Exclusive: Whistleblowers Say State Farm Cheated Katrina Victims
State Farm Insurance supervisors systematically demanded that Hurricane Katrina damage reports be buried or replaced or changed so that the company would not have to pay policyholders’ claims in Mississippi, two State Farm insiders tell ABC News. Kerri and Cori Rigsby, independent adjusters who had worked for State Farm exclusively for eight years, say they have turned over thousands of internal company documents and their own detailed statement to the FBI and Mississippi state investigators. In an exclusive interview with ABC news, that was broadcast on 20/20 and World News, the Rigsby sisters say they saw "widespread" fraud at the State Farm offices in Biloxi and Gulfport, Miss. "Katrina was devastating, but so was State Farm," says Cori Rigsby. At one point, they say State Farm brought in a special shredding truck they believe was used to destroy key documents. State Farm says shredding is standard to protect policyholders’ privacy. The sisters say they saw supervisors go to great lengths to pressure outside engineers to prepare reports concluding that damage was caused by water, not covered under State Farm policies, rather than by wind. They say reports that concluded that damage was caused by wind, for which State Farm would have to pay, were hidden in a special file and new reports were ordered. Cori Rigsby says she recalls a senior coordinator ordering that an engineering company be told to alter the findings in its report so that State Farm would not have to pay. "Tell them if they don’t change their report, we’re not paying their invoice," she remembers the supervisor saying. A lawyer for State Farm, Wayne Drinkwater, told ABC News he was unfamiliar with the Rigsby sisters but denied State Farm cheated policyholders or pressured outside engineers to reach particular conclusions in their damage reports. "We, of course, have not been cheating," Drinkwater said. The allegations, if proven, would support the suspicions of thousands of homeowners along the Mississippi Gulf Coast who have been unable to collect enough insurance money to rebuild their homes. Many have filed lawsuits against State Farm and other insurance companies alleging the companies of wrongly denying or low-balling their claims. The Rigsby sisters’ allegations are now a key part of suits filed against State Farm by well-known Mississippi lawyer Dickie Scruggs, famous for taking on the tobacco companies. See Photos of Katrina, One Year Later – the National Disgrace That Is Still Going On. If you have had a horrible experience with an insurance company, click here to share your story with us.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
The insurance companies are all crooks. Just ask any Florida resident.
Posted by: George f | August 25, 2006, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Sing it with me:
“And like a good neighbor, State Farm is there!”
Posted by: Won't you be my Neighbor? | August 25, 2006, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Insurance companies are a rip off. Pay pay pay and get nothing. State Farm should hold its managers and supervisors accountable if this really did go down like the whistleblowers say. Those managers are no better than crack heads begging for your change at the gas station. Just looking for a hand out and reason why its not their fault.
Posted by: Robert | August 25, 2006, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
You can’t blame anyone else for anything except President George W. Bush! How dare you, the Democrats must take over the House & Senate and win the White House.
Remember, George W. Bush is to blame for every single thing wrong with America. Right?
Posted by: Patsy | August 25, 2006, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Well like a good neigbor state farm is there???? I think I’d rather have a crack house as a neighbor rather than State Farm
Posted by: gary | August 25, 2006, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
This doesn’t surprise me at all. I work at an insurance company and if it is not the company its their agents comitting fraud against the company for their own gain.
Posted by: JoJo | August 25, 2006, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
After suffering through State Farm’s brand of paying off claims after a natural disaster I believe every single word these women are saying. We in Cheyenne, Wyoming were hit by an extremely damaging and freaky flood on August 1, 1985. My husband and I were paid about $1200.00 for some window damage done by hail but we ultimately wound up losing our home and having to claim bankruptcy due to the damage done to our house that State Farm claimed they did not cover. These insurance companies want higher and higher fees to “cover” (and I use that term loosely) and they want their payments “right now” too. However, when it comes to ponying up to the bar and paying their part when something happens, they squirrel out of it like the huge, money-hungry, power-driven mega-monsters that they are. The insurance situation in this country is a disgrace and desperately needs to be over-hauled as well as investigated thoroughly!
Debbie Walter-Holdridge
Posted by: Debbie Holdridge | August 25, 2006, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
The Gulf Coast wasn’t the only area. My home was damaged by Wilma to the tune of $106,000. State Farm first offered just over $20,000. The finally sent us just over $70,000. Still a far cry from the real damage and it has been a constant fight to get paid. Now we are fighting for payment of our hotel bills while the house is repaired.
State Farm should be held to account and their Executives should be investigated just like Enron.
Herschel Kilgore
Posted by: Herschel Kilgore | August 25, 2006, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
I wouldn’t be surprised of the fraud allegations against State Farm..Anything to save a buck..
Posted by: Robert Vysther | August 25, 2006, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Extremists take lives. State Farm takes livelihoods. Both sound like terrorism to me.
Posted by: vEE | August 25, 2006, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
This is just another case of corporate corruption to the fullest. Insurance companies are so tight that they squeak when they talk. What I dont understand is that it we, the general public, pay millions every year to these insurance companies, but when it comes time for them to pay back its like trying to pull teeth from a crocodile. This smells very similar to the Red Cross scandal following the tragedy of 9/11. I hope the evidence that the FBI has wi;; work to the residents benefit. PAY UP STATE FARM….
Posted by: Eli Hardy | August 25, 2006, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
I wonder how many folks are really going to be shocked by this? Hold on for hope though, I’m sure our great G.W.B. will bail them out.
Posted by: dreek | August 25, 2006, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Evil comes in all forms. Shame on State Farm. I was there are a volunteer recovery working for several months. Those people need help on a basic level. How dare State Farm refuse to stand up.
Posted by: Lara Hermes | August 25, 2006, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
“Like a good neighboor, State Farm is there..”
Remember those? What “good neighboor” decides not only to not help, but to destroy that which could be used to help those in such a predicament?
State Farm should be ashamed of themselves; and what’s more, should be foreced to pay out the nose for this indecency. If this leads to insolvency, so be it–that’s what price you pay for being in the insurance biz…and for breaking the law.
Posted by: Phil | August 25, 2006, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
“See Photos of Katrina, One Year Later – the National Disgrace That Is Still Going On.”
I would say a state of Louisiana disgrace. Nagin and company botched the whole thing and now he has the nerve to criticize New York for not fixing their “hole in the ground”???
What an ass.
Posted by: Jeff | August 25, 2006, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
“and like a good neighbor State Farm is there” – doesn’t sound like it….just another example of the little guy getting screwed!
Posted by: Dave | August 25, 2006, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
This really is disgraceful. I have State Farm, but not for long.
Posted by: Jeffery Carr | August 25, 2006, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Wow! I’m not sure if my insurance is State Farm or not, I better check and if it is, cancel it and go with someone else.
Posted by: Duane | August 25, 2006, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
When they send out the lawyer to speak for the company you can pretty much assume they are guilty. I used to wonder why that was… until someone told me it OK for lawyers to lie but not a companies executives.
Posted by: Ray Malone | August 25, 2006, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Wow, what one P&C insurance agency does, others are likely to follow.
Posted by: Kirk Preston | August 25, 2006, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Why am I NOT surprised? Doesn’t it make perfect sense? Insurance companies seem to exist for profit not thier customers.
Posted by: Talon.. | August 25, 2006, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Those insurance companies know what they are doing, they know they are stealing money from the american people and they deserve whatever finanicial losses from lawsuits that are coming to them.
Posted by: Captain Conservative | August 25, 2006, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
So not surprised.
Posted by: vicky romens | August 25, 2006, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
This is nice. Corporate America sticking it to the little guys once again. Why pay taxes…why pay insurance? It’s obvious your paying for the protection of the rich and their assets at the expense of your safety and property. Thanks FEMA, thanks to our administration and now thank you State Farm for taking advantage of our working class and poor who work and pay for your protections.
Posted by: Chris Hartwig | August 25, 2006, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Oh that’s classic, Mr. Drinkwater …
“We, of course, have not been cheating.”
I can only imagine how smug he sounded actually saying that!
(Now might be a good time to get your cash out of those whole life policies from State Farm.)
Posted by: Will R | August 25, 2006, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
The operative phrase is their involvement with the well-known trial lawyer.
Until the facts come out, assign zero creditiblity based on the above. Most likely part of a shakedown strategy.
Posted by: jack hays | August 25, 2006, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
It sounds like something a big corporation would do to keep money in there own pockets. The poor people they have hurt in the process. All because of there GREED. I’m sure glad I don’t have State Farm insurance and this confirms it! Hurray for the girls to come forward in this matter. Why didn’t they do it sooner?
Posted by: Deb S. | August 25, 2006, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Remembers me Bally Total Fitness and their SCAMS. Exactly the same.
Posted by: CEGP | August 25, 2006, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Wow Great idea jeffery, imagine all the people? We were cancelled after 911 in the dc area after paying them since 1979 with 2 water damage small claims. If we all switched…….
makes yo go hmmmmmm…..
Posted by: rick Slick | August 25, 2006, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Maybe it’s time for mortgage companies to pick up the ball and pressure insurance companies to “honestly” insure their customers. Or better yet, just drop the insurance requirements. Fewer policy holders means more competition. Competition breeds better service!
Posted by: sue watkins | August 25, 2006, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
All my relatives in N.O. have SF and got checks when the fled to Los Angeles the following day. They all have positive things to say about how State Farm folks that weren’t even their agent helped them.
Posted by: Other side | August 25, 2006, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
I am an agent and State Farm is a competitor, so I don’t mind them getting bad publicity. However, news shows like 20/20 are notorious for biased coverage of stories such as this to get good ratings. Most insurance companies are happy to pay what the contract requires. However, flood is excluded. The homeowners should have bought flood insurance.
Posted by: Bill | August 25, 2006, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
STATE FARM OR ANY OTHER INSURANCE COMPANY IS JUST ANOTHER TERM FOR LIGALIZE GASTERS…..
Posted by: MARIA MENDEZ | August 25, 2006, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Hats off to the sisters for keeping their integrity intact. Its a shame that insurance companies think they can get away with things like this – we need more people who are not afraid to tell the truth and expose frauds – no matter how big a company they are.
Posted by: basketmom | August 25, 2006, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
thank god there’s no fraud happening the other way! we all know that all homeowner claims are accurate and in no way rounded up.
Posted by: mike | August 25, 2006, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
I have worked in the insurance industry for over 30 years. The adjusters are at the mercy of either doing what they are told or giving up their jobs. These two sisters gave it up for what is right. Their bosses if guilty need to go to jail. People who buy insurance, pay their premiums, have to be treated honestly, fairly, and with respect. They deserve nothing less. State Farm if guilty needs everyone involved fined, dismissed, jailed all the way to the top. No excuses.
Posted by: John Hunsucker | August 25, 2006, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Wow, I’m surprised to see so many people taking the side of the two women.
Hello – your homeowners specifically does not cover “flood”, especially in flood zones (i.e. Mississippi).
So, if you present a claim for something that isnt covered, why is it considered “fraud” when the insurance company doesn’t pay?
If there’s no siginificant wind damage, and the house is flooded, guess what – it was likely caused by a non-covered flood.
Posted by: Doug | August 25, 2006, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
When all else fails, blame Bush, how crazy is that. So much hate to this fine President, and his true beliefs, and will do what is right, not pandering to the poor slo s who just hate him. What is this world coming to.
Posted by: Corona Steve | August 25, 2006, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Yep. Don’t ya know insurance companies is legalized racketerring and extortion. Come on. Every state has laws that say you should pay insurance. That is absurd. If they would do it right and put your money into an a ccount that grows money then there would be no need for insriance companies. It is an unregulated industry that needs serious regualting.
And the dude that said George Bush is to blame is a moron. Really the president is just a figure head. All action regarding goverment regulation is mostly done at the local and state levels. Blame your governors and state representatives. They are the real culprits.
Posted by: Leon | August 25, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Then you add in last week’s federal court decision in a Mississippi court ruling for the insurance industry and you have one big case of piling on the storm victims. Ouch…
Posted by: rich | August 25, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
If this is true then everyone who participated in helping to shredding of these documents should be prosecuted to the extent of the law. We the American people have to stand together and support each other in time of need. And if I was one of the victims in other states who got ripped off from State Farm I would testify to this if this case every goes to trial. Numbers count!
Posted by: Deb Storm | August 25, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Hold on now, I have to call State Farm and CANCEL all my policies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Rick | August 25, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
If fraud was truly committed, then any and all insurance companies involved should be held accountable. It is equally clear after reading prior posts however, that many homeowners do not know what their policies do and do not cover. Insurance companies are NOT responsible if your home was damaged by flood waters and you do not have flood insurance.
Posted by: Paul Wilson | August 25, 2006, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
I have worked in the insurance industry for over 30 years. The adjusters are at the mercy of either doing what they are told or giving up their jobs. These two sisters gave it up for what is right. Their bosses if guilty need to go to jail. People who buy insurance, pay their premiums, have to be treated honestly, fairly, and with respect. They deserve nothing less. State Farm if guilty needs everyone involved fined, dismissed, jailed all the way to the top. No excuses.
Posted by: John Hunsucker | August 25, 2006, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Just remember, you’re in good hands with Allstate.
Posted by: Ron | August 25, 2006, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
what ever happened to innocent until proven guilty. we are so quick to blame and all need someone to blame.
Posted by: j | August 25, 2006, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
State Farm will pay! As well as all the others crooks out there taking from the victims of this Levee breakage. Congress just as fault for letting this kinda thing happen. This is why the people can’t rebuild. The insurance companies, not just State Farm has swindled the documents. It all makes sense now.
Posted by: sosoft | August 25, 2006, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Its not impossible for fraud to go the other way also. If they don’t cover water damage but do cover wind damage I would not be surperised if a lot odf water damage was suddenly transmorgrified into wind damage.
Posted by: Mike | August 25, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
FLOOD IS NOT COVERED UNDER A HOMEOWNERS POLICY YOU HAVE TO BUY A FLOOD POLICY.
Posted by: STATE FARM EMPLOYEE | August 25, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Again we seem to be jumpin the gun an immediately finding State Farm guilty. Lets have a commission appointed to find out if the Insurance companies are bilkin the folks.
Also, to those that want to blame President Bush fer everythin that happens, from garbage pickup in the suburbs to Eclipse of the moon, may me point out that fraud is nothin new, and happens in all administrations be they Demo or Repub. Thank ya. Ed
Posted by: Ed | August 25, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? Seems too me that people like to pass judgement before they know ANY facts. We’ve got a few paragraphs of a news report and pull out the gallows!! Unfortunately as a society we like to throw stones and then ask questions. Listen to what EVERYONE involved has to say before you pass judgement.. Insurance company or little old housewife.. I don’t care.. Deep pockets don’t allways mean fraud..
Posted by: chris | August 25, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
I had to take them to court to get my claim solved. They thought that they would bully me around and that I would drop my lawsuit. They were wrong and I won. State Farm is terrible when it comes to solving claims.
wayne
Posted by: Wayne Berry | August 25, 2006, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
We had a tornado go through our home up here and state farm didn’t do anything to help. I had insurance w/state farm during that time, but had just got a job with another insurance company in this area. I saw how well, they handled their claims and how the put everyone in hotels so I switched. I know that all insurance are crooks but some are better than others.
Posted by: work in insurance | August 25, 2006, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
This is systemic across many sectors of our entire economy. Fannie Mae is missing billions and yet nothing is being done more than an “investigation.” When are the people of this GREAT country going to stop tolerating this crap and begin to stand up? It’s been a long time since we’ve had massive protests, I think it’s about time we begin to speak up.
Posted by: Patrick Ivy | August 25, 2006, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Nothing like guilty until proven innocent. How quickly we all fall into mob mentality. Who needs the legal system. Lets just condem people on popular oppinion and the word of 2 people who don’t actually work for the company.. Good Call
Posted by: logan42 | August 25, 2006, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
I hate the insurance industry. The entire thing is a racket. Perhaps the worst segment with the most problems is the Health Insurance industry.
I wanted to make one comment though. the Insurance industry screws everyone regardless of wealth or class.
Posted by: Fred | August 25, 2006, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Wow! I am shocked, but not surprised. Now if we can only get someone to detail how bias the mainstream media is in this country – that would be great!
Al
Posted by: al | August 25, 2006, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
I am convined that paying for home insurance just guarantees you a right to attempt to sue your insurance company….not be covered for losses. You need to write your legislators to press for a special prosecuter.
Posted by: Curtis Walker | August 25, 2006, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
This is the result when corporate America has the Congress in their back pockets. Nothing will change until campaign finance changes. I have heard many times that State Farm will cancel your policy in a New York minute if you have a bonafied claim. They never pay more than one claim per policy holder. That is their reputation.
Posted by: Brown Derby | August 25, 2006, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Let us not forget the core definition of corruption: Louisiana. As an ex-Louisiana resident, I truly believe that crooks go there for graduate training. Examples: Mayor of N.O and the completely incompetant governess. These two serve as baselines from which all stupidity and corruption should be measured.
Posted by: Da Coyote | August 25, 2006, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
I worked for State Farm as an independent in Luling (New Orleans) after Katrina and saw nothing, absolutely nothing, described by the two sisters. If I witnessed something like what they say they saw, I would have quit immediately. Why didn’t they?
Posted by: tmg | August 25, 2006, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Has it occurred to anyone that this might not be true? Do you want your personal documents floating around with your name, address, and policy number on it. And, these two don’t work for State Farm, they are independently contracted by other companies as well and if this has been happening why did they continue to work for State Farm for 8 years? Sounds like someone is looking for some publicity!
Posted by: Chelsea | August 25, 2006, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
This is unbelievable! Insurance companies know how to take like a cemetary but when it’s time for them to come through in a crisis, they sit on their hands. The best way to show these crooks that we’re angry is to cancel our policies. We need to put that hard earned money going towards “insurance” coverage in an emergency account. That way, we are taking care of ourselves. The best way to be heard is to hit them in the pocketbook where it hurts the most. Why should we have insurance if when we need it, they won’t pay. Let’s be smart and take care of ourselves. No one else will do it.
Posted by: Mimi | August 25, 2006, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
“Just like your neighbor…State Farm don’t care!”
Posted by: Dennis | August 25, 2006, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
It is so refreshing to read the comments from all of you who have the insight and vision to reach a judgement after reading one article providing one side of the issue. Don’t you think it would be wise to hear both sides of this issue before you reach judgement? For those who are blaming George W Bush, you are the idiots.
Posted by: Joe Kuhn | August 25, 2006, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Didn’t State Farm help to pay President Clinton’s legal bills in the Paula Jones Lawsuit, from a liability policy he had with them? So..they will pay for Clinton and NOT for Katrina??…come on!
Posted by: Mark | August 25, 2006, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
I am in the process of buying a house in Colorado, and this Katrina shenanigans has persuaded NOT to chose State Farm as my insurer. What’s the point of having insurance if the company doesn’t pay claims?
Posted by: Peter Fisk | August 25, 2006, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
This is the problem we let people get away with robbing us I say everyone who has a policy with State Robbed should cancel and go to a bettr company!
Posted by: ROBIN | August 25, 2006, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
sing this instead
“Unlike a good neighbor…state farm is unfair…”
Posted by: sj | August 25, 2006, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Hello!!!! Is anyone out there listening to this clamor willing to help……
Silience is not golden, silence is painful and damaging.
Someone with some authority needs to help correct this situation.
Hello!!!! Are you listening……We need help.
Posted by: Miss Young | August 25, 2006, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
I can’t figure out what all the surprise is about. The little people have been “nut & bolted” for as long as I can remember. I suggest we pay our premiums when bad does happen, or,even better, have the insurance companies refund the premiums you have paid for a year but did not use. Sounds like a plan to me.
Posted by: Donna Gothia | August 25, 2006, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Robert (2nd post) what is that all about?
To Chris H. State Farm is one thing and I am sure they are trying to CTA. FEMA? Dont look to the federal goverment to pull you out of a jam. They just make it possible for you to pull yourself out. Nature of the beast
Posted by: icondog | August 25, 2006, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
What ever happened to the concept of innocent until proven guilty.
Posted by: Andy Mixell | August 25, 2006, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
I had State Farm insurance for years in CA until I moved 1 mile and they tripled my monthly rates saying I moved to a high crime area, which is crap. I dumped them for AAA and now pay less than 1/3. Then reviewed my policy a little closer and found how State Farm stuffed my policy with rediculous extra coverge…
It would be interesting to see how much the upper Execs at State Farm got for bonuses this year while everyone in Mississippi & Louisiana suffer in crappy Fema trailers.
Posted by: Kristin | August 25, 2006, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
I hope all of you who are venting remember this episode the next time you get called for jury duty on a civil matter involving negligence in the future. The insurance carriers in this country are all alike.
Posted by: Fred Gates | August 25, 2006, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
another reason to stay clear of this company…if you have state farm insurance…better drop them before disaster strikes and they drop you…
Posted by: danny | August 25, 2006, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
AS AN INSURANCE AGENT I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT WHAT MOST PEOPLE COMPLAIN ABOUT IS NOT THAT THEY ARE DENIED COVERAGE, IT’S THAT THEY ASSUME THAT SOMETHING IS COVERED WITHOUT CHECKING THEIR POLICY. FLOOD WATERS ARE EXCLUDED UNDER EVERY INSURANCE POLICY SOLD. THAT’S WHY YOU SEE SO MANY COMMERCIALS BY THE FED’S URGING YOU TO PURCHASE FLOOD INSURANCE FOR YOUR OWN PROTECTION.
JUST AS YOU ASSUME THAT ALL COMPANIES ARE CHEATS, YOU ALSO ASSUME THAT YOU ARE ENTITLED TO ANYTHING YOU WANT JUST BECAUSE YOU THINK YOU ARE OWED IT. AND IF YOU DON’T GET IT, YOU ARE EITHER CHEATED BY THE FEDS OR BY INSURANCE COMPANIES. WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY?
Posted by: fRED | August 25, 2006, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Does no one here actually read their insurance policies? If you don’t have flood coverage and you get flooded then you don’t get paid for the flood damage. Seems simple to me.
If you are so upset about the cost of coverage, get rid of the insurance that will be much less expensive for you until something goes wrong….then you’ll be complaining about how you can’t afford to fix your house.
Another option – move out of the hurricane and flood zones.
I live in a fairly safe portion of the country and I resent that some of my premium goes to covering you morons who build their houses in the lowest areas directly in the path of hurricanes.
Why should I pay for your stupidity.
Posted by: Invid | August 25, 2006, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
For some reason people complain and complain. If you live in a flood plain would it not be wise to get flood insurance. If a certain company does not offer that. Why not go to a different company. This is typical knee-jerk reactions from the “Eat The Rich” crowd. You people make me sick. Just because you see two women say something all of a sudden it is true. Why not wait for all the evidence? Ridiculous.
Posted by: Jimmy Smith | August 25, 2006, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Funny how there isn’t one favorable comment for ANY insurance company from ANYONE! Seems to reinforce the below order of things (in decending order):
humans
animals
plants
dirt
pig poop
politicians
lawyers
insurance companies
doctors
etc.
Posted by: dick | August 25, 2006, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
I would hate to see those that posted here on any jury. Guilty until proven innocent!
Posted by: J | August 25, 2006, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
State Farm antics (if true) aside, the real national disgrace is “Mayor” Nagin and his total lack of leadership. The people of New Orleans need to get off their collective butts, quit waiting for government hand outs, roll up your sleeves and get to work. A nation of whiners.
Posted by: Steve Evatt | August 25, 2006, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
you get what you pay for people…go with a cut-rate carrier and you will get cut-rate(and potentially fraudulent in this case)service…I know it’s not fashionable to talk about personal responsibility in this country, but I seriously doubt most of the people who are claiming to have had bad claims experiences(once again fraud aside)did their homework on the front end as far as their policy terms and shopped strictly on price
Posted by: brian | August 25, 2006, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
What better way to get the people out of the way than to not pay what they are owed to rebuild in that area? Now the affected homeowners will simply dry up and go away leaving the storm damaged areas available for sale/consumption by big business and big money.
And to think those lying cowards in the insurance industry want to or have already raised insurance rates since Katrina. Well, just another piece of the puzzle in place for the coming violent revolt in this country.
Hmmm, lets see – illegal alien invaders, gangs, insurance companies, lawyers, politicians, judges, terrorists – can you do the ‘duck and cover’????
Posted by: Mike - Florida | August 25, 2006, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Thanks to these two ladies for having enough character to stand up and report this rediculous situation. The shame is that this is a year later and the government hasn’t done anything to make these companies reimburse their customers for their losses. It took two whistleblowers to get the ball moving. State Farm should have to pay these people for the past year of hardships they have suffered by being displaced from their homes and/or living in small camper/trailers. A year is a long time.
State Farm should have to pay the attorney fees too or the people will get their second rip off. Class action isn’t the way to go.
Posted by: Carol McIntosh | August 25, 2006, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Why is anyone suprised? Until we take back our country, our industries, and the responsibility of our own lives, this will continue to happen. The country that we now have is not what I was taught about in school. But people scream and shout and nothing ever gets done. You elect garbage(democrat and republican both) and this is what you get. The Coporate States of America. Old Ross Perot doesn’t look so crazy now does he?
Posted by: bob manning | August 25, 2006, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Like a good neighbor State Farm is there. This is very sad and I am glad Kerri and Cori Rigsby told on State Farm. There are lots of other insurance company’s it would send a real message if people left State Farm in droves. Americans could send a real message to thieves at State Farm.
Posted by: ANDREW COLTON | August 25, 2006, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
As a former State Farm customer who fought them toe to toe over Hurricane Rita damage, I have to ask, “This is NEWS?!?”
Fortunately a good friend of mine is a rep for another ins. company and was advising me how to deal with State Farm. Saved my bacon for sure.
Posted by: Former State Farm customer | August 25, 2006, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
The insurance industry will pay in excess of 50 billion for Katrina. Flood is excluded from most homeowners policies and if the prevailing cause was water then the homeowners policy should not pay. The problem is that most homeowners don’t understand what is excluded in their policy and want to blame somebody when they have not bought the correct coverage to protect themselves. The insurers have every right to make certain that they only pay claims that are covered under the policy. If you live near the ocean in an area prone to hurricanes you need to make sure you buy the right coverage to protect yourself.
Posted by: Ray Hawkins | August 25, 2006, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
off with thier heads!!!
Posted by: jim | August 25, 2006, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
I’d like to see more information from the sisters and from the company before I point the finger at anyone. Nothing’s been proven yet, correct? And if people have a problem with their coverage limits, they should address those with the company before a disaster, but yet it always seems that following a disaster it’s someone elses fault. Where is the personal responsibility? People choose to live in the danger zones and choose not to buy adequate coverage to protect their assets, so why blame the insurance company? Read and understand your policy! These people can disagree if they like, heck they can even file suit if they so choose, but before you jump against State Farm and believe what these sisters say, I’d wait for the verdict from the judge/ courts or some conclusive evidence.
Posted by: Dave | August 25, 2006, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Why is everybody angry at State Farm? They’re just practicing the good Conservative Christian values of the Republican Party.
In other words, take the money and run.
Posted by: Tom3 | August 25, 2006, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
The fraud goes every way. People who buy insurance hope to pay in a little and get out much more. The real answer is to make insurance (of ALL types) strickly voluntary. Natural market forces would weed out fraud. Laws which require the purchase of insurance take away freedom in the form of involuntary servitude.
Posted by: Bryan Lovejoy | August 25, 2006, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Did it occur to anyone that maybe it’s the sisters who aren’t telling the truth? They have made allegations, but what have they offered to substantiate their claims? Nothing in the report indicates that the “thousands” of pages of documents are ones that State Farm claimed not to have, and no one substantiated their claim that damage assessments were changed aty the company’s direction. All we have is the word of these two sisters, who USED to work for State Farm. Maybe they were fired by State Farm, and are using the allegation as a means of striking back at the company…maybe they are telling the truth. Who knows? All I know is that there is nothing in this report that proves wrongdoing by anyone, so why not withhold judgment until the facts are in?
Posted by: Mark | August 25, 2006, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
I’ve been a fire adjuster for 34 years. Haven’t worked storms lately, but spent three months in Florida working Andrew in 1992. First of all, property adjusters are almost never women. Two in one family all by itself smells. Second, independents spend almost no time in company offices and wouldn’t be in a position to see what they claim to have seen. I’m betting dollars to donuts this is made up.
Posted by: eric | August 25, 2006, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
No surprise to me, After being a statefarm customer for 9 years I had to file a lawsuit thru an attorney to settle an auto claim.
Posted by: R C Chisolm | August 25, 2006, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
State Farm hads a long history of not paying claims. I live in Bloomington Illinois where they are base. Back in the 60s and 70s they did not pay there claims. Most people in town would not buy thier ins.
Posted by: STAN | August 25, 2006, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
I hear the Lefties are blaming Bush because Pluto is no longer a planet.
Posted by: Mike | August 25, 2006, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
With all the controversy at what CEOs steal from their companies, do the insurance companies dare to print what their execs get.
Posted by: dan | August 25, 2006, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
I do despise insurance companies, but I’ll play devil’s advocate. You try running an insurance company. I’m sure the cheaters and scammers were plentiful after Katrina. How would you deal with them? The problem is that cheating and scamming is too commonplace in America: refrigerator repairmen, auto repairmen, lawyers, Tour-de-France bicyclists, Olympic athletes, Wendy’s restaurant-goers, mortgage brokers, stock brokers, etc. Maybe it’s a chicken-and-egg problem. There’s too many little guys trying to stick it to the big guy and eventually the big guys get cynical and sick of it, and start sticking it back at the little guys, then MORE little guys stick it to big guys and round and round it goes. Maybe the big guys started it? I don’t know, but it’s got to stop. What State Farm did is simply a reflection of this country as a whole…
Posted by: Matt Fausey | August 25, 2006, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
everyone should change company’s just like gas boycott exxon but it has to be an collective effort!!!
Posted by: james p | August 25, 2006, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
In the Gulf Coast and other flood prone areas ,there is a fine line between damage caused by water and
the wind.
While I empathize , many residents should have been purchasing coverage to cover hurricane related damage. Insurance policies are very specific. Also, Katrina and Wilma should make us aware that we should be willing to shoulder the risk of living in
areas prone to flooding , huricanes and earthquakes . Taxpayers should not be bailing those who refuse to purchase insurance for the risks individuals willingly assume..
Posted by: milwolf | August 25, 2006, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
This is a travesty on the deepest level. Everyone should care about what State Farm has been doing. Corperations who pull stunts like this are no better than suicide bombers. How many lives has State Farm destroyed because of their actions. The whole company should be shut down for violating the law. Their whole existence is to protect people in disasters…this is terrible.
Posted by: Sok Lee | August 25, 2006, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
What courageous and decent women the Rigsby sisters are. I’m so glad to be reminded that there are still people out there doing the right thing just as a matter of course.
Posted by: RRivera | August 25, 2006, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Make sure to check your mutual funds and see if you are invested in State Farm.
Posted by: Jared | August 25, 2006, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Everyone is tarring State Farm with a wide brush. I work for a contractor in Kissimmee, Fl. We had 3 hurricanes come thru Kissimmee in the summer of 2004. The best overall Insurance company I had to deal with was State Farm. We did 90 restoration jobs and my recommendation was always State Farm as the best. Generalilies do injustice to all of the good people who care & try hard for their insureds. I am not employed by the insurance industry. Emmett
Posted by: emmett dugger | August 25, 2006, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
How many people have actually read their policy? Nobody EVER asks the agent about coverage! They shop price and price only! Then they get upset when the policy does not cover exactly what it says it does not cover! Come on people, isurance is not a social program for handouts. Its a business. Read your policy. It is VERY specfic when it says it does not cover flood or rising water! Flood isurance is cheap compared to the standard home owners policy you are already buying. BUY IT!
Posted by: Howser | August 25, 2006, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
IF you put a moron in the whitehouse, THEN guess what your trickle down theory will be? Now here is a red state that might go deep blue this November, but don’t count on ABC political pros to figure that out till November 8th. Mississippi is not red enough like Florida because in Florida the federal relief was paid out to false filers and other 2000 selection supporters after hurricanes blasted that state but Mississippi needs to check their red state IDS for this falls payback election. And then pay them back like they never had it coming so bad like they now deserve it on November 7th everywhere. God will provide faith based organizations to help you voters out…
Posted by: frodaddy | August 25, 2006, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
After working as insurance adjuster(NOT AT STATE FARM), I can say that there are honest companies, but many of my dealings with State Farm were similar. They would do whatever they could to get out of paying a claim even if the claim was 100% legitimate. We would countlessly take them to inter-company arbitration to get our money back after they would refuse to pay for the stupidest of reasons. We would prove in arbitration each time that they should honor their claims and get our money back. It was a large waste of our company’s resources to devote a large amount of time just preparing for arb due to State Farms questionable business practices.
We never felt bad for State Farm each time large court judgements were won by consumers against them.
Unfortunately it’s one of the largest insurance companies and they appear to answer to no one.
Posted by: Emil | August 25, 2006, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
The insurance companies have the most powerful lobbiest. The are allowed to extort higher premiums each year for less coverage. They seldom if ever actually indemnify you for your loss. The politcians are supported by the insurance industry. They wont police the insurance companies. Look at insurance companies behavior after teh Northridge quake or any other natural disaster Look what they did in flordia. Its always the same. It time to prosecute senoir management. Thse low level managers dont do anything without instruction from above. If your senators and congressman can get this resolved vote the the hell out of office.
Posted by: tom | August 25, 2006, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
For all of you preaching about “personal responsibility”, I suggest you go back and actually read the article. According to former employees, State Farm pressured investigators to CHANGE THEIR CONCLUSIONS regarding what caused the homeowner’s loss. It’s the equivelent of refusing to pay for a fire under a fire insurance policy by claiming that the damage “resulted” from the water the fire department used to put out the fire. Ridiculous.
Posted by: Mike | August 25, 2006, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Brain,
Get Job, but nobody should be surprised. StateFarm, et. all has been doing this for years & years. They know they are above the law, and I warn you this is not the last time it will happen again.
I really believe hell was devised for StateFarm and Al Queda.
Posted by: TIm | August 25, 2006, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
You losers, BUSH did it! Now get back to work…..
Posted by: Mississippi Democrat | August 25, 2006, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Notice that the last line says, Katrina, the national disgrace that still goes on.
How is it a national disgrace for private property owners, municipal services and state services, aided by huge grants from the federal government to take a normal length of time,as discussed by Mayor Nagin, to properly rebuild, or not rebuild and sell and strategize plans with their property and city?
Why doesn’t the press look at Florida, hit by five hurricanes in one year. some of their neighborhoods are not rebuilt yet.
This is a case of unrealistic scrutiny on the part of the press on New Orleans.
Posted by: jay | August 25, 2006, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
These allegations are garbage. The insurance industry is so heavily regulated that there is no way that this could happen. It sounds like the Rigsby sisters are hoping for a book and movie deal just like that other scam artist Erin Brockovich.
Posted by: John | August 25, 2006, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
c’mon people – if you don’t have flood insurance, you don’t get paid – state farm isn’t out to cheat anyone – this is another news story without any foundation. read your policies people – if it isn’t covered, you don’t get paid.
Posted by: tim | August 25, 2006, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Crooks are in every type of business, from doctors that perform unnecessary surgery to insurance companies that don’t pay claims to contractors that don’t finish the work to fraudulant charities. Not all in any segment are crooks and not all in any segment are honest.
I just cancelled my State Farm- and I hope every person reading this does the same! That will send a message faster than anything- and if anyone knows what company was the best or paying claims- post it- I’ll switch to them- let’s have the backs of the people who need us- all those that were defrauded.
Hats off and hero awards to the two honest adjusters!!!
Posted by: Claudia | August 25, 2006, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
I find the fraud conspiracy charges dubious at best, determining whether a home was ddestroyed by flood/stormsurge or wind should be pretty easy, they have aerial photos of all the flooded areas, it should be pretty easy to tell whether a home was destroyed by flood, storm surge or winds even a year later.
The real problems are when homes were hit by all 3 wind, storm surge and flood.
My guess is the high wind did most of the inland damage, flood & storm surge most of the coastal & river adjacent damage.
Posted by: Smitty | August 25, 2006, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
We should spend less time pointing fingers and more time putting these insurance crooks in jail. Dont be dragging politics into this issue. This is every one of our faults for allowing these people to go unchecked for so many years… These crooks need to be brought to justice and it’s “we the people” that need to bring the charges and ultimately force reforms to happen. The politicians are only interested in themselves and their latest poles.
Posted by: rpw | August 25, 2006, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
I am sickened but not surprised. My dad spent his working life as a claims manager for a large insurance company.The pressure to screw the insured and cover the company’s butt gave him a heart attack right at his desk. He forbids any one of his family to work in the insurance industry. Says alot.
Posted by: Tony Andrews | August 25, 2006, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Say it with me:
“Your in Good Hands with All State…”
Ooppps…
Posted by: dreek | August 25, 2006, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
The folks in Florida back in believe 96″ begged everyone to listen about Statefarm but the country and Florida officials choose not to because it was just a few thousand people nothing to the scale of Katrina . So folks all of you are to blame in allowing these companies to keep ripping off it customers .Until you force by letters,calls,e-mail to your politicians still will still keep happening .
Posted by: A brown | August 25, 2006, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
I can’t speak for what is happening in Mississippi, but I live in Georgia and have been a State Farm multiple line policyholder for 30 years and through our daughters multiple car accidents, a water damage claim and a burgulary claim, State Farm has always been prompt and fair with their payments and I wouldn’t go anywhere else for my insurance.
No…I don’t work for State Farm.
Resume your bashing.
Posted by: Jim | August 25, 2006, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
All I can say is everyone needs to get American National Insurance! I have had this company for years and was very impressed with their responses before and after Katrina hit us in New Orleans. They are one of the few companies who are NOT excluding wind damage from renewal policies, and their rate increases have been fair, mostly due to the state of Louisiana assessing fees on each insurance company to pay for their own lack of planning…
Posted by: Dan | August 25, 2006, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
…this just means when you have a home insurance policy with State Farm and possibly a myriad of others you are just “insured” of a good old fashion screwing.
It’s nothing personal it is just business.
Posted by: Oh well... | August 25, 2006, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Assuming that State Farm gets their day in court to defend the charges, will there be a nice headline alerting us if they are found innocent of the charges?
Posted by: Frank | August 25, 2006, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
How many people who took out a comprehensive insurance policy would think that hurricane damage is flood, not wind. Isn’t it the wind that is causing the water?
I think of flood as normal flood from rivers overflowing from rains or a damn bursting.
I think that is disingenuous on the part of State Farm and other insurance companies.
I think getting insurance is the way people take personal responsibility. What is someone supposed to do – save $200,000 so they can buy a new home, just in case?
As an earlier poster stated, remember how State Farm behaved if you’re ever on a jury.
Posted by: Louise | August 25, 2006, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
It is always someone elses fault right? Personal accountability is so far gone… The government must fix everything? How about… don’t build your house on the freaking coast or in known flood areas (BELOW SEA LEVEL!!!)and expect everyone else to pay when your house goes down. State farm is in the business to make money not lose it. I don’t agree with fraud but get over it and move on and stop being the victim. Oick up your bootstraps and get to work instead of complaining like a baby. Greed…
Posted by: Andrew | August 25, 2006, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
State Farm Insurance is the biggest Auto & Homeowner’s Insurance company in the country, and not to mention, one of the absolute best!! I have had nothing but a wonderful experience as a State Farm customer, and my State Farm Agent is the best!! Water is NOT a covered loss under ANY Homeowner’s Insurance Policy with ANY carrier. People living in areas that could potentially be flooded should have Flood Insurance Policies!! Believe me, State Farm can afford to pay out for claims that are covered, and they do, every single day. It’s possible that there are some corrupt individuals working for the company – you have people like that in EVERY company unfortuneately. State Farm will investigate the allegations, I’m sure, and get rid of those individuals and do the right thing by their policyholders like they have always done, and will continue doing! Stop blaming the insurance company; blame the agent who didn’t demand that their customer purchase Flood Insurance. How about blaming the mortgage companies who didn’t make that a requirement for getting the mortgage in the first place!
Posted by: Jeannine | August 25, 2006, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
State Farm did the same thing to Earthquake victims in Northridge quake. Trying to make this an anti-Bush thing is asinine.
Doesn’t State Farm use lawyers which are 95% a left-wing orginization? Do a LExus Nexus search and check out how much money the company gave to Democrats. Also check out the Massachusetts resident that the CEO voted for.
On the federal level FEMA screwed up, which is a Republican problem and on the local and state level those leaders, who are ALL Democrats in Lousiana.
By politicians dividing America between left and right it makes us fight each other instead of fighting the real problem. Big government, both left and right.
FEMA screwed up big during hurricane Andrew when Clinton was president. Why didn’t you hear so much about it? Because a left-wing dominated Main Stream Drive-By Media liked Clinton. (Look it up)
Why didn’t you hear enviromentalists blame Clinton for hurricane Andrew? After all Clinton did not pass the Kyoto treaty until his very last day in office. What a hypocrite.
The left-wing dominated media provides at least 15% more votes to the Democrats due to their tainted biased news reports. (Dan Rather and forged documents come to mind)
I am not a Christian right-wing either. Just a Libertarian which I think most Americans would label themselves if they were honest.
I know most Republicans are not hard core religious zealots and most Democrats hate high taxes and illegal immigration.
BOYCOTT STATE FARM, everybody go and cancel your policies NOW!!!
Posted by: Marcus Shelby | August 25, 2006, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
No, the jingle sounds much better like this:
“And like a bad neighbor, State Farm don’t care.”
Posted by: socio | August 25, 2006, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
To the insurance agent concerning flood coverage under a homweowners policy…yes, you are correct, flood isn’t covered. However, alot of this damage was caused by wind which is a covered peril. Which came first? The wind or water? Give these poor people a break. They’ve been living in these conditions for too long. They just want to get back to normal. Unfortunately, the “good neighbor” moved on.
Posted by: teri | August 25, 2006, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
STATE FARM, ALLSTATE and FARMER’S (Mid Century) Insurance Companies have established a pattern of denying claims they should, by their contract (“policy”) and state laws, pay.
State regulators have repeatedly failed to do their jobs because state regulators are “owned” by insurance companies. The insurance industry currently writes insurance law and the “regulators” rubber stamp approval.
STATE FARM, ALLSTATE AND FARMER’S INSURANCE COMPANIES should be dissolved and their entire worth used to pay claimants. Insurance company executives should be stripped of their ill gotten gains and imprisoned.
State regulatory agencies should be abolished and re-built from the ground up, without input from the insurance crooks. We must start by cleaning out our state legislatures. The entire insurance industry and regulatory process is rotten to its empty core.
Posted by: John McGilvray | August 25, 2006, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
If in fact the allegations are valid, I’m confident that they will ultimately be attributed to a single or a few rogue individuals operating at their own discretion without the knowledge of their superiors. ( sound familiar Scooter? ) Remember that insurance policies are written by attorneys, insurance companies are defended by attorneys, victims are represented by attorneys, and at the end of the day, attorneys will decide who’s right and/or wrong. Now guess who gets to go home happier, better compensated and free of responsability at the end of the day.
Posted by: David Slomovic | August 25, 2006, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Insurance of any kind is legalized extortion, bottom line. You MUST have it or you can’t get a mortgate or buy a car. State’s require it by law, banks require it for mortgages. But they use any excuse under the sun to raise your rates and then don’t want to pay when you try and make a claim. Floods in Houston, homeowner rates in Dallas go up. Hurricane damage in Florida, rates go up in Illinois. Where’s the fairness?
Posted by: Daniel | August 25, 2006, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Who cares what State Farm does? At least they did not have sex with those women!
Posted by: Genghis | August 25, 2006, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Don’t be foolish enough to think that State Farm is the only dirty, theiving insurance company in town! I have relatives who have worked for Allstate and Prudential – my nephew was too young and stupid to know that he shouldn’t be telling me or anyone else things like “It’s unbelievable what people, especially the old people, can be talked into. You just dress nice and act really nice, and you can sell them anything. They don’t know what they need – they’re relying on us to be honest. We sell them stuff that they’ll never need. We do it all the time.” How disgusting is that to hear, especially from a relative! And all the while, these agents are gushing about their incomes and luxuries. These companies hand out major prizes, like trips to Hawaii, to whoever sells the most insurance quarterly & yearly. I’d like to think what goes around comes around, but I don’t know. I personally purchase only the bare minimum that I need to be legal.
Posted by: Eileen | August 25, 2006, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
These two ladies were “independent” adjusters and weren’t even employees of State Farm. They could have signed on with some national independent adjusting firm 2 days after Katrina and headed down to the gulf with no experience whatsoever. You people who get fired up over a couple glory hounds who may or may not be credible are scary as hell.
Posted by: Chad | August 25, 2006, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
After reading this i’m very satisfied that I cancelled my State Farm HO insurance policy. What an evil thing to do.
Posted by: MM | August 25, 2006, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
” FLOOD WATERS ARE EXCLUDED UNDER EVERY INSURANCE POLICY SOLD.”
Ummm….can you read? That isn’t the issue. The issue is that INITIAL inspections showed that there was WIND damage (which was covered by the policies) and State Farm sent other engineers back with the orders to rewrite the reports AS flood damage…crawl back under your rock, insurance guy. What a joke. Insurance is a business of RISK…but the insurance companies cheat any time THEY have to swallow the loss of the risks taken.
Posted by: ojarhead | August 25, 2006, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
So, do we really think that State Farm are the only ones to do this? Hmmmmmm…
Posted by: Not my neighbor | August 25, 2006, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
For those saying innocent until proven guilty…I think they’ve already been proven guilty.
Really, did the sisters have a lot to gain in this? Losing their jobs, being accused by State Farm, having their creditablity questioned…being a whistleblower is probably the last think you would want to do.
Most of my family down in Fla. had damage to their houses from hurricane Charley..and they all had problems collecting what was OWED to them through their ins. companies.
Posted by: Katia | August 25, 2006, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
“Facts” can be twisted and distorted. Insurance companies have been posting higher profits every year. The debt burden has been shifted to the government and the customers. Yet the laws still force us to buy insurance.
Write to your representatives. Write to your congressmen. Let your voices be heard. Get out and vote. Stop being sheep. If millions of angry illegal aliens can march in the streets, why can’t hard-working, honest Americans get out there and do the same? If you stay meek and quiet, nothing will change.
Posted by: Peter | August 25, 2006, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
The day the U.S. government investigates the insurance industry is the day that the Russian government investigates the KGB…
Posted by: Scrinine | August 25, 2006, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
I realize that many thousands have been cheated and hurt by insurance companies. I have to stand up for my company here in Tx.. We had a large amount of damage caused by Hurricane Rita, our Company-Texas Farm Bureau went above and beyond the call of duty. Their staff was working the day of the hurricane and their adjusters were at my home in four days. We received our money within eight days of the hurricane. I cannot say enough good things about them.
Posted by: Debbie | August 25, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Anyone interested in State Farm’s illegal activities should also look into the investigation that was carried on by the Arizona State Attorney General’s office a few years back. State Farm (known down there as ‘Snake Farm’) had an entire incentive program for their claims adjustors to cheat State Farm clients out of due payments.
Posted by: Jim | August 25, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Right now, we have the fox policing the henhouse. Insurance companies are free to inspect the “validity” of their policyholders’ claims. Actually, I’m surprised the insurance industry works as well as it does! This speaks well for the free market solution.
But the solution is obviously incomplete. The solution here is really obvious. With some new legislation, 1) make it illegal for insurance companies to process their own claims; 2) create groundrules for new, independent companies to process claims with maximum fees/%-ages or whatever; 3) allow them to compete.
With this system, you’d separate the potential to fraud, keep the competitive nature of the free market to keep consumer costs low, and allow for adequate governmental oversight. Should work fine!
Posted by: Stone | August 25, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
State Farm Insurance is the biggest Auto & Homeowner’s Insurance company in the country, and not to mention, one of the absolute best!! I have had nothing but a wonderful experience as a State Farm customer, and my State Farm Agent is the best!! Water is NOT a covered loss under ANY Homeowner’s Insurance Policy with ANY carrier. People living in areas that could potentially be flooded should have Flood Insurance Policies!! Believe me, State Farm can afford to pay out for claims that are covered, and they do, every single day. It’s possible that there are some corrupt individuals working for the company – you have people like that in EVERY company unfortuneately. State Farm will investigate the allegations, I’m sure, and get rid of those individuals and do the right thing by their policyholders like they have always done, and will continue doing! Stop blaming the insurance company; blame the agent who didn’t demand that their customer purchase Flood Insurance. How about blaming the mortgage companies who didn’t make that a requirement for getting the mortgage in the first place!
Posted by: Jeannine | August 25, 2006, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
In a recent legal case in Pascagoula Ms, that was not against State Farm, The judge caved in and made all insurance companies unqualified winners. The judge (I use that term loosely for there are better ones to describe hiz dishonor) ruled that the burden of proof would lie with the Homeowner–(the homeowner would have to prove the source of his loss)in a wind/water suite and presumably this legal ruling would apply in all loses. The insurance companies–(with their fat overcompensated attorneys paid for by the policyholders premiums)–would only have to defend themselves when and if a policyholder hired an attorney and sued their well-prepared asses. The judge’s decision was simple. “Screw the policyholders and hoover up to the Insurance Companies.” One has to wonder why.
My memories of Katrina’s aftermath are vivid. After the storm, all decision makers in the Insurance companies disappeared, we only had sales personnel and seven dollar an hour customer service reps to contact. Some tried and some were simply unprepared and dumb. Even the agents from other areas who were dispached here to placate policyholders were unable to find any superior who could make decisions. I saw some agents cry when they realized what a decayed, greedy, sorry bunch of dirty rotten sub-humans they worked for.
State Farm a good neighbor–what a crock. Allstate puts you in good hands–I don’t think so.
Some of the small companies tried to help, but the two great advertisers–State Farm and Allstate–lived up to their “Never pay a claim when you can weasel out” principals.
Posted by: R. Miller | August 25, 2006, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
My brother in law is a Catastrophe Agent for State Farm and worked Hurricane Katrina. He wrote hundreds of claims for victims.
I don’t buy that there is any kind of widespread corruption that went on on State Farm’s part.
State Farm pays out in claims MORE than they collect in premiums; they have to make wise investments in order to pay out all the claims they receive. Most for-profit companies certainly don’t work that way.
On the flip side, claims agents have customers attempt to fake hail damage so they can get 30 year old roofs replaced.
There are two sides to every story. Just keep that in mind.
Posted by: Teresa | August 25, 2006, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
What is sad in this country is that anyone or any company accused of anything is automatically assumed guilty. So much for having to prove guilt.
If there was fraud and it is proven then action should be taken against those involved.
Let’s stop trying people in the media, it’s not how our country should operate. And it should scare each one us, that all you have to do to ruin someones life is to accuse them of something and let the crowd pile on. In this case, the mob is attacking a company.
Posted by: Paul | August 25, 2006, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
You pay tons of money for insurance, either home, life, car, or whatever else you may insure. The disgusting thing is, make to many claims on your insurance or file only 1 large claim = GETTING DROPPED and CONSIDERED POTENTIAL HIGH RISK!
Now – go years or a lifetime without a claim, car accident, whatever – You never see a dime back of your money. You can change from one carrier to another for a cheaper rate – yet file no claim before changing – you never get any portion back.
Insurance = a joke.
Best Plan – save your hundreds or thousands of dollars you work hard for. Invest it to profit more for yourself, or put it into the back and collect intrest. By the time you have to file a claim or need the money – you should hopefully have enough from keeping it all to yourself to begin with!!!!
Posted by: Jip | August 25, 2006, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
USAA is the best insurance company most of you will never get to be a member of!!
Posted by: jack | August 25, 2006, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
The truth will come out one way or another. I’ll wait until then to point my finger.
Posted by: Dawn | August 25, 2006, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Last night Minnesota got hit by tornado’s, and guess what? People are cleaning up themselves, neighbors are helping each other clean up, we don’t wait for the government to clean us up we do it ourselves! The people of New Orleans & Mississippi need to get off their butts get shovels and start digging themselves out. New Orleans & Mississippi, you’ve got the work force there, start doing things for yourselves, the government is not going to help and frankly neither is anyone else until you get off your butts and help yourselves first! I’ve got tornando damage to help clean up for people I haven’t ment yet!!
Posted by: Michele | August 25, 2006, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
When the government is clearly corrupt…such as ours…when scandal after scandal become daily occurances…when our “leaders” are only interested in their own re-election rather than in their constituents…what’s the big surprise that rot has trickled down?
Posted by: David | August 25, 2006, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
It just amazes me how people will move to a coastal region and not have flood insurance. With the history of this area it should be mandatory. Just like the people that live in the state of California not taking out earthquake insurance. They will expect the Federal Government to pick up the tab. That my friends is our hard earned taxes that we send in. The rest of the nation is subsidizing this type of irresponsible action. I for one will wait until all of the facts are in on State Farm they are my insurance company and I have never had a problem with a claim. However I do know some people will take advantage of a disaster and try to stick it to the insurance company. I as a customer expect State Farm to pay what is a legitimate claim but also to be very careful in not paying out to people who are under insured or not insured at all. If State Farm or any insurance co paid all of these fraudulent claims the rates for home owners insurance would be so high nobody could afford the premiums. And to those who say they can not afford flood insurance or even earthquake insurance I say move to another part of the country where hurricanes are not an issue I am tired of pay for the irresponsibility of all of these people.
Posted by: Harlin | August 25, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
I would suggest that people start reading their policies. If you dont buy the coverage then youre NOT covered. It is a contract and when you sign this contract the insurance company is obligated ONLY to the CONTRACT.
Its more or less a personal responsibility thing. Blame this person, blame that company.
I work for an insurance company and deal with griping, complaining people all day long. I advise all of them to read their policies and get back to me once they do. When they do they usually agree with my assessment.
Posted by: Josh | August 25, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
I am suing state farm for forgery now and of course they will not admit it but they re-instated the coverage because ‘they saw problems’ with the signature. I understand they were sued in California when a whistleblower exposed fraud there in Earthquake coverages…And to think—State Farm is one of our better insurers—Imagine what the others do…they are probably worse
Posted by: Chris | August 25, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
The old rule, “Follow the money.” applies here, in my opion. Another trial lawyer may be cooking facts for a trial. Sadly, he may win and pocket big bucks at the expense of Mississippians being able to obtain insurance from the nations largest insurance company or other companies. Mississippi had a crisis recently due to medical malpractice insurance awards.
I am a State Farm policy holder for automobile. This report is out of character for this great company. I suggest that we wait ’til we have all the facts. This quote from the article in “key” to me.
“Many have filed lawsuits against State Farm and other insurance companies alleging the companies of wrongly denying or low-balling their claims. The Rigsby sisters’ allegations are now a key part of suits filed against State Farm by well-known Mississippi lawyer Dickie Scruggs, famous for taking on the tobacco companies.”
Posted by: banjeaux | August 25, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
America’s ethics and integrity has been jeopardized for the greed of a few folks…..thanks a lot!
Posted by: Beth E. | August 25, 2006, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I was actually thinking of switching to State Farm. Now, I will definitely not cosidfer it!
Posted by: Rena | August 25, 2006, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
You all realize that insurance companies earned a record breaking $44.8 BILLION in profit in 2005! Now, how are we not getting screwed by insurance companies again?
Posted by: Jimmy | August 25, 2006, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
To the supporters of big insurance who posted about halfway through this list of comments, it should be noted that it was wind that did the lions share of damage in Miss., not water. If the wind rips your roof off and the rain comes in, its wind damage, not flood damage. To residents of the affected states, perhaps you should take a look at your state teachers and public employees pension fund managers portfolios. Some interesting and relevant companies to be found.
Posted by: Cole | August 25, 2006, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Robert….I have a sarcastic sense of humor, and do think I sense a bit of that in your response about it all being President Bush’s fault, but if it is not I am sorry that you have been, along with most of America, manipulated and stupified into believing that. This does not offend me as a proud GOP and Bush supporter, but more importantly makes me feel a bit uneasy as to how intelligent we, the American people, really are. Let us put the MAJORITY of the blame where it should lie….on the conscience of local and state authorities.
Posted by: Benton | August 25, 2006, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
While this might be true, just remember we also have a nut job claiming to have killed JonBenet who wasnt even in CO at the time, so you cant believe all the hype especially from ABC news.
While ins. co’s are definately not to be fully trusted, neither are the attorneys who sue them. Does no one else find it ironic that Scruggs and his mass tort factory is now angling in on this, to the tune of a 50% cut of the suit proceeds, after cutting a ton of money off the top of the tobacco suits which SHOULD have gone to help cover medical costs for the so called “victims” of the tobacco industry.
Ins. Co’s would not be so defensive about paying if there werent so many dirtbag plaintiffs and their lawyers drumming up suits against them.
Posted by: manu4t | August 25, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Insurance companies are the largest, richest, most powerful corporate abusers in America (besides the oil companies). If this is true, then what State Farm has done to the people of the Gulf Coast is a national tragedy. I hope they are sued, sued, sued, and made to pay out the nose for this outrage. I am sick of writing checks for insurance every month of my life, but when I need THEM, all I get is the run around. My husband’s car was totaled by a drunk, and it was like pulling teeth to replace his vehicle. Insult on top of injury. (We have Allstate for 25 years.) I think the insurance companies are all alike: ALL OUT OF CONTROL..they have way too much power, and don’t hesitate to abuse it. I don’t give a damn if Sate Farm goes BANKRUPT over this scandel!! They need to be held accountable for every single person they screwed!!
Posted by: Sheri | August 25, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
As an insurance agent for one of State Farm’s competitors, I would bet this is a totally bogus story (aka finger in chili). Insurance companies do not just randomly cover or not cover a claim. (Although I do recall a few memos I would randomly get from headquarters saying we were not going to pay claims on certain days of the week . . . Ha, ha!) If someone truly had a viable case against an insurance company, any two bit lawyer would have a judgement against them in a New York second. How often do you think an insurance company wins a jury award against an individual? From my side of the desk I see that the customer almost always gets the benefit of the doubt in any gray areas of coverage. It is almost always the customers who are never willing to take responsibility for themselves, read their policies, do reveiws with agents, etc. It is only after a customer has a claim that they are suddenly interested in their policy, their insurance company, and the advice their agent has been trying to give them for years. I have heard it all . . . “what do you mean my house on the ocean is not covered for floods?” “what do you mean my home on a fault line is not covered for earthquake damage?” “what do you mean I actually have to pay my insurance bills to have coverage?” “what do you mean absoloutely everything that could ever happen to my home is not covered?”
It is no wonder there is so many unsuccessful, clueless people in this country when one sees how they leap to blame everyone but themselves when something happens to them. This backward, self-defeating mentality is evident with the hatred of the rich and of businesses. People hate what they don’t understand. Ignorance is not an excuse to jump to unfounded conclusions. Are there a very small number of bad agents and claims that get handled badly? Of course, but 99% are totally above reproach.
Posted by: Anthony | August 25, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
those girls are the “good neighbors”…
Posted by: liz | August 25, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Simple question–since State Farm is a mutual company owned by its policyholders, why are they trying to save all the money, the whole company belongings to its policyholders!
Posted by: DJ | August 25, 2006, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Hmmm 2 independent adjusters who had access to management level decisions? Never saw that in the 5 yrs I worked Catastrophe for State Farm including 3 major hurricanes. Oh and Jack, USAA is ok until the former Naval officer has a loss and tries to deal with an adjuster on the phone in San Antonio (1000+ miles away). NOT a pleasant experience.
Posted by: Chip | August 25, 2006, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
I lost my home to the 94 Northridge Earthquake & to my insurance company taking 5 YEARS to finally pay.
I had full earthquake coverage & full home owners. I was told I had the ‘Cadillac” of USAA’s Insurance products.
5 YEARS!!!!
My reports were lost, misplaced. or they claimed I never turned them in. Forget Return Receipt Requested, they still denied the reports ever got to them. Finally I had to drive down to their office (local disaster office) & hand deliver the reports, taking an adult witness who took photos of the delivery,
The only way I finally got anything was thru a lawyer at 1/3 of the money I was entitled to but worth every cent.
Why do we assume New Orleans/Katrina is unique. It isn’t.
I no longer carry any insurance not mandated by law.
I don’t mind being self insured, since I know that I won’t ever be going through the insurance companies recovery torture.
Additionally, I do not invest in any insurance product, annuities, stocks, mutual funds. AT ALL. They make their money off of our fear of tragedy, then reinvest it to make more, to me it is immoral and dirty money I want no part of.
Think about it once you can pay off your mortgage you can step back & NOT play the Insurance Co’s best games One of which is to insure the amount owed to the mortgagee & not the real value of the home (usually lower) then make the checks that should be going directly to the insured payable to the banking institution and not to the family that pays the Insurance premiums.
Insurance companies are in business to make money. PERIOD.
Posted by: Ms Southern California | August 25, 2006, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
My cousin worked for Stata Farm for a number of years as an adjuster and she said her priority was to not pay out at all whenever and wherever possible. This was also my experience in a workman’s compensation claim where I foolishly did not hire a lawyer immediately. The claim dragged on for two years until I threatened to get a lawyer and sue and the claim was settled within 8 months. Bottom line is scammers one and all!
Posted by: theo | August 25, 2006, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
I worked as an Independent Adjuster for State Farm for 6 years handling castrophe & mold claims. I never once heard or saw any State Farm employee or management do anything fraudulent or detrimental to a policyholder.
We were always instructed to give the policyholder the benefit of the doubt. If there was coverage for it in the policy we were told to pay the claim.
I worked with a good number of engineers on claims and not once did I have management tell or ask me to have them change a report if it meant paying a claim.
If we put something in a shredder bin, it was to protect confidential policyholder information.
I’m not saying State Farm is perfect, (Who is?), this just doesn’t sound or look like anything I ever witnessed.
Posted by: Jay McKay | August 25, 2006, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Sounds pretty fishy. And independent adjusters aren’t exactly State Farm insiders.
Posted by: Austin | August 25, 2006, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
The only people who regularly take on the insurance industry are the
small town trial lawyers. No wonder
GWB and the Republicans openly
attack trial lawyers and want tort
reform to protect the insurance
companies.
Posted by: Ed | August 25, 2006, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
What ever happened to “innocent until proven guilty!?” Is this no longer America??
And it is a very simple fact that many people are ignorant and do not know that flood insurance is not standard in their policies. You have to pay extra for flood coverage, because if insurance companies didn’t charge more, they’d go bankrupt.
I site the poster above, Duane, who doesn’t know what insurance he has, but he’ll be getting rid of State Farm if he has it. I’d guess that Duane wouldn’t have a clue if he flood coverage or not too.
Posted by: Rae | August 25, 2006, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
So ABC news is going to air a story on the anniversary of Katrina that insurance companies ripped off millions based on what? Two independent adjusters who are sisters and who worked for State Farm have, all by themselves, uncovered a “massive fraud”. Do you think they had a little help from the plaintiff’s bar? I bet that ABC won’t “investigate” that angle. It is just all to convenient.
I am sure that in the millions (think about it… millions) of claims over the last several years all were not settled to the satisfaction of the insured. I am sure that some were even cheated. I am equally confident that most claimants, if pressed, would agree that they were treated fairly and many had expectations exceeded.
Posted by: Leon Huffman | August 25, 2006, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
If I were an insurance agent, I would video tape each client as they refused to pay for additional coverage. (when I owned a house in a “flood prone” area, I was the only one I knew who purchased flood insurance, which is run by the govt. and is almost a give away) Are we really to believe the damage in New Orleans was caused by wind? I guess all those photos of houses covered in water were doctored by GWB. If you morons can afford premium cable, PS2, Xbox etc., than use your welfare, section 8, WIC, food stamp and the medicade/medicare money savings to buy the right insurance…oh yeah, and shut up.
Posted by: DJA | August 25, 2006, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Is this the same Kerri Rigsby that worked for VP Barry Tycholiz at Enron? Hmmm….
Posted by: Storms | August 25, 2006, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
State Farm, Allstate, Nationwide and the U.S. Government are all in the same bed. Corporate crooks are running our country and nobody is willing to stick out their neck for fear of having everything they own, do, or contribute taken away from them. Politics are why New Orleans is still in the state they are. It was not Nagin’s fault nor Blanco’s as to why people didn’t leave. If you are that poor you don’t own a vehicle. If you haven’t ever been poor then you really don’t know how badly your government (and the rest of our population)will treat you. And for those of you that think the leaders in N.O. are to blame, I susgest you go back and watch the video of Bush being briefed about Katrina on Friday before it hit by Max Mayfield, head of the hurricane center. He (Bush) then lied about not knowing about the projected destruction to the public, just like he has continued to lie to the public about his actions and the direction he has taken this country. If you are a big corporation then he has you covered and protected so that he and his buddies can continue to profit from our misfortues.
It is time for our country to go back to respecting the individual, not the big businesses. If it wasn’t for the individuals, then none of these big companies would be making any kind of a profit now would they. It is time for people to realize that we can no longer let politicians do what they do without them having to account for their actions. ANd it is time for our country and its people to put aside their differences and work to even the field of play and work.
If you google the word “failure” the number one hit is G.W. Bush’s biography direct from the white house website.
Posted by: Jozy | August 25, 2006, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Yes, let’s automatically believe what these women claim and trash the entire State Farm company. They are a big evil company that is destroying america by employing hundreds of thousands of americans, so they must be stopped!
Let’s just slow down the rush to judgement until more proof and corrobation is found. Until then, let’s continue to blame George Bush for everything bad that happened in connection to the hurricane.
Posted by: JIM | August 25, 2006, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
As an insurance professional I cannot list the number of times I have urged clients to review their coverage – whether it is home, auto or life. I am too often told they understand everything and do not need to review their coverage – to which I respond it is very important to be sure they understand what coverage they don’t have as well as what they do have.
Flood is NOT covered by home policies. If you live in a flood plain or even if you don’t – should you want the peril of flood covered, buy a flood policy!!
The key here is be an educated consumer. Your home is your most important asset – protect it. Getting second rate coverage does not save you money. Get high deductibles – buy the most coverage you can buy – don’t make small claims and only use coverage for what it is intended – disasters!
Posted by: erica white | August 25, 2006, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
don’t believe anything brian ross says. he ambushed our sheriff during the lockheed story. made our area look like racist hotbed.
scott jay
Posted by: scott jay | August 25, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Good to see ABC telling a little truth instead of being part of the ministry of propaganda…
Posted by: PrissyPatriot | August 25, 2006, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
I am an independent adjuster that did work for State Farm after Katrina last year. I went through the State Farm certification process prior to deploying and was pleasently surprised when I was REPEATEDLY told that our job was to find every last bit of coverage under peoples policies and pay them. I was never told (nor was it implied) to shortcut anyone in any way. In my hands-on experience many policy holders did not understand the coverage they had under their policy (homeowners insurance will never pay out for flood damage, it doesn’t matter what insurance company it is). And a claim is not a windfall, I’ve dealt with many great policy holders but unfortunately dealt with a few who thought they’d hit the jackpot only to discover that carriers won’t write them a check for 100K when they only have 25k in covered damages.
In the end, with all the deductibles and additional costs, EVERYONE is out of pocket and it hurts. But unfortunately State Farm and other insurance companies are not to blame for everything. If you are owed for damages COVERED under your policy just persist and you will always get paid. And no, I have absolutely no reason to defend State Farm; I am independent and do not expect to work for them again.
Posted by: JWR | August 25, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
THOUGH I DON’T WANT THIS TO BE TRUE ABOUT MY INSURANCE COMPANY I WILL HOLD ANY PRO/CON COMMOF ENTS UNTIL THERE HAS BEEN SOME FURTHER INVESTIGATION….I DO STILL BELIEVE IN INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY….
Posted by: RANDY | August 25, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
I am a StateFarm customer, having both auto and home insurance form them. I rather not wait until I face a catastrophy and then wait fot State Farm to screw me up further. I am going to change my insurance company right here, right now. Loss to State Farm for being greedy.
I am sure State Farm will ultimately manage pulling some strings up there, close this case in a favourable manner to themselves. That’s how this is going to end.
Posted by: myselfmax | August 25, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Almost 30 posts complaining about how State Farm, George Bush, corporate America, etc. are to blame before Danny, the insurance agent, finally points out the true problem – ignorance on the part of people who buy insurance without knowing what it covers. If State Farm committed fraud, they ought to be punished, but the real problem for our country is the “poor me, everyone else is to blame” attitude, as so well evidenced by the comments on this board.
Posted by: Bob | August 25, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Robert….I have a sarcastic sense of humor, and do think I sense a bit of that in your response about it all being President Bush’s fault, but if it is not I am sorry that you have been, along with most of America, manipulated and stupified into believing that. This does not offend me as a proud GOP and Bush supporter, but more importantly makes me feel a bit uneasy as to how intelligent we, the American people, really are. Let us put the MAJORITY of the blame where it should lie….on the conscience of local and state authorities.
Posted by: Benton | August 25, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
I have a neighbor friend who was denied insurance for flood/hurricane claims – she is a Katrina survivor. She owned a half-million dollar home on Lake Pontchatrain – and was denied by a number of very poor reasons. She was told that the hurricane did not cause the flooding – that her home was damaged by mold and not flooding – that the hurricane only damaged her roof – etc etc etc.
She was told that there were no plans to rebuild her area for at least 5-10 years – so finally had to give up and sold her home to a (greedy) developer for $40,000.
She was one of the lucky ones – obviously. She was able to move to California and start over.
Posted by: Ginger Winchester | August 25, 2006, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
State Farm Executives lie and have even committed perjury to the IRS. But State Farm seems to be so well connected the IRS is ignoring this perjury which allows State Farm to avoid taxes on approximately $3 Billion of annual payroll. This has been occurring since 1998 ($24 Billion and counting). If State Farm Executives can get away with this what makes you think they would be honest about anything?
Posted by: Rich Pyorre | August 25, 2006, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
If lawyer Dickie Scruggs says it then it must be true. Of course he also admitted he know his own flood policy was limited to $250,000.00 and he built a million dollar house. Any bets the accusers are going to get a cut if Dickie wins?
Good luck buying homeowners insurance. Just ask anyone in Texas.
Posted by: Alan | August 25, 2006, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
I worked in State Farm claims for 32 years (about 20 in management)and although almost anything is possible, I have serious reservations that the Rigsby sisters saw what they say they saw. But if they can prove their allegations in a court of law, the guilty will be held accountable. If they can not, they and Dickie Scruggs should be held accountable!
Posted by: Bob Jentges | August 25, 2006, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
certainly not the first time state farm has been acused of wrongdoing is it?
Posted by: berbuy | August 25, 2006, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
EAT THE RICH!!!!!
Posted by: Hon Gri | August 25, 2006, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Look at the photos on their link- who is the homeowner that after Katrina almost aa year labor was TOO LAZY to take the time to cleanup the dirty dishes in the dishwasher and sweep/ shovel the garbage off the floor? That person did NOTHING to help himself afterwards.
I’m forced to pay $1,300 per year in flood insurance in California because my house is 200 yards from a creek that COULD flood, and there is a levee/ jogging trail in between the creek and my home. In the El Nino rains we were OK. How can I feel sorry for people who’s homes were below sea level or in a swamp and they DID NOT have flood insurance?
Posted by: Bill in San Jose | August 25, 2006, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
I am an insurance adjuster; but do not do property claims. While I agree that most people stupidly ignore their Policy language until they need to make a claim, I also think there should be a re-writing of the Policy that differentiates from “wind-driven water” and regular flood water. Of course, then the public would howl at how high those premiums would have to be. I personally do not like to deal with State Farm, but still, the people who have posted here that those who build in low areas should be able & willing to bear the risks, DO HAVE A POINT!
Posted by: indian | August 25, 2006, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
What a bunch of morons. Read your insurance policy! Most people buy the cheapest insurance they can possibly get, then wonder why nothing is covered. If ANYTHING happened to my house it would be covered…you know why? Because I have chosen to pay for the coverage. All you intellectual midgets ranting about all insurance companies being crooks are not only uninformed, but probably the same people who try to rip off their insurance company every chance they get. In huge companies, there often are bad apples. If that is the case I hope they are punished. But…I have seven policies with State Farm, and I am not cancelling any of them. They have been very good to me over the years, because I know my coverage.
Posted by: Alex | August 25, 2006, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty??? Independent adjustor are crooks who make insured feel the insurnace is ripping them off so they act as the insured “attorney”. Show me some proof before I badger State Farm
Posted by: Mac | August 25, 2006, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
I work for a P&C company. We worked long hours to process all the claims and help everyone. I resent being tagged with ‘ALL insurance companies are bad’ label. It is the people that are running and working for the company as to whether they are ethical or not.
Just a heads up… everyone in the country will be seeing a premium increase to pay for this. If you think your premiums are expensive now… just wait.
Posted by: IA | August 25, 2006, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Just want to remind all the folks who are pointing out that no insurance companies cover flooding, and you should be responsible for knowing what is and is not covered – these people aren’t saying they should be paid for flood damage they’re not covered for. They’re saying that State Farm ALTERED reports stating the covered homes were damaged by wind and making them say they were damaged by flood, which of course is not covered.
That is something that, if true, the insured has NO CONTROL over.
Posted by: Celina | August 25, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Look for the next Michael Moore movie, Scam coming to a theatre near you. Honestly I am sure there was some fraud but I highly doubt this level mentioned. I am sure the Demcrats will spend countless millions investigating the insurance companies like they do the energy companies. I bet the result will be the same as as well. Local but no wide spread fraud.
Posted by: Randy | August 25, 2006, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
It is the agent of the company’s responsibility to make sure the insured understands what their policy covers. The agent who spouted off above doesn’t seem to realize who they work for. Most of the insured people in this country can’t begin to understand what a policy says. The terminology is confusing, the acronyms horrid and without training it is all gibberish. It is the JOB of the agent to explain it to the buyer, not the buyers job to figure it out, that is what the agent is for.
Personally, I know an agent who takes the time to educate, to explain and to make sure the customer understands. SHE is not the typical agent, but certainly an agent that can be trusted with your financial security and the security of your property!
Posted by: Paul Robins | August 25, 2006, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
as Ned Flanders was quoted to say on the Simpsons
“Ned doesn’t believe in insurance, He considers it a form of gambling”
Posted by: philip | August 25, 2006, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
WHEN WILL WE ALL LEARN THAT WE CAN NO LONGER AFFORD TO BE REPUBLICANS!
Posted by: tony | August 25, 2006, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
State Farm commits fraud on a periodic basis…I heard of a State Farm adjustor who injured someone in an automobile accident. State Farm appointed in-house counsel but the adjustor showed up to the deposition accompanied with his OWN attorney…if the people that work for State Farm do not trust State Farm…..
Posted by: Marc | August 25, 2006, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
In Georgia it is a state law to have insurance on your home (if you have a mortgage), and on your car.
Alot of our politicians start out in the insurance industry and family members are STILL in the insurance business.
Insurance is a scam. Always has been.
For a product you HAVE to have, by law…..and it is the little people working to stay one step ahead from going under who foot the bill for the money hungry suits.
Posted by: Patty | August 25, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Don’t kid yourself into thinking any “REAL” investigation will be done into this as Bush and the GOP are OWNED by the insurance industry…Business as usual.
Posted by: Joe Smoe | August 25, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
“What a bunch of morons. Read your insurance policy!”
how about you read the article, or better yet have someone explain it to you.
its not what coverage they had thats the issue, its how the damages were said to occur
wind vs water
Posted by: philip | August 25, 2006, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
I am not surprised. My neighbor in North Florida received a written letter of non-renewal on her home owners insurance that she paid faithfully for ten years because she filed a claim. State Farm Insurance. Then as an added insult, she was ‘rated’ for the same offense, filing a claim, by other insurance carriers. The insurance industry and our elected government are great bedfellows. Consider the ad hoc effect of selective control and enforcement in auto insurance.
Posted by: Richard | August 25, 2006, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
If you don’t like what happens with hurricanes then maybe you should move. If you don’t move and don’t get flood insurance whose fault is except the person that decided on not getting it. If you don’t prepare for potential losses and they happen don’t go looking for a scapegoat to make you feel better.
Posted by: Clayclay | August 25, 2006, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
I used to have my home and automobiles insured by State Farm. Each year rates went up 15 % or more. I switched to another company to save money. It was also in the news that they had a class action against them in how they settled automobile claims.
Posted by: Dale | August 25, 2006, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
NEWSFLASH PEOPLE: STATE FARM IS A MUTUAL COMPANY, WHICH MEANS IT IS OWNED BY ITS POLICYHOLDERS, NOT SOME GIANT CORPORATION LIKE ALLSTATE OR NATIONWIDE. WHENEVER SOMEONE FILES A CLAIM, IT HURTS EVERYBODY. THEREFORE, STATE FARM IS OBLIGATED TO KEEP ITS LOSSES AT A MINIMUM, WHICH MEANS DENYING CLAIMS FOR PERILS NOT COVERED UNDER THE HOMEOWNERS POLICY- I.E.-FLOOD DAMAGE. THOSE PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE BEEN RESPONSIBLE AND GOTTEN FLOOD INSURANCE FROM NFIP. YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER, SEVERAL HUNDRED THOUSAND CLAIMS ALL HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME MEANS THAT THERE WILL BE INCREASED SCRUTINY. WHY? BECAUSE THEY ARE TRYING TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY KEEP THEIR POLICYHOLDERS’ PREMIUMS FROM DRASTICALLY RISING. THEY ARE JUST DOING THEIR JOB. SO LEAVE STATE FARM ALONE AND START FOCUSING ON FEMA, WHO ARE THE ONES THAT REALLY SCREWED PEOPLE OVER.
Posted by: cecil | August 25, 2006, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
The question here isn’t about personal responsibility or hating insurance companies. The question is simply whether or not State Farm changed reports and pressured outside engineers to conclude the cause of the damage was water. If people who live in flood prone areas didn’t buy flood insurance, and their homes were destroyed by flooding, then they were stupid and unlucky. But if the insurance companies made it look like the damage was caused by water when independent evaluators concluded it was caused by wind, then wouldn’t we all agree they committed fraud and should be made to pay?
Posted by: Jon Eichten | August 25, 2006, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
You people are amazing. Two idiots are working with the biggest most crocked lawyer in the world to bring down an insurance company and according to all of you, the company is guilty.
I work in the insurance industry and can tell you that everyone wants the cheapest insurance but they also want that policy to cover EVERYTHING. It does not work that way. The Federal Govt set up the Flood Program because the only people who buy it are people in flood areas. It would not be fair for someone in New Mexico to have to pay higher rates to help spread the costs of someone living on the coast or worse in a bowl below sea level like New Orleans. But if this Dickie Scruggs gets his way, he will get rich and everyone in america will pay MUCH more for insurance. When I say much more, I am talking about 20x or even more. People in coastal areas should buy flood insurance. And as for shredding documents, all insurance companies do it to protect privacy or if we didn’t ABC news would pick up that story and run with it about identity theft. Please remember that the 1 year anniversary is comng up soon and abs is trying to get people to watch 20/20.
Posted by: Michael | August 25, 2006, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Working for insurers for over 11 years as an independent adjuster I have found the large well known insurers are typically the worst when it comes to claim payout. Smaller mutual companies seem to settle claims with more realistic numbers. I am not suprized State farm is dening people. I spent 6 months in the south working katrina and Wilma claims, I spoke with hundreds of adjusters, I heard the stories of management cutting the adjusters estimates even theough the managers did not inspect the house, blatent fraud – deflating claims. exact inverse of is “insurance fraud inflating claims” consumers go to prison for inflating, insurers have been deflating since the begining of time and not 1 executive has been sent to prison…
Posted by: Independent Insurance Adjuster | August 25, 2006, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
IF insurance companies are horrible, which I don’t agree with, then it must be because of all the people out there that feel that any claim that they have with an insurance company should pay them millions.
“oh, my house flooded, flood isn’t covered, I’ll go break a window so it looks like the wind caused this damage.”
“oh, this person behind me just tapped the back of my car, I don’t think I can ever work again”
PEOPLE are frauds, insurance companies just have to sort them out.
Posted by: Kathy | August 25, 2006, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
As an employee in a State Farm office, I personally took hundreds and hundreds of claims in 2004-when we were hit with 3 hurricanes. We had ONE dissatisfied client who claimed we underinsured his home, even though he had come into the office and signed the document indicating the coverage amount he desired.
We have sent several mass mailings advising people to buy Flood insurance. Most people think it will never happen to them.
I’m sorry, but I have no sympathy- we pay what we owe-no more. It is the only responsible thing to do for the rest of the policyholders.
And, by the way, any professional I have ever dealt with uses a shredder .
Posted by: Ron | August 25, 2006, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
This thread is ludicrous. State Farm is a MUTUAL insurance company — it’s owned by its policyholders! Discussions of “greed” and “evil” are absurd, because there is no true profit motive.
In cases like Katrina, it’s perfectly appropriate for State Farm to evaluate the root causes of damage, and if it’s due to a non-insured cause, to not pay. If you have no auto insurance but have a term life policy with Met Life, is it reasonable to submit a claim to Met when you get into a car crash?
None of this, of course, excuses the INDIVIDUALS who may have pressured consultants to submit inacurate reports in order to make their own “numbers” look good, but don’t blame the company, blame those unethical individuals.
Posted by: JPH | August 25, 2006, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
State Farm paid me $500 for a TV that was only worth $300. I doubt Brian Ross will be calling me.
Posted by: Goober | August 25, 2006, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
:( It’s not just insurance companies that try to “Cut-the corner” a lot of American companies are using this tactic to try to cut costs or so they say. But we have always suspected that this tactic is used so that their pocket-books won’t suffer. The sad fact is that the whole system of capitalism is failing the very people it was supposed to benefit and all because someone doesen’t think that its okay to gain more business in the long run by taking the hit now.
Posted by: Perry Weswt | August 25, 2006, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
I have state farm as my insurance carrier, and I will now be looking for another insurance company and I encourage everyone else to do the same.
Posted by: NR | August 25, 2006, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
STATE FARM, ALLSTATE and FARMER’S (Mid Century) Insurance Companies have established a pattern of denying claims they should, by their contract (“policy”) and state laws, pay.
State regulators have repeatedly failed to do their jobs because state regulators are “owned” by insurance companies. The insurance industry currently writes insurance law and the “regulators” rubber stamp approval.
STATE FARM, ALLSTATE AND FARMER’S INSURANCE COMPANIES should be dissolved and their entire worth used to pay claimants. Insurance company executives should be stripped of their ill gotten gains and imprisoned.
State regulatory agencies should be abolished and re-built from the ground up, without input from the insurance crooks. We must start by cleaning out our state legislatures.
The entire insurance industry and regulatory process is rotten to its empty core.
Posted by: John McGilvray | August 25, 2006, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Even the people who were paid were paid less than they should have been. We already know that the insurance companies said things like missing roofs were not wind damage but flood. We all know a lot of it was wind. We’ve seen proof of guilt already.
To the person saying people should not live in coastal areas, you need to get a clue. People have to live in the biggest port in the States so YOU can get food, oil, gas, all the things that are shipped in by water. You make youself look stupid saying such things.
Posted by: Tristan | August 25, 2006, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Someone should also look at “auto damage claims”. In 1976 my daughter’s car was “totaled” when she hit the gas pedal instead of the brake and slid on ice into a humongours tree. We had just purchased the auto a month prior and had three people look at the car exclaiming the “near-new” appearance. Definitely had never been in a “hail storm” However, upon settlement, insurance company claimed that it had been severely damaged by “hail damage” and refused to honor our claim. After threatening to go to court they finally setted but for less than 2/3 of the claim according to the insurance policy.
Try using a “small chain” and rapping it over the top of the car several times – result: looks just like hail damage.
Ask if this practice is taught at adjustors claim class for a national insurance company.
Posted by: WILLIAM CLEMONS | August 25, 2006, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
I will cancel my policy with state farm and will advice my family and friends to do the same. Is a shame how these families been thru enough pain of loosing their home, and state farm continue to destroy. I hope every law suit is worth it.
Posted by: Jackie | August 25, 2006, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
This is normal for insurance companies, as I tell friends and business associates. If you hear an insurance company ad on TV or radio, they are bad. After our 3200 sq.ft. home burned 2 1/2 years ago we found the following web site.
We also found out that State Farm had paid for a study several years prior, that found over 95% of people would accept the insurance company offer of settlement, not what should have been paid because of the team of lawyers the insurance companies employees and the intimidation they create.
Beware of insurance companies, do you research and change your carrier. Go to the web site and start.
Posted by: Lee | August 25, 2006, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Time for real, federal, regulation of insurance companies. State commissions just cannot keep up with these corporate goliaths.
Posted by: Ben Murphy | August 25, 2006, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Welcome to capitalist America.
Business as usual.
Posted by: Napolean | August 25, 2006, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
I worked at State Farm for 28 years – 20 of that in claims to include 4 years as a Catastrophe Team Manager. I do not believe these allegations. Never once did I witness any attempts or comments or instructions to ever do anything unethical as is alleged here. It will be interesting to see the comments of these Independents on the show this evening. I agree with other prior comments by other former State Farm long term employees- first Independents would not normally be involved in suit files as they are handled by staff personnel and secondly, Independents are not normally involved with engineer reports. I do not believe State Farm would employ any of the tactics alleged…NEVER. Did I always agree with every decision as an employee…NO..who does for any employer but I do have the utmost respect for their Claim handling procedures and the professionalism they require both of their staff employees AND of their Independent(non employee’s as these two whistleblowers are).
I hope this story tonight doesn’t prove my long held trust wrong.
Posted by: DKWard | August 25, 2006, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Time for State Farm to be put out of business-time for the officers and directors to be put on trial as criminals-no excuses, they are responsible for the company-employees, agents reflect the goals set by the officers and directors-thought these people would have learned after Enron and its accounting firm Arthur Anderson destroyed themselves that the top is where the buck stops!!!!!!
Posted by: Phil | August 25, 2006, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Evryone is right, we all pay our insurance premiums and when it’s time to pay up the companys always roll out 25 miles of fine print to say why they shouldn’t pay. But remember this, we’re all responsible for ourselves. We cannot count on others, whether they are the government, insurance companies, the Red Cross or your neighbor. Take charge of your life and to heck with the rest of them.
Posted by: RLE | August 25, 2006, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
It would be nice to see one of these claimants go over their policy with an adjuster on national tv… reality tv at it’s best. The humiliated expressions would be priceless when the adjuster shows what’s NOT covered in big bold print. The “but…but…but” would be worth the price of admission alone.
Fear not though, there will be changes. I’m sure after Katrina, and all the nonsense that followed regarding claims, they’re trying tirelessly to create home owners policies with more pictures. Big insurance words like “covered” and “not covered” will be replaced with waves with an “x” through it, and a scary cloud face blowing with a smiley face next to it.
Posted by: steve | August 25, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
We had a tornado level a brand new home two years ago. Everything was gone and we had moved in 10 days before. American Family Insurance paid us the limit of our policy. And I had never read the policy either. You put it in a drawer and hope you never have to look at it. In our case, our policy blew away along with everything else. Of course they have to ask questions and look into your claim–we all know how fraud abounds…everywhere.
Posted by: sheri | August 25, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Having adequate coverage and getting fairly reimbuirsed after a loss are two totally different things. DONT asssume that just because you have adequate coverage that you will be able to replace your loss. Been there!
Posted by: Gevans | August 25, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
We were “non-renewed” this past spring by a major Florida insurance group that went belly-up. I was lucky enough to find an agent who got me a package deal through Hartford that saved me almost $1000 on the State Farm CAR insurance alone. Even though the rates for homeowners/flood went up a little, I ended up SAVING, yes, SAVING money. Ask about “package deals” where one company will insure all your stuff. I had to hunt like the dickens for about three weeks, and I talked to a lot of agents/company reps who didn’t have a clue, but I ended up with a great deal with one of the best insurance companies in the country. Keep looking.
Posted by: Debra | August 25, 2006, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Sure looks like a lot of people jumping to conclusions. Everyones story seemed to revolve around not knowing what they were covered under. Lesson? Know what you are buying and are covered under and for. Ignorance isnt bliss.
Posted by: Peter Jones | August 25, 2006, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
As usual, the libs believe everything they hear on the lib news without ANY proof. Most likely it is two disgruntled assoicates wanting to make a buck and get their 15 minutes of fame at the same time.
Posted by: Philly | August 25, 2006, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
I look at it this way – They are ALL crooks. In order to keep my house out of foreclosure, I must carry insurance. That’s what its for, for me. I don’t expect much nowadays. I guess I’m just jaded!
Posted by: wayne | August 25, 2006, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
When (if)your State Farm agent approaches you about life insurance stop them in their tracks and ask them what trip they will win this year for selling life insurance and financial services. As a former employee I have seen first hand the lies and deceit that goes on within State Farm.
Posted by: former sf | August 25, 2006, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Did anyone else think of The Incredibles:
Bob: Did I do something illegal?
Gilbert Huph: [begrudgingly] No.
Bob: Are you saying we shouldn’t help our customers?
Gilbert Huph: [pacing back and forth] The law requires that I answer, No.
Bob: I thought we were supposed to help people.
Gilbert Huph: You’re supposed to help *our* people! Starting with our stockholders! Who’s helping them out, Huh?
Posted by: C Brannan | August 25, 2006, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
I had State Farm on my house. I cancelled and switched to another company and saved $800 a year. That means my insurance costs me a 1/3 of what I was paying at State Farm. The agent never called me.
Posted by: L D | August 25, 2006, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Nothing like a major news network to drum up something sensational to sell some adds. To bad facts and truth are not part of the journalistic code anymore. All that matters is how many people they can whip into hysteria. Federal judge last week just ruled to exhonerate State Farm and other insurers of this type of rediculous allegations. Grow up ABC.
Posted by: Eddy | August 25, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Someone should also look at “auto damage claims”. In 1976 my daughter’s car was “totaled” when she hit the gas pedal instead of the brake and slid on ice into a humongours tree. We had just purchased the auto a month prior and had three people look at the car exclaiming the “near-new” appearance. Definitely had never been in a “hail storm” However, upon settlement, insurance company claimed that it had been severely damaged by “hail damage” and refused to honor our claim. After threatening to go to court they finally setted but for less than 2/3 of the claim according to the insurance policy.
Try using a “small chain” and rapping it over the top of the car several times – result: looks just like hail damage.
Ask if this practice is taught at adjustors claim class for a national insurance company.
Now for the adjustors, insurance sales peope – don’t stick your finger in the face of the policyholder. Right, most people don’t read their policy –but for good reason —even beginning insurance sales/adjustors can’t understand the policy. If that were not true, hows come the first schedule of instruction you receive is “how to understand the policy coverage”.
When a policyholder purchsed the insurance, there is a agent/beneficiary relationship established – agents often render that part of their career invalid – blaming the language of the policy that even they don’t understand and accusing the policyholder of not reading the policy.
As an accountant for over 40 years, I seldom discovered any business owner or manager understanding their policy in full. And if you call the agent he has to “see when I can find the time to talk with you”. They are compensated with commission and if the policyholder cancels a policy the commission is charged back to their account.
I have to admit I have seen many HONEST INSURANCE SALES PEOPLE –AND THEY ALL WERE ONES WHO SERVICED THEIR POLICIES “ALWAYS”. AND BECASUE THEY WERE ATTENTIVE TO THEIR POLICYHOLDERS, THEY LIVED COMFORTABLE.
Posted by: WILLIAM CLEMONS | August 25, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
If I were a Judge or Jury on this case. What really caused the tidal flood. Wind, about 135 MPH winds. So big insurance Pay up.
Posted by: jc | August 25, 2006, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
I live in Florida. My pool enclosure was beaten up, my roof ruined, and fence blown apart by the hurricanes.
I expected hassles and fights. Instead I found State Farm to be more than fair. Yes, I have a high hurricane deductable — but that was part of the deal. I paid the deductable; they paid for all damage. No problem.
I also have neighbors — a few had State Farm. There experience, save a few trying their best to cheat, was the same as mine.
So much for, “Ask anyone from Florida…”
What I want to know is why anyone would insure a city that’s under water in the first place.
Posted by: Brett | August 25, 2006, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
I am not suprised, but I am suprised by the comment that people that live in this area are idiots because of where they live. It would be the same as saying you live in San Fran, and you are an idiot because of earthquakes. Same with saying you live in an area with crime. You should not live there if you don’t want to deal with the issues. Katrina was a horrible act of mother nature. It has been a long time in Ms and La that something like this has happened.
I think if you went down there and saw all of this first hand, you might not call these people stupid, from witnesses and my own eyes, there are people still calling this place home, and living in TENTS. Not everyone can afford to pick up and leave, some call it home, and that is what it is “HOME”. I do believe insurance companies just like other companies will rip you off if you let them get away with it. As far as the sisters, dont know the truth, but it will come out…but nothing suprises me if State Farm is guilty. We are talking about a lot of money for them to fork out.
Yes many probably did not have flood insurance, but what about the ones that did, that they are trying not to pay the claim. Before you completely call the people on the gulf coast idiots, I would think again…what if you had NOTHING, and left living in a tent, and you were ripped off by the govt and also the insurance company. Give my a break!!! Shame on you!!! We have enough problems in the world without people like you (in my words, an idiot) to call someone else an idiot when they are down on their luck.
And not all insurance companies are the same, but if you are a big name insurance company, I don’t feel they are straight up with people. And for those that say read your policy…not all of the policies are written to wear you understand a word they say. Then the insurance guy tells you what is covered, but actually he lied.
I will say, I did not have problems with my insurance company during Katrina, I will knock on wood there. Sad world when you can trust a person’s word.
Posted by: Patpoms | August 25, 2006, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
State Farm is an embarrasement to me and to all. I hope this tragedy of Katrina brings the company into bankruptcy and the families get paid and they whole companies loses everything they have!! They will eventually get what they deserve!
Posted by: Steve Miller | August 25, 2006, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Interesting that the “whistle blowers” are photographed wearing their State Farm jackets. In the middle of summer. If you thought so little of a company that you’d trash them for a national audience, would you validate that company by wearing their clothing? Typical staged “news” from ABC.
Posted by: David | August 25, 2006, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
I am an extreme conservative and I agree with the liberals. George Bush doesn’t represent me any longer. As a republican, I denounce the handling of the Katrina Disaster by the republicans and the Bush administration. Dick Cheney is a terrible president for letting all those people die. Everyday I question myself more and more, why am I such a homophobe.
Posted by: Captain Conservative | August 25, 2006, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
This sounds like sour grapes from people who waited until their employment had been terminated to quote “blow the whistle”. Where were they the past year when all of this was allegedly going on? The other references to a company cheating consumers and not having to pay claims is bunk. Insurance is one of the most government regulated industries in the U.S. You may have had a bad experience with an insurance company, but to accuse a company as large as State Farm of being corrupt at every level is worse that being naive, it’s pure stupidity. Be a smart consumer. Read your policy. Know what your policy does and does not pay for. And like someone else said, if you live below sea level next to a large body of water, for the love of Mike, buy flood insurance!
Posted by: Robert | August 25, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Shame on all of you. If this is true, it is not the company, it is a rogue employee. I may not be in a hurricane affected area, but I work for State Farm and I and my co-workers go out of our way every day to help people in need. We pride ourselves on that!
Posted by: Katie | August 25, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
For those of you who have State Farm for home and auto coverage suggest you consider a new company upon anniversary date of your policy as protest against their “policy” of putting it to us in time of need. I did.
Posted by: RFA | August 25, 2006, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
I GOT STATE FARM INSURANCE AFTER ANOTHER COMPANY CHEATED ME WHEN I MADE A CLAIM. I LOVE STATE FARM. THEY HAVE ALWAYS BEEN GOOD AT PAYING MY CLAIMS OVER THE YEAR. I KNOW PEOPLE–GOOD PEOPLE–SALT OF THE EARTH–WONDERFUL–PEOPLE WHO WORK IN THEIR CLAIMS DEPARTMENT AND I DON’T BELIEVE ANY OF THIS. I BELIEVE STATE FARM PAYS WHAT THEY OWE AND NOT A PENNY LESS AND NOT A PENNY, WHICH IS GOOD, IT PREVENTS FRAUD AND KEEPS OUR INSURANCE PAYMENTS DOWN.
Posted by: NANCY | August 25, 2006, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
This is sooooo bogus. As a general rule, State Farm is one of the most fair and trusted insurance companies in the nation. I hope they file a lawsuit and discover the true nature (and motive and intelligence) of the Rigsby sister and abc.
BTW, a woman recently handled a claim of mine and she was large, largely lazy and incompetant.
Posted by: Bill | August 25, 2006, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
State Farm WAS there for us after Hurricane Iniki in 1992 in Kauai. They hired (and paid for) a structural engineer and accepted (and paid for) ALL his recommendations — to the tune of over half the value of the house, plus all replacement of damaged furniture, and never questioned that it was wind that caused the damage. We’ll be forever grateful to State Farm.
Posted by: AMD | August 25, 2006, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
I worked in State Farm claims for 32 years (about 20 in management)and although almost anything is possible, I have serious reservations that the Rigsby sisters saw what they say they saw. But if they can prove their allegations in a court of law, the guilty will be held accountable. If they can not, they and Dickie Scruggs should be held accountable!
Posted by: Bob Jentges | August 25, 2006, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Wonder if State Farm paid for Trent Lott’s home. He and his brother-in-law [a lawyer] I thought was taking State Farm to court.
Posted by: rosie | August 25, 2006, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
I have not seen any proof……. I hear two women who are independent contractors…. they never worked FOR State Farm they only where hired to do a job. They must not have done thier job or they would still contracted to work for the very company they are “telling on”. Where is thier proof that State Farm did not pay what they owed? 90% of the damage done in Katrina was from flood damage. If a policyholder did not have flood coverage (living in a flood zone ) then why should they be expected to pay. It is a policyholders obligation to know what they are and are NOT covered for when buying insurance. Insurance companies should not pay for coverage not bought.
Posted by: Someone who want the truth | August 25, 2006, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Of course not all the facts are stated in the article above, but I don’t understand why some commenters are bringing up flood insurance. The 2 adjusters claim…
The sisters say they saw supervisors go to great lengths to pressure outside engineers to prepare reports concluding that damage was caused by water, not covered under State Farm policies, rather than by wind.
So State Farms own hired engineers say it was wind damage, not water damage. The fraud is that they are falsly claiming it’s water damage.
I think this is a separate issue from problem that people who live in flood plains should probably have flood insurance.
Rich
Posted by: Rich C | August 25, 2006, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
There is simply no way on earth this could have happened…if it did…GOD HELP AMERICA…cause if it did happen…I think mankind is beyond helping himself anymore!
Posted by: Peter | August 25, 2006, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
State Farm has used the best series of commercials ever done over twenty years to build a completely false picture of themselves. They are notorious for not paying large claims. The local Left Wing paper here did a super expose’ on the company right after a huge brush fire left thousands of people with claims. But more important, anyone who stands up is immediately sued by their army of lawyers. It is a horrible company and has been for thirty years.
Posted by: Howard Veit | August 25, 2006, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
What a shock, a liberal news agency looking to bring down a company who has paid out over 681,000 claims (98% of which are all settled) and $5 billion to the victims of hurricane Katrina. Give me a break. I wish someone would take an “in-depth look” at these crooked new agencies who put these “creditable” stories on the air.
Posted by: Ryan | August 25, 2006, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Let’s see, all I have to do is call a reporter on a slow news day and “claim” I have inside info on fraud. Prediction, it will come to pass these two sisters were fired by State Farm for fraud or attempted manipulation of PH funds.
Posted by: Gulity? | August 25, 2006, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
In light of higher claims and lower profits from investments, the new tactic, for making money (keeping revenues higher than payments) is to reduce the amount of payments.
That holds true for auto, home, and life. Policy holders now have to fight, tooth-and-nail, to receive what they thought all those premiums entitled them to.
By the old formulas, a $5,000 payout would have been $5,000. Now it’s $3,000 or, less.
Claims rep’s are compensated for the money they save the company.
Sad. But, true.
Posted by: Anonymous | August 25, 2006, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Some of the comments above are by people that were in normal floods, no ins co has paid for normal floods in a long time, our tax money does. If State Farm did this they deserve what they get; because they have the funds to pay out.
Posted by: Gary | August 25, 2006, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
My brother lost his home in Katrina, hired an independent engineer expert in determining cause of damage, was TOLD it was due to a tornado spawned by the storm based on tree damage and the way the houses were destroyed(in his area there were many tornados), and good ole State Farm said it was due to flood waters. He’s battling it out now trying to get his money. Sounds so right when these ladies say SF paid these engineers to determine THEIR way so they could save a buck. Guess what? What goes around comes around. These people who did this will one day pay the piper, for you reap what you sow, and isn’t it people who run these places? If they are bankrupted because of it, serves them right. Other insurance companies? Better do it right, keep it straight. NO ONE is able to keep crooked dealings secret for long, and in the end, that’s where you get it! People who are on the side of the insurance companies, better be right, for one day it may be you!
Posted by: Linda Virginia | August 25, 2006, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Are all you negitive people just arriving from Pluto! You have to read what you pay for before you buy it! I have several policies with State Farm and any claim, for whatever reason, I have filed has been handled quickly and with no hassle. I carry separate flood insurance since I live near the Gulf. Isn’t that what you are suppose to do? You only get what you pay for. You should ALWAYS know who you are doing business with and that includes insurance agents. My agent is the GREATEST. I have been with him since arriving in Houston back in 1980 and he has checked on me, made sure I had plenty of coverage and let’s me know when changes need to be considered. When Rita came through my agent assisted me in forcing my mother-in-laws agent (also a State Farm Agent)to handle her policy correctly. So, it does not matter what insurance you are using, the only thing that matters is that you have an honest agent who has your best interest in mind. I would not trust my policies with anyone else.
Posted by: Barb - Texas | August 25, 2006, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
It’s like they said in the geginning, “We can not afford our investors to loose this much money”. They are in the business of taking risk. The risk that nothing will happen and when it does bows out and does what ever it takes not to live up to the part of the deal. I too had to get the State Insurance Commissioner to threaten my insurance company because of the low ball adjustment. And the goverment can do something about it but will not due to the thousands of lobby people taking the to lunch and resort trips. Why change anything and lose those perks. And FEMA they are justas bad. Heavy damge and having to live in a FEMA trailer, but I am told I did not qualify for any assistance other than the trailer. Go Figure………
Posted by: Jeff Kerry | August 25, 2006, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Now that State Farm is being exposed, shall we expect to see a huge public investigation of the countless individuals and groups who bilked the Federal Govt. (that’s US)out of perhaps billions of dollars with false claims. I saw a couple of articles in the paper about it, but then it disappeared from view. Journalists are much more interested in going after one “big corporation” than the myriad of scam artists. Too bad.
Posted by: Jack Feehily | August 25, 2006, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
The insurance cartels have been raping the public for years. First getting lawmakers to pass bills requiring everyone to pay for their services, constantly jacking up rates that required them to be “regulated” in the first place, then being cheap when a claim is filed. They have the money, the lawyers, and the upper hand.
Posted by: TxMarko | August 25, 2006, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
I find it laughable that people still think that Corporations who are that weathly would be devious enough to go to any lengths to keep their wealth….have we learned NOTHING?
Posted by: Number one first | August 25, 2006, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
I worked for State Farm. I see how the executives live. It would make you sick. They live in million dollar houses, drive cars at the companies expense, gas back and forth to work is paid for, etc, etc, etc. I hope that an investigation is done and State Farm is brought to it’s knees. Believe me as a former employee, they do not care about their “neighbors”.
Posted by: Brenda | August 25, 2006, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
I love it how everyone complains about insurance….if you don’t like it and don’t want it then pay cash for everything and don’t insure it through a company-insure yourself if you CAN….but wait then YOU will turn to the government to bail you out………what a joke you all are. And of course George Bush established the Insurance Co.’s right? What a joke…..
Posted by: jm | August 25, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
I don’t believe this for one minute. I’ve worked with State Farm, and they have always had extremely fair claims practices. Everyone that I know that works for them is diligent in paying what they owe…no more, no less. Just as it should be. I’ve also worked with independant adjusters…..it’s very obvious to anyone in the claims field, that their billings were cut and they are pissed off. Or maybe they weren’t getting as many claims as they thought they should. So to get back, they make up a bunch of stuff and take it to a lawyer like Scruggs. Most people who are railing agains tthe insurance companies are the ones who are wanting coverage for thing excluded in their policy. Don’t believe everything you hear, it’s usually not true.
Posted by: Wendy | August 25, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Like a Good Neighbor State farm Is WHERE?
Don’t listen to all of those Pro State Farm Post. The allegations are not for them denying flood claims but rather saying that the actual wind claims were flood claims and then denying them.
Posted by: Jack | August 25, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Being from Gulfport, I can tell you that some of the claims of the homeowners are correct. People who asked their agent when purchasing home insurance were told..”you dont need flood insurance where you live” or your wasting your money”. Dont believe it sorry, because its true. Yes I know its still up to the homeowner to be covered, but wouldnt you trust advice from a pro?
Also many of these homes that were “flooded” were in areas that have NEVER flooded in known history of the area. They were well outside the federal flood zones. But when you get a surge of 35 feet in some areas (I said surge not flood)people are gonna get wet.
Oh and to the fool who said he gets mad when his rates go up because we are “morons” for living in this area. I will promise you the next natural disaster we have that stikes close to your home, I will be screaming that you “idiots” are causing my insurance to rise.
Posted by: Scott | August 25, 2006, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Hello…. Read your policy before you complain about what insurance companies pay out. If you have water damage caused by a flood State Farm is not resposible for paying that claim. You should have bought Flood insurance. Flood insurance is a government policy mandated by congress. Private insurers by law cannot pay out a claim associated with a flood.
Posted by: Chad | August 25, 2006, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
After reading the comments I am worried about our country. We have a bunch of uneducated liberals jumping to conclusions. Is this what middle america has become.
If the company had not shredded the personal info, abc would have this headeline at the top of the page “State Farm exposes Katrina Victimsto Identy Thieves”. Explosive accusations sells news, Remember that people.
I have State Farm and I love my agent and the company. The pay what they owe and that is all I ask for.
Posted by: Jake | August 25, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
You crybabies make me sick. If you think insurance is a ripoff, don’t buy it. And read your insurance contract before you sign it. Unless it specifically states that the insurance company is going to be your momma and kiss your boo-boos and make everything better, then don’t expect that.
Posted by: Top Five Percent | August 25, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Not touching this story with a 10-foot pole. I don’t know what’s worse: the media fueling frenzy over half-baked sensationalist claims just to post something for the evening news, or the viewing public who are so quick to believe whatever is aired. Do your own research before jumping to conclusions.
Posted by: CP | August 25, 2006, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
All of the people should have had hurricane insurance in the first place. Now I have to bail them out.
Posted by: bob | August 25, 2006, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Just curious if the 20/20 episode will show a balanced side? Most comments above are correct in that people want the “cheapest” policy they can get and then cry when a claim hits them and they are not covered due to their own fault! I too work in the insurance industry and deal with folks daily who do not want flood, or rental car coverage, or deductibles that make sense, but boy do they claim ignorance and lapse of memory when claims occur. Fortunately for us, we require signed rejections, but even that does not stop folks from thinking they had “full coverage”. Freedom of the press is wonderful as long as it is fair and balanced. God Bless America!
Posted by: Michael | August 25, 2006, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Its possible that Mississippi lawyer Dickie Scruggs is paying the Rigsby sisters to make these claims. He stands to make a mountain of cash by going after State Farm.
Posted by: dan | August 25, 2006, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
An insurance agent commented a couple hours ago on the lack of “personal responsibility” among those of us that expect our insurance companies to pay claims as promised in policies.
“Personal responsibility”, my salesperson friend, is paying one’s premium monthly, yearly, whatever, for years and years without fail to the insurance company.
It is not entitlement that leads us to expect the insurance companies to pay claims responsibly. Rather, it is years and years and thousands of dollars we pay THEM to spread and manage risk for us. When they don’t do that correctly, WE lose, not them. In what other business does this occur in this country? Hmmm.
Posted by: Make it Stop | August 25, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Maybe if these big insurance companies (State Farm, Farm Bureau, etc.) didn’t send their agents and families on such lavish trips, they could help the little guys. It’s absolutely outrageous how much they spend on these trips. Insurance is such a rip-off!
Posted by: Carlie | August 25, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
State Farm agent never told me I would have to pay higher premiums for 3 years after I got a ticket until I needed a SR22 which they held hostage until I wrote them a check for nearly $200 to cover the increase for two months. That’s when they made a big deal out of the SR22 & not before I went to court & could have plead differently to possibly avoid the problem. I had been a faithful customer for 35 years. NOT any more!!! Progressive is my carrier of choice now.
Posted by: Kerry - Nebraska | August 25, 2006, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
State Farm is a Mutual Company. That means that the policyholders are the owners. There are NO stockholders so profit is only used to pay claims. Allstate and Nationwide, that is another story as they are stock companies.
Posted by: Ben | August 25, 2006, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
These 2 girls are just mad because their mother was denied coverage. Why? Because of no flood insurance, go figure!
-Someone who knows
Posted by: Marsha | August 25, 2006, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
I’m not surprised and thi happens quite frequently. Insurance companies love to collect premiums and avoid claims. I’ve been with USAA for nearly 35 years. They deserve their rankings. The rest are cheats, liers and crooks. The Federal government is doing nothing to prevent this type of fraud and is to bogged down in foreign wars to take care of its own citizens. Vote in November!! Taking their political entitlements and benefits away is the only thing they understand. Vote them all out of office. Change your state insurance commisioners, as well. Vote!!!
Posted by: john mullan | August 25, 2006, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
There seems to be two schools of thought. First, is that insurance companies are out to do nothing but screw you over. Second, people pay through the nose on premiums for nothing. Look at these two arguments being made. If eitherone of those statements are actually true, then why do you pay for insurance coverage to begin with? Simply pay YOURSELF the premiums, invest it, and then when something happens PAY FOR IT yourself. This nation has become a nation of people who feel they are entitled to everything under the sun and when they don’t get what they want they complain.
Posted by: Jim G | August 25, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
The claims are handled by people just like you and me. I have had the news media do a hit piece on my industry and I knew it was not true. These claims are handled by thousands of citizens. Do you honestly believe that all these claims adjusters were told to rip people off and they just did it, no questions asked? Only two people let the “cat out of the bag?” Think a minute people!!! This thing stinks to high heaven. The media is at it again. The media blows up trucks to get General Motors, Gives false reports about Iraq (CNN), Dan Rather and his forged documents, the list goes on and on. Why not take a breath and see if any of this is true.
Posted by: Think a Minute | August 25, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Hey, everybody. I’m one of those trial lawyers you hear about. Now you see why you need us?
Posted by: David | August 25, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
The responses I’ve read have amazed me.This does feel like State Farm is guilty until proven innocent. Maybe if people took the time to read thier policies and see where all the money they complain about paying for insuring a risk goes, they would see that flood is a seperate coverage to be purchased.I think poeple should do thier homework on thier covergaes before they go off spitting fire towards the big bad insurance company.
Posted by: ashley | August 25, 2006, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Whaaaaaaa!! Nagin, FEMA, Deadbeats, State Farm, what’s the difference? Roll up them sleeves and pull yourself out. If you don’t get cheated by one, you’ll get cheated by the other. It’s insurance, it’s politics, it’s life in these United States. Life is hard, God is good…enough said.
Posted by: Rui | August 25, 2006, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Say a tusnami hits the west coast and travels 10 miles inland. Many homes are destroyed by water.
Is this a flood or a result of an earthquake? You have earthquake insurance so your covered in full right? Not according to these insurance companies… better get you insurance now lefties..
Posted by: juan | August 25, 2006, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
I would never do business with a company that doesn’t shred documents. Have you ever heard of identity theft. Every company, big or small shreds their papers. Duh!
Posted by: Jane | August 25, 2006, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
State farm is company #22 in the Fortune 500. They had 60 BILLION in Revenue 160 BILLION in assets and 3.25 BILLION in PROFIT!!! Insurance companies don’t make money by paying out claims… and State Farm appears to be the best at not paying claims…
Posted by: Rob | August 25, 2006, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
As an agent in Texas I have had a lot of Katrina victims come through my office. All felt they were treated fairly by State Farm. One in Saint Bernard’s parish where damage by flood was extensive said less than 6% of homeowners carried flood insurance even though they were exremely vulnerable to flood. These people figured FEMA would pay so why should they have a flood policy.
To many people expect the government to bail them out! If these people are successful in getting insurance companies to pay for uncovered wind surge, all companies will abandon the coast and New Orleans will never recover.
Watch what you ask for, you just might get it and be worse off than ever.
Posted by: Ron | August 25, 2006, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
I wonder why these sisters are no longer working for State Farm? Were they fired? Are they disgruntled? It says they are independent now. What loses did they experience and didn’t have proper coverage for? Was their mom denied a claim and this is why they are attacking? If we’re going to jump to conclusions why not throw accusations at them??
Posted by: Chris | August 25, 2006, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Yeah Yeah Yeah, Bush eats babies and all that nonsense. It’s gonna get dark later too and I am sure there will be some accidents from the darkness. Will that be Bush’s fault too? Enough bomb throwing already.
Posted by: Bill E | August 25, 2006, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
We own property in Nebraska, severely damaged by broken water pipes in a late-2005 blizzard, more than $100,000 in damages. This is not intended to compare our situation to anything that occurred along the Gulf Coast. The storm was major, caused more collective property damage than Katrina, covering three states. State Farm has misrepresented its homeowners policy indicating that it does not cover water damage, referencing exclusion language – which, in all cases, is water that flows into and through the house from external sources, rather than emanating from inside the home, such as our situation. True, 60,000 gallons of water poured through the home since property managers had to dig in to get there; and true, that the water did flow underneath the foundation, slab and footings. The State Farm claims adjuster told us to sue them, if we disagreed with his final settlement – stating “many people have, and we’ve won them all.” I am frustrated at State Farm’s decision with our property; but I am appalled at the company’s loss of heart, especially re: poor and elderly who have lost their properties, with no recourse. They too can sue; but in our case, it would take over-$40,000 to recover the $40,000 in damages that in dispute. Class action may be the only way Gulf Coast victims of State Farm can recover from Katrina. It’s a sad time to be working with American insurance companies – almost as bad as sucking on the oil companies profit hoses.
Posted by: Mike | August 25, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
I see people making comments about Bush but I think insurance laws were wrote before he was able to walk. That same type of ignorance is the same reason insurance companies rip people off. If people would spend as much time researching their home owners policy as they do watching American Idol they would have bought flood insurance. You live near ocean
Maybe you should have spent the extra $600 a year for coverage.
Posted by: The Man | August 25, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Republicans are so brainwashed and ignorant!!! Keep watching FOX and believe everything they say. I deal with insurance companies on a daily basis and know first hand how crooked they are. When is America going to wake up and challenge the insurance industry and hold them accountable?
Posted by: Harry | August 25, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
The story did not surprise me one bit. I was a victim of State Farms wrath about 5 years ago. They are GREAT neighbors, when you do not have a claim. After the horrible bullying by them and me paying an attorney to help me, I was left with nothing but a mess. Not only with the house, it basically destroyed my life as I knew it – I lost everything. Just because one stupid pipe broke and they took a week to send an adjuster. Can anyone say toxic mold?? State Farm is NOT the friendly neighbor – and all I can do is smile in the hopes that this company finally gets what is coming to them.
Posted by: Amy | August 25, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Undelievable that so many are ready to believe this stuff on the word of a couple of people who obviously have a score to settle or have been hired by Dickey Scruggs. Interesting that after losing his case against the insurance industry and after strong arming ST Farm by threating to go to the media if they did not pay claims that were clearly not covered by the policy, this appears. Guarantee there won’t be any supporting evidence that is credible. Just watch. If any insurance company is honest and credible-its St Farm.
Posted by: Wylie | August 25, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
So far I agree that insurance companies are crooked. I had a house fire in Dec. 2004 and I am still dealing with Liberty Mutual to get my house back to the way it was. They hired Full Service Restoration to rebuild my house and that company took the money and ran. The subcontractor working for Full Service contunited on my house working directly with Liberty Mutual, he got a permit but never had the codes dept. inspect the house and he never finished the job. I filed a complaint with the State of Tennessee Insurance Division(where I live) and the man there must be on the take with Liberty Murual and denided the complaint against the Insuance Company. I am still trying to get my house back together.
Posted by: dEBBIE | August 25, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
My father worked for an insurance company his whole life. They are told to minimize each claim as much as they can, basically paying out only pennies on the dollar. I know over the years it took a toll on him. Deep down he felt bad for basically short changing the policy holders. He advised me and my sister not to go into the insurance business, that it was a heartless profession.
Posted by: ChesterL | August 25, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
I see people making comments about Bush but I think insurance laws were wrote before he was able to walk. That same type of ignorance is the same reason insurance companies rip people off. If people would spend as much time researching their home owners policy as they do watching American Idol they would have bought flood insurance. You live near ocean
Maybe you should have spent the extra $600 a year for coverage.
Posted by: W Woodall | August 25, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Geee..I’m not surprised ..we called about our roof after Katrina..not a lot of damage,,,, We reside in Baton Rouge ….however they (SF) gave us names of 3 roofers..no luck.. after almost an entire year we found a roofer, called SF ,to tell them the roofer is here I told them how much they said Go ahead,,,,now they say ,,we aren’t paying,,,you didn’t get an estimate..gee Oh Bright one that works at my agents office at SF,that’s what I called into you!!! AND FAXED!!now they are saying I never called to file a claim! Funny We had a house full of people when I made the call..Oh and by the way we have been with the same agent for over 30 years,,did he ever call , come by HELL NO! he was to busy Golfing or out doing what ever he chose to do! We never heard from our agent on anything!!They take your money go to the Country Club & hang out with their Buds..I mean Friends
I thought it was SF job to take photos as well’! Thank God we did!
BTW..stop paying the blame game…..Now how about everyone getting a grasp of the corrupt Permit violations going on all about the Gulf Coast..mainly New Orleans! State Farm is there..laughing all the way to the BANK! yeah I see an Enron..not only with SF but with them all!
Posted by: RLH | August 25, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
I LIVE IN CA AND HAD STATE FARM. THEY WOULD INCREASE MY PREIUM EVERY YEAR. I DROP THEM LIKE A HOT POTATO AND SWITCHED TO AAA. I NOW PAY A 1/4 LESS THAN I WAS PAYING TO STATE FARM. INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY YOU SAY? WHAT ABOUT ALL THE INNOCENT PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN SCREWED BY STATE FARM?
Posted by: julie | August 25, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
I have been a State Farm Customer for 16 years. My experience is you get what you pay for. Since I pay for quality insurance, I get good quality service.
Why people find it so easy to blame others is beyond me. It doesn’t matter how much or how long you pay for your insurance, if you don’t have the right insurance when it’s needed.
Some of you are acting like State Farm is the reason LA still looks like it does. That’s not the truth, many of the people down there didn’t have any insurance at all. Who do you blame for that? Of course, that would be the government’s fault. We must all stand up and be responsible for our decisions.
Go ahead and drop your insurance, but with Hurricane season here, I’m glad State Farm is my neighbor.
Posted by: Dena | August 25, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Perhaps people should be required to pass an intelligence test before signing their insurance paperwork. If they can’t comprehend what is and isn’t insured by the carrier, then they should not purchase that carrier’s insurance. Perhaps people should be required to write on a slip of paper 100 times, “I’m not covered for flood damage”, so they might possibly understand what is covered. Stupidity is rampant! I also think a property should only be allowed to be “totalled” once or twice before it should no longer qualify for insurance coverage. If you build and then rebuild several times in an area prone to floods then you should learn the first time.
Posted by: Living In NH | August 25, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
I think the issue that needs to be addressed long term is the way the policies are marketed and sold.. There needs to be a nice easy to read summary of cover to be signed as understood before any premium is collected. I blame the closure of the good old local insurance broker offices where we could go ask questions and get 1 to 1 service. Damm telephone marketing and the internet.
Posted by: Juka K | August 25, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Don’t jump to conclusions. If these women are telling the truth (if), then it sounds like there were some EMPLOYEES of State Farm that committed malfeasance. It doesn’t mean that State Farm is corrupt, I know them to be generally a decent company.
Posted by: joey | August 25, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
I too am a trial lawyer in NY. This type of BS happens every single day with every insurance company. They can not be trusted at any level. You will never, ever get what you deserve from these frauds. You want to know where your premiums go? They go to politicians and lobby groups to push for insurance friendly laws that keep this racket up. State Farm is not even the worst. What these women say is, without a doubt, not only true, but only the tip of the iceberg.
Posted by: Lefty | August 25, 2006, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Whoa there. Maybe these two are telling the truth. Then again, did it ever dawn on anyone that it is also possible that the company’s actions were appropriate, and that these two have some issue with the companny and are trying to get back at them. Shouldn’t we get all the facts before jumping to a conclusion? And no, I don’t have an interest in State Farm or any other insurance company.
Posted by: Not Biased | August 25, 2006, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
I’m sure few of you will care, but most of State Farm is a “mutual” insurance company, meaning that it mostly owned by its customers. So what’s their motivation not to pay?
I didn’t check poster Rob’s numbers, but a $3.25 billion profit on $60 billion is 5.4%.
Every healthy company needs to grow, and for a mutual that can’t issue stock, then the only source is profit. And I’d suggest that 5.4% is not very big, is it?
Posted by: Uncle Fester | August 25, 2006, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
This will never get rectified because the Bush Administration is all about big corporations and these big corporations fund the republican party. Oil Companies, Insurance Companies, it’s all relative. A judge recently through out a law suit against a big insurance company regarding Katrina and the same thing will happen here; it will get swept under a rug by some Judge and all these poor people will continue to suffer. What a shame!!! I’m ashamed of our Government and all of the Insurance Companies and they will all answer for their misdeeds!
Posted by: Robin | August 25, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
There are always two sides to the story.
These adjusters have worked exclusively with SF for 8 years. Did they just start going bad now? Also, could it be that these independant adjusters are trying to get SF to cover losses that they shouldn’t cover? After all, public adjusters and contractors have been know to “pad the bill” when it comes to insurance companies. Also, almostr every homeowner hit by Katrina had the option to buy flood insurance. The ones that did are not complaining. The ones that did not are bitching about what the insurance companies, FEMA, the media, their neighbors etc are not doing for them. What about PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY? Oh yeah, this is America, the land of the free lunch.
Posted by: Walter | August 25, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Most of the big insurance companies paid off a long time ago but those were the companies that charged more $$$$ for a policy. Ya get you pay for and if you want the low ball rate…..don’t expect premium service.
I never ever go with the lowest insurance company and therefore, when a tree falls on my house, the insurance company sends a check for the estimate I send them. No questions, quick and fair. And yes a tree did fall on my house last spring.
Posted by: Joseph | August 25, 2006, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
If the accusations are proven true I hope State Farm, or all insurance companies for that matter are held accountable. My cousin in Waveland, Miss. lost everything, their house totally destroyed. They had full coverage homeowners insurance, and flood insurance as well. If their house had been completely destroyed in a fire, then there is little doubt about what amount the insurance company would pay for the claim. However, given the way things seem to work after Katrina, when the amount the homeowner’s policy payment combined with the flood insurance payment, doesn’t add up to what the house was insured for, then something is WRONG. To me, if you have full homeowner coverage and flood insurance there should be NO EXCUSE for insurance companies not paying to rebuild the house. I would appreciate if someone could explain to me where I am wrong about this !!!
Posted by: Darrell | August 25, 2006, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
The person who said we have to get Democrats in the House & Legislature, and get a Democrat into the White House was right on. Republicans are nothing but friends of big business, insurance, oil, drug companies, etc. etc.. That’s why the healthcare system will never see reform in this country, not under a republican controlled government. The little guy is just sc___ed! When you have to hire attorneys to get what you deserve and then give them 30% of what you were entitled to, and it takes 6-8 months. By then you could’ve lost everything you have left. Just as Barb ^ said the fat cat politicians have to much to loose if they stand up for the average joe all we have to offer is our vote. And this “family values” issue thats such a big part of campaigns now has scared too many Democrats to the other side. They are convinced that Democrats want to erode our values, if what goes on in Washington these days has any moral value in it show me. When laws are passed that require you to purchase a product (ie; car insurance) that you are afraid to use for fear of higher premiums or being dropped and categorized as high risk. It’s a sad time in our country and government has to get back to focusing on the average american, and not the interest of big business.
Posted by: Deb | August 25, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Werent these 2 sisters fired by State Farm for trying to embezzle money and short pay claimants and pocket the difference?
Seems there are 2 sides to every story……..
Posted by: Krash | August 25, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
New Orleans is below sea level, and if your policy doesn’t cover flooding, whose fault is that? You people are ridiculous, I feel no pity for them or their losses.
Posted by: GT | August 25, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Sure you can evacuate your home, but you can’t take your home with you. It stays there to bear the brunt of the storm and destruction. The people that are getting screwed by the insurance have my heart. State Farm screwed me on hail damage on my car, I can just imagine what these hard hit families are going through – you’re all in my thoughts and prayers – God Bless!!
Posted by: Shannon | August 25, 2006, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Most of you people complaining about your insurance not covering something ought to read your policy. St Farm does deny claims that are covered. If you can’t understand that then get a lawyer. Spend your money to find out they are correct. And if you want a policy that covers anything and everything then you will have to pay for through the nose for it and I guarantee you won’t do it.
Posted by: Drew | August 25, 2006, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
I LIVE IN CA AND HAD AAA. THEY WOULD INCREASE MY PREIUM EVERY YEAR. I DROP THEM LIKE A HOT POTATO AND SWITCHED TO STATE FARM. I NOW PAY A 1/4 LESS THAN I WAS PAYING TO STATE FARM. INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY YOU SAY? WHAT ABOUT ALL THE INNOCENT PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN SCREWED BY AAA?
Posted by: chris | August 25, 2006, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Yep,
The insurance business is so corrupt that there probably is not much more room for any more corruption, but
they are not all crooks. I work with State Farm agents who are good people. I did have a State Farm agent before though who was a jerk. The system does not work. Michael Moore has an upcoming film about big pharma and the health care industry called “sicko”. I highly recommend and hope that he or other people do one on the insurance system which, from the start, is very prone to mega corruption. If we can go after all of the snakes in the government, IRS(all snakes), big pharma/health care, insurance system and send them packing like St. Patrick did in Ireland, all we will have left is the lawyers!! We can do it! Hooray!
Posted by: Michael | August 25, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
If St Farm was really mistreating so many people they wouldn’t be the world’s largest insurance company and insure twice as many homes as the number two insurer, Allstate.
Posted by: Wylie | August 25, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Once again, the media is using the herd mentality of public ignorance to gain the headline spotlight. Obviously this is the case with the pre-judgmental comments. I would expect this during the late 1700′s to early 1800′s because lack of education, but seems some things never change it this day in age.
Posted by: Rob | August 25, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Give me, give me, give me. I am owed and I want it now. I take no responsiblity for my actions and I want to balme everyone else but myself. Sure I didn’t review or read my policy coverages, and I did not ask any questions either. I also declined the flood coverage, why pay extra when you don’t have too. Why spend time on understanding my insurance coverage when I have more important things to do like go to dinner or watch a movie. Remember the American dream, get something for nothing, take no responsibiliy and take all you can. Now that’s the America I know.
Posted by: I want something for NOTHING | August 25, 2006, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
I have to agree with everyone else: Shame on State Farm! However, as much as I hate to say this: As consumers we are not wise enough to ask the right questions and/or do not have the time or the right educational degree to read the fine lines (often very small!)! After experiencing flooding here in central New York I decided to review my policies with my agent (of which I happy to say I am NOT with State Farm!). What a suprise! I found out a lot since that dreadful day. Every time I came up with a question I either call or email my agent (whether they are stupid questions or not!). There are days I must have annoyed the heck out of him however I am spending my hard earned money and I want to know what I am buying. It also helps to find an agent who has the knowledge to answer your questions and is also looking out for you as a consumer (which in this day in age can be difficult).Unfortunately, for some, the important questions came after the disaster. It would seem if the insurance companies would take a few minutes and analyze the situation: If they pay up accordingly and get their policy holders back on their feet quickly, will they not get their money back just as quickly when everyone is able to go back to work so they can start paying the premiums that much faster? Am I missing something? Hmmmm…..
Posted by: Anonymous 2 | August 25, 2006, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Quit crying people, you either had flood Ins. or you didn’t. I live in Florida and have been hit by hurricanes (five in one year)State Farm paid off, no problems. You cain’t get people to do anything for themselves. They tell you to have supplies for at least three days. People want do it, they want the government to do it for them.I have supplies for at least a week. Come on people get off your a–.People want to live ten feet from the water, then when a hurricane hits they start to cry. If you live on the water you better have flood Ins.so you can build back in the same spot and cry again next year. It’s time people take a little personal responsibility and quit waiting for the Govt.to fry you an egg for breakfast. Some people on the coast were crying the very next day after the storm because the cammode didn’t work. Get a life and read your policy.
Posted by: chuck hall | August 25, 2006, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
I love State Farm. First let me say neither I nor anyone in my home works for State Farm or have worked for State Farm in the past but I am a loyal customer going on 10 years now. I live in Kansas and in May 2003, my home was leveled by a tornado along with most of the town and surrounding community. State Farm adjustor was on sight the next morning and payment on claim was exactly as expected and without any hassle as well as reimbursement for subsistence until alternate housing could be found. Two years prior to that, an uninsured motorist ran a red light and hit me. I couldn’t have asked for more compassion and care from an agent from any company as my auto claim was being handled. So those of you who are going to cancel policies based on this story are being premature without having the whole story and real proof of wrong doing. If all the Katrina stories are to be believed, more fraud had been committed by individuals claiming to be storm victims than by corporate America.
Posted by: Pamela K | August 25, 2006, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Does anyone ever wonder why whistleblowers think the company is doing so bad and how they unfairly treat customers, yet they don’t have a problem continuing to work there and collect a paycheck themselves????????????????
Posted by: DJ | August 25, 2006, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
As a former Examiner/Adjuster, my job was to find ways to not pay claims. Insurance Co.’s are holding company’s, meaning, they have all your money invested in the markets and they do not want to cash in those long term Bonds they have or take penalties for selling stocks to pay for your claims. It is sad, HOWEVER, they are a all a LICENSE TO STEAL, is all they have. Unfortunately, we have to have them for auto, home and health. It is now becomnig almost a disgrace to be and American, Honesty, so many thieves and legal ways to rob you blind……
Posted by: LWF | August 25, 2006, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
In order to be a whistleblower, you have to actually work for the company or udnerstand how it works inside. These sisters (even though they are wearing stolen SF jackets in the video) are neither. Hey – I could claim ABC purposly lies to the audience because I watch the news. I must be a whistlblower.
Posted by: chris | August 25, 2006, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
You folks amaze me. I cannot believe you are so gulible to believe the headlines. “State Farm cheated so now I’m cancelling my policies, I know they did it because the news says they did”. What type of person believes only one side of the story. Probably the kind that is sitting around eating Cheetos and can’t get off the couch or computer long enough to do anything contructive.
The real criminals here are Brian Ross and ABC. Why don’t they wait until things are proven until they report only have the story? Why don’t they find some of the stories from people who had coverage and the insurance companies took care of them and report on them.
I’ll make a prediction, you will never here about this again after it aires. Here is why, because it is not true and ABC will not aire a follow up report when State Farm is found to have done nothing wrong and these sister’s are proven to be a hoax.
A special truck was brought in to shread key documents……please folks, put the cheetos down, get off the couch and get a life. Everything you hear is not true, especially if it comes from the press.
Posted by: Chris Johnson | August 25, 2006, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
I have worked for State Farm since 1994 and was a Catastrophe Adjustor for 5 years. As per State Farm policy, I paid every single claim that I owed and then was told to pay some that were probably not owed. Our policy is always to give the benefit of the doubt to the policyholder. The only claims that were denied were the ones that we obviously didn’t owe – losses that were either excluded under the terms of the policy or were fradulent. The ones that were denied required more paperwork and documentation than the ones that were paid. We made sure that we were 100% in our right to deny or we would not do so.
I worked with many independent adjustors at Catastrophe sites. 95% of them were wonderful people and excellent at what they did. The other 5% were there to get paid. The way State Farm pays independents is they get a set fee for each inspection that they perform and then a percentage of the damage estimate that they write. As a result, they prefer writing big losses because it means more money for them. If they go out and there is no covered damage, they get only their inspection fee. I’m not drawing any conclusions about these sisters based on the above. However, adjustors (be they State Farm or independent) simply don’t have the access to the information that they profess to have. They would be out in the field 99% of the time and would only go to the Cat office to turn in their files.
I did not work on Katrina but company policy prior to that hurricane was that a State Farm adjustor worked with engineers on structural claims. Independents never did. That might have changed because of the amount of personnel required for this hurricane but I certainly didn’t hear about it.
Anyway, both parties will get their day in court, which is how it should be. The ABC news piece will be a hatchet job against State Farm, but we’re used to it. We will win the lawsuit not because of our “army” of lawyers but because State Farm follows the rules; to not do so could cost us billions of dollars in court.
Finally, as has been previously stated, State Farm is a Mutual Insurance Company. That means that we are owned by our policyholders, not by stockholders. We have no duty to anyone to make a profit – we only need to make sure we have enough financial stability to weather disaters like Katrina.
Posted by: John W | August 25, 2006, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
I used to think the scariest thing about the internet were scam artists and child predators. After reading these posted comments I’m changing my mind. It pretty scary to see how many morons there are in this country. A news organization posts a story by two people, and wham, an entire industry and everyone who has ever worked in it becomes the devil. These people had best hope that if they ever find themselves in front of jury, it’s a jury of their peers.
Thanks to those few lucid people, especially those who actually have experience in the business, for your insight. Your calm, unemotional, exploration of the situation helps one to see both sides of the story. I have not made up my mind yet. I’d prefer to hear a few facts before I jump off the cliff and tell my friends and family the sky is falling.
Posted by: ty | August 25, 2006, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
As a state farm agent myself i am amused at the lack of knowledge most people have that are posting here. First of all its unlikely 2 sisters would work the same claim area as independent adjustors. When i consulted the State Farm directory it shows one of the 2 sisters as an external employee. more than likely that explains why only one has a State Farm jacket on.
As an agent we counsel every person on the need for adequate insurance coverage in case of a claim situation. Most people only want the minimum they can get by with. They may have a $200,000 home but only want to cover $130,000 because that is all they owe. Then a fire may come along and total the house. You guessed it! They want us to pay $200,000 despite the fact that they only paid for $130,000. Then we are the crooks for not paying them $200,000 they feel they are entitled to receive. Much the same as in the case of the unfortunate hurricanes. It was amazing the number of people that lined up outside my Texas office to collect a check. Several didnt have flood policies since it wasnt a requirement to have one in their particular area. They would say it wasnt worth the money. Yet, they expected State Farm to give them money anyway on their homeowners policy which excludes natural rising water. Yet once again we are to blame for their lack of proper coverage due to not wanting to spend the money, etc.
Before you cast stones and believe a story that is more than likely due to the sister or sisters being disgruntled, know all the facts. These 2 (if there are 2) obviously had to come on as independents and were not eligible to work as regular State Farm employees and are not happy about that.
As for shredding papers…..dont all corporations shred sensitive documents that contain social security numbers, drivers license numbers, addresses, phone numbers, etc? If we didnt shred them then you would attack for the lack of discretion. Tell us where we win that battle and what you would rather us do.
Grow up people.
Posted by: Scott | August 25, 2006, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
After Ivan, we all had to deal with the same thing. And not just from State Farm.
To the outraged insurance peddler who types in all caps: the issue here isn’t getting paid-out for coverage we haven’t purchased, it’s being denied a settlement for covered damages.
Just because floodwater touches something does not mean its loss isn’t covered, and you know this. Take my parents’ neighborhood in Biloxi. 20 feet of water: unbelieveable. The various insurance companies, of course, denied most people any settlement. But the neighborhood was trashed by Cat 3 wind *before* the water rose. Many homes were eligible, having suffered grevious wind damage prior to being flooded.
When confronted with physical evidence and sworn eyewitness testimony, the insurance companies started paying out. And rightly so. But they would have held their money if they could.
Posted by: Gunter | August 25, 2006, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Pretty poor article and even sadder comments. Not one person has said what is really going on–in most cases, this is State Farm shifting their costs to the AMERICAN TAXPAYER, not sticking to the policy holder. Flood insurance, which most people in the area have, pays whatever the insurance company doesn’t. So if SF can convert wind damage to flood damage, the federal government just ponies up the rest. FEMA is far too incompotent to figure out the real extent of flood damage. Usually, the customer doesn’t care as long as someone pays, even if it is the taxpayer.
Posted by: Tim | August 25, 2006, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
I live in San Francisco and own a house. My current homeowner’s policy with Allstate does not cover damage caused by earthquake. I can buy a separate policy to cover earthquake damage, but in this area it is ridiculously expensive. I decided to take my chances.
*
Now, if the Big one happens and my house is damaged, do I blame Allstate for being crooks and not paying me for the damage I always knew wasn’t covered? Reading from the prior comments it appears that I should…
Posted by: Tony | August 25, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
I can’t believe that I just read all of these posts.More than half the people in this country really are idiots.Where do people think all these billions of $$ come from?If people who build their houses in areas that flood and are prone to hurricane damage don,t pay for the coverage,what do they expect.P.S.I don’t blame Bush.I think Wal-Mart should pay for it all.
Posted by: Mike | August 25, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
“What a bunch of morons. Read your insurance policy! Most people buy the cheapest insurance they can possibly get, then wonder why nothing is covered. If ANYTHING happened to my house it would be covered…you know why? Because I have chosen to pay for the coverage. All you intellectual midgets ranting about all insurance companies being crooks are not only uninformed, but probably the same people who try to rip off their insurance company every chance they get. In huge companies, there often are bad apples. If that is the case I hope they are punished. But…I have seven policies with State Farm, and I am not cancelling any of them. They have been very good to me over the years, because I know my coverage.
Posted by: Alex | Aug 25, 2006 2:20:16 PM”
I feel this needs to be posted again as it pretty much sums it up for me as well.
Posted by: AH | August 25, 2006, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
There is always two sides to every story. ABC prides itself on just showing one side. Fair and balanced would mean no story. Bottom line is without State Farm and the amount they paid out in New Orleans the city would not have recovered. Look at the statistics people.
Posted by: Kevin | August 25, 2006, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
If you want to see a example of what the claims adjusters are like jest go and look at the forums for CLETUS the adjuster these people are who are doing your insurance claims!
Posted by: Roger Poe | August 25, 2006, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
It doesn’t surprise me in the least. I worked for State Farm for 17 years. In the past 8 or so years, they have done a complete turnaround – executives still getting huge bonuses while the company is losing money, downsizing extensively to cut costs, treating employees like crap and eliminating more and more of their benefits, DUIs in company cars that they have tried to cover up, etc.
Posted by: Anonymous | August 25, 2006, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Does someone actually believe that a State Farm supervisor would tell an engineer that he better change his report if he wants to get paid IN FRONT OF WHOEVER HAPPENS TO BE AROUND? think about it already.
Posted by: bill | August 25, 2006, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
I have had State Farm for 34 years and have had the best of service. That is why I decided to work for a State Farm agent. It is a reputable company and I don’t believe any of the garbage that is being said. People don’t look at their policies to see what it covers and don’t really care until it is time to file a claim. Then when the claim is not covered, they start complaining.
Too many people seem to have selective memory. They tell you to cancel certain coverages on their policies to save money, then they need the coverage and are adamant that they didn’t cancel it.
To all of those that are considering canceling their insurance with State Farm, I wouldn’t jump ship just yet. You may be jumping from the frying pan into the fire. I have had to deal with other insurance companies regarding personal claims and they are much worse than State Farm could ever be.
You can always check JD Powers to find out which is the best company. Do your homeowork and there should be no surprises when disaster strikes.
Posted by: Patricia | August 25, 2006, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
If State Farm was fraudulent with Katrina claims they should be made to pay up and heavily fined. It’s sad to hear about the fraud — I used State Farm for years and they were always very generous with my claims — both auto and homeowners. They paid almost $80,000. to practically rebuild my house after I made a mold claim in Texas in 2001.
Posted by: Macie | August 25, 2006, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
WAHHHH…the government won’t rebuild my house for me. WAHHHH…my insurance policy, which specifically doesn’t cover flooding, won’t pay for the FLOODING to my house.
This is what you get when personal responsibility goes out the window and the entitlement mentality sets in. Liberals have been in control of that state for alomst 1/2 a century and, shockingly enough, we now find that the entire local political system is clueless and corrupt and LA’s citizens think the federal government is some sort of surrogate parent for them. With 50 years of liberal control, shouldn’t LA be a socialist utopia by now? WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!! YOU are responsible for YOU, no one else is. Not the governement, not the insurance company, not the tax payers of the rest of the country. Just you. The rest of the citizens of this country are happy to lend a helping hand to get you back on your feet, but you have to make the decision to stand on those feet by yourself.
Posted by: Matt | August 25, 2006, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Always looking for a silver lining, maybe in this case people will hear about it from coast to coast and cause consumers to wake up to the choices they have in purchasing insurance. Wouldn’t it be great if State Farm lost enough premiums to the competition to put them out of their crooked business?
I’ve lived in FL and though fortunately never had a complete loss of property, my insurance company came, inspected, and wrote a check on the spot. No questions asked. That’s what you are paying for!!
Posted by: kasha | August 25, 2006, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
ABS (Always Biased Slant)
Posted by: Kevin | August 25, 2006, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Bush knew from watching the same weather channel we were watching that Katrina would strike New Orleans three days in advance and didn’t do anything about it. He should be impeached for letting this happen to them poor old black folks down in the Ninth Ward. He knew they didn’t have a car or bus fare to get out of town on and didn’t do nothing about that either.
Posted by: Paul | August 25, 2006, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
ABC stands for “Always Biased Coverage”
Posted by: Rat | August 25, 2006, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
I was a hurricane victim in South Florida from Wilma who received major damage to both a new van $2500+ and my home $78,000+, State Farm treated me very fairly and did the same for my neighbors.
Posted by: Duane | August 25, 2006, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Cry me river, build your house in hole on the Gulf then belly ache when the damage is denied due to flood. The only policy that covers flood is a goverment flood policy. If they were all too cheap to buy one then to bad. Insurance is not a bank account they dont “owe” you. If you want paid back, get a savings account.
Here is a good idea, lets let the goverment run the insurance industry. They can do a better job. Everyone should have access to free auto and home insurance! It is our God given right as americans.
Posted by: Sparky | August 25, 2006, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
My wife works homeowner claims for State Farm and she has never told me a story where she has been ordered to falsify anything. They (State Farm) pay what they owe and nothing more.
I will be keeping my State Farm Insurance. I feel badly for those who will cancel their State Farm policies based on what they think happened. From what my wife tells me, State Farm always has an increase in business after a disaster. What does that tell you about their claim service?
As for the two sisters… Isn’t it obvious they have their own agenda?
Posted by: TP | August 25, 2006, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
If it’s proved that State Farm did what is alleged, then they should pay dearly. That said, all these people saying they got screwed probably should have read their policies in their entirety before signing on with any insurance company. When you buy a homeowner’s policy, it generally doesn’t cover flooding. If available, flood insurance would be extra. Had these people insured their homes for flooding, they likely would have been compensated. Like any other corporation, insurers must comply with laws but are still going to try to maximize their profits. I won’t even address why in God’s name people would live in a city that is a) surrounded by water and b) lies below sea level. Yes, New Orleans is beautiful, etc. If I ever lived there, I’d make sure my home was above sea level.
Posted by: Bill H. | August 25, 2006, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
An Insurance policy is basically a contract. Everything is in black and white. If they are not living up to the contracts they have with policy holders, they will be held accountable. Otherwise, they have done nothing wrong. So far,we have two people, of unknown character and motive, condmening an entire company, accusing them of a systematic plot that would involve the colusion of 100′s and 100′s of State Farm workers and Agents. If something truly crooked is going on, then more than these 2 non-employee women will come out with it, and the truth will come out. For the record, I have State Farm insurance, and while it is pricey, they have never balked at a claim I’ve made with my auto insurance. I have less faith in the cheap-o on-line companies like a Progressive or Geico.
Posted by: Bob | August 25, 2006, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
what i hate most is seeing that people are denouncing and telling people to boycott and cancel their state farm policies. i work for an agent who if he thought that a claim had merit he would fight it tooth and nail to get you paid. we had a storm here in missouri in march where an insured’s telephone poles were blown down and needed to be replaced. he forgot to right them in the policy and they were not going to be covered he offered to pay for them out of his own pocket. and that wasn’t going to be cheap either. think about the people like that who are really looking out for you before you do something crazy.
Posted by: jim | August 25, 2006, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
When my home burned down, we were devastated. State Farm offered immediate cash for expenses and eventually settled for all the money. They put my family up in a rental while we finished up a new home. The Agent was courteous and the adjuster was fair.
Years later my sump overflowed and the basement flooded. I didn’t think we were covered but State Farm paid for the clean up and carpet replacement. Later I did get a notice that basement flood damage would no longer be covered.
My point is that any insurance company lives by the reputation of claim experience of the public. Certainly it is understandable that all insurers in the Gulf region are battle weary after the past few years of storm activity. After years of paying out high claim volumes it seems natural that they would be careful to not pay when the policy indicates otherwise, during high claim years.
There may be some cheats in the company but using a broad brush to paint the industry as evil by nature is a low class thing to do. There is a much greater likelihood that the policy holders would try to cheat the ins. company than the other way around.
Then you have the hundreds of millions of dollars that has apparently vanished from the region over the years after local politicians were paid by the federal govt. to distribute to people in need. The Gulf Region is a swamp with Casino’s. Every storm that goes through represents a gravy train for a certain element that profits on misery. The Insurance companies have to sort this mess out every year and try to stay solvent for the small home owner. It’s a tough job.
Posted by: Eric Hanner | August 25, 2006, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
I have been a SF agent for 38 years, I have traveled over 40 times, each trips value was added to my income and I paid taxes on the total cost. I am sure there is some truth and some falsehoods to every story. Ask Trent Lott, he has to know both sides and how to use them. Ask the Mayor of N.O. about the unused school buses in the parking lots getting flooded and the people waiting to be rescued, couldn’t use city employees? I’ll never forget that sight. Don
Posted by: donald koenig | August 25, 2006, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
This is so typical. Why do people believe the worst. State Farm surely did not become the largest insurer of homes in America by not paying claims. I switched to State Farm 28 years ago, I saved money on my premium . They have paid every claim I ever had and the agent always calls and asks if there is anything I want to review. These woman are the only one’s to come forward how interesting.
Posted by: chuck | August 25, 2006, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
The definition of insurance is the premiums of many to pay for the claims of a few. And it’s to put you back where you were, NOT to make you better than you were.
People, do you realize that if insurance companies were forced to shoulder all the claims, that YOUR insurance, as well as theirs, would be more expensive than any of us could afford?
I’ve worked for State Farm for 14 years. We’ve always been told to find the coverage, give the benefit of the doubt.
You have to take responsibility for yourselves. READ the policy you are buying, KNOW what is covered and what isn’t. ASK questions. I’m sure some of these people asked if they HAD to have flood insurance, NOT if the NEEDED it. Obviously, if you’re near a body of water, you need it, but unless a mortgage company requires it, you don’t HAVE to have it. People always want the cheapest way out.
I don’t believe these girls. There’s more to the story. And I can guarantee you that when their accusations are proven unfounded, ABC won’t have a segment on that.
Posted by: Lisa | August 25, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
My brother lives on Lake Pontchatrain in Slidell, LA and the bottom story of his house flooded and his sailboat sank. He was heavily insured for flood and insurance paid for the house to be rebuilt and boat replaced replaced. replaced.
Posted by: vicki | August 25, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
A Homeowners policy cannot pay for damage by water. A Flood policy is needed. It’s Simple. People just did not have the protection that they thought they did. This is not the insurance companies fault. Every policyholder is delivered a policy which makes it very clear that there is no protection from things like flood, earth movement, landslide etc.
As for these two making these allegations, If it is true, it disgusts me, and I agree that action should be taken. On the other hand, I know of THOUSANDS of happy State Farm customers who had claims and been totally satisfied. Just a little reality.
Posted by: JC | August 25, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
I have always been a little synical. Why does anyone not question the motive of the sisters? Everyone assumes that they are telling the truth? Does anyone remember the person who claimed that a finger was found in there Chili at Wendy’s. It was financially devastating for the company. But what happened to the whistle blower? Probably nothing, nobody card once the allegations were unfounded!
I see a book deal in the future, talk show appearances and lawsuit for working in a harsh environment.
I think it would be prudent to with hold judgement until we find out what the motive of these two sisters really is! Were they not paid for overtime or travel expenses? If it was such a bad company why did they work there for 8 years?
Food for thought!
Posted by: Jeff | August 25, 2006, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
I think many of you who are blaming the homeowners for not getting flood insurance are missing the central arguement, which has now been heard by the courts. The insurance companies, State Farm included, are claiming that damage done by high winds and/or storms was done by flood water. The homeowners are claiming that the hurricane winds caused much of the damage, and that the wind caused the water to rise – meaning that the winds, not the water, are the root cause of the damage. The insurance company attorneys are doing what attorneys get paid very well to do – playing fast and loose with definitions and language.
For those of you who are screaming that the liberal media is already condemning State Farm, I would suggest you actually WATCH the program tonight before jumping to conclusions as you’re accusing ABC of doing.
Posted by: jb | August 25, 2006, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Are you people stupid??
It does not matter whose good “hands” you’re in nor what kind of “neighbor” your insurance company wants you to think.
These are corporations and their primary goal is to extract the maximum amount of money possible.
Your local agent a great guy or woman? Read and understand all aspects of your policy.
Posted by: Tupac Goldstein | August 25, 2006, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
To Robert who says President Bush is to blame for everything in the United States. I guess we can blame the hurricane on him also. Gee he IS powerful!
Posted by: Sam | August 25, 2006, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
I am an independent adjuster that worked State Farm Claims for the hurricanes of 2004. In every instance where wind damage was questionable, we were told to find a way to pay the claim. Just because these 2 independent’s claim they have something doesn’t mean that their interpretation of it is the correct one. Most people do not read their policy and endorsements. Flood is a separate issure that most people neglect and when the *** hits the fan they cry that they weren’t covered. The State Farm I worked for dealt more than fairly with their claim holders. The same couldn’t be said for some of these folks who thought that the hurricanes were like hitting the lottery. Everbody had Omaha steaks that were lost and all sorts of things that they couldn’t document were “blown away”. We paid them anyway,so please do not convict the company without knowing all the facts. For every whining post on this page there are hundreds that were satisfied with the way their claims were handled.
Posted by: Rick | August 25, 2006, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
What about the billions of dollars paid out by State Farm to their policyholders? What about the hundreds of thousands of satisfied customers? Did Brian Ross think to ever interview just one of these people? I am a very satisfied State Farm insured who has been paid very well for the few claims I had to file. Thank you State Farm from the bottom of my heart, and thank you State Farm for helping out so many of my friends and neighbors.
Posted by: John | August 25, 2006, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
If banks acted like insurance companies, when you asked for your money, they would first deny that you had an account; following that they would accuse you of fraudulently representing yourself as a depositor; then they would tell you that you did not need the money; when that didn’t work they would tell you they would tie your account up in litigation for years unless you settled for 1/3 of your account balance; and then, two years into a lawsuit, they would settle for 1/2 of what they owed you, but only if you agreed to a confidentiality clause.
Posted by: Lane Wharton | August 25, 2006, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
What greedy insurance companies!
Wait a second, State Farm is a mutual insurance company, which means it is owned by the policy holders. What would be the point of committing fraud and not paying what was due? There would be no point.
As a policy holder (and therefore owner) they have a responsibility to me to make sure they do not pay out claims for things that are not covered.
It would just be wrong for State Farm to pay out claims for uncovered damages. If it starts paying out claims for things that are not due, it won’t have the money to pay the legitimate claims that I might have in the future. I commend State Farm for being diligent with my premium dollars.
I suspect in this case we have a couple of adjusters, who had pity on some of these people who did not buy the correct coverage. They exaggerated the claim, and said wind caused some damage that flooding actually caused. When the management corrected there report, and enforced some guidelines, they went to the press.
Now we all feel sorry for the victims of Katrina, but there is a difference between a charity and an insurance company. I suspect these adjusters Sisters didn’t understand the difference.
Posted by: Tom | August 25, 2006, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
I’ve had many companies over the years and it wasn’t until State Farm took me that I really saw what a good neighbor they are. They have saved me several time both in premiums and when I’ve had a claim. You shouldn’t slam a company until you know what bad claims experiencethese people have had.
Posted by: Ed | August 25, 2006, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
All insurance companies are evil theives. We should line up 100 insurance company executives each day and blow their brains out until they get the message we are fed up with corporate America
Posted by: Fed Up With Corporate America | August 25, 2006, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
I have over 20 products with State Farm and have always been treated great. I wouldn’t consider going with any other carrier. If this was going on, then there are problems that need to be worked out. A lot of these people lost homes, but the insurance company is not responsible to replace their home if it was due to flood damage. Flood insurance is a federal program and no homeowners insurance company pays for flooding. Maybe all the facts should be consider before people start yelling “Hang the Bad corporation State Farm!!” I’ve always had top-notch service from State Farm (the best insurance company!)
Posted by: Brandon | August 25, 2006, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
After hearing all the testimony of former/current claim adjusters here on this thread, I’d like to point out a few distinctions between your sitiautions and Katrina. Firstly, as you are undoubtedly honest people serving honest people, you would recognize that the scope of Katrina and the potential disastrous effect the massive payouts would have on State Farm’s bottom line have to be considered. There is no doubt that such a catastrophe would force the higher-ups to go into evasive maneuvers, if only to forestall payments just a little. This isn’t just a fender-bender; it’s billions and billions going out quickly.
Secondly, I wonder if the insurance companies are counting on the federal or state government to pick up most the costs for reconstruction before they pay out on claims. I think they expected more participation on the part of government. Unfortunately, that did not occur.
Thirdly, it is reasonable to assume that insurance companies, who are in it for profit, would do what they had to do in order to keep those profits rising. It is also reasonable to assume that these insurance company execs, with high-paid lobbyists spreading money all over DC, don’t expect to ever feel the pinch of government oversight and legal action. They would do what they have to do to save the profit margins. It’s their job.
And to all those who cry about ‘personal responsibility’……What about the responsibility of the insurance companies to honestly inform their policy holders? Why does purchasing insurance have to become another case of ‘buyer beware?’
Posted by: Shlomo | August 25, 2006, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
If you live in a flood prone area, you must PURCHASE flood insurance. What are these people thinking? What is the real agenda of the two sisters? I have been insured by State Farm for 20 years and have had excellent claims service. Why would anyone live in a flood/hurricane area and not purchase FLOOD insurance from the FED Gov’t? Didn’t you see the TV ads???????????? Grow up and take responsibility please.
Posted by: Cary | August 25, 2006, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
What needs to be remembered here folks, is that there is a difference between Flood Waters and Wind Driven Water. If the Wind blows out your windows and drives large amounts of water (Rain) into your house, that’s wind damage. The water wouldn’t have been there without it. Seems like they were having the reports show flooding (Not covered) rather than wind (Covered). Not all or even most of the homes there were under any amount of water, lots of Wind damage, tho.
Posted by: Ray | August 25, 2006, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
If the allegations are true, then State Farm should be held responsible. But no one knows yet if they are, and the case shouldn’t be tried in the media. As an attorney, I have worked on both sides of insurance companies, and by far, State Farm and USAA are the best to deal with from either end. We had a claim from an ice storm in 2000 in East Texas, and if you ask most people there who had State Farm, they will tell you they had a good experience. Those who didn’t have State Farm wanted to switch because of the treatment they got from other companies. I am a plaintiff’s attorney and have no problem holding companies responsible when that is how it should be. I hate tort reform, and I am very familiar with Dicky Scruggs in Mississippi. But it is wrong to decide anything without all the facts. Even I am suspicious about the story these ladies are telling. If they are telling the truth, then they should be applauded. If not, they should have problems of their own. The courts need to decide this, not the media. And by the way, if all of you are so upset about this kind of situation, why do you keep putting the Republicans back in office? Think about it come November.
Posted by: Valerie | August 25, 2006, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
After receiving a private email and reading through these postings I feel the need to let you know that we did NOT live in a flood plain when the flood in Cheyenne occurred and because we are land-locked and rarely, if ever suffer from ANY kind of natural disaster, we had no reason to believe we would be hit by a freaky flood. Nobody advised us beforehand to buy flood insurance and we actually had NO idea such a thing even existed. Now… with all the flooding that has occurred since our tragedy, it’s become much more widely known. We had absolutely NO idea that we would need something more than our regular house insurance policy. And to everyone who thinks their insurance company is going to cover them after a natural disaster… I sincerely pray you never suffer through one… it’s a shock and a definite eye-opener and innocence killer.
Posted by: Debbie Walter-Holdridge | August 25, 2006, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
The insurance companies this and the insurance companies that…Wah, wah, wah.
There are thousands of insurance companies. Are we to believe they are all bad?
I don’t see these postings being much different than the blacks, jews or hispanics are all bad. Just a different scapegoat.
Posted by: jbar | August 25, 2006, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
To the dupe defending Bush, saying that he wasn’t responsible for the hurricane:
Bush wasn’t responsible for causing the hurricane, but he’s certainly responsible for the damage it caused, and here’s why– They’d known for quite awhile that those levees couldn’t take a big hurricane, but the funds that were to be spent making bigger levees were re-directed—can you guess WHERE those levee funds were re-directed? That’s right: IRAQ. That’s a cold hard fact. Look it up.
The U.S. can somehow afford to send billions of our taxpayer dollars to Israel to help THEM build huge walls, but when we need levees built in our OWN country, oh, well, then our politicians just can’t help us. There’s something very wrong with this picture, and anyone who busts their ass to pay taxes to this corrupt government should be VERY angry about it.
Posted by: The End | August 25, 2006, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Read your policy….
Posted by: G | August 25, 2006, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Seems a little fishy to me. I’ve had State Farm for over 15 years. My agent has always been terrific. Next thing you know, these so-called whistle blowers will be claiming they found a part of a finger in their renewal bill.
Posted by: Jim | August 25, 2006, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Here’s a thought: just rent instead and then you won’t have to worry about homeowner’s insurance.
Posted by: CP | August 25, 2006, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
After representing numerous insureds against State Farm for Rita claims, I must say I’m really not that surprised about this. However, I am surprised that Congress has time to spend weeks asking Major League Baseball playsers about using steroids but doesn’t have time to investigate these kinds of claims of fraud.
Posted by: Jody | August 25, 2006, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
With all due respect to all involved, I’m now waiting for the story about how the citizens ripped off the insurance companies. I can’t tell you how many of my friends down here in FL made claims for things that had nothing to do with the storm and pocketed the money. Fairs fair. Cheating is cheating and it goes both ways. Of course we are conditioned to believe that only eveil corporate giants do it and that it is ok for the little guy to get back at them , but we all end up paying in the end when people cheat. What’s the over/under on when ABC will run a story on the fraud perpetrated by policy holders?
Posted by: Matt | August 25, 2006, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Hey, jbar, since it’s Bush’s fault, what happened to all the money during the Clinton years that could have been used to shore up the levees? If you’re going to rant about things, at least be logical.
Posted by: Matt | August 25, 2006, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
If this turns out to be true I will drop SF like a hot rock.
In their defense my house burned in 1999. My agent came over imeadiatily when I called the next morning and we had a mostly trouble free claim. Most of the trouble was explaining why I had so many computers in the building. (I’m a tech)
I like in the rebuilt home to this day.
Why would anyone living on the east coast NOT have flood insurance? If you can’t aford it move away from the water. A little research and a modest knowledge of the world around you can save yourself
Posted by: Alex March | August 25, 2006, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
I don’t believe this for a second. I work for State Farm and KNOW they wouldn’t do anthing like this. Listen, people have just lost most, if not all, of everything they own. Who has been there? State Farm, that’s who. State Farm has been there for people when their policy covers their loss. You can’t name a company with a better track record than State Farm. Instead of going straight on the offensive and attacking State Farm, why don’t you all do some research and read a homeowner’s policy? It is all there in writing. It wouldn’t surprise me if someone is paying these two women a lot of money to lie about what they are saying.
Posted by: Tyson Mutrux | August 25, 2006, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Excuse me, for all of the people who have suffered you have my deepest sympathy. Did any of you live in a flood zone? Did any of you have flood insurance? Did any of you pay for coverage for the total value of your home or did you just get a little bit? How can you blame a company for your lack of insurance? Isn’t your job to protect your home any insure it correctly. I take responsibility for my actions and my home.
Posted by: Do not blame the insurance companies | August 25, 2006, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
I had auto insurance with State Farm for almost 20 years. About 10 yrs ago, I had a 2 yr old car totalled (it was hit by a drunk driver while parked on a busy street). I was treated like a QUEEN by State Farm. My car was demolished one week, and a week to the day after the accident happened, I had a brand new car!!! I’ve always had nothing but great things to say about State Farm, and if their rates were lower, I’d still be with them today!! As far as to whether they’re guilty or innocent of the horrible Katrina fiasco, what ever happened to the American way of
‘innocent until proven guilty’?? There are some horrible things being said here, and I for one know there are 2 sides to every story.
Posted by: Carole | August 25, 2006, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Where is Mr Incredible when we need him?
Posted by: Mr Incredible | August 25, 2006, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
We are facing massive cracks in our home due to extreme drought but no insurance will pay that – Doors won’t close. I know it’s not as major as a flood (have been hit by a tornado before), but I agree – insurance is like the electric companies – greedy pigs that should rot in hell!
Posted by: David | August 25, 2006, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Media Headline: Whistleblowers Claim Sky is Falling. Would you believe them? Of course not because you know better.
But when you don’t know something and someone with alleged inside knowledge claims something, you automatically believe it to be true. Educate yourselves!
When people or corporations do something wrong, of course they should be held accountable. Have you already sentenced them before you have heard both sides?
Posted by: Reason | August 25, 2006, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Schlomo, what makes you think we don’t inform the consumer about their policies? I’ve been an agent with SF for 14 years and I inform my clients of what they are buying and what it covers and doesn’t. And I am sure that agents in flood prone are DO tell their customers that flooding isn’t covered and encourage them to buy flood insurance and I bet most of them don’t want to pay the high premiums for it unless their mortgage company requires it.
Again, you have to read your policies and ask questions. Make sure you understand what you are getting before you hand over the money.
Posted by: Lisa | August 25, 2006, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
The only people I trust less than insurance companies are lawyers and the mainstream media-especially the “news magazines” with their breathless come-on commercials.
The lawyers are in it to extort money from the corporations. The media is in it to sell ad time on their fake, made up, news shows.
The people who lose will be the honest folk who find that they can’t get coverage AT ALL after these vultures are done with them.
If you are stupid enough to live in a flood plain or within 100 miles of the gulf coast and NOT HAVE FLOOD INSURANCE then you deserve what you get.
You should have left off the movie and porn channels on your DirecTV subscription and put the money into flood insurance instead.
Posted by: kgreg | August 25, 2006, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
The worst part of all this is that whoever pays, NO will be rebuilt just the way it was. The army Eng are already working on better Levees, STUPID! Lake Pontchatrain is 12-14 feet deep, they have to dredge it for ships to cross it. Start pumping the bottom out and spread it from Levee to Levee, fill it at least 10 above sea level, then fill in the Canals (They are there to DRAIN the rainwater) At least next time, NO flooding! While doing this the worn out Sewage and Water pipes could be replaced, Phone and Cable lines run underground, all at a cost of little more than what they will spend to set up for the next disaster.
Posted by: Ray | August 25, 2006, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
We should all be smart enough to know there are two sides to every story.
Interesting how well timed the allegations are to the anniversary….ratings.
Posted by: Chris | August 25, 2006, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Baaa!!! Baaa!!!! What a bunch of sheep! Let’s read what’s at best a 12 paragraph story detailing pretty much all speculation and hearsay and treat it as fact! Good Lord… READ your policies! ASK questions to make you sure have the correct coverage and what would be covered! At some point in this country, the consumer HAS to assume some responsibilty for their part! This is true not just with insurance but ANYTHING! This society has turned into a “poor me” and “it’s everyone’s fault but mine!” As far as shredding, PLEASE shred my documents! I want no one getting my personal information. Guess what? I’m willing to bet that anything they shredded they have copies of ELECTRONICALLY! What? They may be on the computers and stored elsewhere? What a concept! Baaa!! Baaa!!!
Posted by: No One Particular | August 25, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
This story is why we in the legal community refer to them as “Snake Farm”-we see this all the time….
Posted by: Scott Blair | August 25, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
In Texas , they are called Snake Farm for their behavior in the mold clean-up.
Posted by: Rick Ales | August 25, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
“FLOOD WATERS ARE EXCLUDED UNDER EVERY INSURANCE POLICY SOLD.”
THIS is the WHOLE issue – defining “flood”. For Mississippi’s coast it’s clear as day for me: 30 ft’ of salt water came in and rolled out in a matter of hours. You call that flood, I call you a crook. That’s STORM surge. S-T-O-R-M surge….
New Orlean’s situation is less black and white. 5-10 ft of standing water (sewer really) for 45+ days… You don’t just replace the carpets and sheetrock in those 80,000 homes (EIGHTY-THOUSAND), you bulldoze. But again, salt-water. From the sea salt-water. The sea that was pushed up 30 feet by the STORM.
Basically, insurance companies are telling us not to read too much into that word “storm” in “storm-surge”. We’re just stupid rednecks after all. Stupid enough to be paying them all these years!
For those not wanting to foot the bill: we don’t want your hand-outs either. How about the Fed Govt just give us the small fraction of oil revenue produceds by LA, which are given to EVERY OTHER oil-producing state/territory, and the converstaion is OVER. We’ll be rebuilt to Netherland standards in no time flat… Why doesn’t LA recieve any of this revenue that EVERY OTHER producing state gets? Because of a loophole caused by the Louisiana Purcahse centuries ago… Don’t for a second think the insurance companies stand alone with blood on their hands.
Posted by: NeverLeftLA | August 25, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Mr. Incredible, sorry to hear about the cracks from drought, but, is that really an insurable event?
I mean, don’t those appear kind of slowly? They don’t just happen like an earthquake, do they?
Wouldn’t it make sense to work with a foundation contractor before your house falls apart?
just curious.
By the way, my house needs painting and the toilet leaks and I can’t get State Farm to pay for that either.
Posted by: Greg | August 25, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Defending bush…
look it up it wasn’t bush who determined where federal appropriated monies go in Lousianna ask your fine democratic senators about this..and if you blame bush blame clinton bush sr reagan carter ford hell throw in johnson and kennedy too for not addressing a 40 year old problem….or maybe we should listen to mother nature this time and not re-build a city below sea level huh!!!!
Posted by: Mr Incredible | August 25, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
I’d like to see more information from the sisters and from the company before I point the finger at anyone. Nothing’s been proven yet, correct? And if people have a problem with their coverage limits, they should address those with the company before a disaster, but yet it always seems that following a disaster it’s someone elses fault. Where is the personal responsibility? People choose to live in the danger zones and choose not to buy adequate coverage to protect their assets, so why blame the insurance company? Read and understand your policy! These people can disagree if they like, heck they can even file suit if they so choose, but before you jump against State Farm and believe what these sisters say, I’d wait for the verdict from the judge/ courts or some conclusive evidence.
Posted by: Dave | Aug 25, 2006 1:14:00 PM
Yes we’re on pins and needles awaiting your decision. So, if it’s true, should they read and understand how their policy will be changed by a crook at the company? And I’m curious, where can I move where there is no nature? If it’s too risky to live in the world, State Farm shouldn’t sell insurance in it. Where is State Farm’s personal responsibility?
Posted by: steve | August 25, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Those that didn’t purchase the proper coverage and chose to live in flood prone areas sure are quick to point the finger! Take personal responsibility for your property and your DECISIONS. Spend your hard earned money wisely and invest a little time to review the coverage you purchased. No matter what insurance company you have, FLOOD is not covered. It might be a little odd that only 2 “adjusters”, and sisters at that, saw what they perceived as cheating. The catastrophe teams working that entire area consisted of thousands of adjusters. Let’s get the facts, not just the sensationalized story bits, before we pass judgement. Millions of State Farm customers have been satisfied I’m sure, along with Allstate, Nationwide and many smaller companies customers. Shame on americans who throw stones – take a look in the mirror!
Posted by: Insurance Consumer | August 25, 2006, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
I had auto insurance with State Farm for almost 20 years. About 10 yrs ago, I had a 2 yr old car totalled (it was hit by a drunk driver while parked on a busy street). I was treated like a QUEEN by State Farm. My car was demolished one week, and a week to the day after the accident happened, I had a brand new car!!! I’ve always had nothing but great things to say about State Farm, and if their rates were lower, I’d still be with them today!! As far as to whether they’re guilty or innocent of the horrible Katrina fiasco, what ever happened to the American way of
‘innocent until proven guilty’?? There are some horrible things being said here, and I for one know there are 2 sides to every story.
Posted by: Carole | Aug 25, 2006 4:45:38 PM
Plant.
Posted by: theurchin | August 25, 2006, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
I used to work at an Insurance company for 16 years. This does not suprise me at all. The thing to remember about an insurance company is that their first and most important goal is to make money for the shareholders. The shareholders keep expecting more profits and it has to come from somewhere. Where do you think it will come from?
Posted by: John Moyer | August 25, 2006, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Those that didn’t purchase the proper coverage and chose to live in flood prone areas sure are quick to point the finger! Take personal responsibility for your property and your DECISIONS. Spend your hard earned money wisely and invest a little time to review the coverage you purchased. No matter what insurance company you have, FLOOD is not covered. It might be a little odd that only 2 “adjusters”, and sisters at that, saw what they perceived as cheating. The catastrophe teams working that entire area consisted of thousands of adjusters. Let’s get the facts, not just the sensationalized story bits, before we pass judgement. Millions of State Farm customers have been satisfied I’m sure, along with Allstate, Nationwide and many smaller companies customers. Shame on americans who throw stones – take a look in the mirror!
Posted by: Insurance Consumer | Aug 25, 2006 4:54:08 PM
Corporate Shill. Yeah whistle blowers usually come out in droves. Everyone risks their jobs when something crooked is happening. Guess we don’t need those whistle blower protection laws any more. Thanks Insurance Consumer!
Posted by: dave | August 25, 2006, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Patpoms,
Excuse me but I’m having trouble following you. Where did it say the people impacted by Katrina are “idiots” or “stupid”? Shame on who? And who are you now suddenly calling an idiot?
Can you clarify?
Thanks,
Brett
Posted by: Brett | August 25, 2006, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
It’s amazing how some people will believe a couple of disgruntled employees over a company with 84 years of exemplary service to policyholders. Some people think that insurance is designed to cover any possible bad thing that can happen to you. Any such insurance policy would be way too expensive for 99% of us to afford. An insurance company is a business, so why would you expect them to pay for something that’s specifically excluded in the policy contract with the customer. If your cell phone company incurred higher than expected overhead and tried to bill you in excess of your contract rate, would you pay it? I don’t think so. Don’t expect an insurance company (or any business for that matter) to pay more than what they owe to anyone. To do so would be unfair to their other customers who would have to make up the difference in higher premiums.
Posted by: what-the | August 25, 2006, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
State Farm is evil, but is there a lesser of the evils? If I cancel my State Farm policy, can someone name a better option?
Posted by: Concerned | August 25, 2006, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
There are crooks and good people in this world. This story could be bunk and it could be real. Let’s not trash the insurance industry because of it!
Insurance companies need to make money (we call it capitalism), and sometimes rotten people work too. This is life folks, don’t rely too heavily on a corporation to bail you out and cometimes mean people have to work too!
Posted by: Jessica Robinson | August 25, 2006, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
These allegations are completely inconsistent with my experience with State Farm and as a customer for 25+ years. The company’s stated values and actual actions over many years do NOT match up with the claims of these two individuals.
There are a number of other, independent reasons to question the veracity of these allegations.
An investigation is needed BEFORE any ‘conclusions’ are reached.
The news media needs to devote increased attention to the critical need for both Flood insurance, and join the long-established NFIP/FEMA campaign to increase awareness of this vitally important coverage.
Posted by: Jon - A SF Customer | August 25, 2006, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
I live in MS and lived through Katrina. We have Alfa Insurance and our agent & adjustor was great. We had roof damage, trees & fences down, our hardwood floor was ruined because the wind drove in water under the door. About 10 days after the storm an adjustor came out, we had our check to cover everything a week later. We couldn’t be more pleased with our agent and Alfa. Now my neighbor down the street had State Farm. They had gaping holes in their roof. State Farm refused to pay, saying Katrina didn’t damage it. She couldn’t even talk about it without crying. They lived for about 6 months with tarps over the holes, rain pouring in the house with every storm. Eventually it was fixed, but my friend went through hell to have it done. I am not one to blame the government for all the problems in the country; I think that is stupid and self serving. I have absolutely no respect for slimeball lawyers like Dickie Scruggs, but in my friend’s case, she trully was screwed by State Farm. If what the Rigby sisters are saying can be proven true, then State Farm needs to be held accountable and then some.
Posted by: Christy | August 25, 2006, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
I noted a few rational sounding comments among all the liberal, corporate bashing, individuals who’s only thoughts are that big business and the Gov’t should take care of them. Grand Forks ND had a devestating flood but the TV “journalists” didn’t venture there because the residents rolled up their sleeves and went to work to rebuild their community rather than whine. When the victims of Katrina show some effort I will then have some sympathy
Posted by: tom | August 25, 2006, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Insurance companies lobbied heavily for tort reform so that those making claims will be deprived of full recovery and profits magnified. Maybe those terrible trial lawyers were right!
Posted by: Clem | August 25, 2006, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
This is typical behaviour for any insurer – they don’t make billions GIVING money out. The shareholders (oops, that’s most anyone with a mutual fund) would never stand for it.
Posted by: Bill | August 25, 2006, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
This is a true testament to the intellectual low this country has come to. You have two independent contractors (which by the way, have no access to managerial documents or even know hoot nor hell about the employer’s business practices) working with the dirtiest ambulance chaser in the South. Sounds similar to his tobacco case…”we’re too dumb to read the labeling that says “this product can cause cancer” to know we shouldn’t have started smoking in the first place, so we want you to pay for our stupidity and our medical expenses. Remember the old adage “Fool me once-shame on you. Fool me twice-shame on me.” This lunacy is the “twice,” and SHAME ON US for following the ambulance.
As to all the previous comments saying they’re taking their insurance elsewhere, go right ahead and leave. Let State Farm leave the Gulf Coast. Let all the other carriers follow suit. (And why not? State Farm is the largest in the business. You think if it leaves, everyone else isn’t going to get out of town too?) Let the states take over the insurance business, and let’s see how long it takes you to come crying back to insurance companies begging them to take you back. Ever dealt with the Department of Motor Vehicles? or the IRS? They are living monuments to ineptitude. And if you think those intenties are bad, wait for a government-run insurance policy! Nothing will be covered. Everything will have an extra cost. And the Titanic would have had a faster turn-around time when you have a claim!
In other words, you pay for what you get. People who insure half million dollar homes for less than half their value are fools. And then they want to blame everyone else but themselves for their own stupidity. Ever wonder how New Orleans managed to have so many homes burn to the ground after Katrina? (never mind the fact that the electricity wasn’t working, so there was no way it could’ve been an electrical problem.) They were intentionally burned because homeowners suddenly realized how much of a major screw-up they had committed by not buying flood insurance. Your home is your castle! Protect it, stupid! New Orleans is how many feet below sea level? They get a 3-inch rainstorm there and start freaking out about flooding. And you think wind caused all the damage? Did you happen to notice Oh-I-don’t-know THE TWENTY FOOT WALL OF WATER COMING YOUR WAY!?
Grow up, America! Quit blaming everyone else because you’re not happy with your life, overweight, and have an underinsured house and car. Look in the mirror and take responsibility for your own life!!
Posted by: Jay N | August 25, 2006, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
The degree of irresponsible reporting by Brian Ross is legendary. Yet, here we go again with a cadre of whiners believing his fraudulent insinuations of wrongdoing by State Farm.
Before this is over who knows what we’ll learn about these two so-called claim representatives. Are they beyond suspicion? A little balance here would be nice.
I can speak from first hand experience in dealing with State Farm for over 15 years as a contractor – 99.9% of the people are incredibly talented and dedicated towards fulfilling their primary role of acting in the best interest of the policyholders.
The only reason this is a big deal on this ABC website is due to the great success of State Farm – the envy of the industry.
It’s not greed at work here folks, and please do not impugn the 90 some odd thousand employees at State Farm across the U.S. and Canada based upon a highly suspicious rumor based story by Brian Ross. Good grief, it is just as easily pure unadulterated envy by those who would like to see a successful and incredibly important company be harmed and damaged.
Posted by: Bil Danielson | August 25, 2006, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
These people didn’t need flood insurance. Their houses were “flooded” by water that was caused by WIND, which homeowner policies cover.
From Merriamwebster.com:
hurricane
[1,noun]hurricane[2,adjective]
Main Entry: 1hur·ri·cane
Function: noun
Etymology: Spanish huracán, from Taino hurakán
1 : a tropical cyclone with winds of 74 miles (119 kilometers) per hour or greater that occurs especially in the western Atlantic, that is usually accompanied by rain, thunder, and lightning, and that sometimes moves into temperate latitudes — see BEAUFORT SCALE table
Posted by: MV | August 25, 2006, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
The American people are so quick to judge and lay blame on anyone except themselves. The people who constantly complain that they are being taken advantage of by State Farm need to reevaluate the situation and look at themselves. People need to read their insurance contracts and know what they are paying for. If someone lives in a flood prone area and does not have flood insurance, that is the individual’s fault for being ignorant. All of these people are just foolish and looking for a handout. They don’t pay for necessary coverages in their demographic area because they want a lower premium. It is not State Farm’s responsibility to pick up a tab for damage that the insured was to cheap to pay for. As for these two sisters, it seems like they just want media attention. Maybe the one woman should take off her State Farm jacket before bad mouthing the company that feeds her and pays for her lifestyle.
Posted by: Lindsay | August 25, 2006, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Don’t forget the thing driving water damage claims is people that by their own choice did not buy national flood insurance. There is a huge motivation for people to want their claim to be wind damage driven. If I were State Farm I would be very sceptical of claims that were written up as wind damage in areas where rising water was the real cause. Like Carol said, there are two sides to this story. The one thing you can bet on is that you won’t here both of them on the 20/20 story.
Posted by: Steven Dechain | August 25, 2006, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
The sad part of it is that we are obligated (by law) to get insurance in order to cover any losses that may occur if our property gets damaged, and then when something like this happens we end up losing everything anyway. So basically the laws make us throw our money away into this bottomless pit and we get nothing back out of it but grief, heartache, and higher insurance rates.
Posted by: Perry | August 25, 2006, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
There “by your side” when you are writing a cheek for your primemum; but when you need them its; didn’t you see the samll print, our escape hatch.
Posted by: BOB | August 25, 2006, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
I have been a State Farm Customer for 16 years. My experience is you get what you pay for. Since I pay for quality insurance, I get good quality service.
Go ahead and drop your insurance, but with Hurricane season here, I’m glad State Farm is my neighbor.
P.S. Why would anyone be wearing a jacket in this weather? Smells like a set-up
Posted by: Dena | August 25, 2006, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
I suppose it is the right of ABC News to print every piece of gossip they can about a good company.
But I’ll tell you that is exactly what we have here: gossip. Pure, unproven gossip.
Consider the source: ABC News. Do you really need more reason to be skeptical?
Posted by: jae | August 25, 2006, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
I had auto insurance with State Farm for almost 20 years. About 10 yrs ago, I had a 2 yr old car totalled (it was hit by a drunk driver while parked on a busy street). I was treated like a QUEEN by State Farm. My car was demolished one week, and a week to the day after the accident happened, I had a brand new car!!! I’ve always had nothing but great things to say about State Farm, and if their rates were lower, I’d still be with them today!! As far as to whether they’re guilty or innocent of the horrible Katrina fiasco, what ever happened to the American way of
‘innocent until proven guilty’?? There are some horrible things being said here, and I for one know there are 2 sides to every story.
Posted by: Carole | August 25, 2006, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Not sure if this was noted in any of the many previous posts, but under federal and state whistleblower laws, the Rigsby sisters may be entitled to 15% to 25% of the amount recovered from State Farm as a result of their whistleblowing. These ladies will likely become multimillionaires. Do you think this might have been a factor in their decision to come forward?
Posted by: mike | August 25, 2006, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
I am reading some of the comments with interest, but want to comment on my situation here in South Florida.
As a Federal employee, I am assigned to my post of duty by order, not by choice. Individuals posting comments have blamed everyone from the insurance companies to people building near the coast to ad nauseum.
However, I am the poor fool stuck in the middle: I can’t move anywhere (i.e., just quit, pick up and move elsewhere), people would scream if Federal offices just picked up and left costal cities (really, an impracticality and an absurdity) and I don’t see the Federal government subsidizing my policy with Citizen’s next year (which will probably be double what my premium was this year).
I have no comment about the allegations re. State Farm, but I will say that the insurance crisis generally, especially here in the state of Florida, threatens to leave no one here but tourists, 3 month a year “snowbirds” and the VERY wealthy, who will be able to afford any insurance they want; the middle class will be, sadly, S.O.L.
Posted by: Gringo | August 25, 2006, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
When our office building burned down in 1991, we were “insured” by State Farm. Their lies and flat attempts to cheat us resulted in it taking 14 months to rebuild something that shoud have been done in less than six months. Anyone who insures anything with that company is asking for trouble if they hasve a substantial claim. Believe me, they were nothing like a good neighbor.
Posted by: Bill Hansmann | August 25, 2006, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
i have never turned in a claim they paid. i dropped them and went farmers bereau and have been satisfied.They are rip offs.
Posted by: Diane | August 25, 2006, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
They are in complete denial. Check it out. I need a lawyer.
Posted by: Terrence Brown | August 25, 2006, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Judging by their sly smiles, I’m sure these gals have never told a fib in their lives. Besides, everyone knows that State Farm has been involved in a number of major conspiracies, including but not limited to: the Kennedy assassination, the Lindberg baby kidnapping, the Roswell UFO coverup, and the Hindenburg crash. I have even uncovered evidence that they are training a group of ninja assassins to hunt down and eliminate the sweet innocent plaintiff lawyers that watch over us all.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford | August 25, 2006, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
“Those that didn’t purchase the proper coverage…”
Why read any further? Not really his fault tho, I blame the media.
Flood Insurance is a federal program, and only those in flood-prone areas (based on the 100-year flood plain) are even ELIGIBLE to purchase. Katrina is widley viewed as a once every 400/500-year event.. So I guess you can expect what, five 1906 SF earthquakes before the next Katrina…
Speaking of which, I hope all you folks in S.F. are paying real close attention to all this. Your property values are 50x ours, so I guess you guys will be 50x more upset as we are when your city falls down and the rest of the country treats like an episode of CSI and then before falling asleep on the couch decide it’s best you not rebuild…
You live on the SAN ANDREAS FAULT for Christ’s sakes! What are you thinking? You deserve what’s coming… sound famliar?
Oh yeah… that earthquake insurance you are paying for? Can’t wait to see the look on your face when your insurance company decines your claim because it was your next-door neighbor’s house collapsing on yours that caused the damage, not the earthquake. SAME argument being used daily down here for a year.
Blame the media. This isn’t a black vs. white crisis. Not a Dem vs. Rep fight to the death. They media only profits from ratings driven by controversy. What controversy? Largest natural disaster in America’s history. I don’t care if you have the Emporer of Rome in charge, if any area the size of Kansas was suddenly over the span of 5 hours there’s going to be some tragedy. This isn’t a reality show to entertain the masses and to pick sides. What happened here can happen virtually anywhere. Look it up: a Cat 3/4 hitting N.Y. and wiping out most of Manhatten is 3-4x more likely than Katrina was. Already mentioned S.F. How about the midwest states that are guaranteed catastrophic flooding every 20 years or so. Tornado alley, what are you people thinking? Heat waves in Chicago, sharks off the coast of N.C. (ok I quit)… Point is we are all in this $hit together, like it or not. If we aren’t naturally coming together over this, there’s really no point – we’ve all already lost.
I must admit as a renter, I knew nothing of the complexities of all issues involved until this.
Posted by: NeverLeftLA | August 25, 2006, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
I see everyone on this list complaining and complaining about State Farm. Instead of talking about them, go to another insurance company!!!!! I understand that this doesn’t help the “Katrina” victims now, but I wonder how many people are on here complaining and actually have State Farm as their insurance carrier. Sometimes, you get what you pay for. You want to save $5 a month by going to State Farm instead of another insurance carrier, but complain about the service. There are hundreds of carriers…..don’t blame Bush…CANCEL ALL STATE FARM POLICIES!!!!
Posted by: Margaret | August 25, 2006, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
OK PEOPLE, YOU HAVE TO READ YOUR POLICIES. I CURRENTLY WORK FOR STATE FARM IN AN AGENTS OFFICE. EVERYDAY THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO FILE CLAIMS THAT GET PAID. THESE ARE CLAIMS THAT THE POLICY “CLEARLY STATE SHOULD BE PAID”. YOU AS INDIVIDUALS PURCHASING THE INSURANCE SHOULD READ THE POLICY INSTEAD OF WAITING UNTIL SOMETHING HAPPENS AND ASSUMING SOMETHING IT IS COVERED. “FLOOD IS NOT COVERED UNDER A HOMEOWNERS POLICY” FLOOD INSURANCE IS REGULATED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND CAN BE PURCHASED THROUGH COMPANIES LIKE STATE FARM. I GET SO TIRED OF PEOPLE EXPECTING SOMETHING FOR NOTHING. KNOW WHAT YOUR POLICY SAYS, KNOW WHAT IT COVERS AND DOESN’T COVER AND PURCHASE THE ADDITIONAL INSURANCE. THOSE OF YOU WHO WANT TO SAVE EVERY RED CENT AND NOT PAY ARE GOING TO GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR. YOUR IGNORANCE IS YOUR GREATEST ENEMY, NOT STATE FARM. ALSO, STATE FARM IS A GREAT COMPANY, FAMILY ORIENTED, HONEST AND TRUSTWORTHY PEOPLE WORK FOR THIS COMPANY AND WE PRIDE OURSELVES ON THAT. THOSE OF YOU WHO CHANGE INSURANCE COMPANIES OR SLANDER STATE FARM BEFORE YOU KNOW ALL OF THE FACTS (OR LACK OF) ARE NOT HURTING STATE FARM BUT YOURSELVES. BELIEVING THINGS YOU HEAR WITHOUT ALL THE EVIDENCE IS WHAT IS WRONG WITH AMERICA TODAY. WE CAN’T THINK FOR OURSELVES.
Posted by: MICHELLE | August 25, 2006, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Not that my opionion matters. My insurance agent calls me every year to review my coverages and I go in every year and ask questions. If I do not understand things in my policy. My agent is a state farm agent and He has found gaps in my coverages. He advised me on my old car I should not be carring full coverage. because the value of my vehicle is only worth really nothing. I read the newspaper and when someone get shot or something like that they are asking for a hand out to help with their expenses for funeral cost and medical bill. The world is going crazy people are just looking for someone to make them mad so they can shoot someone. EVERYTIME YOU POINT YOUR FINGER AT SOMEONE ELSE 3 ARE POINTING BACK AT YOU.
Posted by: mitka | August 25, 2006, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
I work in a State Farm agent’s office. We insured a man who never, ever paid his bills on time. We would always call him when his premiums were past due so his coverage wouldn’t lapse. One day, he let it go too long and his VW Bug policy lapsed. His daughter then totalled it. We had every right to deny this man his claim but because we are a “good neighbor” we still paid it. $20K to replace the vehicle. He turned right around and left to go to a sub-standard carrier because his rates increased. We felt cheated by this man, we did so much for him and he never even said thank you. I don’t know of many insurance companies that would do this for their clients.
I can’t believe people are going so far as to cancel their SF policies because they assume this story is true.
Posted by: BL | August 25, 2006, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I have nothing good to say about State Farm in Houston, TX.
I hope they are found guilty, and fined into oblivion! What the Government doesn’t seize, I wouldn’t mind seeing the bottom-feeding Plaintiff attorneys get the rest.
Posted by: ROYKO | August 25, 2006, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
I’ve been with State Farm over 25 years and have always been treated fairly. All claims were taken care of in a timely fashion and they have always gone out of their way to assist us. 17 years ago we had just purchased a house in Illinois for $40,000. During the first month of ownership we were out of town for a few days and a water fixture in the main bath broke flooding the entire house and basement. State Farm took care of it, put us up for the 3 months it took to put the house back together, spent far more on repairing the property than we had paid for it and assured us all would be taken care of then and for ever. And It Was!! I have to wonder why stories of good experiences are never told in the press – buess it must not make for good headlines…..
Posted by: Jim | August 25, 2006, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Ignorance, Ignorance, Ignorance. I’ve had State Farm Insurance for over twenty-five years and they’ve always been there for me. Our rates our high enough, and I certainly don’t want my rates going up because insurance companies start paying for items not covered by a specific policy. I had about $800 worth of Christmas presents stolen out of the trunk of my car several years ago, and thought the presents would be covered by my auto policy, which carried a $120 deductible. Turns out the presents were covered under my Homeowners policy that had a $1,000 deductible. I could have easily been upset with State Farm concerning my loss, but the bottom line was that “it wasn’t covered” by the auto policy. I certainly showed my ignorance, and I certainly could have been upset; but I was the one that left the presents in the car, and it was my mistake. To the people that lost so much in the hurricanes…I feel for your loss; however, you should not be paid for something that wasn’t covered under your policy. I’m glad State Farm shreds any and all documents that might contain personal information like social security numbers and other information. Lastly, I’ll wait to see the reasons these two women don’t work for State Farm, and I’ll eagerly await any responses by State Farm.
Posted by: WFM | August 25, 2006, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Some of the tract builders who generate the most complaints, as well as fines from the federal government, are being allowed to rebuild New Orleans. KB Home is one of the main developers involved, and has been fined by the FTC and HUD for issues ranging from predatory lending, high number of defaults, shoddy construction, breach of warranty, and abusive arbitration practices.
After the hurricanes, & the denial of insurance claims, the last thing this region needs is shoddy new construction with an illusory warranty.
Shame on the govt officials who didn’t “do their homework” before approving the builders who are going to be building thousands of new houses there.
Posted by: CS | August 25, 2006, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Dissatisfied with State Farm? Come on over to AAA. I’ve been insured by them for over 25 years and have had more than my share of auto accidents, both mine and caused by others, and I’ve never had to “fight” for the coverage I”ve paid for. I’ve also had two homeowners claims and their adjusters have been reasonable both times. Kudos to AAA!
Posted by: Joanne | August 25, 2006, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
State Farm tips on claims…from their website.
Look for potential safety risks. Take reasonable steps to correct them.
Take reasonable steps to prevent further damage.
Keep an accurate record of your repair expenditures.
Separate items that may be cleaned and/or repaired.
Check with your claim representative before you discard any items you plan to claim as damaged.
Review your policy for specific coverage information.
Posted by: luluslim | August 25, 2006, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
If you want a huge corporation to hate and mistrust I suggest you start with the news media. They lie, twist, mislead and massage what they choose to call “news” and when someone fingers them for a blatant inaccuracy they bury a correction where no one will see it, if they make a correction at all. Take anything they report with a grain of salt. Be skeptical, be very skeptical.
Posted by: Bill | August 25, 2006, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
These allegations are nothing but garbage. I was a State Farm catastrophe manager and am now an independent adjuster. There is no better insurance company to work for or be insured by. We paid every red cent that was owed. But if it is not covered, it’s not covered. State Farm is a great company! Don’t let these two women and a biased group like ABC news mislead you.
Posted by: Lee | August 25, 2006, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Insurance companies are legally bound to honor the contracts thay make with their policyholders. If you understand your policy, there should be no problem. The ones committing massive fraud are not the insurance companies, rather they’re the people who try to claim flood damage on their homeowner’s policies. Everyone knows that flood damage isn’t covered, but that doesn’t stop them from trying to recover from the insurance companies.
…and don’t get me started on the government-mandated auto insurance. Government has no business forcing people to purchase insurance.
Posted by: Orenthal Simpson | August 25, 2006, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Two years ago, Florida got hit with several Tropical Storms & hurricanes (do Frances, Jeanne, etc. ring a bell?). Our homeowners ins. was with Allstate – we had no claims & our policy was paid up-to-date. However, we received a letter telling us that our policy was ‘not being renewed’ (i.e. dropped). No explanation, just one month to scramble around during hurricane season to try and find another insurance carrier. State Farm not only sold us a policy, but increased our coverage and lowered our premiums. They are one of the few insurers out there willing to take a gamble on those of us in the hurricane belt – and I fear that witch-hunts like this could cause them to pull out.
Oh, and by the way, anyone who lives in hurricane areas has been told that flood damage isn’t covered by Homeowners Insurance! It’s not like there have never been floods here before. We aren’t in a specific ‘flood zone’ but still have made the investment in the Federal flood insurance.
Posted by: Linda | August 25, 2006, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
It seems that alot of you are siding with the insurance co. or
blaming Bush blah blah. you
probably have a nice bed to sleep
in and a comfortable place to
live in,place to call home. Have
you all forgotten the pictures you seen on the news? I assited the HK evacuees in Phoenix when the first came here due to the fact that I was employeed woth the State. Until you have experienced first hand what these people went through and all the stories I heard, you cannot sit here and judge them. These people were failed by the entire system. From Fed-to State and Ciy and yes ,insurance companies. Our unit that was set up by the Governor’s office was to help them while they reamin in AZ. Most have chosen to stay. And yes, most are homes, but there are some that still are hassling it out with insurance co.’s, not to metion all the mess with FEMA. But I can tell you that 99.9 % of folks that were evacuted here,are some of the most nicest people you will ever meet. They tried to remain optomistic even when the tears get falling and the shock in their faces will forever haunt me. As usual, we Americans are looking to point the finger at someone else rather then admit, we screwd up. whether accidental or on purpose. we failed them. I seen A LOT of mispent dollars, fraud, etc. No one anticiated this. Not the folks who lived in flood prone areas,insuraance companies. It was and act of God. These people have nothing . God help those who are condeming these people. It is about these people who lost everyhting , and loved ones. One of the folfs witnessed her mother drown in front of her, and upon arriving in texas in route to AZ., her father dropped dead in the airport! The evacuees witnessed police officers shooting people ( not looters)in the backs. What is wrong with you people? it may not be headline news anymore, but they are still in limbo. just sit tight and wait for the next disaster so you can make a tax deducitble contribution so you can feel like you made a diffrence then talk later.
Posted by: cecilia | August 25, 2006, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
I live in Florida. If you want to see an insurance MESS come here. Some who have never had a problem with insurance companies probably live in states where they’re not allowed to get away with murder. All water dammage is NOT caused by flood and you idiots defending the insurance companies should know that! Hurricanes are high winds and rain. Lots of rain. I’m in an area that doesn’t flood, but what happened to many during hurricane Ivan was roofs dammaged by wind and or falling trees which let in the rain, so some people ended up with maybe a foot of water in the house. This is what the insurance companies are refusing to pay and it’s wrong. These homes didn’t “flood” because the creek rose, or storm surge, the water dammage is because of RAIN! which wouldn’t have gotten in the house if the roof hadn’t been dammaged! According to my insurance agent, flood insurance doesn’t cover this kind of dammage because it doesn’t fit the defination of “flood” meaning it’s not storm serge and not due to rising water.
Posted by: Jackie | August 25, 2006, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
I would just like to comment that I believe the insurance companies are altering the reports. If they paid all the victims of Katrina what they should be paid it would put the companies out of business. I really feel for all the people that have been loyal State Farm purchasers for years only the find out that when State Farm was needed the most they dropped the ball. It wasn’t just the insurance companies acting like maggots and vultures though. Look at all the other people that ran to New Orleans and took food out of already devistated peoples mouths to line their own pockets. Shame on all the AMERICANS that took and are still taking advantage of this terrible occurance.
Posted by: Treva | August 25, 2006, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Right on Comrades! Down with State Farm and Personal Responsibility!
Posted by: Steve | August 25, 2006, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
The insurance companies can usually get away wirh this because people like John Stossel have spent years badmouthing the lawyers willing to take them on & keep them semi-honest. Network, heal thyself.
Posted by: Clem | August 25, 2006, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
I’ve had three major claims with State Farm and I couldn’t be happier with them. I’ve been with them for 14 years and have no problem continuing. My dad was an adjuster back in the day so I knew exactly what was and wasn’t covered when I bought my policies. I know every word of the fine print and know exactly what it covers and what it doesn’t. Because Hugo came through my hometown, I now have flood insurance even though it’s very unlikely that I’ll ever need it. Did it cost? Not as much as you think as all of my policies are with them so I have a massive discount.
People- READ YOUR POLICIES!!! Know exactly what is covered or be prepared for the consequences. Any water damage that I get is covered because I bought the correct policy.
Posted by: Pandarus | August 25, 2006, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
As terrible, devastating, and unfortunate as Katrina was for the gulf coast, everyone there had the opportunity to buy insurance to protect themselves in the event of flood. It is common knowledge that no Homeowner’s policy covers damage caused by flood.
A recent court decision agreed with the insurance companies. Do the disgruntled want to take action against the judge?
When do all of us get to stop feeling guilty because so many people decided not to buy Flood Insurance or for that matter, evacuate in the face of a category 5 hurricane?
Posted by: Bob | August 25, 2006, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
As a former insurance adjuster, and a State Farm insured, I can’t begin to tell you how many false and inflated claims that I have looked at. Like the old say’s goes, it’s okay to cheat the insurance company and the government. You whiners should have learned to read while you were offered the oppertunity to, i.e. school.
Posted by: Chuck | August 25, 2006, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Hello…..McFly!!!!!!!
Insurance is set up to make money, just as any business, to MAKE money, not designed to GIVE it.
however, why don’t you get back to work and save your comments for after both sides of the story are heard.
Posted by: fred | August 25, 2006, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
How nice two idiots who were run out of the catastrophe operation by more than one company, now carry this weak and unsubstantiated storey to ABC on the wings of one of the most crooked attorneys in our history. Wonder how much old Dickey Scruggs is paying these two losers? If anyone fails to agree with a claim decision, hire your own engineer. Wind-covered. Flood, driven by wind or not, is not covered. Notice the picture on this story, smiling-faced disgruntled claims person wearing a SF coat in the middle of the summer- publicity stunt and yellow journalism at its best. If people really understood the real motivation behind 99% of all claim representatives is to pay and close a claim that stays closed. There is no incentive to deny a loss. Most claim reps work very hard to FIND coverage. No company in the industry pays claim professionals any more or less based on claim indemnifications. Generally, the consumer pays on the back end by higher premiums as claim payments increase. Therefore, a PROPERLY handled loss (translation-paying the COVERED damages) results in a more affordable and attainable product for us all.
Posted by: BD | August 25, 2006, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
First of all, shame on State Farm if these allegations are true. They should be held accountable to pay for damage the policy does cover. State Farm should not have to pay for damage that is not covered under the terms spelled out in the policy. That’s what the policy is for and why as a policyholder you get a copy. However, there should be no rush to judgment at this point because of two people coming out and making accusations. These could be disgruntled employees. They might be looking for attention. Who knows? They may be getting paid under the table by State Farm’s competitors. They should not be taken at face value, nor should State Farm’s denials be taken at face value. The facts should be allowed to come out and hopefully, the media will do their job and report it accordingly.
The broader questions in my opinion after seeing all the posts are the following…
Does ownership of real estate in this country come with any responsibility? Does a homeowner have any personal responsibility for their own home? Does a homeowner have any responsibility to read their policy? Does a homeowner have any responsibility to plan ahead? Does a homeowner have any responsibility to assess for themselves what part of the county they live in and the potential for problems arising from that decision? Ownership of a home is part of the American dream. Unfortunately, in these times of no down payment purchases, cash-back at closing, and file bankruptcy-buy a home 3 months later have produced a whole slew of homeowners who don’t have the responsibility it takes to own a poodle let alone a home. Insurance does not and never will cover every possible situation. If it did, nobody could afford it. I’ll repeat. Insurance companies would love to cover every possible scenario and then charge you 10 times what you pay now in return for that type of coverage. Ownership of real estate just like any property comes with responsibilities. In the old days when a minimum of 20% down was required to buy a home it had the effect of only allowing ownership for people who were willing to save and sacrifice to get to the point where they could buy their piece of the American dream. They had pride of ownership and took far more care to understand insurance and what it is and isn’t. Now, the ownership of a home is looked upon as an entitlement and it produces the kind of homeowners that you see posting on this site. I’ll bet if you took all the whiners on this site and dropped them in the forest 50 miles from civilization, most of them would die within 5 miles of where you dropped them. They’d just sit around and wonder when sombody else, not themselves, was going to come help them out. And I’m not only talking about helping themselves after they are in a predicament. I’m talking about the more important part of helping yourself and that is thinking ahead, planning for the future, contemplating a less-than-perfect life and generally being able to pull yourself away from Seinfeld reruns long enough to balance your damn checkbook! Its embarrassing as an American with our history of persistence, hard-work, and rugged individualism to see just how many people have no ability to exercise an ounce of personal responsibility. That’s the real shame here.
Posted by: Mascot | August 25, 2006, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
This is nothing new for State Farm. I know from dealing with them myself and also talking to others, that they are extremely helpful as long as they are on the receiving end, but put in a claim against them and its a different story. You better have a good lawyer.
Posted by: George | August 25, 2006, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Of Course ABC is the pinnacle of integrity and honest news coverage.
I have been insured by State Farm since 1983. I was with them in the Northridge Quake and my home sustained considerable damage. They were there and responded well to my claim. Don’t expect your insurance carrier to write you a blank check or take your word for everything. Many people cheat and try to get more than things are worth. Are they perfect-no-neither are you. Lets get the facts.The company or a couple bad apples?? or trouble makers??
Posted by: maggie | August 25, 2006, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
People continually assume wrongdoing when they don’t get an answer they want.
What happened to the time when people took responsibility for their decisions? Everyone had the opportunity to purchase flood insurance, and they didn’t. Why should everyone else have to pay.
I am sick and tired of the general public blaming everyone else for their bad decisions!
Does anyone seriously believe that a large company like state farm can bring in shredder trucks, shred damaging documents out in the open, and not get caught??
Please!?
Posted by: MTP | August 25, 2006, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
If lawyer Dickie Scruggs and Sen. Trent Lott could’t read their own homeowner’s policies why should anyone else. Gimme the money! Anyone living near a body of water should pay a few hundrend a year for flood insurance. The article does not say that 90+ percent of Mississippi claims have been settled! Nor does it tell the story of how insurance companies now, due to lawsuits, won’t cover homes there and may pull out of the states. Nor how premimums NATIONWIDE will increase if these thugs win in court. Read what you sign, people & check the little box on the front of policies stating they won’t cover floods! DUH.
Posted by: Trent | August 25, 2006, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
I’ve been a State Farm employee or agent for more than 14 years, and no one has ever asked me to give a policyholders anything less than every penny they have coming to them, based on their policy. I wouldn’t put any stock in this story, this is ABC News, and I would strongly encourage everyone to spend a little more time with your agent discussing what is and is not covered by your policy.
Posted by: paul | August 25, 2006, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
I have been an insurance agent since 1971, and I know from all these years that if ANY insurance company has the word FARM in its name: CAVEAT EMPTOR!!
Posted by: STEVE | August 25, 2006, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Their claim: A large insurance company and industry leader was stupid enough to push independent adjustors to help cheat their customers during a major catastrophe, knowing this would potentially open them up to legal problems and bad press. If you believe that I don’t know what else to say.
Posted by: Alan | August 25, 2006, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
I would love to see an investigation of the “Chocolate” Mayor of the greatest “Chocolate” city in America, New Orleans. Mr Nagin, your city is bleeding out from every orifice and all you care about is taking shots at NYC !!! Rest assured, this tactic will not deflect the negative attention that you have so expertly earned. In time, the truth will be told and the scrutiny of history will reveal your lack of character. But by then, I suspect that you will blame your incompetence on everyone who is non-Chocolate.
The insurance issues that are crippling the city should be at the top of your list. Stop your political grandstanding and racebaiting and CLEAN UP THE MESS THAT YOU DID LITTLE OR NOTHING TO PREVENT.
Ps New Orleans will never be on my vacation list as long as you are involved in that city’s politics.
Posted by: Vinmanfab | August 25, 2006, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
After reading all of the above I have come to the conclusion that most homeowners are crooked, fraudulent, and dishonest. hows that for a take on this discussion.
Let me put this as simply as I can if you live within ten feet above the level of any body of water be it a river, a lake or the ocean and you don’t have flood insurance your stupid. More so since most flood costs about a $1.00 a day.
Posted by: T | August 25, 2006, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
It’s amazing how many people all too suddenly believe the word of two obviously disgruntled women before any evidence is presented to prove them right, or in this case, prove the companies guilty. How would you feel if these same women falsely accused “YOU” of committing a crime and everyone automatically shouted “GUILTY, THROW’EM IN THE CAN, LOCK’EM UP, AND LET’EM ROT” without first giving you the ability to show otherwise. Could it be that you’re trying to find a “scapegoat” for your bad choices! It is correct, flood is not covered under a homeowner’s policy. That is a coverage provided under the National Flood Insurance Program. Furthermore, if insurance companies didn’t exercise diligence in paying claims based on contractual language and with your money, premiums would be prohibitively expensive. So for the insurance companies, it’s always damned if they do and damned if they don’t because people will always complain they weren’t paid enough. Perhaps the argument is more appropriate if we say, people will always complain because the will always want more. Greedy says what greedy does! Let’s begin thinking rationally.
Posted by: Anthony | August 25, 2006, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Folks: I’m not a huge fan of corporate America: nearly everything they do contravenes the most basic principles of the Republic. I am thus dubious enough to READ contracts I sign, to ask questions if I don’t understand a provision, and to insist on answers and accountability. Key points to remember:
1. Only the Fed pays flood claims, period.
2. Due to claims fraud, the insurance companies have instituted tests, checks and balances to prevent fraudulent claims: I believe after all the major disasters that have occurred since, and including 9/11, there have been numerous stories of claims filed, and collected, by people who were not even in the SAME STATE as the event!
3. We have inculcated a national entitlement mentality, that we are owed a job, perfect health and perfect security from cradle to grave. If we don’t get what we want, right now, we stomp our McDonald’s fattened feet and scream for a lawyer, then denounce lawyers as greedy opportunists.
I’ve seen numerous statements here demanding intervention by the government. What profession comprises the largest number of legislators? Anyone? You in the back. Yes, that would be lawyers. Therefore, do you really think they’re going to drive their business off a cliff by legislating themselves out of business? No, of course not, and such legislation would never pass muster since it would abridge your right to seek legal redress. If you’ve been following the discussions, all of this comes back to one thing, that is the inalienable right of citizens of our Republic to assume responsibility for their own destiny. Remember: READ the contract, ask questions, do your research. To hold your own in a system dominated by legal Machiavellians, you must learn to think like them. Try it. It’ll be fun.
Posted by: Christopher Gurin | August 25, 2006, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
I’ve worked for State Farm for over 20 years in both claims and management. I can tell you unequivocally, State Farm always looks to find coverage, not deny it–always. It’s unfortunate so many hurricane victims chose not to purchase flood insurance, but that is a personal choice. State Farm actively seeks to pay every dollar for which the policy provides coverage.
Posted by: ZMan | August 25, 2006, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
insurance isn’t a savings account, just because you’ve been paying money doesn’t mean you can withdraw it at any time with a claim.
Homeowners insurance is a contract within the contract there are certain things that are covered and certain things that are not.
The government has decided to provide flood insurance (of course you still have to pay for it) but if damages were caused by flood then a normal insurance policies don’t cover it, it is unfortunate that many people along the coast did not apply for flood insurance with the government. But that is NOT state farms fault or allstate or farmers or anyone elses.
I lived in a flood plain once and my mortgage company required me to have flood insurance.
people want the luxury of living on the coast without the cost…
Posted by: tj | August 25, 2006, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
“Look at me! Guess why I’ve got a big smile on? C’mon guess! That’s cuz Dickie and the network have promised me a big cut off their paycheck for telling, oh just a little lie! Well, maybe, not that little. But still! You gotta love this land of opportunity and our freedom of speech! Hmmm, I’m in the money and lots of money!”
Posted by: Curious | August 25, 2006, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
The CEO Of State Farm is close friends with George Bush.
The country and State Farm run the same way.
Posted by: State Farm Victim | August 25, 2006, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
why not demand that insurance companies cover every single thing there is to cover. then we could all be paying ten times the amount we pay for insurance now. good idea. yea, you know nuclear diasasters aren’t covered either, let’s cover those, oh, and how about earthquakes, they’re not covered either. hey, and who knows there might be a war over here, that’s not covered either. the real kicker would be wear and tear, better make that a 20 times what we pay now cause everybody would be looking for their insurance company to pay for their new roof when it wears out.
Posted by: mike | August 25, 2006, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
oh,by the way, mold isn’t covered either. let’s cover that too. if you are at risk of a storm surge get FLOOD INSURANCE, DAH
Posted by: mike | August 25, 2006, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
state farm has been sued succesfully in almost every state in teh union by various state attorney generals, and so have most other insurance companys. They really are a lot like the mob, they lobby the state to require that you have insurance, then they jack up rates, in collusion with each other, and then when you file a claim they do everything they can to not pay.
Posted by: hater | August 25, 2006, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Good job Fred (posted @ 6:12). Finally, the voice of reason…..
Posted by: Bob | August 25, 2006, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Please, it is common sence!
The folks to investigate are Mississippi lawyers like Dickie Scruggs!!! Follow the money! Kerri and Cori Rigsby are “independent adjusters” not State Farm employees. The real rip off is lawyers and independent adjusters who are in the lawyers hip pocket. Wake up ABC to the real scams.
Posted by: Ray | August 25, 2006, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
When you are called to jury duty, serve. When you hear that case and you wonder why the defendant or insurance company says they are not liable or that the plaintiff was not hurt, remember this story.
Payback’s a bitch.
Posted by: Jonathan Corchnoy | August 25, 2006, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
I own and operate a collision repair business and I see how people are systematically deprived of being properly indemnified for their losses routinely. State farm, in comparison to other companies and in my opinion, generally operates more fairly so you can imagine how bad some of the other companies are in comparison.
All insurance company advertising is designed to make you feel good about your choices of insurer and trusting that they will be there to properly indemnify you at the time of your loss. Good hands, we’re on your side, like a good neighbor, etc. You find out how the beast is unleashed when you decide to negotiate your loss and your insurer disagrees with you on the settlement.
It would behoove all policy holders to read their policies annually and pester the heck out of what few agents are left to explain your contractual rights.
Posted by: Mike of the Ozarks | August 25, 2006, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Whether it is State Farm or whomsoever, there is no real difference in the way these insurance companies will operate to defraud policy holders with rightful claims. Insurance is and always has been a scam, with life insurance being perhaps the greatest scam of all excluding religion, which promises something you can never sue for to collect if you don’t receive it.
Insurance carriers will stiff small policy holders, pay off corporations who have already collected more than their share in FEMA funds, and then declare huge losses that are nothing more than chinese accounting. Then they will stiff policy holders worldwide to cover these phony paper losses..
Its a no win situation for loss payees, and a huge win for stockholders and management. Watch the bonuses and other perks upper management of these companies receive in the next two or so years..
Don’t ask for regulation to correct it, in insurance companies own the regulators, just like power companies do. And we all know how those benevolent public monopolies have stiffed us.
Tai Pan
Posted by: Tai Pan | August 25, 2006, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Woody Guthrie sang it may years ago in “The Story of Bonnie and Clyde”: “As through this life you ramble, you’ll meet some funny men – Some rob you with a six gun and some with a fountain pen.”
Posted by: John | August 25, 2006, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
I used to work for State Farm as a claim rep, I was never told not to pay a claim or was told to change a report. I worked Storm Duty after Frances and wrote hundreds of checks to people. If they did this then they should be held accountable, if not then let it be. Let all the facts come out before you judge.
Posted by: Charles Fouche | August 25, 2006, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
As a State Farm Agent, I can assure you that 99% of the claims that we have handled have turned out fine. Yes, 1% of the time something may come up where there are differences. If these whistleblowers are right and not disgruntled INDEPENDENT adjusters, there was a breakdown in communication within that department locally. Don’t cast a stone at the entire company. Look at your particular insurance companies complaint ratio in your State, and compare it with others. Hands down we are normally in the top tier of companies with very low complaint ratios. Also, I’m tired of people wanting coverage for nothing. If you live in Houston and don’t have flood insurance you either live in a cave or are too cheap to buy it. Sometimes I have to blunt about this type of stories because everyone wants something for free. I helped hundreds of people from Katrina rebuild their lives as they drove across the border to Texas for help. Ask people in Houston how generous Houstonians were. However, here we are one year later and they all still want free rent and free utilities. Should my tax dollar pay for them forever and should my premiums go up so that everyone gets paid regardless of whether there was coverage in the policy? NO WAY!
Posted by: Jerry | August 25, 2006, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
From a Florida adjuster friend who worked in the NO area for State Farm:
HALF the ADJUSTERS quit the FIRST week because of State Farm’s questionable practices. They provided direction everyday for limiting policy coverages. Many adjusters could NOT take it. He personally witnessed 20-30 adjusters leaving the building in TEARS stating “I cannot do this to these people!” They made it almost impossible for them to process the claims properly.That is just some of the story.
Posted by: fla adjuster | August 25, 2006, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
You know, it’s not just homeowners who were underinsured or not insured. It’s renters, too. I bet most of those renters didn’t have any kind of renters coverage and just thought their landlord would cover it. Nope. Not how it works. If you rent, you NEED renters insurance.
And whoever had to get the SR22 way up above. You must have had a massive ticket or a DUI to even warrant having to have an SR22. Your insurance should have gone up.
Apparently, some of you want State Farm and the other companies to have to eat all these claims, whether owed or not. Guess you want them to pull out of some states altogether,huh? What will you do when companies pull out altogether and you can’t get insurance?
Water coming in thru a roof IS covered. Standing water 3 ft high is not. An experience adjuster can tell the difference.
I could sit here all day and tell you stories of people trying to fraud US, the insurance company. I can also tell you about claim after claim where we gave the insured the benefit of the doubt and covered something that probably shouldn’t have been covered.
When’s the last time any of you pulled your policy out and read it? Do you know what your limits are? Do you know that most policies only cover up to $1500 for jewelry and for any more than that you need a separate policy. That guns are only covered up to $2500, same for silverware/fine china? How many of you didn’t realize things in your car weren’t covered under your car insurance, but your home, before the poster above posted it?
How many of you have taken the time to either take pictures or videotape allll your belongings so that in case of a claim you have proof of what you own? It’s smart to do this and put it in a safety deposit box.
Insureds have responsibilites, too. It’s not all on the agent’s lap.
Posted by: lisa | August 25, 2006, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
I have had three major nightmares with this company — including the fact that I will walk with a cane for the rest of my life, in constant pain, due to having been rear-ended by a car owned by the company — which they’d ‘totalled out’, but allowed the ‘owner’ to continue driving (long enough to drive it into MY car) After they’d made settlement with her, paid her, and had it signed over to them.
As bad as that nightmare was, one of the OTHER nightmares is even MORE ov a blood-pressure raiser for me. Unfortunately, I am prohibited from giving any details due to a ‘settlement’ I was forced to sign, after my ‘good neighbor’ insurer hung me out to dry, rendering the ink in my policy WORTHLESS.
So, why do I stay with them? Two reasons. First, IMO any other company would be just as, ahem, ‘honest’ as another, and second, it galls them to NOT have me slink into the shadows after having experienced first hand the quality service they provide.
Your laugh for the day: My first agent with this company had a little poster on the wall in his office. It said that the key to success is sincerity — and once you’ve learned to fake THAT, you’re set.
Posted by: Anonymous in the Midwest | August 25, 2006, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Vote Democrat!
Posted by: Sane One | August 25, 2006, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Pretty simple. If you don’t pay for flood insurance and you get flooded…then you are screwed. Some of these are the same people that refused to leave then our Coast Guard had to risk their lives to save them. These are the same people screaming for the Government to take care of them. Why? Because they have depended on them their entire lives.
Here is the scoop…No one owes you anything in life. If you move into a bowl…there is some risk. If you don’t leave when you are told to…don’t cry when it all hits the fan. Don’t expect your local/state/federal government to take care of all your needs. It’s a shame these folks hadn’t learned to stand on their own two feet. They would be better adapted to do so now. This is why it’s called a NATURAL disaster. Nature-1 Man-0. No one caused this and it’s going to take a lot of time to fix it. I personaly think they are nuts for wanting to build in the bowl again. If I were an insurance company, I would refuse to insure any idiot that would move back in that hole.
Posted by: Dave | August 25, 2006, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
I must have missed something in the comments.
The big argument with the insurance companies is what caused the damage — wind (covered)or flood (not covered by insurance). Because an abundance of water was involved in Katrina the companies are saying ‘flood’ when most of the damage was caused by windborne water.
And it is all in court now. Let’s hope the homeowners get a fair trial.
Posted by: JimPv | August 25, 2006, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
“should they read and understand how their policy will be changed by a crook at the company?”
BINGO, we have a winner!
In my case, they went so far as to say that they’d cover OTHERS in our situation in the FUTURE, since the policy did say what it said — but as for us, we were hung out to dry. They were NOT going to cover OUR claim — a claim that was clearly COVERED by our policy.
When my wife complained to the Nice Man at the office, he LAUGHED at her, and said, “Go ahead, sue me, I’M INSURED!”
Since there wasn’t enough “big bucks” to interest a lawyer (working on contingency), and since we couldn’t afford to pay out-of-pocket legal fees, we were screwed.
Words cannot convey my disgust for the entire industry. The more regulation, the better. They need to be put on as short a leash as possible. And I say this as a free-market CONSERVATIVE.
The industry has abused the power it’s appropriated to itself. Since it is apparently incapable of policing itself, it needs to be HEAVILY regulated.
Posted by: Anonymous in the Midwest | August 25, 2006, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
WHAT A BUNCH OF NONSENSE IN THESE COMMENTS!
Do you honestly think an insurance company would have the highest quality ratings from its customers across the US, be in business80+ years, if it mistreated clients and did not pay claims on time & fairly?! Come on! Business has a way of regulating itself; it is called CHOICE. That includes the choice, even in restricted insurance markets, to get insurance from someone else. There is always at leas one other option.
As a fomer adjuster, I have seen time after time where State Farm has given a policyholder the benefit of the doubt & paid a claim. Shredding documents? I sure hope every company does this, with identity theft all around us.
Denying claims? Every major storm has some story like this. Some have merit, but each side has to be heard. If damages are covered in the policy, they should be paid. Period. Flood is due to rising water and should never be paid under a homeowner’s policy. That is what FEMA & Flood insurance were created for.
Some people need to think before they just “pile on” to a story from 2 former disgruntled adjusters who used to work for SF. Congratulations, you made it on TV and the internet. Now your 15 minutes are over.
Posted by: Mack | August 25, 2006, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
State Farm was one of the first insurance companies to send their Catastrophe teams to the front line. They follow the guidelines of the policy and all anyone has to do is read their policy to see what is covered. It is really a no brainer!! Yes it was a tragedy that happened and many were affected by it but it doesn’t change the fact that if you live in a known area that is bound to have flooding and don’t have the coverage to protect yourself then you have no one to blame but yourself. I’ve had State Farm for many years and they’ve always been quick to pay my claims and were always fair. You can always find cheaper insurance than State Farm but you get what you pay for. USAA is one of the worst to pay claims!! If I am going to have insurance it will be State Farm because they have always been there for me and everyone I know that has State Farm.
Posted by: TL | August 25, 2006, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
All of you Insurance Co haters should be ashamed of yourselves! You hear a story about “supposed” corruption in the Insurance industry, and you jump on it like white on rice. You hate what you do not understand; you have no clue what you are talking about. Why should State Farm or any Insurance company, pay out millions of dollars from premiums paid by all policyholders; just because someone did not read the fine print? And why would you purposely choose to build a home or business in an area that is prone to severe flooding; and not buy Flood Insurance as recommended by the government? Duh!! Didn’t the State of Louisiana receive funds to repair the levees in New Orleans; but diverted those funds elsewhere? The government was warned 2 years ago that a storm like Katrina was very likely to hit New Orleans; and create the havoc that she did. What was the response to this knowledge? Can’t happen! Never has, never will! The Insurance companies did not cause Katrina or Rita; yet you whine and complain when they do not pick up the tab for these catastrophies. These companies have worked hard over the past year doing what they can to help their customers cope with the tragedy of losing their homes, jobs, and family members. Thousands of Agents; Staff; Underwriters: Claims, and Catastrophy Teams have worked tirelessly to get customers back on their feet. Many of these people suffered the same losses; yet they put their customers needs first. If there were corrupt individuals involved with the hurricane claims process; they will be dealt with. Don’t let that overshadow all the good that has been done.
Posted by: Lisa | August 25, 2006, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Why does everyone feel like this is “insuracare” from the movie “incredibles”. We see every day news that is designed to show how the public is getting screwed by the government. Screwed by Big Oil. Screwed by the Drug Companies. This is quite frankly the absolute most RETARDED news story ever conceived. Here is what I got out of this article. 1. They hired 2 independant adjustors to handle claims that much faster. I’m sure that this part was reported. 2) There is a huge shredding truck, shredding documents. WOW! There’s the “smoking gun”. Ever hear of “IDENTITY THEFT”.
Seriously, people, think. Why would the largest property and casualty insurer on the biggest stage under the biggest microscope try and screw people when they need ‘em most? But I’m sure it’s all true because it was reported on the news.
Posted by: ron harney | August 25, 2006, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
So let me see if I understand this…a liberal media outlet, ABC News, is set to broadcast allegations of wrongdoing by State Farm and we are to believe them? How many times has the media provided wrong or inaccurate information. I’m quite sure this will turn out to be another one of those times.
Posted by: Lenny | August 25, 2006, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Two non- State Farm employees decide to get their 15 minutes of fame. My family member is one of the hundreds of volunteers at State Farm who go down to all these disaster areas. He is gone for 6 to 8 weeks at a time working 12 hour days, seven days a week. According to him it’s the opposite policy than these two so called whistle blowers state. It’s drummed into their heads over and over again, If we owe the claim we pay it. According to him the customer gets the benefit of the doubt.
Posted by: M.S. | August 25, 2006, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
AS a former insurance agent, and currently working for an insurance agency, I share many of the concerns shared in this article and the comments. However, I would like to point out that all homeowners policies exclude flood insurance. Storms create a legal nightmare of which came first, storm damage, or flood. Customers should contact their agent to discuss flood insurance to see if they are at risk from flood damage. To not do so is to share in the responsibility for the damage you receive.
Gregg
Posted by: Gregg | August 25, 2006, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
In Denver State Farm is refusing to pay claims in one condominium bldg. for water damage which other insurance companies are paying.
State Farm said they would pay the claim only if it was shown that the homeowner did not take action to stop the leak immediately when informed. When such documents were produced, they backed off that statement and still refused to pay.
The Homeowners in the condo building will be forced to file a lengthy class action suit. Why would anyone DO BUSINESS WITH STATE FARM?
The documents which ABC news said were erroneously sent to the policyholder are a smoking gun!
Posted by: Laura Rogers | August 25, 2006, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
I do not feel sorry for anyone who sustained flood damage and were suddenly suprised that their insurance policy didn’t cover the damages. Hello Gulf Coast Residents! The ocean is right in your backyard and you decided to roll the dice and not pay for flood insurance. Your stupid mistake, don’t make people living in Idaho pay for increased premiums since you decided to sue the only entity with pockets instead of being accountable for your own stupidity. If the insurance companies lose the lawsuit, we all lose because guess what they’re gonna do, recoup their losses by raising everyone’s premiums.
Posted by: Lance | August 25, 2006, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Katrina is no one’s fault. It was a natural disaster. If you read the writings of Nostradamus, there in code, which goes vertically are the letter that spell New Orleans. It was meant to happen to New Orleans. It is a immoral, sleazy city with a lot of bad things going on. It was meant to wiped out by God. Just as the first time the world was wiped out by God, because of sinful behavior. I do feel for the good people. But, people in New Orleans clean up your act and read the ten commandments. The rules God made for everyone to follow by through life. The government you blame is also saving your ass, with billions of dollars. Have a little gratitude!
Posted by: Tohmi | August 25, 2006, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
It’s a prime example of why the Republicans want to punish whistleblowers, whether they be federal employees, agency contractors, or journalists.
The greatest single enemy to the Liberties and freedoms of these United States are the Bush people and the morons who support them.
Posted by: Reed Smoldt | August 25, 2006, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
49% of the people filing insurance claims are morons and couldn’t take care of themselves if they tried. All semblance of self-sufficiency has been bred out of them by government schools. The other 51% are to some extent filing fraudulent claims or uncovered claims. They do not read their policies. They have no clue what is covered and what is not. They build/buy sub-standard homes in low wetland areas that should never have been built in the first place. 364 days per year they whine that insurance premiums are too high. When they get hit by the inevitable storm it is all someone else’s fault. Quit whinning. Get out and fix the damage and go on with your lives.
Posted by: Randy | August 25, 2006, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Hey, I got an idea. Let’s just shut down ALL the insurance companies…they’re all evil, right? Just shut them down and let everyone be SELF-INSURED. That way, you whiny wimps that want everyone ELSE be responsible for your monumental ignorance and stupidity for living in flood plains, tidal basins, shore lines, etc. will have to “pony” up your own funds to rebuild another mansion on sinking sand.
Posted by: Ron P | August 25, 2006, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
STATE FARM, LIKE AMERICA, GETS AWAY WITH IT BECAUSE 90% OF AMERICANS ARE LAZY AND DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN GOVERNMENT. STUPID LAZY PEOPLE ALWAYS GET SCREWED BY BIG COMPANIES AND GOVERNMENT.
GET MAD, GET CONTROL…OR STAY LAZY AND STUPID. SHAME BUT TRUE!!
Posted by: Z | August 25, 2006, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
I highly doubt these allegations. If such is true, then it was probably a rouge or incompetent employee. This is not the culture of State Farm or most insurance companies. Some are a little tighter on the wallet then others but it is not in their interest in any way to find unethical ways not to pay a claim or commit fraud. I have to think there is more to this story and the report on 20-20 may not provide all the details.
Posted by: Sammy | August 25, 2006, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
This is for the people who wonder why people live in flood prone areas. The government put many Air Force, Navy, Marine bases next to the water, shipyards are where there is water, many colleges are close to the water, where are the ports located? It is people that work and support these places, so before picking on where people live, get the businesses to move and so will the people.
Posted by: Bige | August 25, 2006, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi Announces State’s Largest Insurer Has Abandoned Fight Against Good Drive Auto Insurance Reforms and Will Seek Rate Reduction of $204 Million
Announcement follows court decision rejecting an industry-led effort to stop the new regulations; pending approval of State Farm’s plan, rates for 4.3 million drivers have been scheduled for reductions totaling $370 million annually
Posted by: dmz | August 25, 2006, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
Am I the only one to notice the guy’s name is actually “Drinkwater?”
Posted by: chris | August 25, 2006, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Innocent until proven guilty is the law of the land … I do not believe the allegations will be proven in court.
Posted by: berta | August 25, 2006, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Brilliant!!
What the world needs now, is whistleblowers, sweet whistleblowers.
There are countless people in this country who out of fear avoid being heroes.
These women are heroes, and that should settle the question of womens’ role in society.
Where men destroy, all too often wonderful women come to the rescue of us all. Maybe what we all need right now is some serious mother love.
Posted by: kdaves | August 25, 2006, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
State Farm is a mutual company which means that it is owned by the policyholders, if memory serves. That means that these people are stealing from themselves, right? Ah yes, don’t read you policy and then whine when you don’t get your way. Now that’s the new American Way!
Posted by: Richard Baker | August 25, 2006, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Whatever happened to personal responsibilty? If you are going to buy property in a flood zone or hurricane zone, then you should have flood insurance.
I believe the government should make flood insurance mandatory in flood zones so taxpayers don’t have to bail them out. The flood insurance bill should be included in the property tax bill. If you don’t pay your flood insurance bill, the county sells your house.
Posted by: fred | August 25, 2006, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Some of you amaze me. Spin Spin Spin. The issue is not whether flood damages are covered. The issues are 1. whether the consumer had a reasonable expectation that water damage as part of a hurricane was covered. 2. whether water at all can negate coverage for wind damage and 3. whether SF pressured subcontractors into a civil conspiracy to commit consumer fraud.
Posted by: Ed's Frat Bro | August 25, 2006, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Remember: This is unproven!
Posted by: Rick | August 25, 2006, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
had state farm auto frm age 16-24,no tickets, no nothing. had one small accident involving a deer, they wouldn’t even renew my policy at end of term. crooks…pure and simple
Posted by: Robbie | August 25, 2006, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
Rick, if you had insurance that long with State Farm they would not have cancelled you over one comp claim. If you’d had a new policy, within the first 6 months, if you have a claim over $750, they have the right to cancel.
I know. I’m an agent.
Posted by: lisa | August 25, 2006, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
I have not been affected by a national disaster, however, my house did burn down the day after Christmas in 2005. I drove up to my house that day with my two children and my mother with me and my kids to watch everything we had burn. It was the most horrifying experience I have ever experienced. State Farm gave me the run-a-round for two years and to this date has denied my claim. I believe State Farm prays on people with little or no means to hire good attorneys to defend the cause. I tried to hire attorneys to defend me, but I could not afford to do so. Me and my family have lost everything and did not have the means for attorney’s fees.I think homeowner’s insurance is a good thing as long as nothing happens when you need to use it! Why is it necessary for people to get homeowner’s insurance if something happens and they will find any reason not to pay? If your going to lose everything anyway why should you pay the premiums every year? Arn’t insurance comapnies like playing the lotto? No, I think your chances are better.
Posted by: kim | August 25, 2006, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
I am willing to bet that the people who are complaining are the same ones who were to busy to meet with their agent when he called to sit down and review their policy.
For every bad story like this there are 10,000 who where saved by having State Farm. Of course the media won’t run those happy stories now will they?
Posted by: Jeff | August 25, 2006, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
welcome to your good neighbor at state farm.
the trustworthy insurance company who contributed to the campaign fund of a judge,,,,,who by the way,,,,held the swing vote in state farms appeal of a very large judgment for using counterfit car parts,,,,,,,
don’t forget about state farms selling salvage cars with clear titles
or the fact that they dictate pricing for body shops, and short change customers by installing untested, unsafe, after market parts…after market parts are not crash tested
Posted by: john | August 25, 2006, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
I have been a State Farm Agent for over 20 years. My only complaints against the company have been for paying TOO much – for things I thought we did not owe. As several adjusters have stated, they are instructed to find any way possible to pay for the loss. They do an excellent job.
In 1999 a client called saying he thought he might have a sinkhole threatening his home. (It was an old home, without a concrete foundation and he found some cracks in the walls.) We filed the claim and the claim office hired an engineer to check it out. Engineer said it was not a sinkhole. The client hired his own engineer. Guess what! Their engineer said it was a sinkhole.
State Farm paid the face amount of the policy, in addition to additional living expense for a rental home until the claim could be settled and my client could find a place to live.
Fast forward to 2006. Guess what! There is now a NEW HOME sitting on top of that “sinkhole.”
You see, the first engineer was correct after all. There was no sinkhole.
Interestingly enough, as a couple of posters have already mentioned, State Farm’s market share ALWAYS INCREASES after a catastrophe hits an area.
I wonder why?
We are LIMITED in the number of homes we can insure. (Of course, if insurance was such a rip-off, then we would want all the homeowner polices out there.)
So, as for you whiners who say you are going to cancel your SF policies – PLEASE DO SO. I would much rather do business with people who have common sense.
Posted by: Andy | August 25, 2006, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Kim what was the reason given for not paying your claim?
If it was just a simple, straightforward fire, I don’t see the problem.
We had a $300000 house insured for 2 months. They’d made 2 monthly insurance payments on it, probably a couple hundred dollars. Lightning hit it, burned it to the ground.
We paid that claim in full, plus living expenses while the house was being rebuilt AND contents.
So there has to be more to your story.
Posted by: lisa | August 25, 2006, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
what do you call 8 feet of water in your home?
hmmm………..let me think for a sec……….a flood???
oh silly me………
how could i be so dumb as to not think 8 feet of water in my home is not considered a flood by my insurance company because it did not come in the form of rain from the sky?
because it was a storm surge and broken levees it is not considered a natural flood!!
and our government can’t do anything about this??
please!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: angry policy holder | August 25, 2006, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Looks like these independents, who by the way are not State Farm employees are posing for glamor shots, look at the facts State Farm continues to recieve high scores in claims satisfaction. There are always a few who choose less coverage to save a few bucks then complain when something is not covered. I have received nothing but exceptional service from Sate Farm and my agent. State Farm is a mutual company, I don’t want to subsidize others.
Posted by: Dave | August 25, 2006, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
I read some of these comments by the people who are complaning that they are paying the bill for the people who live in the path of hurricanes. Every state in the union has it’s natural disasters. I.E. Hail,wind, tornados,wild fires, lightning, floods and earthquakes-ect.When any these happen we all pay— the insurance compaines see to that in the form of rate increases.I had a waterfront home in coastal MS.I paid a anual homeowners premium of $2400,a flood insurance premium of $400,and my policy had a additional 2% deductable for “hurricane damage”.I paid thru the nose for my insurance coverage.My home is now gone,eyewitnesses who stayed in the neighborhood during the Katrina, testified under oath that the homes were destroyed by the wind before the water rose.Weather reports show numerious tornados in the area,wind gusts near 150MPH.Engineering reports by a private”honest” company agree that the homes were destroyed bu the wind.State Farm AKA snake farm was quick to pay out the flood because it was Uncle Sam’s money they were spending.Not a penny of my homeowners was offered.I retained a attorney,they laughed at his letter demanding payment.I now do not want a settlement I want my day in court in front of a jury,I want my homeowners payment,loss of use money,attorney fees and any other “bad faith”damages that i am entitiled to.I ask the folks out there to do them selfs a favor and switch their insurance coverage to any one except State Farm,they are truly a bunch of snakes.If you are insured with SF and have a major claim-you will be out of luck.
Posted by: Howard Franks | August 25, 2006, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
You people are such complainers. You build a house next to the ocean/ You don’t buy flood insurance/ You don’t read your policy/
Then when your house floods, it is everyone elses fault.
Get a life.
Posted by: Charlie | August 25, 2006, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
“I guess all those photos of houses covered in water were doctored by GWB. If you morons can afford premium cable, PS2, Xbox etc., than use your welfare, section 8, WIC, food stamp and the medicade/medicare money savings to buy the right insurance…oh yeah, and shut up.”
And maybe one day you and the other arrogant fools on this blog will find out what it’s like to suffer a disaster, and then you’ll shut your ignorant mouths. It’s very revealing that the only people mentioning GWB on these postings are knocking down straw men and issuing ad hominem attacks against people they don’t even know.
Posted by: have a heart | August 25, 2006, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Typical lazy-brained Americans– loving the shock-value and jumping to conclusions. Try and understand what the word “alledged” means…
Posted by: Phil | August 25, 2006, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
We were State Farm customers for 20 years, and they treated us quite fairly.
Posted by: Joe | August 25, 2006, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
I work for State Farm as an independent on a regular basis and we are always instructed to err on the side of the policyholder if any grey area exists. The bottom line is homeowner policies do not cover flood damages. That’s what NFIP flood insurance is for. A lot of these people are claiming they did not know they were in a flood zone. For crying out loud, you live on the Gulf of Mexico! The mother of these two sisters had a claim on the Mississippi Gulf Coast and she did not have flood insurance. Therefore she did not get everything she needed from State Farm, but she did get everything that was owed to her. By the way, I work for the same independent firm as these ladies. I have never met them, but this is nothing more than the two of them angry about their mothers plight and trying to get back at somebody, anybody. I also live in Mississippi and my claim was handled fairly, honestly, and promptly by State Farm, and I just hope the actions of these two haven’t done irreparable damage to not only State Farm, but my independent firms relationship with State Farm, because they’re is no other carrier for which I would rather work.
Posted by: fishhead | August 25, 2006, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
I personally worked for State Farm and have seen internal memos and announcements that stated they were raising mandatory deductibles, etc., in various parts of the country so that they DID NOT HAVE TO PAY CLAIMS. They made promises to their employees on paper that were denied in the privacy of a one-on-one conference. We had a male claims manager who was caught in a compromising position in a conference room with a female employee — Guess what? He was promoted and she was fired. You do not know the half of the stuff that goes on in this company.
Posted by: Farmer No More | August 25, 2006, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
I have a NEWS FLASH for you.
The Katrina victims are not the only ones being raped and pillaged.
If you’ve had a Hail Damage Claim in the last two years, there’s an outstanding chance that you have been Low-balled and ripped off.
The Fraud that is going on with “Automotive Hail Claims” is Massive.
20/20 needs to have someone investigate what is going on with that end of the Insurance Business.
If there was an Insurance Adjuster that would come forward in the Comprehensive hail claims sector, it would make your hair curl.
I thought the Hail Insurance Claims rip-off was an isolated case, but now I see that this type of business practice is Rampant!
If you’ve had a Hail Claim lately, I’d like to see what you have to say.
This stuff is sickening!
Posted by: Dustin Lashely | August 25, 2006, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
If you’re ex-military, go with USAA, they’re great.
Sometimes they almost make me feel bad, falling all over themselves to do the right thing for me.
I hate insurance companies. They love getting the money, but when it comes time to part with it, they’ll fight you tooth and nail.
Posted by: Jack Steinhilper | August 25, 2006, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
I’ve been with State Farm for over 15 years. I’ve had my share of claims…several fender-benders that were my fault. I’ve had two homeowners claims that were due to negliegence on my part. Life happens. Accidents happen. Disasters happen. State Farm has paid EVERY one of my claims and treated me with respect. I don’t know what happened internally with State Farm during Katrina. There may or may not have been some crooked employees…let’s face it, corporate America is huge and there are bad eggs everywhere. But, we shouldn’t condemn an entire company. I read another article that says how much State Farm has paid out in claims…they’ve paid out more than many other insurance companies have. Also, may I mention that my agent isn’t out to get me or rip me off. He reviews my policies with me regularly to make sure I have adequate coverage. I know him personally and at the risk of sounding biased, he is more interested in taking care of people and helping people than his own bottom-line. Let’s what for a full investigation and let’s give these companies a break. Let’s also remember that is the individuals responsibility to know and understand their own policies and also understand their limitations. If YOUR insurance company doesn’t take the time to contact you for these matters, then please contact them and fully understand your policy and coverages. I have great compassion for the people of New Orleans and surrounding areas. My heart aches for their losses and I hope that they are able to recover over time. But please, let’s not condemn an entire company and every agent. If all State Farm cared about was ripping off its clients then let me ask you why they paid all of my claims over the years? I feel quite confident that State Farm has paid out more on my claims then they’ve profitted from me.
Posted by: Herbert | August 25, 2006, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
I am just glad to hear something about the Gulf coast instead of always New Orleans and their brave mayor.
Posted by: Will | August 25, 2006, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
READ YOUR POLICIES WHEN YOU ARE PURCHASING THEM.
Posted by: Dita | August 25, 2006, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Finally! Someone looking into the practices of State Farm. In 1990 our family home was vandalized and set on fire. State Farm insisted we rummage through burned clothing, charred furniture and catalog everything, even socks! then they never even looked at the bags (all needed to be seperated, white, colored, linen) then would only pay item for item. I could go on for an hour about the mistreatment my family underwent at the hands of State Farm. In the end we were forced to go to mediation and ultimetly lost out home. Hurray for you sisters for standing up for what is right.
Posted by: Carol Whitley | August 25, 2006, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
The Rigby sisters are nothing but gold digging, advantageous worthless adjusters!
Independent Adjusters are paid by the file and the amount of the insurable loss. When a wind policy pays a couple of thousand dollars, the Independent Adjuster only gets a fee of a couple of hundred dollars. If the house is a total loss, the fee is several thousand. Independent Adjuster make between $25,000.00 to $35,000.00 a month immediately after a storm. The Rigbys wanted all their assigned files to be total loss wind claims. Katrina delivered storm waves in excess of 18 feet 3 miles inland! These are storm surge claims plain and simple. I wonder how much Dickie Scruggs is paying the Rigbys for their information. Strange that this is only coming out now as Scruggs lawsuit against State Farm is coming to trial. Why didn’t they report this to the Attorney General of Mississippi or the FBI in November?
Posted by: Mark | August 25, 2006, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
Kerri and Cori Rigsby, these beautiful women should be given the TIME man/person of the year award.
They helped expose something that a large percentage of blue collar hard working Americans have always known – that the insurance industry as a whole is nothing more than legalized theft.
Posted by: David | August 25, 2006, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
You know what if you were not affected by this tragedy of Katrina then you wouldn’t know. We have two women that are basically putting there entire lives on the line to say that their company did wrong. They walk away from the jobs and security just to put out the message that what was going on was just morally wrong. State Farm is horribly wrong and for those of you that have never been burned by state farm get ready! Because the truth really hurts.
Posted by: Jamie | August 25, 2006, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
I am disappointed in reading this bickering on this board. If agents of State Farm did as the charges allege, they should be dealt with. There are both crooked and helpful people in any organization. I can say that people are naturally skeptical and resentful of insurance companies because of various bad experiences in the past. I can also say that insurance companies are increasingly burdened by irresponsible people who sue when a traffic signal doesn’t have the right shade of green.
Blaming President Bush is also futile. Sure, he’s probably responsible, but let’s deal with him after we’ve solved the problems in New Orleans. Blaming him doesn’t help any homes get built faster and doesn’t help the millions of people who were displaced by the storm. I personally think he should have been more proactive, and I think the evidence has all but established that. Yeah, Michael Brown was the fall guy. Yeah, Bush was briefed fully early on. Let’s put those in the distance and make some progress.
The partisan blame game seems to have truly clouded some people’s judgement. I encourage everyone to do what they can to help the victims. I donate to my church’s aide program, and have actually run a supply drive in my area. People are truly desperate down there, and they need our help. We have two options: we can choose to help them and put any beliefs aside temporarily or we can stick to our beliefs and “let them eat cake.” I know what I choose. I hope my fellow Americans make the same choice
Posted by: Andrew E | August 25, 2006, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
State Farm has the money to pay off the claims. The company has been controlled by the Rust family for ages and is not beholden to any meaningful oversight. They split up their business units to shield them from liability. I worked there and I know. But one last comment – Allstate is much MUCH worse than State Farm when it comes to stiffing their policyholders out of their rightful claims.
Posted by: storgis | August 25, 2006, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
The Insurance Adjustment is a flute. Just from watching the 20/20 video, you could see the slab anchor bolts are bent. Would rising water distort them, of course not. They had to be bent from the force of WIND. I’m no engineer, just using common sense. Come on State Farm – pay up on the evidence that is apparance.
Posted by: Bob Cowart | August 25, 2006, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
I AM A THIRD GENERATION STATE FARM EMPLOYEE AND CAN VERIFY OUR PHILOSOPHY IS TO ALWAYS PAY WHAT WE OWE. IT SADDENS ME THAT 2 WOMEN ARE WILLING TO PRESENT FALSE ACCUSATIONS FOR THEIR 15 MINUTES OF FAME.
Posted by: Alison | August 25, 2006, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
All insurance is a rip off…we are with a different insurance company and have a separate rider on our policy to cover our electronic equipment since we live in an area prone to lightning…this rider’s premium cost is figured at a higher rate than our regular home owner’s policy, but we felt it was worth the extra cost to cover our equipment. Well, after a few years, lightning took out our VCR and a component of our satellite system, when we tried to submit a claim, we were told that if we did so, our premium would be increased or we would run the risk of being dropped all together by our insurance company. So I ask you, what do we pay insurance premiums for?
Posted by: Cyndy | August 25, 2006, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
I’ve had good and bad experience with my insurance companies, but nothing as tiring and taxing as dealing with Liberty Mutual. I had a collision with a bike rider while driving my car and my insurance agent paid on the biker’s claim without investigating the claim himself (To the tune of almost $4,000.00!!!). I spent the next 2 months doing my own research that resulting in a police report that indicated the cyclist had come through a red light and I discovered the quote to my agent for the bike replacement came from not just any bike shop, but the bike shop of the cyclist’s employer (talk about conflict of interest). Needless to say, the insurance company agreed not to increase my rates (a threat they made to me), but I doubt they recouped the money back from the cyclist. Who do you think will ultimately pay for this screw up? Me and all the other customer of Liberty Mutual.
Posted by: Terri | August 25, 2006, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Just to get things clear. Not only was State Farm the first insurance company to show up in most areas (often times by several weeks), they also arrived and began helping customers before FEMA or the Red Cross in some instances. Just because people fail to read legal contacts that they sign (the insurance policy) does not mean an insurer is “cheating” or “screwing” people. It’s time people in this country step up and are accountable for thier responsibilities.
Posted by: Drew | August 25, 2006, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Why should the insurance companies be any different than the oil companies, utility companies or HMO’s. Throw in the judicial system and that should cover it. Getting these fixed will happen right after they rewrite the Constitution of the United States. No one alive now will ever see the day. Middle Americans are in a hopeless situation with no light at the end of the tunnel. Corporate america along with politicians have us by the short hairs. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. No other way to express it
Posted by: S weiss | August 25, 2006, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
I know everyone really would like to blame or attack State Farm over this story, but it really was short and vague on the details. Most of the allegations were thrown out there and addressed as unproven opinions. I know that State Farm and most insurance companies want to pay what the policy covers.
Posted by: D M | August 25, 2006, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
The real criminal is “Crookie” Scruggs – the corrupt lawyer involved here who “hired” these two idiot non-employee former State Farm independent adjusters to manufacture false evidence for him. He’s just scared because of recent court decisions work against his sue everyone strategy. A recent federal court case upheld the long-standing policy exlusion for flood damage(actually the exclusion is typically phrased “damage from water or water-borne material” which defeats the whole “storm surge is not flood” argument).
This is just Crookie’s desperate attempt to breathe new life into his dying cases on behalf of more than 1,000 plaintiffs against insurance companies.
I’m thoroughly disappointed in the sensationalized and distorted reporting that concludes with great bias that State Farm is guilty. All Brian Ross and John Stossel proved tonight is that they are unprofessional biased reporters who care more about hype than the truth.
You have to give the company time to investigate the allegations. State Farm will cooperate with authorities to figure out what, if anything, happened here. You can be sure that if anyone acted fraudulently, they will be fired. State Farm does not offer incentives for employees to even want to underpay claims. That goes against common sense that an employee would even seek to defraud the customers they have to face. Settling these claims is a heart-wrenching duty.
Claim representatives do everything they can to find coverage under the policy. They don’t go into it looking for ways to exclude coverage; however, they have to find the coverage in the policy before they can pay because the premium charged is based on anticipated costs based on what the policy does cover.
I can understand being upset when you discover that your policy doesn’t cover what you hoped it might. However, you can’t buy insurance after you’ve already incurred the loss (unless you do so fraudulently) any more than I can place a bet on last week’s football game or buy Wal-Mart stock at 1972′s stock price.
Posted by: what-the | August 25, 2006, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Katrina Victims are not the only ones that are being Cheated by State Farm. It is happening in Michigan too. My family lost everything the house, clothes, and item that can never be replaced. Due to Toxic Mold that was caused by State Farm not allowing use to do tempory repairs to fix the water leak in the roof that was caused by Ice Damns. Ice Damns were covered on our policy. We left our home with 3 changes of clothes each and had to start all over. Thanks to State Farm. We had been fighting them in court over 6 years. There are many other families in Michigan that are still facing this. WATCH OUT!!! State Farm will cheat you out of whatever they can and if you take them to court they will try and drag it out as long as they can. Just so you will give up on fighting them. Please don’t give up. This company needs to be put in its place and CLOSED DOWN!!!
Posted by: Jenny | August 25, 2006, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
What happened to innocent until proven guilty?? It’s sad what these 2 ladies are doing just to get media coverage and hopefully a slice of some big jackpot they think they will be entitled to. Just another story to help the plaintiff bar pad their pockets… Read your insurance policy or talk to your agent to know what your policy covers. It’s as simple as that…don’t wait for something bad to happen and then cry when it’s not paid for because it’s not covered. Most of the comments posted here today are a sad commentary of America.
Posted by: HD | August 25, 2006, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
I would like to see these investigations go further.Please let all the families know there is power in numbers. They need to keep fighting for the homes they deserve and to keep it from happening to others this way!! We had a similar situation. Our house burned in 2002. Our insurance company – good ole State Farm. Needless to say 2 years and a few thousand dollars in attorney fees later ,we are finally back in our house. My heart goes out to all those who pay so much money for coverage only to find out they have a lot more to weather than the hurricanes, fires and floods. State Farm took so much more than our premiums. They keep you from getting your life back. God bless all who are dangling from the threads of state farm to get there lives back in order.
Posted by: Tina Benson | August 25, 2006, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
This is not about people wanting payment for damage that wasn’t covered. It’s about allegations that State Farm destroyed and/or altered engineering and adjusters reports that supported some level of damage by wind. SF and others want to attribute all damage to flood so they are off the hook totally. Katrina had no wind???
Posted by: Steve | August 25, 2006, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
I am a General Contractor and have been dealing with these Ins. companies for years. Just saw you show on State Farm and how they riped off these poor people. I have found if these people when they can, have a General Contractor repersent them, let the general contactor deal with the adjuster, I promise you they would not get by with all the things they have done to these poor people. My company did a job right after the storm, it was a funeral home, the adjuster came out, took a few pictures, told them they could get started any time, no money just get started. Finally a estimate finally came, still no money, roofing leaking every time it rained. We went on a fixed the roof, chapel ruined!!! When the amount came, I reviewed the statement and found they were over $20,000.00 short!!! It took me over 3 months to get the extra money. My point is, the insurance companies have three different prices, one for the niave homeowner, one for the homeowner that knows a little bit and then the price when the homeowners say “I have a General Contractor!!! If people knew how bad they are being ripped off by these insurance people,you would really have one hell of a story to tell. At the present, I am working on another such issue. My point is, you need to be represented by someone(General Contractor) when you have a large claim. You will get the money you deserve from the insurance company, not what they want to gice you!!! Thank you, Larry
Posted by: Larry | August 25, 2006, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Wow, I thought I was listening to Dan Rather! That’s about how thorough Brian Ross’s investigation was. Maybe you should investigate how the two women are involved with the plaintiff attorney?
Posted by: Joe Parkes | August 25, 2006, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
This is a criminal conspiracy. The executives of this company should be prosecuted under RICO and thrown in jail.
When a guy steals a car, he goes to jail. When these insurance executives steal millions they get bonuses.
Posted by: smokedog | August 25, 2006, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Hey “Lisa”,
You state your home burned down
in december 2005. and you have fought for over 2 years. I think you have a real problem with your story!
Posted by: bob | August 25, 2006, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
We saw this with our house in Bay St. Louis. We were told by a contracting Adjustor for State farm that he saw so much fraud that he quit his position. He submitted our claim 3 times before he gave up. We had Wind, Homeowners and Flood. We were covered. Not many of home owners down there had coverage. We had it and we were lucky. We finally got paid. Believe me, we were surprised.
Then there is the story of the Donut shop accros from the Waveland police department.
A large number of Policemen, hanging on to the little shrub outside the police department, watched the donut shop be blown down by the wind.
The little shrub will be forever enshrined of because it saved the lives of many policemen that day.
The insurance company said the damage to the donut shop was caused by flooding. They would not pay the claim. Imagine the lawsuit,(which I hope happens.) when the 20+ policemen testify to what they saw…….
And the poor guy is so busy taking care of everyone else that he has not done anything for himself. Everyone down there will know exactly who I am talking about. I don’t need to name him.
Just remember, what goes around, comes around. The insurance companies will be remembered.
Posted by: Joe | August 25, 2006, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
to Jeff I live in a small town where the two insurance companies are run by a state representive conflict of intrest!! and friends of the spraker of the house of representives of our state!!!Don’t you think votes don’t go their way for a minute. insurance is insurance it shouldn’t be sperated into different types of damage. 20/20 PLEASE follow this story to the end these guys should be prosecutted to the fullest just as tyco enron world com and all the others who steal from the working class just to have plasma screen TVs over their fireplaces on their patios!!!!!!! No joke my understanding of a gift from an insurance company to a member of the house of representitives
Posted by: MIKE | August 25, 2006, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
I’m not at all suprised at state farm they have been doing this for years. In the seventies after we were hit from behind while sitting at a red light, totaling our car ,and sending me to the hospital. our state farm rep. lied to us ,telling us we were signing papers to release funds the man paided,not signing away our rights. IF THEY DO THERE OWN POLICY HOLDERS THAT WAY BACK THEN, I’m not at all surprised they do it today!
Posted by: gale | August 25, 2006, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
AVARICE!!?? You decide!
Posted by: david | August 25, 2006, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
You people are morons. I am reading about people cancelling their insurance at the smell of a story. What about the other insurance companies completely pulling out of danger areas like New Orleans – All State anyone? Independents do not have the kind of access to information that these two are claiming. Doesn’t it sound pretty stupid of State Farm to pull up a big shredding truck right out side their office and destroy huge amounts of data. And just because paper data was destroyed you don’t think there are electronic back-ups. There is so much regulation in the insurance industry you keep as much proof as you can as to why you did or didn’t pay for something. Media only covers the dramatic. It is too bad the only people that decide to respond are the people who claim to have had a bad experience – WOW sorry you were too stupid to read you own policy and know what was covered. Insurance companies are reimbursed from the federal goverment for flood claims and are forced to sell flood policies as a result. What does it hurt them if they pay flood to people who have it when they are reimbursed.
Posted by: J | August 25, 2006, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
How much did ambulance chaser Dickie Scruggs pay Brian Ross and these women, maybe a reputable news agency will investigate.
Posted by: Joe | August 25, 2006, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Jeff- State Farm didn’t save anyone, ever. Just ask around.
Posted by: bret | August 25, 2006, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
bottom line. Every company has bad apples.Bottom line, flood insurance is different than your typical homeowners policy. Its a shame that a company can handle 100′s of thousand claims and some bad apples hande a claim incorrectly or dishoestly and all the sudden the entire company is bad. That’s crazy. State farm should have sent a representive from their company to report on this and they should also fine tooth look at every claim and make sure things are right with the claims. Remember if you choose to live 6 feet below sea level and you don’t get flood insurance don’t blame the gov or state farm or you insurance company.
Posted by: scott | August 25, 2006, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Why should the rest of us subsidize people to live in flood-prone areas. We should not have to pay for other people’s stupidity.
Posted by: Bob K | August 25, 2006, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Pathetic….
BIG Tobacco, BIG Oil, BIG Insurance, BIG Retail, BIG Trial Lawyers…Little Victims..
These stories do not get ratings. BIG’s employ this countries people and pay them modest salaries. They highly regulated. If BIG’s were hurting the Little Victums they would not be in business.
If the BIG’s were making so much money why does not everyone by their stock. Purchase an insurance companies stock lately? No they have paid what they owe folks and they do not make a lot of profit. Check it out.
ABC Shame on you. Same story Northridge Earthquake. Same Story Hurricane Amdrew…Same story war om IRAQ.Investigative reporting NOT…
There are 99.5 percent of positive stories to report on in Iraq, what the insurers do everyday, what the oil companies are doing for the environment, the tobacco industry is doing on education, what the alchol industry is doing on responsibility, etc… This type of reporting is investigative…
Thiocal blew up the space shuttle. crappy reporting for ratings. No the government ordered the launch against Thiocals warnings and suggested delays. Thiocal’s intervews ignored and twisted. Twisted drama does not sell ABC.
There are three types of Americans. Imagine all have one arm extended; one group has their palm down, one has their palm sidways and one has their palm up.
Seventy-five percent of americans have their palms facing down as they expect nothing for free and work for everything they get. In additon those with their palms sideways have thier plams sidways wiht the invitation to shake a hand of another american and embracing each other.
This story and every other DRAMA presentation is about the 25 percent of the LITTLE Victims with their palms up that BIG Government, BIG tobacco, BIG Oil,
BIG Trial Lawyers, BIG Insurance, and BIG Retail (Walmart) is takeing avantage of. Palms up wants a hand out. If it is not coming to them legitamitely then I can alway rely on BIG ABC to report their story. In this case the hand out will not come as they do not deserve money for what they are not owed.
ABC if you report on what the seventy-five percent of what the American’s want to hear ratings would be back where they were before you reported on what you though americans want to hear.
Americans work hard. Americans do great deads everyday. American soldiers make a difference in Iraq with local folks every day. Big tobacco gives millions to non profits every year. Big insurance gives millions to education and safety groups every year. I can go on.
Employees of BIG’s volunteer in thier local communities, pay taxes and do great deeds for their customers every day. Report the truth.
Pathetic….
Posted by: Bill | August 25, 2006, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
I am a forty-three year agent with this company and I have never seen something like this happening to a policyholder in all my career. I don’t live on the coast, but we have had a lot of weather claims. I always stay on top of all claims and make sure that the policyholder gets what is coming to him. I was shocked at the expose’ on ABC 20-20 tonight. I just hope this information presented is not true.
Posted by: Jerry | August 25, 2006, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
State Farm is also negligent when it comes to auto accidents and you get injured. I had state farm in 2003 and had to hire a personal injury lawyer to sue because they refused to pay my lost wages, medical bills, and my pain & suffering. If you or anyone you know has auto insurance with state Farm change insurance inmmediately! And if you do have State farm and are injured in a wreck, hire a darn good lawyer and fight them all the way!
Posted by: Sean | August 25, 2006, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
The tale of another tape, playing the same mournful lyric: Once again, the lawyers have it all, both ways, in creating the mess and the subsequent litigation.
Rack’em up boys…State Farm did not do this alone, their legal counsels guided them every step of the way – just like they did at Enron, Sunbeam and MCI, if anyone paid attention.
Say it ain’t so…
- Flavious, Esq.
Posted by: Flavious | August 25, 2006, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
These women are just getting their 15 mins of fame…next month, they’ll be in Playboy. SF is an ethical company, and has gone above and beyond for millions of customers. You people are idiots.
Posted by: waaaa | August 25, 2006, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
State Farm is the only major carrier left along the coast. Everyone else has left the area. While Scruggs continues to line his pockets, you morons and naysayers continue to believe everything you hear and read. The only constant here is State Farm -paying what we owe – not one dollar less, not one dollar more.
Posted by: tom | August 25, 2006, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
Before you all go and cancel your State Farm policies – SIT AND READ THEM!!! Like any other insurance company on this planet, State Farm will not pay claims on coverage you don’t have!!! People don’t add the optinal coverage to their policies because they don’t want to spend the money, but State Farm is the bad guy when claims for non-covered damage are denied? Come on…you can’t get something for nothing.
These 2 independant claim adjusters are paid comission on the claims they settle and they get nothing for a claim that is denied (yes, including those denied DUE TO LACK OF COVERAGE) see anything suspicious there? If these ladies have worked for State Farm for 8 years, and State Farm is so terrible, why are they just now speaking out???
Come on, where are the stories about the tens of thousands of people who State Farm has helped?
The lesson here is simple – take the time to review your coverage with your agent and there will be no surprises when the worst does hit. I am a loyal multi-line client with State Farm and will stand behind them.
Posted by: katie | August 25, 2006, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
While I feel sympathy for many who live in the Gulf Coast and feel that this is a terrible tragedy, one should remember that policy holders must read their policies. You must determine what is covered by your policy before a disaster strikes! For example, I live in an earthquake zone, which would not be covered by my homeowner’s insurance. Additional coverage would need to be taken out to cover my home in the event of an earthquake. This holds true for those in hurricane prone areas that require flood insurance. State Farm is owned by the policy holders and has no reason to short change those on the Gulf Coast. However, everyone loves a good “stick it to the big company” story. How terrible! I have had State Farm Insurance for years and would never consider switching. For those who are displeased, you have a choice in insurance.
Posted by: Engineering Grad Student | August 25, 2006, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
I know for a fact that these women are lying. They accepted huge amounts of money from the Scruggs law group to say what they did. The people who work claims in these devistating situations are compassionate, dedicated, hard workers who give up a lot of their lives to be on call 365 days a year. To suggest that there is a big conspiracy is absolutely unfounded. Everyone wants the “smoking gun” everyone wants to blame someone. Well the fact is that there is no “smoking gun”. Look at any of the readily available satellite images. You will see that the majority of the damage stops at a line right down the coast. Guess what else stopped at that line? That’s right, the water. After the water stopped, the major devistation stopped. Sure there was some wind damage after that line, but it was paid for by the wind policies – billions of dollars worth. What wasn’t paid by the wind policies was the obvious flood damage that is only covered by the NFIP and has been that way for almost 40 years. Policy language has also stood for almost 40 years. Ask anyone down there about the other hurricanes that have gone through and not completely destroyed their homes over the years. The major difference was not the wind speeds. The difference was the 20 foot wall of water. The blame is on those who chose either to not have flood insurance or not enough of it. I know that sounds harsh, but it is true. How could a person honestly look out the front window, see the Gulf of Mexico and think “I don’t need flood insurance”? The rest of the country bails out flood prone areas time and time again with our tax dollars. This horrible attempt to smear the good name of a company and the dedicated people who work so hard is just shameful. Those two women witnessed no wrong doing. Don’t you want a company to shred non-essential documents to protect you from identity theft? That’s all they did. And yes, that is a fact. Rest assured that every last sticky note is safe and sound in a claim file where it will remain for years to come. Every state regulates its insurance industry. If inconsistencies are found they are delt with. Yes there are flaws in the insurance industry as a whole, but there is no big conspiracy as those women would suggest. I’m sure that this note will generate some pretty negative responses towards me and what I have said. I ask that you seek all of the facts before rushing to judgement. A company must employ its lawyer to speak on camera. That person cannot devulge every single fact outside a court of law. A company knows that the only way to fight a fair fight is in the legal system. Unfortunately since it is far more dramatic to see a 20/20 report about the big bad insurance company cheating its poor customers, that is what airs. It sure would be nice to see the truth occasionally, but I guess that just isn’t newsworthy. These women claim to be exposing some sort of cover-up. All they did was anger a lot of good people who were on the road to rebuilding their lives and get them to re-live the horror of Katrina. Some day the truth will come out and you’ll see just how evil these women really are.
Posted by: Truth | August 25, 2006, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
I know Cori and Kerri VERY well. It is interseting that Cori used her maiden name. I worked with them during this time period as an independent adjuster. They have many good qualities, and a few that are not so good. Without boring you with the details, I would like to say that they do have personal issues with State Farm and employees of that company (as well as other companies). This has clouded their judgement before and did so during their tenure at the catastrophe operations site. Its a shame that so many people comment on what they do not know. Listen carefully to the facts. Those that attack often do so with emotions, including in this forum. Those who can substantiate their position rarely need to be so heated up. I won’t reiterate what has been said regarding policy language, though some information was wrong in this forum. I will say, however, that judging this company with such one-sided arguments is as foolish as asking the devil if you should worship God. (NO, the accusers ARE NOT THE DEVIL, and BY NO MEANS IS STATE FARM GOD!!) Learn for yourself and find out why/if something happened before judging.
Posted by: Ind Adjuster | August 25, 2006, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
State Farm is participating in several unfair business practices, why should this be any different. Anyone want to take a look at all the Visas issued to people working everyday at State Farm but not “for State Farm”? Evidently, State Farm would rather maintain visas than hire US citizens. It definitely is retaining people on visa status because they are cheaper than the Americans. Of course, these are all contractors, not State Farm employees, so none of these people can sue.
I was there when Katrina happened, and they were grateful it didn’t cost them as much as the other insurance companies. Also they were happy they made profits last year despite katrina.
Can’t say anything else because of the non compete and non disclosure.
Someone ought to be looking at them though.
Posted by: Former Farmer | August 25, 2006, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Lets take a step back—-you live 30 yards from the Gulf of Mexico and don’t carry flood insurance? Hmmmm….sure, why not try and blame it on someone…why not blame it on the insurance company. Ever heard of accountability?? Guess this will play out in the courts….hopefully ABC will run a follow up when State Farm prevails and the Rigby sisters are flipping burgers.
Posted by: Ace | August 25, 2006, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
Don’t believe a word of it. As it stands, State Farm pays out way more than what they should. State Farm does not ‘pray’ on people with little or no means to hire an attorney. I worked for State Farm for over 8 years and we always gave the customer the benefit of the doubt. I find the negative things being said here very difficult to believe. One of the most ridiculous statements I keep hearing: “My agent said I didn’t need flood insurance.” Yet this policyholder’s view out their window was of the gulf. Enough said.
Posted by: Joanne | August 25, 2006, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
A few years ago there was a significant hail storm here in Kansas City area. We didn’t think much about it at the time, but State Farm called us to ask if they could come and take a look at our roof. 3 days later a check for $11000.
Thank God for State Farm
Posted by: Vinny | August 25, 2006, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Sounds similar to a claim in Toronto August 19th.
Posted by: Don | August 26, 2006, 12:01 am 12:01 am
Now why doesn’t this suprise me? I filed a claim on one of their insured this month and they denied the claim before the police report was even done…and the their driver got the ticket for filing to yield the right of way from a private parking lot! I had to get a lawyer to settle this minimal claim…no wonder thier premiums are so high.
Posted by: JASON | August 26, 2006, 12:03 am 12:03 am
There is a loophole in the Florida Law that lets the insurers get away without paying for WATER dammage. Another problem; the insurance company adjuster decides on the amount of dammages they will pay, then you can’t find a contractor to do the repairs for that amount. This is a HUGE problem here in Florida.
Posted by: Jackie | August 26, 2006, 12:04 am 12:04 am
Strange that every response from insurance people is “you should have had flood insurance”. People are giving first hand accounts of houses burning down and car accidents. You guys are a joke!
Say the same lie enough times and the masses will believe it, Right!
Let’s be honest here, insurance companies are in the business of selling policies not paying claims.
My advice is invest in insurance companies. It works for Warren Buffett. If you don’t know who he is do a Google search.
I live on the water and my most inexpensive insurace policy is the flood coverage so cut the crap.
I’m a contractor and all my customers that are fighting their insurance companies for roof and interior damage from the hurricane in my area have the same thing in common, State Farm! Go figure.
And for those of you upset because you think you are subsidizing my lifestyle because I live on the water, get a grip. This is the least of your problems. If you can’t afford waterfront property just enjoy what you have and don’t be jealous.
Posted by: Mr. B | August 26, 2006, 12:04 am 12:04 am
The first thing I thought when I read through these comments was…ARE THESE PEOPLE FOR REAL?
I have been sitting here for over an hour reading through these commments and can’t believe people are so easily influenced…WOW!
Another thought was…THE PRESIDENT WORKS FOR STATE FARM? I didn’t know that?
Then I thought…OH, HE IS GOD AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL BAD THINGS IN THE WORLD.
What is wrong with you people? Is this how you all act on a daily basis? I bet the majority of you people are lonely, bitter individuals.
Anyway, I know first hand that State Farm claim representatives are trained to FIND coverage. There are many cases in which claims that should not have been covered were paid.
It is terrible what happed to people during this disaster, but there is noone to blame. It just happened!
A word of advice…don’t believe everything you hear. I just read an article in line at the grocery store that said aliens were attacking…OH NO, PRESIDENT BUSH IS THE DEVIL AND WERE ALL GOING TO DIE.
get real
Posted by: Disgusted | August 26, 2006, 12:05 am 12:05 am
When the president says mandatory evacuation it also includes black people. and no one is an african american you are either american or not.If you choose NOT to leave you get whats coming period.Flood is exculded on any homeowner policy, but “wind driven precipitation is covered. No wind no surge. its a tough call, but a contract is a contract. if you dont read yours….too bad so sad…it’s always caviat emptor
Posted by: Bruce Gr | August 26, 2006, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Thank you to the courageous Rigsby sisters and to ABC for airing this story. Having just returned from a rebuilding mission trip to Mississippi, I am inclined to believe the allegations. This area was clearly hit by tornadoes on the eastern side of the hurricane’s eye. We met many homeowners (who knew they weren’t covered for flood) but who were betrayed by their insurance companies when the agents looked them right in the eyes and offered insulting settlements, insiting it was flood damage. I pray that sooner rather than later these residents will be properly compensated according to their coverage and that additional compensation will be ordered for their suffering in the meantime at the hands of these greedy, unethical insurance people. Too bad that no amount of money can repair the emotional damage done, not by Mother Nature, but by their fellow man.
Posted by: fran | August 26, 2006, 12:10 am 12:10 am
I am a 23 year State Farm Insurance policyholder and also an 18 year State Farm employee and Agent. I was appalled but not surprised at the completely biased and one sided nature of your report. To take the word of two independent adjusters and a plaintiff’s attorney without any corroborating evidence is very discouraging. State Farm is not just some secret corporate entity, State Farm is 17,000 Agents like myself. State Farm is all of the mem and women that work in these offices and State Farm is the 50,000 plus employees that are present and active in communities all over this country.
I have read all of these comments and there are a lot of valid points on each side of the issue but let me say this. I have worked in claims as an adjuster and in management and not one time in my 18 years have I ever been asked to do anything immoral, unethical or illegal. I would hope that the next time that you use a television show to slander the names and good deeds of over 100,000 people that you would do a little more homework and use a little better judgement. Fair and balanced is how the media is supposed to operate and unfortunately in this case that did not happen.
Posted by: D.C. Clement | August 26, 2006, 12:16 am 12:16 am
I have sat here an read all your comments and I can’t believe my eyes. For those who state that those who live on the coast are idiots, are you also calling those who live around volcanos, in earthquake prone areas, or the tornado alleys idiots? The earth is covered mostly by water. Hard to get away from it or any area that doesn’t have some type of natural disaster that could strike you.
Furthermore, for those who do not know, flood policy coverage is maxed out at $250,000 for dwelling and $100,000 for content. That amount surely won’t cover a $500,000+ home. Besides when ones home is torn apart by tornadoes and wind for hours before the water even reached your home, isn’t it reasonable to expect that wind coverage should be covered especially when you have a 2% hurricane deductible clearly stated on your policy? Especially when this is backed up by engineering reports.
For those who comment about reading polices before purchasing. Hard to do when State Farm won’t furnish the policy until you first purchase it. Then when you do get it and read it, State Farm changes the policy 2 weeks after Katrina.
I was a State Farm policy holder for 29 years, until after Katrina. I also had flood. I’m now with another insurance agency with one policy for flood, one for fire and theft, and one for wind/hail. I also pay $3500/year more for this privilege. Why would I do this? I’m one of those lazy no good worthless people who lost everything to Katrina and am trying to live off someone else according to some of the previous comments. Trying to clean and rebuild is difficult, when you are trying to find a place to live. Once you find that place, if you’re one of the lucky ones, you spend 12 months plus repairing it first. Living with plywood over windows, slab floors, and holes in the roof. Repairing this all at your own expense. So now instead of on the verge of retiring, you are now working a full time job on top of trying to do repairs. Not to mention you are still trying to take care of parents who lost everything too and are in the same predicament and trying to put kids through school and try to give them some kind of normal life, all the while crying yourself to sleep at night through sheer exhaustion and with the overwhelming since of loss of all your treasures and the injustice of not being able to put your life together because the one thing you thought you had going for you was the thousands of dollars of insurance you purchased each year in the event something ever happened to your home. To rub salt in the wound, you have your original policy and 2 weeks after Katrina, you are presented with a new version. Now stating all kinds of things that was not in the pre-Katrina policy. Denials from State Farm across the board on all claims and even denials of investigation reports.
Friends going through the same thing, only they have changed reports from State Farm. First report stating damage done by wind, second report, sorry won’t pay, it was water.
For those who claim 2 sisters couldn’t possibly work in the same office, etc. One set of adjusters we had was a husband and wife team who worked out of that same office of the sisters. You go by that office and there are armed guards there. The office set up is all open with desk after desk after desk. Very easy to overhear and see what is going on.
So for all you non-believers, until you’ve walked a mile in my shoes or one of the thousands of people down here that are going through this hell, lighten up and give us the benefit of the doubt. I’d like to see you do half as well trying to put your life back together when you have been denied payment by the very contract that was suppose to make you whole again. Don’t be so quick to be so critical of thousands of people who are in the same boat as me. All I want is what I contractually agreed to. I did my part, I paid my premiums. Now it is time for State Farm to do their part and pay me what I am rightfully owed. Stay tuned, if we are forced to take this to the courts, they are anticipating that it will take at least 60 years to hear all the cases in Mississippi. My mom will be 143 and I will be 106 if I’m at the end of that list. Hope we can live that long to see justice done.
Posted by: Debbie H. | August 26, 2006, 12:17 am 12:17 am
ABC’S 20/20 MISCHARACTERIZES
STATE FARM’S CLAIMS-HANDLING PROCESS
Bloomington, Illinois, August 25, 2006 – State Farm® is outraged by a misleading story aired on this evening’s ABC 20/20 program and by depictions made by two external independent claims adjusters, Cori Rigsby Moran and Kerri Rigsby. The story mischaracterizes State Farm’s claims handling process in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
The ABC report alleged that engineering reports were altered to deny claims. “How the program characterized State Farm’s claims handling is grossly unfair,” said Susan Q. Hood, claims vice president, State Farm Insurance.
“The fact is that we sought engineering reports in about 1100 cases, less than two percent, of the more than 84,700 property claims that we handled in the state of Mississippi. We issued payments on more than 60 percent of those claims in which engineers were involved. And in the claims where engineers were involved, we paid far more on homeowner claims than we did on National Flood Insurance Program claims. To be precise, we paid more than $26.5 million in homeowner claims and only $3 million in National Flood Insurance Program claims.”
“This evening’s report inaccurately portrays State Farm’s claims handling policies and our commitment to our policyholders,” said Hood. “Our claims associates are committed to operating at the highest level of business and ethical standards. State Farm is committed to paying what we owe, promptly, courteously, and efficiently.”
In Mississippi, where the ABC story focused, State Farm paid out more than $1.1 billion in auto, homeowners, and commercial claims. It also paid out more than $790 million in national flood insurance claims for the federal government.
Less than two weeks ago, a federal court ruled that almost all of the damage caused to a coastal home in Pascagoula, Miss., was due to flood not wind. The vast majority of the claims in dispute are also situated along the coast.
In the segment, ABC’s Brian Ross shared documents (from among documents shared with Ross by Rigsby and Moran) with attorney Wayne Drinkwater, who represents State Farm in Mississippi, saying the documents demonstrated that there were conflicting engineering reports and that State Farm denied claims. One claim shown to Mr. Drinkwater belongs to a Biloxi, Miss., policyholder who, despite ABC’s and the two external independent claims adjusters’ assertions, did receive payment and has declared that he is satisfied with his payment and the way his claims were handled by State Farm.
The two women also alleged that State Farm had shredded documents. Like all other large companies and government entities, State Farm has a records management program, which among other things protects the privacy of its customers and appropriately maintains records for regulatory and tax purposes.
State Farm has tried to meet with the two women adjusters who appeared in the ABC 20/20 segment to discuss their concerns. They have refused to do so, despite repeated requests. They are represented by attorney Richard Scruggs.
State Farm handled more than 295,000 property claims and paid (not including payments made under the National Flood Insurance Program) more than $3.1 billion as a result of Katrina. Thousands of State Farm agents and employees from around the country and Canada joined the thousands of agents and employees who already live in the gulf to respond to these storms. “We dedicated these kinds of resources to handle and pay claims, not deny them.” said State Farm vice president Mike Fernandez.
State Farm has been working for months with, and providing documents to, the Mississippi Attorney General’s office and the U.S. Attorney’s office and continues to cooperate with Mississippi and federal officials as they investigate these and other allegations.
“What’s so often ignored is that we have thousands of dedicated people, some of whom suffered their own losses at the hand of Hurricane Katrina, who have worked extremely hard in a professional and ethical way to resolve each claim consistently and in accordance with our policies and our commitment to our policyholders,” said Hood.
State Farm is a mutual insurance company, not a publicly-traded company. It has been the largest insurer of cars in the U.S. since 1943 and the largest insurer of homes since 1964. It also offers a number of other financial services.
State Farm Insurance
Posted by: Phil | August 26, 2006, 12:24 am 12:24 am
state farm? gotta love ‘em, them
good neighbors! couple years back
in texas, they TRIPLE my homeowner’s
rates due to claims arising from
black mold. oh, and at the same
time, they DROPPED my black mold
coverage.
Posted by: mr.mold | August 26, 2006, 12:43 am 12:43 am
I would need to see the evidence before I would jump in and believe these two ladies story. Sounds to me like they have an ax to grind somewhere. Perhaps they were trying to inflate claims to inflate their service charges, and got caught? Could it be they have been promised a hefty payment by Lawyer Scruggs? Stranger things have happened.
Posted by: Guy Rans | August 26, 2006, 12:53 am 12:53 am
CANCEL your STATE FARM policy today. Other insurance companies will think twice before they screw their customers. That is the only way this will change… the consumer must drive the market.
Posted by: Tony | August 26, 2006, 12:57 am 12:57 am
Insurance companies are nothing more than legalized Mafia. We trustingly pay our premiums on time with the so-called assurance that if something happens, insurance covers the loss. Whether it’s from Katrina, a fire, or earthquake, insurance companies are creative and inventive in finding ways to keep their promise. Insurance companies are not there for us, they are there for the money.
Posted by: KarenWeb | August 26, 2006, 12:59 am 12:59 am
how can anyone say that state farm isnt a good neighbor? look how good they treated clinton. he had a liability policy with state farm, and they “discovered” that it covered sexual harassment, so they paid him a million dollars to defend himself against paula jones.
the fact that they wanted legislation passed to keep banks out of the insurance business had absolutely nothing to do with it. they were just doing the right thing and honoring their commitment.
Posted by: stargirl | August 26, 2006, 1:00 am 1:00 am
Ok is this news, we have an example of a bad insurance company.
What would be newsworthy ? If you tell us an example of a good insurance company. Tell us who the good ones are so we can all change our policies and reward the honest ones. Tell us the good stuff so we can learn for next time, not complain about this time.
Posted by: Steve | August 26, 2006, 1:00 am 1:00 am
State Farm is the best. These accusations are from independant adjusters.
Posted by: fred | August 26, 2006, 1:08 am 1:08 am
I have just spent over an hour reading the comments posted on this site. I now understand why most of the rest of the world laughs at Americans when we travel.
We have become such a society of sheep. No one has the ability to think for themselves. It is much easier to listen to a “news” program (everyone knows 20/20 ranks right there with Nightline and CNN for non-biased reporting….right?) then to actually use our brains and THINK!!
Perfect example….If the Rigby’s were SOOO concerned about what State Farm was “making” them do, why didn’t they report this 6-8-10 months ago? Why now when the independant adjusters are scrambling TRYING to find work?
Why would a multi billion dollar company like State Farm risk the negative publicity, HUGE fines and possible government sanction to save a couple hundred thousand or even a couple of million dollars? They could conceivably be fined HUNDREDS of millions of dollars (and bet me that IF they are the Rigby’s won’t be the first in line with their hands out asking for their cut?)!!
I wonder how much 20/20 paid the Rigby’s for their “exclusive” story?
People, if nothing else this should teach you one thing…..READ your policy!! It’s a contract. Would you buy a car without reading the contract? Very simply put, surface water from the exterior of the building (ie. flood), whether driven by wind or not (ie. storm surge) is SPECIFICALLY excluded in most policies. Look at yours.
While I feel sorry for the people who lost everything, does that mean they should get “special” treatment and have coverage provided when their policy specifically excludes it? When they live 50 feet from the beach where there was a 40 ft. storm surge?
Every person on this site who thinks State Farm and all the other companies should pay no matter what….Don’t complain about your premium rates.
If you want to know what Gov’t insurance is like, ask the people of Florida with Citizens Policies. One half the coverage for twice the premium. Ask the people of Louisiana (where I live) who had a 30% surcharge on their premiums this year to reimburse the State of La. what they spent on the homes that had NO coverage.
You wanna leave State Farm….. Go for it. I am sure they won’t miss you at all.
Posted by: TS | August 26, 2006, 1:15 am 1:15 am
There is corruption in every business, including insurance. Let’s face it…in Louisiana, the past 3 insurance commissioners have been convicted of fraud and spent many years in prison. So if you don’t think that these big insurance companies do it too, think again. It certainly cannot be a reflection on every agent, their corporate offices, etc…but I fully believe that with the volume of claims that there has never had any comparison, yes, some insurance adjusters claimed water damage to avoid paying up. I know first hand that Allstate wasn’t much better…they had so many complaints it was unbelievable and have had to make several trips to the visit the legislature to testify on their practices. Every State Farm and Allstate insurance agent I know is extremely wealthy…makes you wonder.
Posted by: leslie | August 26, 2006, 1:15 am 1:15 am
THIS is why Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway is worth tens of thousands per share… outright theft lobbied for and delivered by his manservants.
Like a good neighbor eh?
Posted by: hsing lee | August 26, 2006, 1:20 am 1:20 am
As an insurence professional I advise all policy holders and prospective policy holders to read and fully understand your policies before you accept them after all you wouldn’t buy a car without looking under the hood would you Well then you can’t really expect SF to pay for Billions and billions of Flood damaged houses when in fact it was the water and not the wind that damaged their home. SF employees have mortgages to pay too. very nice homes just like the people we protect Gdbless and protect all of you Amen
Posted by: SF Agent | August 26, 2006, 1:36 am 1:36 am
My family went through Rita and SF took great care of us. We’ve been with them for 25 years and have always had proper treatment.
Posted by: Gail | August 26, 2006, 1:51 am 1:51 am
I worked for an insurance company in claims for several years. Initially everything seemed ok, however that was only a cover up. This insurance company mistreated their employees and didn’t give a crap about their customers. They had been reported to various governmental agencies and always managed to slither away from accountability. They cancelled policies with no explanation, dodged paying covered claims and awful management. Although I didn’t work for All State, it is possible they did something wrong.
Posted by: Lee | August 26, 2006, 2:01 am 2:01 am
Agreed that insurance consumers need to understand their policies, and that insurers need to write policies because they cannot provide limitless coverage.
HOWEVER- Insurers are in the business of risk. Nonetheless, they are as risk-averse as the rest of Corporate America while pursuing ever-increasing profitability. Like casinos, they make money by taking in more money than they pay out. That is the goal. You are “in good hands” or with “good neighbors” only within the context of achieving this goal.
Posted by: Mike | August 26, 2006, 2:16 am 2:16 am
“FLOOD” IS NOT COVERED….ATTENTION. ANOTHER HURRICANE (WITH POSSIBLE FLOODING) ON THE WAY…BUY FLOOD INSURANCE TODAY AND QUIT WHINING. How about a investigation into the two “suspect whistleblowers”
Posted by: JIM | August 26, 2006, 2:23 am 2:23 am
All insurance companies are like casinos. It’s rigged so that the house wins. The companies put down a bet…say $300…that your house won’t blow away. If you want in the game, you have to “call” the bet. And then next month, the company places the same bet, and again you have to call the bet…and every month it’s the same. Every month that your doesn’t blow away, the house wins. Isn’t that called “gambling”? Insurance companies are involved in illegal gambling under the guise that you must participate, or loose everything you have. They are forcing you to gamble. Like Bob Dylan said “When you ain’t got nothing, you ain’t got nothing to loose”. You also have nothing to insure…and the house looses.
Posted by: Shawman | August 26, 2006, 2:24 am 2:24 am
I am a 12 year State Farm agent. Every sentence uttered by Brian Ross and his cohorts made me feel like I was watching 4 year olds lie. Not a single word rang anything remotely true in my ears.
From the very first sentence in the report: “two State Farm employees”…Of course we know they were not employees. But
don’t let the facts get in the way of a good old fashioned hanging…
Just some things to think about:
I have a full-time employee that spends 4 hours a day calling my existing families to invite them in to review their policies. We try to meet face-to-face at least once every other year. Take a guess what percentage agree to meet? 20% at best. We recognize that people are busy, but if their
doctor or accountant wanted to see them, they’d take off work and rush right over.
But ask yourself, how did it happen that State Farm came to insure one out of every 5 cars and homes in the U.S.? Is this a law that we’re unaware of? Of course not. 20% of America entrusts their family’s future to State Farm because they are friends with their local agent, they’re treated with respect, and they’re treated fairly. No wonder State Farm insures more cars and homes than the next 3 companies combined.
To those of you sold on buying insurance over the phone from an 18-year old live-at-home twit
taking your insurance order (with fries) for GEICO and Progressive, let me ask you: When is the last time your GEICO skateboarder sat down face-to-face with you, your spouse, and your new 16 year old driver and discussed the life and death importance of responsibility behind the wheel? When’s the last time your Progressive order-taker supported your local cancer walk-for-life campaign and showed up to walk? Either of them ever sent flowers to the funeral home and stood in line for hours to spend a few supportive moments with the wife and 2 small kids? Have they ever taken dinner to the grieving family or handed them a million dollar life insurance check to carry out the deceased husbands dreams for his kids? Helped set up a college fund for the kids and secure the widow’s financial future?
Any of them coach your kids’ little league baseball team, volunteer at their school, worked laundry detail at 2 am at the homeless shelter? Bought jerseys for the girl’s soccer team?
Has the creepy little lizard donated his office parking lot on Saturday to the church youth group to raise money for a missions trip, then pay the way for a couple of kids that still couldn’t afford to go?
Civic clubs, Chambers of Commerce, Churches, charities. You name it. State Farm agents and their employees are there, donating their time, energy, and resources to make their communities a better place to live. All we get from the “phone gang” is busy signals, annoying
commercials, and lousy service.
If you’re inclined to believe ABC and its hype, then do yourself a favor and drop by your local body shop and ask them who they’d rather have repairing their car…
State Farm or the other guys. ANY other guys. Ask them who works hardest to make sure their clients are happy. Then ask them who is the worst. Any guesses?
We certainly make mistakes, but please know that State Farm works very hard to take care of its clients. The market responds to this fact and continues to help us grow.
Thank you to those of you who have written in support of State Farm. You have been a great encouragement to those of us who were saddened by ABC’s report.
No doubt, ABC will call for investigations and regulation. But when the smoke clears, I’m convinced our 80-year record will emerge intact. Then, will anyone call for investigations and regulation of ABC?
Posted by: Proud Agent | August 26, 2006, 2:39 am 2:39 am
The inter-net is a powerful tool so I challenge everyone reading this story to send it to everyone they know. The only was to get to the corporate giants in bad publicity. we owe it to the Katrina
victims. Because there will be more to come and they need to know when the time comes they have to pay-up or pay the consequences.
Posted by: LILY | August 26, 2006, 2:44 am 2:44 am
I LOVE STATE FARM! GOD BLESS STATE FARM!!
How could you expect State Farm to pay a claim for a policy that you did not purchase? If you did not buy flood insurance than it is your fault and YOU should take full responsibilty.
Don’t you all know not to take something on tv at face value?? Remember there are always 2 sides to a story. I am disappointed in 20/20′s reporting of this story. How could that man blame State Farm for his wife’s death? How ridiculous is that? He needs to take personal responsibilty for not purchasing flood insurance while living in that location.
I have been a State Farm policyholder for 23 years. They have been so good to me. My agent is like my friend. They go above and beyond to take care of me. I will always be with State Farm.
Shame on 20/20 and ABC News for reporting a misleading story just to make a great story and make money.
Posted by: Cassie | August 26, 2006, 3:02 am 3:02 am
The general Public too often see a large Insurance company & think “make em pay”. Guess what, we ARE that company. The Policyholders will end up paying for any settlements the Insurance Companies have to pay. Does that make sence? Have you ever met Mr. Statefarm? The only people who gain from these type lawsuits and large settlements are the Attorneys. I have worked for many Insurance Companies (including State Farm)over the past 25 years as an Independent Adjuster (just like the 2 lady whistleblowers). And I have never been instructed to do anything dishonest or unfair. In fact, Every Storm I’ve been on, we were all instructed to “make sure you look for & include all the damage & give the Insured the benefit of the doubt”. Every Insurance Company I know of has reinsurance for catastrophic losses. They may have a $5 million deductible but they don’t stand to gain anything by cheating their Customers.
I have to wonder 1st, was the damage caused by a 10′ or greater wall of water which isn’t covered unless you have a flood policy. And 2nd, did the whistleblowers try to set the Company up for their own gain? They should know that shredding has become common practice with every Company that deals with public information, after the recent identity thefts. They seemed to be trying too hard to make a case.
Posted by: Jeff | August 26, 2006, 3:26 am 3:26 am
The part of the story where State Farm shops for and changes engineers’ reports is typical for State Farm. They do the same thing in Michigan for their insured catastrophically injured in auto accidents. I, personally, am currently involved in just such a case – the second one in 3 years. The first case 3 years ago went to trial, but when it came time for them to present their defense, they didn’t have one and settled on the spot for our original request for benefits.
Posted by: Bob | August 26, 2006, 3:38 am 3:38 am
After reading several of the postings, I could not help but notice a recurring theme that suddenly all insurance companies are money-sucking, fraud-ridden institutions. Indeed there are some very unethical companies out there which have given entire industries a bad name. Enron and the Arthur Anderson Accounting firm come to mind. However, that does not mean that all energy and accounting firms operate outside the law. Let’s face it – insurance is an undesirable product to purchase, so insurance companies are an easy target. But keep in mind that there are also plenty of ethical insurance companies out there. Sadly, these quiet companies who operate with integrity and honor their contracts are the ones that don’t make the headlines. The lesson learned here is to do your homework and research your insurance company. Each state department of insurance maintains complaint logs for all insurance companies. Find out who is reputable and switch. The lowest cost operators are not always the best.
Posted by: Scott | August 26, 2006, 4:18 am 4:18 am
It sickens me.
it’s no longer “We the people” it is “We the Corporations”
If you have lots of money you can lobby the neessary changes. if you a poor or average individual you have little to no leverage.
insurance is becoming a farce, it should be simple. You are insured, you get rebuilt…
I am disgusted with what is going on in America these days to the point in which I find it hard to willingly call myself an American
Posted by: Daryl | August 26, 2006, 5:01 am 5:01 am
Insurance Companies gamble that the policy premiums received will be less then the claims and expenses paid out. They complete exhaustive sudies and use actuarial matrices to just about guaranty their lucrative returns. In the case of KATRINA they lost their bet and must pay for their losses and be held accountable. If State Farm is guilty of the accusations made in the article then it suggests unjust enrichment. Furthermore, the promises made in the policys were made in bad faith and to the severe detrimental reliance of the customers. Additional punitive damages should be assessed against the insurance giant and allocated to those of us who have been injured for such gross misrepresentation. Simply put a fraud has been perpetuated against those of us who felt we were purchasing security and liabilty protection and bought nothing.
Posted by: mark Lefkowitz | August 26, 2006, 5:42 am 5:42 am
Too often people see a Big Insurance company & think “make em pay”. Well guess what, WE ARE that big insurance company. You & me, the policyholders. If the company takes a hit & has to pay millions in punitive damages, our premiums go up. The Attorneys are the only winners.
I’ve worked many storms for State Farm as an Independent Adjuster (just like the 2 ladies in Mississippi) and have never been asked to do anything dishonest or unfair. In fact, we are instructed to make sure we figure all the damage & give the Insured the benefit of the doubt. All Insurance Companies have reinsurance for catastrophic losses, they of course have a very high deductible (usually 5 million +) but have no reason to under pay a claim or deny a covered loss. However, in fairness to the other policyholders, they don’t pay for losses not covered either. I don’t want my premiums to go up because some yahoo 50′ from the ocean didn’t have the foresight & good sence to carry flood Insurance.
I have to question the 2 sisters that decided to come forward (a year later). What do they stand to gain from this? They should know that shredding is common practice with every company that deals with personal information (with all the identity theft going on). They seemed to be trying too hard to make their case.
I know alot of people out there (with a mob mentality) are going to read this & think “another Adjuster siding with the company”. But I think alot of us got into this business because we enjoy helping people, unfortunatly we can’t help the ones that don’t have coverage.
Posted by: Jeff | August 26, 2006, 5:46 am 5:46 am
ALLEGATION: State Farm systematically cheated many of its own customers to avoid having to rebuild the homes of people who lost everything….Supervisors demanded that damage reports be buried, replaced or changed so that claims would not have to be paid.
FACTS:
State Farm handled more than 295,000 property claims and paid (not including payments made under the National Flood Insurance Program) more than $3.1 billion as a result of Katrina.
In Mississippi, where the ABC story focused, State Farm paid out more than $1.1 billion in auto, homeowners, and commercial claims. It also paid out more than $790 million in national flood insurance claims for the federal government.
ALLEGATION: State Farm used a special shredding truck. It was used to destroy key documents.
FACT:
Like all other large companies and government entities, State Farm has a records management program, which among other things protects the privacy of its customers and appropriately maintains records for regulatory and tax purposes.
ALLEGATION: State Farm put pressure on engineering firms to bring in the kinds of reports State Farm wanted…If it was water, State Farm was off the hook and if it was wind, State Farm had to pay. State Farm said, if you don’t come back with that kind of report, we won’t pay your bill.
FACTS:
We sought engineering reports in about 1100 cases, less than two percent, of the more than 84,700 property claims that we handled in the state of Mississippi.
We issued payments on more than 60 percent of those claims in which engineers were involved.
In the claims where engineers were involved, we paid far more on homeowner claims than we did on National Flood Insurance Program claims. To be precise, we paid more than $26.5 million in homeowner claims and only $3 million in National Flood Insurance Program claims.
Posted by: dave | August 26, 2006, 6:05 am 6:05 am
I see a lot of “poor little me” coming out here. I would venture to guess that more than 90% of Americans who have insurance never even take the time to read their insurance policy and note the exclusions to the policy. When a natural disaster happens, then the cry is heard, “Fill in the blank Insurance Company” is trying to screw me out of my paying for damages.
First, if you expect coverage for any contingency, then you better be ready to pay for it. Second, read the damned policy and ask your agent to explain anything you don’t understand. Ask an attorney to explain things to you and pay for their time. Three, let’s be smart people and quit having the Chicken Little “the sky is falling in conspiracy” mentality that seems to be rampant here.
Educate yourselves on your policy and then make up your mind.
Posted by: Russ | August 26, 2006, 6:53 am 6:53 am
Like a previous poster, I am surprised that Cori MORAN used her maiden name of Rigsby. I wonder what else she is saying that is untrue. Also interesting that they are represented by a guy who knows he has a $250,000 flood insurance cap, but builds a million dollar house in a flood plain anyway. Oh, it’s not covered? I guess I’ll just start a class action suit. Guess who wins in this folks….Dickie Scruggs. Who loses? All homeowners in the gulf when all the insurance companies pull out because of these fraudulant lawsuits. State Farm stayed when many others left. So use your head, and read your policy. And for all you Einsteins out there taking this story as gospel…get a clue. John Stossel? All he’s interested in is the Nielson rating, nothing else.
Posted by: nonbeliever | August 26, 2006, 7:21 am 7:21 am
What State farm has done to the victims of Katrina is disgraceful. The executives should be held reliable and sent to jail like the Enron execs. They should have all their possesions taken away from them and be forced to live in the gutter just like the filthy rats they are.
Posted by: Edd Howes | August 26, 2006, 7:21 am 7:21 am
My adjuster for Hurricane Francis told me he quit State Farm the previous year, because they had him specialize in finding ways to NOT pay claims!!!!!
Everything you hear about State Farm is Absolutely TRUE!
Posted by: H. Francis survivor | August 26, 2006, 7:26 am 7:26 am
Gee this is exactly what happened to me. The first adjuster sent by State Farm was let go and another sent. I spoke with the first adjuster and he told me I will not like what State Farm is going to do and he couldn’t work for a company that would do this. Yes I had flood insurance but all my contents >$130,000 where covered under my homeowners which State Farm doesn’t want to open. My home was “blown” apart by the wind and hour or so before the water ever got there. I’m still fighting them and will continue.
Posted by: mike | August 26, 2006, 7:37 am 7:37 am
State Farm has been amazing to me and my family; if I had to guess I would say they are shredding documents to protect my personal information from identity theft. (Which is the LAW)
Posted by: Shredding is not the Crime | August 26, 2006, 7:38 am 7:38 am
These sisters sound like the new JonBenet suspect to me — a little suspicious! Did anyone think these sisters are looking for their 15-mintues of fame!
Posted by: The Sisters Sound Crazy! | August 26, 2006, 7:40 am 7:40 am
State Farm should sue these two liars.
Posted by: George | August 26, 2006, 7:44 am 7:44 am
LOL!!!! Shawman, here they don’t call Bingo gambling either! You put your money down either way. Don’t you? And every day nothing happens to you car, house or whatever the insurance co. has won the bet!
Posted by: andy,ms | August 26, 2006, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Please, America, think. What does 20/20 really sell? They are not interested in the *whole* truth. That’s called “boring news”. Focusing on anything illicit gets Americans to tune in. It’s why gossip mags and People magazine sell more than The Economist. 20/20 goes out of their way to try to get you to think that “the big bad insurance company” cheated all those poor Mississippians. Ask ten random Gulf Coast residents that had State Farm and I would bet you that they would tell you that of all the people that were supposed to help their local State Farm Agent were one of the few that came through. Maybe, just maybe, there is a sliver of truth to the three stories they aired. However, State Farm had paid over $1 Billion in hurricane claims in the region. That’s billion with a “B”. Why no mention of that? Why no mention that of all the claims that they handled only 2% (2% !!) had anything to do with an engineering report? Shows like 20/20 want to spoon-feed you to believe what they want you to believe. It’s working and it’s sad. Please, America, think. And, if you think big time trail lawyer Richard “Dickie” Scruggs is all about helping his fellow man…think again. Ever wonder how much of the award trial lawyers get when they go after “big bad business”? Think, America. While you are questioning State Farm motives take just 5 minutes and question everyone else’s (including the adjusters who got their 15 minutes of fame last night).
Posted by: Antonio Roam | August 26, 2006, 8:43 am 8:43 am
I’m just wondering, for those of you who are so outraged… if someone walked into a restaurant and ordered a hamburger and then ranted and raved because they were not given a t-bone steak, would you all have the same reaction? Or would you think that the person demanding a t-bone when they paid for a hamburger is out of line? Inurance companies don’t manufacture money. They collect premiums based on the probability of loss in a person’s area. The premiums of those who don’t have a loss pay for the losses of those who do. The rates are based on statistics of past losses in the area — there’s actually national databases for loss info. Flooding is excluded by every insurance company because there is no good way to predict losses for any given area by flood. I would guess if the hurricane trend continues, hurricane coverage will soon be excluded as well. We all face losses every day. Some can be insured; some cannot. Sometimes, we choose higher deductibles which force us to pay for smaller losses because we believe the risk is so high that things won’t happen to us. I feel a great sadness for those who experienced the loss of their home by Katrina… I sent money to aid organization with the thought that they would help to rebuild because insurance just doesn’t cover everything. I don’t pretend to know if something illegal has happened with State Farm. I do find it suspicious that ABC is the only site that is publicizing this “atrocity”… and that they’re doing it with two women who, from their picture, seem to be a little too happy. As some other posters have advised, I think we all have to wait for the facts.
Posted by: Tracy | August 26, 2006, 8:51 am 8:51 am
State Farm in the BEST insurance out there! These two sisters I’m sure were paid off by 20/20 and that attorney Shruggs or whatever his name is…let’s talk about who the real “cash driven” crooks are! An insurance company that is under the constant microscope of the government and every state department of insurance or 2 sisters out of work and an attorney…also a TV show that is looking for high ratings. 20/20 will not say insurance companies are fair or state what good they have done when it comes to them seeking high TV ratings…just like the war in Iraq, the media will only report the “bad/bogus” for their own personal gain…it is a shame!
Posted by: Jim | August 26, 2006, 9:07 am 9:07 am
First, let me say that what is happening on the Gulf Coast is not limited to State Farm. I know of many stories of the exact same nature from Allstate, Nationwide and even the “better” companies, such as USAA.
Second, for those of you righteous minded posters who want to remind everyone that flood coverage requires a separate policy, you are completely missing the point. There were many homes that were completely destroyed/gone. The insurance companies are using the superficial lack of evidece to their advantage to say the entire structure must have been destroyed by flood. However, this is clearly NOT the case for those highlighed in this story and for many others.
If you walk the property and debris fields, it is clear that wind destroyed these homes hours before the storm surge arrived. As only one example, a tin roof does not float. The only way it can land hundreds of feet from the homesite is from wind. Once the roof is gone, the home is ruined.
The game the insurance companies (Allstate, Nationwide, Statefarm and many others) played with the engineering companies was obvious to those involved. They were clearly trying to take advantage of policyholders who were devastated and too week to fight back.
I truly applaud these sisters for having the courage to go public with their story. For those of you who suggested that their motivation was a pay off by ABC, you need to realize that their decision had to have been made long before ABC picked up this story.
Posted by: Mary | August 26, 2006, 9:12 am 9:12 am
It’s easy to discern the intelligent responses from the people who just want to pile onto the insanity. Fact: Flood is not a covered peril under an HO policy. Insurance carriers have every right to determine the proximate cause of the damage whether it be wind or flood. I also agree with the people who complain that part of their insurance premiums are used to pay for those that want to live in high risk areas. In fact, I live in a normal neighborhood in the midwest and am required by the government to purchase flood insurance because my house supposedly sits on a flood plain that the odds of flooding are 1 in 100 years vs. the normal 1 in 500 years. This insurance isn’t cheap, and doesn’t cover squat. You can pay > $1,000 per year and your contents in the basement are not covered. And to the Bush Bashers – get lost. Our country will go to hell and back if any of the Clintons get back to the Oval Office. I can’t wait to read the blogs after Hillary sets up her national health insurance and you have to wait months to see the Doctor or a procedure is denied because it’s too expensive and you’re too old. Or you could re-elect Jimmy Carter and Al Gore and we could all go to a love in and hug trees.
Posted by: G | August 26, 2006, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Well, I had State Farm (many years ago)on my vehicle. It was sideswiped and they had a list of “approved” body shops for me to take the car to. My Deduct was $250. When I picked the car up I immediately noticed the fender had NOT been replaced…it was Bondo-job, fiberfilled. The original damage estimate was over $1500 which is why I made the claim in the first place. I was furious. The repair shop informed me that the Agency would only approve the Bondo job, not the more costly fender replacement.
I dropped them that day.
Posted by: diane | August 26, 2006, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Remember Allstate after the Northridge, CA earthquake? One engineer said he inspected about 40 homes yet his stamp appeared on over 600 reports. Adjusters came out and said the same thing was taking place. FBI raided Allstate’s headquarters with a search warrent. Nothing happened. The insurers own the government and are now making it almost impossible for their policy holders to sue them. They are calling for a special legislative session in Florida with the goal to stop people from being able to sue the insurers as their claim to “bring costs under control.” And as for Citizens Insurance, our last resort insurer, the ex-ceo of the insurance company just recently peaded guilty to demanding kickbacks from adjusters to issue contracts to go adjust the claims. He pleaded to accepting $145,000.00. How much do you think he actually got?
And our legislature, full of good Republicans, just lets it go on and on and on and on and on……….
Posted by: tasman | August 26, 2006, 9:38 am 9:38 am
There’s only one industry worse than the telecomms, and that would be the insurance creeps. Great article.
Posted by: GOPHater | August 26, 2006, 9:44 am 9:44 am
I have never read such moronic statements in my life. No wonder we as a country are going down the tubes. Everyone is a victim and someone else has to pay. If you don’t want to “gamble” then don’t by insurance. That is what the people who did not buy flood insurance did and they lost. Now they want to blame everyone else and want their stupidity paid for even though they didn’t buy flood insurance. I bet they could afford the new plasma.
I bought a gallon of milk from my grocery store and it was sour. Let’s shut them down. The 2 X 4 I bought from Home Depot was warped. Let’s have a government investigation. Whine, whine whine. I took an aspirin for my headache and it didn’t go away. I need an attorney to sue Bayer and put them out of business.
All you people work for someone and the media can get your industry as well. In the minds of the “whiners” everyone is a crook but them? Ever hear about insurance fraud. How about all the people in New Orleans who defrauded millions from charities and FEMA.
Yeah, let’s close all the insurance companies and let the government run it like the Flood Program. What a bunch of sheep and morons are out there.
Posted by: Eagle1 | August 26, 2006, 9:45 am 9:45 am
I have an idea. How about all insurance companies pull out of the Gulf States and let you deal with disasters yourselves. Then you wont have to complain about high rates and you can have the Democrats pay your way thru life.
Posted by: Mike | August 26, 2006, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Many of you simply do not understand the nature of insurance. People pay premiums to share the risks of loss with others. In fact, most companies pay out about $1.20 for every $1 they take in. The insurance companies make their money by making wise investments. A mutual insurance company is owned by the policyholders not the stockholders so there in no pressure to make huge profits.
Belive me, if this was a story it would be carried by other news outlets. There was no proof offered. I am saddened that 20/20 would run with this story. They are not in the news business, they are trying to get ratings. This a case of a big time lawyer using the media to try to squeeze money out of big companies. Read the book “King Of Torts” you will learn a lot about Dickie Scruggs.
Posted by: Michael | August 26, 2006, 9:49 am 9:49 am
I’m disappointed in Brian Ross’ extremely biased and shoddy investigation of the State Farm story involving the two former independent claim adjusters who now work for Dickie Scruggs. The story last night was the most blatantly inaccurate and biased news story I’ve ever seen. I hope State Farm seeks legal recourse for the slander you’ve committed. When people are desperate, sometimes they will do or say anything. It’s your job if you’re going to call yourself an “investigative reporter” to get past the emotional hype and get to the truth. From this point forward, I will rely on more reliable networks for my news information.
Posted by: what-the | August 26, 2006, 9:55 am 9:55 am
I used to work for State Farm’s Catastrophe team. The claims by these two women sound very bogus to me. Some of the people on this board may have had some bad experiences with SF (and some don’t understand insurance), but in my experience, SF has handled its claims in a highly ethical way and has paid out BILLIONS of dollars.
Everyone is quick to blame the big bad insurance companies, but when a disaster strikes, don’t forget that everyone else seems to try to make a buck. This includes contractors who descend on the ravaged area with inflated prices and shoddy work, attorneys who are trying to line their pockets (interesting these women are with Scruggs, who is Trent Lotts’ brother-in-law), and yes, policyholders who suddenly claim to own a lot more personal property than they actually did before the storm hit (the lottery-ticket mentality).
One of the previous posters was correct in that these offices are wide open. Which is exactly why I have a hard time believing that a team manager would demand reports be falsified in the presence of others. Trust me, no front-line supervisor is going to risk his or her job to do something illegal. No one wants to be on the stand trying to explain things while under oath.
These people are not getting a bonus based on how much they save the company. While it will take years to handle all of these losses, ultimately our goal was to fairly handle, pay, and close the claim.
Before you jump to judgement, let’s see how this plays out.
Posted by: Mad Dog | August 26, 2006, 9:57 am 9:57 am
As far as coverage is concerned, when a disaster strikes like a hurricane or a tornado. We all know that most of the time they bring rain with them. So to say since your roof didn’t blow off and it was rising water that caused the damage and you didn’t have flod insurance we owe nothing is STUPID. After all whether the roof blew off or not it was the hurricane or tornado that brought the water or even a regular thunderstorm. So to play games with words by insurance companies or find loops for which to use to avoid paying is absolutly a scam and should be looked at. Insurance agents have told me don’t you get it you have to pay for different coverage. When what they ment to say is don’t you get it you have to let us screw you with our fine print and abilities to make excuses for anything to avoid paying. What is the next move? Just like social security now a days. The government says you have to pay it but by the way there won’t be enough to ritire you with. But you still have to pay for those whom are retiring now.
C.J.S.
Posted by: Jaime | August 26, 2006, 10:00 am 10:00 am
All these people who say they work or worked for State Farm and were told to rip people off are liars. I have worked for State Farm for 37 years and no one has ever told me to cheat the public.
The whiners are those who eat a meal at a restaurant and then when they are finished complain and want the meal for free. They are the ones who have 3 or 4 color tv’s and want free medical care, they are the one’s when they trade in a car want 80% of what they paid for it 3 years ago and call the car dealership crooks when they don’t get it. Thank God the people who live in this country were not around when it was founded. You “blame everyone but me crowd” need to move to some third world country and whine there and see what you get for nothing. Learn from your mistakes and move on.
Posted by: Sam | August 26, 2006, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Just a question for all the folks blustering about their fellow citizens needing to “get off their butts,” and “not live in a disaster prone area,” and “why should the gov’t bail you out,” etc. – why do you take your fellow citizens to task, yet wave the flag and bow down to the white house when it sends billions of your dollars per year to foreign governments and awards billions of your dollars per year in no bid contracts to a very few, select companies – companies with incestuous relations with the very gov’t awarding the no bid contracts?
Also, how many of you have even been to NO? You should know that folks down there DID start cleaning up as soon as the hurricane blew by.
With fellow citizens like y’all, who needs enemies?
Posted by: kk | August 26, 2006, 10:14 am 10:14 am
When have you ever seen an insurance company pay? This is just on a large scale, so stick it to em as a group……They don’t want to pay for claims.
Posted by: ken | August 26, 2006, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Insurance fraud is the biggest problem in the industry and unfortunately it also happens within companies, not just from customers. This 20/20 story should have been in the National Enquirer and is a disgrace to ABC. It is almost identical to the story Sam Donaldson did years ago against Allstate and the Northridge Earthquake involving disgruntled customers, adjusters, engineers and contractors. ABC never did a follow-up to inform viewers these same folks were convicted in an insurance fraud ring and some went to jail. Brian, you forgot to mention last night that Dickie Scruggs is also in the process of losing his court cases in MS because everyone knows the tidal wave that wiped out the Gulf Coast has never been and is not now covered under homeowner insurance.
Posted by: stephen | August 26, 2006, 10:32 am 10:32 am
I just wanted to say that I think all of the posted comments are hateful!!! What about all the times that State Farm was the first to come through. People need to remember that an insurance company is not going to give you enough to pay off your mortgage. COME ON and get serious. . . READ YOUR POLICY people, become informed. TAKE SOME INITIATIVE AND LEARN YOUR POLICY. If you would take the time and see what your paying for since money is such a problem, maybe you would see that NOT everything is covered by your insurance company!!!!!!
Posted by: Jessica | August 26, 2006, 10:47 am 10:47 am
These girls did not even work for State Farm and their accusations are being taken as Gospel. Any one ever hear of 15 min. of fame? Insurance companies settle claims based upon the merit of the claim. Floods are not covered unless you have a flood policy, hence the name.
Posted by: blizzardwind | August 26, 2006, 10:51 am 10:51 am
The sad thing is that the government and its banks give you no choice but to buy the insurance for your homes and cars but they don’t get involved when these companies weasel out of their side of the agreements….
Posted by: cheryl | August 26, 2006, 10:58 am 10:58 am
OK for the record I have worked for this company as an adjuster on these Catastophe sites. These 2 whistle blowers would have no access to any inside information if there was any to be had. They aren’t credible sources for any of this.
If I could tell you anything about my experience it has been nothing but good with State Farm. We were always instructed to give our Policyholders the benefit of any doubt (“just do the right thing” was our mandate). Often I was instucted to pay damages that I felt shouldn’t have been covered. Never and I repeat never was it the other way around. Which I can’t say that for other major carriers.
This is just another case where the “American Media” creates a story and a bad guy.
Great job ABC. Why don’t you come and interview me! I think the moon landing was fake.
Posted by: patrick | August 26, 2006, 11:03 am 11:03 am
I have been a SF employee for 13 years after working for Allstate for 7 prior to that. If the allegations from these sisters are true, then shame on the supervisors who allowed it. However, I can tell you personally that we in the Northeast were kept abreast of everything going on during these horrible storms and know the company did everything possible to help. We had agents from every state visiting with supplies and volunteering for weeks and weeks at a time. Employees were touched and supportive like never before. I never saw such comradery like that before.
There are millions of policyholders who are grateful to our agents and claim folks who helped them during these trimes and we never publicized them for the wealth of our company. SF is the #1 P&C carrier in the country, and it is solely because of our claim service and value of our agency force. Because we really do care.
Insurance companies in general are targets of the media, but I wouldn’t work for anyone else. I truly believe this insurance company stands on moral and ethical grounds. Again, if this is true of those office managers, then the company needs to pay back and hold them accountable.
By the way, HO policies exclude flood because there is a separate policy for flood. Unfortunately, that is a difficult lesson learned most of the time. Agents should be reminding their clients of the need, but often the policyholder declines because “it will never happen to them”.
Posted by: Proud SF Employee | August 26, 2006, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Surprize, surprize! We got damaged by a tornado in 2004, even though we had been paying State Farm extra premium for “replacement value” for our personal items, they refused to pay this, also we got really screwed on house repairs, barn repairs, ect. In fact in spite of multiple calls to the agent asking her to return calls, we’ve YET to hear from her, even after we cancelled insurance with them and went to Farm Bureau instead. I think State Farm should be investigated for fraud big time!!
Posted by: fizzbincat | August 26, 2006, 11:22 am 11:22 am
My daughter’s house was damaged by Hurricane Rita. Her experience with State Farm was excellent; in part because she called in her claim promptly. She was allowed to return to the area after two weeks and was met at her house by an adjuster the day she returned. He cut her an expense check promptly and told her to get bids for repairs. It took some time to get everything completed because every house in the city and surrounding area had damage but as soon as she accepted a bid from a contractor State Farm gave her a check. My daughter’s house did not flood….but she had flood insurance. Also, in my hometown newspaper today, there is a story about a resident who has been indicited for defrauding FEMA for over $12,000. He claimed he lost his primary residence in New Orleans, auto, and time from work because of Katrina. None of that is true and now, if convicted, he faces up to 30 years in prison. Maybe he can do his time in the local prison where he works. Shortly after Katrina the local TV station interviewed a man who filed a claim as a homeowner and received a FEMA homeowners check for over $20,000 and bought a new truck. Then he said he wanted to GET BACK into government housing!!! Katrina and Rita caused horiffic devastation on the Gulf Coast. Much aid has been provided and many have filed fraudulent claims. As for the gals on TV making allegations against State Farm..want to take bets on how long it will be until they are offered a lucrutive book deal?
Posted by: BB | August 26, 2006, 11:29 am 11:29 am
What a bunch of cry babies. So typical of pigmy mentality. “All I do is pay pay pay and get nothing out of it”. Well my suggestion is have a head on collision and if you survive see if they pay then. Insurance is not an entitlement program it is a legal contract and payment should not be influenced by whether or not it is politically correct. Get a life and quit expecting something for nothing. Contracts do not generally pay for things excluded from the contract. Sorry you chose not to buy the right coverage or you “did not understand”. Next time perhaps you will do your due diligence. This is not an entitlement program. If that is what you want I would suggest N. Korea or Iran.
Posted by: Erik | August 26, 2006, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Maybe this is how State Farm (the largest Property insurer)got to be larger than its next three competitors combined.
Posted by: Ed | August 26, 2006, 11:43 am 11:43 am
blaming w for everything is probably ridulous. Suggesting w has no blame in this is also equally as ridiculous.
W=the Worst president ever
Posted by: fighttherightwingnuts | August 26, 2006, 11:50 am 11:50 am
The profits made by insurance companies is the worlds best kept secret… the indication would be when the elections are near and the money flows like water from the tap ….
Posted by: makesenseofit | August 26, 2006, 11:51 am 11:51 am
I have been a State Farm customer over 20 years. During that time I have had many claims from auto to home and they have always “been there” to not only pay the claim, but have kept my rates low. I always check their rates with others and they always come out the best. State Farm always has thousands of adjusters on hand to help during disaters. They are the best! And you don’t mention that they and all insurance companies are regulated at the state level and if they don’t meet each states requirments for paying claims they can be fined or ask to leave the state for not paying claims. Insurance companies employ millions of people in this country and contribute substantially to the overall economy.
Why don’t you guys at ABC take a look at a “real problem” in this country…education and poorly trained and inept teachers.
Posted by: Mike Jones | August 26, 2006, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Although I am ‘moved’ by the tragic losses and the points made about flood insurance, we have to understand that many of the people that suffered are poor. I am sure that if given the chance, many would move from the area. It comes down to personal responsibility within ones own means. I for one wouldn’t dare live on a coast with my family for the sole reason of nature. How many people in America actually have a choice? Many of the people in New Orleans are living in family owned homes for years and years without choice.
As for State Farm, I had them covering 3 vehicles and our home in Albuquerque, NM. Although they covered all $11,000.00 worth of damage, they dumped us after our truck went through a blockbuster video window that was 4 feet from the curb without a parking bumper. We spent much much more than 11,000 on our policy over the few years we were covered by them.
Posted by: Dee | August 26, 2006, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Flood ain’t covered. Duh!
But that’s not the problem; the problem is crooked company officials who demand the books be cooked to reflect what they want.
As to agents being dishonest, most agents who sell house insurance barely make a living at it.
It’s the big-wig executives like that idiot running for the Senate in Washington who make the big bucks ’cause it sure as hell ain’t the little puny agent who is way, way down the totem pole in power and $$$$.
Posted by: Mimi Schaeffer | August 26, 2006, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
My daughter’s house was damaged by Hurricane Rita. Her experience with State Farm was excellent; in part because she called in her claim promptly. She was allowed to return to the area after two weeks and was met at her house by an adjuster the day she returned. He cut her an expense check promptly and told her to get bids for repairs. It took some time to get everything completed because every house in the city and surrounding area had damage but as soon as she accepted a bid from a contractor State Farm gave her a check. My daughter’s house did not flood….but she had flood insurance. Also, in my hometown newspaper today, there is a story about a resident who has been indicited for defrauding FEMA for over $12,000. He claimed he lost his primary residence in New Orleans, auto, and time from work because of Katrina. None of that is true and now, if convicted, he faces up to 30 years in prison. Maybe he can do his time in the local prison where he works. Shortly after Katrina the local TV station interviewed a man who filed a claim as a homeowner and received a FEMA homeowners check for over $20,000 and bought a new truck. Then he said he wanted to GET BACK into government housing!!! Katrina and Rita caused horiffic devastation on the Gulf Coast. Much aid has been provided and many have filed fraudulent claims. As for the gals on TV making allegations against State Farm..want to take bets on how long it will be until they are offered a lucrutive book deal?
Posted by: BB | August 26, 2006, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Two little girls looking for their 5 minutes of fame – wipe that smirk of your silly face ladies.
I spent days helping folks in the 9th Ward gut their homes of all their possessions…the only insurance company I kept hearing POSITIVES about was State Farm.
They were the first on the ground, they were the first to pay, their agents rallied from around the country to hand out checks to those impacted.
You want corruption, check these girls bank accounts. Find out how much money they took to refer to contractors, how much they are being paid to so called ‘Whistle Blow’.
I have no doubt State Farm paid not a nickel more or penny less than they owed.
My family has been insured with State Farm for over 50 years, they have always gone above and beyond to give us what we were due and I saw that same spirit during this catastrophe.
Crap sells ad space for ABC, good deeds go unnoticed!
Posted by: DM Dwyer | August 26, 2006, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Don’t believe everything you read. Knowing these types of stories over the past few years, these “insiders” are banking on your emotional connection to Katrina victims. Keep your eyes open for a book deal for the Rigsby sisters. And wasn’t there a “Kerri Rigsby” listed in some Enron emails when those went public? Hmmmmmm……
Posted by: DW | August 26, 2006, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
The laws need to be changed and enforced. The banks holding the mortgage should not be able to escape responsibility, they are the true owners holding the deed and should pay for the burden of disaster. The insurance you pay is to protect them. The government should not enforce a one way check valve on greed.
Exclusions should not be allowed in the insurance policy coverage. It should be all or nothing and not mandatory and without penality. Like the extended warranty on your appliance or automobile, They will cover everything except for what typically breaks.
Nobody really owns their property. You are all renters. If you don’t believe it, just stop paying your taxes and see what happens.
Posted by: sahein | August 26, 2006, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Hey SISTERS. This is a great plan. You can’t handle your jobs as claim representatives any longer and found a way to capitalize on the suffering of those in the gulf area. What’s wrong? Too many days away from your families? Too many hours a day worked? Too much of your time committed to helping people in their time of need? I bet it’s going to be nice not having to worry about that any longer. I wonder what the financial gain is to these two independent adjusters from the media partners purchasing this story and from the lawyers with the same agenda? Let’s all slander the big insurance company. A company wide conspiracy! Come on…no proof or evidence has been presented, but it’s a good story to get everyone upset again just as we approach the first anniversary of this horrible tragedy. As you can probably figure out, I have worked as an adjuster. I don’t need to go into the wind/water aspect any more than it has already been covered. You need to read your policy. As for this big “cover up” that has now been uncovered by these two “courageous” whistle blowers…this is ridiculous. I was in Gulf area handling claims for 7 months after Katrina hit. I have never seen anything like that. It was horrible. I can’t imagine what the people who had no choice but to stay during the storm actually went through. I spend months at a time away from my family and friends to attempt to do my part in helping people recover from these unexpected events in their lives. I sat face to face with countless policyholders affected by this tragedy. I listened…I explained…I cried with some…and I adjusted their claim. I have never been told to change, dismiss, or cover up any information regarding the handling of a claim. I have, however, been told a majority of the time when I have taken a questionable issue upper management to give the policyholder the benefit of the doubt even if I myself do not agree that coverage applies. I have been doing this for many years and would not continue for this company if its business practices involved this type of dishonesty. State Farm employs many staff adjusters and in times of catastrophes of this size many more independents. Now two sisters come out with this story and it is aired almost 1 year to the day of this horrible tragedy. The amount of anger displayed toward the “evil insurer” would be much more useful if turned to the two who seem to be attempting to seal up retirement after 8 years of employment. Cheers to you ladies and good luck in wealth.
Posted by: showmethemoney | August 26, 2006, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Our elderly parents’ flooded, ruined home is in Biloxi, MS (they are still “temporarily” relocated in the Dallas area until their home can be rebuilt). After decades of not suffering flood damage from Mississippi storms, our parents unfortunately decided to cancel their flood insurance with State Farm just a couple of months before Hurricane Katrina. In the aftermath of the storm, the State Farm agent in Biloxi was wonderful to our parents in dealing with us (their children) about homeowners’ and auto insurance from long distance (we all live in different states). The agent who came out to inspect the home after Katrina dealt with us promptly, fairly and generously in assessing as much of the homeowners’ claim to wind damage as he could so that our parents could recover something. Although there was the potential for an agent to take advantage of our elderly folks and make it difficult or impossible to collect on the homeowners’ claim, State Farm, one of the Biloxi offices in particular, DID behave “like a good neighbor.”
Posted by: Jane | August 26, 2006, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Everyone should remember, just because ABC airs a story does not mean it is true. News organizations are known for slanting stories to suit their bias and most news organizations these days are NOT ubiased. Video and audio clips are edited and shown out of context all the time. Every news organization does this and you cannot really trust any of them.
Posted by: Dawg | August 26, 2006, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Does State Farm’s behavior surprise anyone? It’s to be expected of a government-mandated scam that puts profits first, stock holders second, and customers last.
Posted by: Dale S. | August 26, 2006, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
This is just one more example of two self-serving opportunists to dredge another slime-ball lawyer out of the muck to take advantage of the whistleblower law! If just one of their complaints is false, the whole lot of them should be packed off to prison. Just look at the smiles on their faces…this is all about them. They couldn’t care less about the “victims”. Just the money.
Posted by: RealMan | August 26, 2006, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
State Farm has stooped to an all time low. It is about time that the Alabama State Insurance dept put State Farm out of business. I can assure you that I will not let state farm insure my house or car.
Posted by: Bob | August 26, 2006, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
For those of you that don’t now nor have ever worked for an insurance company, you have no room to bash State Farm. When was the last time any of you got off your butts and set up a time with your agent to go over your coverages. Maybe if you did that you would know what is covered instead of assuming. We live in a very greedy world full of cheap tight wad people. If you pay your insurance and you know for sure that something is covered, then there shouldn’t be a problem getting what is owed to you. Dont forget about deductibles as well as special endorsements. If your so concerned about what would happen to you, instead of acting like your two and believing two EXTERNAL people who have never said anything before now, talk to your agent and find out what your responsibilities are as far as your insurance goes so when something does happen you will know what to expect. It’s not State Farms fault that people are lazy.
Posted by: Morgan | August 26, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
My home in louisiana was not covered by State Farm, but by Hannover. I can tell you that the Insurance companies are all crooks!
My issue was not wind vs flood, but that issue is moot anyway since the water was wind driven, period! I suggest that eveyone read their policies since most are written to obfuscate, not to enlighten. If you highlight all the phrases that have dual interpretation you would be amazed. I have $23,000. in pending unpaid claims simply due to interpretation issues. However, I do believe that insurance companies are rackets. You would be shocked where their monies are invested and why when a castrophe like this occurs that they fight tooth and nail to avoid payments at all costs. i believe that these women are telling the truth. That doesn’t mean that everyone working for State Farm is crooked, it just means that like Kenneth Lay, absolute power could corrupt absoulutely. They should fall under the scruntiny of federal investigators more agressively. Or be prosecuted under RICO laws. But with the Bushista Gangsta cabal inpower thats like asking the fox to guard the henhouse.
Posted by: robert | August 26, 2006, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
I spent seven months in New Orleans working on Katrina claims for another insurance company. I wrote almost $5 million dollars in claim checks.
I was told the following by my supervisors:
1.) Pay what’s owed.
2.) If you get into a gray area, decide in favor of the insured.
3.) Keep the insured happy.
Did I get complaints? Sure! From people that wanted more than they were owed. If they had wind and flood damage (but no flood policy) I paid them for the wind damage only. People need to read and understand their policies. Ask your agent to explain the policy provisions to you.
Also, I know adjusters that have worked for State Farm. They don’t believe these allegations. State Farm simply wouldn’t do what was alleged. Let’s wait for the whole story to come out.
Posted by: Independent Adjuster | August 26, 2006, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
How can all of you make such broad and sweeping generalizations such as ‘all insurance companies are crooks’ and ‘insurance companies are the mafia’. Get some evidence (from ANY reliable source, not just two sisters looking for their 15 minutes), and make an argument based on FACT. If you read your policies, and asked smart questions, you would know what is and isn’t covered. Then you wouldn’t all whine when your house flooded and you didn’t have flood insurance. Get a clue.
Posted by: Mike | August 26, 2006, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
I think this is one example of irreponsible journalism. Independent adjusters, like the Rigsby sisters, get paid 10% of claims paid to customers. They make a profit for claims paid, wether fraudulent or not. Also, any bank/insurance company in America is legally responsible for shredding documents regarding customer information. I think that more of an effort should have been given a more well rounded report of the facts.
Posted by: SF supporter | August 26, 2006, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Our home in Iowa was hit by straight line winds in 1983. State Farm was our “insurer”.
We had a tree through the side of our house into our bedroom, broken glass everywhere and when I called our agent, he told us not to touch anything and the adjuster would be right out. This happened on June 2oth. On July 4th,after a long 2 weeks!!!!!, a very PO’d State Farm adjuster came. He was upset that he had to work on the 4th and told us we had $1,200.00 worth of damage.Actual damage was over $30,000 (4 different bids from contractors to repair) but we didn’t argue (much). He didn’t seem to care that we couldn’t sleep in our bedroom, it was hot and humid, and we were afraid of wild animals coming into the house and we had small children. STATE FARM WAS DROPPED LIKE A HOT ROCK. Never have we had so much trouble with an insurance company. The insurance company we have now has been fair and fast to settle claims quickly. Not all insurance companies are jerks, but State Farm is one of the worst.
Posted by: shelley | August 26, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Please keep in mind that if you live near a body of water—& even if you are not on a flood plain of record—-that you should purchase flood insurance.
Also, the one trial Scrugg’s lost last week in Miss. was revealing if you looked at the photos of the house in question: the second floor was intact, the roof was intact, and the windows were intact and not blown out from wind (in the wind vs water argument). The first floor had damage from storm surge with minimal wind damage. Storm surge is excluded from all homeowner’s policies. These people, and Scrugg’s and his merry band of lawyers, were trying to re-write insurance policy. How many others are just like them in this lawsuit?
This has been an argument from Florida to Texas after hurricanes in the past & people realize they are not covered after the storm. The insurance companies have iron-clad laws protecting their policies that these people signed.
Do I feel sorry for people who lost everything? Of course. But I do not want 1000 people, who have not paid into flood policies, to get money they don’t deserve.
A lesson to be learned: if you build a home or business near a body of water (or a fault plain for earthquakes) expect that Mother Nature may not be kind to you and insure yourselves as much as possible.
Stop expecting the US government to bail you out when things don’t go your way.
Posted by: Dawg | August 26, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
As a Katrina survivor, I can tell which comments are from people who know what they are talking about and those who don’t. I don’t have State Farm, but I know first hand of the destruction left in Katrina’s wake. The majority of policy holders know that you need flood insurance to pay for rising water. However, in many cases, damage was done by the wind PRIOR to the waters racing in. This has been proven time and time again by eye witness accounts and videos made on camcorders by those foolish enough not to evacuate in time. There is always at least one in every crowd that cheats, but not all survivors want something that they are not entitled to – they just want some semblence of normalcy. Try living in a tent or FEMA trailer for a year and see how you feel. I applaud the Rigsbys for doing what they think is right! If it helps just one displaced family, it is worth it!
Posted by: Jean | August 26, 2006, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Sounds like a bunch of “the world owes me a living Democrats” posting on here… what is it that you people don’t get about homeowners insurance not covering flood damage? Buy flood insurance if you want flood coverage.
Posted by: Ken | August 26, 2006, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
“Whistleblowers?” Why? Is it only because they claim to be in a media report? What about the interests of ABC and the plaintiff attorneys? How many contacts were there between ABC and Dickie Scruggs et al? There are always 2 sides to every story, but sadly only the “story” that fits the media template is reported.
Posted by: AT | August 26, 2006, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
In 1978, as a young law clerk at a firm which represented State Farm on occasion, I came across a letter written by State Farm which was apparently a response to counsel that State Farm’s policy was geared to make the injured party sue, rather than to have State Farm settle outright. I was amazed and though that I had somehow missed the message, but counsel informed me that I had interpreted nothing out of place. This logic, I gathered was – offer nothing at all, or – offer nuisance money. Otherwise, have the injured party sue; the bet is that fewer injured parties will sue, thus taking the nuisance money, and those that do sue must consider what they are likely to receive after paying their attorney fees (contingency fees from settlement or award proceeds and court costs). In essence, State Farm sends a message.
Posted by: John McMillan | August 26, 2006, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Katrina was a complete disaster in terms of the death and destruction and in terms of the response to the aformentioned. Is there anyone out there who seriously believes that the insurance companies paid out the claims for every victim in accordance to the terms of their policies? With billions of dollars at stake I’m sure there were forces inside the insurance industry that worked really hard to disclaim any responsiblity for payment, ethically and unethically.
On a lighter note I did find it ironic ( and by ironic I mean funny) that the lawyer for the insurance company mentioned in this article is named “Drikwater!”
How’s that for a slap in the face for Katrina victims?
Posted by: Bobby Brown | August 26, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
“These people” aren’t asking companies to pay for flood damage — they are asking them to pay for the coverage that was written into their policies. WIND damage is covered. If there had never been flooding, these homes would have still been demolished. Because there was flooding, however, State Farm (and others) are trying to say that they are not liable, even though the flooding occured AFTER the wind damage. Ridiculous and disgusting.
Posted by: ALE | August 26, 2006, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
These women know they have a lucrative future ahead of them as paid witnesses in an untold number of trials. In addition, they will no doubt offer for sale all the State Farm documents they illegally copied for their own use.
It’s typical for plaintiff attorneys and their mininions to give the impression they are for the “little guy” when in fact their only motivation is greed.
Everything Brian Ross swallowed hook line and sinker from these two needs to be taken with a grain of salt. Maybe next they’ll confess to killin Jon Benet!
Posted by: pete | August 26, 2006, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
I hate insurance companies. They use fear to scam people out of their money, then when you have a claim they drop you. Have you ever known a poor insurance agent?Insurance companies have the politicans in their pockets too. Insurance agents make big money and live high on the hog while the common man gets ripped off.
When you take out a policy, they have all these papers you sign with a bunch of mumbo jumbo crap like , we won’t cover this and we won’t cover that.— I HATE EM, I HATE EM, I HATE EM
Posted by: bILL | August 26, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Gee…20/20, huh? I guess they wouldn’t have much of a story if they told of the thousands and thousands of insureds who WERE helped out after Katrina. I would like to hear more checked out on these independant adjusters…wonder if something happened to suddenly have them give this story. If this happened, why not tell it a year ago? Sounds like someone trying to make a quick buck to me!
Posted by: John H. | August 26, 2006, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
I choose to believe that these women were doing what was right, when they saw something morally wrong. There are still people in this world just like them, who would do what they did without the promise of money or fame.
About investigating the backgrounds of these women….why wouldn’t the documents they provided the lawyer with speak for themselves against State Farm without trying to prove these women are “shady”? Can’t believe they would fake 15,000 documents when probably 500 or so would have done just fine to expose wrongdoing.
And I can truly see any insurance company doing something like this, when the very nature of the insurance business is counting on as few claims as possible so they can make a tremendous profit on those monthly premiums. How many people are cancelled just because they turned in a claim or two??
Posted by: Kathy | August 26, 2006, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
DID YOU ALL HONESTLY THINK THAT THE INSURANCE COMPANY IS GOING TO PAY YOUR MORTGAGE OFF OR WHAT???? COME ON PEOPLE GET SERIOUS!!!!! IF MONEY AND WHAT YOU PAY FOR YOUR COVERAGE IS SUCH AN ISSUE TAKE SOME ACCOUNTABILTY AND READ YOUR POLICY!!!! Become familiar with your coverages, and take care of your responsibilities. State Farm is not and should not be held accountable for things you failed to notice on your policy. Come on people get serious, and get over it… Sorry that you all went through the horrible experience. . . but lesson learned, read your policy, and pay for additional coverage instead of trying to milk a company for things that are NOT COVERED!!!!
Posted by: Jessica | August 26, 2006, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Insurance is BIG business. The Insurance Lobbies are HUGE and influence Federal, State and local governments. Health Insurance, Auto insurance… it’s all the same. Consumers and business needs insurance but I believe that the real cost of insurance and what they collect is much much more in premiums than is what is paid out in claims. And even it it isn’t what business is guaranteed to be profitable every year? But here in Flordia they always get approved to raise their rates. And who is running for governor…the prior Director of Finance and Insurance for the state! And who is very chummy with the insurance industry.Tom Gallagher.
Posted by: hank | August 26, 2006, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
For all of those people who think insurance companies are a “rip off” I have but one question for you… WHO IS THE FIRST PERSON YOUR GOING TO CALL WHEN YOU HAVE A LOSS??? Your insurance company!! Its not always the Insurance companies job to read and explain into full detail what your covered for. However, it IS the individual agents job to do this! If your agent did not provide you with adequate insurance, then penalize that agent, don’t generalize the entire industry. In some cases, the client is the one looking for the best price… Unfortunately, in order to satisfy a client we provide basic fire and EC.. AT THEIR REQUEST for “cheeper” insurance. If you as a responsible homeowner cant take the time to read your own policy and ENSURE you have adequate insurance, then it is YOU who has the problem, not the company! Insurance is ” a pot we all put into and take out when necessary” You should be THANKFUL for the service provided to you! State Farm Insurance is and has always been a GOOD NEIGHBOURING COMPANY!
Posted by: Brandy | August 26, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Maybe if insurance polices were easier to understand and if insurance agents weren’t in such a big hurry and would take time to explain more – people would really understand what type of coverage they had purchased.
But really, in a hurricane with gale force winds, how can any insurance company claim that wind didn’t destroy homes and businesses and that all the damage was due to water?
But with billions of dollars at stake, it isn’t hard to see why they split hairs.
Posted by: LA | August 26, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Let’s see if I understand this. If the wind blows a tree into my house it is covered. If the wind blows a car into my house it is covered. If the wind blows another house into my house it is covered. If the wind blows a hippo wearing a pink kimono and rubber boots into my house it is covered. BUT if the wind blows water into my house (storm surge) it is not covered. So water is the only thing on earth that cannot be covered if wind blows it into my house. Wait a minute what if the wind blows water from a pool into my house? is that covered? If that is not covered then you just might need flood insurance in Death Valley if you live near a pool.
Posted by: Scott | August 26, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
If this proves true, I will be changing my insurance to another company.
Sean
State Farm Customer
Posted by: Sean Bello | August 26, 2006, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Ok PEOPLE, get a clue. No ONE BUT NO ONE is to blame for YOUR specific policy misfortunes. If you live near water, get water coverage. If you live in tornado alley get tornado. If you live in avalanche haven, then get that. If these nitwit homeowners who have to have houses of whatever size put into prospective their risk in living where they live then we would not have these cry babies trying to recover losses that have taken place before. Just like them folks that live out west and lose everything to a wildfire. Gee, brain fart!!, if it is dry 99% of the year and the heat levels are unbearably high, a streak of light thru a coke bottle bottom could strike a fire!! But then again, I do not keep up with the Jones and have more house then my wife & I personally NEED. Yes I want to protect my investment. But if my mortgage payment is more then 15% of my net monthly income then maybe I need to regroup & RETHINK my priorities in housing. Gee then again I look at all the factors in WHERE, WHEN, HOW, WHY & FOR WHAT I am buying a HOME for!! Most Americans have a house NOT a HOME!! Oh and what about the comments Nagin made? Come on stupid, just because we are public officials does NOT mean we can NOT have our OWN opinions. I am in perfect agreement with him. But then again look who is complaining the most. The people that can’t even operate something as simple as an elevator without having a unionized person push the button. Get with the program people, use your head for something besides growing or not growing hair on!!
Posted by: Kevin | August 26, 2006, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
I live in MS and I know what my policy covers and what is does not. I know that the Mississippi Department of Insurance regulates the insurance company’s in this state with the exception of the National Flood Insurance Program.
My policy states flood is not covered even if it is driven by wind (hurricane is a wind storm).
My policy also states if there is two or more perils (that is what caused the loss) and the predominate cause of loss is not covered they wont pay. So if your roof was blown off and then your house was washed into a pile of debris from flood you are not covered by a wind policy. It don’t really matter what came first and is what caused the most damage to the SAME PROPERTY. Example (Your roof blows off (covered) then entire house floods (not covered) and then house burns (covered again).
This is examples of homes with flood covering the entire home. Remember that Flood coverage stops at water lines and wind (if covered) starts above that. It is against the law for flood and home owners insurance paying for the same thing.
Ok let’s go the engineer report, I know what an engineer reports is suppose to say. 1: what was the cause 2: what is damaged and by what 3: what is the direction to repair. If the engineer left any of these off his report he must alter his report to finish. Engineers are questionable some times too (not all are created equal). If we can not see the reports in question we can not judge. So let the reports come out and not bring the insurance industry to trial in the media.
Now for the people living outside the FEMA flood zone. The US government has given a little over 5 billion dollars for grants for these people (in MS and checks are going out every day), Because FEMA draws the flood zones.
Louisiana has been given over 6 billion for grants and their government has not come up with a plan to use the money. That is why New Orleans is the way it is.
Well I know living in MS I am prone to hurricanes and all these law suites are going to cause more insurance company’s to leave my area. I also know lawyers will retire from this and the insured will still be with out because his lawyer took half of what it would cost to repair the home. I have to say I am ashamed of my Federal politicians because they are suing their insurance company’s. They had homes on the beach and they were washed away. Guess what National Flood Insurance has a limit on a home of 250,000 dollars. I bet they are trying to get the rest out of their insurance company’s because their home cost much more than the limit of flood policies. They have the power to lobby for policy limits on the flood insurance and I think they should spend their time on that not suing the company’s for what they are not going to get.
Ok let me say this did you know (Most likely not) that you auto liability insurance. Let’s say your daughter crashes your auto into a 90,000 dollar car and you only have 25,000 dollar state min you are liable for the remainder of the dollar amount in coverage you are under insured. That’s why your agent attempts to sell you more coverage.
Posted by: qbpc | August 26, 2006, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
After the Cedar Fires a few years ago in Southern California,we quickly learned who the good insurance companies were. Those fortunate enough to be insured with AAA and USAA were treated fairly and their claims were handled quickly. Those with the big three: State Farm, Allstate and Farmers were not as fortunate. The battle against these insurance companies was worse than the devastation of losing everything to the wild fires. Many people with State Farm and Allstate had to seek legal assistance to try and recoup what they were rightfully owed under their policies. (Farmers finally settled with people around the one-year anniversary of the fire, but State Farm and Allstate still did not come through for their policy holders…many individuals either gave up in disgust and tried to move on with their lives or are still to this day involved with law suits).
‘Snake Farm’ spends a lot of money on advertising, has highly effective legal representation and has powerful lobbyists which make it difficult for the “little guy” to try and fight against such a powerful company. After a disaster, people are only capable of battling against their insurance companies so much…but immagine NOT having to battle against your insurance company. For total losses, friends and neighbors with AAA and USAA were not “battling” against their insurance companies, they were being dealt with fairly and compensated in a timely manner. Can’t say the same about Snake Farm.
Ask people in Southern CA. about the “good neighbor treatment” they received from Snake Farm after the fire. Many of us wish were fortunate enough to have been insured by companies such as AAA and USAA who really do operate in the best interest of their clients.
Posted by: Julie Tunnell | August 26, 2006, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
I like State Farm. Ignorance might have been taken advnatage of, but it is in the people’s hands to learn the laws and the boundaries of what they are signing their name to.
You can not always depend on people’s honesty, just your own. If we could, the divorce rate would be lower, and we’d all live in a Hallmark commercial.
Posted by: Jolene | August 26, 2006, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
People need to wise up about news programs like 20/20. They are not about the truth, they are trying to sell advertising time and headlines sell. State Farm settled my claim fairly and promptly as they always have. They have stayed in our marketplace when many companies have pulled out. Do NOT believe everything you hear on TV or on the Internet. The last time I check, they were at or near the top with companies that measure customer satisfaction. I will definitely stay with them. Brian Ross’s report was neither accurate nor balanced.
Posted by: John | August 26, 2006, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
I live on the MS Gulf Coast and know the Rigsby sisters. Interestingly, they are from this area, too. Funny how they didn’t have trouble doing their job until they came home and had to tell former neighbors and friend they didn’t have coverage. Among those not having coverage…you guessed it, their own Mother. Starts to put it in focus now doesn’t it? I believe she was insured by State Farm and now has a suit against them.
Dicky Scruggs found the lackeys he was looking for in the Rigsby sisters. This is his Modus Operendi. Just look at what he did during the tobacco trials. He wrote the playbook.
Posted by: Todd | August 26, 2006, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
I am an auto and home insurance agent. I decided to become an agent when it became clear to me how much I did not know about my own insurance policies. I felt that my agents should have educated me more on what is and is not covered. Since becoming an agent, I try to educate each of my clients on the kind of coverages they have and what they do not have. No insurance policy is a bad policy, as long and the client knows exactly what they have and what risks they are taking resposibility for.
I can see both sides of the current aguement over the damage from Katrina. It is very difficult to tell whether it was flood or wind damage. IF State Farm has comitted the crimes they are being accused of then they should be taken to court and made to pay for these claims. However it should be investigated and the findings made public.
But it must also be understood that homeowner policies are not meant to cover small claims, but rather the ones that the homeowner truly cannot take care of like the damage from Katrina.
Again the agents need to better educate their clients so that the clients do not make mistakes that eventually results in higher premiums, canceled policies or worse a client thinking they have coverage for something only to find out to late they did not.
Clients also need to know that the cheapest insurance is not always the best. Make sure you have a level of coverage to take care of you when needed and with a company that you trust.
Posted by: S. Bailey | August 26, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Lets look at the wind vs water issue from a common sense standpoint. If you have a house on or in very close proximity to the gulf and it has moved 5 feet off it’s foundation yet 90% of the shingles are intact, the shutters still remain attached would it be logical to assume that wind moved this house? if you say yes then you are either and idiot or in denial. I am a homeowner claims adjuster and I spent 7 months of my life living in substandard conditions, away from my family so I could help the people of N.O. I could go on for days about the fraud going on there but it wasn’t on the end of the insurance companies. Its incredible how many people who didn’t have flood insurance yet they claimed they had fur coats, rolexs, etc. supposedly IN THE ATTIC. Or the claims of looting an entire house of furniture when the house took on 5 feet of water! Can you imagine someone rowing a boat around the waters of N.O with bodies floating around to steal all your belongings? The claims were ridiculous and people wonder why insurance companies take the time to investigate. I call it due dilligence. I think these ladies have ulterior motives or have been paid handsomely by Dickie Sruggs to bad mouth State Farm. Never in all my years working for State Farm have I been told to alter an engineer report. We pay what we owe and sometimes what we don’t owe. No one ever talks about how people get estimates from unscrupulous contractors in hopes we will pay so they can use a lower bid and pocket the difference. I was on my way back to New Orleans and a lady bragged to me how she bought a new mercedes from the money she had bilked from the insurance company. I could write a book about the real fraud that goes on but no one wants to hear that do they?
Posted by: TLnOk | August 26, 2006, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
It is the insurance industry’s basic business model. The way you make money as an insurance company is to collect premiums and deny claims. If you call up Cabelas to place an order, you’re a customer. If you call up an insurance company to make a claim, you’re an expense.
Posted by: boston | August 26, 2006, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
A word to the wise, if you live along the coast make sure you and your insurance agent agree that you have the proper coverage. If you don’t have flood or windstorm coverage,make sure you get it.
The time is before the loss not after the loss. Agents want to sell all the coverage you need, just ask and listen to your agent. JJB 43 years as a concerned insurance agent in Texas.
Posted by: JJB | August 26, 2006, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
The recurring theme (in La., Mississipi, and Florida at least) from insurance companies are the threat to leave the state if they are forced to do anything more than what they are doing or they don’t get their way with the legislature. Well, I can assure you, I see it everyday, and this recurring theme is getting old…quick. This is the first year that some legislators have hit them head on and have said in legislative committees they are sick and tired of hearing this same old threat. With a $1.2 billion gain in one of the largest in the nation, I don’t think they are going under anytime soon. I can also assure you…these big insurance companies make so much money with the auto insurance industry it is incredible. I say if they want to leave, let them…someone else can take their place. There are already some coming into these states that seem very promising. There is a situation going on in Louisiana where Allstate wants to remove wind and hail damage from policyholders in south La., and the commissioner is denying it and it will wind up in court. They also wanted to not allow homeowners to have extra time to file lawsuits or get their situation straight for another year, but they lost that battle yesterday. The Supreme Court said they had to give these people an extra year. They are so used to the big lobbying firms getting them what they want…well, not this time. Now it is time for legislators to take care of their constituents.
Posted by: lynn | August 26, 2006, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
People in New Jersey that had State Farm car Insurance were ripped off for years by State Farm till they were caught, Any one in the world that has State farm should drop them like a hot rock. people have the power to make or brake any company, they just have to stick togeather ( Only if they whould ) it seems to be a big problem these days !
Richard, New Jersey
Posted by: Richard | August 26, 2006, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Hats off to Dickie Scruggs for taking care of the community! Insurance company executives belong in the same category as serial rapist and child molesters.
Posted by: jamal | August 26, 2006, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Time to let the truth be known.
State Farm was one of the best paying firms in the Country until 6 or 7 years ago and then they changed the way the Helping Hands work. I have worked trying to get a fair claim for the Home owners for the past couple of years and recently decided that I could no longer help State Farm Customers because State Farm would not be fair with the home owner regarding the claim. Now just in the past month State Farm started claiming everything. MUST HAVE KNOWN the story was coming. Why dont they just pay what is due like they did years ago?
Posted by: F Blackburn | August 26, 2006, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
I agree with the person who wrote about the fraud going in on New Orleans. I am from that area and I feel for each and every adjuster who had to handle this agonizing workload. It still doesn’t dismiss what these insurance companies sometimes try to get away with. Unfortunately, there will always be people trying to steal from insurance companies and that is why they have investigators. I am around the “big” end of it…and deal with high dollar lobbyists on a constant basis. Unfortunately, the insurance business is just so tempting for bad people to try and get a big piece of it. This is just a big, holy mess.
Posted by: lynn | August 26, 2006, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
I have worked for State Farm in claims, for 39 years and been insured with them for more than that. Never once, not once, have I ever heard of a claim being handled with anyone getting paid less than was owed them. Many times I see people trying to get paid for things that are not owed them. Why is it, normally honest people don’t feel like it is wrong to try to get paid more than they are due from their insurance company? State Farm’s motto has always been ‘pay what we owe’. Thank God, most companies don’t just go out and pay everything people think they should be paid for. There would be no companies left in business.
Posted by: BCH | August 26, 2006, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Maybe EVERYONE should cancel ALL of their insurance everywhere and take on their own financial burdens themselves! Yeah, that will work! I realize there are injustices in the insurance industry just like every other industry. But maybe if we all took more responsibility for ourselves instead of sueing everyone in sight at the drop of a hat, we would all be better off. Being a competitor, I am not siding with State Farm. But not all insurance companies are the same. For those of you that feel all are crooks, please cancel everything TODAY and take responsibility for your own misfortunes. :-}
Posted by: Steve | August 26, 2006, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Katrina, largest national destruction ever…1st responders WERE the greatest ever…all levels of government, especially local were found wanting. NOW WE HAVE NAGIN IN NEW ORLEANS SCREAMING ABOUT MONEY-WHO WOULD GIVE WHAT WAS RESENTLY FOUND TO BE THE STATE WITH THE MOST CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS (ALL LEVELS) MONEY WITH OUT A PLAN. MISSISSIPPI AND OTHER AREAS OF LOUISIANA ARE GETTING MONEY…WHY THEY HAVE A PLAN!!!
Posted by: c blake | August 26, 2006, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
I was a State Farm claim representative and now am an Agent, we are always told at State Farm to pay what we owe. I find this story extremely disturbing and hard to believe. Don’t believe everything you hear…and as many people have noted…you need flood insurance for flood damage to be covered.
Posted by: Maria | August 26, 2006, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
We recently had over $5,000 worth of damage done to our house due to a horrific wind storm. State Farm only paid $63.00 for one window that was knocked out, but would not pay the rest because it was “an act of God.” Reading through my policy, I did not find that “acts of God” were not covered. For State Farm, their dishonesty is just par for the course, and they should be shut down !
Posted by: Roy | August 26, 2006, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
When I read all these comments I keep reading one thing over and over… the people of this contry are tired of being used. Maybe we should all start thinking about where we should should not give our money to anymore…..Insurance,Taxes!!! You got the Federal Goverment spending money like its free… its not. We all work very hard just to put food on our tables for our family…GAS now for our cars, and while our Goverment just goes on spending like it free. Well if they did not have it to spend so free then what would happen….We need to take back control of our lives, not allowing oil rich goverment leaders milking us to death!!!This country has really gone down the drain…..big business…goverment does not care if you have food on your table, job,roof over head…health insur….thet just want your MONEY…Well stop giving it to them…and lets get somone else in office thats never been there!!! FOR THE PEOLPE not the big business!!!
Posted by: Billyk | August 26, 2006, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
I work for State Farm and I believe that when you purchase insurance (FROM ANY COMPANY) you should go over your policies and read them. If there are questions as to what and what is not covered, you can talk to your insurance agent. Any Insurance company out there is going to pay for some things and not others. So many times people call and have no clue as to the coverages they carry and what they represent. There are seperate Flood Insurance policies. I have worked a catastrophe team and we were paying claims submitted; although, remember these were wind claims. Flood is a different policy. So get out there search the different insurance companies, they are all pretty much going to pay the same way. My mother and her husband were hit by a storm in Florida, actually 2 hurricanes w/in 2 days— they did all they could do to keep the water out, but like some policyholders they do not understand what their responsibility is during a storm. Unfortunately during the Katrina disaster, it was impossible. If I was affected by Katrina, I would first look to the governing bodies such as the Mayor and Governor of Lousianna for answers as to why they didn’t fight to get things rectified knowing full well for many years, that what happened was inevitable? ASK YOURSELF THAT! Also what caused these women to turn against State Farm? We do not know that side of the story. As for the shredding truck appearing, we are very strict with our customers’ personal information and even get audited if any of this information is left out on our desks—-that’s more than I can say for other business’ you deal with.
At this moment we have not heard from State Farm, but I think it was quite interesting of the little blip at the end “State Farm is looking into the situation.” Reporting is mostly one sided and that is the way of the world. State Farm did have an interview w/ 20/20 so what was said?
Posted by: MG | August 26, 2006, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
I live in New Orleans. Most of the people complaining didn’t have flood insurance, and have no-one to blame but THEMSELVES. People who did have it did OK, got there homes fixed/updated, alot of work BUT…I resent that some MORON would make it seem like nothing bad can happen in a “fairly safe” part of the country…disaster strikes everywhere, anywhere, anytime…I have friends in Kansas City that flooded in the 90s, remember that? Think they ever thought they would flood? You guys are right, alot of people down here are LAZY, waiting for a hand-out. Those of that aren’t have already went forward for with our lives. People, please read your insurance policies!! Homeowners does not cover everything!! However, State Farm has gone down the tubes…I no longer use them…
Posted by: Steve-O | August 26, 2006, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
I work for State Farm and I believe that when you purchase insurance (FROM ANY COMPANY) you should go over your policies and read them. If there are questions as to what and what is not covered, you can talk to your insurance agent. Any Insurance company out there is going to pay for some things and not others. So many times people call and have no clue as to the coverages they carry and what they represent. There are seperate Flood Insurance policies. I have worked a catastrophe team and we were paying claims submitted; although, remember these were wind claims. Flood is a different policy. So get out there search the different insurance companies, they are all pretty much going to pay the same way. My mother and her husband were hit by a storm in Florida, actually 2 hurricanes w/in 2 days— they did all they could do to keep the water out, but like some policyholders they do not understand what their responsibility is during a storm. Unfortunately during the Katrina disaster, it was impossible. If I was affected by Katrina, I would first look to the governing bodies such as the Mayor and Governor of Lousianna for answers as to why they didn’t fight to get things rectified knowing full well for many years, that what happened was inevitable? ASK YOURSELF THAT! Also what caused these women to turn against State Farm? We do not know that side of the story. As for the shredding truck appearing, we are very strict with our customers’ personal information and even get audited if any of this information is left out on our desks—-that’s more than I can say for other business’ you deal with.
At this moment we have not heard from State Farm, but I think it was quite interesting of the little blip at the end “State Farm is looking into the situation.” Reporting is mostly one sided and that is the way of the world. State Farm did have an interview w/ 20/20 so what was said?
Posted by: MG | August 26, 2006, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
I would like to know why the Rigsby sisters didn’t purchase a flood policy for their mother if she was not able to purchase one for herself. Goodness, everyone knows independent adjusters are easily making six figures, after expenses, in the last few years with all the catastrophes. Why wouldn’t these “in the know” girls look out for their mother ahead of the storm, rather than put the blame on an insurance company, because she didn’t have flood insurance. Take personal responsibility girls!!
Posted by: fh | August 26, 2006, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
If I read one more comment blaming GWB for State Farm’s actions…. What utter, stupid, nonsense. How stupid do you have to be to SERIOUSLY believe that any of the supervisors who supposedly altered/destroyed documents to avoid making a payment against a claim did so at the behest of George W. Bush? Come on, folks…this kind of attack on the President smacks of pure mindless political hatred.
Posted by: Lone Star | August 26, 2006, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
I’m with S. Bailey above. I have worked for several different Homeowners insurance companies for over ten years and I have *never* seen a pattern of deliberate attempts to withhold payment of money that was owed to a policy holder. While I will admit there are mistakes from time to time, when the company is called out on them they always try to make it right. By the same token I have also seen many, many attempts by policy holders to either fatten up their legitimate claim, or fabricate details to get coverage for a non covered loss. The best defense for a consumer is to READ YOUR POLICY and UNDERSTAND WHAT IT DOES AND DOES NOT COVER. In my time in the insurance business I can count on one hand the number of people who have done this. It’s the ones that do not READ THEIR POLICY and UNDERSTAND WHAT IT DOES and DOES NOT COVER are the ones that whine about “unfair” and “insurance companies not paying their fair share.” The insurance company tells you FROM DAY ONE what is not covered. It’s not our fault that people are too uninformed or lazy to care. So stop beating the drum of class envy and rhetoric and 1) buy the right insurance for where you live and what your needs are, and 2) READ YOUR POLICY!!!
Posted by: Mr. K | August 26, 2006, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
I live in Bloomington, IL, home of State Farm world headquarters. I can see their ugly black building complex from my bedroom window.
A few observations–
Despite their high socioeconomic status, State Farm employees are known around town as notoriously cheap tippers.
Yes, without State Farm Bloomington would hardly exist or so the mantra goes. Indeed, SF fits right into and indeed helped creat this region of central Illinois and helped define it as a conservative republican stronghold.
State Farm and the federal government are as tight as can get. For example, State Farm has a super computing network so big the federal government pays them to let them use it. God only knows the amount of information they share.
State Farm’s stiff upstanding corporate culture couldn’t be further from the image of the company they sell, ie the “like a good neighbor” product.
Just another greedy, smarmy, shady underhanded, backstabbing and filthy rich corporation that is in the pocket of our “MBA” president.”
Actually this makes me sick. Unless you’re a gun loving conservative don’t come to Bloomington for vacation.
The only thing Bloomington IL has going for it are the universities.
Posted by: R | August 26, 2006, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Hello?? The news media does not report news, it’s an entertainment industry!!! Hello? Do you guys not get that?
Posted by: Kira | August 26, 2006, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Do I belive that an insurance company, (any insurance company) would try and cheat you out of your claim money? are you kidding or what!..My mother had a house fire a few yrs. back and had to fight them tooth & nail to get her home repaired, I thought then, what good are these people that you pay and pay and pay into only to have to fight when they have to pay?, I will say it now as I have always said it, they are legalized crooks!!!…but on the other hand, if I lived below sea level, next to the coast where the only thing between my home and a deep flood was a dirt wall, I would think it wise to also have floof insurance, just an observation for those of you that insist on living in a bowl below sea level.
Posted by: David | August 26, 2006, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Trust is hard earned and nearly impossible to regain once lost. As a claims professional, I have always worked diligently to resolve all insureds claims fairly and equitably, within the constraints of the policy language. It pains me greatly that the actions of a few paints distrust against hard working claims professionals that strive to assist policyholders that have truly suffered loss.
Posted by: SG | August 26, 2006, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
How many of you went into your agent’s office to get car insurance and said you just wanted whatever made you legal? And when your agent explained that’s not enough, you didn’t care, you insisted you only wanted to be legal? Probably the majority of you.
How many of you complaining here are going to call your agent on Monday and ask for an Insurance Checkup? Probably none of you.
As for being cancelled after a couple of claims, why shouldn’t you be? Say you have insurance for 10 years and you pay $500 a year for that insurance. That’s $5000. Now say you have 2 claims that amount to, I don’t know, $10000. State Farm just lost $5000 on you and you’d have to be insured another 10 years without a claim for SF to break even on you. State Farm is owned by the customers. And if people are having claim after claim, losing money for the company, thus causing rates to rise, I’d imagine the other customers would be glad for you to be cancelled.
I wonder if 20/20 is going to come back when these 2 women are proven wrong and do ANOTHER segment showing State Farm did nothing wrong? I doubt it.
Personally, as an employee of State Farm, I wish SF would pull ALL it’s advertising from ABC until given a fair shake to tell their side.
You know, many, many agents and their families lost everything in Katrina, yet they were out there the next day taking care of there customers from wherever they could find a spot to do it. They took care of themselves last.
What did you do?
Posted by: Lisa | August 26, 2006, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
State Farm does not force anyone to use a certain contractor or a certain body shop. Yes, we have Preferred Shops and contractors, but it is up to the insured to use them or not. I never tell anyone who to use, because, frankly, if something goes wrong, I don’t want to be blamed. I leave it up to the insured on who they want to use, whether it be one on our list or someone diffent altogether.
In most cases, they choose their own. SF will still go out and look and make an estimate. The insured takes that estimate to their guy to see if it works. The shop or contractor can always submit another estimate and it will be gone over. 9 times out of ten, we’ll pay whatever the estimate is.
ALWAYS give the customer the benefit of the doubt.
Posted by: joy | August 26, 2006, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Have condo on FLA coat. In 2003 contacted my State Farm agent to inquire about flood insurance and was told, “…you don’t need it. Your condo is on the 4th floor”. Four hurricanes later in 2004, with major damage to seawall which resulted in an assessment in excess of $5,000. State Farm refused to cover the assesssment stating the the damage from from flood..”…you should have had flood insurance…” Except they told me that I didn’t need flood insurance.
In addition, there is a exclusion in the homeowner’s policy for damage caused by “wind driven rain.” This exclusion did not excist when the policy was originally taken out in 1992 nor was there ever any notice of a change to the coverage. State Farm has effectively made sure that they will not have to cover any claim from hurricane damage.
Posted by: Hedgie | August 26, 2006, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
As for these adjusters they sound fishy and I don’t think being 1 year later when Katrina is all over the news is a stroke of luck. Sounds like a planned event to me.
Ok people take advice from an adjuster. We have a storm in the Caribbean and when it reaches the 78 or the 80deg line you will not be able to get insurance. So you better act now. If you are going to drop SF (they are a very good company and no I do not work for them) you better find out if anybody is writing policies before you act. If you have prior damage take photos video and any thing to show what condition your home is in to prove new damage. As an insured you must prove your loss, companies do not take your word for it. Know your policies and what they cover. No home owners policy covers flood none, no not one, none at all, nota, zip, zero. Hurricane storm surge is a FLOOD and is not covered by home owners insurance.
Please if you are affected by a loss of any kind, be nice to your adjuster. Your adjuster is there to help you. Did you know your adjusters were sleeping in cars and where ever they could get, some were driving 200 miles or more one way to get there every day months after Katrina to help you.
Posted by: BB | August 26, 2006, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
By the way, you can buy flood insurance. Just ask your insurance agent. It’s expensive, but you get what you pay for Senitor Lott.
Posted by: jill doescher | August 26, 2006, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Drive by media at it’s best.
I am willing to bet that 99% of the people who complain about State Farm on this blog fall into one of the following categories:
1. Hippies
2. Liberals
3. Union Workers
4. Lazy slobs on wellfare saying thats is actually THEIR money.
Posted by: CJ | August 26, 2006, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
What a bunch of lemmings. I feel for these people, but these sisters are known crooks. Watch what happens in the next few months. These sisters will profit from the publicity. It is THEY who are NOT concerened about the policyholders and the people. Allow me to spell it out for those less fortunate to have my intellect: these lawsuits will cost policyholders in the end. Your rates will go up, and heaven forbid State Farm and Allstate go out of business. You will be sujected to cut-rate insurance companies who truly WILL screw you every time. Your rates will go up significantly due to lack of competition and you’ll still be complaining, and even more this time. Eventually, the government will take over insurance and you will get what you get….period. No choice.
I feel for these people and I’m sure some feel they have been cheated. But, the fact of the matter is that this whole things was started by Senator Trent Lott who was pissed that his mult-million dollar plantation, I mean mansion wasn’t covered because he didn’t have the foresight to buy the most basic insurance. Furthermore State Farm closed a major claims office in Louisiana and there was a massive loss of jobs. Can’t you shortsighted people see what is happening? You are buying into the media machine and just listening to one side of the story. There is another side and if YOU bothered to practice some critical thinking and not just go off on a tangent with every biased news story you might sound more intelloigent and your arguments might actually be plausible.
Posted by: Friend of State Farm | August 26, 2006, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Interesting that so many people have this take on the story when it was completely one sided. I know what was shown of State Farm’s position was a far cry from what they actually said.
Why is it that reporters can spin a story any which way they want with impunity???
Posted by: Hank | August 26, 2006, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
What is in this for these sisters? Call me cynical, but why did they continue to work there sneaking documents out to the “authorities” when they thought wrong doing was taking place? There is a lot of civil litigation going on and it would not be suprising if they were being paid by a plaintiff attorney or two.
Posted by: Hank | August 26, 2006, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Some of the people who’ve commented in favor of State Farm mention they floods are not covered by insurance. But what if the flood is caused by the wind? The levees broke, not because of the water, but because of the wind pounding the water into the levees. The levees broke because of the wind resulting in the flooding. So SF should pay!
Posted by: beth | August 26, 2006, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
My house collapsed causing over 100,000 worth of damage and my insurance company State Farm did not cover a dime. I now have 2 mortgages and it is going to be difficult for me to pay for my children’s education and weddings(they dont show that on there gooey feel good tv commercials). State Farm has denying claims down to an art…the claims adjuster did not work for SF he was sub letted from out of state firm, the supervisor who denied my claim was called in from California and returned after denying the Pennsylvania claims. State Farm is the worst insurance company in America
Posted by: Darryl | August 26, 2006, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
My husband and I both had State Farm since we were kids. After Hurricane Andrew in Miami they were wonderful. We all made due back then. There were no trailers, just tents. There was no power for 6-8 weeks and telephone for longer. No MRE’s No Water being passed out. Neighbors helped neighbors and we never heard complaints. Who was FEMA?
Well, we were the lesson everyone learned from and things are so much better than you can imagine now.
However, State Farm is no longer our carrier.. After Hurricane Ivan hit us and we had roof damage and leaks everywhere we had a contractor come to our home and meet with the adjuster. The adjuster said the estimate was fair and he was putting in for the entire claim. While others were getting their checks, we got a call from a supervisor who just “wanted to check the measurements” Before he got out of the car he started with “your not getting…..” Long story short, after letters to the Ins Commissioner and numerous meetings with others we had to take a loan out from the SBA and make the balance of the repairs ourselves.
If companies do not want to write wind storm polices in the Gulf Coast and Eastern Coast States, then they should not be allowed to sell auto insurance either!
Posted by: Lillian R | August 26, 2006, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Truly horrible. Just stroll through the CAMPUS (yeah, CAMPUS, not just a building or two) of any major insurance company, and you’ll see exactly why this crap happens–unbelievable excesses that are only exceeded by payroll excesses.
Funny how you never see an insurance company taking up shop in a low-rent district.
Posted by: Andrew | August 26, 2006, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Brian Ross and the Rigsby sisters are sensationalist idiots! It was obvious from some of the video shown on the program that the houses whose claims were in question were right on the water. The dang storm surge was over 20 feet. It’s not rocket science that these houses suffered damage due to storm surge that any idiot knows is not covered by your homeowners insurance. 20/20, Brian Ross and the Stanky sisters need to get a clue and just shut up. State Farm is not ripping anybody off.
Posted by: Al | August 26, 2006, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
It is really crazy how all of the comsumers are screaming and yelling about how they pay and pay and pay, but get nothing for it. State Farm does pay their claims and I am proud to be a representative for them. I see claims come in everyday to our office and I see how they are paid and often times, State Farm is paying for things they are NOT required to pay for. Everyone always cries,but boy oh boy, when they have a claim their hand is out waiting for the money, the first person they call is the insurance company and want to knwo how they can “get their money”. You think other insurance companies are not doing the same thing? Allstate, Farmers, AIG, Progressive, etc. all only pay what is COVERED by the policy. If the people living in the Katrina affected areas did not get flood insurance, then there is nothing State Farm can do. I live in California where we are threatened by the “Big one”..earthquakes. And yes, I have EARTHQUAKE insurance. Wow, what a novel idea. It just makes me so mad that the media only brings up State Farm. Of course, they only want to pick on the number one company. Believe me, the rest of the people who are insured by other companies are in a heck of a lot worse position. Yeah, the big bad insurance company, shame on them. They should just give money away to everyone. Heck, they shouldn’t be worried about a profit, they should just want to work for free!!! You also must remember, the insurance companies are highly regulated by the Insurance Commisioner, so their hands are tied a lot of the time when it comes to coverage issues. And as far as the sisters, they don’t deserve to work for State Farm and disgrace the rest of us who are proud and dedicated to our clients.
Posted by: Dedicated State Farm Employee | August 27, 2006, 12:00 am 12:00 am
So what are all these people talking bad about State Farm going to say about State Farm when we have an EARTHQUAKE and their homeowners policies dont cover their losses????????? I work in a State Farm Agent’s office and I make people aware of the risk of not carrying earthquake insurance 2 out of 10 people buy it. It is so easy to blame someone else for our own mistakes. At State Farm we are trained to protect people’s dreams and help them recover from the unexpected. I hope all those people who were helped by State Farm come forward and say the truth!
Posted by: Jen | August 27, 2006, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Got some PR firm comments down there…
Yeah, guess what – companies are out to make money. Best make use of legal recourse, cause it’s all a game. Your tears aren’t worth my $.02.
Posted by: Kevin | August 27, 2006, 1:09 am 1:09 am
Does everyone realize what happens to State Farm, will trickle down to the other insurance companies, meaning you too will have to pay more in insurance premiums? When something like this happens to practically the biggest insurer in the nation, all of the other companies have to follow suit.
Posted by: Robert | August 27, 2006, 1:11 am 1:11 am
Why now? Why exactly 1-year later does this story break now? Any other time of the year they could have broken this story….
Posted by: Robert | August 27, 2006, 1:20 am 1:20 am
My house fell off its piers in the same direction my trees feel. Trees fall in the direction of high winds not water. My two story garage fell 8′ north and 30′ west. The same direction as the eyewall. But because my house got water, automatically considered flood damage. My insurance company is Farm Bureau. Another rip-off company.
Posted by: Michael Cericola | August 27, 2006, 1:34 am 1:34 am
My adjuster was GREAT !
What followed was extreme rudeness by State Farm employees. I have both flood and homeowners insurance with State Farm and they have refused to provide me with any breakdown of how they arrived at the monetary amount awarded on my claims. They have left me with no alternative than to believe that they are hiding something and have not provided benefits in accordance with what my adjuster submitted to them.
Posted by: B. Garza | August 27, 2006, 1:45 am 1:45 am
Water damage, driven by wind or not, is excluded. If wind blew the house down before the water hit, it should be covered. But how can this be proved when everyone was evacuated and only a concrete slab remains?
Posted by: Frank | August 27, 2006, 1:45 am 1:45 am
The marketplace will dictate the fate of State Farm. If it is proven they were fradulant, then people will not use them and the company will fold. We the consumer have the power over any commercial company, that’s the beauty of a market driven economy.
Posted by: David | August 27, 2006, 8:22 am 8:22 am
State Farm does not pay its claims
without a fight. If you have a claim with State Farm you MUST have a pulic adjuster on your side.
They charge 10% for their service.
They are worth their weight in gold. I had a claim and they tried to pay me half. I got 95% using an
adjuster. State Farm is lousy.
Don’t hire an attorney unless State Farm won’t pay after you
have hire the public adjuster.
If you don’t get paid the adjuster
doesn’t get paid. State Farm
should be sued out of business.
Posted by: Michael | August 27, 2006, 8:25 am 8:25 am
The levees broke due to an increase in water pushed by storm surge and the power of the storm. Not by wind. This lawsuit has NOTHING to do with levees breaking as it is in Mississippi, where there are more class action lawyers than cotton.
Posted by: dumber | August 27, 2006, 9:16 am 9:16 am
I have worked as an Independant Adjuster (contractor not staff)for State Farm Ins Co for the last 10 years. The majority of Comments on this site truly demonstrates the level of ignorance of the people who have posted them. There is little doubt in my mind none of them have even read there HO policies, You know, that legal contract that you agreed to when you bought your insurance. What makes you think that the 5th biggest Co in the world is exempt from employing a couple of bad apples anyway. Bad apples like Drinkwater, or maybe even like Kerri & Cori Rigsby. As for you pinheads out there who have expressed intentions of switching Ins carriers, you might actually be doing State Farm a favor by cutting their risk in an area of the country they no longer wish to insure. Along w/dropping your SF policy, you folks might want to prepare for the excuse you will need to provide your mortgage Co. when they ask you. “And why did you cancel our Ins coverage with the only Carrier still willing to insure homes in your neighborhood?”
Posted by: Kevin | August 27, 2006, 9:41 am 9:41 am
I WISH TO OFFER A COUNTERPOINT TO YOUR ONE SIDED STORY “SISTERS BLOW WHISTLE ON INSURANCE CLAIMS.” JOHN STOSSEL SHOULE BE SAYING….GIVE ME A BREAK. AS AN INDEPENDENT ADJUSTER THAT WAS IN NEW ORLEANS, I HAVE TO DISAGREE WITH THE WAY YOU SAY THAT STATE FARM CONDUCTED BUSINESS. WHAT YOU FAIL TO REALIZE, OR MENTION, IS THAT THE SISTERS GET PAID ON TOTAL LOSS CLAIMS. IF THE HOUSE WAS WORTH $250,000 AND IT WAS A TOTAL LOSS THEY WOULD MAKE MORE MONEY THAN IF THEY ONLY SAID IT COULD BE FIXED FOR $50,000. THEY HAVE AN INCENTIVE TO CLAIM A WHOLE HOUSE DEMOLISHED, THEY MAKE MORE MONEY!!!!! I AM NOT ON THE PAYROLL OF STATE FARM, BUT ONLY KNOW FIRST HAND HOW THEY MANAGED THE SITUATION IN NEW ORLEANS. YOUR STORY WAS COMPLETELY ONE SIDED AND LACKED ANY TYPE OF REBUTTAL FROM ANOTHER INDEPENDENT ADJUSTER. I AM SURE THERE ARE MANY OUT THERE THAT WOULD GIVE YOU THEIR OPINION.
Posted by: JOHNNY | August 27, 2006, 9:53 am 9:53 am
State Farm has a press release on their website. Maybe everyone should read it to get their side of the story. Then maybe you can make an educated decision. It sounds like everyone is jumping to a conclusion here. There are always 2 sides to a story. The truth usually lies somewhere in the middle.
Posted by: Chris | August 27, 2006, 11:13 am 11:13 am
I knew about this 15 years ago. This is not news to me. I’ve heard the Vice President of a Insuracne Company brag that they have low loss on the book because they deny 50% of the claims automatically. These insurance companies are a master at fraud, deception, manipulation and thugs tactics. There are many article like these on other newspaper. I think there was even a similar program about Allstates Insurance either on 20/20 or 60 minutes. There was even one article where they target blacks specificly. Of course I work in the industry many years so nothing you can put out that will be news to me. I think that this is just the nature of business in America. Maybe all over the world.
Posted by: OldTimer | August 27, 2006, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
I want to make a couple of points. I have worked in the insurance industry for several years and every time I watch the news, I repeatedly hear about the problems that people are having with their claims from hurricane Katrina. But I keep seeing two different stories that are getting grouped together and it upsets me. The first point: State Farm, and how they basically destroyed their credibility which has taken them 90 plus years to build. However, I do not feel sorry that they are going to lose a large market share because of poor management and execution from the top. The “sole” person responsible for these management decisions and policies is the CEO himself. If the decision to falsify documents and deny claims came from below, than their heads need to be on the chopping block and criminal charges need to be filed? This will send a message very quickly to the managers that make policy that this type of behavior is not acceptable and will not be tolerated.
The second point is that the news, or sensationalism journalism, is very entertaining to watch. But that entertainment values sometime comes at a price. Sometimes there will be a news story that is presented it in a way that is compelling and yet incorrect. I felt that the expose on State Farm was dead on and 20/20 is usually a news show that can be watched without biases. However, at least once a week you can see a person on the news that is complaining about how they only received $10,000 for windstorm damage and their home had $90,000 of total damage (because of flooding), it makes me think why in the hell do these people live on the Gulf Coast and not have flood insurance. I live on the Gulf Coast, and my flood insurance is only $250 a year. Then you see a public outcry for these people because they do not have enough money to repair their home. The state ruling in Mississippi about wind vs. rising water is a prime example. As far as the public is concerned it shouldn’t matter if it is wind or flood damage, because they should have flood insurance. For the record, no home policy in any state covers flood or rising water period. There is no ambiguity whatsoever in that statement. What I am watching are people who are backed into a corner because of poor planning and hungry attorneys watching for the next big score against companies with deep pockets. I want to say to them, “So what if company X is not going to pay the remaining $80,000 of your damage? You should get the check from FEMA in a week or two. Oh, you don’t have flood insurance! What in the hell are you thinking? You live on the freaking Gulf of Mexico. It doesn’t matter that you don’t live in the 100 year flood plane, you house flooded and you didn’t want to pay a couple of hundred dollars a year more which equals less than $20 a month. Nice move. I bet you feel great about that financial decision. Being cheap really worked out for you this time. Great foresight! Thank you very much because now the tax payers of the United States are going to foot the bill once again.
Posted by: Matthew | August 27, 2006, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Are you kidding me? The story should read, “STUPID PEOPLE LIVE VERY CLOSE TO GULF OF MEXICO AND ARE TO CHEAP TO PURCHASE FLOOD INSURANCE”. Lets face it, if they actually had flood insurance, there would be no story because there would be no problem.
Posted by: bridget | August 27, 2006, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
This all the Republicans fault.from the Iraq War profiteering to big corporations This is the Ara of greed and corruption THANK YOU
Posted by: Mike Sackman | August 27, 2006, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
I am outraged how according to the 20/20 report, State Farm apparently used fraud & underhanded tactics to deprive their customers of rightfully due claims.
I think all involved should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and the public at large should boycott State Farm. I hope they go out of business!
Posted by: Ray Rice | August 27, 2006, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
I AM SHOCKED AND DISAPPOINTED!!
20/20 AND JOHN STOSSEL SOUNDED JUST LIKE DAN RATHER.
EXTERNAL INDEPENDANT ADJUSTERS ARE NOT INSIDERS…
THIS STORY WAS NOTHING BUT 10 MINUTES OF LIES AND DISTORTIONS.
I HAVE BEEN A STATE FARM AGENT FOR 24 YEARS. I HAVE NEVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THIS IN ALL THESE YEARS… IT`S JUST THE OPOSITE
Posted by: bob | August 27, 2006, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
It amazes me how people are so quick to jump to conclusions.
You have 2 people who are independant adjusters, not SF employee’s, who are making the accusations. There were over a thousand adjusters in LA and the surrounding areas with SF but noone else has stepped forward to back up these statements? That is a little hard to believe.
As far as coverage in policy’s go, the company’s policies are written based on policies developed by the state. They have to be approved by the state before they can be issued. At least in FL.
Rate increases must be approved by the state before they can be implemented, and someone says that the industry is not regulated?
How many other companies must have their products designed and approved by the government before they can be sold?
Posted by: NS | August 27, 2006, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
People, People, People . . . Don’t comment about something you know nothing about. I have worked longer than these two girls in the same line of work for several different insurance companies as an independent adjuster – mainly the largest 4-5 of them. I worked in the same office that these girls worked in, however worked on the back-end of the storm and cleaned up a large majority of the mess there. The accusations will be dealt with b/w the people making them and the people being accused of them, but I can tell you, as an independent adjuster, we are “encouraged” by these large insurance companies to pay everything, and I mean EVERYTHING we possibly can so that the file does not continue to open, reopen, etc., etc. State Farm has been the best of any that I have worked for (BY FAR). I know many, many managers with the company, and have the highest regard for all of them – Yes, there’s always a few bad apples, and comments may have been made, but the intention by the “company” is to close the claims and pay everything they possibly can in a timely manner. “Saving” a couple of thousand dollars on the front end does nothing if the claim keeps reopening. Adjusters with State Farm (and hired by State Farm) are always, always encouraged to be extremely personable, extremely thorough and precise, and handle the claims to conclusion. Not everyone agrees with decisions, but decisions are made based on the policy(ies) that the homeowners purchase and sign their name to. The same policies are offered through all insurance companies and most all of them have the same language, and all have virtually the same coverage(s). State Farm is the largest name, so they get the bad press and most exposure. If you think that State Farm is blatantly denying claims, then you must think that all companies are. But I can tell you, personally, from being there in that same office that these girls worked in, (and for 7 months, not just 2 like they were) nothing of what they are alleging took place. You will see how it will turn out, and I know your minds can not be changed if you think a certain way, but just as the very first message posted here states, there is no argument from anyone, anywhere, along that coast (or any state for that matter) regarding pure homeowner’s policies/coverages and how their claim turned out (I closed a lot of them (500+ myself) along the coast and people were very receptive, very pleased, and very satisfied). Sure, there were a few that did not agree with coverages, but they are what they are. The disagreements stemmed from either not having the right coverages, not having enough coverages, or not having coverage at all. If this has taught people anything, it’s to educate yourself – that’s not the insurance companies’ responsibility. The arguments about wind vs. water stemmed from NOT HAVING FLOOD INSURANCE. Everyone that had a flood policy along the gulf coast/New Orleans/etc. (and had their house completely destroyed), was paid their entire policy limits by State Farm (and I would assume all other companies). Most people were underinsured, but that’s not the companies’ problem – that, AGAIN, goes back to the decision(s) made by the homeowner(s). Flood policies are only offered by insurance companies – they are all written and covered through the federal government and have been in place for a long, long, time. “Don’t expect for someone to bail you out for something you could have prevented yourself.” Everyone has the opportunity to make the same decision regarding insurance coverages.
Posted by: Scottie | August 27, 2006, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
How can you believe two independent sisters who are now working with this money grubbing attorney? Flood isn’t covered unless you have flood insurance, right? Why would we want everything to be covered under a homeowners policy, then everyone would be complaining about the rates because they would probably be 4 x’s the rate they are now! Stuff happens in life, and it’s not always fair, but you choose what kind of insurance you buy, it’s not someone elses fault if you didn’t fork out the money for flood insurance and you’re in a flood plain, come on!
Posted by: Mac | August 27, 2006, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
I work with handicapped and tramatic brain injury individuals who were in car accidents. State Farm is there insurance and by law have to pay all reasonable and neccesary benefits. Yet they make up fraudelent excuses no to pay the disabled and those with brain injurys resulting from there accident. Shame on them , what a disgrace to America.
Posted by: Z | August 27, 2006, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
State Farm ranks second on a list of the 100 worst insurance companies. The Hartford is first on the list, and Allstate is third. The rankings are based on the ratio of bad-faith (wrongful) non-payment of claims, compared to good-faith payment of claims. Search for “bad faith insurance” to learn more. As someone suggested, people should not do business with companies that routinely don’t pay claims. Sure, they’ll pay for minor claims like a broken windshield, but for big claims they throw their lying lawyers, adjusters and contractors at you until you either give up or die. Hurray for the whistleblowers in Mississippi. They had the guts to turn over 15,000 pages of documents to the FBI. Let’s hope it’s enough to make State Farm the next Enron, and send a clear message to other fraudulent insurance companies.
But, it’s not just property insurance companies that commit fraud. When the Mississippi whistleblowers reported overhearing a State Farm manager tell an engineering company to alter reports that were unfavorable to State Farm, or “we’re not paying your invoice,” it reminded me that insurance companies control what’s in reports because they pay the people who write the reports. In my own case, three different doctors and a battery of MRIs, x-rays and examinations showed a torn labrum, AC separation and other injuries to my shoulder, requiring surgery. My employer’s insurance company, Auto-Owners, hired an IME (independent medical examiner) to do a 15-minute exam and write a report saying the injury was a minor muscle strain. A politicized (corrupt) worker’s comp judge in Minnesota accepted the insurance doctor’s obviously fraudulent report and ignored the mountain of contrary medical evidence. Unable to do my job or come up with the $20,000 base price for the surgery, I’m still suffering and skirting poverty four years later. That’s workers’ comp insurance.
Here’s a quick story about health insurance. A close friend is a manager at a optical retail store (part of a national chain). She deals with insurance claims daily, and reports having to jump through flaming hoops to get insurance companies to pay for their insured’s eyeglasses and exams. One day while calling an insurance company about an unpaid bill she was put on hold while the representative talked to her supervisor. However, someone must have pushed the wrong button because she could overhear the supervisor tell the rep not to pay the claim until the optical store submitted it three times, because that was their company policy. That’s health insurance.
Big insurance is rich and powerful in this country, and they have an army of people who are paid to lie for them (as we can see from some of the replies in this thread). Chief among those paid liars are the state legislators who write the state laws regulating insurance. What’s the solution? In my opinion, we need publicly financed elections, so that politicians won’t be beholden to the insurance companies and other big corporations that finance their election campaigns. Until that happens we will continue to have “the best politicians that money can buy,” as Will Rogers famously said.
Posted by: Bob | August 27, 2006, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Uh, excuse me, insurance co defenders; I’ll bet dollars to donuts you WORK FOR AN INSURANCE CO or are closely linked with one. Here in Phoenix, it’s the auto insurance that really rips you off, very high rates, I don’t care what your driving record is. I always used to say, “Well, car insurance is a ripoff, but homeowner’s insurance is fair”. Well, since there was so much new home construction in the valley over the last several years, and lots of crappy homes built, or good(and crappy) homes built on unstable land or too close to washes etc, folks in the Phoenix valley started filing against their homeowner’s insurance more and more since their walls were cracking, roofs would cave in, etc, etc. The insurance companies went nuts and raised their insurance so high they couldn’t afford homeowners any longer! Don’t dare file a claim against your homeowners if you live in the Phoenix valley!
Posted by: nikolai | August 27, 2006, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Hey R…if you hate Bloomington so much, why don’t you leave town. Some of us think it’s a pretty nice place to live. And by the way, the universities are not all in Bloomingotn…one is in Bloomington (IWU), and two are in Normal (ISU and Lincoln College).
Posted by: D | August 27, 2006, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
I hope ABC has a knife and fork ready when all facts come to light. I do belive they will be eating a lot of crow.
This was just another instance of the press using their power to whip up a sensational “news” story to get ratings.
Please let the people hurt by Katrina recover. Don’t keep dragging this through the mud. It helps no one.
Also please share with me what exactly Brian Ross and Joseph Rhee have done to help the victims. I would be very interested to know!
Posted by: Fred | August 27, 2006, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
I can believe this is true because it’s happening to me. The 1st adjuster and a structural engineer that State Farm sent out all said I needed a new roof, but there seems to be no reports to verify that information. The 2nd adjuster they sent to my house sat at my table with me and my contractor and agreed to replace my roof. Then he went back to his office wrote his revised report and ‘changed his mind’. I would love to move forward, but I can’t do it if I can’t pay the contractor. Go figure…..
Posted by: Frustrated in Louisiana | August 27, 2006, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Everyone is hootin’ and hollerin’ about flood insurance…”Homeowner’s doesn’t cover flood, should have bought flood insurance”. GUESS WHAT!!! Flood insurance doesn’t cover tidal surge!!! So all of us hit by Rita got screwed by both insurance companies. How you like those cookies!!
Posted by: jim | August 27, 2006, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
In reading the comments I found one that I found quite illuminating. The jist of it was: State Farm exists to make profit, not serve it’s customers.
Well, Yes and no. State Farm and all other insurance companies do exist to serve customers. But they are expected by thier sharehoders to make a profit. The truth of the matter is that G.J Meherle did not start State Farm to make anyone’s life easier, he started it to make a buck. It is naive to think that any corporation in the service industry is there for any other purpose than to make money. McDonald’s exists not to make burgers, but to pay off investors. Coca Cola, Chrysler, The Gap. Regardless of what thier mission statements say, they are all in the business of making money.
There is a major caveat in buying insurance from anyone: Read the policy. Find out what the exemptions are. It should be common knowledge that regular homeowners policies do not cover flood damage.
Frankly, I would be surprized if the homeowners along the Gulf Coast will be able to buy homeowners’ policies anymore. The risk is too great to the bottom line that the insurance companies so desperately want to protect.
Posted by: Former SF employee | August 28, 2006, 2:19 am 2:19 am
Shame on 20/20 and ABC for allowing two women to carry out a personal vendetta and spread a pack of lies.
These claims adjusters were too stupid to make sure their mother had flood insurance when she lived in the area that was affected by Hurricane Katrina. State Farm refused to pay damages that were caused by flood waters and now these women are striking back with lies and fabrications.
Shame on 20/20 and ABC for running a story without getting all their facts straight. I hope they have money saved up for the lawsuit.
Posted by: Someone in the know | August 28, 2006, 4:11 am 4:11 am
HEY EVERYONE–DON’T MATTER
BAD AS IT WAS, IT’S GONNA GET WORSE
N.O. AND ITS INCOMPETENT LEADER LIVE IN A BUCKET BESIDE A BIG POND
WHEN THE POND GETS STIRRED THE BUCKET GETS FULL–DUH!!! OH, AND AS FOR GETTING WORSE, THEY ARE BUILDING IT BACK IN THE SAME BUCKET!!! THIS IS MONEY DOWN A DRAIN THAT ALL CAN SEE, AND STILL THEY POUR MONEY INTO “REBUILDING”??
THE HUMAN RACE IS LOSING IT INTELLIGENCE DAILY.
Posted by: TheBigPicture | August 28, 2006, 6:50 am 6:50 am
before you go lambasting insurance companies, why don’t you read the policy language and ask an attorney. seems to me the federal court found in favor of nationwide in the first case brought before a judge – only the federal government provides flood insurance. period. that’s the way it always has been.
and as for premium hikes, insurance companies are legally – federally and state-regulated – required to put aside enough money to cover risks that are posed by, say, shifting land in a certain area or the possibility of high wind damage in another area. contrary to popular and media belief, insurance companies don’t raise rates just because – they have to have viable, mathematically sound reasons to raise them. the algorithm by which any insurance company in VA determines rates is public knowledge – it’s not any sort of magic and mist – it’s pure mathematics.
why do you think some attorneys are lobbying for the govt to insure all high-risk areas in the Gulf and along the Atlantic coast? why do you think the state of NC has to insure coastal properties? the state can afford the risk, insurance companies (and their policyholders) can’t.
Posted by: insider | August 28, 2006, 8:38 am 8:38 am
I had State Farm Insurance way back long ago on my car. My car was totalled by a drunk driver who ran a red light and my husband was injured in the accident. The woman who hit him was with another high-risk insurance company. State Farm colluded with the other company to keep our claim from being settled until the car was a rusted, worthless hulk. They offered us $600 for the car and $4000 for the injuries even though the medical bill for the hospital alone was more than $10,000. State Farm accepted the terms on our behalf without even asking us, telling us that any additional expenses would be covered under our State Farm policy. They came up with a number like $5000 for the car and $20,000 for the injury. That was in 1984. We are still waiting for our money from State Farm. After one year, they told us the claim had expired and they had no obligation to pay. :-(
Posted by: Missy Miss | August 28, 2006, 9:14 am 9:14 am
it is a terrible thing that people lost their lives and livlihoods. But if floods aren’t covered by an insurance policy, they’re not covered. That’s why the federal gov’t is giving grants to folks who lived outside the flood zone but got flooded anyway. Everyone is angry, but you can’t blame the insurance companies for the flooding and you can’t blame them for people not having flood insurance. If you live near the water, get flood insurance.
Posted by: kris | August 28, 2006, 9:37 am 9:37 am
I have a question for JoJo in Cheyenne. You say that you are mad at State Farm for not paying you for a “freaky flood” but did pay you for hail damage. The question is, did you have flood insurance? If damage is caused by a covered peril, insurance companies will pay. But if a flood damages your house and you don’t have flood insurance, why would they pay you? I think a lot of people have a misunderstanding as to what insurance really is. As for State Farm and the Gulf Coast of MS, it’s going to be a miss clarifying what was wind damage and what was water damage from the storm surge. But again, you should carry flood insurance on your house!!!
Posted by: SF | August 28, 2006, 9:53 am 9:53 am
SO FAR, 661,000 CLAIMS AND $5 BILLION HAVE BEEN PAID BY STATE FARM TO INSUREDS. LOOK AT THE COMPANY PROFILE, IF YOU DONT THINK THEY PAY ON THEIR CLAIMS- YOU ARE CRAZY!! THIS COMAPNY WAS ALSO RATED # 1 BY JD POWER & ASSOCIATES, IN RECENT YEARS, SPECIFICALLY FOR THE GREAT WAY THEY DO HANDLE CLAIMS. STATE FARM KEEPS ITS PROMISES!!!
THAT’S FINE THOUGH, DROP ALL OF YOUR INSURANCE. WHEN A DISASTER DOES OCCUR, YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BLAME ANYONE, BUT YOURSELF, WHEN THINGS AREN’T TAKEN CARE OF EXACTLY HOW YOU “THOUGHT” IT WOULD BE. PEOPLE, READ YOUR POLICIES, THEY EXPLAIN EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW. DON’T JUST TAKE THEM HOME & THROW THEM INTO A DRAWER. TAKE THE INITIATIVE TO ASK QUESTIONS IF YOU AREN’T SURE.
IT’S TIME TO STOP BASHING & START TAKING SOME RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE ADEQUATLEY PROTECTED. IF YOU WOULD HAVE GIVEN UP ORDERING PIZZA 1 TIME PER MONTH, YOU COULD “AFFORD” TO GET COVERAGE FOR FLOODS. UNFORTUNATLEY OUR PRIORITES ARE CONFUSED!
Posted by: A.S. | August 28, 2006, 10:05 am 10:05 am
I gaurantee every person with a negative comment on this blog has never actually read an insurance policy or tried to understand the language within one. i my self am an adjuster for the very company being bashed and I had to learn our policy in and out, IT IS VERY DIFFICULT!!! we are a country built on “what have you done for me lately.” Just because you pay insurance doesn’t grant you a return on your payment. Losses have to be covered for payment. A company doesn’t owe yuo just for having a loss, they owe you for a covered loss. People feel like they are owed, but they should really understand what they have paid for. Read your policy, and know your coverages. Then come back and complain. If you buy an auto policy with no collision, don’t expect a check when yuo mess your car up. If you buy a home owners policy and don’t get flood coverage. Don’t complain to the insurance company for your ignorance and your need to save a buck. State Farm or most insurance companies don’t deserve to be bashed for your own personal ignorance. Before you throw a stone, make sure you know what you purchased. if you have a loss and it turns out to not be covered, you have no one to blame, but yourself. Insurance is bought to protect a risk. If you as the consumer wanna risk your property by not buying suficient coverage or not reading and understanding what you purchased, you have no one to blame, but yourselves!!!!
Posted by: jim | August 28, 2006, 10:09 am 10:09 am
I’m so sick of people blaming George Bush for everything. He is looking out for our nation’s best interests even in the face of being degraded, and cut down for all that he has done to protect us from evil. He’s done so much good and I’m ashamed of America for being such a low class nation for not supporting our President and our troops. We are a disgrace…
We should be standing behind our country’s leaders instead of the media who are only after ratings vs our safety and well being.
Posted by: Mollie | August 28, 2006, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Dear ABC News,
I am interested in a CD/Video or article copy of this article/specila investigative report.
Thank you
Don Simons
Posted by: Don Simons | August 28, 2006, 10:38 am 10:38 am
That’s right – blame State Farm. Did you ever think “you pay for what you get”? These people probably did not buy adequate coverage to start with. They try to cut corners and save but what they don’t realize is if there is a major loss, can they afford not to have that coverage?
It’s human nature to point the finger at someone else but themselves. Is it possible they are retaliating for money and publicity? Why pass judgement til all the facts are in?
Posted by: Betty | August 28, 2006, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Once again, ABC has proven itself to be very one-sided and left-leaning and has shown to me again why I don’t watch them. Where is the other side of the story? Where are the people to back up these 2 SISTERS claims of corruption?
What has happened to self responsiblity in this country? All of these people made the decision to live where they live and to buy (or not buy) the insurance they have on their homes. I do truly hope and pray that the people devastated by Katrina can recover but put blame where it is due, not on the easiet targets (insurance companies and GWB).
Posted by: Cathy W | August 28, 2006, 10:41 am 10:41 am
This is to Bridget who posted on 8/27 saying “ONLY STUPID PEOPLE LIVE CLOSE TO GULF OF MEXICO AND DON’T BUY FLOOD INSURANCE”. If you had gotten your facts straight before you posted this ridiculous comment you would know that the people in the report DID have flood insurance; but they also had wind insurance they expected to receive money from since their contractor had ruled wind damage. Why wouldn’t they expect it? They had paid on this policy for years and it was obviously investigated by a contractor and ruled wind; so, bottom line, state farm should have paid. What they did was criminal. Anyone who defends what they did obviously works for an insurance company. I applaud the Rigsby sisters for their courage to go public and do what is right!!
Posted by: AWR | August 28, 2006, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Let’s face it. Whether your insured with State Farm or some other well known insurance company, you have no idea what kind of coverage you have until you need it. This is true with car insurance, health insurance, etc. Take the time to read your policy, especially the exclusion’s page, and by all means ask questions of your agent.
Posted by: Pam | August 28, 2006, 10:53 am 10:53 am
First of all, this story has made these sisters out to be “actual” employees of State Farm, and they even have State Farm clothes on! If this isn’t propoganda, I don’t know what is. These sisters are EXTERNAL workers of a DIFFERENT company and are contracted to work at State Farm.
Anyways, State Farm has posted a reply to this obvious one-sided argument on the front page of their main website.
Posted by: Matt B | August 28, 2006, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Please read State Farm’s response to this on the front page of their website.
Posted by: A C | August 28, 2006, 11:09 am 11:09 am
If anyone believes that newscast I feel so sorry for you. Can’t you see that the trial lawyers (as shown in the report) are trying to taint the jury pool? It is all about money for them. Not the victims. They are just hoping to get rich just like they did in Texas off of the mold issue. WAKE UP PEOPLE. There was NO PROOF WHATSOEVER in that story. They played you folks like they always do and you guys bought it hook, line and sinker. Hey ABC…hope you got your ratings!
Posted by: Lerae | August 28, 2006, 11:09 am 11:09 am
I work for State Farm and have for 20 years. I can not tell you how many times I have asked a policyholder if they have ever read their insurance policy, whether it was auto, home, life or health. Pratically every time the answer is no. If the policy excludes the cause of loss then it is not covered. It is not fraud, it is simply not covered. If more people would read their insurance policies before a loss occurs they would know what is covered and what is not. It realy is that simple. But hey, file suit against us, bog down the courts with lawsuits, cause premium dollars to go up and then have a judge tell you the same thing we did….your policy doesn’t cover that type of loss!
Posted by: Tom R. | August 28, 2006, 11:09 am 11:09 am
My State Farm agent lives in a 6000 square foot house here in the New Orleans area (which was damaged, but is already completely restored). Both he and his wife drive Lexus automobiles. He takes his wife and kids on trips all over the world several times a year. I’m not saying that makes him a crook. I’m just saying that he and State Farm must be doing well, very well!
Posted by: Susie Q | August 28, 2006, 11:12 am 11:12 am
I trust reporters as far as I can throw them. If you think insurance is a waste, dont pay for it! All of you moan and groan about paying for it but are happy when you need it. You can blame no one for this disaster but Katrina herself. I would love to know how this was Bush’s fault.
Everyone in America has become too lazy, especially the folks in the South. Look at the demographics!!! Maybe next time take the warnings from your local governments and get the hell out of their when a category 5 hurricane is coming straight for you. Common sense folks!!!
If anyone would actually sit down and read their policies like they should, they would know the ramifications of a flood versus a hurricane.
For those who think State Farm is bad for not paying claims and use bunk studies to back up their opinions, look at the facts. See who has the highest rated financial rankings in the USA. Don’t be surprised to find out State Farm has the best.
Posted by: Frank W. | August 28, 2006, 11:16 am 11:16 am
I’m not surprised to see that a bunch of knuckleheads are on the bandwagon to bash somebody. ABC is out to get a story and they will do what it takes to sensationalize stories. I have worked in the insurance industry for 15yrs and have worked many storms as a claims rep for State Farm and in almost every situation I have been in SF has looked for ways to PAY claims when the policy allows it. The simple fact is flood is not covered by ANY homeowners policy written by ANY insurance company! People are doing what people do and that’s passing the buck. They are looking to get something for nothing.
Posted by: gas | August 28, 2006, 11:34 am 11:34 am
The majority of you simply make me laugh. “Why, it must be true. I read it in the Enquirer”
Get real. Two independent adjusters (that’s right, they didn’t work for State Farm) say it’s so, so it must be?
Posted by: BillyBob | August 28, 2006, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Do you really think that ABC would run a news story that outlined all the good State Farm has done? Do you think they would talk about the billions State Farm has paid out to put families back together again and the thousands of claim reps that have put there lives on hold to do everything can to help in those devastated areas? NO, because that is not what sells. People want to hear about corruption and scandal no matter if it is well founded or not. This isn’t about the victims, it is about the trial lawyers trying to get theirs.
AND, IF YOU LIVE IN A CITY THAT IS BUILT BELOW SEA LEVEL, YOU SHOULD HAVE THE COMMON SENSE TO BUY FLOOD INSURANCE!!
Posted by: Luke | August 28, 2006, 11:49 am 11:49 am
First of all I have to agree with the very few of you who are actually using there brains to think, if you do not have a flood policy you do not get paid for flood. It is very sad now days that we as american people want to point the finger and place the blame on everyone else. WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR OWN ACTIONS. If you do not understand your insurance policy pay some one to read it and explain it to you BEFORE you have cat. strike. Hello it’s not brain surgery it’s it typed black letters READ IT. We have used State Farm for years and have never had them even batt an eye at a claim we have given them. If you people were to cheap or just plain stupid and did not purchase flood insurance that is your loss. Also earthquakes are bound to happen do you have your earthquake insurance or are you going to whine and cry to the media about that also. Does anyone know anything about these two “so called adjusters.” They look a little sleazzy to me. Wouldn’t be suprised if they weren’t smacked down for unproffesional behavior in the office and are trying to distract others from it.
Posted by: Cara | August 28, 2006, 11:52 am 11:52 am
I feel for the Doctor who lost his wife and wish he would have purchased flood insurance. If so, this would not be an issue. For those of you that are bashing the Insurance companies, get educated about the issue then make your comments.
Posted by: ed | August 28, 2006, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Bottom line folks: Insurance is big business. Their primary mission is to take care of their customers, but also to generate revenue to continue to run a successful business and hopefully turn a profit. My only hope is that State Farm cares more about customers than revenue. But let’s be real – THEY WILL DO WHAT THEY MUST TO SAVE MONEY. There are always two sides to a story. I agree that you need to review your policy before filing a claim to ensure that you will receive a settlement; however, after working in the insurance profession for a number of years, i’ve seen insurance companies routinely circumvent standard ethical protocol in order to save money. No names or comments. It’s sad but a fact. God Bless the famalies affected by Katrina and let us hope that they are able to recover soon and that justice prevails if necessary
Posted by: gwb | August 28, 2006, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Bob, where did you locate this so-called ranking of worst insurance companies? The only ranking in the insurance industry that means anything is A.M.Best, where State Farm shines as one of the better insurance companies.
In past industry surveys, nearly a third of all people with insurance have no problem falsifying a claim. So, if this data holds true, roughly 33% of all Katrina claims filed by affected homeowners will be exagerated in some way.
Insurance companies are not perfect. However, if all that is left of your house is a slab and a puddle, the claim adjuster and the homeowner will most likely do battle over how the home was destroyed. I can tell you this – insurance companies can’t afford to give away money to people who were not smart enough to purchase flood insurance…
One final note – Have insurance companies made mistakes where the insured did not get their entitled money? Yes. Do we send innocent people to jail? Yes. Do we elect incompetent government officials? Yes. Do we beleive in everything we see or read? I hope not…
Posted by: John | August 28, 2006, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Bloomington, Illinois, August 25, 2006 – State Farm
State Farm® is outraged by a misleading story aired on this evening’s ABC 20/20 program and by depictions made by two external independent claims adjusters, Cori Rigsby Moran and Kerri Rigsby. The story mischaracterizes State Farm’s claims handling process in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
The ABC report alleged that engineering reports were altered to deny claims. “How the program characterized State Farm’s claims handling is grossly unfair,” said Susan Q. Hood, claims vice president, State Farm Insurance.
“The fact is that we sought engineering reports in about 1100 cases, less than two percent, of the more than 84,700 property claims that we handled in the state of Mississippi. We issued payments on more than 60 percent of those claims in which engineers were involved. And in the claims where engineers were involved, we paid far more on homeowner claims than we did on National Flood Insurance Program claims. To be precise, we paid more than $26.5 million in homeowner claims and only $3 million in National Flood Insurance Program claims.”
“This evening’s report inaccurately portrays State Farm’s claims handling policies and our commitment to our policyholders,” said Hood. “Our claims associates are committed to operating at the highest level of business and ethical standards. State Farm is committed to paying what we owe, promptly, courteously, and efficiently.”
In Mississippi, where the ABC story focused, State Farm paid out more than $1.1 billion in auto, homeowners, and commercial claims. It also paid out more than $790 million in national flood insurance claims for the federal government.
Less than two weeks ago, a federal court ruled that almost all of the damage caused to a coastal home in Pascagoula, Miss., was due to flood not wind. The vast majority of the claims in dispute are also situated along the coast.
In the segment, ABC’s Brian Ross shared documents (from among documents shared with Ross by Rigsby and Moran) with attorney Wayne Drinkwater, who represents State Farm in Mississippi, saying the documents demonstrated that there were conflicting engineering reports and that State Farm denied claims. One claim shown to Mr. Drinkwater belongs to a Biloxi, Miss., policyholder who, despite ABC’s and the two external independent claims adjusters’ assertions, did receive payment and has declared that he is satisfied with his payment and the way his claims were handled by State Farm.
The two women also alleged that State Farm had shredded documents. Like all other large companies and government entities, State Farm has a records management program, which among other things protects the privacy of its customers and appropriately maintains records for regulatory and tax purposes.
State Farm has tried to meet with the two women adjusters who appeared in the ABC 20/20 segment to discuss their concerns. They have refused to do so, despite repeated requests. They are represented by attorney Richard Scruggs.
State Farm handled more than 295,000 property claims and paid (not including payments made under the National Flood Insurance Program) more than $3.1 billion as a result of Katrina. Thousands of State Farm agents and employees from around the country and Canada joined the thousands of agents and employees who already live in the gulf to respond to these storms. “We dedicated these kinds of resources to handle and pay claims, not deny them.” said State Farm vice president Mike Fernandez.
State Farm has been working for months with, and providing documents to, the Mississippi Attorney General’s office and the U.S. Attorney’s office and continues to cooperate with Mississippi and federal officials as they investigate these and other allegations.
“What’s so often ignored is that we have thousands of dedicated people, some of whom suffered their own losses at the hand of Hurricane Katrina, who have worked extremely hard in a professional and ethical way to resolve each claim consistently and in accordance with our policies and our commitment to our policyholders,” said Hood.
State Farm is a mutual insurance company, not a publicly-traded company. It has been the largest insurer of cars in the U.S. since 1943 and the largest insurer of homes since 1964. It also offers a number of other financial services.
Posted by: Michael | August 28, 2006, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Kinda funny how no one sues a clothing company when their jeans get a hole, or they sue the car manugacturer when the car breaks down. Any company out there just wants to make a profit just like the one you people work for!! If you want your house paid for call the government. Flood insurance is regulated by the governemnt and Insurance companies like State Farm make no money on it the governmant does. If you don’t want home owners insurance don’t buy it. Pay for your house by yourself when it blows down! Quit complaining and understand what it is you actually pay for before you point fingers at anyone but yourself!
Posted by: Brian | August 28, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Wow, two sisters finally decide to come clean? Funny, how they make the front news headlines. Nice PR job for their own gain. I seriously doubt that SF defrauded customers on a broad scale. Could they mishandle a claim? Absolutely! Does America want to blame someone for its hurricane losses? You bet! Be careful about believing everything you read or hear! An old proverb says, “the first man appears to be right; until his accuser shows up!” Wait for the “rest of the story”.
Posted by: Jay | August 28, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
just thank the ol’ gipper and his posse for de regulating everything that should be regulated during his (republican) watch(using that lame argument about too much government being bad,now wheres all the gove agencys when you need them.anyone (actively/zealously)overseeing the insurance industry???
that 1980s lobbying war is the one that effectively neutered objective oversight of the cia,the fbi,fema,and most all the federal state and private institutions that need some sort of governmental oversight.to wit…
addendum:
republicans are rich mainly,raise taxes on republicans!!
did you vote for reagan then?if so then dont complain now about the state of the union . its YOUR fault for voting in an actor to be president of the most powerful nation ever to exist.really smart chucko(s)…
Posted by: bah | August 28, 2006, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Insurance companies are no different than every other company. Trying to make profit. Whenever a law is broken, whether its on the corporate level or elsewhere it needs to be dealt with.
But demonizing insurance and energy companies is painting with a broad brush. I have AllState and NJM and both have paid claims for me without hassle. Its a service people need and want.
Those that break the law just have to be punished. The rest of the legit businesses
Posted by: Haoleus | August 28, 2006, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Not that I’m making excuses for State Farm or for the Industry on a whole, but tell me, informed consumer, have your ever READ your homeowner’s insurance contract? Have you asked your agent what is and is not covered? I am a consumer 1st, and an agent last. It it difficult to understand, but before I begin mouthing off about the ‘rip off that is insurance’, or any other service which requires my hard-earned money, I sure as hell make sure I know what I’m getting into.
Posted by: nancy | August 28, 2006, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
I was shocked to see the info regarding State Farms claim practices because I am confident they are not true. I have represented countless claims for that company over a 20 year period & have never seen anything but honesty. They even train their claims reps to FIND coverage for a loss and pay based on policy coverage. If its covered – they pay. If not – they do not.
Posted by: del ray | August 28, 2006, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
It is time to change corporate laws period. Compacts and corporations originally had limited life spans. It is time to bring back laws that end these entities that have too much power. They have taken over our country.
Posted by: Murphy | August 28, 2006, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Flood insurance should be MANDATORY for anyone living along the coast, hurricanes happen EVERY year. People don’t want to purchase insurance, but then they expect the government (everyone else in the country) to bail them out when something happens.
Posted by: Steve | August 28, 2006, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
There is fraud on both sides of the line! While you can’t expect the homeowners to pay claims that are excluded and never meant to be covered, you DO EXPECT to be paid for legitimate claims.
As far as the condition of the areas now, remember, “the Good Lord helps them that helps themselves”. A lot of good people out there are working to help each other, but there are just as many or more that are sitting on their backsides just like they were a year ago, assuming someone “owes” them and waiting!!!
Posted by: kb | August 28, 2006, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
IT’S AMAZING, that anyone could believe this. Imagine the number of claims that State Farm must have had overall in Lousiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, and Florida. I am guessing it was greater that a half a million. Yet somehow these few number of people are right and everyone else is wrong. State Farm is a good company and cares about it’s policy holders very much. I have been a long time policy holder in Florida and have nothing but great things to say about State Farm. They have always shown up and helped me recover from the storm. They have been fair and honest. And if something was missed they were happy to return and compensate. Unlike these others I have actually took the time to read my policy and understand what it can do for me and what it can’t. What ever the policy can’t do for me I was able to purchase as well, ie.. FLOOD INSURANCE
WAKE UP PEOPLE
Posted by: SM | August 28, 2006, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
I am so weary of hearing comments from obvious State Farm or other insurance company agents or executives, who consistently and ignorantly continue to say the same thing over and over..” homeowners policies do not cover flood waters…buy flood insurance…why do you want the insurance companies to pay for your destroyed home if flooding is not covered?… Homeowners who do not have flood insurance deserve what they get. They must be stupid because they want to be paid for flood .. yada, yada, yada.”
WELL…LISTEN UP!!!! We DO NOT (!!!!!!!!!!!)want to be paid for flood…we are not simpletons! We want to be paid for our WIND DAMAGE!!!!
You guys just keep on ignoring that we are wanting our claims honored because of WIND and TORNADO DAMAGE…THAT WE HAVE EXPERT PROOF OF, EYEWITNESS PROOF, VIDEOS, PHOTOS, FORENSIC WEATHER EXPERT TESTIMONY, AND MANY OTHER MEANS OF PROVING WIND DAMAGE!! The remarkable thing is that, even tho we have PROOF, the insurance companies are still ignoring it, and denying claims by simply using a generic overall refusal. SF did not even send an engineer out to our slab. We hired expert after expert to show what happened on our site, AND IT WAS PROVEN THAT WE HAD MASSIVE WIND DAMAGE. Even with all of this, Sf just simply ignored our evidence and denied us 100%…AND THEY HAD NO EVIDENCE OF THEIR OWN TO PROVE WATER DID THE DAMAGE.
We do not have to just wonder if what the sister adjusters are saying is true. Friends in our Slingshot Gang (organized to work together to fight the fraud) have seen the Shredding trucks at SF, they have bogus engineering reports and changed engineer reports, have been denied without the insurance company showing proof ( which they are supposed to do!) and have been insulted and pushed to the limits by the insurance representatives at mediations.
Yes, the insurance industry has paid LOTS of money out to policyholders..BUT!!!!! they are NOT paying for the homes that have been TOTALLY destroyed to where there is only a slab left. When there is just a slab, they are automatically attributing it to water damage in Mississippi because, as we ALL know, the water got very high. Altho the insurance companies CLAIM to consider each house individually…THEY ARE NOT DOING THAT!! Our adjuster said that he was not going to come to our slab, “because all of them looked the same.” SF did not send an engineer either…they just denied us. When we provided them wind evidence (the policyholder is not required to provide the evidence…it is the insurance company that is to gather the evidence), SF continued to deny our claim. Someone in the SF office actually told my husband that he was sorry, but that they were told to deny everyone in our area with just a slab. This goes hand in hand with what the sisters have said about what SF has done.
Why do you insurance people continue to turn a blind eye to the many other cases across the U.S., where SF has used the same tactics to keep from paying the BIG claims? (they do pay most of the small claims…I will give them that. That is how they can say that they have settled 85% of the claims..they just pay the small ones. When you figure the average payment per claim in Mississippi, it comes to around $11,000 per claim…and that is NOT the homes that were totally destoyed by wind, or by some wind and some water (and yes, we KNOW the water part is NOT covered!!!)
SF committed fraud and used deception in the Oklahoma tornado tragedy. They relied on their buddies, HAAG engineering to give them the reports that they wanted. COINCIDENTALLY, they are also using HAAG engineering reports to help them deny our legitimate WIND claims in Mississippi. If anyone would like to question this, just type in “State Farm and Haag Engineering” on your search engine…you will find plenty. You can also research a lot more on SF and the many times they have been fined millions of dollars for using deception and fraud.
I am certain that there are MANY SF agents and representatives out there, who are totally honest and would never try to defraud anyone. I appreciate you and wish you the best. But, in reality, there are some rotten apples in your company. Please do not be so naive as to continue to look the other way…do your own research with an open mind. Sooner or later, the truth is going to come out to the fullest, and you may find yourself shocked and ashamed of the company that you continue to hold in such high regard.
Is expecting your insurance company to be honest and fair to much to ask?????????
Posted by: Slingshot | August 28, 2006, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
I have worked in the Insurance industry for over 30 years and find this 20-/20 story hard to believe. I think they should do a more thorough investigation before reporting a half baked story just to get ratings.
Posted by: O.C. | August 28, 2006, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Side note – these women who “put their jobs on the line” are independent adjusters, not actually employees of State Farm. They just happened to work with State Farm exclusively over the last 8 years, but the article doesn’t state the amount of work they’ve done, or how much inside information they can possibly have. If they worked 3 days doing adjuster work over the course of 8 years, they’re still “working exclusively with state farm over 8 years.”
Posted by: jovial_cynic | August 28, 2006, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Whenever there is a flood in the northern states or anywhere, or a tornado in the midwest, or an earthquake in the west, or a volcano erruption in the northwest or in Hawaii, a snow storm or blizzard anywhere, a catastrophic fire in a large city, THE POOR, STUPID FOLKS DOWN HERE IN THE IGNORANT SOUTH DO NOT CALL YOU NAMES AND TELL THE WORLD THAT YOU DESERVE WHAT YOU GOT BECAUSE YOU LIVE IN A PLACE WHERE YOU SHOULD EXPECT SOMETHING DISASTEROUS TO HAPPEN!!!
Actually, southerners have been raised to have more class and manners than that…and if you will kindly check these facts, you will find that it is the SOUTHERN STATES that are the most generous of all the other states when it comes to helping their neighbors…even if they are clear across America.
Making derogatory remarks and calling names is very non-constructive and hurtful. For anyone who lives within 50 miles of the coast to move away because of the possiblity of storms (or else you deserve what you get), would mean that everyone along the entire coast of the United States, including Hawaii and ALaksa, should move. Of couse, we could also add that the folks who live where the tornados hit, should move, as well. And then, there is California, with the earthquakes, etc……SEE HOW RIDICULOUS YOUR COMMENTS ARE, NOT????
Posted by: JD | August 28, 2006, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
When my father died in an accident 20 years ago he had a life insurance policy with State Farm. It stated on the front page of the policy that the policy would pay double if killed in an accident. A State Farm agent came to my mothers house a few days after his death and said that ” we don’t pay double for accidents anymore”. I immediatly threw him out of the house and ran him off of the property. It took a while but they paid when they found out they we would not back down.
Posted by: jess | August 28, 2006, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
I have worked for State Farm for many years and also worked three years on the Catastrophe team. These two women are lying, independent adjusters don’t even work for State Farm, because we wouldn’t even hire them on as real employees. State Farm employees conduct themselves with dignity, unlike these two women. I personally paid many claims and all my customers always appreciated the service that my company provided. I am proud to work for this company.
If people would learn to READ THEIR POLICIES then we would not have these problems. Flood is not covered, one case has already found insurance companies not liable and all the rest will end up the same way. We pay what we owe, it is a contract!
Posted by: APham | August 28, 2006, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
One word…..OWNERSHIP!!!!
I don’t care if it’s homeowners, car, life or whatever you sign your name to, it’s YOUR name on the dotted line NOT STATE FARMS to show that you understand what your coverages are. Any insurance company I don’t care who it is, is ONLY responsible for paying what they OWE, NOT A PENNY MORE, NOT A PENNY LESS!!! They OWE for what the policy defines based on coverages you purchased and if you were too cheap or too stupid not to select a coverage in an area that is “deemed a flood zone” then you diserve have your claim denied – YOU CHOSE THAT, NOT THEM!!!!
For all of you who made ignorant comments about how State Farm has not payed, obviously you didn’t do YOUR research – does 295,000 in property damages and 3.1
B I L L I O N for Katrin related losses sound like not paying?
Talk about trying to make a quick buck – what the hell do you think these two females are about to rake in for this story?!?!
For those of you who say that you arn’t going to carry insurance – Do it, I dare you,(you won’t.) And when something awful happens don’t you dare come crying to anyone other than who is staring you back in the mirror.
And for those of you who are commenting on GWB having anything to do with this – do us all a favor and make a useful comment on the topic.
Bottom line – OWNERSHIP!
Posted by: gomez | August 28, 2006, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
My entire family was devastated by hurricane Katrina, and my husband’s family was devastated by hurricane rita. State Farm paid my grandmother the entire policy limits without even going out to see her house. They paid under her flood policy, because that is what caused the damage. All they did was verify that she lived in Saint Bernard parish. My parents were also paid with no problems. My grandma and parents had additional living expense money that was paid very quickly, and isn’t even offered under the flood policy, but due to the circumstances state farm paid it anyway! I don’t think it makes sense to condemn and entire company and it’s employees based on the word of these two women… And if State Farm hasn’t done anything to you directly why would you leave. In the gulf coast area it’s hard for us to find home insurance, you should feel blessed that you don’t have these problems. It seems to me that these allegations are solely in Mississippi, so makes makes it so different in MS than in LA, AL, and FL??? Sf had policies in all those other states…
OH and you don’t have to be in a flood zone to buy flood insurance!!!
Posted by: Liz | August 28, 2006, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Nothing Snake Farm does could surprise me in the leaset. Having been a victim of their company goal of profits over all else, I feel sorry for anyone they have insured who has a claim. How many states have to investigate them and file suits before the government does something about them? I imagine all 50.
Posted by: DD | August 28, 2006, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
I have been in insurance for 26 years and worked for several different companies. There has been NO ONE who takes care of their customers like State Farm. Throughout the Katrina situation, State Farm was the FIRST company to donate $1,000,000 out of pocket to the American Red Cross. They were also the first Company to pay the claims first, then ask questions later. I do not appreciate the lies that were told by the Independent Adjusters. They do not work for any particular company, and they were the first people to take Total advantage of the situation. Why not ask them how much money they made on this disaster? LIKE A GOOD NEIGHBOR STATE FARM WILL ALWAYS BE THERE!!
Posted by: Judi Hudson | August 28, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Way to go, ABC! I didn’t take enough blood pressure meds this AM to read all of these inaccurate comments! Do the words “personal responsibility” mean anything to these readers who are so quick to judge, or to you, ABC, who presents ONE side of a situation, stated by disgruntled IA’s (also known as ambulance chasers)?? Your trite sensationalism is exactly why I no longer watch ANY network news!
Posted by: dianne | August 28, 2006, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Think about it people……. just cool down and think. If you live on the coast, you NEED Flood insurance.
Let’s put this in language you MIGHT understand (but with what I’ve read, I doubt it seriously)..
You have car. You only want liability, because that’s all the state REQUIRES you to have. You don’t want to spend the extra $40 a month it would take to have Comp and Collision. Someone runs into you that doesn’t have insurance, or the accident is your fault…… Are you going to bitch and complain that the insurance company doesn’t buy you a shiny new car? Apparently the majority of you are!! State Farm (or ANY OTHER COMPANY) will only pay for coverages that you purchase….not what you WISH you would have purchased, or meant to purchase.
Lets say your friendly State Farm Agent has been trying to get you to come in the office for a couple of years to talk about Life insurance so if something happens to you, your family is not left in financial ruin…. When that time comes, you can’t expect State Farm (or ANY OTHER COMPANY) to pay on a Life Policy that was never purchased.
This is NO FREAKIN’ DIFFERENT!!
You live below sea level…..you’re close to the ocean….YOU NEED FLOOD INSURANCE.
Go ahead and leave State Farm. First of all, you now have claims on your record, and second, there are so many insurers pulling out of that area (if they are still in business at all) good luck on finding one.
Being “frugal” on an insurance policy doesn’t pay off in the long run, does it?
I’ve had State Farm for nearly 30 years. I’ve NEVER had not one single complaint on the way they handle my claims. My agent goes above and beyond.
READ YOUR POLICY and TALK TO YOUR AGENT——ASK QUESTIONS—-DON’T BE CHEAP, especially if there’s an ocean out your front door!!
That’s just FOOLish (stupid, crazy, etc…)
Posted by: John | August 28, 2006, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Nothing like blaming big business for stupid peoples problems. New Orleans is below sea level, they knew if a big hurricane hit that place would flood, so why not spend the extra 10 bucks a month for flood insurance? I live right outside of a major river that hasn’t flooded in my lifetime, but guess what, i got flood insurance just in case. That’s what insurance is, in case stuff happens. If your to dumb and cheap to see that something could happen than that’s your own fault!!!! If you live in California you’d better have earthquake coverage, if you live in Florida you better have hurrcane and flood coverage, if you live in Kansas you’d better have something to protect you from Tornadoes…its just common sense here people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Z | August 28, 2006, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
I have been reading the endless list of comments for and against State Farm and it is a huge cause for concern for the intelligence level we have in these UNITED STATES.
First of all, I was a claim rep, fire reinspector and now an agent for State Farm. At no time was I ever advised to treat the customer fraudulently and or deny a claim that should be covered. I was in Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Hugo, Texas hail storms, Oakland Fires, and back up of sewer and drain storms. I have been all over the United States handling claims for State Farm. I was told to go out and take care of the policyholder.
If there was a question on coverage it was handled with the most compassion for the client. It was never covered up or shreded etc. The contract stands on its own. I learned in taking care of our policyholder that we are the best in the industry hands down.
The question I have for the two sisters, is why a year later and how did you get your hands on all the 1000′s of documents. You didn’t handle that many claims in Katrina, so where did they come from. In the 20/20 piece we have two disgruntled clients linked to the two sisters. Maybe the sisters didn’t handle the claim well. There are so many areas in the piece that don’t fit like, the engineer stating, ” a combination of wind.” Which combo was it? Wind and wind or wind and tornado or wind and fish, What 20/20 left out was “a combination of wind and storm surge.”
Also remember the surge comes before the storm.
Posted by: Doug | August 28, 2006, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Did you guys ever think that the people who decided to stupidly build their homes near a hurrican prone area are the ones to blame? Why are we blaming an insurance company when we should be asking why stupid people are building houses near a hurricane zone and not getting water damage isurance. And why they want to rebuild in the same place. Everyone is always out to blame others for their problems rather than just taking it upon themselves. George W Bush, State Farm, Other insurances companies…maybe the reason things are bad is because people are idiots and the world feels more inclined to blame others then taking responsibility. I think that people need to get over themselves.
Posted by: Autumn Zank | August 28, 2006, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
This is to Liz, who said that SF paid the Flood policy without even coming out to see the house. Are you aware that the Flood Policy is issued by our government, and not by the insurance companies? They just have the insurance companies write the policies up…but the money that is paid out for FLOOD does not come fron ANY isurance company. That is why you were paid so quickly. We were also paid very quickly for our flood policies in Mississippi….it is just the WIND policies that we are having trouble having the insurance companies pay. They have not even been paying us even after it is proven to be wind. No matter what the insurance company loyalist keep insisting….SF is not paying the wind claims for houses that have been totally destroyed by wind. THAT is where the problem lies. I truly wish everyone would stop saying that we want to be paid for water damage…that is NOT the issue. Good luck to you and your family.
Posted by: tO lIZ | August 28, 2006, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Wow! How do you really form an opinion with so many variables out there.
First, you have the the insurance company trying to wiggle out of paying claims by using the wind/water issue. To form an opinion against the insurance company, means you have to believe the Second variable in the equation – the two Independents. Now, are they honest whistle blowers just trying to do us all a favor, or are they tools for Dickie Scruggs, the Third variable. It is probably safe to assume that Dickie Scruggs stands to make a lot of money with a class action lawsuit even if it never sees the inside of a courtroom and gets mediated into a settlement. Throw in the Fourth variable, the media, who I’m sure never do stories with a bias – NOT!
It’s the lesser of evils, and everyone’s opinion on that will widely vary. Really, how can anyone KNOW what has REALLY happened without being in the courtroom when and if this all goes down? There’s plenty of motive for all variables, but still too many unknowns!
But please, assume away everyone….
Posted by: ml | August 28, 2006, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
It is nice to hear from fellow independent adjusters out there who point out that we are told to pay all that we can pay and look for every bit of coverage available.
In an iffy situation we are instructed to give the homeowner the benefit of the doubt, we are told that if we must err, better to err on the side of the homeowner.
Yes claims can take some time to settle, but the companies I have worked with have always stressed the importance of good customer service, compassion, and expediency in the settling of claims. Oh and one more thot for you “insurance-haters” out there – THE BIGGER AN ESTIMATE WE CAN WRITE FOR A HOMEOWNER THE MORE MONEY WE MAKE. Adjusters want to pay claims and we will make supported arguments to do it justly … however we will not commit fraud for anyone, homeowners or insurance companies.
If the allegations these women make are true – it’s a shame, but probably isolated.
JUST BECAUSE YOU DON’T GET WHAT YOU WANT DOESN’T MEAN THERE IS FRAUD.
Posted by: MM | August 28, 2006, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
If true, what State Farm did is shameful and illegal. But contrary to popular belief, not all insurance companies are crooks. I have been working for an independent agent since 1977. Our agency goes out of the way to help get claims paid.
Posted by: Betty | August 28, 2006, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Bloomington, Illinois, August 25, 2006 – State Farm
State Farm® is outraged by a misleading story aired on this evening’s ABC 20/20 program and by depictions made by two external independent claims adjusters, Cori Rigsby Moran and Kerri Rigsby. The story mischaracterizes State Farm’s claims handling process in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
The ABC report alleged that engineering reports were altered to deny claims. “How the program characterized State Farm’s claims handling is grossly unfair,” said Susan Q. Hood, claims vice president, State Farm Insurance.
“The fact is that we sought engineering reports in about 1100 cases, less than two percent, of the more than 84,700 property claims that we handled in the state of Mississippi. We issued payments on more than 60 percent of those claims in which engineers were involved. And in the claims where engineers were involved, we paid far more on homeowner claims than we did on National Flood Insurance Program claims. To be precise, we paid more than $26.5 million in homeowner claims and only $3 million in National Flood Insurance Program claims.”
“This evening’s report inaccurately portrays State Farm’s claims handling policies and our commitment to our policyholders,” said Hood. “Our claims associates are committed to operating at the highest level of business and ethical standards. State Farm is committed to paying what we owe, promptly, courteously, and efficiently.”
In Mississippi, where the ABC story focused, State Farm paid out more than $1.1 billion in auto, homeowners, and commercial claims. It also paid out more than $790 million in national flood insurance claims for the federal government.
Less than two weeks ago, a federal court ruled that almost all of the damage caused to a coastal home in Pascagoula, Miss., was due to flood not wind. The vast majority of the claims in dispute are also situated along the coast.
In the segment, ABC’s Brian Ross shared documents (from among documents shared with Ross by Rigsby and Moran) with attorney Wayne Drinkwater, who represents State Farm in Mississippi, saying the documents demonstrated that there were conflicting engineering reports and that State Farm denied claims. One claim shown to Mr. Drinkwater belongs to a Biloxi, Miss., policyholder who, despite ABC’s and the two external independent claims adjusters’ assertions, did receive payment and has declared that he is satisfied with his payment and the way his claims were handled by State Farm.
The two women also alleged that State Farm had shredded documents. Like all other large companies and government entities, State Farm has a records management program, which among other things protects the privacy of its customers and appropriately maintains records for regulatory and tax purposes.
State Farm has tried to meet with the two women adjusters who appeared in the ABC 20/20 segment to discuss their concerns. They have refused to do so, despite repeated requests. They are represented by attorney Richard Scruggs.
State Farm handled more than 295,000 property claims and paid (not including payments made under the National Flood Insurance Program) more than $3.1 billion as a result of Katrina. Thousands of State Farm agents and employees from around the country and Canada joined the thousands of agents and employees who already live in the gulf to respond to these storms. “We dedicated these kinds of resources to handle and pay claims, not deny them.” said State Farm vice president Mike Fernandez.
State Farm has been working for months with, and providing documents to, the Mississippi Attorney General’s office and the U.S. Attorney’s office and continues to cooperate with Mississippi and federal officials as they investigate these and other allegations.
“What’s so often ignored is that we have thousands of dedicated people, some of whom suffered their own losses at the hand of Hurricane Katrina, who have worked extremely hard in a professional and ethical way to resolve each claim consistently and in accordance with our policies and our commitment to our policyholders,” said Hood.
Posted by: hey there now | August 28, 2006, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Since someone asked, I repeat: State Farm ranks second on a list of the 100 worst insurance companies. The Hartford is first on the list, and Allstate is third. The rankings are based on the ratio of bad-faith (wrongful) non-payment of claims, compared to good-faith payment of claims.
In other words, these are the 100 worst companies when it comes to defrauding their customers. It makes sense to avoid buying insurance from the worst of the worst.
I can’t give the web address because “The Blotter” automatically deletes website addresses. Just do an Internet search for “bad faith insurance.” It’s the first hit.
This site also ranks the 100 best insurance companies, though I’ve found that many of the best 100 only insure large businesses.
Posted by: Bob | August 28, 2006, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
As a 20 plus year Independent Insurance Agent, I am very disapointed in State Farm. Situations like this give all Insurance companies, and agents a bad name.
Where were the State Farm agents who sold this coverage to their clients? They should have been fighting for their clients! However, they are employees of State Farm. They represent State FArm, and not their clients.
Insurance is a promise! A promise to be their when the customer need us most! Un “Like a good neighbor” they were not there!
I pray for all of the victims of both Katrina, and State FArm.
Posted by: Tom Wingert | August 28, 2006, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
I’ve had insurance with S.F. since 1973 and I worked in an agent’s office for 10 years. My experiences have been good. S.F. was always more than fair with policyholders.
I do remember an adjuster saying once… that if S.F. paid the claims they actually owed, our premiums would probably be about half of what they are now.
After working in insurance, I look at it in a different way. Most people don’t understand their coverage and want to be covered for just about anything that may happen. But, those same people need to sit down with their agent and go over their policies.
I think many people don’t realize that earthquakes are not covered unless they buy extra coverage. The agent may have mentioned it, but it cost extra and most folks say “no thanks.”
Posted by: CM | August 28, 2006, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
State Farm is a horrible organization that will screw you without thinking twice.
Their adjuster get bonuses for committing fraud and their managers lie and bend people over everyday.
Posted by: State Farm Sucks | August 28, 2006, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Adjusters are crooks. They get huge bonuses for denying claims and don’t give a crap about those that pay their salaries… their customers.
Posted by: State Farm Sucks | August 28, 2006, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
When I was a child in the 1940′s, all my relatives swore never to use State Farm as they were shysters and would not pay. If they did pay, then the policy would be canceled. Cui bono?
Posted by: scholiastes | August 28, 2006, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Why don’t people understand that insurance is not an annuity. The money you put in is not yours to get back. Insurance is for the peace of mind that if catastrophe strikes, you will be put back to the place you were before. That is if you have purchased adequate insurance. If you live in a flood plain, you need flood insurance. If you live in an area with sesmic activity, you need earthquake insurance.
Posted by: ridiculous | August 28, 2006, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
PLEASE REMEMBER – Your average home insurance is only for FIRE and WIND. Not flood. Insurance is a gambling game…they have a group of people pay into a pool and calculate the odds of how many people’s houses are going to catch on fire. Then they pay the people’s who do catch on fire. It’s statistics and probability. The less variables, the less of a gamble, so they sell Fire and Flood and Earthquake insurance separately.
That’s why flood and earthquake insurance are so expensive…the only people who are going to buy flood insurance are people who live in an area where they’re likely to be flooded, likewise with earthquakes. It ups the odds, statistically, making it more likely it’ll happen and more likely there will be major widespread damage. Most companies don’t even risk it! There’s only ONE company that offers earthquake insurance in CA (and it’s hella expensive) and the only flood insurance you can get is through the Federal government, and the MAX you can get is for $250K (and most people can’t afford that much).
Now, if they are being dishonest about whether the damage was wind or not, AND it’s covered, then that’s different. THAT’S wrong. But they aren’t obligated to pay for flood damage. And good luck in trying to sort out which damage is from what…Katrina was a MESS.
Posted by: Ruthie | August 28, 2006, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
I’m a proud 20 plus year State Farm associate. In over 15 years as a homeowner claim representative, I handled many, many severe losses for our policyholders. In most cases, thankfully, I was able to provide the resources our customer’s has a right to expect–prompt, fair, good neighbor claim service. In other cases, the loss was not covered, and I tried to deliver the news the way I would like to hear it—common sense explanations detailing why a loss wasn’t covered. I was trained to listen to concerns or objections raised, and resolve questions wherever possible. Any suggestion to the contrary is an insult to the scores of hard-working men and women who handle claims for our company.
I suspect my friends and co-workers spending months at a time, away from their homes and families are doing much the same, trying to deliver on the promise made when a customer trusts State Farm with their premium dollars. I also figure they will react to this ABC “investigation” the same way that I would–shake their heads at the one-sided and ridiculous reporting, recognize it’s just part of life in the claim business, and set about trying to help the next policyholder who needs them.
It’s certainly an incredible coincidence that the two Rigsby sisters are represented by Dickie Scruggs, noted in the news piece as someone well-known for “taking on the tobacco companies”. “Taking on the tobacco companies”??? I’m approaching middle-age, and pretty much all the “taking on” of the tobacco companies was done long before Dickie Scruggs started following that particular ambulance, although he made himself quite wealthy as a result.
One last thought–if (and when) State Farm and the good people who work for the organization are cleared of wrongoding, will Investigative Reporter Brian Ross complete his investigation and tell the American people that the sisters lied about midnight shredding trucks and secret files? I’m thinking “no”…
Posted by: TO | August 29, 2006, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Why do people carry insurance? If you are wealthy enough to purchase a home/car without financing…then don’t carry prop/casualty insurance if the majority of people here think that insurance is a rip-off, a scam, etc. If you are borrowing money for a home, then you don’t own the home. Therefore, the mortgage company can tell you that you need insurance if you want to borrow THEIR money. Insurance policies are built on contracts. READ your contracts!
Posted by: Yoder | August 29, 2006, 2:37 am 2:37 am
Several of you have said that your going to drop statefarm and goto a diff insurance company, Which one? Statefarm isn’t the only one ripping off these poor people. Every major insurance company is finding a loophold for not paying up. One company refused to pay for the flooding becouse they said it was wind driven what a bunch of crap. Go ahead drop statefarm and get ripped off by someone els.
Posted by: Dan | August 29, 2006, 5:10 am 5:10 am
People, you’re condeming State Farm without proof! If State Farm is supposedly screwing its policyholders, how come other independent adjusters haven’t come forward? Or for that matter, State Farm’s own claim reps? Are they scared of losing their job? I doubt it, but what do I know? I only beleive in the truth based on facts.
Posted by: Mike | August 29, 2006, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Does anyone take into account that 20/20, Dateline, Primetime, etc. are biased, one-sided news programs that edit information for “ratings”? I watched the segment and it appeared to me that the Rigby sisters want their five minutes of fame — I’d like to hear State Farm’s side of the story.
Posted by: Tina | August 29, 2006, 9:07 am 9:07 am
I know now everyone will be checking their insurance policies to make sure they are covered for floods.
I do believe insurance policies should cover my home if its destroyed by anything, be it act of nature or accidents.
Come on these folks need help. Even if they do not have flood insurance the insurance companies make so much $$$ they can be the “good neighbor” and lend a helping hand to rebuild.
Posted by: Rich | August 29, 2006, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Am I the only one who questions how two Independent Adjusters were able to get very private information and download it? I think we are jumping the gun and condeming a company before we have all the facts.
Posted by: stephanie | August 29, 2006, 10:37 am 10:37 am
This sounds like State Farm as usual! This company needs to stand up and do something for once. For years they have been turning against their customers, not covering water, wind and fire damage. They will find any way to keep from helping their customers. In East Texas you can drive by burned houses that have not been rebuilt for years and there in the front yard is the sign of truth “State Farm DID NOT PAY”. It is going to take an out cry from the public and a loss of customers for them to change their evil, corporate, money grubbing, heartless ways, or at least a real big hit to their check book for them to change. This is supposed to be America that we live in, a place for opportunity, freedom and where people care about their country and people. It seems that corporate America does not have the values in which this country was built upon.
Posted by: previous State Farm customer | August 29, 2006, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
You know, I can find any industry to point blame at. My God, you all sound like a bunch of socialists. Relax, maybe these two women are ex-employees that were fired from State Farm, and now have an axe to grind. I have had State Farm for years, and never had an issue, they have always been very fair with me. Have any of you idiots bother to read your policy, have you ever sat down with your agent to go over your coverage? Don’t believe everything you hear from the leftist media.
Posted by: IloveCorpAmerica | August 29, 2006, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
I feel very badly for all those affected by the hurricanes. From experience in the field I can honestly say that I have seen more paid out to give the benefit of the doubt in cases such as this were coverage is not black and white. FLOOD is not covered under homeowners policy and if there is no sign of wind or a COVERED loss then there is nothing that can be done. If payments are made to those who didn’t pay for flood insurance then how wrong is that to all those people who did spend the extra for Flood coverage? Losing customers does not make insurance companies rich – being fair according to policy conditions is the best way to keep most customers happy. Of course the ones who dont have true coverage will not be happy. Happy customers help companies stay afloat so it is in a companies best interest to be fair. I also know these two sisters. 20/20 I encourage you to tell all sides of a story. Ask both Moran and Rigsby how many days did they spend out shopping, talking in the office about their new clothes, shoes and so forth -doing personal things on company time making a huge daily rate while hurricane ravished people were out there suffering…
Posted by: wishyouknew | August 29, 2006, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
First of all, adjusters do not get a bonus for denying a claim. In fact independent adjusters make less money when they deny claims. And for all you who have all this evidence that wind caused the damage, where was this evidence when you spoke with your adjuster. Do you have pictures of your house with just the wind damage? Or do you expect to be paid because there was wind in the area. Many times only a few houses in neighborhoods actually have wind damage. People want to speculate that the wind did all this damage, when the storm surge was over 20ft high. We have people looking at how trees fall and which direction they are laying, when in reality if your house is gone you don’t think the tree could have moved. Besides would paying for your roof from wind damage really make you feel better?
Ok, Let’s look at the real problem, it’s not that these people did not have flood insurance. It is the fact that the maximum the flood policy will payout is $250,000. This has not changed since the 1970′s.
Let’s be real, go after your politicians to have them increase this so when storm surges or floods do occur you can be compensated for your loss fairly. It’s not a matter of whether your insurance company is not paying for wind it’s that the Flood Policy needs to be revised to allow larger policy limits.
Posted by: sm | August 29, 2006, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
I see there are people here who are missing the piont. They are not saying that the policy was denied for flood damage. They are saying that state farm is having the investitgation info changed to reflect damage was cause by flooding not by high wind so as to not to have to pay for the policy.
Posted by: John | August 29, 2006, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
State Farm did nothing different then any other co when wanting to downsize the claims of policy owners I suffered alot of untold stress from SF when Frances hit my home in 04 it took threats photos and numerous inspections before they came thru with part of the coverage I had been paying for for years. and I had to do the work myself to make what little they gave work FEMA was there weeks before SF ever made it out and deemed the building a total loss but SF stated as long as one wall remained it was not a total loss I believe business licenses lost and fines should be given companies that practice to decieve and defraud and action should be made to each states insurance commissioner I had to threaten them with ours before they got busy.
Posted by: April | August 29, 2006, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
ABC’S 20/20 Mischaracterizes State Farm’s Claims-Handling Process
BLOOMINGTON, Ill., Aug. 26 /PRNewswire/ — State Farm® is outraged by a misleading story aired on Friday evening’s ABC 20/20 program and by depictions made by two external independent claims adjusters, Cori Rigsby Moran and Kerri Rigsby. The story mischaracterizes State Farm’s claims handling process in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
The ABC report alleged that engineering reports were altered to deny claims. “How the program characterized State Farm’s claims handling is grossly unfair,” said Susan Q. Hood, claims vice president, State Farm Insurance.
“The fact is that we sought engineering reports in about 1100 cases, less than two percent, of the more than 84,700 property claims that we handled in the state of Mississippi. We issued payments on more than 60 percent of those claims in which engineers were involved. And in the claims where engineers were involved, we paid far more on homeowner claims than we did on National Flood Insurance Program claims. To be precise, we paid more than $26.5 million in homeowner claims and only $3 million in National Flood Insurance Program claims.”
“This evening’s report inaccurately portrays State Farm’s claims handling policies and our commitment to our policyholders,” said Hood. “Our claims associates are committed to operating at the highest level of business and ethical standards. State Farm is committed to paying what we owe, promptly, courteously, and efficiently.”
In Mississippi, where the ABC story focused, State Farm paid out more than $1.1 billion in auto, homeowners, and commercial claims. It also paid out more than $790 million in national flood insurance claims for the federal government.
Less than two weeks ago, a federal court ruled that almost all of the damage caused to a coastal home in Pascagoula, Miss., was due to flood not wind. The vast majority of the claims in dispute are also situated along the coast.
In the segment, ABC’s Brian Ross shared documents (from among documents shared with Ross by Rigsby and Moran) with attorney Wayne Drinkwater, who represents State Farm in Mississippi, saying the documents demonstrated that there were conflicting engineering reports and that State Farm denied claims. One claim shown to Mr. Drinkwater belongs to a Biloxi, Miss., policyholder who, despite ABC’s and the two external independent claims adjusters’ assertions, did receive payment and has declared that he is satisfied with his payment and the way his claims were handled by State Farm.
The two women also alleged that State Farm had shredded documents. Like all other large companies and government entities, State Farm has a records management program, which among other things protects the privacy of its customers and appropriately maintains records for regulatory and tax purposes.
State Farm has tried to meet with the two women adjusters who appeared in the ABC 20/20 segment to discuss their concerns. They have refused to do so, despite repeated requests. They are represented by attorney Richard Scruggs.
State Farm handled more than 295,000 property claims and paid (not including payments made under the National Flood Insurance Program) more than $3.1 billion as a result of Katrina. Thousands of State Farm agents and employees from around the country and Canada joined the thousands of agents and employees who already live in the gulf to respond to these storms. “We dedicated these kinds of resources to handle and pay claims, not deny them.” said State Farm vice president Mike Fernandez.
State Farm has been working for months with, and providing documents to, the Mississippi Attorney General’s office and the U.S. Attorney’s office and continues to cooperate with Mississippi and federal officials as they investigate these and other allegations.
“What’s so often ignored is that we have thousands of dedicated people, some of whom suffered their own losses at the hand of Hurricane Katrina, who have worked extremely hard in a professional and ethical way to resolve each claim consistently and in accordance with our policies and our commitment to our policyholders,” said Hood.
State Farm is a mutual insurance company, not a publicly-traded company. It has been the largest insurer of cars in the U.S. since 1943 and the largest insurer of homes since 1964. It also offers a number of other financial services.
Posted by: steve | August 29, 2006, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
It seems to me the only people who will be left watching the ABC network, are the mis-informed idiots who are always eager to jump and blame someone else. What a viewing audience you will have ABC!! I will not be watching 20/20 again, since I know they do not make an effort to cover both sides of the story. Very disappointed in your one-sided reporting.
You need to check into the sisters and see what is really behind their effort. But, of course, if you did, you wouldn’t retract your story and report on that.
Posted by: ROD | August 29, 2006, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
If you believe these two women don’t have ulterior motives, look at who represents them and who they now work for. TV, book deal, what’s on the horizon?
Twenty foot storm surge, live on the water, on the Gulf, or Lake Pontchartrain, none or little flood insurance, now they’re screaming because they claim wind did the damage. What a surprise! At least the judge in the first case was smart enough to read the policy. Every policy in America EXCLUDES flood damage…period. Why do you think NFIP was created in 1968? When will americans wake up and stop subsidizing the rich that live on America’s coastline?
Footnote: (Ironic) ABC aired a report by JOHN STOCCELL a while back in his “Give me a Break” segment. He stated how everyone in America is paying for those people rich enough to have homes on coastlines, because taxpayers end up footing the bill for all of these flood policies. He made this very point. He even had his own house rebuilt after storm surge…twice!
I hope the women who now work for the attorney Scruggs received a long term contract, and a big book deal. They are no longer employable by any company. They need to recognize the difference between a whistleblower, and an opportunist. I wonder how long it will be before they create dirt on Scruggs to profit off of? Mr. Scruggs: If you go to bed with a prostitute…in the morning, don’t complain that you woke up next to a whore.
Posted by: Kevin Effen | August 29, 2006, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
I normally don’t comment on things like this – but I think someone has to… I have worked at State Farm for 2 years and have NEVER seen any unfair practices… the bottom line is this – FLOODING is not covered by your home owners policy… NO INSURANCE POLICY COVERS FLOODING – that’s why the government offers flood insurance… if you are going to live in an area that has a high possibility of flooding – BUY FLOOD INSURANCE… don’t try to save a few bucks and then whine about it when you’re not covered… Also, if you don’t know that flooding is not covered when you live in these areas – you are simply ignorant… you are required to sign a waiver saying that you are declining flood insurance to not have it…It’s not State Farm’s fault or the agent’s fault that you are not smart enough to understand what you are signing…
State Farm sends THOUSANDS of people to handle hurricane claims… these people live in trailers & hotels with no windows or carpets or showers… simply to aide in releif to hurricane victims ASAP!!! if they were trying to unfairly get out of paying claims – why would they do this? Thousands of people from all areas of the US give up their time & families and lives in general to help hurricane victims get through their loss…
If flooding damage was covered by homeowners policies – EVERYONE’s premiums would go up considerably to pay for this risk… NOT JUST people in flood zones… Also, insurance companies would quit doing business in areas with a high propability of flooding because it wouldn’t be a sound investment…
And one last note – lets keep in mind that the insurance industry is HIGHLY regulated… Insurance companies are only allowed to make a certain percentage of profit – and it’s a fraction of what you think it is…Yes, when you write billions of policies that does mean alot of money – however – in the overall scheme of things – it is a VERY small percentage…. over 90% of the premium collected goes to pay claims… then add in operating expenses and payroll and there is not a large margin of profit…
Everyone who is so quick to jump to conclusions needs to take a step back and look at their own lives – the company you work for – does it make a profit – obviously for most of us the answer is yes or it wouldn’t be in business…is there anything wrong with making a profit? NO! Just because you don’t understand something and don’t READ your policy to understand that something is not covered does not mean that it should be covered…
Posted by: liz d. | August 29, 2006, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
I wish people would stop expecting a hand out when things happen. Know what you are buying, when you buy insurance. Homeowners insurance has never coverd flood damage. Insurance is avalable, if you chooses to gamble and not get the proper insurance then you should keep quiet and deal with it. Not go crying to the government. It is not the governments job to manage insurance. Take some respnsability.
Posted by: mark | August 29, 2006, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
I did not watch the show as I knew it would be biased by disgruntled independent adjusters. No company is perfect and the devastation was immense. All insurance companies who write flood policies and handle flood claims do so under immense scrutiny of the NFIP. The Rigby sisters will enjoy their two minutes of fame. Insurers never intended to insure the peril of flood, which led to the NFIP. I believe the Rigby sisters need to first recognize their lack of talent and quit blaming others for their lack of qualification. Shame on the company who supplies the caliber of people like the Rigby sisters and the smug smiles create some sort of short lived retribution for their lack of interpreting contracts. Shame on ABC for editing to slant the story. Companies make mistakes and also correct the mistakes. If there is a thread of truth to any of this, State Farm will take care of any unethical behavior. I’m ashamed I even posted to dignify a large group of idiotic statements made by people whose own ethical behavior is questionable. I wish people did not steal cable, cheat on income taxes and inflate claims to profit based upon warped rationalization.
Posted by: Kenneth Kim | August 30, 2006, 2:20 am 2:20 am
I also am an independent adjuster as well as a resident of Biloxi, MS. After reading all these posts, people are forgetting… The sisters are referring to MISSISSIPPI claims, where not even the engineers are really sure what damaged what, wind vs flood… and unfortunately for the many people who aren’t getting coverage because of flood… these people don’t live in a flood zone. They were actually advised by their agents not to get flood policies. I really don’t know whats happening and who to believe, but this is situation is very possible. Unfortunately, fraud happens both ways. I have encountered many claims where there is no apparent damage that is storm related, but that coverage was extended. On the other hand, insurance companies are suppose to FIND coverage for the insured and not DENY coverage. If State Farm is found guilty they deserve what is coming to them… just keep in mind, policy holders know how to lie too!!
Posted by: Nora | August 30, 2006, 10:30 am 10:30 am
I find it very hard to believe what these adjusters are saying. As many people have stated on here, no one reads their insurance policy. Everyone just assumes that it is covered. Believe me, if you ask your State Farm agent about your coverage they will be glad to offer you the additional insurance. It will be very handy when your house gets flooded! State Farm agents are there for you, there are over 17,000 across the nation and over 79,000 State Farm employees. We all jumped into action when Katrina hit. We are STILL there too. I hear many people on here complaining about how their Agents and how Executives and the Chairman’s board make loads of money. This is standard business in a company. The Agents are independent. They DO NOT have to meet any sort of quota for gaining policies. It all lies on their shoulders to make money for their family. In fact, if you want to make the $400,000 a year, go start your own Agency and reap the rewards of hard work. For goodness sake! People are coming down too hard at this point. It is a matter that the Company is looking into and until we know the whole story, don’t go relying on those in the the interview. I trust my company more than I trust to adjusters who are probably getting some kind of compensation for this interview. In the media it is all a onesided story, so sit tight and keep your ears open for news from those in the company.
Posted by: Martin C. | August 30, 2006, 11:10 am 11:10 am
How can we critize the residents of New Orleans for not returning and rebuilding, when the insurance companies don’t pay them the value of their lost homes. How can they rebuild if they don’t have the money to rebuild? The insurance companies should take the heat for not rebuilding the area.
Posted by: Gary Plake | August 30, 2006, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
This is such a one-sided story. You do not buy flood insurance, you get no flood insurance coverage. You buy it, you will recieve coverage. The fact that people refuse to read their policies does not give them the right to claim ignorance and try to screw over their insurance companies for money they are not entitled to.
Posted by: Frank | August 30, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
I processed claims for Citizens Insurance for Katrina victims and they were no better. It was a nightmare so emotional I had to quite the job. All insurance companies should be evaluated for fraud in New Orleans. Why should the people come back? They have found a new life that is better than the slums of New Orleans.
Posted by: N | August 30, 2006, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Why should the insurance companies pick up the bill for people who don’t get insurance? the bottom line is….READ YOUR INSURANCE POLICY! If you don’t understand your coverage, talk to your agent! It is your responsibility to know what your policy covers and more importantly what it does not cover. Ignorance is not an excuse!
Posted by: Lori | August 30, 2006, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Like another poster, I worked for SF during Katrina, Rita and Wilma. As long I worked down there, in many areas, I never once saw anything that looked suspicious. If anything we were thanked for our help. Funny how there were different service centers all over the Gulf Coast but these two sisters are the only two people that witnessed the corruption. Why are two independents the only ones who all of the sudden know this?
Many of us leave our homes and families for months out of the year to provide service to our policy holders and will continue to do so as this years hurricane season is upon us.
Posted by: J | August 30, 2006, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
REMEMBER WHISTLE BLOWERS RECEIVE CASH$$$$REWARDS!!!
HOMEOWNERS POLICIES DO NOT COVER FLOOD DAMAGE!
WITHOUT INSURANCE YOU COULD NOT GET A MORTGAGE!
COMPETITION FOR LOSING MONEY DOES NOT EXIST….I live on the gulf coast, and am lucky to have insurance at my inflated rate. Gas just jumped a dollar a gallon, why don’t we all stop using gas and insurance, and financing our homes. (We could all just pay cash) – quit crying.
Posted by: Believe all print | August 30, 2006, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Here’s the problem: we always hear about the 1% of claims that someone isn’t happy about. The truth from what I have read is that State Farm paid on over 600,000 claims after Katrina, and 99% of them settled with their customers happy as can be. In about 1,000 (of the 600,000) claims independent engineering firms were hired to determine if it was wind or water that caused the damage. Of those 1,000 over 600 they ended up paying. These unfounded allegations, until they are proven or tossed out of court, do a great disservice to the employees, agents and honest claims reps who have given up their time away from their families to ensure that Katrina victims have had housing, food, and all the things that ARE promised in the policy language. Why does the media never do a story on the 99%? Because it’s not juicy enough to lead a 20/20 story. The shame here is on the media who are not waiting for the evidence to come in before crucifying a company that leads the country in claims satisfaction. If State Farm really wanted to screw their policyholders, they would do what all the other companies do & pull out of the gulf/coastal states. Read up on this yourself and do your homework before you pass judgment. If something dishonest was done, punishment should (and will) follow. For every 1 story like this, there are 1000 untold stories of State Farm paying for things that weren’t even requested for them to look at, and families whose lives would never be the same if it weren’t for insurance.
Posted by: don't believe the hype | August 31, 2006, 12:08 am 12:08 am
My beef with State Farm and other insurers is raising my premiums for a natural disaster thousands of miles away! People that want to live below sea level, on a volcano, in a mud slide zone, or fault line should be paying for the right to do so! Not me! If I build my house out of straw then I should be paying the premium! Instead I opt for a house of bricks and get screwed by insurance coverage rates for idiots! How in the He11 did this country all of a sudden decide to take responsibility nationally for local stupidity and acts of God where they are fully expected this to happen? Those people in homes that they never paid for whom are living solely on taxpayer expense and are demanding a right to a new home built below sea level should be offered refuge in the third world countries when for once they have it right! You don’t see those countries guaranteeing new homes to squatters and huge overweight loafers! Does this make America greater?
Posted by: Matt Walters | August 31, 2006, 9:16 am 9:16 am
My parents have State Farm. I use SafeCo Insurance and have been pretty happy with them. I am definately canceling my parents insurance policy with State Farm!!!
Posted by: Dae | August 31, 2006, 10:23 am 10:23 am
NO mention has been made of a story that aired on the cbs early show on 8/16/06..this story was compelling and factual. An engineer laid his cards on the table about this shenanigans that has been going on in South Mississippi. Check out the story Katrina insurance fraud, in the “after the storm” section of videos at cbs.com (news video) this story will help resolve most of this bickering on this subject.
Posted by: cameron | August 31, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
There is another issue in insurance adjusting that does get much attention and that is overpayment of claims. I am NOT talking about flood claims, contents claims or even claims with huge damages. I am also interested in how adjusters handled over-the-phone settlements.I am a private citizen and am not currently employed by any insurance company or any goverment agency. The information will help me for a report I am working on. I will not reveal your identity in any way.
Thanks,
Tony
Posted by: Tony Postle | August 31, 2006, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
When is a Hurricane not a Hurricane? When it suddenly becomes a flood. Wind driven water is not a flood. Neither of the polar icecaps melted, nor did a volcano rise up in the middle of the bay, the wind drove the water into our houses. I know, I lost everything and SF gave me a check for $283.00 A flood is when water rises in a creek a river or a lake. The ocean hasn’t flooded since the time of Noah! SF needs to pay up.
Posted by: Tom Grob | August 31, 2006, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
To Tom Grob – when water comes up from the ground, and leaves water marks on the walls, it’s flood. Plain and simple.
Posted by: Sid | August 31, 2006, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
I love how you bleeding heart tree huggin baby killing God defiling liberals love 2 blame Bush for everything. You think Kerry would of done a better Job? I don,t think he would of had the guts to make the tough decisions in order to secure our country better and stand up to the tyrants in the world. He has let our enemies know that we will not back down and our way of life will not be destroyed. Blame Bush 4 Katrina ? Why not blame God while you are at it. But also remeber to thank him because in his infinite wisdom he made sure that his country (founded on the same same principiles that God himself founded for all of mankind to live through) had a leader that could deal with the terrible evils of the world and help this country through the various tradegies and dangers that we have faced during presidents term . His second term I might add. God forbid Kerry,s self serving ass would of been in office we would,ve already experienced atleast six more 9 / 11 ,s . I understand your ignorance and I do not fault you for it . I just thank God that God makes all the real big decisions.
Posted by: Alqeadakiller | August 31, 2006, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Give me a break! Do all these people really think that a corporation with a history like State Farm would, or even could,
do such a thing. These companies are under such heavy scrutiny from all fronts (Business, Political, Personal & the Media) 24/7. I have worked as a clains adjuster for the last 20yrs for all prominant insurance companies & on catastrophe duty for 15 of those years. This is clearly an effort by these 2 women to cause problems for State Farm for a personal grudge thay have against this company. State Farm. or any other company for that matter, would never chance doing anything like what was stated; they could not afford the consequences. It would be too easy to determine this. Any top professional engineering company, which by the way are the only ones State Farm utilizes, would NEVER do such a thing. If they were asked to do so, they would report it right away as they have the same legal liability themselves. I am aware of several companies, NOT State Farm, that will do their best to deny a claim right away & make the policyholder fight for it. In all my dealings with State Farm, I have always found them to be the most fair & honest company to work for, by far. I urge anyone who questions this to actually ask a policyholder how their loss was handled that isn’t trying to gain something they are not entitled to! Most forget the underlying basis for insurance & think it is a “savings” plan…it is not! The premise of insurance is “to gather the monies of the many to pay for the losses of the few”. Customer satisfaction ratings for State Farm ,especially on catastrophe claims, have always been consistently the top of ALL companies. Ask ANY contractor that has worked with them as well. It is sad & shocking to see all these so called “testimonils” from individuals that either believe they are entitled to more that they truly are entitled to or else are of such limited intelligence to actually belive this.
Posted by: Intheknow | August 31, 2006, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
I am surprised that so many people posting missed the point of the story – homeowners paid for insurance against wind damage, their homes were damaged by wind, the engineers determined that their homes were damaged by wind, and State Farm replaced or changed those reports to indicate flood damage. This is not about whether families should have purchased flood insurance. It is about State Farm attempting to defraud homeowners.
Posted by: ChrisO | August 31, 2006, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
The key word in this whole argument is ALLEGED. These 2 young ladies obviously have something to gain from this, and until the evidence is presented and accepted by a judge and charges filed, it is just another story to me. One thought keeps bothering me though: Why would a company that just paid out FIVE BILLION dollars in storm damage be worried about a few more claims to the point that they would falsify documents, forge names, and attempt to defraud less than 1% of their affected policyholders to save one million dollars? Why not deny claims and commit fraud on a more widespread level and REALLY save money? Wake up, folks – it’s fiction….coming soon to a theater near you.
Posted by: don't believe the hype | September 1, 2006, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
To intheknow, are you that naive to really believe the rantings that you have posted. Many thousands of people have been affected by the misdeeds of these miscreants. These charges will be proven and those responsible will have to answer for their actions. Oh yeah..is a testimonil a body part?
Posted by: cameron | September 1, 2006, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Who are the bigger scum? New Orleans ‘residents’ or insurance companies? Ask the people of Houston, Atlanta, Baton Rouge and elsewhere dealing with murders and other violent crime spikes. They cannot wait til they open the dump that is NO back to their ‘people’.
Posted by: Disgusted | September 1, 2006, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
I worked Katrina with the two sisters. These women were never in the field and all they did was sit in the office and flirt with every man that came into the building. They were thick as thieves with the company they worked for E.A. Renfro and State Farm. I repeatedly tried to pay the insureds in the Biloxi and Pascagoula area to no avail. I was told by them as they laughed to pay the flood because it wasn’t their money and that wind was a whole different ball game. The team leader Paula of state farm was also changing my claim writing as did Renfro. specifically these two sisters. The only reason they are blowing the whistle now since they have been doing this for years is the fact one of them is dating the lawyers Scruggs’s son. Yes State Farm is wrong but so is Renfro. I had homes that I knew were hit by tornados and was told I had to deny them. I also was told to order engineers only that were accepted by State Farm and then told that the team leaders of State Farm and Renfro would deal with who did or didn’t get engineers. I ordered engineers for most of my people and it was withdrawn by the team leaders. So, who is in the wrong? Both. State Farm team leader Paula and these two women black balled me due to my stand for the people. Heck I had a simple claim from vandalism over a year ago and they still haven’t paid me a dime. They need to start over with new employees and abide by their policy not whether or not it’s going to put them in bankruptcy and Renfro needs to be dissolved. Thick as thieves and remember the sisters are guiltier than you think
Posted by: diane | September 2, 2006, 10:32 am 10:32 am
There seem to be fraud at every level with this Katrina issue. No one seem to care about the low income population before or after disaster strikes and I am not talking the ordinary everyday people but the big mammoth organizations that do have the financial and/or resources to contribute to the least of these in our society worldwide. My heart goes out to the victims, survivors and families that were affected by the Katrina situation.
Posted by: LV Davis | September 4, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Can everyone says “ORGANIZED CRIME?”
Posted by: NewCommer | September 5, 2006, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
“ORGANIZED CORPORATE CRIME” these are not bleeding heart liberals as suggested that are making these claims over Katrina insurance fraud. People from all walks of life are involved. This story needs to stay on the front burner until people are made whole from these injustices.
Posted by: cameron | September 6, 2006, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
How many of you that are quick to talk big actually had your home destroyed by Katrina? I did, and I have State Farm. I also had Flood Ins from the goverment. My house was insured for 275,000 at the time of Katrina. I was paid 200,000 from state farm and 75000 from the flood ins. State farm was great to me, I will always have it. I have many neighbors that lost everything as I did but were too cheap to get flood ins – they knew the deal – State Fram only pays for wind damage, not water!! Its in the contract. Look it up. Flood insurance is underwritten by the fed gov. State Farm treated me with respect and took care of me and my family perfectly. Thank you sf!!!!!!
Posted by: leah | September 7, 2006, 1:49 am 1:49 am
leah is very fortunate…I also lost my home and belongings to Katrina in Waveland,Ms. We were paid by the NFIP promptly but are still waiting to be paid by our insurer for wind damage that we sustained from 140mph winds for six hours prior to the eye, and subsequent tornadic activity also in that time period. Flood insurance alone is not enough to cover the loss as represented by your numbers show.
Posted by: cameron | September 7, 2006, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I was a Function Director (dilbert-ified term for middle manager) in the Systems Department, G building 2nd floor from 1996-2000, and then when P annex was built, moved to P building 2nd floor. I left the company for greener pastures in 2005.
I state the above so those inside know I’m telling the truth about being an FD when I say: STATE FARM IS CROOKED TO THE BONE, WILLING TO STICK IT TO POLICY-HOLDERS AND/OR EMPLOYEES FOR THE SMALLEST OF SUMS.
I witnessed families destroyed and pulled apart, medical coverups and even death by medical contest by lawyers vs. purported levels of coverage in terminal illnesses wrought on employees of 20+ years. I witnessed policyholders abused over and over again while the abusers literally SMIRKED with power in the meetings held at those meeting tables outside of every double-door entrance in the H-Building. I witnessed cover-ups, shreddings, and I even have evidence in my safe deposit box that can prove state farm was BURYING SILICON PARTS for at LEAST two years when 8086 procs were replaced with pentium. Nice and eco-friendly eh!
State farm will do the BARE MINIMUM to generate the MAXIMUM PROFIT with nary a single care about employee, policy-holder or goodwill to any degree.
Maybe it’s time I crack open my own box of documents since the shit-storm has begun that will ultimately take down this abusive monolith.
Beware Bloomington, IL chamber of commerce!
Posted by: Function Director | September 8, 2006, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
I don’t know why everyone is complaining about State Farm because State Farm isn’t the only insurance company that doesn’t cover flood insurance. When you buy a home flood insurance is NEVER covered. That is extra insurance people needs to purchase. It’s stupid for people in the hurricane areas not to have flood insurance. Everyone that has commen sense should know that flood insurance is not covered. It’s to much of a risk. People always have to purchase that if they want to be covered. Now people are mad at State Farm because they won’t pay out on a claim that’s not covered in a policy. Come on guys get real. It’s like living in an earthquake zone and not having earthquake insurance. Yes, I feel bad for people that’s been affected by hurricanes, but now they are out for the government and they just want a hand out. It’s not the gov’t fault people don’t carry flood insurance. It’s cases like this that causes everyones insurance to rise. Why should everyone else pay for somebodies stupid mistake?? Get the right insurance coverage you need for your area, don’t expect the gov’t to be there all the time…..
Posted by: Michelle | September 8, 2006, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Once again Forrest Gumpisms prevail…after reading the last post I agree with him that stupid is as stupid does. This is about fraud and deception. Reread your post and try to evaluate your use of stupid.
Posted by: cameron | September 9, 2006, 11:13 am 11:13 am
I just watched the touchy feely State Farm commercial about how they were there to help all the Katrina victims …lol. A paper shredding truck …that is funny. As usual, the insurance companies, (not just State Farm, they are just the one that caught this time) are revealed for what they are: a company out to maximize profits, why do people believe the BS about them actually caring or doing what is morally right ? They are looking out for their bottom line nothing else.
Posted by: Chris Reed | September 10, 2006, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
I have seen this first hand when it comes to State Farm. When I had a car accident State Farm told me to prove that the damage that was done to my car was because of the accident. First why should I have to prove it. Second when I did they still told me there was no way it could of happened that why. So do we want to have State Farm as your neighbor weather it be for your home or car. NOT ME or my attorny.
Posted by: Dawn | September 12, 2006, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
I am so thrilled that the media is starting to bring State farm down, State farm does suck and they do refuse to pay. I know personally several times i had problems with state farm for failure to assist.
Posted by: JON C | September 12, 2006, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
I had a State Farm claim and everything was handled beautifully. I didn’t have any hassles and everything was billed directly to State Farm. All I paid was my deductible.
p.s. people need to learn how to spell. That right there shows your ignorance.
Posted by: sarah | September 12, 2006, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
I have to say to all of you people who believe for one minute that State Farm was not founded on the moral principals of doing what is right and to this day still does everything it can to do right by our insureds!!! I am personally insulted by the accusations!!! I have been insured with this company all my life and have worked for them for the last two years in underwriting and agency. I can personally tell you our companies values and beliefs. I guarenetee you it is hard to find a large corporation where the employees not only preach but practice the beliefs of the company, from our CEO down. If you are going to work for this company you not ony must believe but practice the beliefs to ALWAYS do the right thing for our policyholders.
During this event we all did everything we could to help our insureds. I worked 7-7 7 days a week to be there for each and every policyholder I spoke with. Putting off my own life and family, I was there I lisened, I cried, I lost sleep over the tramatic events they lived through and my management supported me 100%. The benifit of the doubt was always given to our insureds and everyday we strive to be more than fair to help each and every policyholder. Read the policy when you purchase insurance and understand what it is that you are buying…ignorance is never a deffense. FLOOD is NOT covered by ANY homeowners policy regardless of if you reside in New Orleans or Arizona, it just isnt. Dont expect the insurance company to absorb a loss you never paid for in the first place.
Posted by: pro-state farm | September 14, 2006, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Please read your policy. I worked as an independant adjuster for State Farm for 9 months, had several managers over me from State Farm. All were professional and honest in the treatment and paying of the hundreds of claims that I adjusted. At one meeting (all adjusters have to attend to be able to work for State Farm) The CEO on live Sat. feed told everyone in attendance that SF is there to pay all!!!! that is owned ASAP. Never once did I here that I paid too much. As long as the items were insured==== pay it!!!. What esle could you want? Read your policy!!!!!
Posted by: tgd | September 14, 2006, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
I have just a few comments:
1. PLEASE FOLKS…STOP SAYING THAT WE SHOULD HAVE HAD FLOOD INSURANCE…that is NOT the issue here. MOST of us DID have flood insurance. WE ARE CONCERNED WITH OUR HOMEOWNERS POLICIES THAT CLEARLY SAY WE SHOULD BE PAID FOR WIND DAMAGE!!!!!!!! Why do so many of you keep missing this point???? WE WANT TO BE PAID FOR WIND DAMAGE AND ARE NOT BEING PAID !!!!! WE HAVE PROOF OF WIND. WE HAVE BEEN DENIED WITHOUT SF EVEN SENDING AN ENGINEER…THEY HAVE DENIED THE BIG CLAIMS WITHOUT EVIDENCE!!!! This is what our gripe is about!! We are not talking about getting money for the water or flooding….stop saying that we are wanting to be paid for what we do not have coverage for…and stop telling us that we should have read our policies…WE DID! That is why we KNOW we should be paid for wind damage when we have been hit by tornadoes and 145 mph winds long before the water slowly got there (we have photos and eyewitnesses!)
2. Those of you who say that the people who lost their lives and homes, jobs and families because they lived in New Orleans or other places that are below sea level, or in places that flooded…deserve what they got…SHAME ON YOU! What a horrible heart you must have. Not having compassion for your fellow man, no matter what the situation…is a sure sign of a person who does not have the love of God in his heart…and I feel so sorry for you. You must be a miserable human being…and a poor example of one.
3. Insurance companies have the job of taking premiums from all of us, no matter where we live…near water, near volcanos, in tornado alleys..it doesn’t matter. Then, they invest and grow that money in order to pay for our claims…that is their job…to make enough money to cover disasters and losses of their clients. Obviously, SF is a master at making our premium money grow. They determine how much we pay, depending on the risks associated with our policies. That is their job…if they screw up, that is their fault…and why they have re-insurance companies to back them up. We all have to share in the cost of each others policy costs…every time someone’s house burns down, everytime there is a wild fire, everytime there is an earthquake, every time there is a tornado or …yes, folks…even a hurricane with high winds and water. But, SF does not need to increase our costs…they still made money..even with the storm…and they should pay their legitimate claims…like wind damage.
4. Yes, SF may have paid out 98% of the claims…or whatever they say they paid. BUT>>>they have NOT paid the LARGE legitimate WIND CLAIMS. WHY do so many of you think it is ok for SF, NOT to pay the remaining 2% ????? One of those claims is our HOME…we had wind coverage…and SF needs to pay for the wind damage. We have proof of changed reports…there are actually a lot more of those out there than most of you realize…SF will be brought to justice…and I for one, will be glad to see it happen so that the hundreds of wind claims that have been fraudently denied will finally be paid….and we can finally get our lives back.
Posted by: Enough is enough! | September 15, 2006, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Interesting that the heading on th story says that the Rigsbys are “independent adjusters that worked for State Farm”, but the story says that the Rigsbys are “State Farm employees”. Which is it? Are they “insiders” or just people with an axe to grind?
And to “enough is enough”…I do hope your claim is paid. But if State Farm has paid 98% of the claims, some of them would have to have been wind claims–even large wind claims.
Posted by: WowGreatBlog | September 18, 2006, 11:02 am 11:02 am
I am personally in a lawsuit against State Farm for an Auto Accident. This was the clearest case of fault their could have been, I was rear ended, by a Van load of teenagers (not 1 of them over 17, no adults) while I was at a complete stop waiting for traffic so I could make a left turn. They hit me at full speed 50-60mph shooting me across oncoming traffic, and totaled my car, when they had 2000+ feet of distance to notice me stopped before they hit (there was also room to pass on the right). They have not paid for anything, gave me an insulting offer, half of bluebook on my very prized sports car. There were witnessses, and police reports filed. They have not paid 1 cent of my medical bills, only paid for 18 days of a car rental (after having it only 36 days and refused to pay any more because I would not accept their low-ball offer), and I still have not recieved any compensation for lost property, even though I would have settled for half of the policy limits. That was 2 years ago….None of this is new, the insurance industry has been corrupt for decades. They will low-ball your claim, they will stall, they will falsify and skew data to their favor internally or with outside contractors (IME for medical, bogus valuation firms for property) Your state’s Insurance comissioner has no real power, nor do they actually track or follow up on claim complaints with any real results. The fedral government refuses to regulate them, in fact recent acts in congress have allowed insurance companies to go into investment banking, which allows them to further remove and obscure their finances, from view (Did we get to vote on that, NO!, your insurance industry funded politicians did that). Most mutual companies are private and are not subject to the kind of accountability and finacial records that a publicly traded company is. Thus their claims of being broke, etc. can appear to be true because paying out on policies puts them in ‘debt’ with their own bank. You can bet they will be crying for a bailout from Katrina, so that they don’t have to even pay their own money on valid claims, it will be taxpayers money! Payroll is often accounted in the ‘losses’ bucket just like claims, I doubt even the IRS knows how much the senior execs get paid. I discovered a financial report from state farm a while back and if I read it correctly (I am not an accoutant), but in 2004 nation-wide, they collected almost 43 Billion in auto insurance premiums, but only paid 280 Million in claims, with that kind of difference, why do rates go up instead of down?
All Insurance should be completely fedrally regulated, with standards enforced for all risk assessments, premium rates and formulas, based on statistical and actual historical claims data, having all insurance providers required to file detailed accounting of everything. Insurance by definition should be non-profit, every bit of premium not used for overhead should be in the bucket for policy claims not diverted to investment banking or pocketed by senior execs or ‘private shareholders’. This is doubly true with Insurance that is required by government regulation, how can the gov. require us to carry certain insurance, but refuse to regulate hardly any aspect of the industry!
Posted by: uncovered | September 18, 2006, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
To those of you who think such a large company could not be guilty of so much fraud….”State regulation of insurance is an anachronism, based on the fiction that insurance is not interstate commerce. It is maintained by the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which Congress enacted in 1945 to overturn a 1944 Supreme Court decision that found insurance to be interstate commerce and therefore subject to federal regulation.” (Quoted from Insurance News Net, Copyright 2005 The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, Inc.) Basically its a loop-hole falsely maintained, so that insurance companies can escape federal antitrust laws, claiming the states will handle it, but the states don’t really do it, and in some cases thay can’t, it goes beyond the state’s jurisdiction to regulate a company based in another state.
Many Mutual Companies are completely private (like State Farm) they do not have to provide the detialed SEC filings or anything else that reveals their accounting corruption, they lobby and fund politicians with huge sums of money to ensure that they will not have to disclose this information. They try to seal all records of cases they lose or settle out of. I am sure that there are people who work for State Farm that are honest and helpful, and really do try to do the best for their policy holders, but they too are bound by their companies policies, and are probably completely unaware of the gouging that is taking place. Undoubtedly these honest people will never make it very far in the ranks of State Farm, their Claims dept profit margin (what they call it when they successfully under pay a claim) is just not high enough to merit promotion.
Posted by: uncovered | September 18, 2006, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
During the big disasters the insurance companies probably do work in mostly good faith, their is just too much bad press if they don’t. Whats worse is the shady tactics they pull the rest of the time when the whole country is not looking. When you have even 100,000 simultaneous claims, it is not cost effective to engage all of the stall tactics and try to lower the claims payout on all of them, which is what feeds the cries for federal bailouts. But the business as usual tactics with stalling, and low-balling or flat denial of individual claims does happen all the time, across the country, until they are federally regulated with required public-open accounting practices, they will continue to gouge the indiviual, and line their own pockets and those of you elected officials.
Posted by: uncovered | September 18, 2006, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
To uncovered, who is obviously a brilliant man…you have said what has been needed. I applaud your dilligence and comprehension of an industry that is running roughshod over the people of this country. They spend millions every week to combat the possibility that this type of press is suppressed. Thank you my friend.
Posted by: cameron | September 18, 2006, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
If the true extent of insurance company fraud were exposed, it would probably make the S&L and Enron scandals look like the school bully stealing your lunch money in comparison. These companies operate in the Tens of Billions every year, and answer to no one in their accounting. They include the litigation costs (the cost of fighting AGAINST your legitimate claim) as part of your policy coverage and premiums, and call it fraud protection or prevention. It adds to your premium, and they can easily show how much more it costs every year, because they resist paying out more every year, more litigations for those denied claims, litigation costs go up, and your premium goes up again. They are raising their own bar, in a conflict of interest with themselves, at the expense of the average policy holder. The best way to solve the situation is to completely remove the industry from private hands, make Insurance, ALL insurance, part of a national pool (or set of pools), where rates and risk assessments, etc. are fully disclosed and controlled federally, yet allow ‘Agents’ to remain in the private sector to support competitive, new and efficient services, so basically agents provide the interface promoting free enterprise, but federal gov controls the costs and finances of the actual underwriting.
Posted by: uncovered | September 18, 2006, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Personal Responsibility? Chose to live in a danger zone? Chose to live there. Didn’t know their policy? Hindsight is 20-20 guys. Most of the people who might be considered victims in cases like this don’t choose to live where they live. They were born there (sometimes in poverty) scrimp and save to get by and rely heavily on assistance for all things from welfare to living. When people like this are fortunate enough to purchase their own home, (usually after a government program makes it affordable) they will go through the closing like a 4 year old. They don’t have experience to deal with these things. They don’t have someone walking them through the process, explaining in detail which insurance will be helpful in their area. They go with the most affordable and barebones plan they can so they will be able to afford their mortgage. This is not everyone’s case of course but the story is not uncommon. Please don’t be so quick to point the finger and say educate yourself, untill you have come from that place and done it yourself. It is definitely a learning experience and I am sure they will be ever the more cautious the next time. But please don’t assume that most of the poor people of N.O. took into consideration the fact that they lived in a bowl that was ready to crack as they purchased their homes or inherited them from their parents. It is not as if they can just up and leave. My point is there are a few different circumstances here that makes it hard to blanket opinion either side. To say whatever happened to personal responsibility in this case is like telling a 3 year old they will have to deal with their burn themselves. They should have taken the responsibility to educate themselves on the effects of exposing toddlers skin to 300 degrees plus before touching the stove. They are ignorant to the effects. Don’t judge them for lack of experience or resources. Again, it’s hard to just blanket opinion the whole situation, but I think in this case it is important to remember that each case is probably a bit different. I read All-State’s response to the story on their web-site and do think shame on them for referencing a bunch of statistics that throws out big numbers to create a “feel-good” spin. Each case is individual and should be handled that way.
Posted by: Rob L. | September 19, 2006, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
when it rains, it pour. Looks like it’s still raining on those poor people who have entrusted thier livelihoods in the hands of state farm. Come on State Farm pay up or never lie to people pretending to be a good neighbour
Posted by: timothy | September 19, 2006, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
The national flood insurance program will not cover wind-driven storm waters, these are supposed to be covered in normal home-owner policies under wind damage. So if the insurance company under its policy says its flood damage, and NFIP says its wind damage, who is right, and who is getting the shaft?
P.S. I think the NFIP is a good example of how a federalized insurance program could work a lot better than the private-for-profit-sector insurance companies.
Posted by: uncovered | September 19, 2006, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
CORRECTION: NFIP does not cover wind-driven rain damage, it does cover wind-driven surge waters, etc.
Posted by: uncovered | September 19, 2006, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
I woke up at 6:30 this morning. My son was already up playing with the dog. I showered, had breakfast and took my 3 kids to school. I was in the office by 7:50am. This is a typical start of the day for me. Sound familiar? I live in a town of about 7500 people. It’s a good community. I sponsor a local little league team. I’m vice-president of my church parish council. I contribute to dozens of local fundraisers and charities throughout the year. I participate in the local summer social and march in the parade. I do these things because I want to. I enjoy it. I love my life. I love my wife and kids. I love my job. I am a State Farm Agent.
I am proud of what I do. Insurance is serious business. It can also be complicated. I do my best to make sure my policyholders understand what they have purchased. I try very hard to make sure they have what they need. They count on me and trust that I will do right by them. I give them no reason not to. Sure, I make mistakes. I’m human. I don’t deny my mistakes, I fix them.
What I have never done is wake up in the morning and make the decision to take advantage of my clients or rip someone off. It isn’t in my nature.
There are lots of comments I have read about Katrina. They are very passionate and my heart goes out to everyone effected by the storm…no buts…I understand their feelings. I only ask that as you read all these comments, remember their are good people, honest people that work hard everday doing what is right, and they work for State Farm.
The discussions above speak of State Farm like it is an inanimate entity. In reality, it is only as good as the people who work for them. If there are things our people did wrong, they should be held accountable. Are there good people that work for State Farm? Absolutely. Thousands upon thousands of hard-working, law abiding citizens just like you.
What I’ve read today at this site hurts deeply. It isn’t anywhere close to the company I know and am proud to work for.
I can hear the sentiment…”the guy is wearing blinders, brainwashed, drank the kool-aid…etc.” That is simply not so. That is not so for most of the people that make up State Farm.
Negativity, hatred, anger, controversy, scandal…these are the topics that make news. This is what gets ratings up. Sad, but true.
It hurts that we will never see a segment on all the thousands of people who our company helped. It hurts that in reality, that isn’t news worthy. Congratulations 20/20. Your segment pushed all the right buttons. Everyone is up in arms and ready to fight. However, there are those of us (your viewers) who were just simply hurt and disappointed. I guess you could refer to me and the other thousands that were personally offended by your segment as collateral damage.
Posted by: Eric | September 20, 2006, 11:02 am 11:02 am
I am saddened by this story and suspect that the “whistle blowers” had an axe to grind for some reason or another. I have worked with/for state farm for almost 20 years and not on any occasion was I ever asked to defraud a policyholder or even a 3rd-party claimant.
As a claim representative and manager I was commended for closing claims in a timely manner and not for protracted claim handling due to short changing clients. Now, as an agent and as an advocate for my clients I have called upon my claims representatives when there was an issue as to how much was owed, or whether any amount was owed at all. I have never asked a claim representative to withhold payment or to deny a claim; and I have not witnesses their doing so when there was no justification. In fact, my clients have always been amazed at how prompt and fair State Farm was in handling their claims. And they were even more surprised when they were not “dropped” at the next renewal like some companies are known for doing.
From my first days at State Farm I was told to “…pay what we owe, not a penny more or a penny less”. My experience has been that if there was a reasonable and irresolvable question as to how much is owed the benefit of the doubt has always been given to the client.
Not everything can be insured. However, in the case of Katrina, many good people who were not properly insured knew that they had the opportunity to purchase flood coverage and for whatever reason chose to opt out. They took on the risk themselves. Where I live (California) we offer earthquake insurance to every client… only 5 to 10 percent of client chose to take out a policy. Yet it will be called fraud when we deny earthquake damage under the regular homeowner’s policy.
I had a gentleman walk into my office the day after Katrina hit; he told me his agent’s office was under water and he did not know what to do to get a claim going. He told me that he had Homeowners policies and Flood policies on several homes in New Orleans. In effect, he properly insured himself. Quickly, and to the client’s satisfaction, State farm paid on all of his claims including is two cars that were under water. Where is that story published??? No where!
I will believe the negative stories about State Farm when the media does not derive any monetary benefit form publishing sensationalized stories and when they take up their precious resources to air/print positive stories about State Farm, or any other insurance company. But I guess saying good things about big insurance companies is not good business, even when doing so would be just.
Posted by: Earl | September 20, 2006, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
It does not surprise me that they fabricate engineering reports to deny insurance claim to Katrina victims.
When I used to work for insurance companies, they used to fabricate documents to fool the regulating agency.
Regulating agency will select a few of the many documents in running the operation. They will notified the insurance companies which one they will look at each time. The insurance companies will get an employee, usually a manager or higher, who used to work for that regulating agency to review the file for the documents listed. Since this employee used to worked for the regulating agency, he knows if the documents in the file will meet the required standard or not.
If the documents have violation, they just fabricate the required documents so that it will appear in compliance with the law. When the regulating agency representative review the file, everything complied with regulation. Of course it will comply with the law since it was review by a high ranking ex-employee of the regulating agencies.
Thus this story does not surprise me. If they are willing to commit fraud against regulating agencies, committing fraud against victims are a cinch.
Posted by: JohnDoe | September 21, 2006, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
There are quite a few venemous comments on here from people making all sorts of assumptions. Some here have agendas, such has homeowners without flood coverage, plaintiff attornies, disgruntled adjusters, and the media.
There are, I’m sure, many that have valid complaints. Considering the fact that there were more adjusters deployed after Katrina, Rita and Wilma hit than at any point in insurance history, not to mention more claims, mistakes were and are still being made. New adjusters both over and underpay claims. Managers approving payments were overwhelmed to the point that it was not possible to review every claim to make payments. This means that some policyholders were overpaid and some were underpaid.
Although I no longer work for State Farm, I did for 12 years. I have also been an independent adjuster and ran an operation that processed over 170,000 claims last year. I had to deal with green adjusters, upset policyholders and everyone in between.
As you read this, think about your co-workers. You have some that pull more than their weight, some that don’t, some that scam to get out of work, and some that help everyone. That is no different than what you see in any operation. It’s the scammers and lazy people that set the stereotype for every industry. You attornies can relate. But the fact of the matter is, if any of your businesses received more than 5000 times the normal workload you would fail. Everyone would be calling you and your co-workers worthless. You’d be on the national media as an aweful company and person.
That’s the business of catastrophe operations employees for any insurance company. When we cut checks, we’re your best friend. When we tell you your contractor is unreasonable, your contractor is your best friend. When your neighbor gets overpaid or paid for something that isn’t covered by the policy, you feel entitled too.
Trust me, most of the adjusting world busts their tail to get policyholders what they need and a little more. It’s what we do. ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC, CNN aren’t experts on insurance or catastrophe operations. They serve a purpose, but rarely give you the whole story. They cannot. They are not entitled to the information on the over 95% of people that don’t have complaints. Federal, state and local law prohibits companies from giving out information.
If you were or are being treated unfairly by your insurance company, contact your state’s insurance department. If that doesn’t work, hire a public adjuster. If that doesn’t work, hire an attorney.
Whatever you do, don’t yell at or demean the people you’re trying to get to help you. Your adjuster is human and can/will possibly become defensive. I think the saying is “you catch more bees with honey, than vinegar.” Make that adjuster want to help you. From the posts I see here, some of you make it hard for people to go out of their way for you.
Try a different approach and see if it works. If not, continue acting as though you are a martyr – just don’t expect people to treat you any different.
Posted by: JohnDoe | September 22, 2006, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
I don’t know how many of you live by the corporate office, but they are the most snobbish, stuck up people to deal with. I won’t by insurance there just due to the type of people they employ. I also keep seeing people say on here “look at the website, they have a rebuttle.” I’ve looked, and no, they don’t.
Posted by: Candace | September 23, 2006, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
I guess the same people, including insurance agents, adjusters, and honest employees of SF…who STILL believe that SF is incapable of purposely cheating people are like the people who still don’t believe that our astronauts actually walked on the moon. Educate yourselves! Read Anita Lee’s articles in the Sun Herald if you do not want to do the research for yourselves. It is all there…..wake up!!!! SF IS CAPABLE OF FRAUD…and they do a great job of it.
And to those thousands of dedicated and honest SF employees out there…thank you for doing the right things…we really do appreciate you. Unfortunately, you are more honest and ethical than the company you work for. When the real truth comes out and is proven, I hope that you will rise to the top of the company and do the job that your senior officials should have been doing all along…..plus, you will be making over 4 million a year for yourselves!
Posted by: I know | September 24, 2006, 9:03 am 9:03 am
To Candace,
Yes State Farm does have a rebuttal on their website. Click on about us on the left side of the home page and then media releases. You will see several different links to media releases.
Posted by: SARAH | September 25, 2006, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Apparently some of the agents who replied didn’t watch the segment. What State Farm allegedly did was to take engineering statements that pointed to damage that was covered by the policies and return them for a reevaluation until they stated the damage was water related and therefore not covered. This is rampant in the industry, and it’s not all State Farm. It is my understanding that avoiding paying claims until 3 or 4 different substantiations are presented is common practice. That means you have to appeal the claim decision and stretch the nonsense out. Small example. Had an A/C compressor banged up pretty badly by hail. Insurance adjuster came out and told me it was $50 worth of damage and all they had to do was straighten the fins. I asked for a second opinion, they sent out the HVAC company they preferred to do the work, same result, just straighten the fins. Called a local company to get a free evaluation of the damage, and they recommended and new unit. Called another company for a second independent opinion, same thing. Presented the independent findings to my insurance company, they called both HVAC places, and after a year, they agreed to replace my unit. It’s just the way they do business, and our representatives continue to require us to feed the beast by requiring insurance. It’s like throwing money in a mudhole, then when you need it, you have to wash the mud from every rock, and twig, and piece of paper to find the money you put in in the first place. I think that if you don’t have a claim in ten years, your insurance company should be required to refund 95% of your payments for those ten years. Then you start again. My money goes into a black hole and I’ll never see it again.
Posted by: Memy Selfandi | September 25, 2006, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
nothing but whinining and more whining. In the America I love, no one holds a gun to your head and makes you buy Insurance.If all insurance is so evil what are you cowards giving them your money for. Go it alone , you have the right to choose!!
Posted by: catdaddy | September 27, 2006, 12:11 am 12:11 am
The funny thing is, is that some of CEO’s CFO’s and other upper management of State Farm started some companies of their own in Houston, i’m sure a lot of people have heard of one them, called ENRON!!! Yep the people that ran Enron in the ground ALSO managed big insurance companies like State Farm. I could only imagine what the FBI would find if it did some digging in that company when other people ran that company!
Posted by: Aaron Timmins | September 27, 2006, 2:05 am 2:05 am
I have lived on the Central Florida Coast for almost 22 years. The area I where I live is considered a barrier island. I have filed only one hurricane damage claim during this time. The roof on my house was replace on my house in 1995. As of this month, my home owners/hurricane insurance jumped from $1954.00 to $4981.00. Since my wife and I are retired senior citizens, I am left with only one conclusion for this greedy gouging endeavor by STATE FARM INSURANCE. It is no less than a conspiracy between The State of Florida and State Farm to rid Florida of its senior citizen population. It clearly displays a non-comittal stance and blatant dis-regard of the State of Florida for its senior citizen population.
Sam
Posted by: Sam | September 29, 2006, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Here is part of a letter I just mailed to State Farm. I advise others to do the same. The bottom line is the only thing that will get their attention!
“…I would also like to state that I had been seriously considering canceling all of my insurance policies with State Farm before this incident, due in large part to your treatment of policy holders in the Gulf Coast region. I find it difficult to trust a company that would treat their customers in the manner in which the victims of hurricane Katrina have been treated by State Farm and several other insurance giants. Americans spend thousands of dollars each year in order to minimize the effects of unexpected events in our lives. I fear paying for coverage that will not be honored in the event that I need it. State Farm has more than enough money in its coffers to cover the expenses of its customers in the Gulf region. Even if the company’s actions (or lack thereof) are found to be legal, it is my opinion that State Farm has a moral obligation to stand by its customers in the wake of ANY natural disaster or other event which was completely beyond their control; shame on you for failing the very people who have lined your pockets.”
Posted by: Rob H. | September 29, 2006, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Our government was handed ample evidence of felonies committed by State Farm and Amex Assurance, but to date, has not even come and look. In the meantime, the insurance company’s attorneys are free to loot my family’s property after they ran a sham trial, as they had all my medical records altered and my real case eliminated.
Posted by: debbie | October 1, 2006, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Is it true that George Bush Sr. owns Citizen’s Insuance Company? In Florida, many people can only buy Citizen’s, so that makes me wonder.
Posted by: debbie | October 1, 2006, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Here in Oregon there is a new measure (42) on the ballot to legally prohibit insurance companies from using your credit rating in determining their premium rates. The insurance companies are making lots of advertisements claiming that rates will go up if this takes affect, urging you to vote NO. They would have you believe that a person with poor credit is a greater insurance risk. Your credit rating has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with insurance risk. The case they make is based upon their own imperical data, that they have caused to be this way. In truth, the credit rating is used to get an idea of income, a person with bad credit typically has lower income (the most common reason for credit delequency), people with good credit can afford their bills on time. A person with lower income gets into a fender bender, IS more likely to file a claim because they can not afford to foot the bill themselves (thats is what insurance is for), whereas a person with higher income can afford minor repairs, and may not file a claim for fear of raised rates and/or canceled policies. I suspect the real reason they want to be able to do this is so they better know who they can deny claims from, a poor person can not afford to fight them in court. What is really appalling is that they are not allowed to do this in the first place (except for new policies, which is also anti-competetive), and they are threating raising rates for all Oregonians if we do not vote this down. Do the insurance risk factors really change due to the outcome of the vote? No, they are going to gouge us anyway, becuase they can’t gouge us the way they would like. Curiously, Agent Associations of State Farm, Farmers and Allstate are listed as being in support of the credit scoring ban, but not the insurance companies themselves. How dare they claim that your rates will go up, just because they will not be allowed to discriminate and gouge the poor!!! They are trying to establish that poor credit is a greater insurance risk, how could they know or claim that if they were not breaking this law already!!!
Posted by: uncovered | October 19, 2006, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
I’m really surprised so many of you believe what you read in the newspapers or hear on TV. State Farm hasn’t even been given the opportunity to explain itself.
It’s pretty simply from my perspective. Just because there is damage to your house doesn’t mean your insurance policy covers it. Homeowners not covered for floor damage had the opportunity to pay extra for this coverage. They decided not to. It was their choice.
If State Farm and other companies know are pressured to cover these losses we will all pay for it in the end through increased insurance premiums. I don’t think that is fair, do you? mnwePeopl
Posted by: Peter | October 21, 2006, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Every once in while I attempt to find out what insurance companies paid for what claims/what company/how much, etc, in cases of disaster. I want to find a company who has ethical and moral beliefs similar to my own. Interestingly enough I found the following info on the Insurance Information Institute website.
http://www.iii.org/media/updates/press.760032
Estimates show that fewer than 2% of homeowner’s claims in Mississippi and Louisiana are in dispute either through mediation or litigation.
One year after Katrina, nine in ten homeowners in Louisiana (89%) and Mississippi (93%) are satisfied with their homeowner’s insurance company.
Four in five people (82% in Louisiana and 81% in Mississippi) who filed a hurricane-related claim are satisfied with the way it was managed by their insurer. Has my premium changed, no but I certainly have less coverage at thsi point.
Through my own personal experience and meeting others who have been displaced from Katrina, I find the above impossible to beleive. I live on the coast and recently had my earthquake coverage removed from my policy (the companies choice- I had the choice to renew under those terms on not renew).I then was provided the opportunity to purchase earthquake coverage for a sum of $450 dollars, in addition to my normal homeowners insurance costs.
My personal belief is that in the desire to make money (which is ok- at these companies are for-profit) there are many bad apples who are spoiling the garden and in their desire to save money who have forgotten or don’t care that they are dealing with humans- who should be afforded respect as such.
And yes, I pay my extra for flood insurance.
Posted by: Mo | October 24, 2006, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Many comments are very naive. ABC news is famous for one sided, sensational hatchet jobs for their own ratings. Scruggs made tens of millions on the tobacco class action case. He intends to do the same here. ABC is feeding Scrugg’s BS to America and many buy it. Shame on you. I am sure many believe ABC or any other network cares about anything but making money by playing off peoples emotions. WAKE UP!
Posted by: Steve | October 25, 2006, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Let’s look at some realities here, yes documents were being shredded which in itself screams that something is fishy, and there were some other major issues and coverups that came to light but if you are living in an area where there are tornados you buy the high winds coverage, if you live in an area that sits below sea level then get smart and buy yourself flooding coverage. The people that are complaining the most didn’t have this coverage and they shouldn’t be reimbursed.
Posted by: Bobby | November 9, 2006, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Um, you guys are idiots. Homeowners insurance does not cover floods which it specifically states in the declarations page. For that, you would need FLOOD insurance which I am certain if you were to take the statistics of how many homeowners had flood insurance, I would bet you that all of them got paid what they deserved. Everyone is so quick to judge State Farm because its in the media (which those girls did a GREAT job in getting there 15 minutes of fame) but listen here and listen well, ALL insurance companies have their scams so guess what, no one is safe. Its the morons who just buy a policy to satisfy there mortgage loan requirements and don’t really read and understand what coverages they are getting that deserve to be shot down. Ignorance is not always bliss.
Posted by: Shannon | November 16, 2006, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Get this through your head, here in Biloxi there was a 30 ft. wall of water from the Hurricane. Now do floods reach 30′ in height? I think not. It was storm damage and not flood damage Shannon, anyone who was here and lost everything knows that. State Farm denied me, I lost everything. They were dropped as soon as I got my denial letter. “Crooks” is too nice a term to describe them. They have changed our ways of life here. And now it costs $5000 a year to insure your home.
Posted by: Mike | January 10, 2007, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
State Farm is crooked. I had personally experience working with them as a paralegal, and I can tell you first hand they’re not in the business to protect the insured, but to get out of paying. They were so rotten in their tactics that we had a nickname for them, “snake farm.” Ever since my experience with them and witnessing them ruin countless lives, I’ve never used them as a insurance company. I am so sorry for those that did.
Posted by: Anon | January 11, 2007, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
MY STATE FARM SLEEZEBALL TOLD ME IF I DO THE REPAIRS MYSELF I ONLY GET 80% OF THE QUOTE THIS GOES FOR CAR HOME OR HEALTH I TOLD HIM IF I DONT HAVE A CLAIM SEND ME BACK 20%OF MY PREMIUM HE JUST GIVE ME A STUPID LOOK THIS IS SUCH A RIPOFF AND I DONT THINK ANYONE CAN STOP IT OTHER THAN NOT HAVE ANY INSURANCE AT ALL
Posted by: jim | February 26, 2007, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Jim,
Most quotes add 10% for overhead and another 10% for profit. That’s probably why he said you could only get 80%. You are not a business so you have no overhead. Also, insurance is designed to put you back like you were before the damage occurred, not make you profit You are not entitled to the 20% profit and overhead.
Posted by: Rebecca | February 27, 2007, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
I can honestly say that the insurance companies are screwing the population I have been fighting a claim for almost 3 years now with no end insight. The things they did to my wife and I are outrages.Their goal is to categorize damages in a manner that allowes them not to be liable for those damages. I sincerely hope you all will get what you deserve either way Good for Good Bad for Bad
Posted by: Leighton | March 7, 2007, 11:52 am 11:52 am
I’m live in Texas. I received a letter from State Farm Ins. wanting me to sign a letter of exclusion. Quoting the letter; ” Due to increased hurricane risk presented by properties located on the Texas coast, it has become necessary for State Farm … to reduce its wind exposure in that area… “Excluding wind coverage has been a difficult but necessary decision made even more difficult by the fact that we must ask you to agree to exclude windstorm and hail coverage from your State Farm … policy. If you do, then State Farm can continue you Homeowners policy, subject to this exclusion of coverage.”
I have been give 60 days to sign and return this letter. If I do not sign, quoting the letter, “your policy will be processed for nonrenewal and your policy coverage will not continue beyond your policy expiration date.” They want to help me obtanin a separate policy for windstorm coverage from the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association. Can someone tell me if this is legal? How can we as homeowners be blamed for a act of God? We pay, pay, pay on time every month just to get canceled. There has to be another answer. Looking for answers quickly.
Posted by: bob | March 16, 2007, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Interesting to read these posts, am I surprised by the story? No, I too worked at State Farm for many years. Is there unethical practices going on there? Probably so, insurance is about profits. If you pay out everything, what is there left for profits?
Now to the flood insurance, most of these people did not live in a flood zone. The answer to the puzzle is, which came first .. wind or water? hmm is not a hurricane made up of wind and water? So what caused the water? Surge? Rain? or the Wind? Well let’s see, an insurance company is going to say “surge” that way they’ve covered themselves. This way if you aren’t in a flood zone and you aren’t offered flood zone, you think you’re safe, but you’re not. I think if you live within 2 hours from a beach, you should be required to have flood insurance. Now maybe State Farm should take Katrina as an expensive lesson, pay out and move on, they won’t go broke, trust me. The money is there, they know that if they start paying, then all these other storm victims from Florida, the East coast will be wanting their fair share as well. So the only thing they can do is to stand up and fight the claims. Are they right in doing this? No, not really, but what choice do they have?
Posted by: Jessica | May 27, 2007, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
It is amazing to me how everyone jumps on the bandwagon to crucify State Farm based on what the media publishes. In the aftermath of Hurricane Kartina, the MS Attorney General’s Office launched an investigation on whether there was fraud in the adjustment of claims by State Farm and whether engineering reports were altered so claims could be denied. The MS Attorney General’s office convened a grand jury BUT GUESS WHAT……no indictments were returned against State Farm. If there was such damning evidence against State Farm as portrayed by the media, then it should have been easy to obtain grand jury indictments. After the firestorm, does the media report that the MS Attorney General’s office failed to get indictments against State Farm? No!
Also, has anyone thought to question the character of the two alleged “Whistleblowers,” Cori Rigsby Moran and Kerri Rigsby? If their true character was known I seriously doubt people would have jumped on the bandwagon so easily. Has anyone stopped to consider the financial motive of these two? They stand to make a lot of money out of this. Don’t be so gullible.
Everyone wants to bitch about insurance companies but what would you do if there was no insurance? People, read your policy. Insurance does not pay for everything!
Posted by: YKrammerick | September 23, 2007, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
If I were to do something dishonest, like insurance fraud, the insurance industry has every available law enforcement agency to apprehend, charge and prosecute me.
When the insurance company acts in a manner that fails to honor their commitment to me as provided through a legal document (policy), then their failure is called “Bad Faith”.
There is no law against bad faith, and I don’t have the same resources to hold them accountable.
But even after entering litigation with State Farm, I find myself engaged in a battle against an invisible enemy.
I feel like I’m fighting some terrorist group who have no name, rank, or serial number, much less a uniform that would identify them as a person of interest.
No one will take responsibility for failure to process my claims.
I suppose the insurance companies count on a certain number of people to retreat in disgust or are unable to financially carry their cases to court.
Time lapsed on my claim as of this date is 793 days!
I don’t know how long it will take to have a fair settlement, but I am a problem for them and will not go away.
Posted by: Samuel | November 8, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Who is the attorney handling the class action? I would like to know who to call. I believe that State Farm never put my claims in either.
Posted by: Orlandoan | January 24, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
interesting news released this week (april 7, 2008). the beloved whistle blowers named above (rigbys) were found to have been paid $150,000 each by lawyer dickie scruggs who is now in prison for bribery of a federal judge in regard to his cases against state farm and the judge has barred him from representing claimants against state farm in the future. the judge also said that the sisters “consultant work” with state farm was a “sham.”
truth is funny sometimes. all the comments above that jumped on state farm before it had the chance to offer its side of the story sure have egg on their face now. i think i will give a state farm agent a call today…
Posted by: matt | April 7, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
I spent almost 37years as a State Farm agent and did not always agree with all the things they did, but I personally know of many claims that were fraudulent on the part of the customer, but they were paid in full. Many were re-opened as much as 5 or 10 years later when something showed up that could be tied to a hurricane. Certainly some mistakes were made, but State Farm deserves the position they hold in the insurance industry, #1 for years.
Posted by: Ken | July 1, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
State Farm started giving a discount for Hip Roofs in Florida. They knew I had a Hip Roof from 2004 and on and yet they neglected to adjust my insurance rates on the house. They “claim” insured homeowners needed to contact them on their own and request the hip roof credit. This information was in small print lost in one of their flyers stuck in a statement that every one of us never reads. I found this to be a very poor excuse for them to say we had to come forward and request it when they were already made aware that we have a hip roof when we bought out home in 2000 and again when someone came out to take photo’s after Hurricane Ivan did damage to our roof in 2004. They started the hip roof credit in 2004 so they certainly had the information about my hip roof and should have been honorable enough to give us this credit back in 2004. It is truly a terrible shame that we cannot trust our insurance companies more here in the USA. I and my husband both are retired military and we sure could have used that extra 700.00 plus per year which amounted to being an overpayment on our insurance that State Farm has refused to refund us. I have called them and they do not care. My husband has Stage IV Colorectal Cancer so lord knows we could use all our money that they never should have been paid in the first place. Not long ago I read that another individual was moving forward with a law suite against State Farm regarding his hip roof credit he felt should have been automatically credited and his insurance adjusted accordingly. They do that on other things, we do expect the same attention to detail.
Posted by: Judy | July 14, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
To the Dupe about Bush.
“Local [New Orleans] officials often resisted proposals to protect their communities from storms because they did not want to pay their share of federal projects.”
There WAS money given to fix the new Orleans by installing gates, but some activists complained and said it would hurt some animal/wetlands.
Look it up.
One cause of the delays was a lawsuit filed by the group Save Our Wetlands, with support from fishermen and local officials, to block construction of two floodgates at the eastern end of Lake Pontchartrain. The suit argued that the gates would block tidal flows and damage the ecosystem. In 1977, a judge ordered the Corps to redo its cursory environmental analysis. The agency eventually abandoned the gates, deciding to build taller levees instead.
The tree huggers never got blamed for all the deaths and destruction.
They have no clue about cost benefit analysis.
They certainly don’t live a lifestyle with less impact on the environment..they just cause increased costs because they are bored and need a “cause”.
There are wetlands…and millions have been spent along the Mississippi..repairing leveees, etc…but as you create levees, there is no silt for the Delta. BOTTOM LINE..WE NEED TO NOT SPEND ON NEW ORLEANS. IT IS NOT SUSTAINABLE.
Some say higher levees would not have helped…good money after bad. FORGET NEW ORLEANS.
THAT IS MY VOTE. DARN SILLY WASTE OF MY TAX MONEY.
Responding to:
To the dupe defending Bush, saying that he wasn’t responsible for the hurricane:
Bush wasn’t responsible for causing the hurricane, but he’s certainly responsible for the damage it caused, and here’s why– They’d known for quite awhile that those levees couldn’t take a big hurricane, but the funds that were to be spent making bigger levees were re-directed—can you guess WHERE those levee funds were re-directed? That’s right: IRAQ. That’s a cold hard fact. Look it up.
Posted by: foxes | October 26, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
We lost our home in the Oct. 2007 fires in San Diego. We are yet another victim of State Farm.
Posted by: David Himelstein | January 28, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Well, I don’t know about Katrina, but we have
a homeowners insurance through State Farm
and in 2006, our water heater blew-up in the
middle of the night. It was a disaster, our
den got flooded, we lost the carpeting, molding
and what’s more, not only did State Farm
immediately Pay for everything directly to
the carpet, molding and painting companies we
didn’t have to pay a nickle out of our pocket,
except for our deductable, which we would have
gotten back also, if I had saved the old water
heater. The only thing they didn’t pay for, which
was not their resposibility…turns out we had an
asbestos floor beneath our carpet, and we
obviously had to have that removed.
I can honestly say though not only for our
home, State Farm has also been there for
our car. We wouldn’t insure with anyone
else.
G
California
Posted by: Greg | August 15, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
State Farm hates paying claims and does their best to load partial blame on the victims. Their car accident payouts are famous for dodging with blaming 20% of the accident on the victim, even in cases where no tickets were issued to the victim, and no attending officer puts any blame on the victim. State Farm then makes up its own claims of “excessive speed” and “bald tires”, and tells victims the police are not authorized to make those judgement calls.
Posted by: State Farm victim | March 23, 2010, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
think about this…state farm has 40 million + policies,if each person payed just $100 a month and we all know it is a lot more,they rake in 4 billion a month…i gurantee they don’t pay out even 10% of that a month
what kind of rip off jerk offs are all these companies?
Posted by: david w | March 26, 2010, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
How is State Farm still in business? Who would be dumb enough to use them after this fiasco?
Posted by: Don | November 5, 2010, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Limbo yea, i scantiness set down i be pleased this still didnt gai be obliged i adapt to the occasio regulate, may i repost this Narrow: Whistleblowers Saw Greatness Landed estate Cheated Katrina Victims – ABC
Posted by: mihail | September 3, 2011, 2:27 am 2:27 am