Masters could alter Couples' legacy

ESPNAPI_IMG_NO_ALTEXT_Value

AUGUSTA, Ga. -- If Fred Couples played a less forgiving game, a sport that chews up and spits out its own, he would be widely known as a guy who never played up to his talent. But inside the ever-protective ropes of golf, Couples is a beloved star and Hall of Famer who can do no wrong.

Only one major and 15 PGA Tour victories with a swing like that? Hey, don't you dare call our Boom Boom an underachiever. At Augusta National, you're not sitting in the bleachers at Fenway Park or in the cheap seats at a Flyers game in the old Philly Spectrum.

And oh by the way, you're not a fan, either. You're a patron who is charged to respectfully appreciate Freddie's career in Freddie's emerald backyard.

But no matter what the green jackets want or expect, facts are facts: Even considering the back injury he suffered 20 years ago at age 34, Couples should be defined by what he failed to do, not by what he did. Freddie should've won a couple more majors and a bunch more tournaments, and the only guy to say it was the man he beat on a lucky bounce -- make that a lucky roll -- at the 1992 Masters.

Well, Raymond Floyd didn't actually say it as much as he strongly suggested it. In an interview with Golf Magazine last year, Floyd teed off on a club he belonged to, the Hall of Fame, for letting in candidates he saw as unworthy. Though he didn't name names, the winner of four majors and 22 Tour events spoke out after Couples and Colin Montgomerie (no major victories) were voted in as the Class of 2013.

"One major should not get you into the Hall of Fame -- maybe one major and 40 wins," Floyd said. "I'm not gonna pick a guy with one major and 11 wins. ... I'll just say that you should have at least two majors. At least! Wow, there are guys in there that it's a joke. It takes integrity away from the term 'Hall of Fame.'"

If Floyd wasn't talking only about Couples, Freddie was certainly among the leaders in his clubhouse. Or outhouse.

And here's the thing: Floyd was absolutely, 100 percent right. Couples doesn't belong in the Hall of Fame, and deep down he probably knows it. His swing was effortless enough to have been outlawed, and he could make an impossibly difficult game look easier than one-two-three. Somehow, some way, Couples needed to squeeze more out of his gift -- maybe a lot more -- than his record shows he got.

Of course, there's still time to do something about that. Couples is 54 years old, and he's sitting at 2-under 142 at the Masters, five shots off Bubba Watson's lead. Only five men are positioned between Couples and Watson, meaning a few Bubba bogeys will put the old guy, Freddie, right back in the fight.

"Can I win it? Yeah," Couples said after his second straight 71. "That's why I'm here."

He's been here before, again and again and again. Ever since he turned 50, Couples has been on a Thursday-Friday Augusta National tear, entering the weekend inside the top 10 each of the past five years.

He was one shot back last year and tied for the lead the year before that before blowing up with third-round scores of 77 and 75. In fact, over his three previous Masters, Couples was 15 under on Thursday-Friday and 8 over on Saturday-Sunday.

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...