Officials: Jefferson Charges by July
Federal officials tell ABC News they already "have enough evidence to arrest" Congressman William Jefferson (D-LA) but will wait until a grand jury in Virginia returns a formal indictment. Charges are expected within four to six weeks on allegations Jefferson took bribes in exchange for his official help with a telecommunications contract in Africa. Department of Justice officials are considering making public redacted portions of the search warrant application to deflect criticism of the FBI’s unprecedented raid on Capitol Hill. Republicans and Democrats Monday suggested the FBI raid violated the Separation of Powers doctrine of the U.S. Constitution. Some of the redacted pages reportedly lay out the month-long sequence by which the FBI had sought to obtain documents and computer discs from Jefferson’s office through the use of a grand jury subpoena.
Officials say the House of Representatives General Counsel made copies of the requested documents and discs several weeks ago but then refused to turn them over. Officials said Judge Thomas Hogan himself suggested the FBI request a search warrant for the Capitol Hill office of the Congressman, which Hogan authorized last Thursday. The FBI used a special "filter team" of agents not connected with the case to guarantee that "politically sensitive" documents were not taken as evidence. Congressman Jefferson has called the raid "outrageous" but declined to answer the question of whether he took bribes.

Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
So lets get this right, crooked Senators and representatives can take their bribes and just keep them in their office and law enforcement would have no recourse? Does that mean any kickback a defense contractor gets can just stay in his office and not be worried about a search? These politicians are oilier than snake oil salesman. I say way to go Judge Hogan and the FBI!!! You got it absolutely right.
Posted by: ron wilson | May 23, 2006, 9:34 am 9:34 am
It’s the other way around. The separations require that the Judicial and Executive branches regulate bribe takers in the Legislative branches. The lawmakers truly do not understand what they are voting on.
Posted by: Neal Watt | May 23, 2006, 9:56 am 9:56 am
I guess we will have to wait to see just how tainted this Congressman is. The mans has lots of explaining to do. I do not see the problem with his office being searched. The FBI went into the congressional offices to investigate the anthrax attacks too. Nobody complained then.
Posted by: Fred Fry | May 23, 2006, 10:10 am 10:10 am
THIS CROOK IS GIVING US, THE CITIZENS OF LOUISIANA ANOTHER BLACKEYE. SINCE HURRICANE KATRINA WE DESPERATELY NEED HONEST EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP.
WITH THIS GUY WE ARE GETTING NITHER HONEST OR EFFECTIVE REPRESENTATION. HE HAS TO GO!
Posted by: Tom Kurzenbaum | May 23, 2006, 10:10 am 10:10 am
We should deplore corruption on both sides of the political aisle. However, it seems that the Republicans are using and posturing the Jefferson case for political purposes. For example, some smart lawyer in the Bush administration or the justice department decided to delay indictment by using a Virginia grand jury. Why? Because the delay will cause the Jefferson case to be in the spotlight closer to our mid-term elections.
Posted by: Paul Benton Weeks | May 23, 2006, 10:25 am 10:25 am
I think the congressman has a much bigger problem than whether or not the FBI violated the separation of powers amendment in the constitution. If these charges are proven true he should deservedly go to prison for a long time. As an African American I would be disappointed to see that happen, but none the less he deserves no special treatment.
Posted by: Kelvin | May 23, 2006, 10:34 am 10:34 am
It will be interesting to see if anything even happpens to congressman Jefferson. I certainly hope he is ruined like congressman Cunningham and also gets at least 8 years in jail. Although I personally think the punishment(s) should be much harsher to curtail and discourage this rash of criminal behavior in the future. Obviously it can’t be stopped but I think there should be more of a universal outcry to lessen it.
Instead the politicians seem to want us to be focussed on meaningless stuff like the national language debate. Well it’s no wonder why.
Posted by: Jim | May 23, 2006, 10:38 am 10:38 am
First , Delay , then Cunningham – now Jefferson – - – and , they’re ones of the few who got caught. Make no mistake, a lot of their colleagues are flying under the radar. Voters get what they deserve , voter ignorance elects persons like Cunningham ,Delay , and Jefferson into office.
Cynicism really isn’t a dirty word.
Posted by: Chas | May 23, 2006, 10:43 am 10:43 am
His Capital Hill office and everything in it belongs to the American public…seperation of powers has nothing to do with it. If the House General Counsel would have turned over the documents like they were supposed to, this “raid” never would have happened.
Posted by: Stephen of Florida | May 23, 2006, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Gee, I wonder if the drive by media will give this as much attention as they gave to the Duke Cunningham story?
Doubt it.
Thank goodness for the alternative media.
Posted by: DJ | May 23, 2006, 11:06 am 11:06 am
The bipartisan congrsssional reaction to the raid is sickening. It smacks of the powerful protecting the powerful. The only conclusion one can draw is that many of these congressmen expressing outrage have plenty to hide in their own offices.
Posted by: Kevin Andersen | May 23, 2006, 11:10 am 11:10 am
It is unbelievable that some people are complaining about the raid on Jefferson’s office. I can understand it from him because guilty people are always the first to complain about THEIR rights being violated. They are not concerned about their victim’s rights when they commit their crimes. The fact that so many congressional people are complaining makes a person wonder what they are REALLY fearful of……
Posted by: Ernie | May 23, 2006, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Boy! Does this country ever need term limits and a third party. “There is not a dimes worth of difference in the two parties” George Wallace said back in the sixties and he was right.
We need term limits because the American people keep re-electing these corrupt politicians.
Posted by: James F. Branno | May 23, 2006, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Perhaps I missed it, but I don’t recall any hue and cry or whining and hand wringing when Duke Cunningham was nailed for accepting bribes. Ninety grand in Jeffersons freezer? One might wonder how much he has dancing around in numbered accounts in offshore accounts. Cheers to the FBI for a job – so far – well done.
Posted by: Steve | May 23, 2006, 11:19 am 11:19 am
I hope this whole thing blows up in the Congressman’s face, and the Democratic Party. There is plenty of corruption to go around on Capitol Hill, in both parties! Get rid of the criminals!!!!! Even if it means searching their offices, or their body cavities!
Posted by: Mister Smith | May 23, 2006, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Let’s see how many of these thieves can be put behind bars!
Let’s see how many open boarder advocats with Mexico, and amnisty advocats for illegals; can be thrown out of office!
George
Posted by: George Boisvert | May 23, 2006, 11:42 am 11:42 am
This crook is toast.
Posted by: Billy Singleton | May 23, 2006, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Right on, this guy is a criminal and they should lock him up and throw away the key. He stole from all of us.
Posted by: Doug | May 23, 2006, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
I think it is time to clean HOUSE and SENATE. Vote all incumbents out of office and start over. I belive almost all are corrupted it is just some more than others. If not let them pass a law that any elected offical who is caught violating a olaw gets double the jail time of a regular citizen
Posted by: Edwin Lee | May 23, 2006, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Looks like this guy will share a jail cell with the Democratic Congresswoman that sucker punched a Capital Hill Police Officer.
Posted by: GEOFF | May 23, 2006, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Here we go again, separation of powers, individual rights, next will have the recial issue come along. Why would you keep money in your freezer? Must have been hot money. Get rid of him, the sooner the better.
Posted by: ruben fonseca | May 23, 2006, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
We don’t call him “Dollar” Bill Jefferson for nothing here in Louisiana.
Too often here in Louisiana we only have the choice between bad and worse. The mayor’s election is an example – choose between an idiot or a socialist. The people selected the idiot.
Posted by: Joe | May 23, 2006, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Hmmm…I seem to recall seeing video of former US Rep and then La. State Sen. Cleo Fields stuffing $20K cash in his pockets, allegedly from Edwin Edwards, and US Atty. Eddie Jordan’s refusal to pursue the matter, while others (including Edwards) went to prison. Cleo continues to serve the citizens of La. Sen. District 14! Jefferson, if he runs and does not get arrested, will win easily. Many voters only look at the color of one’s skin when voting…nothing else, including ethics, matters to them.
Posted by: Joan | May 23, 2006, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
frist is complaining—methinks the apple is falling too close the tree
Posted by: l g black | May 23, 2006, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Perhaps bringing back “Tar and Feathering” might be the kick in the rear our elected officials need.
“If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.” – Samuel Adams
Posted by: Son Of Liberty | May 23, 2006, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
So, what do you expect from a socialist government, honesty and integrity? Not one of our duly elected and appointed have either of those qualities.
Socialist you ask? D**n right. The Republic is long dead, replacesd by a “democracy. What’s the difference? Well stated in a military training manual (TM 2000-25) that was removed from use and ordered “destroyed” by FDR:
Democracy:
.A government of the masses.
Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of
“direct ” expression.
Results in mobocracy.
Attitude toward property is communistic-negating property
rights.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate,
whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, preju-
dice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences..
Results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
Republic:
Authority is derived through the election by the people of public
officials best fitted to represent them.
Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights,
and a sensible economic procedure.
Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with
fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to
consequences.
A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be
brought within its compass.
Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or: mobocracy.
Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and
progress.
‘None are so hopelessly enslaved as those that falsely believe they are free, truth has been kept from the depths of their minds, by masters who fool them with lies, they feed them with falsehoods till wrong seems like right in their minds… ‘ – words from the song “Jesus, The Way and the Truth and the Life.
Posted by: Ronald L. Weston | May 23, 2006, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
I agree, Lousiana desperately need honest effective leadership.
Jefferson has to go! There are plenty of people who could do better then the ones in office there now.
Corruption is corruption, no matter who they are and they don’t deserve to be a leader anywhere, ever again. That includes all Parties.
Posted by: Nan | May 23, 2006, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Hmmnn…let me see, wasn’t late President Johnson a poor school teacher in a one room school house when elected to Congress, and decades later retired to his thousands of acres ranch in Texas?
Is working as a servant for the people that profitable? But as Congressman Jefferson says, “There’s two sides to the story…”
Posted by: katsuji | May 23, 2006, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Desperate times call for desparate actions. I hope they find out how much cold hard cash he had stashed in the freezer in his flooded out house in New Orleans.
Posted by: Dan Keogh | May 23, 2006, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
The corrupt congressmen will use any argument they can dream up to hide their crookedness. Thanks for the FBI! We need more tools to catch the crooks, not ways to protect them. Now we need judges that will put the crooks away for a LONG time.
John
Posted by: John | May 23, 2006, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
I, like most people I know am conservative on some issues and liberal on others. I support the right to bear arms, I believe in capital punishment, both conservative view points. On the other hand I am pro choice and believe the environment needs strong protection, two liberal view points. I am divided on an assortment of other issues which seem to divide in Washington along party lines. The Republicans, of which I am a registered member currently control the executive, legislative, and pretty much the judicial branches of government and to me that seems not a good thing, possibly a dangerous thing. I keep hearing about how the Democrats will make big gains in the legislative branch in the upcoming elections and as a conservative/liberal I see that as a good thing. On the other hand the Democrats are as bad as the Republicans in their own way. We need a third party that is not on the right or left edge of politics but solidly in the middle. I’m not looking for Democrats or Republicans, I’m looking for humans for office.
Posted by: Paul | May 23, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
I’m sorry if the upper crust is upset by this. So sad their illusion was shattered; apparently they supposed their congressional offices did double duty as sanctuaries for evidence of their crimes.
Posted by: JB | May 23, 2006, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
This guy has all kinds of defenses:
separation of powers, white govenment out to ruin his reputation, having the money is crime, and on and on. And he will, no doubt, be re-elected. As one responded, it is a government and offices of the people, by the people and for the people. Not for the corrupt politicians.
Posted by: Karl E. Wahl | May 23, 2006, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Much ado about nothing. The Congress has the power to enact laws about search warrants. Most of the members are lawyers or have access to them. So, the separation of powers rapping is just that. Signed, a lawyer admitted to practice in three states.
Posted by: Brian Cochran | May 23, 2006, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Democrat rules: Cash in a freezer don’t count; Papers in an office can’t be touched; Cops are for punching, and drunken driving at 2-AM is no problem. We need a major overhaul of Congress!
Posted by: Ken Price | May 23, 2006, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Gimme a break. Break the law and then complain that your ill begotten gains should be free of search because you hide it in your capitol hill office and then both sides of the aisle come to your aide? We have 535 members who just can’t relate to us “common folk”. Throws the bums out. Kudo’s to Judge Hogan and the men and women of the FBI.
Posted by: Martin | May 23, 2006, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
I’ve seen the crook in Jeferson the first time I saw him. He and Cleo, should be procecuted, but brother Eddie let Cleo off this time. Why did Jefferson need to get the national guard to bring him to his house after the storm, and the helicopter that was used to get him back after the truck got stuck? He had to get the rest of his money, thats why.
Posted by: Darrell | May 23, 2006, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Regretably the case for Rep. Jefferson does not look good. the sad thing is that the time he served as well as all of the good can be simply erase by such a potentially sordid deed. We pray for him, his family and the people whom he served that they will receive the best which is to come.
The government has so much power to do good; but it is clearly dangerous in the hands of few individuals. “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
That is why the news, vote and the process is so important. Most people’s idea of government is when they need something, have to pay taxes or get ready to vote. It is incumbent upon every citizen to make sure that the country is run decently and in order. This will not happen unless we pay close attention to the issues and the world around us.
This is still not the biggest issue going. Rising gas prices from a group of companies who make record PROFITS year after year and barely pay taxes. Wars in remote places where we tear down and then bill the US to rebuild it. Falling down schools and rising health costs right here. Increased crime! If you really want to do something newsworthy shine th light on SOLUTIONS to these situations, because right now the corruption is not some guy potentially taking a couple of hundred thousand dollars. But the ones who operate at the millions and billions dollar levels who keep the little ones in the news to keep the light off of them.
Democrats and Republicans. One is a white horse with black stripes and the other is a black horse with white stripes. It still black and white to me!
Posted by: TM | May 23, 2006, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
As a proud independent, I am happy to stand neither with the right or the left. Standing inbetween allows me to think for myself and to see the corruption of both the right and the left. I hate politics and I am native Washingtonian. What I hate more than politics, is corrupt politicians. I think the good guys in politics can be counted on one hand. It’s an ego driven way to make a living. Most of those in politics care not about what they speak. Like Al Gore, for example. A man I know went to school with him. When Al Gore decided to run for a TN Senate seat, he needed “an issue” to make his own. That’s how the environment became “his issue”. Because it became a hot issue, he has continued with it. As I said, I don’t like politicians. Honesty and intergrity are two things that escape them.
Posted by: Ellen | May 23, 2006, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
This corruption train won’t stop with just Congressman Jefferson, I’m sure his children will be implicated as well. From all accounts in the newspapers, it looks like he was doing this with his children in mind. This could end with another political conviction; his daughter who serves in the LA House of Representatives.
Posted by: James B. | May 23, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
5 will get you 10 that Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson will throw the race card into this mess!
Posted by: Chuck Filippi | May 23, 2006, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Our elected officials act like they are above the law, that the House does not belong to the people.
I fully support the FBI as long as their activities do not border on political activity.
Posted by: Chris | May 23, 2006, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Cleo was not an elected official at the time he was stuffing the cash in his pants. He is no doubt a crook, but Eddie could not make a “public corruption” charge stand since he was not an elected official. My sources tell me his time will come. As for Dollar Bill, he should be removed from office immediately.
Posted by: Deaux | May 23, 2006, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
I cringe when i hear people talk about criminal investigations being politically motivated. I feel that evil and corruption are far more serious than what party someone belongs to. i dont care if the person is my relative. bad is bad, and so be it if its my political party.
Posted by: Larry Archuletta | May 23, 2006, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Welcome to the US of A.
Posted by: Nick P. | May 23, 2006, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
The Court established in United States v. Brewster, that the “Speech and Debate Clause” must be read broadly to effectuate its purpose of protecting the independence of the Legislative branch,”
The Court upheld the indictment of a Member, which charged that he accepted a bribe to be ”influenced in his performance of official acts in respect to his action, vote, and decision” on legislation.
The Court drew a distinction between a prosecution that caused an inquiry into legislative acts or the motivation for performance of such acts and a prosecution for taking or agreeing to take money for a promise to act in a certain way.
”Taking a bribe is, obviously, no part of the legislative process or function; it is not a legislative act. It is not, by any conceivable interpretation, an act performed as a part of or even incidental to the role of a legislator . . . Nor is inquiry into a legislative act or the motivation for a legislative act necessary to a prosecution under this statute or this indictment. When a bribe is taken, it does not matter whether the promise for which the bribe was given was for the performance of a legislative act as here or, as inJohnson, for use of a Congressman’s influence with the Executive Branch.”
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data
/constitution/article01/21.html
Therefore, while past precedent would lead one to believe otherwise there are other cases which side with the action of the FBI. Moreover, the exemption form the speech and debate clause is specifically in the above case a bribe, similar to the case of Jefferson.
Posted by: Allison | May 23, 2006, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
LOOK
VOTE ALL INCUMBENTS OUT OF OFFICE
It takes some time to make the connections that the politicians have made to get these bribes etc. Put new men and women in office and they will be to busy learning their jobs to have time to socialize.
VOTE THEM OUT
Posted by: Edwin | May 23, 2006, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
How is he not under arrest right now. You or me, we would be sitting in a cell right. Let’s get a pool together to see how long it takes for him to cry racism.
Posted by: matt Klien | May 23, 2006, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
You folks in Congress, grow up. You are starting to believe your own press releases. The American people are generally unimpressed with you as group. Most think you are crooks in an industry that thrives on self gratification. Do you job and get out of the kickbacks and/or the American people will fix the system for you.
Posted by: Steve L. | May 23, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
I hope some of the Democrats and Republican lawmakers come read these comments.
We the people don’t want to hear about separation of power and illegal search.
This is B.S. You commit crimes, then you are going to be caught and procecuted just like Joe public.
I’m sick of all the corruption of both Republicans and Democrats alike. They are all totally out of control.
I’m sick of all the “legal” and “illegal” money that flows to keep them elected.
I’m sick of CEO’s that think they should walk away with tens and hundreds of millions when they leave a company.
I’ve got no problem with the Bill Gates and the Sam Waltons of the world who made billions on their companies because at least they founded the companies and built them up.
But any non founding CEO who gets ridiculous stock options and retirement benefits who then have to have their country club dues and private jets AFTER they retire (I’m talking to you Jack Welsh) when their companies go bankrupt and do away with their pensions. PAY YOUR OWN EXPENSES AFTER YOU RETIRE JUST LIKE THE MAJORITY OF JOE PUBLIC.
I’m just fed up. I’m still a capitalist, but greed and ME ME ME has gone way to far.
And I’m sick of Michael Moore, Barbara Striesand, the Dixie Chicks, and the majority of Hollywood and celebraties.
But at least I feel a little better after typing my rant.
Out.
Posted by: Charlie | May 23, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
I don’t know about you, but I store all of my cash wrapped in foil, in containers and buried in my freezer.
See — simple explanation!
Posted by: Landlocked | May 23, 2006, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
“Throw the rascals out” to coin a phrase
and never ever vote for an incumbent
Posted by: WCS | May 23, 2006, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Separation of powers? Heck, I remember when the FBI swooped into the courthouse chambers of a local federal district judge who later was convicted on a corruption charge. I just don’t see how what appears to be a legitimate police action, supported by the signature of a federal judge, could offend the Constitution simply because the space being invaded is a congressional office. Oh, the arrogance!
Posted by: randy | May 23, 2006, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Scratchin’ the surface, they’re just scratchin’ the surface.
Posted by: Don Wood | May 23, 2006, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
If this Representative was any other race, he would of been arrested already, I am sure the race card will be played by this honest elected official very soon.He was framed, targeted, etc, etc, etc!
jg
Posted by: jake | May 23, 2006, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
We should all be sickened by the likes of William Jefferson and others, regardless of their party affiliation. But what we must be more concerned with is the absurdly expressed moral relativism of those who try to explain why it should have been off limits to search the offices of this man. Can these people be so far off the mark as to be so disconnected to the public mass?
I am an advocate for term limits. Give a President one 6-year term only. Give Senators the same, and let Reps. serve three 2-year terms. This will put a crimp in their incessant leaching of the public funds, and their mining for millions from special interest.
Why will people spend millions to get elected to a $150,000 a year job? If you can’t figure this out – you are a part of the problem.
Ask yourself how it can be possible that Kennedy can have spent so much time in the Senate – deciding the fate of Jurists – while he himself has been involved in so much controversey – even the death of Mary Jo so many years ago.
I say Vote them Out every term until they get the message. Send them all home. Only we can put an end to the madness. Vote them all to go home.
Art
Posted by: Art | May 23, 2006, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
WAIT A MINUTE! The republicans are complaining about investigative raids??? Aren’t these the same idiots that fully support Big Brother eavesdropping on your every phone call and email? This is truly unbelievable. Nobody in Congress seems to mind when the public is being spyed on, but when one of their OWN gets spied on, well, that’s another hypocritical story, now isn’t it?!?!
Posted by: Eric | May 23, 2006, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
I am glad the FBI raided the house of Congress. They are mad, not because of the seperation of powers rule, but because they found out, “that someone else had a key to their clubhouse besides them.
Posted by: mike jones | May 24, 2006, 6:24 am 6:24 am
Oh. Does this mean congressional leaders are above the law when they have been caught breaking it? They need to be treated like the rest of us, and the rest of us would have been subject to an FBI raid had we been caught on tape committing a crime!! The “gripe” the American rank and file have with our government is that they are out of touch with the rest of us and OUR world and seem to believe they are entitled to some “special treatment.” God bless the FBI for doing its job!
Posted by: Shirley | May 24, 2006, 11:36 am 11:36 am
My congratulations to the Judge that signed the paper, and the FBI folks that carried out the search. After wearing a Uniform for 30 years, it is a good feeling to see that at least some of the laws apply to those I helped protect for so long.
Posted by: Mel | May 24, 2006, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
What bribe?
To make a bribe takes an official act that provides favor. Most of what Rep. Jefferson is being tarred with involved NO OFFICIAL ACT! Rep. Jefferson is an official of the United States, which is not an African country. The influence he sold was with African governments. That is LOBBYING of foreign officials, not selling his vote.
There is one area: He may have influenced the Army to evaluate a product, and the question then is did he take a bribe to get them to do that, or did he become a part of the company after the Army had evaluated the product? He had good, lawful reason to suggest the product to the Army, as a minority congressperson helping a minority firm. The fact that he bullied the owner of the company is irrelevant here – he had the contacts to sell the product; the owner did not.
My bet is he gets off, possibly with a censure.
The Republicans have done much worse, which I guess is why Hastert is objecting to the search, since his own office may be next.
Posted by: Matt Filler | May 25, 2006, 4:42 am 4:42 am