a fair and honest hearing. He understands the important role the Senate plays to advise and consent, especially something as important as a Supreme Court nomination," Gibbs said.