Jun 1, 2006 12:18pm

No Icons, No Monuments Worth Protecting

New York has no national monuments or icons, according to the Department of Homeland Security form obtained by ABC News. That was a key factor used to determine that New York City should have its anti-terror funds slashed by 40 percent–from $207.5 million in 2005 to $124.4 million in 2006. "All I can tell you is if you look at their worksheets, and it says that New York City doesn’t have any high visibility national icons … I mean, I don’t have to list the Brooklyn Bridge, the United Nations, Rockefeller Center, the Statue of Liberty, Empire State Building and the Stock Exchange," New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said in response to ABC News’ questions.

The formula did not consider as landmarks or icons: The Empire State Building, The United Nations, The Statue of Liberty and others found on several terror target hit lists. It also left off notable landmarks, such as the New York Public Library, Times Square, City Hall and at least three of the nation’s most renowned museums: The Guggenheim, The Metropolitan and The Museum of Natural History. "I think the facts are clear," Bloomberg said. "What they’ve really done is taken what was supposed to be threat-based and just started to distribute it as normal pork."

The form ignored that New York City is the capital of the world financial markets and merely stated the city had four significant bank assets.

New York City is home to Chase, JP Morgan, Citi Group, The New York Stock Exchange, The Commodities Exchange, American Express, George Soros funds, Michael Gabelli’s funds, Lazard Frere and Salomon Brothers, to name just a few of the more prominent banking interests located there. "Any threat-based analysis would show that New York is the top of the terrorist target list," Police Commissioner Ray Kelly told ABC News.  "We’re also a location that experienced two successful attacks, almost 3,000 people were killed here, four other attacks that were recorded … Every place has vulnerabilities, but clearly, New York is still target number one. "The process they used is also somewhat bizarre. They basically subcontracted it out.  They, as an agency that has 180,000 employees, they went outside, and (used) some sort of peer review, and those people were not privy to any intelligence information …  The, the whole process is really kind of unfathomable to those of us who need this funding."

The formula did note a commuter population of more than 16 million around the city twice struck by fundamentalist terrorists and twice more targeted in plots halted in pre-operational stages. It noted the more than eight million residents and the largest rail ridership in the nation – more than five million. It is those commuters and rail riders who are expected to suffer most from the cuts since mass transit is listed on most DHS alerts as the top terror target. (Click here for the Strategic Threat Document obtained by ABC News.)

The report lists as classified "visitors of interest destination city," immigration cases, suspicious incidents and FBI cases. New York City is home to the largest FBI field office in the country, which actively monitors 24/7 the Iranian Mission.  The city has also had the most significant terror trials in the nation and is home to one of the largest air hubs in the nation.

User Comments

What ever happened to “We are all New Yorkers today”? Funny how quickly we forget that NYC is terrorist target number 1, and has already had 2 terrorist attacks. I guess what they say is true, that the middle of this nation could care if New York and California fell off into the ocean.

Posted by: Eric K | June 1, 2006, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

It doesn’t say who authored this report, but clearly he/she needs to be promoted. Outstanding analysis.

Posted by: surly | June 1, 2006, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

The sad thing? I can’t tell whether surly’s joking or not.
Ah, well. Heck of a job, Mr. Chertoff.

Posted by: David C | June 1, 2006, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Yeah, well… too many goddamn Democrats in NYC, hmmm?
JF

Posted by: Jaime Frontero | June 1, 2006, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Statue of Liberty is in New Jersey

Posted by: nanshan | June 1, 2006, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

This is as shameful as it is unsurprising. What would have been very obvious to your readers five minutes after the attacks of 9/11 is beyond the grasp of this Administration, five years after that tragedy. I wonder how much money is being spent to protect the Alamo, the Grand Old Opry, Falwell’s Thomas Road Baptist Church, and the Dallas Cowboys. Not to mention major Republican campaign contributors.
One could make the case that a sizeable majority of at-risk sites are in blue states or blue areas. But those aren’t places Republicans would seem to be eager to protect.

Posted by: Mike | June 1, 2006, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

See all the money we’re saving for security by wire-tapping?! Now we can return that money to the rightful owners of this country, the rich. There is a price for civil liberties after all. Thanks George “I’m above the Law” Bush!

Posted by: Dan | June 1, 2006, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

I don’t know who put this report together, but don’t blame “the middle of the nation”. Some of us care very much about the East and West coasts sinking into the ocean (we’re generally opposed to the idea).

Posted by: Bob | June 1, 2006, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Yeah,,,again, Bush’s pathetic administration shows its ignorance “Mission Accomplished”! How ’bout some medals boys, I gots a sack full if ya ain’t against me.

Posted by: Dale | June 1, 2006, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Is there anyone, anywhere in the DHS who has a clue about what they are supposed to do and how to do it? Such absolute incompetence is beyond belief.

Posted by: KenoshaMarge | June 1, 2006, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

This is so insane that it seems as if this government *wants* another attack to occur in NY.
Let’s see… UBL is still loose, but Pakistan gets a pass, with our forces in Iraq instead. The madrasses in Saudi still churn out hatred, but the Saudis get a pass, too. On to Iran, even though Pakistan already has nukes, and is a bullet away from UBL having those. And now this.
Almost makes one believe in some of those 911 conspiracy theories, huh?

Posted by: Logan Waters | June 1, 2006, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

For Eric:
1. Where does ‘The Buck Stop’?
2. Where is Texas located?

Posted by: Roger P | June 1, 2006, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

The most famous icon in the world with the most icons in the world, New York City, is not an icon or has no icons?
There is a scientific explanation for this.
In Washington, D.C. there is no gravity, instead the place sucks!

Posted by: KEVIN SCHMIDT, STERLING VA | June 1, 2006, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

It also failed to report that NYC did not support the reelection of Bush, and when the RNC held its convention coincidentally in the same city as the 9/11 WTC attacks, the cityfolk did not welcome the conventioneers with open arms. Nor was the port of NY available for private RNC parties.

Posted by: lizzie | June 1, 2006, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

With all due respect, Eric, I think some bureaucrat is to blame rather than the middle of the nation. I find this article very disturbing and almost unbelievable. Clearly, these funds are going to pork barrel projects rather than where they belong.

Posted by: Jay M | June 1, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Gee, just guessing here, but could the fact that this city is just chock full of Democrats have anything to do with this?

Posted by: K | June 1, 2006, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

If the Statue of Liberty isn’t a national monument, what is?
Are there any in Los Angeles (outside of Graumann’s Chinese theater)? Does Fisherman’s Wharf in San Francisco qualify?
And how about Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis, Cleveland, Detroit, St. Louis, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia–wait, the Liberty Bell is there, Dallas, Houston, Miami (the Fountainbleau?) and Las Vegas (Caesar’s Palace?)
What I want to know is was this reported drafted by someone who lives or has lived in the United States?

Posted by: Harvey Ardman | June 1, 2006, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

I don’t think “heckuva job” even covers it. This is a truly inspired job. I feel so safe today in my 40 story office building in the middle of the NYC financial district. Thanks guys!

Posted by: NB | June 1, 2006, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

So, do I at least get a 40% tax refund now?

Posted by: here right now | June 1, 2006, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Is the statue of Paul Bunyon out west on the list? I just want to know how to measure this administration’s priorities. How about the world’s biggest Walmart?

Posted by: Jeffrey Sweet | June 1, 2006, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Frankly, I’m surprised that they are giving NY any funding at all, given that NY’s two senators are Democrats and there is no chance of a Republican presidential or senatorial candidate winning the state. There is absolutely nothing to be gained by the Republicans in providing any funds to NY so why should they ?

Posted by: Ron G | June 1, 2006, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

What happened to “We are all New Yorkers?”
New Yorkers vote Democratic, so the DHS money has to go toe Florida!

Posted by: Derek | June 1, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Had to pay for those big tax cuts for the top 1% didn’t they. After all, with tax cuts like that the top 1% can afford to protect themselves, to hell with the masses. When is this nonsense going to stop? What does it take to outrage people these days? Bush and company keep having daily FUBARs and nothing seems to change. I hope all the right wing religious wackos that voted (even though it was a stolen election twice)for this brain dead excuse for a leader are happy. Please stay home in November, for me!!!

Posted by: John Mooseles | June 1, 2006, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Clearly, whoever authored this report is doing a heckuvajob.

Posted by: Alice B. | June 1, 2006, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

So this is how it happens: make Chertoff look like an idiot (which he is) by not involving him when a subway attack is suspected in NYC, and he gets even (as would any good Bush crony) by slashing the funds to the wacko liberals in NY. Heckuva job, Mikey.

Posted by: No longer surprised by anything | June 1, 2006, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Sitting here in NYC, with the Brooklyn Bridge in view, I simply don’t know what planet this administration is on if they don’t think this city has landmarks.
I’ve long thought the reason the 9/11 attackers didn’t hit the Statue of Liberty is that they didn’t dare hit the most internationally beloved national monument in the whole country.

Posted by: David L Steinhardt | June 1, 2006, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

That’s because we are paying for this ridiculously unessesary WAR!

Posted by: Kimberly | June 1, 2006, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

There is a key hidden factor in the Bush administration’s formula used to distribute these funds: the party affiliation of the city or state’s population. You see – a Democrat is worth only 3/5 of a Republican.
Assuming that the population of NYC is almost entirely made of up Democrats, you’d assume that NYC would receive 3/5 of the funding that they received last year. Some simple math (124.4M/207.5M) confirms that the city will receive is almost exactly 3/5 of the previous year’s budget.
Where did this number come from? There was much political wrangling at the White House. After heated debate on both sides of the issue, they reached a compromise, which they call – the 3/5 compromise.
—-
OK this is obviously not true, but NYC’s budget really is about 3/5 of what it was last year. The part of me that loved the DaVinci Code wants to believe that this is true. The other part of me that reads the news every day knows that the administration isn’t smart enough to pull off something this coordinated.

Posted by: Kevin | June 1, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

New York has no national monuments or icons?! The Statue of Liberty was viewed as THE most iconic symbol of American freedom and liberty in the days following 9/11. Now it is not worth protecting a mere five years later? What are these people thinking?!

Posted by: Kristin | June 1, 2006, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

The fact that NY has been a target of terrorists twice already (compared to Omaha, Cleveland, Chicago et al.) is not sufficient proof of a higher risk? Short term memory and inability to read history (not to mention to understand its implications).
Now that would not have anyhthing to do with the fact that the two senators from NY are Dems and that there is good chance that the Governorship may become Dem.?

Posted by: Solstice | June 1, 2006, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Yes. The terrorists will certainly go after the Red States first.

Posted by: e_five | June 1, 2006, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

New York City should secede, then build a fence to keep out illegal immigrants from rural America.

Posted by: Mongo | June 1, 2006, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

I’m still baffled and astounded by the fact that NY no longer has ‘national monuments’ to protect from terrorists while places like Omaha, Memphis & Charlotte do. Whoever put this report together needs to seriously revisit 6th grade social studies and revise their ‘monument’ list. I’m with Se. Schumer on this one, the “president” has NO right to claim ‘solidarity’ with New York and New Yorkers in general. Yet one more weapon the Republican Party uses to ‘punish’ those who don’t fall in line with their views. Shame on you Homeland Security! Shame on you President Bush!

Posted by: Keira | June 1, 2006, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

What a bunch of incompetent boobs. The Bush Administration will go down as the most incompetent in history. Next, they’ll tell us there are no governmental offices in Washington, DC; no lakes in Minnesota, no mountains in Colorado, and I could go on and on and on but you get my drift.
Next time, let’s not elect the class clown President, OK?

Posted by: truth | June 1, 2006, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

And what was hit on 9/11/2001?

Posted by: Tom Rodeheaver | June 1, 2006, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Hey, perhaps they can get the “Presidential Medal of Honor”
Heck of a job guys!

Posted by: Greg | June 1, 2006, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Does anyone find it odd that the DHS form seems to give all types of assets the same weight? Does that not seem asanine? How is a ‘commercial asset’ of the same weight as a ‘nuclear facility’? Who came up with this formula? A two year old?

Posted by: Mash | June 1, 2006, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

chertoff is doing one heck of a job…NEW YORK, THE NUMBER ONE TARGET OF ‘TERISTS’…whatever lies and propaganda fit the bill of the day for robbing the country blind.

Posted by: charles | June 1, 2006, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Columbia has william’s brice stadium, sesquicentennial park, the state house, and the sun trust building. where is our $100 million? I do not feel safe.

Posted by: spencer wyant | June 1, 2006, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

This certainly proves the “dumbing of America” theory.

Posted by: Lynne | June 1, 2006, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

What cities did have monuments and how many? It’s hard to judge how blid, stupid or dishonest this is without context.
Still, this is ridiculous.

Posted by: Bruce M. Smith | June 1, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Instead of cutting the Homeland Security Funds from any city, maybe the people that came up with the formula should take a pay cut and that money go towards Homeland Security. Every city, town, and landmark in this nation are a threat and should be protected.

Posted by: Roch C | June 1, 2006, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Where does “Blue State” figure into the formula?

Posted by: Ely K | June 1, 2006, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Wal-Mart in Cheney’s Casper, Wyoming, probably needs the money more, considering all the al Qaeda attacks there.
—Leslie, Democrat in NYC

Posted by: Leslie | June 1, 2006, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

And by outstanding analysis, Surly, I think you mean “heckuva job!”

Posted by: Dan | June 1, 2006, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

from a picture of boy pointing at the statue of liberty and shouting “it’s HER!” from the deck of the ship he’d been traveling with the hundreds and hundreds of people to come and live in their dreams in this new land to a picture of thousands people lining up around the downtown NY to donate their blood for the victims of 9/11, NY is one of the iconic cities in America in my eyes and my heart. I do not have any more anger left to express amd do feel doomed. God help us all.

Posted by: jd | June 1, 2006, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Huh? New York? What is this city of which you speak? I have never heard of this “New York.”
World’s financial capital? The East Coast’s pre-eminent hub of finance, theater, media, entertainment, medicine, culture, arts, an international tourist destination, home of the Empire State and Chrysler buildings, the Statue of Liberty, Rockefeller Center, Times Square, the Bronx Zoo, the Met, the Guggenheim, Carnegie Hall, Broadway, Grant’s Tomb, Ellis Island, Coney Island, the Flatiron Building, the Thanksgiving Day Parade, St. John’s Cathedral, Macy’s Santa Claus, Yankee Stadium, Wall Street, Brooklyn Bridge, and 1/4 of the world’s gold buillion in the Federal Reserve’s banks…are you sure they didn’t mean “Newark?”

Posted by: theorajones | June 1, 2006, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

It’s becoming clearer and clearer that the President and the people in his administration just don’t care! They don’t care about New Yorkers, they don’t care about young men who are dying or are maimed in Iraq, they don’t care about poor people who used to live in New Orleans, they don’t care about older Americans who have to struggle with the Medicare drug plans, they don’t care about the younger Americans who have to drive to work everyday and pay outrageous gas prices and, finally, they don’t care about the world population who will have to endure the dire consequences of Global Warming.
If there is one thing that characterizes this administration, it’s the total lack of empathy. It’s very sad!

Posted by: Richard Krain | June 1, 2006, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

As a crime prevention specialist of over 35 years, I continually am amazed at the ignorance and contempt of Homeland Security (sic), when it comes to protecting the United States and its citizens.
They appear to be an organization that is a prime example of the “Good Old Boy Network”, and are very lacking in experienced crime prevention practitioners.

Posted by: Skip Estrella, Ph.D. | June 1, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Every American has a stake in the defense of New York and Washington. Guiliani was the real leader in a time of crisis. Bush was an opportunist who used the crisis to manipulate us into a catastrophic war. And now he’s using homeland defense funds for election time politicking. Makes me truly sick.

Posted by: Furious | June 1, 2006, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

When was the last time a national monument was the target of an attack. The Muro Building (in Oklahoma) and the World Trade Centers were both attacked and I don’t think any of those buildings were official monuments. Nothing surprises anymore does it?

Posted by: JF | June 1, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

In addition to the omissions already mentioned: Brooklyn Bridge, the George Washington Bridge, Central Park, the HQ for all of the TV networks and other media companies, Grand Central Station, Pennsyvania Station (AMTRAK), Madison Square Garden, Yankee and Shea Stadiums, the airports, Ellis Island, etc.
Also, its just Gabelli Funds.
Would like to see comparison of other areas of the country that do have “national monuments or icons.” What about Jackson Hole or The Alamo, I bet they count.
NYers already know that they’re on their own with this rotten bunch, but it’s still shocking to see it as official policy.

Posted by: J.D. | June 1, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

The Department of Homeland Security also neglects to mention one other fact: the large Jewish population in the NY metro area. One of the biggest in the word, right? I’m guessing THAT might influence terrorists as well.

Posted by: Andrea Schwalm Stolz | June 1, 2006, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

I couldn’t open the document link, but I would like to see where the money went that was cut from the budget of NYC’s.
Otherwise, this article comes off as a bitter NYC-centric whining & moaning. NYC isn’t the center of the universe folks.

Posted by: Michael | June 1, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

This is so TYPICAL. This is what happens when the Republican Congress keeps approving every UNQUALIFIED FRIEND AND POLITICAL PICK OF CARL ROWE to these positions. Just like he had a HORSE SHOW GUY RUNNING FEMA, THE SPY ON AMERICA GUY IS RUNNING THE CIA, THE FORMER LOBBYISTS FOR TIMBER & MINING INDUSTRY RUNNING THE EPA, AND NOW ANOTHER UNQUALIFIED OR HOLY UNSUITABLE PERSON RUNNING ANOTHER AGENCY. THE BUSH PRESIDENCY IS THE WORST RAN US GOVERNMENT SINCE the landing of the MAYFLOWER…

Posted by: Brett | June 1, 2006, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Guess OBL didn’t get the memo.

Posted by: Sloop John B | June 1, 2006, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Clearly the Homeland Security report is another example of gross mismanagement and stupidity.
Does anyone from that department or any other actually read what they write? If someone – anyone – had reviewed the materials, they would have (should have) noted the irregularities and misinformation.

Posted by: Fran | June 1, 2006, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

By reporting this you are helping the terrorists. Find the leaker!!

Posted by: Shmoo | June 1, 2006, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

I guess what they say is true, that the middle of this nation could care if New York and California fell off into the ocean.
I care. It’s the government that doesn’t. Perhaps Boise needed more smoke detectors or something more important. We’ll likley spend the money on more important things like protecting Mount Rushmore from terrar. Because if George Washinton’s nose gets knocked off, they win or something.

Posted by: Nunya | June 1, 2006, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

maybe montana and wyoming really are greater terrorist targets.they haven’t had their funding cut.we should all be thankful that our glorious leaders are so much smarter than we are.

Posted by: rowdyruffian | June 1, 2006, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

“I hear you and the world hears you too ” It’s good to know we have The Decider at the helm.

Posted by: JohnO | June 1, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

This is hardly surprising. It’s an election year, and it’s hardly news by now that the Bush Administration values style over substance – they’re pandering to the fear-addled people in rural America (their “base”) while leaving the people who actually need protection to twist in the wind. This is the same song they’ve been singing for five years; it’s just in a different key.

Posted by: Will | June 1, 2006, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Pardon my cliche, but you can’t make this stuff up. Wow, these guys really are tough on terror. Cracker-jack smart, too. Hell, the Statue of Liberty doesn’t stand for anything these days anyway…

Posted by: Scott | June 1, 2006, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

This dramatically shows the caliber of the people we have working for us in the federal government. I sure feel safer.

Posted by: sbdriver | June 1, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Surely a medal of freedom in his/her future.

Posted by: c kennedy | June 1, 2006, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

New York Harbor is one of the most recognizable scenes in the world.
Since I was a kid, I have known what New York looks like, recognizing the landmarks mentioned above as well as the City Court Building and the Brooklyn Bridge. I can remember climbing the Statue of Liberty when I was a boy as well as visiting the top of the Empire State Building. I remember vividly the views of the city from the Circle Line Tour I took two years prior to 9/11. I also remember the awful day 9/11, seeing on television the destruction and chaos caused by evil rotten fanatics. Living in Hampton Roads, VA, I can remember seeing the crippled USS Cole being repaired in Newport News Shipyard after damage inflicted by al-Qaeda drones. I am sad to hear of this report. The cynic in me wonders if another PDB hit the President’s desk detailing another New York City attack. I can’t forget the lessons of history such as the Reichstag fire. Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it. The day the Statue of Liberty is ignored is itself an attack on America.

Posted by: Andrew E | June 1, 2006, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

If that’s how they feel, then they won’t need my tax dollars as a New Yorker. I’d like to see the numbers as far as what Omaha vs. New York City contributes in tax revenue to the fed. govt.

Posted by: NYC Resident | June 1, 2006, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

It’s nice to see that the “Heck of a job, Brownie” moments continue in this administration.
It’s a good thing that they’re in charge of protecting us.

Posted by: Jp | June 1, 2006, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

This entire administration is beyond scary!!!
They appiont morons, have no solutions, have no handle on anything except the toilet lever as they flush common sense, reason & facts down the drain… and they don’t seem to care at all. Take care of yourselves! This government won’t!!!

Posted by: voice of reason | June 1, 2006, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

I’d be curious to see the “national landmarks” noted in other cities deemed more worthy of protection– and how many of these landmarks happen to be in red states.

Posted by: dan | June 1, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

I think it was someone named “surly”. Seriously, though — good article. If there are cuts to be made, there is plenty of pork out there! NYC has been through enough; they need our support.

Posted by: ken | June 1, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

This is hardly an issue of the middle of the country vs. New York/California, Eric. The real question about this shockingly bad decision by the DHS is motivation. It would be interesting to track political contributions from the cities that received the largest bumps in anti-terror funds.

Posted by: Jonathan | June 1, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

It reminds of an old NY Daily News headlnies from the 1970s:
Washington to NYC: Drop Dead!

Posted by: q | June 1, 2006, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

My question is why should ANY prosperous city get funds?
Why should not the cost of defending a city be born by its citizens? Cops, Firemen, sanitation, corrections are all things that should be paid for by the City. If a nuclear reactor is situated outside of a City then perhaps the State or Federal Government should get involved, but day to day expense money should not be funneled to Washington only to be parceled out with the usual vig taken by the Feds!
It seems funny that the same politicians that complain when taxes are reduced for the “rich” are now complaining that funds are being reduced to one of the richest Cities! NYC has just had its bond rating raised to an all-time high…..I think that they can afford to protect themselves :-)
edge.

Posted by: edge | June 1, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

You’re doing a heckuva job, Brownie

Posted by: Timothy Adams | June 1, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Well, you gotta admit: it ain’t the home of hte Grand ‘Ol Opry… and it if ain’t the home of the Grand ‘Ol Opry, it ain’t got anything.

Posted by: David Flores | June 1, 2006, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

What is most reprehensible is the manner by which the authors justify their findings — namely, reductivism, as if mere “monuments” a terrorist target make.
Having grown up in St. Louis, with its significant landmark, and having lived 12 years in NYC, I can strike the difference quite readily. The fact is that on both a literal and figurative basis, the whole of NYC, especially Manhattan, is a bulls-eye. One cannot travel the length of the City without encountering something symbolic, cherished or otherwise identifiable.
Perhaps the greatest “monument”, thereby potential target, of all is the very population of NYC considering that White, Black, Asian, Hispanic, Christian, Jew, Muslim, and everyone of every possible stripe live, work, commute and so on every single day. It doesn’t take so wild an imagination to wonder how that idea on its own might rankle an extremist, somewhere.
While I can begrudgingly understand that the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial might not qualify as a “Top 10″ national target, I cannot for the life of me begin to understand any rationale that would seek to lessen New York City by comparison.

Posted by: Michael | June 1, 2006, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

The only surprise is that they didn’t list the FOX NEWS HQ in NYC as an important monument or icon.

Posted by: GOPropoganda | June 1, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

I’d be interested to see what cities are receiving an increase in funding?
Perhaps the Carolina – historical monuments to Strom Thurmond, Jesse Helms?
Texas – becuase that’s where Enron was? and the Bushes?
Florida – Terry Schaivo’s hospice site?
Montana or Whyoming?

Posted by: Dorothy | June 1, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Four significant bank assets: (1) the Federal Reserve (bunch of gold underneath; see Die Hard with a Vengeance (or, for your sake, just take my word for it).
(2) Citicorp Center?
(3) World Financial Center (Merrill Lynch, etc.) Fairly clear target right now, given that the buildings around it were demolished starting in 2001.
(4) I’m not about to figure out who to offend by leaving off, say, One Chase Plaza or Metrotech in Brooklyn (where much of the S&C processing for Chase, etc., is done) or the Citi facilites in Long Island City or the buildings that house major investment and foreign banks or the NYSE or the Merc or…

Posted by: Ken Houghton | June 1, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

If the Statue of Liberty, the Empire State Building, The United Nations, and Times Square don’t represent national icons, what does? The Corn Palace in Mitchell, South Dakota? The never-ending genius of Michael Chertoff and the inept administration he allegedly serves is truly astounding.

Posted by: migswando | June 1, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Skeletor should be laughed out of his job. I feel real sorry for any area in the U.S that gets hit by a hurricane this year.

Posted by: Mike G | June 1, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Some experts tell me the terror threat was well known about the Trade Towers in the intel community and that he could have easily prevented the first attack. Even Castro from Cuba warned him when, where, ect. As did many of our allies. He just was too drunk to care-no different now.
People better get some guts and start demanding some action from representatives.
Read this: Al-Qaida nukes already in U.S.
Terrorists, bombs smuggled across Mexico border by MS-13 gangsters
Too late, as usual.
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?
ARTICLE_ID=45203

Posted by: cz | June 1, 2006, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

It all boils down to politics. NYC did not vote for these knuckleheads so screw ‘em. Just like letting California wallow in the ‘energy crisis’ driven by Enron and Kenny Boy.

Posted by: LesIsmore | June 1, 2006, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

So the death of more than 3000 people meant nothing…so the attacks that brought down two of the most important financial monuments signified nada…so the most popular city in the world isn’t worth protecting…this administration is really “patriot”…allows thousands die after Katrina, thousands die in Iraq, allowed thousands die on 9-11 and now shows an odd disrespect with all New yorkers and the nation as a whole; if you don’t learn from your mistakes in the past and you insist on ignoring the obvious you’re called…

Posted by: Helder | June 1, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

You whinning libs need to wake up to what is going on.
You want to rag on Homeland Security for saying New York has no national momuments, and you are quick to point to the Statue of Liberty.
Are you idiots not aware that that statue was removed by the Bush Administrition from the list of National Momuments because its name has the word “LIBERTY”?

Posted by: Dillon | June 1, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

following that train of thought, if you’re going to cut the funds based on a lack of monuments, etc., and find there are none, why give them ANY money? Why does NY need $124 million bucks to protect nothing?

Posted by: Robert Warsager | June 1, 2006, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

For more than 100 years, New York City and the Statue of Liberty have stood as a beacon to freedom. Millions of oppressed people all over the world sacrificed everything to come to the United States through New York and live out the American dream of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. New York and those of us who live here represent America in a way no other city in this country does, second only to Washington, DC.
But hey, I’m sure Omaha, NE would make a fitting replacement.

Posted by: Jon | June 1, 2006, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Let’s make sure Disneyland and Disneyworld are on the list.

Posted by: Orange County Resident | June 1, 2006, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Wow.
This isn’t even a “librul” blog – I can’t f@#$&%$ wait for November…

Posted by: morty | June 1, 2006, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

well, it does sound like a dumb plan, no, i know it is!
Good luck, New Yorkers!!

Posted by: Tanya | June 1, 2006, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Is Homeland Security kidding? New York City has NO SIGNIFICANT LANDMARKS? I’d love to see what landmarks some of the cities that received an increase of funds have on their lists.

Posted by: Larry R. | June 1, 2006, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

This is incredible. I wonder if it has anything to do with Bloombergs’s recent counter-conservative standings.

Posted by: Jerome | June 1, 2006, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

I guess Georgie’s HSD folks made their point with all you liberal New Yorkers this time! You’ll get the cash when the Republicans get the votes and not before! Otherwise, they’ll spend your millions “protecting” some WWII memorial plaque on a rock in Muleshoe, Texas.
Maybe it’s time for us American citizen types to have our own protest marches across the country.

Posted by: Tom O'Brien | June 1, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Bad reporting… shame on you.
Look at the summaries:
Urban Area Asset Risk: Top 25%
Urban Area Geographic Risk: Top 25%
Urban Area Total Risk: Top 25%
Throw in a bunch more national icons, banks, whatever. It’ll still be in the Top 25%. So what if the numbers are one place or another… this is NOT why NYC had its funding cut! Report with accuracy, damit!

Posted by: Mike | June 1, 2006, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

No national monuments?! Did they even check with our National Park Service? Federal Hall, Castle Clinton, Teddy Roosevelts Birthplace, Grant’s Tomb and the Statue of Liberty all immediately jump to mind. What of the UN? What of the Empire State Building, the Chrysler Building, what of the reconstruction going on at the World Trade Center itself, already hit twice?
Morons, to a man.

Posted by: Tom Atkinson | June 1, 2006, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Nice to know that Memphis is ok here. I would hate for Elvis to return from his interplanetary adventure to find his home was demolished by an over zealous idiot.

Posted by: Chris Haskins | June 1, 2006, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Nothing surprises anymore. America is a dream from which the monster of the Corporate-State long ago awakened.
“We, the people” continue to slumber.
It is dead-of-night in America; the only sound is a wailing siren, diminishing to a memory as it flees the scene of the crime.

Posted by: Slothrop | June 1, 2006, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

There is something seriously wrong with this report. Even here in Wyoming, we understand that there are many places in New York that should be considered important enough to be protected. I just want to know what action I can take to get this injustice corrected!

Posted by: Leslie | June 1, 2006, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

I see, it’s another report Authored by the Lone Star Chamber of Commerce.
Now you know why we need to ask how smart you have to be to move cows around.

Posted by: gala | June 1, 2006, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

How simplistic can you get? National monuments and icons are very specifically defined and inclusion is managed by the Dept. of the Interior. This was not some arbitrary list made.
Do your homework and research. Its embarrassing.

Posted by: Gronker | June 1, 2006, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Did they rehire Michael Brown? They let New Orleans go to **** and now New York? What is the matter with these TOTALLY incompetent losers?!

Posted by: Duhpartment of Homeland Security | June 1, 2006, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Let me take this opportunity to do my Hannity impression: “One more example of brilliance from the president! He’s being proactive in ascertaining the fact that both New York and Washington DC have already been hit by terrorists. This means that they are far less likely to strike these two cities again. See folks, the libs would have you believe that NY and DC are still targets. That’s because liberals look towards the past. THIS administration, led by THIS president, looks to the future!” What do ya think, Sean? Am I hired?

Posted by: Steve Slatten | June 1, 2006, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

RELAX, everyone! Look at the link to see the original document. NYC is listed as having over 6000 assets, over 4000 of which are “commercial” which would likely include bank building, the Empire State Building, libraries & museums. NYC is identified as being in the highest risk group, the top 25%. There is probably a very narrow DC-limited definition of “icons and national monument”.

Posted by: Pat Kelly | June 1, 2006, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

If New York is not to be the target of a terrorist attack, could you please notify potential terrorist. After 9/11, we’d be happy to be considered as a non-target (last I checked the color coded system still had us on high alert but I guess we can now downgrade that)

Posted by: NYC resident | June 1, 2006, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

So it’s icons we’re trying to protect. Gee, who would have thunk!

Posted by: Luhren | June 1, 2006, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Well, just in case anyone cared the Statue of Liberty is in New York State, while some of its concession stands are in New Jersey.
Still the DHS are Dolts for cutting NY’s funding.

Posted by: Pointless Factoid of Relevance | June 1, 2006, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Kinda reminds me of Baghdad Bob: compare: “there are no tanks in Baghdad. The Americans have been all wiped out.” with “there are no monuments in NY.”

Posted by: Mike | June 1, 2006, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

*************************
The Bush administration has no shame! They exploited the thousands of innocent’s blood who got killed in NYC icons called WTC for years to win the elections and now this shameless Bush administration says that NYC is not important anymore. This is just mindboggling.
I hope that the media gives lot of coverage to this insane decision of Bushco.
*********************************

Posted by: Kelly | June 1, 2006, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

The Statue of Liberty is not in New Jersey. “Liberty Island is federal property located within the territorial jurisdiction of the State of New York.”

Posted by: Sarah Blackmun | June 1, 2006, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

$124 million? Isn’t that less than Alaska’s “bridge to nowhere” in the highway bill?
Mind you, these are the same people who were SURPRISED by 9/11, nearly 30 years after Samuel Bicke tried the same thing, and only a couple years after another nutjob flew a plane into the Clinton White House.
“Flying planes into buildings? Poppycock! Who would ever attempt of such a thing? Let’s fund Star Wars instead!”
If anything argued for a broader-based, affirmative action to bring in new blood to some of these group-think agencies, it’s silliness like “New York has no high profile terrorist targets.”

Posted by: Zak Johnson | June 1, 2006, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

I guess for a President who calls our Constitution “a g–d— piece of paper”, the Statue of Liberty is just some oversized piece of bad sculpture.

Posted by: Arden Kirkman | June 1, 2006, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

mmmmmmmm??? no monuments, just people. lots of ‘em. millions of people of many races/ethnicities everywhere on that small island, the jewel of democracy. naaaaw, how rediculous it would be to protect that!

Posted by: mlc | June 1, 2006, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

[t]his article comes off as a bitter NYC-centric whining & moaning. NYC isn’t the center of the universe folks.
The poster who left this pearl of wisdom above should have seen the WTC fall (as I did), work in downtown Manhattan in unsafe conditions after 9/11 (as I did), and live with a major terrorist target (the Brooklyn Bridge) outside his living room window (as I do). Then perhaps he might reconsider his opinion. Or maybe not. Some people seem to think this Administration can do no wrong — although even their blind faith must be sorely tried by the endless stream of disasters and incompetents unleashed by the Bushies.

Posted by: Randy Buck | June 1, 2006, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Actually, the statue of liberty IS in New York and not New Jersey. Go look at any mapping website, and you’ll see that boundary intentionally encompasses Ellis Island and the Statue of Liberty.

Posted by: Colin in Atlanta | June 1, 2006, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

No wonder they couldn’t find out whether Saddam had WMD. They couldn’t find a national monument in New York.
We should have outsourced this to the French. They seem to have much better intelligence that we do.

Posted by: Skeeter | June 1, 2006, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Who did they outsource this to Mongolian Yak herders?

Posted by: Dan Maceda | June 1, 2006, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Its such a joke on us. Cut funds and increase the attraction by the terrorists of another attack. How else will Bush and his cronies keep control of this country? lets just leave all the doors unclocked.

Posted by: Joel | June 1, 2006, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

That does it…
Everyone who voted for Bush is hereby no longer alowed to vote…By electing this putzhead you have shown yourselves to be incapable of making good electoral judgements. Thus, in the next election only those who voted for any onter candidate will be alowed to vote. BUSH VOTERS ARE JUST TOO DAMN STUPID!

Posted by: G_fourmyle | June 1, 2006, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Of course NYC got cut. All this terror money has quickly evolved into standard issue pork to be handed out to states which elected the majority party in Congress. As a Democrat I’d like to think our party would do it in a more sensible strategic fashion, but who knows?
Given the record of the Bush administration and its spineless majority in Congress for the past five years, how can we be surprised at this turn of events?

Posted by: Bill Edwards | June 1, 2006, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

I’m suspicious of ABC’s interpretation of this document.
First, I’m a bit suspicious of the document itself since the PDF cited in the article is almost unreadably low-res. I’m suspicious of it for a number of other reasons as well:
The Homeland Security document entitled “Discussion of the FY 2006 Risk Methodology and the Urban Areas Security Initiative” lists 38 “Urban Area Asset Types” while the document provided by ABC News lists only 12. This could indicate either that the form was manufactured OR that it doesn’t represent the complete assessment of the New York City area.
Additionally, most of the things that are cited in the article as “national monuments or icons” are not – bridges for instance, no matter how fantastic, are transportation assets: of which there are something over 1000 cited on the form. The Statue of Liberty is under New York jurisdiction for convenience only: it is maintained by the national park service/department of the interior and stands on federal land. By any definition, it is clearly NOT located in the New York City Urban Area.
Gronker above already pointed out that the definition of “national monuments and icons” used would be that maintained by DHS: those national assets maintained by the Department of the Interior.
Other categories listed are things like “Banking and Finance” – which I expect means major banking and finance and would never be expected to include every single banking institution in the metro area: The federal reserve, NYSE… These sorts of things would be included. Chase, JP Morgan, etc – these are probably Commercial Assets which are covered under that category and for which there are >4000.
This just sounds like non-news to me. NY received less funding than last year – isn’t that enough to work a story around, without bringing in irrelevant details?

Posted by: Not Republican | June 1, 2006, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

I realize that NYC may be the center of the universe, but would like to point out that DC took the second largest cut of more than $30 million. I believe we have a couple of landmarks of our own worth protecting.

Posted by: Jim W. | June 1, 2006, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

I am amazed that most people think that more money will prevent an attack on New York City. This money would prepare them for the aftermath, but not prevent the attack itself.
btw, any anti-terror measure implemented by the Bush Administration (which is actually meant to PREVENT attacks)is opposed by you idiots anyways

Posted by: Kyle | June 1, 2006, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Joel-Dont let your bitterness cloud the issues

Posted by: Kyle | June 1, 2006, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

I guess what they say is true, that the middle of this nation could care if New York and California fell off into the ocean.
Not true. We in Chicago would be devastated.

Posted by: Bill Brock - Chicago | June 1, 2006, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

-New York was given more anti-terror funding than any other city in the country (which it should).
-And if the govt gave NYC 5 billion, you all would be complaining how Bush is running up deficits and is “hyping” the terror threat.
-MONEY WILL NOT PROTECT YOU.

Posted by: Kyle | June 1, 2006, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

I am a Missourian born and bred. This is beyond shamefull. If any more evidence is needed that Congress is a broken institution I sure don’t know what it would be. At this point the American people should rise up and vote all the yahoos out. If this bunch had been in charge during WWII we would have lost.

Posted by: Helen Bremmer | June 1, 2006, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

This is priceless. If they want to slash funds from the city, couldnt they think of a better alibi than “No Monuments.”? Sheesh.

Posted by: Temp. | June 1, 2006, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

These are the same guys that let 9/11 happen in the first place and appointed “Brownie” afterwards. It’s all politics. Forget security. New York already knows that it cannot dependend on Washington to protect it. Thats why we have our own security services all over the world.

Posted by: rick | June 1, 2006, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

The venom that is spoken is frightening. Honest debate is no longer in vogue, I suppose. The ‘you’re always wrong/bad/evil and we’re always right/good/godlike’ mindset has taken over. Truly frightening.

Posted by: Helen | June 1, 2006, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

The party doing the survey was probably NCS Pearson!!! The same agency that is responsible for hundreds !! of ex security personnel in the airports for losing their jobs in 2002.The same outfit for screwing up the results of thousands of college entrance exams in 2006!!!! However they are a govt ?? organization and keep on rolling. We can only pray the old”what goes around comes around” God help us all !!!!!

Posted by: K Hurt | June 1, 2006, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

No doubt Mount Rushmore, being out there in one of the red states with more sheep than people, got counted as four national monuments.

Posted by: BN | June 1, 2006, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Actually there IS a perfectly logical explanation for that zero next to “National Monuments and Icons”: the assessors looked at a street map, found no icons at all (to help them understand what the bunch of letters were for) and … well, you know – one nothing led to another.

Posted by: goodcombadcom | June 1, 2006, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

I saw the report tonite, and they mentioned Omaha NE as getting additional funding. I understand that may sound stupid but the President came here on 911 to the airforce base and stayed many hours. It stands to reason we also should get a share of that money.

Posted by: Joshua | June 1, 2006, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I hope New York is concidered part of the New American Century

Posted by: Luke | June 1, 2006, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

They want to commit more to protecting Diebold Headquarters and the Crawford pseudo-ranch.

Posted by: Peggy Szymeczek | June 1, 2006, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

To all the red staters who come to my beloved city to smile and take snapshots in front of the pit of death at ground zero, please upon your return home contact your congressional reps to do something to fix this travesty.
The comforts of a denial of reality and the rewards of pork cannot compare to the satisfaction of protecting parts of the country that are truly on the front lines of your “war on terror”

Posted by: scott | June 1, 2006, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Congrats New Yorkers, Washington you are no longer a threat for terrorism. Nice to know Bush is looking out for you isn’t it??

Posted by: Erik Weinberger | June 1, 2006, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Speaking as a longtime resident of New York City, there are in my opinion no words strong enough to adequately describe what an utterly appalling outrage this is. This is an affrontery, an INSULT — a slap in the face and a stab in the back to every man, woman, and child of this great city. Only two years after Dubya brought a caravanserai of neocons to this city for the Republican National Convention and exploited 9-11 for all it was worth so that he could get re-elected, the Bush administration has decided that we really don’t matter that much??? INGRATE! HYPOCRITE!
NO ICONS IN NEW YORK?? What sort of icons do Kentucky or Wisconsin have that represent the United States the way that the Statue of Liberty does?? Oh, wait a minute…I get it. The Statue Of Liberty is too closely associated with immigration — it’s not POLITICALLY CORRECT anymore! Could this possibly have anything to do with the fact that New York is a “blue state” while Kentucky is a “red state”? I mean, let’s be realistic here — what is the statistical likelihood that Islamic terrorists are going to attack KENTUCKY? And for that matter…what about DC, for crying out loud? The Capitol Building, the White House, the Lincoln Memorial, the Jefferson Memorial? You can’t GET images much more iconic than that and our federal government is based there — yet their funding got cut too.
Are we still certain that the President is entirely compos mentis? I for one am inclined to wonder — and if I were anymore paranoid and suspicious than this administration has already prompted me to become, I might be inclined to think that there’s more to this than meets the eye and that we’re being deliberately left vulnerable to another hit before the election so that Bush and the GOP can regain their diminishing popularity. I wouldn’t put it past them — hell, I consider these folks capable of almost ANYTHING at this point.

Posted by: Bluestocking | June 1, 2006, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Yeah. You mean they are stripping all protections from NYC in the hopes that terrorists will slip through to attack again and give the Republicans votes in 2008.

Posted by: Anony | June 1, 2006, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

The sad fact is the people who hold leadership positions within DHS have been making these same type of bonehead decisions since the Department was created.
It seems that this is their modus operundi. They form focus groups stacked with YES-men that have no field experience and conclude a predetermined outcome. Then each will get a monetary bonus at the end of the year for their “creative solution” Mark my words. Many of the idiots who drafted this misguided “threat analysis” will get promoted. My bet is that there are retired Secret Service agents on the committee doing what they do best. (taking over important govt functions and destroying them) like they have with the Federal Air Marshal Service. Welcome to my world.

Posted by: anonymous air marshal | June 1, 2006, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

K,
With all due respect, wouldn’t you think that the Golden Gate Bridge, Alcatraz, Haight and Ashbury, Castro, Port of San Francisco (biggest west coast port other than Seattle’s), among others, would get priority over say, Fishermans Wharf or the Embarcadero?

Posted by: Stuart Minshull | June 1, 2006, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

At what point will the American People say enough already to this incredible string of incompetent acts? These people work for US – I say fire their asses from George W. Bush on down. They are costing us money, screwing up the economy, and putting us at risk. At what point do we say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
No icons in NYC – if we continue to allow for this UNABASHED AND BLATANT stupidity and accept it, we do not deserve to live in a democracy.

Posted by: rosesaylavee | June 2, 2006, 12:19 am 12:19 am

So wasen’t GEORGE WASHINGTON inaugurated as the first PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES of AMERIA on the steps of the old treasury building on Wall ST!!!! And isn”t ALEXANDER HAMELTON not buried around the corner on Broadway!!!!
If these are not essential elements of American history then I am truly an ignorant moron, not deserving to be a citizen.
So exactly who are our politicians.
I guess ORWELL had it right. All people are equil, but some people(our elected officials) are more equil than others.
So bow down to BIG BROTHER, they are NEVER WRONG!!!

Posted by: harris | June 2, 2006, 12:29 am 12:29 am

I grew up in NY; the #1 target for every Russian ICBM during the Cold War. I felt I was living in a target zone. Unfortunately I was right. What’s different now?
This is the biggest blunder of the Bush administration next to Iraq. This is not the America I grew up in. If I have my way I’ll retire outside the US because at this rate the US will be inhabitable for decent folk.

Posted by: JJ Stuart | June 2, 2006, 2:02 am 2:02 am

We must start an immediate campaign to have Madison Square Garden declared a national monument. After all, it’s where Bush was nominated for his second term.
He addressed a fundraising event at the Sheraton at 53rd and Seventh, so that should also be a national monument.

Posted by: Jim Lane | June 2, 2006, 2:20 am 2:20 am

No, the obvious truth about New York City being the Number One terrorist target in America is NOT “beyond the administration’s thinking.” They just don’t give a shit. Why give money to a state that will not support them in the coming elections when you can give the money to Middle Of Nowhere, Kansas?
Does ANYONE still think that the Bush administration isn’t THE biggest bunch of crooks and liars in American history? If such a person exists, he or she must live in Middle Of Nowhere, Kansas where they will sonn be knee-deep in Homeland Security cash.

Posted by: Cranky Media Guy | June 2, 2006, 3:46 am 3:46 am

Well, the statue of liberty seems to be more difficult to demolish with thermite … pattern of explosives more tricky, I guess.

Posted by: AB | June 2, 2006, 5:28 am 5:28 am

mr. ross,
i assume that in the next-to-last paragraph, when you say new york was attacked by “fundamentalist terrorists,” you are referring to the bush administration…
or is that already old news?

Posted by: p-rex | June 2, 2006, 6:03 am 6:03 am

To those who voted for Bush, Two and a half more years of this? Thanks Alot.

Posted by: J Carroll | June 2, 2006, 6:18 am 6:18 am

Got to protect the horses in Louisville! And the buffalos (or whatever is roaming there) in Wyoming!
What part of 3,000+ deaths in NYC, Washington, DC, an PA, don’t those dolts at DHS understand?
Or is it that, in an election year with some hotly contested Republican seats up for grabs, the Administration needs to grease the wheels with pork money?
My money is on the latter. Politics above policies, politics above country, and politics above security: that’s the Bush-Cheney-Rove motto!
I feel safer riding the NYC subway already… I am sure that the geniuses at DHS do not want us, New Yorkers, to be blown up on our way to work.

Posted by: Devil's Advocate | June 2, 2006, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Dear United States of America,
Re: The re-election of Bush
We told you so.
Yours truly,
The rest of the world.

Posted by: Mike | June 2, 2006, 8:43 am 8:43 am

GOOD BYE AMERICA AS WE KNOW IT ..WE BEEN SOLD OUT AND ITS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME MAKE THE MOST OUT OF EVERY DAY FRIENDS

Posted by: David g. | June 2, 2006, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Don’t know if anyone else posted on this but… In that list of financial resources they have Chase and J.P. Morgan as two entities. Ah, No, they are the one company now — J.P. Morgan Chase Bank. The merger finalized about 5 years ago. Gee, no wonder they can’t get things right, they don’t even know the facts.

Posted by: PurpleGirl | June 2, 2006, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Heck of a job Bushie

Posted by: Bill H | June 2, 2006, 9:11 am 9:11 am

I was born in New York City and have lived here all my life. I was working in the financial district on 9/11/01. I walked through the ashes late that day (no public transit was running) to get home. I walked back through the ashes to get to work for the rest of that week. The sights, sounds, and smells especially in those first few days are seared forever in my mind. That second week, I stopped near my home for a cup of coffee. As I watched out the window, a flat-bed truck with the largest construction “claw” I have ever seen went down 7th Avenue. On the cab of that truck was a paper sign affixed under the driver’s window. It read “New York bound.” My eyes grew wet when I thought of the great distance that truck and trucker might have come on some interstate highway or other to help my broken city. I just KNEW that anybody seeing that sign flashed headlights and honked horns. For the first time in my entire life, I felt that the rest of the country really did care about my city. I will never forget the notes, signs, flags, flowers, and ribbons that were posted on the fence of St. Peter’s Church, across from what had been the World Trade Center. I made sure to share that with out of town guests, to tell them how much it meant to me and my fellow New Yorkers. I too remember the Gerald Ford “Drop Dead” headline in one of our local papers decades earlier. It saddens me deeply to see my fellow Americans taking this opportunity to criticize and attack EACH OTHER. I have travelled throughout this great nation. It is a beautiful, diverse country that has accomplished such great things when “united we stand” and when we agree to disagree in a CONSTRUCTIVE way.
In those first days after 9/11, I waited for eloquence from Washington. I was not yet born when Pearl Harbor was attacked. But I know what the President told the nation at that time. What I finally heard from the man in the White House in 2001 was, “We’re gonna git ‘em. We’re gonna smoke ‘em out. We’re gonna git ‘em dead or alive.” Nearly 5 years later, we have done neither. What we have done is to violate the sovreignty of a nation. We turned our back on the world community. We have fostered an atmosphere of anti-American sentiment rarely before seen. We have managed to orchestrate the deaths of thousands, some of them our very own native sons and daughters. To what end?
On Election Day 2004, I was one of the first voters to appear at my poll. I promptly voted against Bush and then ran home, sending e-mail to friends abroad, advising them that I had tried to remove the liar from office. On a subsequent trip abroad, I was introduced to some as, “She’s American but she did not vote for Bush.” And some of those people were old enough to remember the great things our country did during World War II and afterward. In fact, there was still a very old Marshall Plan tractor nearby that had just a few years before been retired from service, with regret and profound thanks.
Although I very much feel and see that the present administration in Washington neither understands or cares about New York City, very much the way it has always felt in my lifetime, I refuse to believe that most of my fellow American citizens share that view.
The terrorists probably do not care what monument or landmark matters to which American located where. What the terrorists seem to care about is public relations: the maximum shock effect (and glory? and on-camera suffering?) the terrorists can obtain in the WORLD community. The World Trade Towers were recognized worldwide, as is the Eiffel Tower, Big Ben, and the Statue of Liberty. There is a reason the World Trade Towers were attacked and not the nursing home in which my centenarian aunt lived, where staff slept on air mattresses on the dining room floor after the city went into lockdown mode on 9/11 and all vehicular traffic in and out of Manhattan was halted. The day shift could not go home. The evening and night shifts could not come into Manhattan. I do not wish to diminish any statues, landmarks, monuments, or cultural centers elsewhere. The railroad station in Ogeden Utah is magnificent! The WPA concrete dinosaurs in Rapid City, SD, are fantastic! The World War I doughboy statue in Hackettstown, NJ put a lump in my throat. But for maximum effect on Al Jazeerah, it will probably be something better known that the terrorists will next try to destroy, along with my brave and innocent fellow New Yorkers, Washingtonians, or Los Angeleans. Would the “bad guys” cheer if Willie Penn were knocked off his perch in Philadelphia? I have my doubts. I, on the other hand, would be devastated for my fellow Americans.
This latest report and budget out of Washington is despicable. We must not lose sight, though, of the true evil and that which is good and strong in us. “We the People of the United States…”

Posted by: Barbara J. | June 2, 2006, 10:01 am 10:01 am

How does this reflect the “middle of the country”‘s viewpoint? This is an instance of inept bureaucracy.

Posted by: J | June 2, 2006, 10:02 am 10:02 am

THE GOV IS LETTING DOWN OUR GUARD WATCH WHAT HAPPENS LORD! PLEASE HELP THIS COUNTRY ID LIKE TO SEE MY GRAND KIDS

Posted by: David g. | June 2, 2006, 10:07 am 10:07 am

This is a good report, thank you for posting it. As part of Fleet week there was a low flying commercial flight tour up the east river past the U.N. I was crossing the 59th bridge into Manhattan at about the same place that I saw the 9/11 attack. I almost threw-up thinking the low flying commercial plane was either going to hit the U.N. or the bridge I was crossing not to mention a moment of reliving 9/11. We tried to register a complaint to 311 but the operator told us the flight involved Fleet week and did not want to register our complaint. New York and New Yorkers are used as symbols of 9/11 for all the wrong reasons by this administration and never has the real concern been about our protection or respect for those who died on 9/11 as low flying commercial tour flights around NYC. exemplify. People need to take responsibility for their vote and vote responsibly.

Posted by: ppp | June 2, 2006, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Since NY is a Democratic stronghold, it’s just another attempt by the Bush empire to eliminate as many Democrats as possible in the next attack. If some Republicans are also eliminated, that’s just “collateral” damage.

Posted by: Alan | June 2, 2006, 10:39 am 10:39 am

I’ll bet more is being spent to protect Ted Stevens’ Bridge to Nowhere than to protect the Brooklyn Bridge…

Posted by: John Clavis | June 2, 2006, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Another interesting factoid in this story….Homeland inSecurity Has 180,000 employees on the public payroll?
Doing what, might I ask? 19 Saudis were in the planes on 9/11 and Bush holds hands with the Sheiks.
I think we stepped into the Twilight Zone.
- written in sight of the Statue of Liberty.

Posted by: BB | June 2, 2006, 11:04 am 11:04 am

2006 is an election year. HLS and the Administration sent the money to places that can secure their current position. The people who control the money make all the decisions.

Posted by: GP | June 2, 2006, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Ok. So I can understand budget cuts, but cutting budgets that support the work of law enforcement officials who are already struggling to carry out their normal duties and protecting the public is deadly. Officials are working beyond their means to protect us and Washington says that New York is not a significant target? We have to remember though, Uncle George feels that listening to Aunt Bea talk about her latest hair appointment with her good friend Gertrude on their cell phones, in case they are really security threats, is more important than spending money to insure that the safety of our streets. 2008 cannot get here fast enough.

Posted by: Michael | June 2, 2006, 11:22 am 11:22 am

I don’t understand New York politicians. They want more money from Homeland Security, but cry like babies if the government listens to incoming calls from terrorists nations. You can’t have it both ways.

Posted by: Al Tong | June 2, 2006, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Dear Osama
Please remove NYC off of you “places to bomb” list. Apparently according to the DHS, we have nothing worth destroying so you would be wasting your time. Apparently there are some very nice places in Omaha to bomb.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
The people of New York

Posted by: Ravnwing | June 2, 2006, 11:38 am 11:38 am

You got to strategerize the terrists. If we allow Murkans to reveal where the landmarks are, the terrists know where the landmarks are, and the terrists win. Some are confused, or don’t believe that hiding the landmarks defends Murka. They would rather tell the terrists. I don’t why. I don’t know where the landmarks are. People complain from New York. Where is New York? New York should defend Murka, and stop helpin’ the terrists.

Posted by: George | June 2, 2006, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Other cities do have national monuments: The Golden Gate Bridge; the Space Needle; the Sears Tower; the St. Louis Arch; Mount Rushmore; The Lincoln Memorial, etc. — The major difference is that New York’s non-icons are internationally known. Terrorists are not stupid. It will impress their buddies much more if they blow up the Empire State Building, or the Statue of Liberty, the U.N., the Stock Market, Times Square or any other of our non-icons that are reconized world wide then if they blew up downtown Nashville.

Posted by: Leah | June 2, 2006, 11:44 am 11:44 am

To all that have responded to this story. Before you attack anybody regarding this story I think you all need to do some fact checking. It’s getting very tiresome seeing everybody fly off the handle as soon as the media reports something. It’s really quite funny, ABC knew this would cause an uproar and it looks like their narrow minded, one sighted readership fell for it hook, line, and sinker. I have a couple of questions: why is this document so illegible and what proof is there it’s legitimate?

Posted by: media hater | June 2, 2006, 11:54 am 11:54 am

NY City had to submit a form to Homeland Security and the Mayor did not put any NY landmarks on the list. You should be blaming the NYC Mayor, not Homeland Security.

Posted by: Dan | June 2, 2006, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

For the last time people..get it straight. The STAUE of LIBERTY is in New Jersey and the Gov’t doesn’t care about NYC

Posted by: John Wettstein | June 2, 2006, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

The Decider is a Divider. Now the nation is squabbling over cash, just charming. This administration goes out every day with its’ wrecking ball and tears at the fabric of what President Lincoln worked so hard to preserve. Our nation. The common interest we all share in protecting ourselves as a nation has now become mired in State interests. It is exactly the kind of political maneuvering one has come to expect from this administration. Hey, it might not be smart or good governance, but I bet the President thinks it is good politics. Too bad about what Lincoln recognised, “a house divided against itself, cannot stand.” We are in grave jeopardy and no longer seem able to work for the common good. When we look toward Washington do we see an effort to put forward an agenda that recognizes the voices of all citizens? The issue of homeland security dollars is, or at least should be about where they will best serve the country as a whole. I guarantee you that if the markets in NY did not make a heroic effort to get up and running three days after 9/11 the effects would have been devastating nationally. If NY’s citizens had not gone back to work in the cloud of pollution, the country would have been in deep trouble financially. Let’s agree to serve the entire national eterprise by using our tax dollars wisely – let’s protect the nation’s financial markets that happen to be based in NY, but serve the interests of the entire nation. Gee, even the terrorists seem to get that if you hit NY, you have a good chance of crippling the nation’s economy.

Posted by: Boudica | June 2, 2006, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

I completly agree with the posts on this website. Because of Bush’s administration our country and its assets have gone severaly downhill since he took office.I think that it is perpoterious that NYC is not considered worth protecting and I don’t even live there. I have visited the city and you people are right it is worth every penney it takes to save it.

Posted by: kat | June 2, 2006, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

lol..they didn’t put washington D.C. on the list for funds did they?? Nothing of importance there, corruption,religious zealots dismantaling the Constitution and taking over the government,(hmmm sounds like terrorists there already)

Posted by: bonnie | June 2, 2006, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Time for New York City to secede from the nation that hates us anyway. We could be a neutral Singapore/Switzerland and be a beacon to the rest of North America when the Christian Taliban/religious right wing criminalize every sort of outre behavior.

Posted by: Craig | June 2, 2006, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Media Hater, it appears to be legit per DHS: http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006
/06/dhs_explains_it.html
So I get the part of it where they explain the bridge and teh ESB are not “monuments” cuz they’re counted elsewhere… still don’t get how NYC gets this funding reduction. Maybe DHS figgers the terriss are tard of attackin noo yo-work.
As GWB says, “Terriss, the – you see, the terriss – changed ever thing on 9/11. Up is black! Down is right. You see? We woan get fooled again.”

Posted by: Mister A | June 2, 2006, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

To Media Hater.
They Reached George Foresman. The Under Secretary at DHS.
Did you see his statements?

Posted by: American | June 2, 2006, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

So Homeland Security has been politicized and its funding used to buy off Bush’s ever-dwindling base. And the best joke of all is that the taxes of New Yorkers fund this nonsense over and over. Only pennies on the dollar ever come back to New York from Washington on a good day. Attention New York Assembly and New York Senate: You need to pass legislation next week barring any state, city, or municipal funds from being used to guard or protect any federal government official from Washington while they are in our state. OK, Bolton at the UN? How does that sound?

Posted by: sienna in ny | June 2, 2006, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Maybe if you people would read other comments before flying off the handle on a tirade, there would be some intelligent discussion here. It’s funny how you ignore valid counter-points and just rant and rave about your opinion of a news article that doesn’t tell the whole story. I’m for the protection of NYC, and the rest of the US for that matter, as much as any of you here, but this conspiracy theory stuff everywhere I look is getting to be quite tiring. Just a thought.

Posted by: Jen | June 2, 2006, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Sorry John. You saying it over and over does not make it any more true. Though Liberty Island and Ellis Island are physically closer to NJ, they are considered to be in the state of New York. The below quote is from the National Park Service, which runs the sites. “Liberty Island is federal property located within the territorial jurisdiction of the State of New York.” Yes, it’s true – believe it or not…

Posted by: joe4994 | June 2, 2006, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Not surprising. After all, both senators from NY are democrats. Aside from Mr. Chertoff’s obvious incompetance, this is just political retribution. Does anyone else here picture Bush & Cheney as ostriches with their heads firmly embedded in sand?

Posted by: Russell | June 2, 2006, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

“I have a couple of questions: why is this document so illegible and what proof is there it’s legitimate?”
As a federal gov’t employee, I can assure you that forms are frequently of that quality. That one has the look of a form that has been copied, faxed or scanned multiple times. Very few government entities have gone to the “paperless office” paradigm of digital documents that never get printed.

Posted by: Njorl | June 2, 2006, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Ahhh, the things one could say.

Posted by: Sarah | June 2, 2006, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Oh yes, the Statue of Liberty is indeed a National Monument (run by the National Park Service under the Department of the Interior)
http://www.nps.gov/stli/

Posted by: JT | June 2, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Just one comment: If there’s nothing important about NYC, does that mean GWB will stop saying “9/11″ every time he needs an excuse for something?

Posted by: Cathleen | June 2, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

I suppose since we (New York and California) are so unimportant to the rest of the country we can stop subsidizing their budgets with the income we generate.

Posted by: Shawna Lanne | June 2, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

I’ve read all the posts on this site as well as the postcards that the NY Senators sent to Chertoff. We tend to forget that the government has now been taken over by the people who want government small enough to ‘drown in a bathtub’ as Grover Norquist is so fond of saying. To this crowd, the only thing the government is supposed to do is protect us. For them, the military is the only concern of the federal government. It should not be doing anything else. They hated the New Deal, they hate the fact the government offers medicare or education or anyhing else. They cut taxes with this idea that if they starve the government enough, people will stop looking for help and just rely on their individual local governments. This business of underfunding first responders is part of that ideaology. They don’t want to pay for first responders…it’s not their job. Their job is to attack countries, militarize the border and shoot nukes at people who bother us. That’s what they think the federal government is for. Anything they do, whether it infringes on our personal liberties or not, is fair game as long as they can claim that they are fighting terrorism. ‘those who would forfeit their liberty for security deserve neither’. We continually give up our liberties by not making more of a stink about wire tapping or search and seisure without out a warrant and now we are losing our sense of security. As Americans, I am ashamed to say that we are reaping what we have sown. We allowed this group of people to run the country for eight years. They have pushed the Middle East into a much more perilous place, they have energized the jihadists in the Islamic world and given a powerful voice to the most intolerant factions of the far right wing of the Conservative movement in this country. They will not stop taking things from us until we make them. As Americans we forget that the government is supposed to work for us. We are not supposed to be at the mercy of our government, our government is supposed to be at our mercy. We sacraficed our hope of a different path on November of 2004. We are stuck with this one until this November. Let us sincerely hope that we do not once again give up both our liberty and security, because the crowd that is currently in charge will happily take both and give us endless war and insecurity.
Donna

Posted by: dlw | June 2, 2006, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Does anyone really believe the Statue of Liberty is more important than Carhenge?

Posted by: Jon Swift | June 2, 2006, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Is it possible or even likely that NYC didn’t list those properly on their grant application?
I still don’t see where you people are getting that DHS doesn’t consider NYC an important target. Didn’t it get the most funding this year? Hasn’t it gotten the most funding every year since 2001? Doesn’t it have a huge Federal security presence that offsets some of the need for state and local-level funding?

Posted by: Squeamish | June 2, 2006, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

What do they consider to be landmarks or icons?
Hey kids, there’s Mt. Rushmore, lets divert hundreds of millions of dollars to South Dakota to protect against terrorist attacks.

Posted by: Paul | June 2, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Well, one thing is clear: Bush was right. Catching a big fish really was the high point of his presidency.

Posted by: Josh | June 2, 2006, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

I hope that a more informed person will look at the facts and restore the funding to NY otherwise this would be a disappointing start for a renewed DHS. In the words of Mr. Trump, someone will need the famous “your fired!” :-) The administration in Washington cannot stand by and let this go – or maybe they can ?

Posted by: Frank Jones | June 2, 2006, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

My main argument is this:
If this administration is not willing to protect New York City to the full extent it deserves, a city that is not simply a national monument but an international icon, this administration has no right to utter the phrase “9/11″ every time they feel their poll numbers begin to slip.
New York City is a monument in-of-itself. The whole city is a monument, if not one made of the most recognizable buildings that create the single most recognizable skyline in the world, it is one made of the intangble but omnipresent energy and vitality that has inspired and sheltered countless millions. If that’s not worth protecting, nothing is.

Posted by: Rob | June 2, 2006, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Maybe its a good thing, NY is on its last legs.

Posted by: john | June 2, 2006, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

All this talk about monuments and icons! Al quaeda is not interested in hitting monuments or icons. I assure you, they are not going after the liberty bell, Monticello, or the Statue of Liberty. They’re out to destroy us, not our monuments. The towers and the pentagon are not icons; to be sure, they are symbolic, but also functioning entities that when hit, cause damage that will continue for a long time. Billions were lost, as Osama keeps gloating over.
Homeland security is controlling the debate by setting arbitrary standards for doling out money which they can then funnel to their base.

Posted by: LuhrenLoup | June 2, 2006, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Chertoff is a traitor. It’s treason, plain and simple.

Posted by: Zal | June 2, 2006, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Despite being subject to the ridicule and ignorance of New Yorkers, this New Jerseyite must conclude the stupidity and obvious falseness of any statement that implies that New York City has no landmarks.
And yes, the Statue of Liberty is in New Jersey, according to the charter documents.

Posted by: Ithil | June 2, 2006, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

And john, the World Trade Center was an icon. Al Q chose it not only because it was accessible, but because it was a symbol of Western economic power.

Posted by: Ithil | June 2, 2006, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

You New Yorkers are very selfish. I think the primary interest is human lives, not your non-existant landmarks. You were supplied with a large amount initially and thus should be the most ready by now. More than 93% of the population of the United States is outside of New York.

Posted by: Eric | June 3, 2006, 12:09 am 12:09 am

I’m not an American.
I just want you to know, it’s clear that the people in power in your country are not afraid of another terrorist attack. The first one worked so well for them, I don’t think they’d mind another. Thos selfish greedy jerks are still dividing and conquering you. It’s time you all stood up, united together, stopped bickering, and got rid of them. The world misses you very much America… please come back to us.

Posted by: shocked & awed | June 3, 2006, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Anyone wanna bet that Bush’s ranch is on the ‘notable landmarks’ list for Texas?

Posted by: Chorazin | June 3, 2006, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

So, let’s take the Empire State Building:
The DHS designated the ESB as an “office structure” building rather than an “icon”. Why did they do this? Because the ESB holds a lot of people on a daily basis and places designated as such in fact recieve more attention and funds than those designated as merely “icons”. IOW, the DHS is doing the right thing by funding the protection of people rather than things.
So all the ranting and raving is simply folks (and the reporter who wrote the above story) showing their ignorance.
Then there’s this from the above story:
“That was a key factor used to determine that New York City should have its anti-terror funds slashed by 40 percent–from $207.5 million in 2005 to $124.4 million in 2006.”
What ABC News failed to disclose is the fact that NY got a giant raise in 2005 to make up for a shortfall in 2004 and that the $124 million for 2006 is almost exactly NY’s 5 year average.
Once again, ABC “news” demonstrates it’s slanted, biased coverage.

Posted by: MjM | June 4, 2006, 10:08 am 10:08 am

well said, shocked and awed. what i’m reading here is ridiculous, anger filled ranting. stop taking sides. stop cutting each other down. this is not a partison thing, we as americans are just making that up and polarizing our own nation. shame on you all with your conspiracies and intolerance. i thought 9/11 brought everyone up and united us…i was wrong.

Posted by: rightwithya | June 4, 2006, 10:29 am 10:29 am

As an English women, living in England I could have done a much better job. More than likely I wouldn’t have charged as much either.

Posted by: VEH | June 4, 2006, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

those of you who believe we don’t have significant monuments or that your flat-and-barren states are as vulnerable as our cities- as 21 year resident of nyc, having lived in boston and DC for several years, i sincerely hope you won’t think about hauling your fat middle american butts to see our non-existant monuments from here on in. we just don’t have the funding to protect you any longer!

Posted by: Meg | June 4, 2006, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

I’m from Omaha, Nebraska.. and I’ so glad to be here right now. FYI..this is so typical of politicians using the numbers to fit their agenda. Look at the Dollars spent, not the increase. In total, NY will get what.. $185 million, Nebraska will get $21 million. So.. quit blaming us for your politico’s not doing their job.
AND.. fyi.. I don’t own a cow, nor do I have a cornstalk in my yard. The Omaha area was generally known as the third most important military target during the cold war; behind only DC and Colorado Springs thanks to the location of the SAC base nearby. I watched in horror from my hotel room in SF on 9/11 as the events of that day unfolded, knowing that my wife had recently eaten at the restaurant at the top of the WTC, and I understand that you are the center for what the world views as the ugly Americans, BUT this doesn’t mean that you ARE America.
ALSo, FYI the mayor of the City of Omaha, is a Democrat.. so throw that theory out the door please.
I think Mayor Bloomberg owes him and the City of Omaha an apology.
Now that I’ve had my say.. I’d better go oil up my saddle and feed and water the horses.
:)

Posted by: Tom Wilson | June 4, 2006, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

PS…
Nice place to visit.. wouldn’t want to live there.

Posted by: Tom Wilson | June 4, 2006, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

I don’t have the time to read every single post, so maybe someone’s said this already. If so, forgive me for the repeat. But quit ragging on the middle of the country for what a small group of utter morons in DC managed to pull off! I grew up in the Detroit area–very high on the target list during the Cold War because it is, or at least was, the center of the auto (not to mention the tanks that were for a long time manufactured there) industry. You didn’t hear all of our parents whining for more Federal support/protection because us kids were practicing “duck and cover” drills at school. In fact, you didn’t hear the parents of kids in NYC whining about it back then either! It was just a fact of life. The fact that foreign weapons threaten US targets hasn’t changed over the years. The only things that have really changed are the ingenuity of the terrorists and the willingness of Americans to believe that the Federal government somehow OWES them boat-loads of money to make up for living in or near a potential target.
But before you all get all over my rear end for those remarks, let me say that I would never begrudge any amount of money that is ear-marked for the ‘protection’ of NYC. Just because I live in the Midwest doesn’t mean that I don’t recognize that NYC has a giant bulls-eye on it. And whether the things in NYC that the rest of us think of as “icons” have federal “National Monument” status or not should not detract from the fact that they are viewed as such not only by Midwestern Americans but also by many people in the rest of the world–including terrorists.
In any case, the fact that money was taken from NYC is NOT the fault of the people living in the Midwest, no matter whom they voted for. Please try to remember that, due to the wonders of the Electoral College method of electing the President, not everyone who lives in a “red state” necessarily voted for Dubya. And even if they did, it’s incredibly faulty logic that would lead you to the conclusion that this fiasco is somehow an individual voter’s fault. I’m not the one who stole the candy from the baby. So as a Midwesterner living in a ‘red state’, please get off my butt and find a more constructive way to fix this horrendous error than whining on a tv news website!

Posted by: Lisa | June 5, 2006, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

A GOOD SERVICE BY YOUR COMPANY.THESE TYPES OF SERVICES ARE INCREASING THE INTER RELATION BETWEEN THE USERS ESPECIALLY IN FIELD OF THEIR THOUGHTS , WHAT THE WORLDWIDE INTERNET USERS ARE THINKING IN SO MANY TOPICS WHICH THE SURVEYS OR COMMENTS WEBSITE OFFERS. WHAT TYPES OF THE VIEWS THE WORLDWIDE USERS HAVE.

Posted by: Mr.Mirza Muhammad Naeem Ahamd | June 6, 2006, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

No Icons, No Monuments Worth Protecting:
Q> What’s so significant about the New York City hall and the quaint little park in front?
A> It’s a Historical Icon
City Hall Park is ONE OF THE MOST SACRED SITES OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION !!
It was once called “the commons” of New York. Historians call it the gathering place of patriots and the cradle of Liberty.
_The First Blood of the American Revolution was spilled in a dispute over the Liberty Pole the Sons of Liberty erected in what’s now City Hall Park.
_When Gen. George Washington received word the Declaration of Independence had been signed. He gathered his men in the area that is now City Hall Park and had the Declaration read to them. Ya’see… the Declaration was signed in Philadelphia. . . but the soldiers who were going to back up that bold statement were in New York City.
_A statue honoring Nathan Hale is in City Hall Park. He’s the guy who said, “I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country”.

Posted by: Jimmy (D-NY) | June 8, 2006, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

According to the 2004 census estimate, Omaha’s population had risen to 409,416.
-Wikipedia
Did you know;
As many as one in four Americans can trace their roots to Brooklyn. Many visitors investigate their genealogy at historic immigration sites such as Ellis Island and the French-made Statue of Liberty.
-Wikipedia
There is 8 to 8.5 million people in NYC, during the daytime.
And, about 12 million domestic and international visitors will travel to New York City from Memorial Day to Labor Day to see the National Monuments and Icons the DHS say we don’t have. NYC hosts about 39 million foreign and American tourists visiting New York each year.
NYC needs the funding to provide security to all those people in NYC… our security is a 24 hour, 7 day a week operation… with no interruptions. It costs more than $124 million that DHS is giving us.

Posted by: Jimmy (D-NY) | June 8, 2006, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

I guess my only question is: For all of you who are angry about Bush & Co. now, but voted for him even once, why weren’t you willing to listen to those of us who were telling you what an incredible moron he is, and how evil Karl Rove, Rummy, and the rest are?
I’m not a parent, but I’m getting a sense of what it must be like to be able to see the clear consequences of your child’s actions, warn your child, be ignored, then having to deal with the indignant response when your child gets burned.
By the way — they’re still evil. They’re still liars. They’re still without any moral compass. And they really, really do not care worth a damn about you. (Even less if you’re from a blue state.)
The actual realization can only come from within, America. Those of us in the rest of the world saw it many, many years ago. Please don’t ignore the warnings of your best friends when we tell you what you’re doing is wrong. It just might be that we’ve got a perspective that’s not possible from one’s own vantage point. Sometimes you’re the ant, and sometimes you’re the eagle. Ironically enough, we’ve had the eagle perspective for years, and you’ve still got the ant’s.
Thank God you’re realizing how badly you’ve been lied to. One day, America will soar with the eagles.

Posted by: Stunned by it all | June 10, 2006, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

If anyone had bothered to look, they would have found that California got the most followed by NY, Florida and Texas in that order. Further research would have provided the parameters that were clearly defined in the Program description. New York’s SPOC provided the information to DHS that was then reviewed passed on the program parameters. If NY is so arrogant that they feel they don’t have to play by the rules, implement programs that meet the funding rules that are clearly stated, the residents can only blame their own representatives, Not DHS.
This is a GRANT program, not an entitlement.

Posted by: Wild Bill | June 11, 2006, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

New York City arrogant? Hardly
New Yorkers are correct in blaming the DHS for their incompetence and blatant stupidity and Secretary Chertoff for lamely defending it.
New York City is the home for one of the most sacred sites of the American Revolution… the cradle of American Liberty.
The decision to cut New York City’s anti-terror funding is fundamentally flawed and stupid.
-DHS deciding New York City has no national monuments and landmarks.
-The decision to cut the funds was determined by a secretive and mysterious review panel.
This past Monday, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly gave 17 reasons why New York City’s funding should not be cut.
Commissioner Kelly gave the New York City Council a list of 17 terror attacks, terror plots foiled and terrorists nabbed in New York since 1990.
Commissioner Kelly also offered a somber warning if New York City’s funding is cut. . . it will hurt lower Manhattan, the financial district and the site of the deadliest terror attack in our Nation.

Posted by: Jimmy (D-NY) | June 14, 2006, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

If NY is so arrogant that they feel they don’t have to play by the rules, implement programs that meet the funding rules that are clearly stated, the residents can only blame their own representatives, Not DHS.
This is a GRANT program, not an entitlement.
Posted by: Wild Bill | Jun 11, 2006 12:26:57 PM
In today’s Washington Post;
George W. Foresman, DHS undersecretary for preparedness, tried to correct earlier statements by DHS officials that the District and New York got less money because of weak applications. “They were not deficient in their applications,” he said. “Effectiveness measures were reviewed in relation to others around the country and ranked.”
So,
You are wrong to say,
“If NY is so arrogant that they feel they don’t have to play by the rules, implement programs that meet the funding rules that are clearly stated.”

Posted by: Jimmy (D-NY) | June 15, 2006, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Posted by: Jaime Frontero | Jun 1, 2006 1:18:16 PM
Statue of Liberty is in New Jersey
Uh, Jaime…I think you need to buy a map.

Posted by: Kath | June 18, 2006, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Thanks MjM for showing the simple truth of the matter over the hysteria, hatred and political capital that others are struggling to spread over this issue.
check it out
———>
What ABC News failed to disclose is the fact that NY got a giant raise in 2005 to make up for a shortfall in 2004 and that the $124 million for 2006 is almost exactly NY’s 5 year average.
Once again, ABC “news” demonstrates it’s slanted, biased coverage.
Posted by: MjM | Jun 4, 2006 10:08:46 AM”

Posted by: Sarah | June 19, 2006, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

I can tell you what’s in Omaha: The huge processing facility for First Data Corporation, one of the world’s largest processors of credit card transactions (6.5 billion in revenue and global in reach). Two days after 9/11, FirstData offered up its data and the Bush administration relied heavily upon it. In his new book “The One Percent Solution”, Ron Suskind writes, “The massive data sweeps
[at FirstData]…implicated the privacy of tens of thousands of Americans…”
One of the first infringements upon our civil liberties and privacy rights by our current totalitarian regime began in Omaha – now there’s a “landmark” worth protecting by the secrecy-fueled Bush hegemony.

Posted by: Lisa | June 22, 2006, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Liberty Island and, of course, the Statue of Liberty ARE LOCATED IN NEW JERSEY – NOT NEW YORK! You should be embarrassed. To the person who thought Ellis Island was in New York: WRONG! It’s in NJ. We even won a Supreme Court case with NY over it. A foot bridge even connects it to NJ.

Posted by: Todd Dins | July 23, 2006, 5:53 am 5:53 am

New York City, itself, in its entirety, is a landmark. It is unique in the whole world – there is not a city like it. I am new to New York, I don’t even like it here, and I am always appalled by how provincially self-righteous New Yorkers are, and EVEN I KNOW AND UNDERSTAND THAT NEW YORK IS A LANDMARK!!! How much more the government should know?

Posted by: Louisa Boiman | October 30, 2006, 9:02 am 9:02 am

2 many Damn comments

Posted by: Bob | November 17, 2006, 9:35 am 9:35 am

who needs monuments when we have skyscrapers in corperate america! do you really think they care about our heroes or memorials either? it’s “big” business and military they are after and ‘homeland security’ better keep the ports and airports safeguarded more as well as our communications, but thanks for the history lesson!

Posted by: gwenn | November 16, 2007, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.