The Anatomy of the Foiled Plot in London
The world learned of a terrorist plot Thursday that would have caused mass death and destruction aboard a number of passenger jets had British authorities not aggressively investigated and arrested many of the plotters. More than 20 suspected terrorists were arrested in England by early Thursday morning, in an operation that involved British intelligence, Scotland Yard and assistance by a number of other law enforcement and intelligence agencies, including those in Pakistan. ABC News has learned that two "significant arrests" in Pakistan in recent days may have significantly accelerated the pace of the investigation. Many of the alleged terror plotters appeared to be of Pakistani descent. It appears that they were probably "homegrown" terrorists with strong links to al Qaeda and Pakistani operatives. This new generation of terrorists have figured significantly in plots in the U.S., London and Canada in recent months. In this case, the plotters apparently intended to assemble small but powerful bombs in flight and use them to take down flights from England to the United States in an operation that was just days away. Airport security was tight in both nations. A "red alert" — the highest alert level — was issued in the U.S., and a "critical" state was issued in England. Passengers are undergoing intense scrutiny — carry-on baggage of almost all kinds has been eliminated in Britain and delays abound at London’s Heathrow, the world’s busiest airport. According to a Department of Homeland Security briefing to the aviation sector, the terrorists appear to have planned to use multiple persons aboard each flight to assemble peroxide-based liquid or gel high explosives. The bomb-making materials could easily be concealed in small containers — water bottles, tooth paste tubes, juice boxes and any of the other numerous person items passengers traditionally take into the passenger compartment of commercial flights. At least nine transcontinental flights from American, United and Continental airlines were targeted in the plot. ABC News has learned that terrorists planned to attack the planes three at a time, waiting an hour between each attack. According to federal authorities, two or three bombers would each carry a separate portion of the bomb onto the plane to avoid detection. Once onboard the bomb would be assembled and then detonated by using heat or friction. British authorities had been tracking some of the suspects for several weeks but stepped in to round up the plotters when they began to book flight reservations and before any of the suspects purchased tickets.
British authorities have shared parts of the investigation with the FBI, and out of concern for leaks, only the barest details were shared with regional authorities as late as last night. Now there is a continued concern that other members of the cell remain on the loose and may remain a present danger to intercontinental air traffic as well as air traffic in Europe. Raids were expected to continue in England throughout the day, and authorities were said to be seeking the "factories" where the bomb parts were prepared. U.S. authorities, meanwhile, were running down leads to ensure no plotters or associates were within U.S. borders and intent on causing harm.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Looks like the ‘next’ 9-11 was prevented. I wonder if the authorties “cheated” and wire tapped the suspect’s phone calls? I hope so.
Posted by: PS | August 10, 2006, 10:46 am 10:46 am
I find it ironic that Brain Ross, who is so concerned with terrorism against the US has attacked the very technologies that can protect the US from terrorism. Well done Brian!
Posted by: john grelich | August 10, 2006, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Remember, “we are not really at war” and “there is no terrorist threat.”
Brought to you by leading liberal Democrats by you.
Posted by: Willie Jackson | August 10, 2006, 11:10 am 11:10 am
I FIND IT VERY TELLING THAT JUST
LAST WEEK 11 FOREIGN EGYPTIAN
MEN HAVE NOT REPORTED TO A MONTANA
COLLEGE. COULD THEY BE A CELL??
HOW COME THE MEDIA DOES NOT PRINT THEIR NAMES AND PHOTOS???
Posted by: john | August 10, 2006, 11:11 am 11:11 am
The citizenry of the world need to seriously consider “EXECUTION” for those involved in terrorism..Wherever they are, Whomever they are regardless of their involvement….”DEATH”…”PUBLIC” summary executions…..
Posted by: Oliver | August 10, 2006, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Thank God for George W. Bush fighting the war against Islamists and progressives at the same time.
Posted by: Scott Bieller | August 10, 2006, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Why wasn’t the term “Muslim” or “Islamic” used ANYWHERE in this article??
Is it because you believe there is no connection there?
Posted by: Thomas Zaccone | August 10, 2006, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Bush is at the ranch again. Uh-oh
Posted by: rickygee | August 10, 2006, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Good work
Posted by: andrew ray | August 10, 2006, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Good article and fine reporting with the exception of a small dose of PCism. What’s wrong with calling out these terrorists for what they are? Islamic Arab Muslims who should be dealt with harsely???
Posted by: Roland | August 10, 2006, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Anyone in favor of profiling yet? Anyone? What’s it going to take? Stop with the PC crap, and start rounding these characters up. Death or political correctness? You choose.
Posted by: Laura Wilson | August 10, 2006, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
? And still US Democrats talk of negotiation and peace with Jihadists???.
lunacy –madness — jibberish
Joseph Lieberman is right !!
Posted by: steveDow | August 10, 2006, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Win for security forces now let’s start profiling and finish the job.
Posted by: don | August 10, 2006, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
How does the fact that these terrorists were “home-grown” betray underlying problems in british society? It is rejection by their “home” society that causes immigrant youth to seek affirmation and social acceptance elsewhere. This is not simply a problem associated with being muslim. Exclusion of immigrants from their new community is a social issue, and until it is addressed it will continue to produce these outcomes–home-grown terrorists.
Posted by: angela | August 10, 2006, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Okay so what do you have to say Democrats? Always quick to jump the President as he continues to work hard against this SOB’s. Keep up the good work GW!!!!
Posted by: gloria | August 10, 2006, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
So now what? The Brits will take 4 years to convict the slime and spend tens of millions to do it. Then they will let them go in less than 10 years including time served so that they can turn around and try it again.
Stupid not to have execution for terrorisim.
Posted by: Stan | August 10, 2006, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
To all of you who criticize homeland security and other similar agencies,
Look at what they have accomplished in just over 7 months this year. Plots to blow up the tunnels in New England and now this. I’m glad they are doing their jobs.
Now how about the administration does something about this oil situation?
Posted by: Grant Thompson | August 10, 2006, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
We will finally get it after we get it again and again.
Posted by: Austin Ace | August 10, 2006, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Bush had nothing to do with these arrests. Give credit to British and Pakistanis LAW ENFORCEMENT that, by the way, did not have to invade a country to make these arrests. I guess law enforcement does have its place in fighting terrorism.
As for fighting a war against terrorists and Progressives, if Bush and the Administration had tried to enlist Progressives in the fight against terrorism, we wouldn’t have the internal dissension that has wracked our country. Instead, the Administration, from 2002 forward tried to make the GWOT a Republican issue. Only by pulling together and agreeing that Americans of various political persuasions are NOT the enemy can we unite our country again.
Posted by: Barry | August 10, 2006, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Will this get the anti-war liberals to understand why we must fight for the good of all mankind.
Posted by: Kevin Veator | August 10, 2006, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
How can the Brits solve this and we mange to loose 12 Egyptian students? Thanks to M5. A big thanks to the Brits.
M
Posted by: Marty | August 10, 2006, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
People need to start thinking WHY this is happening. The infalmation of the situation in the Middle East. With the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and the support of Isreal’s oppresion of the Lebannese and Palestinian people no wonder people are trying to fight back agaisnt oppresion. Think of yourself in this position, would you not fight agaisnt this?
Terrorism is not right, I’m not saying that. But what needs to be addressed is stopping people from feeling this resentment. We need to stop this tit for tat, it will only end in the death of more innocent people.
Posted by: George Connor | August 10, 2006, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Yeah, Bush saves the world again! GIVE ME A BREAK
Posted by: Sarge | August 10, 2006, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Bush: “It is a mistake to believe there is no threat to the Unites States of America”
Amen.
Posted by: Andy | August 10, 2006, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Suppose the Brits were listening in on international phone conversations?
Posted by: Chuck Capan | August 10, 2006, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Why is US government still supporting Pakistan????????
Mr.Bush please clean out your ears and hear out what Indian government has been saying atleast now………..
Posted by: df | August 10, 2006, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
execute those terrorists
Posted by: kawy | August 10, 2006, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Thank you Britian…….
Posted by: M ike | August 10, 2006, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
another skirmish in the war on terrorism. There will be more.
Posted by: Fred | August 10, 2006, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
here’s the question that should be asked: by diverting the nation’s resources from the war against al-Qaeda in Afghanistan to the unnecessary war in Iraq, and by not capturing/killing bin Laden and al-Zawahri, has this president and his policies enabled this sort of thing to happen?
Posted by: Jeff | August 10, 2006, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
I would help if you told us why these people are so intent on killing us. What is their vision? What are their goals? I know that you know, so please, let us know.
Posted by: Allen Land | August 10, 2006, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
I’m grateful for God’s blessing on our 2 countries, and the on the labors of our counter-terrorism. Truly this is the hour we must stand together. Let us seek God to gether for His continued mercies.
Posted by: Baker | August 10, 2006, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
It’s gotta be TATP, the terrorists’ bomb of choice.
Posted by: TexasRainmaker | August 10, 2006, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Do people still think the Bush administration is doing nothing about the terror threat?? I think not…
Posted by: Marc Cramer | August 10, 2006, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
It’s fortunate the New York Times did not find out about the investigation weeks ago. I’m sure they would have warned the terriorist on their front pages.
Glc
Posted by: GL Cline | August 10, 2006, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Already the self-proclaimed “progressive” thinkers have found a way to blame Bush, Cheney and Halliburton. Unbelievable!
Why don’t you “progressives” do the world a favor and go ahead and drink the rest of the kool-aid?
Posted by: Jonathan Myers | August 10, 2006, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
WHy all the silence about whether these were islamic? I couldn’t find a single news story that highlighted that obvious fact.
Also, isn’t the term “terrorist” all wrong, and shouldn’t it be replaced with islamic fascist? Of course that won’t happen – until the public abandons media that fails to tell us the truth about what is going on we will continued to be lied to.
I also thank god for George Bush – on this one issue anyway. Turns out he was right all along!
Now if he would only modify his stance on immigration – that’s going to have to come anyway.
Posted by: B. Samuel Davis | August 10, 2006, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
How does the fact that these terrorists were “home-grown” betray underlying problems in british society? It is rejection by their “home” society that causes immigrant youth to seek affirmation and social acceptance elsewhere. This is not simply a problem associated with being muslim. Exclusion of immigrants from their new community is a social issue, and until it is addressed it will continue to produce these outcomes–home-grown terrorists.
Posted by: angela | August 10, 2006, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Thank you U.K. for your efforts. It seems those who truly recognize the threat of terrorism are globally ridiculed, but instances like this show what the world is up against. Not armies fighting other armies, but Islamic terrorists targeting innocent civilians. How warped must a mind be to justify this?
Posted by: DJ | August 10, 2006, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Question: “Why wasn’t the term “Muslim” or “Islamic” used ANYWHERE in this article??
Is it because you believe there is no connection there?”
Answer: ABC Reporters Brian Ross and Richard Esposito (and their empty-suit editors) lack basic intellectual honesty, courage, or both. (Sort of like Reuters and their phony photos.)
The MSM IS the enemy within.
m. r. o’donnell
Posted by: m. r. o'donnell | August 10, 2006, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
This is a sign of more impending things to come. Wake up! Israel is on the front lines of this very same war just as they were during the cold war. They need the support of those freedom minded people willing to stand up against terrorism worldwide not just when it is convenient like certain French leaders.
Posted by: Jay | August 10, 2006, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
President Bush and Karl Rove don’t want to find Al Qaeda leaders; they want the “terror threats” to continue for their political gain!
Posted by: Mike Adams | August 10, 2006, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
the cut-n-run propaganda machine is extraordinarily quiet..what? no conspiracy theories against the republican-run gov’t?
Posted by: cheri | August 10, 2006, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
What if they were Irish terrorists? Would the article say so? I think it would, or at least tell us a description indicating what their agenda was. I suppose we are to assume they were Islamo-facists.
Posted by: kirk anderson | August 10, 2006, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
September 11, Israel’s war with Hezbollah, Iran’s and Syria’s insurgents in Iraq, Madrid bombings, London subway bombings, this foiled plot… All are part of the same global jihad being waged against the West for more than a decade. Appeasement will not stop this. Anyone who doesn’t understand that should go play and let the grown-ups handle this.
Posted by: Larry B | August 10, 2006, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Revelation of this plot will be another nail in the coffin of the Democratic party’s ambition to take the White House.
Posted by: Geoff | August 10, 2006, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
What the hell is a “plotter”? God help us all when George Bush and Tony Blair leave office.
Posted by: Gail | August 10, 2006, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Do they support the Caliphate or are they searching for the 13th Imam?
Posted by: rickmd03 | August 10, 2006, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
How very convenient for the Bush Administration for this plot to be exposed now. As for myself, I must see hard evidence before I accept the se claims. The War on Terror, just like the War on Drugs or the War on Poverty is an excuse for our government to swell up in power and size. Where is the proof to back up this scare story or are to merely bow to our rulers and accept their every word as truth?
Posted by: John McCarthy | August 10, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
“Investigated and ARRESTED…” Will wonders never cease: old-fashioned POLICE WORK saved the day (again). Too bad Bush is still rampaging through the world’s china shop with his mindless bulls, unable to prosecute or even charge more than a handful of suspects after five years of invading the privacy of American citizens.
THANKS Britain (and good recap Ross and Esposito). We can count at least on OTHER countries for a competent defense of our own when plots originate offshore — I have zero confidence in our own ability to do such police work and smart intelligence work here in the U.S. or overseas in defense of our nation. The military is a PR firm now, as are most Executive Branch agencies under the Bush/Rove doctrine of destruction which is falsely advertised as prevention.
Sounds like Scotland Yard still practices the real deal: careful, detailed, EVIDENCE-based investigation and arrest and prosecution of suspects. So far this sounds like a tremendous bit of life-saving preventive detective work. We are in their debt.
Posted by: M. | August 10, 2006, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Mr. Adams, your comments are outlandish and emphasize the school of thought you subscribe to. Your comments make you no better than our enemies.
With a 30-something percent approval ratio, it appears the strategy of not finding Al Qaeda leaders is a real effective one – heavy on the sarcasm. This is not about politics, this is about the struggle of human freedom…you obviously don’t get it.
Posted by: F.K. | August 10, 2006, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
We should stop calling the Islamic Terrorists and start calling them cowards, because that is what they truly are.
Posted by: mike | August 10, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
It’s unreal to read the replies by the Bush bashers. You’d think they would at least think that there was a problem. I guess they still are thinking the towers were taken down by Bush. They couldn’t possibly think Bush was smart enough to fool this many people could they? I mean that’s all I hear from them… It would be nice if the other side had a constructive idea on terror containment. Instead just anti-Bush. Pathetic..
Posted by: Gary K | August 10, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
All good Americans need to have a nationwide “neighborhood watch”. Keep your eyes peeled, your cell phones on, your pantries stocked, and don’t let the head-in-the-sand liberals discourage you with their political correctness or their hatred of America.
Posted by: joel | August 10, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Hopefully this will reawaken the people in this country who would like to revert to a pre-9-11 mentality.
I, like Gail, fear the day that Bush & Blair leave office.
Posted by: George | August 10, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Oliver has it right – Summary execution for any and all, including any who had even one finger in the plot! Jail risks release to try again another day – liberals be dammed!
Posted by: L Rodgers | August 10, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
The timing of the arrests seems a little convenient, vis-a-vis the election cycle. Scotland Yard couldn’t have busted these guys a week ago?
There are no coincidences.
Posted by: SailorSam | August 10, 2006, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
This comment that Bush doesn’t want to find Al Qaeda leaders is insane and based on the hatred of Bush that many feel. Why do you think that America has had no big terrorist incident since 9/11?
The comment seems to be based on emotion and feelings but it is not logical.
Posted by: Frank L | August 10, 2006, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Reuters calls these people “freedom fighters”.
ABC calls them plotters.
When is the left-wing and the mainstream media going to document that the entire world is at was with Islamic Terrorists?
I’ve been a dues paying member of the Democrat all my adult life. I’m so disappointed that the leaders of my party are supporting the terrorists.
Posted by: Monty G | August 10, 2006, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
I predicted after 9/11 that the new global threats of subversive/terrorist warfare
would require a deeply troubling but necessary reassessment of our “rights” and “protections.” I also predicted that many would not be able to adjust to the new reality and would fall back into protecting their personal liberties and pursuing their political agendas once the trauma subsided. That has happened–here and in Europe. But just as the riots and murders in Europe forced some new realizations on idealistic goals of open borders and faith in diversity as a recipe for multicultural nirvana, this new unveiling of a brutal attack on
civilian passenger planes is reasserting the issues only briefly debated after 9/11′s awakening. You can hear the earthmovement rumblings–across the Atlantic–which most
assuredly have been glimpsed here–but only in their infant stages. Leeson: if the partisan proponents of absolute “protections” for First Amendment civil rights do not shift their thinking in the face of this new reality and back off the partisan opposition platform (see New York Times for example revealing classified antiterrorist war strategies under the banner “the people want to know”), they will be in danger of losing the entire body of First Amendment law along with its ideological foundations to authoritarian messengers appealing to the legitimate and illegitimate fears that unfettered “freedoms” will not and cannot quell.
Posted by: Schwartz | August 10, 2006, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Punks organize to attack civilians and all you can talk about is some ridiculous theory about Bush and Rove. As a liberal who is upset over the Iraq war, I’m intelligent enough to know Bush/Rove have nothing to do with this issue today. I am starting to think maybe the anti-war side of my party is willing to be blind to the reality in front of us. Bush will be out of office for sure in 2008 yet something tells me Islamists will still be trying to kill innocents the world over. Do my fellow Democrats think once Bush is gone the threat of millitant islam will stop??? That’s a mental disability!
Posted by: JOn | August 10, 2006, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
I predicted after 9/11 that the new global threats of subversive/terrorist warfare
would require a deeply troubling but necessary reassessment of our “rights” and “protections.” I also predicted that many would not be able to adjust to the new reality and would fall back into protecting their personal liberties and pursuing their political agendas once the trauma subsided. That has happened–here and in Europe. But just as the riots and murders in Europe forced some new realizations on idealistic goals of open borders and faith in diversity as a recipe for multicultural nirvana, this new unveiling of a brutal attack on
civilian passenger planes is reasserting the issues only briefly debated after 9/11′s awakening. You can hear the earthmovement rumblings–across the Atlantic–which most
assuredly have been glimpsed here–but only in their infant stages. Leeson: if the partisan proponents of absolute “protections” for First Amendment civil rights do not shift their thinking in the face of this new reality and back off the partisan opposition platform (see New York Times for example revealing classified antiterrorist war strategies under the banner “the people want to know”), they will be in danger of losing the entire body of First Amendment law along with its ideological foundations to authoritarian messengers appealing to the legitimate and illegitimate fears that unfettered “freedoms” will not and cannot quell.
Posted by: Schwartz | August 10, 2006, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
To the people insisting on labeling these monsters “muslims” or “islamic”, this is pure ignorance. Who in history goes around calling Hitler a christain Nazi? Why must we label the origins of these terrorists. Hell, if they were irish, does that make them any less of a threat? The ignorance must end. Islam is a religion of peace, and what you have here are extremists. Remember, the Oklahoma bombing was done by McVeigh, who believed he was acting in the name of the bible.
Posted by: Duke | August 10, 2006, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
I’m hoping this foiled plot will open up the eyes of the liberals out there still believe “nothing is the matter”… we’re at war for crying out loud… wake up.
Thanks Great Britain for a job well done.
Posted by: Mike Toth | August 10, 2006, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
What is all this hatred for progressives? Don’t we have enough hatred to spread around for now? No matter what you think of Bush’s relentless domestic assault on civil rights and freedoms (freedom is ‘marching on?”) this president’s occupation of Iraq continues to fuel the kind of hatred that results in this level of terrorism. Never forget that Bush proclaimed publically that he DOES NOT CARE about Osama bin Ladin and doesn’t “spend that much time” on him. That’s your big hint right there.
Posted by: Susan | August 10, 2006, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
This is too scary. We have Muslim fanatics trying to kill us and themselves and they will not stop. Will this go on forever?
Then we have pointy headed idiots here in our own country with partisan interests and a warped sense of values actually hindering our capacity to combat these fanatics. God help us……
Posted by: Mark Falzon | August 10, 2006, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Like many other terrorist busts–Im thinking of the one recently in Miami that turned out to be rather blown out of proportion–we need let this story develop a few days so the public and press can figure out what the true facts are.
I listened to the press conference this morning featuring Chertof and Gonzales. Sounded more like a propaganda scare session than an informative briefing.
Posted by: billyjoe | August 10, 2006, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Great job by all parties involved in the capture of these people. The cooperation involved in this raid must have been huge. I think the coordination demonstrated by PM Blair and President Bush should not go unnoticed.
Posted by: Matthew Schiess | August 10, 2006, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Interesting analysis M – “Old fashioned police work” saved the day. Apparently that “old fashioned police work” was centered around a number of “sneak and peek” search warrants that allowed the British investigators to figure out the terrorists next move. Those “sneak and peek” warrants are exactly what people like you tried to have banned in the US during the Patriot Act renewal. Thank God our Congress is smart enough to place our citizens’ safety first and not jeopardize my children’s lives to protect your alleged privacy. Have no doubt that if M’s vision for America prevailed we’d have no defense against terrorists like this. O
Posted by: Bob | August 10, 2006, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Can someone explain to me how continued American presence in Iraq is helping defeat Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism?
Why do I think that America has had no big terrorist incident since 9/11?
Increased law enforcement and intelligence, something Bush has derided, especially in the 04 election.
It’s amazing that some people still believe were are “taking the fight to the terrorists” in Iraq.
Posted by: butternuts | August 10, 2006, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Thank God for Bush and Blair and their dedication to the cause of the World. Both have shown remarkably thick skin in the face of the minority public opinion and the evil media machine that is ou to ruin both of them. Through all of this I have seen two very geniuine men and wonderful leaders do a great job under trying circumstances.
Posted by: Ray O | August 10, 2006, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
“Why do you think that America has had no big terrorist incident since 9/11?”
Why do you draw the conclusion that it’s because of some heroic work on our part? The border’s wide open and people are still making it onto planes in the states with contraband after all of our security “improvements.” We have probably foiled a small homegrown plot or two, but I believe the real cause is that Al Qaeda has not attempted a major attack on US soil since 2001. Let’s not forget it was 8 _years_ between al qaeda attacks on US soil (WTC 93, WTC ’01 ) – this is a patient adversary. That was 8 years space when nobody was paying attention to them.
Although the US developed a very pretty rainbow alert system and our administration never fails to utilize it around election time, we’ve done very little that I can see to protect our ports, borders, and airlines. Little things here and there, but not a lot of oversight, and tons of cracks to slip through for anyone who so desires.
This latest sting is largely the success of the UK’s security. I can’t help but think Al Qaeda’s a bit foolish for trying to pull off a stunt like this over in Europe, where the airline security’s a notch better than the gum-chewing, gossipping American airport security personnel who are constantly asleep at the wheel. It’s just a matter of time…
Posted by: pete | August 10, 2006, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Thank God for Bush and Blair and their dedication to the cause of the World. Both have shown remarkably thick skin in the face of the minority public opinion and the evil media machine that is ou to ruin both of them. Through all of this I have seen two very geniuine men and wonderful leaders do a great job under trying circumstances.
Posted by: Ray O | August 10, 2006, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
The DC snipers, the Cole bombers, the embassy bombers, the 9/11 hijackers, the Seattle shooter, Nasralla, bin Laden, Zarqawi, the Madrid bombers, the London bombers, the Canadian plotters, and on and on and on. What’s the common denominator? Do we know who are enemy is? Are we intelligent enough to pronounce it? How can you win a world war if you can’t even acknowledge who your enemy is?
Posted by: manfred | August 10, 2006, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
SailorSam, maybe you missed the part in the article about having to act now and arrest these BAD guys because they were preparing to embark on their terror targets (airliners). To further praise the Brits: careful/patient surveillance in order to understand the magnitude of this network and the seriousness of the threat they present; waiting until you can catch them red-handed but before they could strike. In today’s lawyer-driven world, you couldn’t stop them any sooner or these guys would be back on the streets in short order due to claims of “profiling.”
Posted by: Gorillis | August 10, 2006, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
SailorSam,
Read the article again. They started the roundup when the “alleged” scum began making flight reservations. Do you think the “alleged” scum do this now in order to influence our primaries?
Get beyond the politics, sammy -
Posted by: eightandcounting | August 10, 2006, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Let’s give a big hand to all who worked hard to discover this plot. The Islamic extremists wonder why we back Israel- well, look at what the extremists stand for! They don’t target military targets , they go only after the civilians- total cowards.
Thank you England! God bless President Bush and Tony Blair. If we get a mealy mouth President come next election, be prepared for the USA to become another Israel or Iraq- we will have terrorist bombings everywhere. I’m very worried about it too,like Gail and others, which is why I’m moving as far from the main cities as I can, I don’t trust the voters not to vote an idiot into office. Sorry, if this offends anyone, but it’s just my opinion.
Posted by: Claudia | August 10, 2006, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Thank you Brits and thank God for a foiled catastrophy. It seems only a short time until passenger and baggage flights will be separate. Seems that would solve a lot of the risk.
Posted by: House | August 10, 2006, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Open your eyes lovers of freedom and democracy, you’re in the crosshairs of Islamic radicals. They want you DEAD… or subjective to Islam! Wake up! Shed your pacifism and naivete before it’s too late.
Posted by: I.B. Worried | August 10, 2006, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
“To the people insisting on labeling these monsters “muslims” or “islamic”, this is pure ignorance. Who in history goes around calling Hitler a christain Nazi? ”
This comment by Duke is indicative of the poor logic on the Left. Dear Duke: Hitler did not perform his crimes in the name of Christianity. Muslim terrorists perform their crimes in the name of Islam and of Mohammed. That, my logic-challenged dhimmified friend, is the difference.
Posted by: mk | August 10, 2006, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
“Have no doubt that if M’s vision for America prevailed we’d have no defense against terrorists like this.”
Have no dobut that if Bob and Schwartz’s vision of America prevails there will be no democracy or individual rights, both sacrifcied in the name of greater “security.”
Posted by: JC | August 10, 2006, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
“…not all Muslims are terrorists, but…almost all terrorists are Muslims.”–Abdel Rahman al-Rashed, Manager, Al-Arabiya TV News
Posted by: flyingcow | August 10, 2006, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
“…not all Muslims are terrorists, but…almost all terrorists are Muslims.”–Abdel Rahman al-Rashed, Manager, Al-Arabiya TV News
Posted by: flyingcow | August 10, 2006, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Kudos to the British police and intelligence services as well as all others who helped in foiling this terrible plot. As for those who see this as a failure of the left or right in our societies, remeber that whatever your views about the politics in your countries the Islamofascists are after all of us.
Posted by: Algodees | August 10, 2006, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
I’m glad the plot was discovered and foiled. On another note, I’d like to know why ‘moderate’ Muslims aren’t actually vocal in their opposition to those who kill unarmed men, women, children, the elderly, the sick and infirm, when The Quran **expressly forbids** such action and calls such action evil.
Posted by: Matt | August 10, 2006, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Thank God for the hard work and vigilance of those who take the war on terrorism seriously, and rightly so. This world-wide, diabolical threat will take decades to (hopefully) get under control, but will never be totally eradicated. We must never again be caught slumbering while our blood enemies plot and toil.
Posted by: Karl S. | August 10, 2006, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Does anyone still think Gitmo should be closed? I THINK NOT!
Posted by: A. S. | August 10, 2006, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Read the article again, folks. The Brits started their roundup AFTER the suspects started making plane reservations. The only way this could have been made to coincide with our election cycle would be if the “alleged” terrorists are trying to influence out elections.
SailorSam – watch out for those black helicopters…
Posted by: dadofseven | August 10, 2006, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
I pray to God that Bush will not usurp the throne. God and his infinite mercy may spare us all the rigurs of this final destruction of the US. Drowned in ‘national security’.
Amen.
Posted by: Peter | August 10, 2006, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
You crazy “God this or God that . . . ” people are the ones causing all the problems.
I am greatful to the dedicated men and women of our police and security agencies. We owe them a big thanks. Many of them can get bigger bucks in the private sector. Be sure when votes come up to support police and fire depts that you vote to support them.
Posted by: Allen | August 10, 2006, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
I thank the Lord I finally grew up enough to decide for myself what is right and what is wrong. When I was younger I bought into every lie the liberals made legal. I have paid severely for such immature thinking. Some of the comments made bashing Bush make me laugh out loud, and then it scares me to death to think that so many out there actually believe such things. One person made mention that only a handful of terrorists have been prosecuted, well you can thank yourselves for that. We have to bend over backwards to make a criminal comfortable. Heaven forbid we compromise the terrorist rights in the process of trying to expose them for what they are, EVIL. Lefties open your eyes before our streets look like Lebanon. However, I’m not so sure you would get it then either. If you can’t figure it out after 911 maybe your just hopeless.
Posted by: A Green | August 10, 2006, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
No one should “fear the day bush leaves office”. As history shows, no matter who is in office there will always be terrorists.
Posted by: DS | August 10, 2006, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
I looked on the BBC web site 1st thing this morning in the hopes of finding out more info…They’re breaking news was “Israel is stopping humanitarian supply from entering Lebanon”!!
At the bottom of the screen it read “US raises threat level due to “alleged” bomb plot”. Right next to the article about 4 penguins dying in a traffic accident in Texas.
WAKE UP WORLD! You rock GW.
Posted by: stu | August 10, 2006, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
After 9/11 we had the world on our side, most every country in the world including our enemies were working with us to find Osama Bin Laden (who has still not been caught by the way). I agreed with going into Afganistan. I believe we should have stayed there, found Osama Bin Laden (the perpatrator of 9/11 who is still at large) and not attacked Iraq (who didn’t have anything to do with 9/11 and didn’t have WMDs). Maybe if we had stayed in Afganistan and not attacked Iraq all these militant Islamist would not be so angry with us and want to kill us. Yes this is George Bush’s fault. You say we haven’t had another attack on America since 9/11 but there are 2500 American dead in Iraq and tens of thousands of Americans wounded and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis dead. Why can’t we use diplomacy instead of blowing up stuff. Or is that all you Republicans understand?
Posted by: Wojo | August 10, 2006, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Didn’t take long for the liberal conspiracy theorists to weigh in on this. As usual, their hatred of Bush has provided a forum in which they can embarrass themselves with their moronic claims.
Posted by: JP | August 10, 2006, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Q: Why haven’t we caught Osama yet?
A: because we’re busy trying to conquer Iraq, where there was no threat.
That is the crime of this administration.
Posted by: Bob | August 10, 2006, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
It seems like duke is one of the few who has a sensible head on his shoulders. These people are not islamic or muslims these are ignorant SOBs who are using a peaceful religion of islam to further their reactionary hatred towards the west. For those of you who think that these people are muslims must know that already all muslims around the world are condeming these monsters. I have a quote from the Quran 27:89 “…nations that do good to humanity and make way for peace and security, will be best rewarded”. There are other numerous chapters in Quran that talks about peace love and tranquility. For those who claims that islam is responsible for all the attrocities should read Quran to understand the true nature of peaceful Islam. Islam by definition means Peace.
Posted by: Jason Allen | August 10, 2006, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Bush didn’t have anything to do with foiling the plot, he is only now being briefed by British intelligence. If anything his policies probably encouraged many of the operatives to take up arms.
And I’m guessing there is no mention of the 21 suspects as being Muslim because there identities have not been revealed to the media, and it would be incredibly irresponsible to report them as being Muslim without any verification of that, even if it is a near certainty.
Posted by: josh | August 10, 2006, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
God is on our side! He has protected us from the evil of the world and he will continue to love us and protect us all!
Posted by: Tracy Russo | August 10, 2006, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
It seems like duke is one of the few who has a sensible head on his shoulders. These people are not islamic or muslims these are ignorant SOBs who are using a peaceful religion of islam to further their reactionary hatred towards the west. For those of you who think that these people are muslims must know that already all muslims around the world are condeming these monsters. I have a quote from the Quran 27:89 “…nations that do good to humanity and make way for peace and security, will be best rewarded”. There are other numerous chapters in Quran that talks about peace love and tranquility. For those who claims that islam is responsible for all the attrocities should read Quran to understand the true nature of peaceful Islam. Islam by definition means Peace.
Posted by: Jason A | August 10, 2006, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
I’d like to salute the newsmen who wrote this. We can all make some obvious guesses, but that’s not news.
By the way, why all the talk about US government on this one? For once, Bush hasn’t done anything right or wrong at all. We should take a minute to give the UK police a great big round of applause today, they deserve it.
Posted by: Rebecca BG | August 10, 2006, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
A polite rebuttal to MK:
“The National Government regards the two Christian confessions (i.e. Catholicism and Protestantism) as factors essential to the soul of the German people. … We hold the spiritual forces of Christianity to be indispensable elements in the moral uplift of the German people…Never will we forget the role of the Jews in the Death of our Lord…I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.” March 23, 1933, Adolph Hitler, Reichstag
Being a government and politics major, I don’t believe in making accusations without fact to back it up. Also, how does me defending a religion against extremism make me a leftist? Am i led to believe that the right need this simplistic method of labeling “bad guys” and “good guys” to function?
Posted by: Duke | August 10, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Why do liberals have no survival instinct?
We are at war and unless we start acting like it, we will all be dead.
Posted by: MacNight | August 10, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
My wife and I are planning on flying to London next week for vacation–the UK counterterrorism apparatus may have saved our lives. I cannot thank them enough…
Posted by: Tim | August 10, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Thank God for those who foiled this catastrophe-in-waiting. My
14-year old Girl Scout daughter is now winging her way back to us as I post this comment. Her plane left after hours of confusion and searches by the authorities.
Posted by: Charlie | August 10, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Just so you know, the “liberals” on blogs you all probably avoid like the plauge also think the MSM is biased–right biased.
What bothers me is pure speculation on the part of the authorities about “massive death and destruction” is given first paragraph space in msm reports. It didn’t happen! Yeah, and the Sears Tower WOULD have come down if the guys they arrested in Florida actually knew how to make a bomb. Why give so much emphasis on the “could-of-happened”? The “Did Happen” is what’s news worthy, everything else is just an attempt to scare the sheep.
Posted by: Freud, S. | August 10, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Jason A,
Actually, Islam by definition means “submission”.
Posted by: Stan LS | August 10, 2006, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
“Sounds like Scotland Yard still practices the real deal: careful, detailed, EVIDENCE-based investigation and arrest and prosecution of suspects.”
To those of you who think that this was a unilateral effort on the part of the Brits, think again. It has been reported on other MSM sites that this was a collaborative effort between MI5 and the CIA. Hats off to the Brits, but don’t take anything away from the Yanks pal.
Posted by: BobbyKeith | August 10, 2006, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
In all seriousness, we need to be thankful that the US and UK is not wiretapping its suspicious citizens. I mean, this event was our fault. Iraq and Afgahanistan was a mistake. We should pull out immediatley and allow another safe haven for terrorists. In fact, lets make the war on terror political. Whatever measure the GOP takes it not good enough, and we should radically oppose it.
Posted by: John Doe | August 10, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
If Al Qaeda is as crippled as Bush claimed them to be (back in 2003), then how could they muster the resources to plan and finance this complicated, devastating attack? Obviously, they are still a very real threat and they will continue to be as long as the US acts as the world’s bully in the Middle East. Violence begets violence. We’re better than this.
Posted by: J | August 10, 2006, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Between the radical conservatives and the radical islamists, both of which thrive on more bloodshed and the clashing of religions – this world will forever be a worse place.
It’s a shame. I wish there was no such thing as organized religion.
Posted by: Jerry Garcia | August 10, 2006, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
President Bush didn’t mince words when he described the culprits as Islamic Facists. Why doesn’t the news print the truth? It may not be politically correct, but it’s correct!
Posted by: Chuck FLA | August 10, 2006, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Crikey, some of you are pretty thick.
Quoting supportive comments Hitler made **about** Christianity does not mean that he proclaimed that he and the Nazis acted **in the name of** Christianity. Nor did Christian Nazis intend to impose Christianity on those they made war against,which in any event were Christian countries as well.
The jihadists invoke Islam when they seek kill “infidels”, not just Jews but ALL those who do not share their religion andits philosphy. No pointing to Suras, please; that’s just cherry picking, and avoiding those suras that openly call for warring against the infidels. Where do you think the jihadists derive the basis for their warped ideas, except from the Koran??
Botton Line: Terrorists who claim toact in the name in Islam are…acting in the name of Islam.
They may be ignorant. They may be perverting their religion, which historically is nonetheless NOT a religion of peace. (Go ask a Shiite what he thinks of a Sunni. Go ask them both what they think of Wahhabis.)
But when they proclaim themselves Jihadists they are acting according to the precepts of their religion. Full stop.
Posted by: jelink | August 10, 2006, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Bob (at 1:13 p.m.) -
Why are you so unaware, at this late stage, of the power of the SECRET court created by FISA and all the many extremely valuable monitoring abilities (with warrants and without in some cases) which that court has facilitated (in accordance with our Fourth Amendment) since its inception, including the numerous worthwhile and wise amendments made to it since 9/11 (as part of both the apparently semi-Constitutional PATRIOT Act and as part of other bills)…?
I guess I shouldn’t blame you — most Members of Congress, even those on the Intelligence Committees, seem equally ignorant of FISA’s wide-ranging, permissive, and extremely potent tools and procedures for monitoring and intercepting threats to our nation transpiring on our soil (which I’m sure match the tools available to the British in this case under THEIR laws). [And of course the media has no idea what FISA procedures allow, and makes absolutely sure that Americans are never informed of the details of its features so that the ongoing violation and abuse of FISA law and our Fourth Amendment can be painted as somehow "necessary" by you and others.]
I trust FISA and I trust the ability of American citizens – in government service and out – to defend this nation while simultaneously honoring our Constitution and its Fourth Amendment. I don’t want and I don’t need a police state like the Soviet Union, in order to feel “safe.” I know we are all safer when we have our guaranteed liberty under law, and our goverment’s police powers are carefully contained to keep them focused on the REAL threats to the nation, and not aimed wildly and randomly at the freedoms of the citizens of this country.
It now seems clear that if not for American CITIZENS on board that United Airlines Flight 93 in PA on 9/11/01, we might not have a Capitol building or a White House today. Our secretive United States Military didn’t (and wasn’t going to be able to) save us that day: heroic private citizens did, thanks to their cell phones and the free flow of information from family members watching the news on CNN.
Don’t run and hide. Stand and fight IN ACCORDANCE with our splendid and profoundly liberating United States Constitution.
Posted by: M. | August 10, 2006, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
If muslim terrorists, both Palestinian and free-range, are engaged in some sort of jihad or justified struggle, then why the heck do they need a ridiculous promise of many virgins in the afterlife? It’s hard to imagine a more sadistic and self-interested motive than wanting to blow up completely random and innocent strangers on the promise that you will get a lot of action in the afterlife. Spin yourselves up into your ridiculous and overblown ranting about Bush and the endless oil company conspiracies; none of them in their wildest allegations even remotely approach the actuality of what drives Muslim terrorism. It is pure, naked selfishness and greed, clothed as religion. And it needs to be ground out utterly and for all time.
Posted by: holdtheline | August 10, 2006, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Conservatives have successfully demanded that the U.S. maintain troops in countries all over the world. Predictably, like fish and friends, those troops begin to stink in the nostrils of locals after a short time and the people begin to resist. Conservatives use their resistance to justify stronger military action which leads to terrorism, which is then used to justify more money for Conservative friends in the Defense Industry, more campaign contributions, and more votes for the right wing. Everybody’s happy, except those who pay the price to keep American Republican.
Posted by: Jim Corbett | August 10, 2006, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Thanks, Brits, for foiling the plot. I see that this site is full of all kinds of bashers, a lot of e-hate going on. It is true that the US is wide open for attack and our homeland security is suspect, but please remember that UK geographically would fit nicely into half of the state of New York. It is also true that GW is more dictator than president, TB is pretty much George’s yes man, the Republicans are elitist power brokers, the Democrats lack fortitude and leadership, and Americans are complacent about everything except gas prices and sports.
Rampaging savagry and hate throughout the world has pressed the vast majority of governments and politcal/religious groups to succumb to violence. The earth grows uglier day by day and your vitriolic e-hate mail sustains and feeds. All we can tell our children is that there are good people out there but you have to be very very cautious when inspecting them for humanity.
Posted by: RWF | August 10, 2006, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
If the government had any guts, there would be public executions of these pieces of scum in Picadilly.
Posted by: frank | August 10, 2006, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Why wasn’t the term “Muslim” or “Islamic” used ANYWHERE in this article??
Incidents like this will continue to happen until people are more concerned with living than being politically correct!
Posted by: Kyle | August 10, 2006, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Can I take back my vote for Ned Lamont?
Posted by: binky | August 10, 2006, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Just heard that Pakistan’s ISI helped foil the plot. Good work Pakistan!
Posted by: Arthur Whittle | August 10, 2006, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
AS I PERSON WHO LOST 2 FRIENDS ON 9/11 I HAVE NOT RESTED EASILY FOR THE PAST MONTH. THIS ALWAYS HAPPENS AROUND THIS TIME. I HAVE A NAGGING FEELING THAT SOMETHING ELSE WAS GOING TO HAPPEN. I MEAN..FOR 5 YEARS THIS GUY BIN LADDEN HAS BEEN SITTING IN A HOLE IN THE GROUND WITH NOTHING TO DO BUT PLOT ANOTHER ATTACK. ALTHOUGH I VERY HAPPY THAT OUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS IN LONDON WERE ABLE TO STOP WAS WAS ABOUT TO HAPPEN..HAVE THEY REALLY? OR HAVE THEY STOPPED IT FOR THE TIME BEING? THE MEN AND WOMEN WHO DIED ON 9/11 LOOKED DOWN ON US TODAY..THEY ARE THE TRUE HEROS.
Posted by: MARIANNE | August 10, 2006, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
To “J”
“If Al Qaeda is as crippled as Bush claimed them to be (back in 2003), then how could they muster the resources to plan and finance this complicated, devastating attack?”
Lets not forget that these attacks are not planned over night. A cell or group of cells can be in place years in advance before any attack comes to fruition. Its also important to point out that nothing significant has occured within the US since 911. The last major attacks were in Europe. This is because places like London(prior to the Underground bombings) were one of the world’s largest safe havens for terrorists under amnesty laws.
“Obviously, they are still a very real threat and they will continue to be as long as the US acts as the world’s bully in the Middle East.”
You should take note of the fact that the US did not had a significant “war” presence in the Middle East before we got hit by the 911 homicidal maniacs. One could make the argument that the first Gulf War stirred up the bee hive, but all of the world’s Arabs and Muslims hated Sadam anyway, so thats a moot point.
Posted by: BobbyKeith | August 10, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
About all this Islamo-Facist hubbub, remember that Islam is the most practiced religion in the world. If its practice was to result in a terrorist mindset, there would be a billion of these murderous bastards, not the small number we have seen.
In addition, fascism, according to the American Heritage Dictionary, is “totalitarianism marked by right-wing dictatorship and bellicose nationalism.” I don’t see how these psycho killers fit this definition. They are neither moved by nationalism or by their desire to serve a dictator. They are just warped and happen to be under the influence of twisted faux-religious leaders. It’s like the leaders of christian identity groups, or other organizations that use the guise of religion to justify their demented world view.
Remember a guy name Timothy McVeigh (Christian & Veteran)? Remember the militia groups? Psychos come from all sorts of backgrounds.
Posted by: John J | August 10, 2006, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Maybe we could be finding and fighting more terrorist cells if we were not fighting a pointless in Iraq. At least Saddam did not support terrorism, but now we have created a breading ground for recruiting terrorist followers. Bush has done some good things, but Iraq is a mistake we will be paying for in many years to come.
Posted by: Brian, DC | August 10, 2006, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
1. Too bad the U.S. doesn’t have Britain’s intelligence operatives–9/11 might never have happened.
2. Bush says we’re “safer” now than before 9/11? No way. As long as we’re “adventuring” (can’t bring myself to call it a war, an occupation maybe)in the Middle East, get ready for anything!
Posted by: Bruce | August 10, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
i’m glad somebody still knows how to do police work without getting mired in politics–
d
Posted by: dulcea harris | August 10, 2006, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I don’t think there was a mention of the citizenship or religion of the people apprehended.
Posted by: Klish | August 10, 2006, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Good to see we are figting them in Iraq so we don’t have to fight them in Birmingham. Oh wait….
Posted by: Valerie_Flame | August 10, 2006, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
To be fair, the religious persuasion of the suspects may not have been released as of yet. The early signs point to a strong probability that they are Muslim, but to say that before it is known would be premature.
Posted by: Lou P. | August 10, 2006, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
How can anyone say “Thank god for Pres Bush fighting terrorists.” First off, this plot was thwarted by British intelligence, not by George Bush. Secondly, this plot has the ear-marks of al-Qaida, the people who attacked us 5 years ago and are still at large. If Bush was really interested in fighting terrorists, these people would have long since been apprehended.
Posted by: Iraznam | August 10, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
People,
What is all this anti-democrat/progressive stuff? Again, these are silly, over-simplifying, devisive labels that have little or no basis in reality. I am progressive as far as abortion, gay-marriage, and separation of church and state are concerned but i own guns, believe in the death penalty, support capitalism and the war in Iraq (although i think the Bush administration has bungled it by sending too few troops in the first place). So where does that place me? Am i a progressive or a conservative? I’m neither and i think most americans would be difficult to fit into either camp as well. This infighting is simply stupid.
Remember: the ACLU protects Nazis and the KKK too!
Posted by: Charles | August 10, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
It is such a pitty that majority of the people on this forum have such a limited historical background. Any terrorist who use religion to defend his or her act is a coward. Whether it is Adolf Hitler, Osama bin Ladan, Timothy McVeigh, London Subway bombers or Irish IRA, they all use religion as their defence. However, people should understand that its not the religion but the individual who misrepresent a religion to further their heinous agenda. Islam just as Christianity is a religion of peace. It is easy to blindly follow any hatemonger’s speech and their dogmas then to sit down and reflect on the true message. It is imperitive that we all read the true message of Quran and make our own decision and not listen to the media. Islam by definition is “submission to the will of God (which is peace)”. (Thank you Stan LS for correcting me)
Posted by: Jason A | August 10, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Funny how someone mentioned had the NYT’s mentioned this story weeks ago, it would’ve been treason as it would’ve aided the terrorists.
Yet here we are, on the day the plot is revealed to be broken up, and news reports from CNN to FOX News are reporting that as many as 10 suspects are still out there, on the loose.
Do any of them have explosives? Do any of them have the potential to detonate a device in an alternate location now that the plot has been publicly disrupted?
Seems to me the right thing to do would’ve been to NOT go blabbing to the media:
“Hey Look at us! We disrupted the plot, but we haven’t gotten everyone involved. See…um…they’ve still out there and since the entire world knows the plot was disrupted, those remaining terrorists who were involved are going to get driven underground to either strike again at a later time, or worse, potentially just pick an alternate target like a bus, train, or mall to detonate the explosives.”
Yeah. And this time, it wasn’t the New York Times, but the British and US government spilling the beans.
Keeping us safer, one convenient sound bite and one Red Elmo threat level at a time.
Posted by: Phillybits | August 10, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Wooh. Pakistanis living in London. Sound’s like the ideal excuse for the warmonger preznit to invade Iran and create even more American-haters.
So much for the lame “fighting them there so we don’t have to fight them here” excuse for the Iraq invasion.
Posted by: Beebaduba | August 10, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
“I attacked the United States and I got was away with it.”
-Osama Bin Laden
Thanks, Mr Bush, for making the world less safe.
Posted by: Allison | August 10, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Incidents like this will continue to happen…as long as Bush is distracted by his oil grab in Iraq. The sooner we get rid of Bush and Blair, the better!
Posted by: d.w. | August 10, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Funny how this plot was foiled by intelligence, not a war, huh?
Posted by: caune | August 10, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Gee whiz, Bush sure has got a lot of you frightened. Great control technique, that. Of course the plot they foiled was not going to be carried out today (if ever) and they sat on the story until an opportune time…like a hawk democrat getting spanked over his allegiance to the Bush administration.
Stop the war in Iraq.
Bring our troops home.
Signed…60% (the majority) of Americans.
Posted by: GW Lost | August 10, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Thank God for the hard work of the British Government and thank God for George W. Bush!
Posted by: Joey Mushinski | August 10, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Shoes, scissors, and now shampoo. Welcome to air travel for the rest of your life, thanks to the looney leaders of the US and UK. You bomb them, they’re going to want to bomb you back. Pretty simple cause/effect, folks.
Posted by: Michael | August 10, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
“Can I take back my vote for Ned Lamont?” – Posted by: binky | Aug 10, 2006 2:44:12 PM
Only if a connection demonstrated between the Civil War in Iraq and this plot.
Posted by: Elphin | August 10, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Yeah! And how come the ABC article failed to mention that the terrorist suspects were all MEN?
Posted by: Ken | August 10, 2006, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
I wonder if they will ever tell us if the reservations that were made were for Aug 22nd? As I could see this being yet another lever being pulled by Iran.
Posted by: surplusmarine | August 10, 2006, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
“I don’t trust the voters not to vote an idiot into office. Sorry, if this offends anyone, but it’s just my opinion.”
Yeah, because three times in a row would be scary.
Posted by: Poor Richard | August 10, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Be afraid! Be very afraid! The baddies are going to get us!! Oh, BTW, vote Republican!
Posted by: Whatever | August 10, 2006, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
I’m sorry – can someone remind me how British and Pakistani competence proved that George Bush is competent? Can someone remind me how destroying civilization in Iraq and wasting military resources which could be protecting us helped whatsoever in this successful foiling of a plot?
How is it that spending a trillion dollars in Iraq will protect me at home again?
More power to the Brits and thank you. Nothing about this proves that Bush is competent. Nothing about this proves that taking absolute power and giving it to a semi-literate kingly half wit helped in this.
You are mixing apples and oranges. Protect us – apply the forces to homeland security not agressive BS. Impeach Bush.
Posted by: Mark | August 10, 2006, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Can I vote for Ned again? Let’s get our boys and girls back to us where they belong. Iraq didn’t attack us. Where’s Osama? Isn’t he the guy that led the dudes that attacked us?
Posted by: Ed | August 10, 2006, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Another election cycle…another terrorist threat, ho hum, is this the best that republicans and Karl Rove can do?
Posted by: Bill | August 10, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
What is amazing is how the Bush apologists keep talking about the “nail in the Democrats’ coffin.” Are you kidding me? The War on Terrorism has been a joke. The Bush Administration abandoned that A LONG time ago when it let up in Afghanistan and went into Iraq, which – as has been documented time and time (and time) again – had nothing to do with 9/11. The Bush administration has botched the WOT so terribly that this is the result: The increased spread of terrorism. If you haven’t noticed, the government’s own data show that terrorist attacks have INCREASED since King George took office.
I don’t know of an American who doesn’t take the threat of terrorism seriously. The difference is in how they believe we should RESPOND to it. To those who support the administration, that means invading a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, creating a civil war, and further destabilizing an already unstable region – not to mention costing the American taxpayer hundreds of billions of dollars, while absolutely failing to take many of the essential steps to protecting “the homeland” laid out by the 9/11 commission. It also means that they are willing to give up essential liberties because of the threat of terrorism, that they are willing to look the other way as tens of billions of taxpayer dollars disappear without a trace, with no accountability.
As Wesley Clark said the other day: “Invading Iraq and diverting our attention away from Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden is not being strong on national security. Blind allegiance to George W. Bush and his failed “stay the course” strategy is not being strong on national security.”
The rhetoric from the likes of many who have commented here is so typical. The policies of the leader you have blindly followed have failed miserably. And our country – and the rest of the world, for that matter – is paying the price for it. And now, as the case should be, you are feeling the pangs of guilt for having abetted this administration’s disastrous actions. So you attack attack attack those who actually want to protect this country, instead of doing what you should be doing: blaming yourself and this administration and having the courage to take the actions necessary to mitigate the damage that’s been done.
Posted by: Whigsboy | August 10, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
How the hell can anyone associate Bush’s fiasco in IRAQ and his disastrous policies with the excellent police and investigative work done here by the British?
You don’t win a “War on Terrorism”with tanks and planes as we can see every day in the IRAQ quagmire – you win it step by step with well executed intelligence and teamwork within the police and military groups.
Go it alone buffoonary won’t win the day – this type of good solid intelligence work may!
Posted by: Jack | August 10, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
To those of you who think this is just a big hoax, I sit here in amazement at your ignorance. I don’t know what else to say.
Posted by: Conway | August 10, 2006, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
how curious: the diligent work of law enforcement in the pursuit of terrorism–the plan kerry promoted in 2004–is working, while the military plan of grinding our army into dust against an enemy with nothing to do with terrorism–the plan bush continues to promote–continues to fail.
Posted by: angry young man | August 10, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
You can always tell when it’s election time. Remember all the red alerts in 2004? They’re back until mid November.
Posted by: Pat | August 10, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Well, thank God the British and Pakastanis haven’t taken their eyes off Al Qaeda like Bush has. Wake up, Bush supporters! The Bin Ladens are his personal friends! I pray that the Democrats take control and restore sanity and security to our nation.
Posted by: Ellen F. | August 10, 2006, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
War is no longer army v. army. It is now an individual in Times square with explosives round their waist, it is a vehicle with a rocket launcher on it that can move quickly to another site – it is not tanks, the latest most expensive warplane – it’s about hearts and minds of millions of people who have to be convinced when they are young.
The Brits have great “feet on the ground” intelligence while we in the US largely rely on electronics to do the work for us – our ‘feet on the ground’ intelligence, I suspect, is sadly lacking.
Posted by: Chris Zonneveld | August 10, 2006, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
No one is speaking about the big elephant in the room …. oil. Until the middle east became wealthy over the use of oil, the radical muslims had no way to finance their jihad. As long as we are willing to use middle eastern oil, we will continue to support terrorism.
Posted by: ken | August 10, 2006, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
“Pip-Pip” to the Brits for a job well done.
How in the world this somehow falls into Bush’s accomplishment column is beyond me, but “Jolly good!” to the Union Jack!
Let’s give credit where it’s deserved.
Posted by: zach | August 10, 2006, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
ONE WORD: PROPAGANDA!
Posted by: YOURTIMEISUP! | August 10, 2006, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
What did Bush have to do with this? Wasn’t he sleeping at the ranch when this happened? Pakistani terrorists no less, we’ll have to put them on the list after Iraq, Iran, Syria and North Korea if any of us are still alive.
Posted by: ckerst | August 10, 2006, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Here’s a couple of things for you slogan-shouting folks to remember…
1. Have any of you looked up the definition of fascism? These people are not fascists…they are religious extremists. Big difference. Oppressive? Yes. Cruel and barbaric? Yes. Does that equal fascism? No.
2. Did military action foil this plot? Nope. Did intellegence and police work foil it? Yep. So quit lumping the Iraq war into this. We need more investigation, less invasions.
3. If you’re going to post something, try originality. Repeating what you heard on Boortz or Hannity or Limbaugh this morning doesn’t count. Use your own mind. ( I know…it’s tough isn’t it?)
Posted by: Vernon | August 10, 2006, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Given that these terrorists were Pakistani, this plot has nothing to do with Israel, Lebanon or the middle-east. It is to do with the terrorism against India, a terrorism
that has killed more Indian civilians, women and children than all other terrorist incidents in the world combined. The al-queda affiliated Pakistan terrorist group
Lashkar-e-Toiba has repeatedly claimed through its journals and websites that its main aim is to destroy the Indian republic and annihilate Hinduism.
Posted by: foo | August 10, 2006, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
The only reason this plot was successfully foiled was that Bush was NOT involved…This only proves how unsafe we are 5 years after 9/11. Does anyone honestly think the crack Dept. of Homeland Security would have stopped this?
Posted by: Richard | August 10, 2006, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Why is it that Blair and Bush being in office is such a good thing only on the day a plot is foiled? It seems a few posters are happy today as some vindication of their beliefs of the Daddy Protector Figure in power.
What about all the other days with the death, destruction, lies, ineffective govt., scandals, etc.? Those things are all gone because of this!?
Hey I am very happy this is broken up, but you don’t have to be a Bush hater to see that
a) neither man nor their policies really didn’t have anything to do with it – it was the police work not the terror talk and plans here
b) Bush in particular has mostly been screwing up (Iraq, Leb-Israel, Economy, Katrina, Energy, etc.)
Posted by: Fred Jones | August 10, 2006, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
It would be wise not to jump to any conclusions about investigative techniques or US involvement in the incident until more information is released. It would also be premature to include Iran, Iraq, Israel, Palestine, Hamas, or Hezbollah as having anything to do with the alleged plot.
I’m personally curious about the bomb itself. It was labeled as a hydrogen peroxide bomb. Aren’t hydrogen peroxide bombs so-called pressure bombs? For example rapid creation of oxygen from a chemical reacion of hydrogen peroxide and sulfuric acid creates an intense pressure inside a closed vessel like a plastic bottle which eventually gives under the intense pressure and pops. Would this actually be enough to breach the interior of a commercial aircraft?
I am not really familiar with methods to create high explosives but a misspent youth in a rural area plus an interest in chemistry did give me some basic information on the other type.
Posted by: Commissarjs | August 10, 2006, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Why are terrorists being made in Pakistan? Isn’t Pakistan our ally, don’t its people all just LOVE George Bush?
Posted by: Sonsa LaMew | August 10, 2006, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Just reading these rightwing Republican comments sickens me. I have two young boys in Europe about to return through London to the US. All I can think of is Bin Laden dragging a his dialysis machine around Pakistan making more plans for destruction with a smile on his face!
This is the real issue, while we are sidetracked by Iraq, THE REAL TERRORISTS are still at large with plenty of time to plot and plan against us. You fanatical Bush lackeys can only talk about the Democrats lack of commitment to fighting terror, when the truth is Democrats had and STILL want to get Bin Laden and his gang, will you nutcases want to stay the course in Iraq were we have spent billions of tax dollars only to have control of the “Green Zone”…. Yipee! WAKE-UP America, we can do better than this.
Posted by: WHC | August 10, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Whoa whoa whoa.
Before we thank God for Bush and those red blooded republican heroes, please illuminate what part he played in foiling a UK plot against the US, solved extensively by English authorities? Im sure he was pleased to here as he cleared brush from his ranch on vacation. At least Tony Blair had the sense to cancel his vacation..hah.
Posted by: fd | August 10, 2006, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
GOOD GOING BRITIAN AND ALL THE INTELLIGENCE THAT MADE THIS HAPPEN TO THE GOOD…CATCHING THE SUSCEPTS WITHOUT ANNOUNCING THE PLANS LIKE THE UNITED STATES DOES, WHENEVER THERE IS SOMETHING IN THE AIR…JUST KEEP IT SECERT UNTIL IT ACTUALLY HAPPENS IS THE KEY…
Posted by: bob | August 10, 2006, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Maybe they haven’t used the words “Muslim” or “Islamist” because it hasn’t been verified yet. It’s still a new story.
Posted by: deniz | August 10, 2006, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
This was a victory for high tech intelligence and was not solved with tanks and soldiers in Iraq. The ridiculous money spent (daily)in Iraq would be far better used investing in the sci-fi technology and ultracovert action necessary to catch these fanatics. We cannot win an unconventional war through conventional means.
Posted by: lonewolf777 | August 10, 2006, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Good thing Bush was on vacation again or they might have pulled it off.
Posted by: burningbush | August 10, 2006, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
One Question: What’s the connection between the “Home Grown” in UK Terrorists and Iraq? There goes our idiot’s theory: Once Iraq becomes Democratic, there will be no more terrorism! All these Muslims were born and brought up in UK, a model, economically developed Democracy ..
Posted by: Sanjay Keole | August 10, 2006, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Just more evidence that the “war” on terrorism (and on muslims) is fostering and inspiring more terrorists.
Posted by: Lynn | August 10, 2006, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
I find it curious that the current administration is taking credit for this when the reports are very clear that “British, Pakistani authorities team up to block plot to bomb U.S.-bound jets.” So the jets were aimed for us and we still had nothing to do with stopping the attacks. Interesting…
Posted by: jacque | August 10, 2006, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Funny how the right always invoke the words “God” and “Terrorism” when they want to invoke fear and bloodshed.
Posted by: Kayo | August 10, 2006, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
2 points:
1. This act of prevention was done by the British, not Bush and his team. I do not know why many on this list is touting Bush and his WOT.
2. This was a police, not a military, action against homegrown threats. No other country to bomb or invade. British security services did their police work and arrested, not detained in an off-shore location, the suspects. This shows that the current administration continues to fail in protecting the American homeland while spending resources overseas that could be used here to make us safer.
Posted by: Steve | August 10, 2006, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Why is no one reporting the arrest of 2 men in Columbus Ohio and speculating on the link to the London arrests? Only the Druge Report has posted info.
Posted by: Mary | August 10, 2006, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
“September 11, Israel’s war with Hezbollah, Iran’s and Syria’s insurgents in Iraq, Madrid bombings, London subway bombings”
ALL of those happened during Bush’s watch. Notice that this foiled plot did not involve ANY help from the US.
The US isn’t doing anything to protect its citizens. Borders are still insecure, the Taliban is making a comeback, we still have not caught Bin Laden, and our troops are trapped in the middle of a civil war.
Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, and North Korea have only become more powerful and more emboldened during the Bush years.
I am supposed to feel safe knowing that my Government had NOTHING to do with the thwarting of this attack? Where was the US in all of this? Why didn’t we stop it?
The same can be said for the recent plot based in Toronto.
Maybe I should start paying my taxes to the UK and Canada since it seems like they are the only ones protecting us these days.
Posted by: Nylund | August 10, 2006, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
SailorSam said:
“The timing of the arrests seems a little convenient, vis-a-vis the election cycle. Scotland Yard couldn’t have busted these guys a week ago?
There are no coincidences.”
You’re joking, right? Many people would be saying the exact same thing if this plot was uncovered even one month ago. There are coincidences, but what is the coincidence between actual people that want to blow up airplanes and primary elections?
Posted by: Matt | August 10, 2006, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
It looks like the Liberman loss put the repubs into a media tizzy again. There is no less than the control of the United States at stake here. It is just another attempt to change the attitude of hope to one of fear. They will have to get more realistic as time gets closer to make it more effective.
Posted by: sahein | August 10, 2006, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
This is the most idiotic terrorist story ever. Why the hell did they have me take off my shoes the last time I went through a check but I had 4 bottles of water in my hand carry on and no one cared? Are they not confessing to monumental incompetence once again if this possibility of people assembling a “bomb” inflight was never, ever thought of.
Posted by: Kathy | August 10, 2006, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I find the timing of this somewhat suspicious based on it being 12 days until Iran’s response to the UN’s best attempt of an ultimatum being given to Iran. September 11 was on a Tuesday as August 22, 2006 is. Thank God for George Bush and Tony Blair and this bust is a great accomplishment for all officials involved.
Posted by: Brad S | August 10, 2006, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
IF YOU PICK A FIGHT AND DUCK A PUNCH…
are you a good guy for ducking a punch?
or a bad guy for picking a fight?
dont forget “you” is much bigger
(sorry for the reductionism, but attention span is in short supply)
MORE:
on the subject of their muslimness.
to label them as “muslim” would be good but slight the greater muslim community they are “muslim fascists” at the least. Just as saying Jim Jones and his people were simply “christian” and not part of a christian CULT would slight the christian community. people dont commit suicide or murder-suicide without a good deal of breanwashing or coercion.
Posted by: Joshua M | August 10, 2006, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
And the world is a safer place now than it was before 2001. NOT! Here’s to the November vote putting the right wing wackos out of power, and injecting sense and sensibility back into the world politic.
Posted by: Eric | August 10, 2006, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Good thing they read the memo “Terrorists Determind to Strike Against UK”…
Posted by: smoke and mirrors | August 10, 2006, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
These kind of alledged terrorist plots are the direct result of the illegal foreign military actions and illegal domestic anti-freedom tactics of the America Bush administration and Britians Blair. The legacy of these two men will be more of the same for years to come. Thanks to them for making America and Britian less secure and free.
Posted by: Terrible | August 10, 2006, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Kyle, how is your life and safety dependent on making a ethnic slur?
The posts here crediting George Bush are like thanking the snowstorm for the roof over your heads… Armies don’t stop terror attacks. Police do.
Posted by: Gads Whatslop | August 10, 2006, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
This comment area is proof that the US is in serious trouble. Most of these meandering idiots actually believe in the “jihad” humdrum that has been developed to twist us all into a knot.
Example:
Rep. John Conyers, Jr. just laid out a 354 page report that lists every crime the Bush admin has committed against the constitution.
Within 48 hours a “terrorist” plot is foiled.
The “Loyalists” will use this “plot foiling” as proof that we must fear the possibilities, and give Bush everything he needs, including our liberty.
The “Patriots” will do some simple math…2+2=BS!!!
Better choose sides!
Notice that it is much easier to do simple math than it is to believe something without seeing anything? It is also much easier to believe simple math than it is to trust the government.
Sadly, the only reason these people are clinging onto GWB’s coat tail is because of their ridiculous pride. They voted for him, and argued for him, and “by golly, they aren’t backing down. Even at the cost of their country, liberty, and their reputation.
Once again, the US is in bad shape.
God bless America, we need it now more than ever.
Posted by: Chip | August 10, 2006, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
It pleases me to see that the subjects of the government I assisted in founding are so eager today for what I tried so desperately to see implemented, namely, an extremely centralized and powerful federal government.
Beyond that it amuses me greatly to see many of you are craving authoritarianism. We didn’t bust our asses forming this great nation for false patriots to come along and urinate on the foundation we provided in the hopes that a new government will take shape reflecting forms intended solely to reassure the most fragile of egos and pathetic, human banality.
Beat it, ‘fraidy cats. Silly, pathetic wimps, your willingness to grant power to those you grovel before is unbecoming, and an affront to the flag you pretend to love.
Posted by: Alexander Hamilton | August 10, 2006, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Why is it that so many of the (presumably) right-wing bloggers are so angry with left-wingers all the time? Seems to me like you should all be in a good mood. Your boys have ruled our government for the past 5+ years. 9/11, anthrax at the post office, the reemergence of the Taliban and the heroin trade, nearly as many dead Americans in Iraq as on 9/11, our phones tapped, UN ambassadors’ phones tapped, secret torture prisons, CIA agents tracking WMD in Iran outed in the press, lip service but no action on illegal immigration, the biggest national debt in world history, election fraud, a congress cowering from their oversight responsibilities, 200 million dollar bridges, the stink still rising from the lower 9th ward… this is the Republican Dream. This is what you folks voted for. So why aren’t you all smiles and back-slaps? I don’t get it.
So are you gonna tell me that I have a pre-9/11 mindset? Well, if that means using diplomacy to avert war, a balanced national budget, clean air and water, reduced domestic crime, a better educated citizenry, respect for our Constitution and a president who can speak better than a 2nd grader and who isn’t gone fishin’ when our nation is under attack, okay… sure… maybe I do.
Oh… one last question: Why do right-wingers hate America so much? You ought to just move to North Korea… I hear it’s everything you guys dream about.
Posted by: Satiric Phenomenologist | August 10, 2006, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
You people that fear the day Bush and Blair are out of office are the most ill-advised and narrow minded people I’ve ever come across. To fear a pre 9/11 mentality?! I’d hate to not see our administration constantly spin every little article of news onto Fox so that you people can enjoy being scared. Unbelievable. You all have battered wife syndrome.
Posted by: Steven | August 10, 2006, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Kirk Anderson
If they were Irish terrorists, they would be funded from the US. So that would be OK???
Posted by: peter | August 10, 2006, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
So for all the posters here who are so sure this vindicates the Presidents policies I have one question: When are you aigning up for the Army? Our forces are stretched thin and need you. If the terrorist threat is so great I don’t understand why you won’t join the Army and fight it. It’s easy to bash liberals, but it takes real guts and patriotism to actually go and fight in uniform. Get off your butts and enlist NOW!
Posted by: Mike in SLO | August 10, 2006, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
So obviously since 9/11 we have done nothing to stop these kinds of attacks. The more we are over there playing ‘Wild West’ the more they will want to harm us.
So basically the administration is kicking the can down the road and starting more wars for the next President and further generations to fix.
Smart, real smart.
But that’s ok, Jesus gonna come soon and save us all! right??
Posted by: tommy | August 10, 2006, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
To all of you folks saying that George Bush is some kind of savior, I have to wonder if you can truly believe that a Democratic President would somehow not be interested in fighting such attacks. You’d have everyone think that Democrats hate America or something. Shocking how quickly you folks march in the straight path that your party leaders have shown you without questioning *anything*.
Posted by: Peter Jetter | August 10, 2006, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Dictionary definition: “Fascism is a radical totalitarian political philosophy that combines elements of corporatism, authoritarianism, extreme nationalism, militarism, anti-anarchism, anti-communism and anti-liberalism.
Hmmmm. The truth never was an obstacle to the 29% Club, the frightened blind followers of powerful, militaristic fear-mongers. And the corporate element in the so-called Islamo-Fascism? Nada. Zip. Zero. Tabla rasa. BUT… they all fit the authoritarian Republican corporatist White House and Congress to a T, don’t they?
So when will the MSM call their President a dictionary-less, disengaged, know nothing non-reader?
I’m laughing my tuchas off.
Posted by: David Sternfeld | August 10, 2006, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
So, how come we’ve been taking wine & hard liquor by the boatloads on commercial jets (my own pet peeve) for the last 5 years? A silly concern, but aren’t they a bit. . .flammable? And, wouldn’t the broken glass of a wine bottle be just as, if not more, deadly than a boxcutter?
So, today, 5 years after 9/11, Tony & George get together and, with another terror plot about to be hatched, do something about it. Finally. The heroes.
I’m supposed to think wonderful things of them? Cheer their intelligence? C’mon, folks! A two year old could have looked around a commercial jet and picked out some of this stuff. Flammable liquids are alot scarier than tweezers.
George W. Bush is doing NOTHING to make you safe. You are in your own personal New Orleans up there, flying in your jets in the friendly skies, and the only time he concerns himself is when he thinks it can reflect kindly on his, or Tony’s, poll positions. And god help you all, you eat it up, blaming Islam as a whole, Iraq instead of Al Queda, the poor guy down the street working at the gas station.
I wish there was someone with a half a brain in the white house that could deal with recognizable threats like FLAMMABLE or HAZARDOUS liquids on planes without hundreds of thousands of people being put at risk or greatly, greatly inconvienced- like they were this week. Someone that could deal with such an obvious threat BEFORE the fact.
Truly, half a brain in the white house would be better than what we’ve got.
Posted by: Sheila | August 10, 2006, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Be very afraid terrorists will be everywhere until the november elections are over.
Posted by: Bill King | August 10, 2006, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
I am a liberal. I reject terrorists, terrorism, fundamentalism, war profiteering, and authoritarianism of all stripes. I am quite willing to support all attempts to secure our fundamental rights (not provided by the state, but defended by a state that is the product the community coming together consensualy), including supporting institutions whish defend our society against those who kill civilians in the name of religion..
As a liberal (as in supporting liberty), I believe that all attempts to decree that the state stop securing fundamental rights must be necessarilly and specifically limited in time and scope.
It is our responsibility to help reproduce the liberty we enjoyed not elsewhere, but here at home, both by fighting against murderers and those who would exploit there presence to create a society that comes to see unailienable rights as mere gifts occasionally provided by whoever the authorities happen to be.
Liberals believe in Constitutionalism! Conservatives appear to believe in executive power.
Posted by: El | August 10, 2006, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Another good sign the “war on terror” is going just swimmingly. We’re fighting them in Iraq so they won’t threaten us here unless we go to Britain, or Israel, in which case we might be fair game, but heck oil’s at 77 bucks a barrel and Bush and Cheney are cashing in so just as long as Americans keep sleeping the right wing government will be safe at the polls this November…
Posted by: Ned McGuire | August 10, 2006, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
The terrositism and the anti-terrorism will continue until the world is ready to accept the Pope’s new world order.
Posted by: Roger | August 10, 2006, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
what is happening in pakistan? why do all these people travel to pakistan before doing anything like these? who is funding these operations?
Posted by: kumar | August 10, 2006, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Murder is murder, whether it is by ordinary men or men in uniform. Stealing is stealing, whether by petty criminals or by a country stealing land from another country.
Posted by: Chui | August 10, 2006, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
What’s hilarious about all these right-wing-wackos is the fact that they don’t realize that any punk with a bomb (made of anything) wrapped around their body is a terrorist (eg Oklahoma City Bombing). Therefore, the only way to get rid of terrorism is to make sure that people like us. What the Bush administration has accomplished is the 1984 scenario, an endless war against a faceless enemy where they can erode our civil liberties, take monetary advantage of the chaos, and play games with our fears.
Posted by: NS | August 10, 2006, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Come on people…isn’t it just a little suspicious that this is happening now? Just like before the 2004 election…Bin Laden re-appeared. Oh yeah, where is Bin Laden anyway? Oh, yeah, BUSH & Co. let him get away.
Posted by: Claire | August 10, 2006, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
When you have a disproportionally large immigrant population, you will have assimilation difficulties. For generations, whether Irish, Italian or Chinese immigrants, disaffected youths led to higher crimes, a la gangs, mafia & tongs.
But there is a big difference between crime and terrorism which in these cases are based religiously and idealogically and on a clash course with Western civilization.
Economical opportunities and class segregation worsen the matter for Western Europe. I am an immigrant and I feel grateful to this country for its open-ness and opportunities for those who work hard.
Posted by: Woo | August 10, 2006, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
I’ll admit it. I’m dumb. What, exactly, do people mean by “islamic fascists”? No fair looking it up. If you are going to bandy it about, it should be at the tips of your fingers.
And what, exactly, is cowardly about blowing up an airplane in which you are travelling? Evil, despicable, heinous, frightening, and all sorts of other things, yes. Cowardly? Not really.
Posted by: GMB | August 10, 2006, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Tell me again, where is Bin-Laden? Isn’t that the original culprit, Mr. Bush?
Posted by: Smyth-Hichens | August 10, 2006, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
If liberals only had a brain…
They would be dangerous as the terrorists… unfortunately, they are allowed to vote…OUCH!
Posted by: Truth | August 10, 2006, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Hoo boy everything seems to be devolving into crazy “right wing conspiracy theories” and “leftist nutjob” accusation games. You want the truth of it all? The US is engaged in a war it cannot win without killing many civilians, something we are not willing to do. these ‘jihadists’ (a disgrace to their religion, by-the-by) are engaged in a war that they cannot hope to ever win. Tackling America? Yeah right. That’s like getting involved in a land war in Russia. Not going to end well.
It’s a pity everyone is so short sighted as to fear only government election conspiracies and the ‘ignorance’ of the left.
Frankly, I think you’re all idiots.
Posted by: Ryan | August 10, 2006, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Bush: “It is a mistake to believe there is no threat to the Unites States of America” Amen
Posted by: Andy | Aug 10, 2006 12:19:11 PM
Yes, Amen oh Holy Bush. He is the largest threat to the United States!
Posted by: Moonsha | August 10, 2006, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
The U.S. has the finest intelligence resources in the world. Why didn’t they use them following the August 8 PDB, “Bin Laden determined to strike in U.S.”? Can you imagine Tony Blair cutting brush for photo ops after reading that kind of briefing? But, no, the bush administration blew it off and we had 9/11. If this were 2001, and the “foiled plot” were in America, the terrorists would have implemented their plan, because bush would have been asleep at the wheel. There was no excuse for the criminal negligence of the bush administration in 2001. Anybody remember that famous scene where he told the CIA agent who came to warn him, “Okay, you’ve covered yourself”?
Try to use some critical thinking, right-wingers. Try to imagine what Blair would have done if he had been handed a memo that warned that bin Laden was determined to strike in Great Britain. Whatever he would have done, bush did not do, and that has made all the difference in the world.
Nice timing on revealing the “foiled plot,” too. Just like clockwork.
Posted by: Straight Shooter | August 10, 2006, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Wow, reading through these posts it’s very disconcerting that so many people still think ol’ Propagandist George is actually doing anything to keep this country (and the rest of the world) safe.
What will it take to wake up the brain-dead sheep of this nation?
STOP WATCHING FOX AND LISTENING TO RUSH!
It’s turned your brains into mush.
5 years and $400 billion and where are we? WORSE OFF than before 9/11.
WHEEEEEE!!!!
Posted by: Jerry T. | August 10, 2006, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Oh yeah.
One more thing:
WHERE’S BIN LADEN??
Posted by: Jerry T. | August 10, 2006, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Operation Yellow Pants is in full swing. Don’t question anything, look at the pretty changing colors and Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.
And of course the hardy gumshoes and detectives will not get the credit, for they are not political appointees nor even folks who may be wearing our flag on their uniforms. No, the credit is given to some guy and his chuckleheads who could not even protect the citizens of a major US city from a lumbering calamity that could be seen from space.
Posted by: rpppolyp | August 10, 2006, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
The “antiwar far left Democrat” is a bugaboo that’s been constructed so that simple Republicans can neatly categorize everyone into a binary absolute ledger.
Republicans just can’t get their comic book minds around the concept that the war in Iraq has not been demonstrated to be the equivalent of war on terrorism.
This inability to distinguish even the obvious nuances is clear proof of incompetence. And is best evidenced by Iran’s current practice of leading them around by the nose. Chalabi’s INC disinformation, their establishment of ties to Iraqi Shia parlimentarians and associated militias, Hezbollah — Iran acts, and Republicans react.
The Republicans, who are capable of belief only when it suits their emotional biases, are busy gifting Iran the entire Shia world, and can’t see it.
That is what Lamont and now 60% of Americans oppose. Of course you can’t grasp that, but hell I had a few spare minutes to type anyway.
Posted by: rat-terrier | August 10, 2006, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Some of these “neener neener” and “hey liberals” posts just really shine in their lack of thought. I can all but guarantee you that the Brits:
1) used law enforcement techniques (no soldiers, Strykers, or clusterbombs), and
2) took the time to obtain proper subpoenas and authorized wiretaps
to take out these very real terrorists. They did not invade a sovereign nation. There is no war on terror.
Posted by: rickygee | August 10, 2006, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Boo! Why are you conservatives so afraid? Your fear is what fuels terroism. Stand up! Be brave! Shake it off! Your a bunch of chicken littles screaming the boogie man is coming! Boo!
Posted by: real | August 10, 2006, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
I thought we were fighting them (the terrorists) “over there,” in Iraq, so we didn’t have to fight them here (or in Britain)?
Posted by: General Jack D. Ripper | August 10, 2006, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
I forgot to add…Bush and his supporters seem to be taking a lot of credit for this bust, and Fox News seems to be supporting this. O’Reilly tonight thanked the NSA for helping to capture these thugs. Seems to me that Pakistan and Britain were the ones who did the work, not Bush and his team.
Posted by: General Jack D. Ripper | August 10, 2006, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Hats off to the Pakistani govmnt and British law enforcement. Great job. Let’s work on our relationship with the good people of Pakistan.
Posted by: caleb | August 10, 2006, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Thank goodness and God that the powers at be were using all the at their disposal to stop this attack. My family was flying this week and intend to in two weeks… the American people need to come to grips with the fact we are at War and President Bush is the Commander in Chief. Those with their “hair on fire, hate Bush” need to deal with the realities of our world. Proud father of one in service, soon to be two.
God Blees our Troops, Country and President.
Tony
Posted by: Tony | August 10, 2006, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Another reason to throw Bush out for wasting our troops and resources on his pack-of lies war in Iraq.
Posted by: Robert Bauer | August 11, 2006, 1:06 am 1:06 am
lets see a show of hands, who wishes Al Gore were president?
I know I do
Posted by: Sean F Lally | August 11, 2006, 3:04 am 3:04 am
It’s just funny how quickly the liberals forget that Clinton had eight years to find and catch Bin Laden too but he was a little to busy with the interns to do that. The largest recruiting period for Al-Quaida was in the 90′s I don’t think Bush was President then.
Posted by: Andy | August 11, 2006, 8:39 am 8:39 am
I missed my civics lesson. When did Pakistani’s become “Arab Muslims” as noted by “Roland” above ?
Posted by: Lax | August 11, 2006, 8:51 am 8:51 am
This is the first time I’ve followed comments on line from a news story.
It seemed to start off with generally
intelligent remarks but now has sunken to some idiotic blather about
hate for the government.
Do you people do this all day? Are you really all that consumed with hate for the Bush’s and Blair’s of the world?
I’m not sure which is worse, a terrorist with a bomb or you with a vote.
Posted by: Ray | August 11, 2006, 8:55 am 8:55 am
since a number of people here essentially encourage violence and illegal activities, lets just push the little red button and start from scratch, provided the whole planet doesn’t disintegrate
Posted by: chasmodee | August 11, 2006, 9:13 am 9:13 am
My, my, don’t we all have a lot to say. By reading all these posts, it would appear that I wouldn’t want to be Democratic or Republican. And the Mr. Bush is the only president to miss his chance with bin Laden (seems Clinton had his chances). Give credit to the Brits and the Pakistanis for this stop, but please keep it all in perspective. The war on terror will need the help of many countries and agencies. The US alone cannot patrol the entire world from these cowards.
Someone mentioned earlier that blowing up a plane isn’t a cowardly act. And you’re probable right except for the fact that if you are trying to eliminate an opponent, do it on a military level, not a mothers-and-babies level. These people are attacking innocent and un-armed civilians for their cause, and they die without saying anything. And please, please don’t confuse them as mondern day Kamakazies. Those guys had guts.
Posted by: SK | August 11, 2006, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Thankfully, it was British Intelligence that handled and diverted this tragedy. If it was in the hands of Bush and the Republicans, not only would there be 3 thousand more dead on their watch, but the victims would be used as a marketing tool for the midterm elections! Thank you England! You proved that terrorism can be dealt with! Are you listening Republicans??!!!
Posted by: Republicans Killing America | August 11, 2006, 9:43 am 9:43 am
I thought we were fighting the Islamists “over there” so we wouldn’t have to fight them “here”. The fact that that strategy doesn’t seem to be working bothers me a great deal. As a Republican, I can’t believe I’m saying this, but why did we divert resources in Iraq (which I now believe wasn’t connected to 9?11) instead of using them to fight real terroism?
Posted by: Anne | August 11, 2006, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Do they really expect us to believe this BULL, more fear politics from this idiot in the White House.
Posted by: Christopher Callihan | August 11, 2006, 10:14 am 10:14 am
All you GW fans, why not ask this question: If this was an al-Queda plot, then why did the US goverment disban the Osama bin Laden task force? He is the leader of al-queda and I am sure he ordered this plot?
As always, GW goes after the incidents and not the source.
Posted by: Bryan | August 11, 2006, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Exactly did Bush have anything to do with stopping this? What about lets keep the war in Iraq so its not here? By the way, the wiretaps they had on these guys, they recieved a warrent for.
Posted by: Ben | August 11, 2006, 10:48 am 10:48 am
The fear, terrorists, war mongers, threats, political beliefs and ALL beliefs are the cause of this insanity. All of it is insanity. All please wake!
Posted by: Doug | August 11, 2006, 11:13 am 11:13 am
It’s amazing–and frightening–to realize that in all the news about this terrorist plot, which was DAYS from happening, there is nothing saying that the U.S. “homeland security” forces had anything to do with stopping it.
Bush, his war, and his wasteful anti-American “homeland security” operatives did NOT stop this threat. British and even PAKISTANI forces stopped this threat.
Apparently Tony Blair is better at defending America than Bush is. It’s time to dismantle “Homeland Security” and imprison Bush and his cronies for high treason. They aren’t protecting us; they’re causing more terrorist threats that the British and Pakistanis have to stop in order to protect us.
Posted by: Paul M Bennett | August 11, 2006, 11:25 am 11:25 am
I am thankful for all the attempted measures the TSA is putting into place. There is one thing bothering me….what about body cavity searches or people swallowing things, like drug running “mules”.
Posted by: Cynthia Croft | August 11, 2006, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Thank god Bush invaded Iraq! How could we ever fight terrorists if no Moslem hated us enough to become a terrorist!
Posted by: misterbone | August 11, 2006, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Why have so many writers connected the alleged terrorists with their fellow Democratic citizens? I don’t remember any Democrat in or out of office running on a platform of “Death to Americans.”
Why do you display such vicious hatred towards your own countrymen and women: “Why don’t you “progressives” do the world a favor and go ahead and drink the rest of the kool-aid?”
Why do you so strongly advocate against the principles in our Constitution? Instead of trials to prove guilt or innocence, you call for “PUBLIC summary executions,” “execute those terrorists,” “Summary execution for any and all, including any who had even one finger in the plot! Jail risks release to try again another day.”
“Does anyone still think Gitmo should be closed? I THINK NOT!”
Instead of engaging in a discussion with people who disagree with you, you resort to taunts and name-calling: “Anyone who doesn’t understand that should go play and let the grown-ups handle this.”
Translate them into Arabic, and these seem more like the words of terrorists than citizens of a great free nation.
America is not just a bunch of people who happen to inhabit the same continent. America is an idea – freedom, equality and justice. That is what is embodied in our Constitution, our system of law, our relationships with other countries, and our national pride.
We are not winning the war on terror. We are losing. We are losing because the murderers who bombed us on 9/11 have been used by our government for political gain and power. Instead of actually catching OBL, he’s become a boogeyman used by the GOP to scare the huddled masses. And the result is the death of that idea of freedom.
You are not safer. And giving up your liberties – and mine – is not going to make you so. We will win the war on terror not by being afraid, but by being fearless.
What happened to “Give me liberty or give me death?”
What happened to “We have nothing to fear but fear itself?”
What happened to the bravery that made this country great?
You are all far more likely to be killed in a car crash than by a terrorist. America and the world can deal with the threats that these people present without sacrificing the principles that make us different from them. In the end, that is really what terrorists want to destroy.
Posted by: Chris | August 11, 2006, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
How does anyone know if any of this is real?
Posted by: Joe | August 11, 2006, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Great job for the British Intel and the pakistanis, but what about bush? He got Ssaddam Hussein and his sons, but what really counts is Bin Laden is still free as a J-bird.
Why not first place 140,000 troops at the Pakistan, Afganistan border before grabbing for the Iraqi oil, or revenge for GWB’s father? Oh yeah, i’m too stupid ’cause if you caught bin laden and Alqueada who did 9/11, the american fear will ease, and there is no excuse to grab for oil in Iraq. dummy me, sorry.
Posted by: Jsy | August 11, 2006, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
So I’m kinda dumb?, but I still believe killing hundreds of innocent civilians in IRAQ is the MOST effective way to stop 22 terrorist plotters in GREAT BRITIAN, just makes sense.
There’s a terrorist pipeline and you have to get to the beginning of it to stop the flow! Now we have to get to the beginning of Pakistan’s pipeline and IRAN’S.
Just makes sense.
Posted by: BUSH-LOVE THE MAN!!! | August 11, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
“Why do you think that America has had no big terrorist incident since 9/11?”
Because Bush/Cheney hasn’t ordered one. Duh!
Posted by: truebluetexan | August 11, 2006, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Your article titled: ‘The Anatomy of the Foiled Plot in London’ has a number of inaccuracies:
1. “plotters apparently intended… to take down flights from England to the United States”. The plot was infact allegidly one to ‘take down flights’ to the US from any United Kingdom airport, which as well as England includes airports in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland(not just England).
2. “a “critical” state was issued in England”. A ‘critical security threat was in fact issued to the whole of the United Kingdom – comprising of the constituent nations of England, Scotland, Wales & Northern Ireland.
Does ABC News and its agents not have standards with regards to accurate and factual news reporting?
Posted by: Bill | August 12, 2006, 3:42 am 3:42 am
Bush: “It is a mistake to believe there is no threat to the Unites States of America.”
The implication, of course, is that somebody believes that there is not threat to the U.S. Who? Nobody. By implying that some people (Democrats) believe there is no threat, he is misleading Americans, using terrorism as a political tool.
Everytime you hear Bush say “Some say that…” or “Some believe that…,” be sure to think twice about whether anyone actually says or believes what Bush claims. You can be pretty certain that he is trying to misrepresent what his oppostion believes.
Posted by: Dean Booth | August 12, 2006, 10:16 am 10:16 am
For all of you lovely posters who provide us with callow remarks and your infinite wisdom:
A) The nerve of not including the term “Muslim” or “Islam” in this article! Honestly, is it necessary? Must we know the religion of every person that commits a crime? “And today, John D. Smith was arrested for aggravated assault and attempting to rob a bank. He is a devout Catholic who attends blah blah blah church and enjoys long walks on the beach.” Who cares? He robbed a bank-end of discussion.
B) I absolutely love the continued and degrading use of the term “progressive” which, so that we all remain on the same page, means advancing and moving towards better conditions. So, if Democrats are considered to be “progressive” it is a safe assumption to describe Republicans as the antithesis of progressive, which is, ironically by definition, unimaginative and unchanging.
C) Yes, we must fear the day that Mr. Bush removes his personal belongings and ridiculous ideologies from the White House, as we will all be infinitely doomed thereafter. Frankly, I am not sure how the country will survive with out his brilliant “strategery”, his defense against “nuculear” warfare, and, oh yes, his stance on national sovereignty.
Posted by: Julie | August 15, 2006, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Are you all out of your minds. You think Bush is this savior that is keeping us on track and protecting us from everything. Maybe you should read up on your history. What is happening in our country right now is exactly what the founding fathers who were infinitely smarter than Bush said would happen before we returned to a sort of dictatorship monarchy. So we have the choice to Live in Fear of some people that I have never met because they are on the verge of killing us at every moment of every day or Die because we aren’t protected. I would rather die than live in fear every day of my life. We might just as easily die when we walk out into the street as we will from a terrorist attack. In Fact a Terrorist attack is much less likely to happen. Don’t just lap up whatever Fox news and the president say. They have their own agenda just like everyone else.
Posted by: DK | August 18, 2006, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Yeah right.
Waterbottles go boem…..
I drunk the water and i did not die.
Posted by: Jan.S | August 30, 2006, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Don’t be fooled. Think for yourself. I hope it’s not too late when the masses realise that the terrorists operate from within.
Posted by: Stekel | November 16, 2006, 3:56 am 3:56 am