Michelle Obama’s Pricey Vacation Wardrobe

Getty Images/AP Photo
The Obamas have been drawing heat for their 17-day Hawaiian holiday, estimated by some media outlets to cost taxpayers $4 million.
But the criticism doesn’t stop there. Now first lady Michelle Obama is under scrutiny for her high-end fashion choices.
For the Christmas Day church service at the Kaneohe Bay Marine Base, Mrs. Obama was photographed in a seemingly simple white sundress with red and yellow stripes. The dress, however, was by French-born, U.S.-based designer Sophie Theallet, and would have cost the first lady almost $2,000 when she bought it in 2009. More recent designs by Theallet sell for even more.
For the meet-and-greet with service members and their families in a nearby mess hall later in the day, Mrs. Obama dressed down — in a printed green $950 Comme des Garcons skirt with bag waist.
Some see the first lady’s penchant for expensive labels at odds with her reputation as a bargain shopper who frequents J. Crew and Target.
One comment on the Naked DC website read: “She claims to be a champion of the poor and a fellow bargain shopper, but yet, here she is, sporting a dress that no unemployed American can afford.”
President Barack Obama’s dinner last night with the first lady and friends was similarly out of range for many Americans. The group dined at Alan Wong’s Restaurant, an upscale eatery that specializes in Hawaiian Regional Cuisine and is a favorite of the first couple.
The Obama party ordered off a special 5-course tasting menu for $75 a person — $105 per person with wine pairings for each course. Highlights included”Sassey Salad” and bacon-wrapped pork loin, one appetizer and a sample of three butters from three local dairies.

Email
Celebrities with 'Sole'
Robin Thicke's Advice for Aspiring Musicians 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Instead of leading by example she says “let them eat cake.”. They could care less about cost to the taxpayers.
Posted by: Kathy in Pa. | December 29, 2011, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
For people who decry “class warfare ” so much , the conservative’s constant attacks on the Obama ‘s vacations and down time (whilst conveniently ignoring all the previous egregiously wasteful vacationing of conservative presidents ) ring pretty hollow and partisan as well . What a bunch of loud-mouthed hypocrites ….
Posted by: davem | December 29, 2011, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Uh…maybe you should read up on just how much ole George W spent on vacations….he spent MORE than ANY other President….ever.
Posted by: Sandy | December 29, 2011, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Doesn’t matter how much either outfit cost, they are both equally ugly.
Posted by: Timme62 | December 29, 2011, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
This woman worked for a living; so did he. I’m sure she can “afford” to purchase her clothing. It’s funny how the media puts this crap out there for us to bite and choke on. Taxpayers aren’t dressing the “first lady”…Gee whiz… I could care less how much she “pays” for her dresses..My main issue “can I afford to retire” in 10 years..
Posted by: Wolffie | December 29, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
“here she is, sporting a dress that no unemployed American can afford.” Now I thought that was the reason to be employed –so you can afford things. No person in this country should be hungry or cold, but I do not feel that high fashion is a need of life.
Posted by: vissionquest | December 29, 2011, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
The same people attack her for not dressing up enough. How pathetic that ABC News gives attention such ridiculous stories attacking the family members of politicians.
Posted by: Adam | December 29, 2011, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Many designers will give clothes to people in the public eye. How many of you have heard that designer’s name before reading this article. Knowing that the Obamas would be photographed often, it’s the perfect opportunity for designers to make a move.
I don’t know that the dress was free, but it may have been.
Plus, that woman can’t win. If she bargain shops, people criticize her for not showing off American designers. When she wears designer clothes, other people criticize her for being hypocritical or not championing “the everyman.”
Posted by: jd | December 29, 2011, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
The media seems to forget that the Obamas are wealthy people and who with the grace of God would not spend taxpayers money on their personal wardrobes. Least we forget many designers donate clothes to the First Lady and to get the publicity for their clothing lines. I am sure Mrs. Obama does not buy or wear her clothes for our approval to each his own.
Inf
Posted by: Angela grace | December 29, 2011, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Now wait a minute. Nancy Reagan wore only the very best from top designers. She bought extremely expensive china for the WH in her lavish revamping of the aging structure (the WH, not Mrs. Reagan). “W” took so many extended vacation days at his ranch and elsewhere that it blitzes anything that the Obama’s have done. Also, Mrs. Obama was a very successful attorney, earning her own money. It’s not like she’s using her White House AmEx card to pay for this stuff!
Posted by: rich | December 29, 2011, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Oh come on now…she is not spending tax payer money on her clothes and what if she was. She is the First Lady and is entitled to it. Think about all the money Jackie spent on clothes etc. Every First Lady spends big bucks on clothes. Let the woman alone. You always have to complain about something!
Posted by: Retired | December 29, 2011, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
For crying out let the woman alone. I think we more important issues going on in this world than to critizce what the First Lady is wearing. Regardless, she and her husband are entitled to go on vacation. I guess the writer of this article didn’t have anything noteworthy to write about than to go on about this…tadatadatada.Let it go!
Posted by: reyab | December 29, 2011, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
GW Bush took many vacations….to his boring ranch in TEXAS! It was his private property and he preferred to mountain bike, clear brush, and soak in the beauty of the landscape. The Obama’s prefer to live it up and Michelle in particular. No one is saying they should not take vacations…but the Obama’s have a tin ear when it comes to public relations. Jetting off to Spain and Hawaii when most American will never visit those places reeks of poor taste and bad publicity. A great President would recongize this and curtail this kind of travel. Guess what…they just don’t care. Let them eat cake is right!
Posted by: Joe | December 29, 2011, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
First, let me say that I am not a fan of the Obamas in any way, shape or form. However, this article is ridiculous. She bought a dress in 2009 & is still wearing it. What’s the problem with that? No one who is unemployed can afford J Crew either. Purchasing these items helps keep other people employed. If those who can afford to spend money stop because other people can’t afford to spend, then even MORE people will become unemployed.
As for vacations, no President is ever really on vacation. They are President 24/7/365. It doesn’t matter WHERE they are, they are still the President & are still working. The only difference is that stupid, fluff stuff isn’t filling up their calendars. With technology today, there is no reason the President has to be in Washington for anything. Besides, what is wrong with going home for Christmas?
I can find a lot of things to complain about the Obamas, but clothing and so-called vacations aren’t two of them.
Posted by: wryview | December 29, 2011, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
I don’t care what she spends on clothing – the taxpayer isn’t paying for it and I sure don’t want her going around in torn jeans. I do care about the class warfare that is being waged so people, remember – when Obama says he’s one of us, HE ISN’T, never has been and never will be. I also care about the stupid two month extensions of supposed tax breaks, the increase of the debt ceiling, the continued overspending by the Government, the lack of action by the Government. These are much more important than clothing.
Posted by: Give Me a Break | December 29, 2011, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
The Obamas as well as all the other politicians in Washington, DC, Democrat and Republican, need to be forced to live like those of us whose lives have been destroyed by their incompetence with our country and our tax money. None of them give a damn about those of us who basically end up paying for all of their extravagances and we can’t even afford groceries and heat for the winter. You know, I’ve always heard that “Every dog has his day.” I hope their day comes and comes soon!
Posted by: living in poverty | December 29, 2011, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
I like her dresses. She doesn’t look good in those skirt and blouses with wild colors.
Posted by: Kathy | December 29, 2011, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Just like any celebrity… why do people assume she even pays for this stuff? Designers and fashion houses gift items to celebrities for the sole purpose of having them photographed in it and creating more press for themselves. Find something new to complain about.
Posted by: Get over it | December 29, 2011, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
But she does spend taxpayers money when she has to take all her separate plane rides or trips to Spain. Lavish is appropriate to describe her marathon spending.
Posted by: Joanne | December 29, 2011, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Give it a rest people! Yes the same people that are knocking her were knocking her for wearing jeans and sneakers! And yes designers give stuff to her to wear for publicity. Where were all of you when GW was on permanent vacations and spending tons of money as well as Nancy Reagan! And she is wear US designers…Nancy didn’t! It’s unreal. I have never seen such hate and anger. HYPOCRITES!
Posted by: Barb | December 29, 2011, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
When I first read this story I wondered; “how many people will be googling Sophie Theallet’s name.” I have never heard of the gal myself. I’m sure her website is now getting numerous hits. Then I looked to the writer (because most certainly this is a “hit” piece) and noticed a woman of color. Okay…I’m going to go there… it struck me as odd BUT she is entitled to her opinion. Then I went to this Naked DC website and discovered… a blog? ABCNews, you’re kidding me, right? Well, maybe Lichina and Emily Zanotti (blogster) are friends and she wanted to steer some traffic her way. Then THIS is what I learn about Emmy; “In all seriousness, Emily is a politically (very) libertarian writer and media strategist living in Chicago…She’s a seasoned political operative who has worked for several organizations blamed for astroturfing a variety of grassroots political movements on both sides of the aisle and been a fixture at political events for years.” Really ABCNews Editors… giving credibility to a blog that gets no more than 50 hits a day? Here’s test for everybody (to show how insignificant this piece is) go over to google and type in naked dc. The blog doesn’t even register on the first page. Finally, Mrs. Obama buys her own clothes. She has worn lots of inexpensive fashions (did wonders for J Crew) and can afford finer things too. What’s the issue? Part of the job! As Mrs. Bush (in her book) said their accountant told President Bush once all the bills came in; “Its expensive being the President.”
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 29, 2011, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
With all the scandals Obama is involved in…..Solyndra, Lightsquared, MF Global Fast & Furious
I bet she has found a way to skim her clothing off the top with taxpayer money
She cares NOTHING about the middle class
Posted by: Left wing dumb | December 29, 2011, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Guess it’s a slow news day. You know the media starts all this anger…it spreads it…by posting stories like this. The media is a huge part of our problem.
Posted by: Barb | December 29, 2011, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Really? Do we really care how much she spends on clothing or where they eat? They pay for it themselves. I am no where near the income tax bracket of the Obamas, but I have been know to purchase one or two really good pieces of clothing and accessories and I have also gone out to very pricey restaurants on occasion. They were treats for me and I paid for them myself. Let’s look to something more important like jobs and the economy. As for the Hawaiian vacation, it is where Obama’s hometown is located. Are we to start criticizing all the politicians for vacationing in their home state? It’s just lucky for him that Hawaii is his home state and not Alaska. Not to disparage Alaska, but if I have to go to either one in the dead of winter, I would probably pick Hawaii.
Posted by: Catherine | December 29, 2011, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
I could care less what she’s wearing, but $4M on a vacation on taxpayers’ dime does tick me off. And YES, it ticked me off when Bush did it as well.
Posted by: Kristi | December 29, 2011, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Come on! The MSM are well aware of this reality. They are aware when she publishes slop to the little people about her ‘bargain’ clothes. That is just PR deception. She expects to wear expensive clothes because it is owed to her for her life growing up on the South Side of Chicago. Entitlement is the way to understand this woman. If you think that you owe her something then you will either ignore this truth or attack those who remind you of it.
Posted by: Perplexed | December 29, 2011, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
As long as she waste Obam’s money and not ours who cares. As far as their tax payer funded extravagant vacations, it is most likely cheaper for us if they stay there full time. That will keep them away from Pelosi and Reid. That alone will save us trillions.
Posted by: specialty57 | December 29, 2011, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Personally I don’t care what she spends on her clothes, it is her money (no matter how ugly, she should fire her stylist) but she give the appearance of not caring and it’s like a slap in the face of so many people who are suffering and appearances are everything. Perhaps the whole family could exercise some self control and lay off the expensive clothes, vacations etc until the general public is doing better
Posted by: samhiguchi | December 29, 2011, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Why would anyone believe she paid for it, I’m sure designers are begging to have her wear their clothes at no cost
Posted by: So What | December 29, 2011, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Hey her husband got a bill passed so you can afford pizza once a month what else could you want? Enjoy your two months of pizza and quit your complaining.
Posted by: broke | December 29, 2011, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Let’s blame it on Bush because he vacation so much that all of you idiots don’t see through your thick eyeglasses of bias, when Bush went to his ranch everybody said he is out of touch with the people but yet we have a big spender in Obama (5 Trillion dollars in 3 years) that’s just fine for them to go to Hawaii to vacation because they deserve it specially when Michelle can’t wait for her husband to finish the peoples business before she jetted off to this destination. HYPOCRISY!!
Posted by: Juan | December 29, 2011, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Kathy in PA – for the past three years, we’ve heard the liberal media blast Sarah Palin about her makeup and wardrobe on the campaign trail and Gingrich’s credit card balances. They make the Republicans look like irresponsible spenders, while the President plays 90 rounds of golf in 3 years and Michelle Obama is dressed to the nines on the government dole.
You talk about class welfare, but this meme is coming from the Democrats. They talk about the “99%” and how they are losing ground in America. How would you feel if someone you knew tried to convince you that you needed to do more to help the poor, while his wife is clinging to his arm in a monk coat and diamonds? You would dismiss this person immediately. And that’s what the people of America will do in the next election.
This President loves to portray “victims” around the US due to income inequality and demands that we all need to tighten our belts to get through “the biggest recession since the Great Depression”. However, aren’t true leaders people who lead by example? This President just continues down his community organization roots and blasts anyone who doesn’t follow his hollow words.
Posted by: djaymick | December 29, 2011, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
I agree with Rich that compared to Nancy Reagan, she doesn’t spend that much. She is expected to dress well and she has a flare for it. She is a pretty woman and I enjoy seeing what she is wearing.
Posted by: LW | December 29, 2011, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
She sould NOT wear anything that focuses on her waist or 3/4 sleeves – she has the oddest body.
She should only wear clothes from designers if they give them to her in order to market themselves.
Celebs do that all of the time, they do not own all of those foo-foo gowns and jewelry.
Posted by: Sue | December 29, 2011, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
They both earned very good incomes before he became president.
God has financially blessed them . Why should they live as if He had not. Also they are givers & receivers. Stop hating and maybe you too will be financially blessed.
Posted by: jackie | December 29, 2011, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
The First Sow is still ugly with a bad attitude. Apparently her suckophants have never heard the expression “You can’t make a silk purse from a Sow’s Ear.”
Posted by: Jack | December 29, 2011, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Nancy Reagan had each dress designed exclusively for her from Oscar De La Renta, Bill Blass, Carolina Herrera. Wouldn’t be caught dead in anything from the GAP or Macys. As First Lady of California, she refused to live in the Governors mansion so the people of California had to build a new mansion for the Governor that was built on the scale of the White House. It had an indoor bowling alley, and indoor pool and all the amenities she felt she was accustomed to. CALIFORNIANS PAID FOR NANCY TO LIVE IN THE LAP OF LUXURY. It took 7 years to build the thing and it was being finished just as Reagan was to leave office. Jerry Brown, who became Governor at that point, rented a 2 bedroom apartment, sold the fleet of 6 Cadillacs and that house and used a Dodge from the state cars available at that time. Now I know that there are some of you who think that Mrs. Obama should be wearing rags and out picking cotton and servicing her master but she is the First Lady of this country so get over it.
Posted by: howdymo1 | December 29, 2011, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
To those complaining, you DO realize that President Obama was BORN in Hawaii so he is just going home for the holidays. For those Republicans in need of a geography lesson it is also part of the United States. The entire Congress is out on vacation so why shouldn’t he enjoy some down time with his friends. As for the clothes, who cares? If she can afford to buy them more power to her. She is helping the American fashion industry.
Posted by: afmcalax | December 29, 2011, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Its funny how so many people rant that G.W. Bush vacationed in Texas and champion him for staying “in country” yet they ALL tend to forget (or they just don’t realize) that Hawaii is a U.S. STATE. Its not like its some lavish foreign country, and that “estimated by media outlets” figure of $4 million dollars for their vacation is being put right back into the American economy…..they are traveling domestically you know. So lets break down the 4 mil….paying secret service employees (US Jobs) paying the White House Press corp to travel with them (99% US jobs) paying the hotel and its staff to house W.H.P.C (More American Jobs being paid and $ into American economy) add in the money the entire traveling White House will spend while in Hawaii, thus pumping up the US economy and the Hawaiian State economy. Why waste time crying about it?
Posted by: Manda | December 29, 2011, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
She paid that much for those pieces of junk. Both outfits look like she bought them in a second hand thrift shop. I smell a refund! In any event, to pay that much for outfits, when she touts her frugal shopping reputation, is really a slap in the face for everyone in the US counting pennies to make ends meet. These two have no shame. Can’t wait to get rid of them!
Posted by: Vicki | December 29, 2011, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
I am a white woman who gladly and with much joy voted for a black man as president, I do not feel like I made a bad choice. If this president and his first lady were good ole’ boy white men then nobody would be a saying a damn word about how much their clothes cost, how many vacations they took or how much those vacations cost….there are many Americans who need to get a grip and find something else to gripe about…like the fact that there are children living in poverty or who are homeless…
Posted by: Donna | December 29, 2011, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Is ABC implying that the tax-payers buy the first lady’s clothes? Or that she is using campaign funds (ala Palin) to buy her clothes? And this from a website more devoted to embarrassing celebrity photographs than it is to news.
It’s no surprise that with the choice of which section to put it in, Politics or Fashion, ABC chose Entertainment/Celebrities. Hire some adults ABC.
Posted by: EatRunDive | December 29, 2011, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
I do not agree with the liberals on most areas except the excellent taste in fashion for the First Lady Michelle Obama. American women should not be walking around all disheveled, uncombed hair, second hand clothes, clothes that don’t fit and look like they don’t care one bit about themself. One would think being a career women would change all that but the opposite is true. The more women work the worse they look. They look beat up and mean. Michelle Obama’s style shows an amazing thoughtful woman who knows she is a wife and mother that deserves respect in her family. That is so refreshing and what a blessing for her daughters. This is not about the cake. That is a different story.
Posted by: Mystery | December 29, 2011, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
SHE SPENT HOW MUCH? I can’t believe she spent her own money. Why that’s criminal when you can get your party, or big sponsors, or donations (that you can actually keep). Why, she probably even does her own hair. They probably paid for their own dinner at their favorite restaurant. Just can’t imagine that. Where’s that going to get her? No wonder she shops at Target so much. The woman just needs an agent.
Posted by: Sarah Palin | December 29, 2011, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Has anyone actually confirmed that she BOUGHT these? Designers frequently send outfits to celebrities/public figures in hopes of drawing attention to their brand. For all we know, she didn’t spend a penny on either of these outfits.
Posted by: Allie | December 29, 2011, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
OMG! what is the matter with all these people with their negative thoughts on the President and the first lady? I am sure they’re not the first politicans to ever go over board on spending. When all those other president and first lady does it no one complain. If you live in a glass house don’t throw stones. People please get a life, and stop criticizing the president.
Posted by: ladybug | December 29, 2011, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Oh, get over yourselves. She is allowed to purchase and wear whatever she chooses . What woman doesn’t want nice things? I have a few things that I splurged on, and things that I got at Target or Old Navy as well. Heck, I’m on a strict budget like many Americans, but I won’t complain if those wit more want to spend more as it is their perogative. If you really want to gripe, gripe about the Hollywood “celebrity” crowd who flaunt material things and spend obscene amounts of money on absolute junk, like $500 baby clothes. The President himself doesn’t make that much money, and is much more modest thatn they are. Now, for those of you with political issues who for whatever ridiculous reason feel that the country would be better off with this crop of fools running for president right now: go ahead and vote for them and see what will happen to your few pennies you say you are counting.
Posted by: msyellarose | December 29, 2011, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
I for one EXPECT our nation’s First Lady to dress well. The Obama’s are financially sucessful people. Are we to expect themt to look like slobs because some people are out of work?
Posted by: hadtochimein | December 29, 2011, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
“Has anyone actually confirmed that she BOUGHT these? Designers frequently send outfits to celebrities/public figures in hopes of drawing attention to their brand. For all we know, she didn’t spend a penny on either of these outfits.”
It would be illegal any other way. Nancy Reagan was caught up in a flap when a designer allowed her to “borrow” an outfit. Personally, I have no problem with that but maybe it is some conflict of interest whatever. All First Ladies (and Presidents) buy their own clothes and as I pointed out earlier President GW’s accountant informed him that “its expensive to be the President.”
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 29, 2011, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
She has some high-priced fashion items; she has some low-priced fashion items. She also had a lucrative career of her own, and has a husband who made a fortune from the books that he wrote before he became president. Are taxpayers paying for her dresses? The article doesn’t claim that. And she’s wearing things “no unemployed American can afford”? So WHAT? She’s got money of her own and an employed husband. Does the idiot who made that statement really think that the wife of the president of the free world should limit herself to clothes from Target? No one would be saying these things about her if she didn’t already have a tendency to patronize lower-price clothing brands to begin with. And if Michelle Obama’s taking flak now for her fashions, what will people say about Callista Gingrich should her husband be elected? This just isn’t a story.
Posted by: JrzWrld | December 29, 2011, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
I don’t care who designed it or what it costs. The clothes are ill-fitting and make her look frumpy and aged 10 years. She needs to go back to Target, Sears, and J Crew.
Posted by: sarah | December 29, 2011, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Good Grief!!!! I can’t believe this! Of course she’s going to be scrutinized–she’s the first lady. But, if she “dresses down” everyone complains that she’s not “elegant”. And, when she honors our country by wearing proper dress, she is talked down. She’s the first lady! She’s very beautiful! She could have worn pant suits with sequins on it and a pair of JC’s! But, she hit the nail right on the head… she’s not overdressed and she’s not underdressed. She’s gorgeous!
Posted by: Chloe | December 29, 2011, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
at that cost it should look good. she looks like crap
Posted by: terry | December 29, 2011, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Um they pay for their own clothes….get real people. who cares
Posted by: smoochie | December 29, 2011, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Callista Gingrich looks like a mannequin. And I thought Mrs. McCain was plastic and owned by Disney?
Posted by: sarah | December 29, 2011, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Since when has the first families wardrobe been “Tax payer” funded. There are some really dumb people in this world. lol And I guess the President is supposed to travel commercial since the OBAMAS has taken over the WHITE house. I wonder where all this “park Tax Payer Funded Air Force One” talk was with all the other Presidents before Obama. This has to be one of the dumbest articles written. lol
Posted by: jstate83 | December 29, 2011, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
When she spends taxpayer money, it is our business. When she goes on these trips separately from her husband it costs us extra money in a big time way. That is an unnecessary extravagance. It is not appreciated. I don’t owe her anything. She wasn’t elected President. A lot of this ‘you owe me something’ came from hillary. Somehow she reasoned that we elected her co-President so she could spend as she saw fit.
Posted by: Perplexed | December 29, 2011, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Barb…you got something right for a change!! The media is responsible for non-stories like this one that get people wound-iup and angered! They are indeed a huge problem.
Posted by: Gunner_1959 | December 29, 2011, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Give me a break.. She’s the wife of the President of the United States. She should be dressed up. If she dressed down, people would rag on her for not dressing her part.
Come on people – aren’t there more important things to deal with?
Posted by: Bentley G | December 29, 2011, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
The first lady needs to slim down. She looks larger than her husband’s body. The size of her posterior is very large. Her style of clothes does not impress me since she keeps ignoring her weight problem. At 5′ 11” she should weight no more than 140 lbs. to look well.
Posted by: SUZANNE | December 29, 2011, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
I will be so glad when a president that looks like what some of you are used to seeing is back in the Whiehouse. Maybe then some of you fearful,disrespectful,ignorant people will stop coming out with these ignorant and sometimes racist comments. The man that talked about Michelle’s butt was ignorant enough and then he has has the audacity to apologize as if someone will believe he’s sincere.He said what he meant and meant what he said. No need to be fake and phoney with a lame apology.
Posted by: vanessapenney | December 29, 2011, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
President Barack and Michelle Obama are both beautiful, elegant and brilliant people. Thank God, He is Leader of our Free World. They have both done phenomenal work to bring this Great Nation out of the flithy, miry pit that the former Republican Cabal dragged us into during eight horrific years. President Obama will go down in history as one of the greatest Presidents America had ever had. He has already won the 2012 election, thanks to the pathetic Republican/ Conservative candidates being offered up to the Nation. President Barack Hussein Obama, every time I read the vicious comments from the racist lynch mongering redneck bigots, I send you money. Many of us do. We will always love and support you and your fabulous family. OBAMA WINS IN 2012!
Posted by: MISTY YEPS | December 29, 2011, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
The Obama’s are attacked for breathing. This has NOTHING to do with the economy, it has NOTHING to do with how the country is being run, it has NOTHING to do with anything but just another attack from the spitefull disgruntled LOOSERS of the 2008 election. PATHETIC.
Posted by: dan | December 29, 2011, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Just think of all the 99% she could help by selling the dresses. I mean, we just want to spread the wealth around.
Posted by: Bill | December 29, 2011, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
I don’t think she got her money’s worth. Those dresses don’t look like anything special. Especially the skirt. It looks more like she shops at Goodwill. She doesn’t have much fashion sense. The dress she wore to the inauguration looked like she took it off a mummy.
Posted by: Moonhill | December 29, 2011, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
The first lady needs to slim down. She looks larger than her husband’s body. The size of her posterior is very large. Her style of clothes does not impress me since she keeps ignoring her weight problem. At 5′ 11” she should weight no more than 140 lbs. to look well.
Posted by: SUZANNE | December 29, 2011, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
______________________________________________________________________________
Everybody that is 5’11 should weight 140. Some can carry more weight. Not everybody wants a bone. Even dogs wants some meat. Also the article talks about how much her dress cost in 2009. REALLY! Please she is STILL wearing the thing. What do you picky people want? For her to dress in, a barrel. Then I’m sure you would say or question how much she paid for that. She is the 1st Lady of the USA.
Posted by: Angy | December 29, 2011, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Tax payers don’t pay for the clothing the first family choose to wear. The President does receive a salary with the job, and family expenses are paid from his earnings. Mrs. Obama is on public view infinitely more often than the average American. She may spend what the average American considers a lot on one dress or gown, but she also doesn’t wear them one time and forget about it. The article mentions one dress she purchased in 2009; you can bet your bibby she’s worn that dress many times. Just as often as she’s been photographed in “expensive” dresses, she’s been photographed in work-out clothes, shorts and T-shirts. Furthermore, she’s a very tall woman and it’s very difficult for a 6 foot tall woman to find clothes off the rack, especially dresses.
Posted by: amn | December 29, 2011, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
It didn’t Michelle very long at all, once she got to the White house, to start living like she was in Beverly Hills…$2,000.00 dresses is a great way to stay in touch with the average american house wife…she couldn’t care less as long as SHE is living like a queen…
Posted by: RalphF | December 29, 2011, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
DAN…I so agree with you……just the mear of existence of the Obama’s is obviously a problem to some of these people….according to them everything is wrong with the Obamas…..And I mean EVERYTHING!!! I wonder why….hmmmm
Posted by: TW | December 29, 2011, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I don’t care as long as it’s their money she’s spending and not ours.
Posted by: newcountryman | December 29, 2011, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Mrs. Obama is the Queen of America and she should have a nice dress. What is wrong with the people? Are people jealous, stupid or so politically agitated they can’t see the dresses from the trees. Did you ever buy a nice new dress? Why shouldn’t she? Even the poorest person on the planet can understand the need for that.
Posted by: reubenr | December 29, 2011, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
TW and Dan, I’ll tell you why everything is wrong with the Obamas! They promised hope and change and instead brought this country to the lowest point its ever been in recent history! Simply Google the various confidence polls out there and the forecast is it won’t be getting any better under his watch. He’s toast in 2012!
Posted by: Gunner_1959 | December 29, 2011, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Obama-basher, line up!
Posted by: Steve | December 29, 2011, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
I find it amazing how people are worried about how much Mrs. Obama spends on her clothes or how much their Christmas vacation cost. They were millionaires BEFORE he became president and he didn’t expect to do that since the only reason he wrote his books were to pay back the student loans he and Michelle had from college AND law school to which are paid in full. I wonder how many of you have taken a vacation or brought something very expensive and your student is in default. Don’t worry I’ll wait.
Posted by: Mz. Common Sense | December 29, 2011, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
DAN: What are you implying? Are the obamas exempt from any criticism unlike every other President and First Lady before them? Do they merit some exception? If so, why?
Posted by: Perplexed | December 29, 2011, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
TW – probably the same problem that many people had with GW. I wonder why. Hmmmm….
Posted by: Douglas | December 29, 2011, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
“for the past three years, we’ve heard the liberal media blast Sarah Palin about her makeup and wardrobe on the campaign trail…”
Never did nor never thought she was at fault and I am by no means a fan! It was her handlers. Like what time did she have to shop?
“and Gingrich’s credit card balances.”
Personally never understood the whole brouhaha about this and Tiffanys. Its his money and bills and had/has nothing to do with me.
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 29, 2011, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Gunner_1959 — President Obama changed as much as he could during the first two years while faced with an onslaught of flat out lies and misrepresentations coming out from the of the FOX/GOP media wing. The second two years has been a total wash due to constant obstruction. Change does not come easy with record filibusters and Limbaugh Lemmings willing to throw the economy under the bus for political points.
Posted by: dan | December 29, 2011, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Give it a rest people. You compalin because she shows her arms, you complain because she shops at Target, you complain because she has some nice clothes. This particular dress is from 2009 – - it cost $2,000 at that time – - she and her husband are more wealthy than the average person. She can afford it. The “people” of the US are not paying for her clothes. When a woman in the limelight wears something, other women see that and want it. You know, like Jackie Onassis (Kennedy), Barbara Bush, Hillary Clinton, Lady Ga Ga and Katy Perry. It happens
Posted by: Browsingguy | December 29, 2011, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
“Gunner_1959 — President Obama changed as much as he could during the first two years while faced with an onslaught of flat out lies and misrepresentations coming out from the of the FOX/GOP media win…”
In addition Gunner your statement is just not supported by the actual facts at this time. Please feel free to share your views regarding how the country is worse. Clearly given the pathetic Republican roster the mission is to prove “that anybody can beat Obama.” I definitely don’t agree but we shall see.
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 29, 2011, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Dan, didn’t you mean to say Obama “charged” as much as he couldduring the first two years with President Pelosi and VP Reid?
Posted by: specialty57 | December 29, 2011, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
The Obama pretend to care about the 99% but in actuality are the 1% most dangerous because they are elitests who have never produced anything of value for society.
Mrs. Reagan was attacked mercilessly by the press for her purchases while Michelle Antoinette is defended or the purchases mostly ignored. W spent time at his ranch but the total cost of his ranch time was less is eight years than the Obama’s in three. He always went to one of two locations owned by him and it did not require constant setup for operations. He and Laura almost always travelled together unlike Barack and Michelle who require separately planes just someone is not inconvenienced by hours or a couple days.
Posted by: Allen | December 29, 2011, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Where is the OWS crowd protesting the excessive ness of these elitests? Where are the OWS crowd protesting Pelosi’s $15,000 a night expenditure per night for a suite in Hawaii? It is because Sorus and Axelrod are not paying them to AstroTurf there!
Posted by: Allen | December 29, 2011, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
How utterly ridiculous! Leave the woman alone! Why are some people are such haters! All they do is criticize! They would find fault with something, no matter what the Obama’s do.
Posted by: Glorrio | December 29, 2011, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Every President has done the same things, along with his wife, but because it’s Obama it’s a problem, let alone, “news”.
Posted by: poopedCheetah | December 29, 2011, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
I hope some of you folks are taking your blood pressure medication since you appear close to stroking out. They are vacationing in his home state with friends and family and they buy their own clothes. Sheesh.
Posted by: nw mom | December 29, 2011, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
As long as Obama’s $2000 dress, Pelosi’s $10,000/night room, etc. isn’t OUR money, who really cares?
Posted by: newcountryman | December 29, 2011, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
I don’t care if she wears a feed sack made of gold and they stay on vacation for another two years, it will save us money. However I think they could show a little bit more class when so many are doing without right now. Other than Reagan cleaning up the Carter mess, Clinton, and Bush 1 and 2 had good economies so it was not noticed as much. People will complain when they are down and at this moment we have a record number of them. This is not a good time to spend piles of money when 4 million bucks could help some families have a decent meal.
Posted by: specialty57 | December 29, 2011, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
specialty57 —
Funny how you guys conveniently forget the 8 (EIGHT) years Bush “charged” , 6 (SIX) of those years with a REPUBLICAN congress. Funny how people that voted for and backed Bush %100 percent and even called for four more years started disavowing their failures and calling themselves independents. Limbaugh Lemmings are nothing more than a hypocritical joke.
Posted by: dan | December 29, 2011, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Allen, that is a good question. If the OWS are serious they should be in Hawaii right now. Maybe Soros would not pay their way and besides, it would look bad for his man.
Posted by: specialty57 | December 29, 2011, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Dan, yes bush overspent and Obama makes him look like a rookie. Dan have you ever googled George Soros and his ties with Obama? I would assume Google is not affiliated with any political group. Do that and come back and tell us why you are such a big Obama fan. The Soros Obama “agenda” is not a pretty sight. Soros has pulled it off in other countries and has his man in DC but we must not let them succeed. The ultimate goal is the New world order. It is the Soros dream and he calls the shots.
Posted by: specialty57 | December 29, 2011, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
In another post someone said Obama and wife are entitled to go on vacation. Is that a fact? Well I’ve heard that Obama (and wife I’m sure) have gone on vacation more than any other president in history. That has cost taxpayers several million on each trip.
Posted by: Lynne | December 29, 2011, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Yes, Lynne. It’s a fact, they are allowed to go on vacation. And even though it’s nice you’ve heard Obama has gone on vacation more than any other president in history, it’s laughable to think folks belive this: it’s true, you can find anything online. Like this:
[Bush spent 1,020 days of his presidency on vacation. To put this into context, John F. Kennedy spent fewer days in office, 1000, than George W. Bush spent on vacation. Bush spent 487 days at Camp David, 490 days at his Crawford ranch, and 43 days in Kennebunkport. George W. Bush spent 69 days in Crawford during his first year in office. In contrast, according to FactCheck.org, Obama spent all, or part of, 26 days of his first year in office on vacation. This was less than all three previous Republican presidents, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush, but more than the two previous Democratic presidents, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.]
Posted by: So What | December 29, 2011, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Probably didn’t cost nearly as much as Nancy Regan’s redecoration of the White House – which “was” paid by taxpayers.
Posted by: yeah.i.said.it | December 29, 2011, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
@So What … Please don’t confuse the children with “facts” … lol!
Posted by: yeah.i.said.it | December 29, 2011, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Slow news day??
Posted by: Greg | December 29, 2011, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
“She claims to be a champion of the poor and a fellow bargain shopper, but yet, here she is, sporting a dress that no unemployed American can afford.”
I didn’t realize that people were supposed to base their purchases on what unemployed people can/cannot afford. SMH.
Posted by: Gimmeabreak78 | December 29, 2011, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
@Reyhab if she wasnt such a hypocrite with her Target photo ops and telling Americans what to eat while she is eating a $260 bacon wrapped pork dinner they would leave her alone but when you have that faux bull s coming out of both of their mouths they deserve every bit of this.
Posted by: MARY | December 29, 2011, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
But,but,but,but, what about Bush, and Reagan ? I just love to read all of those Obama apologist making excuses for such an typical elitist liberal family ! Can you say HYPOCRITES LIBERALS !
Posted by: Seriously ? | December 29, 2011, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
They get this crap for free, you people are dumber than a box of rocks. You would complain if she wore Target crap too. Get real already!
Posted by: GetReal | December 29, 2011, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
The Obama’s lived this way before they moved into the White House. Why should they be expected to change?
Posted by: bodacia | December 29, 2011, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
GETREAL….They get this crap for free…….Then it belongs to us stupid a## taxpayers ! There are limits on gifts to these type of people !
Posted by: No Way ! | December 29, 2011, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Laura Bush used to pay $30,000 for a dress and Mrs. Reagan too so what’s the point of no “news” here? There is a bunch missing from this post and most of it is facts.
Posted by: Maritza | December 29, 2011, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Sounds just like the kind of people Mr. Obama has been complaining about. Occupy Washington.
Posted by: Harry | December 29, 2011, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
I watched all the First Ladies styles and I never wondered one time what they paid for them. I would think that Mrs. Obama pays for her own wardrobe. Certainly if they must pay for their personal grocerys in the White House, she pays for her clothes. She was dressing long before she became first lady and had quite a salary as well. Why is it necessary for people to assume that taxpayers pay for all that they do, eat, wear and everything else. They were not poverty striken. He ran for President, remember. That cost money and as the news is now showing you, if you aren’t wealthy, you can’t run for office and especially for president. Besides I don’t think the people blogging here pay the kind of taxes that could afford her wardrobe. Stop watching Fox News. They are not poor. Now get a life.
Posted by: Khrish | December 29, 2011, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
I am very fond of Mrs. Obama, but she is no fashion plate. I would not have paid $10.00 for that dress and I would not take the skirt if someone gave it to me for free.
Posted by: midfield91 | December 29, 2011, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
All of Michelle’s taste is in her mouth.
Posted by: sandalwood | December 29, 2011, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Well since our taxpayer dollars are used to pay for wardrobes that look like this, she might as well shop at wal-mart. At least when Nancy Reagan, Laura Bush and Jackie O spent our money on clothes, you can tell the difference. BTW, nobody in the WH spend their own money. They turn in all personal effects when they check in for four years.
Posted by: DJ | December 29, 2011, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Odd, I don’t recall there ever being an article of this sort on Laura Bush. Laura that took yearly girlfriend vacations I might add. I guess she dressed in rags. I’d imagine this designer gave her this piece in 2009 and when they leave the WH it will stay behind. There are laws.
Posted by: lexingtonlady | December 29, 2011, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
And when was there such a “HUGE” issue when the other First Ladies were in the White House? Go check how much George W. Bush’s wife’s clothes cost & how they were paying for them & then write an article.
Please use your time to write something useful other than this crap.
Posted by: Educate90 | December 29, 2011, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Doesn’t anyone else realize that most of Michelle Obama’s wardrobe is gifted to her by the designers who make the clothing?
Posted by: Mobalajee | December 29, 2011, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
How much of that 4 million involved security? The media is quick to judge but we must take measures to ensure our First Lady and the President are kept safe. There are a lot of crazies out there that would not hesitate to attack if either was caught alone. Whereas you and I can just jump in a car and go, the Obamas have to follow protocol and procedure. The government is better off cracking down on people that manipulate and abuse our welfare system. They cost us more money.
Posted by: Aquia | December 29, 2011, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Since when is the First Lady expected to shop at Target? Do you think Laura Bush or Nancy Reagan ordered their clothes from Sears? Although Mrs. Obama can well afford to buy anything she likes, most of her fashions are gifted to her by the designers and then donated afterwards. George and Laura Bush took far more vacations than the Obamas, but they were fortunate to have luxurious “family compounds” in Texas and Maine as their destinations. The Obamas only have a house in Chicago that’s not exactly ideal for a winter vacation. Give them a break. You’re all a bunch of nasty idiots.
Posted by: Miss Macy | December 29, 2011, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Haters. You poor miserable peasants are just jealous of the president and his family. For God’s sake, he is the president, he works hard, and he deserves a god vacation. End of story. I wonder how much taxpayers had to coughed out for Bush’s excessive vacations.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | December 30, 2011, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Did all of you RW’ers complain when Nancy Reagan flew her hairdresser from CA to DC at taxpayer expense? $2k was a drop in the bucket for her to spend for a dress. She wore $25,000 worth of clothes to Reagan’s inauguration ceremony and inaugural ball and that was 30 years ago! Michelle Obama is downright frugal compared to the saintly Reagans’ but of course, nobody would complain about them.
The $4m cost of their vacation is the total cost, however, the only portion that is paid for by the taxpayers is the same as every other President–their security and travel. For the idiot who talks about them going to exotic places like Hawaii, you’re obviously unaware that it is the President’s home state and it’s nothing new for the family as they’ve spent Christmas there since they were married.
Why don’t you all try to find something worth complaining about, like the outrageous amounts spent on campaigns by BOTH parties? If we had publicly funded campaigns with every candidate receiving the same amount, nothing more, we’d have far less favors owed to corporate donors since they’d no longer be dictating who gets elected via their hefty donations. That’s worth speaking about, not the First Lady’s wardrobe, which is either paid for by her or given to her.
Posted by: Kate | December 30, 2011, 1:39 am 1:39 am
ALLEN,
You might want to check your facts because Dubya took more vacation time than any other President with a total of 1042 days in 8 years. President Obama has taken a total of 87 days so far and President Bush had a total of 278 days on vacation by this point in his Presidency. He spent 497 days total in Texas and 480 days at Camp David with the remainder at the family vacation home in Maine. Don’t bother with the nonsense about Bush allegedly being on a “working vacation” while in TX as that was spin put out by the WH and repeated by the media to counter the extreme number of vacation days that he took.
Posted by: Kate | December 30, 2011, 2:02 am 2:02 am
Well why not!!! The Obama’s have spent hundreds of millions on vacations, why shouldn’t the first lady spend a few hundred thousand of her hard earned tax payer money on a nice wardrobe??? After all, she only has a few more months left before the party will be over and the Republicans will be moving into the White House!
Posted by: BIG JIMMY | December 30, 2011, 2:45 am 2:45 am
How dare you question our first lady for her choice of clothes!
Posted by: Chloe | December 30, 2011, 6:15 am 6:15 am
This no big deal cus she get some of her clothes at places of Target too. So is ok to even out cost buys of low and high.
Posted by: Yochi | December 30, 2011, 6:21 am 6:21 am
____”Doesn’t matter how much either outfit cost, they are both equally ugly.”
POSTED BY: TIMME62 | DECEMBER 29, 2011, 12:25 PM 12:25 PM________________Your poor little heart must be burning up with jealousy.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | December 30, 2011, 6:26 am 6:26 am
Its so sad that this family is humiliating this counrty why people like myself are strugling to survive. they are just blowing our money and laughing all the way to the bank , so much for really trying to help this counrty. he as our president has made us poorer and made us look like fools to the rest of the world sad very sad.
Posted by: scott levesque | December 30, 2011, 8:32 am 8:32 am
A woman of color is writing this stuff about the First Lady?
Surely you do a disservice to women in general let alone women of color.
I’m sure you may have come across the work the First Lady has done with military families etc.
Take it up a notch and maybe your articles will reflect your level of intellect because
surely this does you no justice.
Posted by: indra | December 30, 2011, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Has the price of meals and wardrobe of any other President and First Lady been subject to such scrutiny? Come on bloggers and other Americans, enough already!!
Posted by: pauline | December 30, 2011, 9:21 am 9:21 am
O_o …You have got to be kidding me? Must not be anything else going on in America. The Obamas weren’t poor before they came into office. They BOTH had very good jobs, with very good pay, so if they want to spend THEIR money on nice clothing, then by all means, they have worked for it. And, what they mean by they can relate to hard working ppl, poor ppl, is that they didn’t have life handed to them on a silver platter, they went to school, got an education, and worked their way up to a life where they can afford to spend 2000 on a dress. Stop nit-picking everything that the president and his wife does, its not a good look.
Posted by: Keri | December 30, 2011, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Look Obamabots….it is true every first lady wears expensive clothing whether it has been purchased or loaned to them. What Obamabots miss is the fact that Michelle O. makes a big deal of pretending to be like, us, you know, the “little people”, “the unwashed masses”, by doing her shopping photo-ops at Target and claiming that she enjoys buying clothes at J.Crew.
The Obamas dine on lobster, Waygu Beef, ice cream cones, French fries, hamburgers, etc.,pizza, Chinese food, all the while with Dear Leader BO telling us “we”need to sacrifice and tighten our belts (do they tighten theirs with all that they stuff in their mouths?) and Michelle tells the kids to eat their peas and vegetables. And do any of you remember BO saying that Americans have become LAZY!!!!! These two are the BIGGEST HYPOCRITES and that is why they draw our ire.
Posted by: littleleers | December 30, 2011, 11:09 am 11:09 am
I don’t care what she or anyone else spends on their clothes. I think the point is that she should stop the pretend trips to Target and just own it. It’s OK! I don’t want the First Lady shopping at Target! It’s silly. I also tire of hearing that J. Crew is so affordable–I think a lot of people find it otherwise. Nancy Reagan wore designer clothes but didn’t pretend to be “just like us.” That’s the difference. Just own it without guilt and we’ll be fine! Really!
Posted by: Valerie | December 30, 2011, 11:16 am 11:16 am
KERI–you are spot on!
Posted by: Valerie | December 30, 2011, 11:19 am 11:19 am
My bad…I got the name wrong on last post. I meant LITTLELEERS…You are spot on!
Posted by: Valerie | December 30, 2011, 11:22 am 11:22 am
As far as I’m concerned, those designer clothes are ugly and I wouldn’t pay $20 for them let alone $2000. MO has bad taste.
Posted by: Jane | December 30, 2011, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
The Obama’s have spent more money on this Hawaiian holiday vacation than most people make in a life time of working! Their next vacation will begin Jan. 20th 2013………….Let them eat cake!
Posted by: BIG JIMMY | December 30, 2011, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Nancy Regan and Jackie Kennedy were both high fashion First Ladies and nobody complained. If Mrs. Obama wore chap and ugly cloths people would be saying “Oh, Mrs. Obama looked so bad. It is embarrassing for our First Lady to look so bad with all the other country’s wives looking so good and fashionable.” No matter what this woman wears or where they vacation people are going to complain.
Posted by: Loretta B | December 30, 2011, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Why does everyone think she paid for the dress, most women in the spotlight get their designer clothes for free. It is called advertising, they give it to someone who is famous. Who is more famous than she other than Kate Middleton(I am sure she is getting the same perk since marrying Prince William).. I don’t remember anyone complaining about Laura Bush.. That’s right no one cared because she was white… No one ever said the Obamas are poor. Tell me something if she did buy the dress how does that affect you? The President actually does get money for being the President.. SMH…Even if she never went on vacation and purchased Wal-Mart rags would the economy get better.. I THINK NOTTTTTTT!!!!!!
Posted by: kiyah | December 30, 2011, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
It’s not just her wardrobe. She has been costing taxpayers MILLIONS flying around all over the world on her expensive vacations and shopping sprees for several years. It’s indefensible especially given the historically bad economy while people are suffering to eat, the budget deficit is record breaking, and given Obama’s alleged populist stance. Michelle Obama has expressed very hateful attitudes towards the U.S. and this is probably her way of sticking it to people because she’s obsessed with her racist agenda and seems like a very angry person. Whatever Nancy Reagan did is irrelevant. That was 30 years ago during the go-go 80s. That’s really scraping for a justification for this outrageous spending.
Your justification is that Nancy Reagan spent money 30 years ago? I
Posted by: Drew | December 30, 2011, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
The issue isn’t so much that she wears all these fancy clothes. What’s more bothersome is the constant class warfare spiel Obama spews out, all the while they are living that 1% lifestyle. They call it ‘hypocrisy’. The libbies seem love to overlook that in their can-do-no-wrong leader.
Posted by: Barney | December 30, 2011, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Why did Judicial Watch have to sue the Obama administration to force them to release records detailing the cost of Michelle’s lavish and expensive trip to South Africa??? What did they have to hide??? Obviously they are living large on our dime while they tell us we are “getting lazy” and need to make “sacrifices”!!!
Posted by: whathappened08 | December 30, 2011, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
For crying out loud. . . . .She’s the wife of the President of the United States!! Do you really think Michelle Obama should be wearing clothes from J. Crew and Target???? Get real. Complaints about a dress that is two years old??. Jackie Kennedy was never seen in the same dress twice when she was First Lady, and certainly wouldn’t show up in public with a two-year-old dress. I’m sure you can find more important “issues” to report.
Posted by: MikkiGirl | December 30, 2011, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
These righties would bellyache if she shopped ay Walmart … if your “broke” and can’t make ends meet … don’t expect ANY president to make your life better.
Posted by: yeah.i.said.it | December 30, 2011, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
For pete’s sake this is the President and first lady of United States we are talking about. Is this writer representing Romney or some GOP candidate, who loves to equate the Obamas with the 1%. Romney was up to something similar when he called the President a french aristocrats called Marie Antoniente just to hide from his record as Bernie Maddoff of Bain Capital.
Posted by: Ben Emosivbe | December 31, 2011, 6:23 am 6:23 am
The Obama’s never claimed to be champions of the poor. They wouldn’t know what to say to the poor people of northern climate where fuel assistance has been cut by 60 % over the past 2 years. They did claim to be champions of the middle class but I think they tend toward the upper middle class bordering on ultra comfortable. Those that can afford to send their kids to private schools. I vote Democratic ticket all the way. Next year, (Happy New Year all!), I will hold my nose while I vote. The promise of change has definitely passed this woman with a long standing physical disability by. I wonder how many persons with disabilities he has working in the White House? Bill and Hillary Clinton has many including a couple of service dogs working along side their owners. Hillary, if you ran, I wouldn’t have to hold my nose! I wonder if the Kennedy clan will support Obama this time. They have always championed the poor, persons with disabilties…
Posted by: RosemaryTree | December 31, 2011, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
COME ON PEOPLE GET IT TOGETHER.IF YOU HAD THE MONEY THE OBAMAS HAVE YOU WOULD BUY WHATEVER YOU WANTED.GET A GRIP.I RECALL A FIRST LADY ( NOT SURE WHICH ONE I THINK GEORGE BUSH) SAYING WHAT EVER YOU BUY OR DO PERSONALLY (PARTIES ETC…) YOU PAY FOR OUT OF YOUR OWN POCKET.I AM UNEMPLOYED AND IF I HAD THE OBAMAS MONEY I WOULD GET WHAT I WANTED BECAUSE I WORKED FOR IT AND I DESERVE IT.PEOPLE WHAT YOU SHOULD BE COMPLAINING ABOUT IS THE WAY THE REPUBLICANS DO DONT BACK PRESIDENT OBAMA AND BLOCK EVER THING HE TRIES TO DO AND TRY TO DONE PLAY IT LIKE HE IS A SLACKER.PRESIDENT BUSH LEFT A MESS THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS TRIED TO CLEAN UP.MOST AMERICANS THINK OUR PRESIDENT IS HOUDINI OR HE HAS A MAGIC THAT CAN ERASE THE MESS IT TOOK BUSH 8 YEARS TO SCREW UP.ITS TIME TO BACK THE PRESIDENT THAT IS FOR THE PEOPLE NOT JUST THE PEOPLE WITH MONEY.
Posted by: YVETTE PITTS | December 31, 2011, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
This is such a ridiculous article. Laura Bush wasted tons of money on some stupid place settings. America is still racist and will continue to knit pick on the President and his beautiful wife. GET OVER IT!!!
Posted by: Yolanda | January 1, 2012, 12:44 am 12:44 am
You all have to be FREAKIN’ kidding me!!!!!! She is NOT and will NOT be the last First Lady to wear designer clothes!! Nancy Reagan, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Bush (1 and 2) all did the same thing but most of you kept you rat traps closed then…so heres a solution to the problem…keep you rat traps closed on this!!! Jeezz you would think folks had something better to do with their time than critique what someone wears…Good Ole USA!!!
Posted by: Anitra Brown | January 1, 2012, 7:18 am 7:18 am
It would not matter how much her clothes cost because they do not flatter her big frame and could hardly be considered “fashion.” Most of her clothes are ill-fitting and her style choices are in poor taste. She does not have the figure to wear tiny-waisted clothes and bold busy prints. I honestly do not understand the public’s romance with this woman’s sense of style –
She should take a lesson from Catherine – simpler, subdued, and classic.
Posted by: Karen | January 1, 2012, 11:49 am 11:49 am
And if Michelle Obama dressed down there would be a scathing article here announcing what a slob she is… it’s not a crime to buy nice clothes with your own money
Posted by: Jenny | January 1, 2012, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Nice to see ABC News maintaining its’ image as a joke by publishing a gossip story based on what’s being gossiped about by 1) “some media outlets” and 2) unnamed readers to a blog.
Posted by: CINDY SMITH | January 1, 2012, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
at least she repeats her clothes like most of us
Posted by: kathy | January 2, 2012, 12:42 am 12:42 am
T.J.Max? Target? She don’t shopped there?
Posted by: Joe | January 2, 2012, 7:52 am 7:52 am
I guess people forgot they were well off (financially) before they were the President and First Lady. So she’s wearing a dress most people find to be expensive. Ok….and??!! One day she wants to wear this stuff and Target the next. Everybody has their own version of expensive and cheap attire. Big whoopdie do! Find something else to report on please.
Posted by: Stephanie | January 2, 2012, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Jeez. What a waste. I wish I were special like them. NOT! Somehow or another I suspect that this type of behavior might ultimately cost them more than they realize. I say fire them from their present jobs and let him go organize some community somewhewre around CHicago again.
Posted by: Rodney Dotson | January 2, 2012, 10:46 am 10:46 am
There surely are more interesting topics to talk about. She AT TIMES stylishly dresses normal WITH HELP but personally, I don’t think she has a sense of style. My vote for elegance? Laura Bush – a classy and well-dressed First Lady – always.
Posted by: Marie | January 2, 2012, 10:47 am 10:47 am
I’m more concerned about what they are eating on vacations. Mrs. Obama is pushing for Americans to eat healthy . On the menu sassy salad sounds delicious but I’d say bacon wrapped pork loin is not as healthy and 3 different samples of butter. I wonder what the appetizer was. Hopefully healthy. A while back on a different vacation to Africa. She was eating deep fried foods. I’m sure she could have found a place with healthier choices.
Recently, I read an article that Mrs. Obama is changing the menu at some schools so kids can have healthy foods choices only. I got the impression that a lot of food was not eaten and thrown.
Posted by: Dorothy | January 2, 2012, 10:57 am 10:57 am
All presidents wives from the beginning have had the clothing which represented their taste. The same critics made statements about past first ladies nothing is new, just a bunch of haters and that was known long before the day she became first lady.
Posted by: james kent | January 2, 2012, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Let’s just be glad we don’t have to support a monarchy, like in the UK.
Posted by: Nadia | January 2, 2012, 11:16 am 11:16 am
For someone that pushes the healthy food lifestyle she sure looks like she doesn’t miss to many expensive lavish meals herself. She reminds me of a lady from way back that said ** Let Them EAT CAKE**. And do you really think that they would spend their money when they have an open spending account of your taxpayer money. The rich do not stay rich by spending their own money
after all. And where did her and his saying go You know the one ** Share the Wealth**.
Posted by: Ron | January 2, 2012, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
They pay for their own vacations. They pay for their own clothes. The only thing the government covers is security. Conservatives are just constant complainers. He’s from Hawaii, he’s going to go back there for Xmas. Just shut up already. And Michelle looks lovely. Who cares what the cons say. Really. There is NOTHING Obama and his wife can do to make them happy, so, you might as well look fabulous while you tick them off.
Posted by: marsha marsha | January 2, 2012, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Jealousy, of the worse kind. (1) they’re rich (2) they came from NOTHING and became rich by their own hard work and (3) they are well educated and smart, which is why they are now rich and 94) They’re BLACK!!!! and the folks who are jealous are NOT well educated, did NOT improve their self worth as much AND they’re white….soooo, sort of rocks their world. how can the BLACK man have worked harder and been more successful than ME?????? I thought blacks were inferior! Is he….smarter than me???? Richer than me????? JEALOUSY!
Posted by: Not UR Average Joe | January 2, 2012, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
She reminds me of a lady from way back that said ** Let Them EAT CAKE**—oh the ‘lady from way back”…..gee, dont shock us with your knowledge. That was rumored to be Marie Antoinette, the french queen before the French Revolution, who, actually, never said that. And Marie Antoinette was never born poor, as Michelle was, as Obama was, and never worked her way up in school and became a well educated lawyer as Michelle did. Marie was born into wealth, more like a Bush. So, why exactly, does she remind you of her?????? I dont see a single thing in common.
Posted by: GrannyNosBest | January 2, 2012, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
She doesn’t have a perfect figure, but I bet, she has less body fat than 99% of republicans! I saw those rallies. Bunch of fatties. I bet your arms jiggle alot more than Michelle’s does!
Posted by: marsha marsha | January 2, 2012, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Wearing a dress that “unemployed people” could not afford–more like wearing a dress that even the working class could not afford. These two have been taking Americans and the United States for a ride since B.O. took office. The pauper prez thinks he is a king and his classless wife thinks she is a queen! ABC is finally getting it right by not subjecting themselves to propoganda and sticking up for this slime ball! Oh, and I consider shopping at J Crew and Target a luxury and would be embarassed to say I bargain shop there. $2 dress or $2000 dress–you still look cheap!
Posted by: Barb | January 2, 2012, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
She has the right to look great!!! Our first ladies have worn high end designers from Bush to Kennedy. HELLO!?!?!!!! Get over it!!!
Posted by: richards | January 2, 2012, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
The Obama’s should pay all of us back for all the luxurious vacations they’ve been taking ever since he became President. We American’s are lucky to even get a vacation anymore. And when we do have a vacation time, we either don’t have enough money or enough time to do anything. Must be nice to take advantage of us American’s Mr. Obama…..When you get voted out of office, Karma is a B*&ch. You’ll feel the same way we American’s have felt for a long time.
Posted by: Jeff | January 2, 2012, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
$4million dollars can sure with payoff a lot of debit for a lot of people, or help people that are homeless. You can be white, brown, yellow or purple and spending that much money still does not make it right. Officials want the country to spend less, then they should practice what they preach. Start with their own spending habits, what would the government officials do if they only made $36,000 to $40,000 a year? They could not make it on that money cause they live to expensive lifestyles. Instead of cutting jobs and salaries, and social security cut their salaries.
There are old gyers up there that have been in office since the 1920′s and still think the country should run like it use to!!!!! Spend less and help the people of America more!!!!!!!
Posted by: KitnKat | January 2, 2012, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
The first lady’s salary at University of Chicago was huge and she afforded her wardrobe way before she saw the w.h. What paid positions or on same education level of Michelle,can anyone recall of first ladies in the past. None. And those fashions they wore were back in the day, sad except Ms. Kennedy. Oh you haters and envy. LUV.
Posted by: Luv Daniels | January 2, 2012, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
OMG!!!!PEOPLE!!! give it a break already. This has clearly been a black and a white issue from the very start and will be until the end. We have had four years to get our heads together to get past all the negative criticism that has been slung at the first family. This is exactly why the foriegn politicians make a mockery of our country. No matte whom they have had in office you will NEVER read any public negativity regarding the leader and his family. For all the highly intelligent and upper class citizens of this great country you should be proud that the “unworthy first black family” as they have been labeled has “CLASS”. It is not purchaseable in any store I have ever shopped in…they don’t sell it on the shelf. You either have it our you don’t. I know personally I would NEVER want anyone who represented Americans in such a way to EVER step out anywhere half-stepping and make our country the laughing stock of the world! Come on people get it together she must represent at ALL times. Aunt Jemina only sells grits and pancakes she clearly could not walk as the “first lady”! What most are not considering that most designers up and coming or established would be elated to occupy a spot in the first lady’s closet. Sales have gone thru the roof for most things she has been seen wearing. .
Posted by: Son | January 2, 2012, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
I remember when I was a little girl how people fawned over the clothes that jackie Kennedy wore. No one seemed to be concerened about price- only that she looked good. I also remember there being stuff that IF i had the money, wouldn’t buy for my mother. The scrutiny over Mrs Obama’s clothing selections are ridiculous.. or is it because it’s easier for such news to be circulated on the tech information highway?
I like about 90% of her clothing and think she’s in good shape. She the most active,vibrant and out-in-the-public 1st Lady(FLOTUS) we’ve had in decades or again is it the information highway? Where were the complaints about The Bush 1st Ladies or Mrs Reagan? Or the concerns about how they spent their money? Or what they ate? Or their trips home? No one made a stink about when I took my daughter to China-I just wasn’t worth a security detail. …Goodness gracious folks!
Posted by: Patricia | January 2, 2012, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
these aren’t new clothes. She’s smart and wears her clothes more than once.
Posted by: Phyllis | January 2, 2012, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
I don’t care how much she spend, but, please make her stop wearing horizontal stripes across that broad behind.No matter what she does or wears.
Posted by: LAUREL | January 2, 2012, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
If she wants to boost the economy in the fashion world, she should be wearing clothes from makers like LLBean, Land’s End, Macy’s, JC Penny, and donate her designer disasters to Good Will. Jaclyn Smith markets her clothes at KMart … what’s wrong with that store? I really don’t care what the First Lady of America looks like ,… her husband was elected to run the country. Was Eleanor Roosevelt a fashion icon? Probably not …. but her husband got America thru a Depression and a world war! No one cared where she bought her clothes, but she was well respected for the work she did. It seems that Jackie Kennedy was the first one to call attention to wardrobe …. now they all have to compete. (Michelle O. is no Jackie K!) Changes need to be made in Congress, too, starting with the Pres … does an already wealthy man need an annual salary of $400,000 plus free government housing? Most members of Congress are multi millionaires … think what their government salaries could be used for to help the economy. Maybe some of these issues should be put on the November ballot. In the meantime ….. Michelle …. please cover up those arms!!!!!!
Posted by: Jenny | January 2, 2012, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Barak Obama successfully wrote and sold a book, maybe 2 I believe. So they have money from that and if she wants to spend it on clothes why is that anyone’s business but theirs?? This is pure silliness. Unfortunately for the Right – they can’t fault the marriage or family due to infidelity or any fault. So now – they just have to make up silly stuff to try to tear them down. Pure hate from dark, sick hearts.
Posted by: Janet | January 2, 2012, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
she is the first lady that mean she more power she uesed that money it not her she don’t know how much we working , 4millions dollars how many fammily live and this time alot peoples don’t have ajob
they don’t have money buy the food asked the firstlady how she think about that
Posted by: lisa | January 2, 2012, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Thank God the 1st Family dresses well. I would be embarrassed if it weren’t so.
Posted by: Angie | January 2, 2012, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
She buys her own clothes and they pay for their own vacations by themselves. What they wear and where they travel have NOTHING to do with taxes. The security the president and his family receive is regardless of where he is. It doesn’t matter. If he’s not on vacation, which, oh horrors, it’s Christmas, how dare he go on vaca for Christmas????????? … then we pay to watch him there, if not, we’d pay for him to be in DC and his daughters to be at school and michelle wherever she goes. To section out how much it costs to watch them THERE is stupid. It’s the same as anywhere! It’s not like when they’re in DC the girls just walk out of the whitehouse with a detail! duh!
Posted by: marsha marsha | January 2, 2012, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
hank God the 1st Family dresses well. I would be embarrassed if it weren’t so.— I actually agree with this. I saw the White house when Laura Bush decorated for Xmas. It was an embarrassment It looked like the blue light kmart special! NOT the house of a statesman and certainly not the president of the United States! Our president and his/her family SHOULD have some class and some style. Yes. I”m glad they do, finally, after 8 years of country bumpkin embarrassment, I find her style very refreshing and something to be proud of. Everywhere she travels foreign countries and their dignitaries rave about her. After 8 year of pure embarrassment, it’s lovely. !
Posted by: GrannyNosBest | January 2, 2012, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
If I had paid $2000 for a simple sundress as a public servant, I would be wearing it more than once too. J. Crew is not afforable either. Now Target & the Gap….that’s on an average persons budget.
Posted by: faye | January 3, 2012, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Oh please, where is the important news? It’s obviously a slow news day. I don’t care how much she spends on her clothes and neither should anyone else.
Posted by: Jones | January 3, 2012, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Most of the cost of the Obama’s vacation is the planes to get there and take the security, cars, etc. which is required of the president, over 3.6 million. The President is paying for the meals and the house in which they are staying. Transportation, then, is the bulk of the cost.
Since that is the case, and since Bush flew to Texas for vacations, we can assume he has also spent more for his vacations than obama. And unemployment was high then, as was the country in turmoil. Reagan went on vacation with 9.5% unemployment and no one cared at the time. We only care when it is a democrat, evidently.
Posted by: joan | January 3, 2012, 11:36 am 11:36 am
With all of the complaints about the wealth of the Obama’s, $$’s spent on clothes and vacations – are you also keeping in mind that Obama wants to raise the tax rate for millionaires (which will directly impact his wealth). Where’s your support for this effort – and in fairness, your criticism to the politicians who are doing everything in their power to protect wealthy individuals. Seems a bit two-faced. And let’s get it right – Michelle is not an ordinary housewife, she represents the United States of America – it’s her duty to dress the part.
Posted by: Otter09 | January 3, 2012, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Transportation, then, is the bulk of the cost.——and that is the same for WHEREVER he goes, regardless. And, he’s the president, he goes places. He goes to places in the US that have issues, he travels to foreign countries for treaties and to get better access to trade. If he wasn’t on vacation he would be going somewhere, and that cost would be the SAME. The number of security would be the SAME. The girls and Michelle always have security no matter if they’re in DC or with Obama. Makes zero difference. It’s not as though you say ‘security costs $$ for this trip”. Duh! The security for them to be home cost the same! It’s not like if they travel to China for trade talks there is no security or travel cost!
Posted by: Not UR Average Joe | January 3, 2012, 11:52 am 11:52 am
The $4 million figure sounds bogus. Air Force One has pilots on call 24/7 and they are paid whether they fly the First Family or not. Same with the Secret Service, those guys are on salary, whether they are all being used or not. Isn’t the only real additional cost to the taxpayers is the price of fuel for the plane and perhaps hotel bills for the Secret Service guys? Who came up with the $4 million figure? Sounds suspiciously like fixed news.
Posted by: Librarian53 | January 3, 2012, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
First of all, she is FAR from the first First Lady to wear an expensive wardrobe. Her appearance is a part of her job. Their “$4 million” vacation is a crock! That vacation is NOT costing us, or anyone else, that much money. You people DO realize that they likely get a LOT of their things for FREE because of who they are. Including a lot of her wardrobe pieces and their lodgings/meals, etc. Hell, I’VE spent $100 a person on dinner once or twice….it’s not like we’re talking THOUSANDS of dollars on a meal! There are much worse things happening right now than this petty junk. Guess what? We pay the taxes we pay no matter WHERE they get spent.
Posted by: Shannon | January 5, 2012, 11:48 am 11:48 am
The First lady is entitled to dress according to her style of clothing. and her lifestyle. No one one dare insult the Queen of England for her way of dressing. Which in my opinon make our first lady seem as though she shopped at Family Dollar. Give it to the first couple they looked elegant and dressed elegant and I personally applaud them. They look marvelous in thier wardrobe.
Posted by: CINDY WASHINGTON | January 7, 2012, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
I’m curious about the origins of the writer’s motivation for authoring this article given her background. That is, why was this particular writer chosen to pen an aritcle that depicts the First Lady in such a negative light? It appears that ABCnews has the shrewdness and cunning of a chess player stategically maneuvering pawns across the board in order to get a checkmate.
Posted by: et1707 | January 7, 2012, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Only Michelle can make a $2000 outfit look like something thrown together from Target, Wall Mart, and the second hand store. And I don’t apologize for my new hobby of laughing at her wardrobe, as the income tax rate of this hard working citizen is a significant amount of money leaving me no “change” to support a real hobby.
Posted by: Martha | January 22, 2012, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Forget the story for a sec, it’s just great to see this on ABC news PERIOD.
Posted by: Ed Richardson | February 6, 2012, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Everyone references what previous Presidents did wrong as justification for a $4 million vacation on the dime of the taxpayer. That’s a silly argument and the timing of this expenditure of ours is at the worst possible time ever. They’ve all been corrupt since Clinton. Obama is a joke.
Posted by: Matthew | March 11, 2012, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
estimated by some media outlets to cost taxpayers $4 million…..
————————
Who are these media outlets? Where is the link to back up this statement.
The old “some say” tactic. Back it up with facts, otherwise it is just more BS
Posted by: CB | May 3, 2012, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm