Republicans, Don't Cede Millennials to Democrats Just Yet

In the aftermath of President Obama's 2012 victory, conventional political wisdom all held in some form or fashion that the Republican Party was beginning its siren song. Sinking under the weight of outdated ideas, unable to compete technologically and held in place by a raucous base that was out of touch with the changing electorate, President Obama's victory signified the beginning of the end for the Grand Old Party.

Yet to accept this line of thinking as fact is to ignore a fundamental reality of politics, as expressed so eloquently by James Carville: "It's the Economy, Stupid." The reality is: young voters captured by Democrats in the Obama victories face a crushing fiscal combination of high student loan debt, a demoralizing job market and the continued growing pains of ObamaCare – ensuring that it's not too late for Republicans, provided they can rise to the occasion.

For college students electrified by the idealism in the President's campaign rhetoric, reality has become a tough pill to swallow. According to the Project on Student Debt, students graduating in the class of 2011 carried an average of more than $27,000 in debt; this is coupled with a stubbornly slow economy, particularly at entry level. More recently, Senate Democrats, eager to play politics with the issue, slow-walked a solution to the planned increase in student loan rates despite House Republicans passing legislation that nearly mirrored the solution called for in President Obama's budget. The slow-walk backfired, disillusioning a group of voters Democrats are confident will remain in the fold.

Moreover, as Northeastern University Economist Andrew Sum recently pointed out, young workers and new graduates find themselves caught in a difficult job cycle. With baby boomers working later in life and employers able to find willing populations of older workers for even menial jobs, middle and lower class students and graduates have been unable begin their careers – setting their progress back all the more.

Additionally, voters were treated to another canary in the coal mine when the Obama administration was forced to delay implementation of the employer mandate – a key portion of the law that indicates the monumental difficulty faced with its implementation. More importantly, young workers are only beginning to realize they will shoulder a large part of the cost – even if they are healthy--to support the aging baby boomer generation. The Heritage Foundation took a look at this dynamic, termed, "age rating" and found that, "the effect will be to increase premiums for those ages 18–24 by 45 percent and those ages 25–29 by 35 percent while decreasing premiums for those ages 55–59 by 12 percent and those ages 60–64 by 13 percent."

There is a certain irony that the Affordable Care Act is responsible for reducing the number of full time jobs available to our younger work force. Once the employer mandate is put in place, tens of thousands of employers who are facing skyrocketing health care costs may reduce the number of full-time positions to avoid paying massive increases in health insurance. As a result, instead of finding good full-time jobs with benefits, our younger workers are competing for lesser-paying, less-attractive, part-time positions that offer no health care coverage. Young voters will soon begin to understand that their support of the president and his party, rather than improving their lives, has actually impeded their progress.

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
null
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...