CIA Praises Deal; Harsh Techniques Would Continue
The CIA director, General Michael Hayden, praised the deal reached in Congress today that, in effect, would permit CIA interrogators to use harsh techniques critics call torture. "If this languages becomes law, the Congress will have given us the clarity and the support that we need," Gen. Hayden said in a message to employees late this afternoon. CIA officials said it was impossible to proceed with the agency’s harsh interrogation techniques without a law that made it clear CIA officers would not one day face prosecution. THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS VIDEO: Watch Brian Ross’ World News Report on Secret Prisons Sources Tell ABC News Top Al Qaeda Figures Held in Secret CIA Prisons Click Here for More of the Brian Ross Page As reported on the Blotter on ABCNews.com, in questioning certain high-value terror suspects, the CIA has used a series of six increasingly harsh interrogation techniques that begin with a slap to the face and end with a procedure called water boarding, in which a prisoner is made to feel he is drowning. President Bush and the CIA have repeatedly maintained the procedures are not torture and have saved American lives. Human rights groups maintain the procedures constitute a form of torture, and the United States military has banned its personnel from using water boarding. Today’s congressional deal, if signed into law, would allow the CIA to continue the six techniques and to continue to run secret prisons overseas for select terror suspects. Gen. Hayden said the measure "allows us to continue to defend the homeland, attack al Qaeda and protect American and Allied lives." Read the entire CIA Statement.

Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
This is disgusting, coming as it does on the heels of the news that Maher Arar was kidnapped and tortured for ten months, and reportedly confessed under duress to crimes of which he was entirely innocent.
Let’s be clear that torture is not a search for truth, because the truth and his personal innocence did not save Mr. Arar.
It is sick revenge and a perversion performed upon helpless subjects by sadistic sociopaths who have no business calling themselves Americans.
Anyone who does not stand against these barbaric practices is just as sick and perverted as the torturers themselves.
Just so we’re clear, I am a United States Army veteran and my patriotism is beyond question. Click the link.
Posted by: Repack Rider | September 21, 2006, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
The idea of civilized warfare is an oxymoron. Uncivilized morons start wars. There you have it in a nutshell.
Posted by: RX | September 22, 2006, 1:40 am 1:40 am
Lets see, making terrorists uncomfortable,thousands dying. Tough choice.
Posted by: Kartar | September 22, 2006, 4:23 am 4:23 am
I, too, am a veteran — retired. I disagree with Repack Rider. War is an ugly side of life, the hidden side of freedom. Without a strong military and outfitted with the appropriate tools, we would be unable to beat terrorism. They use the compassion of Americans against them. They know how our court system of “rights” works and they use it against us. Let there be no mistake — they are cruel, dangerous, and sadistic. They would kill you in a heartbeat if they could with a smile on their face and praise to Allah on their lips. The soldiers who interrogate them are skilled professionals — not “sadistic sociopaths”. Be thankful for your freedom, Repack Rider. If not for the brave men and women in uniform you wouldn’t still have the freedom of speech which you exhibit now. If the terrorists were in control of this country/government you would be executed for daring to speak against them.
Posted by: Recost | September 22, 2006, 5:28 am 5:28 am
Hayden’s grandmother would confess to a terror plot if “waterboarded”.
This is not about information. It’s about intimidation. It’s a psyop against the “free” people of the world. DRTC = Disorientation, Regression, Transference, Compliance. We are all complicit.
Wake up Americans!
Posted by: Michael Fury | September 22, 2006, 7:48 am 7:48 am
When will this nightmare end?
Posted by: Dennis | September 22, 2006, 10:58 am 10:58 am
I’ve got to hand it to the Democrats. The strategy of allowing the Republicans to “thrash out” their differences on the treatment and prosecution of detainees has played out exactly as planned…for the Republicans. Don’t let anyone convince you that you can go to the well too often…that is if you are a Republican and your opponent is a fully inept Democratic Party.
Amidst a trend of favorable polling data and a firestorm of speeches by the President to refocus the voting public on their fear of terrorism, the Democrats stood in the background for the past two weeks and watched what the GOP will call the difficult work of creating legislation that preserves our commitment to civil liberties while at the same time providing our determined President with the essential tools needed to pursue those who seek to kill us all.
OK, perhaps I’m being too harsh. There is a possibility that in the past two weeks the Democrats were able to devise their sixth iteration of a campaign slogan and strategy to roll out with less than 50 days to the election. Perhaps they could call it “Fifty States, Fifty Days…But Never Fifty Percent”! It’s catchy, it’s succinct, and it may well be accurate come November 8th.
Posted by: Daniel DiRito | September 22, 2006, 11:29 am 11:29 am
The Constitution says loudly and clearly that there shall be no cruel or unusual punishment and no infringement of judicial by administrative or legislative rights. So! What gives?
Posted by: Marvin | September 22, 2006, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Repack, I don’t see anyone questioning your patriotism, and I’d like to personally thank you for serving our country in our nation’s armed forces. But the simple fact of the matter, as Brian Ross has stated in other forums, is that the six techniques advocated for by the CIA do work very effectively. Ross has stated that 14 terrorists have been interrogated using these methods, and all 14 have given up useful intelligence that has saved American lives as a result. None of these terrorists have been permanently injured using these techniques. Not one.
The White House and Congress have merely asked that these effective techniques be continued, to save the lives of our friends and neighbors.
Most Americans have a Jacksonian view of dealing with our nation’s enemies. We will afford every right and privilege afforded by the laws of war to an honorable enemy soldier captured on the field of battle. If you fight America honorably, we will treat your honorably, even though you are our enemy. At the same time, if our enemy dismisses the agreed upon common decencies and rights, there are no legal moral or ethical reasons that we should treat them with kidd gloves at the expense of our own lives.
If our enemies are dishonorable, attacking innocent men, woman, and children instead of legitimate targets, then our gloves will come of as well, and we have the right to engage you in total war with all the methods at our disposal to defeat you. And yet, the United States has conducted an exceedingly restrained and honorable war against terrorists and the nations that support terrorism.
Even though we have the unquestioned capability, we have not launched the large-scale carpet bombing campaigns against cities and civilian populations that we did in the Second World War. We use precision-guided weaponry whenever possible, with protection of even enemy-sympathetic citizenry always at the forefront of our mission planning. Our honored military veterans are fully aware of the great pains we take to minimize civilian casualties, even though the pains we take to ensure the safety of innocents often puts our soldiers lives at risk in exchange. We have without a doubt, and without contradiction, the most lethal and compassionate military force that this planet has ever seen.
But even though we are compassionate, we recognize that to survive as this great and compassionate nation, we cannot be weak and cowardly, as many would clearly like us to be.
The techniques we use are unpleasant and coercive, but they are not torture, and it is both dishonest and disheartening to see our own media attempting to blur the line in such a way to make all such life-saving intelligence gathering techniques a crime.
By their own repeated, long-standing and well-documented series of abuses of basic human rights and dignities, the terrorists we have captured have forfeited any right for human treatment, and yet we consistently treat them better than we do domestic criminals in our prisons and jails.
We are clearly on moral ground here, no matter how willing many people in our own nation are willing to give that ground away.
Posted by: Bob Owens | September 22, 2006, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Check mate. We lost the war on terror. Terror (Fear) won and the US became as extremist and inhumane as our enemy. Water boarding is torture no matter what name you put on it. The US torturing muslims is the the best recruitment campaign for AlQaida I now understand why OBL smiles on the Aljazeera videos.
Posted by: Hans | September 22, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Bob Owens -
You make no distinction between a terrorist and a suspect. People are innocent until proven guilty under the due process of law.
With your frame, interrogators can decided someone is guilty, and coerce him to talk.
The result will be false confessions.
Posted by: Eric Jaffa | September 22, 2006, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Waterboarding is TORTURE, period. The only reason this thuggish adminstration wants it legalized is to keep their sorry asses out of jail when they are finally kicked out of office. Anyone else supporting this disgusting practice is probably suffering from testosterone poisoning of the brain.
Posted by: Rose | September 22, 2006, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
All of the legislators who backed this bill or even voted for it, should have first been made to experience this water boarding, and then decide for themselves what that constitutes.
Posted by: drew | September 22, 2006, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
I too am a veteran. I wonder why the vets who approve torture do not mention that our allowing the CIA to torture suspects now gives every terrorist group or country in the world the right to torture our soldiers whenever they want. That’s one reason why the United States supported the Geneva Conventions. For the small price of not torturing other combatants, the US could have reasonable insurance that its own soldiers wouldn’t be tortured. Ignorance or denial of this reality comes from continuing to believe that the US is all-powerful and that no other country or group would dare challenge us. Get real. Get moral.
Posted by: John Miller | September 22, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Eric,
As has been stataed, these tactics have been useful in getting info out of the top 14 Al Queda suspects in custody. This info has saved lives.
Of the 6 tactics, water boarding is the only one that comes close to “torture” and it still leaves no physical injury or harm to the suspect. Also it is only used as a last resort.
According to Brian Ross, water boarding cracked Khalid Sheik Mohammed and let to info that disrupted a plot to crash airliners into the library tower in LA.
Also, these tactics are not used indiscriminantly on “innocent until proven guilty” persons. They are used on known high level terrorists that have info that can save lives.
I’m sure you can understand the difference.
Posted by: Lester | September 22, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
What is missing in all the above discussions is the bigger picture. Justifying what we do to terrorists because they are terrorists is not the appropriate approach. As your parents told you growing up, two wrongs don’t make a right. Stooping to their level, i.e. torturing detainees, means we have intentionally abandoned our moral standing. How can we justify telling other nations about human rights if we don’t practice it ourselves. I find it interesting that people with military backgrounds understand this (Powell, Warner, Graham) and those who never served (Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld)don’t get it.
Our War on Terrorism is being waged like our War on Drugs and we all know how that turned out. In both we are fighting the supply and not the demand. What Bush’s policy should incorporate is why people are willing to be suicide bombers and try to address that. That is not to say we should not go after OBL and his henchmen but solely taking the approach providing democracy at the barrel of gun surely will not work.
Posted by: Gerald | September 22, 2006, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Is it clear to everyone yet that McCauin is a hypocrite? He’s always so eager to talk like an independant more concerend with what’s right that with party politics. Then he winds up time again siding with Bush against his own publicly declared principals.
Posted by: Patrick | September 22, 2006, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Remember, we only torture the bad guys. Just ask Canadian Maher Arar…
Posted by: chitown | September 22, 2006, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
“We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was legal.”
Martin Luther King, Jr.
Posted by: -coda | September 22, 2006, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
I believe that the deal President Bush has struck is a betrayal of the America I believe in.That abandoning the rule of law and giving the President the freedom to interpret the Geneva Conventions any way he sees fit is an open invitation for Executive abuse and that providing immunity to those responsible for past human rights abuses is a miscarrage of Justice.The exemption from prosecution those who authorize treatment traditionally considered torture is sure to impress the world of our high moral character. Stripping detainees of access to US courts will also color
us in ways as yet to be deterimined.DO NOT LET THIS HAPPEN.I am an honorably discharged veteran of the Vietnam War.
Posted by: Lloyd Scott | September 22, 2006, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Law and Justice. There is no such thing as a terrorist suspect. A person is innocent until proven guilty. A victim of rape is not permanently harmed. The right for a person to have their day in court prior to any form of punishment is about protecting us from our own governments, just because they say so, is not enough, they must prove it in a court of law.
Posted by: Robert | September 22, 2006, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
So they’ve pared the “12 steps” down to six..hmmm. Maybe Brian or somebody in the adm. would like to try it so they can speak from first hand knowledge as to wheather it is torture or not. Any volunteers?
Do we need to be strong as nation? of course, but strength is expressed in a variety of ways. There is a giant of a guy in the neighborhood and nobody messes with him but you never met a friendlier person, and he doesn’t have to prove anything to anybody.
So here is a crazy idea that sometimes works..why not try to talk to some of these leaders that control terrorists. When we saw that we were not getting anywhere militarily we talked to the russians, the chinese, the vietnamese, and a majority of people, even the generals, don’t believe that the fight against terrorism can be won just militarily. The Brits didn’t do much with the IRA until they came to some agreement. It’s worth a try and we don’t demean ourselves by doing it.
What we should worry about is that all these measures the government has appropiated for itself to combat percieved threats (torture, surveilance, wiretaps, secret home invasions etc.), could someday be used against any citizen since a terrorist is anyone that they say is a terrorist. So we have to be careful that we’re not in the wrong place at the wrong time for the wrong reason. It doesn’t inspire much confidence when any question of inquiry that is asked gets the same reply…It’s SECRET.
Posted by: AL | September 23, 2006, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Torture has long been proven to be ineffective and produces nothing more than untruths, severe discomfort and/or death. There has been no due process for those held in limbo in the black hole called Gitmo. Bush is a pathological liar. He says they’re terrorists and has decided to become their judge and executioner. Let’s see the evidence he has before we fall for another of his lies. This is all about saving his own behind from prosecution for war crimes once he is out of power.
Posted by: Angie | September 23, 2006, 8:01 am 8:01 am
If I were even so much as slapped by an individual cloaked in the guise of a “decent” American “conservative” citizen “helping protect the ‘freedom’ of his fellow Americans”, I would quite frankly wish to kill that so-called person of “dignity” who has slapped me, his not knowing I was innocent of any terroristic intents. The wish for revenge against such perpetrators is “NORMAL”, and would eventually be wreaked by those, or on behalf of those who have struck people in the course of interrogation. I say to you scum who intend such very un-American harsh “techniques”, that you will ultimately not be free from prosecution, no matter the law. Someone, somewhere, will get you, *BIG-TIME!* Many of us consider such actions by persons in authority as an abuse of same, and will punish these actions as *assault* causing bodily harm
Posted by: World Citizen | September 23, 2006, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
We’ve been TOLD that torture gained important information and saved lives. But a fact check of the cases Bush cited proved that the information was already known PRIOR TO capture of most of these suspects, and in at least one case, a false confession was made that the president used in fanning the flames for war in Iraq. All the torture in the world will not gain enough information to protect Americans when our government is busily creating more enemies than we can kill.
The debate against torture is NOT about who is being tortured or why. It is about us, it is about America, it is about who we are and what we stand for. We’ve tortured a number of innocent men, some of them to death. That cannot be undone. If we are now willing to become as sadistic and totalitarian as our enemy, demanding that other nations change themselves to suit us and our national interests, then Bin Laden has already won and no amount of money or firepower will rescue any kind of victory worth having.
Posted by: windrider | September 24, 2006, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
And remember, all the power that’s been put in the hands of one man, George W. Bush—the power to define torture according to his political agenda, the power to arrest and detain suspects indefinitely, without charges, or lawyers, or court access, the power to eavesdrop on any and all Americans without a warrant…all this power will one day be in someone else’s hands, not George Bush, maybe not a Republican, maybe not even a Democrat, maybe in the hands of a neo-Willie Stark. This power will not always be used judiciously against real enemies; it has already been used against the innocent. This power invites abuse because it is power without restraint, without judicial or legislative review. This was our Founding Fathers’ worst nightmare, and it is hard to believe that it is Americans themselves that have so thoroughly corrupted the honor and morality of the American Dream they fought and died for.
Posted by: windrider | September 24, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Brian …
If you care at all about America,
investigate this legislation and it’s implications fully,
as it goes Far beyond the somewhat trivial use mentioned above.
This legislation should scare the hell out of you, and all Americans.
Use the Vast Power you all (in the Media) have of informing & educating the public,
(to influence outcome contructively), to collectively use Truth as propoganda about this legislation.
Conspire with other News Organizations if necessary to create an immidiate Informed public uproar against this legislation, (in it’s present form).
Posted by: Mango | September 24, 2006, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Why are you idiots continually bringing up constitutional rights and “cruel and unusual punishment” These are not Americans, these criminal terrorists are not covered by either the geneva convention nor the constitution. They have no rights .. they gave up any claim to supposed rights when they joined an organization that blew up the twin towers and sentenced those people to death without due process, and sentenced untold numbers that will suffer health issues and a decreased quality of life. Why should they enjoy rights and privilages that they deny others …
I have been here in Iraq for three years now … Frankly, I don’t think the bill goes far enough in allowing stuff. We will never win this until we allow the intel services and the military to have the biggest stick
Posted by: dave | September 24, 2006, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
“Rights” are brought up because we are a nation of “LAWS”. Can it be that people are idiots for believing this? Many have died for this truth. Should we scrap our laws when we think that they don’t work for us? Who wants to live in a totalitarian state?
The people 230 yrs ago believed that everybody should have their day in court. In this country even murderers and rapists have this right. Why? It turns out that some of them were found to be innocent.
Incidently, for all the Faithful, in the Good Book it says: “…the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you”.
A greater danger is that living under one-party rule as we do today is a recipe for disaster because it is easier to get some very bad laws passed, laws that can come back to haunt us.
Posted by: AL | September 25, 2006, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Funny how those who condemn torture now were so silent during the Berg beheading and other atrocities so gleefully broadcast by the MSM.
Posted by: Frank | September 25, 2006, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
This sums it up -
Kudos to the one who posted this…
“We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was legal.”
Martin Luther King, Jr.
“Those who do not remember the past are condemed to repeat it…”
Posted by: Watcher | September 25, 2006, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
If you are naive enough to think that if we don’t torture others we will not be tortured you do not need to be posting anything relating to this article.
The terrorists we are dealing with are just that TERRORISTS they cannot survive as organizations unless they make big headlines and they do not make big headlines if they do not do flagrant acts of cruelty and violence.
I am torn about the whole “torture” thing. I am a member of the U.S. Army and I do not favor the idea of terrorists having an easy time while being interrogated. However, this must be controlled somehow. I do not think that there is a right answer to this. It is much more complicated than anyone might think.
Posted by: daniel | September 25, 2006, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
I am also a veteran. There seems to be outrage about the way we treat terrorists and terrorist suspects. Where is the outrage when innocent civilians are kidnapped and beheaded by these extremist groups? There seems to be a huge double standard in this country.
Posted by: ADRIAN REYES | September 26, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Are you suggesting that we march on down to Cuba, grab a bunch of those guys and start chopping? That ought to send a message. But why stop there? Lets march on back and dig out some of our home-grown undesirables and do the same thing. Castro did that in Cuba and he hasn’t had any domestic problems in 40 yrs.
Interestingly enough, the people that served in the Pacific in WW2 went through some very tough H… in fighting the enemy and yet their people appear to have been treated decently by us. Soon, we gave them millions, ten yrs. later, we’re buying their cars, and we have been buying Japanese stuff ever since. Also, American tourists have been showing up in Vietnam for awhile now visiting the former enemy.
History sure is strange.
Humans are capable of great and terrible things and we should hope that both our enemies and our leaders decide to do what will bring real peace.
Posted by: AL | September 26, 2006, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
I cannot claim to be a veteran or serving in the forces, currently I am only a cadet.
Whilst I do not agree with the torture at all, I can understand why the US government thinks it is required…
I’m not going to get into a discussion about the torture itself, I think that’s being handled well enough. I will say this however:
How do we know those being tortured are guilty? The US government is increasingly moving towards a “guilty until proven innocent” mentality. With people being imprisoned without trial or evidence… The line MUST be drawn somewhere or SUSPECTED but not proven terrorists will be tortured soon… and there is BOUND to be at least one mistake.
America is supposedly the land of the free. It isn’t.
The question is, do you want to preserve your country by being viscious and tyranical, or do you want to lead the world into a better age by setting a good example?
Iain – England
Posted by: Iain | September 27, 2006, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
I believe that anyone who votes for this bill will become an international war criminal as soon as a single person is terorized by the CIA. Remember, CIA agents are under indictment in Italy, and more will be in Germany soon. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld have already been classified as interntional war criminals by amnesty international.
Posted by: Roland Tollefson | September 28, 2006, 1:37 am 1:37 am
torture ‘em all
Posted by: mt | September 28, 2006, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm