By Krista Kjellman

Jun 30, 2006 12:00pm

No Laughing Matter

A trio of protesters dressed as clowns decided to take nuclear disarmament into their own hands last week when they broke into a nuclear missile launch facility in North Dakota.   

Carl Kabat, OMI, a retired Catholic priest from St. Louis, and Greg Boertje-Obed and Michael Walli, both military veterans from Duluth, Minn., were arrested after breaking into the Echo-9 missile launch facility, which houses a Minuteman III missile with nuclear warheads and is located in McLean County, west of the town of Garrison. 

Staff Sergeant Trevor Tiernan of the Minot Air Force Base told ABC News members of the 91st Missile Security Forces Squadron responded "within minutes" of the protesters approaching the facility’s fence.  When asked for an exact number of minutes, Staff Sergeant Tiernan again said it was "within minutes."  But when ABC News talked to Michael Miles of Nukewatch, the group for which the three men are volunteers, he said the airmen showed up "45 minutes" after the three protesters broke into the site.   

Whichever it was, it was enough time for the three protesters to cut through the outer fence with bolt cutters, pound the concrete lid of the missile’s silo with sledgehammers and paint "Disarm" on the casing.   

The activists were apprehended by the airmen once they arrived and held until local authorities came.  Kabat, Boertje-Obed and Walli were all charged with criminal trespass and criminal mischief, both Class A misdemeanors, which carry a one-year prison sentence and $2,000 penalty in North Dakota.  Bond was set at $500 for each.

According to McLean Sheriff Don Charging, the FBI had issued federal retainers on the activists.  And they have each been charged with two federal counts of sabotaging national defense material.  A preliminary hearing is scheduled for July 5.    In a statement posted on the web by the activists the day they broke into the missile launch facility, the men said, "We have chosen to start the process of transformation and disarmament by hammering on and pouring our blood on components of the Minuteman III nuclear missile system." As for their costumes, the men wrote, "We dress as clowns to show that humor and laughter are key elements in the struggle to transform the structures of destruction and death."

All three men are volunteers for Nukewatch, a Wisconsin-based group dedicated to the abolition of nuclear weapons, which issued its own statement on its website detailing the men’s actions. Speaking on behalf of Nukewatch, Miles said the trio’s actions are in accordance with the group’s purpose.

All in all, there is no time to be clowning around.  The Minuteman III missile is an intercontinental ballistic missile developed with three nuclear warheads, although most are now being downgraded to one warhead in accordance with past agreements and treaties, according to several websites.  They are contained in hardened silos to protect against attack and are connected to an underground launch control center. There are currently 500 Minuteman III missiles in the United States, 150 of which are under the watch of the Minot Air Force Base.  According to Staff Sergeant Tiernan, 15 facilities surrounding the base each monitor 10 missiles and are manned 24 hours a day, 365 days a year by a two-man crew.

User Comments

People who try to destroy our defenses need an experience of what it feels like being defenseless.
I suggest we take them (in their clown costumes if they like) and deposit them in the middle of Sadr City in Baghdad, for a day or two, without defenses.
If they survive, bring them back and let them give speeches of their experience. I will be the first to listen.

Posted by: Andy Jozan | June 30, 2006, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

My concern is not what these folks did, but that they were able to do it! I don’t feel very safe knowing anyone could not only get onto a missle base, but obtain access to a missle. What if they chose to take a more severe action? If the missles are there to protect us, who protects the missles?

Posted by: Bob Crispens | June 30, 2006, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

SO WHY WERE THEY NOT SHOT ON SIGHT?
I would hate…no very afraid to think that any one could dress up as a clown and get near a missile site armed with how many nuke war heads?
In this day and age we let a group of people near so dangerous a weapon? What if they were armed with a shaped charge instead of paint and party ballons?
I would feel a lot safer if anyone getting that close to such a terrible weapon would be instantly killed!
I know this sounds harsh but the idea that all anyone has to do is put on a funny suit to allow them to get so close to somthing that can kill millions!

Posted by: davids | June 30, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Good for these folks. These weapons serve no useful purpose except to perpetuate the threats of mass annihilation and American imperialist dominance. The less of these the better. I just wish their actions were less symbolic and more destructive. If the government won’t disarm itself, let us disarm it then.

Posted by: Rick Erickson | June 30, 2006, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Humm…
Interesting.
Reminds me of Marcinko´s Red Cell (dressed in “assimetric camouflage fatigues”).
Or even Sturmabteilung Koch in Eban Emael, 1940.
I am surprised they weren´t shot on the spot.
Beware, America, learn from this!

Posted by: Pedro Marcos | June 30, 2006, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Well, they didn’t have “access” to a missile. They did have temporary access to a site. Both men and missile are physically well protected but if “45 minutes” is accurate, this is much too long. Knowing the miitary, heads will roll on this one. Good wake up call to improve security. Thank God it was just a bunch of “clowns” … this time.

Posted by: Gregg | June 30, 2006, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

They were most likely spotted by the military. Security was trying to figure out what to do with the cute loveable clowns. The chain of command must have been dumb-founded. I mean come on now, we have to be politically correct in decisions like this. How could we hurt the clowns feelings by being mean to them. What if the press was watching and reported our insensitive actions.

Posted by: Dr. Vinny Boom-Botz | June 30, 2006, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

We should launch the particular missile at Tehran just to make sure they didn’t damage it.

Posted by: Dan | June 30, 2006, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Guys, they didn’t have access to the missiles. They cut a lock on the fence, and then pounded on the giant concrete lid that protects the missiles. In effect, they were standing on a sunken building and pounding on the roof.
I’d be reluctant to trust the word of Nukewatch when it comes to how rapidly our forces responded.

Posted by: Brian | June 30, 2006, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

Dan, I like the way you think. :) Maybe we could let them try it again, and fire the next one at Pyongyang.
Never can be too careful.

Posted by: Brian | June 30, 2006, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

deposit them in the middle of Sadr City in Baghdad, for a day or two, without defenses.
Are you kidding me? These guys didn’t lessened our defensive capabilities. These remote silos are built to withstand a near miss by a nuclear missile. How the heck are three men and a sledgehammer going to damage that? And you want to kill them? (And BTW, I don’t think they should go unpunished either, but kill ‘em?

Posted by: Steven P | July 1, 2006, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Why would a bunch of hippy clowns lie about the response time?

Posted by: Justin Hughes | July 1, 2006, 4:49 am 4:49 am

Thank god it had taken this long for the two man crew to wake up and call for help. In the event of a nuclear war thanx to these “quick” responses there might be a place left on earth where mankind could survive…

Posted by: Joepfromholland | July 1, 2006, 8:27 am 8:27 am

The 45 min response time was probably realistic since they did have the time to use bolt cutters to carve out a fence hole, get to a missile silo on foot, paint the word “Disarm” on it, and pound on the doors with sledgehammers. The scary part is, I wonder if they would’ve EVER been noticed had they NOT pounded on the doors.
I don’t favor ditching our nukes, I don’t like them, but threats of mass destruction are a necessary part of international life for the U.S. thanks to all of the enemies our political leaders have made for us. What I do think is that they need to be secured. I find it ironic that we probably have much more advanced security on the Mexican border than we do on this major nuke storage site.
To be fair, that massive staff of 2 people per 10 missiles does provide a major measure of security. I suppose that a potential terrorist group might need as many as three people to ensure that they can overwhelm them…oh wait, that’s how many just broke into the facility, wasn’t it?
Maybe instead of arresting these clowns, the government should be hiring them to test their security since they obviously can’t do the job themselves. And if the military needs to roll some heads let’s start with Donald Rumsfeld’s for allowing this major security flaw to exist for so long.

Posted by: PAwatchdog | July 2, 2006, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

I always knew clowns were evil!

Posted by: Ruth | July 8, 2006, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Anybody who does not believe that government security is capable only need to try and get into the empty desert in area51 to know how wrong they are and how effective government goon squads can be when they need to.

Posted by: Anomaly1974 | July 9, 2006, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

The clown suits were strangely fitting. (Double entendre) The fact that they got in may seem disturbing to some, but the fact that they took a hammer to a silo designed to take a near miss from a nuke? That IS funny! Anybody who does not think Government security is any good, only needs to try and get into the “empty” desert at Area 51 and they will know that our Government can even keep people out of the open when they need to.

Posted by: Anomaly1974 | July 9, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.