May 24, 2006 6:24pm

Officials: Hastert “In the Mix” of Congressional Bribery Investigation

Federal officials say the Congressional bribery investigation now includes Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert, based on information from convicted lobbyists who are now cooperating with the government.

Part of the investigation involves a letter Hastert wrote three years ago, urging the Secretary of the Interior to block a casino on an Indian reservation that would have competed with other tribes.

The other tribes were represented by convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff who reportedly has provided details of his dealings with Hastert as part of his plea agreement with the government.

The letter was written shortly after a fund-raiser for Hastert at a restaurant owned by Abramoff. Abramoff and his clients contributed more than $26,000 at the time.

The day Abramoff was indicted, Hastert denied any unlawful connection and said he would donate to charity any campaign contribution he had received from Abramoff and his clients. A spokesman for Speaker Hastert told ABC News, "We are not aware of this.  The Speaker has a long history and a well-documented record of opposing Indian Reservation shopping for casino gaming purposes."

This week, Hastert has been outspoken in his criticism of the FBI for its raid on the office of another congressman under investigation, Democrat William Jefferson of Louisiana. "My opinion is that they took the wrong path, Hastert said of the FBI.  "They need to back up, and we need to go from there." ABC News’ Rhonda Schwartz and Richard Esposito contributed to this report. Link: Click here to read Brian Ross’ latest report on the bribery investigation into Rep. Jefferson. Link: Click here to see the charges on Abramoff’s AmEx Bill. Link: Click here to check out the bribe menu of convicted Congressman Duke Cunningham. Link: Click here to read Brian Ross’ story on Abramoff accepting a plea bargain. Link: Click here to read Brian Ross’ report on "Delay’s Lavish Island Getaway" arranged by Abramoff.

User Comments

Geez, is there a republican who’s not corrupt?

Posted by: Wisco | May 24, 2006, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Caught the “investigative” report on Hastert and it just reminded me why I NEVER watch ABC news. No substantiation of the crimes he is to have committed just a bunch of hyped up accusations made by un-named federal officials. OK, lesson learned…back to Fox!

Posted by: PE Adams | May 24, 2006, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Republican…Democrat…it makes NO difference…these corrupt, self-serving idiots have been doing this for YEARS! And WE allow them to do it! Shame on us!
Being elected to public office is akin to being given a license to steal…

Posted by: Eagle1 | May 24, 2006, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

I hope Nancy Pelosi is happy that she affiliated herself with Hastert today with their joint statement. Guilt by association?

Posted by: Robert | May 24, 2006, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

UNbelievable! No wonder he wants the FBI to return the documents they took from Jefferson’s office because he knows they’ll be after his soon!
Brian, I absolutely praise you for continuing to report knowing that they are watching, listening and monitoring you.
Don’t worry: the American people who are actively demanding that our congressional members WAKE UP and begin some oversight procedures! What is wrong Brian? They’ll be rounding us up and putting us in the detention centers that KRB is building for Haliburton!
Please keep digging Brian, and don’t worry. We’ve got your back, and they can’t stop us.

Posted by: Vicki Satta | May 24, 2006, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Now we know that more than one member of congress is hiding his crimianal activity in the offices of the halls of congress. They have now declared “we are above the law”. Enough said.

Posted by: Scrapiron | May 24, 2006, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

“My opinion is that they took the wrong path, Hastert said of the FBI. “They need to back up, and we need to go from there.”
What’s this supposed to mean? Since when does congress tell the FBI who or what to investigate?

Posted by: This Old House | May 24, 2006, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Why am I not surprised…they’re eating their own now, so predictable-just throw a net over all of them!

Posted by: devin | May 24, 2006, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

It’s about time.
I doubt that I am alone in being sick to death of all of the corruption that seems to be the only thing that the Congress has been up to these last five years.
This is not the first claim of Hastert accepting bribes, either.
So much for values.
Just drop the s, it’s all these morally vapid public officials care about.

Posted by: Pete | May 24, 2006, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Is he a crook or is he being punished for disloyalty to King George? Why either or? He could be both. So, I don’t know whether to happy or sad over this. I’m so confused.

Posted by: lance peeples | May 24, 2006, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

My! My! My! Aren’t we all surprised? Another upstanding Republican in the Congress in a NO NO scandal. And he has the audacity to complain about the execution of a Search Warrant by the FBI. Another fine representative of the people who believes he’s above the law. Sounds to me like its time for the Republicans to clean house!

Posted by: Alex Varga | May 24, 2006, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Hastert “In the Mix”? Well now we know why he suddenly became a constitution loving patriot.

Posted by: Paul D. Meehan | May 24, 2006, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

It’s about time something is being done about politicians who think they are above the law. I don’t care what party afilliation they have they should be brought to justice and pay the penalty regardless.
Politicians need to remember what they were elected for and to remember that.

Posted by: Bob | May 24, 2006, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

It starts with Bush and goes and goes and goes. Why doesn’t the stupid media get it? Why do you think Hastert is going crazy because Jefferson’s office was raided-maybe, he’s next?

Posted by: patricia licopoli | May 24, 2006, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Regardless the party, our “representatives” in Congress are all for sale. They do not think of the people, they think only about whatever fills their coffers. As for me, I intend to vote against ALL incumbents this and future elections. Term limits won’t get voted on favorably in DC, therefore, we need to impose our own.
Rich
Berlin, MD

Posted by: Rich Frey | May 24, 2006, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Democrats, Republicans, I don’t care. If we have corruption in highest offices of America…flush them out!!!

Posted by: John | May 24, 2006, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

What is it Hastert & Pelosi are trying to hide from the legal citizens of America??? – They are so afraid of being exposed in corruption by JEFFERSON DOCUMENTS — Amnesty for illegals – DNC/GOP let our elected officials show their true colors – who is for/against illegals – then go face the voters in the fall, DNC – vote on both sides of the immigration issue – GOP are weak-kneed

Posted by: Andrew Kozik | May 24, 2006, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Your story of allegations against Hastert is weak.
ABC/CBS/NBC/PMSNBC/CNBC/NPR…SUCK

Posted by: David Ziegler | May 24, 2006, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Why am I not Surprised?

Posted by: Federali | May 24, 2006, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

How dare these elected representatives in Washington both Democrat and Republican cry out that the recent FBI search of Representative William Jefferson’s office in conjunction with a criminal investigation was an “outrage”. This is an office bought and paid for by the American taxpayer and is not some sort of privileged sanctuary free from the moral, ethical and legal constraints imposed on society. By what stretch of the imagination can these elitists assert that proof of criminal activity secreted in a congressional office is somehow protected from discovery by the United States Constitution. A legal warrant issued by a federal judge to the FBI to conduct this search does not violate the separation of powers. Rather it is an affirmation of what so many in Congress have been demanding the President and the NSA do when trying to protect us from terrorists. So many of these people have been in Congress for so long that they truly believe they are above the law and not subject to the same restrictions as mere unelected American citizens. The arrogance of our so called representatives is appalling. They need to be reminded that election to office is not a license to flaunt the law. This is one more compelling reason in a long list for the establishment of term limits for Congress.

Posted by: Michael Mattia | May 24, 2006, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Here’s my suggestion for next fall:
THROW EVERY SINGLE SENATOR AND CONGRESSMAN OUT OF OFFICE! NO EXCEPTIONS!
Damn, if there were a viable third party, I’d vote for it’s candidates in a heartbeat.

Posted by: Mark Jaeger | May 24, 2006, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

I think this helps explain why so many Republicans are fighting for William Jefferson against the FBI. It also explains why I and many of my fellow Republican friends are becoming registered Independents and leaving the Republican Party!

Posted by: Mike Mullen | May 24, 2006, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Brian Ross: How can you investigate anyone when you’re #1 on the FBI”S hit parade?

Posted by: tom callahan | May 24, 2006, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Well THIS would confirm why Hastert has been so outspoken about the FBI raid on a Democrat’s office! Just I suspected! The WHOLE LOT OF THEM are rotecting one another. Democrat, Republican, the whole lot of them are filthy! This is increasingly becoming the dark day for America that we always knew was there! The whole lot of them are crooked!

Posted by: James Burke | May 24, 2006, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Why haven’t people become at least concerned about these nasty polital habits and allegations of nasty political habits that have been exposed over the last year or so? Too many Americans seem to believe that this is just some sort of cost of doing business, instead of recognizing that this is eroding our government and our society’s ethics. Few also seem to recognize that the FBI’s recent raid of a Congressman’s office is a constitutional breach. Instead, too many seem worried about what Hollywood is doing for “family values”, what language Hispanics are singing in, and shopping.

Posted by: Dana Smith | May 24, 2006, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Bring out the backhoe and keep on diggin!

Posted by: Vincent Nemeti | May 24, 2006, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

It was fine for the Executive Branch to do Congress’ job and declare war (Congress had to beg to rubberstamp the Iraq war resolution and, apparently, any spying GWB wants to do) but now that the Exec branch is raiding offices they are outraged? Amazing.
So perhaps this is why Hastert and the Congress have suddenly re-discovered the Separation of Powers…to get their payola papers back?

Posted by: DaveP | May 24, 2006, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Go Brian go. Republican or Democrats, expose them. Hastert protests too much.

Posted by: Bob | May 24, 2006, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Very misleading title…

Posted by: Bob | May 24, 2006, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Investigate everyone in WashingtonD. C. They are all
crooks.

Posted by: Margaret M Hoffman | May 24, 2006, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Developing.
Could be something. Could be nothing.

Posted by: Sean | May 24, 2006, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

this explains why he was so defensive of Jefferson’s plight………..they are all crooks !!

Posted by: Frank Krosnicki | May 24, 2006, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

*LOL*!!!
This Is So Funny That, I Burst-Out Laughing When I 1st Read The Headline!!!
In Reality Though, It’s SO DARN *SAD*!
:-(

Posted by: The View Master! | May 24, 2006, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Brian:
Unlike your unaired story on the Admin bugging journalists, your producer has to put this story out… or do they?

Posted by: SPENCER ADAMS | May 24, 2006, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

This is just the tip of the iceberg…
Of course the members of congress are stating this is unconstitutional, they are all corrupt and they all have something to hide.
I THINK IT’S ABOUT TIME FOR ANOTHER BOSTON TEA PARTY…
Throw all of those theiving bastards out and make mandatory term limits so they aren’t tempted to take bribes and become engrained in corruption.

Posted by: Paul | May 24, 2006, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

I know Denny Hastert personally and would be shocked if there is any truth to this.

Posted by: yorkvilleguy | May 24, 2006, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Dennis Hastert is out to lunch.
Let’s have the House and Congress abide by and subject to the same laws the rest of the nation lives under.
Is he and his conrades exempt from the very rule of law he pleaded to uphold?
Save a jail cell for this one, XL.

Posted by: moe | May 24, 2006, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Is their a democrat without 100 grand in his freezer ?

Posted by: kevin | May 24, 2006, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Whatever happened to the bribe from russia that hastert received…Did the FBI forget that or oops sorry hastert is a republican, they dont do republicans, just democrats…

Posted by: pal | May 24, 2006, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

No wonder Denny boy was so hot under the collar when the FBI raided William Jefferson’s office..said it was unconstitutional (guess he knew he might be next..?)….How ever it seems to be pretty much okay with their Constitution (Pelosi, included) to raid/ tap/listen/data-mine/snoop, on us peasants, who pay the bills for these jackals and theives….any body else as sick of this bunch as I am? Can’t we just start all over….?

Posted by: Chabuka | May 24, 2006, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Ahhh..I love this left wing bias in the media…It’ll help get those Neo-con pigs out of office 06 and 08.

Posted by: Jc Owens | May 24, 2006, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

What is the term used now when liberal journalists report false information? I think it is “got out in front of the story” Brian Ross seems to have done this as the Justice Department “on the record” which is more than Ross can provide has just said that “Hastert is not under investigation” Nice job Ross

Posted by: Robert | May 24, 2006, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Thanks brian…Thank you so much…Thank you for not letting them keep this quiet..

Posted by: pal | May 24, 2006, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Surprise, surprise…Hastert whines about the FBI raiding congressional offices WITH A LEGAL WARRANT, and now we find out Hastert himself is under FBI investigation.
Some say (Hi, Fox News!) this sounds like Hastert protecting himself more than some crooked Democrat.
And what’s up with Pelosi? How many Democrats must we also drain from this swamp of corruption?

Posted by: jimbo92107 | May 24, 2006, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

This is not a republican thing. They are all corrupt. They don’t give a damn about the American people. They will sell their own mother out. We must have term limits. No more than 8 years for anybody.

Posted by: Sara | May 24, 2006, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

The devil’s advocate version of all this is “All you people are so disgusted with the *perceived* corruption of congress, that the executive branch could pretty much send them all to Guantanamo, “Just in case,” and you’d go along with it.

Posted by: Randall | May 24, 2006, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Tried, convicted and hung all on the unsubstantiated reporting of a “trusted” newsman…let’s see the results before being so quick to pass sentence…

Posted by: Daryl T. Brooks | May 24, 2006, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Ross, It’s about time you print the retraction isn’t it? Both the FBI and the DOJ have said “on the record” that Hastert is not under investigation. You should get your high government officials to try that “on the record” stuff!

Posted by: Robert | May 24, 2006, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

The Bush administration will catch ‘holy hell’ from Congress about this. If they thought they were getting grief before from Republican legislators, just wait. It is clear that this leak came from the executive branch with high-level approval. I’m betting on the legislative branch- any takers?

Posted by: vk | May 24, 2006, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Brian,
You are the man.
Keep up the good work.
PS, you may want to get a disposable cellphone.

Posted by: joewilson | May 24, 2006, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Perhaps this country needs another Clinton administration to awaken conservatives.

Posted by: Robert Nance | May 24, 2006, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Mark Twain recognized the affliction, a long time ago and it’s not getting any better:
”It could probably be shown by facts and figures
that there is no distinctly native criminal class
except Congress.”

Posted by: ich dien | May 24, 2006, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

The story is false. The Justice Department has issued a statement that Speaker Hastert is not under investigation, and the Speaker’s office is demanding a retraction from ABC.

Posted by: Rick | May 24, 2006, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Geez is there a Democrat who is not a criminal (Jefferson in LA, Clinton, Hillary etc?)

Posted by: Al | May 24, 2006, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

no wonder why media like ABC are going south!!!!

Posted by: clark pell | May 24, 2006, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Corruption in Congress goes back so many years and against many there now and more that have left. Between political graft, pork spending (check the “Big Ditch” from $2B to $14+B”) to current bribery and pay-offs for political favors. Why can’t the public see that we need radical changes in Congress, both Dems and Reps. Let Justice investigate the whole bunch.

Posted by: David Austin | May 24, 2006, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

EVERY PERSON IN GOVERMENT SHOULD
BY LAW HAVE TO TAKE A LIE DECECTOR
TEST IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE WHO ELECTED THEM,LETS HAVE A REAL
GOVERMENT,BY HONEST PEOPLE ,..BUT ITS ALL ABOUT MONEY…GREED.
“ONCE PEOPLE BELIVE IN NOTHING…THEY’LL BELIVE IN ANYTHING”
JOHANN DOHMANN

Posted by: JOHANN DOHMANN | May 24, 2006, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Folks, the real bribery lies in the Budget Earmarks. THATS where the real graft is. Keep you eye on that.

Posted by: Dan | May 24, 2006, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Wires are circulating that the DOJ has been contacted and denied this story is true. What’s going on? He’s either “under investigation by the FBI” or he isn’t.

Posted by: Robert | May 24, 2006, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Earliest on this thread, someone maligning “Republicans” as being a group of people who does not contain any one non-corrupt person:
More people have been investigated in one degree or another by the FBI and other efforts by law enforcement than most Democrats would ever admit or even be aware of, in my experience. It doesn’t mean there’s corruption present, it just means there’s a possibility by affiliation.
I would not jump to conclude that Hastert (nor anyone in similar situations) is “corrupt” just by Party nor just by association. That’s the purpose of an INVESTIGATION, to try to determine what’s what (granted, with an access advantage when it’s from a prosecutorial perspective).
Take a long look at the Democrats in our nation. Ted Kennedy, John Kerry…the Democrats in the House majority in the state of California, state legislature…the list is a long one of “corruption” for socio-political and often sheer egotistical and ambitions’ incentive.
But it’s important to keep in mind that whoever suggests a corrupt association or association for purposes of corruption should be exposed and penalized and booted out of elected office. I think the issues here are those of human ethics and human morality and not of political party as a defining characteristic in association with “corruption.”
It’s also important to remember that those investigated are almost always those in the scope to one degree or another of those who politically oppose them. Stare long enough at anyone in elected office, you’ll find undue advantage somewhere to some extent. Among all politics, all party affiliations.

Posted by: -S- | May 24, 2006, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Greetings,
It is no wonder the Speaker for the United States House of Representatives, thereby being constitutionally authorized, in time of a national tradgedy to take over the role as president if our country were to suffer an unforseen loss of our President and or Vice President of the United States, was one of the first of our nations leaders to be “offended” by the FBI executing a search warrant on the Louisiana democratic congressman’s office this past Saturday, as it directly relates to his being implicated in a bribery event himself.
As an American citizen, who fought in Desert Storm and continue to serve my country in a local community for which I am employed as a law enforcement official, am deeply troubled and appalled by our nations leaders for having a sense of being “above the law” when it comes to conducting the country’s business.
If a regular american citizen, not entitled to the “perks” as are the elected officals, were to act in a manner consitent with the behavior of some of our elected leaders, he or she would have been remanded to the custody of the local sheriff and or state prison system upon the trial of said individual and be publicly scrutinized in a manner more severe than the elected officials would ever think of facing.
These elected officials need to understand that they are there strickly on the backs of the working class society and yet they continue to conduct themselves in a very scandalous manner.
I call for the immediate and unequivocal resignation of any all elected official and there staffs, if when all evidence comes to fruition that they were implicated in these criminal acts.
The American people need to be very worried as to how our elected leaders conduct themselves on our behalves. I am a Repulican voter, however, it is of my belief that the corruption freely flows on both sides of the isle and it needs to cease for the betterment of our country.
This is not a Republican and or Democratic issue, it is an American issue that needs to be addressed swiftly.
Thank you,
MLB

Posted by: Melvin B | May 24, 2006, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Instead of this being a chinese-water-torture, drip drip drip… I wish that ALL the people that are implicated by the now “cooperative” Mr. Abramoff would just be revealed. Get it overwith already!!!!
Neither party can afford to have this corruption scandal pushed under the rug. Finger the bad guys, force them to resign & let all the other hardworking Members of Congress – and the candidates for Congress get back to doing the people’s business.
This is excruciating!

Posted by: Miss Boleyn | May 24, 2006, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

You’re all a bunch of suckers! You’ll fall for anything the media reports. Check this out:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE OPA
WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 2006 (202) 514-2007
http://WWW.USDOJ.GOV TDD (202) 514-1888
STATEMENT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
“Speaker Hastert is not under investigation by the Justice Department.”
###
Speaker’s Press Office
United States House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: 202-225-2800
May 24, 2006 Ron Bonjean or Heidi Armstrong
Statement from Ron Bonjean, Communications Director
for Speaker Hastert
(Washington, D.C.) Ron Bonjean, Communications Director for Speaker of the House J. Dennis Hastert (R-IL) issued the following statement regarding the ABC Nightly News story that aired this evening:
“The ABC News report is absolutely untrue. As confirmed by the Justice Department, ‘Speaker Hastert is not under investigation by the Justice Department.’ We are demanding a full retraction of the ABC News story. The Speaker’s earlier statement issued today accurately reflects the facts regarding this matter.”
###

Posted by: justin | May 24, 2006, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

I am not surprised to find that most of the people posting think this is about hiding from guilt. The separation of powers is one of the most important of our constitutional rights to a free congress. The fact we have found democrats can be just as corrupt as republicans is really in the grand scheme of things is not only obvious but unimportant. We will always have corrupt politicians , it seems we may not always have the rights guaranteed us by our constitution. Next time the president may decide to take all power from the other branches of government. Perhaps taking away our right to vote. Bush has already crossed the line so many times people ignore the infractions on their rights. Once lost these rights are not easily regained. At this rate we will have dictatorship. Thank you mindless middle America you voted for him.

Posted by: Jeff Rogers | May 24, 2006, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

At least Bushes justice department is going after both republicans and democrats. Clintons Reno did nothing about all the obvious corruption.

Posted by: Bob Crossett | May 24, 2006, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

I wonder if the President is making his move for absolute power. Sounds like this story is too close to Hastert’s complaints of Executive abuse.
This administration is going to try and stay beyond 2008.

Posted by: Stro2425 | May 24, 2006, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

The Republican party is imploding, and out of the ashes, Bush will try to take absolute power.
They didn’t do 911 for nothing.

Posted by: stro2425 | May 24, 2006, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we threw all of them out and started over with God loving, blue-collar Americans who knew what it was like to work 10 hours a day,52 weeks a year. McKinney can punch a cop and nothing happens, they all are untouchable and we Americans have let this happen. The enemy is truly from within.

Posted by: David | May 24, 2006, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Is there anyone in the “house” surprised about this so called revelation???

Posted by: Frank | May 24, 2006, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

There all corrupt it seems like.
Big smiles, I passed this, I did that, look at this, and that and life goes on and nothing for the middle class changes. How much more can citizens take of this. Another slap on the wrist?

Posted by: dave | May 24, 2006, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Federal officials, yeah they’re never wrong. You’ve been played ABC the story isn’t true. Why don’t you tell us who those federal officials are. This is why Main Stream Medis is fading away.

Posted by: Kurt Peters | May 24, 2006, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Geez, is there a REPUBLICAN who is not a criminal? You Republican fools are still talking about the Clintons? Is that all you got?
The Republicans under indictment and investigation: Hastert, Delay, and Frist (The top 3 Republicans in Congress), Goss (head of CIA who had to step down), Abramoff (#1 lobbyist in DC), Safavian (Bush’s budget head), Claude Allen (Bush’s top policy advisor), Dusty Foggo (#3 at the CIA), Karl Rove (you know who he is), Scooter Libby, Cheney may be indicted, Bob Ney (top Republican congressman), Duke Cunningham (doing 8 years in prison), and the Abramoff investigation is just beginning.

Posted by: Bob | May 24, 2006, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

To Jeff Rogers,
Why is it that all the people moaning about separation of powers fail to mention THE FEDERAL JUDGE who issued the warrent?

Posted by: Robert | May 24, 2006, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

did not harry reid accept money from abramoff? where is your story on that corrupt person??????
Oh thats right he is on the left where you are

Posted by: richard | May 24, 2006, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Brian Ross must be out with Jason Leopold wondering why they are so easy to be PUNKED by their “un named sources”

Posted by: Robert | May 24, 2006, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Hastert is full of beans, the Constitution does not prevent the search of Congressional offices under a warrant, only the arrest of a member going to or coming from a vote, or for voting a particular way. They are just as susceptable as any citizen to a warrant when issued by a judge – in this case it’s a slam dunk. Folks, let’s vote ‘em all out and start over-it’s high time for a house cleaning and term limits.

Posted by: John Kenney | May 24, 2006, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

this is what pols do. they are usually some rich big shot type who get into politics to make more biz..from the mayor on up..its all about control….this is not a party thing. its a power thing.

Posted by: pooky | May 24, 2006, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Does anyone remember the Hudson Casino? This Clinton era scandal involved numerous Minnesota Congressman and Senators that wrote letters to the BIA to kill of the proposed casino in Hudson Wisconsin. The Hudson Casino would have competed with the Minnesota casinos who were giving large donations to the Minnesota congressional delegation, mostly Democrats. The independent counsel chose to ignore all of the congressman who wrote letters to the BIA, regardless of the donations received. So it would appear letters to the BIA don’t count.

Posted by: Tony | May 24, 2006, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

I have been a Republican my entire life. I have voted for Bush twice. Isn’t it time we impeached both Bush and Cheney? How about a third party?

Posted by: Greg | May 24, 2006, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

The FBI ought to have something more than the testimony of a convicted crook before they send the Speaker of the House to prison.

Posted by: implicaverse | May 24, 2006, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Of course some members of Congress are too rich to have to steal. They do it recreationally…

Posted by: John West | May 24, 2006, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Hastert don’t look like he’s been missing too many of them free lobbyist meals, does he?…

Posted by: John West | May 24, 2006, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

I think that the next American Revolution is long overdue. Not a violent one, but a revolution nevertheless. The two party system is failing us as is the checks and balance system. But perhaps the politicians will realize that the American people will not take this anymore and maybe change their strategies. That may be wishful thinking, but not completely out of sight yet.

Posted by: Tucker | May 24, 2006, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

DOJ denies report. They state that Hastert is not under investigation. Did Ross check with DOJ before reporting? Are his “federal officials” DOJ, or another outside agency? Tell me he at least asked the DOJ, and if he did why didn’t he include their answer in his report. I am not saying Hastert is guilty or innocent. But I would think that he would have at least asked DOJ before he jumped the gun.

Posted by: kevin peters | May 24, 2006, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Yay, yay! This wills surely dwarf the Jefferson story! Brian Ross always comes through for us!

Posted by: Jenna | May 24, 2006, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Is ABC News trying to one-up Dan Rather? This codswallop wouldn’t have passed muster at any farm town newspaper without more sources, but yet ABC brethlessly rushed it on air to smear Speaker Hastert. Disgusting. And there’s still no update to the story showing that it’s been officially denied by DOJ.

Posted by: Juan Nadie | May 24, 2006, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Two words…”TERM LIMITS!”

Posted by: jim whitesell | May 24, 2006, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

ABC: de-Noted!

Posted by: Bob Bowie | May 24, 2006, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

This investigation also seems to be inching closer to Missouri Congressman Roy Blunt, who also signed several letters to DOI, including one with Hastert, on behalf of Abarmoff clients. Abramoff contributed to Blunt’s ROYB PAC soon after.

Posted by: Ray Smith | May 24, 2006, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Law enforcement officials leaking information of this nature is very destructive to their purposes since there is no way Hastert can defend himself. He doesn’t even know for sure what the charges might be. Therefore I suggest ABC investigate the individuals who leaked this information.
However the problem is obviously that we essentially have a Congress which does not operate for the people, but rather for those who can afford to buy influence. For example the US Chamber of Congress is aggressively pushing Amnesty for illegal aliens, and since the Chamber of Congress has almost unlimited funds it’s not surprisingly that the Senate is about to vote for Amnesty.

Posted by: Chris Baker | May 24, 2006, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Personally, I think anyone who serves in elected office should have to submit to in depth and random lie detection tests, complete background investigations and know that at any time their complete communication chain might be investigated – if they are privy to any classified information. Makes sense to me.

Posted by: grassroots | May 24, 2006, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Back to Fox News huh, Wisco.
That’s getting the unvarnished truth for sure.
Fox News, “We decide then report”

Posted by: taloka | May 24, 2006, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

This hand has played out. Time to reshuffle the deck.

Posted by: Tom | May 24, 2006, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Finally porky got it!!!

Posted by: ddarrow | May 24, 2006, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

So what if the DOJ denied it? The ABC article says nothing about him being investigated by the DOJ. I’ll believe him when we get a response from the FBI saying they’re not investigating him.

Posted by: Justin | May 24, 2006, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Never, and I mean never, have I seen anything like these past six years, where mainstream broadcast journalists have taken leave of their senses and their professionalism.
How can this country put its trust in anything if the media is rotting from within?
I do know that the only possible way left to regard any reporter who references “an unnamed source” is to regard the allegation as false until properly double-sourced *on the record*.

Posted by: George W. | May 24, 2006, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Brian, who was your source? It appears your story has absoltely zero truth to it….

Posted by: James Williams | May 24, 2006, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

When Hastert is cleared a lot of you who shoot from the hip will be eating crow

Posted by: Wally | May 24, 2006, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

All politicians are corrupt. Not just Hastert. He’s just been named as the latest target for someone’s personal vendetta. If all corrupt politicians were ever called to account I am 100% sure that 95% of Congress would have to tender a resignation letter. The REAL problem is the morons who vote these people back into office each year.

Posted by: Robert | May 24, 2006, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

And don’t you know that this all started with PAC MONEY?

Posted by: M. Hughes | May 24, 2006, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

I see the justice department has definitively rebutted your story. You’re not just careless, you’re deliberately pursuing a liberal agenda designed to discredit republoicans. Deny it? HOW! Your credibility is at an all time low.

Posted by: David Tanton | May 24, 2006, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

When Hastert is cleared a lot of you who shoot from the hip will be eating crow

Posted by: Wally | May 24, 2006, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Why are some of you picking on Bush..gee whiz it is his administration that is exposing the corruption EVEN when it is republicans. You can’t say he is just going after democrats. It seems pretty even handed. I think Congress’ halls are fair game, I mean it is where the PEOPLE’s business takes place, and it is from US that they get the power which they misuse. Their house is our house…….and I see no reason for it to be off limits to searches. But, let’s at least agree that no matter what party a crook is, he is a crook. And at least the Bush team is exposing them all and let the chips fall where they may.

Posted by: gRAMMIE | May 24, 2006, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Is He Going To Jail?
For How Long?
???

Posted by: The View Master! | May 24, 2006, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Hmmm — If this is not correct will Brian Ross resign or be fired?
First CBS and now maybe ABC?
Now wonder we turn to blogs anymore for news.

Posted by: Kurt | May 24, 2006, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Sounds like a liberal conspiracy to me. I’m tired of all this dirt coming from an “annonymous” source.

Posted by: E.Marie Martin | May 24, 2006, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

So Rather-gate distroyed what was left of CBS news ….( ok there was not much left) , will this turn off the lights on ABC? hope so…either way… FOX one more viewer coming:)

Posted by: mike hawk | May 24, 2006, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Robert,
is the doj the only investgative arm of the feds ?

Posted by: mike perry | May 24, 2006, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

There are plenty of Republicans in Congress that are not corrupt but overall they are not enough to overcome the pork barrel corrupt “moderates”. There is a direct correllation between corruption and the size and scope of government. Shrink the federal government and corruption will shrink. Shrink spending and you will see the influence of special interests shrink. Impose term limits. We cannot ask the Federal government to do more because this gives it more power. Ask it to do less and this will decrease the power of politicians and the corruption that naturally follows.

Posted by: Ben Moore | May 24, 2006, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

90% OF THE PRESS IS LIBERAL DEMOCRAT. THIS IS A FACT.

Posted by: Tnev | May 24, 2006, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

This is absolutely ridiculous, let me quote from a college level political science textbook that I own which is titled “American Government and Politics Today: The Essentials” (2006-2007):
“The framers of the U.S. Constitution chose to craft a Republic, meaning sovereign power rests with the people . . . the idea of a republic also meant a government based on common beliefs and virtues that would be fostered within small communities . . . THE RULERS WERE TO BE AMATEAURS- GOOD CITIZENS WHO WOULD TAKE TURNS REPRESENTING THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS.”
I think our elected officials need a crash course on the essence of leadership and politics, don’t you think??

Posted by: Victoria | May 24, 2006, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Mr. Ross:
Where is the rest of the story? My guess is you already have information that disproves your assertion. As a reporter, you should report all your facts. I look forward to “learning” the rest of the information from the news media.

Posted by: Full Truth | May 24, 2006, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

I think Brian Ross owes us an explanation and Dennis Hastert a public apology. This is journalism at its worst….

Posted by: James Williams | May 24, 2006, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Is There a Mug Shot, Yet?
Has Bail Been Set?
???

Posted by: View Master | May 24, 2006, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

I am so upset at our culture as a culture of ‘convict first, ask questions never’. Come on guys and gals, aren’t we innocent until proven guilty? If this charge was against you, wouldn’t you want that respect? It makes me very upset that we have become a generation that believes anything that is said in the media. Neither the left or right can be perfect. I lean right a bit, but consider myself pretty much an independent. We will always have ‘scandals’ in politics. It’s in the nature of the business as it is today. Let’s see how bad we can make our opponent look. Just be reasonable and ley justice take it’s course. Isn’t that what our forfathers came here? Justice? Freedom?

Posted by: lsutiger | May 24, 2006, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Brian, aren’t you a little nervous right now? I checked out just about every other mainstream news source and not a single one of them is even willing to touch this story with a ten-foot pole. You are all alone on this story. All by yourself.
Apparently Mr. Ross, you studied at the “Dan Rather School of Journalism”. Just make it up as you go along….

Posted by: James Williams | May 24, 2006, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Ok – Brian Ross needs to say who the federal “officials” are who said Hastert was in the bribery mix since the Dept of Justice spokesperson has now said Hastert is not under investigation. Its funny how critics who have posted a comment deriding Hastert and other Republicans just lick up the rumors as divine gospel truth from these unnamed federal “officials” who are helping ABC out with these juicy tidbits. People see and report what they want to see – forget the facts.

Posted by: Mike in Texas | May 24, 2006, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Perhaps it could still turn out to be true. But, once again, the moral is, I think, that it is foolish to assume that stories based on anonymous leaks are well-founded. More likely, they are smears and slanders put out by people with a political agenda, and printed by reporters with the same political agenda.

Posted by: mike | May 24, 2006, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Ross Perot was right about one thing when he said “time to clean out the barn” Republican or Democrat if they are crooked they must go. There is a seperation of branches and freedom of speach rules but it was not an excuse for criminal activity. The FBI went to a Judge and got a warrant as required after there was ample reasonable belief of criminal activities.
We need to continue the founding fathers ideals and values of honest Christian Conserativism that our country was founded upon. Theirs too much money and too many deals. The access of business to lobby congress and also foriegn governments must stop.

Posted by: Glenn Simmons | May 24, 2006, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

There is an alternative to Denny Hastert and his politics of corruption. His name is John Laesch and he is running against Hastert. He is honest, a veteran, and has never even met Abramoff. You want honest government? Vote for honest candidates. Vote John Laesch.

Posted by: Frank | May 24, 2006, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

“Hastert…says he has a long history of opposing certain types of Indian casinos.”
me too. specially the ones that don’t pay out.

Posted by: shaman | May 24, 2006, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Shame on you ABC.

Posted by: Chad Kimball | May 24, 2006, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

To those who say we will all be eating crow when Hastert is absolved assumes that Hastert hasn’t already eaten all the crows.

Posted by: Frank | May 24, 2006, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Wow, Justin, you just took ignorance of our American system of government to a whole new level. The FBI is not a cabinet level administrative agency – it is part of the DOJ and answers to the Attorney General. I’m willing to bet all the money in my pockets against all the cells in your skull that the Director of the FBI is not going to authorize an investigation – much less a public comment on an ongoing investigation – of a sitting Speaker of the House without receiving approval from the office of the AG. Any takers on that action? Even if I count the change in my jeans I think I’ll have more at stake than Justin.

Posted by: Birk | May 24, 2006, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

I’m no fan of Dennis Hastert, and he just MAY be guilty of some wrongdoing. However, I find it very suspect that unnamed “federal officials” have mysteriously linked Hastart to the Abramoff scandal one day after Hastart takes Bush to the woodshed over raiding another Congressman’s office and further eroding what’s left of the separation of powers. The FBI raid on Jefferson’s office was another White House power grab. And if anyone in congress voices opposition to this fascist dictator…well what Mr. Hastart has to say about the FBI raid in the coming days. This President in now officially a dictator.

Posted by: Ken | May 24, 2006, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

At least the GOP isn’t freezing money in their freezers.

Posted by: Ed | May 24, 2006, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

The US imports about ten million barrels of oil per day. The US EXPORTS one million barrels per day. Google: CRS Report RS20540.
We also EXPORT a large amount of refined products,gasoline etc. mostly to Mexico. In 1997 British Petroleum was accused of exporting oil from Alaska to China and Japan at a reduced price in order to create a shortage on the West Coast states. The FTC began an investigation of this but dropped that later. Senator Ron Wyden has tried to get bills passed to stop exporting Alaskan oil but all we hear from the Administration is the claim that we must drill in ANWAR. To believe that there is a supply and demand free market determining the price of oil is most naive. There are other sites about these oil exports if you search around.

Posted by: jerrywil10 | May 24, 2006, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

They are not above the Law and it is time they played by the rules they have forced on us with out worry

Posted by: alacour | May 24, 2006, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Well according to the Feds Hastert is not under investigation. Will ABC have the decency to retract their original allegation.

Posted by: Greg H | May 24, 2006, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Further proof there should be a two term limit on congress. Also state levels.

Posted by: Paul Wade | May 24, 2006, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Impose term limits……….if they will not do it, we must by creating and voting for a third party.
We have no choice. I am sick of the inefficiency of my govt.

Posted by: Bruce Ozmon | May 24, 2006, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Mr. Ross,
I don’t remember in recent history, a journalist more eager than you, to MAKE NEWS, than REPORT IT!
Another Drive-by Media shooting…

Posted by: Doug Shockey | May 24, 2006, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

It’s all of our faults! The founding fathers never intended for congress to vote themselves pay and raises. These people have been given the keys…more like given themselves the keys to unlock any and everything that gives them an advantage and re-election.
Hard to believe, but there are some politicians that are honest…not sure who that may be at this point. One thing is for certain; politicians will compromise everything in their feeble attempts to sucker us all for what they believe will be the gain of political power. Just look at Hillary on ethanol and McCain on illegal migrants in this country.
I’m guessing that the politics in D.C. is a world none of us could believe unless we’ve experienced it as a federal politician. I’m guessing it tests the best of them, and the inferior give in first…then it goes right on down the line!
The ONLY reason the public knows about factual corruption, is because someone was caught red handed. More recently, being caught red handed does not mean anything because there are a thousand excuses most will accept in one form or other to justify the actions of the corrupt. Just look at Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) He says “I did nothing wrong”. Just like Marion Berry. In spite of the fact that the evidence is irrefutable.
Now having rambled on about all that…let’s work to raise taxes and penalize business for creating jobs and being prosperous!!! After that, let’s make sure that people in this country illegally are given the best treatment possible. We need to pay them from the raised taxes so they don’t have to work…oh..and don’t forget…they are not citizens of the USA so they are not subject to our law either. WOW!!! Talk about the American dream.
Thanks John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, Tom Harkin, Lindsey Graham, Denny Hastert, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Charles Rangel, Bill Clinton, Algore and all the rest of the politicians who really hate this country and what it was founded upon that only care about being re-elected.
One more thing; thanks to the supporters of politicians who only care about being elected or re-elected. You all have done a bang up job of supporting the ruination this country. I look forward to its quick end because man and woman’s “infinite wisdom” will see to it.

Posted by: Fred W | May 24, 2006, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Corruption is essential for success in the American political system, which is essentially fuelled with money.
What Americans who want to see corruption curbed, if not eliminated, which would be asking too much, is publically financed elections. As they say, he that pays the piper, calls the tune. Who would you rather have your politicians really answer to, private interests that finance their election campaigns, or the citizens who elect them?

Posted by: Jack Shultz | May 24, 2006, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Watch — my money is that Hastert cut some deal to ease up on the FBI in return for their denial that he is under investigation. I hear that Hastert’s press statement claiming that he’s not under investigation was seized on Sunday in Rep. Jeffersons’s papers.
Amnesty for illegals, harassing American oil companies while making 10x more in taxes per gallon than the companies made in profit, falsely accusing our own troops of atrocities — let’s turn all of the bums on the Hill out, Repub and Democrats alike!!

Posted by: Former Repub | May 24, 2006, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

So much for the check and balances in our country. The promises and committments by candidates have been deleted from the political lingo. It’s time for a clean sweep come November. This reminds me of a quote by Henry Kissinger, ” Corrupt politicians make the other ten percent look bad.” Shame, shame on us. Demand term limits, and hopefully, more than in the past, that Americans will exercise the “right to vote”.

Posted by: Dennis A. Purcell | May 24, 2006, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

And let us do remember why Sybil Edmonds is the most gagged person in our nations history.
IT WAS BECAUSE LITTLE DENNY WAS CAUGHT TAKING BRIBES ON TAPE.

Posted by: Christy | May 25, 2006, 12:19 am 12:19 am

There are no polititians of high level wherever who aren’t corrupt.
It’s good at least a small part of them get caught, but in the end it’s all a game, and the Hastert case only proves that there’s greater corruption in the management of the puppet theater, and there are people who’ve made much more dough – found the black sheep :) The worst thing no individual can influence the global corruption, modern PR technologies so advanced.

Posted by: Demid Tishin | May 25, 2006, 12:33 am 12:33 am

With all the crooks in the House, they should just park a police wagon out in front of the capital and round them up at once.

Posted by: Red | May 25, 2006, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Cafferty made a an excellent point: leaders on the hill are all in a tizzy because “one of their own” got his office searched, (gasp!) despite being caught on tape accepting a $100,000 bribe. Meanwhile, the rest of us, who have done NOTHNG WRONG, have lost our protection under the 4th Amendment by our private phone calls being tapped by the NSA without a warrant. And the elites up on the hill seem to be perfectly okay with all that. They’re just the American public, they’ll get over it.
Hey, that’s it: if you want to be a terrorist, run for congress. They’ll never find you.

Posted by: BB | May 25, 2006, 12:45 am 12:45 am

>With all the crooks in the House, they should >just park a police wagon out in front of the >capital and round them up at once.
That’s true, and imagine all the gas they’d save.

Posted by: BB | May 25, 2006, 12:46 am 12:46 am

*tisk tisk tisk*
The Drive By Media once again gets it wrong…
Do you people do ANY fact checking?
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2001359
- Creathir

Posted by: Creathir | May 25, 2006, 1:06 am 1:06 am

The rich get richer. The poor get poorer. This is no accident. The rich want power and more power. It is called greed folks.
I highly doubt it we really get to choose our leaders anymore. Sure we may vote between to people but in all honesty, when it boils down to it, they all are for the elite and powerful.
So whats the solution? Honestly, its a war, and it already has started and the rich are winning because the poor and middle class have no idea they are fighting a war (or most don’t).

Posted by: AlanB | May 25, 2006, 1:18 am 1:18 am

why do you not identify the congressman as a REPUBLICAN???
man you guys are really out to lunch . . . and obvioulsy the gop is paying!

Posted by: ppirt | May 25, 2006, 2:08 am 2:08 am

I want to know why the content of this article changed. Earlier today, the article at this URL was completely different text. It explicitly stated that the Speaker was under investigation. Now it has been changed to say he was “involved” in the investigation which could mean he is assisting. The text of this blog entry earlier today was:
The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Dennis Hastert, is under investigtaion by the FBI, which is seeking to determine his role in an ongoing public corruption probe into members of Congress, ABC News has learned from high level official sources.
Federal officials say the information implicating Hastert was developed from convicted lobbysists who are now cooperating with the government.
Part of the investigation involves a letter Hastert wrote three years ago, urging the Secretary of the Interior to block a casino on an Indian reservation that would have competed with other tribes.
The other tribes were represented by convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff who reportedly has provided details of his dealings with Hastert as part of his plea agreement with the government.
The letter was written shortly after a fund-raiser for Hastert at a restaurant owned by Abramoff. Abramoff and his clients contributed more than $26,000 at the time.
The day Abramoff was indicted, Hastert denied any unlawful connection and said he would donate to charity any campaign contribution he had received from Abramoff and his clients.
A spokesman for Speaker Hastert told ABC News, “We are not aware of this. The Speaker has a long history and a well-documented record of opposing Indian Reservation shopping for casino gaming purposes.”
This week, Hastert has been outspoken in his criticism of the FBI for its raid on the office of anotehr congressman under investigation, Democrat William Jefferson of Louisiana.
“My opinion is that they toook the worng path, Hastert said of the FBI. “They need to back up, and we need to go from there.”
Which is completely different text than was posted. My question is: Which text is ABC standing behind, the original text, this text, or the text that will be under this URL in the future? It is dishonest journalism to rewrite your story and then claim to “stand behind” it. Are you going to rewrite it yet again if it turns out that the Speaker isn’t even “involved”? It is one thing to publish a new article but quite another to go back and modify an existant article to make it appear to say something different than it did originally. Shame on ABC. This displays a total lack of journalistic integrity.

Posted by: crosspatch | May 25, 2006, 4:25 am 4:25 am

There are no allegations of crimes, only facts about correspondence and campaign contributions in the ABC news account. Like Fox News, Wisco fabricates truth and reality to benefit the White House or conservative Republicans.
By all means, go back to FOX! There you will find your comfort in propaganda; ‘news’ that you ‘want’ to hear, with tags like ‘some people are saying . . .’ Oh yeah, like WHO?
In any event, DON’T watch ABC News! FOX News addicts have no business outside their comfort zone of lies and propaganda.

Posted by: antiblather | May 25, 2006, 10:20 am 10:20 am

If Dennis Hastert is not under investigation, he ought to be. Google “Sibel Edwards” and “Dennis Haster” together and read about the Turkish bribery scandal that never made the headlines.

Posted by: andrew | May 25, 2006, 10:49 am 10:49 am

I second the questions from crosspatch. From my perspective, and I can’t imagine being alone on this, this “report” is simply a hastily thrown together smear job which fell apart pretty quickly. Now the first two paragraphs have been altered to fit the new reality that ABC apparently wants to impart on it’s readers without any easily identifiable reason why it has changed…..Ross relies on anonymous sources but I rely on my own two eyes.
ppirt, Speaker of the House, by definition, is from the majority party. The piece identifies him as Republican to anyone who is actually matters to.

Posted by: zenpig | May 25, 2006, 11:09 am 11:09 am

This from a subsequent news report at “The Hill”:
================================
The Department of Justice issued a statement clarifying that Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) is not under investigation Wednesday evening after ABC World News Tonight reported that he was “very much in the mix” of the DOJ’s sweeping congressional bribery probe.
“Speaker Hastert is not under investigation by the Justice Department,” DOJ Director of Public Affairs Tasia Scolinos said in a one-line statement.
The DOJ started releasing the statement in response to reporters’ questions around 7 p.m. Wednesday.
The ABC News story, which was picked up by the Drudge Report in the early evening, claimed that Hastert was under investigation by the FBI, “which is seeking to determine his role in an ongoing public corruption probe into members of Congress,” according to the story. The story first cited “high-level government sources,” but later changed the sourcing on its web story to “senior U.S. law enforcement officials.”
================================
Can anyone out there say “Dan Rather”?

Posted by: Robert L. Barney | May 25, 2006, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Now that the Justice Department has flat out DENIED this report. What do you have to say now, Mr. Ross?

Posted by: M> Garrett | May 25, 2006, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Sounds like Brian & ABC are graduates of “DAN RATHER SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM”. When will you appear on 60 mins to justify.

Posted by: burt | May 25, 2006, 11:55 am 11:55 am

The cries and whimpers of the Fox mavens are laughable. No, there are no substantiated charges against Hastert as yet. The article makes that perfectly clear. The story clearly states that government informants have brought Hastert in to their testimonies, and that’s it. But please, do go trotting back to Fox if you choose, and live in your fantasyland where Republicans are always noble and innocent, every problem faced by this country can be traced back to Clinton’s zipper, and the other people of the world live to serve you and your kind.
I’d bet dollars to doughnuts that when they perp-walk Hastert out of the legislature, Fox won’t even broadcast it. Maybe they’ll show a tape of a little boy with his fingers in his ears, singing “la la la la” instead. Meanwhile, as the wheels of justice slowly grind Denny and his cronies into the dirt, you Fox folks can comfort yourself with another viewing of “The Clinton Chronicles.”

Posted by: Max Black | May 25, 2006, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

The following is the text of a letter written by Speaker Hastert’s legal counsel to ABC:
===================================
David Westin
George Stephanopoulos
Brain Ross
ABC News
7 West 66th St.
New York, NY 10023
RE: False Story Regarding Justice Department Investigation
Dear Mr. Westin, Stephanopoulos, and Mr. Ross:
At 7:25 p.m., the Statement of the Department of Justice confirmed:
“Speaker Hastert is not under investigation by the Justice Department.”
At 10:21 p.m., you wrote:
“Whether they like it or not, members of Congress, including Hastert, are under investigation,” one federal official said tonight.”
This statement is false, and your republication of it after actual knowledge of its falsity constitutes libel and defamation. ABC News’ continued publication of this false information, after having actual knowledge of its falsity, evidences a specific and malicious intent to injure and damage Speaker Hastert’s reputation by continued repetition of a known falsehood.
We will take any and all actions necessary to rectify the harm ABC has caused and to hold those at ABC responsible for their conduct.
Please advise regarding who will accept service of process to remedy this international falsehood.
Very truly yours,
J. Randolph Evans
Stefan C. Passantino
Counsel to Speaker J. Dennis Hastert
==================================
It seems to me Fox News or no Fox News, ABC got the story wrong. Failure to acknowledge the story’s error runs the risk of compounding this error into a Dan Rather moment. It’s one thing to shoot yourself in the foot, it’s an entirely different thing to do so while it is in your mouth.

Posted by: Robert L. Barney | May 25, 2006, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Just more democrat propaganda,
back to the internet where I can get facts not democrat propaganda.

Posted by: gene | May 25, 2006, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Democrats are above the law and has been for a long time , and that is good because if they were not above the law the majority of them would be in jail, at this time, you know what I am talking about. clintons, kennedy adam claton powell al sharpton, jessie jackson to many to name.

Posted by: gene | May 25, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Please find enough evidence and take this scumbag down…Next: FRIST!

Posted by: Al | May 25, 2006, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Gee wiz, Honesty, Integrity, and Deecency really have returned to the Guvment. This puffed-up looking “Speaker” should have been locked up years ago. And to now hear him cry ‘foul’ is truly pathetic. Why wasn’t this puffed up dirt bag crying ‘foul’ five years ago when you could see Excutive Power being both expanded and corrupted. And now this swollen-up toad wants some justice. Hah!

Posted by: Santa Fe Chris | May 25, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Gee wiz, Honesty, Integrity, and Deecency really have returned to the Guvment. Get a rope! This puffed-up looking “Speaker” should have been locked up years ago. And to now hear him cry ‘foul’ is truly pathetic. Why wasn’t this puffed up dirt bag crying ‘foul’ five years ago when you could see Excutive Power being both expanded and corrupted. And now this swollen-up toad wants some justice. Hah! Get a rope!

Posted by: Santa Fe Chris | May 25, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

I see the Deputy AG said this:
Deputy Attorney General Paul J. McNulty; “With regard to reports suggesting that the Speaker of the House is under investigation or ‘in the mix,’ as stated by ABC News, I reconfirm, as stated by the Department earlier this evening, that these reports are untrue.”
What I want to know is why the story on this page was modified after the initial DAG statement while ABC was claiming to “stand behind” the story. The initial story said Hastert was “under investigation” with no “careful reading” required. Then the article mysteriously changed to Hastert being “included” in the investigation.
Not only does this reflect poorly on Mr. Ross and ABC News, it reflects poorly on the entire journalism trade. It’s dishonest. You don’t “stand behind” a story that you went back and changed. It is obvious that ABC doesn’t stand behind the story because they keep changing it. Goobers.

Posted by: crosspatch | May 25, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Journalistic ethics (if that’s not an oxymoron) require you to either identify your source or retract your story and apologize publicly to Hastert. Or will this be another “fake but true” excuse?
All of those posting here about how Hastert must be guilty of something, regardless of the sloppiness, inaccuracies and potentially deliberate lies in this story, are completely missing the point about the dishonesty of the MSM that is so graphically illustrated here.

Posted by: tomsyl | May 25, 2006, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Looks like ABC didn’t learn anything after the CBS fiasco re: George Bush and the National Guard.
Hope ABC looses their shirts in this suit:
Hastert Legal Letter To ABCNEWS President Westin
David Westin
George Stephanopoulos
Brian Ross
ABC News
7 West 66th St.
New York, NY 10023
RE: False Story Regarding Justice Department Investigation
Dear Mr. Westin, Stephanopoulos, and Mr. Ross:
At 7:25 p.m., the Statement of the Department of Justice confirmed:
“Speaker Hastert is not under investigation by the Justice Department.”
At 10:21 p.m., you wrote:
“Whether they like it or not, members of Congress, including Hastert, are under investigation,” one federal official said tonight.”
This statement is false, and your republication of it after actual knowledge of its falsity constitutes libel and defamation. ABC News’ continued publication of this false information, after having actual knowledge of its falsity, evidences a specific and malicious intent to injure and damage Speaker Hastert’s reputation by continued repetition of a known falsehood.
We will take any and all actions necessary to rectify the harm ABC has caused and to hold those at ABC responsible for their conduct.
Please advise regarding who will accept service of process to remedy this intentional falsehood.
Very truly yours,
J. Randolph Evans
Stefan C. Passantino
Counsel to Speaker J. Dennis Hastert

Posted by: agaguy | May 25, 2006, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Sounds guilty to me and if not under investigation, he should and will be. Come on, a letter was written by Hastert shortly after a fund-raiser for him at a restaurant owned by Abramoff. Abramoff and his clients contributed more than $26,000 at the time for a letter to deny another Indian tribe of building a casino.
You know that walks like a…, talks like a …, must be a….
The Republicans have so many crooks in Congress and other government appointments by Bush. The Republicans in Congress don’t know whether to say “present” or “not guilty” when the roll is called. This corrupt Congress is only going to be in session a very short time this year because Republican members need time to work on their defence for: perjury, treason, conspiracy, taking bribes, putting our economy in the tankj with record deficits, war crimes, lying us in to war, etc, etc, etc….
The WORST President and Congress in history.

Posted by: drbill | May 25, 2006, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

I’d vote for no journalistic immunity in a flash. ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and “so called public” broadcasting stations (funded by your tax dollars by the way) have been liberal biased for years and don’t deserve either journalistic immunity or our tax dollars. I hope Hastert sues the crap out of ABC. Maybe money will force them to stick to the facts! Too bad they can’t be handed some of their own “medicine”; ie. lies broadcast nationwide about them!

Posted by: Jerry | May 25, 2006, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

I’d vote for no journalistic immunity in a flash. ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and “so called public” broadcasting stations (funded by your tax dollars by the way) have been liberal biased for years and don’t deserve either journalistic immunity or our tax dollars. I hope Hastert sues the crap out of ABC. Maybe money will force them to stick to the facts! Too bad they can’t be handed some of their own “medicine”; ie. lies broadcast nationwide about them!

Posted by: Jerry | May 25, 2006, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

For those saying that if this is untrue, Hastert should sue, looks like you get your wish.
Dems should be careful – first the Rove indictment story is false, then Jessie Macbeth is debunked, now this. Will you have ANY credibility left when this is over?

Posted by: Russ | May 25, 2006, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Let’ see: Senate Minority leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, wrote at least one letter opposing a new casino(which would compete w/ casinos owned by tribes represented by Jack Abramoff) after receiving campaign contributions fron Abramoff. There’s nothing wrong there. Dennis Hastert, a Republican, wrote at least one letter opposing a new casino (which would compete w/ casinos owned by tribes represented by Jack Abramoff) after receiving campaign contributions from Abramoff. This is a major scandal. Can you explain the difference in ABC’s coverage?

Posted by: margrave | May 25, 2006, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

It is obvious to anyone who takes journalism seriously, that ABC NEWS needs to reveal their sources who are contending that Speaker Hastert is under investigation.
It is against every journalistic ethic to maintain as fact what has been denied by the government department doing the investigation. Media scandals over the recent years have centered around ‘unnamed sources’, who are not held accountable for the comments they make and are just quoted as fact.
If ABC NEWS wants to maintain its reputation as a reliable news source, it must come clean and state who their sources are with this contradictory information. Until they do, they can justifiably be considered biased and untrustworthy.

Posted by: Dr. Will | May 26, 2006, 12:15 am 12:15 am

BRIAN,
E-mail me. I have information for you that might help you catch Hastert!

Posted by: Victoria | May 26, 2006, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Is anybody really surprised? In these last 6 years, ABC news has made no bones about who they are. Water carriers for the DNC. It really doesn’t matter if the story is factual or not, as long as it damages the Republicn Party. So what if ABC might give information to Americas enemies, that may cause the death of some of our troops. As long as it helps the cause.
Thank God for the new media. A lot of us get sick of being insulted, and having to listen ABC dis-respecting our President night after night, while covering for an increaasingly bitter, and even treasonous democrat party.

Posted by: James | May 27, 2006, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Why does this part of the Republican Party keep getting away with destroying our country? No morals, no truth telling, Bush’s signing statments nullify any laws passed by Congress. We need to take our country back!

Posted by: Ogradon | May 29, 2006, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Until a campaign for public office does not also require a continuous campaign for private campaign funds, we will have conflicts of true public and disguised private interest. Term limits will only create a ‘revolving door’ through which naive know-nothings put up by private interest groups will come and go. The equation of money and “free speech” helps not at all; “feee speech” is a great equalizer when all voices can civilly receive an equal audience. But it doesn’t equalize today when more campaign money equates to more public audience for a campaigner’s point of view. I don’t know how to fix it, but perhaps if there were limits imposed on campaign *advertising* (and that advertising were free?) rather than limits on *terms* — we might see more campaigners speak to their points with concise civilty rather than yell at their opponents with disgusting and expensive attack ads. The present “market imposed” system of whoever can afford the most campaign advertising clearly delivers more corruption and less public interest; more heat than light.

Posted by: John Koerber | May 29, 2006, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Congratulations for your blog

Posted by: paco | May 30, 2006, 10:50 am 10:50 am

There is no journalistic standard or commandment that says a reporter must reveal their anonymous sources.
Think about it:
Recent American history shows that the criminality of one Richard Millhouse Nixon and his corrupt administration only became public knowledge because two enterprising reporters named Woodward and Bernstein used a anonymous source named “Deepthroat,” whose identity was not revealed until decades later.
Further, many will recall that Woodstein’s intial reporting was vigorously refuted as false and untrue by Nixon’s Attorney General.
Officious sounding claims of “falsehood” against the media are a common public relations tactic by government officials, because they are, on the main, immune from libel and defamation (by virtue of their public office) from the very media organizations they are slandering, often in a cynical effort to confuse and manipulate public opinion.
If it were not for the use of anonymous sources, the American public would hardly know a damn thing about how their government truly and often operates contrary to their best interests.
Be patient with this one and let the grandstanding play out.
History will show who was issuing falsehoods and who was trying to manufacture consent.

Posted by: Publius | June 4, 2006, 4:00 am 4:00 am

criminality of one Richard Millhouse Nixon and his corrupt administration
Whatever crime President Nixon may have comitted, pales in comparrison to the numerous felonies that one William Jefferson Clinton got away with.
Too bad there are no Woodwards or Bernsteins that are hell-bent on bringing down a democrat President. The Clintons and O.J.’s of the world are free to carry out any felonious deeds they wish to, as long as this biased media controls the airwaves. The many crimes of Clinton will continue to be exposed as time passes, and the media will continue to ignore them, while persuing false claims of the liars, such as Joseph Wilson who will stop at nothing to bring down any Republican President. Good men like Gordon Liddy will serve time, while traitors such as Sandy Berger continue to walk free.

Posted by: James | June 8, 2006, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Drive by media. report it before you know it it true. Liberals will believe anything the drive by media reports. My gosh, if reporters could be held responsible for false reporting this column would not have existed.

Posted by: robert knihnicki | June 20, 2006, 5:27 am 5:27 am

The Religious Right reelected this
president on grounds of moral issues.
I was brought up on the teaching of
what is right and wrong. The golden
rule was also very important.
It used to be we thought for
ourselves.
I guess being of an older
generation that too has changed.
If you don’t approve of someone
then don’t vote them back in.

Posted by: Carl | August 28, 2006, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Why is ABC network airing Bush’s right wing propaganda “The Path to 9/11″?
I think people are sick of the administration and the republicans exploiting this tragedy for their own gain.
Why don’t they air “Fahrenheit 911″?

Posted by: ziggy | September 3, 2006, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Is the following information true or not?? Considering the biased 911 show ABC is about to air, I think knowing the facts are important. Don’t you?
It took them 8 1/2 years to hit us again after WTC 1993. Especially good since the Republican congress tried to stop everything Clinton was doing.
Contrasted with Clinton’s real results:
– Sent legislation to Congress to TIGHTEN AIRPORT SECURITY. (Remember, this is before 911) The Republicans because of opposition from the airlines, defeated the legislation.
– Sent legislation to Congress to allow for BETTER TRACKING OF TERRORIST FUNDING. Republicans in the Senate because of opposition from banking interests, defeated it.
– Sent legislation to Congress to add tagents to explosives, to allow for BETTER TRACKING OF EXPLOSIVES USED BY TERRORISTS. The Republicans because of opposition from the NRA, defeated it.
When Republicans couldn’t prevent executive action, President Clinton:
– Developed the nation’s first anti-terrorism policy, and appointed first national coordinator.
– Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up 12 U.S. jetliners simultaneously.
– Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up UN Headquarters.
– Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up FBI Headquarters.
– Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up the Israeli Embassy in Washington.
–Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up Boston airport.
– Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up Lincoln and Holland Tunnels in NY.
– Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up the George Washington Bridge.
– Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up the US Embassy in Albania.
– Tried to kill Osama bin Laden and disrupt Al Qaeda through preemptive strikes (efforts denounced by the G.O.P.).
– Brought perpetrators of first World Trade Center bombing and CIA killings to justice.
– Did not blame Bush I administration for first World Trade Center bombing even though it occurred 38 days after they had left office. Instead, worked hard, even obsessively — and successfully — to stop future terrorist attacks.
– Named the Hart-Rudman commission to report on nature of terrorist threats and major steps to be taken to combat terrorism.
– Tripled the budget of the FBI for counterterrorism and doubled overall funding for counterterrorism.
– Detected and destroyed cells of Al Qaeda in over 20 countries
– Created a national stockpile of drugs and vaccines including 40 million doses of smallpox vaccine.
– Robert Oakley, Reagan Counterterrorism Czar says of Clinton’s efforts “Overall, I give them very high marks” and “The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama”
– Paul Bremer, Bush’s Administrator of Iraq disagrees slightly with Robert Oakley saying he believed the Clinton Administration had “correctly focused on bin Laden. ”
– Barton Gellman of the Washington Post put it best, “By any measure available, Clinton left office having given greater priority to terrorism than any president before him” and was the “first administration to undertake a systematic anti-terrorist effort.”

Posted by: r worsham | September 5, 2006, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

So it’s almost four months later and this story has gone NOWHERE. Rather than acknowledge their screw-up, ABC and Ross merely walked away from their report. Irresponsible journalism at its worst.

Posted by: Truthseeker | September 15, 2006, 12:16 am 12:16 am

I UNDERSTOOD BEATIFULL THANKS

Posted by: msn | March 13, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Any honest Republicans on this planet?? This is crazy.

Posted by: Jim | October 16, 2007, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Politics is meant to increase knowledge to better a situation or focus. When it is used for selfish gain, it is no more than a personal issue and ‘politics’ has just faded away.
Sajjid

Posted by: Sajjid Manuel | November 16, 2007, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

First I would like to say I had nothing against The Clintons,(until now) I just think Obama is the better Person. Now I don’t think it I know it. I was at the Nevada caucus on January 12, and if all of them where like the one I was at, I know why The Clinton camp won.From the minute I got there the Clinton party were (for lack of a better word) playing dirty pool. I know this because I saw it first hand. It is a shame we can’t have a honest race, I thought we where pass this from the Bushes.I am not writing this because they said she won in Nevada but it is because of the way she did that I have a problem with it.

Posted by: A Hayes | January 20, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Old story, but politics is same all time and get worst. Again same things repeating this days.

Posted by: Hate Politics | August 20, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.