Ivy Leaguers Leave Lebanon First and Fast Through Private Security Firms
When fighting broke out in Lebanon, college students studying there for the summer anxiously awaited their turn to evacuate. As it turns out, if you were an Ivy League student in Beirut, your turn came first. Among those enrolled in the summer Arabic program at the American University of Beirut, students told ABC News, those from Harvard, Yale and Princeton were in the first group evacuated – by high-end private security firms. Students from other American schools were left behind, waiting it out for days while the U.S. embassy formulated its plan. A.G. Leventhal, a Junior and Near Eastern Languages concentrator at Harvard University, was enrolled in summer classes at AUB when bombs began falling on southern Beirut. Leventhal was immediately contacted by Harvard and informed of the International SOS service, which would begin evacuation the next day. While Leventhal and his cohorts were being bussed or flown to safety, other students were told to stay put as bombs falling nearby shook their dorm rooms. The students left behind recall their frustration and a feeling of isolation. One student who wanted to remain anonymous for security reasons said, "It was unfair that the private, wealthy schools were afforded the luxury of a quick evacuation." Both her university and her government, she says, failed to help her out of a dangerous situation. With the growth in American students studying abroad in the Middle East, some schools are turning to private security companies to protect their students where they cannot. Harvard, Princeton and Yale are insured by International SOS and Medex, two private security companies. Arriving with well-equipped teams, these companies arranged everything for students from land- and air-route evacuations, to hotel rooms, to cold bottles of water at the Syrian border. "International SOS did a fantastic job," says Robert Mitchell, Director of Communications at Harvard University. Customer satisfaction with the American government: not quite so high. The Beirut situation "has shown how horrible the State Department has been in evacuating people…keeping people informed and not causing a state of panic," wrote Leventhal in an e-mail to ABC News. In a public announcement, the State Department stated, "The U.S. Government is using all resources possible to facilitate the speedy and safe departure of American citizens currently in Lebanon using every means available." But luckily for Leventhal, his Harvard status kept him safer, sooner.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Yeah right….We all want to go to the back of the line. Dialog…”No please, go first I insist, I’ll stay behind and deal with the bombs”. Anger management, with panic, as we push and shove in line at McDonalds for a hamburger.
Posted by: botcha-galoop | July 21, 2006, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Just another example of the privilaged life of rich kids, in this case they get to live, while others may die. Also – shows how a private company can beat govt. agencies anytime.
Posted by: stu | July 21, 2006, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
It just gose to show that if the money is right you get what you want… I guss there wasnt enough room for the rest of the students to get on….
Posted by: kellen smith | July 21, 2006, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
GO USA!! it seems like the Katrina factor all over again
Posted by: john | July 21, 2006, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Sure, that’s screwed up. But conflating membership in the Ivy League with wealth is ignorant.
Posted by: x | July 21, 2006, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
nothing here indicates individual wealth but institutional health. i applaud harvard et al for spending the cash necessary to protect its students. many students at ivy league schools receive scholarships to attend. these kids are lucky because their universities put money into security, not (necessarily / always) because they’re sucking silver spoons. don’t blame them for being in an opportune situation; that’s just stupid.
Posted by: columbia kid | July 21, 2006, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Yes, this seems elitist and awful. but also, ivy league kids (or their parents) pay a godawful amount of money to put their kids in those schools. If i were paying ivy league prices for my kid to study in lebanon, you’d better be sure i’d expect that with such a heavy price tag my child would be bought a first-class ticket out of their if her life was in danger.
Posted by: ryan | July 21, 2006, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
People should concentrate their concerns on the the lacking govt reponse (per usual) more than they should be concerned with the services that somebody’s study abroad tuition provides. Further – its highly likely that if Harvard wouldn’t have done it, one of the students’ parents would have called up their security firm and had it done. Maybe GW will be lucky and get the regional war he’s been gunning for!
Posted by: Grady | July 21, 2006, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
The rich are different. So what else is new…
By the way, the Ivy League schools don’t cost any more or less than most private schools. It’s just that the kids who get in tend to be from very wealthy families.
Posted by: Carmen | July 21, 2006, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
More than half of Princeton’s students receive financial aid. Princeton does not require students to take out loans, instead providing grants and on campus jobs. The annual bill fits the needs and capabilities of the student and their family. As an alumn, I am overwhelming proud of this fact, and very glad Princeton provides such outstanding opportunities for our students, and the foresight to keep them safe.
Posted by: Tiger | July 21, 2006, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Conflating Ivy League status with wealth isn’t all that outrageous…and I doubt the current Oval Office occupant didn’t go to Yale and Harvard on his mental abilities.
Daniel Gross, Slate, Jan. 12, 2005:
“Something has changed about the character of the student bodies at many Ivy League schools in recent decades. With the rising ability of the wealthy to smooth the path to admission by paying private-school tuition and hiring college advisers and SAT-prep tutors and with college tuition far outpacing financial aid growth rich kids are more likely to get in, and to attend, Ivy League schools than in the past. A widely quoted study from the Century Foundation found that 74 percent of the students at 146 selective colleges surveyed came from the top socioeconomic quartile, while only 10 percent come from the bottom half! Harvard President Larry Summers devoted his 2004 commencement speech to this phenomenon. On a percentage basis, fewer Ivy League graduates than public school graduates today need to find stable, high-paying jobs at big companies. More of them can afford to traipse around Asia for a year or pursue a career in film-making. It could be that the already rich and comfortable are simply less interested in pursuing careers in large corporations than their less-comfortable public-school peers for purely economic reasons.”
Posted by: BRD | July 21, 2006, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
What is going on you people at ABC and the comments section? I think you are very much uninformed regarding the SOS evacuation insurance. These policies are very cheap considering what they do. These policies are NOT just for IVY LEAGUERS, so please stop the class warfare, OK?
When students at my little Iowa university travel abroad for academic purposes, they ALL get insurance. A policy for a student is about $140 a month. It covers medical evacuation as well as evacuation in wartime as well. So, if you get really ill in some foreign hell hole – you will get flown back to the US/Europe. Or, if you are stuck in some proxy war between the US and Iran, SOS will come and get you!!!
I think that the students who DIDN’T get insurance were total idiots. My dear sweet Jesus….. they were going to BEIRUIT for gawd’s sake.
Students who did not get an evacuation policy were just trying to save money. I feel bad for these people, but they had a choice.
Please, end the class warfare and let’s consider the REAL war.
Posted by: Tom Riedmiller | July 22, 2006, 2:26 am 2:26 am
Ryan said:
“Yes, this seems elitist and awful. but also, ivy league kids (or their parents) pay a godawful amount of money to put their kids in those schools. If i were paying ivy league prices for my kid to study in lebanon, you’d better be sure i’d expect that with such a heavy price tag my child would be bought a first-class ticket out of their if her life was in danger.”
Golly, Ryan, it DOES seem a wee bit elitist and awful, now that you mention it.
Say, here’s an idea: if your upper crust male offspring ever take a cruise, why don’t you pack some dresses and wigs in their suitcases. That way, if there should be a problem mid-ocean, when the crew says, “Women and children first!” your far-more-important-than-the-rest-of -us progeny can jump into the first lifeboat.
Don’t worry, we working class scum will understand the need for the product of your 24 karat gold-plated seed to evacuate before us. We’ll go happily to our watery graves in the knowledge that our betters will survive.
Posted by: Cranky Media Guy | July 22, 2006, 4:14 am 4:14 am
If I were a parent with a kid in a situation like this, I’d spend every penny I had to get them out. Thank god Havard, et al view their responsibilities as a parent and did not leave their students up to the government (look at this administration, would you?). The focus should be on the OTHER college who put their students in a situation like this and are doing nothing. Why are you trying to blame those who acted?
Posted by: TM | July 22, 2006, 7:00 am 7:00 am
The real issue is the demented foreign policy that the USA carries out in the Middle East; it is as demented as the American government’s reponse to evacuating its own from Lebanon.
Posted by: Lesyk | July 22, 2006, 7:21 am 7:21 am
Most people will laugh at this, but there are those who understand. It’s the illuminati at work. Yale, Harvard, and Princeton are schools where U.S. presidents have been “tapped” – in other words, “chosen”. George W. Bush and many elected officials belong to secret societies connected with these schools – like the Skull and Bones society. These societies are the works of Masons – the unseen force behind “your” government. They control the money and protect their own.
Posted by: Mark Vander Lugt | July 22, 2006, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Well it seems that Harvard, Yale and Princeton have a good understanding of the geo-political situation in Lebanon and took it far enough to protect its students.
Too bad the other schools did not advise their students of the dangers in the ME. To say that this is the advantages of wealth is nothing more than spoiled milk. You want to go visit areas of this planet where one walks the edge of the envelope without a SoS plan and then complaint because the USG has to make you wait a little while so it can deal with all 25,000 Americans is really a very lazy and shallow arguement.
Its your responsibility to be prepared. Not just abroad but here at home as well.
Posted by: SpecCat | July 22, 2006, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
the ivy league is perhaps the most misunderstood myth in american culture. to say that the it is only for the richest of the rich is malarkey. i go to yale, and sometimes i am so poor that i cant pay my cellphone bill on time. and there are many folks like me here.
what the situation does reveal, however, is that HYP are elite private institutions that function with greater finesse than our very government. simply put, it exposes just how slow and unproductive our government can be.
to the US government all i have to say is: “i dont wanna hear, i dont wanna know. please dont say youre sorry.”
Posted by: A Yalie from the Ghetto | July 22, 2006, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
As a future student at an Ivy League school, I can by all means attest to the fact that I am by no means wealthy. Criticizing Harvard, Yale, and Princeton for looking out for the welfare of their students is absolutely ridiculous. If your child was in the same situation, wouldn’t you want his or her alma mater to do the same?
Posted by: FutureIvyLeaguer | July 22, 2006, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
The gentleman from Princeton shocked me, as did some other folks on this site, with the naive belief that “Ivy League” doesn’t correlate totatlly with “rich.” I teach at an Ivy League University and the scholarships we can offer barely make a dent in the crippling six-figure costs over foru years. A few poor kids, thank God, get a free ride, but middle-class kids are not coming to these schools, and, arugably, they’d be pretty selfish if they did, since it would mean their parents couldn’t afford vacations, nice clothes or a secure retirement.
What happened in Beirut was “The Titanic” all over again — only the rich got lifeboats.
Posted by: Prof. | July 22, 2006, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Hmm.
Is this shame on Ivy League students, for attending institutions that have the money to provide full security?
Wake up — Ivy League schools have great facilities, great education, and offer great job prospects, and that’s just the way it is. And everyone should know by now that Ivy League is at least 50% meritocracy with lots of hoi polloi on scholarship.
If the Ivy League can insure their overseas programs and thus students, all the better. I’m sure some financial aid students were among the ivy students evacuated by the security firms that were contracted to do so. (And probably contracted because 1) the Ivy have the money to pay the insurance and 2) admittedly, the Ivy generally fears powerful litigious parents of some students — thus everything is about security — for ALL students, rich or poor.
So its not a simple question of rich kids getting special treatment.
Posted by: SwissExpat | July 23, 2006, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
“I teach at an Ivy League University and the scholarships we can offer barely make a dent in the crippling six-figure costs over foru years. A few poor kids, thank God, get a free ride, but middle-class kids are not coming to these schools … What happened in Beirut was “The Titanic” all over again — only the rich got lifeboats.”
I don’t know what university you teach at, but I haven’t observed such a disparity in class and income at Harvard, which bears the brunt of criticism whenever ivy league privilege is brought up. Most of my friends are in fact middle class and I myself pay next to nothing to attend to this school. In my experience, Harvard does a great job of enabling kids from all backgrounds to attend, and I don’t think it’s fair to characterize the Beirut evacuation as the rich exercising their privilege. I have a lot of middle class friends studying abroad right now and if it were them or me in danger, we’d be just as protected as our better off peers.
It’s unacceptable that students elsewhere aren’t given the same amount of protection, but I think many people miss the point: what schools like Harvard did for their students shouldn’t be considered a privilege but a basic expectation that any school should offer. It’s unfortunate that that’s not always the case.
Posted by: Not-so-privileged at Harvard | July 24, 2006, 2:40 am 2:40 am
To be fair, not all ivy leaguers are rich… almost everyone I went to school with was receiving a generous amount of financial aid AND working part-time or full-time jobs.
Posted by: Meg | July 24, 2006, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Dear Prof– see the two comments above yours. I too attended an Ivy League school and can attest that I did not grow up wealthy, nor exactly poor, but in fact fall into the category of “selfish” middle-class kids that you claim never go to these schools. I do not know what prompts you to believe that all or nearly all of your students are extremely wealthy, but I would venture to guess that is an unfair generalization. My classmates came from a variety of backgrounds, yes, some of them wealthy, from private schools, others poor, on a full or partial scholarship, but many of them were like me– somewhere in between, making our way through on a combination of work-study programs, government-subsidized loans, private loans, private scholarships, and of course the invaluable assistance of our parents, none of whom, I can assure you, are destitute as a result. It is unfair to assume that all Ivy League students are at these schools simply because they come from wealthy families. The Ivy League opportunity is available to many bright young students of all financial backgrounds– and in my opinion can prove a great equalizer to those who are at good schools simply because of a legacy, like our president. In addition, as others have pointed out, many private colleges in the US are at least as expensive as Ivy League schools, and they should all have insurance policies that would provide their students with the sort of support one would expect in Lebanon. The fact that the Ivy League universities had this type of coverage and that their administrators saw fit to call students and advise them of it simply means they were better organized. There is not even any proof in this article that other schools did not have such insurance policies– no other school is named, nor are any students– yet another example of how people are often quick to say “look how lucky the rich are” without looking any deeper. What other schools had students studying in Lebanon? What security companies had they hired, if any? These strike me as key questions that should have been answered as part of a responsible piece of journalism rather than one designed to play on stereotypes without finding out where the blame should really lie for those students left behind.
Posted by: columbia alum | July 24, 2006, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Criticizing the Ivies isn’t fair in this situation. The schools saw the students were in danger and acted accordingly.
However, if Harvard can get its students out quickly and safely, you’d think the US government could do the same for its citizens.
Perhaps the Bush administration should look into hiring these private security companies to help get all Americans out of dangerous situations. Looks like they do a pretty good job.
And it’s entirely possible that after seeing what happened during Katrina, Harvard, Yale, and Princeton realized that the government cannot be counted on in times of crisis and took matters into their own hands.
Bottom line: This story does nothing but illustrate that our government will not be there for us when we need it.
Posted by: Sev | July 24, 2006, 10:37 am 10:37 am
And if the Ivy League schools hadn’t done their best, and students had been injured, the same people would be complaining that “rich” schools should have done better. The US governement is not in charge of personal security in Lebanon, so anything they do to get citizens out is a bonus and should be appreciated.
Posted by: Bruce | July 24, 2006, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Hi All,
It amazes me how quickly people to place blame on the State Department for the speed of evacuation without thinking of the cause. Let’s say State did like the French and said everyone just get on a cruise ship. Let’s say Hizbollah or just so Joe with a chip on his shoulder and a few extra grenades decides to bomb that gathering of Americans. Would you then say it’s not the State Department’s fault or that they should have provided security?
If you would in any way blame State for not providing security, as I would, then how do you blame them for taking the time to have the Navy move assets into position. Let’s remember large scale evacuation of Americans were about 24-36 hours behind the French and Spanish who seemed to be most advanced with evacuation efforts and all those countries did was say hop on the cruise ship we’re sending you. The reality is Americans are always targets and when people forget that Americans get killed.
Slightly off topic pet peeve: And how do you complain about paying $150 to get rescued from a war zone? If you can afford to travel to Lebanon you can certainly put $150 on a credit card to defray the cost the rest of us Americans have to pay for getting you from an exist war zone.
Tom
Posted by: Tom | July 24, 2006, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Good for Harvard, Yale, etc. or whoever paid for the evac insurance! Sounds like “SOS evacuation insurance” is a pretty good value for the money.
I just think this situation is more illustrative of what happens when an administration that HATES government programs gets to appoint people to run government agencies that have no stake in good performance. Say what you will about Clinton and the demos, but they at least tried to appoint effective leaders at FEMA, FDA, EPA, etc. Clinton is known to have BUILT UP FEMA only to have GW destroy it in a few years by appointing his cronies to run it. When I was a kid you always heard of how GOOD the US government was at taking care of citizens abroad. Heck, Reagan sent in the MARINES to Grenada to rescue a few med students (and of course topple an unfriendly government…).
So I don’t think we can say government HAS to be incompetant at protecting citizens abroad. It just has become that way recently. Perhaps we need to install an administration that believes in effective government rather than one that merely wants to tear it down in as many places as possible, and then say “See! Government is incompetant! Let’s ‘outsource’ everything to our friends in private industry!”
Posted by: Gregg | July 24, 2006, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Medex and International SOS are NOT private security companies, they are emergency travel medical assistance companies, working on behalf of insurance carriers worldwide. I’m also insured with a travel plan through Medex as part of my employee health benefits. Trust me, I’m not wealthy. These are common policies and the Ivy League schools apparently had enough foresight to invest in them. It does make the other schools look bad though, and make it seem like the rich are more important. Here in Canada, most students might not have this, but lots of low-income office workers do…
Posted by: Jane | July 25, 2006, 9:51 am 9:51 am
In this particular context, I agree that the criticism should be directed at the failure of the U.S. government to protect citizens living or studying abroad and not at Harvard and other schools that had the foresight to ensure that, should such a situation and need arise, they would be able to protect those in their care. Let’s remember that colleges act in loco parentis while students are in their care.
That said, there has been an astonishing (and I am tempted to say disingenuous) display of naivete on this blog. While one can always adduce examples of those from low income environments who enter the ivies, the notion that the majority of those in ivy league schools are not the beneficiaries of inherited wealth and privilege is laughable.
While not quite the preserves fo the wealthy as they once were, elite schools are still self-perpetuating engines of inherited privilege and wealth. A very fine article by Walter Benn Michaels on this very subject appeared not long ago in the magazine n+1. It is well worth reading.
Posted by: Eric J-D | July 25, 2006, 10:40 am 10:40 am
I am a former Yale student who is not rich. Yale, being a very wealthy institution was able to offer me much better financial aid than other expensive liberal arts colleges. That said, I had to work the entire time and came out with lots of debt. It is good that even this is offered, but it is not enough. Many people threw out the figure of 50% of students being on financial aid, which last I heard was pretty close. That means half of all Yale students came from families who could afford to simply pay for school out of pocket. These people in the rest of country make up about 5% of the population. That means that regardless of the partial efforts made, the rich make up an undeniably disporportionate number of ivy league students. I can attest to having met lots and lots of kids at Yale who were not particularly smart, just rich, but then I don’t think personal anecdotes are very convincing argument.
As for the evacuations, it’s clear just as in Katrina that wealth (or being affiliated w/ a wealthy institution) can help buy your way out of risky situations. I believe that everyone deserves to be protected from harm, regardless of their class. However, it’s worth noting that if the US were not giving Israel a blank check to bomb Lebanon into oblivion, these students wouldn’t have to be evacuated in the first place.
Posted by: angry ex-yalie | July 25, 2006, 11:46 am 11:46 am
When Katrina hit, Harvard invited all Tulane students to transfer there for the fall semester, apparently because Tulane is an expensive sister private institution, the vast majority of whose students do not come from Louisiana. Students at the several public-supported universities in New Orleans, whose student bodies were overwhelmingly from Louisiana and whose families therefore suffered much more from the hurricane, did not receive such invitations. Talk about class solidarity!
Also, see sociologist Zelda Gamson in a 1997 issue of Social Text in which she reveals that students at the most selective institutions come from families with incomes three and four times higher than those of students at the least selective institutions.
Posted by: New Orleans Native | July 25, 2006, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Instead of passing blame, look at the root cause. These students chose to go to Lebanon, a place not really known for peace and tranquility. Maybe it’s because I graduated from a state university instead of a private or Ivy League school, but if I were heading to the Middle East, I wouldn’t be surprised if stuff started blowing up.
Also, Katrina provided us with a harsh but necessary lesson: waiting for our government to bail your butt out of a dangerous situation isn’t a good idea.
Posted by: Poor Richard | July 27, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
These evacuation programs are not expensive, so everyone who thinks these are reserved for the financially elite are selling themselves short (or playing the blame game instead of realizing their own responsibility to protect themselves). Yes, Yale, Harvard and Princeton are doing the prudent thing to provide this kind of program to their students…but these programs are also available to individuals. Check out the Medex Travmed program on http://www.insuremytrip.com that has a terrorism rider — it’s only $1 a day!
So stop complaining and dish out the money, that you would otherwise spend on trinkets and gifts, to be sure YOU will make it home. It makes me sick to see how quickly people point fingers and feel sorry for themselves without doing a little research.
Posted by: Nikki | July 27, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
It is amazing how a subject like this twists itself into political and social knots. The point of the report, for those who really are interested in where this started, is that some university administrators had the foresight to recognize that university’s students might experience catastrophic medical or security circumstances. That has absolutely nothing to do with elitism. The pure fact is that some state universities and small private colleges work with companies like Medex, as does my daughter’s. Her school charges something insane like $90 a year, hardly elitist and certainly affordable on my single parent budget.
To those who want to bash the schools whose sin here is being interviewed and commenting positively on the fact they had a means through Medex and SOS to get their sons and daughters to safety, what did your school do for its students? What did you do to protect your spouse and family during your European vacation?
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone…or rocket.
Posted by: Randall | July 27, 2006, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm