Federal Source to ABC News: We Know Who You’re Calling
A senior federal law enforcement official tells ABC News the government is tracking the phone numbers we (Brian Ross and Richard Esposito) call in an effort to root out confidential sources.
"It’s time for you to get some new cell phones, quick," the source told us in an in-person conversation.
ABC News does not know how the government determined who we are calling, or whether our phone records were provided to the government as part of the recently-disclosed NSA collection of domestic phone calls.
Other sources have told us that phone calls and contacts by reporters for ABC News, along with the New York Times and the Washington Post, are being examined as part of a widespread CIA leak investigation.
One former official was asked to sign a document stating he was not a confidential source for New York Times reporter James Risen.
Our reports on the CIA’s secret prisons in Romania and Poland were known to have upset CIA officials. The CIA asked for an FBI investigation of leaks of classified information following those reports.
People questioned by the FBI about leaks of intelligence information say the CIA was also disturbed by ABC News reports that revealed the use of CIA predator missiles inside Pakistan.
Under Bush Administration guidelines, it is not considered illegal for the government to keep track of numbers dialed by phone customers.
The official who warned ABC News said there was no indication our phones were being tapped so the content of the conversation could be recorded.
A pattern of phone calls from a reporter, however, could provide valuable clues for leak investigators.
Email
big brother times three. Government whether on any level is not being held accountable and is out of control- their arrogance is mind boggling
Posted by: LEAHK | May 15, 2006, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Having the intelligence community monitoring phone calls is very disturing and a direct violation of the constitution. What is even scarier, is who is doing the monitoring. It’s not just the NSA, NRO, DIA etc… Look who is working for these govt agecies. There’s been a lot of outsourcing of intelligence jobs. Pls take a look the web page for SAIC and check out the job posting. Lot’s of jobs requiring SAP clearance and contracted to the NSA, DIA, etc.. What it comes down to is our govt has outsouced intel gathering to corporate America. Very very scary.
Also they say their only looking at call patterns. Witht the high level use if statistical analysis and just bits and pieces of converstations, they call tell a heck of lot about a person.
Robert Calandriello
Posted by: Robert Calandriello | May 15, 2006, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Good! I hope they do find out who is leaking national security info to the press. I’m tired of the press helping our enemies. Maybe you guys should start trying to “FOR the USA” instead of “AGAINST the USA” ALL THE TIME. I hope the FBI nails lots of idiots who are out to destroy the intelligence agencies and cost us more soldiers and spys!
Posted by: Grace | May 15, 2006, 11:09 am 11:09 am
‘Bout time you guys are roped in.
Posted by: Brad | May 15, 2006, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Excellent the Media needs looking after, Traitors most of them…….
Posted by: ken wiley | May 15, 2006, 11:12 am 11:12 am
good, you seditionist creeps deserve what you get. who knows how many serviceman have died because of your “right to know”
Posted by: jeff bynum | May 15, 2006, 11:12 am 11:12 am
I hope the information they gain allows them to catch the scum that leak information, and helps them arrest the communist scum who publish it.
Posted by: Dave Mottolo | May 15, 2006, 11:12 am 11:12 am
‘Bout time you guys are roped in.
Posted by: Brad | May 15, 2006, 11:13 am 11:13 am
well maybe ABC news better stop leaking classified information. This only helps our enemies and right now I believe ABC news is an enemy of the US.
Posted by: scott | May 15, 2006, 11:13 am 11:13 am
You didn’t inconvenience someone, you broke the law. It’s called a criminal investigation!!!!
Posted by: George Chelpon | May 15, 2006, 11:15 am 11:15 am
I believe that it is a great idea to maintain telephone surveilance over news organizations who disclose classified and sensitive secret information. Lets nail the government employees who knowingly break their oath to not divulge classified information.
Posted by: robert johnson | May 15, 2006, 11:17 am 11:17 am
GOOD! I hope they find out who is reporting all of these leaks. And I hope you are tried and perhaps spend some time in jail for it.
KEEP CALLING and I hope they track your every word!
Posted by: bridget | May 15, 2006, 11:17 am 11:17 am
“Under Bush Administration guidelines, it is not considered illegal for the government to keep track of numbers dialed by phone customers.”
Under the law as signed by Bill Clinton collecting the information is legal. Why do you portray it as “under Bush administration guidelines?” Is this part of the bias I hear so much about?
If they are investigating leaks they probably have warrants for the searches so they can see who is leaking information. I am glad they are rooting out the people breaking the law. I hope they get the one who broke the law by telling you about this.
Posted by: Big Dog | May 15, 2006, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Anyone who doesn’t believe this is just the tip of the NSA domestic spying iceberg is either naive or foolish. The first thing that crossed my mind when USAToday broke the story about a database full of purely domestic call records was that the Bush regime would be using it to keep track of every journalist and blogger. Just another step taken by this administration to suppress dissent and just another step towards stifling freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Maybe now the MSM will finally wake up and start reporting the facts about this administration instead of trying to remain neutral.
Posted by: 3reddogs | May 15, 2006, 11:21 am 11:21 am
This might be one of the most frightening things I’ve ever read.
Posted by: bob | May 15, 2006, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Anonymous sources will never be credible. It seems that the media tends to quote a “source” but won’t name them. If you feel strongly about something, have the courage and conviction to stand up and be named. Another reason why I find out facts, before I reach a conclusion.
Posted by: Donna | May 15, 2006, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Welcome to the KGB.
Posted by: GoodGrief | May 15, 2006, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Just as NYTimes’ Frank Rich warned in his OpEd this past Sunday:
“…this program may have more to do with monitoring “traitors” like reporters and leakers than with tracking terrorists.”
And i bet we could add political opponents and candidates to that list too.
Posted by: voxpopgirl | May 15, 2006, 11:26 am 11:26 am
I am a journalism graduate, UNC-Chapel Hill. I am also a veteran.
I hope they catch every government leaker of classified secret information and put them in prison for life. And any reporter publishing known classified secret information should be shot. It is called treason, not first amendment rights.
Posted by: Tom Camp | May 15, 2006, 11:26 am 11:26 am
The Government appears to be more concerned about ‘leaks’ than they are about anything else.
The term ‘National Security’ was used as a reason to spy on war protestors during the Nixon era and it is used excessively now.
If we are o.k. with trolling phone numbers for a large data base then don’t be surprised if this method is used for other nefarious reasons, especially since this comes right behind attempts to get medical records of women who had aboriton to search for teen abortions, attempting to get library and book store records, e-mail and telephone conversations listened to and it was suggested at one time that Americans could spy on each other and report back. I think the example was a Pizza delivery person sees a person making a bomb as he orders pizza.
It’s a slippery slope and we are fast giving our freedom and liberty so fought for by thousands of young men and women in wars, conflicts and police actions. What a disgrace.
Posted by: Nevis | May 15, 2006, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
The problem, folks, is that the government has broken the law. Get it?
I’m always staggered when people who claim to uphold the “values of America” willingly and joyfully allow their government to violate those values. What’s your problem with the Constitution? Take another look: Fourth Amendment. Please.
Posted by: RHG | May 15, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Change your phone service to Qwest.
Posted by: Tom Paine | May 15, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
I think that this is very good news. Something has to be done to investigate the main-stream media as the MSM has obviously declared war against the President in regards to the war on terror and and the liberation of Iraq. It is outrageous how they are working to leak classified information and to undermine our security at every turn with their reporting. It is also outrageous how they fabricate stories against the President or in a timely fashion recycle old stories as if they were new. I personally no longer trust the MSM at all and feel extremely threatened by their agenda.
Posted by: Garry | May 15, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
I’m appalled that so many of you think this is a good development, that journalists should be gagged. I just can’t wrap my head around why anyone would want their own government to have this kind of crazy power over their citizenry. Especially a government led by a man who considers his greatest accomplishment in office catching a fish.
Posted by: Madison Underwood | May 15, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
You guys in the press have been sucking up to this president from the very beginning. You reported his lies, you bought the B.S., and you did it all for access and so you could get invited to the right parties, and so he could towel-snap you and give you stupid nicknames.
And where did it get you? Monitored by the NSA.
Maybe if you’d done your job from the beginning, we wouldn’t be living in a fascist state run by a madman right now. But no….it was more important that Al Gore was stiff and John Kerry had no charisma. You wanted to drink beer with this guy? Fine. Drink your beer with him. But don’t start crying now about your rights being violated.
Posted by: Jill | May 15, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
i cant wait till the democrats get back in power and start cracking down and tracking all the rightwing thugs and some of the commenters found here. some people are so dumb and shortsighted and have ZERO understanding of the rule of law, the constitution, and civil rights.
Posted by: ron | May 15, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Amendment I – Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression.
Congress shall make no law… or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press….
Posted by: andy | May 15, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
I am tired of thae news media leaking secret information in order to hurt PREDIDENT BUSH. I would prosucute the news media leakers for treason like LINCOLN did. We are at WAR with a enemy who whants to take over the world by force or kill all of us
Posted by: Ron Zacharias | May 15, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
This has to be one of the most frightening issues of our time. I as a citizen deserve to know what the moral construction of our government. The press gave us information such as immoral and unappropriately un-American torture prisons; obtaining this information and releasing is Patriotic, because it goes against what we believe is right. “Our govt should be afraid of its people”, not the other way around.
Posted by: Aaron | May 15, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Will mainstream media FINALLY fight back against this fascist regime? It’s almost too late now.
BTW, with all the spying on Americans taking place, has anyone seen Osama?
Posted by: Kat | May 15, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
i don’t what is scarier, the article or the responses in this thread. some of these responses smack of the very worst kind of authoritarian fascism. these people talk just like the communist party hacks i’ve met in cuba or the old soviet union… and they call themselves patriots. it’s disgusting.
Posted by: drew | May 15, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
I think that this is very good news. Something has to be done to investigate the main-stream media as the MSM has obviously declared war against the President in regards to the war on terror and and the liberation of Iraq. It is outrageous how they are working to leak classified information and to undermine our security at every turn with their reporting. It is also outrageous how they fabricate stories against the President or in a timely fashion recycle old stories as if they were new. I personally no longer trust the MSM at all and feel extremely threatened by their agenda.
Posted by: Garry | May 15, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
You commit treason and expose classified national securtiy information – the goverment is going to come after you – as they should.
Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Tom,
Bush and Cheney are committing illegal acts. They shouldn’t be protected. It’s morally right for these “leakers” to get all the information out……
And please no one needs to be shot.
My .02
-Mike
Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
You do realize people are being paid by the Bush administration to attack the press publically on comment pages like this. I personally was offered a job doing it.
Look at the similarities in the comments.”Aid the enemy” “leaking security” ABC is simply telling it’s viewers what it’s ELECTED GOVERNMENT is doing with it’s money-destroying this country’s power in the eyes of the world!
I want to know what my government is doing. I want to have some measure of control over my life. I am tired of living in the constant fear this administration has subjected us to in the name of patriotism.
Who are these jackasses who think the press is giving aid to the enemy. What blind nonsense.
Posted by: Dawn Howard | May 15, 2006, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
“Welcome to the KGB”
…and the ignorant children turning in their parents for crimes against the state.
Gone are the days of the patriot who spoke, “Give me liberty or give me death.” Now we have Neil Cavuto: “[C]ollecting our phone records” is better than “collecting our remains.”
Posted by: TC | May 15, 2006, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
If you don’t believe in the US Constitution, get the out of here. If you don’t support the Bill of Rights, then YOU are Anti-American. Go move to Russia, Cuba, or China; move anywhere but get the hell out of my country. The only reason our soldiers are dying in this war is because the people that you degenerates voted into office sent them off to fight for someone else. Own up to your mistakes and quit trying to trade my liberty for your false sense of security.
Posted by: LeLand McGee | May 15, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Might as well start calling Bush “Dear Leader” as well as addressing each other as ‘comrade’ and while we’re at it let’s change the name of the CIA to KGB and start holding May Day parades where we show off our shiny tanks and missiles. That’s where we are headed folks, I mean ‘comrades’
Posted by: just changed it to 'Yuri' | May 15, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Ok Tommy Boy, shall we start with Dick Cheney and Robert Novak?
Posted by: solid | May 15, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
When the government itself breaks the law and hides behind the veil of secrecy – who will stand up and hold them accountable to the rule of law? An elected government is not royalty nor infallible – a true democracy, the people, keeps its government in line with the law. The news media “broke the law” when they published the classified Pentagon papers back in the 70′s – and when the activities of Nixon’s “plumbers” were exposed. A lot of those same convicted criminals are back at it, running through the halls of power today. Since the American people seem unable and unwilling to throw these bums out of office, it lies with the media to report on the truth and not allow the government to break the law and gut this country. Stand up to power, folks!
“Fascism would be better described as corporatism, since it is marriage between the state and business” – Benito Mussolini
Posted by: WWII Vet | May 15, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Tom, it’s not treason. It’s covered by US Code title 18 section 793, 794 and 798 among others. See http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/dd_1847_1.pdf
It’s a felony. The leakers should go to jail. The publishers and reporters, to the extent that they knew information was classified, should go to jail. Nobody should be shot.
Posted by: Richard R | May 15, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Didn’t we just live through this a little over 30 years ago? Just a week ago today, John Negroponte said:
“This is about international terrorism and telephone calls between people thought to be working for international terrorism and people here in the United States.”
The news reports of domestic spying are just the sound of history repeating. When the President and “America” become conflated – for whatever reason – anyone who can be viewed as in opposition to the President is therefore in opposition to “America.” Reporters, whistleblowers, activists, columnists, Democrats – they are all working against our country.
Therefore, they are “working for international terrorism”.
Fair game for wiretaps, for warrantless searches, for blackmail, for sting operations, for prosecution, for rendition, for Guantanamo – or for a Halliburton-built “detention center.”
Why is it always the Republican presidencies that act on their paranoid fears? Is GWB wandering the halls of the White House at night, talking to a portrait of Lincoln?
Posted by: Louise | May 15, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Tom Camp: “I am a journalism graduate, UNC-Chapel Hill. I am also a veteran.
I hope they catch every government leaker of classified secret information (*) and put them in prison for life. And any reporter publishing known classified secret information should be shot. It is called treason, not first amendment rights.”
* – Except outing CIA agents for political payback. I like those.
Posted by: Gryn | May 15, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
I will bring Dick Cheney to his knees.
Posted by: Federal Source | May 15, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
They’re not spying on reporters to find “leakers”. They’re looking for anything that’s different from their POV – different from the FoxNews POV.
It’s brainwashing. It’s clear by those who rushed to post supportive comments here that it’s worked to a degree….
Enjoy the fission this administration has created in this government……
Posted by: Paul | May 15, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
CHENEY, LIBBY, BUSH. They are the leakers.
The press is there to keep them from further screwing up this country. Without accountability they can do whatever they choose (pretty much what Bush is doing spying on all of us, costing us a fortune in gas prices and medical bills, and killing innocent people because of a pack of lies)
Posted by: Dawn Howard | May 15, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
People should remember the thoughts of Thomas More when Henry VIII jailed him for not accepting Royal edicts. More believed we have to fight for the rights others’, in this case the news media, to protect our own.
If Bush isn’t stopped, we’ll all lose our rights under the guise of fighting terrorism.
Posted by: Joe S | May 15, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
If people were really interested in “rooting out the lawbreakers” they’d root out the Bush Administrations as a whole.
Our troops today and yesteryear did not sacrifice their lives so that we can live in the same conditions as the former USSR.
Posted by: Chris | May 15, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
It’s funny watching people support the actions of the government in recording and tracking American citizens. The Bush Administration has turned the United States into a Soviet style state, where dissent and questioning is treason and people should be shot. Where did my country go. And don’t give me a line about 9/11 changing everything. The terrorists hitting us has nothing to do with our Constitution being usurped by these hacks.
Posted by: David L | May 15, 2006, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Tom Camp, do you think this should start with Scooter Libby, Karl Rove, and Dick Cheney, or is disclosing classified information and outing a CIA agent for the purpose of attacking a political enemy OK if the President agrees to it?
Is it treason to disclose information classified by the executive branch if that information reveals that the President has repeatedly broken U.S. law?
Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2006, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
I will bring Dick Cheney to his knees.
Posted by: Federal Source | May 15, 2006, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
The blind hatred for the press conveyed by several who have posted is more frightening than the NSA.
Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2006, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
The people who are posting in support of this non-sense seem to have forgotten what is at stake here. The Bush administration and their cronies need to be held accountable. Do not forget the Presidential Daily Brief from August 2001 that forewarned about a potential terrorist attack. We’d not even be having this discussion if Bush and crew had been doing their job. To say that reporters and/or dissenters should be treated as traitors is really over-the-top. Perhaps those who support this need to take a long look at what it means to live in a free country, because they surely seem to be bound and determined to turn America into a fascist state. Wake up, people!
Posted by: JEB | May 15, 2006, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Whatever is necessary to win the war on terror is justifiable, therefore, will be done- right or wrong.
Posted by: skmp | May 15, 2006, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
I am going to be very curious to see how people feel when a democrat is in the White House and essentially inherits the same set of rules that this president is using. Remember the black helicopter crowd in the 90s? These are the same people writing in to support the president’s efforts to infiltrate the press. In fact, I’d be willing to be they’re the same people commenting on this post.
Sag.
Posted by: Sagrilarus | May 15, 2006, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
$10 says this is the same source that provided them national guard documents.
Posted by: Poser | May 15, 2006, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
So I suppose they are also keeping track of people who comment on this story. “Knock, knock.” “Who’s there?” “Gestapo.” “Gestapo who?” (Sound of door being smashed….).
Posted by: jason Shapiro | May 15, 2006, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Fascinating watching all the Soviets giggle over the press “finally getting caught” and muttering about “traitor journalists.” Welcome to America, comrades, it’s looking more and more like your former home every day.
As for the press itself, it will be interesting to see if anyone actually put up a fuss. The mainstream press has been Bush’s faithful lapdogs for his entire presidency. I doubt many of them will actually bother to protest. The days of a real oppositional press in this country are long behind us. I’m not even sure the wirepats are necessary; I imagine that most of Bush’s little journalistic poodles would have provided the information if asked.
Posted by: Black Max | May 15, 2006, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
The most frightening part of this is the swarm of responses attacking the media and honest public servants for revealing illegal government operations.
This lynch mob believes that torture, arbitrary arrest, indefinite detention on secret charges and other abuses of human freedom are only bad if the Russians or Chinese do it.
Yet they attack liberals for “situational ethics.” What goes around, comes around, folks. Don’t come whining to the media when it’s your turn on the rack. Not that we won’t want to help you — but you will have blown away our ability to do it.
Posted by: Jules Siegel | May 15, 2006, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
I thought the story was that the terrorists attacked America because they hate freedom. The only people I see who hate freedom around here are Bush supporters.
Posted by: Amused Canadian | May 15, 2006, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Fellow Americans, we have to insure that the Bush administration doesn’t feel free to spy on whomever they want WITHOUT A WARRANT. It’s illegal.
Posted by: Martin | May 15, 2006, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
It’s good to read comments from right wing conservatives advocating the prosecution of the vice president for the treasonable act of leaking Valerie Plame’s name for political purposes. The fact that she was expert in Iran’s nuclear weapons capabilities is very important to national security. I’m not sure the leaking of news about our having secret prisons in eastern europe where torture interrogations are conducted qualifies as the same type of leak. Sadly, the fourth estate is as corrupt as both political parties.
Posted by: 1776 Patriot | May 15, 2006, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
From the Church Committee report:
“In time of crisis, the government will exercise its power to conduct domestic intelligence activities to the fullest extent. The distinction between legal dissent and criminal conduct is easily forgotten,” the committee wrote. “In an era where the technological capability of government relentlessly increases, we must be wary about the drift toward `big brother government.”’
Posted by: LesiureGuy | May 15, 2006, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Andy says “We are at WAR with a enemy who whants to take over the world by force or kill all of us”.
Well, his name is George. And what are we going to do about him?
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Benjamin Franklin
Posted by: Jon Leslie | May 15, 2006, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
My question is simple. If you won’t allow the government to do ANY type of data mining or survellience without FIRST having a federal warrant, how the heck can you get the warrant? Don’t you need evidence before a warrant is granted? On one had the media, and ABC, complain about the administrations inability to “connect the dots” that lead up to Sept. 11th and on the other they criticize every effort to thwart terrorists attacks?
Personally, as I don’t call anyone associated with Al Qaeda, I don’t CARE if the Government tracks me, listens to me or records me. Only the guilty should be nervous. Is ABC and the NYT Guilty of aiding terroism or are they/you simply guilty of undermingin our security by letting the terrorists know what we are trying to do to stop them? In either case, you should be ashamed.
Posted by: Chris | May 15, 2006, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
What did ABC say during WWII when Roosevelt made sure that no classified information was leaked through the media?
Posted by: Owen | May 15, 2006, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
How can one defend the indefensible? This is not an America with which I’m familiar. And neither are these posters. If they don’t like a free press, one that takes an active look at exactly what our government is up to, then I suggest they move.
I hear North Korea is nice this time of year. You’ll find the press there much less apt to level a critique against the government.
I also think the above posters suffer from belonging to the Bush cult of personality. Within this cult, Bush can do no wrong and is to be trusted. Not that he’s ever given evidence for this, but this is one of the underlying delusions of the posters. Nothing new here, Nixon also attracted rabid defenders to the bitter end.
As for ABC, thank you for your work.
Posted by: Dave | May 15, 2006, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Very scary, but who knows…if these records were public information, rather than being screened and filtered out against favorite targets, I think we would see a lot of the leakers (think Libby) are on the wrong side of the fence…although we will never hear about those leaks…
BTW, a source is only protected if the information provided is determined to be true. A source loses its legal protection if they are providing lies.
Also, the protections of a journalist and a source are about as protected as a Lawyer -> Client or Doctor -> Patient. Not that I necessarily agree it should be (people should be accountable for what they say) but either this information needs to be available for everybody, or nobody. I don’t want some partisan analyst overlooking all their buddies leaks and using this for their own agenda, which is exactly what I see happening.
Posted by: Andy Carroll | May 15, 2006, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
This article is completely dependent upon an unnamed source who supposedly made the claims cited in the article. None of this may be true but ABC doesn’t even suggest this possibility; rather, it publicizes this unproven contention–”ABC News does not know how the government determined who we are calling”– by concluding it is true, yet there is no way for ABC to know if any of their phones were tapped at all. Since they are willing to go public with contentions “proven” by yet another unnamed source, I am unwilling to get fished into whether or not this is good or bad. But my inclination is to suspect the network is creating a suspicion that isn’t there, and as a national media outlet, they shouldn’t be in the business of unsubstantiated rumors.
Posted by: norcoast | May 15, 2006, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Anyone who thinks they want this information just to track terrorists is brainwashed.
It’s obvious to anyone who understands how Rove & Co. operate that this information is being gathered to help them in consolidating and controlling power – they will use it in any way they can to qwell opposition and scare people into keeping quiet while they break the law.
These guys are thugs and liars and will do anything to retain power — given the billions of dollars that power lets them control. Anyone who thinks this database won’t be brought to bear to to help them not lose control of that money is fooling themselves — and lying to the rest of us.
They are complicit in the fleecing of Americans and in assisting the funders of the Republican Party in locking down control over the US Treasury and Military to use for their own, self-serving purposes.
Posted by: Me | May 15, 2006, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
I’m amazed by all the people who think illegal spying is ‘okay’, as long as it ‘protects’ them.
Nothing is going to protect them. The terrorists will strike when and where they strike.
President Bush is an incompetent boob who has absolutely no finesse or intelligence, unfortunately and who is ruining America. The fact that he has a bunch of liars, thugs and criminals working for him just exacerbates the problems.
It really is a sad day in America.
My family escaped from a Communist regime and, to see this butchering of the Constitution is just sickening.
Impeach him now!
Posted by: Leslie | May 15, 2006, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Leaking classified information is a crime. It doesn’t matter the intentions, it is a crime.
receiving and publishing that info is a crime.
Both need to be punished.
As far as tracking phone calls, the Feds do much more than that with your financial info. The IRS routinely trolls through your financial records without your knowledge.
So far, nobody seems to mind that.
But, ooooooo those SCARY phone records.
BTW: As early as the 1920′s ITT, the international phone company was giving the govt the full text of all telegrams crossing the US border. The NSA was founded for the express purpose of monitoring phone calls across the border. Its been doing that since 1949. And you are just now figuring this out?
Sheesh.
John Henry
Posted by: John Henry | May 15, 2006, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
I can’t beleive the number of comments about hoping to catch media people who leak classified info! How about Presidents, VP’s and Secretaries of Defense and State who leak CIA operatives names for their own political gains? This country and many of the people in it are becoming very scary! The drink the coolaid everyday and somehow miss the point of who is leaking our national secuity, who is lying about wmds and causing untold death and destruction for profit? Its not the news people or CIA veterans who tell the truth to protect America and the Constitution…they are heroes! They know what America used to stand for and are risking their lives and futures to try to save it from the fascists who have somehow taken over the government with their own selfish
agenda.
Peace
Posted by: Linda Carpenter | May 15, 2006, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
If Bill Clinton’s administration had tapped Fox News’ phones, the right-wing fascists would have fired their assault rifles at the White House.
Posted by: Susan | May 15, 2006, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Q:
What’s more offensive to our democracy than the Bush administration turning the executive branch into a virtual black op, attempting to seal off world-changing and constitution-altering plans and activities from press and congressional scrutiny?
A:
Well for one thing, the blind and clueless enthusiasm with which Americans like some of the posters here rush to support them, barely a clue in hand about the full story or its consequences.
“Thank you sir, may I have another!”
IMHO, which I see is already, fortunately not alone (as it was when I first when to try to get this post up). If these probably well meaning patriots have to post again to tell me my liberal, civil liberties-over-war-on-terror opinion is twisted, weak, and aids “the enemy” — apologies in advance to all who have to type or read the responses. I know how tiring this all too predictable exchange is by now…
Posted by: Alex | May 15, 2006, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
I am ashamed of THOSE AMERICANS THAT I HAVE JUST READ … THE ONES THAT ARE SAYING IT’S OK FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO WATCH OUR ACTIVITY. And that the MEDIA is the enemy of the state.
I AM APPALLED BECAUSE FROM WHAT I REMEMBER GROWING UP…IT WAS THE COMMUNISTS THAT MONITORED THEIR CITIZENS…THE THING THAT HAS MADE AMERICA GREAT IS OUR CIVIL LIBERTIES,,,, AND THOSE THAT FOLLOW BLINDLY BEHIND THIS ADMINISTRATION OR ANY ADMINISTRATION FOR THAT MATTER ARE SHEEP AND NO BETTER THAN THE GERMAN CITIZENS THAT FOLLOWED BLINDLY BEHIND ADOLF HITLER AND THE NAZIS
Posted by: Tamela | May 15, 2006, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
So for all you who think the media needs to be roped in, would you rather the government break the law and violate your rights as a citizen and you NOT know about it?
Whistleblowers can’t go to a Republican run congress, nothing will happen. This is the only way people will know what’s going on.
And if you think this is limited to just news sources and NOT political opponents, then you’re incredibly naive.
Posted by: Kevin | May 15, 2006, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
THE REAL QUESTION is if all the Bush apologists posting here are going to feel the same way when President Hillary has the power to spy on Americans she doesn’t like…
Posted by: True Blue Patriot | May 15, 2006, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Are we seriously supposed to believe this story? How self-promoting can you people get? Look! Look! Everything we said was happening is happening because we say it is!
Nice try.
Posted by: Cardinals Nation | May 15, 2006, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
‘Personally, as I don’t call anyone associated with Al Qaeda, I don’t CARE if the Government tracks me, listens to me or records me. Only the guilty should be nervous.’
And if you call someone who called someone who called someone who has a name similar to a terrorist … you’re being tracked. This is a ‘contact-contagion’ database, not something with a nice tight focus. And they apparently are tracking *ALL* the calls in the country, probably including cellphones (or, why criminals and terrorists use disposable cells).
Posted by: P J Evans | May 15, 2006, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Looks like the same people who are spying on Americans are posting about his article.
Is there anything Republicans won’t do to destroy this country in the name of one little Chimp dicatator?
Posted by: Billy | May 15, 2006, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Chris,
How does collecting more dots help you to connect the dots? It only makes it harder to connect the dots when you start throughing it billions of other dots that have nothing to do with anything. Look, it is not only people that are guilty of crimes that should be afraid, everyone should be. This information can be used against political opponents, reporters, and anyone that opposes the government. If you can’t see that, God help you.
Posted by: squid696 | May 15, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Breaking News … Stained blue dress found in the oval office.
Can we impeach him now?!?
Pretty please with a cherry on top.
Posted by: Jason | May 15, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
I was watching a documentary on the horrors surrounding Auschwitz over the weekend. The Nazi party made war on anyone who disagreed with them, too. Sound familiar?
Posted by: RJVegas | May 15, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
It is not illegal for government employees to reveal illegal government behavior. It’s called whistle blowing and is protected (or was until the Bushies gutted the statute.)
To those who would nail investigative journalists to the wall I would ask:
Wasn’t it better to know about the abuses at Abu Ghraib so that these abuses stop? There was no indication that the Bushies would have done anything about it if it hadn’t come out in the press.
Wasn’t it better to know about the secret prisons where “shadow” prisoners were held in violation of the Geneva Convention (remember, that is what keeps our soldiers from being tortured when they are captured). Again, without the press, this would still be a secret and we would be violating international human rights standards even more than we are.
Wasn’t it better to know that the Bushies were vioating the FISA act repreatedly and egregiously? Congress offered to change FISA to make it more palatable to the Bushies, but they preferred to go skirt the law intended to stop just the kind of investigating of political and journalistic domestic spying the Bushies are clearly doing now.
Wasn’t it better to know about extrordinary rendition, the kidnapping, abuse, and torture of sometimes innocent people? Those who believe in limited government, the 4th amendment, and/or the first amendment should be railing at the Bushies, not egging them on. It shows that your partisan fervor has drowned out your desire to defend the constitution and civil rights.
Beyond Left/Right
Posted by: beyond_left_right | May 15, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Maybe those who are posting here and believe that it is ok for the governemnt to spy on their own people should be reminded of the situation in the former USSR between 1917 and 1989.
If you beleive the Bush administration should not be questioned and should do whatever the heck they please then so be it. I however am SICK of the administration using terrorism as an excuse to stamp out my civil liberties!
Maybe all of you who are against freedom of information and of the press should etierh stick your heads back into the sand where they belong or go watch fox.
Posted by: Todd | May 15, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
So, um… have all of Bush’s 29% chimed in, or are there one or two of you left?
Posted by: japhy | May 15, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
There’s no real dispute that it’s legal for the government to examine call records in the context of an investigation (without warrants), and there’s also no dispute that investigating leaks of classified information is a very legitimate activity.
What’s the problem?
Posted by: Ari Rabkin | May 15, 2006, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
I think the worst thing about this is that it defiles the basic rights that so many soldiers have laid down their lives fignting for. I think the question is: Where do we draw the line between gonvernment accountability and basic freedoms? When we step over that line, we erode the basic foundation that supports our society.
Any administration that goes unchecked will cross the line, and this system of accountability, though obviously flawed, is what keeps the entities of our government within some degree of control. Our forefathers seem to have undersood very well what so many of you have forgotten.
Posted by: Dave | May 15, 2006, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
My my, there are some people on this thread who have seriously lost touch with reality.
“Bush has changed our country into a fascist state” – well if this is true, then why isn’t Michael Moore in jail? Why are you allowed to post your anti-Bush comments? Your claim will have more credibility if Bush refuses to leave after his second term. That won’t happen.
“Leakers are courageous dissidents” – No. Leaks of this nature from the intelligence community are inexcusable. There are well established channels by which people in the intelligence community can be “whistle blowers”. None of those channels involve broadcasting national security secrets to our enemies via our all-too-willing media. The people who do this deserve jail, not praise.
If they broke the law, they should be prosecuted. And that included reporters. Period.
“This is a violation of the fourth Amendment” – No. There is no illegal invasion of privacy here. In Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 744 (1979) the Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement access to the telephone numbers that you call is not an “unreasonable search or seizure” and therefore is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Unlike a search warrant, law enforcement officials do not even have to have “probable cause” to request these sorts of records.
Posted by: ksm | May 15, 2006, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Anyone ANYONE can legally buy reports showing whom cell phone users called, and were called by. It has NOTHING to do with NSA. Defense lawyers and the media use the service all the time. Where was the outrage then? http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-privacy05.html
Posted by: Jay | May 15, 2006, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
This article is worthless on it’s face. An unnamed “federal” source reports that ABC news is being tracked to find out who the leakers are. And, of course, they met in person. To add mystique to the myth.
First, lets deal with this “news” article.
They carefully word things to suggest the worst. Recently disclosed NSA collection of domestic phone calls.
In reality, this means that in the past 4 1/2 years the government has begun storing anonymous records of the phone digits being connected by telephone companies. 273-4589 called 745-9871 on June 15th, 2004.
This same information is bought and sold by private companies, except it’s bought and sold with consumer information.
Your phone number isn’t private, it can be looked up on the internet.
So, lets say the government happens across a would-be terrorist. They get his cell phone, and they plug it into this database. They now, instantly, have access to everyone that phone number has contacted in the last 4 1/2 years. No digging involved. They can then get immediate warrants to search and seize as necessary from those phone numbers. This is a miniscule loss of privacy with a huge potential benefit. And, as pointed out above, you do not currently have this privacy…your information is already on sale or freely available.
Can the information be misused? Absolutely. But the government stores incredible amounts of information on all citizens. Are those records misused? They can be. But I don’t hear for calls to erase/burn all tax return records.
Where is the crushing of dissent? I see little but dissent in the form of media, public rallies, and online discussion. People are free in this country to voice their opposition, and they do so.
We do not live in a police state. It has been 5 years since the last domestic terrorist attack, and I have been asked to give up almost no freedom. I have a longer line at the airport. Anything else? Can you name one other factual inconvenience or definitive loss of privacy in your life?
The truth is, we have been asked for terribly little in the way of sacrifice to ensure national security. And, as Americans, that is the way we like it.
Posted by: Jo | May 15, 2006, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
The MSM has been incredibly slow about calling this President’s bluffs. Frankly, they haven’t been doing their job, yet they still expect the free press privileges. Well, this is what you get when the free press forgets to function!
The gov’mnt says this program doesn’t “listen in”. No, probably not. This program may simply identify the numbers ripe for tapping… passing them to another gov’mnt program to do the actual taps… maybe even under FISA. What has been shown is that this administration dissembles as a matter of course. Now, why would I believe anything they say? How careful are they being about our rights while they’re breaking the law? Probably just as careful as they’re being about the law itself.
Posted by: solitaire | May 15, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
How much clearer can it be… this administration is conducting a systhematic war against the American people, our values, and institutions. Only the wholesale arrest of these scoundrels will save the nation.
Posted by: Erik Vilius | May 15, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
“Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”
Posted by: j | May 15, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
It is preposterous to claim that telling the press about torture gulags, or patently ILLEGAL wiretapping, harms national security. That stuff is classified because it is politically embarassing and ‘super-depressing’, i.e. the public doesn’t want it to happen! That the existence of the programs is classified does not mean national security is actually implicated.
The government is illegally obtaining phone records and tracking down political opponents. When will it stop?
Posted by: Derek | May 15, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
This shows bad faith by Bush Administration.
This has nothing to do with spying on terrorists or national security, which is the sole rationale for the program.
This is akin to the Nixon administration and enemies lists abuses of power.
The disclsosure that press calls are being traced is the equivalenmt of learing that Nixon taped whitehouse conversations.
IMPEACH!
Posted by: bill | May 15, 2006, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
This piece coyly states “ABC News does not know how the government determined who we are calling, or whether our phone records were provided to the government as part of the recently-disclosed NSA collection of domestic phone calls.”
Ummmm, isn’t it possible, if the “phone calls and contacts by reporters for ABC News, along with the New York Times and the Washington Post, are being examined as part of a widespread CIA leak investigation” that the information was either obtained by virtue of a search warrant, duly issued and approved by a Federal magistrate, or was legally obtained without a warrant because such information has been held not to be private? In fact, isn’t it PROBABLE that this is the case, given that the Feds must surely be aware of the likelihood of leaks, and that the whole operation will be spun by the media as a violation of free speech and due process?
How can the lamestream media seriously push the idea that the government is full of evil geniuses engaged in a vast conspiracy to destroy our Constitutional rights while at the same time implying that government investigators are so stupid that they’d knowingly give the media such ammunition against themselves?
I’ll tell you what I believe in this story: (a) the government is investigating leaks; (b) they are trying to find out who in the media suspected leakers are talking to; (c) somebody in the government (probably more than one person) has been asked to sign a document (probably under penalty of perjury) saying that he/she isn’t the source of a particular leak; (d) the investigators have dotted all their legal i’s and crossed all their legal t’s.
Mostly this article is all speculation and spin, presenting, as clearly intended, the lamestream media as victim. Sorry, ABC, I don’t buy it. Cross posted to my blog.
Posted by: ExRat | May 15, 2006, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
The Bush machine will tolerate no dissent. Just like Saddam or Mugabe.
Posted by: nottheamericaIknow | May 15, 2006, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Myabe now the MSM will take their gloves off for this cabal of a administration!!!
I hope so…I hope every reporter out there will start telling it like it is concerning this facist group!
Wake up America!
Posted by: VPS | May 15, 2006, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
This is why the terrorists are going to win. Every debate in this country boils down to those who hate Republicans and those who hate Democrats. Its not about the war, stopping terrorists or saving lives. Its about the next November.
If and when we all figure out that the terrorists want to kill both sides the same then we will have a chance to win the war against them.
If you don’t like these intelligence gathering programs, then you should propose what you would do instead. Otherwise, after the next terrorist attack, don’t start criticizing the leadership for not doing enough as the Democrats did after 9/11. We have to do something. So what would you do if monitoring the communications of suspected terrorists is inappropriate?
Posted by: Sun Tsu | May 15, 2006, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
To those who support this anti-first amendment breach, you obviously don’t see where this overstepping of bounds can lead to —–> Total Banana Republic Regime (we’ve taken multiple steps toward this place under Bushy McFlightsuit)
…and what is with calling anyone you disagree with a communist???!!!???
Posted by: lillyhammer | May 15, 2006, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
“I’m appalled that so many of you think this is a good development, that journalists should be gagged”
The attacks on “the press” result from, to take one example, the fact that a lot of us have or personally know people who have spent a lot of time in Iraq recently. When someone you know and trust gives you a picture of goings on there that radically differs from what you’ve seen in the paper or on TV, you come away with a feeling that some press entities are actively working for the enemy. I agree with you that the press needs strong protection – but enemy propagandists don’t. I agree that it’s frightening, but it’s also frightening that many reporters do seem to either hate this country or hate this president so rabidly that they’ll damage the country to damage him. It’s the press conflating the president and the country, not their critics.
Posted by: J | May 15, 2006, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Fantastic news. I hope we see some of these leakers and their media contacts in jail for stabbing America in the back.
Posted by: DaMav | May 15, 2006, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Welcome to “1984″ … there is to be NO “checks and balances” in this administration is there? are Congress is useless and now the last hope, the media and their confidants are to be hushed too. Next thing you know they’ll start wanting to know who has every single gun in this country. But be wary.
Posted by: bobnbob | May 15, 2006, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Reading all the comment reveals extremists on both side of the argument. People blame Bush for September 11…. how could he have prevented it. Everything being done now to prevent another 9/11 is being criticized. Also consider the number of calls (no names or call content) in these databases. Volume is to large to ever be analyzed. Use of the databse is as follows: US phone number receives a call from a know terrorist. Database will allow governmet to track all the phone numbers called. They still do not know any names.
Posted by: G Keehn | May 15, 2006, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
I see a lot of “arguing by affirmation” from the Left on this thread.
Apparently, if you say something emphatic enough, and in enough different ways, then that makes your statement true.
Kind of reminds me of the old sterotype of Americans shouting loudly in an attempt to make a foreigner understand what they are trying to say.
These guys need to take some classes in Logic and History. They are so emotional that they don’t seem to realize how juvenile they sound.
The President’s biggest responsibility is to defend our country in time of war. And to do that he has to gather intel.
More power to him!
Posted by: KSM | May 15, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
its hilarious how many people in this population of “free democracy” can’t wait to submit all their liberties to the powers that will (soon) control all aspects of their lives.
this administration has taken leaps and bounds into total control and will continue to devalue the lives of citizens.
Posted by: alex | May 15, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Funny how those asserting that the U.S. is becoming an evil fascist state will still vote to raise taxes.
Posted by: ss | May 15, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Will the tapping end with the phones?
We have monotoring from space now. Whose to say emails and website tracking isn’t also hidden in this databse.
Posted by: James | May 15, 2006, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Ari Rabkin says —– “There’s no real dispute that it’s legal for the government to examine call records in the context of an investigation (without warrants)”
Ari – are you under investigation?? Am I ?? I think thats the point, don’t you?
Why do Bush apologists just not “get it” ???? Are you that in love with him?
Posted by: sorrystateofaffairs | May 15, 2006, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
It is astounding to me that of all the saliva-flecked commentary here, only ONE person has mentioned that the processes under attack were initiated under the CLINTON Administration, and informally (and still legally) in use for decades before that? Where were all you geniuses then? Haven’t any of you been through a security scan at an airport? Did you protest your right to privacy at the security screeners looking inside your handbag with an x-ray machine? and no warrant? Do you protest the fact that your employer (or anyone else who pays you money) informs the government about it? Don’t you see how you are being manipulated like a sock-puppet? If you would just look at the prefabricated howls of outrage – really look- you would see that they are seldom based on actual FACTS. Come on, people. If you have some concrete evidence or a reasoned argument, go ahead. But enough with the name-calling.
Posted by: Steve | May 15, 2006, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
I fully support privacy, especially for members of the press who are (belatedly) investigating this mistake of a presidency. Do the best you can, ABC! There are terrible things afoot and you know it!
Posted by: Andy G | May 15, 2006, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
It’s called “Caller ID”. What part of Appalachia are you guys from? The phone switch at ABC has the capability of logging incoming calls, and it may very well be doing so. It can log outgoing calls, too.
Are you THAT clueless that you thought calls to a geovernment office were not logged?
Posted by: Chuck Simmins | May 15, 2006, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
“Personally, as I don’t call anyone associated with Al Qaeda, I don’t CARE if the Government tracks me, listens to me or records me. Only the guilty should be nervous.”
If the government isn’t guilty of anything, they shouldn’t be nervous about their secrets being leaked.
Posted by: anonymous | May 15, 2006, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
It’s dizzying to read the comments on this story. Ben Franklin said- “he who sacrafices liberty for security gains neither”
Posted by: Spence | May 15, 2006, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
UMass Amherst did the same thing A DECADE AGO when someone leaked the Basketball Team’s grades.
Posted by: ed | May 15, 2006, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
I have never been paid by anyone to post comments but I happen to agree with many of the comments saying you have committed treason. I would say no other country that is opposed to us in the world needs any spies now, since the mainstream media is doing all their work for them.
Posted by: Garland Byron | May 15, 2006, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
I am ashamed of the people that defend what the Bush administration is doing in spying on American citizens and the press. How do you think that Watergate was discovered and brought down a President that was totally out of control with no bounderies?
What you are defending is fascism. Look up the word in a dictionary. How do the citizens find out what their government is doing with the three branches of government under one party? No ethics, outing a CIA Operative, no WMD’s, attacking a country that was no threat to America, etc.
Do you know that this administration considers Greenpeace, Sierra Club, Democrats, anti-war domostraters, environmentalists, liberal churches all terrorists? Do you feel safe under a totalarian government, because that is now what we have become? Are you all so scared of the so called enemy that you will give up basic american rights?
There is not a single person in this administration that has not lied to us and to other world leaders. Beware when we no longer have a free press that can track the illegal acts that this administration does.
Posted by: Irene Euchler | May 15, 2006, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Pastor Niemoller wrote “First they came for the Communists,
and I didn’t speak up, because I wasn’t a Communist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn’t speak up, because I wasn’t a Jew.
Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn’t speak up, because I was a Protestant.
Then they came for me,
and by that time there was no one left to speak up for me.”
It was your job, for the past six years to expose the sins of this administration. Now they have come for you; is there anyone left to speak up? Now would be a heck of a time to start doing your job!
Posted by: Mike Grello | May 15, 2006, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
ADDRESS COMPLAINTS TO:
Who’s the person running the NSA’s data collection program?
James M. Cusick, assistant deputy director of the NSA for data acquisition. He’s Mr. Data Acquisition. He’s the specialist in charge of building collection systems that can acquire vast amounts of data, and his unit is the one that is running this program.
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/05/15/
aid_interview/print.html
MR. JAMES M. CUSICK
922 VANDERWOOD ROAD
BALTIMORE, Maryland 21228-1326
U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
SENIOR EXECUTIVE
07/06/2004 500.00
TOTAL CONTRIBUTION 1000.00
Committee: BUSH-CHENEY ’04 (PRIMARY) INC.
http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:MSucjNYnIUUJ:
herndon2.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/dcdev/forms/C00386987
/131995/sa/ALL/13+%22James+M.+Cusick%22&hl=
en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=21
Posted by: Bob | May 15, 2006, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
If Bush is “crushing dissent”, he’s sure doing a poor job of it.
Posted by: Elvis America | May 15, 2006, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
I really could care less who or what the Government spies on. Even if they were upfront about it and it was “legally” done, there would still be something illegal about it – in someone’s eyes. Ask yourself this question, when was the last time I knowingly talked to a terrorist outside this country? As for the media, they get what they deserve – nothing but a bunch of snot nosed brats who hide behind the 1st amendment, while pointing the finger at someone else – their establishment is just as bad, if not worse, than our current governmental administration. I see no need to worry, as a private citizen, because I know I have done nothing wrong – have you?
Posted by: Chardsand | May 15, 2006, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Throughout the history of our country the whistleblower and the journalist have conspired to keep Americans free. Utilizing government programs to undermine journalists’ ability to exercise their right to free speech and report the truth undermines the very fabric of freedom this country is supposed to uphold. It is imperative that all Americans remember that this is THEIR government. It is not the President’s or Vice President’s alone. It is all of ours.
Our government has failed to hold itself accountable for the past 6 years. Every failure is met with an excuse or a dismissal. No one has lost their job over a single point of failure. Only those who have spoken up to try and prevent those failures have lost their jobs.
We need to have a free and unemcumbered press. We need SOMEONE to provide oversight to the government, who has proven time and again in the past few years that it does NOT care about America, only its political life.
You are afraid of terrorists? You think that spying on journalists and other Americans is an important component to stop terrorism? I will tell you this: the War on Terror is NOT about planes flying into buildings or bombs being dropped in Afghanistan. It is about IDEALS. It is about PHILOSOPHY. America is a land of IDEALS. We have always valued freedom – freedom to practice whatever religion you want. Freedom to SPEAK YOUR MIND. Freedom to SPEAK OUT. These ideals are trampled upon every day now to defend the government’s “War on Terror.” THe very thing that MAKES US AMERICA is being diminished every single day, and you all sit around and take it, so long as you can watch American Idol and eat Big Macs.
This whole thing is an outrage. It’s a great contradiction to what our country is supposed to mean.
Posted by: Al | May 15, 2006, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
I certainly hope THIS will be your lead story tonight, not the immigration pandering done by the administration.
If you can’t get the news, you can’t tell US the news.
Posted by: Joseph Bua | May 15, 2006, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
UMass Amherst did the same thing A DECADE AGO when someone leaked the Basketball Team’s grades.
Posted by: ed | May 15, 2006, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
I see the President as an honest man that is trying his best to protect us from those that would,could, did and will do us great harm.
His job is not made easier by the political left; they have always been a noisey bunch that seeing conspiracies everywhere. This stems all the way back to the Vietnam War. The whole reason we lost that war was due to the fact that the politicians running the war lost their resolve due to the bosterious left and all their antics.
Posted by: SteveC | May 15, 2006, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Newsrooms need to get their webmaster to start applying for VOIP ONLY and start opening other gates with SKYPE. This way you can talk to whoever you want without being tracked. For outgoing calls, you simply keep rotating the accounts, dropping a few, signing on a few new ones… confusing the system.
I used to work in computer security, so take this tip as a good one.
Posted by: Citizen Yes! | May 15, 2006, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
This is outrageous! How much more of this are we willing to allow? They can use 9/11 as an excuse to monitor every aspect of our lives. Enough is enough. They are infringing on our rights more and more. It is time to get answers from them. They have crossed a line that should not be crossed.
Posted by: Pat | May 15, 2006, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
some are repeated multiple times… most negative comments are written in the same voice. someone should investigate whether the NSA or the RNC uses spambots to post comments like these…..
Posted by: The comments on this page are highly suspicious | May 15, 2006, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
“BTW, with all the spying on Americans taking place, has anyone seen Osama?”
Yes! He’s in Vegas, and what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. BTW, he thinks its hilarious that we have destroyed our own society and way of life by “hunting” the very thing we created with our policies and desire to ‘give up freedom for security’. I guess Franklin was right. We deserve neither if we continue to be apathetic and allow our country to become fascist. All Heil Bush comrades!
Posted by: gotFreedom? | May 15, 2006, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Disgusting. If ABC News and other affected media outlets do not report this, you have all failed me for the last time. I used to want to be a journalist, now I’m disgusted by the media pandering to what this admin has become.
Posted by: jh | May 15, 2006, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
I’ve long suspected that the right wing cares about nothing except the second half of the second amendment…But these comments prove that it’s much worse than that. The right wing is openly hostile toward EVERYTHING in the Bill of Rights EXCEPT the right to have a gun. Of course, it was THEIR president who called the US Constitution “g-ddamn piece of paper.”
Posted by: MrDoggity | May 15, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
This guy is amazing. Spying on the press is about as stupid as it gets–George W has few friends and the MSM is one of the few he has left. I love watching this guy–can he do anything right?
Posted by: Fred | May 15, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
We used to make fun of the Soviets for this sort of thing. Now, it’s us.
Posted by: nocore | May 15, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
What a sad day in America. The leakers in chief are the Bush Administration. When Valerie Plame was outed, Bush said he would fire anyone who was involved in the leak. Turns out he was the leaker. He ought to fire himself.
This sends a scary message to potential whistle-blowers — it’s hard enough to stand up to this Administration and its illegal activities; now it will be even more dangerous. But the tide has turned and I believe it’s a little late for Bush and Cheney to think they can stem that tide. This has to stop. They are shredding the Constitution.
Had to laugh at the paid posters who are so happy at what is being done here and wish to bring back the sedition laws. Two of those posts were virtually identical. What a joke.
Posted by: Nightprowlkitty | May 15, 2006, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
“that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain–that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom–and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” Abraham Lincoln
I hate what these neocons are doing to this country. How dare they distort and bend the constitution.
Posted by: rob34j4 | May 15, 2006, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Boy, this is scary stuff! Not just the news but how complacent the public is – or rather how they blame the press?! Secret prisons are helping protect America? Why are they secret? So the prisoners can’t be broken out? Nonsense! No, because it’s abhorant behavior for a country that claims it operates otherwise. Secret drone attacks and kills mostly innocents in Pakistan? That’s a secret that needs protecting for our national security? Any one who understands the situation in the Middle East – not just those who listen to Fox news, but those who really know the politics of the Middle East, KNOW that we are now in more danger because of Bush’s arragance, not LESS danger. It’s simply a fact. And the foolhardy who want to give up their freedoms to support those freedoms (through war) are pretty dissallusioned. And the torture? Come-on. Our president says “We don’t torture” then goes on to defend it and reserves the right even after the Senate passes a law against it. Where is the America I believe in? Trampled under the boots of this foolhardy and deceitful administration. All so sad…
Posted by: T | May 15, 2006, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
¨If they broke the law, they should be prosecuted. And that included reporters. Period. ¨
Ok well, >I tend to disagree. There is sometimes a moral high ground, above the ¨law¨ I wonder what your take is on Rosa Parks, um Boston Tea Party, Pentagon Papers, um French Revolution… With that logic, Rosa Parks should have just sat at the back of the bus, and we should still be British. Give me break. What is America to you. Wake up. By saying that Michael Moore isnt in prison means that were a free country is just as insane as A German under Hitler saying, well they didnt bring sò-and-so to the concentration camp, so its not really fascist. Please grow up and read the dictionary, then a history book. Why is it that some conservatives have to lose their objectivity, is there never a bad republican? Iwas conservative, that is until they became all about big government and deficitsand corruption. Is there not any other conservatives here that cringe at what ¨republicans¨have done? For once I think the MSM is doing us a favor here. Wake up and see that liberals are not the enemy here. I hope to God that there are some independant minds out there on the right. For the sake of this country we should be fighting over small details such as government spending programs, religious programs. How the heck did we go from Roe vs Wade, to defending secret eastern european prisons, domestic spying, and the lack of dissent. Weren´t we always against government invasion of privacy, isnt that why there are so many conservative contitution ¨ëxperts¨, what did they do, lose their copy?? Just scary all I can say is i would have least expected the traitors to have come from the right. Just sad.
Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2006, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
allrighty msm. . . ‘dem there is fightin’ words.
the question is: “are you gonna do anything about it?” even if the dear leader apologists here have no idea what is really at stake, i would sure as hell hope you do. . .so are you gonna take it or are you gonna start doing your job?
Posted by: sandoz | May 15, 2006, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Fight back. Change over to laptops, an open Wifi connection, a series of skype (or other VOIP service) accounts and (most importantly) a mac address spoofer. You should be able to find a geek capable of explaining all this to you. They only rights we have left are those we can individually defend.
Posted by: XXXX XXXXXXX | May 15, 2006, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Do we really want to have a government that decides that it can violate the law with impunity, and then brand those who disclose the illegal activity to the press, as well as the press itself, as criminals? The White House has already made clear that it consideres the Legislative and Executive Branches to be nuisances, rather than co-equal branches. Now, by moving against the press, they are moving directly against the public itself.
Do you wonder why this new “tool” hasn’t been used to discover who in the White House leaked Valerie Plame Wilson’s name to the press? The answer is obvious: the White House doesn’t think that leak was bad. Only those leaks that embarrass the White House, show that its being deceptive, are somehow threats to our national security.
I thought that Watergate was as bad as it could get. I was wrong. I fear for our country.
Posted by: litigatormom | May 15, 2006, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
All you people who want to prosecute the leakers and the press, how about starting with Cheney, Libby, Rove, Robert Novak and Judy Miller?
Yeah, thought so.
Posted by: no-one in particular | May 15, 2006, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
If a member of the press shoots one of our unsuspecting soldiers in the back of the head, it is a first amendment right as long as they report on the story, right? Stop the call tacking! Get the ACLU down here to defend Osama’s right to know! Shoot a soldier unawares! It makes for good print!
Posted by: gotGetOutOfJailFreeCard? | May 15, 2006, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
“Nur die Schuldige mussen Angst haben.”
NSDAP 1930
Only the culprits must fear.
Fascism creeps in subtly and incrementally. It does not arrive overnight.
The mere suggestion that the executive branch of government is spying on who reporters are contacting, and for political gain, should be cause for serious alarm.
And then to compound it with some of the statements I read here.
Posted by: Karl | May 15, 2006, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
National security is not just about military secrets and spies.
It’s also about ensuring that no branch of government is too powerful, which is why you have checks and balances. The executive’s power must be checked by the congress and the judiciary, blah blah blah so how many people even care anymore?
If you think Bush needs to have unquestioned authority to fight terrorism, would you feel comfortable giving Hillary Clinton those same powers if she were elected in 2008?
Yeah, didn’t think so. That’s why you should care, even if you have 100% faith in Bush.
Posted by: Michael | May 15, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
does al queada exist? are there terrorists in this country? the media can’t prove it and the government won’t prove it. both sides have yet to make a point, but the battle for ‘the hearts and minds’ continues. it is homegrown, not overseas.
the administration has succeeded in creating a divided and distracted amercian population so it can go about it’s business unfettered.
as long as there was bread in the breadlines under the czar there was no popular revolt. similarly, as long as people can buy cheap goods at walmart, download music to their cell phones and buy gas cheap, no american is going to give a damn what the politicians or the media do.
the media and americans rolled over the consititution over 25 years ago when they allowed media market consolidation and accepted the lies from the administration of ‘the great communicator’ and his cronies, many of whom are currently running the show. the results are plain to see in these postings: american ignorance stands as the lasting legacy and witness to the end of the great american experiment.
the united states is dead, americans just haven’t figured it out yet.
Posted by: d.e. | May 15, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
The paranoids in the white house are going to use any means possible to maintain their power to foster their fascist global corporate control. They will only repeat lies after the truth has been found contradictory to their previous lies. This goes far beyond what has been exposed thus far. Now that some have found courage to speak up to these yahoos, maybe even the kool-aid drinkers will start to come around.
Posted by: chuckwoolworth | May 15, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Here’s my prayer, “Dear God, please shine the light of truth on this situation. With a constitutional system designed to be of the people, by the people and for the people, it is very troubling to many Americans as we witness an American government that tells us it can only do its work in secret If the Bush administration is doing data-mining of millions of Americans for only the purposes of tracking terrorists, then help us see that. If the Bush administration is doing data-mining of millions of Americans for illegal or political reasons, please help us see that. We Americans need to see through the veil surrounding those once-secret policies which may take our nation in a direction we do not want to go. Amen.”
Posted by: Donna | May 15, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
“The President’s biggest responsibility is to defend our country in time of war.”
No, the President’s biggest responsibility is to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. That’s what he swore to do when he took the oath.
Many soldiers throughout history died to protect liberty and freedom. We should be prepared to do no less, not throw liberty and freedom away for security in the face of the latest enemy.
Posted by: Tom J. | May 15, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Only an fool would believe that terrorists didn’t realize they were being electronically tracked. And only an idiot would think that this information, once released by ABC, would be advantageous to terrorists that are already using encryption and throw-away cellphones to avoid government spying. The ONLY threat being posed by these revelations is to the criminals in the White House that have taken Nixon and McCarthy’s dirty tricks to a new level in order to maintain the power they grabbed. They don’t care about our security; you can see that in how they spent our money, how poorly they’ve looked after our security at our ports, how Bush & Co. eliminated 9000 border patrol positions last year, how they installed FOBs in critical positions instead of people with competence and experience (heckuva job, Brownie), and most importantly, the extremely poor response to disasters in this country. What they want is dominion, over the money and communication channels, in order to further enslave the working people. Ask youselves this, patriots, “Am I better off now than I was 5 years ago?” And more importantly, “Why are the FOBs much better off than our guys risking their lives in Irag and Afghanistan?”.
Posted by: mjb | May 15, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
As a vet who served, I am seriously dismayed by what is taking place in the country I once would of died defending, but no more… gone is the country I could be mostly proud of being from, it has disappeared into a deep morass of deceit, lies, and mistreatment of citizenry. We have a lot of fear and it isn’t from without, it is from Washington and trust me, I am sure they are far more scared of us, than we are of them and shame on us for not being more vigilant and signing away our rights one by one… I want MY AMERICA BACK!!! Go ABC News and give them what they deserve, the news, unvarnished, untouched and honest, no fluff or spin please! Oh and get qwest, so they can’t track you, thought I’d never say this but YEAH Qwest!
Posted by: former citizen believer | May 15, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
OK, we don’t want government fascism. You ignored Bush all these years, his madness. Now maybe you can start paying attention and calling him on it.
Posted by: Noperson | May 15, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Sorry, I just don’t believe that all the above comments are genuine. It sounds like a single person with a gripe, probably a plant.
Posted by: Suspicious | May 15, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
If America doesn’t clean up it’s own act pretty soon, it may find itself up against the Allies.
Remember us?
Posted by: Trout | May 15, 2006, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
I laugh at these people that think this is alright…If doesnt matter if your innocent if bush dislikes you you will be gitmoed…One more year and those camps inside U.S.(at old militray bases) will be ready for those guys that think this kind of intrusion is alright…CAN YOU SAY TORTURE, FOREVER…Cant wait..
Posted by: PAL | May 15, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Welcome to 1984. Absolutely outrageous, irresponsible power grab by the goverment. Bush should be impeached.
Posted by: James | May 15, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
This is a clear violation of the law and is exactly the sort of action that lead to the near-impeachment and resignation of Nixon.
This is the sort of story that needs to be the lead story, not whether or not tanning is addictive.
You’re journalists. Do your job.
-Brian
Posted by: Brian | May 15, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
America needs a free press to keep a check on government abuse, which is exactly what this is. The press has not cost any American soldiers their lives — only Bush’s incompetence and phony wars have cost American lives!
This really has to stop. Freedom of the press is what seperates us from the Soviets and the Nazis and other repressive regimes throughout history.
Posted by: Sage Vanden Heuvel | May 15, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Gotta agree with Suspicious…I have a hard time believing that many people think it’s a good idea for the government to spy on the media.
Terrifying story…I wish it didn’t seem so plausable.
Posted by: Nick Dobbins | May 15, 2006, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
You know, look at the first batch of comments to this thread. Notice that some are “eerily” similar to one another in their use of language. Many of those first posts were written by the same person.
This is absolutely terrifying. I wonder how many people are being paid tax dollars to sit around and surf the net. Blogging and tattling to the New World Order’s Freedom-Extermination team.
Posted by: SP | May 15, 2006, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Since when does ABC news report hysterical rumors, suggestive of vast conspiracy theories without a shred of proof? This is crap. Come back with some facts.
Posted by: Roger Rainey | May 15, 2006, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
ABC should pull the plug on the President’s address tonight.
Posted by: RandyRanson | May 15, 2006, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
In America today…it’s a matter of “the blind leading the deaf”. If it wasn’t for the press…however slanted…the administration would be doing things far worse than what they’re already getting away with. There are now SIX “crime families” in America..not just five, with the Bush family now on the list. As John Lennon once sang…”Power to the people”.
Posted by: G.A.S. | May 15, 2006, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
People who have NOTHING to hide…hide NOTHING…track me all you want…and keep me safe
Posted by: Dohna | May 15, 2006, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
If we were to go after the leakers then the entire Bush administration would find itself under indictment.
Posted by: George | May 15, 2006, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Bush and his gang are leakers too and hopefully will soon be brought to justice in the CIA/Wilson/Plame case. God bless the patriotic government whisleblowers who are risking their lives and careers to help get the truth out.
Posted by: joeb | May 15, 2006, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Did we fight the cold war just so we could start spying on ourselves? Isn’t this they type of behavior we used to loathe from the REDS? Seems like it’s gone full circle now. We have an interesting blend of policies and procedures taken directly from the KGB and Nazi handbook. The we wonder why we are not universally loved throughout the world. (I’ll be listening for those ‘clicks’ on my phone calls…)
Posted by: Bear | May 15, 2006, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
After 9/11, I had conversations with people who eagerly waved off privacy concerns with “the government won’t bother with normal people like me, just muslims and freaks like you.”
Tyranny always begins to extinguish the rights of the weak, feeding on the indifference of others until all are threatened (as in the current calling scandal, and the possible new war with Iran, etc.). The poster above is correct: if we (as a society) do not respond with an effective veto of these policies, the Democrats (or whoever inherits the white house in Jan. ’09) will not only inherit these rules and seucrity infringements, but will expand on them.
Liberty dies when power goes unchecked.
Posted by: g | May 15, 2006, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Who is breaking the law here? Clearly President-in-Fact Cheney and his mouthpiece, George Bush and their sycophants.
How sad that so many Americans care so little for their own rights of free expression.
Posted by: Larry White | May 15, 2006, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Ok, This is it people, The commies actually managed to do it didn’t they? And all this without even firing one nuke at us. They have taken over…..or, err??? Is it the Nazis that we are about to become? Whatta heck, it does not matter any more, we are all to be well taken care of inside our own ironwallcurtain….see ya when it is down, cause I am one of those really free who are happy to be on the outside…bye!
Posted by: LDS | May 15, 2006, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Please do not allow yourselves to be cowed into silence by the radical right wing. Exposing fraud, misadministration and malfeasance are exactly why we have a press. It is your job to bring things like secret CIA renditions to light – I notice that they aren’t half as interested in finding out who leaked Valerie Plame’s identity – when she was investigating Iran of all places. Oops, I forgot – they did that for political reasons, so it’s okay to cover that up…
Posted by: Brian | May 15, 2006, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
I use to think that communist (China) and facist/dictatorships (Zimbabwe) states are the only ones that want to control the media, spy on its citizens,…
Posted by: Ky | May 15, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
I find it incredible that people believe that leaking criminal activities to the press is somehow unAmerican.
We the people are not to be silenced by our government.
Good Ole Karl Rove has really done a number on our society now that people calling for the TRUTH are labelled terrorists.
If you want to live in a society where people are shot for revealing criminal deeds of the government, get out of here because the United States of America is not that country!
Posted by: samething | May 15, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
These actions undermine the whole Constitutional concept of “Freedom of the Press.” These leaks and stories aren’t ‘aiding the enemy,’ they are an exercise of democracy (remember, that thing for which we are fighting this war in the first place?)
Posted by: epp | May 15, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Yes… ABC pull the plug!!! Let’s start a movement to do just that… call ABC everybody!
Posted by: patric | May 15, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
im from scotland and picked up this thread on fark.com.i cant believe there are people in the usa NOT outraged by this.as for “communist” jibes does no one care that george w bush is coming on like josef stalin in his show trials days.comments supporting this only succeed in draining the once proud colours of your flag.didnt use my real name as i dont need the hassle from fundamentalists of any kind.
Posted by: bruce banner | May 15, 2006, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
ABC, I beg you, continue to investigate these Presidential crooks. Puruse them, hound them, continue to root out their illegal activities. I fear that we are slipping rapidly into a kleptocracy, and the media is our only chance. This should be the lead story every night.
Please, don’t give in, don’t give up, until these guys in the White House are out of power.
Posted by: Graham | May 15, 2006, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Perhaps the NSA should start tracking international phone calls from known drug dealers to their foreign suppliers. And while we’re at it, they could also targget Americans calling/emailing Canadian pharmacies to refill their prescriptions. Once the government has a good database they can direct Customs Service which packages from our northern neighbor need to be inspected before importation. Then it won’t be any problem to nab those folks who illegally order their medical prescriptions from Canada.
Posted by: DC | May 15, 2006, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Finding a leaker means finding a leaker. Who leaked Plame is your mantra; well, let’s find out.
Posted by: rather | May 15, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
NSA Concerned Over Pattern of Calls to Domino’s Pizza
As part of the warrantless surveillance program, the NSA has been mining data on the number of calls to Domino’s by some demographic populations. The calls are concentrated in mostly liberal cities that are known as college towns.
Conservative commentators, putting the pieces together, are calling for investigations. They believe that such a high concentration of calls could indicate that the liberal 18-22 year old demographic is supporting terrorist causes.
Rush Limbaugh, the conservative talk-show host, chimed in on the issue on his show yesterday. “Have you ever called a Domino’s? You know,” he said, “I’ve been calling them for years, sometimes twice in one day, and I’ve yet to speak with one American.”
Limbaugh continued, “The NSA says a lot of these calls are going out just before midnight straight from college campuses. Let’s see if we can make a connection here. Liberals calling foreigners at astonishingly high rates at odd hours? You do the math, folks.”
The NSA said its data mining project has turned up high-value information in the fight against terror, but it was very concerned about the data missing from the area dominated by Qwest, which refused to hand over the phone records.
An NSA spokesman said, “Qwest, headquartered in Denver, CO, is the carrier for the University of Colorado at Boulder. CU Boulder is known for its party atmosphere and occasional rioting after football games. We can only assume the pattern of late night calls to Domino’s is present there, but we don’t know who is doing it. To be without this data about calling patterns there is cause for grave national security concern.”
“We know they hire males of Middle East descent,” the spokesman continued, “and we’re concerned that the transactions they do, which are usually all in cash and sometimes involve tips of up to two dollars, may be going to fund terrorists. This money is untraceable”
Another NSA official, speaking to us on the condition of anonymity, said, “We called a Domino’s in Boulder, trying to get the information any way we could. There was a guy named Muhammad answering the phone. We asked for call recordings, but he insisted on getting our delivery phone number first, and we had to abort the operation.”
President Bush, speaking in the Rose Garden, said, “Just this one patternistic finding justifies the whole program, and I think the American people realize that we’re doing everything in our power to protect them from the evil-doers—no matter where they’re hiding.”
Posted by: The Stricken | May 15, 2006, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
1: Bush claims no spying without a warrant.
2: Bush admits the gov’t is indeed spying without warrants, but only on international calls, and it’s perfectly legal because he says so.
3: Bush admits the gov’t is also spying on domestic phone calls, but it’s perfectly legal because he says so.
And now this story confirms what we’ve suspected all along: some of this spying was done on political enemies.
Why oh why is this continuing when NSA experts have claimed that it is a highly inefficient and ineffective way to catch the real bad guys? How outrageous does this spying have to get before people realize how closely this administration resembles communist Russia?
Posted by: judy s | May 15, 2006, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
We went from 2006 back to “1984″. Forget freedom of the press. That is a thing of the past.
Posted by: RL | May 15, 2006, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
For those of you who support the government in this case, shame on you. Why don’t you start your own fascist, state-controlled country and leave America alone?
Posted by: Jake | May 15, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Ever since Bush won the presidency the LIBERAL media(ABC<NBC<CBS) has been out to nail Bush. Its about time to turn the tables on the media. You reporters are low lifes that care more about their man(Kerry/Gore)losing than us winning this war on terror. I hope they put all you low lifes in jail. The only news I believe any longer comes from FOXNEWS….Jeff Valovich
Posted by: jEFF t. vALOVICH | May 15, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Isn’t it interesting that we have no idea of the extent of their monitoring, but there are people who are eager to defend it’s legality?
If you support indeterminate power to monitor activity, then it is logically acceptable for federal agents to come into your house and look around.
After all, you have nothing to hide, do you comrade?
Posted by: Tim | May 15, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
My earlier post was not posted.
This president Bush must be removed from office and tried for treason. He has repeatily publicly admitted that does what he thinks is right and not what is lawful.
He has voilated his Oath of Office. He must be put on trail.
Posted by: EasyRider | May 15, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
It’s amazing to me how so many people actually think hampering the press is a good thing. Of course, when one knows absolutely nothing about the constitution and actually thinks the govt. is on the side of the people, I suppose it’s not so surprising after all.
You can have security or freedom. There is no such thing as both at the same time. It appears that many would not object to living in a prison as long as they have their toys with them. What a sad, sad commentary on a so-called democratic state. But it appears the people voted to give up their freedom in 2000.
Posted by: amy | May 15, 2006, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
If you don’t understand why this is a bad thing for citizens of a state, then you need to brush up on world history.
And if you can’t figure out what I mean by that, then your country’s educational system has already failed you.
The right wing supporters will get what they deserve, and when they do, they won’t realize that they really just gave it to themselves.
Posted by: Dave | May 15, 2006, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
The media consists of a bunch of aging hippies. They make up stories, then blame Jayson Blair. The aid and abet terrorism. This is the most free country in the world. Yes, there is a record of your phone calls, it is called your phone bill. There is a list of phone numbers, it is called a phone book. The yellowbook is now spy lingo for facism among the backpatting media. Have they become obsolete yet? Maybe the truth is that the CIA is watching who calls reporters on government phones. I am not paid by anyone to comment on the decline of the media, I do it on behalf of my children and my country.
Posted by: Karen | May 15, 2006, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Re: Federal Source to ABC News: We Know Who You’re Calling
The whole world is watching. America – land of the free. Freedom of the press … How about all of the journalists that have been killed in Iraq? Bottom line: ignorance is dangerous.
Posted by: Aimee | May 15, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
I am outragged and hope that ABC and Brian Ross will continue to do their job. Investigate and ask questions on my behalf. That is what helps define a democracy. We have no accountability in this Administration. We are on a very dangerous path and I am sure I am on the watch list since I am for truth and peace.
Posted by: Angela Spotts | May 15, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
I hope that ABC and the rest of the corporate media has the good sense and decency to report this outrage as widely as possible, and not just on the internet. If not for the love of our country, do it at least in the service of self-preservation.
We now know that George W. Bush was lying when he said, “Our intelligence activities strictly target al-Qaida and their known affiliates”. Bush’s illegal spying on American citizens is yet another step towards to eliminating free speech and the freedom of the press. It is another step towards silencing political opposition and establishing one-party rule under a single “unitary executive” authority.
Wake up America!
Posted by: GS | May 15, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Does anyone else notice that the same people damning this leak investigation are mostly the ones who are clamouring to have an investigation into the Plame “leak” and have Bush impeached for it.
For future reference, consistency across political lines is the best way to make your point.
Posted by: Frank | May 15, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Journalists need to remember that with rights come responsibilities. One of the most sacred responsibilities of the journalist is to report only fact, not supposition, rumor or innuendo. The American press has for far too long adopted the practice of reporting gossip as though it were news, innuendo as though it were fact, and supposition as though it were authoritative analysis. So-called “un-named sources” are not sources at all, they are political hacks and the news media supports these hacks by transcribing their every word and reporting as though it were authoritative, factual, and newsworthy. Frankly, I think the whole lot of you belong in a prison, not the hallowed halls of our Fourth Estate.
You are being treated as traitorous scum and political assassins because you are acting like traitorous scum and political assassins. Don’t be too shocked when the people whose reputations you are attacking – along with the Nation whose job it is for them to protect – object mightily and call you to account. Just be glad Franklin Roosevelt isn’t President. He’d have J. Edgar put you in the slam without trial or benefit of the doubt.
Posted by: Geoff | May 15, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
May God save the United States of America from the domestic enemies of our Constitution! As a conservative republican, I say this Administration doesn’t even UNDERSTAND our Constitution, or the ordered liberty it was written to provide. What do you think America would be like today if J. Edgar Hoover had had the technology these people are using against Americans? That’s exactly where we’re headed!
Posted by: David Pseudonym | May 15, 2006, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Would you have impeached Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy too???
The word “privacy” does not appear in the Constitution.
Posted by: Tom R | May 15, 2006, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Those who would call for trials for leakers must remember this: Someone in the Whitehouse may have leaked the name of Valerie Plame. Where will you stand on that issue?
Posted by: Mark Petts | May 15, 2006, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
In my short 45-years on this planet in the USA, I have learned that the majority of the “news media” is simply a tool… of the rich media moguls/corporations to spread their own personal opinions and to advance their own agenda(s). I have also learned that the media moguls/corporations see themselves as self-important as Hollywood celebritys see themselves. They use the same media to spread their own hate, lies, and agendas, instead of actually expending the energy to do something constructive rather than destructive. I am convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that all news media is niether unbiased nor fair and balanced. None can be trusted to report what is reality, without any degree of slant in their reporting.
It is very rare to see any media report all the good along with all the bad, unless it’s sensational and makes money. It is impossibly difficult for the media to report anything whatsoever in full illumination, unless it suits their needs.
Lastly, I am wholly and completely convinced that the media will report ANYTHING that will make them more powerful, and richer, no matter the cost to our security and our country’s cohesion. Media plays directly into the hands of the socialist movement and all people (using the term “people” loosely) who would see this country turned upside down and destroyed.
Yes, it’s about time someone reigned in the vastly liberal media, and the subversives in the media who perpetuate calamity and downright treasonous irresponsible behavior. Kudos to my government for doing so when it is so sorely needed, but it should have been done sooner.
However, I do admit, my opinion would be different if I was actually doing something illegal and subversive to this country and my fellow countrymen… but I don’t have to worry because I don’t. I gladly welcome the agencies responsible for mine and my family’s security from foreign and domestic terrorism to listen, watch, and review everything I communicate while it is necessary, if they deem it so. Why shouldn’t anyone… unless they have something to keep secret for fear of penalty under law.
Posted by: Tom R. | May 15, 2006, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
People get the government they deserve. Reading these comments it’s clear that a lot of people think this is what Americans deserve. Those old-fashioned niceties of the Constitution are so 18th century. Substitute “Jew” for “reporter” and you’ve got Nazi Germany in the 1930s. It can happen here as we are discovering daily.
Posted by: old heiskel | May 15, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
It is unlawful to classify information relating to criminal activity by government officials and/or agencies of government. It is a sacred duty to expose criminal activity by government officials and/or agencies of government.
Posted by: john | May 15, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
The conservative media covering corporate interests may be a trend of the past. Corporations depend on the media to facilitate advertising to the masses. These corporations aren’t going to be too thrilled with the government messing with their messenger.
Posted by: chad | May 15, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Forget telephone monitoring. . . Someone needs to expand the current investigation to ask why the government monitors our email use and the URLs that we visit. And, if ABC News really wants to blow this investigation wide open, go ask DirecTV and TiVO the number of customers for whom they’ve handed over viewing logs to the NSA. The answer, if the damn questions were ever asked, would chill bone marrow, let alone the first amendment.
Posted by: Bill | May 15, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Stop complaining people.
The very effective head of East Germany’s Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung, Markus Wolf, said they spied on their citizens because the state “loved” them. The German Democratic Republic wanted them “safe”.
Bush loves us. He wants us, in our “democratic republic”, safe.
Posted by: Occam | May 15, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
You write that “under Bush Administration guidelines, it is not considered illegal for the government to keep track of numbers dialed by phone customers.” Wouldn’t you better serve your readers if you went on to note what legal scholars think of thepractice? Since when is the standard what a given President “thinks” what the law is?
Posted by: charles nau | May 15, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
The government says disclosure of information about (probably illegal) programs like the NSA domestic spying and last week’s revelation about collecting numbers and those dialed is helping terrorists subvert such systems.
Yet we all know that terrorists worth a grain of salt, much like mobsters – already assume that high tech means are being used to intercept their communications.
Sadly, it’s looking more and more like not only criminals but all of us – and with this administration, especially the press – should now assume that all of our communications are at the very least being logged in massive government databases.
So much for privacy. So much for liberty.
Posted by: corbett | May 15, 2006, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
We need reporters like you to rise up against the fascism that is quickly gripping our nation.
Don’t succumb to fear for.. the spirit of fear does not come from God.
“Blessed are those who have been persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.”
Posted by: Mark | May 15, 2006, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
The commentos calling for imprisonment in this case must have a poor recollection of history at best. Villifying the press is just the final step towards a totalitarian government. Our poor conservatives, the trampled majority, are under constant unscrupulous attack from “liberal” media, and “liberal” judges. Nevermind the fact that the party has their own network, and their great and powerful leader was selected to lead the nation by a slim majority of not so liberal judges. I wonder if you’ll be stricken with conscience when you see where this blind loyalty leads you.
Classified information in these instances has been leaked because the government broke the law, plain and simple. Given the right’s stranglehold on our system, those with knowledge and a conscience were forced to step outside that system to affect change.
As for calls coming from “known terrorists”, this has always confused me. If our dear leader has this vast list of “known terrorists” and their phone numbers…. gee, I don’t know… pick them up?!?!?!?! Just a thought here.
Posted by: Matthew | May 15, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
ABC..Govt. is paying people to blog against you..Listen to their phrases..Get some guts ABC or let someone else do it..
Posted by: PAL | May 15, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
You know what you Americans need? A government run news. That the way the only thing that comes out in the news is only what the government wants you to hear. The government can edit anything they don’t like out of the storys.
Hwang Kno, China
Posted by: Hwang Kno | May 15, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Karen;
And who’s going to silence the media from the rest of the world? it must be some giant conspiracy against Bush? The news we recieve is still incredibly biased in favour of America and the West, every film we see, do you ever see insurgents being interviewed? films being made about them? I come from Ireland and when I think of a terrorist.. I don’t think of an IRA man in a balaclava I think of an unshaved Muslim man, thats indoctrination, and thats the media.
Posted by: Davey | May 15, 2006, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
WHO IS THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION’S ROLE MODEL?
North Korea?
Communist China?
Nazi Germany?
The Soviet Union?
Posted by: Paige | May 15, 2006, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Well it seems like they’re just referring to phone records, calls made from one phone to another. That’s always been available in criminal investigations. While I don’t doubt that they have voice recordings, at least they have the decency to not tell us this time. But in a murder investigation or a missing persons there are checks on who the victims/suspects called. As for the massive amount of comments about roping in the communist press. I really just have no idea what to say. The US has never stopped the free press except under John Adams’ Alien and Sedition Act which illustrated just how important a free press is to a democracy. Otherwise we might as well call Bush our king and let him be dictator. Democracies are about intelligent voters making decisions for their future, and in order to do this properly, they need to be informed by as many sources as possible. I don’t think Bush is a dictator, though he has been widening executive powers, but I do think that the Rove/Bush press machine is portraying all the tyrannical qualities of dictators as strong and steadfast policies of a good leader. And that is far more scary than domestic spying. As if they didn’t already do that.
Posted by: John | May 15, 2006, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
“Fantastic news. I hope we see some of these leakers and their media contacts in jail for stabbing America in the back.”
Not the America I know. The America I believe in is a place where the Constitution means something – and what sets us apart from lesser nations is that even the President of the United States has to follow the law.
We are not in a war – we’re in a “war of our own making.” There’s a difference.
I agree with one statement in here: The press does not have the right to leak classified information. That’s correct – instead they actually have the “Responsibility” to do it if the information reveals illegal activity, or actions that violate the Constitution and the core premise of America.
There’s a reason freedom of the press was guaranteed: to protect us from the likes of those who would rather turn this into a facist state. It’s amazing how many people are so willing to sacrifice the one thing that truly makes this America: The Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Posted by: NJ | May 15, 2006, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
It’s amazing that anyone would defend the way this government continues to break the law. It makes you believe what other nations are saying about the U.S. that we really are a nation of total idiots to have any trust in this lying, conniving and totally corrupt government. Thankfully people are starting to wake up – ol’ Georgy Porgy’s approval rating is a mere 29%. I just hope the village is ready to have it’s idiot back and his little dog Dick too!
Posted by: Amy | May 15, 2006, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
“My question is simple. If you won’t allow the government to do ANY type of data mining or survellience without FIRST having a federal warrant,”
The answer is simple. Go read up on FISA. The goverment does not need the warrant first, they just need to file for one after the fact, in a secret court. In itself scary, but a lot less scary than what they are doing.
Posted by: Steve | May 15, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Forget whistleblowers — why does out government have *secrets*?
Oh yeah, probably to protect me
from the truth. I can’t handle the truth.
Posted by: bill | May 15, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
History has taught us that absolute power corrupts absolutely. This latest revelation of spying curiously illustrates the sinister nature of the NSA domestic spying program involving the tracking of millions of Americans phone calls over the past several years.
Clearly, phone numbers can be traced from whistle-blowers to journalists very, very easily and not to expect the government to utilize this vast, new database in this manner is to be politically naive. Those of you who seem to be in favor of such spying activity, have you given any thought to the fact that hundreds of thousands of your countrymen have paid the ultimate price to keep our country free from tyranny in its many guises? And yet so many of you seem so willing to so easily and quickly surrender your constitutional rights! You should be ashamed! YOU SHOULD BE OUTRAGED WITH THIS VIOLATION OF YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS! In my view and in the view of many of my countrymen, the Bush Administration has gone too far in its efforts on the basis of fighting a war on terror. Don’t you see that it is changing the face of our country in ways that are abhorrent to freedom loving people? Our system of checks and balances, which has served us well since our country’s birth, includes the absolute necessity of having a free and independent press. It plays an essential role in keeping all of the players honest and our system free and open. This system seems to have gone awry in the Bush administration’s quest to assimilate and consolidate an unprecedented amount of power in the Executive branch. Of course, this accumulation of power comes at the expense of the legislative and judicial branches. (Whatever happened to the concept of three separate but equal branches?!) This is simply too high a price to pay for patriotic Americans.
Why are people so willing to quickly surrender their freedoms for the sake of what essentially amounts to an infinite, unending war on terrorism? Don’t you understand that you are being asked to permanently sacrifice your freedoms? I mean, haven’t you asked yourself, “What are the conditions of victory?” When do you determine that this war has been won? When is it over? Who makes that determination? Wake up, America!
Of course, the net result of all of this is an all-powerful, secretive, Soviet-style central government. Totalitarianism. Is that what you people want? ! I certainly don’t.
I urge all of you to contact your congressmen and demand investigations into these serious violations of our Constitutional rights. All elected officials have taken a solemn oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Apparently, it is more solemn to some than to others. As loyal and patriotic Americans, it is our essential duty to ensure that these Constitutional guarantees remain in full force. For it is that document and that document alone that defines who we are as a people and a country. Without that document, and the spirit that it represents, we are nothing but a piece of inhabited geography. But with that document guiding our thoughts and actions, we are AMERICANS! Protect liberty. Contact your congressmen and insist that they take action against this outrageous spying program. It is an alarming and deeply disturbing assault on the essential freedoms and system of government that have served us so well since our nation’s infancy when our Founding Fathers had the wisdom, intelligence and spiritual insight to codify that wonderful document into our nation’s identity — our political DNA.
Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Anyone at ABC news familiar with the LEAKED Downing Street Memo?
If Bush was willing to invade Iraq for political reasons (as opposed to vital national security reasons), then all bets are off. Spying on reporters is likely the tip of the iceberg.
Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
The arrogance of the press is amazing. The CIA and NSA is supposed to keep secrets not leak them to the press. It is absolutely wrong and illegal for bureaucrats to leak our nation’s most sensitive secrets to the press. I’m with Bill Bennett – let’s start arresting journalists for publishing our nation’s top secrets.
Posted by: Chris Johnson | May 15, 2006, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
First thing you do is arrest the people ‘authorizing’ the tapping of our telephones. That is breaking the law. Then you can investigate whether or not reporters are divulging secrets. Why is it ok for bush to commit treason, yet when reporters (part of our free press) tell the truth, they are vilified.
Posted by: Stevo | May 15, 2006, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
If the NSA, CIA and FBI are being used to chill the efforts of the press to keep we, the people, informed of when the government is breaking its own laws, we have now crossed the line to become a totalitarian regime.
I have wondered how the White House had been able to keep all of the Republican legislators in lock step. It is likely that not only were the press being spied upon, but also legislators to insure control of a majority of each voting body.
Posted by: sjr | May 15, 2006, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
– Benjamin Franklin (1755)
“Make yourself sheep and the wolves will eat you”
– Benjamin Franklin
Posted by: Crackerjack | May 15, 2006, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Please impeach this President,I voted for him the 1st time…not the 2nd…what a lame ass…I’m rather conservative fiscally speaking but very liberal socially.This President is too shallow to feel shame…or take advise or directions. Please resign soon at least or find Bin Laden your close family friend.
Posted by: John | May 15, 2006, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Wow, the freepers are really hitting this site with the right wing nut spin.
It discusts me to see American turn into a communist/facist nation with a file on every citizen.
Anyone that supports the current administration is a traitor to the United States.
Posted by: James | May 15, 2006, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
i love bush
i love the nsa
i love the gop
america love it or leave it
better dead than red
tax rebates for the rich…yes!!!
a god in every pot
yeehah for the red white and blue
so….do you think they are reading our emails?
can i get a raise?
Posted by: mark mywords | May 15, 2006, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
I find it completely ironic that so many anti-Bush lefties complain about their privacy being infringed upon through analysis of calling patterns, yet seem pleased by the unlawful leaking of information that actually puts our troops in harms way.
How sad it is that any American can actively work to make the U.S. less effective in their attempts to keep us it’s population safe.
Shame on you all!
Posted by: RA | May 15, 2006, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Everyone pull out their copy of the Consitution and review the First and Fourth Amendments to the Constitution, better known as the Bill of Rights. When James Madison wrote it over 200 years ago, the BoR was intended to do is establish what the Government can NOT do. The BoR truly establishes the 4th check and balance for this democracy to survive… namely, through the First Amendment it gives the ability for a public entity (the press) to let the rest of us know what the 3 established branches of government are doing. Is the press perfect? No, because they are for more holden to corporate $$$ (through ratings) than they do about finding the news… they also resort to reporting things that sometimes shouldn’t be… but in this case, they are reporting that WE ARE UNDER ATTACK FROM WITHIN OUR OWN GOVERNMENT!!! Look to the source, NOT THE MESSENGER… there is at least one person in the government that has a conscious, and a modicum of ethics.
For the Bush Supporters who, like their President, have probably never read a book should try reading through the Constitution… it will provide some interesting reading, especially when you realize that document applies to each and every person in this country.
Remember, in the oath of office every President swears to protect, defend, and uphold the Constitution of the United States SO HELP ME GOD! Don’t lie to me, Mr. Bush… and don’t lie to my God! You are not here to defend me as a person, but the democracy that my anscestors helped form.
Posted by: Ward Parkway | May 15, 2006, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
I don’t know what’s more chilling – the fact that the government is monitoring reporters calls or the fact that so many posters on this blog support this activity. Bush and his fellow felons have done a phenomenal job of brainwashing their base. Scary . . . very scary.
Posted by: OklahomaLiberal | May 15, 2006, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
The numbers could also be used for political or corporate espionage by government insiders. They could be used to track down bio-chemistry academics talking amongst themselves about US complicity in banned weapons distribition.Then they could be killed. They could track down Saddams defense attornies. And then kill them.
They could track down you or me – and then kill us. Remember the Italian journalist and Italian security guy that got nailed 10 minutes from sanctuary by the appologetic “I made a boo boo” US military in Iraq. All one needs to know is who called who, and depending on their business, one knows what to do.
Remember Tom Delay using DHS to track texas state democrats travel patterns? Haliburton has just been awared a defense contract to build concentration camps in the US. Google it!
So many rights have been usurped. So many obligations set aside. So many treaties thrown in the can. A man who talks to god and the profitable (big oil – Big Arms – Big Dope) results of those conversations are all we need to know.
They’re preparing for a coup. They’re preparing for marshall law. They’re building the infrastructure for a police state.
They actually think they can control us. Inbreeding and the Reagan Education Program no doubt. The problem with arrogance is that it can start a fight – but it will never end one.
Our fault – we should have have nipped this in the bud a long time ago. Deja vue all over agin.
Posted by: Cadavre | May 15, 2006, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Some of you are shocked by postings defending unlimited spying on Americans, and unrestrained executive branch power. (Variations on “If you haven’t done anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about” or “We’re at war, don’t be a dirty traitor”.)
Keep in mind that nowadays there are a lot of people paid to blog and comment on the internet, in an attempt to make it appear that the injection of paid talking points into the public discourse are in fact personal opinions.
Distributed spin-control blogging is a growth industry.
Posted by: pointingouttheobvious | May 15, 2006, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
I can’t believe I am reading all of these postings that lambaste the media. Granted, I am not a big fan of the MSM, but they must be allowed to do their job. What is their job?? It is to be the watchdog of our government. Only with a free media can democracy truly exist. Those who wish to crucify the media do not understand the role the media plays in a republic. Although I may not have like the outcome of the Clinton scandal, the media did dig deeper and deeper until the truth came out. They should be allowed to do the same when Bush breaks the law regarding illegal wiretaps and the secret prisons. Without the media, the government becomes a brick wall of lies and doublespeak. Once that occurs, we cease to have a government of the people…
Posted by: CentristDem | May 15, 2006, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Agreed that people are really naive to think that this is it. Email surveilance (especially free services – like hotmail – I wondered why the anti-trust suit was dropped), phone tapping and data mining, probably satellite images of people…There is so much more to this. These people need to be arrested and sent to prison for a long long time.
Preferably in an Iraqi prison.
Posted by: Begeegs | May 15, 2006, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Crackerjack:
I understand you point but how else do we find terriorist in this country without wiretaps? Why is it a good thing that we tell the enemy how we are hunting them down? Should we just wait until they attack? If not what are your plans to stop them? I certainly dont know what the answer is? Pretty sure GWB doesnt know the answer! People in this threas certain dont know the answer? But they will all complain when we get attacked again!
Posted by: Concerned | May 15, 2006, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
I’d comment but I don’t want to get in trouble…
Posted by: robert | May 15, 2006, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
This governments dismal policies have put our troops in harms way unnecesarily.
Bush has no one to blame but himself for the problems we face now.
He had bipartisan support after 9-11.
He has failed.
Leaking about criminal aspects of the government is patriotic.
Posted by: --- | May 15, 2006, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
There you liberals go again using facts an reason to argue with! It’s no fair! I’m going home!
Posted by: TOM | May 15, 2006, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Whether the more leftish commenters here choose to recognize this or not, the fact remains that what the Bush Administration is doing is legal. There are no privacy issues involved here; unless the government is actually listening in on the call, which does require a warrant, then the Fourth Amendment does not apply; who you call and who calls you is not protected information. Anyone who thinks otherwise can take the issue up with the Supreme Court, which decided this issue in Smith v. Maryland in 1979. As for the press and leaks, I find it hard to work up any real sympathy for these people. They have treated this administration with unrelenting hostility from day one; they should not be surprised, therefore, that the administration regards them not as honest news brokers out to inform the public but as flacks for the oppostion out to make the government look bad, even if it means leaking classified information in the middle of a war.
Posted by: Akaky | May 15, 2006, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Is this what happened to Mary McCarthy? Will someone stop this madness of loss of our freedoms & liberties? What will Al Qaeda envious for now?
Posted by: lisste | May 15, 2006, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
There you liberals go again using facts an reason to argue with! It’s no fair! I’m going home!
Posted by: TOM | May 15, 2006, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
maybe if you don’t want journalists reporting the secrets you illegally leak, then maybe you should stop illegally leaking them instead of blaming reporters for reporting. duh.
Posted by: um | May 15, 2006, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
The people have been voting away their freedoms since long before Bush’s administration.
The “democratic” system has been skillfully coerced into a state of consecutive four year plans (administrations) which remove the redtape that protects the people’s freedom while preventing the formation of a totalitarian state.
The presidents aren’t really in a position to do anything to change this new state, only go with what their superiors tell them to, or face some form of retribution ie. assassination.
Most people realize that we are in a pretty bad state, though nothing changes because either people can’t come up with a viable solution to the problems at hand, or can’t rally enough effective people to make the major changes possible.
I’m aware that most of this may be common sense to many but I still felt it had to be said..
Posted by: Seth McEwan | May 15, 2006, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
CentristDem,
Let me know when the MSM is going to investigate 9/11. Still waiting.
Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2006, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
I’m chilled! Shocked, shocked! Offended and politically incorrected!
Face it, journalists: you are not, in fact, better than or more important than normal citizens. You are subject to government scrutiny. The government must watch you for acts of sedition and treason.
Posted by: Just Some Guy | May 15, 2006, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
I never dreamed I would live in a police stare. But here it comes. It is paramount that ABC and other news organizations take the government to court to preserve the freedom of the press and the right of privacy of all Americans, even those who side with the government in this latest travesty.
Posted by: Mikey Moon | May 15, 2006, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
The government should do whatever necessary to find out what media people are endangering all of our security trying to “break” the story. These liberal news organizations are out of control.
Posted by: Bill K. | May 15, 2006, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
I cant believe what I am reading..our civil liberties are being stripped from us and people cheer this on!! The ones that need to be arrested are sitting pretty on capital hill.
When will the American people stop being so complacent and live up to the ideals our forefathers fought and died for?
Posted by: LInda | May 15, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
The leakers in the white house too!
Bush, Cheney, Rove, Libby etc. Isn’t that what you mean? Traitors!
Posted by: U lookin at ME | May 15, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Everything the government does or does not do should probably be secret, according to the government.
Posted by: bill | May 15, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
In Soviet Russia, government reports on press
Posted by: CDB | May 15, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
One can only hope those who call the press names and want to kill the messenger will someday get caught up in a case of mistaken identity that ensnarls them in a nightmare from which they struggle to emerge. The people “leaking” things to reporters are the true patriots, horrified at what they see being done to our country. Thomas Jefferson said “the Constitution was not written to protect the government from the people, but to protect the people from the government.” Be afraid folks, be very afraid.
Posted by: heidi claire | May 15, 2006, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
big brother? fascist state? Welcome to the KGB? crazy power?
Get a grip people. Could they monitor the phone calls of our guardians of state secrets… the press? Sure they could, just like they could come in the dead of night, kidnap them and spirit them away to an undisclosed secret prison in Eastern Europe and bring out the dreaded panties of infamy. But they won’t. They are trying to protect us from more terrorist attacks.
Geeze.
Posted by: David Javems | May 15, 2006, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
big brother? fascist state? Welcome to the KGB? crazy power?
Get a grip people. Could they monitor the phone calls of our guardians of state secrets… the press? Sure they could, just like they could come in the dead of night, kidnap them and spirit them away to an undisclosed secret prison in Eastern Europe and bring out the dreaded panties of infamy. But they won’t. They are trying to protect us from more terrorist attacks.
Geeze.
Posted by: David Javems | May 15, 2006, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
You know what I find scariest about this list of comments?
Bush supporters and Bush opponents live in parallel universes and they *hate* each other.
I might be a total complete kook for even mentioning this phrase, but another generation or two of this and I could see it happening.
Civil War.
… or perhaps simply breakup/balkanization such as what happened to the old USSR.
I don’t like Bush much, but I wasn’t a big fan of Clinton either. Both, IMHO, were/are abusers of executive power. Clinton laid the groundwork for much of Bush’s abuse of power.
As for the question of whether the press can/should report leaks, I think it depends on the case. If it’s a case that could endanger American lives then I agree that the press should voluntarily keep quiet and that at the very least it is bad form to publish such information. However, if it is (as this is) a case that involves mainly domestic issues I think that the press is fully within it’s right to report on it.
I’m not a huge fan of either side. I lean a bit Democrat right now since Bush has horrified me, but I have no illusions about getting some kind of dramatic salvation from them.
But I am a huge fan of America.
This insane divisiveness is Bush’s worst legacy. Not the torture, or the spying, or the incompetance, or the theocratic leanings. Those are bad, but not as bad as this. Bush is the most divisive president in recent American history– probably in a century. He has, since day one, made large numbers of Americans feel as if they are no longer welcome.
I hate him for that, and always will.
Posted by: Adam | May 15, 2006, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
The point is: THE GOVT. IS BREAKING THE LAW!!! This is the problem!! Are you really so blind that you cannot see beyond this one issue? That when we start to say idiotic things such as “good, you deserve it” rather than intelligently finding solutions in wartime to freedom of the press(have you heard of it?? do you even remember Vietnam???) we hand over the rest of our constitutionally granted rights as well. THINK, People!! I am so tired of ignorant America and their inability to think through things thoroughly. It is going to be You who hands over this country, on a silver platter, to a DICTATORSHIP!!
Posted by: Heather | May 15, 2006, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Next time use VOIP computer to computer with strong crypto. Domestic spying is illegal, period. It saddens me to hear all these pro Bill of Rights burning folks approving of such behavior. You folks would bring us right back to McCarthyism if it were up to you.
Posted by: Mr. Nibbles | May 15, 2006, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Anyone notice a trend?
First, we learn they’re only listening to foreign conversations without a warrant.
Then, they claim they’re listening to phone calls to or from the US without a warrant.
Then, they admit that well, maybe they might have listened to a few purely domestic calls without a warrant.
Now we hear that they’re attempting gathering data on EVERY SINGLE CALL made in the U.S. without a warrant.
Do we actually need to wait until it comes out that they are monitoring all phone calls, everywhere, all the time without a warrant or oversight of any sort? Can’t we just assume that dot will follow all the rest?
Posted by: hossman | May 15, 2006, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
“Under Bush Administration guidelines, it is not considered illegal for the government to keep track of numbers dialed by phone customers.”
Umm . . . The Supreme Court made this decision in 1979. This program started under Clinton! It’s not ‘considered illegal’ under the LAW, not ‘Bush Admin. guidelines.
Posted by: r.w. | May 15, 2006, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
I have an equal amount of respect for our soldiers in Iraq, the “leakers” within the CIA who see wrong and try to right it, and the reporters who report it to you and me. All are equal in their love for their country. If one does not see that, then all the sacrifices that the millions before us have made so that we can even have this conversation are in vain. GW
Posted by: George Wilk | May 15, 2006, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Wow. I hope the rich media moguls/corporations have the high tech means to trace these posts back to the source. That would save time when we need to pinpoint the facsists who believe that the media is the enemy. Cause we know that they are keeping track of those of us who think that a free press is fundamental to an open and democratic society.
Posted by: KC Anderson | May 15, 2006, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
I find it funny how ten years ago, conservatives were blathering on about “Big Brother” this, and “Big Government” that, and “Government has no business being in your home”. Oh, what a surprise it is to see that this was all a charade, and now to see those same conservatives are falling all over themselves, defending this on high, and making every excuse in the book for it.
But of course, the media is out to get the poor President; he didn’t choose to be the center of attention. He didn’t choose to run for public office. Aww. So I guess that makes everything okay, because we need to protect him from those evil bastards at the Associated Press. Therefore, I guess we actually need to have government-level subterfuge to prevent the evil media from diverting the government’s agenda.
The question is this: suppose a liberal Democrat started a similar program and claiming to be “fighting terrorists” and all that other stuff; what side would those conservatives fall on? The “Get the Feds Out of My Life” side? Or the “We’re trying to fight terror–it’s still good, it’s still good” side?
Think about that one for a couple seconds.
Posted by: vcthree | May 15, 2006, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Lots of complaints on both sides obviously. Here’s the deal: YES! There are people out there giving out sensitive information. NO, it hasn’t killed anyone on the battleground yet. YES! The idiot IN THE WHITE HOUSE who has been instrumental in releasing a lot of this, will continue to get away with it.
Why? Because YOU, the American people, have given up on your essential freedoms. Your founding fathers warned against this mentality, but you’re too busy watching television (particularly the advertisements for products that help you define yourself, and select which anti-depresent you want to take) and being comfortable to care.
It is ALL YOUR FAULT! Stop looking for someone to blame your problems on. This is the 21st century, and information (or too much of it) is creating a digital dark ages… educate yourself, and learn how to discern truth… if you don’t, we have ALREADY LOST THIS WAR, which is unfortunate because most of us don’t yet know who the enemy is.
Posted by: Dustin | May 15, 2006, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
The problem is this – Without a free and unfettered press, who has the ability to investigate wrongdoing on the part of the government, corporate entity or private person – we are no better than any of the communist, stalinest or facist states that have proceeded us.
If the press steps on a few toes while doing this – so be it. tell you, I’d rather know what my government is up to, behind my back, than wake up to find myself in an american Gulag because I don’t support the current president.
Posted by: Dan Mitchell | May 15, 2006, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Monitoring phone calls is an act one would expect in a fascist state. People should sue the phone carriers who give this information out. This is another reason it was foolish for people to elect a Republican like Bush president. He cant be trusted to protect liberty at home and he thinks every problem is subject to a coercive or military solution. Wrong.
Posted by: paul | May 15, 2006, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Like the old adage… I didn’t object when they came for the liberals because I was not a liberal…
The bush/fascists are now coming for the corporate media.
Serves them right…but the American people will be the ones who suffer most.
Posted by: Pat | May 15, 2006, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
@Mike
It is the duty of the citizenry to watch the government for signs of sedition and treason. Bush & co. work for US, not vice-versa.
The media has been vapid and half-hearted in its duty to present the truth to the American people. Now we learn that the media is the focused target of NSA surveillance for political reasons.
With the limited exception of information which is a critical and immediate danger to national security (i.e. ship positions in wartime), the media can be and is held accountable for leaking classified information AFTER THE FACT. Prior censorship violates every principle this nation was founded on.
It is not clear to me that the NSA or the CIA know anything that could be used to stop a terrorist attack, or conversely could be used to protect the lives of US citizens at home and abroad.
I think the burden of proof is on the CIA and NSA to account for the taxpayer dollars spent and lives lost in pursuit of nebulous goals and bad intelligence. Obviously, this cannot be done in real time to protect sources and methods — so let’s start with twenty years ago.
What was the NSA and CIA doing in 1986 to protect American lives and provide accurate operational intelligence to policymakers? Oh, yeah, predicting that the Russians would fight it out to the last kulak and ruble . . . IDIOTS.
Al Queda is not nearly as much of a threat to America as is the Republican Party and its jingoistic “you’re with us or you’re with the terrorists.” THINK. This war is a war of ideologies, and the simple-minded are de facto allies of the terrorists.
I weep for the Republic.
Posted by: Andrew | May 15, 2006, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
These are some very interesting and disturbing responses. The fact is that collection of mass amounts of phone records does not help defeat terrorism, and neither does looking for those individuals in government that have leaked information about the illegal activities of our government. Ask any law enforcement officer, nothing works like good old fashioned detective work. The idea that this has to take place to protect us is an insult to all the hard working agents at the FBI and local law enforcement who use legal means to track down criminals every day.
Posted by: TJone | May 15, 2006, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
I can’t believe it. Four years studying totalitarianism to earn a degree in Russian Studies, and now I get to live it. And what’s even more shocking is the number of people cheering this on. What’s the point of being an American if you happily hand over your freedoms to the first guy in a cowboy hat?
I don’t trust the government, just as I don’t trust any organization, to always, without fail, do the right thing. That’s the whole point of a free press – to shine the light in the hidden corners and make sure we all know what is being done by our government in our names. Anything that inhibits that ability harms each and every one of us.
It’s so ironic that so-called “conservatives” who theoretically distrust government are the ones so loudly screaming about the press being traitors, etc. You don’t trust the government to rescue hurricane victims, why on earth do you trust them with *this* power??
Posted by: Amanda in NC | May 15, 2006, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
In the words of Ben Franklin, those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither security nor liberty.
Posted by: NotSoAnonymous | May 15, 2006, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
As a true Patriot, all I can say is: Give me freedom, or give me death. Maybe there are terroists out there. It’s true, there are plenty of people who hate us. Some with good reasons. Some not. But once we are stripped of our personal freedoms, what is the point in protecting our country anymore? The founding principles of our country will be lost in order to ensure our ‘safety’.
The reality is, bad things happen. They happen to everyone, no matter what country you live in, no matter what nationality you are, no matter what religion you have. You can’t protect against everything, and if someone is determined enough, they can and will hurt us. No matter how many people you spy on, or countries we invade, we cannot change this.
And perhaps you see this as a small infraction of our personal freedoms. Maybe you even think the people deserve to be spied on. But the fact is that we have very specific laws in our country protecting the rights of our citizens. Remember the phrase ‘innocent until proven guilty’? Or the fact that the government must follow specific laws in order to search your property (also known as a warrant)? Or how about providing a fair trial?
If we are going to fight the terrorists, we had better be sure that we don’t lose what we are so desperately trying to protect in the process. Our democracy is not guaranteed, and would not be the first to fall.
Posted by: bram | May 15, 2006, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Face it folks we’re screwed. Your cell phone is equipped with a global position system, and these phone records are associated with your finanical, medical and voter records.
Last time I checked, the constitution demands that ALL votes be counted. Like it or not, Al Gore is our President.
Posted by: Impeach | May 16, 2006, 2:07 am 2:07 am
The next shoe to drop will be that they ARE bugging the calls of journalists, critics, political opponents. This is a vicious vindictive administration incapable of not using any information it gets to slander, smear, and damage their imagined opponents. They are a greater threat to America than the terrorists,. who only threaten us in one way. The Bushies are subverting our freedoms on every front from the inside.
Posted by: Michael Hammerschlag | May 16, 2006, 2:10 am 2:10 am
With regards to the “treason” comments:
The comments above are frightening. Do you folks seriously wish to live in a police state? It sounds like you’d welcome it.
I fear for my country. Indeed, listening to this administration and its supporters talk, I am no longer welcome in it.
And no, I’m not going to give my email address.
–
Anon-E-Mouse
Posted by: Anon-E-Mouse | May 16, 2006, 2:12 am 2:12 am
Grace, Brad, ken wiley, jeff bynum, Dave Mottolo, scott, George Chelpon, robert johnson, bridget, Big Dog, Tom Camp, Garry, Jill, Ron Zacharias, joe, Chris, norcoast, Cardinals Nation, and the rest: These are obvious trolls working in concert to bring up WH talking points, support and promote FEAR and throw insults. They are not interested in discussing FACTS. They also have very little tolerance for anything that challenges their narrow world-view.
I would strongly suggest picking up the June 2006 Harper’s and read an article entitled, “STABBED IN THE BACK! The past and future of a right-wing myth” By Kevin Baker
A snip:
“As the United States staggers past the third anniversary of its misadventure in Iraq, the dagger is already poised, the myth is already being perpetuated. To understand how this strategy is likely to unfold — and why this time it may well fail — we must turn to the birth of a legend.”
The trolls won’t really know what hit them until it affects their lives directly, like when they make a large deposit at the bank or pay off a large credit card debt and the FBI knocks on their door. Or when their medical records or tax returns are made available to the public or certain “agencies”. In 1930′s they had a name for these kinds of people: Good Germans.
Posted by: BillORightsMan | May 16, 2006, 2:14 am 2:14 am
“Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger.”
– Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials, 1946
Posted by: frowny face | May 16, 2006, 2:19 am 2:19 am
Conservatives need to wake up: This government, for the last _several_ presidencies has proven itself hostile to our basic rights as guaranteed by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. We have allowed the situation to be perverted into people for the government, by the government, of the government.
I say this as a capitalist: Soviet Babylon America is rising before our eyes, with the help of blindly greedy/naive/stupid corporate America, midwifed by its globalist masters.
Use your voice in government while it remains. Allow no quarter for all who would subvert our laws to fight “terrorism” or any other fomented context. If there’s hope of return to the America we were raised to believe in, this is the only way.
———————
PS: That’s NOT God’s eye on our dollars, folks. Read Exodus if you honestly believe He likes Pyramids.
It’s time for all who will to get to know Jesus (the REAL one, not the plastic-cross GOP/Democrat-touted abomination) while you can (John 14:6). He’s the only peace any of us can count on now.
Posted by: Joe American | May 16, 2006, 2:39 am 2:39 am
And what’s the point behind all this? The problem is accountability. One of the branches of government (the executive) has forgotten that is a co-equal with the other 2 branches (you know, the legislative and judicial). The Bush Administration has been tossing around this idea of the Unitary Executive. Bad idea. Works great in the UK, but not here. Where is Congress? Where are the courts (not to mention the FISA Courts)? Where is the Fourth Amendment? Where is the accountability?
Finally, are we, or or we not a nation of laws? Yes. But don’tget me wrong, there are bad people out there – but damnit, follow the law! It’s the Founding Fathers would have wanted and expected – and those guys knew a little something about terrorism.
Posted by: Bob | May 16, 2006, 2:43 am 2:43 am
just because the government is investigating abc doesn’t make them guilty. and if it does, doesn’t that infer that secret prisons and hidden missles are ok? anc isn’t perfect and neither is the government.
Posted by: Ian | May 16, 2006, 2:44 am 2:44 am
The U.S. is the new Soviet Union…
Posted by: olydig | May 16, 2006, 2:47 am 2:47 am
ALL Reporters done ?? Worldwide ?
ALL political opponents, Kerry ? Clinton ?
All GOP officials of course too ??
This is a double Watergate.
Posted by: George Naudon | May 16, 2006, 2:49 am 2:49 am
How long you people are going to watch a government which lies and spies to you, invades countries preemptively under pretenses?
That’s how Nazi germany started, with a depressed nation wanting a strong leader, fabricating facts to invade its neighbours.
Your governement is reaching the point where they have overdone it – do you realize it?
There are frogs in a pan with water, and the water gets slowly hoter, but the frog can’t destinct, until the water boils and the frog missed the point to jump the pan and dies.
It’s hot in your pan, people of the USA, it’s damn hot.
Posted by: Someone Else | May 16, 2006, 3:05 am 3:05 am
I am appalled at the number of these commentors that are perfectly happy to be leaving in a fascist state. I say: The history of humankind is one person or group of persons wanting to control, or wanting to be controlled, by another person or group of persons.
Posted by: Gerald Nelson | May 16, 2006, 3:14 am 3:14 am
So each act of this production of a play we call ‘Life on Planet Earth’ continues scene after scene following the Orwellian script in a never-ending nightmare of a Shakepearean tragedy of every star & stripe one could not possibly have imagined, even in the most sadistically pathological Machiavellian sense of an identically humanistic accomplished cyborg psychopath – advanced well beyond the most outrageous combination our Hollywood entertainment/propaganda machine could dream up in the best they have ever known – say the Terminator……
Did anyone read all of that without feeling its effects of disorentation, confusion, attention diverted from the issue?
Exactly my intention – look over here, take your eyes off the ball for a second…
Just like the administration is doing, has been doing, for many, many administrations before Bush. And we are ALL falling for it – HOOK, LINE & SINKER!!!
Why is that? Because we are afraid. Afraid of the unknown, afraid to know because of what unknown will result from that, and afraid to feel any more uncertainty than we already do. So the easiest thing to do is ‘Stick Our Heads In Sand!’
But quite sooner than later – much sooner than later – will be the last time we have the luxury of sticking our head – in sand. Even sticking our heads in sand is a choice we get to make only if we get to make choices. By the time it is too late to choose ‘SAND’ we will find there are no choices left.
Why do we find SAND so compelling and irrestible? I believe it is because history repeats itself. Not sometimes, not every once in a while. Always. Repeatedly. Guaranteed.
Just as with our own personal lives and the growth we experience involves making some mistakes over and over until we learn our lesson, so does our population – collectively. That is exactly what is happening right now and it will continue to happen, on schedule, right off the pages of a script as though it were written and played out verbatim.
What can we do? Not a damn thing any of us can individually do to change anything. But that does not mean there is nothing we can do. No, far from it.
We need to do for ourselves that which will allow each of us to evolve and allow our awareness to expand and see with new perspective that which we were blind to see before. This individual awareness will collectively unite the people and all living things on the planet, eventually transcending our existence to otherworldly dimensions.
Or, if you prefer, please go ahead and bury your head in sand once again. We won’t bother any one any more with any more from any one.
The choice is ours and yours and hers and his and mine and all who can choose must choose – Evolution or Sand?
Posted by: Drew Terry | May 16, 2006, 3:21 am 3:21 am
And what about those in the White House who leaked the information on Valerie Plame?
And did anybody notice that all the comments at the start were of the “you liberal scum in the press deserved it” variety and the ones towards the end are of the “Bush is a criminal” variety? Me thinks the dittoheads got in first.
Posted by: datsun18eb | May 16, 2006, 3:28 am 3:28 am
Wow, it’s’ sad to see that the loudest and most active people on this board are also the blindest, most mind numbingly ignorant, portion of our society. We, who look at both sides of every story and make up our own minds better get with it and speak out louder and more intelligently than these “tell me what to believe, Rush/Bush/Cheney/Orielly/Hannity” members of our society.
Posted by: JDawg | May 16, 2006, 3:30 am 3:30 am
Those willing to sacrafice liberty for security deserve neither. Being so called at war without a declaration of war from congress, we should ever be
vigilant for protect, defend, and uphold the constitution of the united states against all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC.
Posted by: Larry Henry | May 16, 2006, 3:49 am 3:49 am
If Bill Clinton had this power, he could’ve tracked Matt Drudge’s sources and pressured them into keeping quiet about Monica Lewinsky.
I feel sorry for the dullards who’ve commented on this board that can’t see past their own political partisanship and see the wider dangers of clamping down on a free press.
Will we now go after the soldier who leaked the Abu Ghraib photos in the name of “national security”? Wake up.
Posted by: Theo | May 16, 2006, 4:05 am 4:05 am
Big Brother has made a lot of posts here.
Posted by: TheyKnowWhoIAm | May 16, 2006, 4:12 am 4:12 am
Thanks for this info. It confirms our worst fears: our government is using the apparatus of our spy agencies to ensure that the truth about its own activities will be hidden from the people.
If we do not know what our government is doing. If we allow our government to secretly arrest and try whomever it choses – including the media. Then, we will live under a tyranny that we cannot oppose, discuss, or acknowledge without fear of disappearing, ourselves.
Posted by: Jamie Wagoner | May 16, 2006, 4:20 am 4:20 am
Whenever politicians or head of major corporation do something wrong they call whoever shines the light on their wrongdoings – unfaithful, etc. But those who are brave enough to challenge the self-serving politicians, are the true Patriots of the USA. It is good that ABC, CNN, Time, New York Post, 60 Minutes, and even government workers and soldiers have shone the light on what is wrong during Vietnam, Watergate, Enron, and now Katrina debacle, what is wrong in Iraq, what is wrong at the Mexican Border, Guatanamo, and Cheney shooting a so-called Friend. Else we would believe FOX-size lies and only much later find out that we have been not in a Democracy but a Soviet style Bush-Cheney Oligopoly.
I challenge all those who think that the Press have been doing wrong to look at what happened during Katrina. Homeland Security was lying and it was the Press who went down there to investigate and get out the Truth. If you are so Bush gong-ho and think he has done nothing wrong then you should go to Iraq and see how many Iraqies have been killed by our own forces who have nothing to do with WMDs and Saddam.
Posted by: OpenUrEyes | May 16, 2006, 4:22 am 4:22 am
If you’re going to use the old “you should only be worried about surveillance if you’re doing something wrong” axiom, it applies to those in power, too.
And Lord knows they’ve been doing all kinds of wrongs these past six years. The press is merely doing its job, and the administration are orchestrating cover-ups in the name of “national security”.
So Dubya, if you’re not doing anything wrong, you shouldn’t have anything to worry about. :)
Posted by: Theo | May 16, 2006, 4:26 am 4:26 am
The fact that private enterprise is already in the business of collecting, buying and selling our personal data doesn’t justify our government’s getting in on the act.
A good number of “fascist” commentators here have argued, however, precisely the opposite. I’m reminded of Scott McNealy’s [in]famous statement back in ’99, when he said, “You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it.”
In a sense, he was right: the right to privacy (or violations thereof) are increasingly a moot fait accompli of the information age.
May be, then, these misguided people posting stuff here in support of the administration’s collecting all this personal info are not fascists after all: they see themselves as “realists” who refuse to hang on to an outdated, romantic notion called “privacy.”
Posted by: Robert in CO | May 16, 2006, 4:31 am 4:31 am
I’m shocked to read the comments of these people supporting the erosion of our civil liberties. Green Day is right. There is an Idiot America. For all of you who continue to rant about how “if you have nothing to hide, you shouldn’t be worried” consider this, I’m proud of my body, it doesn’t mean I want my neighbor looking through my window when I shower.
Terrorism as a weapon doesn’t gain ground, topple governments, or accomplish anything other than to terrorize the target. This administration has gutted the consititution in response to a criminal act. Do I feel safer… no. I feel afraid and sad for my country. The terrorists won. Our president is terrified, and as cost us all our liberty.
Posted by: Bill | May 16, 2006, 4:35 am 4:35 am
As a former citizen of East Germany (German Democratic Republic), it shocks me to see what you have gotten yourselves into.
You must fight this governement, immediately, consequently. If not, your country will be flooded with hate and pain.
Trust me on this. I’ve seen that all before. Don’t buy their propaganda! RESIST!!!
Posted by: David | May 16, 2006, 4:42 am 4:42 am
How many fascists are responding to this? If this was Clinton doing this you guys would be out in the street marching asking for his death. I guess torturing and killing people is OK and very American as long as Republicans do it. We don’t have to be like the enemy to win. We’re only going to lose.
Posted by: M.Hall | May 16, 2006, 4:43 am 4:43 am
Just think, a new reason the media won’t be reporting anything outside of missing girls, La Crosse teams and polygamists.
‘We’re being spied on, we can’t risk it.’
That, and your paycheck.
Spied on, lied to, your rights suspended, your country hijacked, continously preached about some nebulous enemy hiding under your kitchen table, and treated as though you possess a pea-brain first grade mentality unable to comprehend a single sentence in the Bill of Rights.
Hey guys, welcome to OUR world. Your silence helped create it.
Posted by: ShockNAppalled | May 16, 2006, 4:49 am 4:49 am
I’m pretty shocked by all of this.
I was raised to believe that “lose lips sink ships” in a very conservative household. I used to think that leaking national security secrets actually hurt our country and our people and never cared much about legalisms or the Constitiution or the Bill of Rights other than knowing they existed. But I now think differently. I’ve come to understand that misguided people within the government have and can break the law and because those bad actions are classified as secret, these bad people within our own government can get away with some really horrible crimes without justice being served.
I believe George Bush and his administration has committed crimes and is now trying to silence the people by silencing the press. I think Bush should be impeached just for that. But if he is actually subverting the Constitution like you guys are saying, he should be tried in a criminal court. I am not being paid by anyone. Thank you.
Posted by: lucas | May 16, 2006, 4:51 am 4:51 am
Do Americans really belive you live in the land of the free when the goverment taps your phones? Yove gotta be joking right? You live in a dictatorship – wake up and see your constitution being ripped up in front of you!
Posted by: Andrew Routledge | May 16, 2006, 5:26 am 5:26 am
You ever wonder how the “marketplace of ideas” gets narrowed to a dictatorship of state sanctioned truth? Stay tuned folks. Those who’ve studied history recognize the signs. Those who haven’t could very well be on their way to receiving a crash course in the fall of republics.
This is how dictatorships come into being people. History bears it out, all you have to do is look.
One party rule, dogmatic leader who effectively dissolves congress and makes law, secret torture facilites, secret courts, secret surveillance, due process suspended indefinitely for potential enemies of the state, wars of aggression, and a terrified and xenophobic populace…
Good times indeed.
Posted by: Winston | May 16, 2006, 6:03 am 6:03 am
Wow! The people who are supporting the government right to data-mine for reporters who talk to the government are trying to stop any information about 1) rendition flights of individuals to countries where people can and have been tortured to death, 2) news stories about torture in US prisoner of war prisons in Iraq, Afghanistan, Cuba and elsewhere, 3) discussions to drop a nuclear bomb on Iran.
This all begs the most obvious question: is there anything, any reason that these ‘patriots’ who excuse the government tracking down any leaker – is there any secret that the government does not want out – that could excuse a leak? d
Posted by: Rich | May 16, 2006, 6:05 am 6:05 am
Why are americans so proud of their country? You have no historical knowledge, no geographical knowledge and you only speak one language.
The wars your government fights is understood by almost no one in your country. You don’t know their culture, language, history, geographical location or why they supposedly threaten your “Freedom”.
The level of knowledge of the average american is sad and pathetic but americans act as if their military power gives them a moral supremacy. This is why americans are hated around the world.
Posted by: Nick | May 16, 2006, 6:26 am 6:26 am
We are at WAR?
We are fighting what ememy?
Lets see a group under an oppressive govenment wanted to attack are way of life.
So we changed after that attack, to be an oppressive goverment.
Who won?
Posted by: jackb | May 16, 2006, 7:06 am 7:06 am
1. Connect the dots.
2. But don’t find the dots.
Posted by: Chester White | May 16, 2006, 7:08 am 7:08 am
I have to say: if you are a citizen of the USA you must be very sad at what this administration has done to your freedom. Many of you likely had family members die in the Revolution – and now you are watching the fruits of that sacrifice be thrown away. How sad for you. What a dark time to be an American. I hope you recover the greatness that you achieved through your historic embrace of individual rights – at this time however you are simply a fascist state in fear of fear itself.
Posted by: Duncan "Not Afraid Of the USA" Strong | May 16, 2006, 7:22 am 7:22 am
Can you name one other factual inconvenience or definitive loss of privacy in your life?
The truth is, we have been asked for terribly little in the way of sacrifice to ensure national security. And, as Americans, that is the way we like it.
Americans have lost their ability to be anonymous and not have big brother tracking their every movement. You cannot make a bank transfer or pay a bill of over $10,000 without it being reported to the government, you can’t get a telephone, even a prepaid one, without providing ID, you can’t open a bank account or a brokerage account without the information being provided to the government. You cannot travel anonymously on an airplane, bus or train. Now, of course you can’t call ABC News without the governmet knowing about it. Your loss of freedoms isn’t as overt as being put in a cage, but that could be arranged very easily, too.
I’m willing to sacrifice – just not the Constitution.
Posted by: worried | May 16, 2006, 7:24 am 7:24 am
Ah, “Land of the Free”.
Posted by: MadeInEurope | May 16, 2006, 7:27 am 7:27 am
I don’t know what is worse: Seeing the large cross section of people on here behaving like sheep and actually swallowing the outright attack on civil liberty with no independent/humanitarian or Christian thought.. Or, the fact that, the US government/corporations can get away with anything without effective protest. People tend to turn the other way rather than question things these days. This is all very shocking and very disheartening. I brought kids into this world and I fear the worst for them. What next? A Coke Advert projected onto the moon?
Posted by: Freedomman | May 16, 2006, 7:32 am 7:32 am
We haven’t had “privacy” since the social security number was issued.
Posted by: Laurie | May 16, 2006, 7:46 am 7:46 am
The comments of those who support the usurpation of freedom of the press here show just how well the Bush Administration has done its job. They now place journalists on the side of terrorists because they are exercising their right to report news that they don’t agree with. It is frightening to see their blindness to the dangers inherent in this article and their myopic vision of what constitutes truth.
Posted by: Christopher | May 16, 2006, 7:51 am 7:51 am
How completely sad. The Rove (Bush)administration and their toadies – and the 29% of the public that support them – seem to think they are being patriotic by destroying the Bill of Rights (all except the 2nd, of course) in the name of fighting terror. Stalin would have loved you folks. The terrorists certainly do – you’re doing their work for them.
What was that expression that you “patriots” used back in the 90′s? Oh yeah – “I love my country, but fear my government”
Posted by: Scott | May 16, 2006, 8:04 am 8:04 am
Personally, I find this a staggeringly corrupt power grab.
Here is me open question to the defenders of this program (in all seriousness). Where would you draw the line?
In answering this question, I throw four elements into the mix for consideration. (Perhaps they are baseless assumptions though?)
The first is that clearly our government is built to sacrifice some level of security for liberty, after all a police state would be much more secure, but we chose to avoid that route.
Second, it seems equally clear that military orders and national security do not always trump concerns of law, liberty and basic human principles. This seems to me best demonstrated by the fact that we do not accept a soldier’s saying that he was “just following orders” as an excuse to a criminal action.
Third, there must be *some* point where government secrecy cannot trump disclosure. If no such line exists we would have the absurd result of a government that could literally do anything at all regardless of legal, ethical or Constitutional boundaries simply by classifying the information or declaring a national security priority. After all, if no one knows you broke the law there can be no enforcement, and without enforcement the law is meaningless. So there must be such a line somewhere.
Finally, there similarly must be some point at which the government cannot claim that information is a security risk. Once again, without such a point *somewhere* we would have the absurd result that the government could literally classify anything and everything, as there would be no way of ever contradicting a claim that information is a security risk.
So, as I said earlier, my open question is where would the defenders of this program draw the line? Personally, I feel that this program well exceeds where any line would be. I feel that the combination of illegality of this program and the targetted use of it at administration critics in the press more than satisfies Point #3. While Point #4 might save this, I do not know of any information or evidence at all that this phone-tapping program has had any effect whatsoever in increasing national security. (Apparently it has also caused a flood of useless data which is backlogging the FBI according to the NY Times.)
So, thoughts?
Posted by: Eric | May 16, 2006, 8:08 am 8:08 am
A number of lefties have raised the point that Republicans won’t be too happy when Dems are back in power and abusing the power of government against their political opponents.
Considering that nobody likes to be proved a hypocrite, I am sure that you all were very upset that nobody went to prison over the 900 FBI files of Republicans that were illegally obtained by the Clinton administration and will never vote for Hillary Clinton who was implicated in that domestic spying event with evidence just as strong as the source for this article.
Posted by: Mark in Texas | May 16, 2006, 8:12 am 8:12 am
I find it very difficult to understand how anyone with any brains could possibly endorse the behavior of this regime. Some of us are soooo willing to give up all that our founding fathers have fought so hard for. Willing to turn over our rights to a regime that has done nothing but lie to us. Oh, they are the moral party aren’t they. I guess if they lie it is morally acceptible.
Posted by: Nancy | May 16, 2006, 8:13 am 8:13 am
Why would any sane person think that the people who bravely expose the illegal behavior of our government have endangered the lives of American soldiers? Without those honest citizens, we would never have learned of the lies that were used to put our soldiers in danger in the first place.
Posted by: Scott in NC | May 16, 2006, 8:14 am 8:14 am
Lets listen in on Cheney’s calls to Halliburton to see if they have made enough money yet in Iraq…then we can determine the exit plan for the war.
Posted by: Rob Johnson | May 16, 2006, 8:17 am 8:17 am
“Freedom of the press” and the right to “free speech” are precisely the Communistic ideals the founding fathers were trying to stamp out when they made the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
Posted by: Nay Jaylor | May 16, 2006, 8:22 am 8:22 am
One word about the domestic spying: Outrageous. One word about people condemning the media for reporting it: Outrageous.
ABC News must stay on this story to ensure this activity stops and doesn’t spread further.
Posted by: Tim | May 16, 2006, 8:27 am 8:27 am
I see the right-wing nuts wasted no time labeling the media as traitors. How many of you are willing to become a police state in order to…what? We have NO evidence that phone taps have stopped anything. But we do have direct evidence that these phone taps have not been done in accordance with our laws, and we DO know that they are a direct contradicting (i.e. lie) to what president Bush himself told the American people only a few weeks ago. Of course, republicans don’t want little things like the US COnstitution…or laws…stand in their way.
Posted by: Sam Barber | May 16, 2006, 8:27 am 8:27 am
“we need to get Tough” Blah Blah Blah. When the ruber hits the road Most Americans are a bunch of cowards. The Minute you mention Terrorist..We will give up everything including our own freedom, money, kids and the ability to address a president before taking us to war(media). I’m the last brave American. I’m not willing to give up one freedom and I’m not afraid to fight those Terrorist here in America.
Posted by: KizerSozay | May 16, 2006, 8:31 am 8:31 am
Pastor Martin Niemoeller, said it best. We need to keep our eyes open and watch to make sure that we don’t all lose our most precious liberties.
Posted by: Marcus | May 16, 2006, 8:35 am 8:35 am
Apparently a Free Press is no longer necessary. The most disturbing thing is how many people have come out in SUPPORT of this blatant attack on our rights to a free press.
Posted by: Camden in PA | May 16, 2006, 8:38 am 8:38 am
The fact that one has to read lines such as “Under Bush Administration guidelines, it is not considered illegal” shows how far the system has been broken. It is not a matter of what the president *condires illegal*, interpreting the constitution is not up to him but to the supreme court!
Posted by: Anonymous | May 16, 2006, 8:45 am 8:45 am
There must be a line between holding our National Secrets and the public’s right to know. When that line is crossed, then the offenders must be prosecuted for they endanger the average citizen by supplying our enemies with valuable information.
Posted by: Brian | May 16, 2006, 8:46 am 8:46 am
When the name of a CIA employee was “leaked” to the press, a two-year investigation began. No law was broken, because Ms. Plame was not covert. No one has been proven guilty of anything in that case, yet the drive-by media continue to scream for the head of Carl Rove, the President, etc.
Now there is evidence that the media is complicit in really breaking a law. The information you have printed and reported is classified. You are providing intel to an enemy that has a stated goal of destroying the US. I believe ANY steps taken by the US government to secure this information and prevent its illegal dissemination, including the prosecution of those complicit in the crime is acceptable practice and should continue. In fact, the individual who tipped you to change your phones should be arrested for divulging information during an ongoing investigation. I believe you should be arrested and jailed until you give up his name.
Posted by: Ramarious | May 16, 2006, 8:55 am 8:55 am
“We are at WAR with a enemy who whants to take over the world by force or kill all of us” and his name is Bush!!! Any thing kept secret is poison that dies in the light of exposure. Secrets are used to keep evil alive. The Lie IS DEAD! IMPEACH BUSH!
Posted by: Richard | May 16, 2006, 9:00 am 9:00 am
The only illusion all commenter’s share is that they think there is a right and and a wrong side to these issues, as if there was some moral or ethical principle involved. Really it just a box of weasels biting and scratching at each other. We humans have never been noble or fair or honorable and we haven’t started lately. It is just silly to think anyone in this story, the administration, the media, or the corporations collecting our information have altruistic motives that outweigh their personal interests.
Good privacy technology exists today, and those of us that want to protection from all those weasels are already using it. Encrypt your emails with GPG, use Zfone for private calls and cut the central authority out of the loop. Don’t for a moment expect a big telecommunications company, this administration, or a journalist to value your privacy or your Freedom when there is a single dollar to be gained.
Posted by: Scott | May 16, 2006, 9:08 am 9:08 am
I’m quite concerned about the comments posted here supporting eve the most obvious abuse of authority. I’m more concerned by the chorus of bobble heads in Congress that are happy to cheer anything on if it will keep emotional issues on the front burner in a sucessful attempt to obscure their actual votes on continued benefits for the richest in the country.
I’m not certain at what point this nation decided that a large segment of the population just isn’t woth supporting but it does seem like we’re becoming more fractured each year. We have an elected government that is more concerned with diverting tax revenue (which is becoming more and more borrowed money) to private industry. We see this again with the mandated hiring of contractor border guards. It would seem to me that we have a border guard program already in place that would be a better place for the additional funding as report after report tells us that contractors are more expensive.
As the saying goes, democracy ends with thunderous applause but it is not restored so easily.
Posted by: Ijnid | May 16, 2006, 9:15 am 9:15 am
Any of you who support this type of activity deserve a theocratic corporatist fascist government. There is a price for liberty and that price DOES NOT INCLUDE GIVING UP ANY OF YOUR LIBERTIES. If you think it does you are not American and you are not any type of patriot.
If you are willing to give up one speck of personal liberty and freedom then you deserve NOTHING.
Posted by: RLW | May 16, 2006, 9:21 am 9:21 am
I can’t believe the number of people supporting the government, but then in Geore Orwell’s 1984 fear is used to control people. In this case it’s an unrealistic fear of terrorism. Bush and company can do anything when using the word terrorism.
Posted by: Dan | May 16, 2006, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Read the posts from 11:09am through 11:17am May 15th.
Tell me those were not posted by agents. Scary indeed.
Posted by: usaliterate | May 16, 2006, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Looks like nsa,fbi,cia, couldn’t listen to your phone conversations. Encrypted? Finding the other person might be a better avenue. Or they wouldn’t do such a thing. Right.
Posted by: Lucy | May 16, 2006, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Looks like nsa,fbi,cia, couldn’t listen to your phone conversations. Encrypted? Finding the other person might be a better avenue. Or they wouldn’t do such a thing. Right.
Posted by: Lucy | May 16, 2006, 9:42 am 9:42 am
The issue is: this phone tapping is being done without judicial oversight. It has nothing to do with whether going after leakers is good or bad. Without judicial oversight, there is absolutely NOTHING to stop the government from spying on you, and then using that information to destroy your life. Maybe you trust this government to operate in your best interests. But do you trust every future government? Think about it. Demand that such information be gathered based on a warrant.
Posted by: Shannon | May 16, 2006, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Did it ever occur to anyone who supports this clear violation of our civil liberties, that George Bush himself is the admitted leaker of Valerie Plame’s name? If you are all so concerned about the press leaking secrets, instead look to the White House. Our president leaked the name of Valerie Plame for nothing other than political gain, to justify his illegal war in Iraq. Get the facts before you start smearing the press as “leakers.” Valerie Plame was investigating WMDs in Iran. We’ll never know what she could have found, or prevented, thanks to George W. Bush. Hmmmm….works to his advantage, doesn’t it…
Posted by: Carolyn Walsh | May 16, 2006, 9:52 am 9:52 am
There is too much hate showing up in these posts. What is going on with you people that have to bash someone to feel good about yourself.
There is no simple answer.
You have lawbreakers in those that leak the classified information.
If Bush/Cheney leak it is ok because they can reclassify from secret to not secret. duh.
I understand the big brother issue, but there has to be a middle ground.
Try posting a comment that tries to find a middle ground instead of hate.
For you far right and far left that cannot see past the end of your nose, you get what you deserve.
Posted by: Frank | May 16, 2006, 9:56 am 9:56 am
What happened to our privacy when the government can listen in on our confersations and monitor our calls? What happened to the Republican theme of little government and that government should stay out of our lives?
Posted by: dan lindsey | May 16, 2006, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Now that we know that Bush has been tracking every phone call made by every person in the United States, or at least those made by ATT&T and Verizon customers it makes you wonder what’s next? Has Microsoft or Apple collaborated with the NSA to plant spy software into Windows or Apple OS-X? Are they tracking everything we do online? That would be the next logical step in the progression of illegal spying. So I would ask Apple and Microsoft, hopefully before the fact, if they intend to cooperate with the NSA to illegally tap our computers?
Posted by: Marc Perkel | May 16, 2006, 10:14 am 10:14 am
News stories don’t cause the deaths of soldiers. All of you flag-waving patriots need to connect the dots as to why soldiers are dying…
Wouldn’t it be nice if the neocons got the totalitarian government they so desire? They’d turn around and blame it on the liberal media.
…Jingo all the way.
Posted by: Notta Robot | May 16, 2006, 10:17 am 10:17 am
It is getting more and more funnier. I mean…NOBODY is raising any voice to stop this?
Everybody is blind? or what?
Posted by: James | May 16, 2006, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Are You Kidding Me???
This is governmental intimidation!
Honestly, i was amazed to read that some people think this is OKAY???
Hello!!!
Read Your Constitution People!!!!
YOU ARE GIVING AWAY OUR RIGHTS!
Posted by: Julie Sadler | May 16, 2006, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Cell phones are tied to your identity. Getting a new one won’t do any good.
Social network analysis (a.k.a. link analysis) is used by the FBI when investigating organized crime.
http://www.fbi.gov/page2/aug05/links081805.htm
“”Any kind of number structure data you can get, it will link it together,” said Jack Israel, the FBI’s chief technology officer.”
Posted by: Ray | May 16, 2006, 10:26 am 10:26 am
You know, for 5 and a half years our media has not questioned anything about the current regime, and allowed them to build up this Stalinist empire.
ABC, congratulations, you are now reaping what you have sown.
The sad part is none of the other MSM organizations have done enough research to have the government spy on them.
Unfortunately, we the people, are going to be the victims in this.
All good things come to an end, it looks like our day is coming.
All hail King George, and the Therocacy for which he stands.
Posted by: NoneyaBusiness | May 16, 2006, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Do you all not see the evil genius of Bush and his cronies? Just as the Iraq war is an effort to stop terrorists attacking on US soil, the trampling of the constitution and bill of rights is an effort to stop terrorists from attacking us because they hate our freedom. Basically, erode our freedom so that terrorists won’t attack us for it. Like I said, evil genius.
Posted by: Michael | May 16, 2006, 10:43 am 10:43 am
It is illegal to divulge classified material, as it is to report it if you know it is classified. It is not up to a per son to decide if something is illegal and then disclose it. If it is classified, you can’t legally advertise it. If you do you are committing a crime and should pay the penalty for that. It should be noted that if it is not classified, then it is not illegal in most cases, and you are then a whistleblower and enjoy the protections that come with that.
Also, there is no evidence that Carl Rove, Scooter Libby, or Dick Cheney did anything illegal, other than an incessant chanting by people that hope upon hope that something can be found that will de-legitimize the current administration with whom they disagree.
Posted by: Bingo Kahrde | May 16, 2006, 10:44 am 10:44 am
You’ve got to be kidding. Freedom of Speech is our first, and most important right. What’s next? Censorship. Huge parts of articles disagreeing with the Government’s way of running things vanish, singular people who posted to newspapers, letters ot the editor, and even people who voted AGAINST the president end up being slowly ‘corrected’.
Sources are kept silent for a reason. As there IS still respectability in Journalism, despite what some may say. There are still news reporters who go out to inform the public and do not put anyone in danger. There are those that will lay their lives on the line like any in the military.
I suppose there’s still respectability in politics, but after this big brother project, I’m not so sure.
Posted by: ERuifrok | May 16, 2006, 10:44 am 10:44 am
As an Irishman, I have experience of how terrorism works.. A torrorist only has power if it’s targetted government and people are phased by their efforts, in this case America has been drastically changed by “the war on terror”, and therefore the terrorists are suceeding in their efforts.. Likewise, you can’t win against terrorists by militery means, short of wiping the middle east off the face of the earth. Obviously that is an unfeasable action.
It saddens me that America has allowed to corrupt itself, and pervert it’s consitution due to an act of terrorism. If I was to discover that my government was spying on me and my fellow countrymen, I’d sue them, have these ‘laws’ declared unconsitutional and hopefully see whoever implimented them fired.
America is losing this ‘war’, not because of terrorist attacks, not because of lack of militery or resources, but because American freedoms are being erroded, America is becoming what the terrorists prefer to be. The people are being misinformed, are having information withheld from them. Without the information that’s being leaked to the press, everyone would be in the dark and would not be able to make a clear assesment of how well the government is doing it’s job.
If strategic militery information was being leaked, and was risking the lives of soldiers, then that might be deemed worthy of jailtime, this is clearly not the case however.
Posted by: Aidan | May 16, 2006, 10:46 am 10:46 am
People need to understand the difference between leaking the name of a CIA officer (illegal) and a whistle blower telling the media about illegal activities that our own government is engaged in. There is a big difference. When the media tries to create accountability for our government that doesn’t help our enemies or lead to servicemen being killed. It is the decisions and actions of our own government that is leading to the thousands of dead service men.
Posted by: Ian | May 16, 2006, 10:49 am 10:49 am
The problem is this: The government gets revenue every month from the employers of the nation who “withhold” from employees wages – since WWII.
The government makes policy as it wishes with this revenue – as we can see, the public opinion be damned.
This was not always so in America.
Until the American public gets rid of the tax on income, we will be subservient to the whims of the government. The government has left its proper sphere of operation.
The government needs to be restrained from this exercise of immoral power.
Posted by: Paul | May 16, 2006, 11:06 am 11:06 am
“The most effectual engines for [pacifying a nation] are the public papers… [A despotic] government always [keeps] a kind of standing army of newswriters who, without any regard to truth or to what should be like truth, [invent] and put into the papers whatever might serve the ministers. This suffices with the mass of the people who have no means of distinguishing the false from the true paragraphs of a newspaper.” –Thomas Jefferson to G. K. van Hogendorp, Oct. 13, 1785. (*) ME 5:181, Papers 8:632
This standing army is Judith Miller, Fox News and embeded Journalists. It is scary how true his words are today
Posted by: IAN | May 16, 2006, 11:12 am 11:12 am
No problem with the gov’t checking my phone calls. I have no problem with exposing the anti US folks in the press. I haven’t watched or listened to major media for more than 17 years.
Posted by: Tony | May 16, 2006, 11:14 am 11:14 am
What so few people ever mention,
and I assume fail to grasp, is
the dangerous precedent this
sets regardless of which side
you are on. Let me explain to
those who don’t seam to be able
to think beyond the end of their
nose. Even IF you trust this
particular administration
establishing the power to
monitor citizens without over
site sets up the potential for
abuse and control, the type of
control that the Nazi
established to take control.
Now!, NOTICE I am NOT calling
this administration Nazis. I am
saying THINK AHEAD, this power
is dangerous because IF someone
were to come into power that was
willing to abuse it without
oversight there is little well
intending people could do
against it.
Posted by: Doug Marsel | May 16, 2006, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Absolutely stunning. Our soldiers are over fighting and dying in a fake war for freedoms that we are giving away at home. If anyone believes we are living in a democracy today, wake-up. We are living under a regime, pure and simple. Never before in the history of the U.S. have we had so many government whistleblowers – anyone wonder why?? Because there is so much corruption and law-breaking like never seen. Com’on American’s stand-up and fight to take back our true democracy and the true heart that made America once great.
Posted by: jiske | May 16, 2006, 11:25 am 11:25 am
They know the number not WHO one is calling. If they needed to find out who, THEN they get a warrant. And they can’t listen. Do the numbers folks. We are talking many, many millions of calls.
Posted by: ld | May 16, 2006, 11:26 am 11:26 am
WOW this is too far ! Reporters and millions of other Americans have their phone records tapped and searched. Last year it was John Bolton getting transcripts of conversations between Sec. Powell and Gov. Richardson. Its time for Sen. Spector and any other official who took an oath to the Constitution to shut this down.
Posted by: Ben M. | May 16, 2006, 11:31 am 11:31 am
While it’s certainly easy to condemn government employees leaking classified information, and those employees doing so should have their clearances revoked, one has to look at their motivation. Perhaps concern for the legality of it? Even moreso, one has to look at what the leaked info itself tells us about the activity of our government.
Like it or not, our government is spying on its own people. Period. Bottom line is that this would be wrong to do regardless of the administration, Republican or Democrat, liberal or conservative. You can say you have nothing to hide, but I doubt you’d really be comfortable with the government listening in on your private conversations regardless of how benign they may be.
How many of those who say the NSA (or CIA or FBI) should be allowed to tap phones have ever had a conversation on the phone that involved private health or sexual matters? How comfortable are you with those conversations being stored by the government and listened to by NSA agents?
Posted by: ConcernedForOurFuture | May 16, 2006, 11:32 am 11:32 am
The U.S. government is a terrorist organization.
Posted by: rakhia | May 16, 2006, 11:33 am 11:33 am
I loved this one:
“One of the most sacred responsibilities of the journalist is to report only fact, not supposition, rumor or innuendo. The American press has for far too long adopted the practice of reporting gossip as though it were news, innuendo as though it were fact, and supposition as though it were authoritative analysis. So-called “un-named sources” are not sources at all, they are political hacks and the news media supports these hacks by transcribing their every word and reporting as though it were authoritative, factual, and newsworthy. Frankly, I think the whole lot of you belong in a prison, not the hallowed halls of our Fourth Estate”
Yeah, I would have liked it if the press hadn’t simply repeated all the lies about weapons of mass destruction that the Pres and his crew spouted. I would have liked to have seen some investigation there. Also, it was terrible that they reported as news the baseless innuendo about a connection between Iraq and terrorism. Being as no such connection exists I’m wondering why the supposedly “liberal media” who is hostile to our President didn’t take him to task for such flagrantly misleading statements.
What information has the press leaked that is harming our troops? As far as I can see it the greatest danger to our troops is Donald Rumsfeld. He ignores the advice of generals and sends the troops in in insufficient numbers to do a job that changes every day. They’re not fighting terrorists, they’re fighting guerillas. How the heck could disclosing that the gov’t is tracking reporters phone calls endanger troops?!? Is any action that our President finds annoying sedition and treason?
Posted by: david | May 16, 2006, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Blind trust in the government is the OPPOSITE of a free democracy. Everyone promoting the idea that our government functions better when we ignore what it does would do much better living in a dictatorship.
Reporters serve the function of watching the government and reporting its illegal or immoral actions, and if we allow the government the power to stop them from doing that, then all it does is empower the government to break the law and become an immoral and corrupt state. No citizen of a free democracy should ever support a country becoming like that.
Posted by: Patriot | May 16, 2006, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Ever wonder how many of these comments are planted? I don’t have to wonder – I can see it happening with my own eyes. Amazing that we have low level staffers doing this kind of low-level propaganda, and getting paid for it with your tax money. Kinda makes me feel queasy inside.
Posted by: GeeWhiz | May 16, 2006, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Welcome to 1965. NSA has been keeping detailed records on American citizens since the 1960s, at least. Even Brian Ross doesn’t really have a clue. Phone records? That’s nothing. He has a whole file of his dangerous opinions somewhere in Washington.
The only reason anyone has any privacy at all is because their lives are too boring to be of interest to anyone else. Your mother won’t tell you that, but that’s the truth.
Posted by: Cliff | May 16, 2006, 11:41 am 11:41 am
More dangerous than terrorism is the threat of an informed electorate. To protect our way of life, citizens have no right to know anything the government is doing, and the government has every right to spy on every American in order to protect this great nation. If anyone bothered to read the U.S. Constitution, they would understand that the purpose of this country is to make the friends and family of the president rich beyond their wildest dreams. The president must be able to hand out no-bid contracts to his corporate sponsors, and to operate with sleazy back-room slush funds, or our nation is at risk. Americans need to shut-up, go shopping, and watch Fox News.
Posted by: ilo | May 16, 2006, 11:44 am 11:44 am
If, in 1776 or prior, the British had the ability and desire to spy on every colonist, then this country would not have been founded and every “traitor”, including Washington, Franklin, Jefferson, Madison, Paine, and others, would have been hung, or shot.
The seeds of liberty lie within the checks and balances placed upon the government by the citizens and press. The citizens *should* check their government by electing officials who would do it.
However, in today’s age, we no longer care about ensuring our government represents us in a legal and freedom-protecting way. We merely want to pander to those who think they are our superiors.
If, at some point, America becomes a dictatorship or a monarchy, as it was pre-1776, then what patriots will come to it’s aid to free the country?
Will a Revolution be able to happen, will men like Paine be able to write freely and expose the naked truth of deception and devine rule?
To those who call freedom of press and checks and balances unpatriotic, you people are the British Loyalist lackies, you are a disgrace to the meaning of this country.
Posted by: Shawn | May 16, 2006, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Wow. I don’t know what’s more disturbing, this article or the mis-informed responses claiming that this is the media’s just comeuppance. I didn’t realize our nation was so accepting of totalitarianism.
Posted by: Mike | May 16, 2006, 11:50 am 11:50 am
The leaked information that roiled dear Leader and this administration was the revelation that we are operating secretive prisons in eastern Europe. Countries that allow for torture, in direct apposition to the Geneva conventions. How does this revelation affect our ability to fight the so-called war on terror?
Posted by: Mike | May 16, 2006, 11:55 am 11:55 am
The people who think this is “good” development to reign in the “traitors” represent that minority of the population who do not really believe in democracy. These people want a police state so that people they don’t like (journalists, political dissidents, homosexuals) can be subjugated.
There is no point in engaging these dangerous authoritarians in debate. The point is to organize to protect our democracy and our liberties from the attacks of these people and their president.
Posted by: James in Chicago | May 16, 2006, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Two classes of people who want to relive Watergate: Journalists, and hardcore Democratic activists. Now, ABC News, where do your anonymous sources fit into this scenario? They’re playing you. They know about your secret yearnings–because you’re really not so good at keeping secrets. And they also know about mixed messages–you’re Achille’s heel. When the time comes to testify they’ll point the finger at you, the news media, just like Joe Wilson did before the Senate. It will seem credible because the public doesn’t trust you anyway. They certainly don’t like you.
It’s really immoral to contribute to your martyr complex by laughing at you, but damn, you guys are just too funny.
Posted by: Hardy Har Har | May 16, 2006, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
“Better that right counsels be known to enemies than that the evil secrets of tyrants should be concealed from the citizens. They who can treat secretly the affairs of a nation have it absolutely under their authority; and as they plot against the enemy in time of war, so do they against the citizens in time of peace.”
– Spinoza
Posted by: mark | May 16, 2006, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Wow! it’s amazing how many people are willing to let our civil liberties be breached for a decent nights sleep! Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press and Separation of Church and State once we start chipping away at these, we have let the terrorists win.
Keep up the good work Brian and ABC, I just hope that other networks will follow your lead.
Posted by: Joe C | May 16, 2006, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
I cannot believe that there are people who are actually thinking the government has the right to monitor our calls. Dissent is how this great country began. We are FREE to question and challenge. Speak truth to power and a free press if a major part of our freedom.
Posted by: Texas Proud Dem | May 16, 2006, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
If you didn’t object when somebody made copies of 900 FBI files . . . then you can’t object to tracking telephone calls.
Posted by: Bear | May 16, 2006, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
The Bush administration gets creepier and spookier and more treasonous all the time. I am grateful that every once in a while a major news organizaton still manages to print illustrative of how our nation is lurching toward fascism. Thank you.
Posted by: cajoe | May 16, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
I have heard that the congressmen supposedly briefed on this NSA program were sworn to secrecy before they knew the details of it. And now we’re hearing that a private corporation is connecting phone numbers to social security numbers and other private data. Disgusting.
Bush claims that he could use electronic surveilance in this way, but look here at US CODE, Title 50, 1811 –
TITLE 50 > CHAPTER 36 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1811
§ 1811. Authorization during time of war
Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for a period not to exceed _fifteen_calendar_days_ following a_declaration_of_war_ by the Congress.
(Source: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/
uscode50/usc_sec_50_00001811—-000-.html)
Posted by: Catarina | May 16, 2006, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
The liberal scare mongers never cease to amaze me. I love it when they claim the Bush administration is using information gathered from phone records to suppress dissent. They’ve got to be kidding, the Bush administration has allowed and suffered through more dissent than any other president since Richard Nixon. Remember the GOP convention in New York or how about Cindy Sheehan, who has been following Bush around like a newborn puppy blaming him for everything. President Bush can’t go anywhere without some bozo waving a stupid sign and whining about Iraq. There’s not another president I would trust more with my personal information than Bush. Despite the continued lies from the left, Bush is the most honest president since Harry Truman. What needs to happen is the government needs to catch whoever is leaking this classified info and lock them away for good. The NY Times and the Washington Post think they are doing us such a service by reporting what the CIA and NSA are doing but the only people they are really helping are our enemies. The next time the terrorist are successful at killing thousands more Americans we should take it out on the liberal media for exposing our nation’s security secrets.
Posted by: Robert Moon | May 16, 2006, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
The end times are coming, read the bible! Soon, we’ll all have the chip in our hands, maybe even the mark of the beast! God help us all.
Posted by: CJ | May 16, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
When the President and vice president leak information it’s okay. Even thought they are trying to crush critics of their administration. Probably getting people killed in the process.
When the press reports information about secret prisons where we are most likely torturing
suspects. The leakers are considered to be traitors? I would rather be a traitor. We condemn other countries for mistreating or torturing their prisoners. But it’s okay because we are doing it. We should punish the individuals that have committed these crimes in the name of the US; instead of the people reporting it.
Posted by: John | May 16, 2006, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Why doesn’t the government try the telephone number calling pattern system with Iraq? The number of phones is less, calling is less, and there are far more terrorists, so pattern matching should be really easy and successful! That way the insurgency could be stopped, and fewer of our people killed.
Finally, if it ACTUALLY works, I’d be willing to listen to arguments about why it should be used in the US, with surveillance of US citizen phone records.
Posted by: Bob | May 16, 2006, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Most Germans during the 1930s and ’40s were convinced that shipping Jews and Poles and Gays, etc. was A GREAT IDEA. The Soviet Union supressed it’s people with tales of imaginary capitalist enemies. People spied on their neighbors.
We are almost there. Have a beer, watch the game. It’s almost over.
Posted by: Tom | May 16, 2006, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
“I think the worst thing about this is that it defiles the basic rights that so many soldiers have laid down their lives fignting for. I think the question is: Where do we draw the line between gonvernment accountability and basic freedoms? When we step over that line, we erode the basic foundation that supports our society.”
I gave 12 years of my life to the USN. I believe that if most of the whining going on here were translated into action, the United States would have collapsed long ago.
Get over it, people. There’s no such thing as privacy anymore. NSA is collecting much less information on you than your grocer down the street. Your local ISP collects more info on you in a given day than the federal government does in a year.
And by the way, where were all of you when the Clinton government actually WAS collecting the type of info you’re all up in arms about now? Where were you when carnivore and echelon were being exposed? Oh, that’s right, y’all never inhaled.
A pox on both your houses, Democrats and Republicans alike.
Posted by: dave | May 16, 2006, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
As a person who believed that the outing of Plame was an immoral and dangerous act, I would say that investigating the leak is a good thing, as long as it is done LEGALLY and ethically. Rooting out whistleblowers of illegal government activities by rifling through databases containing the phone records of all americans seems a *little* different to me. By the way, we all already know who leaked the info about Plame, including Bush, and he doesn’t seem to worried about that leak does he? I just want to mention one more thing that noone seems to recognize. There is no “war on terror”. There is only the worldwide escalation of american military aggression which is justified by the “promotion of terror” by our government. Think about it, if you were Osama, would you be all twisted up over the fearmongering that this government is engaged in? All you have to do is make one attack and then your “enemies” will use it forever to scare their own population, what could be better for you?
Posted by: Nate Glenn | May 16, 2006, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
[[Does anyone else notice that the same people damning this leak investigation are mostly the ones who are clamouring to have an investigation into the Plame "leak" and have Bush impeached for it.
For future reference, consistency across political lines is the best way to make your point.]]
For future reference, conflating treason and political payback with whistleblowing is NOT the best way to make your point.
Posted by: Lex | May 16, 2006, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Welcome to Fascist States of America
Posted by: Anonymous (FBI is reading) | May 16, 2006, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
After reading the numerous posts from people approving of the government’s behavior I finally understand why the country is in such trouble: we have a naive, moronic electorate. Wake up people — the Bush administration is trampling on the constitution. This is Nixon all over again!
Posted by: Dale Cressman | May 16, 2006, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
We as citizens must know what our elected government is doing. And we as citizens must defend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in particular, or we don’t deserve to remain citizens. Many of the above comments are so misguided and out of touch with what makes this country strong that I wonder how we have managed to survive as a nation and a culture this long.
Blind devotion to a flag or a uniform or a manner of speaking means nothing. Defending the Bill of Rights is where it’s at, this country’s essence. The fourth amendment is at stake here, and that is the thing which I and others served and serve to defend, along with the second, third, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth amendments, et al.
What appalls me is that so many respondents aforementioned sound, unbeknownst to them, like the fascists, communists, monarchists, and nazis who we have fought to defeat these many years, in order to defend this land of liberty. Indeed, give me liberty or give me death! Don’t those words mean anything any longer? You’d sell it all out, give away your rights in a misguided quest to be “safer.”
Go back and read the magna carta, and then read the Constitution, and then read the Bill of Rights, reflect on the fact that I and many other good citizens consider those the basis of our citizenship, and then ask yourself if you are really willing to kick all of that to the curb to allow the present Administration to monitor all of our phone calls, which if it is deemed legal and acceptable could easily lead to a complete lack of privacy, the abrogation of our rights as free Americans.
What I lament the most, though, is that we let fear-mongers come between us. The Russians, Chinese, Japanese, Germans have all waged war upon us in the past, and we have faced them down. Now, a relative handful of extremists, poorly organized and without real resources, can’t hope to put asunder the USA. We can defeat them easily, and United we will.
Unless a lot of worried internal extremists convince us to give up the rights we have husbanded down through the generations, convince us to give up our freedoms, among them the right to bear arms. This would open us up to harm from within, the beginnings of a new fascist state.
I say, have some confidence in this land and its principles. In our toughness. A few Islamic extremists are a problem that must be dealt with, but not a threat which should cause us to abrogate our rights under the Constitution. Truth and openness are what we should fight for always, and honesty in government. The press should be able to go about its business, and reporters should never have to worry about their phone lines being tapped, if they are acting under constitutional guidelines and the rule of law, as they pursue that truth and openness in government.
If you disagree with this, then say so, and reflect that your right to do so is writ down in the Constitution that you seem so eager to denigrate.
Wake up America. Freedom! Liberty or Death! No tapping of phones without court-approved warrants. That is what I will fight for, along with Brian Ross’s right to do his work in an honest and legal way. Brian, you have my thanks. Keep at it.
Posted by: Dan | May 16, 2006, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
This is outrageous! This administration takes no responsibility for its actions, yet decides it can track calls of reporters to “ferret out” leaks in its administration.
If this administration had any respect for the Constitution, I might give it some slack, But they have shown that they are willing to destroy lives to advance their own agenda.
Worse, the government should not be spying on citizens or news organizations. There are plenty of ways to figure out who is leaking information.
If people think the reporters are the problem, they are looking in the wrong place. Strange how people rail against the media divulging national secrets, but think it was okay to identify a CIA agent.
If you really want the government tracking all your moves and calls, please move to China; they have a well-run authoritarian state.
People should not be afraid of their government; governments should be afraid of their people.
MTL
Posted by: MIKE | May 16, 2006, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
America is in a sorry state. I can’t believe that we have lost our way to such a degree that asserting basic freedoms can be portrayed as a treasonous act. We have grown lazy and ignorant. Is there any hope that pragmatism, individuality and open intelligent dialogue may once again become part of the political fabric? They should have hung Thomas Paine and submitted to the rule of a divinely appointed autocrat. 230 years wasted.
Should I be afraid that I must submit my email before posting?
Posted by: Jim | May 16, 2006, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it. Those who like to think this government’s surveillance will only be used for legitimate purposes, and not to control, intimidate, quash dissent, to gain, maintain and expand it’s power, should study The Third Reich. It’s chillingly predictive of this administration’s actions, reactions, strategies, techniques, and devices.
A pox on both their houses is right. Corrupt Republicans plus corrupt Democrats compounded by Democrat spinlessness and nonfeasance, makes it all possible. Apparently true that all it takes for evil to prevail is good people doing nothing.
G
Posted by: george | May 16, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Ed said: “His job is not made easier by the political left; they have always been a noisey bunch that seeing conspiracies everywhere. This stems all the way back to the Vietnam War. The whole reason we lost that war was due to the fact that the politicians running the war lost their resolve due to the bosterious left and all their antics.”
No. Not at all, and don’t you think you should have a clue what you are talking about before doing so? The Vietnam War was lost because our policy was to kill everyone, and forcibly expell whoever was left from their homes (Strategic Hamlet Program). The communist’s strategy, as always, was to garner the support of the peasants. We stomped communism into Vietnam because the insane morons we elected at the time had the resolve to think killing everyone would get anything accomlished. And who were those leaders? The worst president ever, LBJ, and the current president’s role model, Nixon.
Posted by: warsupportersaretraitors | May 16, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
The so-called “Conservatives” who support this unprecidented power grab by the Executive have an astonishingly short sighted view of American politics.
Perhaps you think that George W Bush is the most trustworthy guy on earth and would never abuse any of the trust or authority granted in him.
I remember when you all got so (rightly) worked up over the abuse of power displayed at Waco.
What do you imagine President Hillary Clinton is going to do with all this new ability to wiretap and spy on ordinary Americans? Especially if she is supported by Senate Majority Leader Reid and Speaker of The House Pelosi? Do you trust those three to protect your liberties?
If not those three, three other similarly minded Democrats will be in power, sooner or later. Karl Rove’s dream of a thousand year GOP majority is fading away right now and you must know it.
So why do you support this power grab on the part of the Federal Government? Isn’t a pillar of Conservatism small government? Where did you lose your way?
Posted by: Jim Ausman | May 16, 2006, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Those of you who are so eager to demonize the press should bone up on the very basis of our society: the U.S. Constitution.
The First Amendment say…”Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of…the press.”
Under our form of democracy a free press was seen by the founders as essential. You may want to ponder why.
Posted by: Jordan | May 16, 2006, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Folks, believe this was all covered in a Supreme Court Decision over twenty years ago. The majority decision was written by that conservative hero Harry Blackmun and also supported by another mainstay conservative still there… John Paul Stevens. Their decision? That the government is not invading privacy to look at phone numbers. Read it and weep! (OK, I was joking, Blackmun and Stevens was/still is very liberal. Go figure.)
The following website contains the Supreme Court decision that phone numbers belong to the phone company and no expectation of privacy is attached.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1630900/posts
Posted by: Griff Dawg | May 16, 2006, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
People (some) here are the epitome of Orwellian doublethinkers. “I’ll give up my liberty for freedom.” Wake up people.
“His mind slid into the labyrinthine world of doublethink. To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which canceled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and the Party (BushCo) was the guardian of democracy, to forget, whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the time it was needed, and then to promptly forget it again, and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself – that was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed.”
Orwell ‘doublethink’
Mindless, thoughtless, robotic, herded sheep…..the other 29%.
Posted by: Flip | May 16, 2006, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
You all may as well get used to the media disclosing leaked information to the public.
As long as the media is supported by advertisers, they’ll continue.
If you really want to DO something about it, contact those advertisers and write letters, by hand, to let them know how unhappy you are with the behavior of the media that you watch or read.
Tell them (and be willing to follow thru) that as long as your chosen journalists continue to misrepresent the events of the day you will do your best to shop elsewhere.
When the behavior persists…shop elsewhere. Shop online or down the street.
Newspaper subscriptions are already dwindling ( San Francisco Chronicle & LA Times are down 20%) and the major media news channels are out viewed by cable, and Foxnews is #1 on cable.
Don’t waste your time with e-mails or e-mail petitions.
The letter must be hand written and addressed. Give your name and address only.
Posted by: Bistro | May 16, 2006, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Patriot said it right! These comments where people are praising the government and saying that the press should be put in jail for life are low level government employees that have been paid to post these things. It is part of the Homeland Security Act. It is the war on terrorism to control the flow of information on the internet. It is disturbing how sophomoric their postings are. You can identify them everytime. Just rantings with no real gist.
Everything we are hearing is just the tip of the iceburg. The U.S. might appear to be a lamb but in fact speaks like a dragon. The fact is that this is not a free country anymore…no more so at least than the old Soviet Union. I am terribly afraid that things will only get worse…much worse.
Posted by: Patriot2 | May 16, 2006, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Some of these comments are absolutely hysterical.
Is Bush a great president? Sadly, no. As someone who voted for him twice, I, too, am disgusted — but for a different reason. If I had wanted a democrat in office I would have voted for one. Have I hit a nerve?
Let’s see: for all of you calling him a Nazi or a fascist, get a clue. The Nazis were socialists, much like today’s liberals. It was the National Socialist party. Nice try.
Is the big bogeyman Bush collecting data snooping on your privacy? Where were your concerns when Clinton was doing it? Were you so hysterical then, or only now when the opposition party is in office? Was it okay with you when Clinton snooped into IRS records of Americans? Was it okay when the Carnivore computer program started spying on Americans? Was it okay when the Clinton administration actually the nuclear reactors built in Korea with which we are now threatened?
As to the Valerie Plame debacle, please do some research. No law was broken by revealing her name. Scooter Libby is in trouble because he lied to the Feds. Does that sound familiar? How about Clinton’s lying under oath? Liberals are quick to dismiss that, why are you jumping on Libby now?
Some here are quick to excoriate Bush, saying he is curtailing civil liberties. One of democrats’ favorite presidents was FDR. Didn’t he curtail civil liberties of Americans while at war? I recollect hearing of something called an internment camp. Was he a bogeyman, too, or not because he wasn’t a republican?
I do not condone snooping on Americans, but it didn’t start with this administration and it won’t end with this administration.
Face it, folks, we are at war. It is wrong of so-called news organizations to broadcast information which will help those with whom we are fighting. When these organizations are led, as ABC and CBS are, by their biases, we all lose.
Posted by: Sheila | May 16, 2006, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Our government was founded on the principle of checks and balances. The creators of this system understood that a system left unwatched or unbalanced is a system that has no measure of control over it. Imagine a totalitarianistic United States of America – it’s not hard if you try. Our basic liberties were secured by people who broke the law in the face of the King of England, and here we are handing those liberties back over to a nameless and faceless entity on a silver platter! Do I believe we need to have secrets, to protect our troops and our civilians? Yes. But should we always assume that the people in charge are doing “The Right Thing” ™? No, and I applaud those individuals who have the gumption to step forward and speak out when something is amiss. I’ve never been a soldier, but I’ve heard of more than one who disobeyed an order, because he knew it was not an order worthy of obeying. I’d give my life for freedom, but I won’t give my freedom up for life.
Ironically, I don’t think most of you even understand what your freedom means! Would you publish to everyone on your block, or in your apartment building, your town or city, every conversation you’ve had with other people? or even just post your phone records for all to see? What about your bank statements, how you spend your money? I think not. Where do you draw the line? How much do you enjoy locking your doors at night, being alone and knowing that no one is listening? Would you allow yourselves to be governed from dawn to dusk in everything you say and do, for fear of being imprisoned for having ideas or notions that might run contrary to the current whims of the people in charge? Would you let yourself be told what to say, what to think, what to eat, how to live, under pain of imprisonment or death? Would you give up the ability to choose what you do, where you do it, and how it’s done in favor of a regime that has made all those decisions for you (and, mind you, not necessary to the benefit of the you or people in general)? Would you stand up and fight for that? Would you be willing to give your life for that?
The road we are on is slippery, and has been getting steeper all the time. And while people are busy being distracted by this war or that issue, this debate or that report, the gears are still turning – things are still happening. The people on the inside, where “We the people, of the United States” cannot go without some special priviledge, are trying their damnedest to protect our freedom, no less than the soldiers who give their lives for this great country. And it is a great country. But it, like all great civilizations, will fall if we do not educate ourselves on the issues at hand. If we refuse to keep watch over our government, we are then no longer in control of our government – perhaps we never were, and it’s just an illusion that is in the midst of dissolving. I’ll leave that as an exercise to the reader.
If you all have so much faith in our government “Doing The Right Thing”, perhaps you’d better look again at history, and the history of all the politicians that run around up there. Take a real good look at who is in control, and listen for what they DIDN’T say. You might be surprised what you hear. Sometimes it takes breaking the law to protect the freedom of us all, and those who can’t live with that notion should not have applauded the downfall of Saddam Hussein. China does a pretty darn good job controlling the media, so why are you all complaining about the violations of human rights there? The hypocracy most of you exude is astounding, and terrifying – leaving this country up to such notions as I read here would drive us all right into the heart of what we supposedly do not want: the loss of all our freedoms.
Posted by: Matt | May 16, 2006, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
I don’t know whether this news is more disturbing, or the reaction in the comments. How anyone can think it’s “good” that steps are being taken to keep people who feel there is wrongdoing in the government from telling the press, should build a time machine and move to Nazi Germany.
This act by the government will dissuade whistle blowers of all types. If you really think we’re better off in a world where atrocities go unknown (and unstopped) then you are clearly in the 29% who will follow this president, no matter what.
Posted by: ryan | May 16, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Maybe History is repeating itself. Are any of you fimiliar with “The Law for the Protection of People and the State”? NO? Hmm. Well this law and a few others with similar names were established to restrict the press from “leaking” information to the people that the government thought to be “Confidential” or “secret” or part of “National Security.” Now do you know who passed these laws? Sounds like what our government is trying to do, doesn’t it? It may surprise you then to learn that this law and a few others with like names were the beginning of Hitler’s reign of Terror, which later turned into WWII. The law actually read as follows: “Law for the Protection of People and the State abolishes the following rights: free speech, free press, sanctity of the home, and security of mail and telephone…” NOTE>>> re-read the last bit, mail and telephones are not private. Again, sounds like our government! I have heard people in the past say how they couldn’t believe the German people just let Hitlor do all those terrible things. Well, he didn’t start out killing people. He started out by snooping into people’s lives and stopping freedom of the press. Making arrests and putting people in jail without a trial for national security reasons. And at first, like many of you today with our own government, the people thought he was doing it for their own protection. That Hitlor was doing it for their elected government. I will repeat that for anyone who may have missed it :: The Nazi Party was elected because at first the people thought that he was helping them!! What happens when Bush takes away more rights, puts more people into jail without trial? Will you stand up then? Or, will it be to late, because, like the German people did with Hitlor, you let Bush get to far before you tried to stop him? Will history repeat itself? I guess it depends on how long it takes for the American public to open their eyes and putting a stop to it.
Posted by: Tami | May 16, 2006, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
When the film Good Night & Good Luck was released I assumed that Americans would watch it and think, “Jeez, that was close! We nearly became a fascist state.” But having read most of the jaw-droppingly naive comments in this thread, I am inclined to think that most Americans wish the McCarthy witchhunts had been more successful in lurching the US to the extreme right.
A free press is the absolute bedrock of democracy. If you restrain the press, you restrain yourselves. If you believe in “government of the people, by the people, for the people” then you need to start recognising that the government serves you, not the other way around.
Remember, a man who would give up liberty for security deserves neither.
Posted by: Michael Cockerham | May 16, 2006, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Hmm… I guess my post yesterday never made it on the board. The gist of it was that Bush and his Neo-Con cronies have absolutely played themselves into U.B.L.’s hands by making BinLadin’s dream a reality… we now live in a nation terrorized by our own government.
Oh yeah, and if you have any doubts about terrorists living within the borders of our nation, just google the Bush family’s dealings with the SaudiBinladin group.
Posted by: spectre | May 16, 2006, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Wow such heat being placed on the news media, I guess it should be your job at ABC to just read press releases from the White House. This “Classified information” business is nonsense. The reason it is classified has nothing to do with national security it has everything to do with hiding what is really going on. The administration probably really believes this is a good idea, and that they are responsible enough to handle this power. However I think given their past record they should be kept on a much shorter rope than usual.
Besides what will they do if they hear “suspected terrorist calls”, abduct you and throw you into a secret prison to torture you and not allow international oversight?…. yeah that sounds about right.
Posted by: Brian Stowe | May 16, 2006, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Anyone who thinks spying on US citizens is a good idea because ‘an honest person has nothing to hide’ should go live in Saudi Arabia. They agree with you. They also punish criminals in a way that you would likely also agree with. They chop off the hands of shoplifters and behead adulterers. Consequently they have very little of those types of crime. If it isn’t our Bill of Rights and other constitutional freedoms that makes America great, sets us apart from other nations, I don’t know what it is. Anyone who thinks we’d be better off without freedom of the press, or protection from government invasions of our privacy, isn’t thinking like an American. They’re thinking like the very people they hope to be protected AGAINST.
Anyone who supports Bush and his repeated attempts to turn our government into a dictatorship run by decree of the president should save themselves the trouble. Emigrate to one of the middle eastern countries where you will find many others of similar mindset. Let the rest of us keep America American.
Posted by: U.S. Citizen | May 16, 2006, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Assuming this report is true (the combination of ABC News and “undisclosed sources” makes that a legitimate concern) I hope the government compiles the necessary information to bring charges against ABC, the NY Times and all those whose leaks have served to put the US at greater risk from terrorists. The leaks have been generated and publicized purely for political reasons and it is long past time for the left to understand that contempt for the United States does not grant license to assist the nations’ enemies. How delicious it would be to watch Dana Priest reevaluate the legitimacy of her divine mission for, say, the next 2 to 5 years!
Posted by: Doug Book | May 16, 2006, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
This country was fought for and founded to recover and defend individual freedoms. Every drop of blood that fell in freedom’s name is being spat on by “patriots” who believe they are above the law. Our FREEDOM is being spat on by those who insist that domestic surveillance outside the law is legal or in any way acceptable.
Anyone that exposes a threat to or breach of our Constitution should be considered a hero as patriotic as our forefathers. Thus anyone that supports actions that fly in the face of our noble birth as a nation should be considered treasonous. Stop goose-stepping behind this administration and open your eyes to the real threat to America. Our freedoms are being sold and stolen from within.
In addition – why are leaks only a problem when the GOP agenda is exposed but they’re acceptable when trying to sell a war or smear an adversary? Are those opposed to leaking information actively trying to get Rove, Libby, Cheney and W exposed?
Posted by: Mike in VA | May 16, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
I really can’t believe what I am reading. People are actually mad at the press as they dig for stories….yet they trust our government. How far we have fallen
Posted by: Nomah | May 16, 2006, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
“Of course the people don’t want war. But after all, it’s the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it’s always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it’s a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger.”
– Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials
Posted by: Bryan | May 16, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
I think all these neat new powers the president has are great! I can’t wait to see what Hillary does with them!
Posted by: D. Moore | May 16, 2006, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
“Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger.”
– Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials
Posted by: Bryan | May 16, 2006, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Some observations:
1. It’s illegal to report national secrets, unless Emperor Bush decides it’s politically expedient to do so.
2. The government paid bloggers in this thread have tipped their hand by posting their support for the current totalitarian regime in groups.
I suppose you have to squeeze this in between writing “news” assignments for the Iraqi papers.
3. The use of domestic intelligence is fraught with many dangers to the watchdogs of government corruption and to the political process in general.
The current administration shows a lack of judgment in how it (mis)uses its power. He isn’t labeled “Emperor Bush” as a joke.
Posted by: Snow White | May 16, 2006, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
The comments posted by a lot of the readers are scarier to me than the news story itself!
Many of you think that illegal government activities deserve greater protection than the constitution. Think about where that road leads.
It must give Bush hope — maybe he’ll be “re-elected” to a third term just as Nixon plotted for himself before his administration imploded. Hell, let’s do away with terms! Long live Caesar W!
Posted by: Jeff | May 16, 2006, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
The revelation of criminal behavior by government officials is a duty of the Press. It is not the DISCLOSURE that is the crime, it is the crime itself.
We note that Porter Goss reportedly fired Mary McCarthy as the possible leak in the secret prisons story. Surely she would not have been fired for disclosing something that wasn’t true.
Therefore, we have to assume that the CIA is acting in an unaccountable fashion.
If the NSA declined to get either FISA court, or even Justice Department endorsement for acquiring phone records of apparently everyone in the U.S. … we have to assume they knew it was illegal.
If the NSA refuses to give security clearance to Congressional investigators, we have to assume they are preventing proper oversight … and this exceeds their authority.
The potential of the government to missuse the powers of surveillance, e.g., for political purposes or to hide their malfeasance, is too great to leave ignored.
ABC news should make a much larger outcry about this apparent abuse of power. Citizens should begin to get the idea — as took a long while during Watergate — that the administration might be acting badly.
Posted by: William S | May 16, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
i can’t believe my eyes! this is the most incompetent administration, and so-called leader the world has ever known. he is a black mark on our nation’s history. the only dopes still falling for this clown’s B.S. is the religious right. and that’s because they can be scared into doing anything…DOPES!!!
Posted by: bones | May 16, 2006, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
People just don’t get it. What if this was a democratic administration spying…? Would the same conservatives be cheering for them? I doubt it.
Look ahead, and look around at where else this might lead to.
We need a return to checks and balances.
Posted by: J Klepetka | May 16, 2006, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
What is this administration protecting, you or itself?
It has broken the law numerous times and hides behind the fear that your enemies are watching. There is no rocket science in saying that you can tap phones, that is why Osama doesn’t use technology.
The torturing of suspects around teh world has been going on for years and has been reported for quite a while too. It just recently came out in the US. Check out this link
http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/archives/2005
/11/torture_bill.html
This administration has broken all kinds of laws, from exposing spies to illegal tapping, yet I hear how the whistle blowers should be strung up. Wrong, this administration should be strung up. They have deceived its citizens since day 1, and rules by fear ( quite effectively).
Where is there accountability.
Posted by: Peter | May 16, 2006, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
All these guys posting about how we need to find the whistle blowers weren’t saying jack when it was Valerie Plame. No crime? The CIA stated she was undercover, and revealing that information is a felony. And people are still testifying, so we can’t be sure yet which crimes were or weren’t commited. For most of these Brown Shirts it’s all about politics. To you guys, I say this.
Imagine it was President Hillary tracking leaks from her Administration to your “Fair and Balanced” FOX news. I bet then you would be crowing about Freedom of the Press and the Constitution.
Posted by: *smacks forehead* | May 16, 2006, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
[[Let's see: for all of you calling him a Nazi or a fascist, get a clue. The Nazis were socialists, much like today's liberals. It was the National Socialist party. Nice try.]]
No, YOU get a clue. The National Socialist German Workers Party was “socialist” in name only. In reality, it was a partnership between Hitler’s authoritarian nationalists and the nation’s most prominent industrialists. That’s “fascism,” for all those who weren’t out back smoking dope during middle-school history.
Posted by: Lex | May 16, 2006, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
is 9-11 the only reason why Bush’s “team” now resorts to tracking the free press? it seems the main philosophy behind both the terrorists’ twisted invasion and the governments’ untwisting is a collective distrust of the American people by terrorists and government spooks alike. or, am I being merely imaginative and, eeegads, paranoid?!
Posted by: NAkers | May 16, 2006, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Collecting records of calls does not provide any information whatsoever about the content of calls, for starts. Hence it is useless for preventing terrorist attack. Secondly, warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance act are relatively easy to get. The only real function of collecting who’s calling what number is for after-investigation or for collecting blackmail information. “Do you want us to tell your wife you’ve been calling Trixie? Or do you want to give us your boss’ files?”
The largest threats to liberty come from those who are willing to do anything at all to protect it, including destroying it.
Posted by: 1st of the 27th '68 | May 16, 2006, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Please don’t, please don’t use us troops as an excuse for those of you that say it is okay to spie on Americans. That’s crap!
It is never okay. It is illegal; it’s against the Constitution.
Do you think George knows better than Madison and Jefferson?
Please go back and read the Bill of Rights, and why they were included in the Constitution. Although you will apparently believe they are a liberal plant too.
Sad state of of affairs in American. I am embarrassed by the policies of this Administration.
Bob, Tall ‘Afar Iraq
Posted by: Bob Naley | May 16, 2006, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
It doesn’t matter what any of us crow right now.
Senators say they know the full scope, and are ok with. Polls show for some odd reason that the nation is split again on the issue.
(Good job bush)
When it comes down to it, Bush is supreme ruler, no longer a US President. He’s commander of everyone now, he has the power.
The NSA can do whatever it wants and if we don’t agree, or Senators… he’ll point a finger at laws passed and say he’s immune.
Posted by: phreaki | May 16, 2006, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
“The only security of all is in a free press. The force of public opinion cannot be resisted when permitted freely to be expressed. The agitation it produces must be submitted to. It is necessary, to keep the waters pure.” –Thomas Jefferson to Lafayette, 1823.
Posted by: Thomas Jefferson | May 16, 2006, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
The government has hit a new low in attacking the fundamental values upon which this country was based. Let’s recap shall we?
We have a Born Again Christian leader who follows none of the teachings of Christ. In fact his actions are an abomination to God.
We have a man who has sworn to uphold the rights and freedoms of every citizen while he does everything in his power to take them away.
A man who took an oath on the Bible to uphold the constitution and yet lies and subverts at every turn in order to render it a useless piece of paper.
The freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the rights of the individual, the sanctity of our very way of life. These are the things that have been, and are being openly attacked by the Bush administration from behind a shield of lies and fear.
This is not a man to be honored. He has no honor or dignity himself. Why should we give him any? The freedom of the press and of the individual are now at stake. It’s time for this administration to be held responsible, before it’s too late.
Posted by: Taller | May 16, 2006, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
I’m just wondering — how does the fact that a report saying the government spies on its citizens undermine our nation’s “security?” If someone in our government needs to break the law to notify the public that they’re being spied upon, then I support them whole-heartedly — I say to them, “Thank you for letting me know!” — am I suppossed to sit by and willingly accept the fact that other parts of my government are violating the law by violating my privacy rights? (And in what century is the person living who mentioned the ‘communist’ plot? — that excuse is WAY old school!)
Posted by: james | May 16, 2006, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
To those of you who say that they have done nothing wrong:
Remember the Jews? What was their crime? How about the Armenians, Cambodians, Macedonians, Timorese, Rwandans, Polish, Arabs, Ethiopians and even Blacks in this country? What were their crimes? Their only crime was not being the ones in control of their government.
What do they all have in common? They were the downtrodden and poor, the oppressed and under-represented poor. They had no one to speak for them and no value in the eyes of the rich. As long as our government is married to the corporations, and the rich, WE are at risk of becoming the next victims of our own placidity.
The Germans were extremely efficient at keeping detailed records of the associations of their citizenry also. This information only serves as a tool for government to control people.
Think of how much information the government has on each of you…
Everything you have purchased with a credit card.
Every phone call you have ever made, to whom and for how long.
Every word of every email and fax you have ever sent.
Every medical record and immunization.
Every class you have ever taken, every book you have read.
Every web site you have ever been to.
All this and more is available to them without warrant and without oversight.
Of course you don’t mind if they tap your phones, you are already under their control.
It is the people who still want the ability to make choices who are worried about the liberties they have lost. You are sheep, you eat what you are told, go where you are told, and die when you are told. Perhaps sheep do not see the fences around them either.
To those of you who feel that this information is too extensive for the government to datamine, you are fools. The personal computer you use today has the ability to keep track of billions of pieces of information, if you so desired. Do you think that the government does not have the ability to track trillions of pieces of information? They have programs which allow them to track voice conversations and pick out keywords in language, “tagging” the conversation for human review. They use it to track calls in foreign countries now, who knows where else they use it?
To those of you that agree, I ask you “What have you done to change our government? How have you made a difference?”
Posting in a blog will not change anything. Railing against the tyrannical will not stop them, they cannot hear you in their lofty towers.
Something more is needed…
Posted by: Regnat Poplulus | May 16, 2006, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
OK. For you “Good, Glad They Caught You Reporters” bubble brains, wasn’t it good ol’ president Bush who ordered the leaking of classified intelligence? In fact, that was the White House defense of the leaks – once it’s leaked by the Prez, it’s legal.
When a President shuts off access to information on what’s happening within the Government in what was a free society; When a President seals all presidential records “forever” so our Government for the people by the people is no longer transparent or accessible; When one party (The Repulicrats – don’t delude yourself into thinking there are really two parties in this country) controls everything, and then shuts down all access to information in an attempt to carry out policies secretly which in no way can be for the “best interest” of the people (Enron anyone? Many from there have already testified that they screwed California out of billions, and the only way they could do it was with the illegal collaboration with other energy companies which ARE NOT being so much as investigated); Once profit drives secrecy in the name of National Security, the security of this nation is compromised, and it is the DUTY of government personnel to blow the whistle.
You right wing conservatives spew the height of hypocrisy. You call for small government, but you support the largest spending, the most powerful, intrusive, unaccountable and untouchable government this nation has ever known. You call for leakers to be prosecuted – unless the leak damages ‘the other side’ of America. You are at war against your own country. A country divided cannot stand, and if we as a nation let Bush and the other Neocons build a impenetrable barrier between the government and it’s people, we will surely fall. And all those who profit from this new “anti” United States, like GW Bush and that fat pig from Exxon Mobil who walked away with a half billion dollar retirement package, are simply going to move away when we collapse into a garbage dump and leave all you Neocons to heat your houses with your single minded dogma and feed your families with your political loyalty.
Oh yah, and don’t give me that “we have the power to vote” crap. If you see a name on a ballot, it (*almost* always) was vetted the the Republicrat power brokers to insure their dominance. If you don’t believe that, then you are truly a fool’s fool.
Posted by: Person | May 16, 2006, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Those of you asking for a government policed only by itself deserve exactly what you are asking for. I pray fervently that you get to someday live under such an arrangement. Perhaps it will make genuine patriots out of you.
Posted by: J. Q. Hammons | May 16, 2006, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Journalists should use a temporary, tossable phone number to protect them and their sources. Practically untracable! Tossable Digits offers it for cheap, only $4.99/month
http://tossabledigits.com/?affid=abc-news-fed
Posted by: ooglek | May 16, 2006, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Geeze people, how can you be so credulous? All those pro gov’t comments at the top were posted by the same person. All seconds apart. What are the odds there would be seven anti free press comments in a row when the entire remaining thread is the exact opposite? Haven’t you picked up by now that the entire conservative/republican M.O. is deciet and dishonesty? Lies and deception? This was just another minor example.
The current admin are not Republicans. They are not conservatives. Heck, they aren’t even Americans. They are just criminals whose only goal is to divert as much of the pubic purse into the pockets of their croney’s as is possible. No matter what the cost to our military, our society, our freedoms. But I certainly agree with the poster who said the the media shouldn’t come crying now. If they had done their job when we needed them, we wouldn’t be at this point.
Posted by: Thomas | May 16, 2006, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
“…has anyone seen Osama?”
Oddly enough, the U.S. was planning to snatch or eliminate Osama several years ago until Sen. Orin Hatch, Republican from Utah, told American journos that we were tracking him on his sat phone. Of course, the American press reported the story and Osama and his sat phone parted ways.
Our government is full of bumbling fools like Hatch.
Posted by: Eddie | May 16, 2006, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
To all of you self-proclaimed conservatives lemmings who flocked here to post your negative opinions and voice your support for the president’s policies. I have a few words for you, not that I expect you to understand them fully.
While you may assert that there is in fact no such thing as a journalist-source privilege under current federal law, your collective shortsightedness and lack of ethics prevents you realizing that these wiretaps are nothing but a witchhunt to find and punish those whistleblowers for exposing illegal or potentially illegal actions taken by our administration.
Posted by: Anonymous moderate | May 16, 2006, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
I am appalled by the comments of a few of the posters, that they could believe and defend this administration who has lied, who has the most corrupt members in our history, And now want to stifle our press what is left of them, most are so afraid of the administration thats it’s appalling. We are certainly doomed with these people in charge.
Posted by: DYLittell | May 16, 2006, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
I find many of the comments here disturbing to say the least. This country was founded upon certain freedoms and rights. Each of them support the others to guard against tyranny. For one to suggest that it is ok to relinquish some of them in order to obtain some degree of imaginary security is crazy.
We have whistle blower protection laws to protect those who come forward with cases of gevernment misconduct. To punish the messenger who brings a valid case is counter productive to a democratic state. If however, a person comes forward with an unfounded claim, they should be punished for such. It has to work both ways. Every case brought forward by a whistle blower should be thoroughly investigated, and if justified the perpetrators punished. If it is not a valid case the whistle blower then loses his protection under the law and is therefore open to prosecution.
This is how the system is set up to protect us all. To suggest that all whistle blowers should be tried for treason is not even an option under the law.
We have these laws to protect us from a government run amok and they are needed not more than any time in the past 30 years.
Richard Nixon was impeached for far less than George Bush has accomplished, where is the outcry for our country?
Posted by: TEP | May 16, 2006, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
With the Psyops program in full force, maybe the supportive comments here should be viewed in an entirely different light.
Posted by: KB | May 16, 2006, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
It seems people miss the point. If the government destroys confidentiality agreements between sources and media, the media is, in effect, hog-tied.
The media is not here to cheerlead government efforts under some vague guise such as national security.
If some Americans don’t wake up soon, they will find that they live in a dictatorship where national security and terrorism are nothing more than buzzwords used to keep the populus in line.
Suggested Reading: 1984 by George Orwell.
Suggested Viewing: Brazil, a Terry Gilliam film
Posted by: Dr. gonzo | May 16, 2006, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Sooooooooooooooooooooo, are you going to take and have them put your personal info chip in your hand or in your head? Or are you going to believe in Jesus as your Savior? Just a thought and a dang serious one too!!
Posted by: Whipsnard Q Bimblemann, III | May 16, 2006, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
God Bless America ! and our Valiant Leader … President George W BUSH !!!
Posted by: smokin joe | May 16, 2006, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Sun Tsu writes:
So what would you do if monitoring the communications of suspected terrorists is inappropriate?
Um, you take your case to a judge and get a warrant. The only reason for not doing so is if you think the judge will say “no” to the surveillance. If a judge is likely to say no, doesn’t that tell you something about the legality of the surveillance? Did none of you even take high school civics?
Posted by: Mike Norris | May 17, 2006, 12:04 am 12:04 am
Keeping it simple and Plain. If what the government is doing is Illegal. Prosecute, Convict and Sentence ANYONE who took part in this so called “Data Mining” AKA: SPYING.
If you are trying to tell me that the government feels it’s neccessary to spy on EVERYONE in America for the sake of National Security…You’re wrong.
If this is the only solution the Bush administration has to offer. I say gather them ALL up and Give them ALL the Pink Slip.
Lets think about this. The administration Lied and got caught. The Administration torchered prisoners and got caught. The administration is playing a game that obviously is OUT OF THEIR LEAGUE.
So get these wanna be Historic Legacy clowns out of office and elect someone who has both the Knowlege and INTEGRITY to address and resolve these “National Security” issues.
This administration is using the Fear Factor. They tried it on the rest of the world and failed. So it seems that they will use it on American Citizens. What a shame it is to be a leader who cannot LEAD. In my opinion the best way to insure “National Security” Is for the current Administration to resign. Collin Powell knew that he was amongst a bunch of TRUE Idiots and he did the right thing. He got out. Furthermore, we have a problem with Illegal Immigration. Bush’s solution: Hire 6000 more people to police the borders and have the national Guard assist but not enforce. My solution: If you get caught trying to sneak into the USA. You go to jail and the illegal immigrants country will get the bill for his incarceration. I read a story not too long ago about how the NYPD hired an illegal as a Police Officer. Lets stop this madness and send a STRONG message to the Politicians That we will Prosecute, Convict and Sentence any Elected Official who abuses the PRIVALEGE to represent the People Of The United States Of America.
Posted by: Brooklyn | May 17, 2006, 12:29 am 12:29 am
I can understand people cheering for the media to be monitored. However, I feel if Big Brother can look into their private info, then Big Brother is looking over our shoulders too much & has been for too long. YOUR & MY privacy is at stake. How much freedom are you willing to give up? Not me.
Posted by: JS | May 17, 2006, 12:31 am 12:31 am
All you people who want journalists to be prosecuted and sent to prison for releasing classified information…it’s not going to happen. Unless the information released puts our nation in “clear and present danger” a journalist, nor his or her source, can be prosecuted for releasing such information.
The media does not always do a good job of reporting acurate news, i.e. FOX News, but there are still thousands of journalists out there who are just trying to give information to the public that the government itself is denying us. We have a right to know what the gov’t is doing and what they intend to do. We also deserve to know what is truth or lies.
These journalists are just doing their jobs…and might I say…doing it well.
Kudos to all you journalists out there!
Posted by: Katie Carter | May 17, 2006, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Hey! The U.S. Government has become the same as the USSR government i was tought to fear as a kid!! YEA!!!
Posted by: Big Brother | May 17, 2006, 1:35 am 1:35 am
I’m not sure which disturbs me more… that the Bush “We are a nation of laws” Administration has turned this country into the very thing that the founding fathers saw fit to succeed from England over, or the fact that the media has been entirely complicit in allowing it to happen by not allowing for any public debate over the matter. The ironic thing is that it is the same said media that is amongst the first to get bit in the rear-end by their lack of action. As a few other comments suggested, maybe this will finally serve to be a wake-up call.
Posted by: DAR | May 17, 2006, 2:19 am 2:19 am
please everyone, please realize that NEOCON ideology is very influential in the current Administration, and to look the other way as they warp the system is irresponsible, and idiodic. Face it, accept it, and we can change it! There is no Super Network of Terrorists, no more than there are Superfriends living in a Justice League. We should demand answers to the 9/11 discrepancies…the same people Rumsfeld/Wolfowitz/Cheney were in power in the 1970′s…when they taught us to fear another evil…USSR…in the same exact way
Posted by: uncle saul | May 17, 2006, 2:33 am 2:33 am
You have to be ready to die for freedom or you will lose it.
You have a free will. You can do what you want. Ask youre soul and you will get ansers from god.
Posted by: Henrik Rydberg | May 17, 2006, 5:59 am 5:59 am
One of the funny thing is how everyone is coming with this “Soviet Union” talk, when the US did almost exactly the same in the era – blacklist, McCarthy, does it ring a bell?
I think it is just natural, that finding a Great Enemy again, that threatens the US the whole thing is going back to Cold War.
But it is sad, and a bit frightening.
One good thing is, that this kind of thing was stopped in the past.
So there is hope.
Posted by: despil | May 17, 2006, 8:52 am 8:52 am
I wonder which Republican party interns are recruited to type this stuff, and do their fingers get tired?
Posted by: DR | May 17, 2006, 9:57 am 9:57 am
By the time I hit “seditionist creeps”, all the snarky comments had left me. All I can to say to those who defend such spying:
“You’ve done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?”
Posted by: Jay | May 17, 2006, 10:06 am 10:06 am
I cannot believe the amount of people who agree with what the government is doing. To say they are doing this for our own good is ridiculous. And these zealots who think that sacrificing our freedom and liberty for security are sadly mislead. The government isn’t doing this for freedom. They’re doing it to reign us ALL in…not just the press. Left to thier devices it’s only a matter of time before free speech zones and internment camps for dissenters are the norm….YIKES! Be vigilant fellow Americans. Big Brother is watching and LISTENING to you.
Posted by: Mark | May 17, 2006, 10:22 am 10:22 am
This is very frightening. Freedom must be preserved. The people must be made aware of what their government is doing in their name. This is OUR country. OUR Government. They are suppose to be working for US! The press is the ONLY way we can find out the truth. The government isn’t going to tell us. How many lines do we cross before we have gone too far? How much freedom can be lost before we have none at all?
Posted by: matt | May 17, 2006, 10:42 am 10:42 am
“Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
quote by Ben Franklin
Posted by: Michael Rice | May 17, 2006, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Yet another leak to the media from a nameless “senior federal law enforcement official”.
This is cute: “Under Bush Administration guidelines, it is not considered illegal for the government to keep track of numbers dialed by phone customers.”
Uh, no — under Supreme Court ‘guidelines’ dating from 1979. And under Bill Clinton’s ‘guidelines’ from the 1990s. You could look it up and spare us some bias.
IF you’re being investigated, it’s because IT IS A CRIME to reveal classified information. And it’s a crime because you HELP OUR ENEMIES by betraying this information to them.
How about if you media types stop, you know, publishing classified information? It’s like you WANT us to lose.
Posted by: Paul in NJ | May 17, 2006, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Yet another leak to the media from a nameless “senior federal law enforcement official”.
This is cute: “Under Bush Administration guidelines, it is not considered illegal for the government to keep track of numbers dialed by phone customers.”
Uh, no — under Supreme Court ‘guidelines’ dating from 1979. And under Bill Clinton’s ‘guidelines’ from the 1990s. You could look it up and spare us some bias.
IF you’re being investigated, it’s because IT IS A CRIME to reveal classified information. And it’s a crime because you HELP OUR ENEMIES by betraying this information to them.
How about if you media types stop, you know, publishing classified information? It’s like you WANT us to lose.
Posted by: Paul in NJ | May 17, 2006, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Perhaps those who think that its acceptable for the organs of the State to spy upon its citizens and the press ought to consider moving to say China, Iran, or North Korea where the government makes sure that people.
Posted by: Gene | May 17, 2006, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
anyone who thinks that this is fair should be prepared to post their personal information for all of us to see so that we can in exchange help out our beleagured intelleigence officials by surveilling them
Posted by: Sashja | May 17, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Facts.
What are the known facts?
Posted by: ABC's Censorship | May 17, 2006, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Big brother will keep listen to unprotected cellular communications for many years to come regardless of all the public attention. If you want to protect your information you can use powerful new technolgies that can prevent eavesdropping on cell phones. You can visit http://www.snapdefense.com and check out solutions that are in-use today by military and private organizations who want to keep their communications secure and private.
Posted by: Advisor | May 17, 2006, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
The ones leaking information are from the White House. Libby and Rove are under a serious investigation about revealing the identity of an operative. Plain and simple this is treason, especially in a time where we need good foreign information. As far as claims that those people had leaked classified info – they merely pointed out information that was known in foreign press that the whole basis of Nigerian yellow cake was trumped up and the documents obvious forgeries. Sometimes Al Jazeera is closer to the truth than American media as it was in this case. This misuse of homeland intelligence is politically motivated and sheer intimidation to squelch dissent. They have to resort to this because they can’t win on the merits of their arguments.
Posted by: CTO | May 17, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Yet another leak to the media from a nameless “senior federal law enforcement official”.
This is cute: “Under Bush Administration guidelines, it is not considered illegal for the government to keep track of numbers dialed by phone customers.”
Uh, no — under Supreme Court ‘guidelines’ dating from 1979. And under Bill Clinton’s ‘guidelines’ from the 1990s. You could look it up and spare us some bias.
IF you’re being investigated, it’s because IT IS A CRIME to reveal classified information. And it’s a crime because you HELP OUR ENEMIES by betraying this information to them.
How about if you media types stop, you know, publishing classified information? It’s like you WANT us to lose.
Posted by: Paul in NJ | May 17, 2006, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Boy, some of you people are falling right into the trap of this fear-mongoring administration! It is not right for the government to collect information such as phone calls you are making, health information, etc. As for the media, they are not releasing any information that would hurt this country anymore than this administration already has! Enough is enough! I am 50 years old and have never seen an admnistration as hypocritical, dishonest, and carrupt as this one. I am litterally in tears over all of this! When is it going to stop?
Posted by: Sad in WA | May 17, 2006, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
What everyone who thinks this is a good thing fails to mention is what is being leaked. What is being leaked is other crimes: Torture, outing CIA operatives, warrantless wiretapping and phone record collecting, violations of the first amendment.
Yes, leaking classified information is a crime, but when the classified information itself constitutes a crime, a leak is thereby justified.
Have you people no conscience? No morals? You must weigh which crime is worse, leaking information, which in this case, gives absolutely no aid to our enemies, or allowing some of the most sacred precepts of our country. Which is less patriotic? Betraying a commander in the wrong, or allowing such crimes to continue?
The thought that we should obey leaders regardless of whether or not they are right or wrong is very ignorant.
Posted by: Brett | May 17, 2006, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Did you notice the large volume of support for the government that followed the first people who disagreed with the spying? If you’ve ever read ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses’ from the PNAC, or been keeping up with news about spying for national security, you’ll find that the government considers the internet to be a weapon that needs to be controlled. Brian hit it right on the mark when he called these guys government paid writers. In a few exercises if I remember correctly, these same people led a fake assault against high traffic blogs in order to control information and influence opinion. Is every person who agrees with spying an agent? Certainly not, but it helps to be aware that major blogs ARE being targeted and infiltrated.
Posted by: matt | May 17, 2006, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Did you notice the large volume of support for the government that followed the first people who disagreed with the spying? If you’ve ever read ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses’ from the PNAC, or been keeping up with news about spying for national security, you’ll find that the government considers the internet to be a weapon that needs to be controlled. Brian hit it right on the mark when he called these guys government paid writers. In a few exercises if I remember correctly, these same people led a fake assault against high traffic blogs in order to control information and influence opinion. Is every person who agrees with spying an agent? Certainly not, but it helps to be aware that major blogs ARE being targeted and infiltrated.
Posted by: matt | May 17, 2006, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Um, who is planting the comments above?
Posted by: Me | May 17, 2006, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Does anyone know how many cellphone calls are made in one 24 hour period in the mainland US? What about emails, faxes, land-line calls? Heck, parents can’t even keep up with their kids calls. Maybe this could solve our unemployment problems. We would have to hire a crapload of people to keep up with all this data!!! JMHO
Posted by: Whipsnard Q Bimblemann, III | May 17, 2006, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Well then, when a “known” Terrorist is planning bombings & MURDER around the world (if by phone) he should target the U.S. because we can’t LISTEN or attempt to TRACK him.
AND if-and-when something DOES happen. What are people going to be SCREAMING? “HOW could our Government let this happen? They should have been keeping up with these Terrorits!” Oh Brother…….
Posted by: moss | May 17, 2006, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
I want to thank abc news for this forum, it has been a very insightful read…….
Posted by: Boy Howdy | May 18, 2006, 12:08 am 12:08 am
Bad procedures happen too often as it is without G.W. Bush making holes for it to come pouring through. With lowered controls on them the NSA and others we will be open to private little investigations formed around likes instead of laws. I don’t want to be investigated for walking out of a bar with some agent’s girl or something. Taking to a hobby like Role Playing Games isn’t grounds for a background check. Would blogging be grounds for phone tracking? Don’t they get enough dead ends without making a new list?
The problem I see in unwarranted wiretapping and phone tracking is that this is an opening for a single agent or small group to act without supervision. This is what the laws and amendments are constructed to stand up for, our right for fair process on suspicions. If I were a reporter I’d rather have the NSA keep a record of what all their agents have been looking into, even slightly. That way nobody there would feel free to tell me to stop investigating or reporting on something because of what they like. If a government employee got a complaint that person’s boss should be able to track every action and page read that has anything to do with you. Then he can correct the agent’s action. I’d also not like to be under investigation just for being a reporter.
The change here is like going from letting cops see you come and go to letting cops follow you all day because you crossed their path. No other suspicion for looking into your life than you being seen in passing by an agent. Take me. In a regular day I sometimes go from a bar to the houses of two friends and wear a backpack most of the time. I know a major (legal) gun owner, a chemist, some liberal arts students and several engineers. I’m also black and bearded. If some junior profiler shadowed me for a day or two (without looking for more info, like my open internet postings) they’d try to label me as a drug pony. They’d waste their time and our tax money trying to make me out as a criminal. Then they’d see the opposite.
… That is if nobody with an agenda and no overseer poked their nose in the file. And no matter how much a person like that does NOT get away with, there is still the problem of disrupting somebody’s daily life. That’s something that our constitution was made to prevent. At best in that disruption a citizen gets questioned by a creepy agent. (Anyone asking you questions as if you HAVE to answer is creepy.) Trust me, if you found out that “der kommisar” was looking at you hard enough to bother talking to you or your friends your day would be a bit off. At its worst, any agency needlessly policing into the affairs of a private life causes a mistaken shooting. All it takes is one moment of stupid on either side of the conversation. (Let’s just say Ruby Ridge and Wako were done badly.) And before you say, “That wouldn’t happen if you’re not up to something.” I’ll remind you that you’re thinking about thinking, not reacting. Some people train to react in a set way, like at a gun range or dojo, and then one day they think they see a weapon come their way. They react. And if the interaction didn’t need to happen, but bad procedure caused it to, you still have the same incident. Remember, policemen shot an innocent man for reaching to get his wallet. They were mistaken to even talk to him but they jumped up and treated him like a criminal. Bad procedure caused his death. (Bad procedure being either the lapse of proper planning, a lack of planning or both.)
No, I’d rather not give anyone that didn’t like somebody –for whatever reason- the freedom to do any snooping beyond what’s right in their face without anybody having a record of THAT person’s snoop. This keeps somebody in position to tell them when they’re loosing sight of enforcing the law. A work record like that would reveal their effectiveness anyway.
Posted by: The Riftalope | May 18, 2006, 1:55 am 1:55 am
“Um, who is planting the comments above?”
Like I said, people paid by the government to attacks widely read blogs. They’ve done exercises with this before, and seem to be doing it now.
Posted by: matt | May 18, 2006, 3:10 am 3:10 am
“It’s a felony. The leakers should go to jail.”
So many people with no understanding of law are here. Leakers are specifically PROTECTED from prosecution under U.S. law because they were leaking that the government was breaking the law.
It’s called whistleblowers laws, you need to do some legal research.
Posted by: Saint Jerome | May 18, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
I can’t believe every single American reading this report isn’t scared by it.
Posted by: Bridget | May 18, 2006, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
“You guys in the press have been sucking up to this president from the very beginning. You reported his lies, you bought the B.S., and you did it all for access and so you could get invited to the right parties, and so he could towel-snap you and give you stupid nicknames.
And where did it get you?
Monitored by the NSA.
Maybe if you’d done your job from the beginning, we wouldn’t be living in a fascist state run by a madman right now. But no….it was more important that Al Gore was stiff and John Kerry had no charisma. You wanted to drink beer with this guy? Fine. Drink your beer with him. But don’t start crying now about your rights being violated.”
I am appalled at this administration on more levels than I have time to type. I am even more appalled at the press and it’s fawning over this administration until the truth was so obvious it hit you in the face.
Many of us had the foresight in 2002 to know that invading Iraq was based on lies and a bad idea, that Bush was incompetent, and that the media had screwed Gore out of the election with their hysterical “I invented the Internet” lie among other false reporting, not to mention claiming Kerry had no ideas. You replaced journalism with the repetition of right wing talking points. Now you are finally starting to get it, after the jerk has been reelected and the power has been made perpetual. You should be ashamed of yourselves. You are all totally incompetent.
As for those here posting that the traitors deserve to be punished, just remember that once all dissent has been quashed, there will be no one left to speak out for you should you need it. Our Founding Fathers were smarter than you, and wrote the Bill of Rights to protect you, even those of you who don’t deserve it.
Posted by: Brian | May 18, 2006, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Meanwhile, General Hayden is taking the stand and claiming that the NSA’s warrantless recording of phone calls is strictly to target terrorists and Al Quaeda. Same thing that our President claimed. Obviously, they are both compulsive liars; the information is being used to maintain secrecy, and target those who reveal inconvenient truths about this administration.
It is all a page from the playbook of Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda, who said
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Cheers to you, ABC, if Bush & co consider you to be enemies of the state, you must be doing something right.
Posted by: Lee | May 18, 2006, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
It is unsettling the large number of STUPID, ignorant Americans there are in this country who think spying on anyone and everyone in this country is an acceptable practice (by business or government).
AND THESE PEOPLE VOTE!
Whether or not a newspaper is a willing lapdog of the Bush Administration, to spy is to suppress necessary knowledge and the preservation of freedom.
It’d be difficult indeed to report the truth considering this administration deliberately and aggressively attacks its political opponents even demonizing them as “unAmerican” “terrorists”, which is an apt description of himself. If journalists were in constant fear of jail, “disappearing”, Halliburton Hotels, or GITMO torture, we could never expect to hear anything but what Bush WANTS U.S. to hear.
If not for the press, who admittedly have, at times, abused the “American people have a right to know” ideal, we’d be a nation of numb, mindless automatons.
Blame the mainstream media if you want, just remember that mom and pop PRO-democracy blogs like BUZZFLASH.COM (which unlike the mainstream media are free to say what they want because they DO NOT accept ANY advertising and are NOT owned by corporate America) are our ONLY hope for a free society (particularly in these shaky times) and are equally and MORE likely to be targeted than the lapdog press.
It’s unconscionable for journalists or the common citizenry to be in a constant state of fear by either Bush’s propaganda or his lapdogs.
Journalists “leak” crucial information for MY and YOUR benefit as FREE, informed Americans, while Bush leaks a CIA undercover agent’s identity for POLITICAL GAIN and RETALIATION, while knowingly putting her very life in danger. This is a TRUE leak and wholly INEXCUSABLE!!
When our government and president is engaged in wrongdoing it is critical that they be exposed.
Long live the long dead John Peter Zenger, hero of the free press and the 1st Amendment!
Posted by: Jay | May 18, 2006, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
I want to thank abc news for this forum, it has been a very insightful read……
Posted by: JJ | May 18, 2006, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
“I want to thank abc news for this forum, it has been a very insightful read…….”
Yes, me too, we think alike. This has been a profound experience. We think alike. This has been great.
Posted by: Henning | May 18, 2006, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
I’m shocked at the number of negative responses.
I have to say, the press has itself to blame. It let democracy slip away. It let all this happen.
Now, public sentiment has had seven years to degenerate into this – accusations of sedition against the press.
American journalists need the three networks and the White House Press Corps to be leaders. It is necessary to turn the tide, as otherwise any attempts would be crushed. We would be behind you, but instead, you have been staring at a cup of cold hemlock for six, seven years, too chicken to drink it.
Never in my life have I heard members of congress complain that the press is too passive. Is it unprecedented? Could be. It is truly pathetic, truly shameful. Careerists who rose on a feeder system of news outlets that are increasingly corporate and consolidated, that reward careerism and punish true community service, lead to this. Rosters at the biggest outlets full of cowards with no moral bearings, no ethics, no sense of duty. That’s what you get.
Brian, there you have it. You are screwed but fight the good fight and best of luck.
Going back to potted plants wouldn’t be a bad idea.
Posted by: anna | May 19, 2006, 10:34 am 10:34 am
In U.S. you are under a dictatorship, and you do not realize it yet.
Wake up guys !!!!!
From UK.
JB
Posted by: Joseph Benfeld | May 19, 2006, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
I am amazed at the people who believe the media are somehow playing into the hands of the enemy by doing their jobs. It is useless for us to combat an enemy who seeks to deny our liberty when we lose ourselves from the inside. When we shackle ourselves in the name of protecting our liberties, we have already lost. It’s then just a question of which power-monger gets to run the jail.
May the media, flawed as it is, continue to keep the spotlight of accountability on those who would claim the responsibility of government. As Mark Twain is reputed to have said, “Loyalty to the country always. Loyalty to the government when it deserves it.”
Posted by: DK | May 19, 2006, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Please can someone please check into reported 200+ armed incursions into the U.S. by mexican soldiers? Why are we not hearing about this in the main stream press?
Posted by: Ray Sandoval | May 19, 2006, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
There are many, many other ways other than bombing a federal building or crashing a plane somewhere to commit an act of terrorism.
Where nobody is watching. I won’t list all of the ways , because that could give potential terrorists ideas, but with enough creativity, they can attack anywhere. Surveylance won’t help there – unless it’s extreme sureylance, the kind that requires literally every person to be stopped and searched.
Posted by: Anastasia | May 19, 2006, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
It is possible that the media will ultimately be judged by history to be mistaken, but the media is only made up of humans, and Americans like ourselves. To those that criticize news reporters for uncovering government wrongdoing, when the press is destroyed, the ACLU gone, watchdog groups silenced, who will protect you when the government comes for you? You say that you are a patriot, with nothing to hide? Nothing to fear from our government? Don’t be so sure. After all, in Stalin’s Soviet Union, even ardent nationalists and patriots were killed or jailed. A secretive government is more an enemy of democracy than any terrorist can hope to be. So be careful about what you wish for when you want to silence the press.
Posted by: RCM | May 19, 2006, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
I believe when something is wrong it should be leaked. These organiztions have people with consciences and they should be rewarded for leaking info that is taking away our freedoms. The government is of, for and by the people. We didn’t vote to make Bush king or czar. I don’t want to wake up tommorow and find out we are under communism because we needed protection against the stupid terrorists. For heavens sake we haven’t been protected since 9-11 at our borders or our seaports. What is wrong with you guys????
Posted by: Sandra | May 19, 2006, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
I believe it is time for President Bush to set it straight to the public, what exactly his mandate on personal privacies are, and how far the government MUST go with measures to protect the people. If all of this privacy invasion is truly necessary, they need to explain EXACTLY why to gain public support.
Posted by: Kelowna Realtor | May 19, 2006, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
The real problem is that our enemies have a right to hate us/Israel. If there were public support for this war we wouldn’t be having this conversation.
Posted by: WT Sherman | May 20, 2006, 8:02 am 8:02 am
Impeach Bush now!
Posted by: Chris | May 20, 2006, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Garbage in Garbage out
It’s nice to know that the REAL bad guys just have to call wrong numbers every few calls to throw off the fed’s data and implicate innocent people. Have you ever gotten a wrong number or dead air call. Hope it ‘s an honest mistake and NOT a terrorist. As with all data collecting garbage in garbage out.
Posted by: Albert | May 20, 2006, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
YOU SHOULD ALL STOP WRITING HERE AND START WRITING CONGRESS.
DEMAND ACTION OR WE WILL ELECT SOMEONE WHO WILL!
Posted by: Chuck | May 20, 2006, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Either shut up and sit down or do something about it. Next time the opportunity arises to vote, do it. This country abdicated its right to free speech when most decided it was not worth the effort to vote. Make your voice heard any way you can.
Posted by: 2LucknF8 | May 21, 2006, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Why do reporters always think that they are above the law or that no matter how irresponsible they do their job, they can always fall back on the 1ST amendment.
When will reporters finally learn to be cognizant of national security?
Does the scoop at any cost always come first?
It’s a good thing that during WW2
reporters didn’t have the same freedoms they now demand or we would all be saluting a different flag.
Posted by: bob3160 | May 21, 2006, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Shouldn’t the they be looking for terrorists instead of reporters. I believe most of that would take field work which this countries security are not equipped to do. They either are not trained, dont speak the language, have no contacts or are have poor leadership. Lets look for the bad guys not at reporters.Some of that Pentagon money should be going to the CIA to better equip them to focus outward towards real threats.
Posted by: Frank | May 21, 2006, 11:02 am 11:02 am
I am shocked at some of these posters. Don’t they know this is the way a Dictator runs his country? Bush DID say it would be easier that way. Very, very scary !! It’s time the media reports what’s going on !!
Keep your sources protected , get this administration OUT before all our freedoms are taken away.
Posted by: AJ | May 21, 2006, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
As if this story isn’t chilling enough, what is even more frightening is the number of responders posted here who ‘kill the messenger’ and ignore the horrors, ramifications, and CRIMINAL behavior of this KGB method practiced against citizens, including the Fifth Estate. Note that very, very few among those who condemn ‘anonymous’ sources have the courage of conviction to post their full names, thereby remaining ‘anonymous’ critics. The Bush Administration has done everything within its power to relegate the Constitution to the function of toilet paper. Fundamentalist judges indeed! Contra-Constitutionalists is more apt. This administration is putrid with corruption, criminality, and fascist (YES! Look it up!) activity. And they call themselves people of Christ and true Americans!?! Generations will be necessary to toil tirelessly to repair the devastation wreaked against the United States of America by the coven of Bush / Cheney demons , if enough bones and sinews and soul remain to restore.
Posted by: Alvin Ross / Los Angeles | May 21, 2006, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
It’s nice to know that these calls with no one on it or asks for Shameal and says “E toll me ta cah ear” in that all too familiar dialect of English, means the terrorists are running a scam on me and our government’s spying machine. I have had it checked out and found that I had some of my calls tapped. It sounds like someone has picked up an extension in your house. Now I know why. I try not to talk about politics on the phone and I still have trouble. I live near the Canadian border and though I never do anything that is wrong I still am being spied on. I don’t think that is right. I don’t think it’s right to spy on the newspeople either. We need to know the full scope of this spying on Americans program. Is this a free country anymore? I also think we should write to our members in Congress and tell them that Gen Hayden is not the right person for the director of the CIA because it gives Bush the right to order him to do anything he wants with our security and the capability of suppressing our rights. What is your impression on this momination???
Posted by: Sandy | May 21, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
We the people…are to blame the facts have been there the whole time but We the people …were content to be spoonfed our info and fear and now We the people are left without the rights Americans before us died for and the whole point of America in general.
Posted by: Julius McKnuckles | May 21, 2006, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
What part of foreign surveillance targets do some people not understand? FISA targets must be agents of a foreign power, involved in international terrorism or knowingly helping someone who is an agent of a foreign power or terrorist.
WWII propaganda by the OWI had nothing to do with domestic spying, it was about (censored) images sent home from the fronts.
Posted by: Tim Z | May 21, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Poster chartsand said:
“I see no need to worry, as a private citizen, because I know I have done nothing wrong – have you?”
Chartsand, how can you be so naive?
“Wrong” is a very subjective concept and is totally dependent on who’s deciding what “wrong” is.
Additionally, everyone, EVERYONE, has done something they’d rather no one know about. Recreational drug use or drinking, nasty personal habits, marital infidelity, dishonesty, unusual sexual practices,seeking information about obtaining an abortion, making dishonest excuses to a creditor(lying to avoid bankruptcy), etc, etc. I wonder how many of the extremely small range of examples i’ve given might be prosecuted if “accidentally” captured by the NSA and “shared” with other law enforcement agencies under our govenments new and novel constitutional interpretations?. I don’t know and neither does chartsand or anyone else. Why? Because the Catch-22 is that we are not allowed to know anything being done in our name for national security reasons and therefore can’t protest what we don’t know.
When citizens must substitute speculation for knowledge of the domestic workings of their government, then something is undeniably wrong.
I agree that, by and large, the press are a bunch of elite, supercillious, overpaid, vain, selfish, and self centered idiots. I work in the television news business. But you can’t chuck one group to the dogs because it’s expedient without putting everyone else at risk. If it’s ok to punish this press because you don’t like how they act then you open the door to future press purges based on entirely different metrics as to what constitutes a “good” press. We have to live with the Rushes and O’Reillys as well as the …. well, sorry can’t really think of a rabidly left wing news personality currently on the scene, but if there were one, then he or she.
Posted by: Callisto | May 21, 2006, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Please, please DO NOT COWER FROM THESE FASCISTS!!!. We have had to sit on our hands for over 5 years while the 2000 election was stolen…which began this living nightmare, and you, along with the entire MSM, are partially to blame. No one in the news force wanted to tell the truth, but it was all over the Internet. Read more blogs like Huffington Post, Firedoglake, or Talking Points Memo.
Posted by: H. Stevens | May 21, 2006, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Just to clarify. A leaker is someone who says something that actually harms us. A whistle-blower is some one who reports an injustice or abuse of power. Dick Cheney/Scotter Libby/Carl Rove are a leakers. The person/s who told us about the ilegal phone and data monitoring/illegal prisons in foreign conutries/etc. is a whistle-blower. If it weren’t for whistle-blowers we wouldn’t know about things like Big Tabacco’s cover up of the addictive properties of nicotine, Richard Nixon’s corruption, or corruption of any kind anywhere.
The truely sad angle of this story is that the Media does a very poor job of investigating or doing any sort of repsectible job covering any story. They fail to ask the important questions of the current administration. Were are the journalistic heroes like Edward R Murrow?
Posted by: Gary | May 21, 2006, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
i hope you guys start realising how low your goverment has become ,you should have done more in stopping the war in iraq since you didnt the war crimnals think they can get away with everything were are the chemical weapons all lies lets hope you jounalist become better at storys now your ass’s are on the line be like colbert
Posted by: al | May 21, 2006, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Anyone who believes that the government will use the tracking of reporters’ phone calls only benevolently, to “protect us from terrorists”, has the critical faculties of a child.
Nixon alone proved that those in power can, and will, act out of self-interest, breaking the law and setting themselves above it in the process.
Far beyond any real actions that might be taken, the chilling effect this will have on both sources and reporters is mind-numbing.
For all the scorn people have for “the media”, without them, what way do we have to know what’s really going on? When there is spiritual wickedness in high places, it must be seen, or else it cannot be combatted.
Lincoln said that the dead of Gettysburg “gave the last full measure of devotion” “that government of the people by the people for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” The same is true for our dead in Iraq and Afghanistan–and all our wars and conflicts. Without an effective, independent media, “government of the people by the people for the people” is an impossible joke. A crippled media is one more step in the direction of all those lives being lost in vain. Is that really the America we want?
Posted by: MarkusB | May 21, 2006, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
I’m not sure what’s more frightening- this story or those commenters eager to toss the free press into the gulag as well.
So let me get this absolutely clear- people are willing to chuck away our freedom and national values to defeat those who wish to take away our freedoms and sully our national values.
I would have to think Osama’s laughing himself sick. He doesn’t need to launch any more attacks on the US- Bush et al are doing his dirty work for him.
Now excuse me, I think I hear jackboots kicking my door down.
Posted by: Steve_Z | May 22, 2006, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
our government(ha ha) if they can spy on the people why cant we spy on them??? like you said if you have nothing to hide what the big deal.
Posted by: jr | May 22, 2006, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
I wonder how many of these posters who are outraged by the “domestic spying” were up in arms during the Clinton years when FBI files of his political enemies mysteriously showed up in the White HOuse? Were these posters outraged by the Echelon spy program that was in place during the Clinton years? Could the outrage about spying during a time of war versus spying during a time of peace (the 1990s) be because it was a Democrat doing the spying in the 1990s (and we all know that Democrats can do no wrong in some people’s eyes).
Posted by: savvyj | May 22, 2006, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Get angry.
Who is Congress listening to? It is time to make certain Congress listens to you
power of the press
Posted by: jr | May 22, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
The Bush Administration let 9-11 happen to give them the perfect opportunity to justify things they wanted to do all along:
1. Destroy Saddam as payback for “Daddy” Bush.
2. Enrich their military-industrialist cabal headed up by Halliburton
3. Create an excuse to create billions of dollars in profit for their oil and gas industry buddies by constructing an apparent “shortage” of Middle East oil supplies.
4. Inspire mindless, unquestioning, fanatic patriotism that would make the majority of people eager to give away our Constitutional liberties as demonstrations of nationalist pride and “supporting our troops”.
Please note that the sudden “crisis” of immigration that is being manufactured and brazened via the news media is making building a wall along our southern border sound like a great idea to all kinds of citizens who may one day find to the regret that a wall not only keeps outsiders out, but can trap insiders IN.
See you later, in the Gulags, suckers.
Posted by: Laura M D | May 22, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
In Soviet America you don’t play the game, the game plays you.
Posted by: Comrade | May 22, 2006, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Under current guidelines George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin and most of the other founding fathers would be considered seditious and would have their phones tapped. Of course only a true idiot would talk about anything illegal on the phone. Bin Laden and his bunch aren’t stupid. They know the phones are monitored. Hell lots of people eavesdrop on phone calls besides uncle sammy. Every cell conversation is subect to being picked up by cheap scanners…it’s a hobby for bored perverts anyway. I guess that’d include the CIA/NSA too. :)
Posted by: void | May 22, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Thank you for your reporting.
Like yourself, my daughter works as a reporter. Free to write the truth because of the lst amendment.
I believe it’s shameful and disturbing that there are fellow citizens who find this spying acceptable. Possibly when we go into marshall law will they get it. How many of our freedoms need to be incremently taken away?
Please continue to bring us this news on our “national security”.
Posted by: Sharon R | May 22, 2006, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
I am not shocked or appauled by those who would give up their freedoms and liberties.
Just as long as it’s their own they give up. Let me choose whether to give up my freedoms and liberties. You have rights only to your own.
Posted by: Tongo | May 22, 2006, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
It might be of some interest for you that the European Union (precisely and ironically, the Committee of the European Parlaiment for Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs) recently has set a directive enforcing the EU national gvts. to collect and retain *every* contact information (mail, phone, internet traffic) during one year (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Telecommunications_data_retention).
Posted by: jack | May 22, 2006, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Only in America ™.
All this talk about being Anti-American makes me sick, come on people snap out of it1 Are you all still living in the McCarthy era?
Posted by: Kim | May 23, 2006, 1:55 am 1:55 am
Politicians cannot hide their criminal behavior under the veil of “national secrecy”. If a government employee is asked to break the law by a politician, it is their duty to disclose details to the public and law enforcement.
The discussion shouldn’t be about how the story broke… the discussion should be about what laws were broken, what damage was done, how the politicians will be brought to justice and what can be done to prevent illegal behavior by politicians in the future.
Posted by: Michael | May 23, 2006, 4:31 am 4:31 am
About all these people saying “GOOD! SERVES YOU RIGHT!”
Don’t worry too much about them. It’s one guy, or a small group of people mass-comment spamming to fill the message board.
They are inconsequential to the truth.
Posted by: Anonymous Coward | May 23, 2006, 7:12 am 7:12 am
“WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH”
Get it and fight back. It’s time.
Posted by: Emmanuel Goldstein | May 23, 2006, 9:00 am 9:00 am
I want MY constitutional rights back.
AND I dont give a ratt’s tail about the media’s reports.
Posted by: Matt Martinez | May 23, 2006, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
this is how the game goes there are not enough spys as normal free loving people ,dont get scared,thats how big brother works all an illusion to scare us
Posted by: al | May 23, 2006, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
…look folks,this is a time of war and if you don’t get it yet,remember those towers that used to stand in n.y. city? you seen to want to blame geo. w. try clinton instead! and for the life of me….please read the constitution before you exclaim what you think is in it!
Posted by: ronn p. | May 23, 2006, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Bush is doing what is ness to protect us. The Dems and their mouth piece, the flamin’ media is all at fault. God Bless the U!S!A!
Posted by: R. R. Walt | May 24, 2006, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
After being a mouth piece for government insiders, Brian Ross is finally getting a taste of his own medicine! First his phones are tapped, now he is being fed disinformation by the same dogs he drinks with…..
Posted by: Jim | May 25, 2006, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Historicaly politicians lie. The government lies. The president lies.
Be true to yourself is an aspect for good self esteem. That means do not lie to your self. Beleive the politicians and your are now lying to yourself. Believe the lies and you are ignorant(a useful idiot) or knowingly mislead (a useful idiot).
Think, don’t believe anything you hear or think you see. Do not believe lies. Do not tell lies. Do not gossip. Do not believe superstitions. Because when you believe unquestioningly you lie to you. You are a piece of God. Do not lie to God.
Thank You, my brothers.
Alejandro Garcia
Posted by: Capslockf9 | May 25, 2006, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
whats the new motorola music phone called?
Steve
Posted by: Steve George | May 26, 2006, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
“Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
- Benjamin Franklin
Posted by: AhmNee | May 31, 2006, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
In the absence of leadership people are just not very courageous, and will sacrifice their essential liberties for (verbal) assurances of diminished risk. At the present time, the so-called right shows a touching faith in the wisdom of the federal authorities, and the so-called left a certain attachment to individual liberties, positions which to a degree could be diametrically reversed by a change of administration. Of course, the picture is not as simple as that, but in large measure that is where we stand at present.
Posted by: Fabian Delay | May 31, 2006, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
i dont like how the government spys and listens to our conversations and i dont think that he would like us listening in on his conversations. and i dont like how he spys with camera’s.
Posted by: ashley green | June 1, 2006, 10:58 am 10:58 am
i dont like the fact that the government is spying on us U.S. people……it seems like we dont have n/e thing private n/e more….that’s all i want to say!!!!
Posted by: JAZZ | June 1, 2006, 11:01 am 11:01 am
i dont like how the government spys on you all the tme and he can when ever he wants. and i dont think that he woudl appreshiate if we did that to him.
Posted by: erica schinejesed | June 1, 2006, 11:03 am 11:03 am
I can’t be bothered with anything these days, but such is life. I don’t care. So it goes. More or less nothing seems worth thinking about. I’ve just been hanging out waiting for something to happen, but that’s how it is.
Posted by: Kaka44931 | June 1, 2006, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
I am the government. I am the dictator of the United States of South America. I am The Man. I am darkness. I am the night. I. Am. BATMAN!!!
Posted by: Max Power | June 2, 2006, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
>> Do we actually need to wait until
>> it comes out that they are
>> monitoring all phone calls,
>> everywhere, all the time without
>> a warrant or oversight of any
>> sort? Can’t we just assume that
>> dot will follow all the rest?
Um, first of all, we don’t have the technology nor manpower to do this. Second of all, there IS OVERSIGHT OF THE NSA PROGRAM. Stop believing the lie that there is not.
Posted by: Paul | June 5, 2006, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
I can’t be bothered with anything these days, but such is life. I don’t care. So it goes. More or less nothing seems worth thinking about. I’ve just been hanging out waiting for something to happen, but that’s how it is.
Posted by: Kaka73125 | June 7, 2006, 8:32 am 8:32 am
I’m tired of hearing about terror.
Posted by: mary | June 8, 2006, 9:28 am 9:28 am
How many native-born American citizens have been arrested on American soil and held in solitary confinement with no access to counsel or family or any human contact FOR YEARS?
And how many people did this happen to under Clinton?
And to how many of us right here right now will it happen to in the future?
I never thought I’d live in a world where I seriously wondered about the answers to these questions….
Posted by: Uncle Pat | June 11, 2006, 6:37 am 6:37 am
Damn. i am gobsmacked by the comments on this blog. I come from a country where we have a free press and people believe in a free press. It’s a country where terrorism is as much a worry as it is in your country… but where also, unbelievably, we believe it is as important to keep the government in check. The media, you dumb folk out there, is the only way to do that. Oh, the country is Britain…. God help us if British folk start believing that the government here should ride roughshod over everything.
Posted by: tim | June 15, 2006, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Hi:
I have been reading most of the posts here.I’m not f