May 18, 2006 7:46pm

Air Marshal Says He Faced Retaliation for Bringing Up Security Issues

The head of a group of Federal Air Marshals says the service is badly broken.

"Right now we cannot protect the public," says Frank Terreri, an active duty air marshal who represents a group of 1,500 air marshals. "And not because we’re not proficient, not that we’re not capable, it’s because federal air marshal management, along with the Department of Homeland Security, won’t let us do our jobs."

Terreri says air marshals are not able to work undercover because check-in and boarding procedures at airports make it impossible for air marshals to maintain their anonymity:

"We’re supposed to be undercover. But basically when everybody knows who you are, you’re just the guys on the plane with the gun. Either they’re gonna avoid you or overcome you, you’re at a severe disadvantage."

Terreri has spent three years trying to get the air marshals management to address these issues with no response. Instead he says they’ve retaliated against him, with four separate investigations, including one for misuse of his business card.

"The items that he was being accused of were so surreal that they were obviously intending to terrorize the other air marshals into silence," says Tom Devine, an attorney with the Government Accountability Project. The project has petitioned the U.S. Office of Special Counsel to open an investigation into Terreri’s allegations. 

The House Judiciary Committee is expected to release a critical investigation of the air marshal service next week.   Committee Chairman Rep. James Sensenbrenner says the air marshals lack of anonymity violates federal law. He hopes the Federal Air Marshal Service Agency will "at least be a little bit more compliant with the law and whistleblowers, rather than trying to shut them up," citing the case of Frank Terreri as one of several examples.   

In an American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit filed last year, Terreri challenged policies prohibiting air marshals from speaking publicly about their jobs or the agency. The Federal Air Marshal service agreed to change those policies in settlement reached last month. 

Department of Homeland Security officials declined to be interviewed or provide comment to ABC News regarding  the Federal Air Marshal service which will be the subject of an upcoming ABC News special report to air Friday on ABC’s World News Tonight and 20 / 20.   

ABC News’ Avni Patel contributed to this report.

User Comments

Shawn B. McCullers
FLEOA FAM Agency VP for Health & Safety
Frank Terreri is absolutely correct in his allegation. It has become pattern and practice for the FAM Management to initiate fraudulent charges against FAMs that have spoken up and out against the many security, health, safety, and policy violations committed and perpetrated against the rank and file FAMs. They have then proceeded to parade these FAMs as word of mouth examples in the field offices, briefings, and training sessions, that anyone who fails to go along or opposes these violations will be made an example of by having their careers ruined and financially trying to break that FAM and his family.
It is a well-known fact in the FAM service that FLEOA Representatives were especially targeted to discourage the rest of the rank and file FAMs from coming together to voice their concerns. FLEOA Reps are non-paid and non-union members of a professional organization that represents more than 24, 000 Federal Agents. FLEOA addresses our safety issues in a progressive and professional manner, in many ways to our individual agencies and to the legislature. FAM Management was adamant about characterizing reps as “troublemakers” and “Pea Brains”. This attitude was pervasive and had a profound effect on silencing the rank and file. Many told me personally that they could not afford to go through what Frank and other FLEOA Representatives had gone through. Many made reference to the retaliation, bogus investigations and allegations of wrongdoing. Also, in the case of some reps injured directly as a result of their employment, this meant having to go without income form the FAM service for as long as five months because they were denied light duty positions and were having our OWCP cases tampered with by the FAMs OWCP Coordinator and their Field Offices in violation of 18 USC 1922. These issues were well known as examples of what would happen to those that did not remain silent. Some FAMs were told they would be looking for jobs like the FLEOA Reps if they did not “Shut up and Fly!”
It is also critical to mention, that these practices are not only pattern and practice for the retired SS Managers, but many of the Pre-9/11 FAMs that have gained low-level managerial positions during the build up Post 9/11. What the SS Managers have done is to leverage their apparent political pull against the career aspirations of these low-level (first line supervisors) to goad them into modeling their managerial style of oppression, illegal activity, and tyranny. Now, please do not excuse or feel sorry for them–because like us all they had to make a choice of whether the cost of their souls was worth the promise of promotions to come. They chose to sell their souls to the SS Managers in hopes of promotions and participated fully and willingly in the criminal conspiracies that have been perpetrated against the rank and file FAMs for the sakes of their career aspirations. I do not make these allegations arbitrarily; these are my personal beliefs and EXPERIENCES, as well as, those of countless FAMs that correspond with me for advice.
Neither the American People nor the FAM Service is well served by their choice. We have a very distinctive mission, and at the very least that mission should have been of the utmost importance with the horrific events of 9/11 propelling the need for our dramatic increase in manpower. FAM Management has squandered a very fortuitous opportunity to garner and harness an immense amount of skills, knowledge, and abilities coming from almost every law enforcement, military, experience, and educational background to create one of the most superb Law Enforcement Agencies in the world. Might I add that, in my opinion, they forsook this responsibility solely for their own financial gain and ego.
To all American Citizens that read these articles and these posts, Please make it your business to be proactive with your newfound knowledge of these atrocities. Pick up a telephone or an ink pen and write your Congressman and/or Senator and demand accountability. We are a Nation built in part on Political Revolution; please find it in your spirit to refuse to abide this type of behavior in your public servants. Please do not settle for one or a few scapegoats at the lower levels that allow the Perpetrators of these crimes to retire again, and fall into some other cushy position in the private sector.
Fellow FAMs, it is long past due for you all to stand with us and get on the record. We are charged with protecting American Citizens and consider your fellow FAM one of those Citizens that need your protection. The door is open, walk on through and join us…we are waiting. Let us demand that this program be all that it should be and more. Let us be the catalysis for the change that we need to restore integrity, accountability, and a well deserved good reputation to OUR AGENCY!
True accountability is what we are sacrificing our careers for. It is not about personal vendettas, although I would be lying if I said that it would not satisfy me personally to see FAM Management held accountable. I believe that what we have sacrificed our careers for IS ACTUALLY more important than ourselves. In order to choose the lifestyle of a Law Enforcement Officer, yes it is a lifestyle and not simply a career choice, you have to believe somewhat idealistically in the concept of right and wrong. IF SOME OF US ARE TO BE HELD TO A HIGHER STANDARD, THEN SO SHOULD WE ALL. They all need to be thoroughly investigated and appropriately held to the highest standard of accountability and of the law. Fellow FAMs Hold Your Heads and Protect Your Neck…literally…as the Managements Irresponsible Behavior has left us all Vulnerable.
Shawn B. McCullers
Former Philadelphia FAM

Posted by: Shawn B. McCullers | May 18, 2006, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

You can sneak any weapon you want at any airline in the states. They do not search the personel who come in everyday to work at the airports. Janitors, clerks, airline personel, and any of them can smuggle in weapons and you know if you are in a connecting waiting lounge you don’t get screened or searched again. Some American Airlines people told me this and that they complain to higher ups and nothing is done. Do these Marshalls know this, they must and that has to be a big worry to know someone may have a gun and they know you are the Marshall. This world is crazy.

Posted by: Don Fahrney | May 18, 2006, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

It’s pretty sad it has come down to this. We have people at each gate in every airport whose job is to prevent passengers from boarding planes with weapons of some sort, in hopes to avoid another terrorist attack. Also, this is the article received by the bipartisan committee with an F for pre-screening, http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/05/
911.commission/index.html
Therefore, we have air marshals that need to carry guns on board planes because the missed/over sight passengers that could be possible threat to the other passenger, or worse another hijacked plane into another tower or building.
The marshals are doing their jobs but, being forced to board the plane no differently than the rest of the passengers.
There are other ways for them to get on-board and unseen, why has this become so difficult for this to be done?
How come it’s so easy for NSA to tape into phones and computers without the proper warrants, and not receive any repercussion for this but, when the air marshals attempt to do their job their identity is put in jeopardy?
God Bless

Posted by: Victoria Rum | May 19, 2006, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I just got through watching the news regarding the air marshalls on board airplanes. This report was very informative, especially, to those terrioists who are rather on the “dumb” side. Why do we air such report findings? Isn’t this a breach of confidentality? I am concerned for the information being reported on the news instead of just to the people who have influence to fix this situation and make it better. I fear the air marshall program is now in jeopardy which, in time, will jeopardize the lives of future passengers on board. Thank you for you time. May God Bless America!

Posted by: Frances E. Kwiatkowski | May 19, 2006, 7:25 am 7:25 am

I have a friend who has given many years of his life to his country. He served in Vietnam flying F4s and F5s and was shot down twice. He has served in the capacity of Air Marshall and agrees with the poor assessment. He is being held to his job, even though he qualifies for a medical retirement, due to two “blown” discs in his lower back, caused by ejecting from his aircraft.
Why are our heroes being treated so poorly? It’s because this country has become ruled by the rich and for the rich. The middle class is paying the price. We are on our way to becoming an impoverished country with a large gap between the haves and the have-nots.
This is my opinion.
Peter Lewis / Electronic Technician

Posted by: Peter Lewis | May 19, 2006, 8:14 am 8:14 am

With all the hassles, it’s hardly worth flying anymore. The government has the entire airline and airport industries so tied up with red tape, regulations, and beurocracy, it’s a wonder anything gets done.
Anything the DHS touches becomes so full of ineptness, incompetance, and stupidity… we were better off before 9/11.

Posted by: Michael Linneer | May 19, 2006, 9:54 am 9:54 am

The EEOC is charged by law with enforcing federal employment laws; these offices should file a claim for retaliation and then proceed to file a lawsuit in federal court.

Posted by: G E Hill | May 19, 2006, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Shawn McCullers was right on the money. If you care about your safety and the security of this nations airlines, write all of your state representative and senators and demand what is suppose to be. The air marshals need our help and support just like our troops do.

Posted by: Name | May 19, 2006, 9:59 am 9:59 am

I did a lot of undercover work in my police career. What pin head came up with the idea the Air Marshals need to go through security at the airport. Obviously it was some suit who has never done field work. Come on guys get your head out and let the guys do their job. Have them enter the airport through some alternative means before you get one or more of them killed.

Posted by: Scott roder | May 19, 2006, 10:02 am 10:02 am

I am losing all faith in all levels of government…

Posted by: Mike | May 19, 2006, 10:08 am 10:08 am

I am losing all faith in all levels of government…

Posted by: Mike | May 19, 2006, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Congress is not the answer to our law enforcement crises. They are absolutely useless demagogues, and they have no ability nor desire to make changes in any agency policy. The responsibility and blame lies squarely on the President’s shoulders. He is a do-nothing, disinterested President who hires shady and unqualified people to run the country. When the top dog is incompetent, what can we expect from the people he hires? (Calm down, there, Mr. Liberal Press…Clinton was just as worthless). People complain because Bush is secretive. Incompetent people are always secretive…lest they expose themselves for the chimpanzees they are. Get all bothered about flight security if you want, but absolutely nothing will change until real men run this country. And that will never happen (thanks to our public school educated electorate), so I guess we’re doomed!

Posted by: Tom SteChatte | May 19, 2006, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Everything connected with airline travel security is in a shambles.
Anything that makes practical sense is discarded. It seems simple to me that Air Marshalls could and should be boarded way ahead of any passengers. Common sense and practicality are not used by the TSA or many other federal agencies.
Those responsible for the air marshall problems should be fired with no benefits. Period. Start with Norman Mineta.

Posted by: Radford B. Allen | May 19, 2006, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Our president needs to get off his duff and clean out FAM management.

Posted by: Joe Lynch | May 19, 2006, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Don’t expect the TSA to protect you either. Their employees are incompetent.

Posted by: DJ | May 19, 2006, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Read “Terror in the Skies Series” at Womens Wall Street Journal. Very eye opening and runs along this line. They have been talking about this for years and nothing is done. Why is that? I don’t fly anymore on vacations and Thank God none of my family or myself have to fly for our jobs. Scary Stuff and unforgiveable. We need outcry from the people to congress!!

Posted by: Cindi | May 19, 2006, 10:30 am 10:30 am

I am tired and disheartened by this agancies persistent reckless disregard for the ones who actually effect the mission.
I have given the vast majority of my life to public service not because I desire accolades, but because that is my purpose in life.
“Until morale improves, the beatings will continue!!” is such a true saying in this agency. FAM management need TO GO! Change needs to happen, NOW! The only thing is this CHANGE ISN’T CHANGE UNTIL IT IS CHANGED!
I would love to do more, but unfortunantely I wasn’t a prior Secret Service agent, not one to suck up to the boss. There is no vision and it has been said that “where there is no vision, the people perish.”
I thank my fellow brother at arms for his courage, percistence, and the intestinal fortitude to tell the TRUTH which our management has no capability of doing.
To the FAM Management a word of advice my mom always told me growing up, “What ever hides in the dark, SHALL come to light!” CLICK!

Posted by: FAM Wanting Change | May 19, 2006, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Seems as though not a single day goes by that you do not see one or more “whistleblower” reports of malfeasance on the part of our government bureaucrat or bureaucracy.

Posted by: Bob Karcher | May 19, 2006, 10:37 am 10:37 am

I am someone who worked for a major airline before, during and after 911. The screeners on duty before the attack were doing as good a job as the TSA is now…the weapons that allowed the attack were not prohibited at that time. The only difference between then and not is the change of restricted articles and the 100′s of millions of dollars we spend on the TSA. Air Marshalls were able to board the airplane in other ways than through the lounge door…not sure if that has changed, but don’t imagine that it has. The methods, training, procedures and heightened awareness of the airline personnel, federal screeners and air marshalls has been sufficient to preclude another attack to this point. Changes are always being proposed, considered and implemented to try to stay a step ahead of potential attackers. The best way to assure our security is to challenge and attack terrorism whenever and where ever we find it and, thanks to our brave people in the federally controlled departments and the armed services, we are doing just that thing. Eventually free people everywhere will take control of their countries and isolate these extremists to put and end to their attempt to control those same people.

Posted by: Frank Caba | May 19, 2006, 10:59 am 10:59 am

What a huge beauracracy our government has become. Homeland “Security”? What a joke.
A bunch of power hungry guys in charge of a MASSIVE budget.
We have groups of terrorists.. One group destroys a building. Another one destroys our Constitution. Another waging war on our workforce and standard of living.
Billy

Posted by: Billy Barty | May 19, 2006, 11:00 am 11:00 am

There has to be a solution to this problem. Decent travelers want to get to their destination in peace without having to worry about another terroist attack. Letting the pilots, flight attendants and screener know beforehand who the air marshalls are would eliminate the confusion and protect they’re identity. They can be the first ones to board the airplane and no one would be the wiser. Let’s find the solution fast and get it done!

Posted by: Sonia C | May 19, 2006, 11:12 am 11:12 am

It is Unconstitutional to deprive airline passengers of the means to resist.
The U.S. spent billions on the antithesis of the lesson learned by flight 93 on 9/11. Armed Passengers and aircrew are the answer, not impotent (by their own admission) Federal Air Marshalls.
I’d rather see “swap boxes” of frangible common ammo types at the ticket counter. Dont mind being “sniffed” for nitrates, though.
Abolish the Air Marshall program, cut TSA budget by 50%. We’ll all be safer.

Posted by: Mark | May 19, 2006, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Clintons dept of transportation appointee is the cause of all this bull. I travel and watch elderly citizens searched and time wasted while people capable of highjacking scoot thru the line. Passengers are unaware that our own guys will shoot us down if we are highjacked. As a ex-FEMA employee, I cannot tell you how lazy, uneducated, unmotovated most of those guys are. Nepotism is rampant and talent is dismissed (fired). Also check the fare from Chicago to dallas, and then the fare from dallas to chicago……thanks too for that Mr. Mineta…by the way…are you an American?

Posted by: robert | May 19, 2006, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Just another example of how our Government is being run by proponents of the New World Order, trying to achieve their goal of destroying our country from within. I hate to say it, but we will never be at peace again. If we do not stage a revolution and bring down the current President, House and Senate, we are doomed.

Posted by: Mike McDermott | May 19, 2006, 11:33 am 11:33 am

I think the complaints of these air marshals are all seriously a bunch of crock. 9/11 was a one time deal. The security check points for baggage, carry-ons and personnel are more extensive enough for flight protection. And the concern that airport or airline employees can bring illegal stuff on is absurd. First they have to conspire or want to conspire with some from the middle east or Arab world. That won’t happen.
The next middle east attack won’t come from airlines so that it is a non-issue. Their cover has been blown to this method of attack. The next attack will come from some other source. E.g. rail way, container ships are a great source, I’m told only 3 % are inspected. That’s a great way to get stuff in. Or over land through Canada or even Mexico. To use the analogy, just think of terrorist weapons as narcotics drugs. We can’t even stop all the flow of narcotics drugs coming in from Canada or Mexico or over seas container ships – then how are we going to stop terrorists and their method? Answer we are not, they will get through, it’s my “needle in the haystack theory”. That’s what you are looking for and you won’t find it. And all it takes is one needle to ruin our day. It’s not a matter of if but when, so these wining FAM are a bunch of loosers. Stop your wining. There’s no need for your protection, you don’t even need to be on a flight with the reinforced pilot doors they have now.
Further using the domino theory, once they attack, (and next time it will be just as spetacular of not more so – cause they will probably buy a suitcase atomic fision bomb on the black market from either N Korea, Pakistan, or Russian from the Russian mob) Wall Street will crash, jobs will be cut right and left, including the military, and it will be chaos and anarchy.
As far as I’m concerned these FAM have their heads up their asses anyway like they are a deterrent just because they can go incognito or under cover. Bull, the days of airline /missile threats are over. That was a one time deal. Either way an Air Force or Air National Guard fighter jet will be scrambled to shoot it out of the sky and sacrifice all on board, INCLUDING the under cover or non-uncover FAM. So what good is their wining.

Posted by: Bill Hutchinson | May 19, 2006, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Just another example in a mind numbing litany of the government simply not being serious about security. From borders to, well everything else, there’s always something blocking efforts at security. Not to be cynical but it is probably going take another terrorist incident – or series of incidents – on US soil before we do anything about the mess that has been made of security. The mind boggling amnesty plan about to be adopted by the Senate is just the latest in a series of actions taken by the government that simply defy rational explanation.
The worst aspect of it is the loss of national consensus. Fed by a media that wants controversy, as it fuels the public’s hunger for the product put out by the media i.e. news reporting, the overal consensual nature of our republican form of government is fraying, with a result I don’t want to even consider. This will be made far worse under the plan being considered by the Seante, which on the low side will give us 90 million new citizens in the next 20 years, a mind boggling number, that is the functional equivelent of national suicide, and the eventual balkanization of America as each group sets up enclaves.
Pretty far afield from the orginal issue, but this is what our leaders are handing us, as we go like sheep to the slaughter…

Posted by: B. Samuel Davis | May 19, 2006, 11:40 am 11:40 am

If FAMs feel they should be able to board secretly and leave the flight crew out of the loop they are nuts. In most cases there is only one boarding door for an aircraft. With so many passengers crowding around this door waiting to board, it’s pretty obvious that any FAM boarding will be seen. What I think they seem to forget is that most passengers have no idea what FAMs look like. They are dressed in plain clothes. If this argument is about special treatment for FAMs the whole program is in trouble.

Posted by: Jeff Preston | May 19, 2006, 11:42 am 11:42 am

I work at National Airport, and to watch our Air Marshals stand out so badly is pathetic. I sit back and pick out Air Marshals as easy as it is to pick out a women who is 9 month’s pregnant. You laugh,….BUT IT”S TRUE !!
Now let me give you Marshals some advice,…….STOP LOOKING LIKE AIR MARSHALS ! You guy’s always pair up walking through the terminal with your brand new bags, and then to make things even obvious, I can just about identify your maker of the gun you hold on your side. Jeeze,…wear more appropriate shirts please !!
Also,…..to have the Marshals go past the security lines to a Police Officer who checks their ID’s in plain view of the same passengers who will be getting on the same flight is ridiculous ! At National Airport, the Marshals go in the opposite way that the landing passengers go when exiting that terminal. You guessed it,…..it’s right next to all the passengers that are waiting to get to their flights. What GREAT GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE HOTSHOT CAME UP WITH THAT IDEA !! I’ve come to finally realize that not only is our government corrupt,….but alot of the folks in these 6 figure salary positions are just as bad. It’s one big dog & pony show, where-as the little people make things work, and the top people brag about how important they are. I could only wish to get a top job so I could run the Marshals the way they should be run.

Posted by: Joey | May 19, 2006, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

All but the somnambulent should be aware by now that the our politicians have declaed war on Americans on all fronts. This is just another example.
There is only one safe place on an aircraft to place a gun. Secure behind a locked sturdy cabin door.
The next commercial aircraft to be used as a missile will be commandeered with a federal air marshall’s gun. This exposure is so completely obvious that one must believe that even our politicians can not be so stupid as to provide would-be hijackers handy access to a gun that they could not get through security.
An electronically locked gun cabinet in the cockpit should be part of any commericial aircraft’s safety equipment.
Here is the problem, to identify a gun as a piece of safety equipment is intolerable to most politicians. They would rather see billions of our cash spent to make the airways even less safe than they were prior to 9/11

Posted by: Bruce Frykman | May 19, 2006, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

The incompetence in the FAM program and Homeland Security is stunning to say the least. FAM’s are required to enter through an area, (visible to everyone) other than the metal detecters, as do all law enforcement because they’re packing heat. What’s even more ridiculous is the FAM’s have a dress code. They’ve fought this for the longest time as anyone who had a shred of intelligence would. However, the same FBI mentality (bureaucratic lack of imagination)that gave us 911 still permeates TSA and the FAM program. I was a security screener for TSA for two years. I would cringe every time I had to pat down a 90 year old wheelchair bound passenger while three 20-something Middle Easterner’s skipped through without a concern. I suggested many times that TSA send management teams to Israel for training but to no avail. Without a doubt, El Al has the best security in the air-carrier industry. For four decades Israel has been dealing with unfriendly neighbors who cause a very real, day to day existential threat. Security personnel at El Al are dead serious. They’ll make you sweat, they will make you squirm but a it’s small price to pay for safety. They utilize a method we abhor. It’s called ‘Profiling’. We in America are too stupid to use it and ultimately I’m afraid we’ll will end up paying a very high for allowing Political Correctness to trump our safety.

Posted by: Kemaste | May 19, 2006, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Are these posts censured? I left a comment 2 hours ago, mentioning the New World Order, and it never appeared, but comments posted after that are displayed. What gives with that? Anyway, I believe it would be easy to get Marshalls on board without being obvious…just have one obviously waiting by the boarding area, with another waiting with the passengers. The official-looking one will divert any attention from those seeking to cause trouble, and he’ll secretly be backed up by his covert partner. They should also be seated in the rear of the plane.

Posted by: Mike McDermott | May 19, 2006, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

You simply follow logic…
Air Marshals should pick their guns on the plane. The pistol is
in a special hidden compartment in one of the restrooms or galley
that can be open with a special
key/rench. So they can board the flight like any other passenger.
It has been done on other safe airline, you know…

Posted by: G. Zak | May 19, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

It is unfortunate that it is so difficult to fire incompetent high level managers in government service. It is also unfortunate that too many cooks spoil the broth and most government programs are like the proverbial camel that was supposed to have been a horse, but was designed by a government committie.

Posted by: Russ | May 19, 2006, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

While the FAM’s perform their service to the best of their ability, and are undoubtedly frustrated, they are seeing the result of being handcuffed just like the rest of the USA’s law-abiding citizens. Before meaninful change can occur, the People (as in, ‘We the People’) must realize that A: The government CANNOT and IS NOT designed to provide security during private transactions, ie, flying on PRIVATE company airlines–you are on your own. B: The absolute BEST defense against terror in the sky is to let law enforcement PROFILE the types of people who would commit crimes as was done on 9/11 and not cave to social whining. The fact is that 75 year old “Aunt Minnie” from Scandanavia is not going to have a bomb, gun, or box cutter under her dress to use against an aircrew member. On the other hand, a young man from the Middle East who is overheard talking about his great hatred for the ‘great satan’ shortly before checking into his air carrier just MIGHT merit an extra careful search. Remember, the President is very vocal reminding us that we are in a war against terrorism. Terrorism, 99% of it originates from the Middle East. C: The best defense on an aircraft is a trained and ARMED civilian populace, ie, those law abiding citizens who show an interest in carrying weapons for the protection of themselves and others. Statistics indicate (look them up yourselves–I am not your librarian) that armed civilians have less cases of mistaken identity, less missed targets, etc, than trained law enforcement does across the board.
Bottom line: You lose both your freedom AND your security when you give up your rights in the name of “security”.

Posted by: Retired First Sergeant | May 19, 2006, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Is this a union issue. Is the group that is represneted a union group or is the gentleman mentioned part fo the leadership?

Posted by: Rick | May 19, 2006, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

I was a Sky Marshall in 1971 and we had exactly the same problems.
It’s a fairly useless program anyway. We never stopped a hijacker and I doubt the program can be made to work.
Do it like the Israelis did-post a guy in theback of the plane with an Uzi in plain sight.

Posted by: Hugh | May 19, 2006, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Sending FAMs on board ahead of regular passengers is a dead giveaway, whether they’re “dressed to impress” or blending with the crowd. Anyone with half a brain can board a flight early and pick out FAMs already seated. Flight personnel (pilots, flight attendants, etc) already know who their FAMs are and typically don’t care to show any discretion concerning the “undercover” nature of those officers. The solution here is to allow FAMs to board flights exactly like normal passengers — that’s the whole point of being undercover. No one knows who you are until the **** hits the fan; otherwise, you’re suddenly the target, and where does that leave us, if both FAMs are attacked and brought down from the beginning of a hijacking?

Posted by: Katerina | May 19, 2006, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

I recently returned from a trip to Denver with my family. The announcement came over the PA system that the flight I was on was allowing courtousy seating begin for people traveling with small childern. My wife and I approached the gate with our childern to present our boarding passes when 4 single men with no childern just walked right past us on to the plane. I started laughing with disbeleif right there in the airport. Having just come from watching my family being molested at the security check point by the TSA screeners, I knew right away that those gentelmen were FAM’s and I couldn’t fathom that they were so blatant in their boarding procedures. I mean come guys, at least try to remain undercover, fake an injury or something to at least cover up why 4 very healthy men have to rush in front of every mother and child to getr to their assigned seat first.

Posted by: Dan | May 19, 2006, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

FAMs are now irrelevant. Will any post 9-11 flight crew open a cockpit door, knowing that hijackers are bent on suicide? Will passengers remain passive while terrorists try to force their way into the cockpit? A terrorist could threaten to kill a flight attendant with a sharp pencil through her neck, but they won’t get into the cockpit. We learned that lesson five years ago.

Posted by: Larry Tate | May 19, 2006, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Why don’t we just out source our airline security to a Dubi company, I’m sure that halaburton has a security section there.

Posted by: Tim | May 19, 2006, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Amazing that this is allowed to happened. Almost as bad as the open borders. Some fight on terrorism

Posted by: Fern | May 19, 2006, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

It’s Bush’s fault.

Posted by: Jack | May 19, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

When will America wake up and realize that 9/11 was an inside job and all of this bickering is a mute point. BYU professor physicist Steven E Jones makes it all very clear if you’ll just give him the time.

Posted by: Alex | May 19, 2006, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Bush Sucks!

Posted by: Jim | May 19, 2006, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

How bad are the TSA screeners? Leaving a Texas airport after an opening weekend of Deer hunting, a TSA screener asked me what’s in my bag? I told him my hunting pack and rifle ammo (in original packaging) along with dirty smelly hunting clothes. Well, he proceded to dump all my hunting pack stuff out on the counter and swab certain pieces for some kind of residue. EVERYTHING IN THAT PACK HAS GUNPOWDER RESIDUE ON IT (I WAS HUNTING!!). He had a look on his face like he had hit the mother lode. that is until a co-worker wispered something to him and he looked at me very uneasily. then very hurridly stuffed my belongings back in the duffel and gave me a rude comment about being disorganized. What a joke. Also, he asked me if i had any lighters in my bag, i said no and he didn’t even check…i did, but didn’t want to lose them as i just bought them. So i flew with them and nothing happened. How are they effective? (they’re only effective at making you late for your flight)

Posted by: Beau | May 19, 2006, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

PLEASE LOOK INTO VOTING FOR LIBERTARIAN WHERE OUR FREEDOM IS CONCERNED, TIME FOR CHANGE. WE BELIEVE IN PROTECTIING OUR COUNTRY. DO NOT BELIEVE IN GIVING FREE BENEFITS TO ILLEGALS. YES SOME OF US DO BELIEVE IN KEEPING THE ILLEGALS OUT.
LOOK AT ART OLIVIER WEBSITE FOR GOVERNOR.

Posted by: LIBERTARIAN | May 19, 2006, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

TIME FOR A CHANGE VOTE LIBERTARIAN. THE OTHER GUYS ARE NOT WORKING FOR US WE THE PEOPLE.

Posted by: FREEDOM | May 19, 2006, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

My Congressman Rob Andrews has been reporting the shortcoming at the Philadelphia Airport for over since before 9/11. One would think Washington would listen. However, like any business the WH security concerns seem to be low on their priority list. We pay taxes for the government to protect us, well they should do their jobs or be fired. I mean we’re not allowed to protect ourselves when we fly.

Posted by: Jimmy B | May 19, 2006, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

it is their right and duty to be at all times armed

Posted by: Thomas Jefferson | May 19, 2006, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Everyone keeps asking about a union. There is none! When DHS was formed part of the agreement was to dissolve all bargaining powers of ALL active unions so not to hamper what the agency wanted to do.
If I am not mistaken the Patriot Act had something to do with it.
So, all the organization that moved over to DHS lost a say, and their say was exactly the same as who ever had the most power. Oh and dare to have a different opinion!
The DHS plan to revamp the pay system is a sham. It is a biased and prejudiced way to cut out those they don’t like or don’t want to rise to position to be part of change.
This is what all this boils down to power, position, and recognition! It is ridiculous!
My only hope is that someone does something with all this, otherwise we got all riled up for nothing.

Posted by: Flying FAM | May 19, 2006, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

This kind of stuff is why I get so frustrated at the Democrat / Republican rhetoric. Bottom line is that no matter which party is in charge, the government is failing us at every conceivable level. The more faith we put in government to solve any problem, the more thier incompetence be displayed. The people need to wake up to this and throw every single one of those corrupt bums out of office, from the President right on down to the local dog catcher!

Posted by: Bill G | May 19, 2006, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Not being privy to the precise details of the case, I won’t comment on the particulars surrounding this FAM’s allegations. However, the rule prohibiting FAMs from speaking publicly about their job seems a rational one to me, and I am confused as to why it would be rescinded in the recent settlement. This is a sensitive security post. While I understand that sometimes the only way to effect change is to scream your argument from the rooftops, it seems that in this case the congressional oversight system was working to generate the necessary change.
My concern is this: I now know that it’s difficult for agents to be anonymous. If I know it, others know it. Doesn’t this obviously degrade the security situation even further? If so, isn’t this FAM’s public commentary counterproductive to his original goal of enhancing security?

Posted by: Fabio Patricio Escobar Castelli | May 19, 2006, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

It is truly amazing to me how pathetic some of our FAMs have become. They would rather dime out their fellow Air Marshalls under the guise of trying to bring inadequacies of the agency to light, when it is clear they are doing it for self gain/promotion and notoriety. What about backing the badge and protecting the other FAMs who are still flying? I am sure they appreciate your flagrant disregard of OPSEC. That is operational security …you may want to look up the definition. There are many other avenues to deal with an agency that has problems. That is what Congress is for, as well as other watchdog agencies. Resorting to diming out your fellow FAMs is reprehensible. If the FAMs that come forward are so disenfranchised I have news for you…this is a job and guess what if you don’t like it then quit. Military members don’t get to pick their mission or how it is accomplished. They shut their mouths and salute smartly and deal with whatever crap sandwich they are dealt. I say suck it up or get out. To the FAMs that are still flying I salute you. I pray to God that these rogue FAMs do not cause you to be placed in any additional danger, or worse lose your lives. I hope those who came forward get their just rewards and get fired from this job they hate so much. The American public certainly would be much safer with them out of the sky anyway.

Posted by: OPSEC Soldier | May 19, 2006, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Fabio-
How can a broken system be more broken? The info is already out there. Any flyer with two eyes and a functioning brain can figure it out in minutes.
You can’t put that genie back in the bottle.

Posted by: law dawg | May 19, 2006, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

The solution is simple. Repeat after me: “I AM NOT AFRAID.” Say it often and say it loud. Say it to your representatives in government. Tell them that they are borrowing and spending too much money on “terror” when you are not terrorized by anyone. Free yourself from the mental slavery of believing that you are in more danger from Osama bin Laden than getting struck by lightning or killed in a car wreck. Stop the nonsense and put an end to the senseless war profiteering. Say it now: I AM NOT AFRAID.

Posted by: Earl | May 19, 2006, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

If all concealed carry permit holders were allowed to carry on all airlines, nobody would know but the carriers, but the prospective ‘terrorists’ wouldn’t know who was armed and who wasn’t. Sounds like a plan that would work, but, of course, ‘a workable plan’ isn’t listed in the government handbook!

Posted by: Kathe | May 19, 2006, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

- OPSEC Soldier
I pray to God that these rogue FAMs do not cause you to be placed in any additional danger, or worse lose your lives. I hope those who came forward get their just rewards and get fired from this job they hate so much.
These rogue FAMS are not a minority. They are the majority and any information that they are releasing has already been released by top supervisors. I’m a flying FAM and praise these guys as patriots who are risking their positions.

Posted by: FAM | May 19, 2006, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Government employees at all levels — Federal, State, Local — are constantly subjected to managerial retaliation, often worst than described in this article, for speaking out against mismanagement, fiscal irresponsibility, and general incompetence.
The only protections are for those who elevate gross negligence, criminal malfeasance, or sexual harassment.
No protections exist at all for taxpaying citizens who work in government and call for responsible reform.

Posted by: Sean | May 19, 2006, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

I worked for a company that provided technical support for the TSA/DHS.
I saw up close and personal that the senior management of these new organizations were egomaniacal fools out to build new empires within the federal govt, NOT properly spend the taxpayers money wisely and defend us against terrorism.
But then again what would you expect from an agency that orders the air marshals to wear suits and ties on airline flights.
Talk about stupid

Posted by: somewhere in MD | May 19, 2006, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Why can’t FAMs buy tickets, board like airline personnel (to avoid the metal detectors) and be reinbursed later?
Maybe too simple?
Not like other agencies don’t do something similar…. Successfully….
Or are simplistic, peter principle grads like Meyers’ daughter in the way?

Posted by: george | May 19, 2006, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

KISS – Keep it simple stupid.
Need I say more.
Underwire Bra’s are a weapon.
America must gain control of it’s identification system. Require complete documentation on a encripted
storage device. Not modifiable by any Hacker/Programmer.
Comfortable Passenger compartments with “NO” access to the Flight deck/cabin.

Posted by: Chris | May 19, 2006, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

FAM-
–These rogue FAMS are not a minority. They are the majority and any information that they are releasing has already been released by top supervisors. I’m a flying FAM and praise these guys as patriots who are risking their positions.
Patriots my ass. The true patriots are in IRAQ giving their lives everyday despite their own comforts and political views. Patriots fight to protect the American people not for reasons of self betterment. If you are indeed a FAM then why don’t you ask Mr. Pickard why he really came forward? I bet it had nothing to do with being patriotic but more about getting some cash in his pocket or lining himself up for future employment. I would bet money there is some ulterior motive for his OPSEC violation. I know FAMS and know the service well–more than you think. Didn’t you guys sign a nondisclosure agreement? I signed one for my military position and a court martial would be quick at hand if I did such an act of cowardice. So much for service before self. I know the system is broken. However, just as the American public can view alJazeera on TV and online…what do you think the terrorists watch? Yep you guessed it American news programs. I also guarantee that information will be given out in this interview that has not been heard before by the public and to think otherwise is naive. These FAMs need to learn how to be big boys and handle their business the right way. If it sucks so badly why didn’t he quit? I applaud you for being a FAM as it is typically a thankless job. I applaud you for backing the badge of your fellow officers. I think you are doing yourself a disservice backing Mr. Pickard as he does not care about you or your security…if so he would have handled this much differently. I tell you one thing, if I did something like this it would be the functional equivalent of finding Al Qaeda while I was in Afghanistan, pointing over the ridge and letting them know where to find my platoon to kill them. I hope that things get better for you and your brethern, however I wouldn’t hold my breath that anything will come out of this interview…well except for Mr. Pickard losing his job.

Posted by: OPSEC Soldier | May 19, 2006, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

POST AN OPERATIVE tsa AT THE REAR OF THE PLANE W/A FULLY-VISIBLE USI..AND LET THE CHIPS FALL!

Posted by: rOBERT ENDERSBY | May 19, 2006, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

OPSEC-
Hey pal, why don’t you do a quick Google and read all the articles that have already given out every single piece of info Pickard gave out.
Articles directly from FAM management.
So if management releases the info and then Pickard does, he is the one that should be punished?
You can’t put the genie back in the bottle.

Posted by: law dawg | May 19, 2006, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

I agree with you 100% Mr McCullers.
Former Miami FAM

Posted by: Former FAM | May 19, 2006, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

All true folks. You are not safe in the skies! Not to mention, most Air Marshals who have filed EEO Complaints against supervisors are paying the price for speaking up. The SS cares about no-one, only how much more money they can put into there retirement check.

Posted by: Still a FAM ? | May 19, 2006, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Without giving out too much info, I am a female FAM. In the past week I flew 5 flights while wearing jeans and sitting in the middle of the plane. No one had an inkling as to who I was with the exception of the FFDO’s and other armed LEO’s flying. If the big wigs watching me (FAMs) in the airport couldn’t pick me out of the crowd then they can’t rat me out either, get it? Great jobs guys and gals!

Posted by: Female FAM | May 19, 2006, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

I am absolutely stunned at some of the idiotic comments made by those who have no knowledge of the subject.

Posted by: Stunned | May 19, 2006, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

law dawg-
Well I am glad that Mr. Pickard saved the terrorists the time it would take to google all of those documents. I am pretty sure their wasn’t any video footage for us to show them until now. Riddle me this, didn’t the FAMS have to sign a nondisclosure agreement? So explain to me why Mr. Pickard shouldnt be punished for violating that CONTRACT…is the defense going to be because the other kids did it first? Any violation of this agreement by him or the management should be punished. No you can’t put the genie back in the bottle…but you damn sure dont need to blow it up to the size of a Macys day balloon and broadcast it on national TV.

Posted by: OPSEC Soldier | May 19, 2006, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

I have read some very interesting postings on here.
To the airline employees who are bashing fams…. IF you thought you could do a better job, then you should have applied. Oh, by the way, sheep need not apply, we only want sheepdogs willing to fight off the wolves.
Mr. Larry Tate,
I fly 4-5 days a week. I have seen the cockpit door open for 4 minutes while a very interested pilot talked to a very attractive flight attendant. I have seen passengers open the lavatory door just as the pilot opened the cockpit door and they got into a shoving match over opening the door, resulting in the pilot falling backwards onto the center console and the door coming open. Then the passenger shut it for them!
Don’t think for one minute that you can leave it all up to screeners and flight crews. There are mostly very safety conscious crews, but, the lazy ones are just asking for another takeover and then they can lead the charge up the aisle to take the plane back.
This may seem insensitive, but if the crews really watched what they were doing and followed procedures, we wouldn’t be needed in most cases. But, just like the Government is full of laziness, there are doors opened right in front of passengers who the flight attendant expects them to “just wait there” within 7 ft. of the open door and no cart out.
We are forced to go through security checkpoints as designated by the local Law Enforcement/FSD. We don’t have a choice. As for boarding right in front of the passengers… blame the airline, your airline, for screaming and crying whenever we tried to get a discreet meet in place in operations. Before people start blaming the FAMS who are forced by out of touch managers and “king and queen of my domain” gate agents to do what they want, not what is safest, educate yourselves and find out the truth, not just what you THINK.
I support my brothers and sisters in their fight to get the job done the right way, each and every one of them would give their life to save yours. We just don’t want to give it up over stupidity, that’s all.
Semper Fi!

Posted by: jarhead | May 20, 2006, 1:00 am 1:00 am

Most of you guys know who this is and how I feel, a little like Scalia know for telling my true feelings, and not afraid to speak up, but blow my cover to the world! I don’t know! Hey guys you know this is one of those things that was well intended buy slightly twisted. I have to say if the terrorists didn’t know all our stuff by now from all the footage in the media, now they do now. I know that the big wigs in our agency are having a blast collecting money and bonuses, pretending to care about the country but they just got done sitting around in vest and a nice suit coat for the last 25-30 years sweating there asses off with no action. Do you think that they have half of the experience on the street, or in the Military that most of us have had. Lets face it all they care about is the money, and looking good to congress. They have molded a system where they take bonuses for themselves and give raises to only the kiss ups in agency. They have recently decided to hire all of their sons and daughters along with their friends, since they think it is such a joke. They have brought these kids in telling them they are the new breed and paying them more than those of us that have been that quiet professional over the past 5 years, and once you speak up or expose this mess they black ball you. I know that the intentions are good behind this story, but it went too far. We are going to have to do our own thing now, adapt and over come until the circus we are in gets it right. I will pray for all of us who are under paid, black balled and unappreciated, and soon to be ever bigger targets, but let us not forget we are just cops in the air waiting on that one big day and our brothers and sisters are giving the ultimate sacrifice everyday over seas. Stay safe stay low and put on a collared shirt for Gods sake

Posted by: Bobby | May 20, 2006, 1:26 am 1:26 am

OPSEC Soldiers,
Check nightline videos for 7/10/04 and abc news 7/8/04 on these days they video taped specifics on our tactics. Both of these videos specify details of how we function to the same detail as that of FAM Pickard.
We were hired under false pretenses worse than any military recruiter could ever do. In addition as stated by some of my counterparts like it or not the majority of us are educated, articulate and have held positions at supervisory or higher positions previously. We care deeply about the flying public and honestly, our own necks. I get on a plane everyday and do say “not on my watch.” But this is a loaded phrase. My goal is to go home at the end of the day.
I have served this country in uniform in th military, in uniform as a police officer and now in a suit as a FAM. We have been working hard for the last 4 years trying to get things changed and some are seeing no other recourse but to go public.
Understand that the reason for the change is to ensure the safety of the flying public, which could include your family. How would you feel if due to the ineptitude of management your family could have been saved in an incident?
Unlike us that sign up or take positions to serve our country, the general public are not combatants and as such need to be protected and if you or I have knowledge that can protect them it needs to be brought to light. The things Pickard said are common knowledge.
In the military if you find fraus wast or abuse it is your responsibility to report it. Well, the malfeasence and nepetism of this agency need to be reported. The normal channels of reporting this in DHS are broken at best so what options are left?
We the flying FAMS can assure you see FAM Pickard as a brother at arms and respect his decision. Honestly, we that did not know him personally, he has gained our respect.
So please stop saying that he stabbed us in the back, because we don’t see it as such. I have spoken with over 15 FAM’s in the course of this night including one lower level supervisor and none has spoken about Pickard except with respect. So again, if the majority don’t feel as you say we should feel, it should give you into some insight into how severe the problem is. Honestly it is much deeper than Pickard said.

Posted by: FAM | May 20, 2006, 1:38 am 1:38 am

To Opsec soldier
I am a current FAM who served active duty with Special Ops and Military Intelligence. Like you, I have served in combat zones and I know how intelligence is suppose to work.
Let me begin by saying that FAM management exposed virtually every sensitive tactic that we use to secure an airplane in a dog and pony show a couple years ago. These tactics were observed by Al Queda members who devised ways to defeat our tactics. This is in a FBI report that will come out next week.
The Al Queda operative also stated that he identified FAMS do to the poor procedures that we are required to follow such as boarding procedures and dress code.
OPSEC, if the terrorists already know our procedures, doesn’t it only make sense to change them?
We are not worried about the general public, but the terrorists who stake us out are on to us and mangement refuses to change our procedures.
A key principle of operational security (OPSEC) is to make adjustments when security has been breached. FAM mamagement has made no such adjustments.
With regard to whining, remember that the FAMS has no functioning chain of commmand. Unlike the military many of these upper management do not have any leadership skills.
I work with many ex-military and the consensus is that the current management is dangerous.
We don’t need your lecture about opsec. The FAM that came forward has pointed out to the public what the terrorists already know! The focus should not be about what was exposed but why the policies haven’t been changed by management who know that AL Queda has known them for some time.
The way that this agency is being managed is a disgrace to the flag OPSEC.
With regard to Iraq, we have several members who have served time in Iraq and have come back with us. Many of the single guys say they would rather be deployed to Iraq than work as a FAM and be harrassed. You of all people know how ridiculous this sounds but it is true. Many FAMS who serve in the guard get harrassed for going to drill,.
Our agency in general is filled with some of the most Patriotic group that you will find anywhere. And 98% of us are with Spencer and Frank Terrari (who you will see next week )
We are fighting the same guys you were dealin g with in Iraq and you should know that they will make adjustments very quickly. It is guerrilla warfare.
The secret service managers don’t understand this type of warfare and fail to adapt!
Thank you for your service in IRAQ. You may have served next to a FAM without knowing it!

Posted by: anonymous | May 20, 2006, 2:01 am 2:01 am

This administration is what you should see when looking up “Peter Principle”in the dictionary. I must say I am not surprised.

Posted by: Don | May 20, 2006, 2:16 am 2:16 am

OPSEC,
Riddle me this. If an AL AQeuda member reveals to the FBI that he learned our tactics from a broadcast a couple years ago. And this broadcast was part of a dog and pony show by top management in an effort to “deter” terrorists from flying, how can you critique Spencer for exposing managements noneffort to adjust accordingly.
If a secret tactic or procedure is already known to be exposed to the terrorists, wouldn’t it be a good idea to change that tactic/procedure?
In regards to violating any contract. There is no such thing as a contract to these guys. what about violating the LAW! Something that our upper management have done repeatedly!
If you were truly OPSEC you should be informed that the FAMS HQ has repeatedly overclassified documents that have no intelligence value only to cover-up poorly written policies with obvious flaws.
The reason noone is giving out their names in this forum is not for fear of a terrorist discovering it, it is to avoid retaliation from management. That fact alone should speak volumes to someone who just came back from Iraq!

Posted by: anonnymous | May 20, 2006, 3:01 am 3:01 am

OPSEC – You sound more like Management than brother in arms?
Nice try, but that dog won’t hunt.
You’re dripping with arrogance and it shows all over that suit.
Whatever your point is, isn’t.
This Agency’s Leadership hasn’t had time to develop even a ‘policy’ to develop an SOP, so when the proverbial stuff hits the fan…it will be the FAMS themselves who will be blamed for any fall out.
How convenient is that?
In the LAX field office, the original FAMS cleaned up an old range to make it usable, didn’t even have ammo but were told to buy it themselves…so they did.
Soon, there was money to provide big barriers in the office to separate the FAMS from the Management, and then there was money for a new office in a Fortune 500 building for management complete with a state of the art gymnasium, and FAMS became quite cognizant of the fact that they wern’t welcome to use that facility.
LAX FAMS weigh in with the rest of the Nation’s FAMS in offering respect and appreciation to Spencer for his sacrifice on behalf of the American people.
One of the biggest ‘secrets’ still in tact concerns the number of Federal Air Marshals in Service. It may be because the Agency Brass doesn’t want anyone to know the actual ‘turn over’ numbers and dumbing down of training requirements for Air Marshals to fill ever gaping holes in their ability to man aircraft.
How about supervisors ‘whiting out’ actual working hours FAMS report, or asking FAMS to lie on their time sheets? Does that affect national security?
How about FAMS being told that they would fly four days on and three days off…like all Flight personnel and even military pilots because to fly longer is unhealthy and dangerous.
Then, FAMS were told that the Agency wasn’t going to accept any other medical evaluations of dangerous flight times and worked them five days a week at 30,000 feet for a year while the inter Agency ‘study’ was being done.
Without informing the FAMS of the results, the Agency suddenly put them on four days of flying with one day in training. On their two days off they had to file reports, read memos and ever increasing new instructions and unpack and repack for the next go.
They have no collective bargaining unit, they have no overtime pay, they often put in 16 hour days port to port, they sleep on different beds every night, and are locked up in a container with people with the flu, colds and God knows what else, and get harrassed and threatened and treated like children if they ‘are absent’ without a Doctors permission slip.
They were put on a rotating pay scale which steals pay from them each month, and a cascading day off plan that assures them they can make no plans with their families whatsoever…and they are on call 24/7 as well.
If a sick FAM nods off during a second or third flight of the day, he’ll be fired. Most of them suffer chronic sleep deprivation as well.
NOT ONE SINGLE FAM has cited these, nor many other legitimate personal grievances, they endure at the hands of this double dipping Government largess Agency Leadership.
So they aren’t ‘whining’ as you put it, for ‘themselves’.
I commend your service in Iraq (if true?), but you are OPSEC and you are not out there in the danger zone with the ‘young ones’.
So, don’t try to bring any shame by comparison to these great American HEROS by trying to diminish them claiming a Military Soldier sacrifices more.
Lest you appear a little like their current Management folks who rarely miss an opportunity to demean them…EXACTLY as you have done here.
Methinks you need to get back in the dining room to practice more good “Management stance”…cause out here in the kitchen it’s getting a little hot…and it looks like your getting burned like all the other ‘know it all…know nothings’.
God help American with Leaders like these.

Posted by: Public at Risk | May 20, 2006, 7:40 am 7:40 am

i can’t belive that anything good could come out of this type of bording procedure.threse undercover officer’s ;what they have to go through is a rediculious procedure [hello]you see this is the problem these little security flaws that is so oblious to the government and most of the world is whats makesc us wander who is really lookin out for us

Posted by: veronica | May 20, 2006, 8:33 am 8:33 am

I LEFT A PROMISING CAREER AS AN EXPERT TRAVELING AROUND THE WORLD TEACHING OTHER COUNTRIES SECURITY OFFICIALS HOW TO COUNTER TERRORIST TACTICS. BECAUSE AT THE TIME ‘9/11’ IT SEEMED THE RIGHT OPPOURTUNITY TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE AND TEACH THESE VERY SAME TACTICS TO MY OWN GOVERNMENTS SECURITY OFFICIALS THE FAMs. I AM ALSO A FLYING FAM! I SERVED IN THE MILITARY, AS A CIVILIAN POLICE SWAT OFFICER THEN A FEDERAL AGENT AND INSTRUCTOR ENDING UP AN ADJUNCT INSTRUCTOR. AS IT WAS KNOWN IN THE BEGINNING THE PROGRAM WAS A SUCCESS WE WERE PROVIDING FAMs THE BEST TRAINING IN THE WORLD. THE SHOOTING QUALIFICATION COURSE WAS SECOND TO NONE, BEING AN ADJUNCT TRAINER THAT HAS TRAINED WITH MANY SPECIAL MILITARY UNITS & CIVILIAN POLICE SWAT TEAMS, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SWAT TEAMS AND TRANSPORTATION SAFEGUARDS FEDERAL AGENTS, I CAN ATTEST TO THE PROGRAM. IF YOU ARE NOT AWARE THE PROGRAM HIRED ALL THE FLYING AIR MARSHALS MANY MONTHS PRIOR TO HAVING THE CORE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM WE KNOW TODAY. THE AIR MARSHALS WERE MOSTLY MID CAREER FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT, CIVILIAN LAW ENFORCEMENT OR MILITARY VETERANS. OUR BACKGROUNDS AND SKILLS SETS WERE IN MOST CASES SUPERIOR TO THE MANAGEMENT TEAM OF MOSTLY RETIRED SECRET SERVICE AGENTS, BROUGHT IN BY MAGAW WHO LATER TURNED OUT TO LEAVE IN DISGRACE FOR BEING A GREEDY EGOTISTICAL MANIAC LIKE MOST RETIRED SECRET SERVICE AGENTS ARE! <-THAT MY FRIENDS IS THE ROOT OF ALL OUR PROBLEMS AND WHY WE ARE IN THE SITUATION WE ARE SUFFERING THROUGH. THE FEW WHO HAVE COME FORWARD SHOULD GET KUDOS ALONG WITH THE SENATE AND HOUSE COMITTEES INVESTIGATING THE ILLS OF OUR AGENCY. CIVILIANS YOU SHOULD BE HAPPY THIS HAPPENED NOW! DON’T BE CRITICAL OF THE WORKING DAILY FLYING FAMs BECAUSE THEY ARE STILL WILLING TO GIVE IT THEIR ALL TO WIN A FIGHT EVEN AT A DISADVANTAGE. WITH THESE ISSUES BROUGHT TO THE FOREFRONT HOPEFULLY THE FAMs CAN SOON BECOME THE UNKNOWNS TO ALL ON THE MISSIONS THEY FLY.

Posted by: Flyingalot | May 20, 2006, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Remeber when Codeleeza Rice was going around and saying that: “We have to be right 100% of the time but the terrorists only have to be right once”
The Retired Secret Service managers attitude is something like this:
“We covered 1000 flights but they only got one”
You see, their bonuses are based on how many missions the flying FAMS complete.
And most of the flights that we cover are based on routes that get us as close as possible to a Ten hour day. (Not Intelligence, as the fling public would expect)
To yop that off it is a computer program that generates this schedule, (which of course is a convienient scapegoat for upper management when asked why routes based on REAL INTELLIGENCE are not being covered.
To Mr Lambert, Jim Sensennbrenner is not a liberal Democrat! and we appreciate support from any politician who will assist inpurging this agency of the SS retirees.
In the name of National Security fire this Syndicate.

Posted by: annonymous | May 20, 2006, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

I LEFT A PROMISING CAREER AS AN EXPERT TRAVELING AROUND THE WORLD TEACHING OTHER COUNTRIES SECURITY OFFICIALS HOW TO COUNTER TERRORIST TACTICS. BECAUSE AT THE TIME ‘9/11’ IT SEEMED THE RIGHT OPPOURTUNITY TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE AND TEACH THESE VERY SAME TACTICS TO MY OWN GOVERNMENTS SECURITY OFFICIALS THE FAMs. I AM ALSO A FLYING FAM! I SERVED IN THE MILITARY, AS A CIVILIAN POLICE SWAT OFFICER THEN A FEDERAL AGENT AND INSTRUCTOR ENDING UP AN ADJUNCT INSTRUCTOR. AS IT WAS KNOWN IN THE BEGINNING THE PROGRAM WAS A SUCCESS WE WERE PROVIDING FAMs THE BEST TRAINING IN THE WORLD. THE SHOOTING QUALIFICATION COURSE WAS SECOND TO NONE, BEING AN ADJUNCT TRAINER THAT HAS TRAINED WITH MANY SPECIAL MILITARY UNITS & CIVILIAN POLICE SWAT TEAMS, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SWAT TEAMS AND TRANSPORTATION SAFEGUARDS FEDERAL AGENTS, I CAN ATTEST TO THE PROGRAM. IF YOU ARE NOT AWARE THE PROGRAM HIRED ALL THE FLYING AIR MARSHALS MANY MONTHS PRIOR TO HAVING THE CORE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM WE KNOW TODAY. THE AIR MARSHALS WERE MOSTLY MID CAREER FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT, CIVILIAN LAW ENFORCEMENT OR MILITARY VETERANS. OUR BACKGROUNDS AND SKILLS SETS WERE IN MOST CASES SUPERIOR TO THE MANAGEMENT TEAM OF MOSTLY RETIRED SECRET SERVICE AGENTS, BROUGHT IN BY MAGAW WHO LATER TURNED OUT TO LEAVE IN DISGRACE FOR BEING A GREEDY EGOTISTICAL MANIAC LIKE MOST RETIRED SECRET SERVICE AGENTS ARE! <-THAT MY FRIENDS IS THE ROOT OF ALL OUR PROBLEMS AND WHY WE ARE IN THE SITUATION WE ARE SUFFERING THROUGH. THE FEW WHO HAVE COME FORWARD SHOULD GET KUDOS ALONG WITH THE SENATE AND HOUSE COMITTEES INVESTIGATING THE ILLS OF OUR AGENCY. CIVILIANS YOU SHOULD BE HAPPY THIS HAPPENED NOW! DON’T BE CRITICAL OF THE WORKING DAILY FLYING FAMs BECAUSE THEY ARE STILL WILLING TO GIVE IT THEIR ALL TO WIN A FIGHT EVEN AT A DISADVANTAGE. WITH THESE ISSUES BROUGHT TO THE FOREFRONT HOPEFULLY THE FAMs CAN SOON BECOME THE UNKNOWNS TO ALL ON THE MISSIONS THEY FLY.

Posted by: Flyingalot | May 20, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

OPSEC Soldier-
You say this made it easier for the terrorists? Easier than a two day special on MSNBC that detailed exactly how we dress, how we board, what weapon we use, what tactics we use, our communication device and where we sit?
As far as the nondisclosure agreement, that is only relevant when you are disclosing something. If its already been disclosed then you are not disclosing it again. Its now public domain.

Posted by: law dawg | May 20, 2006, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

I would like to say thank you to all those FAMS out there who are sticking out there necks for better procedures and common sense. I an a former Secret Service employee as well as a former FAM. I can only say that I now work for a different government agency and could not be happier. The Secret Service and the Air Marshal program both have high turn over rates and continuing low morale. These situations are due to poor supervision, power hungery managers, and a disregard for employee’s health or safety. During my time in both agencies, I’ve seen supervisors ask employees for a copy of a death certificate so they could get time off for a family member’s funeral. I personally worked with one Air Marshal who was very outspoken and critical of policies. What happened to this person? The Air Marshal service fired him, claiming he made international phone calls with his government phone. These were bogus charges that were never proven. They were trying to silence him and put a scare into everyone else. That’s when I knew it was time to get out. Since leaving the Marshal program, I continue to hear horror stories about their jobs. Hang in there guys. Your supervisors are just there for the extra retirement money and more glory. We all know how these former SS agents crave attention and recognition. As for you OPSEC boy, this is not the military. We don’t take blind orders from anyone. We use our intelligence, experience, and common sense to solve problems. Stop wrapping yourself in the flag and do what you do best: sucking up to management.

Posted by: JF | May 21, 2006, 2:06 am 2:06 am

While the iron is hot, there is a FAM office in New Jersey that is in a different state and over 55 miles away from the aiport it “covers.”
Not too far unless you take into account that for the past four years taxpayers have been paying out millions of dollars in mileage and toll reimbursement for FAMs who work from this office.
Why? Well, because the SAIC lives extremely close to the office and does not want to drive more than three miles to work every day. He refuses to move the office closer to the airport resulting in waste that reaches stratospheric levels.
If a FAM working out of the airport needs backup with an airport arrest or similar issue, as has already been the case numerous times, the nearest “manager” is an hour away. That’s right, the lowest-level supervisor is making well over 100K and is of absolutely no use.
The boarding and dress issues are barely scratching the surface here. Someone who can not be tainted needs to seriously look into what is going on in the FAMS. Just in one office alone millions of dollars can be immediately saved with a few minor changes.

Posted by: Nothanx | May 21, 2006, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Not only do I believe everything these FAM’s have been saying in these various posts about the malfeasance of FAMS management, I think that someone ought to send copies of these blotter posts to every member on the Hill and to the White House for “required reading”.
This disgracful unlawful conduct has been covered up by the guilty for too long and it is not too late for the powers to be to take action and investigate to the fullest any and all agencies that have refused to investigate all of the charges of unlawful conduct, discrimination and incompetence by management.
I believe you ! Bless you all for your courage,commitment and enduring integrity. You are the real spirit of America and an example of those that made this country what it is today. Keep up the fight – because you are right !

Posted by: I Believe These Brave Fams | May 22, 2006, 1:26 am 1:26 am

The fraud, lies and waste of this agency is disgusting. I beg the American people to read these blogs, the report from Congress and take some sort of action. Call your Congressmen and Senators. Send an email. Demand a full investigation and hearings into what is going on…
Many FAMs would prefer they simply disband this agency completely and spend the money saved on reinforcing cockpit doors and training flight crews to fight better. This is no exaggeration. The criminal conduct is so bad. I pray the USSS itself is not so corrupt. I know the US Border Patrol has issues, but nothing like the FAMS.
Maybe Secret Service agents lie so much since they spent so many years near politicians and lobbyists.
I hope the American people stand up, because I am quitting the job soon.

Posted by: Leaving FAMS | May 22, 2006, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

I agree completly with almost every comment made! I wanted to be a air marshal until i heard they were required to follow a dress code. How STUPID is that! What idiotic in a suit behind a desk came up with that great idea?! I’de like to know so i could write him. Why not put a sign on your back saying “AIR MARSHAL”. I thought this was considered “UNDERCOVER” work. i know undercover police officers and i know they can look and dress any way that helps them blend in with the people they are infultrating. Air marshals are supposed to blend in NOT stand out like a G.I. Joe Ken Doll. I fear for the safety of the marshals and the passangers on the planes alot more than for the executives behind the desks with no fear for their lives or 150 other people. just a few things i feel they should do to make it safer and more “UNDERCOVER”:
1. NO DRESS CODE
2. AIR MARSHALS ENTER THE AIRPORT THROUGHT A SECRET ENTERANCE (THE SECURITY ENTERANCE MAYBE AS NOT TO BE SEEN GOING AROUND SECURITY CHECK POINTS.)
3. NO EXTRA MESSURES WHEN BOARDING PLANES (LET THEM GET ON WITH AND LIKE EVERY OTHER NORMAL PASSANGER.)
GOD BLESS THE MEN & WOMEN IN THE MILITARY, POLICE OFFICERS, FIGH FIGHTERS, AIR MARSHALLS AND ALL OTHERS GIVING THIER LIVES FOR PEOPLE WHO DONT GIVE A DAMN ABOUT THERE’S!!

Posted by: Mike Arft | May 22, 2006, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Incompetence earns job security in the Bush Administration. Cronyism earns promotion. Failure earns top job consideration.
Honesty, leadership, integrity, and accountability are completely useless job skills and qualities in this administration.
It says a lot about why our country is on the brink of a catastrophic collapse.

Posted by: Ginger Winchester | May 24, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

I am in the application process for the FAMS and was quite eager for this opportunity UNTIL I started researching and found such a large group of low moraled individuals. I dont think I need to start a career with an agency that is a living mess filled with incompetent or even worse, uncaring managers. I will take the job if offered and do my best but I dont think I will be offened if I never hear back from the FAMS again!!!

Posted by: Alanzo | June 4, 2006, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

After watching the events of 911 hit very close to home, I realized that I wanted to make a difference and contribute to my country. Many of the postings that I have read are pretty informative. May god bless us and all that are on the front lines protecting and securing the country. Management may need to go. Most of the managers running the program are babyboomers counting the days before retirement. Hopefully, some of the young blood will have the opportunity to step up into some of these decision making roles and make a difference and bring some new innovative ways of thinking to the table. That will be a nice thing….Be safe to all of LAW ENFORCEMENT……

Posted by: NYer | July 21, 2006, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Air Marshall’s giving their lives for…
Please.
Well paid job, free travel, feeling of power.

Posted by: James Sterling | December 11, 2008, 6:36 am 6:36 am

You can certainly see your expertise within the work you write. The world hopes for even more passionate writers like you who aren’t afraid to mention how they believe. All the time follow your heart.

Posted by: zapalniczki zippo | October 26, 2011, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.