Tale of Two Friends: Will Andy Hurt Roger?
Pettitte's affidavit reportedly contradicts Clemens on steroid, HGH use.
Feb. 12, 2008 — -- In the epic battle to defend his reputation, it looks like Roger Clemens has as much to fear from his friend as he does from his foe.
The pitching legend goes to Capitol Hill on Wednesday morning to give a sworn deposition about performance-enhancing drugs.
Missing from the room will be Andy Pettitte, Clemens' longtime teammate and pal, who asked to be excused from the hearing, a request that was granted by the committee.
Baseball observers immediately suspected that Pettitte didn't want to face his buddy, especially since his affidavit reportedly contradicts Clemens, who has emphatically denied using drugs.
Parts of Pettitte's deposition are expected to be read at the hearing, and, according to several reports, Clemens' longtime friend gave Congress some seemingly damning testimony about him.
Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., told Newsday that at least one part of Pettitte's affidavit could be damaging to Clemens' case, because it supports what former New York Yankees trainer Brian McNamee told Congress.
Newsday, citing unnamed sources, said that McNamee told investigators that Pettitte asked him during a workout session, "How come you don't give me the stuff you give Roger?" McNamee reportedly replied, "Because it's illegal."
Clemens has insisted that his friend's recollection of the incident is incorrect. And sources close to Davis told ESPN.com that the congressman was misquoted in the Newsday story.
Pettitte's affidavit also claims that Clemens talked to him in 1999 or 2000 about using human growth hormones, when the two were teammates on the Yankees, The Associated Press reported today.
Despite those claims, Pettitte might also not be a strong witness for those hoping to nail Clemens as a baseball cheater.
Sources tell ESPN.com's TJ Quinn that, while Pettitte's account of some events doesn't square with Clemens' version, Pettitte also contradicted himself several times in his affidavit.
That, presumably, makes him a less reliable witness, which may be why Congress gave Pettitte an intentional walk.
Today, Clemens continued his concerted mission to save his reputation. So far, he has met with more than half of the 41 members of the committee.
Asked how his day was going, Clemens gave reporters a one-word response: "Great."
His lawyer, Rusty Hardin, said Clemens aims to answer every question and be up front in his explanation, contrasting it with the infamous 2005 Congressional hearings, at which Mark McGwire's testimony was considered evasive.