Ohio Execution Fails After 18 Attempts to Puncture Inmate's Veins

Convicted killer appeals to federal court to stop second try.

ByABC News
September 18, 2009, 2:42 PM

Sept. 18, 2009 -- On Tuesday night, convicted killer Romell Broom ate the strangest meal of his life: veggie nuggets, lima beans, bread and cookies.

It wasn't the menu that was extraordinary, but the fact that he was alive to eat the food.

Broom is the first person ever in U.S. history to be scheduled to die by lethal injection, and then to have his execution postponed because authorities were unable to find a suitable vein in which to inject the three-drug cocktail that was meant to kill him.

Concerned by the failed attempts, Ohio Governor Ted Strickland delayed the execution, and a federal judge has pushed it back until at least September 28, pending appeals.

But Broom's lawyers filed papers in state and federal court today, contending that Ohio shouldn't have a second chance to subject Broom to lethal injection.

Broom was convicted of fatally stabbing Tryna Middleton in 1984.

Adele Shank, a lawyer for Broom, says she has spoken with him and seen the puncture wounds. "He is swollen and red and is in active, aching pain." she said.

Broom's lawyers contend that the Ohio system -- where officials took two hours trying to puncture Broom's arm -- is critically flawed. Thus, Shank said, death by lethal injection constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.

"His arms hurt and his veins are damaged," said Shank. "If they couldn't do it last week, next week will be an invitation of disaster."

In an affidavit filed with the court, Broom says nurses tried 18 times to insert a needle in one of his veins, but never could.

"He attempted to insert the IV," said Broom of one male nurse's attempts, "but he lost it and blood started to run down my arm. The female nurse left the room. The correction officer asked her if she was OK. She responded, 'no' and walked out."

Death penalty opponents are convinced that the unprecedented "temporary halt" will be anything but temporary, and they hope this case will reignite the debate over whether lethal injection constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.