Federal Air Marshal Whistleblower Suspended
Federal Air Marshal Spencer Pickard was removed from his job and placed on indefinite administrative leave yesterday. His badge and gun were confiscated pending an ongoing investigation. Pickard has not been notified of the exact nature of the investigation, but he believes that it is a result of his outspoken efforts to alert Congress and the American public to safety problems in the operation of the Federal Air Marshal service. In an interview on ABC’s 20/20 last month, Pickard warned that Federal Air Marshal policies were putting the flying public at risk by making it impossible for air marshals to work undercover. "They are going after me because I repeatedly spoke out to headquarters, Congress and ABC News. But nothing has changed. The policies are exactly the same, and the risk is still there," says Pickard. Federal Air Marshal Service spokesman Conan Bruce said he was not allowed to comment on any personnel matters due to privacy concerns but did say "any personnel actions concerning Federal Air Marshal Pickard are completely unrelated to and predate his appearance on 20/20." Pickard was told he would not be allowed to enter the Las Vegas Air Marshal office where he is stationed but is required to stay in the area and call the office daily. Pickard had recently requested a hardship transfer to Dallas for family medical reasons. In a letter to Pickard earlier this week, Senator Harry Reid (D-NV), said he was "deeply concerned" about the air marshals’ lack of anonymity and would be "monitoring the situation closely to guarantee the implementation of common sense measures to the FAM service." A spokesperson said they were taking a look at Pickard’s case.
Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Are you kidding me? Anyone in our office nows the real reason this guy got suspended.
Let’s see him own up to it! He can’t keep control of his equipment…ask him for the real truth and stop blaming others.
Posted by: LAS FAM | June 30, 2006, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Common Practice is what is happening to Spencer, the Federal Air Marshal Service through the mouth of one who once has flown amongst the ranks has now flown the coupe like a chicken looking for a feed. Why because treatment is better in the Ivory Castle of headquarters and other selected assignments as people have fulfilled as the chosen ones. Or was the spokesperson internally advertised and filled on a competitive basis?
Retaliation is retaliation, and we can say it predates his appearance, but feces are feces and these feces stink like retaliation. Are they that busy that they can not deal with issues timely? Of course not they dig and dig until they find little things or they hold onto stuff until they have ammunition. Since some of management have trouble meeting the same standards of the flying FAM, they know who they are! So they sling feces to hit a FAM who they see as their enemies with that old us and them mentality of the Secret Service.
A suit and an ear piece never make a man. What makes a man is standing up for what is right. I will say this handful of people have had the courage to stand up for what’s right but most think what they speak. I use to hear it almost daily and witness it, but they all fear management and know what others have going through and the disparity in treatment between how management is treated and how FAMs and others are treated.
One of many examples I could give;
I remember a loaded pistol being retrieved out of the glove compartment of a vehicle which the ATSAIC left there. He went home and called back to ask if we could see if it was there. When another ATSAIC was informed it was like it was not even a problem, what was the saying they must be in control of their fire arms at all times and he was recently in regards to a management official.
As the EEOC and MSPB cases are now starting to work through the system one would expect that some accountability would be brought to management. If Dana Brown was truly for change he would get rid of some of those temporary managers out of the federal service and start to reorganize the service with experienced Air Marshals in leadership positions and loose the attitude of when the Big 33 are going it will be so much better. A term many agents (SAIC/ASAICS/ATSAICS) refer to in regards to the original Air Marshals.
Posted by: Richard | June 30, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
OK LAS FAM..you must be Mgmt. The real truth america is that this agency attacks anyone who speaks the truth. You Mgmt types can try and spin this if you want, but I wouldn’t throw stones because your glass house will break! Let’s see…..LAS managers have lost equipment, changed Official Documents, lied to OIG etc. If you open this can of worms you will fail. I hope you all have good legal reps….Just ask your fellow managers in the Denver Office how it feels to be outed for what they are….then check out Chicago, Miami, New York, Pittsburgh etc. You may be able to keep your power hold on this agency due to special deals and protection promises from DC but your reputations will be forever tarnished. “THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE.”
Posted by: A Real FAM | June 30, 2006, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
He got suspended because his boses are egocentrical maniacs who think they know better than anyone. How can you be so stupid as to let a hotel welcome the FAM as client of the month lit up sign? He is just trying to protect other air marshalls.
Posted by: concerned citizen | June 30, 2006, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
It’s nice to see that Las Vegas field office management reads this blotter. Nice try. But even a ham sandwitch is smart enough to know this is nothing more than whistleblower retaliation.
Posted by: Real LAS FAM | June 30, 2006, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Spencer is a fine FAM and a good person as well. Thank God for his courage. EVERYONE knows this is just blatant retaliation.
I wish Congress would do something.
Posted by: Another Real Las Vegas FAM | June 30, 2006, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
To
fam Pickard: God speed. Thanks for standing up for what’s right. As for the comment made by the current clown FAM spokeman Conan Bruce: who are you trying to kid, retaliation is retaliation no matter how you try to disguise it. This organization will not get better until all the SS scum is sent packing.
Posted by: wfam | June 30, 2006, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
You must be kidding, I was in the office today and the office was empty. I forgot it was Federal Half Day Friday.
Posted by: HateFAM | June 30, 2006, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
I love how they plan it just before a holiday weekend when the media is not paying attention. Senator Reid better stand up for that young man.
Posted by: Chicago Federal Air Marshal | July 1, 2006, 1:36 am 1:36 am
So…getting drunk with your wife and waving your gun around makes you a “Knight in Shining Armor?” Get real guys.
I don’t know what he did this time, but I am sure it was something along the same lines.
And for all you haters, I was a flying fool for 3.5 yrs, had enough and moved on happily.
And…some of us know the real story on this guy, we just aren’t on 20/20 spouting our mouths off. You guys don’t realize these reporters will turn on you just as quick if they can make a story out of it.
See you back at the X.
Posted by: Former FAM | July 1, 2006, 6:45 am 6:45 am
Who is in charge of this place? Do these guys know what happened on 9/11?
They need to put this guy back to work and get their heads back in the game.
Posted by: Joe V. Trujillo | July 1, 2006, 10:29 am 10:29 am
We all know how it works … maybe the public should know too. Here it is: There are so many tiny rules, small conflicting directives, and stupid “orders” that each and every one of us has done something technically against the rules at one time or another. each of us has flown without a jacket when suits were required, or worn something other than dress shoes, shown up for a flight after the official check-in but well before the time needed to make the flight, gotten upset with an ignorant gate agent who offended us, or stayed at a hotel that isn’t on the designated list. We’re all in fear that if we do something that pisses off management, they’ll come after us and retaliate against us by finding out one of these tiny offenses and over-repremanding us for it because, as the report clearly stated, there is no consistancy in the system for reprimands. Retaliation doesn’t come in the form of, “You went to 20/20 so we’re going to get you.” It comes in the form of, “You went to 20/20? Good for you. Oh, by the way, you were 10 minutes late for a checck-in, you’re voucher was 35 cents off, and your T&A was turned in a day late. Your FIRED!” Spin, anyone?
Posted by: withheld for obvious reasons | July 1, 2006, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Former FAM above does not know Spencer. Spencer is a squared away and by the book FAM. He has done nothing to deserve any discipline.
Continue on Spencer and enjoy the paid time off. I hope they give up the idea of retaliating on you.
Posted by: Anonymous FAM | July 2, 2006, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Who is going to fly the missions when we are all gone to other jobs?
SS Management – what is Conan or Baghdad Dave Adams going to tell the public when we have all quit?
NCIS, Border Patrol, ICE, DEA, FBI and the private sector are picking up FAMs in great numbers. Who will you abuse when we have all left?
Some guys are quitting without a new job lined up. Many are leaving law enforcement completely.
Wake up managers, because you surely are not leaders.
Posted by: Wayne Enderlingston | July 2, 2006, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Spencer never claimed to be a “Knight in Shining Armor”. Spencer has yet to talk about the retaliation he has suffered because he was more concerned about the other FAMs, the country, and aviation safety! Spencer has stood up against the FAMS for the ridiculus policies since 2002. Every mistake he made including minor ones he has suffered the wrath of the terrible management of the Federal Air Marshal Service.
The two incidents referred to in this blotter are misrepresented here by somebody (probably managment). The true stories are not known by any FAM other than Spencer because nobody was present when they happend.
Spencer said he was defending his wife whom to men tried to take from the MGM parking garage (the same garage that made national news recently when teenagers beat MGM employees). He drew his weapon in defense of his wife and himself and he was not drunk! Spencer served a 5 day suspension because the agency had it out for him due to him standing up to them about the same issues as he spoke about on 20/20. The way he explained the story he showed unbelievable restraint. I probably would have shot the two guys if the grabbed my wife and tried to take her. Clearly, they intended to do her serious bodily harm most likely rape and kill her.
According to the State of Nevada he did nothing wrong! The sole misdemeanor charge was dismissed and sealed. This was not a case of him being protected because he had a badge or he would not have been given a citation. The court agreed with Spencer!!! The agency did not but that is not surprising because he has stood up to these evil and corrupt managers in this agency!!!
As far as the equipment issue, he left his firearm in his vehicle after a major car accident. He drove off a Hwy. after falling asleep at the wheel. No accident report, no evidence of alcohol being involved. He left his keys and wallet in the truck too! There was no intent to violate the agency policy that you cannot leave your firearm in your vehicle. This incident has been investigated and the agency proposed a 10 day suspension. Does this seem fair?
Let’s look at the violations of other FAMs in Las Vegas:
FAM has an AD (accidental discharge-fired his weapon accidentally) in his hotel room after drinking at the hotel bar.- Three days proposed served one.
FAM is drinking at a softball game with his weapon in his car. Get’s into a car accident. Charged with DUI accident while in possession of his firearm. Pleads to lessor charge. Gets a letter of reprimand!
FAM leaves his loaded firearm in the airplane lavatory during a mission flight. A passenger finds the weapon. FAM transferred to Los Angeles sent to work as a Firearms Instructor at Phase II training. Then promoted to ATSAC in San Diego!
These are just examples in Las Vegas!
You can say what you want about Spencer and you might think he made mistakes but HE HAS BEEN RETALIATED AGAINST AND WILL BE AGAIN!
As far as this article it is not accurate according to Spencer he has not been Suspended and he is allowed in the office. (I saw him there today)
The agency put him on administrative leave(paid)while the TSA performs an undisclosed investigation. The agency has proposed a 10 day suspension for the car accident therefore that investigation is complete.
Clearly, the agency is searching for something to get Spencer on that they can say was before 20/20 but we all know the truth!
Spencer never claimed to be perfect but he was not wrong about the issues he spoke about on 20/20! IF HE WAS THEN THE MANAGEMENT WOULDN’T BE TRYING TO DISCREDIT HIM ON THIS BLOTTER!
Where is the Housed Judiciary Committee? Where is Sensenbrenner? They talked big but have done NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE POLICIES HAVE NOT CHANGED AND SPENCER WILL SOON PAY FOR SPEAKING OUT!
NOBODY WILL CARE UNTIL THEY CRASH PLANES AGAIN!!!!
Posted by: Las FAM | July 3, 2006, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
“Las FAM”:
You forgot to mention the fact that the NOW Supervisory FAM who left his gun in the lavatory of a plane in-flight tried covering up the incident. The FAA and TSA only found out about it because the Captain of the plane filed a complaint with them.
You also forgot to mention that the Training Instructor Air Marshal chaalso rged with drinking and driving had WRECKED his car and REFUSED to take a breathalizer test. It is a miracle that the State of Nevada gave him back his Driver License.
Protecting yourself and your wife from muggers or almost killing yourself in a car accident are really the TRUE crimes to FAMS Management – ESPECIALLY if you are a FLEOA Representative.
Posted by: Las Vegas Chair FAM | July 5, 2006, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
None of this would have happened if we didn’t have these stupid rules prohibiting passengers from having weapons on planes for self-defense and anti-terrorism purposes. For more information, visit http://www.armedpassengers.org
Posted by: Michael Bane | July 21, 2006, 4:18 am 4:18 am
Mr. Bane is very scary. His heart is in the right place, but the mind is not totally engaged.
Hang in there Spencer. At least 17 of your brothers had the courage to speak up. Hopefully more will follow soon.
Posted by: JJ Hinson | July 22, 2006, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
OK, according to JJ Hinson, I’m “very scary”, and my mind is “not totally engaged”. All because I question the government telling us that the common citizenry doesn’t have the basic human right to self-defense when traveling by plane, but rather that they have the moral obligation to relinquish that right to others who are deemed by fiat to be more appropriate to handle the responsibility than the rest of us. My message to JJ Hinson; go find a 9/11 victim’s family and tell them that it was better in the name of political correctness that their loved one wasn’t able to defend themselves adequately. Then come back to this thread and criticize me.
Posted by: Michael Bane | August 9, 2006, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Bane,
I have met many family members and I have yet to meet one to agree with you. I can’t imagine one saying, “If only my wife had a snub nose .38…she would have executed the hijackers one by one and landed the plane herself…”
Sit down and think beyond your wild cowboy scenarios. It sounds like you are someone denied for application to a police officer position.
I am one of many trying to prevent another 9/11. I never said passengers should not be vigilant and act in an attack if necessary. I would not want my children on a plane in which your relatively untrained (I am giving you the benefit of the doubt – you must have some level of training) people are sitting there armed. You do not know anything about fighting aboard an aircraft in flight if you propose putting weapons there in the hands of anyone, but sufficiently experienced and supremely trained personnel.
Do you not even understand the issue of anonymity many FAMs complain about? If anyone figures out you are carrying a gun, your ability to protect the plane just went through the floor even if you are a highly trained counterterrorist professional.
Go drive on our nations’ highways and streets. Do you trust the ability of many of those people to drive? They have licenses and are legally driving, but they kill people through their own recklessness and stupidity every day. How do you propose we keep out all of those morons from your program?
If you want to help, call you Congressman about the issues you care about. Tell your neighbors to keep their chin up despite the screening hassles. Finally, be vigilant and fight as hard as you can to defend that plane if you find yourself in a horrible situation and there are no FAMs present. The whole bring your gun to fly idea is not well thought out.
Would you support bringing your gun to the White House to defend yourself if a tourist was to go insane and start hurting you? Same thing at work here. There are some places where deadly force needs to be left in the hands of the professionals.
Posted by: JJ Hinson | August 17, 2006, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Actually, statistics show that law-abiding citizens injure innocent bystanders less than police do. I think that’s because private citizens are more conscious of the fact that they can be sued for what they do, whereas government employees enjoy immunity from liability.
Now I would like to address other parts of your last post:
“Sit down and think beyond your wild cowboy scenarios.”
Invoking the “wild west” argument is a knee jerk reaction anti-gun naysayers invoke all the time to predict doomsday whenever gun laws are liberalized.
“It sounds like you are someone denied for application to a police officer position.”
You have no idea who I am, what I do for a living or what I would like to do. Is there some sort of insinuation you are making about the attitudes of people who don’t make the police department?
“I have met many family members and I have yet to meet one to agree with you. I can’t imagine one saying, ‘If only my wife had a snub nose .38…she would have executed the hijackers one by one and landed the plane herself…’”
That’s because the American public has been brainwashed into thinking that it’s OK to give up their basic human right to self-defense and leave it to the “professionals”.
“Do you not even understand the issue of anonymity many FAMs complain about? If anyone figures out you are carrying a gun, your ability to protect the plane just went through the floor even if you are a highly trained counterterrorist professional.”
Regular passengers have a better chance at remaining anonymous. They have to work harder at it in order to keep whatever licenses they have. And the potential for more armed people onboard would make it more difficult for a hijacker to pick out who is who.
“You do not know anything about fighting aboard an aircraft in flight if you propose putting weapons there in the hands of anyone, but sufficiently experienced and supremely trained personnel.”
That’s because we don’t have the chance to prove competency by being allowed to bring weapons onboard in the first place. Requiring some level of training is not unreasonable. Just don’t tell me that I don’t deserve to to take steps I think are appropriate to protect myself.
“Go drive on our nations’ highways and streets. Do you trust the ability of many of those people to drive? They have licenses and are legally driving, but they kill people through their own recklessness and stupidity every day. How do you propose we keep out all of those morons from your program?”
All of us interact with others on a daily basis; it’s a necessity. We go to doctors, leave our kids at daycare, and eat off food vendor carts. We must have some level of trust in others in order to get things done. The possibility that something could go wrong is simply not reason enough to conclude that the potential danger of allowing passnegers to carry weapons outweighs the benefits.
“Tell your neighbors to keep their chin up despite the screening hassles.”
The whole point of my position on this issue is that I disagree with not being allowed to bring weapons onboard. Why would I tell people to bear with it?
“Finally, be vigilant and fight as hard as you can to defend that plane if you find yourself in a horrible situation and there are no FAMs present.”
So you at least acknowledge there is credibility to the general idea of passengers being able to defend a plane. I’m boycotting flying until they let me bring my gun with me, so I’m not worried about running into a situation like you describe.
“Would you support bringing your gun to the White House to defend yourself if a tourist was to go insane and start hurting you?”
We could go on and on about different situations and places where people could or could not carry weapons. Let’s just stick to the topic of airplanes.
“Same thing at work here. There are some places where deadly force needs to be left in the hands of the professionals.”
The whole point of my position is that planes shouldn’t be one of those places. If you disagree, that’s certainly your right.
If you’re a FAM and you work diligently to protect the flying public, good job. I have never said that there’s no need for law enforcement officers on flights.
It’s my understanding that all federal law enforcment officers can carry weapons on planes. I’m sure they don’t have the same level of training that FAMS do. How do you justify that? Just because they have a badge? If so, that goes directly to my point. It’s not the danger of the weapons themselves, but the attitude about some people being judged “worthy” above others in the name of political correctness. In my opinion, that’s simply wrong.
Posted by: Michael Bane | August 30, 2006, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Michael,
Other federal LEOs all go through annual training about flying armed. ALL do. This is on top of the fact of them carrying a weapon and engaging in enforcement activities FOR A LIVING.
The topic pointed out by Hinson re: the White House versus planes is a perfect point. Your rebuttals prove his case. You do not understand the inherent challenges of the aviation domain. You don’t even comprehend the issues Hinson put to you.
Many highly qualified federal agents and military types wash out of the FAM training program. How in the world do you propose opening it up to anyone with a clear criminal history and the desire to get ‘trained up’? The wash out rate for the general public to understand the issues involved and to be able to be proficient would be close to 100%. No offense, but you have to be a very special person to become an Air Marshal. A lot of police officers, feds, and commandos are still not the kind of special that is needed and recruited.
I, as it appeared Hinson is too, am in favor of an armed public. I understand it is not a wild west in every state with liberal concealed carry laws. That being said, the aviation domain is far more special than even the White House. Think about it you simpleton. You can move the President and make the White House another pretty building. You can call for backup. You cannot crash the White House into yet another high value target. They DO NOT let anyone come waltzing in the White House to help the Secret Service protect anyone. What kind of nut expects the Air Marshals to trust anyone to help them if they are unsure of their level of training?
An Air Marshal is alone against an unknown foe, with no backup, with no retreat, with no chance to think about things. He must respond, be brutally decisive and win. Sorry Bane, you are frightening. Your ideas are poorly considered.
I will not even try to respond to some of your latest arguement as you make the case through your responses. The case for keeping you off airplanes.
Posted by: Undisclosed | September 6, 2006, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Bane is a nut. I would be scared to fly with him as much as the bad guys.
9/11 Relative
Posted by: Cindy Maxwell | September 7, 2006, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
“Think about it you simpleton.”
It figures someone who would resort to posting anonymously would also resort to personal attacks. Let’s see what that makes your credibilty level: ABSOLUTELY ZERO. Have the guts to give your real name like I do.
“Bane is a nut.”
Cindy Maxwell, your resorting to personal attacks instead of arguing facts speaks volumes about whether you have any credibiltiy as well.
Posted by: Michael Bane | September 11, 2006, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
OK, now let’s dissect our anonymous friend’s arguments:
“Other federal LEOs all go through annual training about flying armed. ALL do. This is on top of the fact of them carrying a weapon and engaging in enforcement activities FOR A LIVING.”
GAO report 04-242, page 11 notes how air marshals have the “highest qualification standard of any federal agency.” That means other Federal LEOS that are also allowed to carry on planes have less stringent requirements. If the issue of firearms proficiency on and around aircraft was as important as you claim it is, there wouldn’t be different standards for different agencies. I know a few LEO’s who don’t carry off duty and don’t practice as much as some civilians I know.
“No offense, but you have to be a very special person to become an Air Marshal.”
You say “no offense”, yet you stoop to calling me names later on in the post. As for being a special person to be an air marshal, some of those people have:
*been caught sleeping on flights;
*admitted and pleaded guilty to drug smuggling;
*pointed a gun at people in a dispute over a parking space;
*dropped their bullets on the floor in front of other passengers; and,
*left their guns in airport bathrooms.
“The topic pointed out by Hinson re: the White House versus planes is a perfect point. Your rebuttals prove his case. You do not understand the inherent challenges of the aviation domain. You don’t even comprehend the issues Hinson put to you.”
No, they do NOT prove his case, nor do they prove that I don’t understand what he was trying to say. I clearly understand his concerns about the presence and use of firearms on aircraft; I merely disagree with his analogy to the White House. That’s not the same as not comprehending something.
“An Air Marshal is alone against an unknown foe, with no backup, with no retreat, with no chance to think about things. He must respond, be brutally decisive and win.”
Any street cop could find themselves in the same situation chasing a suspect into a dark alley. Private citizens who are attacked by criminals are put in that position all the time, yet they fight back. The fact that air marshals have to do that doesn’t mean others can’t.
“Sorry Bane, you are frightening. Your ideas are poorly considered.”
I suspect you are saying that merely because my position on this issue is controversial.
“I will not even try to respond to some of your latest arguement as you make the case through your responses. The case for keeping you off airplanes.”
More personal attacks instead of reasoned arguments. Maybe we should let the fact you’re willing to engage in that type of conduct speak for itself.
Posted by: Michael Bane | September 12, 2006, 10:02 am 10:02 am
I must agree with others that Mr. Bane is all too eager to get a weapon. He should worry more about being a more alert passenger and watching things around him. Then he can report these incidents to the proper authorities or point them out to the innocents around him if there is not time for anything else.
Being a FAM is far different from chasing a perp down a dark alley as was already pointed out. A police officer can be smart and back off instead of chasing an unknown down a dark alley alone. A FAM MUST win despite risks to himself. Street cops are trained to survive. They do not race into a hostage situation as soon as they arrive first on the scene. They set up a perimeter and wait to think about things. They CAN do that because they are on the ground and time is on their side. The longer time goes on, the hostage takers tire and the cops bring more and more help. A FAM would have to use speed, surprise and violence of action to end the situation immediately. He may have to do this alone. Time for a FAM emergency situation means it is closer and closer to the plane being shot down by F-15, F-16 or F-18s.
The White House was a perfect analogy by undisclosed. There are certain times and places when you must control the environment more than the Wild West.
Some of my co-workers have been arrested, fired or disciplined for criminal and/or stupid actions Mr. Bane. Do you know of a human organization without any failures? The CIA has had operatives and employees turn and spy for the enemy. The FBI and Secret Service have had their share of embarrassments.
As for your addressing of Ms. or Mrs. Maxwell, Go to hell Mr. Bane. You show your lack of tact. No matter how you dress it, your ideas are weak and poorly reasoned.
I am not a profiler, but I would imagine you have a long criminal history or at least complaints related to road rage as well.
Please seek counseling.
I almost forgot a great one. You feel it is a great idea to arm passengers since you know some gun enthusiasts who shoot more than some LEOs you know. Great, there are some surgeons out there that do not study on a continuing basis as much as some other scientists. Do you want the credentialed, experienced surgeon Mr. Bane, or should we bring on all who have read a bunch of books and dissected animals all week long?
Posted by: T.R.J. | September 18, 2006, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Bane is frightening. I think his postings must be a joke to get people fired up. Someone cannot be that stupid.
Armed security needs to remain the job of the professionals. Able bodied passengers are great, but allowing everyone to fly armed is too dumb an idea on so many levels.
Posted by: WFO Fam | September 18, 2006, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Enough responding to him. MBane is a gun NUT and not someone to engage in an intelligent discussion.
He is the reason the NRA and other self defense organizations get a bad name.
Posted by: Detroit Cop | September 19, 2006, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Arming passengers is a bad idea. Wait until one of them gets into a dispute over the chicken or the fish meal.
Leave the guns to the gunslingers, not the vigilantes.
Posted by: Flt Attendant SWA | September 19, 2006, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
All right, let’s address the latest spin.
“Some of my co-workers have been arrested, fired or disciplined for criminal and/or stupid actions Mr. Bane. Do you know of a human organization without any failures? The CIA has had operatives and employees turn and spy for the enemy. The FBI and Secret Service have had their share of embarrassments.”
I never said that all law enforcement officers should are not trustworthy. What I did say is that we should not just trust the government when they say “leave it to the professionals”.
“As for your addressing of Ms. or Mrs. Maxwell, Go to hell Mr. Bane. You show your lack of tact.”
The fact that you would say this shows your lack of maturity and emotional stability. Be an adult and stick to reasoned arguments instead of stooping to personal attacks. The fact that you would make such a statement says more about you than you ever could about me.
“I am not a profiler, but I would imagine you have a long criminal history or at least complaints related to road rage as well.”
If you’re not a profiler, then don’t make assumptions about other people. You have no idea who I am and what my background is. Mature adults don’t slander people.
“Please seek counseling.”
What kind of education and training do you have that qualifies you to diagnose people over the internet?
“Great, there are some surgeons out there that do not study on a continuing basis as much as some other scientists. Do you want the credentialed, experienced surgeon Mr. Bane, or should we bring on all who have read a bunch of books and dissected animals all week long?”
That’s just a silly comparison. Self-defense isn’t brain surgery.
“Bane is frightening. I think his postings must be a joke to get people fired up. Someone cannot be that stupid.”
Someone claiming to be a FAM posted this. I find it disturbing that someone who would stoop to making statements like that was determined psychologically fit to be an air marshal.
“Able bodied passengers are great, but allowing everyone to fly armed is too dumb an idea on so many levels.”
I never said everyone should be allowed to fly armed. Convicted criminals can’t even own a firearm, let alone carry one.
“MBane is a gun NUT and not someone to engage in an intelligent discussion.”
Someone claiming to be a police officer posted this. My concerns about the mental stability of this poster are the same as for the supposed FAM.
Posted by: Michael Bane | September 23, 2006, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
B A N E, N U T.
Enough said people. He will probably go off on a tangent with a quote of “B A N E, N U T” and then try to spin it.
Posted by: Delta Pilot | September 24, 2006, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
I agree. Stop all the silly arguing. I do not want anyone on my flight with weapons other than FFDOs, FAMs and properly authorized law enforcement officers.
Posted by: Commercial Pilot | September 25, 2006, 6:21 am 6:21 am
Thank God for the whistleblowers.
Posted by: Malcomb H. | September 25, 2006, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
The only “spin” on this blog is coming from people like Delta Pilot who can’t think of anything better to say in response to someone else other than calling them names. The first line in his post isn’t even a complete sentence!
I don’t object to anyone providing rebuttals to my reasoning; just don’t resort to making personal attacks.
Posted by: Michael Bane | September 26, 2006, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
I pray for you Mr. Bane. I hope you find some peace and common sense.
Thank you FAMs for protecting my flight deck from Bane and other unstable ones.
Posted by: Frontier Pilot | September 13, 2007, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Spencer Pickard is a hero still to this day. The world needs more whistle blowers to keep mgmt on thier toes.
Posted by: Look Again Folks | February 11, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm