The Note: Err Apparent

As the saying goes, if you want political reporters to eat their vegetables, it helps if they have nothing else on their plate. The Clintons, meanwhile, are serving whoppers.

Former president Bill Clinton is the latest to hand out a juicy fib -- circling back to Bosnia to cram four falsehoods into 23 words: His wife, he said, "one time late at night when she was exhausted, misstated and immediately apologized for it, what happened to her in Bosnia in 1995."

Where to start? If his telling is accurate, it depends on what the definition of "one time," "late at night," and "immediately apologized" is. (And it was 1996, not 1995.)

"Hillary Clinton actually made the comments numerous times, including at an event in Iowa on Dec. 29, and an event on Feb. 29 and one time -- bright and early in the morning -- on March 17," ABC's Sarah Amos and Eloise Harper report.

"Sen. Clinton wasn't as quick with her apology as President Clinton may remember either. In fact, it took a week for her to eventually correct herself, first talking to the Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board on March 24 and again apologizing the next day in Greensboro, N.C."

Politifact.com gave Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's handling of the matter the dreaded "pants on fire" designation.

ABC's Jake Tapper counts up a total of eight different misstatements/exaggerations in his telling of the tale on Thursday.

Maybe this whole Bosnia flap has gotten too much attention. Maybe Bill Clinton is right that his wife was wrongly treated like "she'd robbed a bank the way they carried on about this." Maybe he's also right that "when they're 60 they'll forget something when they're tired at 11:00 at night, too." (Who are "they," and why are they so mean to his wife, anyway?)

But for whatever reason, another "they" -- Pennsylvania voters -- have followed this storyline. (The word around Camp Clinton is that this story is the biggest factor in her Pennsylvania dip -- which is one reason Bill Clinton is trying to explain it away to voters in Indiana.)

It remains Sen. Clinton who's defending her credibility, honesty, and trustworthiness, keeping the spotlight away from her rival in the closing weeks before April 22.

The problem for Sen. Clinton is that one side of the double-edged sword that is her husband remains sharper than the other. The Clintons can explain away their differences (trade, torture, an Olympic boycott) but this is messy stuff for a campaign that can't afford too many more distractions.

The Boston Globe's Foon Rhee calls it "one of the central challenges of Hillary Clinton's campaign: How to take credit for the accomplishments of her husband's presidency and profit from his popularity while distancing herself from his past and present positions on which they disagree."

Former presidential adviser David Gergen sees the campaign "going sideways rather than forward." "She very badly needs to get back to the campaign message, what she would do in the next four years," Gergen tells Rhee.

Remember the quaint old days when we feared Sen. Clinton being overshadowed by her husband's wattage? Overwhelmed is more like it.

What of this portion of the legacy? Welfare reform -- still the target of liberal ire 12 years later -- is reemerging as an issue, Peter S. Goodman writes in The New York Times. Clinton "rarely mentions the issue as she battles for the nomination, despite the emphasis she has placed on her experience in her husband's White House," Goodman writes.

"But now the issue is back, pulled to the fore by an economy turning down more sharply than at any other time since the welfare changes were imposed. With low-income people especially threatened by a weakening labor market, some advocates for poor families are raising concerns about the adequacy of the remaining social safety net. Mrs. Clinton is now calling for the establishment of a cabinet-level position to fight poverty."

It could still be trade that moves the most moves in lunch-bucket parts of Pennsylvania. "Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is pressing her claim that she opposed her husband's free trade push when he was president, despite her favorable words about it at the time," per the AP fact-check. "She spoke up for [NAFTA's] passage and early results when her husband Bill was president, years before Obama came to Washington."

This isn't as serious -- but will (unfortunately for the Clintons) generate more buzz. Coming to a right-wing talkfest near you: Clinton's "presidential retirement benefits cost taxpayers almost as much as those of the other two living ex-presidents combined," Politico's Kenneth P. Vogel reports. "The price tag for Clinton's federal retirement allowance from 2001 through the end of this year will run $8 million, compared to $5.5 million for George H. W. Bush's and $4 million for Jimmy Carter's during the same period."

(He did serve as long as H.W. and Carter combined . . . )

If not for all of this, it just might be Sen. Barack Obama's (possible) hypocrisy that would consuming the campaign oxygen. There's his dance on public financing, and this: "A mere five months ago, in Iowa, Obama didn't like it when outside 'special interest' groups sided with his rivals, pumped their own money into the campaign, and ran independent ads against him," Dick Polman writes in the Philadelphia Inquirer.

"Fast forward to the Pennsylvania primary, present day . . . and the news that SEIU and an affiliated health-care local union are pouring upwards of $1 million into an independent pro-Obama effort that parallels the official Obama operation.

"Nothing illegal about that, then or now. The issue here is the difference between Obama's stance, then and now," Polman writes. "He's a politician who is trying to win, and he will flip where he once flopped if that's what it takes."

Particularly because (Sen. Clinton's complaints to the contrary) the Democratic Party is showing no likelihood of suddenly behaving like Republicans, she needs to pitch something close to a perfect game between here and Pennsylvania (and beyond) to capture the nomination.

Jake Tapper does some math along with ABC's political unit and comes up with this scenario for when the Democratic voting is done: "Obama in June would still lead Clinton with 120 delegates. Almost two more months, millions of dollars, hundreds of attacks and counter-attacks between the two campaigns later," Tapper writes. "It all means that come June we could be essentially exactly where we are today, short of some serious movement by superdelegates or Democratic voters one way or another."

Slate's Christopher Beam does some math of his own: "Even if Hillary Clinton wins every single one of the remaining contests by 10 points, she still needs to win 70 percent of the remaining uncommitted superdelegates. Given that since Feb. 5, Obama has netted 69 superdelegates and Clinton has lost a net of five, it's fair to say the pendulum is not swinging her way."

And if she can't win Pennsylvania, the rest of the story is written. Salon's Walter Shapiro travels back to the site of Obama's bowling fiasco (and reminds us that he was actually bowling a 47 -- and working a spare -- when he quit in the seventh frame). "There are hints that Obama, who is narrowing the gap against Clinton in recent statewide polls, may be tapping into something even here in Altoona, where the 19th century offered more promise than the current one," Shapiro writes.

"What everyone remembered (including the clerk from the rental car company who insisted on driving me on Obama's route through Altoona) is the candidate who came to bowl . . . even if badly."

Here, though, is a twist: "Sen. Barack Obama has collided with the gritty political traditions of Philadelphia, where ward bosses love their candidates, but also expect them to pay up," the Los Angeles Times' Peter Nicholas reports. "The dispute centers on the dispensing of 'street money,' a long-standing Philadelphia ritual in which candidates deliver cash to the city's Democratic operatives in return for getting out the vote."

(Can you imagine the stories if the payments were made? How does the politics of bribery play out?)

This is not a financial decision -- and neither is Obama's campaign a pure-as-the-driven-snow people-powered movement.

There's the small givers Obama likes to celebrate, and "those with wealth and power also have played a critical role in creating Obama's record-breaking fundraising machine, and their generosity has earned them a prominent voice in shaping his campaign," Matthew Mosk and Alec MacGillis write in The Washington Post, in the definitive account of Obama's money team.

"Seventy-nine 'bundlers,' five of them billionaires, have tapped their personal networks to raise at least $200,000 each. They have helped the campaign recruit more than 27,000 donors to write checks for $2,300, the maximum allowed."

More Obama money scrutiny: "Campaign finance records state that Obama has received tens of thousand of dollars from people in many of the same groups and industries he regularly rails against," Brett Lieberman writes in the Harrisburg Patriot-News.

What it means: "Barack Obama will likely overwhelm John McCain in campaign spending, if the Illinois senator wins his party's presidential nomination, in what would be the first time in four decades a Democrat would enjoy such an advantage," Bloomberg's Jonathan Salant reports.

"And he could do it whether he accepts federal campaign- finance limits or raises all the money privately."

Another twist to add this Friday, in the clip most likely to be circulated by the Clinton campaign: "Republican Sen. John McCain has erased Sen. Barack Obama's 10-point advantage in a head-to-head matchup, leaving him essentially tied with both Democratic candidates in an Associated Press-Ipsos national poll released Thursday," AP's Nedra Pickler writes.

"The survey showed the extended Democratic primary campaign creating divisions among supporters of Obama and rival Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and suggests a tight race for the presidency in November no matter which Democrat becomes the nominee."

Key nugget: "About a quarter of Obama supporters say they'll vote for McCain if Clinton is the Democratic nominee. About a third of Clinton supporters say they would vote for McCain if it's Obama."

For Clinton, it's been the first good taste of superdelegate movement in a while -- three in 36 hours: new Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif.; former Pittsburgh mayor Sophie Masloff; and Bill Burga, former president of the Ohio AFL-CIO.

As for McCain -- are we detecting a move to the center (already)?

There's this: "Senator John McCain, who drew criticism last month after he warned against broad government intervention to solve the deepening mortgage crisis, pivoted Thursday and called for the federal government to aid some homeowners in danger of losing their homes, by helping them to refinance and get federally guaranteed 30-year mortgages," Michael Cooper writes in The New York Times.

(Shouldn't he get the base in line first? "Hey, remember when I praised McCain's housing stance? Forget it," blogs Michelle Malkin. "Maverick schmaverick."

And: "Sen. John McCain broke with President Bush on how to manage the nation's emergency stockpile of petroleum, saying the administration should stop adding oil to the reserve at a time of high prices," Stephen Power and Neil King Jr. write in The Wall Street Journal.

Also: "Unless they change something pretty quickly," McCain told the ladies of "The View" Thursday, per ABC's Bret Hovell, "I would not go to the opening ceremonies [of the Beijing Olympics]."

That leaves Obama as the odd candidate out: Obama has "expressed similar views, adding his concerns about Chinese influence with Sudan in the midst of the slaughter in Darfur," Johanna Neuman writes in the Los Angeles Times.

"But Obama, saying that a boycott of the opening ceremonies should be 'firmly on the table,' argued that the decision 'should be made closer to the Games.' "

Or maybe it doesn't: "Barack Obama said Thursday that it would be an 'appropriate step' for the president to skip the opening ceremonies in protest to China's policies," the Chicago Tribune's John McCormick reports.

Said Obama: "The Olympics always has been a place where people register their concerns. . . China clearly has not upheld the kinds of human rights that we would expect from such a major actor on the world stage."

Some praise for McCain from everybody's favorite independent mayor: "He is someone who is nothing if not forthright," Mayor Michael Bloomberg, I-N.Y., said in introducing McCain in Brooklyn Thursday.

And Bloomberg has a long memory: "I got elected because of you," he told McCain.

DNC Chairman Howard Dean invited reporters to peek at his playbook on Thursday, including one juicy item that he won't bring up -- promise. "Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said Thursday that swing voters participating in focus groups commissioned by the DNC bring up John McCain's age unprompted," per ABC's Teddy Davis and Mike Elmore. "I doubt we will bring it up in the election," Dean said. "There is somewhat of a higher ethical bar on what we do." (Come again?)

Sen. Clinton has a pair of events in Philadelphia, where she is expected to unveil "a crime-fighting plan that she boldly says will halve homicide rates in cities over five years," per the Philadelphia Daily News' Catherine Lucey.

Get ready for COPS 2.0: "She maintains that she could cut homicide rates in cities by increasing the number of police on the street, reducing gang violence and by cracking down on illegal gun trafficking," McClatchy's William Douglas reports.

Clinton plans to say: "At its core, my agenda is about responsibility. . . . It's about the federal government living up to its responsibility to help restore order in our communities, pave the way for economic development and new jobs, and help our families feel safe in their homes and neighborhoods."

Obama hits Indiana on Friday. Per his campaign: "Senator Barack Obama will call for swift passage of his legislation to require corporations to hold a nonbinding shareholders vote on compensation packages offered to executives."

From his prepared remarks: "So what we need to do is restore balance to our economy and put in place rules of the road to make competition fair, and open, and honest. One place we can start is by restoring common sense to executive pay."

Get all the candidates' schedules in The Note's "Sneak Peek."

From the White House: "President Bush, with his assertion Thursday that the surge of U.S. military forces in Iraq has 'renewed and revived the prospect of success,' is signaling that he is ready to hunker down with a disputed war strategy for the remainder of his presidency and hand off a nearly 6-year-old war to his successor," Mark Silva reports in the Chicago Tribune.

On Friday, ABC's Martha Raddatz will conduct a wide-ranging interview with President Bush -- on Iraq, 2008 politics, and other topics -- at his ranch in Crawford, Texas. Portions of the interview will air on the "World News" broadcast and Webcast, as well as ABC News Radio, ABC NewsOne, ABC News Now, and on ABCNews.com.

Elsewhere in the news:

Colin Powell and Dick Cheney disagree (again). As Powell says he "admired" Obama's speech on race, the vice president popped up on Sean Hannity's radio show long enough to let us know he was among those who saw those tapes of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

"I thought some of the things he said were absolutely appalling," Cheney said, per ABC's Jon Garcia. "And, you know, I haven't gotten into the business of trying to judge how Sen. Obama dealt with it, or didn't deal with it, but I really -- I think, like most Americans, I was stunned at what the reverend was preaching in his church and then putting up on his Web site."

How to call Pennsylvania? "In Democratic politics, the contrasts between Pittsburgh and Philadelphia are so sharp that they might decide the outcome of the state's presidential primary April 22," the Philadelphia Inquirer's Tom Infield writes.

"The Pittsburgh area, according to polls and politicos-in-the-know, is Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton territory. The Philadelphia area is the Keystone State's biggest stronghold for Sen. Barack Obama. The differences that 300 miles can make stem mainly from one thing: demographics."

The Economist explains the keys to the Keystone State: "Pennsylvania is a 'no excuses' state for the Democratic candidates. The two rivals have had six weeks to prepare for the primary, so they cannot blame 'momentum' or accidents for any misfortunes. Pennsylvania's Democrats also operate a doubly closed primary: you not only need to be a registered Democrat to vote, but you also need to have registered at least a month before the contest. Mrs. Clinton will not be able to attribute a good performance on Mr. Obama's part to gate-crashing by independents or even Republicans."

An intriguing take from Philadelphia magazine's Steve Volk, writing in The New Republic: Obama should run like Gov. Ed Rendell, D-Pa. (a Clinton supporter). "Just because a strategy is ironic doesn't mean it's wrong," Volk writes. "The Rendell voter is a carbon copy of the standard issue Obama voter--African-American and white, professional class."

"And more than 200,000 Democratic voters have been added to the state's voter rolls. Because the Obama campaign has put so much effort into voter registration initiatives, a majority of those voters are thought to be Obama converts," Volk continues. "But the question is whether or not he will go for an outright victory in Pennsylvania -- or if his campaign will be governed by the notion that a small loss is really a win."

Some Iraq positioning from Clinton, in Pennsylvania: "Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said yesterday that she would carry out her pledge to begin withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq within 60 days of taking office, even if military commanders advised against it," Thomas Fitzgerald writes in the Philadelphia Inquirer.

The latest from the department of off-message surrogates: The DCCC is raising money off these comments from a GOP House candidate, David Bellavia: "You can have your Tiger Woods, we've got John McCain." "Will New York Republicans do the right thing and call on John McCain to reject Bellavia's racist comments?" Carrie James, a DCCC spokeswoman, tells The Washington Post's Mary Ann Akers.

Scrutiny for Team McCain: "Two of Sen. John McCain's top advisers and fundraisers are among several Republican and Democratic presidential campaign officials whose lobbying firms have been paid more than $15 million by foreign governments since 2005," Jim McElhatton and Jerry Seper write in the Washington Times.

Time's Michael Scherer explores whether McCain has changed his position on an issue that's pretty close to his heart. "On this latest piece of legislation, which arose during the heat of the primary campaign and may surface again later this month, McCain sided with Bush in opposing a further restriction of CIA techniques," he writes. "Despite the claims of some partisans, McCain's decision was not a flip-flop, but rather the continuation of a position he took in 2005 when he first championed a bill to restrict the Bush Administration's ability to mistreat detainees."

A veepstakes update: "Mitt Romney is still running -- perhaps for vice president this fall or the White House in 2012 or 2016," per the AP.

"Two months after bowing out of the Republican race, the former Massachusetts governor has become one of Senator John McCain's biggest boosters, pledging to raise $15 million for his former rival and praising him on talk shows and the campaign trail."

It must be fun to be staffing back up. "Sen. John McCain, still rebuilding his presidential campaign after last summer's near-bankruptcy and staff upheaval, has re-enlisted respected veteran Bill McInturff as his pollster," Jackie Calmes reports on The Wall Street Journal's blog.

USA Today's Fredreka Schouten tracks outside spending. "Spending by independent political groups has more than doubled since 2004, a USA TODAY analysis shows, in a sign that outside organizations are gearing up for sweeping influence in the heated presidential contest," Schouten writes. "More than $8 of every $10 spent has helped Democrats, according to the analysis of 'independent expenditures' reported to the Federal Election Commission."

A California update, in advance of Sunday's party caucuses: "Sen. Barack Obama late Thursday reinstated hundreds of California Democrats to run as delegates in his name at the Denver national convention after blocking them earlier this week," the Sacramento Bee's Kevin Yamamura reports.

"Obama's initial purge angered many Democratic activists around the state who volunteered on his behalf and planned to compete Sunday in local caucus meetings for 107 California delegate spots. They suggested that the removal of so many grassroots supporters ran counter to his reputation for reaching out to voters outside the political establishment. Many complained Thursday to his national headquarters in Illinois."

A wrinkle for Obama, presented by his possible supporter, former president Jimmy Carter. "President Jimmy Carter is heading to Syria next week and is slated to meet with Hamas representatives," ABC's Sunlen Miller reports.

"This presents a unique situation for presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama -- who is well [documented] saying he'd meet with America's 'friends and enemies' if he were President, one difference he has with Senator Clinton. But Obama draws the line at meeting with Hamas."

ABC's George Stephanopoulos interviews Carter on Sunday's "This Week."

Obama makes some news on gay rights. "Barack Obama said he's confident he could end the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy for gays in the military, but he won't make it a criteria for serving on the Joint Chiefs of Staff," Michael Saul writes in the New York Daily News. Obama told The Advocate: "I would never make this a litmus test for the Joint Chiefs of Staff."

Big Sunday event: Obama and Clinton answer questions (separately) about faith and values at an 8 pm ET forum sponsored by Faith in Public Life, broadcast on CNN.

The kicker:

"That's my phone buzzing there. . . . I don't want you to think I'm getting fresh or anything." -- Barack Obama, while getting his picture taken with a supporter in Indiana.

"At first glance, I thought it was a naked woman as well. . . . However after close study and a second opinion . . . I believe it's his arm." -- Photographer Jody Gomez, on the odd image reflected in Dick Cheney's sunglasses, the cause of an Internet firestorm.

Bookmark The Note at http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/TheNote/story?id=3105288&page=1

ABC News is accepting requests for press credentials for the April 16 Democratic presidential debate sponsored by ABC News, the National Constitution Center, and WPVI-TV. The debate, moderated by ABC News' anchors Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos, will be held at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia just days before the Pennsylvania primary, and will be broadcast in primetime on national television starting at 8:00 p.m., ET/PT on the ABC Television Network.

Credentials: Journalists interested in obtaining a press credential for the press filing center and spin room should send the following information to ABC.Debate@abc.com:

Full Legal Name

Company and Title (freelance journalists should specify their assigning media)

Medium (i.e., Print, Television, Radio, Online)

Best Phone Number (either cell or office)

E-mail Address

Social Security Number (required by the Secret Service)

Supervisor Name and Contact Information (phone and e-mail)

If you are interested in reserving space for a stand-up location in the spin room, a stand-up position outside, and/or parking for a satellite truck, please note that as well

Media will be required to present photo identification and a company ID upon check-in at the press filing center.

Please note the credential will grant the journalist access to the filing center and the Spin Room, not the debate hall.

The deadline for submitting a press credential request is Friday, April 11, 2008 at 12 p.m. ET.