By Avni Patel

Aug 18, 2006 12:38pm

Where Were the Air Marshals? None on Disrupted London Flight

No on-duty federal air marshals were on board the transatlantic flight that triggered a security scare on Wednesday, according to an FBI affidavit filed in the case against the United passenger whose erratic behavior forced the captain to divert the flight to Boston. Air marshals are required to file an affidavit when incidents involving criminal charges occur on flights they cover, according to current and former air marshals.  In cases where there are no air marshals on board, the FBI files the affidavit. "This begs the question: Why were there no air marshals on board a flight from the U.K. to the U.S. while we’re under orange alert?"  said a former air marshal who asked to remain anonymous. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff announced last week that it would deploy additional air marshals to cover flights between the U.K. and the U.S. after British authorities made dozens of arrests in an alleged plot to bomb planes over the Atlantic. Shortly after the announcement, an ABC News producer was able to spot at least seven air marshals on-board a flight from New York to London. During Wednesday’s disturbance, flight attendants had to ask other passengers to help restrain the woman using airline-issued handcuffs after she urinated on the floor of the cabin.  The affidavit makes no mention of air marshals being involved in the incident or the arrest of the passenger. A spokesman for the Federal Air Marshals Service said that he would not comment on whether federal air marshals were on-board Wednesday’s flight, stating it was agency policy not to reveal such information.  He did say that air marshals do not necessarily always write incident reports.

User Comments

“It is customary not to comment” blah, blah, blah. The usual copout as to why they cannot say they blew it again. 8 air marshalls on one flight. None on another……Give me a break. It is still a club and they all were taking a ride together not even thinking about their overall responsibilities to the public and why they are there. I GIVE UP. Some of those 8 ought to be given their walking papers or the guy who assigned them all to fly together. I’m sure they had a wonderful card game.

Posted by: Barney-TUCSON | August 18, 2006, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

I’ll bet they show up on payday.

Posted by: KeyKots | August 18, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

My husband said none of the FAMs from his office were even sent because his big boss failed to answer the call in time to deploy the guys. They had a transport ready at a nearby Air Force base and the calls did not get answered in time.
Even in the times of increased alerts, the ones getting the call to go overseas are invariably the ones kissing up to management. There is even mismanagement and favoritism in times of Orange and Red alerts. I keep telling my husband to quit and walk away, but he remains committed to the job.

Posted by: Soon to be Ex-wife of a FAM | August 18, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Tell your husband to quit whining. If he was a real man he would have joined the USSS years ago and now he could be a supervisor working a four hour workday in the FAMS. Sounds like he is an amateur.
He needs to shut up and have a better attitude about our little country club.

Posted by: Dallas Man | August 19, 2006, 11:16 am 11:16 am

u know…i’ve been reading this blogg for a little while and the comments r just to good to be TRUE…
if anyone remembers the ‘journalists’ were doing a reports on what could or could not be brought on board on plane… one said ‘masscara’ no…less than ’7 inch screwdriver’ yes… i knew right then some dumb treasonist traitor was going to pull something…
one of the charges should be trying to reveal classified info if not treason for trying to reveal if or not feds were on the plane…
this woman had no disorder…she is trying to take our freedoms away and shouldn’t be allowed to fly again…but i don’t believe taking her right to travel away forever would lead to soviet era travel restrictions…so, she gets searched throughly and the rest of the passengers can be told it was her fault the flight took longer to take off…
glad to know ABC gets the tip a bin Laden tape was going to be released…the ‘experts’ said it was false…and well, u connect the dots…i’m not ur mother!!!
glad to know the only transcript ABC exculsively obtained was back in Sept 5, 2005 of Aiman Al Zawahiri…and well, u connect the dots…i’m not ur mother!!!
u all have a good day now…wouldn’t want to spoil the gossip…;))

Posted by: ravin black | August 20, 2006, 11:07 am 11:07 am

As soon as the FAM service management found out that overtime was authorized, most London missions were cancelled.
Many FAMS were begging to cover those London flights but instead were left covering the usual 10 hour day flights that an outdated computer program selected at random.
This is all done to ensure that management can display that “they” fly more minutes than any other office.
Of course “they” are not the ones who are actually flying.
Even on Red alert, the FAM management is more concerned about their next Power-Point presentation containing meaningless statistical data that makes the public no safer. all this, in order to justify their “merit” pay and bonuses.
Why was the flight not covered? Because there was already a checkmark next to that part of next years appraisal.
. Deployed enhanced personnel resources to London for red alert in August.
Managements’ quest for bonuses has lead to bad policy, unsustainable schedules, and massive recruitment and retention issues.
Is it acceptable to the public that seasoned highly qualified Federal Air Marshals who leave in disgust are being “replaced” with baggage screeners AKA (Transportation Security Officers)?
Are the F-16′s going to give these newly hired baggage screeners a chance to retake the plane from the hijackers? Can they take that chance?
Certainly something to think about, especially if you are on that plane!!!!
Message to Director Dana Brown. Retention should be your number one priority. The only way to do this is to bring back a reasonable work schedule similar to the one that attracted all of the highly trained seasoned operatives that were hired after 9/11.
Failure to retain competant operatives will inevidably lead to lack of confidence in FAM service ability to retake the plane. Federal Air Marshal should be considered the last line of defense, not the F-16s.
Your (Director Brown)lack of action in implementing retention policies could lead to the order that nobody wants to give and no pilot wants to hear.
“Shoot it down”

Posted by: anonnymous | August 20, 2006, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

It is hard to retain good people if the answer to criticism is “Go find another job if you don’t like it!”
Dana Brown needs to make some hard decisions and start cutting the dead weight at the top so the front line FAMs can see a future for people with integrity in the FAMS. By#@$ is the ghost of Quinn and too often has the same mentality of retaliating in a twisted way when criticisms come forward. Complain to Congress about anonymity – fine. Now we will make your reservations for you, destroy more anonymity, waste tax dollars, take away your choice of where to sleep on your off time and claim it is because the flying FAM asked for the change to be made. Expert retaliation as it is in the guise of helping.
A major step would be bringing back Don Strange in any capacity to help bring some respectability to the ranks.
We need more people thinking about the mission and the quality of life of the workforce before their own petty agenda for raises and bonuses. The flying FAMs want leaders who actually care about preventing another 9/11 BEFORE ANYTHING ELSE.
Maybe someone from Congress will help make this a reality?

Posted by: Unknown Skyfed | August 20, 2006, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

if you need to look at a system that works….look at El Al….but they take terrorists seriously!

Posted by: Elizabeth | August 21, 2006, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

What I am about to say is speculation. I have no reason to believe that FAMs were, or were not on that particular flight.
However. If I were king, I would make it very, very clear to any undercover police officer that they should never break their cover to handle any situation which does not involve a threat to the aircraft or its entire complement of passengers. Is this policy in place? I have no way of knowing, but it certainly *ought* to be. Otherwise, any coordinated effort to hijack a plane would begin with a single disorderly passenger acting out and throwing things, in order to force the FAMs (or, for that matter, any hero-wannabes) to identify themselves. Once identified, they are no longer undercover, and can be neutralized.
Given this observation, the fact that FAMs did not act can not be taken by itself as evidence that they were not present.

Posted by: Lyle | August 21, 2006, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Lyle,
The problem with your theory is that the FAM management no longer considers the flying FAMs to be “counter-terrorism” instead they are viewed by management and constantly reminded that they are security guards and nothing more.
If there was a team aboard, they would be facing disciplinary action for not acting. That is the sad truth.
When the program was serious (before the retired Secret Service agents began ruining it) staying undercover was, in fact, a top priority.
You have to understand that the FAM service has deteriorated into a statistical driven agency.
The reason no FAM team was on that London flight is because managements imaginery quota had already been met in their own minds.
If anything had actually occured, they can point to all the flights they covered the days before and say “we enhanced coverage”
What they won’t tell you of course is that their self imposed (ala bonus money) domestic routes still needed to be covered. Therefore, they cancelled all the London trips in order to accomodate this make believe domestic quota. Keep in mind that these low-threat level domestic routes were randomly computer generated based on ten hour days well before the London
incident occured.
My husband was begging to cover the London flights but never got the opportunity. Instead, guys who didn’t want to go were called on their days off. Then they were told they would not get paid for their time since it was not a “scheduled” flight.
As soon as the FAM service realized that they would not get away with this, and would have to pay overtime, the FAM coverage on all the London flights from my husbands office was mysteriously cancelled.
Lyle, your observation was logical and it is certainly what a reasonable person might conclude.
However, its premise is faultyh and leads the public to a false sense of security. The public pays for this program to be a last line of defense.
FAMs need to be on routes where the threat is, not where an outdated computer program can calculate out ten hours!!

Posted by: wife | August 22, 2006, 3:47 am 3:47 am

Lyle,
You make some sense, but what good is it if the terrorists already know who the FAMs are at the beginning of a flight? Until anonymity issues get resolved, everything else is just a bunch of rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Help us US Congress and Senate. We need Don Strange back in the FAMS.

Posted by: Wayne | August 22, 2006, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Catherine Mayo, who forced the plane down with fighter jets has been glossed over as just hysterical.
However TSA should delve into her background more. Catherine Mayo is a journalist based in Pakistan writing for the Muslim Paskistani Daily Times. Flying home from Pakistan, she stopped in London. That causes me to wonder why was she flying from London to DC if she was enroute to her residence in Vermont?
Mayo’s son, Josh, 31, described his mother as a peace activist and said she had been in Pakistan since March. She has traveled there often since making a pen pal before Sept. 11, 2001. The pen pal hasn’t been allowed to visit the United States. I further wonder who is her pen pal and why he isn’t allowed to visit the U.S.
I couldn’t find out where she was born but she taught in the UK East Midlands Area at the Hillcrest Community School, Gainsborough where she received the Guardian Award for Outstanding New Teacher in 2002. Fifty-nine year old Mayo is largely unknown to her neighbors where she rents a former schoolhouse in Braintree, VT; but is “more familiar” in Northfield where she previously lived with her ex-husband and three children.

Posted by: Grandma Ruth | August 24, 2006, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Grandma Ruth,
Put down the Geritol and tell us what you are trying to say about all this!
Thank you

Posted by: Michael Gilflover | September 1, 2006, 11:58 am 11:58 am

I near the top of the flight attendant seniority list for a major airlines and fly mostly international flights. We are introduced to the FAMs so we know where they are situated. In no way we can recognize them without the introductions – only guess, and that is exactly what that reporter was doing by claiming having found eight FAMs on board! What a phony claim! The only way a reporter will ever know how many FAMs are on a flight is to count them after they take out a real terrorist(s) – not some lady who peed on the floor. This could have been a diversion to find out who and where the FAMs are.

Posted by: Babbawa | February 29, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.