The Playlist: Great In-Ear Headphones

A few months ago, I joined some other PC World editors in testing headphones for a comparative review. That was my first chance to really compare in-ear headphones like those from Etymotic and Shure to other over-the-ear models. In short, I was really impressed.

If you can get used to the feel of an earpiece that fits into your ear canal, ear buds are a great choice for on-the-go sound reproduction. Canal phones block out around 20 decibels of sound, creating a cleaner listening environment, and they don't bleed sound into the world around you--a fact your fellow commuters will appreciate.

I've tried a few of the bulky, battery-laden, and unimpressive over-the-ear noise-canceling models--like the $300 headphones that seem to be standard issue for business-class travelers--and I can report that in-ear models do a much better job. They're also easier to carry and are much less likely to make me look like a big dweeb than the I've owned for a few years now.

Anyway, shortly after we finished our headphone roundup, reps from a company called Ultimate Ears dropped off a demo unit of their new $250 Super.fi 5 Pro ear canal phones, which I've been testing and enjoying for the past month or so. The folks over at the oh-so-originally-named "Playlist" gave the Super.fis a pretty thorough write-up, but they didn't get around to comparing them with other in-ear models.

To my ears, the Super-fis compare favorably with the more expensive $300 Shure E4-C and $500 E5-C models we tested for our roundup. Having lived with the Ultimate Ears phones for a while now, I can say that I'm really impressed by them. They feature two drivers and produce a crisp and clear sound. Despite their small size, they manage to have some pretty good bass response. The accessories and the overall feel of the earphones are nice as well. They come with a slick and compact metal and rubber carrying case. Bottom line: If I were buying a pair of earphones right now, I'd probably spring for these.

What happens when two well-intentioned apps try to solve the same problem on your system? Some headaches, that's what.

Like a lot of people, I have Apple ITunes set to manage my music library. This is terrific for those times when I download or rip new music to a directory outside of my music library. Once I add those files to ITunes, it checks the file's ID3 tags for artist and album information and moves the files to the appropriate folder in my library.

That's a great feature, and it's worked flawlessly for me until I started playing with Yahoo's Music Engine media player a few months ago. Using some technology from Gracenote, Music Engine goes through your audio library and retags songs it recognizes, adding missing information, grabbing album art, and normalizing certain bits of formatting.

So here we have two players both trying to make organizing your music a little easier. What happens when you put them together? Chaos.

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...