Exclusive: The Sexually Explicit Internet Messages That Led to Fla. Rep. Foley’s Resignation
Florida Rep. Mark Foley’s resignation came just hours after ABC News questioned the congressman about a series of sexually explicit instant messages involving congressional pages, high school students who are under 18 years of age. In Congress, Rep. Foley (R-FL) was part of the Republican leadership and the chairman of the House caucus on missing and exploited children. He crusaded for tough laws against those who used the Internet for sexual exploitation of children. THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS Read an instant message exchange a former page says he had with Rep. Foley in 2003. Warning: sexually explicit language, reader discretion advised. Sixteen-Year-Old Who Worked as Capitol Hill Page Concerned About E-mail Exchange with Congressman Check out the World News Report on Foley on the Brian Ross Home Page "They’re sick people; they need mental health counseling," Foley said. But, according to several former congressional pages, the congressman used the Internet to engage in sexually explicit exchanges. They say he used the screen name Maf54 on these messages provided to ABC News. Maf54: You in your boxers, too?
Teen: Nope, just got home. I had a college interview that went late.
Maf54: Well, strip down and get relaxed. Another message: Maf54: What ya wearing?
Teen: tshirt and shorts
Maf54: Love to slip them off of you. And this one: Maf54: Do I make you a little horny?
Teen: A little.
Maf54: Cool. The language gets much more graphic, too graphic to be broadcast, and at one point the congressman appears to be describing Internet sex. Federal authorities say such messages could result in Foley’s prosecution, under some of the same laws he helped to enact. "Adds up to soliciting underage children for sex," said Brad Garrett, a former FBI agent and now an ABC News consultant. "And what it amounts to is serious both state and federal violations that could potentially get you a number of years." Foley’s resignation letter was submitted late this afternoon, and he left Capitol Hill without speaking to reporters. In a statement, he said he was "deeply sorry" and apologized for letting down his family and the people of Florida. But he made no mention of the Internet messages or the pages. One former page tells ABC News that his class was warned about Foley by people involved in the program. Other pages told ABC News they were hesitant to report Foley because of his power in Congress. This all came to a head in the last 24 hours. Yesterday, we asked the congressman about some much tamer e-mails from one page, and he said he was just being overly friendly. After we posted that story online, we began to hear from a number of other pages who sent these much more explicit, instant messages. When the congressman realized we had them, he resigned. Click here to read an exclusive 2003 Internet exchange between Congressman Foley and a former congressional page, according to the young man. Warning: sexually explicit language, reader discretion advised. Click here to read more Internet exchanges between Foley and former congressional pages.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Well, this pretty much establishes the kids were minors, making this a criminal issue. Certainly is a tragedy, for those Foley victimized. This guys gonna burn, and deservedly so. Plus, he wasn’t even that smooth.
Posted by: Matt Burnett | September 29, 2006, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
C’mon Repubs…let’s see a defense!
“Uh, Clinton was worse”?
LOL…you guys define hypocrisy
Posted by: gee | September 29, 2006, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Another example that those who scream the loudest about something are probably the worst violators behind the scenes!
Posted by: Jason Carson | September 29, 2006, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Wonder if he’ll get some mental health counceling? What a piece of scum of the worst kind. Preying on children is the lowest.
Posted by: sandy | September 29, 2006, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Another bit of upstanding behavior from the “Party of Family Values.”
Posted by: tony | September 29, 2006, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Our worlds just excactly like what the Bible says it is-
Jer. 17:9 says that
The heart is deceitful above all things, And desperately wicked;
Who can know it?
Posted by: Richard Forinash | September 29, 2006, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Umm. I do not see anyone defending this guy.
Posted by: Den | September 29, 2006, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Please do not make this a political thing. That he’s Republican has nothing to do with the crime he committed. Let’s keep the focus on that, not on your politics. The fact that you’d use something like this as a weapon to stump for your party is pretty insensitive and sick. You’re giving liberals (like myself) a bad name.
Posted by: Matt Burnett | September 29, 2006, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Well, they DO say in politics that the best way to lose an election is to be found in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy…
But the angle that he wrote the laws that he violated just astounds me. It just goes to show, yet again, that anything that a fiction writer can cook up will always be bettered by real life.
Posted by: Pat Payne | September 29, 2006, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
give me a break matt. Get off your stump and get real this could be anyone. Sexual pedophilia is not limited to a political party base. Lets get of the rhetoric and get the guy behind bars. That is what matters.
Posted by: Brandon | September 29, 2006, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
it has nothing to do with him being a democrat or a republican either way he is a sick man that clearly made sexual comments towards a minor. I am tired of hearing that the Democrats “conspired” to bring this up so close mid term elections. The fact is that it was brought up and that he needs to face the consequences.
Posted by: Carlos Gutierrez | September 29, 2006, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
I think it’s more of a travesty that a man can become a state representative while still mistaking “you’re” and “your”
Posted by: Rob | September 29, 2006, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Stop turning this into a political debate. It had nothing to do with his affiliation, just the fact that he was a sick man in power. Now he’s removed, and hopefully he will be prosecuted. Get a life.
Posted by: Tom | September 29, 2006, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
sad thing is, if he were a female high school teacher doing this, it would be a misdemeanor, especially if he claimed he was Bi-polar, which he probably will at some point
Posted by: NMH | September 29, 2006, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
This isn’t a dem/rep thing. It’s a sick, twisted, criminal human thing. I can’t think of one republican who won’t be delighted to see this guy go down, and deservedly so.
Posted by: bjs | September 29, 2006, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Priceless…I hope they punish him to the fullest extent of the strict laws he worked so diligently to pass.
Posted by: J | September 29, 2006, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
let’s bring down all the pompous creeps in government who preach one thing and do another; all of them, from president cheney, w the wonder dog, and the rest of the self-righteous draft-dodgers who feel comfortable telling men to go and die when they were unwilling to do it during the vietnam war.
Posted by: dan | September 29, 2006, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Ha. This makes the user comments on the original article pretty laughable. This isn’t a Democrat vs. Republican issue people, and it’s definitely not liberal propaganda. Both parties need a lesson in accountability. Let’s quit pointing fingers and work together to keep criminals out of Washington.
hypocrite
1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings
Posted by: Lori | September 29, 2006, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
I wonder why it boils down to a Democrat/Republican thing with everyone as if it means every other one is involved. Because he’s a hypocrite? That’s every one of them, guys.
Posted by: Lyfe | September 29, 2006, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
It’s not about which party can be more disgusting. This is a non-partisan issue.
I mean, the sex offender registry doesn’t list political affiliation on it, does it?
But really… What’s a pederast, Walter?
Posted by: Non Partisan | September 29, 2006, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
That is why he quit so fast. Evidence that shows he did it. Plus being on the Committe to fight such things he should have known better.
Posted by: DL | September 29, 2006, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
I am certainly not making excuses for the allegations against the Congressman. However, I will say this, unless the AOL technical team can provide electronic versions of these messages, or unless a forensic examination of the alleged victims’ computers can verify the accuracy of these messages. The PDF file is just another possible Dan Rather incident. With all the ability to cut and paste, and fabricate documents, I would like to see some hard evidence provided by someone other than the alleged victims. It is very easy for someone to slander someone else with nothing more than a word processor and some fonts used by AOL.
Posted by: Long-Time Chatter | September 29, 2006, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
There won’t be any defense from Republicans, not after these messages. The earlier ones were pretty innocent, but these messages seem to be illegal and I don’t want anyone like that representing me. I’m sure most other Conservatives will say agree.
If he broke laws – prosecute!
Posted by: Emma Morrow | September 29, 2006, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
This is appalling and unacceptable but it wasnt our president who did this and dont forget about your great congressmen too like the one in Louisiana who had 100k in his freezer!
Posted by: J | September 29, 2006, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Last one for me today-
I like what Num. 32:23 says-
But if you do not do so, then take note, you have sinned against the LORD; and be sure your sin will find you out.
Check out those words- and be sure your sin will find you out. Yup, the word of God lives on !
Posted by: Richard Forinash | September 29, 2006, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
As a conservative, there’s no defense at all from me. Let this guy fry. No excuses. If this stuff is true, I for one won’t be trotting out a left wing conspiracy. Sexual predators should never walk the street again, regardless of party-religion-nationality or sexual orientation.
Posted by: steve | September 29, 2006, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
There is nothing to defend. His legislation to protect kids is real however, it got passed, it protects kids etc. What this guy was doing will likely get him in jail however. talk about throwing away a career.
Posted by: repub1 | September 29, 2006, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
This is really sad. Its an example of a gross abuse of power. It shouldn’t be seen as a partisan issue, though when reading about it I can’t help but feel a bit of irony.
Posted by: Clay | September 29, 2006, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Michael Savage just said that Foley shouldn’t have had to resign, and he made the Clinton comparison. Claaaaaasssssy.
Posted by: motherlowman | September 29, 2006, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Some morons here make this a Repub vs. Dem issue. He’s a pedophile. It doesn’t matter what his politics are. Lock him up and anyone else who’s a pervert from either side of the isle.
Posted by: george Stevenson | September 29, 2006, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Republicans won’t scream about conspiracy theories or smear campaigns. They won’t stand behind him just because he has an (R) next to his name. They will express their disgust and demand that he be held accountable, period.
Posted by: Mykelbe | September 29, 2006, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
If they can prove that these internet chats came from the congressman, I will be the first Republican in line to ask that he be prosecuted to the fullest extend of the law.
This is improper behavior from ANYONE, no matter what party line they tow.
Posted by: Karen | September 29, 2006, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Foley should be tried convicted and do hard time with no special privilages. Put him in the general prison population. This is a huge betrayel of the public trust.
Posted by: bill | September 29, 2006, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Delay, Ney , now Foley. Looks as though another Republican cut and running. Who’s next?
Posted by: Yert | September 29, 2006, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Let’s NOT make this political. It is wrong no matter who the person is, race, gender or religion. Start bringing up Clinton and you show you care less about prosecuting the guilty, and the minors that are effected than your party affiliation. That in iteslf is sick. I am a conservative republican and if this man is guilty, I hope he is prosecuted and serves a lengthy sentence for his crimes once convicted.
Posted by: chris | September 29, 2006, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Yesterday, I agreed with the people who thought this guy was out of line. Who would even have TIME to chit chat with some kid like he was doing?? Meaningless bunk!
Well, so much for all those naive people who thought he was :”just taking an interest.”
Think how “bullet proof” he must have felt, to dare to do such things. Just think about that.
Posted by: S. Sommer | September 29, 2006, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
>>C’mon Repubs…let’s see a defense!
Defense? Please. Let the guilty be punished, says I. Lock him away. And I think my fellow “Repubs” would agree.
Posted by: Kenny | September 29, 2006, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
No, this isn’t a dem/rep issue. My political beliefs begin with the premise that all politicians are snakes.
I haven’t been disappointed yet.
Posted by: Joel | September 29, 2006, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
no defense from this republican. put him away for a long time.
Posted by: william devan | September 29, 2006, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
WHERE ARE THE APOLOGISTS NOW?
EGG ON YOUR FACE. OWNED!
This guy is disgusting, Republicans should be ashamed.
Posted by: Jack | September 29, 2006, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
The speaker of the House (Hastert) who is a Republican did not attempt to defend his resignation. There are good Republicans and bad republicans just like there are good Democrats and bad Democrats.
Posted by: random | September 29, 2006, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
For what it’s worth, this man is human and to err is human. He made a mistake but he did the right thing in resigning. Let us learn from his mistake and build a better future for our kids. Let us not politicize or victimize anybody.
Posted by: George | September 29, 2006, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
FYI : definition of a “pederast:
ped·er·ast (pd-rst) (Websters)
n.
A man who has sexual relations, especially anal intercourse, with a boy.
Posted by: Gwen | September 29, 2006, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
C’mon Dems. no one is going to defend this scum bag. he deserves everything he’s gonna get. How about you show the same intellectual honesty in condemning criminal elements within your own party (i.e. Rep. William Jefferson D. Louisiana….Mr. Cash in my freezer).
Posted by: jose | September 29, 2006, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
I agree, why would a Republican want to defend this action. The guy is a disgrace. I doubt you will see any Republicans offering this guy a pardon. At least he saved us the trouble of tossing him out.
Posted by: Skyman | September 29, 2006, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
(gee) get a clue. to make this a partisan issue cheapens it. it’s a human issue. when charged,foley should be given a trial and if found guilty – prosecuted to the full extent of the law (problem is, politicians have a way with getting away with crime too much, don’t you think – gee?).
Posted by: David | September 29, 2006, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
As a conservative, I agree with Steve. A true conservative typically is principled and thinks this is wrong — whomever does it. This guy should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law….and we need to reform the rest of Congress. Give the country back to the people, not these self righteous hacks…of both parties!!!
Posted by: Ken | September 29, 2006, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
The self righteous, hypocritical SOB deserves everything he gets…
Posted by: Richard | September 29, 2006, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
This guy got caught with a minor. He didn’t confront the truth at all–he’s been doing this for years. At least with Clinton, it was consensual between two adults. True, he lied but then why the hell was it our business?
Posted by: Bush | September 29, 2006, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Why would anyone compare Clinton lying to Foley? Clinton’s lie was the worst part of the crime, had he admitted that he had relations with Monica he’d be embarassed but not prosecuted.
Foley lied about soliciting minors. He didn’t resign to avoid embarassment but because he is about to be prosecuted for a criminal offense.
Posted by: Uhh... | September 29, 2006, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
It’ll be interesting to see if his prosecution and sentencing are similar to others who have been caught, or if he will get a lighter sentence.
Posted by: Douglas Westerman | September 29, 2006, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Illegal activities and hypocrisy probably sums up most of our representatives.
Posted by: ralphy | September 29, 2006, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
I was a page in high school, but for the Senate side – this type of stuff was going on 10 years ago when I was there, and its a shame its still continuing. These boys never learn!
Posted by: tes | September 29, 2006, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Please, let’s hear some more of how this guy was such a wonderful person.
Posted by: Ron | September 29, 2006, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Well, the Dems had their scandals like this too. You know what happened? The voters re-elected the guy anyways. Check out Rep. Studds from Massachusetts: In 1983, U.S. Representative Jerry Studds of Massachusetts admitted having sex with a male teenage page.
Posted by: Max | September 29, 2006, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Aren’t people innocent until proven guilty? Yeah, thats right all you liberals, innocent until proven guilty. You’re jumping to convict him just because he’s a republican? What a sham you democrats are. Yes and it was eqaully shameful for republicans to convict clinton before a trial–even though he was guilty. If the guy really did this–then yes , he should burn, but let the jury decide and put away your partisan hatred and vitriol.
Posted by: Independent | September 29, 2006, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Um, don’t get me wrong, what this guy did was inexcusable but 1) Why did the kid continue talking to him, If I was 17 year old boy, and some old dude was creeping me out, I would have ceased communication with him immediately 2) Why if this kid says he was creeped out did he seem to flirt back with him, something doesn’t add up here.
Posted by: Tony | September 29, 2006, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
If this was a woman doing this to anoter woman would she have to resign?
Posted by: Don | September 29, 2006, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
I’ll agree that this isn’t a partisan issue. It’s simply a shame that someone with this little moral grounding was allotted so much power by our system.
Posted by: Kevin A. | September 29, 2006, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
to some people seen writing here: once again, you are letting the perverted, disdainful acts of a singular moron define a whole group of people (republicans) and their related character. Such uninspired, dim-witted partisan thinking is indicative of your level of understanding how the world works. Each group has its own.
Posted by: Luke | September 29, 2006, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
“I’m sure the Republicans are gonna cry this is a smear campaign by the Democrats” No Republicans are gonna call for the maximum penalty of the law. There’s more to life than your little us vs. them game.
When did Politics turn into the WWF?
Posted by: Don | September 29, 2006, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Thank God ABC nailed this one. Shows that the media can still do some good in America. Foley needs to have the book thrown at him. No party politics are required here. I think even the most partisan Dem or GOP would condemn this. I mean, as much as I despise what Clinton did to Monica, at least she was over 18.
Posted by: az radio guy | September 29, 2006, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
hypocrite
1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings
It is the hypocrisy that is so breathtaking among so many of these holier-than-thou, tell-us-how-we-should-live, defender-of-moral-values Republicans.
Makes me proud to be a liberal and delighted that Republican “family values” have blown up in their faces once again.
Posted by: Bob | September 29, 2006, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Sexual perversion knows no partisan affiliation. Those who suggest otherwise are just as dumb as this guy is sick.
Posted by: John Brown | September 29, 2006, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Maf54: Do I make you a little horny?
Teen: A little.
Maf54: Cool.
So it made the teen ‘a little’ horny, almost sounds as if this kid was into it. Was he? Maybe he’s not so innocent. I’ll wait for the facts to come to light, we’re only getting the media’s sensationalized version of this story.
Posted by: Laurie | September 29, 2006, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
I’d like to point out that sex scandals between consenting adults is one thing. Soliciting underage children for sex is a totally different thing.
Posted by: T | September 29, 2006, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
This is NOT a sex scandal, this is a PEDOPHILIA SCANDAL. What’s wrong with you people.This man should be in prison, I don’t care what party he is in.
Posted by: Campbell | September 29, 2006, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
UGH! This guy needs help.
I,as a Republican teen, do NOT defend this maniac. Even though he needs help with his problem, there is NO way he needs to stay in power trying to help others.
Posted by: Jason | September 29, 2006, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Dems never have sex scandals.
Which ones faced felony child molestation charges, as Foley will?
I’ll wait.
Posted by: dave | September 29, 2006, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
The gay rags in Florida have had photos about Foley and his partner for a while. But this minor thing is new to me.
Posted by: florida dem | September 29, 2006, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
We should know by now that the republicans are liars. It’s not too different than Bush saying he’s fighting for freedom when he’s really trying to limit freedoms. Yea Clinton was stupid but he was having a sexual encounter with a consenting, flirtatious adult. It ruined his chance to be a great president. Wouldn’t it be great if this one event pushed the house out of republican hands.
Posted by: Dave | September 29, 2006, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
He hasn’t even been convicted of a crime in a court of law and everyone is lining up to lock him up and throw away the key. Let him have his day in court and if he’s convicted the he should be burned.
Posted by: bobby | September 29, 2006, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
“Dems never have sex scandals, oh, except for”
This isn’t a sex scandal, most of which involve consenting adults. This is pedophilia.
Posted by: Sree | September 29, 2006, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
I am hoping the DNC can press this and take FL as another seat.
I am sure whoever gets put in will have his own skeletons Red or Blue. But any chance to get control over Congress and stop George “Il Duce” Bush from making more of a mockery of us on the world stage and get the War on Terror refocused, I am down with that.
Posted by: DS | September 29, 2006, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
I once did an article on sexual molestation of minors. The detective I spoke to said that in all his thousands of cases, he’d never prosecuted a case of an openly gay man. It was virtually all married heterosexual men, even when the victim was a boy. I also spoke to a summer camp director who said that the openly gay counselors were, almost uniformly, some of the most gifted he ever knew (and that he’d NEVER had a “sexual” problem with any of them).
So I always think it’s REALLY depressing when I read about policies like the Boy Scouts’ ban on openly gay men: it unfairly discriminates against and demonizes openly gay people, while doing nothing to actually protect kids, and actually may make things worse by creating a false sense of security.
Posted by: Brent | September 29, 2006, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
This guy should fry. Period.
This isn’t a Reb/Dem issue. This guy is a sexual predator and should be in jail.
My only question is the timing of the release of this.
Why so soon before the election?
Posted by: Common Sense | September 29, 2006, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
So he is guilty until proven innocent? That’s funny, I thought in America it was the opposite…
or maybe it’s “innocent until some weasely reporter says he’s guilty”.
Get ahold of yourselves people. This is exactly why our founding fathers didn’t set us up as a pure democracy. He’d be burned at the stake by you people before getting a fair trial.
Posted by: The Crow | September 29, 2006, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
There are wolves among us everywhere. Let’s not blame the sheep.
Posted by: Embarrassed | September 29, 2006, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
It gets worse? Public disgrace is not nice.
Posted by: Chris in Chicago | September 29, 2006, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
This is one sick puppy. The democrats are just as bad. They don’t see this as a child predator, they see this as a sure-win for a congressional seat.
Right out of the gates on the blogs, they are celebrating this as a victory. That is just sick.
Posted by: TB | September 29, 2006, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
I don’t think I’ve heard of anyone defending this guy from either side. He did something wrong, he got caught, he resigned, and now he’ll probably go to jail. Everything seems ok to me, and I’m a guy who voted for Bush in the past two elections. Funny how some people take the actions of a single man and use it to attack an entire group of people (read: Typical hypocritcal Republicans).
Posted by: darcdante | September 29, 2006, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
There is a BIG difference between this and Clinton. Clinton was having sex with an ADULT. This guy is a pedophile….
Posted by: anon | September 29, 2006, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
You waste so much time arguing back and forth about Dem/Rep and lib/cons. IT’S POINTLESS! The problem is not which party is in government, the problem is government. People keep thinking – if we pass more laws, we will be better protected; we can rely on the government. All they are doing is abdicating their liberty in return for nothing. No law will protect minors on the Internet. Only proper education and parental supervision will. That’s not up to the government or any party. It’s up to us.
Posted by: Mark | September 29, 2006, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
I voted for this guy many years ago (I’m a Democrat, and I thought he seemed decent and would give him a chance).
In 2000, when he defended Bush’s move not to count the votes in Florida, I knew I had made a big, big mistake. Who ever heard of a congressman, in America, that doesn’t want to make sure that the vote count is accurate?
After that, I thought he was just a spineless sheep following directions, I didn’t realize he was a pedophile.
Posted by: Former Idiot | September 29, 2006, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
And oftentimes, to win us to our harm, the instruments of darkness tell us truths, Win us with honest trifles, to betray us in deepest consequence.
Posted by: JA | September 29, 2006, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Where is the outrage from republicans. A leader who is involved in setting up laws to protect children is a man who children need protection from. Hypocrites!!!!I believe republicans have some dark secrets and that is why they set laws. They know their own evil self.
Posted by: Disqusted | September 29, 2006, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
For heaven’s sake! Look at you, turning this into a partisan issue. Foley is evidently a sick man. It doesn’t matter what side of the political spectrum a pedophile is on. They all need to be removed from society in a permanent fashion.
Posted by: Oh, please | September 29, 2006, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
A pervert is just a pervert. This isn’t an issue on party vs party. Get a life people! Quit trying to divide this country and unite in grilling this guy for what he is, a simple pervert. Nothing more!
Posted by: Ben | September 29, 2006, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
I am a conservative republican and I could care less if this guys is a republican or a democrats he should be castrated.
Posted by: republican | September 29, 2006, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Some of you need to wake up, this is not an issue of party. This man wanted to have sex with children, you need to get over yoursleves and whatever party you belong to and say this is wrong and he is sick.
Posted by: TRM | September 29, 2006, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Some of you need to wake up, this is not an issue of party. This man wanted to have sex with children, you need to get over yoursleves and whatever party you belong to and say this is wrong and he is sick.
Posted by: TRM | September 29, 2006, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
He needs to go to prison and NO, NO special treatment because he is a U.S. Rep. either! He needs his benefits stripped from him, too!
Posted by: Sue | September 29, 2006, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
One of the worst things is that this news story showed the kid’s screenname (before fixing it), which allows anyone to find his personal information, pictures of him, websites he’s posted on, etc. This is such terrible editing, I can’t believe it. Getting a news story out quickly is one thing, but giving out the names of everyone involved is irresponsible.
Posted by: Random | September 29, 2006, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Comments on the original article were based on the evidence present at the time. Now we have more to go on, plus a resignation. Trent Lott lost power over his gaff. Please, no one would actually defend a pedophile in their party.
Posted by: hacha | September 29, 2006, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
I don’t know of any Republicans who are trying to defend this guy, but let’s stop and wait just one minute. Just because some ex-Pages SAY that Congressman Foley used that on-screen name and posted sexually explicit stuff doesn’t make it the unvarnished truth. I can take that same name and go on-line right now and post whatever I want at a wide variety of chat rooms and blog sites. Let this play out. If he’s actually guilty, I’ll be happy to pull the switch on the guy, but if he’s not–THAT needs to come out too. His resignation raises questions, but isn’t “proof” of anything.
Posted by: Dave | September 29, 2006, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Time to elect a moral, hard-working, Democratic Congress!
Posted by: dan | September 29, 2006, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
OK just read the IM exchange and this is definitely inappropriate dialog btw Foley and the minor. I don’t think the issue has anything to do with whether one is a democrat or republican, it’s inappropriate because the young man is a minor.
Posted by: nettie | September 29, 2006, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
[we] can sit here and finger-point all we want, regardless of party affiliation this behavior is wrong. the major point i get from this is how many within the republican party stand up and openly declare their disgust towards homosexuals, and policies that directly and indirectly effect gays and lesbians. this makes me sick to my stomach. any sexual predators, straight or gay, need to be held accountable.
Posted by: TS | September 29, 2006, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
As a conservative I think Foley should be punised to the full extent of the law.
And, BTW, Clinton’s offense was not having sex, it was lying about it under oath…its called perjury and he should have been prosecuted.
Posted by: numb6 | September 29, 2006, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
You are right this is neither a Dem or Rep issue, this is a sick individual who needs to be locked up and have the keys thrown away.
Honestly though, the only reason he resigned was b/c he was caught. He would have kept on flapping his lips about needing stricter policies on pedophilia….I think he doth protest to much comes to mind…all the while lusting over teenage boys and obviously at least in some way that is now proven, act on them.
What we need is to quit separating ourselves along party lines and start paying attention to the PEOPLE we elect and if we feel they are fit to serve US, the people. With full drug tests, background checks, criminal misconduct checks, and more b/c they work for US. I am sick and tired of politicians covering up for each other and only distancing themselves when someone is caught with their hand in the cookie jar. If this were a typical business, not many on the Hill would be left with a job.
Just my humble 2 cents.
Posted by: Miche | September 29, 2006, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Why doesn’t anyone bring up the fact that these “children” were 17 and almost 18. Hardly children in my book.
Posted by: Adam | September 29, 2006, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Did anyone read that convo??? Holy cow. I hope that kid was leading him on intentionally or something. I know I would have been like “uh dude quit asking about my package please”. Good call on saving the convo too.
Posted by: Jason | September 29, 2006, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
I think this conversation goes a bit far when it says he wants to have sex with children. The only age I’ve seen listed for a complaintant is 16, which is the legal age of consent in a great many states and the District of Columbia (though Florida’s age of consent is 18).
I’m not endorsing the behavior, but unless there’s some evidence that the representative was also seeking out eight and ten year olds, let’s leave out accusations of pedophilia. They go farther than the information that has been reported, and really smear the guy. Clearly he’s a creep; clearly he has no boundaries; and clearly he’s willing to use his office to try to leverage sexual favors from subordinates. But a pedophile? Not based on this information.
Posted by: shamanic | September 29, 2006, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Unreal. This is so disgusting. As for the Republicans coming out to help, why would they? This guy moved Woodward and the facts of Bush’s botching of Iraq off the table. DAMN YOU KARL ROVE! LOL
Posted by: Constituent | September 29, 2006, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
I cant believe anyone would seriously try to compare Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky to this situation. You Repubs need a serious reality check. That was an affair between consenting adults and, while wrong, comes nowhere near to predatory internet pedophilia! Call a spade a spade. This guy is sick, and the Republican party has a long history of hypocrisy and, frankly, deviancy, that has to be addressed.
Posted by: Mary | September 29, 2006, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
How, exactly, were these messages authenticated? Were they found on the Rep’s computer system? Traced back to his personal IP address? If they are just text logs from a IM chat there is no reason to believe they are real.
Email is just as easy to fake, assuming you have a real path you can duplicate.
Although resignation does make it look like he’s guilty.
.cp
Posted by: coderpunk | September 29, 2006, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Hmm, turned out to be something worse than first reported… where are the people that gave Brian Ross a hard time about this story yesterday at today? tisk tisk
Posted by: JR | September 29, 2006, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
I guess ABC has a different standard for Republican sex scandals… When it came to the Starr report, they showed no such restraint with the details…
ABC writes:
“The language gets much more graphic, too graphic to be broadcast, and at one point the congressman appears to be describing Internet sex.”
Posted by: corn | September 29, 2006, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
“Innocent until proven guilty” right… but people still can’t get over OJ…
Posted by: JR | September 29, 2006, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Well, its just too sad that people can’t stick to the rules that they place on others. It appears he has a thing for young boys – so he should roast by the laws he pressed to enact.
That which is done in the dark….shall come to light. So be careful folks.
Posted by: calisally | September 29, 2006, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Nothing to do with politics here, guys is scumbag regardless of how he votes.
Posted by: JF | September 29, 2006, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Bill O’Reilly skewers people weak on child molestation – can’t wait to see him push for a 20-year sentence for Foley! No-spin zone!!!
Posted by: Jeremy | September 29, 2006, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Isn’t this guy from the state that decided whom the leader of the greatest nation would be? It goes to show how gullible these “conservatives” can be sometimes.
Posted by: California | September 29, 2006, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
y’all chickenheads have the political savvy of a door frame.
a) republicans will distance themselves from this guy, not defend him
b) clinton was not preying on children; it was not worse
c) democrats had every right to defend clinton because, see above, he wasn’t a PEDOPHILE. apples and oranges, people!
Posted by: chase | September 29, 2006, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
I wanted to believe ALL people would condemn this activity. However, partisanship remains even when it comes to the welfare of minors. Rep. or Dem. IT DOSEN’T MATTER. Crime is crime. If convicted.
Posted by: chris | September 29, 2006, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
This is just the latest in a long line of incidents that entail members of both parties. By the numbers, both parties are guilty of an almost equal number of incidents.
The first action that needs to be taken is the immediate termination of the Congressional page program and the sending of all pages home immediately. All these pages do is petty gopher work anyhow. This wasteful program needs to end.
Mark Foley needs to put away in prison as a sexual predator for the remainder of his life. Gerry Studds, and other past offenders need to be brought to justice as well.
Posted by: Mark | September 29, 2006, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
This is indeed a shock. But then again Congress has been do as I say not as I do for a long time. Perhaps its time for the time honored vote the SOBs out…
Posted by: W Cavins | September 29, 2006, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
I find it incredibly coincidental that ABC News would publish such allegations without an accompanying report of an arrest based on actual evidence that exceeds a PDF file with typing that could be generated by anyone. Without defending or crucifying anyone related to this story, can we please wait until there is some actual EVIDENCE of GUILT? We have an accuser and an accused, nothing more. To extend this beyond an accusation that will require more investigation before a FINAL conclusion can be made, just shows the ignorance or lack of intellect of those who have pronounced sentence.
Posted by: Dan | September 29, 2006, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
What concerns me is that a member of our government used ‘your’ when he wanted to say ‘you’re’. Even if Foley wasn’t soliciting sex from a child, it’s still a sad portrayal of the intelligence of our government. And in instant messaging, I would have excepted ‘yer’ or ‘ur’, but no, he chose to write out the whole – wrong – word.
And lastly, to sandy back at the top, are you really comparing Clinton’s relations with a consensual adult to soliciting sex from a 16-year-old boy? Wow.
Posted by: Tim | September 29, 2006, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Look folks,
I’m sure it must have occurred to you that the honorable Foley was doing research for his legislative initiatives. What’s wrong with a bit of congressional research.
When I am elected, I will tackle prostitution and other forms of illicit heterosexual behaviours.
Posted by: Ragman | September 29, 2006, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
The world is full of sick people, with a fair amount of them posting to this story. The collective conscience of the Dems are guilty. I see way more democrat whining at and about the injustice to Clinton(which this has nothing to do with)and the republican’s condemnation of this activity as a matter of principle.
Posted by: Chris | September 29, 2006, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
This is not comparable to the Clinton scandal.
Clinton’s lying under oath was bad, and his daliance with an intern was bad as well. But she was an adult, and the relationship was legal. This wasn’t a crime that came out of an investigation, it game out of Foley’s own behavior.
Let’s face it, certain people are just pondscum, and need to go. Foley is one of those. (Some folks say “need to fry” and I’m not sure that emails, however vile, qualify as a capital crime.)
Kudos to Conservatives and Liberals who adopted a wait and see attitude with the first charges, which seemed creepy and requiring an investigation, but not enough to ‘convict’ as it were.
Posted by: Fides | September 29, 2006, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Foley’s opponent in the Florida race is former GOPer Tim Mahoney, who was convinced to switch parties by Rahm Emmanuel to run against Foley. This whole thing stinks of republican dirty tricks. I’m not saying Foley’s not guilty. I am saying they needed him to go.
Posted by: Buddy | September 29, 2006, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Perhaps we can arrest this guy and throw him into a secret CIA prison without trial? He voted for that too!
Posted by: LokiLoki | September 29, 2006, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
The Repubs have been the worst at name-calling, at attacking, at pandering to the fundamentalist mornonic holier-than-thou “we’re good and you’re not” bunch… this is exactly what they deserve and they will most likely face alot more. It is obvious they have been BSing their way through while in power…this is only one of many ways. It’s way past time their house of cards began to crumble…we’ve all suffered enough at the hands of the ignorant.
Posted by: Eric | September 29, 2006, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Great reporting Brian and team!
Posted by: Corey | September 29, 2006, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Stop politicizing this????
You must be kidding.
This entire story IS political. No one is politicizing it. It’s political all by itself. Foley is a prominent Republican who appears to have engaged under-aged boys in sexual conversations. Aren’t the Reublicans supposed to be the party of Values?? Seems like everytime I turn around, there is another scandal going on in the Republican party. Cunningham, Abramoff, Allen, Foley… the list goes on. With so much corruption in this party, no wonder nothing is getting done. Now I know why Iraq and everything else is such a mess.
Posted by: jdw | September 29, 2006, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
It is just pathetic how people on the left or the right try to use news like this to demonize the other side. It has nothing to do with politics – If all you can take away from news like this is “ammunition” to demonize an entire party (under the notion that this sort of behavior is indicative of all of them and therefor rationalizes your compulsion to hate) then you are a sad example of why this country is in trouble. The man is a pathetic, sick person and he brought this on himself. Its got nothing to do with his party affiliation as far as any rational person is concerned.
It’s all shameful bottom feeding garbage. People like those that tout this sort of news as “evidence” that one party is evil are primitive thinkers at best, and a sad statement about our country at worst.
Both sides are equally guilty – there is no “high road” anymore. This is politics in America and it is a sad state of affairs.
Posted by: David | September 29, 2006, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Can we for ONE second knock off the Republican bashing?
This kind of crap is going on ALL Over the place, STOPPING it should be your main concern, not crowing about some imagined political gain for your “party” that doesn’t care about you anyways.
Why are you guys fighting for a bunch of suits in Washington? These are our children, and it’s not just Congressmen trying to fill the void in their soul by preying upon innocent kids.
FIGHT THE REAL FIGHT.
Posted by: Rich Foster | September 29, 2006, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
I have come to the conclusion that 50% of our legislators are crooks, 40% are perverts, and 10% are probably pretty decent.
Posted by: Jay | September 29, 2006, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Judging from most of the above comments, the human race is doomed. I really wish there were an alternative planet to go to.
Posted by: Doomed | September 29, 2006, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Well, I gave him the benefit of perhaps being innocent and got kicked in the face. Really does make you want to lose all faith in all politicians but I won’t do that. And I dont care if he’s Rebulican or Democrap, He’s a lousy criminal and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Actually should be held to a higher standard because of the trust we put in him and should receive twice what ever the sentence would normally be for soliciting minors. Makes me so damn pissed off that I tried to defend the bum….
Posted by: Lazaro Valdes | September 29, 2006, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
I just read the copy that ABC has of the messages he sent. If what they have released is the extent of it, he’s already punished by the public. It’s gross, but not criminal in my eyes. If there is more, and worse in nature, then he should face charges.
Posted by: Shannon McD | September 29, 2006, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
This is a such a disgusting shame! Here we have a congressman trying to pass laws about pedophilia, and he’s doing the exact same thing behind closed doors.
Kinda makes ya wonder about all those anti-gay “crusaders” ;)
Posted by: c1 | September 29, 2006, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
I am a Republican and I can say that this guy is a sicko. I hope there is a special place in hell for him and others like him. He should be prosecuted and hopefully will never see the light of day again.
Posted by: Jeff | September 29, 2006, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
I agree this isn’t a partisan issue except in the fact that the republicans always are running on “family values” and I’m tired of people telling me that they MUST vote republican because it’s the “Christian” thing to do. Are all democratic politicians wonderful people? NO. Do I approve of Clinton’s personal behavior while in office? NO. But he never once told me I should vote for him becuase it would make God happy. Come on, people! Wake up! I believe that my God wants us to think for ourselves.
Posted by: JJ | September 29, 2006, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
I’m really as liberal a democrat as they come and I love to see the republicans embarassed when they deserve it, but I have to agree that this is a non-partisan issue. And shame on those in either party that uses this tragedy for political game. He’s a sick, disturbed man who was preying on children. It’s disgusting and we should all be discussing ways to prevent this sort of thing instead of pointing fingers and trying to figure out which party is the bigger hypocrites. This has nothing to do with party and everything to do with protecting children from sexual predators.
Posted by: geoff | September 29, 2006, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
age of consent–16 wheres the problem?
Posted by: pzout | September 29, 2006, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
A person’s political preferance is irrelevant to this situation. What has this counry’s political system come to when we have pedophiles in Congress?
Posted by: Analyse | September 29, 2006, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Would this be the highest-profile person ever involved in an Internet-based scandal?
Posted by: Matt | September 29, 2006, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
I smell a book deal coming…Oprah get ready!!!
Posted by: dadpasadena | September 29, 2006, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Okay if anyone reads the so called transcript of the instant messages, you’ll notice that the screenname of the teen is “Xxxxxxxxxxx”.
Doesn’t this beg the question that beg the question that if his screenname can be alterned cannot the actual conversation be altered as well?? Furthermore the actual conversation itself doesn’t appear to come from a man the age of the Congressman. It just doesn’t seem plausible.
Then again you liberals aren’t concerned with the nature of the evidence but the seriousness of the charge.
Rather-Gate and forged memos sound familiar?
Posted by: Jeff | September 29, 2006, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Guilty in the court of public opinion! How many of you or even myself could stand under that scrutiny. I guess thats why we are here and they are there. A target is squarely on your back, but if you want to be in the public eye you better be a stand up guy. Someone, somewhere is digging up something to get you busted. In this case let’s wait and see, his life is basically ruined now anyways. One more pedophile exposed(so to speak) let’s put our energies into getting them instead of pointing fingers. Who will be first. By the way, my earlier post was added for one reason, it is sensationalist. The more bombastic and contoversial you are the more you are heard. Ain’t America beautiful!
Posted by: chris | September 29, 2006, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Apparently house leadership knew 11 months ago. And the FBI had received a complaint two months ago.
This is more than just Foley, but the “leadership” and the lack of action by the FBI seems to me. So why not anything on that aspect of the story ABC (home of fabricating events against Clinton over 9/11)…?
Posted by: lestatdelc | September 29, 2006, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
people are people and you’re going to get slimeballs regardless of party affiliation. Pretending it is all Republicans or all Democrats is just so blatantly stupid and ignorant.
Posted by: Bryan | September 29, 2006, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
Posted by: lestatdelc | Sep 29, 2006 8:18:13 PM
And more to the point, a sexual predator of teenagers in charge of the House Committee to protect minors from sexual predators.
Posted by: darylj | September 29, 2006, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
I don’t feel sorry for the Congressman since he knew what he was doing was wrong. Both parties are full of hypocrites and a sexual creep preying on kids is bad no matter what color, affiliation or sexual affiliation he is today. Even more troubling is a person of power (political, police, fire, religion) who uses it to get victims and hide behind the dignity of their professional. Shame to every politician, not just Dem or GOP. Every Congressperson is shamed bu this.
Posted by: jim | September 29, 2006, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
I am a Republican, but think that this sicko should be arrested and put on trial.
There simply is no excuse for this. It is a blessing that Foley never had a chance to be alone with the kid.
I wonder if there are other under age boys who will now have the courage to come forward if he truly molested them. Somehow I think that there are other victims who were.
Resigning from Congress is far too little a punishment, especially because of the seriosness of his crime.
Posted by: Lois at Sep 29, 2006 8:24:02 PM
Posted by: Lois | September 29, 2006, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
I am a conservative, but I got to tell you, I am very glad this guy got caught before he possibly got reelected. I hope he, if this stuff is true, and it sounds as it is, is prosecuted to the maximum. Let’s see how he likes playing these games with Bubba and Rock in prison. Far from a Democrat/Republican issue (let’s face it people, just like any other segments in society (male/female, black/white, Christian/agnostic, rich/poor, etc), there are some sickos)it makes you wonder what power does to some of people who behave so weird.
Posted by: Josh | September 29, 2006, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
The Difference between Republicans and Democrats is this..
We Republicans will not make excuses for his bad behavior. WHen A republican falters, we dont try and make like its OK.
This guy needs some serious help and I hope he gets it. He does not belong in congress
Posted by: Anthony | September 29, 2006, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
GET A LIFE PEOPLE. Why is it always a Rep vs Dem. thing! We should do away with all Parties and just vote for the individual. If you base your vote just on the R or D, your a moron! You know what…Reps. do good, Reps do bad. Dems. do good, Dems do bad. People do good, people do bad. Just vote for the person not the R. or D.
Posted by: BOB | September 29, 2006, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
There’s more to the story, folks. Who, What, Where, Why, How & WHEN. ABC never reports _when_ these exchanges took place. I’ve no doubt their eagerness to bring down a Republican House member just short of an election. The real story is timing. No one can seriously defend this guy – there’s no question he should have resigned and face prosecution. Yet, what we see, once again, is the media as willing accomplice to publish leaks – an issue they’re all too happy to ignore.
Posted by: Pablo | September 29, 2006, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
ABC MUST BE HAVING AN OVERWHELMINGLY LARGE RESPONSE TO THIS STORY… BUT THEY WON’T REPORT IT UNLESS THEY CAN FIGURE OUT A WAY TO MAKE IT GEORGE BUSH’S FAULT… BECAUSE ACCORDING TO THEM EVERYTHING IS!
Posted by: ROCKY | September 29, 2006, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
As a libertarian, I am sickened. Are we so far off a normalized curve that we can not reach a common opinion on this point without immaturity and pedantery?
Do we hate the “other” to such an extent that we are willing to suspend our fundamental beliefs?
Is it not sick to derive joy from this situation or any other that is pareto and/or kaldor-hicks inefficient (see, gloating over clinton, thurmond, 9/11, et. al.).
In the words of Oliver Cromell, in the bowels of Christ, think that you might be mistaken.
Your horrify me.
~someone three sigmas outside the mean.
Posted by: dmk | September 29, 2006, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
To John, if Speaker Hastert did indeed know about this, that’s another story worth looking in to. Because this thing is so new, I doubt you know what Hastert knew a year ago. I’ve yet to read that.
Besides, you totally glance over the point of my post. -Pablo
Posted by: Pablo | September 29, 2006, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
I think that the funniest/saddest thing about this whole story and the above comments is that so many people are so stupid to believe that there really is a difference between the Rep and Dem parties.
Get a clue all of you.
Posted by: Gary | September 29, 2006, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Only one question….
What kind of society do we live in that allows powerful to prey on the powerless for so long? Doesn’t anyone care?
Posted by: Mike from CT | September 29, 2006, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
I’m a young, life-long Republican and this is a straight fact story. Mr. Foley, who is someone I’ve always enjoyed as a national Republican figure, has completely wrung his own neck here. I’ve read the entire transcript and it is undeniable his intent, past interactions, and technique was focused on fulfilling sexual desires with this underage former Congressional page. Foley being gay is not the issue. The issue is the abuse of his position as a member of Congress and as Chairman of the House Committee on Missing and Exploited Children as it pertains to his illegal actions with this underage young man. It’s disappointing to see anyone discard years of accomplishment by letting unhealthy desires overwhelm his/her sense of what’s appropriate, legal, and responsible. In all seriousness, he’ll probably wind up serving time for this and any other inappropriate relationships he’s fostered in the past. Fellow Republicans should not attempt to defend him or his actions, for Mr. Foley is wholly responsible. Democrats should not make political hay out of this, because it just reflects badly on all people in power. Just one more shade of doubt cast over our leaders.
Posted by: mh | September 29, 2006, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
I haven’t been able to find this in anything I’ve read so far, but has it been proven that Foley was actually the person using the Maf54 IM handle? I mean, take a look at this forum – anyone can enter in any information and make it appear as though someone else was posting. Anyone can create an IM handle with any name they want. I am just wondering if the same thing happened here with Foley or if they actually have some concrete evidence to prove the allegations…
And I don’t think the fact he resigned is proof of anything – take a look at Tom Delay. Forced to resign but the charges against him are being dropped left and right. With the way the media is hostile against conservatives, Foley may have simply resigned because it is close to election time and didn’t want this to distract against the upcoming races. If that is the case, liberals could simply win by accusing a Republican of something hideous. That alone is a scary thought.
Granted, if Foley *IS* indeed guilty, they need to lock the sick SOB up for a long time…
Posted by: voxrepublicanis | September 29, 2006, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
See how the GOP and supporters of Foley are blaming the people who discovered this or reported on it rather than just saying what Foley did was wrong and moving on?
Also, if the GOP leadership of the House knew about the Foley emails 10-11 months ago why did they not ask for his resignation then? Why didn’t he do so? Why didn’t they tell the voters that this happened? He broke the law and they covered it up!
Posted by: bob | September 29, 2006, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
Perhaps Chris Hansen should set up his “To Catch a Preadtor” house in D.C. Then he can get rid of ALL of the pedophiles in Congress. I guarantee Foley is not the only one. The rest just are not stupid enough to leave a trail.
Posted by: Danielle | September 29, 2006, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
It’s not a Dem Repub thing, it’s a loss of the moral fabric of society thing. Don’t bring up Clinton, because a 35 year old aid and a minor are two COMPLETELY different things. Don’t confuse a political issue with a criminal issue, please.
Posted by: Carl Eliotte | September 29, 2006, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Republican or democarat – he was a hypocrite. He acted in a committe to protected missing and exploited children. The irony is that he will be judged by some of the laws that he helped put into place. I’m glad he stepped down.
Posted by: jan | September 29, 2006, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
For those really interested in hypocrisy, read the responses to the story yesterday.
So many people ready to jump on Brian, NBC and the kid who thought it was weird to begin with.
Is is possible to get all those people who defended this weirdo to give us an updated reaction. And perhaps an apology?
Posted by: Brady | September 29, 2006, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
It is a shame there is not a way to vote out everyone from office. Reps and Dems all at the same time. Since there is not you have to vote for who you feel will not tax you to death, or pass laws that make it difficult to do anything fun… oh well there’s alway Iran… according to the news that guy there’s wonderful and we should all just let him develop a wonderful energy supply.
Posted by: Jack | September 29, 2006, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
To think that someone puts the politics of re-election over the well being of our children is disgraceful. If House leadership knew something about this and did nothing for fear of losing a few seats, none of them deserve their seats in Washington. Get the political parties out of this and truly put the country’s interest at heart, and there is a slight chance you might have people in Washington with some backbone to stand up and say “we won’t accept this” and put bastards like this in jail. I’m sure the Democrats would’ve covered up this kind of activity, too. Screw the party system!
Posted by: dataman4hire | September 29, 2006, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
This is typical of the kinds of decision making and leadership that make up our government.
Posted by: Dave | September 29, 2006, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
All these posts detailing who ELSE did what to whom are irrelevant.
What is relevant: Assuming the allegations are true (and that looks like a lock) do the people of Florida want THIS man representing them or not?
What is relevant: Was a crime committed? If so, will he be punished?
As for why this came out so close to the election, BETTER NOW than AFTER the election!
Honestly, IS THIS THE BEST WE CAN DO???
Posted by: John P | September 29, 2006, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
So how is FOX News the “Balanced to the Right” newsgroupies going to cover this?
Posted by: Dale | September 29, 2006, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Those that assume politics will force Republicans (like me) to come to Foley’s defense are wrong.
On Drudge, I read some of the IM transcripts. This guy should be in jail. If it gives the state of Florida to Democrats, so be it.
If he did this, then he should spend years hard time. He might not even mind. Sick.
Posted by: Wade Lindberg | September 29, 2006, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
No one who has read these comments has mentioned that we should weep at the condition of our nation for our leaders are some of the worst among us in hiding their sins till they are caught. I am assuming since he resigned that there must be fire where there is smoke. Regardless if he is guilty or not we should pray as a nation for our leaders who are captive to their own lusts. We need to sorrow that both parties has men among them who are great deceivers and bound by sin. This is nothing to rejoice over but weep over as a nation. We need to pray for better discernment in choosing the men who lead us. To read the comments and see the rejoicing at the fall of a man is a sin that is equal unto his in my judgement. Are we fellow Americans who should sorrow that there are men who rise so high to national heights. Pray for his soul that he may repent and be delivered from his lusts.
Posted by: george | September 29, 2006, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Those of you who are clinging to the idea of “presumed innocent until proven guilty”… Would you quickly abandon your seat in the House (or any other position of political power, for that matter) if someone lied about you engaging in sexually explicit discussions with minors on AOL?
I mean, at least defend yourself if you’re innocent of the charges! Sheesh! Don’t run like a coward! Simple fact is… he has to know he’s been caught to run like that.
The irony, of course, is Republicans (and many Democrats) who are responsible for passing unconstitutional laws which gut the idea of presumed innocence, to say nothing of dozens of other ideals that they should be protecting. Republicans insisting on presumed innocence for Foley is a new standard by which all future hypocrisy shall be compared.
Posted by: John Cullison | September 29, 2006, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Posted by: dataman4hire | Sep 29, 2006 9:16:00 PM
“If House leadership knew something about this and did nothing for fear of losing a few seats, none of them deserve their seats in Washington.”
Well that is the hanging question, which ABC doesn’t touch at all, but other news sources are discovering.
Posted by: lestatdelc | September 29, 2006, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
The fact of Mr. Foley’s sexuality is of no concern to me. However, I am disturbed that he sought to demonize and punish others who were of the same sexual persuasion. He is a disturbed, self-hating individual. He lived a lie, which has finally caught up with him. He must be held accountable for his actions.
Posted by: cabral2 | September 29, 2006, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
I love how republicans are going no go ahead and fry this guy and all the libverals are saying how hypocritical rebulicans are? This is one moron regardless of party affiliation. Liberals get a clue no here has defended this scum bag. Let him fry!!
Posted by: Joe | September 29, 2006, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Wow. This is really disgusting. What a creep. When they first reported this I thought it was just politics as usual but this is gross. I hope he goes to jail.
Posted by: Pattie | September 29, 2006, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
This is not a republican or democrat issue. It is about the depths of the depravity of man. Sexual deviancy does not respect political affiliation. There are liberal and conservative pedophiles. Anyone who tries to make this a republican issue is an absolutely pitiful hack and very shallow. If you think have a (D) next to your name means you cant ever be a deviant, you are an idiot.
Posted by: mobilepreacher | September 29, 2006, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
The thing that surprises me the most, and I’m sure I will be called naive because it does, is that anyone is even saying anything about Dems or Repubs. The fact that this was an adult soliciting a minor (the kid admitted he was a minor) is more than enough. I read someone said, “I’ll wait for the facts of the case”??? What is that about? The kid said he was under 18, this freak is talking about hard penises, what other facts do you need? Is their ever a case where it would be ok for an adult to speak to a child this way? And yes, seventeen is still a child. Does it even matter that it was consentual? No and no. Just another case of someone in a powerful position preying on someone weaker than themselves. It’s so disgusting.
Posted by: Sheli | September 29, 2006, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
Why does this have to be about Republicans and Democrats? This is about a man who is seriously ill and needs to be prosecuted under the fullest extent of the law no matter his political affiliation. You’re not going to find a single Republican or Democrat who is going to justify what this guy did if he is found guilty
Posted by: Tanner | September 29, 2006, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Clinton’s ordeal wasn’t with a minor and he was not out there preaching against infidelity. Throughout time, every leader in the world, or just about every man in power, for that matter, has or has had a mistress. Great men that no one would ever question the integrity of have had mistresses. Nobody should care but Mrs. Clinton and Miss Lewinsky. How can anyone compare what Clinton did to this? Totally different thing here people. Minor vs. consenting adult. Grow up and stop treating government like football teams. Root for good vs. evil not Republican vs. Democrat. Root for the progress our leaders make not the ideals they claim.
Posted by: mariya | September 29, 2006, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
We can vote out the do-nothings and scammers.
Support verifiable paper balloting
Democracy is built one vote at a time!
Posted by: kaypicts | September 29, 2006, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Posted by: cabral2 | Sep 29, 2006 9:32:37 PM
Good point, though worth underscoring that homosexuality and pursuing minors is not the same thing at all. Just like heterosexuality is not the same thing as pursuing minors.
Though homophobia in society and the GOP in particular might have been a contributing factor in this guys repression and pathological problems.
A point which will get lost on the GOP-bigot brigade of course, but gay = commie boogeyman (just like “terror” = commie boogeyman as well) in days of yore, and besides, the GOP doesn’t do nuance of complexity well, there world is black and white (excpet when ti comes to global warming and you know… actual science, then it is all just “speculation” and “inconclusive” stuff, trotted out by oil industry paid for hacks).
Posted by: lestatdelc | September 29, 2006, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Hey Vic,
Typ Rep. straw man argument
Posted by: kaypicts | September 29, 2006, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Why not stop functioning as a “D” or an “R” and just be a member of the HUMAN RACE. People in this group think this is disgusting regardless of party affiliation, rejoice at his exposure and pity his family–as most normal people would.
Posted by: Terri | September 29, 2006, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Posted by: Joe | Sep 29, 2006 9:34:39 PM
Sell it to someone else. Yesterday the GOP was screaming this was all a Democratic smear job, and now right here in this thread they are screaming this is no different that Clinton and Lewinsky, or the result of liberalism, etc. Not to mention that it appears the GOP leadership knew about this for almost a year and did NOTHING about it in order to defend their control of Congress. Sorry, but your protestations ring false as Washington’s teeth.
Posted by: lestatdelc | September 29, 2006, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
This is not a Republican or Democrat thing. There are hypocrites everywhere. I’m sure I’ve been found to be hypocritical in other areas in my life too. And how the hell did Clinton, Bush and Cheney get drag into this?
I’m Independent-I think hypocrisy and self-righteousness are booming in the liberal and conservative crowds. Turns me off!
And if those boys weren’t under 18 – who cares?
Posted by: Ray | September 29, 2006, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
The sad part is that it seems Dennis Hastert and other members of the Republican House leadership have been covering this up for almost a year.
If this is in fact true, they should all resign in disgrace and keep Foley company in jail.
Posted by: Howard | September 29, 2006, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
I posted earlier today about withholding judgement until more info was available, well …..
He’s a pedophile….sick, perverted, disgusting….thankfully he had the sense to resign..
Posted by: mom | September 29, 2006, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
FYI – Foley has always been criticized by Repubs for being too liberal. He’s known as a RINO (Republican In Name Only).
Also – I think this is a clear case of someone with personal sick issues. He has fought in Congress to stop child pornography for years. I think he wanted to get rid of it so that it would be impossible for him to access it. He probably did some research and became addicted to it. He’s sick, twisted, and needs help.
It’s pathetic to me that so many on this blog have made it a partisan thing. If this blog is any indication of our country (which I think it is), then we are never going to find a middle ground in politics. No one wins with so much extremism, because ideals and principles are compromised for voter appeal.
Posted by: Mason | September 29, 2006, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
This guy is a joke… I am a rock rib hard core Republican – he belongs behind bars. You wont see the Republicans lining up behind this piece of trash like you did all of the duplicitous Womens groups ( liberal Democrats ) behind Clinton after his abuse of an intern. remember NARAL, Feinstein, Boxer and the likes. Guaranteed the Republicans help convict this pedophile.
Posted by: Frank Consalo | September 29, 2006, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Age of consent in Washington DC is 16.
Technically, he was not soliciting “children” under DC laws. I am not sure that DC would charge him with anything.
DC is not a state, so I am not sure about state laws.
It will be interesting to see if he is charged and with what.
Posted by: Steve | September 29, 2006, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
This sounds like a typical democrat hit job just like Woodward’s book. How did this little scam come to light?
Posted by: t j callahan | September 29, 2006, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
No Republican is going to stand by this lost soul – he needs incarceration, and repentance before God Almighty. Prison is just where he belongs – - so long as a Liberal (Democrat) judge doesn’t give him a light sentence, as we all know they usually do.
Posted by: Peej | September 29, 2006, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
The man was part of the leadership on the House caucus on missing and EXPLOITED children.
If this doesn’t shock to the very core every parent in America i don’t know what will. I don’t care if you’re a Democrat, a Republican, or a Libertarian, that’s got to make you want to smack this man in the face, as well as his cohorts who covered it up for a YEAR.
Posted by: Dee | September 29, 2006, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Where’s that nimrod journalist Chris Hanson when he’s needed?
Posted by: yoda222 | September 29, 2006, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
And to just imagine, the republican leadership knew about almost a year ago. they are done!!
Posted by: alan | September 29, 2006, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
How did this come to light ?
Because someone got tired of covering for him – it looks like the Republican leadership has known about this for over a year.
What same person would let a known pedophile run a committe on missing and exploited children ?
Oh yeah, the same one that puts oil companies in charge of the Clean Air Act, mining companies in charge of Wildlife Preservation, the military in charge of No Child Left Behind and a retired horse judge in charge of disaster recovery.
Posted by: Ultra | September 29, 2006, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Throw the bums out– all of them.
Posted by: Jon | September 29, 2006, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
You know, this is really a sad state of affairs. This is not about R or D, this is about a sick individual who has broken the law, and is a pedafile. I think this shouldnt be painted as party politic, but as a criminal offense that needs to be prosecuted accordingly.
Posted by: Teresa | September 29, 2006, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
that’s why there are laws to protect kids – it’s because they are kids no matter what they already know about sex. i’m no prude, but leave the kids alone, they can get themselves in trouble on their own as it is, there’s no need to help them get into deeper trouble. then you have a LAWMAKER who seduce kids – it’s just SICK….no wonder he resigned so fast.
Posted by: Clara | September 29, 2006, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
>>Posted by: Lori | Sep 29, 2006 >>6:29:42 PM
>>Clinton lied under oath. This >>guy quit, when confronted with >>the truth. There is a big >>difference.
Really. Can your Republican measuring stick measure the difference between sex with an adult and pedophilia? I’d like to know how large THAT difference is…
Posted by: sdf | September 29, 2006, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Some same the Republicans aren’t lining up for this guy, and that he quit which all somehow makes it good…
The problem is the republican leadership knew about this for almost a year. They were going to wait until after he won reelection to expose him (no pun intended.) That says to me the republicans were protecting this sicko.
Posted by: Dave | September 29, 2006, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Why are you making this a republican/democrat issue….the issue is an adult soliciting an underage youth…get serious about the crime and quit using politics to inolve an issue that is not political…it is horifying example of an adult who took advantage of innocent young people…he is a pedophile…last time i checked they were not particularly affiliated with one party vs another….so focus on the issue
Posted by: john | September 29, 2006, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Posted by: Gary
“I think that the funniest/saddest thing about this whole story and the above comments is that so many people are so stupid to believe that there really is a difference between the Rep and Dem parties.
Get a clue all of you.”
————————
Stay focused. Help bring our kids home and realize that most of the problems we face today were borne of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
Posted by: rolly polly | September 29, 2006, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Monica was over 18 and they were both consenting adults, I admit clinton was a scumbag for doing this, so sdf dont try to justify this by bring up bill clinton again and again, or should I say this 13 times
Posted by: alan | September 29, 2006, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
No politics here. Well, hypocritcal of course. This evil person is a pedofile. Unfortunately, there’s a lot more out there, along with sexual predators of all sorts.
Posted by: scott cluthe | September 29, 2006, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
This shouldnt be a partisan thing. The man is obviously sick and if he broke laws he should be punished according to them.
Posted by: Greg | September 29, 2006, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
This Congress is worthless- Democracts and Republicans. They should all be tossed out on their rear ends. And if that were the case, Republicans and Democrats, would both be better off. While this country bickers and squabbled in partisan disputes, the world is passing us by.
Posted by: Jon | September 29, 2006, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
THIS IS NOT A REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT THING. THIS GUY IS DISTURBED. HE DID THE RIGHT THING BY RESIGNING. NOW, HE HAS TO FACE THE MUSIC.
Posted by: tuftskins | September 29, 2006, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
As a Republican, I have only one comment, IF he is prosecuted then he is still innocent until proven guilty.
Posted by: AMERPUN | September 29, 2006, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Wise people realize that there isn’t much difference between the parties when it comes to morality yet, it is hard not to question the Republicans attachment to what they believe is moral, especially when they define the Democrats as “Godless”. Like I said previously, things and people are not what they seem. No one with a brain actually believes that either party is worth a anything. They are corrupt without any regard for anything other than their own bank accounts. So don’t assume you know what anyone else is about—how foolish, you thought you knew what I was thinking. Dumb!
Posted by: Art | September 29, 2006, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
The worst thing about this story is just coming out. Apparently the Republican leadership knew about this for almost a year and DID NOTHING. In fact they helped fund Foley’s campaign. Sick
Posted by: Scott Andrews | September 29, 2006, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Unbelievable…A sick child porn pervert congressman getting caught and all a majority of you Americans can do is make this into a politcal issue. Last time I checked Republican, Democrat, or Independent, any adult engaging in sick sexual perversion with a minor has no party affiliation. He’s a sick bastard. Shame on America!
Posted by: Tom | September 29, 2006, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
These conversations that so many of you are so disgusted by happen by thousandfold everyday online between consenting adults. The problem here is not the content so much as it is the fact that these boys were underage. At least this paragon of hypocrisy Congressman did not actually proposition these kids, I far as I can tell from reading the IMs. It seems more pathetic than anything else, a grown man asking boys about their masturbatory practices… Do we know if he actually broke any laws? I believe he deserves to resign but his biggest moral failing seems to me to be his political & public hypocrisy, acting as if he seeks to protect youths from online predation and then practicing it on the sly… At least Clinton wasn’t trying to pass legislation to ban fellatio!
Posted by: Chris | September 29, 2006, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Is it true the age of consent in D.C. is 16? I read that.
Posted by: Bill | September 29, 2006, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
The politcal crap got way too thick half-way down. This is just another “see how twisted the world is stories” to get everybody’s attention away from how twisted the world is.
Posted by: Mudlake Slim | September 29, 2006, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Why does the age of consent matter? This guy was preying on teenage boys, over whom he was in a position of influence. Even if these kids were 18 or 19, it is still sick. And NOT because he’s gay… it would be just as sick if they were girls…
Posted by: mad hatter | September 29, 2006, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
The article states that a former class of pages was warned about Foley by “by people involved in the program.”
It’s reasonable to assume that the term “people involved in the program” refers to adults that oversaw page operations. If the statemennt is true, it indicates that certain adults knew something was suspicious and failed to take action. In other words, a cover-up.
Perhaps that’s what Hassert was referring to when he stated that Congress was going to review the page program.
Posted by: E | September 29, 2006, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
“Innocent until proven guilty” is only valid in a court of law. In the court of public opinion the rules are different. If someone slashes to death his ex-wife and her boyfriend, yet pays an attorney to convince a jury otherwise … he is ‘not guilty’ of the crime in the eyes of the state, but is still guilty in the court of public opinion (and he still did it).
In this situation the court of public opinion has rendered its decision on whether or not a self-appointed member of God’s Squad in our United States Congress inflicted his pedophile disease upon an innocent minor.
Even if the glove don’t fit, you can’t pull the wool over the eyes of the public.
Posted by: ras | September 29, 2006, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
It really amazes me that all of these Republicans have skeletons in their closets. They are all hypocrites. We really need to make the vote count this fall and get rid of anything republican.
Posted by: Liberal Politics | September 29, 2006, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
After reading the explicit e-mail, the former congressman should be charged with multiple offenses forthwith. His actions are disgusting and bring shame to his office and his family.
Its ironic that the state of Florida has done such a great job with protecting children with the passage of “Jessica’s Law” as well as Foley with his recent legislation but these same laws will be used to prosecute Foley.
As a person who investigated child abuse & neglect with the former NYC Child Welfare Administration for 7 years, I would ask that Foley be given no leniency.
Posted by: Paul Kosowski | September 29, 2006, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
After the house leadership found out about these e-mails, why didn’t they ask Foley to resign immediately? Why didn’t they protect other pages from this predator?
Posted by: Wendy | September 29, 2006, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
I’m glad when a republican does something like this the caucus doesn’t jump to his defense. If he’s a sicko, we don’t want him representing our party. Shame that when a dem (let’s say william jefferson) hides several thousand in his freezer (a logical place, but did anyone check under the mattress?) everyone, including some members of the GOP come to his defense. I dont care if he’s a republican or not, do something like whats described in this article or what Jefferson, or Ney, or Delay did, and its good riddance. Partisans should not want these ppl representing their parties.
Posted by: aaron | September 29, 2006, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
You Americans really are strange people. You manage to turn every issue into a Democrat vs Republican, Liberal vs Conservative issue. Why can’t you just a spade a spade sometimes. What a painfully divided and polarized nation you live in. Glad I don’t.
Posted by: George | September 29, 2006, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
When it comes to politics it is everywhere, and in many different forms. For instance, when I first became a teacher, I was informed by a student, that some “volunteer” instructor (aged 33) was having sex with the teenage girls on the flag team. As a feminist, a woman, a human being I turned the rat in; however, afterwards I discovered that all the male coaches/teachers had “heard” about it. What does that say about a group sticking together or ignoring the problem. The creep accused did serve a brief amount of time for 18 counts of sexual whatever WITHOUT the teens testifying—he went to prison for 18 months, eleven of those months were at the county jail. Creeps are everywhere lurking, as well as disguising themselves the best way they can.
So, it is not about the parties but it does make for interesting satirical musings in the political realm. And we all know that it is not a funny situation for the children of this country.
Posted by: Art | September 29, 2006, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
I dont care if it a Democrat or Republican….but if the Republicans withheld this information for over a year as is now being reported–then they must pay the political price. If it were the Democrats who his this, same goes for them.
Posted by: Billy Depp | September 29, 2006, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
This has nothing to do with being Republican or Democrat. He is a pedophile and should be in jail.
Posted by: Susana | September 29, 2006, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
Why do some find it ironic or strange that Foley was on a committee to protect children from internet predators? Immersing oneself in the committees and people and groups who fight against what one does is common: they believe 1) none will suspect him/ her due to their membership; 2) they will come to know ways to avoid being caught; and 3) they will obtain insider knowledge of how the opposition operates. Consider the criminally minded individual who volunteers to do police work or the firesetter who volunteers in the local fire dept.
Posted by: PoliThinker | September 29, 2006, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
I think its pretty sick in of itself that some people are using this for strategy in a political season. I’m a republican an a survivor of abuse.
I say leave politics out of it and punish folley. Then get to the healing part for his victims.
Posted by: rich | September 29, 2006, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
Honestly, the AOL chat seems questionable. If it is true, the guy should burn. BTW…I love how the Dems love to make this political and screaming ‘hypocracy’. Don’t you see the irony there?
Posted by: Kevin | September 29, 2006, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
This is why i hate being a republican, though. You know that dems are going to swing, and we’re going to look foolish trying trying to play it down.
Especially the white house. No matter what, this is good for at least a 3 to 6 point hit on his numbers. It will be interesting to see how the white house plays this one.
I hope tony snow comes out and just says “the white house comments on matters concerning the white house” and moves on.
I apologize to all of you dems out there for the hipocracy and dishonesty. The voters as a whole, i’d guess, apologize.
RjG
Posted by: RjG | September 29, 2006, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
“Another example that those who scream the loudest about something are probably the worst violators behind the scenes!
Posted by: Jason Carson | Sep 29, 2006 6:19:31 PM”
I guess this would make socialists the worst capitalists behind the scenes! Or those who call for more stringent laws against rape or murder the biggest rapists and murderers around!
A++++ FOR LOGIC.
Posted by: cicero | September 29, 2006, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
Wow. Hard working tax paying americans are struggling to survive, solders are dying every day in Iraq, we have a huge deficit and this is how he chooses to spend his time.
Posted by: Tim | September 29, 2006, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
This has nothing to do with either political party. Its nothing more than a sick individual who had more power than most everyday citizens, and used his position to warp the minds of children.
The people posting here that are bashing each others political stance when the real issue is obvious, remind me of jr high kids.
By the way i am a registered independant that couldnt care less how it makes either party look.
Posted by: mark | September 29, 2006, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
As others have voiced already, hey d _ _ _ _ _ _ s, this has nothing to do with party politics so leave it by the curbside…quit with the labels, what we have is a sexual predator hunting for minors. Who cares if he is republican or democrat but it seems that party apologists are out again bent on blaming others for this man’s wrong doings. The spin machine will effectively cover up his crimes, blame the other party for it and all of society’s problems and he’ll walk without even a threat of an investigation. Those of you bent on protecting this guy ought to join him in one of our fine Los Angeles County jails.
Posted by: eleven bravo | September 29, 2006, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Of course it’s a political matter. The GOP leadership KNEW about this for a long time, and LEFT Foley on the house, ways and means, and the committee dealing with kids and predators. THEY LEFT HIM ON these committees.
The GOP administration’s FBI has known for 2 MONTHS and has done nothing.
If it was ONE GOP member, sure it wouldn’t be a political matter. But the GOP LEADERSHIP CONDONED this predator by allowing him to remain a GOP LEADER himself, and to write laws against people like himself. Talk about putting the fox in the hen house…
Yeah, don’t let the right wingers here say party affiliation has nothing to do with it. The GOP allowed it, thereby condoning to having a known predator serving in our sacred united state’s congress.
Posted by: rdf | September 29, 2006, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Clinton did not engage in illegal activity with a minor…that’s the difference!
Posted by: MacMac | September 29, 2006, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
The GOP leadership should have immediately reported him to the authorities when they found out about these advances to a minor.
Posted by: Jane | September 29, 2006, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
clinton had an affair with a grown woman, which is not pedophelia. and pedophelia is not confined to a political party. there will be more kids coming forward to point fingers at men of both parties. google search the franklin cover-up and watch “conspiracy of silence” on google video.
Posted by: jj | September 29, 2006, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
people keep saying “minor” I understand by many legal definitions a anyone under 18 is a minor but also keep in mind the age of sexual consent in many states is quantified by several ages (eg 14, 15 and 16) so in many states a 16 year old is not a minor when it comes to sexual consent. So what foley has done may be immoral it may not be illegal. And judge not yet yee be judged
Posted by: CensoredAgain | September 29, 2006, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Ironically, the laws that Foley was helping to put into place may be what does him in. We do not have all the facts yet, so we should try to remain objective, even when it looks like he is interested in the forbidden fruit (the real forbidden fruit—our children).
Posted by: Art | September 30, 2006, 12:00 am 12:00 am
The saddest part of reading these posts is the partisanship. Democrats and Republicans are both so brainwashed that they can’t see that both parties are corrupt to the core. This isn’t about left or right, it’s about the rampant and unchecked debauchery in Washington. If you think Foley is an isolated story you are very mistaken. Read the Franklin Coverup as a primer. We are ruled by some sick wackos.
Posted by: Eric | September 30, 2006, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Why is it a female teacher can have sex with an underage male student and receive little, if any punishment, but this man on boy is horrendous? What if a male teacher has sex with an underage female student? Same punishment? NAH! All of this is terrible, but we justify some and demonize others. This guy just TALKED about sex. It’s all a matter of opinion, but it should not be. This is why the world needs a source of Absolute Truth!!
Posted by: robert | September 30, 2006, 12:04 am 12:04 am
Im in shock. This guy isn’t in jail yet? This isn’t a dem or repub problem, it is a politician problem.
Posted by: Frank R | September 30, 2006, 12:14 am 12:14 am
You are missing the real issue. This man was caught because of who he is. The real issue is all of the people like him are not high profile and no one looks at what they do. One caught and thousands working the computer as we speak. Pretty Sick! Then think of the rights we will give up to catch the thousands. Think about the millions of people who will gladly give up their privacy rights. It just keeps getting worse and worse and worse. But lets do what we have been programed by handlers on both sides of the isle. Lets frame this issue as a conversation on elephants and asses.
Posted by: Jeff Shaffer | September 30, 2006, 12:17 am 12:17 am
What is MOST disturbing is that Foley was a KNOWN predator & had been reported by a sponsor of a page!
Posted by: MJ | September 30, 2006, 12:20 am 12:20 am
President Clinton had sex with an adult. The Republicans wasted our dollars and time because they wanted to remove him from office for what should have been a family matter.
The finger pointers had some trouble of their own though. Why did Newt Gingrich resign as Speaker of the House *and* from Congress within days after being re-elected by his district in Georgia in November 1998? At the time of his resignation, he said it was because although the republicans won, they didn’t win big enough. The truth? The “moral” finger pointer had an extra-marital affair and got caught. It was about to come out. It later did. Why did Bob Livingston (R-Louisiana) resign? Same reason. He got caught doing what he was trying to bring President Clinton down for. WHAT HYPOCRITES!! Not just Newtie and Bob. Now this guy, someone who says he’s out to protect children from pedophiles, look at him now. These are not people we want making decisions for our country.
Posted by: Disgusted - We need Democrats! | September 30, 2006, 12:20 am 12:20 am
I like how I was called out by name in some of the earlier comments in this thread for something the guy who posted AFTER me wrote. Just so you’re clear on how this blog lays its comments out, it’s the comment FOLLOWED by the person who wrote it. The “posted by” tag refers to the poster ABOVE that line, not under it. Sheesh. Now people think I’m an idiot when they’re the one’s that can’t read!
Posted by: Matt Burnett | September 30, 2006, 12:22 am 12:22 am
To Mike in Florida:
I didn’t see any of the stuff you claim the Republican leadership did in this article and haven’t seen it elsewhere, so with that, I won’t comment on what you claim they did.
However, what Rep Foley did was wrong and he needed to resign which he did. He also needs to be held accountable in a court of law and he will be.
Posted by: Patrick | September 30, 2006, 12:27 am 12:27 am
I think the biggest difference between Republicans and Democrats is that when a Republican gets caught doing anything, they always get punished for it.
I am a Conservative, but I do not think for a minute Republicans are mightier than thou…to the contrary…they do the same sick stuff as anyone else…however, when they get caught there are consequences.
When a liberal gets caught, it is all about excuses and no accountability. Eh Bill?
Posted by: M Perrien | September 30, 2006, 12:37 am 12:37 am
What does this have to do with any political party? Obviously some of our dems are really reaching for anything they can get there hands on. Shame on you for spinning this into a political statement. This guys a pervert. Period. Nothing to do with politics. You will latch on to anything. Punks
Posted by: greg | September 30, 2006, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Well it’s disgusting no matter what side of the aisle he’s on.
He didn’t deny it, he did apologise and resign right away instead of pointing his finger at the camera insisting it never happened.
I hope they throw the book at him.
Posted by: LJ | September 30, 2006, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Why must we go back to what some other politicians did? That was yesterday, this is today. And furthermore, attempting to seduce a male minor (pedophilia) does not compare with drunk driving, adultery, illegal perscription drug use, etc.—come on, raping children is a bit different.
Posted by: Art | September 30, 2006, 12:41 am 12:41 am
This isn’t a political issue. This guy is sick, regardless of party affiliation, and he was trying to cover it up by pushing programs that would target people like himself. I’m glad he got found out, I’m sorry for his family, and I he can become more human over time, and do so far, far away from any public office.
Posted by: idiophone | September 30, 2006, 1:00 am 1:00 am
This is certainly not a partisan issue. Pedophilia is a serious issue in Washington, simply go watch the banned Discovery Channel documentary, “Conspiracy of Silence” on Video Google to find out how serious.
As for anyone pushing the Left/Right, Liberal/Conservative, Republicrat angle of any situation where a real crime has been committed, you are only aiding that criminal and the other criminals who hide behind their office. Stop being good Democrats, stop being good Republicans and start being good Americans.
Posted by: WinstonKirk | September 30, 2006, 1:04 am 1:04 am
With Clinton
it was between 2 adults..
and no one should be prying into
and asking questions about what they do or did in bed or out of bed(or standing up!)
With Foley, to go after minors,
is unforgiveable.
Posted by: Dino | September 30, 2006, 1:07 am 1:07 am
I am so tired of people defending Bill Clinton’s behavior as being about sex. Sex didn’t get him impeached. Sure he should’ve been faithful to his wife, but that wasn’t the issue. The issue was HE LIED UNDER OATH! It doesn’t matter what the lie was about. He could’ve lied about what he had for dinner the night before and it would have been just as wrong. Not only that, but he tried to coerce others to lie for him. All to avoid being found guilty in a civil suit. As chief law enforcer, he betrayed his oath and office. That’s it.
Oh, and if Foley is guilty, he should be punished. You’ll hear no defense or apology for me. If you ask me, if I were king for a day, I’d clean house and have us elect a new congress.
Posted by: Chaz | September 30, 2006, 1:15 am 1:15 am
This is totally disgusting. This congressman should serve real time for this. I am a republican, but am astonished this moron is in the same party. Good catch for abc news.
Posted by: John | September 30, 2006, 1:22 am 1:22 am
Note to 16 year olds. If someone is talking to you in a sexual manner on IM and you think its creepy, block that contact. Don’t egg the person on for a period and then turn it all over to investigators.
Posted by: Rob | September 30, 2006, 1:29 am 1:29 am
You partisan hacks are laughable. We can all admit that perversion crosses party lines.
Posted by: jgn | September 30, 2006, 1:31 am 1:31 am
This is just sick stuff and he deserves whatever punishment allowable by law – his own law apparently. But…please do not paint all Republicans with the same brush. McGreevy was a sick pup too and he ended up on Oprah. But…woops…he’s a Democrat! Watch the hypocrisy unfold!
Posted by: PFG | September 30, 2006, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Hey, there is no excuse for this. As a republican, I am ashamed that this happened in my own party. He should resign. He should take any punishment that is necessary. I hope he can get his life back on track and that whoever he was soliciting can live a normal life without fools like Tom Leykis leaking their names. Don’t ever make blanket judgments about republican hypocricy; we are as appalled as anyone.
Posted by: Scott | September 30, 2006, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Every comment above that mentions Democrat, Republican, etc. is completely misguided and it’s people that THAT who elects PERVERTS like Foley. Wake up America.
Do the RIGHT thing. Politics is not about your favorite team. It should be about the individual, representing the people.
I’m moving, thanks. (Yes, overseas.) I’d rather live in a corrupt nation that admits it than to live in one that ignores it in exchange for flat screen TVs, cheap gas and fast food. Idiots.
Posted by: Olden Atwoody | September 30, 2006, 1:46 am 1:46 am
This is not a Democrat or Republican issue. I find the congressmans actions to be quite repugnant. Apparently some people are such politcal zealots that they will use any occasion to sling mud. This is an issue of poor personal morals and the lack of personal restraint and judgement and the congressman should suffer the full consequences regardless of their party affiliation. We all should demand the highest moral character in those that represent us.
Posted by: Dave | September 30, 2006, 2:00 am 2:00 am
Truth: there are scumbags on both sides of the aisle.
Don’t try to act like either side is worse.
Posted by: RJ | September 30, 2006, 2:07 am 2:07 am
If you are going to turn this into “party” issue, try being fair & balanced. In 1983, the House censured two lawmakers – Daniel Crane (R) of Illinois and Gerry Studds (D) of Massachusetts – for having improper relationships with pages.
And I didn’ see many outraged posts about the Democratic billionaire & FOB who was picked up for soliciting teens for sex on this same website. Just thought I’d bing those up so our friendly Democratic poster might want to avoid his own hypocrisy. Let’s focus on the bigger picture kids.
Posted by: Sebastain | September 30, 2006, 2:09 am 2:09 am
This country is getting so politically correct that it’s getting to the point where even a bit of harmless flirting on the internet causes everyone to get upset!
These pages knew exactly what they were saying and talking about, they certainly don’t seem as shocked as many of the people commenting here.
Posted by: Albert | September 30, 2006, 2:19 am 2:19 am
Hey everyone, I urge you all to take a look at the messages posted a few days ago under the headline “Sixteen-Year-Old Who Worked as Capitol Hill Page Concerned About E-mail Exchange with Congressman”.
You will see plentiful examples of conservatives IMMEDIATELY jumping ALL OVER the poor kid who had this done to him. Now, of course, they are shutting up.
One poster, Stephen, didn’t even bother posting an apology on the thread after he directly accused the BOY of being “warped”. What a jerk. Let these fools know how you feel. It isn’t right to make an assumption and then simply “walk away” when you are proved wrong. Taking responsibility for mistakes applies to CONSERVATIVES too.
Posted by: Jim | September 30, 2006, 2:20 am 2:20 am
It wasn’t a party thing…. Until republican party leadership (Dennis Hastert) was informed 10-11 months ago and allowed Foley to keep his position as the chairman of the House caucus on missing and exploited children. The next step is finding out who else knew about this and when. Hint – I’ll bet you they didn’t tell any democrats. So yeah. Pedophilia isn’t party specific, but in this case the republicans were the ones covering for Foley until the news broke. As far as politics go it’s not the crime, it’s the cover up.
Posted by: john | September 30, 2006, 2:23 am 2:23 am
After reading one of the emails I’m appalled that the readers wonder why he resigned, or think that it a smear campaign by democrats. What is the problem here? The guy is a hypocrite at best and a pedophile at worst!
Posted by: Maureen | September 30, 2006, 2:29 am 2:29 am
Let me see if I got this straight.
Clinto has an affair with a 20 something year old woman, and BARELY lies about it while being hounded by a rabid Republican congress ( who should have let him hunt Bin Laden instead)… that is equal to A republican congressman preying on underage boys over the Internet, and his Republican leaders turned a blind eye for over a year.
Have I got that right?
Posted by: Knowitall | September 30, 2006, 2:47 am 2:47 am
Those mentioning Clinton on this site are ignoring one critical point _ Clinton lied about what he did, which is bad, but it was CONSENTUAL SEX WITH AN ADULT.
Even mentioning Clinton in this context is subtlely _ but exactly _ tantamount to condoning Foley’s behavior.
There’s no such thing as an “independent” anymore in U.S. politics. You’re either a Fascist or not. Some of you posting here are implicitly justifying pedophilia because one of your own got popped. That shows the strength of the Fascism gripping our good country. As a loyal American, I disown you.
Posted by: Zell | September 30, 2006, 3:16 am 3:16 am
First, I don’t think Foley would have been so quick to give up his House seat if he was innocent…Do you? Second, from reading these e-mails, if there is any defense by Republican’s for this guy, I think it going to be “Let’s not make this a political thing…ummm ok.” I only can only hope that the Republican’s get what is coming to them. I recall them being relentless and nasty about Clinton and Monica (and that was between consenting ADULTS)…So, please don’t tell us Democrats not to make this a political thing. What did you expect from all the under-handed political operations the Republican party has done to the Democrats while Rove has been in the driving seat? You get what you deserve and you deserve as scandal like Foley’s…So sleep tight my Conservative Republicans.
Posted by: Julie in Missouri | September 30, 2006, 3:27 am 3:27 am
This guy’s a scumbag and should get all he deserves. But this won’t influence my decision to vote Republican in November — pedophiles and perverts can be found on both sides of the aisle…
Posted by: Jack | September 30, 2006, 3:34 am 3:34 am
“Reps. — the Reps ADMIT they made a mistake, resign and take their punishment — like the rep. from Ore/Wash — the Dems yell, scream, deny, lie and stay in office continuing to lie and deceive!”
Excuse me, but Foley has been lying and deceiving for years now, and has only resigned when he got caught….
Posted by: dave | September 30, 2006, 3:48 am 3:48 am
What makes this a “Republican” issue, is this creep’s behavior was brought to Republican leadership A YEAR AGO! This became politicized when it was ignored, or swept under the rug, most likely to avoid the political fall out. That’s disgusting.
Posted by: JR | September 30, 2006, 3:54 am 3:54 am
Look, I don’t think any decent human being — Republican or Democrat — will defend what Mark Foley did. I find it reprehensible that some people are already using this to score political points against the GOP.
Posted by: Bla | September 30, 2006, 4:11 am 4:11 am
I can’t believe some of you people. Since when does pedophilia have anything to do with political affiliation?? That’s like saying only Catholic priests are pedophiles, so your kids are safe if you’re Jewish, Lutheran, or Episcopalian! Our stupidity is why creaps like Foley get away with this stuff. Pedophiles nest in places where adults are trusted and kids are plentiful. Teachers, religious leaders, and yes politicians involved in leadership and the chairman of the House caucus on missing and exploited children! Shame on any of you who further exploit children by making this about Democrats and Republicans!He’s a creap and they are everywhere and they are black and white, and they are Catholic’s and Jews, and they live on your block and they teach your kids and you all need to wake up!
Posted by: Janet Johnson | September 30, 2006, 4:32 am 4:32 am
People! Will you PLEASE read the stories!
First:
1. The comments made by ‘gay’ page (i.e. 17-year-old, about to turn 18) were not the same as those from the 16-year-old who was ‘sick’ about this thing.
Also, the comments from 2003 came from the ’17-year-old’ while that from the 16-year-old was from 2005.
Finally, Foley is NOT married. How hetero-normative to assume that.
Posted by: Robert | September 30, 2006, 4:35 am 4:35 am
only, *ahem* this is turning into a very political thing. The latest reports indicate strongly that the House leadership knew of Foley’s little misadventures up to a year ago, and at min from this past spring. So, yes the actions of Foley are not a R or D thing. But, the actions that Hastert, Alexander, and Reynolds took, as members of the leadership, to minimize and bury Foley’s actions are a very republican party action.
BTW Foley’s apology leaves out what he actually did. He never apologized for what he did, he simply said I’m sorry I let people down.
Posted by: edge | September 30, 2006, 4:37 am 4:37 am
Hastert is going down like Cardinal Bernard Law. And the GOP is going down like the Archdiocese of Boston.
Cardinal Law also tried to “take care” of a pedophilia epidemic in the Archdiocese of Boston. Quick transfers of priests. Hushing of complaints and appeals to loyalty. It didn’t work. The archdiocese was cratered by the onslaught of suits and ended up having to sell off churches and the Cardinal’s own mansion.
The scandal had been brewing for a while but one case involving a priest who’d abused a number of kids broke the floodgates some years ago. After that case took root and grew literally scores of young and not-so-young adults stepped forward and filed their own cases against yet other abusive priests.
Posted by: WeToldYouSo | September 30, 2006, 4:44 am 4:44 am
Sexual orientation has nothing to do with this. Gay, straight, bi, whatever, unwanted advances on minors is sick, immoral, and criminal. It strikes me that this man was a member of the party that claims to be the moral majority. Government should not be based on religious claims of moral superiority, it should be based on basic human decency. Republican used to mean fair, honest, decent. Now it seems to me that Republican means radical righ-wing religious agenda, while Democrat means attemtped government solutions to social problems. I’m voting Democrat.
Posted by: Chris | September 30, 2006, 5:08 am 5:08 am
Wrap yourself in vertu, and God will remind you that you’re human.
Posted by: Mojo | September 30, 2006, 5:43 am 5:43 am
How can ANYONE compare a pedophile to an adulterer?
Are people so dense as to think ALL sex is equally “Filthy”?
Wake up!
Posted by: Alfie | September 30, 2006, 6:00 am 6:00 am
Both parties are destroying America. And you shills aren’t helping at all.
Don’t Vote ’06
Posted by: Divided States of America | September 30, 2006, 6:31 am 6:31 am
It is amazing to me that we all know this exists and these people are out there in very influential places but nothing is done to protect the child it seems these sexually deviat (mostly) men are able to continue violating children. It is not okay! The positives I see is that with more exposure people will numb to start taking care of these kind of people instead of sweeping under the rug and leaving these children helpless and violated.
Posted by: Minnesota Mom | September 30, 2006, 6:34 am 6:34 am
I am not going to go into comparisons between Clinton and Foley, but if you have children you would find that the exchanges Mr. Foley had with these boys were totally inappropriate and disgusting…..and this is the guy that is supposed to be protecting our children. Mr. Foley and I would be handling this man to man, fist to face if these were my kids.
Posted by: KoolDude | September 30, 2006, 6:48 am 6:48 am
Anyone who tries to inject Clinton into this is being (at best) ridiculous. Grow up. Nor is this a reflection upon Republicans. It’s a reflection upon Foley, period. The only political aspect of this to be discussed is how this might affect the House majority after the election.
Posted by: DaTruth | September 30, 2006, 6:49 am 6:49 am
This perv’s behavior DOES NOT prove anything about Republicans in general! Yes, it’s not to be tolerated, but doesn’t have anything to do with what side of the aisle he’s on.
Posted by: bs | September 30, 2006, 6:55 am 6:55 am
The big question is how long did the republicans cover up for this guy?
Posted by: jasonbance | September 30, 2006, 6:56 am 6:56 am
I don’t think we can defend or excuse the behavior of any of these people. To me, they are predators in a position of power who take advantage of their positions for their own sexual gratification.
Children or teenagers are most vulnerable. To say that if it happens between consenting adults its okay it ludricious. It is not okay if you are on the receiving end of a person in power who pursues you, while enticing you with empty promises of love, while “helping” you in career advancement or whatever. (No, it didn’t happen to me, but I have seen a married professor friend of mine doing this with a female ex-graduate student. He is no longer a friend, by the way.) No matter who it happens to, it is despicable.
Posted by: Feed up with predators | September 30, 2006, 6:59 am 6:59 am
“Reps. — the Reps ADMIT they made a mistake, resign and take their punishment — like the rep. from Ore/Wash — the Dems yell, scream, deny, lie and stay in office continuing to lie and deceive!”
That’s BS! Foley tried to DENY the whole thing one day ago when the first ‘tame’ messages were released.
Posted by: TY | September 30, 2006, 7:07 am 7:07 am
Our CHILDREN are our CHILDREN, there is NO excuse for this type of behavior.
Posted by: Broward | September 30, 2006, 7:14 am 7:14 am
this guy isn’t going to go to jail, and i’ll tell you why.
the only way that he will go to jail is if the boy in question lived in maryland, and his house (to which the leading IMs were sent) is in maryland.
the age of consent in florida and the district of columbia, and virginia (where most pages live) is 16. in maryland it’s 17. but in most states, generally speaking, it’s 16.
so, from a sexual point of view, he’s not commiting a crime against a minor. (and he probably knew this, too.)
however, there are a bunch of workplace violations he’s making, and this is what he will get done for. the court of public opinion might convict him for the fact that it’s a teenage MALE, but legally, he’s actually in the clear.
he will plead guilty to a lesser charge, get a big fine, and probably get run out of town.
Posted by: factotum | September 30, 2006, 7:14 am 7:14 am
I think this would make a great campaign ad that would go something like this:
Screen shows some clearly underage boys playing and a man grabs one of the boys. An ominous voice in the background says: “The republicans chose Mark Foley to protect our children from perverts and pedophiles, but now Foley has been forced to resign for soliciting sex from an underage boy in the Capitol. If we can’t trust the republicans to protect our children in the Capitol, how can we trust them to protect all of America from terrorists?”
Posted by: PabloZed | September 30, 2006, 7:17 am 7:17 am
its amazing how people will use anything to futher their political agenda. I guess i cant blame them, when their agenda cant stand on its own
Posted by: john | September 30, 2006, 7:20 am 7:20 am
To those who couldn’t bash Clinton enough when the Monica Lewinski incident became public… what goes around comes around! Just because someone has a “R” in front of their name doesn’t make them more moral… wake up you straight ticket voters!
Posted by: SAP | September 30, 2006, 7:44 am 7:44 am
What I did NOT get from as far down as I read (forgive me for not having the time to read more than 50 postings) is it is the SITUATION that “creates” this. If the “people” give power to anyone, Murphy’s Law tells us that bad things will happen. So, why put people in the position of facing temptation in the first place? Because you are too lazy or cowardly to take personal responsibility for running your OWN life? Anarchism really is not the “bad” that power-hungry scum make it out to be. Almost every decision you make daily is in response to your own conscience (God’s government). Why give corruption to another to steal from you and possibly kill you with immunity as well? “This world is too complicated” is just another lie that you tell yourself. Will Rogers told us a while back. Read up on the little ‘truths’ he spoke about government. They are just as correct today as then.
Posted by: JOhn Boanerges Redman | September 30, 2006, 7:55 am 7:55 am
One things you guys have to remember: Clinton wasn’t impeached for having sex with anyone. His crime was lying under oath.
So, I submit to you–which was worse: lying under oath about a personal sin, or violating the very constituency you are being charged to protect. Oh, and his fellow repubs didn’t even try to stop him like Clinton’s cabinet did for him. Get the picture?
Posted by: JIm | September 30, 2006, 8:01 am 8:01 am
Watch how the media jimps all over this and remember to compare their enthusisasm and aggression with their reluctance and defense of Clinton, who did much more than just chat about it online.
Posted by: taipan | September 30, 2006, 8:02 am 8:02 am
It’s really simple. If a Democrat does something wrong, it’s WRONG. If a Republican does something wrong, it’s WRONG.
It is a shame that right and wrong are tossed aside for the sake of two rival parties of which neither are particularly moral these days.
I heard it asked a few years back…”What is the difference between the Republicans and the Democrats?” Answer: “About 5 years”.
Give it some thought.
Posted by: Jim | September 30, 2006, 8:02 am 8:02 am
It’s a proven fact that many men who strongly support the fight against internet sex with minors often are those who act it out. He’s trash and what do you do with trash? Dump it!
Posted by: Invisibleman | September 30, 2006, 8:10 am 8:10 am
ABC should do a “Catch a Predator” sting like NBC has been doing in Washington DC. I will bet a month’s pay that Foley isn’t the only politician in DC that’s perverted. The networks wouldn’t dare to do an undercover sex investigation in DC as they might actually have to show the American public who they have sent to run the country.
Posted by: Alaskop | September 30, 2006, 8:12 am 8:12 am
There is no comparison between Clinton and this Foley. One lied about an adult relationship and the other is a pedophile.
I agree, this isn’t really political, but it is interesting that Foley was all into taking down Clinton for what he did and being so vocal about kiddie porn. He’s a hypocrite, that’s for sure!
Florida sure doesn’t seem like a safe place for kids. Schools don’t either…. it’s a sick world.
Posted by: Linda Trzos | September 30, 2006, 8:14 am 8:14 am
Foley needs to hire Michael Jackson’s lawyer.
Posted by: windmill | September 30, 2006, 8:28 am 8:28 am
Leadership only knew of the originally reported email exchange. That alone, while a bit creepy, wouldn’t be enough to really do anything. They told him to stop it. NOBODY knew about the more explicit messages, and once they found out they were very quick to denounce it.
Posted by: kt | September 30, 2006, 8:28 am 8:28 am
It is disappointing to see (once again) people trying to relate a personal mistake or failure to the ideaology of one party or the other. One can look back through this country’s political history and find a myriad of sexual escapades – both homosexual and heterosexual, and involving people of every political idealogy. Foley’s appetite for young, underage men is disgusting and he deserves everything he gets in terms of punishment and public shame, but come on folks….this is not about politics!
Posted by: Bob | September 30, 2006, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Why is this even a Republican/Democrat issue?
Posted by: mach | September 30, 2006, 8:35 am 8:35 am
I don’t care if Foely is Rep or Dem…two words best describe any person in a position of trust who preys upon the innocent: Eviloers, reprobates!
Posted by: Betty | September 30, 2006, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Republicans, Democrats, it’s simple and I have told this story almost 10 years ago, when I was perped walked from a large technical firm for not paying a bill. THE CREATION HAS OUT GROWN THE CREATORS!. And there is no turning back. Bush can’t be wrong. The American Government can’t be wrong! Rich white, black and yellow people can’t be wrong. Slave labor can’t be wrong. Misguided justice can’t be wrong. Judges can’t be wrong. Abuse of the planet can’t be wrong. The rich man getting to heaven as easily as a camel threw the eye of a needle can’t be wrong. Sounds like America can’t be wrong!
Posted by: Metra | September 30, 2006, 8:39 am 8:39 am
I am so glad to see that everyone here is omniscient enought to try, convict, and sentence Mark Foley without having any of the evidence examined or all of the facts of the case proven. Furthermore, it’s a welcoming sign of better things to come when we want to convict people for what they think and say even though they have not acted…. because they might act on the crime later.
On a serious note, instead of idle speculation and partisan mudslinging, it would be far better to wait until all of the FACTS are known.
Posted by: Voice of Reason | September 30, 2006, 8:44 am 8:44 am
It should be appalling to EVERYONE that someone on Capitol Hill, sent there by his constituents, would prey on any child. And it should be appalling to everyone regardless of the person’s political affiliation, and I would hope that if it had been a woman, it would have been equally disgusting. No one has a right to prey on children who come to our nation’s capital to learn and work and become honest and hard-working Americans. Shame on every porson who does this to a child. I dare say every child predator deserves to be castrated.
Posted by: Isabella | September 30, 2006, 8:45 am 8:45 am
This isn’t about a Republican or a Democrat… it’s about a man who’s sick and demented, never mind politics.
Bear in mind that Jeffrey Dahmer was in the U.S. Army. Some sickos just fall through the cracks. And the public has to take SOME blame, too.. how could anyone have missed this grotesque personality flaw? I can assure you there are sick Dems, Independents, and Republicans equally. That’s (unfortunately) life.
Posted by: KCP | September 30, 2006, 8:45 am 8:45 am
Please do not get suckered in by all those begging you not to make this “political”. It’s a member of Congress, and yet another corrupt Republican. I assure you, if this had been a Democrat, Republicans would be politicizing this. Please see the entire Clinton years for reference. And stop comparing consenting adults to a member of Congress soliciting a minor. Repeatedly.
Posted by: proudliberal | September 30, 2006, 8:47 am 8:47 am
As a nation of voters we have become so “single issue” that we allow an ever increasing number of these pin heads to remain in office. Few people seem to realize that most of what the legislature does is make laws.
Pinheads in office = pinhead laws
Page molesters, adulterers, drug users, check bouncers, the american electorate knows much more about American Idol participants than they do about the poeple they elect (by voting or not!) to make laws that we have to live by
Pay attention – Vote! Its the only way out of this insanity
Posted by: Helme Calfee | September 30, 2006, 9:02 am 9:02 am
Take your fingers out of your ears Republicans. This is POLITICAL because the Republican leadership knew of this and DID NOTHING! NOTHING!
Republican Majority Leader John Boehner has just admitted that he was informed that Hatert indeed knew of this 11 months ago. You know calling your majority leader a liar?
It’s POLITICAL because they covered for this creep, they allowed him to remain chair of the “exploited” kids caucus, they allowed him to run again.
What part of this aren’t you GETTING.
Ignoring the facts doesn’t change them.
Posted by: Mo Curtis | September 30, 2006, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Just as disturbing is the House blocking an investigation into who knew what and when. Disgusting.
Stupid, as well. Clearly the pressure will build, and not investigating will make it much worse.
Posted by: Matt | September 30, 2006, 9:08 am 9:08 am
It is amazing to me that these news items creep out months after the event occured and timed perfectly for the election cycle. The several Demo counter-parts will be carefully reported on after the election on page 1,000,000.
Posted by: Ben | September 30, 2006, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Whether or not he’s sick, it really disturbs me that anyone in such a public/political position would be so stupid as to jeaprodize himself, co-workers, and constituants. What a Fool!
Posted by: Buz | September 30, 2006, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Where there are one or two emails there are probably many more. This abuse of kids goes much deeper and news organizations need to grab the shovels and start digging. Get a list of all the kids who have worked in congress and start asking questions.
Posted by: KGO | September 30, 2006, 9:19 am 9:19 am
It is crazy to make this a political issue. What Foley has done is reprehensible and he deserves the consequences which the legal system will bring down on him. Again, it is pure crazy to go political on this issue.
Posted by: Gee | September 30, 2006, 9:19 am 9:19 am
This happened back in 2003? Why is it being brought forth now just before midterm elections? Plus, why is Foley working on his campaign (according to the chat logs) in ’03, when that wasn’t an election year?
Posted by: Chuck Dhue | September 30, 2006, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Is there any wonder why so many of us hate politicians? When I was involved in politics, this hypocrate belonged to the same side of the fence I did….I refuse to defend this crap even when the lying hypocrate is on my side of the aisle….I still hold strong to certain core republican issues, but this is an example of why I refuse to link myself with a particular party…there is only a small group in Washington who do anything other than what will promote their own careers or egos.
Posted by: mikePA | September 30, 2006, 9:25 am 9:25 am
“Those that protest too loudly…” Reminds me of a crusading prosecutor in St. Louis that went with a vendetta against adult book stores and prostitutes. Then he was caught with one and was found to be a frequent visitor.
What a waste with the prosecutor and this sad representative! Hopefully all this jerk did was emails!
Posted by: Scott | September 30, 2006, 9:25 am 9:25 am
You people are more worried about who to point a political finger at than the fact that kids were being hurt.
This guy wasn’t a Rep OR Dem, he was a criminal.
The GOP doesn’t need jerks like this. Nor do the Dems need something else they can scream foul about rather than dealing with actual election issues.
Misdirected anger is becoming a liberal calling card.
Posted by: Mikey | September 30, 2006, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Oh go on, POST IT VERBATIM.
Even when they’re obvious pedophiles, you media guys do your best to protect the Right Wing, don’t ya?
Posted by: Randall | September 30, 2006, 9:28 am 9:28 am
We live in Mark Foley’s district in Florida and have supported him throughout his political career. Recently we sent him a campaign contribution. We are devastated and we will not be defending him in any way whatsoever. Let the law work.
And please you liberals, pay attention to how we conservatives handle this case. You may learn a lesson from the fact that Foley will not be judged innocent because he’s a Republican.
Posted by: WPF | September 30, 2006, 9:28 am 9:28 am
In a nutshell, here we have a bad guy that behaved criminally. Yes he was scum. And, yes he also happened to be a Republican. Lets be clear here though – that is not an indictment of the entire Republican party. Just like McGreevy and Clinton were not an indictment of the entire Democrat party. If you have allegiance to a particular party, pay attention to the platform and the issues of the day and stop trying to convince yourself that the other side is plain old evil. Both parties have good apples and bad.
Posted by: Josh R | September 30, 2006, 9:31 am 9:31 am
So when did he actually solicit sex from minors? I’m not questioning that it happened, but there’s been no proof offered.
As I understand it, ABC News had this story last year. Why not put it out then? Waiting for the right time, perhaps?
Posted by: Pat | September 30, 2006, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Someone once told me–and I believe it–that politicians are ALL squirrely (an insult to squirrels everywhere).
Posted by: windmill | September 30, 2006, 9:35 am 9:35 am
If it hadn’t been at election time, we probably would NEVER had heard about this because, I beleive, our elected officials keep EVERYTHING inhouse. He’ll probably get off with a slap on the wrist even though he is no different than those targeted on TV’s ‘To Catch A Predator.”
Posted by: Mac | September 30, 2006, 9:37 am 9:37 am
I can’t believe that anyone would make this a polictical issue. The man is sick and needs to pay for the crime. This is not a polictical issue. Next someone will say its Bush’s fault some how. Let’s not forget the kids need help, why are these kids able or even communicating like this on line. We need to remember the kids and help them not fall into these traps.
Posted by: Ross | September 30, 2006, 9:39 am 9:39 am
I consider myself a Republican. Great work by the investigators. As Republicans, WE should be the ones congratulating the investigators, not deflecting the issue onto Clinton or anywhere else. If there is an issue to be cleaned up in our house, WE have to lead the charge. Foley should be treated like any other person under investigation for something like this and no better.
Posted by: Dave | September 30, 2006, 9:40 am 9:40 am
why cant you self righteous fools get this lathered over illegal aliens crossing our borders in the middle of the night??,or our out of control tax system??,and a good many other more importatnt issues that concern YOU!!??.what ever happens to this guy will not affect our future as a nation nearly as much as the things i just mentioned,but you choose to get bent out of shape over non- issues,and let the things that do matter just slip by.no wonder our country is so messed up.pay attention to the real issues,and get involved.
Posted by: amy | September 30, 2006, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Politicians, regardless of any supposed affiliation with a “party”, are immoral, and they all need to be removed from office. They keep us fighting amongst ourselves with labels like “left”, “right”, “Republican”, and “Democrat”, but the truth is they are all part of the same cancer-riddled system, and they all are there to do just one thing: serve themselves. Every single representative we now have in Washington, from the President on down to the first-term Congressman, makes me sick. Our country is is real trouble, and I don’t see what we can do about it.
Posted by: Mike McD | September 30, 2006, 9:49 am 9:49 am
I want to know why the Republican leadership protected Foley for over a year. They’ve known for a year that this guy is a pervert and still allowed him to run for his seat. Hastert covering this up is the biggest scandal ever.
Posted by: Jaime | September 30, 2006, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Now you know why the country is in the mess that it is.The poor fools just can’t/won’t get away from that old death trap called political ideology or called thinking outside of the box.
Posted by: Cree | September 30, 2006, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Most of this chain is ridiculous. This is not Republican or Democratic issue! This Congressman is sick and looks to have done things that were wrong. The issue ought to be thoroughly investigated and if the Congressman is guilty he must be prosecuted. There is no more to say.
Posted by: Larry | September 30, 2006, 9:54 am 9:54 am
You people need to learn that all politicans are pure scum.
Both major parties are corrupt.
duh !
Posted by: fnord | September 30, 2006, 9:59 am 9:59 am
“I did not have sexual relations with that women, Miss Lewenski.”
The defense? Republicans have a sense of shame. Is Foley still in Congress? How about Rep Jefferson? He’s still there and seeking reelection.
The defense is Republicans, most of them, especially the Christians, are contrite. Democrats, most of whom worship themselves, aren’t.
Posted by: Jericho | September 30, 2006, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Uh…guys….Clinton didn’t prey on children. Monica Lewinsky was not a teenager. CLinton might have committed adultery, but last I checked, that wasn’t against the law here in the USA. This guy Foley is propositioning children!
Posted by: Melo | September 30, 2006, 10:04 am 10:04 am
SICK, SICK, SICK…
Posted by: echam | September 30, 2006, 10:05 am 10:05 am
You guys are comparing (Foley – Gay Pedophile), to (Clinton – straight sex out of wedlock). And you are trying to say Clinton’s actions even compare at all to this perverted child molester?
That just shows how dumb some people can be.
Posted by: go1 | September 30, 2006, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Why r some LUNATICS even mentioning Clinton???? I am almost scared that a PEDOPHILE!!! has just been busted & we have to talk about Clinton because this CHILD MOLESTER is a republican!!! TAKE A LONG LOOK AT YOURSELF IN THE MIRROR & THINK ABOUT WHAT U ARE SAYING!
Posted by: Paul | September 30, 2006, 10:13 am 10:13 am
I’m a Republican and I think this guy should go to jail. I’m not defending him at all. Too bad you democrats defended Bill Clinton to the end. If you were consistent, you’d defend this perv too.
Posted by: Brad | September 30, 2006, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Umm… I like how people say the Republicans are going to defend this guy and then attack them as hypocrites; regardless of the fact they have done nothing yet. Down mad man, down. Nobody will defend this guy, especially in an election year. He will be roundly denounced from all sides of the aisle.
Posted by: Brandon | September 30, 2006, 10:15 am 10:15 am
When is the Congress going to propose a bill to retroactively make pedophilia a crime that cant be prosecuted (kinda like torture)?
Posted by: go1 | September 30, 2006, 10:16 am 10:16 am
What do the names Packwood, Gingrich, Livingston, others, and now Foley have in common. When it becomes apparent that they are moral reprobates,they’re flushed, for the good of the party. That’s one page the Dems could take from the Repub play book. The citizens deserve it.
Posted by: KTW | September 30, 2006, 10:16 am 10:16 am
what is pathetic is that there are those of you out there turning the victims into a political debate. it has nothing to do with republican or democrat, he is sick and he needs to pay. get over your personal needs to prove who is wrong or right in the government and look at the real issue here. the need to turn this into a political debate is half the problem in this country.
Posted by: nicole | September 30, 2006, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Two Massachusetts Democrats, Barney Frank and Gerry Studds, also salvaged their political careers despite acknowledging unconventional sexual activities. Frank was reprimanded by the House for his relationship with a male prostitute, and Studds was censured for having sex with a 17-year-old male congressional page.
Studds, who maintained the consensual sex did not constitute misconduct, served 13 more years in Congress after his 1983 censure by the House.
Frank, who was reprimanded by the House in 1990 for allowing the male prostitute to operate out of his home, contended he was not aware of any illegal activity. He remains in Congress, and serves on the House Judiciary Committee.
Posted by: DR | September 30, 2006, 10:22 am 10:22 am
This guy is just a sick person and needs to be prosecuted under the laws he help create. Oh the irony.
Posted by: Charlie | September 30, 2006, 10:25 am 10:25 am
I don’t see the comparison. What Clinton did with Lewinsky was not a crime. They were both over 21. What Foley was engaging in is ILLEGAL. What makes it even worse is he was on the committee that was supposed to stop these creeps!
Posted by: utmost333 | September 30, 2006, 10:27 am 10:27 am
It’s looking more and more to be a political issue, as it appears a number of Republicans knew about Foley’s tendencies for some time, and even knew of specific incidents. To claim that Republicans are not supporting Foley and that makes them morally superior to the Dems about Clinton is hooey. Republicans are merely better at manipulating public perception.
Posted by: Varecia | September 30, 2006, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Since when does one man represent an entire party? That applies to the Clinton AND Foley references.
Posted by: Patrick | September 30, 2006, 10:33 am 10:33 am
So Foley is out. The next story is that the GOP big-wigs knew about it and covered it up. When did Hastert know about it and why did he do nothing about it, when did Bush know about it and why did he do nothing about it? We should demand answers to these questions.
Posted by: RealityCheck | September 30, 2006, 10:38 am 10:38 am
And another thing, this does involve politics because it sounds like the Republican Leadership knew about it. This Alexander guy knew about it since last year. Republicans made decisions to not say anything.
And one last thing…
It’s Pedarast or Pedophile.
Not “Pedarest” as I keep seeing people type on here.
Posted by: lesalesa | September 30, 2006, 10:45 am 10:45 am
The man is a pedophile. That is established, and for that he needs to go to jail.
What makes this worse is the fact that he was all about writing the laws to prosecute them. If you are one of them, then it’s best to find a different assignment.
That’s where the hyprocracy comes in.
Posted by: Someone Holding Out for Themselves | September 30, 2006, 10:47 am 10:47 am
I am a constituent of Foley’s. He has betrayed me, my neighbors, my community, the citizens of Florida and Congress.
Apparently, at least some in the Republican House leadership knew or strongly suspected that Foley was a pederast and that he was harassing the young boy pages, but they did nothing to protect them from the predator and were engaged in covering it up. To me, that is as criminal as the sexual exploitation of these children in the first place.
And some wonder why citizens are so cynical about politicians.
Posted by: Mimi, Palm Beach Gardens | September 30, 2006, 10:47 am 10:47 am
This is a Republican problem because they knew about this for a while and did nothing but protect the perpetrator.
The pages knew. Boehner knew. And Hastert knew. Who else knew? And for how long?
This is just like the Catholic Priest sex abuse scandal. Those who protected Foley should be found and run out of Washington.
Posted by: Curtis | September 30, 2006, 10:54 am 10:54 am
‘This guy got caught with a minor. He didn’t confront the truth at all–he’s been doing this for years. At least with Clinton, it was consensual between two adults. True, he lied but then why the hell was it our business?”
Re: Your post above…….it was our business because the president of our country is the last person who should be lying to a grand jury. What don’t you get about this??????
Posted by: Rob | September 30, 2006, 10:57 am 10:57 am
It just hit me like a ton of bricks. After reading the ‘intelligent’ posts that have been submitted here, this poor country is in serious trouble.
As someone who isn’t a puppet for either party, I’m ashamed to call myself an American after seeing the way the majority of you rip into each other.
The truth is that both sides have issues to think about and for anyone to point the finger at the other when these things surface is indeed a hypocrite that has no credibility.
It’s a shame that nobody here really thinks about the children who are victimized and the patterns that result. Any opportunity to stick it to someone who may have different ideas seems to be the motivation here.
What a pathetic bunch…
Posted by: Jeff | September 30, 2006, 11:19 am 11:19 am
It’s rediculous how on any page I go there are people comparing this to Clinton. This guy is a sexual predator going after minors. Its a typical response from the republican party to find anyway to spin something to suit your own needs. Face the facts: he is a sick man. he went against the very things he helped create and support. other party members knew about it and covered it up. granted they probably thought it was wrong, but to them as with almost all republicans, they will do whatever they can to make their party look good, not do what is best. makes me sick reading about all of this and the ignorant comments coming from the party supporters
Posted by: Monkey | September 30, 2006, 11:21 am 11:21 am
I was reading these comments from the beginning. From the initial reporting of this story. Now I find it hysterically funny, that so many people said,,,,,,”Well seems innocent enough, I don’t believe he was out of line. I think that kid is just looking for attention.” Way to victimize the victim again. Shame on all of you who commented from that angle. Personally I prefer to wait until facts are brought to light, from any accusation. I’m thinking they certainly came to light in this instance. His resignation/admission of guilt in my opinion, is going to be difficult for anyone to “explain away”. How nice to know that children who are sent to learn about the running of our gov’t, are learning THIS. I feel hopeless. Sad. Sickened.
Posted by: MK | September 30, 2006, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Why don’t people seem to understand the difference between ADULTery and pedophilia (gay or otherwise)?
Posted by: Ed Schrock | September 30, 2006, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Many commenters here are trying to equate Mr. Foley’s actions to those of Clinton or other Democrats. Want to know what the big difference is?
One word: Hypocrisy. Few, if any, Dems, claim to be morally and spiritually superior. During the month prior to the ’02 elections, I watched as politically active, right-wing Republican TV preachers declared forcefully and repeatedly on “Christian” television that the “Democrat” party did not possess the necessary “spiritual maturity” to govern, but that the Republican party was the only party possessing the necessary spiritual and moral requirements to make America [once again] the Christian nation “our founding fathers intended”. They said we needed the Republicans to restore morality to government and help us to forget the “nightmare” of “William Jefferson Clinton”. These republicans set themselves up by declaring themselves to be paragons of virtue and superior moral standing. Since they have chosen to assume a smug, holier-than-thou stance, they should not be suprised when the people they have been trashing, while forgiving them, are not universally sympathetic toward them, because they have failed to live up to the high moral standards that they, themselves, have established — for themselves.
Posted by: prittfumes | September 30, 2006, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Where was John Boehner? On Friday, Boehner blocked a resolution calling for an ethics investigation into Foley. What is Boehner hiding? Was he complicit in failing to report Foley’s actions? Did he violate Ohio law by failing to report Foley’s sexually predatory actions? Shame on Foley and shame on those like Boehner that sought to cover this up.
Posted by: JimOhio | September 30, 2006, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Actually, by covering this up for so long, the Republicans DID defend this guy. Not only that, they also allowed it to continue and more young boys were affected! Wow! And Clinton simply received oral sex? I can’t believe that many of these comments actually consider both events as being equal. Man, I’m glad I’m no longer a Republican.
Posted by: Sleestak | September 30, 2006, 11:26 am 11:26 am
I think there should be a full investigation of every individual within the legislation that new about this problem from when it originally surfaced. The public has a right to know who let this complaint by a Page, slip under the rug. They should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. I hope this does not end here, I believe there are others that should take the heat.
This is not a Democrat or a Republican issue, like many other bloggers write. It’s amazing how a political base can stand behind an individual because of their popularity within the party. Would it be different if Foley were emailing their teenage kid? For some’ it probably would not!
Thanks to Brian Ross and his associates at ABC News for their investigative reporting.
Steve
Posted by: Steve | September 30, 2006, 11:28 am 11:28 am
How can this be anything but Political. This is an elected representative of a portion of the people of Florida. He gets to contribute to decisions of legislation that affect us all. His acts expose the entire congress to ridicule and distrust. It’s certain that his party was aware of his proclivities. I’m sure the other party was aware of it as well. Time to throw all the bums out.
Posted by: Obnoxiously Obvious | September 30, 2006, 11:36 am 11:36 am
God help us all. This is an elected official. We really get the government we deserve, don’t we/
Posted by: NCL387 | September 30, 2006, 11:46 am 11:46 am
sick sick sick i think we should outsourc him send him to find osama
Posted by: maw | September 30, 2006, 11:46 am 11:46 am
I can’t believe what I’m reading. Some of you are excusing Foley’s pedophilia because the boys he exploited and seduced via the internet were teens, not girls or tots. That seems to have been the attitude of the Catholic church as well, when it covered up for their pedophile priests who were preying on teen choir boys.
No wonder sex crimes against children are such a pervasive problem, if enablers try to excuse the behavior of adult predators who target teen boys. There seems to be no sympathy for the boys betrayed by their adult mentors.
And let there be no doubt, it is a crime for adult men to solicit sex and send pornographic messages to teen boys via the internet, thanks to the legislation Foley pushed through Congress. What irony.
Posted by: Susie LeBlanc | September 30, 2006, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Um, didn’t Foley insist that this was a smear campaign by his opponent only two days ago?
I am so sick of Republicans.
Posted by: Bill | September 30, 2006, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Since 2005 this was known by the House Leadership? and nothing done? Right up to last night’s cover-up vote to not investigate the matter further.
What were Nixon’s instructions to Dean? ‘Deny, tell them you don’t recall, Stonewall ‘um’ Masters of the Cover-up yet again. And of course it’s all timed just before a Congressional recess.
Posted by: bruce dobb | September 30, 2006, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
I’m a Republican, but this isn’t about Politics….It’s about Moral Ethics and Character. Our leaders should serve with HONOR and deserving of our Respect. If this were Bush,I would feel even stronger. You don’t bring filth into Office. Past Sins should be WAY in the PAST. A Proven Change in Character should be required.
Posted by: Cheryl | September 30, 2006, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
How is this NOT a Republican issue?!? The Republican leadership knew about Foley’s actions for months and did not report it. How hard is it to call the Attorney General?
Posted by: drh | September 30, 2006, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Being gay and being in political office is no more offensive than holding a job as a teacher, priest or gas station attendent. The problem here is that the congressman abused his own computer to elicit sexual responses from many congressional pages.
Senator Barry Goldwater refused to attack a gay aide to President Johnson in the 1964 election stating, “for every Democrat found, you will find a Republican”
President Nixon even sent the name of Florida Judge Harrold Carswell for a seat on the United States Supreme Court. He was rejected as “mediocre”. Six years later he was arrested for making sexual advances to an undercover officer in a men’s room in a Tallahassee shopping mall.
What outrages the general population is not the human failings, but the hypocracies of those engaged in the act, by attempting to legislate against what they themselves perform.
Posted by: Peter Brown | September 30, 2006, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
is it just foley? after the initial election of jeb bush,some of his staff attempted to place a prision for pederasts directly across from a fla. panhandle school.outraged residents stopped that. later on a back page of a newspaper(tallahassee dem?)i read where they were attempting to acquire a multiple wing building to house the pederasts in one wing and troubled children in an adjacent wing. perhaps this is a bigger story.
Posted by: bill | September 30, 2006, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Congressman Foley has been in a relationship with his partner (an opthamologist in Palm Beach) for the past 20 years. I hope he kicks Mark out of the house…!
Posted by: Jem | September 30, 2006, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Mr. Foley is toast and it is no longer the reason behind any strident defense or attack.
It is a question of who defended him, who knew and chose not to tell, why, and what this implies to the broader picture in an election period.
If the “Right” ever actually figure out what is “right” it will be a true revolution in American politics.
Posted by: and_thats_the_truth | September 30, 2006, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Heh…Mr Dobson? Oh, Reverend Falwell; Pat Robertson? Why is it all of you always fall silent along with Rev Hagee when real Biblical moral lapses occur among your “family values” banner carrying Republicans? I cannot understand your silence on these issues. Afterall, when it comes to supporting the slaughter of our young boys in uniform, you are all over the map and vocal too.
Posted by: Lee | September 30, 2006, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
This crime has nothing to do with party lines and everything to do with politicians feeling “bulletproof”. In an ABC ( I think) news article a former page said that new pages were “warned about Foley” by other pages. You can’t tell me that there weren’t adults in power well aware of what was going on – if not well aware, then definitely suspicious enough to investigate. Why did NO ONE move to protect the kids? Why did it take a former page sharing an e-mail for Foley to finally get caught? You know there had to be some knowledge of Foley’s activities. Why would anyone protect this guy? He’s a pervert and a criminal. He used his congressional power to seduce underage boys and was so secure in his position that he PUT THAT CRAP IN WRITING? I guess he’s a STUPID pervert and criminal.
Posted by: luckyduck63 | September 30, 2006, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Broward brings up the issue of actual ages of consent, which I’d been wondering about. I hadn’t thought of Maryland and residence. Trusting the web (hah), DC is yes, 16, as was the page AFAICT, but Florida is 18. The page seems to have been from Louisiana, where the age is 17. I see 18 for Virginia, and actually 16 for Maryland.
So a statutory rape case might depend on residence details. Workplace harassment seems a more reliable charge.
Also, while I’d love to see the Democrats recover Congress, I have to say that I don’t think “pedophile” should be used here (though I can’t resist quipping “Grand Old Pedophiles”). There’s a world of difference between going for 10 year olds and going for 16 year olds. Teenagers, especially older ones, are not “children” in social or maturity senses. They’re teens. People don’t magically grow up on their 18th birthday, they’ve been maturing all along, and that matters.
Posted by: Damien | September 30, 2006, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
The question that I would like to ask is why the leadership did nothing when this was initailly exposed some 10 months ago? And now that it is out in the open the leadership is appalled that he would do such a thing (at election time?).
Time has come to clean house! Let us rid ourselves of everyone of them and vote then out of office. And hopefully find others who are committed to our well being and the especially the protection of our children.
Posted by: Dusty | September 30, 2006, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
I don’t see this as a Republican/Democrat issue. Sin is universal. And the guy probably pushed those laws because he had more familiarity with that particular topic than others. How sad he didn’t control *himself*.
I am really interested to know how many politicians have found themselves convicted under laws that they themselves sponsored or voted for! How ironic! I just know of Clinton and now this guy.
Posted by: Chadwick Smith | September 30, 2006, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Let’s take another look at the politcal scoreboard and see who gets to reap the benefits of this sick tragedy.
Hooray for your side! The pervert is a republican. Enjoy your little victory.
Posted by: Jerry-ID | September 30, 2006, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Sexuality is a manifestation of power within the political realm. Having lived in DC as a young man made me aware of the compelling nature of sexual adventurism among the elite in this country. It is unusual in that these same individuals extoll virtuous living yet do not adhere to their prognostications.
Sexual licentiousness needs to be addressed within the context of the pathology of pathocratic behavior adjusted for political purposes.
Posted by: ALFRED HOLDEN | September 30, 2006, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Shame on you for bringing politics into this! I’m very much a Republican and am EXTREMELY disgusted by this! It has nothing to do with what Clinton did or didn’t do… or who gets away with what. It has to do with a pedophile that needs to burn. He will never be ‘cured’ so he must be put away for good!
Posted by: Ralsix | September 30, 2006, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Foley’s crime isn’t Rep vs. Dem. How the house knew about it (even warning interns about Foley) but did nothing is the problem.
As far as Clinton goes: his intern wasn’t a minor. His infedility was NOT a crime.
Posted by: kahootz | September 30, 2006, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
I think its interesting how one Republican’s misconduct is automatically projected onto the entire Republican party.
One weirdo does not an entire political party make.
This man’s actions equate to nothing more than the misdeeds of one person – as much as Clinton’s actions reflected on the Democrats – none.
Posted by: Erik | September 30, 2006, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
The difference between Dems and Republicans? This guy will fry at the hands of his own party. The Dems are still defending what Clinton did.
Posted by: Me | September 30, 2006, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
He did it, he lied, he’s gone. If he were a Democrat he’d still be in office and they’d be sticking up for him.
Posted by: Jim | September 30, 2006, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Hmm, bit of a different tune from yesterday’s comments when everyone was complaining about it even being in the news…where this is smoke there is usually fire. This type of predatory behavior crosses all political and socio-economic lines. Cripes, our kids aren’t even safe from elected officials.
Posted by: Tracy | September 30, 2006, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
It would seem that the problem has been known about for some time, and that Foley is not the only one.
And yes until the really explicit stuff came out both Foley, and the winger chorus, were all “so what” about it.
And yes secretive abusive people who have no respect for the lives of others is a working definition of John Dean’s athoritarian personality. And yes such folk are today almost exclusively Republican.
Posted by: FreeDem | September 30, 2006, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
I cannot believe that someone would try to compare this to Clinton’s issues. This guy was is a pedophile. Clinton had sexual relations with an adult. One is illegal, the other is not. Clinton was busted for lying under oath. Not even close.
Posted by: Bill | September 30, 2006, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Wow, I am surprised that the Republicans aren’t rallying behind this guy like they did Lawrance King back in the 80s when he had huge pedophilic orgies that involved members of the GOP all the way up to the Reagan/Bush White house. And when a documentary was made about it the Republican congress under Clinton stepped in and stopped the doc from being aired. There is a huge problem in America involving high ranking Republicans and pedophilia… anyone wh o would bother to take a moment to look up would find massive amounts of information on it. It’s nothing new, Americans are just ignoring it. Sad.
Posted by: David | September 30, 2006, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Obvious, Foley has some serious personal problems, like many political figures. Should we be suprised when a politician, liberal or conservative, is involved in a scandal?
And for the record, most intelligent conservatives never said they’re “holier” than others – - many just have a value system of absolute right/wrongs. Whether you like it or not, most people have a value system, but it’s more fun for the media to pick on Christians.
Posted by: Not an Idiot | September 30, 2006, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
This guy has appeared on Fox and Friends many times. As a conservative republican, he has always given me the creeps.
Good riddance. I hope he is
monitored for life, he needs to be.
Tony
Posted by: Tony | September 30, 2006, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
What is even more of a tragedy is that some in the GOP (Majority Leader John Boehner) knew of this in detail last spring and did nothing! A child molester in the GOP and he did NOTHING! The GOP wants power…At ALL costs. Even to sacrifice an innocent 16 year old boy so they could cover up their vulnerability in Rep. Foley. God how disgusting!
Posted by: PClark | September 30, 2006, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
You people that turn EVERYTHING into a partisian political issue … You’re pathetic morons who represents all that is wrong with America. This isn’t partisian …. The Florida rep is a sicko irrespective of affiliation. You’re all a bunch of hypocrites … BOTH SIDES! When will you wake up and start doing what is right for AMERICA and not your pathetic left or right party?
Posted by: Dave | September 30, 2006, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
C’mon people. This is just sick. This is incredibly disturbing–that someone could possibly feel compeled to act so aggressively deviant and all the while be jeopardizing his career, family, life. This has nothing to do with being Republican or Democrat, and trying to take partisan shots here is irresponsible and immature. This is not politics, this is mental depravity. To act as if this proves something about conservative values is unacceptable.
Posted by: Guy | September 30, 2006, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
I find it hard that people can sit here and argue about oh democrat this and Republicans that… the fact is we have a lot of men and women preying on our children. You can watch on TV (cant remember the name for the life of me right now) people talking to minors on the Internet and then showing up to have sexual relations with children. These men and women are from all different races, ages, political groups, backgrounds, and professions. So this isn’t a political thing its a society issue. Show this for what it is… a sick perverted man in a sick and perverted society.Put a stop to your child’s unsupervised Internet access, pay attention to your children and their needs and most of all be involved in their lives!!!! Stop it on your end so the risk of your child putting themselves in a position to be preyed upon is dramatically lowered. There are to many predators out there… don’t just give your child to them!
Posted by: amy | September 30, 2006, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
This is not just a gay man flirting with someone who happens to be underage (not that that would be okay either.) This guy is a pedophile (okay, more likely ephebophile) — look at all the “How old are you now?” questions. He’s explicitly looking for an adolescent and NOT for someone of legal age.
Yes, the teen guys he’s talking to are probably gay themselves, or at least curious — he’s seeking out people he thinks will be open to his advances. The gift offering and “are you safe” stuff is also “grooming” behavior.
He’s looking for impressionable gay teens. Not other gay men of age. This isn’t just about a gay guy putting the make on someone at work. Wake up and smell the coffee.
Posted by: Alexa | September 30, 2006, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
FINALLY someone put the right light on this — Foley was never interested in protecting children. He was supressing his own demons (or feeding them). The child protection involment was his hiding place. Thanks Rick.
Posted by: r. shevchenko | September 30, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
NO- they haven’t rallied around him because they know this is a felony….
BUT–they did try to hide it for the past 6 months.
PROTECTED & SHIELDED – completely unexcusable!!!!
Posted by: casey | September 30, 2006, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
It is bad enough that this happened, but hving high ranking Republicans NOT take action because the parents wanted to hush it up….somehow this doe taint the Republican leadership. Looks too much like: “Let’s wait until the election is over to do something!”. They could of at least gotten him off the committee to protact children. Don’t you think?
Posted by: George Pole | September 30, 2006, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
no matter WHO tries to paint it differently, right is right and wrong is wrong, despite party affiliation. Foley AND Clinton’s behavior were wrong and there is no defending either. Now, how many other offenders are serving in the “public interest”? We can’t expect our leaders to be perfect, but we need to weed out the REALLY BAD apples on both sides of the fence. It’s time the decency of the common man (and woman) took back our goverment!
Posted by: Bert | September 30, 2006, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Ha Ha right wing values at work!
Posted by: ?what? | September 30, 2006, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Mark Foley was once a little boys shamed by the same sexual abuse that now he craves to do.
He needs to get counseling and admit his “inner struggle”
Boys and girls are not Women and Men!
If you are gay… be gay with a legal male.
If you are just repeating the cycle of abuse ..stop it!
Posted by: Anoy | September 30, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Remember people in glass houses should not throw stones.Do you really think all the democrats are lilly white? why bring up a litney of hearsays like Joe did.check both sides of the aisle.I’m sure you will find a lot of dirt. Its shameful.Marion
Posted by: Carol | September 30, 2006, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
What makes this a political issue involving the Republican party, as opposed to just a lone sicko, is that the Republican leadership has been aware of this situation for nearly a year, and has done nothing about it. I wonder how many others fell victim during the interim?
The crime is bad, the shielding of an alleged pedophile is even worse for this reason.
Posted by: Oilfieldguy | September 30, 2006, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Remember people in glass houses should not throw stones.Do you really think all the democrats are lilly white? why bring up a litney of hearsays like Joe did.check both sides of the aisle.I’m sure you will find a lot of dirt. Its shameful.Marion
Posted by: Carol | September 30, 2006, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
All of you people posting your outrage, but I bet less than 5% of you actually vote. That is how you answer this. Vote the whole damn Congress out (Rep & Dems) and vote in new members, then and only then will we be taken seriously. The newly elected members of Congress will think twice before abusing their office. I am not talking only about this issue, but the stealing and cheating that is out of control. I say that election day is the only day that every U.S. Citizen is equal. You must vote or they will keep doing it.
Posted by: Chris Ely | September 30, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Another sleazy politican…….
Posted by: MrEdd | September 30, 2006, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
People with problems don’t resolve those problems by being locked up. Their problems only get worse in jail. And that means OUR problems get worse, because we share the same planet with these people. The US needs to focus on healing and rehabilitation because we are ultimately healing our species, and not just individuals. We are all inherently connected whether we like it or not.
Posted by: Paulito | September 30, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
I think this is all Al Gore’s fault since he invented the internet.
Posted by: NFW | September 30, 2006, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
You serious? This is a repulican, democrat issue? That is idiotic. Foley should pay he price for his indescretions and so should anyone. Get a grip! It isn’t about politics – but it is about the condition of the human race…..
Posted by: steve mcdonald | September 30, 2006, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
The worst aspect of this thing is that the Republican House leadership knew what was going on and failed to act. The House majority Leader at the very least knew and probably also Speaker Hastert. Efforts by Republican apologists to ignore the fact that the episode IS political because these Republican leaders made it political won’t wash. Frankly, I think Boehner should also resign at the very least.
Posted by: Bernard | September 30, 2006, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Who warned the class about Foley?
Posted by: enough | September 30, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Why make a political issue out of this sad excuse for a man. Throw him in the mental ward dungeon and throw the key away. This guy is a psycho.
Posted by: Doug | September 30, 2006, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
COVER-UP
Republicans covered this up by not telling about this when they first learned of it. They let him continue to be a threat to Congressional Pages. All to continue the Republican stranglehold on power in Washington.
COVER-UP
Posted by: CLK | September 30, 2006, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I found it to be VERY interesting that Foley has made several interviews with right wing xians like Pat Robertson”s 700 Club and DJ Kennedy’s Coral Ridge Church. I wonder if these two tv preachers would acknowledge the “gentleman from Florida” now in lieu of recent events?
Posted by: Kenneth B | September 30, 2006, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
If he was a Democrat this would have been a much bigger story! This guy is lucky he’s a republican for sure.
Posted by: alex stewart | September 30, 2006, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Is this a political lobbeying for favours?? It sounds for me like ‘both’ sides are just ‘mud-slinging’ and loses perspective. Both participants in the dialogue,hasn’t got a clue as to what is ‘freedom’. Freedom can only be attained if they respected their limits/restrictions. The intent of the messages that was exchanged, only highlighted,not the case for age difference,ephebophile, but chronophilia(and hebephilia,parafihilia (Roman Catholic sex abuses) Which could be acted out by Hetro and Homosexual people!
Posted by: Vrilza | September 30, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
I missed the part where Clinton made sexual advances to minors. Can someone please post some links to the stories of Clinton attacking children. I must have been napping…
Posted by: alex stewart | September 30, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
The only people with these particular glass houses are Bushists, Carol.
Do you really want to be defending an adult sexual predator of minors? Or minimizing his predation? Or defending other Republicans who failed to report this man’s crimes?
Soliciting underage kids over the internet is criminal.
Posted by: No Blood for Hubris | September 30, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Dems knew last Nov and held this info till now????
Posted by: les | September 30, 2006, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Gosh – Who needs porn sites, videos and like activities when we can just look to our political “leadership” to fulfill the QUESTIONABLE DEED needs of the public?
I do believe, (though I am not a lawyer – as they tend to be) that there is a crime called “ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT” – so then doesn’t that make the politicos and lawmakers who knew about this for nearly a year culpable and guilty too? How many law books do ya have to read to know when something is wrong? No wonder they keep such secrets. If all their dirt was exposed they’d be in jail -unfortunately and again at the expense of us taxpayers… how ironic is that?
It’s a shame that we do not have the courage and fortitude to kick them out of office. This is our right but I too join this list of voices and complainers. Please see that the number of commenters here alone (now at well over 600 people) represent a pretty substantial number of voters! We should fire them, and then sue their pants off in a class action suit for BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST. Holla!
Posted by: mint | September 30, 2006, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
I am a GOPer and I am appalled by Foley’s actions. Sickened in fact. As far as the dem’s go on this site, you’re criticizing repubs because of his actions and NOT 1 repub is defending this sick so-and-do. Quit with the politics.
Posted by: Kevin | September 30, 2006, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
He’s not a pedophile, he’s a homosexual hebephile or a ephebophile.
The difference: Some argue that a consistent preference for adolescents is merely normal attraction to individuals at or near the peak of their sexual capability, and reflects a biologically normal reproductive strategy [citation needed](in contrast to a preference for pre-pubescents, which does not and is therefore pathological).
I want to see Foley burn as much as the next guy, but if we’re going to hunt witches, let’s get our terminology straight!
Posted by: webster | September 30, 2006, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Let me re-phrase. NO republican should be defending this clown. If you are, you should be ashamed of yourself. There is no excuse for his actions. I wish Chris Hansen from Dateline NBC had caught this guy. Sicko pervert.
Posted by: Kevin | September 30, 2006, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Who knows more about passing pedophilia laws than a pedophile himself?
Stop making this political – some kids got messed around with here – and that should be the number 1 concern – but of course in this polarized nation of ours, it isn’t.
Posted by: Kevin | September 30, 2006, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
The number of Republicans attempting to go on the offence heres is just repulsive. Almost as much as the fact that key Republicans protected this guy for 11 months. Bring in the FBI now.
Posted by: Allen | September 30, 2006, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Sick, sick, sick. Sling the man in jail. Put him under the jail.
Why are democrats on here laughing and asking us to defend these perverted acts? This isn’t a Rep. vs. Dem. thing, everyone wants child predators put away – this story is nothing to make light.
Posted by: John | September 30, 2006, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
THAT CONGRESSMAN IS ONE SICK PUPPY!!!
Posted by: David Moore | September 30, 2006, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
I think you are all missing it. It is not a Repub/Dem issue, it is a cover up issue. At least 5 top republicans knew of the incident in November of last year and did nothing to protect these pages. All 5 should be held accountable along with Foley.
Posted by: missing the boat | September 30, 2006, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
I think what is just as sad and disgusting is that the main focus seems to be on the political party that the individual belongs to.
Should issues like this not be above political point scoring and actually concentrate on the individual or individuals who carry on behaviour such as this.???
I also feel that if other people have been aware of this for some time but decided to do nothing about it they should feel ashamed. This is a matter for the authorities in my opinion.
Tony, Canada.
Posted by: Tony | September 30, 2006, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
It’s not the (just) crime it’s the coverup. Republican leadership KNEW they had a pedophile in Congress for a YEAR and they did nothing!
The “family values” Republican party has become nothing but a cult of hypocrites.
Posted by: Cat | September 30, 2006, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
John posted:
“This isn’t a Rep. vs. Dem. thing, everyone wants child predators put away”
That is true, but Republicans, mostly led by RINOs, tend to overreact for political reasons. As a longtime conservative who votes Republican, my legislators here in Georgia (Republican House, Senate, and Governor) recently wrote such a bill, which the Governor signed. It was an embarassment. Law enforcement asked for tighter controls on the worst offenders (Level III in Georgia), and the Republican leadershipled by Rep. Jerry Keen of St. Simons Island, changed the bill to cover every level (which law enforcement opposed) for political reasons. The law backfired, sent many of the worst sex offenders (that were being monitored) into hiding, and ran many law abiding offenders and their families out of their homes. The rural areas became flooded with sex offenders. The Democrats in Georgia are having a hayday with this bungling by Georgia Republicans.
Posted by: JD | September 30, 2006, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
FOR ALL OF YOU COMPARING CLINTON TO THIS PERV,-I THOUGHT THE LEWINSKY WAS AT LEAST 24 YEARS OLD NOT A 16 YEAR OLD TEEN PAGE -HOW DARE YOU COMPARE HIM TO THIS PEDIOPHILE-
Posted by: jimmy mcneill | September 30, 2006, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
I would like to encourage everyone to go back to the entry on the 28th, when all the Republicans insisted it was a smear campaign and some actually blamed the boy. It’s funny how a few days turns it into a “nonpartisan” issue. I hope you jerks who defended this sicko lose a LOT of sleep!
Posted by: Jacob in SC | September 30, 2006, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
The news report said he was chair of some congressional committee which deals with missing and abused children. I’m surprised that Foley didn’t spin it that he was doing some “field research”. “Don’t underestimate the value of a good lie”: O.J. Simpson
Posted by: Tom | September 30, 2006, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Whether Democrat or Republican, we all can agree on the fact that having a pedophile in the guise of a Congressman is abhorrent. My question I would like to ask is that the Republican Leadership knew about it and did nothing about it! What is going on here? Is gaining political advantage so important that we ignore the specter of depravity just to maintain power? Say what you want about either party, Clinton and his 24-year old intern, Bush and his failed opportunities to really rally the country from Oil & Middle East domination, or whatever – THOSE PEOPLE IN CONGRESS KNEW AND DID NOT SAY A THING!!!! Think about that when you vote!
Posted by: Gary Roesler | September 30, 2006, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Totally so sickening that he would do such a thing… for he’s a naughty bad fellow … abusing his authority and the system …
isn’t it ironic that he in charge of a committee that handles Missing and Abused Children …. wooof!
Posted by: Justin | September 30, 2006, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Since it was a Republican, the Democrats rejoice. But if it was a Democrat, the Republicans would rejoice; as predictable as juveniles. Can’t we just condemn it because it was wrong and realize that the party affiliation is just incidental. It’s just a matter of time before a Democrat will be found with the same baggage.
Posted by: Sheldon in K. C. | September 30, 2006, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
I am a republican and this guy is a disgrace to not only his family, but the entire party. Aside from resigning he should be locked away for the rest of his sick, pitiful life.
Posted by: Mike Reynolds | September 30, 2006, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
People keep saying its not a party issue then why did the REPUBLICAN leadership hide this for so long. Party of hypocrites they are and its sickening!!!!
Posted by: Tony | September 30, 2006, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
I follow no party line. I do consider myself conservative in many ways and liberal in other aspects. I want this Foley person stripped of all dignity and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Forget his remorse, and his apologies, for he is only remorseful after being caught. This man must be punished in a way that speaks to all men of such importance. To think, this predator was given the privilege to govern over our nation along with hundreds of others, swearing an oath to The U.S. Constitution…..
I see nothing but red. I am disgusted and ashamed of this animal, Foley.
Posted by: james | September 30, 2006, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
This whole matter is sad but what saddens me the most is that kids were victimized and those in authority chose to protect Rep. Foley over protecting our children. Whether they protected him because he was a Republican or because he was their freind, they were wrong to do so. Even the first child’s parents chose to “not make a bid deal” of this. We have to start taking our responsibilities more seriously.
Posted by: Jacqueline | September 30, 2006, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Republican or Democrat—Hypocritical Cronyism is the breeding ground for this perverted powermongering. The Good Ole Boy party has existed a long time before any of the bloggers got involved and that party has Old White Men who had the way paved for them to Yale or Princeton or Harvard and who are perverts (and that IS Republican AND Democrat). Maybe I overgeneralize but I think I am hitting pretty close to the mark. The Political “Family Tree” of the United States is filled with a lot of Lemons right now.
Posted by: Jim | September 30, 2006, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
May I please point out that the “consensual sex” between Clinton & Monica Lewinski was only “consensual” in the fact that he didn’t rape her? Although couldn’t an abuse of power be considered rape? What other young college student aka intern, when asked by the PRESIDENT of the United States for sexual favors, WOULDN’T comply?
Either way, as so many other people have said, this isn’t about Dems vs. Rep., hypocrisy or the ‘scandal’ being brought up right before the election. Having read the IM’s I can DEFINITELY say: This guy is a REAL SICKO!!
FRY HIM!!!!!
Posted by: Sarah | September 30, 2006, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
I’m a registered democrat, but I’m glad he resigned, and didn’t drag his family through the muck of this child molesting, garbage. He still should be held accountable for his actions, and serve the time, and or penalty of his actions.
Posted by: jimmy | September 30, 2006, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
At least this sick guy resigned. There has been at least 2 representatives in the 80′s who didn’t just send icky text messages but actually had sex with teenage pages. Both guys were only Censured. For those of you who seem to think this is a political thing vs a perv thing, one was GOP and one was a Dem.
Posted by: pat | September 30, 2006, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Lol, come on this is not a big deal at all. the only stupid thing is letting this kid know who he is.
Posted by: Ted | September 30, 2006, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
THat is sick and wrong. and the goverment tells us to watch out? They should think before they say anything!!!!
Posted by: Myam | September 30, 2006, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
What’s with the Clinton comparison? Monica was a consenting adult. OK, he lied about it. Sex, WMDs, you Americans have your pick of what you prefer your prez to lie to you about!
Posted by: Constantin | September 30, 2006, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
funny how its the liberals who are the first to bring up politics when this is clearly so much more…Republican or democrat the problem is a sick person that needs to be punished…there should not be any talk of someone thinking that republicans will call it a smear campaign or anything else. No republican, or any right thinking individual is gonna back this guy up. Realize that a child is a victim here..not how this is gonna help your party or hurt the other. this really goes way beyond your politics that seem very insignificant compared to this
Posted by: Stlver1 | September 30, 2006, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
I was looking at the comments section of your first article about the Foley emails. People really let you have it about being on a witch-hunt. Wonder what they think now?
Stiver1,
I agree that this is not a partisan issue, but the “non-reporting” is. I don’t particularly think it should be an election year cause [though it probably will be] But the motives involved in glossing this over for 10-11 months, seem pretty outright political.
Posted by: Mickey | September 30, 2006, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Nice that the party of family values is in charge. Ha.
Posted by: Talkie Toaster | September 30, 2006, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
I’m guessing all those who on the 28th thought this was just a ‘witch-hunt’ have a lot of egg on their face. And I would think that Judy, who seemed to think that these emails would have been okay for her son to receive may even be second guessing herself now, as well. Not news, huh? Usually when things come out of the blue like this, people don’t be so quick to stand on your soapbox defending someone. Democrats and Republicans alike all have some skeletons. Well, it certainly looks like another democrat will win a Florida chair in the House!!!
Posted by: MaryAnne Terrell | September 30, 2006, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
What makes this a partisan issue for me is the inaction of the house leadership in dealing with this issue when they first knew about it. That is ineptitude at best and a cover up at worst. While you were distracted by this issue your leaders in congress passed a bill that retroactively pardoned Bush and his staff of any crimes they may have committed since 2001. We’re on our way down as a country in so many ways.
Posted by: Spokevin | October 1, 2006, 12:03 am 12:03 am
The scandal isn’t about Rep. Mark Foley – the REAL scandal is how the Republican House leadership, including Majority Leader Boehner, NRCC Chair Reynolds, and Speaker of the House Hastert have known about this since 2005 and COVERED IT UP. If they had exposed Rep. Foley and forced him to resign back in 2005, this would be as small an issue as some of the GOP’s defenders here pretend it is. Instead, the whole House Republican leadership is tainted – because apparently, they only believe it’s a crime if you get caught.
Call for the resignation of EVERY person involved in the coverup. That’s the only way the Republican Party can recover its dignity.
Posted by: dave | October 1, 2006, 12:42 am 12:42 am
Can you say ‘total hypocrite’?
Posted by: Colleen | October 1, 2006, 12:56 am 12:56 am
It seems like Republicans have been getting in a lot of trouble in the last few years. Hopefully the voters will swing this time around, maybe even Rush L.
Posted by: joe | October 1, 2006, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Just another reason ALL the current elected should be tossed.
“Power corrupts, absolute Power corrupts absolutly”
Can we as Americans please wake up and toss ALL the bums out this year????????
Posted by: John | October 1, 2006, 1:19 am 1:19 am
I see we’re getting closer to understanding this coverup.
Democrats made clear the matter was kept out of their hands. While Representative John Shimkus, an Illinois Republican who’s chairman of the page board, said his panel had looked into the matter, the Democrat on the board said he was never informed of the matter and the board did not discuss the matter until Sept. 28, after Foley had resigned.
Posted by: Spokevin | October 1, 2006, 1:34 am 1:34 am
As I commented on the original story, there wasn’t enough there (in the news article) to say for sure that there was anything criminal. And that, as a parent, I would monitor the situation. Then, if anything that crossed a legal line was said, I would go to the police.
Well, the line was crossed, and this guy should be denounced. I say that as a conservative Christian who is also a Republican.
Posted by: Jon Craft | October 1, 2006, 1:50 am 1:50 am
Former Rep. Mark Foley, a child predator, must be prosecuted and punished for soliciting minors.
Posted by: Nancy Lisker | October 1, 2006, 1:53 am 1:53 am
This is not about Republicans and Democrats. Foley is a sick man who was exposed. Everyone is saddened by his behavior. I hope he gets help. It puts a bad light on both parties.
Posted by: lou | October 1, 2006, 2:08 am 2:08 am
‘That he’s Republican has nothing to do with the crime he committed.’
That’s ridiculous. It only means he should have known better. Take him down.
Posted by: Jeremy Nimmo | October 1, 2006, 2:54 am 2:54 am
Two words: REACTION FORMATION
Look it up people.
Anyone shocked by this man’s alleged behavior shouldn’t be. Zealots of any kind ought to arouse our suspicions.
Mark Foley deserves a presumption of innocence like everyone else, but things certainly don’t look good for him.
Posted by: Mike | October 1, 2006, 3:28 am 3:28 am
Those certainly are some HOT conversations I must say. Just like real porn. Phew.
So ridiculous and arrogant, that he was going after kids who didn’t even seem that interested. He could’ve found plenty of young gay adults on the internet, consenting. But no he has to prey on kids. Wow.
What a creep.
Even sadder will be if it turns out there are some he succeeded with. Maybe those stories will come out later.
Posted by: Helen | October 1, 2006, 3:29 am 3:29 am
‘When did Hastert know about it and why did he do nothing about it, when did Bush know about it and why did he do nothing about it? We should demand answers to these questions.’
I doubt very much that Bush knew about it. No-one in the Republican party ever dares bring Bush bad news.
Posted by: B. Kaufmann | October 1, 2006, 4:25 am 4:25 am
My God, this is a child not an adult
Four Questions:
-HOW DOES ANYONE JUST FORGET ABOUT or dimiss SUCH ALLEGATIONS?
-When does the political party preservation rights of the parent trump the public rights for a child? If necessary charge the childs congressmen and parents for concealing this matter.
-Given that another page has been contacted, has the FBI raided the congressmen’s Hill office,his state office,his home computers or seek access to this internet records from the phone company?
-Has anyone reviewed any of the Exploited Children’s legistlation to find any loop holes that may have been inserted?
Posted by: pspethics | October 1, 2006, 5:54 am 5:54 am
At leas the Republicans aren’t defending him the way the Democrats defended Clinton. Both were indefensible acts.
Posted by: ENon | October 1, 2006, 6:17 am 6:17 am
I concur with Mike’s posting.
Posted by: Mike | Oct 1, 2006 3:28:24 AM
Posted by: pspethics | October 1, 2006, 6:39 am 6:39 am
When this story first broke I read countless posts that accused ABC news and Brian Ross of being left-wing partisan hacks. I have yet to find a single apology from anyone who posted such opinions. Now that it has been proven to be true, those same people want to point out that this is not a Repub vs. Dem issue. You guys are unbelievable. Literally.
Posted by: Bard | October 1, 2006, 8:16 am 8:16 am
Every member of Congress who knew about the emails should resign or be thrown out of office. Period. Condemning Foley after the fact is not enough. At least a half a dozen members of congress knew of this. They were silent. They betrayed our trust and our children. This is just like the Catholic Church… hush it up. Handle it ‘privately.’ Do nothing.
Posted by: corn | October 1, 2006, 9:06 am 9:06 am
It does not matter what political party he belongs to. I am getting so damn tire of all the political BS when it comes to stuff like this.
Each party has its problems and If you want to go over the list of who has done what I bet you the list will be just as long for the Democrats and the Republicans So give it up and get a life.
Todays society is falling apart and it is because as adults and parents we worry to much about what the other people are doing.
Posted by: esleyzak | October 1, 2006, 9:09 am 9:09 am
I’m not American. Reading your contributions above I was stunned by how polarised your country has become. Clearly Foley committing this “crime” is not political, bad people and hypocrisy exists on both sides.
But obviously some people in the republican house leadership had knowledge of his behaviour and tried to cover him up, get him re-elected and even let him remain in a committee which main purpose it is to protect children from sexual abuse on the internet. That is both political and stupid. These people should be held accountable. I fear that one cost of your polarised society is lack of political accountability and poor political leadership.
Posted by: Danish | October 1, 2006, 9:45 am 9:45 am
This is CRAZY! How much MONEY does this guy make a year? PLUS PERKS! I did 20 years in the military (working for a fouth of what this guy made in a year) and CONDUCT was IMPORTANT AND NECESSARY. I WAS HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR MY ACTIONS AND I ALSO TOOK AN OATH TOO! I FULFILLED MINE! WHAT’S THE PROBLEM HERE?
“RESIGN”? “QUIT”? STAND – UP AND
FACE YOUR ACCUSERS!
THERE WAS “NO QUITTING IN THE MILITARY” and there should NOT BE ANY FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS EITHER. THE SWORE TO AN “OATH OF OFFICE” THEN BY GOD HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE TOO! – “ENOUGH SAID”!
Posted by: Bill - California | October 1, 2006, 9:59 am 9:59 am
To me the politically important issue is the Republican leadership having been informed and then knowingly failing to act to protect congressional pages from a sexual predator. Why would they fail to act?
More broadly this issue is another example of repeated overall failure of this Republican Congress to fulfill its duty.
It is time to clean House and throw the bums out!!!!!
Posted by: don condliffe | October 1, 2006, 10:04 am 10:04 am
The question is this: Did he implicitly know the age of the girls he was chatting with? If AOL can’t provide actual typed text from her stating her age, he can claim that he didn’t know how old she was.
Posted by: Get a Lyfe | October 1, 2006, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Gotta love those moral, family value loving republicans!
Posted by: none | October 1, 2006, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Jermery, I agree with your post!
It says in the Bible he who has fault with others “Need to take the POST our of their EYE! And also HE who has NO SIN SIN CAN CAST THE FIRST STONE!
But actions do need consequences!
“OATH OF OFFICE”!
“NO RESIGNING OR QUITTING HERE”!
TAKE IT LIKE A MAN!
Posted by: Bill - California | October 1, 2006, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Hey, ENon. Clinton didn’t have sex with a MINOR! There’s is a HUGE difference.
And the Repubs DID allow the CRIME to continue until these disgusting emails came out and he was FORCED to resign.
Posted by: Me | October 1, 2006, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Isn’t it funny that some of the republicans here are trying very hard to defend that this Foley’s scandal is a “non-partisan” issue? Which cave have you guys been hiding? Which party enacted the “holier than thou” motto? The party’s hypocricy is starting to be widely exposed I’d encourage everyone (especially the left) to dig hard in these right-wingers’ closets; it’s a no brainer that you’re going to find some skeletons…
Posted by: not republican | October 1, 2006, 11:47 am 11:47 am
what an idiot.
Posted by: tony | October 1, 2006, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
With regard to any smear against Clinton, at least Monica Lewinsky was a consenting adult.
I hope that when Foley and those who hid his acts are brought to justice, some of the laws his committee pushed into existence are used against them.
But, all in all, I wouldn’t compare the scandals of the Republicans and Democrats. Rather, I’d hold ex-Congressman Foley under the same journalistic microscope as that on the Catholic Church. It seems the same sorts of deflections of inquiries, policies of hidden knowledge, and the passive protection of leadership went on, at the expense of the safety and peace of mind of a LOT of minors.
Posted by: Todd | October 1, 2006, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Don’t understand why Clinton’s name comes up. His “Faux pas” was (were) with an adult or two. I also agree with the people who wonder if this was would be that big if the congressperson was a woman. But the law is an ass.
Posted by: Stephen | October 1, 2006, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
This is no different from that of Catholic priests being shuttled as pedophiles from one parish to another. Let’s see – parents of the one page knew about it, some congressional leaders knew about it, congressional page overseers knew about it, and YET Foley was not turned in until ABC News jumped on the story. Tell me, who is the watchdog here? Who is protecting our citizens from the excesses of an all-powerful government? My God, this guy is a predator, and yet, people turned a blind eye to him for at least a year before an outside entity shined a light upon the monster. Thank God for the 1st Amendment – don’t look for the party of “family values”, nor of its counterpart to do job. When it comes to getting and keeping POWER, even a sex predator is protected by colleagues. Are there others of his ilk? How about it, Denny Hastert and Nancy Pelosi? Are their more in your parties?
Posted by: stevep | October 1, 2006, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
I wondered if Bush had a conversation with God on this issue? Since he is on a personal level with God. Did he tell him to stay the course and cover this one up, since they knew about this pervert for years. How many kids slipped thru the cracks from encounters with this demented perverted pedofile.
How I wish that NBC’s Dateline had caught him.
Thank you Chris Hansen for continuing the crusade on catching these sick perverted men!!
Posted by: Darrell | October 1, 2006, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
House Republican leadership has known for months about emails reportedly sent by Foley to a 16-year-old-male congressional page.
He left office after he was confronted by ABC.
That is what makes it a Republican thing.
Posted by: Steve | October 1, 2006, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
not to defend the guy at all. he should have known better.
But in reading the whole IM conversation, do you get the impression that the Teen played him? Baited him with some of his responses? Is there really a victim here? It was’nt like he confronted him in at a rest stop.
Posted by: Willy | October 1, 2006, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
To WPF:
Chemical castration is available for both men and women. It near eliminates urges (but of course, nothing except removing organs works 100%).
Oh, and I just read the entire exchange–Mr. Foley is disgusting and it’s very sad that he let down supportive constituents by engaging in such deplorable acts. It is extraordinarily shameful to utilize one’s position in Congress to remain in contact with a congressional page (oh, the various questions Mr. Foley asked this page were entirely disgusting and increasingly nauseating in nature.)
Posted by: Isabella | October 1, 2006, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
lets see. on dateline nbc they arrested every single one of these predators. this guy wasnt arrested yet? There is no special treatment for a pedophile!!!!!!!!!
arrest him and thats that
Posted by: STEVEN E | October 1, 2006, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
This creep Foley is really sick and I hope he gets the maximum punishment possible. There are too many predators holding responsible positions such as teachers, preachers, law enforcement or politicians. My question is: How did he get the young Page’s home email address anyway?
Posted by: Nickie | October 1, 2006, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
It’s ephebophilia, not pedophilia. Either way it’s sick. But, I’m guessing there are many there in office in Washington with some pretty messed up predilictions.
Either way, I hope he’s made an example of, regardless what party he belongs to.
And, those that knew and waited this long should be held accountable as well, and prosecuted to the fullest for knowing and not reporting or doing ANYTHING about until now.
Posted by: B.G. | October 1, 2006, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
THE SAD PART AND TRUTH, IS THAT THIS EPISODE IS ONLY THE TIP OF THE ICEBURG!!! THIS SORT OF THING AND MUCH WORSE GOES ON UNDISCOVERED BY MOST OF HIS PEERS ALL THE TIME!!!
Posted by: Deet | October 1, 2006, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Foley’s behavior IS a political issue since the Republicans have made their “family values” agenda such a prominent part of their national campaign. I’m a Libertarian (an alternative to the other two, BTW) with nothing or nobody to attack or defend here on party lines.
Posted by: Erik Viker | October 1, 2006, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Hey, maybe Foley was just doing some research, you know like “I wonder how easy it really is to exploit some kid on-line?” Then he would have more credibility as the chairman of the House caucus on missing and exploited children when he says “Its easy for a pervert to get on-line and do this…”
Posted by: Jim H. | October 1, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Foley was foolish and has paid for his folley by promptly resigning his treasured House seat. This ought to quiet anyone who had questioned the propriety of his actions. He self-distructed!
My new concern is the reports today that certain leadership members of his party knew about his contacts with pages, talked to him about it, and did not provide any oversight. Watch how they try to dumb down the email exchanges to make it appear as a partisan assault on their party.
I am all for family values, and this is not a value to be emulated!
howard in Foley’s district.
Posted by: howard | October 1, 2006, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Mark Foley is a pedophile. What irony…he earned respect in congress for championing the protection of children against sleezy perverts such as himself.
He’s aplogized to both his family and to his constituants in Florida. Where is the apology to his innocent young victims?
Posted by: a mom | October 1, 2006, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
The scary thing is that other high-up Republicans were aware of Foley’s problem, and NO ONE did anything about it. There were Democrats that knew – there were Republicans that knew. For goodness sake – if the boys in “page school” were WARNED about this guy, why wasn’t something done about him long ago?? It simply makes no sense. I think all of the people were aware and remained silent should also be prosecuted as accessories to the crime.
Posted by: C Irmen | October 1, 2006, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
I urge you folks to read up on the Franklin Cover Up – the Foley case is nothing new – you have Mark Gannon – who folks suspect is Johnny Gosh. Sex rings at the highlest levels of our govt. have been known for some time…
In Franklin Cover up Senator DeCamp sought out to dispel rumors that White House officials were involved with kids – to his dismay he discovered it was worse than one could imagine.
Additionally, people like Cynthia McKinney who was called crazy (I wonder why) called out US, UN and corporate (DynaCorp) involvement in the traffic of women and children. Folks wake up!!! Do your homework and pull your heads out of the sand…
Posted by: Joe | October 1, 2006, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
justfication makes me sick:rich powerful men(i.e woody allen,polanski)are called eccentric.poorlower class men are called perverts .makes me sick,the media,advertising and hollywood,m.t.v had got to be made accountable with their trolling of underage sexualisation in the guise of art.i.e britney spears in school unif-past film clip and calvin kline ads sexualising young boys and girls for profit.this world is full of abuse.it permiates ones subconscios.kate
Posted by: kate | October 1, 2006, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
So, is this man going to get locked up for child pornography, or is he going to get off scott-free just like other widely known figures. This is sickening,and the man needs to be held accountable and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law!
Posted by: Correctionaljustice | October 1, 2006, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Wow, can you belive all this utter hatred? I agree with the earlier post, about being glad he doesn’t live in a country where everything is polarized into R/D, Left/Right.. except, the embarassing part, is I have to live here! Is it at all possible that we can just vote for neither the R or the D, in the next two elections, and get someone else in charge? Perhaps with less bitterness? Hatred? And maybe focus on things like, I dont know, why we went into Iraq and started a war? I say vote everyone out, so no one has a reason to complain about anyone, and start this damn country over again. No wonder the rest of the world hates us! Holy crap people, are you reading what you are thinking about your fellow citizens?? This is a legal issue, and this man should be prosecuted,as a criminal, and then we vote everyone out and try to get our country back in order.
Posted by: Teresa | October 1, 2006, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Sounds like the Republican leadership in the House has something in common with the hierarchy of the Catholic Church, that being the protection of a child predator in their midst.
Posted by: Tom | October 1, 2006, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Why has he not been arrested?
Posted by: KE | October 1, 2006, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Foley is disgusting and should be prosecuted to the fullest extend of the law. Chris Hansen should featured him on Date Line NBC.
Posted by: Bree | October 1, 2006, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Some of these comments utterly amaze me; so this particular sleazeball happened to be a Republican. Has no bearing on the subject. Get protections for these kids in pleace, prosecute Foley if he broke the law, and let’s move on without all this recrimmination and name calling. Sheesh
Posted by: Joe | October 1, 2006, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
The thing that makes this political is that the leadership of one party kept the knowledge of it a secret for nearly a year and did not report it to criminal authories for investigation or share it with the ethics committee (because they almost certainly would have insisted on an investigation as to what was in the Instant Messages). THAT’S where the hypocrisy comes in. Repub party leadership claims they’re the only party who will protect us and our families, but the leadership valued political expediency over child safety. They “enabled” Foley for months and even let him keep his chairmanship of the Missing and Exploited Children’s Caucus–all to protect the party and that valuable seat in Congress. The only reason that Foley or the party leadership are talking now is that they knew ABC was about to make the email messages/IMs public. This is why we so desparately need checks and balances in Washington. There are always going to be bad people in the world. But you always hope that there are grown-ups out there who will intervene. No one came to the rescue here. Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. That’s why we need checks and balances in our government and why the recent trends toward consolidating power in one party is so frightening. The founding fathers were very wise.
Posted by: another mom | October 1, 2006, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
The problem is the same Congressmen who voted to impeach Clinton for legal sex with Monica, supported this guy for re-election DESPITE knowing about his illegal activities.
Posted by: Dan B. | October 1, 2006, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
I think we need to toss the whole damn bunch out. Regardless of party…from bottom to top…If someone was warning pages back in 2001, then more was known,sooner than both sides care to reveal. I live in a small town, I would think the pages world is a small town…where everybody knows what everybody knows….neither side is on the high road here.
Posted by: alice | October 1, 2006, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
People need to teach their children to use common sense on the computer.I realize these kids were away from home at the time, and hopefully nothing more than these sick exchanges happened, but still there is no excuse for a supposed adult talking like this to a minor. This shows me that sick people that are in charge are part of the problem and not part of the solution.
Posted by: Cece | October 1, 2006, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
Sick stuff. How can he do this for years without anyone knowing or reporting. While I don’t blame his party, anyone with prior information should be forced out. Here we are trying to force our “values” on the rest of the world, an our leaders are making sexual advances on minors. I’m sure other countries are laughing, an our partners (British) feel like fools. Oh, by the way, please don’t insult Edwin Edwards, past gov of La for his comment about a live boy or dead girl. Even his behavior wasn’t this low.
Posted by: marc | October 1, 2006, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Stay tuned … I am interested in hearing Representative Foley’s side of the story. Since he is not an enemy combatent, he’s entitled to tell us his side of the story. I am even more interested to hear from Foley about the internal workings of the House members and leadership. I wonder how many members, particularly the leadersip, are on the verge of resigning.
And again, why did the parents not report this to the police in Louisiana or Florida?
Posted by: pspethics | October 1, 2006, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Reading the items posted makes me wonder about the whole moral fiber of this country. For so many people to bring up the Clinton – Luwinski affair as some kind of offset or tit for tat is ridiculous.
Bill Clinton had an affair initiated by a twenty – two year old college educated women, an adult.
Mr. Foley initiated e-mails soliciting sexually explicit responses from underage boys, whom he contacted through the Congressional Page system. If the readers of this forum can’t distinguish between the two events and the ramification of same, we are in a moral quagmire in this country.
Posted by: pj | October 1, 2006, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
I am surprised by the Republicans who don’t want the Foley incident politicized.
I’m sorry but the Bushes gave us Lee Atwater and Karl Rove. It’s not a gentleman’s game anymore.
Posted by: frank hubbard | October 1, 2006, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Can someone help Mr. Kolco?
FBI spokesman Richard Kolko said the FBI is “conducting an assessment to see if there’s been a violation of federal law.” He had no further comment.
Posted by: pspethics | October 1, 2006, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Hey, how about engaging in some thinking for a change? One person’s sick desires don’t mean an entire party (whether Democrats when Clinton’s indiscretions came to light or Republicans uninvolved in the current scnadal) is to blame. By that logic, every murder that takes place in your state is YOUR fault too, and every American’s fault. Let’s be clear here: ANYONE, Republican or Democrat or otherwise who knew about this SHOULD have informed those in positions of responsibility. This includes Members of Congress all the way down to executive assistants and pages. Congress bears the most responsibility here if it knew of this but didn’t respond since their is a strong disincentive for pages and other vulnerable people to “whistleblow.” Still, anyone who knew of this and did nothing ought to have balanced their priorities and done what was right. I hope Foley is prosecuted to the full extent of the laws he helped right. Hoisted by his own petard, indeed.
Posted by: Concerned Law student | October 1, 2006, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
This wasn’t a political issue until the idiots made it one. I mean, its bad enough he’s a pedophile, but toss in the R next to his name and it becomes 10x worse, right? Calm down, justice will unfold.
Posted by: steve | October 1, 2006, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
just more evidence that republicans are hypocrites. down with the bush agenda!
Posted by: Dallas | October 1, 2006, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
will he still receive full pay and benefits for LIFE?
Posted by: tina | October 1, 2006, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
i keep reading that no republicans will defend Foley. I have to disagree. The republican leadership knew for over a year about Foley’s behavior and they engaged in a massive coverup to hide what was happening. They also continued to allow Foley to serve in leadership capacities in the party. While you may not consider this “defending” Foley, it certainly is harboring a criminal and in essence it is “defending his behavior.”
Posted by: RonDawg | October 1, 2006, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Fla. Rep. Foley, He’s done. This man has disgraced his state, Republican Party, and he will suffer countless whiplash from this. It’s doesn’t look good for him, and also if they Republican Party knew about this..
Posted by: Jeffrey | October 1, 2006, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
my only question is this : would we react any different if he was doing this to a [female] rather than a [boy] – homophobia making anyone act a lot stronger on this subject..because this is what im getting from some of the comments..
Posted by: jordan | October 1, 2006, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Can we leave Clinton out of this? lol Give the guy a break. No sense in beating a dead horse. Why the comparison? I am sure he has attoned for his sin. Everyone is human even the President. He/She puts their pants on like everyone else.
Posted by: ksu | October 1, 2006, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Let us all not forget his contribution for making it a federal crime for soliciting sex of a minor online which I hope he will be prosecuted by the same law he help write.
Perhaps his crusade with predators on minors was because he, himself, was one and he was looking for internal forgiveness. Hopefully now he will get the help I think he has been crying out for – just had no way to get it when you are a man or woman in the political/media spot light.
Posted by: Nancy | October 1, 2006, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Our legal system always seems to get more bite out of cover ups than the actual crimes. I hope that the speaker of the house and others who new about this sicko for a year and chose to do nothing are held accountable. This is one more example of having one party incharge of all houses of power avoids any oversight and checks and balances.
Posted by: michael | October 1, 2006, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
He ought to be punished to the fullest. Shame on him. He is very sick and needs help.
Posted by: Rhonda | October 1, 2006, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Even if Foley had consentual sex withone or more of the male pages, it would consistitute rape of a minor and a number of other charges.He is in serious trouble.I agree with other comments that senior level people looked the other way on his behaviour, and it may have went too far.
Although this has nothing to do with Clinton, remember, Clinton lied under oath in a deposition (to a federal judge), subourned perjury when he conspired with Lewinski to submit a false affadavit, etc. Although he was impeached, he should have been tried and charged for the criminal offenses…we would.
Posted by: j house | October 1, 2006, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
Can you say irony? Mark Foley’s big public grandstanding as a moral upstanding person pushing for laws to protect children has proven to be a big farce. For all those suggesting that this not turn into a political agenda must all be registered republicans. After the dirty underhanded campaigns run by Karl Rove over the last several years, democrats would be crazy to let this opportunity pass them by.
Posted by: Randi | October 1, 2006, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
“Great Caesar’s Ghost!!!!!
Jimmy, Lois……get in here……”
Posted by: Jon | October 1, 2006, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
you know, back in the day of socrates, this type of pedophilia was considered normal and completely acceptable. not defending, just playing the devils advocate…let the man have his day in court before we throw him to the wolves, this is America right?
Posted by: not surprised | October 1, 2006, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Since when do party lines make any difference? A sick person is just that – I, quite frankly, don’t care if he is communist. Let’s just be glad that nothing happened to one of these young people. Republican or Democrat makes no difference, he needs to pay dearly for that kind of behavior.
Posted by: Reader | October 1, 2006, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
If Mr. Foley was common, hard working, and/or poverty-stricken, he would have been arrested on the spot, sent to jail without any bail, sentenced to prison without any parole(maybe).So, how is it that he’s given special treatment? What an example to the people of this country- “become a politician, get out of jail free?”
Posted by: lacy | October 2, 2006, 12:39 am 12:39 am
This is a beautiful example of Republican hypocrisy. I can’t help gloating. Pious Republicans just LOVE to preach to the rest of us about how we should live our lives. Yet they’re just projecting their own fears about themselves onto us. (And, in fact, their behavior is more twisted than any of us normal people could come up with!) Foley co-sponsored some “Child Protection Act”? THE LADY DOTH PROTEST TOO MUCH!!!
I hope this helps undo the evil, right-wing Republican machine, which is ruining our great country.
Posted by: Brad | October 2, 2006, 2:10 am 2:10 am
QUOTE: “my only question is this : would we react any different if he was doing this to a [female] rather than a [boy] – homophobia making anyone act a lot stronger on this subject..because this is what im getting from some of the comments..”
Absolutely. For evidence, check out the current news story on the rich New York financier who was actually arrested for paying for sex with girls as young as 14. The comments section is fully of yawns and “boys will be boys!” The hypocrisy and double standard is actually very sickening, much like the acts of both these men.
Posted by: Dave | October 2, 2006, 2:42 am 2:42 am
Laurie, 9-29-06, In my book, most minors are innocent when involved with or being solicited by most adults. And in this case, if this conversation, in truth, actually happened, it sounds as if he honestly answered a question put to him by a man of power & position who is supposed to be respected & looked up to & whom he probably/posibly admired. I don’t get the feeling from reading this exchange that the underage page felt that he was engaging in or being engaged in a sexual encounter or pickup attempt. The feeling that I got was more that he might feel as if “he was like one of the guys”, that this was something that men do, talking about their maleness. What do I know about what guys do or say to each other? I simply mean that I did not get the feeling that the young man was buying into a sexual relationship knowingly even via imail. He also didn’t sound as if he was stringing the Rep. along or leading him along or had initiated this relationship in hopes of bigger &/or better prizes on down the political path. The young man did not seem to be upset or terribly uncomfortable with most of the discussion with the exception of being asked to repeat a rather personal answer that he had already given.
Posted by: Sue | October 2, 2006, 3:01 am 3:01 am
Shut up! for you all, ‘yapping back and forth whether who’s more evil, realize that ALL politics is dirty and the worst political scums are the ones toting the laws they ‘nobly’ designed to serve their own purpose, clutched next to their holy bibles…as an old saying goes, “Only a thief has the worst grudge on other thieves”… ditto with phedophiles—especially those in power. There should be no mercy for guys like this.
Posted by: bill | October 2, 2006, 3:07 am 3:07 am
Cool down a bit, what if his “victims” were female? I dont think their would be the outrage whats more he didnt actually have sex with any of them as far as has been reported. The guy is weak, confused and certainly doesnt deserve to be an elected leader. But as the bible bashers say let he who without sin…. How old were these kids? 16 is the legal age in most places, not that it means much when someone in a position of power abuses it.
Posted by: consider this | October 2, 2006, 3:34 am 3:34 am
The first reaction of the GOP leadership after learning of a potential child predator in their midst was to circle the wagons and protect themselves from a scandal. Even though it meant leaving this guy in place to continue harrassing these kids, or perhaps worse. In light of this stallar demonstration of their priorities, how could anyone of good concience entrust these guys with making the right decisions to protect our young men and women fighting in Iraq and Afganistan? If I were in a combat zone now and read about this I would begin to understand why I didn’t have the body armour yet.
Posted by: Dingus | October 2, 2006, 3:34 am 3:34 am
This *is* a political article. Nobody is “turning” it into one – the author already did. These comments relate to *this* article. The people crying “let’s not make this political” are making a rather awkward attempt to dodge discussion of the political angle of this article. To these people – Why do you want people to *avoid* discussion of the political angle? If you don’t want to read the political comments, just skip over them (they are fairly obvious)..
This is as much of a Republican scandal as Clinton&Lewinski was a Democrat scandal. If dems must own their scandals (remember Bush ran on a moral values platform,), repubs must own theirs too. Let’s be fair. The fact that this guy held this particular station makes it hypocrisy, and the prospect that he *might* have used his power to facilitate his crimes or even avoid or mitigate prosecution is downright scary – who knows with anyone like this?
Posted by: fashionofchrist | October 2, 2006, 3:59 am 3:59 am
Interesting to note that Foley had earlier stated that child molesters needed mental health counseling NOT that they needed to be arrested and locked up in prison.
Sounds like Foley, was almost defending molesters. Would not be suprised to see Foley soon seeking mental health counseling in a futile attempt to keep from being locked up
Posted by: David | October 2, 2006, 4:21 am 4:21 am
Just a question here. Did he have sex with any of the pages or did he just solicit them online??? At any rate what he did was immoral and illegal. Please don’t continue to compare this to Clinton because there are really different issues involved here. I am a Republican and hope that this man is tried and convicted of his crimes.
Posted by: Lori | October 2, 2006, 5:21 am 5:21 am
This is sooo wrong…. A man of his age and a boy of 16… That’s not right….
Posted by: Sara | October 2, 2006, 8:58 am 8:58 am
In this day and age, how can someone be so stupid as to have these conversations over a computer and NOT expect them to be recovered and exposed??? Haven’t people figured that out yet?
Posted by: Ferris | October 2, 2006, 9:36 am 9:36 am
I just read the emails that were preceded by the “graphic language” warning.
maf54 is DISGUSTING, just disgusting. I don’t care what party this Rep is from, if the leaders have known from 2 – 5 years (differing press reports) they ought to be VOTED OUT OF OFFICE for ignoring this obviously sick man.
Claiming alcoholism “made him do it” (see letter on Drudge) is a poor excuse. To think this guy was involved with legislation to stop online child predators, HAH. Beware of those who claim “family values” what crap.
Posted by: Sully | October 2, 2006, 9:38 am 9:38 am
If you walked in and saw your son communicating with someone and that’s what you saw on the screen, what would your initial impression be? Pervert! The police would be called and you would haul your kid in front of the TV to look watch a “Dateline” episode. I doubt that boy’s parents feel any compassion for their son’s online predator just because he happens to be a Congressman. I’ll bet they feel the same way MOST of the public does: that that man is a PERVERT!
Posted by: Rachelle | October 2, 2006, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Certainly, these events have nothing to do with Foley being a Republican–but the Republican Party will reap what it sows.
The Republican Party has historically blamed Democrats for any sexual scandals of the past (and Democrats have had plenty–juts like Republicans seem to get involved in monetary scandals). Republicans have continued to push the very conservative idea that sex is bad so Democrats involved in sexual scandals are evil.
Well, the shoe’s on the other foot now–and Republicans are crying that sexual scandals have nothing to do with the Party. Too late.
Posted by: Mac | October 2, 2006, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Why does everyone is a scandal nowadays suddenly check themselves into drug/alcohol rehab–Foley, Mel Gibson, Patrick Kennedy, etc. Do these acts suddenly seem forgiveable if there is overuse of a substance involved?
Posted by: hsr | October 2, 2006, 9:53 am 9:53 am
those red staters and their superior moral clarity. foley voted for iraq war too.
Posted by: Richard | October 2, 2006, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Isn’t it laughable how Clinton was pilloried for sex with a 21-year old adult and now the GOP tries to laugh off internet solicitation of minors?
Pathetic. Had enough yet? Vote the dirtbags out.
Posted by: Watcher | October 2, 2006, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Sick Sick Sick
Posted by: Jess | October 2, 2006, 10:15 am 10:15 am
What did the republicans want to do with Bill Clinton after he got caught with Monica Lewinsky. A adult doing adult stuff with an adult. Foley should be removed from society and register as a child molester. All moneys from his job should be returned. With the laws that he implimented than broke, it’s like a act of treason. His actions say that he has no respect for the laws of this great nation. I wonder how many more capital hill perverts are running this country.
Posted by: David Huajardo | October 2, 2006, 11:06 am 11:06 am
We need a lot more women in the Senate and Congress. Lets face it none of the MSNBC investigations showed them busting women. Sure they’re may be a few sick attention seeking females out there but this is a 99.9% male issue. What a disgusting lack of self control. He needs to be locked up.
Posted by: Nan | October 2, 2006, 11:28 am 11:28 am
There is no excuse for this type of behavior. It is laughable that anyone would think the GOP was involved. What a joke.
Posted by: Southern Republican | October 2, 2006, 11:30 am 11:30 am
For those who say this is not Polital are mistaken. It became political the very minute the Republican leadership did nothing when they knew about it as early as 5 years ago. Hastert was made aware last year, yet he stated he only learned of it (Foley’s misdeed) last week. HMMMM! GOP=GOPP= “Grand Old Pedophile Party!”
Posted by: rey | October 2, 2006, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Doesn’t everyone see the extent of this scandal? The GOP has known about Foley for years, according to some former pages. And with respect to this incident, they’ve had the “explicit” email for weeks. Instead of reporting this to the proper authorities, they actually took the matter to the GOP campaign committee who decided to brush it under the carpet until the elections were over. Hastert even knew about this (or at least one GOP party member has said so). The GOP has actually compromised the welfare of children entrusted in their care in order to protect their place in the election? And this is the party of family values???
Posted by: Charles | October 2, 2006, 11:34 am 11:34 am
The sweet irony in all of this. Foley is going to be prosecuted under the same laws he helped to enact. BEAUTIFUL! I love it.
I do so love hypocrisy.
I just hope that no minors were actually harmed.
Posted by: Shane | October 2, 2006, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Listen to the Republicans!!! They’re trying to say this is not a political issue. HA! The republican party has made morality their platform (anti-abortion, anti-gay rights, pro-christion, pro-bible) for the last 20 years…all the while pandering to the religious right. So, YES…this is a political thing. You can’t have it both ways guys.
Posted by: Charles | October 2, 2006, 11:43 am 11:43 am
It IS a political thing.
The fact is that Rep. Rodney Alexander, R-La; Thomas Reynolds, R-N.Y.; House Republican Speaker Dennis Hastert ALL KNEW ABOUT FOLEY for at least a year. Why did they do nothing?? They are guilty of allowing this pervert to continue.
Posted by: Lisa | October 2, 2006, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
A pedophile in Congress…don’t they have to go through background checks? To work in a school district, teachers have to go through a state and national background check. This guy has been at this for three years and probably longer. With minors working in the Capitol, everyone there should be screened to protect the children from harm.
What about random checks of email and IM server for key words like “butt” and “hard”? It couldn’t hurt. Congress has the right to spy on us…
If the guy has problems, alcohol rehab won’t help him with this problem. Jail will. Perhaps he can take some remedial English/ Language Arts classes while he’s locked up.
Posted by: Cathy | October 2, 2006, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
I’m sorry I haven’t read this entire thread, so many good points, tho. Forgive me if I repeat someone else’s thoughts… Now he’s checked himself in for rehab….as if drinking or drugs causes pedophilia! And to top it off…this guy and his family will reap the rewards of any other congressman/woman or senator…life time healthcare, retirement, etc….unless he’s censured…lets hope congress does the right thing. I’d sooner pay for almost anything with my taxes than assuring this guy has a comfy retirement and rehab!!
Posted by: deb | October 2, 2006, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
why wait till the election to broadcast? well the welfare of the children obviously comes second to scoring political points, sick dems………
Posted by: ron | October 2, 2006, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
My outrage is not with this very sick man. I am furious at the senior members of his party who were aware of his problem as far back as September of last year but, chose not to take a stand to protect the innocent here. Instead they were/are more concerned about elections & keeping control of Capitol Hill. This is where my anger & disappointment are directed. Congressman Foley is a sick man who needs help, the Speaker of the House & other Senior party member are the ones who should be charged for CRIMINAL action. Get off the high horses and take responsibility for not only knowing but allowing a sexual predator to continue unchecked for the sole purpose of political gain. SHAME ON YOU!!
Posted by: Ria | October 2, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Let he who hath not sinned cast the first stone! Has any of this been proven, NO! Just because these pages were minors when they were pages doesn’t mean that they never got any older, remember the youngest a page can be is 16, so do we know if any of this happened while they were in the program or 2, or more years later? NO, we don’t! What does political affiliation have to do with any of this? Nothing, you people get a life!
Posted by: sandy | October 2, 2006, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
You start to blame Clinton with Monica..I love it..The only big difference here is that Monica was a consenting ADULT not a 15 year old!!!! Republicans can be o sooooooooooo hipocritical.
Posted by: steve | October 2, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
the emails did establish he was talking to a minor, Sandy one kid said “whoah slow down…I’m not 18 until the 23rd of February…”. How would you feel if it was your kid, would it matter if they were 16 or 18? I agree his political affiliation doesn’t matter, republican or democrat if you’re preying on minors you deserve to have the book thrown at you.
Posted by: say what sandy? | October 2, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Let us not forget, regardless of whether or not the boy appeared to participate willingly in the conversation, he was a MINOR. That makes it WRONG, no matter what.
And, although I agree that this is not a partisan issue, if there are party leaders who were aware of this behavior, they must be prosecuted as well.
As a parent, I cannot imagine another responsible adult knowing about this and then allowing this behavior to continue unchecked. If ANY other members of congress, regardless of party affiliation, knew about it and did nothing, they should be held liable also.
Posted by: Mike | October 2, 2006, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
HERE YA GO FOX NEWS!!!!!
EAT IT UP!!!
Posted by: Jack Tanner | October 2, 2006, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Shut up! Hes a pathetic human being regardless of his affiliation
Posted by: Danny | October 2, 2006, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
God Bless Brian Ross.
God Bell Freedom of the Press!
Wake up America!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Jack Tanner | October 2, 2006, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
I can’t believe the media has made this aol conversation publicly available in PDF format! You are basically providing erotic literature to other child molesters and perverts to save and add to their collections! Great work, US Media! :FURIOUS:
Posted by: Brad | October 2, 2006, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
I would like to say that this is a terrible problem in our internet world. Older people prey on young children all ofthe time and people say they do not know it is going on. Give me a break America, wake up and smell the child molester. You may as well say that we are not at war. I say he deserves to be in a prison cell for a very long time.
Posted by: Patrick | October 2, 2006, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
I was very impressed by the way the young man handled the exchange. He seemed to obviously know what Foley was after and was very diplomatic and direct. I’d even go so far as to say the kid didn’t seem all that offended. Kids/Teens/young adults are getting a lot more savvy. I hope that even if the exchange had resulted in dinner that Foley would have taken “No” for an answer. Let’s hope the issue here is not the involved sexuality but the age of the participants.
Posted by: Ranch | October 2, 2006, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
The Democrats don’t send reports of child molestation to their campaign committee first. The Republicans, as we now find out, do.
First the Republicans were saying “no Republican would defend him.” Then it turns out the Republican leaders–like Hastert and Shimkus–were made aware of the problem at least a year ago. That is completely indefensible. Now they’re backing and filling and calling for investigations–where were they before the media caught them?
I’m very curious about whether those oh-so-moral religious right leaders will withdraw their support from these people, or demonstrate their own hypocrisy by continuing to support them. It’s all about clinging to power–not about values, or ethics, or doing what’s right for individuals or the country. Just power.
Posted by: Noah Vaill | October 2, 2006, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
It IS relevant that this sicko is a REPUBLICAN!! Because it has been Republicans like him who have been shoving their “family values” in our faces. It’s Republicans like him who are HYPOCRITS.
Posted by: Deb | October 2, 2006, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
1. Gerry Studds, 1982. Had sex (not just written communications) with male page. Response? Congress gave him three–count ‘em THREE– standing ovations, while the Washington Post said he was “entitled to keep his job.”
2. Either fellow GOP congressmen knew of these emails awhile ago and kept them hidden until now, right when they can’t replace Foley’s name in the Florida primaries, or they didn’t know. Or do you think it makes more logial sense that DEMS knew of the specifics awhile ago and sat on them until just the right time? The former would make zero sense, the latter quite a bit. Where should the investigation focus? I’d say on WHO knew about the real juicy stuff, and WHEN they knew it. Wanna bet the Dems kept this under wraps until last week? Foley should go, no doubt; but so should the one(s) who leaked this now.
Posted by: Jack | October 2, 2006, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Why didn’t any of these young men find it disturbing enough to report him? Some of the emails are
revolting. What were they ‘not’ thinling ?
Posted by: Dumfounded | October 2, 2006, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
By arguing that he has an alcohol problem and checking into a clinic, Foley has already begun to defend his actions – “the booze made me do it”
Posted by: kiwidude | October 2, 2006, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Who cares? GOP will rise above this. They always do. Get’s those liberals everytime. Damn liberals have evened up the polls but will blow it because they will focus on this when any rational person knows that political affiliation has no bearing on this case.
Posted by: Bob | October 2, 2006, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Isn’t the age of consent 16? If you don’t like it; change the law! Criminal culpability aside, this is at least an ethical outrage committed by Foley.
Also if these guys were so innocent and heterosexual, then why were they participating with the flirtation, including telling him that his flirtation was giving them erections?
Posted by: J | October 2, 2006, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
It is supremely ironic that the only issue, “family values”, that allowed Bush to win 04 may very well doom the rest of his term.
Posted by: Operjanky | October 2, 2006, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
I agree with JonDC political affiliation has no bearing on this case, but that’s not why the “liberals” will win. The liberals will win because the Republican leadership used “political affilation” to hide the truth.
Posted by: Operjanky | October 2, 2006, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
A persons politics has no bearing on their propensity to commit a crime and the sooner you realize this the sooner we can protect our children. It’s not a political issue and we shouldn’t make it one. It’s unfortunate that the way some protect their kids is by looking at whos political party the person aligns with and bases their opinion on them from it. It’s not about politics, it’s about children.
Posted by: Cassandra | October 2, 2006, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
How do we know that these IMs are really. They could be easily faked. In fact far easier then the National Guard records on Bush in the last election. Those were fake.
Posted by: John | October 2, 2006, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
The liberals will win because the Republican leadership used “political affilation” to hide the truth.
–EXACTLY. That is what is the most telling about the whole situation. The fact that they will protect their own at the expense of innocent children. Not so family values after all.
Clinton and his intern at least were of consentual age. Being a crappy husband and a good leader are not mutually exclusive.
After reading these IMs, Foley clearly was the predator. These kids were placating him and not advancing the conversation. Foley was doing that all on his
own.
Posted by: politicktalk | October 3, 2006, 1:00 am 1:00 am
The biggest scandal of the decade. Perfect timing. I love it when hypocrites explode.
Posted by: monika | October 3, 2006, 2:33 am 2:33 am
I am hearing a lot of blaming the young man involved, and it is really making me angry. It does not seem to me that he was leading Foley on, and it does not matter if the boy is gay or not — he is a boy! Furthermore, I do not believe that he is gay. Some people say that they would never (as a teen) have told a 54 yr old man that he made them a little horny. Well, it may not have been the man, but rather the sexual conversation. Also, you must realize that to this young man(the kind who would want to be a Cong. page), the attention and support of a Congressman was extremely important, heady, flattering, etc. Foley could have had a dramatic impact on his future career — for good or bad. And to this teen, Foley would have been like an actor or rock star would be to an “average” teenager. He didn’t want to make Foley mad or stop his interest in him, so he said “hmm a little” Also note, please, that when Foley goes “too far” i.e. “Take it out.” The response is “Hold on, Mom’s calling” Then an abrupt change in subject, then I gotta do my homework.
Blaming the victim is a really bad thing to do. Tell me, does a woman desreve to get raped if she wears a mini skirt??? …
Posted by: Jennifer | October 3, 2006, 7:38 am 7:38 am
Foley’s behavior is clearly deplorable and he deserves to be punished, but the Republican leadership “appear” to have known about his innapropriate behavior for some time and choose not to do anything about it. It is the Republican party that that chooses to use it’s “Family Values” issue to separate itself from the Democrats. This is just another example of the power abuses in Washington and how they protect each other at any cost. SHAME ON YOU
Posted by: Christy | October 3, 2006, 8:53 am 8:53 am
The original e-mails that broke this story seemed ambiguous. The IM exchanges that appeared later (available on this site) were not. They are explicitly sexual, and there’s just no reason why a 50+ year old man need to be having that conversation with ANYONE 16 years old. Whether that’s the age of consent or not, is this the kind of guy you’d want representing you? Talking to your teenage kids?
And the guys who didn’t investigate this are just idiots. They should be removed from office, not just for a failure of moral leadership, but for being so stupid. Anyone with judgment that bad shouldn’t be allowed to vote on the budget or sending the country to war.
I’m not arguing that people should vote Democratic. But I do think it’d be worth throwing out a bunch of these guys and starting with someone new who hasn’t been so thoroughly corrupted.
Posted by: B | October 3, 2006, 9:24 am 9:24 am
I can understand the outrage if this was a child – but these were males over the age of consent (16 in most states). It’s apparent from the messages the boy(s?) weren’t horrified and were willing participants. If anyone thinks 16-18 year old boys are nieve and aren’t sexually active, think again.
This seems to me to be a scandal for the sake of a pre-election story. Is a 50+yo man with a 16 year old (of any sex), gross, yes. But – there is no criminal activity here because we aren’t dealing with children.
Posted by: James | October 3, 2006, 10:45 am 10:45 am
No one is blaiming Foley’s horrific choice of being a predator of children on the Republican Party, Jennifer.
What we are blaming is the Republican party for excusing Foley’s behavior. The way the repubs went after Clinton was unbelievable but what’s even more unbelievable is the way they are NOT going after Foley.
Let’s see…sexual exploitation of a minor, being a sexual predator of minors…Hhmmm….let’s go to check into a rehab for alcoholics.
This is a political issue because the repubs made it one when they went after Clinton. Now it comes back to haunt them.
Kinda bites, doesn’t it?
Posted by: Karin | October 3, 2006, 10:54 am 10:54 am
if this was any regular joe, dont you think the FBI or local police would have already seized his computers?!
Posted by: rich | October 3, 2006, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
It amazes me how you all sit here and bicker over Republican and Democrat, liberal and conservative. This guy broke the law and should suffer stiff punishment. You all wonder why this country is in the political quagmire it is in. All this spin contributes to that. You should all be ashamed. Think about the vicitms and get this guy in jail where he belongs. If it is was your son in this situation, would you really care what political party he is involved with?
Posted by: James | October 3, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Attack Foley because he was wrong.But, separate e-mails from IMs and leave Hastert alone. Unless you can prove he knew about the sexually explicit IMs.
Posted by: Pat | October 3, 2006, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
This is a dang shame! God help us all………..
Posted by: paris | October 3, 2006, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Since when is being a pedophile Republican or Democrat. It has NOTHING to do with politics. There are as many sickos in each party…he just got caught first! Get real people…this is NOT a political issue. It is a moral issure that runs deeper than any political party. That is what is wrong with this country…everything has to be political. WELL SOME THINGS SHOULD BE ABOVE POLITICS.
Posted by: Chare | October 3, 2006, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
No way, did he really say “do I make you horny”? I bet he sounds just like Austin Powers. What a freak! Yeah, baby, yeah!!
Posted by: SammyDKat | October 3, 2006, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
One thing that seems to make this discussion partisan is that other Republicans may have known this was going on for months, and did nothing about it. They just let it go on because they didn’t want a scandal. What seems to be their priority? Putting pedophiles in jail, or saving face to the public. Time and time again the republicans show that they don’t care about the law.
Posted by: Jason Jones | October 3, 2006, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
the real point is, if this were you or I, we would be tackled by the police, handcuffed, and in jail already………
Posted by: Phil M | October 4, 2006, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Why is no one commenting on the fact that this boy, though under 18, is obviously going along with what this ‘creep’ is saying? “If it sounds creepy, it probabably is”, I’m pretty sure he could discern Foley’s intentions. While Foley should have known better than to experiment sexually with a minor especially homosexuality…I don’t think that we should overlook the fact that the boy appeared to be encouraging. When I was that age a couple of years ago, I knew not to carry on such conversations with grown men….I mean its ridiculous! As for the argument that this should not be discussed along party lines; I think its unavoidable- as it was when Clinton was in the spotlight. Everything a politician does has implications for his party and so I don’t begrudge the smile on the faces of democrats right now…cos republicans will do the same were the shoe on the other foot.
Posted by: solaris | October 4, 2006, 1:23 am 1:23 am
as far as it being a cut and paste thing doesnt apply here foley ADMITTED to writing those I.M. but him trying to make excuses about being drunk and bringing up the thing about his abuse now is sick and is bs and him bringing up his sexuality is his way of trying to rally support which he is not going to get.
Posted by: Ac | October 4, 2006, 3:33 am 3:33 am
The guy isn’t a paedophile. The youngest person he propositioned was 16. Now as he’s the one that’s been pushing for making sex with anybody under 18 illegal, then it serves him right, but keep ‘paederast’ and ‘pedophile’ for the appropriate behaviour.
And would you be getting so hot under the collar if it was teenaged girls he’d been propositioning and not teenaged boys?
Posted by: Stephen Jones | October 4, 2006, 8:43 am 8:43 am
Is this guy above the Law? Why has he not been arrested? If it were any “normal” American (non-politician) they would be locked up by now. And why are the people that knew about it not being prosecuted? They are just as guilty as this sicko is. How many more excuses are they going to come up with? Alcoholic, drinking while sending the messages (until they realized that would mean he had been drinking on the job), Gay, then molested as a child himself what is next. I mean come on! This is what I think should be done…..Arrest him, don’t let him out to do this again, and take back the entire salary he was paid as far back as they can prove this has been going on. I as a taxpayer am sick over the fact that Americans have been paying this guy to have internet sex with young boys. Then fire all parties that knew about the situation and said nothing, take away their benefits while you’re at it (their cushy retirement plans and health insurance). This really makes me wonder what else is going on in Congress that we have no clue about.
Posted by: TL | October 4, 2006, 11:55 am 11:55 am
i hardly think this is a political issue. thats the problem with this country–everything is measured by what party you belong to. unbelievable. doesnt anyone feel the least bit concerned about the ‘rehab’ thing?? ive never met an alcoholic who has good judgement, and these guys are making decisions on our future and that of our country? egads!
Posted by: moira | October 4, 2006, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
if these IM’s are true, this guy is sick… disgusting… plain disgusting; who cares about republican or democrat this is not about politics; some of you act as if they are teams and are always trying to stab at the other party, stop being ridiculous- this guy acted alone and is sick…I wanted to vomit after reading it..
Posted by: Ryan | October 4, 2006, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
I knew it! I knew it! I was waiting for him to blame a priest. Nobody bought the drinking made me do it defense, so whats the next best excuse I was molested. Who cares that he was gay, this guy needs to be put away. just like another person wrote if it were you and I, out butts would already be behind bars
Posted by: Ernestine | October 4, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Foley’s crime is not a dem/repub thing and it shouldn’t be framed as one. Its a matter for the courts. However, the apparent cover-up ny Speaker Hastert was done for very political reasons. Do you think Hastert would have remained quiet for 2 years if it was the Minority Whip who was sending these emails? The cover-up was done for political reasons alone, preserving this pervert’s seat was done at the expense of allowing him to continue preying on innocent kids. This thing should be thoroughly investigated and anyone who knew about this and didn’t pursue Foley’s arrest should be named as an accessory to Foley’s disgusting and criminal behavior.
Posted by: Macbeth | October 4, 2006, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Well here’s the thing foley made a choice to commit this crime, just like he chose to drink so I say if you are big enough to do the crime you are big enough to do the time. They do not need to wasted money on an investigation, and definetly do not have any mercy upon him. As a leader of great expectations he should have been way above what he did, especially upholding the law.
Posted by: Ct | October 4, 2006, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
I am not trying to justify Foley’s actions because it is a different case. Though i will say for the people who are relating this to other presidents and officials, generalizing them into one catagory of “wrong-doers” is a foolish way to look at it. Politics is a dynamic field, one example that particularly annoys me is Clinton. Bill was actually a very good professional leader, his personal life wasn’t the best but on the other hand we’ve had drunks and war mongers as presidents aswell. So in a quick summary I’m saying that dont put all the ‘bad’ presidents together, THINK before you recite what the news tells you. Dont be a parrot.
Posted by: ark | October 4, 2006, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
As a second year law student I am just waiting to see when the other areas of the legal issues come into play. Why was this kid going along with foley? If you really read into this, it seems there must have been much more than conversation going on here. It seems the kid had already given foley certain details when it came to certain aspects of his body.
This is gonna get very interesting in the next few eeks.
Posted by: Mike | October 4, 2006, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
I’ve never understood when people are more aggravated by “hypocrisy” than anything else. What you have rathered? That Foley tried to pass laws permitting the explotiation of children? Thank goodness for hypocricy. Thank goodness our culture is structured such that public behavior is more virtuous than private behavior. Foley’s laws are written to do just what they do: to protect people from others who may know what they are doing is wrong, but just can’t stop themselves. (I’m not making a “he couldn’t control himself” argument here – the fact that he couldn’t control himself is *why* he should be punished.)
Let’s at least be happy he controlled himself to the extent not engaging in sexual relations with a vulnerable young peron that he had power over (so far as we know at this point).
Posted by: SJS | October 5, 2006, 9:59 am 9:59 am
The progression of comments from emotional to thoughtful has been interesting in this story. Foley it seems has some problems with his sexual preferences and resigning was the right thing to do, others will have to determine if there should be additional legal implications. However it doesn’t look like there are very many innocent parties when it comes to this story. How many of you readers have cut and pasted or screen printed your IM conversations on a regular basis. Even sexually specific ones that may have commercial value at a later date? Would your normal 16 year old think to do that, perhaps. Maybe he had some coaching, maybe not. It’s interesting that there is no way to prove that these IM’s are real, They could be completely fabricated or the 16 year old that Foley thought he was talking to could have been a 50 year old investigator at the DNC. He resigned so there must be some fire around this smoke, but before we over react we need to be thinking about the motives of the other players. It sure would be nice to see who had these IM transcripts and when they had them. They could have been created the night before the story broke.
Posted by: Mike | October 5, 2006, 11:40 am 11:40 am
We all need to pray for Rep. Foley and his family.
Posted by: randy | October 5, 2006, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Maybe most of you haven’t been around the internet that much, but uh…these are basically the same kinds of conversations I was having with people (sans the homosexual part) at 16. Granted I don’t think there were any 52 year olds involved, but there were older people around. I still shrug off worse things in my daily internet travels (or find them amusing).
Having read that EXCLUSIVE CONVERSATION! the kid seems so bored that it’s funny, and Mr. Foley comes off as more of a moron than a perv. Conspiracy theories aside, what he says is so forced that it comes off as quite the contrived conversation.
I could go on, but I don’t like soapboxing. I know saying that this kind of thing is fairly common gets the puritans up in arms about the youth of America, but really, most of us turn out just fine. And to prevent the counterpoint of “…but they shouldn’t have to put up with this,” well, it’s a story to joke about with friends over a drink…once you reach the magic age of course.
Posted by: Tele | October 5, 2006, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
I am sick and tired of people comparing this incident to the Clinton scandal. The two are not even on the same playing field. Monica Lowinsky was 22 years old when she engaged in her laisons with Pres. Clinton. An ADULT. Foley, on the other hand, used his position of power to prey on underaged boys. Please, someone tell me how these are similar?
Posted by: Mandy | October 6, 2006, 1:51 am 1:51 am
not-funny thing is, if he had been a democrat, the republicans would be rubbing it in the faces of all democrats and calling for all their resignations…..drama queens……, the point is, its not a direct political issue, just like Clinton, but shouldnt republicans suffer the same slander as he and all democrats at the time? sadly due to the condition of our country today, i would like to see the repubicans go down for sneezing….
Posted by: rage | October 6, 2006, 8:05 am 8:05 am
Mandy,
They are similar because in both cases a man used a position of power and authority as a lever to manipulate a younger, less experienced person. That is very often the hallwark of sexual harassment and exploitation in the workplace, and it is universally frowned upon.
You are right that the situations are not perfect mirrors. The Foley scandal is “worse” because of the especially young age of the person involved. The Clinton scandal was “worse” in the sense that sexual relations actually occured, Clinton was married, Clinton had promised the American people (after Gennifer Flowers) that he would not involve himself in additional scandals, Clinton did not resign, and Clinton lied under oath, perjuring himself.
Still, for the differences, there are enough similarities in my mind to warrant comparison.
Posted by: SJS | October 6, 2006, 8:21 am 8:21 am
If this were a Dateline episode Foley would be arrested on the spot – the law doesn’t require that you actually engage in sexual activity with the minor. Soliciting sex with a minor is against the law and Foley violated the law he created and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Voluntary intoxication is no defense. And on that note, if he has such a debilitating drinking problem then he shouldn’t be representing anybody anywhere at any time and particularly where it concerns sending young men and women to war.
Those members of his party who covered up for Foley are just as culpable under the law as aiders and abettors. Well they would be if they were poor or middle class folks who lacked powerful connections or positions in D.C.
I predict, like Rush Limbaugh and other similarly situated hypocrits that Foley will walk away with his Congressional pension in tact and those who knew and did nothing for years will suffer no shame.
The only shame the people of this country and particularly Foley’s Congressional District will suffer is the embarrassment of having Foley and others like him go unpunished.
Posted by: Mary | October 7, 2006, 1:34 am 1:34 am
I have heard it all from repubs. Yes, Foley is the guy who did this, but the leadership allowed it to continue. If you can’t see that, you are choosing to be blind. The only similarity between this and Clinton is that the underlying theme is sex. I never read or heard that everybody knew and nobody said anything. I thought repubs were using the cut and run rhetoric to label dems, not use it as a guide to live by. Sure Foley resigned, let’s cut it there and run away. B.S.!! If you covered it up, get out!
Posted by: French | October 7, 2006, 9:47 am 9:47 am
u kno what the funny thing is is that if any normal person were to do this he’d go to jail for statutory rape this guy doens’t need counseling he needs and extended prison sentence because he’s a person of law and he is goin against it so he should have a worse punishment but no what do they do they plea oh well this poor man needs help no he doesn’t he’s completely of sound mind he just needs to go to prison like ne one else would
Posted by: jake | October 7, 2006, 9:54 am 9:54 am
This just seems so unreal…these teens need to come forward if this is true…..i think it’s a setup. This guy fought for law enforcement of predators of young children…doesn’t make sense
Posted by: leeza | October 7, 2006, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Leeza, please, think about what you are saying? If this was a setup, why would Foley have admitted it? The first day he said, “Oh just being overfriendly, yadayada” But after that, when he realized they had the transcripts, no more arguments, none at all (except of course trying to remove attention from the real issue of his extreme behavior to I was drunk and I was abused). There are only two reasons I can see not to argue
1) He knows it is true and there is proof of it out there; consequently, don’t argue, don’t lie, it will only make you look worse later — a lesson possibly learned from the Clinton/Lewinsky situation.
2) Really a continuation of #1 — There could be worse stuff out there to be discovered — If I tell the truth, and get scrutiny off of what I did and on to my excuses for doing it — perhaps these worse things won’t be discovered.
Reason #2 is, of course, only a possibility! I am not saying this is the case, only that it is a consideration.
Also, I hope very much that either Foley went to a lot of churches as an altar boy OR that his allegations of past abuse by a priest are true. Because even though he would not name this alleged priest (HMMMMM), the fact remains that it would not be difficult to discover where he was an altar boy as a teen. If there was only one place with one priest, then a good man’s reputation could be shot. As Foley is in his 50′s, it is quite possible the priest in question is deceased and unable to defend himself. If he did it, okay, but if not, I think it is horrible that a decent man’s memory could be maligned.
Posted by: Jennifer | October 8, 2006, 12:59 am 12:59 am
Wow, the party of “family values” wants to sweep this one under the rug. Well at least Foley didn’t try to gay marry or gay adopt one of these boys,that would have sent the G.O.P. into convulsions
Posted by: Antony | October 8, 2006, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
The whole thing is sad really. Foley for what he did, esp. in a position of trust. The Republicans for the apparent cove up. The Democrats for holding the information for release before the election and most of all the news media for publishing the messages and IM’s – after all an actual person was involved, I can’t imagine a more embarrassing situation for the Ex-Pages then to have their communications and in some cases their I.D.’s discovered and published. I wonder what we have come too. Sad really, just sad all this from the greatest country that has ever existed… did I say how sad it is… yeah I did.
Posted by: Ed Murphy | October 9, 2006, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Let’s get to the point, If he did this at work or at home. He is responsible for his behavior. Wrong is Wrong.
Please let him go like he has. The system still works and he will have to pay his dues.
This has nothing related to Primary Parties; or how we will continue having real good people doing there job with respectable behaviour.
Posted by: Mark | October 9, 2006, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
I don’t care what you say republicans. You will lose congress in November over this. This is what this country needs and what you all deserve. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Posted by: John | October 10, 2006, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
jams has written very much right, i support his views. A man standing on this post, doing act like that must be treated reguardless his position.
Posted by: lucky | October 11, 2006, 1:55 am 1:55 am
Asides from the sexual content of Foley’s IM’s, I’m horrified that a man (formerly) in such a position of power, has such a terrible grasp of the English language. His grammar is awful!
Posted by: Melanie | October 11, 2006, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Matt.
Hypocrisy? How so? Nobody is defending Foley or Clinton. We are consistent. Perhaps it is you that is a hypocrite defending one party because of partisan bias.
Posted by: Joe | Sep 29, 2006 6:27:25 PM
Foley committed a CRIME. Clinton just lied about an affair with a consenting adult. I’m disgusted with the republicans for the millions they spent on the witch hunt that went nowhere.
Posted by: Dave | October 17, 2006, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Isn’t it great that Foley’s defense is a Priest who supposedly abused him. What a country? He just doesn’t get it. Obvious attempt to lie blaim elsewhere. Prosecution should go more aggressively against him because of that.
Posted by: Jim | October 19, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Mr. Foley I feel for you. Cannot say much because there is not enough space here to really express my thoughts. Take care and God Bless.
Posted by: dan | October 26, 2006, 1:08 am 1:08 am
Innocent naive boys or not, the fact remains he was an adult and the kids were not. This is illegal and immoral. Foley knew it. Any other interpretation is a rationalizing cover for the behavior and enabling for those who want to practice it.
Posted by: Sandra Cole | November 6, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
I beg to differ.
The public would be VERY interested in Mr. Foley if he were approaching underage females. It is a crime to solicit a minor, male or female. Sexual relations between adults and minors are not ever considered consensual under the law. Mr. Foley knew this.
As to Mr. Haggard, you might like to do a web search on Jimmy Swaggart, prostitution, and dirty magazines. The public was very interested.
Posted by: Sandra Cole | November 7, 2006, 1:38 am 1:38 am
I am sorry if someone has already stated this but, I grew tired of reading all of the stupidity on here. I think its funny that almost everyone that has said directly, “This is not a political issue…” has followed up or preceded with “I am a republican (or conservative(or a combination of the two)).”
Posted by: this_is_apathy | November 18, 2006, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
2 months & all is quiet on the Foley sex cover-up. Hastert is business as usual.
The powers of the GOP seem determined to put investigation on hold until AFTER congress adjourns. All Hail the Cover-up?
Posted by: mike arrington | November 21, 2006, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
I’m not a republican, but I think that sucks that these IM conversations are on the internet. We know that Mark Foley had naughty internet exchanges with minors, but I think seeing the details is just classless and unnecessary.
Posted by: Jessica | December 13, 2006, 4:59 am 4:59 am
thjis weido needs the rest of his life in prison as do all predators. They never learn and just continue when they get out. There is a 99.9% recidivism. There is no comparison to Clinton He did not carry on with a minor and she started it. What is consensual between adults is no ones business.
Preying on children it unforgivable. It is niether Dem Or Rep. it is just human sludge leeching to the surface.
Posted by: Freda Spooner | December 13, 2006, 11:48 am 11:48 am
So much for respected politicians..
Posted by: John | December 17, 2006, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Just because we are republicans does not mean we support the actions of every republican. He did wrong, and he deserves to be punished. Foley represented the Republican party in his position in politics but not his lifestyle. You cannot judge the entire Republican party with just this one man or other men who defile the the Republic party, especially if the Republican party agrees that they did wrong. There is no justification in his actions.
Posted by: Xander | December 29, 2006, 6:30 am 6:30 am
This guy sounds like the typical internet predator. The kind that teenagers my age run into all the time, always asking sick questions. This story is made more horrendous by the fact that a man of such power would make those kind of comments. Its kinda scary that a person so influential could act that way.
Posted by: person | May 3, 2007, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Are you people here as sick and twisted as those that victimize children? I am disgusted to see what is a human issue and more so, a child welfare issue being turned into a political issue. I have read very few responses about the well being of not just those affected here but those affected nationally and internationally for life because of being victims of sex crimes against children. The issue isn’t limited to Dems and Pubs, this is issue isn’t black or white or rich or poor. Everyone one is affected and all children are potential victims and need to be protected! It doesn’t matter his role in life, politician, teacher, engineer, sales clerk, anyone can be a child predator. Those that look at this for a political platform and that look at this for political gain are as sick and twisted as the predator here and exploit these children in the same way for their own satisfaction!
Posted by: D.Rey.002 | May 20, 2007, 10:21 am 10:21 am
The simple reason that this is a political issue is because Republican members of congress knew about it and did nothing. And quit being hypocrites. If a Democrat did it, it would be just as political. When something wrong is done by a politician, it is going to be political. Wake up and pull your head out.
Posted by: Xavier | July 11, 2007, 5:07 am 5:07 am
Political pedophile or not, we all need to watch our children. Understanding where the threats are in our neighborhood or anywhere we go is critical. Some states have done a relatively good job of mapping out predators, however, some firms have developed software that tracks them far more effectively.
Posted by: Watch Your Kids! | July 31, 2007, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Harder – Codes and ciphers are forms of secret communication. A code replaces words, phrases, or sentences with groups of letters or numbers, while a cipher rearranges letters or uses substitutes to disguise the message. The technology of such secret communication is called cryptology.
Posted by: yoyoyoranran | August 10, 2007, 4:45 am 4:45 am
This underscores the segment of a letter written by Lord Acton in a letter to Bishop Mandel Creighton in 1887: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.”
Posted by: Ann Sikorski | August 29, 2007, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Irrespective of Foley and what he did or did not do… the question I want answered is this:
IF what FOLEY did was so reprehensible (and do not get me wrong here, it was reprehensible) why does ABC not recant from broadcasting the IM messages? Are they not in the same boat for broadcasting such messages as Foley himself?
To my mind, they are now no different.
Posted by: Shaun | November 15, 2007, 8:28 am 8:28 am
There is also another aspect, legally speaking, did ABC get legal authorisation to publish the IM messages? In other words, permission from Foley AND the underage people involved? If not, then they are in breach of US privacy laws.
Posted by: Shaun | November 15, 2007, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Uh, they weren’t minors. The age of consent in D.C. is 16. So he was really just being creepy.
Posted by: Deloris J. | April 19, 2010, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
I am seriously shocked that he hasn’t received some form of sentencing- I’m a pretty reasonable and sympathetic guy when it comes to punishments (bringing down manslaughter terms etc) but on this I am the complete opposite.
The more you see of the text conversation, which grows steadily more and more disturbing and it progresses, the more infuriated you become that the government doesn’t care at all.
P.S. I know of course this isn’t relevant or his fault but the kid took an inordinately long time to catch on. Also it kind of creeps me out that he’d open up so much to an adult online.
Posted by: Jermzy | April 13, 2011, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm