Mar 8, 2010 12:11pm

Why Weren’t Farrah Fawcett, Bea Arthur in Oscars’ ‘In Memoriam’ Tribute?

Two pop culture icons were missing from the Oscars' Sunday night tribute to stars who passed away in 2009: "Charlie's Angel" Farrah Fawcett and "Golden Girl" Bea Arthur. 

Although both actresses may be best known for their roles on TV, their career highlights include prominent films. Fawcett won critical acclaim for 1986's "Extremities;" Arthur acted opposite Lucille Ball in 1974's "Mame." Both earned recognition from other awards committees during their life: Fawcett's work won her multiple Emmy and Golden Globe nominations; Arthur held a Tony and Emmy awards under her belt.

In a statement to Radar Online, Academy Awards executive producer Bruce Davis conceded it's impossible to include every actor and actress who passed away every year. (Patrick Swayze, Natasha Richardson, Ron Silver, David Carradine and Dom DeLuise were among those who made the telecast's tribute.)

“It is the single most troubling element of the Oscar show every year," Davis said. "Because more people die each year than can possibly be included in that segment. You are dropping people who the public knows. It’s just not comfortable."

Academy publicity director Leslie Unger echoed Davis in an e-mail statement to ABCNews.com. "It's impossible to include everyone who passed away during any given year," she said. "Very difficult decisions have to be made and no matter who is included, there will always be a hundred more who are not."

What do you think about Fawcett and Arthur being left out of this year's Oscars?

– Sheila Marikar

User Comments

I cannot even stop re-reading the lame excuse ABC BRUCE WHATEVER HAS GIVE- They cant name everyone ? Ms FGawcett is an ANGEL- an ICON- EXCUSE ME ????
FARRAH FAWCETT IS SO ABOVE THIS CRUEL ,LAME, AND DIMMED OSCAR CRAP.
LOVE YOU FARRAH-

Posted by: BOYZ | March 8, 2010, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

If they are going to have a tribute to those who have passed on; then they should do it RIGHT and mention everyone.
to leave anyone out is insulting…..

Posted by: Sunshine 60 | March 8, 2010, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

While I agree that it’s probably difficult to get everyone in, the fact of the matter is is that it’s disrespectful to leave anyone out. It’s disrespectful to the star, disrespectful to their families, disrespectful to their peers, and disrespectful to the audience.

Posted by: MetzyMom | March 8, 2010, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

I feel the same as previous communicators. It is rude and disrespectful not to include every one of the recently deceased entertainers in the special segment of the Oscars. The feelings of their families and friends must be considered.

Posted by: doxmom1 | March 8, 2010, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

I was shocked at the 1994 Oscars held March 27, 1995 that John Candy was not mentioned in the “In Memorium” segment. John was in well over 50 movies and a brilliant actor.
Was it because he was Canadian? He was even on one of our Canadian Postage Stamps – eh!

Posted by: Laurie Revell | March 8, 2010, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Include Michael Jackson whose life was ‘storied’ to say the least, let alone the fact that he was NOT and actor, excluding “the Wiz”. and to snub Miss Fawcett, and Miss Arthur is inexcusable. They were both superior actresses. No excuse will be accepted by the Academy for their deliberate snub to these two fine women.

Posted by: Gwenn | March 8, 2010, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

okay, if they can’t show pictures of everyone why not list names of the others, maybe at the end of the tribute that way no one is left out.

Posted by: Jamie | March 8, 2010, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Boy, they could have made some time in their tribute by leaving out those producers and other behind-the-scenes guys no one ever heard of. Now that might have made some room in their tribute. Maybe not do their presentations in such a lame time-wasting way would have helped too.

Posted by: AZRan | March 8, 2010, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Yeah I found it shocking that they would include Michael Jackson who died on the same day as farrah fawcett as a movie star, showing clips from a music video and his one movie, The Wiz. He was a musician not an actor, but Farrah fawcett can be left out. Thats the first thing i noticed when it was over. Just like when MJ died, Farrah fawcett’s story seemed irrelevant.

Posted by: bsills | March 8, 2010, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Yeah, we found this omission strange. Both deserved mention… Bea for her acting ability, and Farah for her looks. These were bigger names than most of the others who did get mentioned.

Posted by: Jenn | March 8, 2010, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

We can cut out the person who wrote a screenplay or directed in the early days of TV. But you can’t cut out those people that have become iconic for their body of work soo many know and love.That is rediculous.I’ll bet that if they realized what would’ve happened by not mentioning those 2 Ladies, I’d bet they’d include them then.Too late to correct such a bonehead move!!

Posted by: G Nala | March 8, 2010, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Can’t include everybody? Wasn’t Farrah Fawcett one of the biggest Hollywood icons ever?!

Posted by: Phil | March 8, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Inexcusable! All us baby boomers grew up with Farrah and Bea. They were highly recognizable and loved by many. They should have definitely been included. How sad for their families to be so blatantly snubbed by the Academy.

Posted by: Kay | March 8, 2010, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

I’ve always loved the Oscar’s….but guess it’s at political as the gov’t.
If you can’t include everyone, then type the names on the program or something. They always say people are “black-balled” in Hollywood for one reason or another….this is as close to “black-balling” as you can get I think. Shame on you Oscar’s committee….

Posted by: Betty | March 8, 2010, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Not enough time to list everyone? Please!! If the writers had omitted the first half hour of the show, which I might add was extremely boring, there would have been time to include all the deserving folks who passed in 2009. I was not impressed with the show this year, especially the two hosts. Fifteen minutes or less woulf have been sufficient time for them to bore me, not half an hour.

Posted by: Lea | March 8, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

So…according to these so-called organizers, it’s okay for the first part of their awards show to be top-heavy with cheesy banter so build supposed-suspense, and then rush through the rest of it? Even Tom Hanks practically had the Best Picture envelope opened up before he reached the microphone because the show was running so late, but it wasn’t because they “ran out of time”. It was because they didn’t anticipate how much time would be wasted by poorly brought-off presenter antics and 10 movie trailers. The ‘memorial tribute’ looked like it was thrown together the night before the event, and was an inexcusable slap in the face to Fawcett and Arthur’s memory. Nice, how today’s show business treats the memory of those who came before them.

Posted by: Allison | March 8, 2010, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Sorry no excuse this time. Just admit you were wrong and leave it at that. Think of how there family and fans feel who would have wanted them recognized to there peers. Whoever left them out should be ashamed of themselves, but if I were to guess there not.

Posted by: pat | March 8, 2010, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Sometimes the academy’s decisions on in or out are inexplicable. Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur were primarily television stars and the Oscars are film.
What sticks in my mind was the year that Peggy Lee was left out. She was an Oscar winning composer. There’s quite the conspiracy theory on why she was left out.

Posted by: Susan Lee | March 8, 2010, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

What a disgrace. I am appalled.
So why did they get left out?

Posted by: Lori | March 8, 2010, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

I agree with a lot of the comments on this site. Why include all of those people no one ever heard of? Also, I could have lived without Neil Patrick Harris at the beginning – that would have added enough time to include Bea and Farrah.

Posted by: EJ | March 8, 2010, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

They included people behind the camera such as “executives” so cut the crap Bruce, you and your team f’d up big time, just admit it. To include executives the public has never heard of over someone like Farrah and Bea is just plain incompetence – you listening executives, we watch for the talent, not the bosses etc., that’s left for the acceptance speaches!

Posted by: BigFan | March 8, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

OMG….of all people to leave out, Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur. Shame on you and everyone else at the Oscars. They gave their lives in show business and you couldn’t give them a 10 second recognition…..That’s bad.

Posted by: BJ | March 8, 2010, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Beyond Lame explanation. Take responsiblity for your screw-up and apologize.

Posted by: Tanya Smith | March 8, 2010, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Most of the viewers didn’t know half he people listed because they were writers and names alone don’t mean squat. Bea Arthur and Farrah Fawcett were noticeably omitted and far more noteworthy as actors than Michal Jackson. I say list everyone or else list no one. I would have gladly traded Neil Patrick Harris’ act for a longer remembrance segment.

Posted by: Shane | March 8, 2010, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Academy Awards show is just that. It’s an event to entertain. Goofs are part of the show and everyone gets to talk about it. Political Correctness is a major swinger. Two lip-locking best actress award nominees also make a splash and create entertainment and popularity. Since the “African American” director didn’t win, the “Woman American” was next best in line. Why wasn’t the “German American” or English American” mentioned? I’ve never heard of a “French American” winning an Award either. When will that uproar start?

Posted by: chicagcpoetry16 | March 8, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

I agree, how do you include everyone? What’s the criteria if their work was in multiple mediums? What if they only did minimal work in film? Is Farrah & Arthur TV stars to be remembered by the Emmys or movie stars?

Posted by: David | March 8, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Yes, I for one, kept waiting for Farah’s name to be mentioned. It makes no difference at all if Farah was not in movies (which she was). Just read all of the articles which were ever written about her. She was an awesome human being,loving mother who never gave up on her son or for that matter, Ryan O’Neil. Nobody gives her enough credit for what she went through in her cancer struggle. She was one very courageous woman and should be commended not only for her career, but her strength in a time of horrendous pain. The academy cannot ever offer a good enough excuse and they should be extremely emabarassed and ashamed at themselves. THERE IS NO EXCUSE!

Posted by: evelyn todd | March 8, 2010, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

It was very disrespectful to not have mentioned these two very fine actresses. Like someone already said, many of us grew up with these two ladies and to leave them out is inexcusable. If you can’t mention everyone by name, mention none at all. Not fair to them or to their families and their fans. I also agree with someone else. The show could have left off the entire first 30 minutes to an hour. Extremely boring and not entertaining at all. Is there a new producer of the show or something??

Posted by: rkt | March 8, 2010, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

The first couple of people couldn’t be seen, because the camera showed James Young’s head. This happened last year too. I don’t understand why the Im Memoriam section isn’t about the ones who died…Richard Todd, Oscar-nominated British actor wasn’t included either.

Posted by: Dani | March 8, 2010, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

if they can not include them all then none should be announced. Michael jackson give me a break, It should come back to haunt you Bruce what ever!!Your name will be rememberd as the one who was inconsiderate to others memories oh thats right they were will respected, I forgot!

Posted by: Sheila | March 8, 2010, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

This is so BULL. Michael Jackson please. Sure he was in the WIz, but the other two actress’s deserve the recognition as well. Sorry Academy you blew it. In all honesty I thought the OSCARS were boring this year as well. Wish Whoopi, Hugh Jackmen were back.

Posted by: Katie | March 8, 2010, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

ABC’s response is inadequate. Bea Arthur and Farrah Fawcett were better known than other persons featured in the tribute.

Posted by: Bills | March 8, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

What a pathetic excuse for an oversight…”…impossible to include EVERYONE…”?? You’re talking 2 people-not 2000! Admit it-you messed up!Just say so, apologize and do something to make up for it.
Ya jerk.

Posted by: kathryn | March 8, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Leaving out Bea Arthur and Farrah Fawcett was inexcusable. Those in charge with the awards program are really just irrelevant and out of touch with the public.

Posted by: Kathy M. | March 8, 2010, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

It would have been better for Mr. Davis to apologies and admit that it was an oversight.

Posted by: Pat | March 8, 2010, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

I think that it was terrible they left out Farrah&Bea. How wrong.

Posted by: sherry | March 8, 2010, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

It is incomprehensible that Bea and Farrah were left out. I didn’t even know some of the people they included. EVERYBOBY knows Farrah and Bea!

Posted by: Diane | March 8, 2010, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Why did they not take out some of these people we nevber heard of?
To not pay tribute to the golden girl and the woman with the golden hair is a shame they were bigger then most and the show ran over 35 minutes anyway, whats an extra 2 minutes! SHAME ON THEM!!

Posted by: Mark Manz | March 8, 2010, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Shame on you people!!!!

Posted by: Gab | March 8, 2010, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

I looked on the oscars.org site where they keep a list of all academy members that have died since Feb 1, 2009 (not all of them were in last nights tribute)
Perhaps Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur were not members of the AMPAS? They were both primarily TV actors – maybe they simply weren’t members and that is the reason they were excluded.

Posted by: Trina | March 8, 2010, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

It sounds to me like one of the main honchos in fantasy land didn’t like the 2 in mention…… oh by the way , the oscars sucked this year , just as well there names were not with the rich and shameless….. Thank u……

Posted by: Tom | March 8, 2010, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Personally, I think they should try to show everyone who passed as a final tribute, and cut into some of the stupid dance numbers and comedic crap that makes the show longer than it needs to be. If you can’t respectful to all the dead, maybe you should consider making sure the ones the general public would know are shown and the more obscure ones, choreographers, cinematographers, etc. should be on the end and cut if there isn’t time. But in a year of huge losses of talents, skipping Farrah and Bea was just disheartening and a slap in the face to those who saw some make up artist or gaffer in their place.

Posted by: Jeremy | March 8, 2010, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Who knows – maybe half of them listed weren’t members of AMPAS. Just a thought. And some of those names are not necessarily recognizable – but many of us recognize the work they are associated with and those in the industry probably recognize them more than those watching at home do. And really – aren’t the Oscars for those in the industry?

Posted by: Trina | March 8, 2010, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

I think it would be wise for the academy to recognize Bea Arthur, and Farrah Fawcett next year as a memoreum.
They both worked hard and loved their craft.Both had life time achievement.They deserve the recognition.

Posted by: scott baldridge | March 8, 2010, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

No excuses….it was WRONG and you know it Mr. Academy whatever!

Posted by: Sally | March 8, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

If they couldn’t include all, then leave out the ones that the general public never even heard of. Some obscure behind the scenes people that only insiders would know could have been replaced with the more well known actors that we outsiders recognize. Honor the others at at an insider’s dinner! Bea Arthur and Farrah Fawcett we knew! It was shameful to exclude them!

Posted by: lynne | March 8, 2010, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

It would of only taken seconds to recognise Farrah but there were people that nobody ever heard of recognised! I am discusted with the producers of the academy awards! If you would have cut down on the time wasting humer you could have paid tibute to those that deserved it. That was more important than the jokes!

Posted by: Butch | March 8, 2010, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

The Oscar show was beyond boring. Way too long, way too many commercials and just plain boring. They could make this 3 plus hour show, no more than 2 easy. Won’t watch next year, especially since they left out Farrah and Bea….how pitiful is that!

Posted by: reva lewis | March 8, 2010, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

MJ was nominated for an Oscar before, (Ben for best song) so that is why they put him in.

Posted by: Anonymous | March 8, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Rediculous! If they were going to include Michael Jackson who is primarily known for his music they should have included Farrah and Bea who are primarily known for their television shows.

Posted by: Trey | March 8, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

That is a lame excuse if I have ever heard one!!! Give someone a job to just track the passing of Hollywood icons each year. What a slap in the face to the families of both of these fine actresses. Shame, shame, shame!!!

Posted by: HOLLY | March 8, 2010, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

I am also disappointed at the lame excuse used to leaave out Bea & Farrah- why Michael Jackson?

Posted by: curlyqputter | March 8, 2010, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

I didn’t watch the oscars….so I don’t know who was left out. But I learned from some of my favorite legends who passed away last lear (Michael Jackson, Farrah Fawcett, Bea Arthur, & Dom Deluise) that if you want something to happen….you have to make it happen. So I choose to honor these legends in my own way. Michael wanted to heal the world and give endlessly to charity, Farrah wanted to raise awareness for cancer and domestic violence Bea and Dom wanted to make everyone laugh.

Posted by: Alice | March 8, 2010, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

don’t blame michael he had nothing to do with it. but his passing was talked about over the whole worldfor months. i loved farrah and bea and yes they should have been mentioned ,but remember everyone still use the name of m.j. for ratings and money making.

Posted by: kathy | March 8, 2010, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Yes they should have inclued FARRAH it was wrong that they didnt and she died the same day as michel jackson. they also forgot ED MCMANN how rude can they be ? RIP FARRAH, ED, BEA ARTHUER

Posted by: POOBEE44 | March 8, 2010, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Such a lame excuse by the academy. It is already a 3 1/2 hour show. They are telling me they can’t take another 45-60 seconds and show Farrah and Bea, not to mention other favorites like Edward Woodward and Gene Barry?
Is their logic really that 3 hours 32 minutes is not too long of a show but if it ran 3 hours 33 minutes, well then that’s a problem. Cut out the stupid Ben Stiller bit which NOBODY thought was funny and you then have the time. Jerks!

Posted by: Jake | March 8, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

The academy forgetting Farah Fawcett and Bea Arthur – their excuse that you cannot comemmerate everyone – Farah and Michael passed 1 day apart- she was overlooked due to the MJ week long tv hype — she was a good actress – has everyone forgotten “Extremeties” she won an Oscar -but you can put Michael Jackson out front and center? Is this an entertainer tribute or actor tribute —– I am getting so tired of what is “Politically correct” that you forget to include what is RIGHT!

Posted by: Marilyn | March 8, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Michael Jackson was a singer not an actor and he was remembered during the Oscars.

Posted by: Janice | March 8, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur were snubbed and yet Michael Jackson was not. In my humble opinion, the Grammy’s n is the appropriate platform to memorialize Michael Jackson and not the Oscar’s. An absolute disservice to two great women and contributors to film and movies.

Posted by: TGarza | March 8, 2010, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

I think it is terrible not to mention Farrah and Bea they are icons. Who is Natasha Richardson and Ron Silver? My point has been made dont know these two.

Posted by: carla | March 8, 2010, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

There were SO MANY show biz people in the tribute that no one has ever heard of outside the industry. Behind the scenes people, set designers, costume designers, executives….maybe some of THOSE should have been left out to make room for household names like Bea Arthur and Farrah Fawcett. That should have been in the criteria for selection: Which of these people are actual household names and part of popular culture? Farrah and Bea fit that standard, many of those others did not!

Posted by: mike | March 8, 2010, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

I think it’s a shame not to mention those two great acteresses. The lame excuse of not enough time shows absolutely no respect for their accomplishments nor the family members.
Michael Jackson, come on! What did this guy offer up to the entertainment world that the other 2 didn’t?
The academy owes the family members and the ppublic a sincere apology for their blunder.

Posted by: Kurt | March 8, 2010, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

If they leave off people like Farrah and Bea, then they had better do away with the whole segment, then nobody would feel left out. They should have been mentioned.

Posted by: Lane | March 8, 2010, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

I don’t watch the Oscar because of a lot of the lame lines and jokes. I catch the highlights the next day. And yes I was shocked that Bea & Farrah were not mentioned. It’s an insult to their memories and an insult to their families.

Posted by: Tasha | March 8, 2010, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Could have done without the whole Horror montage: at one point I was nauseous. That would have made a huge difference in time available to “remember” people who were well-known to the public AND those who were not so famous, but just as important. Did producers knowingly choose to omit certain people from In Memorium so there was time for, let’s see, horror clips!?

Posted by: anon | March 8, 2010, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Farrah? Ok. I can deal with that. But Bea Arthur? Shame on you Oscars!!!!!

Posted by: smb | March 8, 2010, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

I thought I missed Farrah’s tribute by chance when I didn’t see her picture. If the Academy can’t include every dead actor/actress they should stop the tribute part, period! It is not fair to honor some and not all.

Posted by: pagnaa | March 8, 2010, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

I noticed Farrah but not Bea Arthur. There were a number of behind the scenes people who died who got their due, they should just admit they forgot them. Poor Farrah was overshadowed by Michael Jackson’s death from the day they both died. An apology is owed.

Posted by: linda | March 8, 2010, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

A guy that could sing, that liked to have little boys sleep over, was honored instead of these two women. Someone really f’d up.

Posted by: Ron | March 8, 2010, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

That is the worse excuse and response. Not everyone can be remembered. Two of the most amazing ICONS of the 20th century and they are SNUBBED! Who in the heck were half of those writes and some others who 3/4 of the American population don’t even know or care. I am offended by the stupidity of the academy.

Posted by: John | March 8, 2010, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Geez, even my 12-year-old daughter noticed that Farrah wasn’t included. That is just sad! She and Bea were both icons. Could have skipped all those ‘dancers’ and remembered those now departed. That dance segment was so lame and boring!!! At least us little people remembered Farrah and Bea! Hope you ladies are livin’ it up in Heaven!

Posted by: lanamaha | March 8, 2010, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

To all those who believe that the lesser known individuals involved in the motion picture industry are expendable and not worthy of mention in the “In Memoriam” portion of the Oscar broadcast – please remember that a movie cannot be made without all of those individuals. The gaffer is just as important as the sound man, as is the screen writer, as is the director, as is the person who’s name heads the marquee. All are deserving of mention.

Posted by: Michelle | March 8, 2010, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

I think ABC’s excuse is ridiculous. They certainly included Michael Jackson who was not an actor and who had only one lame film to his name. Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur were far more worthy of recognition for their bodies of work. I think this year’s telecast was a total flop all the way around. Lame hosts, lame production numbers, lame # of film nominees, lame venue….

Posted by: blogger1954 | March 8, 2010, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Most everyone knew Farrah and Bea. They made great movies and were great actresses. Why was M. Jackson included? He was not an actor. This is disgusting. Hollywood has gone to hell.

Posted by: Proud American | March 8, 2010, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

The Academy should be ashamed of themselves for omitting two incredible actresses namely, Farrah Fawcet and Bea Arthur on their In Memoriam Tribute. Fawcett and Arthur are NOT just “anybody”. They are well respected actresses on the surface of any entertainment medium.

Posted by: Gemini50 | March 8, 2010, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

No matter how exec producer Davis tries to slice and dice the Academy’s excuse, it was dead wrong (no pun intended) to omit both Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur from the annual tribute. I’d rather the Academy fess up to their mistake, error, oversight (however they want to see it) and just simply apologize.

Posted by: Lisa | March 8, 2010, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

What a load of !@#$%^&*((. ABC has no excuse. The memorial tribute is the main reason I watch the Oscar’s. Tell me, why is it valuable for me to use my time to get gyped?

Posted by: David | March 8, 2010, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Failing to memorialize Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur was the dimmest of many less that brilliant lights in this year’s production. I seldom contribute through this media. but the “academy” is rapidly striving for a new low in it’s judgement of priorities. There seems to be ample time for less-than-thrilling song and dance, but not for recognition of the winners who are ushered off stage with a dead mike and blasting music. The music nominated as “best” is only heard as a backdrop for a gym-dance routine. No disrespect intended, the dancers were magnificent, but the music became a backdrop for the mainstage. In short the entire production was a non-plus in comparison to the quality productions I once looked forward to. Even though the “Academy” doesn’t have time for them, the people in the seats will always remember Farrah and Bea.

Posted by: Joe | March 8, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Bruce Davis’s name and services should be omitted from future award shows. Seems odd that they omit women who’s performances were iconic but include behind the scenes people that few of us have heard of…. They could have easily dispensed with the tiresome dance ‘tribute’ to theme music and added Farrah and Bea with time to spare.

Posted by: Jamie Curtis | March 8, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

How about leaving out more of the ‘wink wink “No, I’m kidding!” ..’ lame stuff out of the show itself? You know, the stuff that didn’t work! And while he was a fantastic filmmaker, why was John Hughes singled out for an entire tribute…because he died….but these two formidable ladies are left out? These two were nowhere NEAR ‘can’t possibly get everyone in there’….EVERYONE knew them! Jeez…maybe it really is rocket science, and I’m a freakin’ genius!

Posted by: Rob | March 8, 2010, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

I feel that Bea Arthur and Farrah Fawcett of all people should have been included in the Oscars Memorial. They added Micheal Jackson. And although I love Micheal Jackson, he did not do films he did music. Half the people that they did do the memorial for, not to say that they weren’t deserving, but I didn’t know them. There faces were not familiar to me. Bea and Farrah, I miss you so much. RIP.

Posted by: CurlyCute | March 8, 2010, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

You’re telling me that Natasha Richardson….NATASHA RICHARDSON gets a mention but Bea Arthur and Farrah Fawcett do not? You gotta be kidding me! You need to sell that manure to someone else, ABC…nobody’s buy’in it. I’m amazed at how many liars there are in the world. Just admit you screwed up royally and it’s all forgotten. Why lie, duck, and cover?

Posted by: Aaron | March 8, 2010, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Sad Bea and Farrah were not included. Better to have had none mentioned, then leave such 2 wonderful actress out.

Posted by: Bev | March 8, 2010, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Both Farrah Fawcet and Bea Arthur were well known actors. The Academy has no legitimate reason for not recognizing them. We, your audience, have our memories of these special people and we feel short changed when you fail to recognize our importance.
By the way, what role did Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin play in this year’s broadcast? They stunk……..

Posted by: Thomas | March 8, 2010, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

well they could have cut steve martin and alex from their stupid opening
remarks and have the time to put both
the ladies on there!!

Posted by: dianna | March 8, 2010, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Yes the awards continually go too long. Yes there is reason to not have ‘EVERYONE’in it, let’s say someone who was first grip on 1 movie or a person who wrote one movie and so on. Mr Jackson did act in his videos and he had many, but they are not motion pictures. Puting in Jerry O’Connell (when he passes away many many years from now) with 3 movies under his belt would exclude him possibly from consideration.. and yes Farrah had only a few but so did James Dean and i am sure no one would even be considered omitting. Ms. Arthur made many many movies besides the one with Ms Ball. The thing is it isn’t causing the Oscars to run long; because the memorium was made before the show aired, so the memorium could have been 20 seconds longer and it wouldn’t have mattered, they would have just hurried along Mr. Baldwin or Mr. Martin.

Posted by: JuliaElizabeth | March 8, 2010, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Farrah Fawcett was an “owner of the 1980′s”. She was everywhere. Bea Arthur during the same time frame and into the 1990′s was a household name. It is inexcusable not to mention them. What were you producers and editors thinking?

Posted by: Aaron | March 8, 2010, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

But they remembered Michael Jackson who what in what? One movie.

Posted by: cathy | March 8, 2010, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

I think it is a royal outrage that Bea Arthur and Farrah Fawcett were snubbed at the Oscars. Those two have given so much into the industry and by the members of the academy to not give then the tribute and recognition that is very well deserved is like a slap in the face.

Posted by: rlm_65 | March 8, 2010, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

I personally could have done without that drawn out dance number to the best score nominees — it was boring and uninspiring. We’re talking about needing to add a total of 15 seconds to the show to memorialize both Ms. Arthur and Ms. Fawcett. Are they really serious to state that they couldn’t spare 15 seconds!! Bruce Davis and Leslie Unger are just trying to put a spin on an unfortunate error in judgment. Going forward they should have a fresh eye take a look at the “In Memorium” tribute…someone who would have the responsibility to research those in the industry who passed away in the previous year before it’s shown on the Oscars…to find the glaring omissions!

Posted by: Hal | March 8, 2010, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Well David Carradine was best known for the TV Show Kung Fu. And Michael Jackson is best known obviously for his music. The memorium was about great entertainers and pioneers of pop culture and here are two of the greatest pop culture icons of their time and they get snubbed? What a joke.

Posted by: Michael | March 8, 2010, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

The Oscars are a complete waste of time. Farrah and Bea should thankful they weren’t mentioned. Their memories are in a better place…shame on the Academy and all who support it!!! Trash!

Posted by: Miamimice | March 8, 2010, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

The Oscars are a complete waste of time. Farrah and Bea should thankful they weren’t mentioned. Their memories are in a better place…shame on the Academy and all who support it!!! Trash!

Posted by: Miamimice | March 8, 2010, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

I always watch the oscars and i appreciate the fact they give tribute to deceased stars..i kept watching to see Farrah and Bea..but nothing this is a big disappointment and let down…i am 47 and gay so these two woman were my idols and icons..shame on the academy..shame

Posted by: Matthew Puz Sr | March 8, 2010, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

I always watch the oscars and i appreciate the fact they give tribute to deceased stars..i kept watching to see Farrah and Bea..but nothing this is a big disappointment and let down…i am 47 and gay so these two woman were my idols and icons..shame on the academy..shame

Posted by: Matthew Puz Sr | March 8, 2010, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Every year I tell myself that I won’t be watching the Oscar ceremony the following year, yet I always get caught up in the Oscar hype. But this year, it’s true. I will never watch the Oscar ceremony again as it has become so meaningless as far as talent goes. It’s all political and rushed in order to get as many numbers as possible. Bring back the simplicity and the talent into the Oscar ceremony and the beauty of the show will come back with it. Watching the Oscar ceremony now is like watching an olympic event. Everything is fast and hyper, except that at the Olympics, it’s truly the best athlete that wins the gold medal… So long Oscar… it’s been a nice 35+ years, but next year count me out… If I want to watch Miley Cyrus, I’ll turn on my TV on Satudary mornings at 11:00… I want Oscar material at the Oscar, not a Disney show.

Posted by: Myself | March 8, 2010, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

There were far worse omissions of people who made as much or more of an impact in the medium of motion pictures than Fawcett or Arthur: Richard Todd (an Oscar nominee), Gene Barry, Paul Burke, Lionel Jeffries, Jane Randolph, Brenda Joyce, Arnold Stang, Harve Presnell, Edward Woodward, Henry Gibson, Zelda Rubinstein, Virginia Davis, Jane Bryan. It’s all sadly youth-oriented…and more sadly, most of today’s Oscar audience members probably have never watched a film made before 1990. I am over 50 so I recognize these names and appreciate their contributions to the arts.

Posted by: michael | March 8, 2010, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

I think everyone here is being ridiculous. Most of you suggest taking out writers, and execs, and cameramen, etc. because you don’t know their names? Their families know there names, and the people they worked with know their names. I’m sure it was a great honor for them. And yes, perhaps to be fair they should list everyone…but it is a short segment that needs to be edited for time. If the producers made it the other way around, simply listing everyone with a few short clips then people would be on here blasting them for that…that it wasn’t personal enough. It is a no win situation for the producers as someone will always find something to pick at. Yes, Farrah and Bea should have been in there before Michael Jackson…but to cut an industry great because you personally don’t know their name and include someone like Brittnay Murphy whose movies won’t be remembered in 50 years? C’mon. It’s never going to be right for everyone so let’s stop arguing for arguing’s sake and get over it. Besides, I read that interview with Davis days before the Oscars…so he’s not giving an apology, or admitting that they “f’d” up as one of you tactfully put it. He was simply giving an explanation as to how difficult that segment is to produce every year and how every year someone will be disappointed. Obviously he’s right, and I feel badly for them having to take all of this flack for it. I’d love to see any of you try to produce such a HUGE event, get it in in the time allowed, and manage to please every viewer.

Posted by: Kelly | March 8, 2010, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

I can’t believe they included Michael Jackson!?!?!?! I don’t remember him as a movie star??? If they can’t include everyone, then start their exclusions with the non-movie people (i.e. Jackson)!!!! Sooo patronizing!

Posted by: marys | March 8, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

this was a horrible mistake on the academy. but why do you have to tear someone else down to try and prove your point? i didn’t know alot of those wrtiters and camera men etc., i’m sure their families apprececiated it; but to criticize michael jackson for being up there! he not only acted but he wrote music for lots of movies. you are trying to make this a black/white (also writtten by michael)issue. the academy made a big mistake and that’s it.

Posted by: genieb | March 8, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

They definitely should have been mentioned. Either mention all or none.

Posted by: pattir | March 8, 2010, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

IN THE PAST 2/3 YEARS I HAD ALREADY BEGUN TO LOSE INTEREST IN WATCHING THE OSCARS. WITH YESTERDAYS SHOWING OF A LACK OF RESPECT,CONSIDERATION AND RECOGNITION FOR THE MEMORY OF THESE TWO LEGENDS, YOU CAN BE SURE I WON’T WASTE MY TIME NEXT YEAR. I’LL FIND SOMETHING BETTER TO WATCH, LIKE MY DVD COLLECTION OF CHARLEY’S ANGELS AND MAUDE.

Posted by: JOSE | March 8, 2010, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

They mentioned David Carradine who would still be here if he wasn’t such a super freak. Both of these woman died through no fault of their own and were very well known. I did not know half the people they included in the tribute.

Posted by: Tom | March 8, 2010, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Shame on them! include all or none.

Posted by: Angele | March 8, 2010, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

What an excuse, if it is?
Farrah Fawcett’s name resonated even as far as the Philippines.
To the Oscar’s Committee – cut the crap, admit the oversight, say sorry and do something about it.
Everyone can make a mistake especially the Oscars so . . .

Posted by: MONTOGAWE | March 8, 2010, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Although I am a HUUUUGE Michael Jackson fan, I am quite surprised that Farrah and Bea were left out. I am also a HUGE fan of Bea Arthur and I grew up watching Farrah in the 70′s. It’s a shame they couldn’t make room for TWO more people. Yea, maybe you can’t include everyone, but these two names are too big to be left out.

Posted by: Vickie | March 8, 2010, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

The show was so heavy with dead weight-the Neil Patrick Harris routine, and the dance routine specifically. The show is about honoring actors and actresses- don’t waste our time with the other crap. The memorial list should have been completed before allowing time for the other stuff.

Posted by: paul r | March 8, 2010, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Next year I intend to leave out the Academy. NO room left for them….

Posted by: Susan | March 8, 2010, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Perhaps Mr. Bruce Davis should be replaced.. I think it is beneficial to remember and to pay a tribute to all actors who have passed on..What an idiot to say such cruel things. And he is on the Board of Directors.. I think he should be replaced,, AFTER ALL we can boycott the OSCARS, I think the quallity of the Oscars are falling anyway..

Posted by: Reality340 | March 8, 2010, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

They should have done away with Neil Patrick Harris….trying to sing and gave the time to honoring those people.

Posted by: moe | March 8, 2010, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Absolutely UNACCEPTABLE. How ever did they find time to put Bruce Davis’ name in the credits. I, and most of the viewers, could care less about him, even moreso now that he has been so disrespectful to these 2 Icons/Legends. So to use that lame arguement, like so many people died it is impossible to include them all, is ridciulous. We are not talking about all the people who died this year….we are talking about 2 extremely RELEVANT people who deserved the honor, not my relatives. So, Bruce and your hired gun publicist who echos the same B.S. as you, if more and more people work on your show every year, are you going to cut them from the credits? This is purely ego and hypocrisy. Leaving these names out tarnishes the The Oscars. Way to go!

Posted by: David | March 8, 2010, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

What makes the Academy Awards better than anyone else? In the real world when a mistake is made, an apology is made. Shame on you for not admitting your screw-up – it was BIG. Both women were more famous than 1/2 those people – strange that it ends up being two women. Shame on you!

Posted by: Kathy | March 8, 2010, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

It was rude and disrespectful.
Why can’t they just apologize for their mistake??
Why can’t they just say they made a mess and apologize??
It’s inexcusable what they did.
Farah Fawcet and Bea Arthur were excellent actresses during their time.

Posted by: Mel | March 8, 2010, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

IT SHOULD NOT MATTER HOW MANY PEOPLE PASSED ALL SHOULD BE MENTIONED AT ANY MEMORIAL, HELL WHAT’S ANOTHER FEW MINUTES AFTER ALL MOST OF THE SHOW IS BORING ANYWAY THIS IS ONE REASON I DO NOT WATCH THE OSCARS I SEE FAVORITISM HERE. WHY WERE THEY NOT MENTIONED BECAUSE THEY ONLY STARRED IN ON MOTION PICTURE SHAME ON ALL THE OSCAR BIG SHOTS

Posted by: MICHAEL | March 8, 2010, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

It was a shame that two talented actresses were left out of the tribute.
But then the icon of the 70′s was forgotten when she passed because Michael took all the press that week and for weeks after. These ladies were classy and talented. They deserve more than a minute blurb.

Posted by: Karen | March 8, 2010, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

The excuses are completely unbelievable. They include a whole bunch of non-actors who no one has ever heard of, including a publicist for crying out loud, but they can’t include Farrah and Bea? Nonsense. I suspect it was an innocent but terribly bad blunder and they are now trying to cover up their incompetance.

Posted by: gengwall | March 8, 2010, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

It was a shame that two talented actresses were left out of the tribute.
But then the icon of the 70′s was forgotten when she passed because Michael took all the press that week and for weeks after. These ladies were classy and talented. They deserve more than a minute blurb.

Posted by: Karen | March 8, 2010, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

So get rid of some of the unncessary bantor (such as the Ben Stiller segment that was horrible and went on forever) and include everyone who has passed away. Who’s to say who’s deserving to be mentioned and who is not.

Posted by: Jem | March 8, 2010, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

There aren’t that many actors and actresses that pass away each year. These two women should have been included. I simply don’t understand why Micahel Jackson of all people would have been mentioned at these awards when he was not an actor. Favoritism is clearly at play here, and I think it’s disgusting and disrespectful. From the comments on here, I think everyone is in complete agreement about what they did.

Posted by: Wparsons | March 8, 2010, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

There was so much they could have cut out of the show that was complete nonsense and add all who died to the memorial. The excuse Bruce Davis gave was a lame attempt to cover up a big mistake. Watch the Academy Awards next year – maybe not!!!

Posted by: Fran | March 8, 2010, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

I will never watch again!

Posted by: B-BO | March 8, 2010, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

I didn’t see Patrick McGoohan, either, and he was certainly a superior actor to many that were featured.

Posted by: Quatermass | March 8, 2010, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

If you mention one, you should take time to mention them all. Shame on the Oscar’s. I was watching last night and thought the time limit given to the past was much to short. They need to change that time frame and give respect where respect is deserved.

Posted by: debbie bryant | March 8, 2010, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Tacky, tasteless and completely out of lign to include Michael Jackson who has NOTHING to do with movies and snub two ICONIC actresses who did. Typical Hollywood, always trying to do what’s popular and acceptable to those that “matter’.

Posted by: Another hockey fan | March 8, 2010, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

I Totally agree… dump the Neil Patrick Harris’ act for a longer remembrance segment. My God it was Farrah!

Posted by: Len | March 8, 2010, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Make sure that they are included in for next year. Better late then never. I can see many fans not even watching. You are very wrong! Take out some of the non important segments and focus on the ones that really count.

Posted by: Jill | March 8, 2010, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Face it, the public who watches the Oscars want to see (and remember in tribute) those familiar faces that are so recognizable and that have provided us with entertainment through the years…. not to diminish the losses of anyone, but many who were paid tribute by the Oscar video were people the public never really heard of: film critics, set designers, writers… and while their passing is equally as tragic and heartfelt as any, the public wants to remember and recognize those who they “knew” – like Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur.
It’s a shame that five more seconds couldn’t have been added to show a tribute of those two lovely, inspiring women.

Posted by: Kate | March 8, 2010, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

michael jacson was not a movie star though quite poss a pedifile and you mention him yet leave out farrah and bea and others cut the riddiculous thank yous and mention all of the due respect ACTORS

Posted by: abel | March 8, 2010, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

How long does it take to mention a name. A lot less time that the winners talking all their stuff. All it takes is to mention names. No big tribute or anything.

Posted by: Tom | March 8, 2010, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

When you are being paid the money these people are being paid to prduce the Oscars and put everything together, it should be completely flawless. No, none of us could do it because we aren’t paid to do what they are, and it isn’t our job, it’s theirs!!!…it is okay to say the things others are saying. That’s part of living in a free country. Face it, they f’d up!!!

Posted by: Miamimice | March 8, 2010, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

I cannot believe the sorry excuse ABC offered. I mean, seriously? If you honestly have to pick and choose who to include, why are you NOT going to pick the celebs that everyone knows? Are you honestly going to omit the most famous ones but include a bunch of people that nobody even knew existed? Get real. Nobody believes for a second that what this person said was true. Admit to your wrong doings b/c you look like a fool for using such a lame, inconsiderate excuse. These people should be ashamed…the rest of us are.

Posted by: Yemmey | March 8, 2010, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

A really boring awards show. I won’t waste time with it next year. The only part I liked was when that White woman took over the mike from the Black director. Now that was the best drama of the night. The ten films nominated? None worth of ‘Best Picture’ if you ask me (and EVERYONE else I’ve talked to). Doesn’t Hollywood have any creative types left anymore – or is it all about money?

Posted by: OJ SIMPSON | March 8, 2010, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Idiots like Sean Penn get spotlight treatment over these professional actors and good ones. Idiots like Sean Penn who taday said we should all go to jail for hating his pal Hugo get the limelight. Shows what Hollywood is and has been all about. Most think they are gods and a heck of alot of people treat them like they are. Bugs Bunny where are you when we need you??

Posted by: Jim Rod | March 8, 2010, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Its a shame when the academy decided to for go mentioning/showing such star’s like Farrah and Bea. Bea gave the senior women class on television. If Farrah had not made the Burning Bed. Women would have thought is was okay to take beatings. Come On!!!!!

Posted by: Penney | March 8, 2010, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

stay on point people. we at least i am talking about a big screwup the academy made. everyone up there in the tribute deserved to be up there. some of you are doing the same thing the academy is accused of doing. you’re saying who you think should have not been up there. some insane person even said farrah was forgotten because michael jackson “took” all the press that week. are you saying that it wasn’t the academy’s fault; but michael’s? listen to yourselves.
i didn’t know 1/2 the people up there but i’m sure not going to say they shouldn’t be there. again the point is bruce and friends screwed up big time!

Posted by: genieb | March 8, 2010, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Leaving out Farrah and Bea was just wrong! And to make matters worse the Academy made a statement to E! News saying “Academy won’t apologize for Farrah Fawcett’s snub.” WOW – at least apologize. These two names were known and adored by so many. Yet they made the decision to include Michael Jackson instead, come on! So disrespectful!

Posted by: Wendy | March 8, 2010, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

I’m reminded of when they honored past hosts and forgot Whoopie – one of the absolute bests – guess they just can’t remember everything.

Posted by: Jayne | March 8, 2010, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

If you’re not going to include everyone then you might as well not include the entire segment on the show altogether. It’s a slap in the face. It is inexcusable not to have them recognized amoung their peers and friends. Bruce Davis should explain that to the families of both Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur face to face. I’d like to buy a ticket to watch that movie unfold.

Posted by: Teddy G. | March 8, 2010, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

It’s the Academy of MOTION PICTURE Awards. Bea and Farrah may have been Hollywood icons, poplular actresses, and so on, but they are not known for work they did in the movies. Are we going to start complaining when they don’t include stage actors or even athletes in the tributes? Many of them fit the same criteria.

Posted by: Ben | March 8, 2010, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

While I intend no disrespect, wasn’t Michael Jackson only in one movie (The Wiz)? He was an amazing entertainer but Farrah was actress as well as Bea Author. I’m sure it was just an oversight but it’s tragic one. Does anyone remember the Burning Bed? She was in lot’s of movies and I think this is very sad.

Posted by: Dani | March 8, 2010, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

If they are going to have a tribute to those who have passed on; then they should do it RIGHT and mention everyone.
to leave anyone out is insulting…..agree 100 % BOYZ!!!

Posted by: Sunshine 1118 | March 8, 2010, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

what the heck is miley cyrus and the other youngsters (please) doing at this event – barbara walters was smart to stop her shows – ther e are no major stars today it is just pop culture they are in and out and full of themselves – wont be watching next year didnt plan to this year and my sister pulled me into it – boring show

Posted by: dolores cocuzzo | March 8, 2010, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

what the heck is miley cyrus and the other youngsters (please) doing at this event – barbara walters was smart to stop her shows – ther e are no major stars today it is just pop culture they are in and out and full of themselves – wont be watching next year didnt plan to this year and my sister pulled me into it – boring show

Posted by: dolores cocuzzo | March 8, 2010, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

what the heck is miley cyrus and the other youngsters (please) doing at this event – barbara walters was smart to stop her shows – ther e are no major stars today it is just pop culture they are in and out and full of themselves – wont be watching next year didnt plan to this year and my sister pulled me into it – boring show

Posted by: dolores cocuzzo | March 8, 2010, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Oh sure, they can include Michael Jackson who made 1 film..”The Wiz”…Bea Arthur had made dozens of films,and she died at the beggining of the year…Brittney Murphy just recently died…what’s up with that?

Posted by: lance | March 8, 2010, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Shame on the committee members to leave out Ms. Fawcett and Ms. Arthur, but do have the time to include a PUBLICIST! I do not recall a publicist ever being included In Memormeum before this year’s telecast. Is this honor based on whose palm you grease! This is very disturbing and I do hope the show’s executive producers and host network take serious note of their blatant disrespect and the insuing public outcry.

Posted by: Cathy | March 8, 2010, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

This omission is disgraceful and maybe sexist. Include a male musician – Micheal Jackson – and exclude two extraordinary female actresses.

Posted by: Joan | March 8, 2010, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Well, as long as we’re not mentioning EVERYONE who passed away, I wonder why Michael Jackson was shown. He was a pop singer for goodness sake. Bea Arthur and Farrah were actors!! Makes no sense.

Posted by: Abby4u | March 8, 2010, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

I thought this was a ‘gossip’ blog?

Posted by: Doogie! | March 8, 2010, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Both were older women-see the connection.

Posted by: jan | March 8, 2010, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Explain to me how they included Michael Jackson who wasn’t even in the Motion Picture industry and excluded Fawcett and Arthur. Look how hard is it to add another 10 second to the song?

Posted by: Steve | March 8, 2010, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

The oscar people have always been narrow-minded snobs. I don’t even bother watching them. Regarding best picture; they get it wrong so often.

Posted by: twinkle | March 8, 2010, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Its disgusting Farrah an Bea were great Farrah is a house hold name if your a house hold name I think you need to be honored. She ranks along the lines of other famous one namers – Cher,Tiger,understand.

Posted by: Deno | March 8, 2010, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

WHEN I SAW MICHAEL JACKSON, I WAS TRULY DISAPPOINTED NOT TO SEE FARAH FAWCETT, ESPECIALLY SINCE THEIR DEATH WAS SO CLOSE. IF THEY CANNOT INCLUDE EVERYONE, THAT PART OF THE SHOW NEEDS TO BE EXCLUDED.

Posted by: che | March 8, 2010, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Henry Gibson left off as well. Shameful.

Posted by: gengwall | March 8, 2010, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

The awards over all were a real disappointment. There is no excuse at all for Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur being left out of the memoriam. Lauren Bacall was ripped off in her brief tribute. She shuld have been onstage with clips from all her movies in the background. She surely deserved more of a tribute than she received. The dancers to nominated music were ridiculous. Neil Patrick Harris singing at the opening was out of place. After all, he is a T.V. and Broadway star, not a movie star. Even the set design was crummy.No glamour, no class, just a real hodge podge.James Taylor playing and singing was definitely a highlight.Alec Baldwin and Steve Martin were not on enough !

Posted by: Elizabeth Gann | March 8, 2010, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Why? Makes one wonder…shame on the
Academy Awards.

Posted by: Paula | March 8, 2010, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

They listed a bunch of writers that no one knows but leave out Fawcett and Arthur? It doesn’t make sense.

Posted by: neil | March 8, 2010, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

As soon as the memorial was finished, I turned the tv off and posted on Facebook how offended I was that they would leave Farrah out of this memorial….I didn’t think of Bea but now I am even more upset! Jackson got all the attention instead of Farrah the day she died….She was a pillar of strength and should be remembered for that! I was appalled last night and I am still appalled by the excuses for leaving these beautiful women out….

Posted by: dna | March 8, 2010, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

No reason those two talented actors were not included. Just no reason at all.

Posted by: Deb | March 8, 2010, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

NO EXCUSE!! Industry front liners!! They BOTH should have been included!! SHAME ON the powers that be for THINKING (NOT) that these two women should not be included in last nights tribute!

Posted by: Larry | March 8, 2010, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Michael Jackson stopped being cute at about age 10. He disgraced himself over and over. Steve Martin and Alex Baldwin are about the same age. Alex’s Mother should have altered his suit. Am sure glad I’m not one of their Mothers.
The Oscars become more boring and inane every year. To ignore Bea Arthur & Farrah Fawcett shows exactly where their brains are. I opted for some M*A*S*H* re-runs.
Diane

Posted by: dehorton | March 8, 2010, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

It is a level of disrespect to not honor everyone that died. Also, the honorees were shown more than once, which says that there could be room for others to be honored during the memoriam segment.

Posted by: realidad | March 8, 2010, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

How in the world can you leave out Farrah or Bea????? Must be Democrats… always in a world of your own!

Posted by: Papillon23 | March 8, 2010, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

How come John Hughes got an entire segement to himself and they left others off? It is all political. I don’t think he was any more important than anyone else who passed away recently.

Posted by: Scott | March 8, 2010, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Farrah and Bea should have been included. They mention behind the scenes people from 60 years ago but forget two TV icons? Michael Jackson may have been in the Wiz but that doesn’t make him an actor. The show ran over by 30 minutes whats a few more seconds? Cut out some of the fluff and show respect to all or don’t pay tribute at all. I agree with Gwen, list the names.. and maybe have a moment of silence. Everyone’ life was important. The Academy shouldn’t get to pick and choose.

Posted by: Dina | March 8, 2010, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

What a stupid excuse. They should be ashamed of themselves. No excuses for this. Whoever is organizing these events need to be more accurate about what they are doing. Get it together!!

Posted by: Nur | March 8, 2010, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

not that farah fawcett was of my great taste….but it would have been impossible not to notice her abscence, specially since she passed away the day michael jackson did.

Posted by: REX GIFFORD | March 8, 2010, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

i think they just made a mistake and are too dumb to admit it!!! I mean mentioning Dom Delouis and not Bea Arthur or Farrah!!!
Worst telecast ever as well and so boring! There was no major star power there…

Posted by: greg | March 8, 2010, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Why did they put Michael Jackson in… poor Farrah.

Posted by: ALLIGIRL | March 8, 2010, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

It’s an OUTRAGE that Farrah and Bea were not mentioned, and that perv Michael Jackson was not an actor.

Posted by: Mmouse | March 8, 2010, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

IT’S NOT ABOUT HOW BIG THE NAME IS! The people they included in the memoriam are those who made significant contribution to the movie industry. So they are beyond most of our times or knowledge, but IT IS because of them that movies are they way they are. The present is made of the past and the people that they mentioned made contributions that significantly shaped today’s movies.
Movies are more than just one person or group, so to say that an actor is above the person who wrote your favorite line or above the person who designed your favorite back drop or the person who made it happen is just ignorant.
Life isn’t black and white, so it’s not just none or all. While it can be debated, you can’t say who doesn’t deserve to be on the list if you only have an audience’s knowledge on their life’s contribution to the art of movies.
P.S. IT’S NOT ABOUT THE VIEWERS!!!! IT’S ABOUT THE ACADEMY RECOGNIZING THOSE WHO DESERVE IT IN THE MOVIES OF THAT YEAR! THE FACT THAT THEY TELEVISE IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE WANT TO WATCH IT, BUT NOT BECAUSE IT’S ABOUT WHAT THE AUDIENCE WANTS… IT’S THE [ACADEMY] AWARDS

Posted by: Anonymous | March 8, 2010, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

i think that it was so disrespectful that FARRAH FAWCETT WAS NOT included in the Oscar’s. she fought so hard for her life. the academy should be ashamed of themselves. they were very uncompassionate, Micheal Jackson was mentioned, he was not a actor. Farrah Fawcett was great in the movie the burning bed.

Posted by: kathy | March 8, 2010, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

I agree with many things that have been said. Many people of my generation grew up with Farrah and Bea. I know they are mainly known from the small screen (TV) but non the less important as icons in or lives. Its really a disgrace to not include these two famous persons in any memorial list of celebrities. As it was last night there were several instances which could have been shortened here and there, thereby making more time to include these two important people.

Posted by: Allan Willner | March 8, 2010, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

to: Posted by:
Anonymous | Mar 8, 2010 5:42:47 PM
If it’s not about the viewers then why waist our time by airing the damn show?!! It certainly is about the viewers as well…are you ignorant perhaps????

Posted by: Papillon23 | March 8, 2010, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Why Michael Jackson and not Farrah and Bea. Hollywood is a bigger joke than i thought. I would love to see hollywood the way it was when Casablaca won for best picture those were real stars, now we have a bunch of want to be politicans.

Posted by: Catherine | March 8, 2010, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Shame on them…if there’s “no time” for all our deceased stars, then there should be no tribute AT ALL! thats so much crap…they can edit it, and the show always!!!!! runs long! who do they think they’re fooling? not the viewers!

Posted by: liz | March 8, 2010, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Not enough time? What a lame excuse from the powers that run it. This pretty well finishes my watching it again. Two icons like these ladies who were so well thought of, and they can’t find maybe 30 seconds for the many, many hours they gave us? Outrageous, the show producers should be ashamed.

Posted by: Phil | March 8, 2010, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

It’s an absolute shame and disgrace to disrespect Miss Arthur and Miss Fawcett in such a way. I know it was a hurtful and embarassing slap in the face to the families and friends who still love and will always love them, not to mention their millions of fans. Shame on you, Academy. This is one situation that there’s not a “fix” for, and one that won’t go away no matter how much money you throw at it.

Posted by: leesagee | March 8, 2010, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Rude and totally unprofessional! Unfortunately, ANY big business that equates to big money is CORRUPT.

Posted by: Melody | March 8, 2010, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

I am truly shocked that Bea and Farrah were directly left out. Was this some sort of inner politics as Monique spoke of?
They should be ashamed and should give a strong apology. But then again, by now it would surly be false, wouldn’t it?
For reasons unbeknown to us the public, these two BRILLIANT women were snubbed.
Who made this choice?

Posted by: TONJA | March 8, 2010, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

The excuse for leaving these two actresses off the show is about aa lame as the show itself turned out to be.It was over-hyped,overlong and boring. In the future they should cut out intros of the execs and technical people and those silly jokes that nobody laughs at.

Posted by: Jesse | March 8, 2010, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Wow, how long does it take to show a photo of an actor. Cut back on the acceptance speeches. My guess is that most people would rather see a tribute than listen to someone thank his/her hair stylist.

Posted by: BG | March 8, 2010, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

seriously bad form on the academy’s omission of Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur.For heaven’s sake, Farrah’s hair alone is worthy of an Oscar nod. Who didn’t own a Farrah poster? It was a hands down classic. And every guy’s hand was down there when looking at it!

Posted by: sunny sinclair | March 8, 2010, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

This is just shameful. Sure they were better known for being TV stars but still. I don’t recall Michael Jackson being in a movie other than “The Wiz” and who were these other guys they mentioned? Not that these people didn’t deserve to be recognized for their contributions to cinema and the entertainment business but to omit ANYONE is just shameful and the excuses that are being given are just as shameful–they’re right down offensive. Admit that a huge mistake was made and next year don’t invite Dougie Howser and instead make a special mention that both these ladies were horrendously omitted and give them their well deserved last 15 minutes of fame. End of story.

Posted by: Art Paz | March 8, 2010, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

BS! They showed some actors more than once! Maybe if they had saved the slot for Farrah and Bea they would have made the cut!

Posted by: Me | March 8, 2010, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

I agree with some of the other writers. Drop the behind the scene guys and cover the in front of the screen people. What was Michael Jackson mentioned in the Oscars for??? He was a musican NOT an actor. To miss these two LADIES is unforgiveable. How many others were over looked???

Posted by: Donna | March 8, 2010, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

it wus rong to leve bea arthur
and farrah fawcett out of the
oscars memoriam triute. ma thy
all rest in peace,

Posted by: gene halford | March 8, 2010, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

sorry they were not on there, i thought they were not film, just t.v. but oscars excuse was odd. Even Michael jackson got snubbed for his movie, this is it. so there.

Posted by: jenn | March 8, 2010, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Maybe Fawcett was too little known in films. But Bea Arthur? Well, they were already covered at the Emmys. Certainly the excuse ABC gives is ridiculous. Cut the silly song and dance and show respect.

Posted by: Diane J Standiford | March 8, 2010, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

The answer is pretty simple. Omit that segment altogeher. An even better idea is to omit the Oscars altogether. Why should I care about what a bunch of clowns in Hollywood thing about movies. Most is the movies that I enjoy have little to do with Hollywood and I don’t watch porn either.

Posted by: DICK SCHLADEN | March 8, 2010, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Yes, I am heartbroken over these 2 wonderful ladies were left out. If you had let me run this show, I would have made the time! I watched the whole show just to see who had died. Over half I had never heard of. What about Ed McMahon, and my all time favorite Paul Newman? Last Oscar I’ll ever watch.I cried thinking about them & their families, and all the people who loved them. They deserved & worked hard , just to be snubbed. SHAME ON YOU!

Posted by: Heartbroken | March 8, 2010, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

What a silly excuse! Most people never heard of than half of those behind the scenes people that were mentioned. Not enough time? Bull! The first part of the show was a wasted on a lot of nonsense. To leave out Farrah and Bea is a joke, to say the least. Were they deliberately left out? What Academy Politcal agenda was at work here this time?

Posted by: Paul | March 8, 2010, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Poor Farrah was snubbed by the media when she died once word of Michael Jackson’s death was announced, and again last night, where of course MJ was mentioned.
MJ would have been better remembered at a music award event, as he has been everywhere else then an movie awards. I think too much is being made about certain people and not enough about others. Bea Arthur was a tv star that made her name a household name to various generations but she was not only a tv actress, Farrah contributed a lot more to movies then MJ did.
There was no excuse for leaving 2 people who are widely known off the list for some people who are virtually unknown outside of Hollywood. I think next time they ought to change the way they select the precious few that get a mention. Maybe let the public vote on who they would like to see and take the top 75% voted on and leave the last 25% for the behind the scene people. Someone will always get left off but really to leave 2 very well known people off who were prominant in the industry is unexcusable.
I have nothing against MJ but was another rememberance of him really necessary, and at a movie award ceremony at that?

Posted by: Rene | March 8, 2010, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

If you are going to include Fawcett and Arthur, I DEMAND you include all the dead guys who were stunt men. Those guys are incredible–I want everyone who was in movies on that list of the dead. It’s insulting to Billy Smith, Tom Thomas, Joe Jones, and all those others to not be on there.
…hey, maybe that’d be a good cable channel for everyone here–the dead people in movies no one gives a crap about channel! The DPIMNOGACA-TV!

Posted by: jim | March 8, 2010, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

That is a LAME excuse given by the Academy. If they can’t list everyone then they should not show anyone! That is the only fair thing to do each year.

Posted by: Billy | March 8, 2010, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

I think it was a crying shame to leave Bea Arthur and Farrah Fawcett and God only knows who else out of the Memoriams. Maybe they could have taken less time with the “lame” jokes, etc by the mc’s and allowed more time for all of the people who passed on in 2009!! Very sad……….they earned that tribute and then some!!!!

Posted by: Cora Adams | March 8, 2010, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Kelly, if it’s such a HUGE and difficult event to produce, then why don’t they just save themselves the headaches and worry and stop having the awards at all? If it’s something they really want to produce, they always find a way. By the way, from the way you talk, it makes wonder if you’re on the payroll.

Posted by: leesagee | March 8, 2010, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

The Academy Awards is NOT a popular culture obituary, it’s a FILM awards show. For all the people posting about ‘crummy executives’ or ‘someone who wrote something’ being included, newsflash for you… just because you don’t know someone doesn’t mean they’re not HUGE in the MOVIE (not TV, not theatre) business. Ms. Arthur and Ms Fawcett did not work primarily in fim and I don’t care how big a fan of either you might be, you’ve got to acknowledge their celebrity combined doesn’t begin to compare with that of Michael Jackson. They can’t include everyone.

Posted by: StillStanding | March 8, 2010, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Hollywood is very much like your High School Days where the really cool kids, the footfall stars, the cheerleaders always get their photos in the Class Year Book, over and over and over again. While the geeky, unpopular kids are just blurs in the background shots. The Oscars are after all the ultimate popularity contest and if your considered one of the geeks in Hollywood like Farrah or Bea Arthur, well then you’re just the blur.

Posted by: A.Lincoln | March 8, 2010, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

It struck me that they included a lot of tributes to people I had never heard of before. On the other hand, I think Michael Jackson deserved a mention, if only for “Thriller.”

Posted by: Joan W | March 8, 2010, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

If your going to do something like this do it right! Its terrible to tell the loved ones of Bea Arthur & Farrah Fawcett you didnt have time for them. Those of us who watch movies/TV always found the time for both!

Posted by: Sara | March 8, 2010, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

It’s all about where the money is coming from and if their foundations is donating enough to the palms of the Oscar Execs. We all know this, we just don’t want to admit it.

Posted by: fq4u | March 8, 2010, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

if i was them i would be ashamed!!!
cut something else and do it right!!!

Posted by: ria | March 8, 2010, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

They could have said, “We would like to pay tribute to all those stars that have passed on this past year.” (something to that effect) and left it at that. It would have included everyone of them without even mentioning one person’s name. It is so simple.

Posted by: d | March 8, 2010, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

What a vociferous group of Know-Nothings! Neither Farrah Fawcett nor Bea Arthur were members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences (the ‘Academy’ in Academy Awards), so why would they be included? Don’t know whether or not MJ was a member (doubt it), but, he was an Oscar nominee (for Best Song for “BEN”) and in addition to other films, including this year’s “THIS IS IT.” If anything, I want to see more of the people who actually have worked in and affected the industry and I don’t give a crap whether you people know their names or not.

Posted by: IndustryGuy | March 8, 2010, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

And what about Patrick Swayze? Unless I missed something, all they showed of him was his picture at the very beginning! Very disrespectful!

Posted by: buckeyegal73 | March 8, 2010, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

While I understand time is limited, to leave out both Bea Arthur and Farrah Fawcett is disgracfull! And to include Michael Jackson!?!? There is no excuse for the omission and I would hope members of their community will be speaking up about it.

Posted by: Jeanette | March 8, 2010, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

I agree that the dance extravaganzas and slapstick could have been greatly reduced to allow the Academy to honor all of its fallen. I do NOT agree with the sentiment here that because a backlot person was unknown to the public, they could be eliminated. No, they couldn’t and shouldn’t be. The Academy exists, in part, to recognize the astonishing work of these mostly unknown creative geniuses. The Academy Awards are the Academy’s party honoring it own – we the public are invited to watch, but it’s their party. And truthfully, from their perspective, the award shows that should have honored these women were the Tonys (stage) and the Emmys (T.V.), where the bulk of their work happened. It would be nice if the Academy apologized, but it’s not going to happen, folks. Go ahead and vent, but then let it go. It’s just not that important.

Posted by: Pat | March 8, 2010, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

I did notice they managed to put Michael Jackson in. How many movies did he do???? If Farrah got a Golden Globe Nomination I would have to say she was pretty special in the movie she did. I really need to know did Michael Jackson do a movie? The Wiz maybe??? One movie. It was only a picture they had to put on the screen. You could have doubled up wow. I was not impressed at all with the Oscars this year. Kind of a waste of 3 hours for 10 awards.

Posted by: em | March 8, 2010, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

I was very embarressed for the Academy to have made such a mistake like leaving Farrah Fawcett & Bea Arthur out how is a mistake like that even possible im only watching from home and that is the 1st thing I said and noticed .. It’s awful & whoever put that on ought to be ashamed and very apologetic to say the least .

Posted by: Annmarie | March 8, 2010, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

They could have dumped that stupid “interpretive” dance routine that wasted so much time, MJ culd have been cut for someone that actually meant something. On another tack. Did any “Irish-Americans” win anything, hyphenated nationalities are getting so popular. I thought we were all Americans, not hyphen this or hyphen that. Get over beingso self-important. Sorry, you’re not that special.

Posted by: Jeanne | March 8, 2010, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Worse than these omissions was the very mawkish “tribute” to John Hughes. All those brat-packers just looked uncomfortable and ill-at-ease. Why not just include John with all the other deceased movie people?

Posted by: Mary Ross | March 8, 2010, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Bernie Mac and Issac hayes wasn’t even mentioned. If they are going to do a memoriam, they should do it for the year that the oscars are held so that way nobody gets missed.

Posted by: Lonewolf1044 | March 8, 2010, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Yes…but the DID HAVE TIME FOR…..”Doogie Houser”….aka Neil Patrick Harris to do his LAME song and dance routine….and GOD WAS IT AWFUL……HE CAN’T SING….(didn’t anyone notice that in rehearsals????) and his dancing was QUESTIONABLE……and OH…I forget….WHAT MOVIES HAS HE BEEN IN?????
But hey…just forget about FARRAH and BEA…..what a shame…..

Posted by: Tessa | March 8, 2010, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Really, they didn’t have time? Three and a half hours and they can’t devote a minute or two to at least show the face of Farrah? I like John Hughes but really? Five minutes for him and zippo for Farrah? I would really, really love to understand the decision making process behind who was cut and who wasn’t.

Posted by: Nobody | March 8, 2010, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

I think it may be impossible for me to fit in going to the movies or watching the Academy Awards telecast next year. There is, afterall, a lot for me to do in a year and I have to make decisions as to what to watch and how to spend my money. They made a mistake, should own up to it, apologize, and move on. By giving that lame excuse, they have just made fans mad. Do they do PR for Tiger Woods too?

Posted by: Tim | March 8, 2010, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

It’s OUTRAGEOUS that the Academy snubbed Fawcett. It’s OUTRAGEOUS that they recognized Jackson instead. Here’s her movie roles:
1969 Love Is a Funny Thing Patricia
1970 Myra Breckinridge Mary Ann Pringle
1976 Logan’s Run Holly As Farrah Fawcett-Majors
1978 Somebody Killed Her Husband Jenny Moore As Farrah Fawcett-Majors
1979 An Almost Perfect Affair Herself Uncredited
Sunburn Ellie As Farrah Fawcett-Majors
1980 Saturn 3 Alex
1981 The Cannonball Run Pamela Glover
1986 Extremities Marjorie Nominated – Golden Globe Award for Best Actress – Motion Picture Drama
1989 See You in the Morning Jo Livingstone
1995 Man of the House Sandy Archer
1997 The Apostle Jessie Dewey Nominated – Independent Spirit Award for Best Supporting Female
The Lovemaster Craig’s Dream Date
Playboy: Farrah Fawcett, All of Me Herself Direct to video
1998 The Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars Faucet Voice
2000 The Flunky Herself
Dr. T & the Women Kate
2004 The Cookout Mrs. Crowley
2008 A Wing & a Prayer: Farrah’s Fight for Life Herself Documentary

Posted by: Danny | March 8, 2010, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

In this day and age that is a lame excuse…easily rectified.
Simply create a version with all stars that fall into this category and make it available on the web…..at the end of the broadcast version of the tribute offer a link to the full length tribute.

Posted by: UncleJohnsBand | March 8, 2010, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Please join my group on Facebook…People Mad at Academy for leaving out Farrah Fawcett “in Memory” tribute

Posted by: Tim | March 8, 2010, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

I agree – they claim there was not enough time however the music went on longer and they stopped the photo’s – there should have been a way to list them on the screen or make some mention to the great ones lost. How rude, I agree MJ was a singer and not known for acting – someone should have thought that one through. Bet someone is answering for that now behind the scenes.

Posted by: kimmyz | March 8, 2010, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

I think it is disgraceful that they left Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur out of this category. I think they should apologize to the public and their family for such a stupid statement that they can not include everyone…. Then don’t honor anyone… I will never watch the Academy again….

Posted by: Sandra Swain | March 8, 2010, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Someone here said it well…”mention all or none”! very simple…shame on them.

Posted by: Judy | March 8, 2010, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

If they’d cut the amount of time they spent saying how great George Clooney is during the Best Actor awards, they could have included all the dead people.

Posted by: Truth | March 8, 2010, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

did they forget about Farrah Fawcett because she died the same day as Michael Jackson?

Posted by: kathy | March 8, 2010, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Okay, then why did they honor Michael Jackson, who was not a movie star????? The millions of fans who watch the Oscars want to see the celebrities we loved and lost…not the reporters, writers, and producers who we do not know. The money from advertisements during the Oscars comes from the same fans. My point is, I am glad they recognized Michael Jackson, as they should have recognized Bea and Farrah -what an insult, Academy!!!

Posted by: Lisa | March 8, 2010, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

I, too, thought it was tacky and inconsiderate to name bunches of people the audience never heard of and couldn’t possibly have cared less about, and then turn around and omit two of the biggest names of the last 3 decades–Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur. Shame-double shame on you, Oscar committee members for this blatant snub. May you all be forgotten when your time comes.

Posted by: Lucille | March 8, 2010, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

I think they mistakenly left Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur off the list and just won’t take responsibility. After all, those are two pretty damn big stars to forget, but I noticed they didn’t leave off some who seemed to be those no one in america minus their families ever heard of.

Posted by: Kathy | March 8, 2010, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Hollywood has been political like this for years. They create an overcomplicated voting system to ensure that the films that a bunch of tired old dinosaur critics want to win always do. They leave well-known, beloved people out of the “In Memoriam” tributes all the time, yet these old white guys that nobody’s ever heard of keep getting in. When is it going to stop? But it’s okay. They can keep their pathetic little boys club antics. And in the meantime, the producers of such snubbed greats like Avatar and Wall-E are laughing their way to the bank, and the ratings for their pathetic little awards shows will keep going down until even the cable channels won’t want anything to do with them, and all the while big game events like the Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four will see record ratings hikes. Pretty soon, these awards shows will be so isolated that the only people who will care about getting an Oscar, an Emmy or a Grammy will be the idiots who get them, those “coveted” statues will be as valuable as a used up piece of gum that gets stuck on your shoe, and all will be right with the world.

Posted by: kristina m | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Hollywood has been political like this for years. They create an overcomplicated voting system to ensure that the films that a bunch of tired old dinosaur critics want to win always do. They leave well-known, beloved people out of the “In Memoriam” tributes all the time, yet these old white guys that nobody’s ever heard of keep getting in. When is it going to stop? But it’s okay. They can keep their pathetic little boys club antics. And in the meantime, the producers of such snubbed greats like Avatar and Wall-E are laughing their way to the bank, and the ratings for their pathetic little awards shows will keep going down until even the cable channels won’t want anything to do with them, and all the while big game events like the Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four will see record ratings hikes. Pretty soon, these awards shows will be so isolated that the only people who will care about getting an Oscar, an Emmy or a Grammy will be the idiots who get them, those “coveted” statues will be as valuable as a used up piece of gum that gets stuck on your shoe, and all will be right with the world.

Posted by: kristina m | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Hollywood has been political like this for years. They create an overcomplicated voting system to ensure that the films that a bunch of tired old dinosaur critics want to win always do. They leave well-known, beloved people out of the “In Memoriam” tributes all the time, yet these old white guys that nobody’s ever heard of keep getting in. When is it going to stop? But it’s okay. They can keep their pathetic little boys club antics. And in the meantime, the producers of such snubbed greats like Avatar and Wall-E are laughing their way to the bank, and the ratings for their pathetic little awards shows will keep going down until even the cable channels won’t want anything to do with them, and all the while big game events like the Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four will see record ratings hikes. Pretty soon, these awards shows will be so isolated that the only people who will care about getting an Oscar, an Emmy or a Grammy will be the idiots who get them, those “coveted” statues will be as valuable as a used up piece of gum that gets stuck on your shoe, and all will be right with the world.

Posted by: kristina m | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Hollywood has been political like this for years. They create an overcomplicated voting system to ensure that the films that a bunch of tired old dinosaur critics want to win always do. They leave well-known, beloved people out of the “In Memoriam” tributes all the time, yet these old white guys that nobody’s ever heard of keep getting in. When is it going to stop? But it’s okay. They can keep their pathetic little boys club antics. And in the meantime, the producers of such snubbed greats like Avatar and Wall-E are laughing their way to the bank, and the ratings for their pathetic little awards shows will keep going down until even the cable channels won’t want anything to do with them, and all the while big game events like the Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four will see record ratings hikes. Pretty soon, these awards shows will be so isolated that the only people who will care about getting an Oscar, an Emmy or a Grammy will be the idiots who get them, those “coveted” statues will be as valuable as a used up piece of gum that gets stuck on your shoe, and all will be right with the world.

Posted by: kristina m | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Hollywood has been political like this for years. They create an overcomplicated voting system to ensure that the films that a bunch of tired old dinosaur critics want to win always do. They leave well-known, beloved people out of the “In Memoriam” tributes all the time, yet these old white guys that nobody’s ever heard of keep getting in. When is it going to stop? But it’s okay. They can keep their pathetic little boys club antics. And in the meantime, the producers of such snubbed greats like Avatar and Wall-E are laughing their way to the bank, and the ratings for their pathetic little awards shows will keep going down until even the cable channels won’t want anything to do with them, and all the while big game events like the Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four will see record ratings hikes. Pretty soon, these awards shows will be so isolated that the only people who will care about getting an Oscar, an Emmy or a Grammy will be the idiots who get them, those “coveted” statues will be as valuable as a used up piece of gum that gets stuck on your shoe, and all will be right with the world.

Posted by: kristina m | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Hollywood has been political like this for years. They create an overcomplicated voting system to ensure that the films that a bunch of tired old dinosaur critics want to win always do. They leave well-known, beloved people out of the “In Memoriam” tributes all the time, yet these old white guys that nobody’s ever heard of keep getting in. When is it going to stop? But it’s okay. They can keep their pathetic little boys club antics. And in the meantime, the producers of such snubbed greats like Avatar and Wall-E are laughing their way to the bank, and the ratings for their pathetic little awards shows will keep going down until even the cable channels won’t want anything to do with them, and all the while big game events like the Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four will see record ratings hikes. Pretty soon, these awards shows will be so isolated that the only people who will care about getting an Oscar, an Emmy or a Grammy will be the idiots who get them, those “coveted” statues will be as valuable as a used up piece of gum that gets stuck on your shoe, and all will be right with the world.

Posted by: kristina m | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Hollywood has been political like this for years. They create an overcomplicated voting system to ensure that the films that a bunch of tired old dinosaur critics want to win always do. They leave well-known, beloved people out of the “In Memoriam” tributes all the time, yet these old white guys that nobody’s ever heard of keep getting in. When is it going to stop? But it’s okay. They can keep their pathetic little boys club antics. And in the meantime, the producers of such snubbed greats like Avatar and Wall-E are laughing their way to the bank, and the ratings for their pathetic little awards shows will keep going down until even the cable channels won’t want anything to do with them, and all the while big game events like the Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four will see record ratings hikes. Pretty soon, these awards shows will be so isolated that the only people who will care about getting an Oscar, an Emmy or a Grammy will be the idiots who get them, those “coveted” statues will be as valuable as a used up piece of gum that gets stuck on your shoe, and all will be right with the world.

Posted by: kristina m | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Hollywood has been political like this for years. They create an overcomplicated voting system to ensure that the films that a bunch of tired old dinosaur critics want to win always do. They leave well-known, beloved people out of the “In Memoriam” tributes all the time, yet these old white guys that nobody’s ever heard of keep getting in. When is it going to stop? But it’s okay. They can keep their pathetic little boys club antics. And in the meantime, the producers of such snubbed greats like Avatar and Wall-E are laughing their way to the bank, and the ratings for their pathetic little awards shows will keep going down until even the cable channels won’t want anything to do with them, and all the while big game events like the Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four will see record ratings hikes. Pretty soon, these awards shows will be so isolated that the only people who will care about getting an Oscar, an Emmy or a Grammy will be the idiots who get them, those “coveted” statues will be as valuable as a used up piece of gum that gets stuck on your shoe, and all will be right with the world.

Posted by: kristina m | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Hollywood has been political like this for years. They create an overcomplicated voting system to ensure that the films that a bunch of tired old dinosaur critics want to win always do. They leave well-known, beloved people out of the “In Memoriam” tributes all the time, yet these old white guys that nobody’s ever heard of keep getting in. When is it going to stop? But it’s okay. They can keep their pathetic little boys club antics. And in the meantime, the producers of such snubbed greats like Avatar and Wall-E are laughing their way to the bank, and the ratings for their pathetic little awards shows will keep going down until even the cable channels won’t want anything to do with them, and all the while big game events like the Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four will see record ratings hikes. Pretty soon, these awards shows will be so isolated that the only people who will care about getting an Oscar, an Emmy or a Grammy will be the idiots who get them, those “coveted” statues will be as valuable as a used up piece of gum that gets stuck on your shoe, and all will be right with the world.

Posted by: kristina m | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Hollywood has been political like this for years. They create an overcomplicated voting system to ensure that the films that a bunch of tired old dinosaur critics want to win always do. They leave well-known, beloved people out of the “In Memoriam” tributes all the time, yet these old white guys that nobody’s ever heard of keep getting in. When is it going to stop? But it’s okay. They can keep their pathetic little boys club antics. And in the meantime, the producers of such snubbed greats like Avatar and Wall-E are laughing their way to the bank, and the ratings for their pathetic little awards shows will keep going down until even the cable channels won’t want anything to do with them, and all the while big game events like the Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four will see record ratings hikes. Pretty soon, these awards shows will be so isolated that the only people who will care about getting an Oscar, an Emmy or a Grammy will be the idiots who get them, those “coveted” statues will be as valuable as a used up piece of gum that gets stuck on your shoe, and all will be right with the world.

Posted by: kristina m | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Hollywood has been political like this for years. They create an overcomplicated voting system to ensure that the films that a bunch of tired old dinosaur critics want to win always do. They leave well-known, beloved people out of the “In Memoriam” tributes all the time, yet these old white guys that nobody’s ever heard of keep getting in. When is it going to stop? But it’s okay. They can keep their pathetic little boys club antics. And in the meantime, the producers of such snubbed greats like Avatar and Wall-E are laughing their way to the bank, and the ratings for their pathetic little awards shows will keep going down until even the cable channels won’t want anything to do with them, and all the while big game events like the Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four will see record ratings hikes. Pretty soon, these awards shows will be so isolated that the only people who will care about getting an Oscar, an Emmy or a Grammy will be the idiots who get them, those “coveted” statues will be as valuable as a used up piece of gum that gets stuck on your shoe, and all will be right with the world.

Posted by: kristina m | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Hollywood has been political like this for years. They create an overcomplicated voting system to ensure that the films that a bunch of tired old dinosaur critics want to win always do. They leave well-known, beloved people out of the “In Memoriam” tributes all the time, yet these old white guys that nobody’s ever heard of keep getting in. When is it going to stop? But it’s okay. They can keep their pathetic little boys club antics. And in the meantime, the producers of such snubbed greats like Avatar and Wall-E are laughing their way to the bank, and the ratings for their pathetic little awards shows will keep going down until even the cable channels won’t want anything to do with them, and all the while big game events like the Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four will see record ratings hikes. Pretty soon, these awards shows will be so isolated that the only people who will care about getting an Oscar, an Emmy or a Grammy will be the idiots who get them, those “coveted” statues will be as valuable as a used up piece of gum that gets stuck on your shoe, and all will be right with the world.

Posted by: kristina m | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Hollywood has been political like this for years. They create an overcomplicated voting system to ensure that the films that a bunch of tired old dinosaur critics want to win always do. They leave well-known, beloved people out of the “In Memoriam” tributes all the time, yet these old white guys that nobody’s ever heard of keep getting in. When is it going to stop? But it’s okay. They can keep their pathetic little boys club antics. And in the meantime, the producers of such snubbed greats like Avatar and Wall-E are laughing their way to the bank, and the ratings for their pathetic little awards shows will keep going down until even the cable channels won’t want anything to do with them, and all the while big game events like the Super Bowl and the NCAA Final Four will see record ratings hikes. Pretty soon, these awards shows will be so isolated that the only people who will care about getting an Oscar, an Emmy or a Grammy will be the idiots who get them, those “coveted” statues will be as valuable as a used up piece of gum that gets stuck on your shoe, and all will be right with the world.

Posted by: kristina m | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

The Oscars have always been about snubs. I just didn’t think they’d snub anyone posthumously.
http://mundwiller.blogspot.com/

Posted by: nnnjake | March 8, 2010, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

even being a HUGE michael jackson fan i think it was really lame farrah and bea were snubbed.

Posted by: Sym | March 8, 2010, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Farrah starred in a bunch of films, Sunburn, Somebody Killed Her Husband, Saturn 3, Dr T and Women, Extemities, Cannonball Run, The Apostle, Cookout, Myra Breckenridge – that’s 9 that I remember, Jacko only 1 bomb, and he gets mentioned? It was unexcusable.

Posted by: Jordan | March 8, 2010, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

If there is time for Ben Stiller’s lame and failed attempt at Avatar comedy, there is certainly time to make sure that the “In Memoriam” segment is complete and properly presented. Not only were Bea and Farrah not included, but once again, even with my 40″ TV, the first three shown were hard to recognize. I realized the first was Patrick Swayze, just before his photos were removed, but I still don’t know who the next two were because it wasn’t until the fourth person shown that their photos and names went full screen.

Posted by: Walt K | March 8, 2010, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

People calm down. Farrah and Bea wore recognized at the Golden Globe Awards. The Academy Awards is based on excellence in movie. Farrah’s attempt at the silver screen were pretty lame, but she excelled on the tube. And Bea was a Broadway and TV star.
Ron Silver was a major movie character actor, to those who don’t know.

Posted by: Lauren Griffin | March 8, 2010, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

I didn’t watch the show, but just caught a tidbit of the tribute. First, get rid of James Taylor.Grr. How can he make a Lennon Classic sound so flat a dull!. I agree, list everyone or no one. Fawcetts work on the Burning Bed, and Arthurs groundbreaking Maude deserved more. Not that the behind the scenes people should not be mourned by the academy, but the show is for the audience, who knows who that sound guy was anyway.

Posted by: Joe | March 8, 2010, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

And by the way, what movies did Neal Patrick Harris star or even appear in. I stopped watching the award shows a long time again. And to include Micheal Jackson was a real bummer. Who cares. I guess everybody love a child molster.

Posted by: robert | March 8, 2010, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

all i see in this posting is a regurgitation of the same common facts and quotes surrounding this story from every site on the web this morning.
not one original thought, or opinion.
“Sheila Marikar tells it differently from the other entertainment and celebrity gossip bloggers”?
I guess you do, darlin’. the rest of them are actually trying.

Posted by: rewod | March 8, 2010, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Farrah Fawcett was a very special actress as well as an inspiration to those that face cancer. I did a bag for her in last years Relay For Life. I was proud to honor her life. It is a shame that she was not honored for her acting career in the Oscar Tributes.

Posted by: JBL | March 8, 2010, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

I can appreciate that the big Memoriam at a film award show would showcase those that predominantly worked in the film industry – so leaving out Fawcett and Arthur in understandable as their careers were in television and on stage (Arthur) – HOWEVER when the academy included Michael Jackson who made an obscure MUSICAL film (The Wiz) was included, the omission of Fawcett and Arthur stuck out like Rachel Maddow at the CPAC convention. The academy should have left out Jackson – if they had we wouldn’t be talking about this.

Posted by: Daniel | March 8, 2010, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

To mention Michael Jackson, who had very little to do with the movie business, and leave out two great actresses shows that the academy is more about “who makes the news” than the craft of acting. The producers need to apologize instead of being so pretentious and pointed about the rules.

Posted by: sanetexan | March 8, 2010, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

i agree with alot of the comments they should have left off Michael Jackson he was in music, and one of the other behind the scene people. Then they would of been room for the Angel and Maude…
The Academy should be VERY A SHAME of them self…

Posted by: letty | March 8, 2010, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Guess who won’t be watching the oscars next year. Perhaps a year without viewers would reset the Oscar acadamie’s priorities.

Posted by: russ dubbels | March 8, 2010, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Every year I tell myself that I won’t be watching the Oscar ceremony the following year, yet I always get caught up in the Oscar hype. But this year, it’s true. I will never watch the Oscar ceremony again as it has become so meaningless as far as talent goes. It’s all political and rushed in order to get as many numbers as possible. Bring back the simplicity and the talent into the Oscar ceremony and the beauty of the show will come back with it. Watching the Oscar ceremony now is like watching an olympic event. Everything is fast and hyper, except that at the Olympics, it’s truly the best athlete that wins the gold medal… So long Oscar… it’s been a nice 35+ years, but next year count me out… If I want to watch Miley Cyrus, I’ll turn on my TV on Satudary mornings at 11:00… I want Oscar material at the Oscar, not a Disney show.

Posted by: Myself | March 8, 2010, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

I promiss to Snub the Academy from this moment on! This is not right and IS their fault! Maybe if they cut ten or twenty commercials they could have found the time to give these people who gave them their JOBS a small notice!!!!

Posted by: Edward Albert Wilkinson | March 8, 2010, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

RE:genieb |Oh please, a black and white issue…sounds like you have some kind of hangup yourself. Michael Jackson was a very talented man but he did not belong on that list if they had to leave out two actresses who committed their careers to film. It has nothing to do with Michael being black. Duh!

Posted by: sanetexan | March 8, 2010, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

This was a BIG mistake. Farrah & Bea were incredible actresses. It’s embarrassing that they weren’t included in the memorial at the Oscars. Shame On whoever made that decision——very bad judgement!!!!

Posted by: unforgiving | March 8, 2010, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

I didn’t even realize that Farrah Fawcet had been left out until my fiance mentioned it. There were a lot of people in the tribute who were probably only well known to a select few Hollywood insiders. Hell, I work in public relations and was surprised to see someone in my own field listed. Take him and Michael Jackson out and there you have two slots available to honor FF and Bea Arthur.

Posted by: tommywo | March 8, 2010, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Okay … let me get this straight …. there was enough room for Michael Jackson – who was NOT an actor – but there wasn’t enough room for Farrah???? Spare me!!!!!

Posted by: Mike | March 8, 2010, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

I’m done with the Oscars…i won’t support rudness and jerks . I am really mad at this ..really mad. We need to make a point here next year!…DON”T WATCH THE LAME DUCK SHOW ANYMORE!!!!!People need to start to become more proactive.

Posted by: rick | March 8, 2010, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

The Academy Awards did a good job of honoring women this year. With this step forward, there were several steps back. I found the Dance segment gratuitous and superfluous. The hosts were inane and lacked entertainment. Alex Baldwin….really? The omission of Fawcett and Arthur is inexcusible…so don’t make an excuse. Cowboy up and admit you had a significant lapse in judgment. Bea Arthur was terrific in Mame and Fawcett was in movies.

Posted by: Maeve | March 8, 2010, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

This was NOT a case of no time…they did this for a reason…what that is i have no idea..and don’t really care..they are trying to say what she did on screen was nothing…moreover there nothing.

Posted by: rick | March 8, 2010, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

This type of response to an obvious oversight is the reason why I typically avoid watching. One year when I decided to give it another chance, the executive producer of the academy makes a stupid statement that enrages the public. The public cannot connect with the writers and cinematography names shown versus icons like Farrah and Bea. Show them all and remember who the audience is.

Posted by: DAK | March 8, 2010, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Neil Patrick Harris is a TV star and he opened the show. Bea and Farrah should have been included. By the way, I thought I had time traveled back to the Tony Awards when I saw Harris.

Posted by: Jane Jones | March 9, 2010, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Michael and his whole family are sick, but that appears to be what has taken over that industry, screwed up people. Farrah and Bea Arthur were not only TV stars, but what about stage and movies. Who were all the unknowns mentioned and why can’t some of those stupid jokes by Steve and Alec just stopped so they can mention those who have died, no matter what there age was. I don’t watch that political BS anyway, my husband does and he was really hurt that Farrah wasn’t mentioned, but the pervert Mike was.

Posted by: Judi Haase | March 9, 2010, 12:07 am 12:07 am

People still watch the Oscars?
Haven’t watched any award shows in years; nothing but a bunch ‘celebrities’ patting themselves and each other on the back.

Posted by: beetle baily | March 9, 2010, 12:09 am 12:09 am

I have no problem with writers (Michael Crichton, for instance), technical people, producers, and so forth…
…but Ms. Arthur was a film and television actor, as was Ms. Fawcett, yet were not included. And Mr. Jackson should also have been replaced by Henry Gibson, whose role in Nashville beat Mr, Jackson’s entire career…
…but the Academy of Motioned Pictures Farts and Scientologists is about as good as Zenu ;)

Posted by: Theoacme | March 9, 2010, 12:13 am 12:13 am

They provided a tribute to Michael Jackson and left out Farrah and Bea. That is a shame they put in a musician instead of actresses in an acting awards show???

Posted by: Wizard | March 9, 2010, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Who gives a rat’s behind.

Posted by: John | March 9, 2010, 12:20 am 12:20 am

This is a political circus these days. A great opportunity for sponsors doing commercials would be to “salute” these fallen but not forgotten stars. For example, what better opportunity for the Coca Cola’s, Pepsi Co, Hair-Make up companies to set positive memories/images in the viewers minds. Plus the Academy gets its advertising accordingly. Run a complete list with a start-end date disclaimer (you can always make up the following year). Just a fan of the golden oldies.

Posted by: a_conservative | March 9, 2010, 12:21 am 12:21 am

…and yes, I deliberately misspelled Zenu – I do not want to see Battlefield Earth once, much less 30,000 times, whilst having Tom Cruise stare longingly into my eyes, his hands reaching for my wallet :)

Posted by: Theoacme | March 9, 2010, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Easy solution. Don’t do the dead-actors tribune at the Oscars. I mean, it’s not like nobody ever does any tribute to them at the time they died.
If someone gets an Oscar posthumously (i.e. they died before the Oscar could be awarded) then yes, do a “tribute” in lieu of an acceptance speech.
But there is no reason to trot out the name of everybody in the entertainment industry that died over the past year at the Oscar awards ceremony.

Posted by: JaylahPriest | March 9, 2010, 12:34 am 12:34 am

What a lame excuse. Why did they just not say they were not worthy or that we forgot of them and do a special tribute.
They are a lot more worthy than some of the names they mentioned.
Two idiots just backing each other up

Posted by: Rick | March 9, 2010, 12:47 am 12:47 am

I’m sorry, but as much as I liked Bea Arthur as an actress, she was a TV actress who did virtually nothing of note in the movies.
Farrah did some terrific movies, like The Burning Bed, but again they were TV movies, not shown on “the silver screen”.

Posted by: The_Mick | March 9, 2010, 2:31 am 2:31 am

If it wasn’t bad enough that Michael Jackson over shadowed Farrah at death, now Oscar has neglected her as well. And Bea Arthur…..what the hell? Both Bea and Farrah had done movies. Yet there was Michael Jackson. What did he do “The Wiz”? Pleeeeeease. The Oscars should be ashamed of themselves. There is no justification for this clear snub of Farrah and Bea.

Posted by: Pattie Buscema | March 9, 2010, 4:58 am 4:58 am

If they couldn’t do Farrah or Bea Arthur then why did they do Michael Jackson? Yes he played a huge role in pop culture but when did he ever act in a movie or a tv show? Farrah and Bea did a ton of more work for movies and TV. Its a farce. Its always something.

Posted by: jk | March 9, 2010, 7:30 am 7:30 am

This is not new to the Oscars. In 1999 Peggy Cass was left out. She had even been nominated in 1958 for Antie Mame. Another one this year was Henry Gibson, star of Nashville. What aq shame

Posted by: Tim Mason | March 9, 2010, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Somebody made a huge error…REALLY..you are going to include David Carradine, who died under weird circumstances, who had a limited appeal, and Michael Jackson???? Then not include Farrah Fawcett, who, while she made some unusual choices, at the end fought hard and enlightened many people about how much security your medical records really have, among other things. SHAME ON YOU, ABC! Apologise…..admit it….the producers screwed up!

Posted by: CJ | March 9, 2010, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Bea Arthur sang in more than one of acting appearances. Maybe they should have omitted Michael Jackson from tributes and the Grammy and honored Bea. Seriously thought the omission of these two talented actresses is sad and appalling. These tributes are something that fans of movies and the people that acted in them look forward to. It reminds us of how great they were and they imapacted in some small way!

Posted by: Nick | March 9, 2010, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

They found time to mention Michael Jackson whos outstanding film career included classics like The Wiz and Moonwalker…. and that’s it!LOL No, he was mentioned purely because he was black (don’t laugh) and most likely Obama ‘asked’ the Academy to mention him.

Posted by: Maxx | March 9, 2010, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

If you can’t make time for all of the stars, just don’t do it. Poor excuse, pitiful.

Posted by: carol in Alabama | March 9, 2010, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Inexcusable, they should be ashamed to have omitted Farrah Fawcett.She was a member of the academie for 4o years. Although she starred in more TV movies , I can think of at last 5 five theatrical films in which she acted. Most notably Extremities and The Apostle of which she was nominated for awards. How sad for her family and fans.
PI believe an apologie should be made.

Posted by: Laura | March 9, 2010, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

To future awards shows: please omit the names of Bruce Davis and Leslie Unger after they die. Call it Karma. thank you

Posted by: CJ | March 9, 2010, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

You MAKE the TIME! Period. Lame ass men and lame ass excuse.

Posted by: Paul | March 9, 2010, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

I feel the fans of the Oscars have a right to know what process decided who is recognized in the Memoriam Tribute.
Farrah stared in more movies than Michael Jackson, the public needs to know what process does the Academy follows.
Larry

Posted by: Larry | March 9, 2010, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

I THINK THAT IT WAS A DISGRACE NOT
MENTIONING BEA ARTHIR AND FARA FACCET
ENOUGH W/ MICHAEL JACKSON GIVE REMBRANCE TO SOME OTHER PEOPLE THAT
REALLY DESERVE IT. I AM VERY UPSET

Posted by: madd | March 9, 2010, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur definitely should have been rememebered. Michael Jackson desereved to be rememebered too, he was a superstar, an icon.

Posted by: amgroucho | March 10, 2010, 2:37 am 2:37 am

pretty wild…..Farrah was the last of the famous blonde icons…..Jean Harlow….Marilyn Monroe…..and then Farrah Fawcett……would the academy have left off the other two from their memorandums…..DUMMIES!

Posted by: Mannie | March 10, 2010, 9:09 am 9:09 am

While I agree that Farrah and Bea should absolutely have been included in the tribute, the “behind the scenes” folks are recognized for their contributions to film and should be included in the tribute.
As for the lame excuses from ABC et al, it’s a bunch of crap. Since the show ran over by half an hour (Tom Hanks was probably told not to introduce the films individually and just open the envelope so they wouldn’t get into another half hour) the extra minute it would have taken to include those two irreplaceable ladies wouldn’t have mattered. I could have done without Neil Patrick Harris’ lousy production number at the beginning but I was also glad that there weren’t more cheesy stagings of each individual song.
Shame on the producers of this year’s show – hopefully if all of these complaints from all sources are noted, they’ll get it right next year. EVERYBODY who contributes to film – actor or behind the scenes folks – should ALL be included in the yearly tribute – NO MATTER HOW LONG IT TAKES!
What crap. RIP, Farrah and Bea – your fans will never forget you, even if the Academy did.

Posted by: Catherine | March 10, 2010, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Unreal. I will leave them out of my living room next year. Complete ignorance and an apology to each family is needed.

Posted by: alibeck | March 10, 2010, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Blame the staff at the Oscars’ for not including Farrah Fawcett and Bea Arthur from the “In Mermorial”, but don’t downgrade Michael Jackson because he was included. The tribute has left out noteworthy individuals in the past, but for goodness sakes stop picking on Michael Jackson!

Posted by: Janina | March 11, 2010, 9:47 am 9:47 am

ABC… this is a very POOR reason to leave out exceptional people. We could have done without the dancing aspect of the show or limit the about of times one is shown on the tribute. Not to take anything from the late Mr. Jackson but I must seen his profile at least 5 to 6 times during the tribute. As long as he was featured is what counts and not how many times. By showing him once you could have included Bea, Farrah & others which were also left out. Please use common sense next time or get someone who can use better common sense to do a better job. Do you really think this excuse will win ABC viewers? USE COMMON SENSE GUYS! or get someone else to do the job accordingly.
take care…

Posted by: mario | March 11, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am

I’m boycotting the Oscars. Anything worth watching can be seen on YouTube the next day. We needed to see all those clips from horror movies on the Oscars? We needed five different dance routines? None of that was directly related to what represents Academy Award nominations or wins. Neil Patrick Harris has been in which Oscar-winning films? I don’t buy all the hollow and heartless excuses coming out of the Academy spokespeople. Farrah Fawcett deserved to be remembered for her film work and a room full of snobs and knobs decided they simply wouldn’t give her the, what, eight seconds of screen time to do that. Unacceptable. Farrah was an icon, and contrary to what Leslie Unger is implying, there are not “a hundred other” recently passed film people like her. I would venture to guess there aren’t a hundred others equal to her in the past decade.

Posted by: J T | March 11, 2010, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Academy Awards show is just that. It’s an event to entertain. Goofs are part of the show and everyone gets to talk about it. Political Correctness is a major swinger.

Posted by: china door manufacturer | March 14, 2010, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Academy Awards organizers have to realize that they have upset fans of these two icons and I am sure their families did not feel all that great either. I am writing to you from the other end of the ocean and believe me Bea and Farrah are very well known and loved here, and a number of people who were included in that memoriam are virtually unknown to most (especially agents, producers, writers etc). With no disrespect to them or to what they have contributed to this industry I also believe that either everyone should be mentioned or no one at all. At the end of the day, these two ladies were not stars of the 40′s or 50′s that perhaps were forgotten and I can assure you that we all expected them to be included… I mean who can forget Charlie’s Angels of the Golden Girls? There have been so many reruns of these shows, we practically all grew up watching them.
Its more respectful on the part of the organizers to admit that they have omitted them by mistake, acknowledge that and perhaps apologize to their family and fans rather than using very poor excuses, indeed!!!

Posted by: Anna | March 17, 2010, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

I was so shocked when Farrah passed away and all the news was surrounding Michael Jackson! It was sad. She was such a huge part of the television and movie watching society! She was a super awesome lady. And Bea Arthur, man she was super as well. I’m not trying to belittle Michael Jackson’s fame, but i do feel that Farrah’s and Bea’s show of appreciation was pathetic.

Posted by: Jody | March 18, 2010, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

We lost a wonderful talent this year….Bea Arthur. The Oscar’s might have forgotten Bea but I haven’t.
I found this clip of Miss Arthur’s final interview with Bea discussing her career in her own words. The clip also shows Betty White, Carol Channing and Phyllis Diller. I think it’s for a show called, “Lunching with a Legend.”
I’d hate for a full interview with Bea or the other legendary ladies in the clip to go unseen.
http://lunchingwithalegend.com/
Cheers,
Stephen

Posted by: stephen | March 19, 2010, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

We lost a wonderful talent this year….Bea Arthur. The Oscar’s might have forgotten Bea but I haven’t.
I found this clip of Miss Arthur’s final interview with Bea discussing her career in her own words. The clip also shows Betty White, Carol Channing and Phyllis Diller. I think it’s for a show called, “Lunching with a Legend.”
I’d hate for a full interview with Bea or the other legendary ladies in the clip to go unseen.
http://lunchingwithalegend.com/
Cheers,
Stephen

Posted by: Stephen | March 19, 2010, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Just Desserts For Oscar: Perpetuate his omission, just a while longer, to highlight Farrah and Bea, not that their stars need any polishing!
We are talking milliseconds, which they could have squeezed right in, to show their wonderfulness once more to us.
Bring back some 70s tv exposure of both, too, because, Maude? We Love Maude, including her All In The Family position, and Charlie? We Love Your Beautiful Angel – the one on wings of peace in heaven.
Based solely on Farrah’s role portrayal, Extremities is one of the best movies I have ever watched, and yes it is. Bea changed history and tv censorship on Maude.
May they both rest in peace and love. Love is all there is!

Posted by: Marta | March 19, 2010, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

I missed the oscars this year but kept tabs via my phone.. I would have been infuriated to watch and not see these two ICONS included!!! The audacity!!! I can’t even comprend ANY EXCUSE!! You can be sure that this viewer will NEVER tune in to another Oscar ever again… how hurt the famalies must have been!! Unacceptable!!

Posted by: Roxanne | April 2, 2010, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Thank you very much for the brief explanation.

Posted by: sesli sohbet | April 3, 2010, 2:48 am 2:48 am

politics and legal issues at the academy with both actresses.

Posted by: SC Skilling | April 7, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Shame on Oscar for not including Farrah Fawcett & Bea Arthur in their Memoriam tribute. They could mention screen writers, but not these two great women? Especailly after Farrah bared her cancer pain on TV?

Posted by: JerseyGirl | April 10, 2010, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Oh yeah – they didn’t forget to include screwballs like Michael Jackson and David Carradine. Lived weird, died weird. Guess they fit right in to Hollywood.

Posted by: JerseyGirl | April 10, 2010, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

I personally never bother to watch the Oscars because the show bores me to sleep, but I think they should not have been left out. I would have been more inclined to leave out Michael Jackson, who’s been getting memorials all over the place. For the most part, those memorials make no sense at all. I admit to thinking of Bea Arthur and Farrah Fawcett more in television, and I hope they’re remembered at the Emmys, another sleep-inducing show.

Posted by: Amy | April 15, 2010, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Bea Arthur had acted in more than just the “Golden Girls” hadn’t she? But Farrah Fawcett – she was known for her hair in the 70′s. There are many actors and actresses who pass away that are forgotten – especially older actors and actresses from the 40′s through 1960′s. Farrah was noteworthy due to her hair celebrity status, and she did suffer a terrible cancer. But really – her career – you feel it was THAT notable??

Posted by: EdwardsCougar | April 16, 2010, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

My GOSH, I cannot believe they were excluded. I’m aghast! What a lame excuse. How disrespectful.

Posted by: Jeannine E | May 14, 2010, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

So…they can waste time on overdone musical numbers and lame jokes, but just don’t have the time to include every actor who has passed away the year before? Can you LAME-O?

Posted by: perrey | May 29, 2010, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Ugh! Why don’t they just run some kind of list in the background during the memorian for those who passed away also? It’s the least they can do, u know?

Posted by: Greg | August 9, 2010, 11:30 am 11:30 am

A place to be seen…
In a promise
there’s the
light that
always remains
like a delicate
leaf in the
dark of a forest,
and there, in
your eyes, I
see beautiful
skies and a tender
relief.
Francesco Sinibaldi

Posted by: Francesco Sinibaldi | August 16, 2010, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Bea Arthur was commemorated at the Emmy!!! I saw it, she was an excellent actress!!! That Ms. Farrah and Ms Bea weren’t commemorated at the major Academy Awards? They should have been!!! Both of them represented different eras when it came to film, tv and even theater, Ms Bea did!!!! She was funy, a lil different, maybe not the vision of beauty, but she also, as Ms Farrah, she had a unique beauty to her and I believe that that crud that they said that there was not much time? I would like to know if those who worked that hard, when they pass away, if they got looked over will be laying in their grave scratching their coffin! I am convinced that the art kno9wn as acting has gotten so impersonal that they don’t give a flying fish, but I guess they would like to be remembered the same way they disregarded those actors they wrote for. Congratulations for the blah blah blah, may it not happen to Hollywood, but you all are hypocrites!!!! Cheers!!!

Posted by: Rita C | September 11, 2010, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Because they spoke out against commie unions.

Posted by: Bill | February 27, 2011, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

I believe “ALL OR NOT AT ALL”. If the Oscars are for actors/actresses, isn’t that what Farrah & Bea were? I love Michael and mean him no disrespect, but fair is fair. If there was room for him there should have been for these two icons. At least list their names above the “behind the scenes” folks for whom they made the money.

Posted by: LNB | March 1, 2011, 12:34 am 12:34 am