If you thought all U.S. cities are tightening their belts because of budget crises, think again.
Despite the tough economic times most U.S. cities are facing, some city officials -- from Las Vegas to Pittsburgh -- are spending millions of dollars on expensive projects that are raising eyebrows.
Here's a look at some questionable spending sprees on taxpapers' dimes:
Las Vegas: Mob Museum Exhibit Hijacked by Cost Concerns
In early July, the Las Vegas city council approved $7.1 million for museum exhibits for the Las Vegas Museum of Organized Crime and Law Enforcement, also known as "The Mob Museum."
About $12.4 million for the project is coming from the city's coffers, and the museum -- which is scheduled to open in 2011 -- has attracted about $8.3 million from local, state and federal grants.
Funds for the $42 million museum were allocated in 2004, and city officials are defending the project as one that will create jobs and help the tourism industry. The city projects that the museum will generate $8.5 million to $13.9 million in revenue over a 10-year period and will employ 92 people when it's complete.
But at a time when Las Vegas is facing an $80.8 million shortfall in fiscal year 2011, plans to cut at least 200 jobs and reduce overtime and is cutting community programs, the decision to spend millions on a museum has generated severe criticism. The union for Las Vegas city employees assailed what it called the city government's "spending spree" as "absolutely unconscionable."
Officials say the money for the museum was set aside long before the economic downturn.
"Much of the funding for the Museum comes from redevelopments funds, which have to be spent in redevelopment areas for redevelopment projects like the Museum -- not jobs. Of this $42 million, more than $8 million is from grants that must be used for the Museum -- not jobs," city officials said in a statement to ABC News.
Museum representatives say the city council, only one member of which voted against the museum funding, didn't discuss whether to allocate the money on another project, in light of the declining economic conditions since the museum was approved.
Kansas City: Power Failure?
The Power & Light District, a downtown revival project and one of the Midwest's largest construction ventures, was supposed to revive the downtown district in Kansas City, Missouri, when it was approved in 2006.
But the project, hailed by some as the "renaissance of downtown," has become a noose around the city's neck with its $850 million price tag, opponents say.
When the project was initially approved, the city agreed to back $295 million in bonds on the assumption that the entertainment and dining area would quickly attract revenue and become self-sustaining.
Original projections from the Chicago-based consulting firm C.H. Johnson Consulting slated the entertainment district to be at 90 percent occupancy and generate $17.7 million in revenue by March 2007, according to the Kansas City Star.
But a poor economy, coupled with difficulty attracting investors and an eight-month delay in opening, has left the Power & Light District 25 percent unoccupied, and city officials in July projected an annual cost of $10 billion to $15 billion in subsidies until 2033, when the bonds are set to expire.
Kansas City Mayor Mark Funkhouser, a Democrat who was elected after the Power & Light District project was approved, has assailed the project as a waste, saying it will do nothing to help the city's $87 million budget shortfall.
"These glitzy projects, paid for by tax incentives, do not generate the positive cash flow that would somehow lift up everybody else," Funkhouser told ABC News. "It simply doesn't work. The evidence is clear, over and over.
"It's finally been acknowledged that the thing is going to run probably a permanent subsidy ... but it should not be a surprise to anybody who's paying attention," Funkhouser said. "This thing was done without, in my view, an adequate financial analysis at all. ... In addition to sucking up all the taxes, it also requires $10 to $15 million in general municipal revenue that we could have spent on cops, on teachers, on firefighters or something else."
In the meantime, the city is cutting services across the board. In March, the city decided to shut down 28 of its 61 schools in an attempt to close a $50 million budget gap, and the city council has approved a $15 million cut to the police department, slashing civilian positions and stretching the existing police, Funkhouser said.
San Diego: Breaking New Ground or Breaking the Bank?
Like many cities in the cash-strapped state of California, San Diego faces a looming budget deficit that's expected to climb above $211 million in 2010, according to the city's Office of the Independent Budget Analyst.
The whopping figure has got many residents concerned about the city's new central library, which carries a price tag of $185 million. Late last month, the city council approved construction of the library, for which the city has earmarked $150 million.
Critics say the city is wrong to embark on a project that it may not be able to complete without hefty funding.
City officials say the library is much needed and that it's fully funded through community development funds and private donations. Donors have already pledged to give the additional $30 million the city will need to complete the project.
"We wouldn't have moved forward with this if they [the city council] didn't believe it couldn't be raised," Rachel Laing, a spokeswoman for Mayor Jerry Sanders, told ABC News.
The library is expected to open in July 2013.
Pittsburgh: Trash Talk
In 2009, Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl faced wide criticism for using $252,500 in partial state grants to purchase 250 new trash cans for the city -- with his name and title embossed on them.
The 36-gallon, 280-pound metal trash receptacles, purchased as part of Ravenstahl's "Taking Care of Business" campaign to beautify 50 city business districts, cost $1,010 apiece.
Ravenstahl dismissed the backlash at the time.
"You can't simply go to Home Depot to buy a garbage can and put it on the street corner. We're looking for beautification," he told reporters after the purchase.
Critics charged that the spending was too lavish at a time when the city was facing a tight budget and a nearly $600 million pension fund shortfall. The inclusion of the mayor's name on the cans amounted to taxpayer-funded endorsements just before the election, opponents charged.
In recent years, other cities, including Philadelphia, Minneapolis and Cincinnati, have purchased similar trash cans for less, a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review investigation found.
But the mayor's office defended the spending as part of a larger, multi-year business district improvement project, saying that city residents had previously complained about shoddy or vandalized garbage cans that allowed trash to spill over. Placing Ravenstahl's name on the cans was a way to direct business owners to the proper local agency, and it was "something we felt was appropriate," Ravenstahl spokeswoman Joanna Doven told ABC News.
"Do your research, 'cause I did mine: You cannot find good quality garbage cans for under $1,000," Doven said. "We invested in our neighborhood business district by investing in garbage cans."
Bell, Los Angeles: Plus Jobs
Bell, one of the lowest performing cities in Los Angeles County, paid its top officials exuberant salaries -- $800,000 to the city manager, $457,000 to the police chief and more than $787,000 to the chief administrative officer -- according to documents obtained by the Los Angeles Times in July.
The city initially defended the hefty paychecks, telling the newspaper that the city is one of the best in the region because of people like the city manager. Following a public outcry and emergency City Council meeting behind closed doors, the three high-paid officials resigned, though community activists continue to reel about the pension plans which some of the resigned officials will receive.
In response, Mayor Oscar Hernandez – who initially defended the salaries – volunteered to serve the remainder of his term without pay, and the City Council – which approved the salaries – voted to slash its pay by 90 percent.
The per capita income of the city of Bell is half that for the rest of the United States, and 2008 census data showed that 17 percent of the population lives in poverty. In the wake of the uproar, the attorney general has launched an investigation into the salaries, and the state controller's office ordered all cities and counties to report the salaries of all public employees and elected officials.