By Maddy Sauer

May 19, 2006 9:46am

No Trial, No Punishment for Accused Molester Says Vatican

A well-connected Vatican insider accused of molesting young priests in training will not face a trial or be severely punished, the Vatican said today. Instead, Father Marcial Maciel was asked to give up all of his public ministry appearances. A statement issued by the Vatican earlier today invited Father Maciel, who retired in 2005, "to lead a reserved life of prayer and penitence." There was no official finding of guilt. A number of former priests told Vatican investigators they were abused by Father Maciel, the founder of the Legion of Christ, a small but wealthy Catholic order that operates in the United States and 25 other countries. Many of Maciel’s accusers had waited for years for the Vatican’s decision. "It has to come, we are so many victims of this man," Juan Vaca, one of the accusers, told ABC News earlier this week. The accusations go back to the 1950s. The allegations were presented to Pope Benedict XVI in 1998 when he was a Cardinal. Some of the accusers said then-Cardinal Ratzinger attempted to cover up the case because of Maciel’s prominence and close relationship with Pope John Paul II. The then-Cardinal Ratzinger became visibly upset when asked about the Maciel case by ABC News’ Brian Ross in April 2002. "You do not ask such questions," he said and then slapped Ross’s hand. Any finding of guilt "would automatically become a stain on the legacy of Pope John Paul II, who was a huge supporter of Maciel," according to Jason Berry, author of "Vows of Silence," which deals with sex abuse cases in the Catholic Church. The Legion of Christ issued a statement on his behalf saying that despite the allegations against Father Maciel, "he declared his innocence and, following the example of Jesus Christ, decided not to defend himself in any way." Complete statement by the Legion of Christ follows: In reference to the news regarding the conclusion of the investigation of the accusations made against Fr. Marcial Maciel, our beloved father founder, the Congregation of the Legionaries of Christ offer the following statement: 1. Fr. Marcial Maciel has received during his life a great number of accusations. In the last few years, some of these were presented to the Holy See so that a canonical process would be opened. 2. Facing the accusations made against him, he declared his innocence and, following the example of Jesus Christ, decided not to defend himself in any way. 3. Considering his advanced age and his frail health, the Holy See has decided not to begin a canonical process but to "invite him to a reserved life of prayer and penance, renouncing to any public ministry." 4. Fr. Maciel, with the spirit of obedience to the Church that has always characterized him, he has accepted this communiqué with faith, complete serenity and tranquility of conscience, knowing that it is a new cross that God, the Father of Mercy, has allowed him to suffer and that will obtain many graces for the Legion of Christ and the Regnum Christi Movement. 5. The Legionaries of Christ and the members of the Regnum Christi, following the example of Fr. Maciel and united to him, accept and will accept always the directives of the Holy See with profound spirit of obedience and faith. We renew our commitment to work with great intensity to live our charism of charity and extend the Kingdom of Christ serving the Church. Click here to read the National Catholic Reporter’s article on Fr. Maciel.

User Comments

So much for our new Pope. This is a disgrace and this Maciel guy can do his penance and prayers in jail. He does not deserve to be called a Father. I do not understand why we are letting him off with all of the priest’s that has came forward.
I personally as a Catholic think Pope Benedict XVI does not deserve to be a Pope. I wonder what else we do not know?? Of course he does not even try to live a life like Jesus. I am speaking of his clothes, etc. Shame on him.

Posted by: Betty | May 19, 2006, 10:59 am 10:59 am

If he is guilty I apologize as a fellow Roman Catholic, and The Lord will take his vengance. I can only trust in the Lord and pray for the pain of those abused to be taken off them.
God Bless

Posted by: Arlene Beninato | May 19, 2006, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Why would the church honor Pope John Paul II by making him a saint? He protected child molesters & the current guy is no better. Obviously I’m not catholic. That bunch is the ultimate ol’ boys club. The abused children deserve justice but I’m not holding my breath. Can you imagine how they feel?

Posted by: Brenda | May 19, 2006, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Figures! Having gone through sexual abuse myself, it eats me alive to hear how many children or innocent people suffer the effects of these perverts!!!
Thank-you,
Trina

Posted by: Trina Hrdlicka | May 19, 2006, 11:44 am 11:44 am

The hypocrisy continues.

Posted by: Robert Tarzia | May 19, 2006, 11:47 am 11:47 am

seriously..what is wrong with the world? how could you be so close with God and then go and molest people who are trying to get closer to Him? Then they dont even get and penalties..and we wonder why catholic preists still are molesting Boys….i didnt know it was that hard to put a stop to this….

Posted by: Amy | May 19, 2006, 11:47 am 11:47 am

UNBELIVEABLE!! This man should be put in jail like the rest of the perverts! How can the Catholic Church look the other way. Are they not ashamed of themselves!!

Posted by: wanda | May 19, 2006, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Just goes to show that the Golden Rule is still in place. They who have the gold, make the rule. Nothing ever changes.

Posted by: Steve | May 19, 2006, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

so…what’s wrong with that?
let’s just wink and look the other way
but mine’s ok
MONEY!!!

Posted by: outsider | May 19, 2006, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

I am a non-practicing catholic. This is one of the examples why I left the catholic church so long ago. This is completely appalling and inexcusable. These priests should be severally punished, to the full extent of the law, just as non-secular individuals are. I am disgusted…

Posted by: Vivian Taylor | May 19, 2006, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

I don’t understand how the Church can say it’s a moral guide when it does things like this. It’s horrible. You can argue about the logic of arguments for any religion, but allowing sex abusers to go with no punishment? There’s nothing ethical about that.

Posted by: Rachel | May 19, 2006, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

I still haven’t been able to find out if these seminarians were young adults or children etc… If they were young men, then it’s a case of possible sexual harrassment, or just homosexual behavior, in that case I have no idea why secular America is up in arms about it. SInce when did they care so much about what homosexuals did beneath the sheets, Church members should be more outraged.
I know a man who was abused when he was 16 by a priest. 16? In my opinion at 16 you had gay sexual relations with a gay priest, you weren’t molested.

Posted by: Mike | May 19, 2006, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

In a time when the new pope has an opportunity to make great changes in the catholic church which are highly necessary and too long in coming, he has taken several giant steps backward in his leadership. How sad that politics take precedence over respect for the active priests in “his” care. My prayers are with those priests whose trust and faith in their “leader” has been so sadly missplaced.

Posted by: Joyce | May 19, 2006, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

I’m embarassed to say I’m Catholic these days.
I wonder when this mega dynasty is going to collapse. I wonder when the congregations will wise up and denounce this house of horrors. Time to stop adding to that collection plate.
This priest, is not going to heaven.

Posted by: Sandi | May 19, 2006, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Once again the church turns a blind eye and avoids what it needs to face up to. The priesthood is perceived as a haven for perverts and molesters. Let them marry and have decent people become priests. Who can we Catholics trust? Seriously? The Pope needs to go to confession and or step down for covering up this crime. Clean house now.

Posted by: Jeff Wadl | May 19, 2006, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

For the record, many of the accusers say they were in their young teens when molested by Father Maciel. They say he would “forgive their sins” because they were helping God’s work.

Posted by: Brian Ross | May 19, 2006, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

To Outsider:
You have to realize that these cases are from over 50 years ago, this didn’t happen last night. The statute of limitations is probably long sicne expired. There is no way to punish the priest to the fullest extent of the law. The process was whether or not to punish the priest internally. In this case the Vatican removed all public duties as a priest and told him to go live his life in prayer and penance. What should the Church have done burnt him at the stake? The Church can’t punish him anymore than derfocking him, nor can they stop secular authorities from making a case against the priest. If it was up to me I would make an example out of him, butthe Church is more forgiving I guess.
Most people here probably know about zilch as to the details of the case they are speaking about anyway.

Posted by: mike | May 19, 2006, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I have been a life long Catholic. Catholic schools all thru my educational experience. When I think of all the guilt the nuns and priests piled on us students then to find that the same standards don’t apply to them-I am disgusted!

Posted by: kathy | May 19, 2006, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Following the examples of Jesus Christ! What?! If Father Maciel was following Jesus Christ’s examples, he would be protecting God’s children, not harming, molesting and exploiting them. He should not be comparing himself to Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ is pure and good. Jesus Christ protected God’s children from harm whereas Father Maciel did not. Jesus Christ died and went to heaven, Father Maciel will not be.
The Catholic Church has lost all my trust in protecting God’s children. We are all God’s children. To those who harm, molest children and protect those that do, burn in Hell for all eternity. To those who stand with courage and compassion in their hearts to protect God’s children, thank you.

Posted by: Paula | May 19, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

OF COURSE, Mr expensive designer red Prada wearing Pope. He is more concered about image than reality. They are all in one it, it is a corrupt immoral dyanasty and a haven for child molesters, perfect cover!

Posted by: FURIOUS | May 19, 2006, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

The indoctrination process of the Catholic
Church is so effectual among the faithful, particularly as it pertains to questioning church authority, that the mass of catholics still remain relatively silent againt the issue of sexual abuse. Indeed, while some catholics may register their disgust at such matters, they nonetheless continue to support an overwhelmingly patriarchal, secretive and condescending Vatican.

Posted by: John Caney | May 19, 2006, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Fr. Maciel may actually be innocent of the alleged charges. Why do the prior posters assume that he is in fact guilty? As far as I know, the accuser(s) were not children at the time when the alleged acts may have occurred, and there is no aspect of abuse of children at issue here. The accusers appear to be individuals with a gripe against the Legion and Fr. Maciel. It is not unheard of for such people to lie.

Posted by: Veritas | May 19, 2006, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

It is sad to see the Catholic Church and 2 popes fail so badly. That the new pope took such speed to “saintify” the last pope denigrates all previous saints and questions their status. When the new pope was selected, the cardinals brought in 20 nuns to “cook” for them. You’ve come a long way baby…I am a lapsed catholic means the church passed me by long ago and I can’t catch up. The newly found Judas Gospel may mean that those like me actually gravitated toward Jesus and his teachings as the Vatican drifted the wrong way. Doubt me anybody?

Posted by: frodaddy | May 19, 2006, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

In reply to the last comment about Maciel’s innocence, the church would not have issued this punishment unless they had found some truth in the allegations. This is one of the most severe punishments a priest could face. The first reported case was in the 50′s, and the accusers were in fact teenagers. So this issue has been ignored for decades…this pope is not setting a good example for future generations of Catholics who are flocking in large numbers elsewhere in search of spirituality.

Posted by: Candelario Davila | May 19, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Was it gay sexual relations? (poster: Mike) If only talk and innuendo was involved I would call it harassment. If any physical contact was involved I would call it molestation. If any penetration was involved I would call it rape.
Unfortunately, there are incidents of this type in all religous venues. That’s why our faith and trust should be in God and not men. And by the way, no matter how ‘anointed” they tell you they are and they think they are, no matter how duped the “Legion of Lemmings” may be – they are just men. Men who can and will sin.

Posted by: Sad | May 19, 2006, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

I don’t think that this issue is one of facts. I think that the bottom line is that people are tired of these false priests getting preferential treatment. They are perverts any way you look at it. I agree that the church is more forgiving, but they should forgive before, after or during the proper PUNISHMENT. From an outsider looking in, it seems that the Catholic church is all about what “looks” holy instead of actually being holy in your heart. God judges the heart. With that in mind, it doesn’t matter how well you cover up perversity, it still stinks in God’s nostrils. If these priests were actually punished, then they would stop doing this mess. There are perverse people in every denomination. However we need to be careful not to send the message that the victims’ hurt, pain, and embarrassment is insignificant by letting nasty religious leaders get away with this evil. If it is a matter of homosexuality, then they either need to admit what they are and suffer the consequence of redicule from the Catholic church or get married and suffer the consequence of being demoted by the Catholic ordinances. If they don’t like the rules of the Catholic church, then they should get out of it! It is as simple as that.

Posted by: Tink' | May 19, 2006, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

People are talking about PUNISHMENT, but folks, these are crimes that Father Maciel commited 50 years ago, if the civil authorities can’t press charges, what should the Vatican do? They can’t burn people at the stake anymore. This Priest was the founder of the Legionaires for Christ, a very respected Order of Priests and laymen now in ruins, an order this young depends on the sanctity of its founder, which is now destroyed. This is a HUGE move for the Church. For him to be censured is an enormous punishment. The Vatican can’t do that much more to an old man, they can’t put him in jail. You are all rushing to judgment. You act like the Church has the power to lock this guy up and throw away the key, this isn’t 1487 folks. Despite what ABCNEWS has said in this little piece Cardinal Ratzinger STARTED the investigation into Father Maciel in 1998, AND approved the censure of Father Maciel. This is a big mvoe in the right direction. The Pope is sick of the “filth” in the Church, and while men will always sin, priests are not given the benefit of the doubt anymore. But again if a priest hears of another priests actions during the sacrament of confession, that can’t be broken.

Posted by: Mike | May 19, 2006, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

To Mike,
So a person who committed murder 50 years ago shouldn’t be prosecuted at all? I expect the church to do acknowledge what Maciel did and comfort those who got molested. I expect the church to strip Maciel of all honors he received to date. I expect the church to put more monitoring processes in place to prevent perverts from becoming priests. Yes, I expect the church to do a lot more than to ignore and forget. I expect the justice system to prosecute Maciel to the full extent of the law permits. He did after all commit a crime. It is too easy for Chritians to just go to confession then all is forgiven. I wonder how you’d feel if you are one of those priest who got molested?

Posted by: Bill | May 19, 2006, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

What punishment are you referring to? When you get right down to it, the statement from the Vatican says that all canonical process has been stopped, and that Fr. Maciel has been “invited” to withdraw from public life, which is what he has done anyways in light of his age and health. An “invitation” to keep the status quo is hardly an order or a censure. There is no finding whatsoever that Fr. Maciel did what he was accused of, and I doubt that it could have been proven or disproven in light of the passage of time. It appears to me that the media is putting a twist on this that is broader that the statement actually issued by the Vatican. Again, the Church and an individual, Fr. Maciel, is made to appear in a bad light, for obvious reasons. Certain people hate the truth ….

Posted by: Veritas | May 19, 2006, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Veritas,
When the Vatican approves an edict for Father Maciel to retire to a life of “prayer and penitence”, no doubt the findings of the investigation started by Cardinal Ratzinger were not good. That is a huge slap to a very influential man in the Church, and will more than likely be very destructive tot he order he founded the Legionares for Christ. That is a punishment, and about all the Church could really do to the guy at this point, with the crimes occuring so long ago.

Posted by: mike | May 19, 2006, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Bill,
What punishment would you like the Church to doll out? They already told him he can’t peform his duties as a preist and to live his life in penitence. The only reason I say it was 50 years ago is because the statute of limitations is gone for a civil prosecution. The Church can’t draw and quarter the priest, or burn him at the stake, what do you want them to do? They are not the civil authorities, they won’t jail him, they can’t. If you want him to be punished to the fullest extent of the law, then take it up with the civil authorities. The fact of the matter is this story trashes the new Pope when he is the one who STARTED the investigation into Father Maciel in 1998, and he approved the punishment. Father Maciel is like 80 something I think, the Church can’t jail him, they already pretty much removed all priestly duties from him, what can they do? So much vitriol and hatred in this thread towards an entire religion. Protestant ministers, Rabbi’s, school teachers, camp counselors, boy scouts, all have the same issues. It’s like wanting to become communist because of some corrupt politicians in Washington.

Posted by: mike | May 19, 2006, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

I do not understand how the catholic church and the pope can let this man go after he has molested so many young priests. How do you turn your head and look the other way? The church needs to stop worrying about the issues they have with “The Da Vinci Code” and concentrate on more important matters like child sexual abuse. Seriously, they need to get their priorities straight.

Posted by: Mari | May 19, 2006, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Letting Fr. Marcial Maciel’s declaration of innocence stand without any correction or comment certainly leaves the appearance of a vatican cover-up.

Posted by: Chris Baker | May 19, 2006, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Christ’s representative? My, OH my, why do people insist that the leadership of the Catholic church has ANY validity. Christ would not allow the guilty to go unpunished, nor would he sanction sexual abuses, I won’t go on…. and neither should they.

Posted by: croffer | May 20, 2006, 1:03 am 1:03 am

I agree with Mike’s comments defending the Pope. Most posters are so angry, it seems they are repeatedly saying the same thing. I repeat what Mike said, that the church DID take action. The church’s words in response were not very angry, but they did in fact remove him from his duties. By the way, did you ever consider that he may also have been abused? I work with abused people, and I find (research backs up) that abuse is learned. Often someone who was abused becomes an abuser.

Posted by: vince | May 20, 2006, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Do not comment on things you don’t know. Only God knows the truth and only God will do what has to be done. What we do know for a fact its that Father Maciel made has made a lot of good things not for himself, of for the church, but for humanity itself.
He who is free of sin throw the first stone…

Posted by: Calo | May 20, 2006, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Ok, let me see if I get this straight. The church does not punish child molesters but instead goes after (and with a vengence) two loving adults of the same sex who just want to care for each other a get married.
I think the church should care more about child molesters than it does about two loving consensual adults who want to marry.
… And we wonder what is wrong with the world. Start with the priorities of the catholic church.

Posted by: Greg | May 20, 2006, 6:38 am 6:38 am

SHAME!!!
The worst possible outcome: Case closed… No investigation… No nothing…..
It looks to me as if the Anti-Christ would have a hand in this matter….
My sincere condolence to all the victims and the millions of voices of true catholics that have been abused by the Holy See.

Posted by: Anonymous | May 20, 2006, 9:00 am 9:00 am

Croffer,
All Christ did was let sinners go unpunished and forgiven, that was Christs entire message, one of forgiveness, and not of judgment (go read the parable of the Samaritan woman at the well John 4:5-26; 39-42), because we are all horrible sinners in God’s eye. Molesting a 14 year old boy is no more a sin in God’s eye than fornication, divorce and remarriage, or cheating in business. That is why we can punish wrong actons and call for justice, but we souldn’t judge people. Now if Father Maciel is guilty of molestation 50 years ago what exactly would you have the Church do? They punished him, they can’t jail Father Maciel. But the Vatican will opt towards forgiveness rather than calling for blood like everyone in this thread. I am all for punishment, if the civil courts could make a case and convict Father Maciel, then they should, and I would enjoy a molester serving a long prison term, however I have no problem with what the Church did, what more would you guys have them do? THE CHURCHES JOB IS TO FORGIVE SINNERS IN THE NAME OF CHRIST, not further condemn them. How would you feel if you went into confession and told the Priest of an affair, and instead of counseling you with kindness and granting absolution, he called you a pig, and told you to get out of the Church? Maybe if they burnt Father Maciel alive you would feel justified or better?

Posted by: Mike | May 20, 2006, 10:25 am 10:25 am

If you were to report (out of spite) false allegations about your neighbor of child abuse to the HRS, they have no choice but to begin an investigation (unless the neighbor gave up the child before the process). Instead of dragging his congregation through this, Fr. Maciel chose not to ride out on the white horse; rather caring a cross like Christ.
If something is good, it will be attacked by the evil one and the devil uses gullible people to fight his battles. If not prayerfully, then even logically examine how you would attack the fastest growing fruits (i.e the new ecclesiastical movements) of the one true church.

Posted by: Bill | May 20, 2006, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Another case for the dangers of Religion in any form. Christians, just like Muslims, are wrong.

Posted by: Randy | May 20, 2006, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

I’m a Catholic and used to be very devout. However, the sex abuse cases have lessened my faith up to a point of doubting and not believing what the Catholic Church teaches. They are so hypocritical and unjust siding more with the molestors than with the victims.

Posted by: ben | May 20, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Being a survivor or severe sexual abuse by my parish priest some forty years ago, it is hard for me to believe that this pope would have done any less than the last. Put any name to it you like, it is evil. My heart weeps for those abused. Harriet

Posted by: Harriet | May 20, 2006, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

This comment is directed to Ben: any actions by Church leaders, or lack of action, should not interfere with your faith in the teachings of the Church.The Church is made up of people, true, but what the Church professes is eternal. I do not agree with people who say they “left the church” because they no longer have faith in its leaders. Why should what someone else does have such an inordinate influence on your own personal faith? If you were truly connected to your fellowman, the bad things people do would tend to strengthen your faith. I believe it is an excuse people use in order to blame the Church for their own acedia, their own spiritual sloth. Ben, do not allow what Fr. Maciel or others like him have purportedly done keep you from searching for God within the Church. After all, the only real reason we are on this earth is to “draw closer to him.” Every thing else is distraction.

Posted by: Jose | May 20, 2006, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

I completely disagree with the comment that supports the theory that in God’s eye molesting a 14 year old is no more a sin than cheating in business. Can you return someone’s virtue? I think not. If you cheat someone in business, at least you have the potential capability of repaying them what they may have lost monetarily.

Posted by: Pamela | May 20, 2006, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Mike
The Catholic Church across the world has repeatedly sought to play down the level of sexual abuse carried out by its priests against vulnerable members of the community, whether within or without its own ranks.
I cannot believe that you are saying that, to all intents and purposes, perverted acts carried out by Maciel against MINORS (or anyone elese for that matter)should go virtually unpunished by the church!!
That this man can carry on in his ministry away from the public is a travesty of justice and can only make one wonder at the lack of leadership at the top of the Catholic Church – no real action is virtually giving a green light to this appalling behaviour!
Mike – both you and the church that you attempt to defend should hang your collective heads in shame.

Posted by: Hector | May 21, 2006, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Perhaps all the sexual problems that arise inside the Catholic church stem from their policy stating clergy cannot marry! The church takes this stand by claiming St.Peter was single. However, the infallible Pope must surely know that, according to Matthew 8:14,15, Jesus healed Peters mother-in-law…or does he? And certainly he knows that St. Paul told Timothy [1 Tim.3:2] that a Bishop CAN marry!
But, hey, after all, why should we expect this priest to be punished, when Hitler..a Catholic.. has never been ex-communicated?

Posted by: Philip | May 21, 2006, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Well geez folks! How can you expect the Vatican to pay attention to this horrible crime that has been going on for ages? It’s not their fault! They’re WAY too busy protesting that WORK OF FICTION we call “The DaVinci Code.”
Obviously protesting a FICTIONAL movie/book is FAR FAR FAR more important than addressing the sins of child molesters.
Shame on the Catholic church…get your priorities straight please!

Posted by: Just my opinion | May 21, 2006, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

I agree with Mike. I live in Mexico, and just the fact that Father Maciel has been “put out to pasture” as some see it, by orders of the Vatician, it is as much a declaration of his guilt. He’s been stripped of all duties, and while he may not be rotting in jail for the remaing days of his life, for the founding father of the “millionaires of Christ” (as we in Mexico like to call them) this is a very public humiliation and condemnation. If he’s really guilty of what he’s been accused of, and if he’s repented and asked God for forgiveness and confessed for his sins and been absolved, then case closed. That’s the Church way, its doctrine. I feel (and I’m sure many of you too) that that is NOT enough. It was and is a crime. I would like for him to publicly admit it (and show some remorse). Now, while my sins are not in the same league as Maciel’s, would I like my parrish priest to make me admit them publicly? No. But would I, as part of my pennance and for my salvation, go and ask my accuser for forgiveness? Yes. But that’s me. My faith is strong. I know what’s right and what’s wrong. That doesn’t make me perfect. Only God is perfect and he still forgives us. I wonder how many of you can admit they are without sin?

Posted by: dora | May 21, 2006, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

When the issue pertains to the Church itself, we are asked; who is without sin? … and then the church seeks no punishment for priests accused of pedophilla.
But when it comes to gay people who are not priests and who are not pedophiles, but in committed loving relationships with another caring adult, the church wants a contsitutional amendment passed against CIVIL marriage AND CIVIL UNIONS so that we don get some 1400 rights that heterosexuals get. Why doesn’t the church try to take away the rights of pedophiles instead?
How can anyone believe in this ignorant ridiculous hypocracy?
Greg

Posted by: Greg | May 21, 2006, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Reading this story squashed the bit of interest I had about learning more and perhaps regularly attending (and giving money to)a Catholic church. Yes, Protestants (and any other group)have child abusers too, but at least we don’t think everything the Pope says is sacred and straight from the mouth of God. Reading in the story that the then-cardinal slapped the reporter’s hand and said he shouldn’t ask questions about a child abuse case…. that’s just obviously wrong. To the poster who said that it was just ‘spiritual sloth’ that was the reason most of the other posters have lost their faith, and not the sex abuse cases and the cover-ups/lack of investigation — let me remind you of a very important Christian tenet : Judge not, lest ye be also judged.
I’ve been through abuse and trust me, it can easily cause serious doubts about how God can allow innocent ones to suffer. I just choose to believe anyway in God being a source of good, and wanting to do good myself, despite the myriad of tragedies in this world.

Posted by: Faith | May 21, 2006, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

I am a Mexican. I worked for Fr. Maciel as secretary for several years. I never saw anything even close to a sexual molester in him. On the contrary he always irradiate peace, love to others, and he though thousands how to love God and the Church. I don’t know if 50 years ago he was a child molester, but I know he has helped and done well to many many people. He changed the life of thousands to good. Personally he thought me to love God and my brothers in a very manly, seriously, bravely way. You may say all what you want about him; you may condemn him if you want. At the end, even if he once sin, he will always win because he ended doing God’s will. And those who show lack of charity hardening their hearts, maybe even blaming an innocent, those will lose because heaven is for those who love, not for those who judge. Remember that many saints suffer the same type of “punishments” from the Church. It seems God, at the end of the life of those men that gave their life to the church and to God, ask them for a final prove of love and fidelity been “rejected” by who they more love: the Church. Just as the Father ask his beloved Son.
My friends… soften you hearts to Love.

Posted by: Javier Telle | May 21, 2006, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Excuses, excuses, bla, bla …. Outside of the church, if you abuse children, you are labeled as a sex offender and in California at least, your every move is monitored and it is posted on a website for EVERYONE to view.
This man was a child abuser.
STOP PROTECTING A CHILD ABUSER!

Posted by: Greg | May 22, 2006, 8:50 am 8:50 am

The church has no compassion for same-sex couples who love each other and want to marry …. WHY DOES IT HAVE COMPASSION FOR CHILD ABUSERS?!
…Because the church doesn’t know what it is doing!

Posted by: Greg | May 22, 2006, 9:52 am 9:52 am

The Church has compassion for gay men and women, the Bible says sodomy is a crime that makes the heavens cry out for justice. How can the Church just cut out what it says about gay relations in the Bible and 2000 years of Sacred Tradition? They can’t, it’s there and taught as a sin just as fornication, or divorce and remarriage or adultery are, jsut like in Islam and Judaism. The Church can’t allow that as acceptable behavior. People KEEP talking about jail, the Church can’t jail him, that’s up to the civil authorities. The fact is this is a case of a gay man bullying young men into gay sex, not pedophilia, pedophilia is sex with a pre-pubescent child. The entire scandal is a problem with gay men who run to the priesthood in an effort to push away their homosexual tendancies. It doesn’t work, Governor McGreevy was going to join the priesthood in hopes that the vow of celibacy would quell his desires, it would’ve been a disaster. I can’t stand pedophiles, it’s disgusting, and if the civil courts could try Fr Maciel then they should do it, but the Church is there to welcome any sinner back if they repent and turn away from their sin. No one on these boards would get any different treatment. And if a gay man today repented and turned from his fornication and sodomy he would be welcomed with open arms back into grace. I know forgiveness is a tough concept for people whose natural tendancies are revenge, but it is the only true Chrisitan way.

Posted by: Mike | May 22, 2006, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Just an update…Cardinal Rivera, from Mexico City, was on the news this morning (in Mexico) commenting on Fr. Maciel’s case. He said Father Maciel was “invited” by the Vatican to abstain from all duties, not ordered. Cardinal Rivera has got to be one of the most arrogant Cardinals in the Church. This is not the first time he’s defended a priest accused of child abuse. I think he even protected one and hid that was wanted in the USA on charges. This doesn’t make me doubt the Church, just it’s leaders. Don’t tell me you’re not the least bit upset with Bush’s command and administration. We know that The act of homosexuals is a sin in the eyes of the church, but homosexuals are welcome and loved in the Church. God loves the sinner, not the sin.

Posted by: dora | May 22, 2006, 10:49 am 10:49 am

How can Fr. Maciel admit to something he didn’t do?

Posted by: Anon. | May 22, 2006, 11:38 am 11:38 am

for 2000 years it’s been one lie after another…with no real evidence other than “the gospels” of jesus’ very existence…WHEN WILL PEOPLE OF CONSCIENCE FINALLY HAVE THE GUTS TO PUT AN END TO ALL THIS NONSENSE…

Posted by: Jeff | May 22, 2006, 11:44 am 11:44 am

This is just one more reason I no longer attend any catholic services…or give them a penny of my money! I find that giving to local charities is more satisfying and I converse with GOD while out in nature!

Posted by: Bill | May 22, 2006, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Cardinal Rivera is speaking the truth. Father Maciel was “invited” by the Vatican to abstain from all duties, not ordered. I fail to see how this is protecting an abuser, since there is no probative evidence that such abuse ever took place.

Posted by: Unnamed Vatican Source | May 22, 2006, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Jeff,
it’s an act of faith. Either you believe or you don’t. I became a Catholic by choice. It wasn’t fed down my throat by birth. I was raised a 7th day Adventist. I had the liberty to choose. You either get it or you don’t. If what you see as lies, I choose to believe is the truth. It’s your choice. And while I’m as outraged as anyone else with the actions of Fr. Maciel and those who tend to look the other way, I’m not going to condem all priests. Our Church isn’t perfect. I’ve had the fortune to know some pretty wonderful ones. As any job, and let’s not kid ourselve, it’s their job, there are some priests that really missed their calling. I pray for them. I would like to see some reforms, allowing priest to marry is one of them, but until this happens, we as practicing Catholics accept what is a given. If you don’t, I’m sure you can come up with a suitible religious sect that conforms to your idea of what you are looking for. That’s pretty much how the rest got started. Good luck. As for me and oh, I don’t know, several million others, we’ll just keep going to mass and praying for our spirital leaders.

Posted by: dora | May 22, 2006, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Unnamed Vatican source:
Cardinal Rivera should take a lesson from Bishop Jose Guad Martin Rabago. The church has choosen to forgive and not strip Fr. Maciel of all his duties due to his age and all his work (not to mention the fact that the Legion of Christ has always provided the Vatican with so much money had something to do with it)How do you bite the had that feeds you? Humility brother, humility!

Posted by: dora | May 22, 2006, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

I too am fed up with what is happening in the Catholic Church. For centuries the church has leaned to whatever country conqured the are that they were in or to the ruling party. God said that men and women should be married this includes ministers of all religions.
We need to follow what God teaches not what man has ordained as the truth.
The church is the wealthist in world and many of its followers go hungry, both in food and the true word.

Posted by: Nancy | May 22, 2006, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Hypocrisy runs amuk in the so-called “Christian” world. I will NEVER understand why priest are dealt with any differently than any other human being. They should go to jail just like any other common criminal. I am glad to see that others confirm what I already know. Shame Shame Shame on the Catholic Church. And on anyone or any entity who supports them.

Posted by: Donna | May 23, 2006, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

judge not lest ye be judged…

Posted by: jd | May 24, 2006, 11:58 am 11:58 am

So you think Fr. Maciel should be in jail? Do you think the Pope can put people in jail? Do you want the Pope to have the power to put people in jail? It is up to the criminal justice system of the country where the alleged crimes were committed to charge, arrest, try, and then imprison or free the accused – none of that is the job of the Pope.

Posted by: John Koch | May 24, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

In the name of God,chop his head off and say a prayer for his soul.

Posted by: Chuck | May 24, 2006, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

In the name of God,chop his head off and say a prayer for his soul.

Posted by: Chuck | May 24, 2006, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Well, We see who’s court the ball is in. None other than a member of the New World Order, like Bush and his clan.

Posted by: Judy | April 15, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.