Sep 11, 2006 6:12pm

Ammonium Nitrate: Weapon of Choice for Terrorists?

Ammonium nitrate has been used around the world in devastating terror attacks — from Istanbul, Turkey to Oklahoma City. There’s even an al Qaeda video posted on the internet, showing how to mix ammonium nitrate to make a bomb. "Ammonium nitrate is a weapon of choice for terrorists," said Congressman Peter King (R-NY), Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. Yet as a widely used fertilizer, it is easily and cheaply purchased at farm supply and gardening stores around the country. There is no federal law restricting, or even requiring registration of, who can buy it and no background checks required as we discovered in the course of an ABC News undercover investigation. With virtually no questions asked, we were able to make large buys at four separate stores in Virginia and North Carolina. A brochure put out by the fertilizer industry encourages farm stores to identify their customers by requiring a government-issued photo ID. That did not happen at any of the stores we visited. "When you’re talking about something as lethal as ammonium nitrate, we have to have controls in place," Congressman King said. But efforts in Congress to put in place background checks have failed, blocked by lobbyists for the American Farm Bureau as an unnecessary burden on farmers. "Background checks would definitely be something that would cause many of the folks I work for a hard time," Rebeckah Adcock, Director of Congressional Relations at the American Farm Bureau, told ABC News. As to whether a stranger could walk into an agricultural store with cash and buy ammonium nitrate, she replied, "I think that if he was in middle America, it would be unlikely." Our ABC News investigation found otherwise. In two days time, our undercover team, spending less than three hundred dollars, had assembled a thousand pounds of ammonium nitrate and, undetected, moved it into a storage shed just a few miles from the White House. A thousand pounds would take down a good-sized building. Congressman King says he’s had to accept a watered-down version of his bill, with no background checks, in order to get even limited controls past the farm bureau lobbyists. The full House will vote on that bill sometime this fall.

User Comments

As I recall, after the Oklahoma City bombing it was reported that in many countries Ammonium Nitrate is not sold in pure form. Rather it is sold mixed with something that does not lower its fertilizer value but does make it hard to detonate. I guess the US never adopted this approach.

Posted by: Tony Marshall | September 11, 2006, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Mr. Ross – Considering the day if you pulled off your top secret immodium nitrate operation of planting it within blocks of the White House would not better judgement say to notify to authorities of this weakness instead of telling the bad guys through television that this can be done. While you are on a roll why not tomorrow night tell all the youngsters in America how to make meth in their bath tub? You can not even let your children watch the news these days as they may think that the above may be something to do to get attention. If you go out on your investigative reports the authorities should be notified before the general public and if the authorities fail to produce identifity that weakness. I thought with Charles Gibson being the news anchor that some of the twisted drama might be removed from the newscast; however, I was wrong.

Posted by: BRAD CONKLIN | September 11, 2006, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

It is my understanding that the fertilizer that can be bought now is not explosive grade no matter how much you buy. If that is true then your story is helping to feed my perception that the news media does not do their research before reporting what they consider “noteworthy news”. Can you dispute this?

Posted by: olsendaughter | September 11, 2006, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

I can’t beleive the details of this story. One thing we DO NOT need is telling those who would wish us ill how easy it is to get what is needed to create a massive bomb. Now, I realize that the “big time” terrorists (al Qaeda etc.) most likely figured this out but what about smaller groups or even individual people who may be out to do evil. IF this needs to be reported,(and that I think is a big IF) perhaps just a shorted story, without a lot of detail, that5 ABC News was able obtain some items to create a bomb. No need for details. Why give someone ideas or information they don’t know.
Please consider this in the future.

Posted by: Michael Teixeira | September 11, 2006, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

There is a major flaw in your investigative experiment to buy mass quantities of ammonium nitrate, your men who purchased the fertilizer were working class white men. Do really expect a 75 year old experienced hardware store owner to question a large purchase of fertilizer by these men. If there were two Arabic men that barely spoke any English making this purchase, the red flags would be flying!!!
Yeah… Tim McVeigh…. blah, blah, blah,… that’s the past, we’re in the age of Muslim Terrorism. Please lighten up on your endless pursuit to make the Bush Administration look like they’re not doing enough to prevent attacks (5 Years, 0 Attacks).

Posted by: Zach | September 11, 2006, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

So do you want cheap tomatoes or not?
And
Why does that sound familiar?

Posted by: Jim Padgett | September 11, 2006, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

I really appreciated the Movie “Path to 911″, but was disgusted to see Brian Ross’ report immediately afterward telling terrorists about more of our security weaknesses, and how they might strike us again. You talk about the lack of accountibility in our government, but who is Brian Ross accountable to?
Dale

Posted by: Dale | September 11, 2006, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

I thought the “Path to 9/11″ was a well made film, and I congratulate ABC for not capitulating under pressure to sensor the program. I am angry that Bill Clinton and the Democrats have forgotten what FREEDOM OF SPEACH means in America!!

Posted by: stephen | September 11, 2006, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

Brian,
A sensitive issue still remains. Should we trust the information the government is supplying to the press & our people? Is the information valid? Is taxpayer funds being diverted in direct interest towards long time players in the government stature (i.e JFK’s brothers). Power and money have long term consequences for the next generations.
Does the president of the U.S. have full control in informing the general public the sencere truth of current events regarding where we stand as american citizens?
There is plenty of information on the internet that will simply saturate the true events of the lawfull or leagal aspects of the american way of life. It simply scares me when the government (persay) covers up many of the operating aspects of our government. Not just Washington DC but ALL of us citizens together that make the power to mould the U.S. into the most ideal place on earth to raise families & live life life to the fullest.
I’m proud to be an american & veteran but scared with the aspects of the undisclosed truth the government may be covering up.
gary n
ft wayne, in

Posted by: gary | September 11, 2006, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Should background checks be required to purchase knives, rope, plastic bags and water because people can be killed with them?

Posted by: Matt Nordhoff | September 11, 2006, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

This story & it’s irresponsible sensationalism is disconcerting.
While I’m no bomb-making expert…
Why do I have to register to own a gun, when college-aged kids can walk into a store and buy bomb-making materials or meth ingredients?
If we have to register for a shotgun or Sudafed, why are special-interest groups keeping a strangle-hold on Capitol Hill?

Posted by: Stacie | September 11, 2006, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

The clerk who sold the ammonium nitrate to the white men and women was far better at identifying the enemy than our own “highly-trained” TSA agents. Since they did not fit the terrorist profile he made a reasonable decision. Meanwhile, the TSA agent is forced to search the bag and shoes of an 80 year old American woman from Des Moines, Iowa. Talk about wasting tax dollars!

Posted by: Jim Galen | September 11, 2006, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Mr. Ross,
In your report tonight, you repeatedly mentioned that lobbyists and the Farm Bureau continue to block bills that would restrict the purchase of Ammonium Nitrate. My US Government knowledge may not be the most complete, but from what I remember, lobbyists do not vote on bills. Why not expose those members of congress who voted against these bills? Lobbyists certainly have influence, but ultimately, each individual congressperson most vote for what is right. I want to see those who voted against these bills explain their vote(s).

Posted by: Brent Willingham | September 11, 2006, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Several Senators should have been arrested by the FBI for extortion when they sent the letter to ABC threatening their license unless they caved in. Although they were only mimicing Jessee Jackson et al, so I guess they were actually following the Dems regular playbook.

Posted by: bill | September 11, 2006, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

The next time you have some investagative report about buying ammonium nitrate and not getting caught or questioned, try using some arabic men wearing dress shoes who load the stuff in a rent a car. I put my money on the feed store owners kicking themselves and holding them until athorities arrive. Stop crying about background checks…. give me a break, if I farm a thousand acres, I need a background check to buy fertilizer?

Posted by: Jeff Sheets | September 11, 2006, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

I think you can see the quality of ABC’s think tank in this event from GMA. Where a terrorist researcher did not know nor had ever heard of the mafia called “the mob” and the person is a producer that is supposed to investigate resources…its to funny not to read..

Posted by: mrbill | September 11, 2006, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

While Brian Ross and crew were able to buy ammonium nitrate, were they able to buy anything to detonate it with? The mixture won’t go off by itself. How hard is it to buy blasting caps anonymously nowadays? How hard is it to buy anything that would set it off?

Posted by: David Misner | September 11, 2006, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Mr. Ross,
I feel that we need the same type of system we use to purchase guns and explosives used for Ammonium nitrate. Americans want the Government to do everything they can to make all of us safe but they dont want any inconviences in their lives. We are acting like spoiled children. Learn and plan for these things that might take a bit longer. I would rather have a little inconvience than go thru another 9-11 again. How soon some of us forget!!! Stop criticising and do your part.
Chris

Posted by: Chris Spiess | September 11, 2006, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Whenever I get a cold or sinus headache, I have to fill out a form with my name and driver’s license number in order to purchase pseudophedrine (Sudafed). This is because it is the main ingredient in making crystal meth.
I feel sure that more people buy Sudafed than buy ammonium nitrate, a main ingredient for simple bombs.
If you can inconvenience me at the grocery store or retail store, I think you should be able inconvenience farmers who are purchasing fertilizer. Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure we all have purchased fertilizer at one time or another. The only difference is that the farmers have a lobbying group fighting on their behalf.
Yes, it’s a little more time-comsuming and frustrating, but what’s a little time compared to the overall safety of our country? They can just have that information ready and in-hand when they pick up their order. I don’t see what the big deal is that they have a lobbying group fighting this.

Posted by: grits65 | September 11, 2006, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Great analogy about meth Grits65. What about buying gasoline though? Shouldn’t a background check be required? It seems like that could be used for bomb making. Wouldn’t a Ryder truck with a few 55 gallon drums full of it go big?

Posted by: Jeff Sheets | September 11, 2006, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

I am not impressed with the ease with which one can buy ammonium nitrate. True, it can be used as an explosive but only when it is set off with a detonator. For your next episode set your college kids the task of going out to buy some detonators and see how easy that might be.

Posted by: zulutime01 | September 11, 2006, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

We were youngsters during WW2 but remember the tokens required to buy meat, eggs, milk, sugar and gasoline. Farmers or other consumers should be required to furnish some form of Id when purchasing fertlizer and other chemicals or insectides for their use. Our safety is more important than a few minutes spent identifying ourselves.

Posted by: Ronald D Jenson | September 12, 2006, 12:09 am 12:09 am

I found it interesting that your controlled test was carried out with caucasian college students. Perhaps if you had used middle eastern decent students you would have gotten the result we all expected. I am from rural community USA and I can promise you using the test subjects you did as buyers was a bad idea.
While I don’t have a problem with an ID check to buy it, I do have a problem with a back ground check. It is foolish and would be a real issue in the day to day activities of the agriculture community. Perhaps a registered user permit would be a much better idea, just an added piece of paper to USDA’s system but worth that annual report perhaps?

Posted by: Karen Whitlock | September 12, 2006, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Thank you ABC for showing Path to 9/11 and for not giving in to pressure. ABC seems to have done their own research, not totally relying upon some of the somewhat questionable findings of the 9/11 Report. It is well documented elsewhere that the CIA could have taken Bin Laden out on several occasions but was blocked in different ways by the Clinton Administration. What happened was shameful enough that it is no wonder Clarke, Albright and Berger deny what happened. It is always easy to be critical of others actions in the spotlight of hindsight but how do we learn from mistakes when the truth is lied about.
I also found the information that Congress has failed to restrict the purchase of ammonium nitrate, because the Farm Bureau blocked it, to be very distressing. Who are our elected officials working for? It is very scary that on an issue which seems as clear as this one, that special interests rule the day. I am left wondering, if Congress can not enact this seemingly simple restriction to protect the American people because of lobbyists, how can we expect them to do anything else of value? Is it donations from the Farm Bureau or have they simply forgotten why they were sent to Washington?
Last, my only real complaint with the programming tonight was with your spelling our so clearly for our enemies how vulnerable we still are and how easy it is to buy ammonium nitrate. It is my opinion that when the media, including the other networks, report on our nations security, or lack of, they should take far greater care, particularly details they are also making available to our enemies.

Posted by: N. McCord | September 12, 2006, 2:51 am 2:51 am

Gee Brian, I’m embarrassed for you. Did you really think you were blowing the cover on something sinister? You mean some white kids that look like farmers can buy large quantities of fertilizer in farm country without being questioned? What an outrage! I won’t repeat what others have already said, but my first thought when viewing your “undercover report” was; “those people don’t look like terrorists to me”. Profiling = common sense. Bring back common sense. I would call your piece irresponsible if it wasn’t so laughable.

Posted by: Bob Wells | September 12, 2006, 3:32 am 3:32 am

The days of the “A” team are over. The highest available is 30%. It would take a lot of processing to concentrate the ammonium nitrate to an explosive grade. This is just another example of someone jumping on the wagon shouting WOLF and trying to futher a totalatarian police state where the police control how much TP you can use.

Posted by: pops | September 12, 2006, 6:56 am 6:56 am

Must be one of the lamest attempts yet,, so what the bought some fertilizer, is this what it will come down to?? Panic mania, if you really look at things just about anything can be made to go boom, as the one person noted what would be the difference if they bought $300 worth of Gasoline and had a tank in car that held 100 gallons there would be nothing you could do about it, sure lets fill out a form for buying gas then you know what happens it become old and no one will pay attetion to it. Maybe the next Big story will be that they got bags and bags of Grain dust, and we all know what happens to grain mills with grain dust..

Posted by: Geo | September 12, 2006, 7:40 am 7:40 am

These posts are so funny. Sad but funny. Are there people who actually believe that evil-doers are clueless unless they read it in the media. Get real folks, they already know this.

Posted by: W.D.Russell | September 12, 2006, 7:42 am 7:42 am

This may sound simple, but why don’t we make ammonium nitrate a class 1 hazardous materal. This would require the person purchasing,and transporting it a haz-mat endorsement{any quanity}.
These systems are already in place and would be a minimal cost to implement, a small cost to pay to help keep America safe.

Posted by: Marty Christensen | September 12, 2006, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Did the news team even buy the right formulation of ammonium nitrate to create a WMD? I doubt it. For one they are not properly trained to recognize the right formulation to purchase to make a bomb. Chances are they purchased a low grade ammonium nitrate for lawns that could not be used as a WMD. Funny, I did not see them report this fact since it was their blunder. The reason they were able to purchase the fertilizer is because the dealer knew it could not be used to produce a bomb. The ag dealer knew this and the news team took the bait. Idiots!

Posted by: kevinr | September 12, 2006, 10:58 am 10:58 am

I moved out into agricultural Long Island from the projects in the South Bronx (last of the 3rd Ave El, near where the Janes and Kirtland foundry made the once all-iron Library of Congress, the Capitol Dome for Lincoln [~1 million] and other capital projects, where the Mott Foundry made stoves, public fountains, sculpture, etc.) and in the 1960s there was stories about the “fertilizer bomb” and rumored to need about a 2 lb. coffee can of mercury fulminate to set off the oil and nitrate mix in a steel 40 gallon drum. Fertilizer bags marked “30-0-0″ the best, the amount of nitrate, potassium, etc. The US Army was testing it in the 1980s, shown in a NEWSDAY photo report (as was the Ayatollah with the Reagan family bible). I have no idea perhaps it was invented locally by some “genius” in exothermic chemistry. They are using nano-amounts now to investigate chemical reactions, thankfully. New Yorker Tim McVeigh should not have been executed, and kept as a future resource. (That might be because in school I’ve seen the original print of the first woman in an electric chair, taken from a shin-worn smuggled camera, that ended on the first page of the “Chicago Sun”). In my opinion, and apparently Oklahoma witnesses, others and events were ignored in the investigation by the authorities.

Posted by: George Myers | September 12, 2006, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Just because the purchasers of fertilizer don’t wear turbans doesn’t mean they should be overlooked. At one point in this story they were loading bags directly into a rental van and THAT should have set off some flags.
I work in the fertilizer business and at first we were given guidelines as to what to look for, such as rental vehicles or large purchases. Most of our customers, however, have been buying from us for years and it seems almost silly to require them to have a background check.
Or, as my employer did, these farms stores can stop selling ammonium nitrate all together.

Posted by: Kristy | September 12, 2006, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Yes, farmers and lobbyists are selfish and self-serving with little regard for life. Yes, store clerks may be breaking the law and could care less. They are definitely a bigger problem than the politicians who cannot enact a law requiring a national identity card, an energy bill aimed at USA independence from Middle-East oil, and a law that permits screening based on profiles of terrorists. Not really!! John Estep

Posted by: John Estep | September 12, 2006, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

This Is just yet another glaring
good example of how fouled up the
whole George W Bush & His DHS Do
Nothing Micheal Chertoff are sure
mismanaging the entire war on terror and why we need to vote out
every incumbent Republican &
Democrat in Congress and demand that Bush Fire That Incompetent
Loser Sec Of Homeland Security
Micheal Chertoff Immediately And
it’s all also another good reason
for us to Impeach both George W Bush & Dick Cheney For Incompetence
In Handling the War on Terror!

Posted by: Sandy Long | September 12, 2006, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Nice try! The ignorant probably fell for it. The NH4NO3 that you folks bought (as visably stated on the bag) was the mixture 32-0-0, The mixture of 20-20-20, is what you need for the bang-bang, and thankfully you’ll can not easily get it.
Even then, criminals are more interested in it for is value in crystal-meth production than as explosive material.
Your report was a failed attempt to show how little-ole-you could construct a bomb provide by some of us ignorant southern hay-seeds, in light what you see as GW’s unsafe war on terror.
Want to impress us viewers? Mix some diesel fuel with your 32-0-0 and try to blow it with a blasing cap.. you’ll get more bang with some methos and 2 liter of diet coke!

Posted by: mike | September 12, 2006, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Hey Mike,
It was 34-0-0, not 32-0-0. Second of all, you are sadly mistaken to imply you need less nitrogen and any phosphorous or potasium to make a bomb. Do you know what the numbers stand for in 20-20-20? It is the nitrogen and ammonium that makes it a fierce oxidizer.
What was it you were saying about ignorance? It may be the one thing you have proven to be an expert on in this thread.
ABC’s research is right on the money. Everyone from homeland security experts to the Farm Bureau itself acknowledged the acquisition of 34-0-0 is problematic.

Posted by: Rodney | September 13, 2006, 1:15 am 1:15 am

Some of the little known facts that were left out of the investigative report, Farmers are required to have a pesticide license and have to have annual training to maintain their license. They are required to show it and their suppliers record their license number when they purchase pesticides. Obviously the simpler way to solve this issue would be to expand what products the license covers. As in every case, the way this was reported is that farmers are against controlling this product which is far from the truth. There are existing ways to do this and that is why they were opposed to the bill that would have instituted this policy. The American Farm Bureau does not/can not provide any funding to members of Congress. Obviously most amercians have no idea of the amount of regulations/policys that already impact farmers to suggest that they must go through a criminal background check on top of eveything else.

Posted by: Sharon | September 13, 2006, 9:39 am 9:39 am

I would challange your investigative team that amassed the Ammonium Nitrate to actually set it off all by itself.
They are missing another easly available component without which its just a pile of white powder.

Posted by: Doug | September 14, 2006, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Coming from a small farming community in central Illinois, every business knows if someone is new to the community. Every time the goverment makes a new law like this, it raises the farmers cost monetarily and extra time. Beleive it or not the american farmers and small town america are still the backbone of this country. In these communities, small town people are much better at policing our own. We don’t need more laws to protect us at the price of our rights slowly being taken away. Where I was raised if any of us were face to face with a highjacker with a bomb. Our thought is, OK a bomb,no negotiations. We are going to be blown up so why let them accomplish their goal. It’s rediculis to take our shampoo to protect us. Lets let our farmers feed us at lower cost with less interference from neurotic people who can’t, or are to weak to face their own responibility to take action.

Posted by: TRACE | September 14, 2006, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

I am seeing too much fear in your words people. How many people die everyday all around the world. Do you truly believe that, in the entire history of the world, and amongst all of the genocides and killings that have occured, that 9-11 even slightly stacks up to the people that are dying everyday from smoking tobacco, drinking alcohol and driving and/or doing drugs and the like? I am truly astounded at your narrow vision of what really matters most. There are greater concerns in this world than losing a skyscraper or two in a city that is responsible for killing so many more people a day. Cities with populations over 1/4 million are responsible for much worse attrocities than that. I say that the true terrorists are not from another country but right here in our own. Forget about that crap. Life is too short. Worry about nothing because you have no control. Your life will leave you in a heartbeat and nothing will protect you when it’s time. Admit that to yourself and feel the peace that comes to you.

Posted by: Vexxis the Wise | January 15, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

YOU PEOPLE AND ALL AMERICANS THESE DAYS ARE NOTHING ABOUT A BUNCH OF PARANOID, FEAR FILLED CANDY-#####.
A background check to buy ammonium nitrate. Sure…let’s allienate the 5.7 million convicted felons in this country even more. Now if some dude was convicted for having some weed or pills years ago and happened to do some time for it or even received probation not only can that person have the chance after he or she turns their life around to have a decent profession anymore that requires licensure such as a doctor or nurse; now the government won’t even let them be farmers!
Hey you all…if you ever decide your tired of working to survive and put food on the table you can simply go out and commit a small felony. Don’t worry even if you don’t have a criminal mind or heart it is really simply in this country these days to break some insane, useless and draconian law. Anyways…then you can just sit back and collect disability, welfare, food stamps and whatever else the government offers those people who can never work. After all, every darn thing these days requires a backgroud check to do….What the heck is left for someone who has ever made a mistake in their life.
Let me tell you the difference between a convicted non-violent felon and a citizen with no record. The felon got caught. I see my ‘clean’ prison guard, cop, homeland security, and nurse friends prancing around town once in a while drunk as heck on the weekend drving from one bar to another without ever being pulled over. The majority of them even light up a joint when they know a drug test isn’t in the near future. Once I had a torn rotator cuff and picked up some extra pain meds because I was miserable in pain and my doctor would not listen to me when I told what I needed as everything else does not work. Well, I happened to get wacked in a sting. Felon for life now. I have 2 B.S. degrees, too many post grad certificates to mention, and I can’t get a job with the state or fed now. Ha! They view me as being ehtically challeneged. Ethically challenged people don’t make up at least 50% of the state and federal workers? No….not them. Ya right.

Posted by: your all slaves | March 9, 2009, 7:52 am 7:52 am

tnt

Posted by: yyt | March 9, 2009, 7:54 am 7:54 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.