By Brian Ross And Rhonda Schwartz

Sep 8, 2006 12:18pm

Half Ton of Bomb Material Stored a Few Miles from the White House

With virtually no questions asked, an undercover ABC News team was able to purchase a half ton of one of the world’s most dangerous bomb-making materials and move it into a storage shed only a few miles from the White House and the U.S. Capitol. Despite its use in the bombing of the Oklahoma City Federal Building, there are still no federal laws restricting the purchase of ammonium nitrate, a chemical fertilizer, widely sold at farm supply stores. The ABC News undercover team made the purchases, in cash, at farm supply stores in North Carolina and Virginia and were never once asked for any valid ID.  Legislation requiring buyers of ammonium nitrate to be registered by the federal government have been blocked by the agricultural industry, according to the Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Congressman Pete King (R-NY). The results of the ABC News investigation are "a wake-up call that the American people and the Congress needs," King said.  A law requiring sellers to record purchases has passed King’s committee and is awaiting a vote by the full House. Brian Ross’ full investigative report will air Monday on World News with Charles Gibson and as part of an ABC News Special Report on the fifth anniversary of 9/11.  (10pm EST/9pm Central) 

User Comments

………and children under 18 years of age aren’t supposed to be able to purchase cigarettes, or those under 21 can’t drink or buy alcohol……..
Come on Brian, isn’t there enough legitimate news to cover without going into cloak and dagger modes…..
Give me a break…….

Posted by: dreek | September 8, 2006, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

September 8, 2006
Bomb making material!!! Guess who is paying for it….YOUR TAX DOLLARS…..
See federal case in Federal Court House in New Orleans, LA closed section……LOVOI vs. ALITALIA AIRLINES, et al…….after 9/11 an Executive Order was put out by President George W. Bush who said “we will not do business with terrorist and those who do business with terrorist countries.” Has he stuck by his order and the funny part…….federal judges don’t care what he said either……..It is YOUR TAX DOLLARS that are paying for the terrorist and their weapons, etc. through FEDERAL GRANT MONEY….THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL CONTRACT COMPLAINCE PROGRAMS who oversees these issues is failing their jobs and so is HOMELAND SECURITY……..Domestic and International air carriers either passenger or cargo receive federal grants from the U. S. GOvernment. THey travel to terrorist countries everyday and pay for services and wages. This revenue that they acquire comes from YOUR TAX DOLLARS—-the Federal Grants. When this information was brought to the federal judges attention she ignored it and so did all of the government depts.
WHY put out an Executive Order if no one is going to honor it.
Judicial Complaints were filed…the Judiciary Hearing Committee IGNORES the complaints. George W. Bush has copies of the complaints and ignores it……………..WELCOME TO THE BANANA REPUBLIC!!!!!

Posted by: Josephine S. Lovoi | September 8, 2006, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Are you serious? Is this what journalism has degraded itself to. Conjuring up “potential terror threats”? I didn’t know ABC was on the Bush administration’s payroll. Bunch of lapdogs!!

Posted by: Steve Chapman | September 8, 2006, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Wow…you guys are idiots! Why don’t you just call the terrorists and tell them how your report went. Here’s a headline….”ABC GIVES TERROIST ATTACK PLANS” Nice work ABC….great network.

Posted by: jk | September 8, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

This doesn’t surprise me. The authorities let homeless people sleep in the park and lay in the streets around K street (CVS and other supply trucks come in and park for hours)…around MacPherson Square…in front and a block away from the White House, no one checks and there is not enough security to stop a quick hit – like running a truck fast through the park to the White House…We are no where near ready!!

Posted by: Edith | September 8, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

NICE WORK ABC. SOMEONE HAS TO WATCHDOG THE THE EMPTY LEGISLATION COMING OUT OF WASHINGTON, AS WELL AS, THE LEGISALTION BEING SHELVED WHICH WAS EAR-MARKED FOR U.S. PROTECTION. CONGRESS TALKS FROM BOTH SIDES OF ITS MOUTH.

Posted by: RAY ILLUMINATI | September 8, 2006, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Thanks Brian. It’s not like the govenment and law officals have enough things to worry about and you’re going to show the terrorist our weak points. Why don’t you tell the police? We don’t need to know this! Who is paying your salary? It needs to be spent on something worth while. I’m embarrassed to know you are an American reporter.

Posted by: Rich | September 8, 2006, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Wake up call? To purchase fertilizer? Go back to reporting on drunk celebs if this is what you call news.

Posted by: skidog | September 8, 2006, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Bri’, you da man, man!
We need to know this so we can jump our reps all up in there.
It’s not enough that they know this is happening; they need to know that WE know, too, and that, if WE know, they won’t get away with knowing and hoping it will go away.
You da man, man!

Posted by: Bob | September 8, 2006, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Is this news? Why don’t you put up a flag, “Hay Bad Guys, This Is How You Do It”

Posted by: Lee | September 8, 2006, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Bri’, you da man, man!
We need to know this so we can jump our reps all up in there.
It’s not enough that they know this is happening; they need to know that WE know, too, and that, if WE know, it may come back to haunt them.
You da man, man!

Posted by: Bob | September 8, 2006, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

I agree. It seems a little too much like yellow journalism. Unfortunately though, that is what Americans respond to in the news. Gone are the days when Americans come home from work to engage in a critical review of the world’s events. Between the 10-hour days at work, family obligations, financial concerns, long commutes, and a complete absence of an education system that encourages individuals to take responsibility for understanding the underlying issues in the world today (remember the MSNBC poll where not even half of Americans could find LA and Iraq on a map), the vast majority of Americans do not have the time or energy to “tune in” for an hour to take command of the issues of the day. In fact, I believe that the majority of Americans who do watch the news do so for the entertainment value. So, in line with these observations, Brian Ross’s “scenario development” is of value. It entertains Americans and, in some instances, it will lead Americans to engage in conversations at work and school about one of the critical issues we face as a nation: national security. I imagine that many Americans then will express anger and belief to their friends and family. But, will they seize upon those emotions and take the responsibility to engage themselves in the decision-making process that establishes our policies and laws pertaining to them? If history is any indication, I imagine that they won’t – they will instead blame the delegated leaders that made those decisions on their behalf and look to a new Congress (whether Republican or Democrat) to do a better job. I only hope that we will not “become ignorant and degenerate into a
populace that (is) incapable of exercising (our) sovereignty,” as James Monroe so wonderfully put it.

Posted by: agincourt | September 8, 2006, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

LOTS of things can be used to make explosives. Care to guess how many gallons of gasoline or LP are even closer to the White House than your fertilizer? As John Stossel would say . . “Gimme a break.” Why do journalists feel compelled to create paranoia over things completely uncontrollable. Shouldn’t it be obvious by now that no amount of chest pounding legislation can protect us 100% of the time . . STOP TRYING GET GET MORE USELESS LAWS PASSED BY DRUMMING UP DRAMA.

Posted by: Dave | September 8, 2006, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

So….what you’re basically doing is showing the wackos of the world how to attack/bomb us? Hey, great job.

Posted by: Roger | September 8, 2006, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Edith, someone could rob your house tonight. Will you be ready? Where’s your security? We cannot and never will be ready for every act of violence against the US. If you want to stop a pot of water from boiling, you don’t insulate it from the heat. You turn off the gas.

Posted by: Steve | September 8, 2006, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

..so should we be worried that a terrorist might blow up a storage shed a few miles from the White House and the Capital Building? …this is investigative reporting? Gimme a break, Brian.

Posted by: Tom | September 8, 2006, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

You should have ponied up and tried moving the “bomb” making supplies with in a half mile of the white house. Then Brian Ross could have given his full investigative report from behind bars.

Posted by: Brandon | September 8, 2006, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

You obviously are missing the point about this report. This shows that if ABC can purchase bomb material without questions, then terrorists already know about this and who knows if they already haven’t done so.

Posted by: dan | September 8, 2006, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Awesome, this proves that the Bush Administration’s talke that they have made our Country so much safer since 911 is political b.s. God help us all!

Posted by: Elizabeth | September 8, 2006, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Journalism at it’s finest. What a joke. Next time ABC, please try to think of safer ways to sell your news stories.

Posted by: Mike | September 8, 2006, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

i agree w/ jk WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU AND YOUR TEAM, BRIAN? I am all about justice, investigations, etc. but not just now but in the past as well, some of your “trick” research’s is an open call to bad guys giving them ideas they may never otherwise have had. Pandora’s box is open. I know you are trying to prove a point, but at who’s expense? It’s almost a Catch 22

Posted by: carol | September 8, 2006, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

I wonder – if someone conspired to place a half ton of explosives in the basement of the ABC News building, and then broadcast it on National TV, would ABC thing that was helping ABC with its own security?
If ABC had any jounalistic ethics whatsoever, at the point where they found they could potentially purchase explosive without ID, then that should have been immediately reported to the authorities. Instead ABC conspired to conjure up a threat against our government.
All involved parties to this should be immediately arrested and tried on illegal purchase of explosives with intent to publicly expose and politcize national security deficiencies, and aid terrorist organizations plots to do damage to America.
Shame on ABC. First you try to re-write history for the benefit of the Democrats. Now this.

Posted by: One_American | September 8, 2006, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Not that I’m defending dc or the bush security agenda, but they stop intrusions on the white house all the time…
Back to the pointless article, so you were able to get some ingredients for a possible bomb within miles of the whitehouse? So what? Miles from the white house puts you in virginia or maryland… Try getting it to the white house, I’m sure you’ll have a little more trouble.

Posted by: JK | September 8, 2006, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Osama, are you reading this crap? Great job informing Terrorists of the ease of mounting a attack. Brian, you so called journalist, you belong on the View.

Posted by: shawn | September 8, 2006, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

So?? I dont get the point. Could the blast from the explosives destroy the whitehouse from that distance away? Try sneeking a nuclear missle into the same storage shed, then you will get my attention. So the options were you blow up a storage shed or fertilize the grass? If you were white, black, or asian there was probably no suspition of any wrong doing . Now try getting a few Arab men from pakistan between the ages of 18 and 40 and pulling the same stunt. That would really test the new measures. If that got through then we would have a real problem

Posted by: Dave | September 8, 2006, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

This probably shows that much more has to be done within the country and not somewhere far away.
How come people in the U.S. are so blind to see what is going on in their bakcyard but try to spread democracy in countries a good fifty percent can’t show ona map?
Here in RUssian where i’m temporary staying the U.S. seems obsessed with “helping people” but their own.

Posted by: Gerhard | September 8, 2006, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Above, Steve said maybe ABC is on the Bush payroll. Well, maybe he’s right, if they can’t give a true version of the 911 Path. Reportedly, they have altered things to suit themselves. Going to “edit until the last minute” etc. What’s wrong with using what you KNOW to be true and not making it up ??

Posted by: Betty | September 8, 2006, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Would’nt your crew have felt really stupid if the material would have ignited??? O yea, that only happens with guns!

Posted by: Scot | September 8, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

You wonder why the terrorists side with the liberals. They basically do the planning for them. Way to go ABC, did you give the terrorists the address of storage facility and also give then a list of supplies and phone numbers of where to get it.

Posted by: Sam | September 8, 2006, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

The Democrats probably put ABC to this after the who temper tantrum about the facts (the biggest enemy to democrats) in ABC’s miniseries. Does any one else wonder why president AKMEDENJADONMFODFOFGHLLADOFj;fgg
aoWAKOJIHADWAKO seems to use liberal ideas to put down AMERICA? MAYBEE instead of planning terrorist attacks ABC could do a story on that……..yeah right.

Posted by: Stu | September 8, 2006, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

It seems that reporters and news teams are interested in finding loop holes in our system, however, it is ludicrous to advertise them. Let’s not put anymore ideas out there shall we!

Posted by: Sheryl | September 8, 2006, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

This has to be one of the worst premises for a news story that I have seen. These clowns, as I dare not use the word “reporter” because it has the connotation that actual news will be dispersed, ought to be fired. If there is nothing to report as news, maybe you take the day off, not create your own fertilizer…

Posted by: DH | September 8, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Gimme a break! You think the “bad guys” of this world didn’t already know this? It’s guys like Brian who put pressure on the Gov’t to make changes.

Posted by: MP | September 8, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Wow! You can buy fertilizer in D.C.? With all the bull shoveled on the Hill, I wouldn’t think there was a need for it.

Posted by: Jerry | September 8, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Unfortunatley, if Billy Clinton would have done his job instead of his secretary we might not even be in this situation right now. He left this whole terrorist mess for Bush because democrats only know how cry about things, they dont know how or what to do when it comes to taking action. They can criticize but they dont know any alternatives to what they are criticizing. And this whole attempt for censorship this miniseries shows exactly what they want to do and that is control the media ,which they already do pretty much control, but apparently they want more. This sounds like IRAN to me. Dems want get rid of truth and replace it with liberalism.

Posted by: Howard | September 8, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Walter Cronkite would’ve never reported this type of material.

Posted by: Dave | September 8, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

So with this show and with Path to 9/11 ABC is obviously just making up the news now. Who could believe anything this of the bs this network puts out? Credibility?pffft!

Posted by: John Curry | September 8, 2006, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Good, another free campaign commercial for the Democratic National Committee. How many more of these to you plan leading up to the election, Mr. Ross? How about a report on how to get FBI files into the White House basement? How about a report on the different ways to dispose of pregnant mistress’ or even better, how about a report on how Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney conspired with the oil companies to bring the price of gasoline? How about this one, a report on the conspiracy between Mr. Schumer and Mr. Fitzpatrick to falsely smear the Bush Administration? Here’s another, during the last Presidential campaign, Mr. Kerry stated that he had a plan for victory in Iraq, maybe you could investigate and see what happened to it? See if it really existed. Any of these would be interesting stories, what do you think? Would be interesting to see a report on the threats and intimidation of former Clinton Administration officials regarding “Path to 9/11″ and the caving in of ABC.

Posted by: Allen Land | September 8, 2006, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

This is exactly the type of reporting we need to hold government officials to their word! For those who criticize these actions, remember the terrorists already know how to do this, they’ve been doing it for decades. Way past time for people in our country to wake up to the danger.

Posted by: Dan | September 8, 2006, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Wow! Journalist sure are clever. I’ll bet they could probably ‘drive off’ without paying for gas, ‘shoplift’ without getting caught, ‘skip out’ on a dinner bill at a classy restaurant; or successfully engage in any number of anti-social and deleterious behaviors. Thank God there are a majority of ‘well-intentioned’ everyday folk who don’t seek ‘noteriety by abusing freedom in order to further their own careers and bragging about it in order to shine their egos and achieve self serving personal goals. One can generally group folks into three categories; those who ‘build’ a better world, those who ‘destroy’ the former, and of course those along for a free ride. Each has their own choice to make.

Posted by: Larry | September 8, 2006, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

What a waste of time – ABC has a problem and now you are also bowing to complaints by Clinton’s team on your special – for shame.

Posted by: cam | September 8, 2006, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

What’s going on with ABC?
First, a 9/11 movie with allegedly made up facts, next, ABC buys explosives and plants them near the White House just to see if you can get away with it?
A viewer, Edith, writes about homeless people sleeping in the park and says “We’re no where near ready”, presumably for another attack.
ABC rewrites the truth, makes up the news (the real story should have just been about getting the chemicals) and no one cares that there are homeless in the park right down the street from the seat of the most powerful government on the planet?
With priorities like this, I’m ashamed to be a human being! The founding fathers would be ashamed of what we’ve allowed ourselves to become. Maybe if we as a society cared for people instead just standing by as they descended into homelessness, we wouldn’t be such a big target for those of us who hate and kill other people.

Posted by: Rick Fague | September 8, 2006, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Fear…it’s all about fear. A scared society is more easily manipulated.

Posted by: steve | September 8, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

And within a mile or so of the White House, you can buy a kinds of drugs and firearms, and see Americans living in poverty. But that is apparently not what our news media is concerned with.
This story will be cold in 2 days.

Posted by: Gus | September 8, 2006, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

WOW!!! Buying #1000 of fertilyzer in an agricultural area, driving and storing it 1/2 mile from the Whitehouse. OOOOOh so scary!! I think I’ll move to Belgium, Switzerland or some other uninvolved neutral country that I can pull the covers over my head knowing that nobody cares of it’s existance. It’s sad to think that “homegrown” people like Nichols and gang found how to use something like that to bring the Fed Bldng in OK. down!! So how and who do we really watch that can keep this from happening again? There are a lot of laws and regs. on the books that are supposed to keep us safe. The only thing missing are the people that can follow them to the letter, which just like speeding on the freeway, “I’ll let you go with a warning”.

Posted by: ERNEST | September 8, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Terrorist plan? These guys routinely plan some of the most complex terrorist attacks in history, but they never knew before this article that fertilizer could make a bomb? Puhleeze!.
This is just stupid journalism. So some fertilizer got within a few miles of the White House.
Guess what, I bet there are dozens of trucks with fertilizer all over Maryland and Virginia within a few miles of the White House.

Posted by: Doug R. | September 8, 2006, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

I want to know if Brian Ross is gonna get off that stupid cell phone in the picture and respond to what people are saying? Why does ABC like to put Americans in panic mode? What is the agenda over there? Can anyone answer?

Posted by: jk | September 8, 2006, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

For anyone who complains that this is giving ideas to the terrorists: WAKE UP! This material was already used in OK City bombing, the first WTC bombing, Bali, etc. The terror cell in Toronto was trying to acquire this stuff. The group down in Miami that wanted to blow up the Sears Tower was going to use Ammonium Nitrate. All of this is BEFORE Brian and his team discovered how easy it is to still get your hands on the ingredients.
Fact is, even though we have all of the warnings in the world — even in the form of hundreds of dead people — this stuff is still easy as pie to get and Congress keeps having measures to track it blocked by big lobbyists. If you think ABC showed anything to the terrorists, you have it backwards: The terrorists showed this to ABC and the rest of the world.
The fact that this was stored in DC is a sidenote to the story because it could have been stored anywhere. Besides, they wouldn’t detonate it in the storage unit anyway.
The fact that they got so much with no questions asked is the point.

Posted by: Pee Dee | September 8, 2006, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

JOHN CURRY, YOU ARE MY HERO.

Posted by: Sten | September 8, 2006, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

What a horrible story and a botched try to generate news.
Morons.

Posted by: David Lowry | September 8, 2006, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

The government can pass laws that track who is buying cold medicine since it can be used to make drugs (meth), but it can’t track who is buying the stuff used to in truck bombs? That makes sense… NOT.
To whoever said something about someone’s skin color mattering in this story: What did Timothy McVeigh look like to you? I hope you don’t work in law enforcement.
By the way, only a couple states have passed legislation on this stuff (Oklahoma, obviously after their attack). That’s why folks wanted Congress to pass a federal regulation. Otherwise, the terrorists can just buy it in the states where they don’t track it.
Ooops! Am I giving the braindead terrorists ideas since they NEVER thought of this before. Well, except for the millions of times they’ve already tried to blow us to bits with fertilizer. But as long as they don’t sell Sudafed untracked, we’re good to go!

Posted by: Boondoggle | September 8, 2006, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Agree with Pee Dee.
ABC group didn’t show anything to terrorists. They already know all of this. Even I know how to prepare a boms using but ammonium nitrate. So what? Major of USA citizens – don’t know about this, and that’s your weak point.
Moreover, ABC team showed, that all Bush’s anti-terror war means nothing. Nobody want’s to blow up america. NOBODY tries to do so. If terrorists wanted to blow up anything they’d do this a hundred times in one month.
That’s what ABC team showed you.

Posted by: Dee | September 8, 2006, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Hey I bought 1/10 of what they bought for my yard last spring. I hope is doesn’t explode and kill my grass.

Posted by: dan | September 8, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

You-all keep doing exactly what ABC wants you to do; believe everything they write. Nicholas & the gang were set up at OK. If you did your homework you would know that Nitrat blows down not up & out. In OK if that had truly been Nitrat there would have been a huge hole in the ground. It was plastic that blew OK city. And it was our own government people that did it to OK City.
Government wanted to pass a law that took away add’l rights from us. They couldn’t get enough lawmakers to vote yes so they created an issue in the very heartland of the US. This created sympathy and got the law passed. Do you know you have to inform your bank what you are going to do with “your money” if you take more than $2,000.00 out of your bank account? If you refuse to tell them, the bank will refuse you access to your own money.
Instead of more laws which just inhibit our rights, we should be demanding more accountability from our elected officials.

Posted by: Lydia | September 8, 2006, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Gee, you can buy fertilizer in North Carolina? The next thing ABC will try to tell me is that you can also buy gasoline for the truck carrying the fertilizer. And gosh darn it, don’t even try to tell me that in my diesel driven, fertilizer carrying pick-up truck, I can’t but me a lighter for my smokes. Or whatever else I care to light.
I’m curious ABC? Did your “investigative team” wear trench coats and sunglasses when they bought there….shhhhhh…you know what?

Posted by: Gus | September 8, 2006, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

How pathetic. What happend to the days of professional journalist? Reporters reported the news; not invented it. What is worse, this isn’t even newsworthy. Half a ton of fertilizer three miles from the white house; so what? If exploded damages what, a 1000ft. radius. Further, most every high school student has a fake ID to purchase alcohol; so checking ID’s to purchase fertilizer is going to help how?

Posted by: Mike Adams | September 8, 2006, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Brian, knock this crap off!!! No problem with you doing investigative reporting on this type of stuff in fact keep doing it, our authorities need to know our weaknesses. However keep it out of the media until such time when the problem is solved. Once again you are enabling our enemies. We have freedom of the press, freedom to print it or freedom not to! If I were to go to some terrorist and tell him this kind of information It would be considered treason, and by putting it in the media well….. you do the math!

Posted by: Stuart | September 8, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

here’s an idea: wait until you see the story. Everybody jumps to conclusions and haven’t even seen the report.

Posted by: Bob | September 8, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

You people honestly think the terrorists haven’t thought about using fertilizer and that ABC gave the terrorists ideas? You people need to wake up. The terrorists are a little beyond fertilizer bombings. Good job ABC for getting this in the open. Fertilizer sales should not be unrestriced.

Posted by: Jason | September 8, 2006, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

This is news? Give me a break! By the way, good luck getting your ammonium nitrate to detonate without primacord. 500 pounds of ammonium nitrate fertilizer is about as dangerous as 500 pounds of cedar mulch without some serious blasting caps and booster charges. This is such a stupid, tired story. Leave the COOP people alone, the farmers don’t need more bureaucracy to get their fertilizer you hacks. It’s easy to get AN because it is so safe and NOT so easy to use asa blasting charge. Stop howling for police-state restrictions on basic commodities you yellow journalism lamebrain crybabies.

Posted by: snyderman! | September 8, 2006, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Stuart… it has been 11 years since OK City. Is that long enough for law enforcement, and especially Congress, to get their butts in gear? Lord knows they spend enough time talking about flag burning and gay marriage. I’d think they’d already do something about people being able to buy an explosive oxidizer off the shelf with no ID.
Personally, I know folks who sell Ammonium Nitrate and don’t sell it to anyone they don’t know. Why? Because they KNOW people can make bombs out of it. It isn’t a matter of letting law enforcement do their job if there isn’t any regulation to make it illegal. My friends who sell it also say there are a lot of sellers who aren’t as prudent and there is no law to make them keep tabs on the stuff. I’d like to think if a truck bomb went off, we’d be able to look up who has been buying the stuff and potentially track the criminals down.

Posted by: Rodney | September 8, 2006, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

My goodness, are people so ignorant? That fertilizer isn’t even an explosive nor is it dangerous by itself, but it can act as an oxidizer to accelerate the burning of fuel in a bomb. Or it can make your lawn or home garden prettier There is no need to regulate or track that stuff anymore than other common household products that could be used to make something poisonous or explosive by a bad person. Are we going to outlaw cotton underwear because it can be used to make trinitrocellulose?

Posted by: Ralph Siegler | September 8, 2006, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

folks, youre missing a great opportunity here…stop giving ABC all those negative comments…and send them to CBS and NBC instead!

Posted by: campbell | September 8, 2006, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

…and what are you going to do with the purchased fertilizer now?

Posted by: Elena Renteria | September 8, 2006, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Hey Brian, when you’re ready I’ll help you find a Ryder truck and a map to the White House.

Posted by: Mike Gainer | September 8, 2006, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

PeeDee has it exactly right. The point of the article is that we have a known material that has actually been used in more than one attack that supposedly has had legislation passed to regulate its use (very good thing) but some nimrod industry protectionist is holding up the implementation of the law (very bad thing). This is another example of why we’re still vulnerable to attack – too many people don’t want to take threats seriously enough to allow action against them to proceed. This story about how we are failing to deal with a specific and well-known threat should be of interest to anyone who is interested in our nation’s security.
For those of you who sneer that this report is just fear-mongering, I would say to you what Aragorn said to Frodo – “You’re not nearly frightened enough.”

Posted by: inmypajamas | September 8, 2006, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Way to generate a headline! You cannot find real news, so you create it. What next? Are you going to sneak into a theater?
You are so ridiculous.

Posted by: Michael Bond | September 8, 2006, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Brian, Give me a break. Registration to purchase fertilizer??? What’s next, registration to purchase fuel? Don’t forget the other component of the OK City bombing; fuel oil. Gasoline by itself is incredibly volatile and can destroy easily. How about the other over the counter products that can easily be used to create explosive combinations or incendiary devices. Next you will call for registration to purchase batteries because they could be used in building detonators. Get a life!!!

Posted by: Chuck | September 8, 2006, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

This seems like a lame premise for a “news” story. Maybe the fact that you could buy such a large quantity of potential bomb making chemicals deserves some attention but the fact that it was stored a few miles from the White House seems irrelavant. What are you proposing the Government do about this? Perhaps daily door to door searches of all properties? One more nail in the coffin in the “Land of the Free”.
I also don’t think Democrats or Republicans can be blamed for what’s happening in your country right now regarding terrorism. This problem has been brewing for years upon years. Saddam and Osama were your friends when it served your purpose. Thier transition to evil is too complicated to type in this post but it is easily found by searching out some history. Unfortunatly, American News is more concerned with ratings and entertainment than it is with reporting the true nature of things. I guess it all boils down to shareholder value in the end. Who cares what the truth is as long as a dollar is being made.

Posted by: Starguy | September 8, 2006, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

You got it Posted by:
shawn | Sep 8, 2006 1:52:39 PM
So?? I dont get the point. Could the blast from the explosives destroy the whitehouse from that distance away? Try sneeking a nuclear missle into the same storage shed, then you will get my attention.
A FEW MILES? Ross, you are a pathetic newsmaking loser. Go back to trash removal, not trash reporting, moron.

Posted by: sho07r | September 8, 2006, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

We may have been attakced by Islamic terrorists, but “profiling” Muslims or people from the same areas as the terrorists is a bad thing.
But the people that buy ammonium nitrate are not only not Muslims but are largely white. Not only that but a lot of them own guns and chew tobacco or smoke, just the kind of people that we need to keep an eye on.

Posted by: Poor Schmuck | September 8, 2006, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

So you’re going to make life harder for the farmers who use the fertilizer to GROW YOUR FOOD!!! Way to go. Farmers have enough hassle without dumb reporting like this. Someone somewhere wasn’t using their noggin. If the journalists had to be as censored as the American citizens are at times, our enemies wouldn’t know what we’re up to half the time, would they?

Posted by: pagirl | September 8, 2006, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

This is not the appropriate time to print information like this to encourage the radical’s who are looking to do something drastic on or near the anniversary of 911. Why do we keep showing people how to commit terrorist acts. This is giving them the roadmap. The next group to do this will not let us know it has been done. I think this is in poor taste and again extremely bad timing.

Posted by: debbie byrd | September 8, 2006, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

I love the non-committal ‘a few miles from the White House’.
So, where was it? Somebody’s backyard shed in Suitland, MD? Hey, that’s a ‘few miles’ from the White House. Oh, no… from the look of the grainy indistinct picture, it was probably one of those self-storage places. Those things are as common as, well, fertilizer out here a ‘few miles from the White House’.
What’s with the sensationalistic tabloid news blurbs? Did you guys merge with The National Enquirer when nobody was looking? Is this really “investigative” news? There are better ways of informing the public that you can still buy enough fertilizer to make a powerful bomb. The way you chose just makes y’all look bad.
I wonder what your advertisers pay for click throughs on these ‘journalism’ pages.

Posted by: Straphanger | September 8, 2006, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

This is the journalistic counterpart of “bait-and-switch.”
First: In the lead-in description of the story, ABC did not even mention fertilizer, probably because they knew it would be met mostly with yawns. Anyone can purchase ammonium nitrate, and store it virtually anywhere.
Second: Who was that clown that said fertilizer is the terrorists explosive of choice? With a couple of exceptions, it has been largely ignored for more compact high explosives like C4 and Semtex.
Come on, ABC, your are succumbing to the stereotype of tabloid journalism. But then, why should that surprise anyone.
You aren’t serving the public by making the world more informed of genuine threats, but rather you are creating worthless fear-factor stories out of whole cloth, resulting in more unwarranted anxiety simply to sell “copy.”

Posted by: Gabriel | September 8, 2006, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Ammonium Nitrate is “fertilizer”.
So let’s pervert “fertilizer” into “one of the world’s most dangerous bomb-making materials”.
The number one chemical liquid that causes more deaths than anything else is Hydrogen Monoxide.
Also known as water.
Sad.

Posted by: Marc | September 8, 2006, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

So, the American people pay billions of $$$$ to farmers to subsidize farmers and they object to Ammonium Nitrate purchases being recorded. Get a life you hayseed jerks. Is it because you can’t write your names or are you too stupid to understand that this stuff is actually used in making home made bombs and killing Americans. And you congressmen who cow tow to this, you are even and patriotic. It’s all about politics, not integrity. I don’t believe there is any integrity left in the halls of congress. Probably very little. We need some national referendums.

Posted by: Barney-TUCSON | September 8, 2006, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Our TV reporting is BS. They need hot stories to keep the rating. They care less about the wellbeing and the security of the nation. Why don’t you guys go after Big Oil companies making 45 billion dollars a quarter profit? You report for a day or two and forget. Investigate how our congress is failing us. Report with facts. Go after the “good for nothing” Senators and congressman. Expose pork-barrel fund allocations. FEMA missmanagement. Did you expose a single scam and nail a single federal official when they turned blind eye to the Gulf coast victims even after one year of Katrina. Did you ask our president whether he knows how to get the job done rather than giving empty speeches? Do our morons in Congress realize how big of a problem Illegal Immigration is? They don’t care because it affects thier votes. They will sell our country if it is benificial to them. Brian… there are many better things to report and make our lawmakers act responsibly and ethically. Grow up child.

Posted by: Jay | September 8, 2006, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

More clear evidence that the liberal news media colaborates with the Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups to inflict damage to the people of the United States.

Posted by: JR | September 8, 2006, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Now if your crew would have made a bomb that would have been news. I do not think you or them are smart enough and this story proves it.

Posted by: Pat | September 8, 2006, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

If the US is indeed at war with Islamo-fascists and is in a struggle to the death, why doesn’t the USA simply use the nuclear deterence concept against the Islamic world–one more attack of any kind against any US target will result in the immediate nuclear destruction of all major Islamic cities around the planet, including Mecca, Damascus, Ridya, and Tehran.
It is time to stop screwing around with these Allah damned fools. This will force the so-called moderate muslims to reign in the extremist elements of their societies. If they fail to do so, then we shall simple eradicate this islamic pestilence from the earth. And it is a hell of a lot more economical approach in terms of American lives and dollars.

Posted by: Amaal Nasfad | September 8, 2006, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

This is a sad day for “journalism” in the USA. Pitiful, pitiful, pitiful idea for a story. I hope heads roll at ABC and that the cretin(s) who planned this have to walk the plank. Just Dumb !

Posted by: J.T. Lee | September 8, 2006, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Some here say that Brian’s report is a criminal, terrorist “how-to” manual.
I got A NEWS BULLETIN: they already know how, and they didn’t need Brian’s report to persuade them.
Liberals say that we have choice. Criminals and terrorists have choice, too. They are not robots waiting for Brian’s reports to tell them what to do.
If Brian’s reports are so influential, how come I’m still not committing criminal and terrorist acts?
Brian’s report does a service to us, not to them.

Posted by: Bob | September 8, 2006, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

This is in response to Barney-TUCSON
I’m one of the hayseed jerks you are referring to, and I can purchase items at your local supermarket and do as much damage or more maybe us hayseed jerks should see about regulating your food intake.

Posted by: Farmboy | September 8, 2006, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Ammonium Nitrate is old news…you should have filled the storage unit with something really dangerous like British Sports Drinks!!!

Posted by: Yadda Yadda | September 8, 2006, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

THIS IS TERRIBLE! Why ANYONE could purchase DEADLY EXPLOSIVES!!! Where is the waiting period? Where is the background check? Should people that have domestic violence violations be allowed to purchase this DEADLY EXPLOSIVE? There should be a one pound per month LIMIT! Next we’ll be hearing about people buying this DEADLY EXPLOSIVE and taking it into the city and selling it out of a car trunk! Or a storage unit! Quick, somebody call Mayor Bloomberg! These are just REASONABLE RESTRICTIONS to make us FEEL safer! Nobody needs that much explosive.
What? You mean this is a FERTILIZER??? Well, those farmers will just have to use something less dangerous. Like human feces. Yah! That’s the ticket. We may lose a few hundred thousand people a year to disease and farm production will plummet and we’ll have to IMPORT FOOD but what the hell. We’ll FEEL safe and that is more important.
Thanks ABC. If you hadn’t MANUFACTURED this hyped up story, a lot of people, like terrorists, would NEVER THINK OF IT!
What’s next? Checkpoints? “Show us your papers”?

Posted by: Fiftycal | September 8, 2006, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

This is BS. Sounds like manufacturing a story to me… we are at war and you have to conjure up stuff like this!? BTW– you should wear a headset that Blackberry near your head (in your photo) must be messing up your brain waves (LOL).

Posted by: SJ | September 8, 2006, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Why didn’t you idiots do this in 1995 after the Oklahoma City Bombing?

Posted by: Ivan | September 8, 2006, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

don’t think they were noticed…shows how smart they are…if they were smart enough to build the bomb…they would of been in jail…
i don’t know…give them what they want…arrest them, go thru their stuff…figure out the charges later…
they think the american people are stupid…
it’s not disney la la land!!!
that would be why their stock is going down down down!!!

Posted by: ravin black | September 8, 2006, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Don’t blame ABC for giving away terror ideas. The whole point is to make the Government DO something about it. Just handing over the data to law enforcement will go nowhere but in the trash. Newsflash…federal and D.C. law enforcement are ALREADY incompetent. This is why we have the Press…to expose that incompetence. Would you be grateful if you were a moron and your neighbor came up to you and said, “Hey pal, you’re bad for our neighborhood, and here’s my proof on video…provided discreetly for your review.”? Yeah, I didn’t think so.

Posted by: tom | September 8, 2006, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Hey, maybe everyone should carry a gun. Then if you see someone looking suspicious transporting loads of fertilizer you can shoot them.

Posted by: mike | September 8, 2006, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

FOOLS AND IDIOTS ON TOP OF BEING LIARS…THAT IS WHAT ALL YOU MEDIA PEOPLE ARE! Do you in the left STILL linger in the fantasy that we are all out here actually believing your BS?!?!?! FERTILIZER CONTROL! FERTILIZER CONTROL! … Chicken Little, that is what you are…when it time to make a bomb, a bomb will be made, with or without fertilizer…

Posted by: HATE MEDIA MORONS | September 8, 2006, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

The moment you purchase of half ton of ammonium nitrate, You can bet somewhere someone knows. They knew a rag reporter purchased it, & thats fine with me.
Now try purchase a Nuke & I’ll vote DEM!!

Posted by: CD | September 8, 2006, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

So what, you bought some fertilizer within a few miles of the Whitehouse. If you really want to show the American people something, try putting it into a truck and get within a couple hundred feet of the Whitehouse or Capitol. Then you’d have a story. I’d love to see you guys get arrested.. This is stupid.

Posted by: youcallthisnews | September 8, 2006, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

So who takes all that fertilizer home since no one’s blowing up the capitol or white house? Someone should at least get a healthier garden out of this absurdity.

Posted by: LRC | September 8, 2006, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

I know that the media is out to make the government look bad but this is insanity at it’s best. If the news personnel were trying to find out what would happen, then the Secret Service should arrest all of them and charge them with plotting a bomb attack on the whitehouse. Throw them in jail for 10 to 20 years and really give them something interesting to write about.

Posted by: Tom | September 8, 2006, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Have Brian Ross and Rhonda Schwartz been put on the terror watch list?

Posted by: Joseph Spammolino | September 8, 2006, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

What this proves, in absolute terms, is that ABC is a terrorist organization whose sole objective is to inflict terror specifically on the citizens of DC and generally on all citizens of the US. Worse yet, they do it for money, not principle. They should jointly and severally be held accountable for their actions in creating a terror threat. Lets face it, it was only fertilizer until they said it was a potential bomb in their possesion. A pistol is only a gun until someone states it has become a weapon in their hand. They created their own distinction, and they should answer for that threat which they created and itterated.

Posted by: Homer | September 8, 2006, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Brian, just to follow up your incredible journalistic coup on fertilizer, why don’t you identify all the mosques within half a mile of the White House? You want to find a real terror threat, there’s where you start looking.

Posted by: Russell | September 8, 2006, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

This stunt by ABC looks like it might be helpful in the ratings race or eventually provoking measures to prevent amateurs (e.g. Columbine killers) from getting easy access to bomb components. Sadly, we really won’t be able to stop the pros’ truck bombs when they come to our cities. My bet is that the pros haved moved on, perhaps busy sizing up rail cars with chlorine parked in Elizabeth NJ, waiting for a windy day.

Posted by: Dan | September 8, 2006, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

You Bush haters miss the one point. The fertilizer bomb that blew up the building in Oklahoma was during your beloved CLINTON administration and he did nothing about it!!!

Posted by: TC | September 8, 2006, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

What’s worse is there was actually a newsworthy story within 50 meters of ABC; it was overlooked.

Posted by: Mike | September 8, 2006, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

“LOTS of things can be used to make explosives. Care to guess how many gallons of gasoline or LP are even closer to the White House than your fertilizer? As John Stossel would say . . “Gimme a break.” Why do journalists feel compelled to create paranoia over things completely uncontrollable. Shouldn’t it be obvious by now that no amount of chest pounding legislation can protect us 100% of the time . . STOP TRYING GET GET MORE USELESS LAWS PASSED BY DRUMMING UP DRAMA.”
I have to agree.

Posted by: Ken | September 8, 2006, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

OK, so the ABC report suggests that having a law that requires that you maintain a list of all of the people that bought Ammonium Nitrate will help stop terrorist attacks?
Is the FBI supposed to followup and interview everyone on the list and walk through their fields and make sure they can smell fertilizer?
Will the FBI agents have to weigh what the buyer has in storage and estimate what’s already in the ground?
Sounds like a waste of our security resources.

Posted by: Scott Lamond | September 8, 2006, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

This is another example of sensationalized so called reporting. Why don’t you just offer rides to the terrorists after you show them how to purchase the “most dangerous” bomb making materials. You guys know nothing and it shows. Keep up the good work (wink wink) trying to make the administration look bad.

Posted by: Jeff | September 8, 2006, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

I know. Brain, er, Brian, why don’t you do some investigative reporting and figure out how you can turn ammonium nitrate into an I.E.D. also? And the best avenues to plant them in the DC area? And then get a hold of your comrades over at Al-Jazeera and give them the GREAT news!

Posted by: 99% of democrats give the rest a bad name | September 8, 2006, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

This action brings to mind that of a little child. He or she will push it to the limits, yet cry bloody murder and the 1st admendment when they get spanked by mom or pops. You should consider yourself(ves) lucky you’re not in jail. Instead of making this “news”, you should have brought it to the attention of the authorites…. quietly.

Posted by: brad | September 8, 2006, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

There is no law against buying this type of fertilizer, dynamite and probably C-4 because the democrats block every law designed to save a lot of lives including the retarded democrats(most shouldn’t be saved). Why so you think they are called the obstructionist party? Whine and obstruct is all they know since they have no plans. I was wrong, they came out with a plan to save SS, you can retire at half the normal amount (maybe $500 a month) at 100, and get the other half at 110. That will save enough money for them to keep drawing over a hundred thousand a year after serving one term in congress. Don’t you democrat followers feel better now that they are looking out for you?
“If you are against using the NSA program to track phone calls from terrorists, the program to track terrorists funding, and using the Patriot act to catch terrorist (the same type program is legal to catch drug dealers) then what part of the “War on Terrorism” do you support”?
I’m going to love filling body bags with you city slickers after the next attack. Fire-Rescue forever.

Posted by: Scrapiron | September 8, 2006, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

If ABC employees or agents actually purchased and transported all the ingredients to make a detonation of the type used in the Oklahoma bombing, they are subject to arrest and prosecution under longstanding laws. Diesel fuel used in most large trucks and many passenger cars is another ingredient used and is also readily available without a special federal license. Nor should it be. However starter explosives necessary to cause that mixture to detonate are highly regulated and restricted.

Posted by: Bill | September 8, 2006, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

If ABC employees or agents actually purchased and transported all the ingredients to make a detonation of the type used in the Oklahoma bombing, they are subject to arrest and prosecution under longstanding laws. Diesel fuel used in most large trucks and many passenger cars is another ingredient used and is also readily available without a special federal license. Nor should it be. However starter explosives necessary to cause that mixture to detonate are highly regulated and restricted.

Posted by: Bill | September 8, 2006, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Interesting comments, many of which are irrational, irrelevant and miss the point.
It seems that Brian was trying to demonstrate that one of the only instruments ever used in a terrorist attack in the United States, ammonium nitrate, is still not traceable because of the efforts of the agricultural industry. Imagine if after 9/11 there had been no change in air security because of pressures from the airline industry.
The fact that ammonium nitrate can still be purchased in large quantities with cash and moved across state lines so long after the tragedy of Oklahoma City is disgraceful. It raises the question once again about just who some in Congress are trying to protect.
Good story and thanks!

Posted by: Robert | September 8, 2006, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Last I checked, it was jet fuel, and not ammonium nitrate, that was the terrorists’ weapon of choice. Aside from the nut in Oklahoma, how many fertiziler bombs have been used as IED’s on American soil? It takes tons of the stuff, milled perfectly, mixed with the right proportion of fuel, and detonated with dynamite. It ain’t exactly a suitcase bomb.
Chicken little, the sky isn’t falling.

Posted by: Gimme a break. | September 8, 2006, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Are you kidding me? You went through all this effort just to show that you can buy fertilizer and rent a storage facility in Washington?

Posted by: Edwin | September 8, 2006, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

I think we should not only ban pointed sticks, we should ban the means to make points on pointed sticks. Plans for pointed sticks should be removed from the internet.

Posted by: Andrew | September 8, 2006, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

It’s fertilizer for God’s sake! I can also make a bomb with hydrogen peroxide that you can buy at any drug store anywhere in the world. This has got to be the most stupid topic ever….

Posted by: FarmerBrown | September 8, 2006, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

For all of you poo-pooing this story, your are off base. This legislation is actually enforced in other states. E.g., the kid who blew himself up at an OU football game using TFTP tried to purchase ammonium nitrate at a farm supply store, but was denied. This actually put him on the police’s radar, but he died before they could find him…

Posted by: Jerky | September 8, 2006, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Scissors…don’t forget scissors! Those things can be really dangerous, especially if you run with them. You might put an eye out…

Posted by: FarmerBrown | September 8, 2006, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

AMERICA IS GOING TO BLOW UP !

Posted by: haley! | September 8, 2006, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Hey Brian, did you guys go to Target and buy about 50 coffee grinders to mill this stuff so you can BEGIN to think about using it as an explosive? What about the fuel oil and blasting caps? By the way, how much fuel oil are you goint to need for the correct stoichometric balance?

Posted by: blaine | September 8, 2006, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Marc, you are so quick to criticise farmers, evidently you don’t enjoy eating much. I agree that farmers are given too much $ in subsidies, but Farmers are not the enemy and neither is firtilizer- it’s young muslem extremist men who are the ones that want to kill you and your family. Isn’t it time we remember who the enemy is instead of having the media make up schemes to try to discredit the work of the Bush administration. We also need to remember that government is not our salvation … Jesus Christ is the only true saviour. We should turn from our evil ways pray for our country and our world. I’m talking to the Church in America who has allowed itself to turn away from God’s ancient paths!

Posted by: Cliff | September 8, 2006, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Manufacturing the news. ABC should be ashamed.

Posted by: Chris | September 8, 2006, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Awwww…well life happens and if you’re not careful, you could get hurt…you could get hurt even if you are careful…if you decide to copy a moronic stunt from “Jackass” and you die, well, it was your choice, your decision…we don’t need the left to zip us all up into padded plastic baggies for the rest of our lives “for our own good” thank you very much…mind your own business!

Posted by: theleftisabunchofmorons | September 8, 2006, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

You people need to WAKE UP! You can start by reading The Hudson Valley Freeman.

Posted by: Yankee Jim | September 8, 2006, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

I got it…we use the coffee grinders to grind up the young Muslim extremists. Problem solved.

Posted by: FarmerBrown | September 8, 2006, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

What would you expect from the “DRIVE BY MEDIA”? look at the 9-11 series Clinton people and they all run to cover themselves.

Posted by: don | September 8, 2006, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

IThis is not a stunt. This is the media trying to stain Bush yet again. This is outrageous. I think ABC should be hauled to court. The media has lost it. Lost it.

Posted by: tom callahan | September 8, 2006, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

I firmly believe the United States government should prosecute and persecute the ABC undercover team in exactly the same manner as they would any other party who perpetrated such a hoax.
Hello BATFE! Where are you? Hello Attorney General! Where are you?
Hello FBI! Where are you?
Employees of ABC have purchased explosive material with the intent to illegally detonate said material in the National Capitol.

Posted by: Dan | September 8, 2006, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

If you guys insist on “creating” news, why don’t you stash a bunch of fertilizer over at CBS with Katie Couric and see how close you can get it to the nightly news set. Now there’s a story.

Posted by: Keith | September 8, 2006, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Brian, I hate to disallusion you, but any farm boy can consruct very large bombs fron stuff around the house. So it surprises me greatly that a few snobs from the press have achieved parity. It ain’t rocket science!
BK

Posted by: Bill Kenney | September 8, 2006, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Well you may as well have included the “recipe” on how to make the bomb in your article too.. sheesh.. oh well.. its probably elsewhere on your networks website..

Posted by: Eric | September 8, 2006, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

that bomb making compound is so common, I have had a 50 bag of it for years. I got it at a standard nursery store – - – You do not need to go to a farm supply company – - and the farmers use it by the ton, Dump truck fully loaded with it – - in the area of 20 thousand pounds. – - This is simply a common chemical – - and has very valid needs and usage – - in high volume. – - High volume – -
Now many other compounds are dangerous also – - when combined. – - and are common – -
and you expect the bad guys to not know this – - it is basic chemistry – - check the internet for more information
I have had friends tell me about their kids making Nitro – - that is right nitro in quanity – -
I had a roommate in college in Iowa that made dynomite. – - that is right – - in the barn – he and friends made dynomite – - and had fun blowing up stumps on their farm.
So why hide what is already known. – - and so easy to get information on.
Jim P.

Posted by: Jim | September 8, 2006, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Thanks for giving terrorists a public how-to for blowing things up in DC. Oh, that would be a great news story for you, wouldn’t it? I’m sure you wish for it every night. Useful idiots!

Posted by: Charles | September 8, 2006, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Give me a break ABC. Cover news, not your own agenda.

Posted by: Karen Smith | September 8, 2006, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Don’t you newspeople have a conscience? Why not expose this to the government 1st, give them a chance to correct the problem, and then put the story on after the solution is in place?

Posted by: smortie | September 8, 2006, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Ammonium nitrate is FERTILIZER! What do you think all of those gardens and 100s of acres of grass probably are treated with AMMONIUM NITRATE. And coming from working on a golf course when I was younger, I know we had hundreds of bags on hand all the time, so it wouldn’t surprise me given the amount of care the landscaping there is done with, there is probably 1000s of pounds in the groundkeeper building.

Posted by: William | September 8, 2006, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Brian, who are you kidding? A couple of weeks ago, you try to do a contrived, untrue smear of State Farm’s effort with Katrina claims. Now this trash!! What next?

Posted by: Billy | September 8, 2006, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Reason 432 why network “news” is no longer relevant.

Posted by: Mark | September 8, 2006, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Since when are ABC reporters allowed to smoke crack?
They got half a ton of fertilizer within a few miles of the White House? THAT’S a story? They must be smoking crack.
Next thing you know they will be reporting that they got 25 gallons of gasoline within District limits. Seeeeesh.

Posted by: Wudndux | September 8, 2006, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Woop dee doo, Brian. Ain’t no news, make some.

Posted by: Forest | September 8, 2006, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

ABC still thinks Americans are stupid like before cable news…just like the democrats.

Posted by: metro | September 8, 2006, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Brian, you call this an “investigative report?” To me, that denotes the investigation of some unlawful activity. Your description says you bought the ammonium nitrate “at farm supply stores in North Carolina and Virginia”. The photo shows several individual bags, typical of what anyone should be able to buy for farming or gardening purposes. Since you obviously did not purchase a “half ton” of material from one store, just how much of a revelation is this? Seems to me you should check out Home Depot for their supply of paint thinner and bleach while you’re at it. As a piece of mainstream journalism, I give this an “F”.

Posted by: Andy | September 8, 2006, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Yep, just fertilizer and McVey didn’t even have that much in the ANFO bomb at OKC but you humorous Bush-nosers wouldn’t know anything about how easy it is to mix the FO with the ammonium nitrate.
And you can buy an initiator in the fire works stands of throughout the United States, but that just a joke to you BushWar on Terror patriots.

Posted by: docholliday | September 8, 2006, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

one of the great things about america is our freedom of speech ,however i feel time has come that maybe a panel of judges needs to be created to bar some of these idiots of the press from doing us more harm . all i can say is im glad i have cable so i dont have to listen to abc. then again on the other hand fox news isnt any better . they need to learn how to report both sides of a story not just the one side they think will make their ratings go up . its simple abc if you have to stoop this low to get your ratings up then were trying to tell you something. you guys need a life

Posted by: sam | September 8, 2006, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

It’s fertilizer, not “bomb materials”. Sure, you can make an explosive from it…but then you can do so with half the things found under your kitchen sink as well. We live in an industrial age, surrounded by chemicals. Banning or restricting anything that could be used to manufacture a bomb is nearly impossible. And even if you could, I wouldn’t want to live in the society that managed to do it.

Posted by: Mike Asher | September 8, 2006, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

“………and children under 18 years of age aren’t supposed to be able to purchase cigarettes, or those under 21 can’t drink or buy alcohol……..
Come on Brian, isn’t there enough legitimate news to cover without going into cloak and dagger modes…..
Give me a break…….”
Exactly. Want to see how many people I can smash in the face as I walk down the street. This article is a cry for a bigger, more obtrusive goernment. Not what you would expect from the “liberal” media. But from what I’ve read above not too many liberals think anything through

Posted by: Jeff | September 8, 2006, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

You know what’s scary about this? At some point, the failure of the American media to report on the news without imposing their agenda… or flat making stuff up… will lead an extrememist in a position of power propose we seize the media. Eventually, people will get fed up enough with this crap that such a solution could make sense. Then, we won’t stand a CHANCE of getting any fair representation of the truth.
Not that we really have one, now.

Posted by: Mystral | September 8, 2006, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

Now what if someone finds the storage unit and blows it up?
NIce job sherlock!

Posted by: brian | September 8, 2006, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Well I think I will become an undercover news reporter to show that anyone can become a reporter and make news. Like above, why didn’t they use gasoline>? would have been cheaper and easier to get closer to home. Tsk Tsk. ABC that used to stand for something…..now Absolute Bull Crap is what the letters stand for now!

Posted by: scotty | September 8, 2006, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Hey Brian, thanks for working so hard to get all our freedoms taken away. We will be much safer when we can’t buy anything without showing our I.D. Take notebook paper for example …flammable, paper cut hazard, potential spit-ball putting someone’s eye out. Capitalism…such a dangerous concept.

Posted by: wes | September 8, 2006, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Was the person buying the **scary** “bomb” material a middle-easterner with an accent? Did he/she wear a straw hat?
Why don’t y’all try that stunt with guns?

Posted by: me | September 8, 2006, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Watching “investigative” journalism over the years I’ve come to the conclusion that media folk THINK that a degree in journalism makes them experts in every other field. This story is an example. Here’s a clue, Brian: The ANF purchased for garden and farm use does NOT have the same physiscal properties as the form used to make bombs. No farm or garden store sells that form of AN. Any terrorist worth his training knows that he can get more bang with 50lbs of an explosive made with H2O2. Why would he waste his time procuring 1,000 lbs of farm grade AN and then go through the annoyance of processing it into weapons grade AN? He could carry 50LBs where ever he wanted to place it WITHOUT using a van.
The terrorists are already light-years ahead of your pathetic, ego feeding journalism.

Posted by: GreyGeek | September 9, 2006, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Now all you need is the dynamite to set it off.Go buy that at your “farm supply store” moron.

Posted by: Capt. Kirk | September 9, 2006, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Yeah, I agree with alot of people that this info is just there to scare the American public into a panic. causing them to continue hiding in their homes, albiet, maybe unintentionally or waste of time laws stopping nitrate when clearly gun laws can suscribe to terrorrism as well. However, Brian Ross also supports the fact that it is still so easy to comitt any form of a terrorist attack today that all this security and al-qaeda talk doesn’t make much sense. Especially when you question why al-qaeda hasn’t attacked us yet, given the numerous security flaws present. It almost seems that al-qaeda and the so called bushism “islamofacist” only attack us when it is convient for George Bush. Coincidence? Sadly, I am beginning to see that in life there are no coincidences.

Posted by: scared straight | September 9, 2006, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Brian,
I think that what you did in looking for loopholes that terrorists can use is very good.
However Brian, this report should not be aired until you have reported this to Homeland Security and they have taken steps to prevent it from happening again.
Telling the American public AND the terrorists are telling the wrong people. This is not real news.
Brian, your patriotism has been overshadowed by your rush to a report that can hurt this country.
Brian, stick to the news and if you stumble on something that can help secure our nation, report it to the proper authorities. Don’t report it to people who don’t have the means of getting it done or the ones who want this information to continue to hurt us.
If you would have done this reporting during World War 2, you would have been jailed. If you continue to do this, you should, in my opinion, be jailed or at least fired.

Posted by: joe | September 9, 2006, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Why don’t we just scrap all state laws and make Federal laws against any and all crime, potential crimes, possibility that a crime could be committed, etc.
You can’t buy more than 20 lbs of sugar without it being reported to ATF. I guess moonshine is still more dangerous than fertilizer.

Posted by: Iam Drexel | September 9, 2006, 11:40 am 11:40 am

I bet the same folks jumping on ABC News think that Fox News isnt biased. – lol
I think this IS an important story. Are we not at war? Why is it crazy to actually pay attention to whats going on within our borders for once? I think this story shows a huge problem, a problem with people that blame the media for everything. Darn media did it… yep
I would think Americans would want to know if it’s that easy to build a bomb in D.C. Now if somebody can actually fix a problem without starting another war. Maybe a war against bombs is needed.
Dont throw stones at the messenger. Throw stones at Fox News. j/k ;)

Posted by: Terry | September 9, 2006, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Wow, congratulations! you bought fertilizer and put it in a shed! Probably some of THE ABSOLUTELY WORST JOURNALISM EVER.

Posted by: Eric | September 9, 2006, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Yo Brian! Why don’t you post the instructions on how to make a bomb from fertilizer on the WWW, and report on how easy that is, too?

Posted by: Tag | September 9, 2006, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

To all of you who are criticizing this article, you don’t even realize that this is what they want. Getting people to talk about the issue. regardless if it positive or negative you all are talking about it.
They are not sharing “secrets” the terrorist don’t already know! We are not waving a flag and saying here’s our weak spot! It’s obvious they know more about our weak spots than we, as the public do.

Posted by: Erica | September 9, 2006, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Brian: This is not what journalism is about…please find something better to do with your time. Next assignment – placing breath mints in diet coke…creates a dangerously explosive mixture. Get on that one right away, partner’ will ya’ please.

Posted by: roberto | September 9, 2006, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

This doesn’t surprise me. No matter how prepared a government entity becomes, they still fall short of the protection they esteem to have under the belt. It’s called human error and guinea pig-ism….

Posted by: Christel Cosper | September 9, 2006, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

KILL YOUR TELEVISIONS! Free your minds from the manipulation! THINK AGAIN! TAKE IT ALL BACK!!!
This current pathetic attempt to herd your duly terrified little rear-ends into the hog pens of the EVIL, LEFT WING, ANTI-AMERICAN, OPEN BORDERS, ONE WORLD AGENDA so they can keep you all nothing more than MEAT COGS IN THEIR MACHINERY must be exposed for what it is!

Posted by: DUMP THE LEFT | September 9, 2006, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

why are people complaining about our rights being taken away? is it so hard to give the required info. what is is like 5 extra minutes. if you all cooporated right from the get go it wouldn’t ake so dman long!

Posted by: erica | September 9, 2006, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

I have allways questioned the validity of the claimed dangers of fertilizer bombs. Thro the years I have used many tons of fertilizer and once about 30 years ago had diesel fuel spilled with 5 ton in the back of an old Chev.trk and I’m still here. And I used the trk for many more years on the farm. I guess my main question is not that there might be a danger but the level of danger or of the power of a fert. bomb. I think there is a faulse impression portrayed about the power of such a bomb. Finaly I cannot understand or relate to a belief so strong that somebody will destroy or kill to prove a point. Also we don’t need more gument (:> control on ag products.

Posted by: Forrest | September 9, 2006, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

To all you political savvy persons out there who are trying to make everything political and pointing fingers at the opposite political party: You all missed it. ABC is only trying to make the American people who vote these bozos into office who are blocking the legislation to prevent the purchase of these ingredients see what is happening.
The lawmakers we vote into office to protect us on their word that they are honest and informed of what is going on, “the politicians” ARE THE VERY ONES WHO ARE GOING TO DO US IN WITH ALL THEIR GOOD INTENTIONS, and no action to protect their own homeland from acquiring the necessary goods from the very places the terrorist’s most want to destroy.

Posted by: Elizabeth | September 9, 2006, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Ammonium Nitrate Explosives? How do you get it to detonate? With a Match? This stuff cannot be detonated without the use of High Explosives and a Blasting Cap. Both are Federally Regulated and require a permit issued by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (B.A.T.F.) So you bought some candles and are prohibited by law from obtaining the matches without a permit or license. Big Deal!
Why don’t you do a little deeper investigating and know what you are talking about.

Posted by: Joseph | September 9, 2006, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

I just filled up my SUV with 35 gallons of gasoline, and was able to buy a BIC lighter…AT THE SAME GAS STATION!!! I then drove past 1600 Pennsylvania Ave…TWICE!!! I wasn’t stopped, searched or detained. Scary stuff…gimme a break ABC

Posted by: G_force | September 9, 2006, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Brian Ross, corporate news shill, and fraud, attempts to stir fear and terror in the minds of his readers. Relying upon the wide-spread ignorance of his readers, he plays fast and loose with small facts in an attempt to inflate minor nonsense into major newsbreaks.
Fortunately, not all of us are ignorant. Ross is a fraud, or he’s stupid.

Posted by: Roland | September 9, 2006, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Wow, I’m so impressed by your derringdo! Get a life. Are you the one doing 9/11 flick full of lies? So…you want the Republicans to stay in power ahh?
Anything to do with Haliburton?
Bravo. That’s what I call patriotism!

Posted by: carlos a. garcia | September 9, 2006, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

ROTFL or crying on the floor because of the stupidity of people/”journalists”?
Quote: “there are still no federal laws restricting the purchase of ammonium nitrate” but you give the answer yourself, because it is a “chemical fertilizer”.
Quote: “and were never once asked for any valid ID” You Don’t need an ID to buy box cutters either. Or a butter knife.
For crying out loud, get real! Are you paranoid? Are you scared of the dark? Can you sleep with the lights OFF?
Well, I’d expect an article like this in The Onion, but that is parody up front. This here is presented as News. Not in the entertainment section.
This article is ridicolous. It belongs into the hall of shame. As well as some of the comments. Example Comments:
“ABC GIVES TERROIST ATTACK PLANS”
“and you’re going to show the terrorist our weak points”
“Why don’t you put up a flag, ‘Hay Bad Guys, This Is How You Do It’”
“Great job informing Terrorists of the ease of mounting a attack.”
“It seems that reporters and news teams are interested in finding loop holes in our system, however, it is ludicrous to advertise them. Let’s not put anymore ideas out there shall we!”
I wonder if the people who wrote these comments were trying to be ironic – but I fear not.
And I thaught Fox News was bad, distorting and paranoid…

Posted by: Max Schneider | September 9, 2006, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

I had to double check the URL that I wasn’t on the website of THE ONION by mistake – buzt no, I wasn’t.
And then I got scared.
Not because of the ridicolous scare ABC tried to pull off but because they apparently believe what they wrote. And some readers apparently believed in what was written.
OMG, I’m going to move to Israel – or Lebanon, less lunatics over there.

Posted by: Max Schneider | September 9, 2006, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

This is what happens when you have a 24 hour media, and there is not 24 hours worth of news. If they want a real project they should track down terrorist already in the country.

Posted by: andy | September 9, 2006, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

I agree with Josephine S. Lovoi but the only problem is that no one American cares enough to stand up and say “We live in a politically corrupt country with a president who is in cahoots with terrorists.” No wants to saying anything, our freedoms are being violated and we are letting it happen.

Posted by: ralph | September 9, 2006, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

fertilizer! That is what the U.S. News Reporters are full of…..crap!!!!!!!! Why not just make a list of things that the terrorists can use and give it them, let them in the country, and let them do their thing. Quit abusing the freedom of speech and raping the minds of the citizens of the U.S. I am sure it is rating time and why not feed off of the anniversary of the horrific 9/11! The press is what gives this country a bad name!!!!!!!!! Not the government! But, our own press has to make everybody look like a bunch of bumbling idiots, when they are the cause and root of most of what is wrong here! I wouldn’t want to live anywhere else on earth. This is the absolute best place. Quote: “FEAR is simply false evidence appearing real” Don’t live in it!

Posted by: pai | September 9, 2006, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

boycott the mickey mouse 9/11 mockumentary on ABC

Posted by: coal_train | September 9, 2006, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

What’s your next story? Rent a shed and store a half a ton of table salt near the Pentagon, just because salt contains chlorine – a WMD.
This is not a joke, turning agricultural fertiliser into explosives is just as hard as extracting chlorine from salt.

Posted by: David | September 9, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

I was allowed to purchase over 100 lbs. of explosives and transport them to within feet of an airport terminal!
Granted, it was gasoline…
Where’s my news story?

Posted by: Laughing at you | September 9, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Registration and all legislating will not instill a respect of life. Your stunt demonstrates nothing about security and says more about your narrow minded quest for hype and glory. This kind of demonstration leads nowhere except that it discredits ABC News if that is possible. Disdain for this act should be as severe as for acts of violence because they spring from the same depraved emotion to gain attention then to claim status based on the fear and reaction of innocent people. When you learn, after many more years of study judging from the immaturity of your deeds, that holding up virtue next to the barbarians who use violence is far more worthy than your vain attempts to find monsters to fear, maybe you will understand the true character and courage of civilized and happy people.

Posted by: Aero | September 9, 2006, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

I hate to tell y’all, but this is a serious issue. You can compare an oxidizer to matches or box cutters all you want, but Ammonium Nitrate combined with Fuel Oil (ANFO) is the leading explosive used in demolitions in the country. This isn’t like selling box cutters or gasoline.
Some states already passed legislation requiring people to show a photo ID when buying it. If you can take the time to give an ID when buying beer or cigarettes, why can’t you do it for the major component of a bomb?
Also, did it ever occur to you that ABC and other media outlets DO KNOW how to make every specific aspect of the bomb but DON’T WANT to share it. Why? For the same reason you lambaste them, they don’t want to give the terrorists a cookbook. They make the same point by just saying they got it without explaining the process of milling, ratios to diesel fuel, the necessary containers, the types of blasting caps needed, etc. Therefore, for you to come out and say they are helping the terrorists and in the same breath claiming their ignorance by describing the actual process is hypocrisy at its greatest.
As for those who doubt whether this is dangerous because you spread it on your lawn or it didn’t explode in the back of your truck: Spreading it on your lawn or somewhere there is a lot of air doesn’t make it explosive. It’s the difference between setting fire to some gunpowder on the ground and detonating a firecracker. The fact that it is wrapped compactly makes it explode instead of just catch fire. And depending on how it is wrapped determined which direction it will explode for the conspiracy theorists who say “nitrate explodes down.”
In 5 states, you must have a PHOTO ID and provide a name/address to buy Ammonium Nitrate. Some retailers voluntarily ask for this info when selling it. A Bi-Partisan group of politicians proposed this regulation.
Y’all can’t see the forest for the trees. Or, you can’t see anything due to your hatred of the other political party and hatred of the media. Blame Bush, blame Clinton, blame ABC.
Bottom line, this stuff should be tracked because it makes other products like gasoline or diesel fuel MUCH MORE dangerous than those products on their own. Not even close to the same as a gasoline bomb without an oxidizer like Ammonium Nitrate.
ABC isn’t telling the terrorists anything they didn’t already know. This would be like having a report that planes can be flown into buildings to cause a collapse. But more importantly, it is like saying measures to track who buys an airplane ticket is being stalled by some corporate interests.

Posted by: William Woods | September 9, 2006, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Does this mean some of you don’t think the press should serve as a watchdog for our government and public policy?

Posted by: Jimmy | September 9, 2006, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Useless. Anyone with the will and know how can visit any store for improvised munitions and fly under the radar by paying cash. So what?
Is the diving industry regulated as well? Terrorists are crafty and intelligent. All you need is to use the system to your advantage. Why join the SEALS when dive shops will train you? Duh. Want to carry HAZMAT, go to truck driving school. Another known avenue of approach. Buying fertilizer? Whoop-de-doo. For economic reasons the Government cant shut it all down. Our society would collapse, which judging by Katrina and the rise in youth crime is already upon us. All we need is a stock market crash and all you peace lovers who spout Darwinism will learn survival of the fittest first hand.
Terrorism isnt rocket science Sheeple. You talk about giving things away, they know all this already.
They are a closed society which is why infiltrating them is extremely difficult. We are an open one which is why we are extremely vulnerable. But God forbid Soccer Mom cant drop BoBo and Binky off on time in her van or SUV. God forbid we realize our enemy is waging total war and we arent.
De oppresso libere

Posted by: Napolean | September 9, 2006, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Inventing the news?
There is a proposal in Congress to regulate ammonium nitrate. There has been a proposal several years in a row. It keeps being blocked because the farmy lobby says it isn’t easy to buy and regulation is unnecessary.
How is a report today “inventing news” when this is something Congress has been debating for years? Seems to me ABC had the guts to play watchdog and actually see if the claims were true.
Do I understand some of you don’t want the press to play the watchdog and test claims made by politicians and lobbyists?

Posted by: Jimmy | September 9, 2006, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

When I was a teenager over twenty years ago, I used to grow 3-4 acres of strawberries commercially on the family farm. Every year, I used to buy about 1500 lbs. of pearled ammonium nitrate to serve as fertilizer, which at the time I knew fully well could be made into a fuel-fertilizer bomb (my older brother was a special-forces officer, and I was always precocious in laboratory science).
Of course, I never made any attempt to construct such devices; I was just wishing to apply the necessary nitrogen to the strawberry beds. Ammonium nitrate is a necessary agriculture commodity, for very many people.
If the point of this story is that there should be efforts to make purchasers of this commodity have some sort of registration, which farmers already must have to purchase many types of pesticide — then the story is quite legitimate. But instead, you guys seem to have taken an excessively flamboyant approach that focuses entirely upon the wrong issue.
That you could lease a storage shed or garage somewhere in Washington D.C or Arlington VA, then drive an SUV to it and unload a bunch of nondescript 80-lb sacks out of the back is really no story at all. What are you advocating, that our nation be turned into a police state, in order to track the transportation of agricultural chemicals?
There are lots of potential dangers in our society that need address. But you should craft your stories to bring attention to the matters-at-hand, like the fact the federal government should make purchasers of ammonium nitrate demonstrate they are licensed to apply agricultural pesticides or have similar license, which has been required of farmers for thirty years. The White House angle is totally inappropriate.

Posted by: Theophilus | September 9, 2006, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Ice heads all over missouri have no problem getting the stuff. This is old news ABC….

Posted by: Ernesto | September 9, 2006, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Are the outraged commentators on this thread forgetting Tim McVeigh? Terrorists are already perfectly familiar with the possibilities of Ammonium Nitrate.
Go read wikipedia on this stuff. Fires have caused Ammonium Nitrate to explode by accident. It should be no consolation at all that it’s only “half a bomb.” You think terrorists aren’t resourceful enough to craft a detonator for it?

Posted by: Jason | September 9, 2006, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

The so called terrorists have already won we are running scared.
I’ts fertelizer. Uou can make gas out of corn what are we gonna make every one who buys corn prove who they are. THE NEW WORLD ORDER is upon us.

Posted by: rhonda | September 9, 2006, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

I’ve only perused a few of these comments and one thing sticks out like a red flag. “Gee, Brian, thanks for letting the terrorists know how to hit us.” Give me a break, folks. If you think that any self-respecting terrorist in the world today would not know about ammonium nitrate, then you are hopelessly naïve. Reporting like this tells me that not enough money has been spent here in the USA to protect us. It gets harder and harder to believe that ol’ W really wants to protect you. Wake up, people. These right-wing, neocon God freaks will destroy this country as we know it, and as most American households are glued to a television for an average of 8+ hours a day, we need the media to get smart and start telling the truth. The emperor really has no clothes.

Posted by: Degobah | September 9, 2006, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

I can’t believe so many people are attacking the reporting here. Why is it we still believe terrorists are inept, and don’t already know about this. Ammonium nitrate and its ease of acquisition are familiar to any 12 year old whose read the Anarchists’ Cookbook. It takes public attention such as is generated by reporting like this, to get anything done in this country. Although, if the Oklahoma City bombings weren’t enough attention, I doubt this story will be enough, and another weakness that we are aware of and can do something about will remain.

Posted by: Eric | September 9, 2006, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

What a buffoon.

Posted by: Benjamin | September 9, 2006, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Please don’t start creating phony news and hype. ABC is a better network than this. You don’t want to be like Dateline, who will do anything and everything to create a news story. Don’t get into the trash dump with them. COVER the news, DON’T CREATE the news. Really, you are a better network than NBC, so don’t stoop to their levels.

Posted by: Madelyn | September 9, 2006, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

I have difficulty believing ammonium nitrate fertilizer will catch on as the choice of weapons for terrorists. It’s heavy, takes a lot of it to do more than destroy the vehicle its in, and its smell is distinctive and repulsive.
Farmers have known ammonium nitrate is potentially explosive for decades. Anyone who has grown up on a non-organic crop farm has been taught to handle it carefully, and farmers generally store it well away from people and buildings when they can.
This little “sneak it into Washington” charade may do little more than make it more difficult for farmers to grow and tend their crops. Although it is likely to further misinform viewers about the low risks associated with that chemical compound.
Is ABC suggesting that Ammonium Nitrate would be good for explosive belts? That would be amusing. The idiot who put it on, with the help of 20 or 30 friends, wouldn’t be able to move!
What’s the real point of this “super-scoop”?
And, I would not be so sure NSA is in the dark about ABC’s nonsense.

Posted by: edwinkenn | September 9, 2006, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Sorry, but after the “Path to 9/11″ fiasco, ABC has no credibility as a reliable news organization anymore.

Posted by: JJ | September 9, 2006, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Nice job ABC, I think that the governmet needs to pay more attention to things that are being bought that could be made into weapons of mass destruction.

Posted by: shandra | September 9, 2006, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Boo
I said “Boo”
Hellllloooo “BOO”
Orange Alert… duct tape…Boo
shit it’s not working

Posted by: c | September 9, 2006, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Yeah, I guess that was a dumb thing to do. Sorry, I won’t do it again.

Posted by: B | September 9, 2006, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Whats next? the Pepsi and Mentos bomb on the white house lawn?
It seems they added Create news to thier Who, what , where , when and why motto.
Long live the alternate media!

Posted by: Mark DeNoyer | September 9, 2006, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

ummm, i think the point of the story is that all this “protecting the homeland” crap coming out of washington is a load of just that, BS.

Posted by: zeek | September 9, 2006, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Commenters who are claiming this will give terrorists ideas have a woefully inadequate understanding of the enemy and the world. Do they REALLY think terrorists are going to be smacking their foreheads and saying, “Doh, Why didn’t I think of that?” Climb out of your cocoon and get real!
The story here is that the agricultural industry was able to torpedo what seems to have been pretty commonsensical legislation.

Posted by: Jim | September 9, 2006, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

This whole story, a waste of time and money. Like you all have said,
it has been done before. It is a danger, but so is an accident while driving and flying, and your chances of being hurt are greater than that of a terrorist attack. Pray for peace and live life in the best way possible that you can!
The news can be valuable, but it is most definitely abused.

Posted by: pai | September 9, 2006, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Do not show the path to 9/11 please… just like your pseudo journalism here….it would be most inappropriate to waste and squander the capital police running around watching the media collect bomb materials…… give me a break. ABC should let Homeland Security do its job, just like Bush et al said… we have had no attacks since 9/11… so the population expects ABC to calm down and return to their eight place ratings please. You are only harming all your advertisers with your beligerant behaviour.

Posted by: liz | September 9, 2006, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Why is this bad news? We can not get stronger unless we tend to our weaknesses.

Posted by: Sean O'Malley | September 9, 2006, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

Brian demonstrated that a determined terrorist can do damage, this should not come as a big surprise. This should reinforce the idea that there will be no absolute defensive measures that can be employed to ensure safety. Americans have never been whimps as far as I can recall. We can inflict as much pain as anyone wishes to dish ‘em out. Americans should have this clear message, you mess with us, we will punish you, your family and your extended family. We need to learn from the Israelis in this way. Israelis are told that they are all warriors. What the 9/11 event should have done to all of us is the realization that we are now at war. And as consequence, no more whimps, we are all warriors. We can get killed at any moment in time. But we can take comfort in the fact that if I get blown up by one of those terrorists, my fellow countrymen will investigate it and find their familis and friends and shove the same bombs up theirs. For those peace-niks that believe violence begets violence, let’s just keep something in mind, these terrorists won’t stop killing our innocent fellow countrymen until we all accept their agenda. And their agenda should be self-evident in how they ran the countries where they have been dominant. None of the American values that we believe in will ever be upheld in their society. We need to find a compromise and be of one mind as a nation in our strategy to keep our values intact. To me it sounds like the path to peace means surrendering our values. What do you counterpropose as a method of winning the strategic battle? Are you willing to surrender and give up the American experiment to uphold your peaceful goals? This article of Brian clearly demonstrates that having a one-dimensional approach (ie. pure defense) is not going to work.

Posted by: anon | September 9, 2006, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

i am surprised people are critical of this report. After the Kansas City building was lost , I thought the rules WERE changed to record large purchases of this item. Apparently once again, it fell through the cracks. And – hey – with the super pro guys that are helping them do IED I am sure they already know how this works. Don’t forget what they did at those hotels about a year ago in jordan and elsewhere. They know how to do what Brian is talking about. Brian is wondering why we are making it so easy for them.

Posted by: joe public | September 9, 2006, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Mr.Ross ;why dont you find out just who is bankrolling this comercial free ;so caled “docu-drama Abc is reported to be showing on September 10-11?Now that is something a lot of people would love to know.

Posted by: cincigal | September 9, 2006, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

This report dramatically shows what we all have known or should have known for the last five years. To wit: the G W Bush administration has done NOTHING to really fight terrorism. There is no scanning of containers in our ports because that would upset Walmart and Home Deopt both heavy contributers to W and congressional Republicans. Homeland Security dollars to not go to the two principal target cities NY and Washington but rather to Indiana and other places where it is politically needed but where the probability of a strike is very low.
As for these comments it looks like are the Conservative Republican trolls got theri talking points memo and are out doing their lemming thing. YOu guys are really pathetic

Posted by: Jack | September 9, 2006, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

If anyone thinks that this was a revelation to potential terrorists, we are really more stupid than we imagine.
The recent hoo-haa about liquids on airplanes revealed how far off the mark Bush’s WOT is: Bush was actively trying to cut funding for liquid bomb detection devices — until that plot was uncovered.
W’s “war on terror” is a sham – it’s really about no-bid contracts, overpaying Halliburton and blow-jobbing the oil companies.

Posted by: David | September 9, 2006, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Whoever said Ammonium Nitrate smells is ignorant. No offense, because ignorant does not mean stupid… it means you have a lack of experience/education with the material. It is INORGANIC and has NO smell whatsoever. I have used prills of Ammonium Nitrate on my acreage before and it is like small white BBs with no odor at all.
But don’t let the facts get in the way of your ignorant rants. It is a chemical fertilizer with dual use: one legitimate, one nefarious. It should be tracked, in my opinion

Posted by: Roger | September 9, 2006, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Apparently ABC feels a need to march to Fox News drumbeat. Hype-up the fear factor, pander to the right wing, and run their 9/11 docudrama with debatable accuracy, perfectly timed with the Bush administrations PR blitze to reinvent their justifications and bolster their sinking public opinion polls. This is exacly why ABC news is a joke. Try NPR’s “Fresh Air” real relevant information.

Posted by: Robert Renouard | September 10, 2006, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Way to go. why not draw the terrorist a map, too ABC? Or are you now the ARAB Broadcasting Company? When they blow up something (with the fertilizer), the Feds will find you and then YOU WILL PAY!

Posted by: Gary Ruppert | September 10, 2006, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Amazing isn’t it? After the first terrorist attack when Clinton was president, you know the one that George H. W. Bush was resposnible for due to his lack of leadership, President Clinton said that there was a serious problem regarding transnational terrorist organizations. Heres the point… Clinton introduced legislation to Congress that would require fertilizer companies to introduce taggants to their product that would identify when, where, and from what batch the fertilizer came from. The republicans led by Trent Lott said that this was a distraction and that it was unnecessary. We should malke a movie like PT911 which is airing tonight. Even better we can have terrorist organizations help produce it… kinda like Mr Cunningham’s daughter (the main director for today’s “patriotic” film). Anyone who remembers news from the 80′s will know doubt remember Youth With A Mission. Mickey would cry if he knew how Mr Cunningham’s daughter supported Rios Montt’s terrorist campaing to kill 70,000 mayan peasants.
Email me if you care to find links to this. A lot of people really don’t care. Myself (as for most Americans) I will not be watching PT911… FOOTBALL!! But in Latin America football is not the same, but the director or PT911′s daughter may know a little about it since she helped kill a lot of children. Micky should be ashamed of PT911… it’s more of an Uncle Scrooge Ducktails type of adventure. I really hope Disney looses it’s broadcasting license.

Posted by: Keith | September 10, 2006, 2:45 am 2:45 am

Last year it was black white supremacists rioting in Toledo. Now it’s fertilizer. I suggest you smell what you are shoveling. ABC has without a doubt disorted and even fabricated the news. Try telling the truth for a change.

Posted by: Harry L. Hughes | September 10, 2006, 9:41 am 9:41 am

You are all pathetic, but more so on the left than the right, at least the right is still mostly in touch with reality as opposed to the left who have run out of tinfoil hats.

Posted by: JD | September 10, 2006, 10:46 am 10:46 am

This incident underscores the fact that perfect protection cannot be guaranteed due to the human element. The party of treason, the Democrat Party, will try to blame it on the Bush Administration but the clear fact remains that this is a large country and not everything and everywhere can be covered as long as human beings are involved inprotective policies…..too much fraility involved.

Posted by: KC Collier | September 10, 2006, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Just the type of “reporting” our so-called educated journalist are doing these days. In my youth one could at least depend on the reporterd to find truth somewhere actually happening instead of manufactiring “news”. these days a journalist can not even speak the english language properly, much less determine what is news and what is B.S.. I liken the roprters of today to the professional athletes. The athletes are a bunch of overpaid, wimpish, drug addicts and the reporters are a bunch of undereducated, overpaid, readers of cr*# written by some idiot who could not even be a pimple on a real writer’s butt. Methinks that journalism today is pushing and learning from the ultimate yellow journalist of yore who became a billionaire from reporting a lie and causing the Spanish-American war to escalate. Yes William Randolph Hearst. A wierd, at best, distributor of half-truths and out and out lies, but a great rabble-rouser, and a pervert to boot. Kind of reminds one of the majority of reporters and even most anchor persons of today’s media. Degrees do not make one educated, only shows that they are proficient in “Regergitation”.

Posted by: Gunny | September 10, 2006, 11:40 am 11:40 am

So, can I have the fertilizer now that you are through with it?

Posted by: roland | September 10, 2006, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

I think this story is ridiculous! Like some of those above me said, the news shouldn’t be “created.” It should just be reported. Investigative reporting is one thing, but this is a whole new ballpark. You are just perpetuating the fear that many Americans have had since 9/11, and *THAT* is exactly why the terrorists commited the attack in the first place. To scare us!

Posted by: Jordan | September 10, 2006, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Monkey Boy,Darth Vador and boys couldn’t care less about America they are too busy looting the treasury to stop and protect the country.

Posted by: Dick Weed | September 10, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Oh no!!! ABCNews uncovered that various locations are actually dispensing highly flammable and explosive liquid gasoline in the vicinity of the White House! Oh NO!!!

Posted by: markjohnson | September 10, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

I think it’s unfortunate that the media thinks it’s up to them to go out and try to cause disturbances by doing things like this. It is also unfortunate that the media can get away with this, what if I wanted to go out and test something like this, I would be locked up (rightfully so). I think ABC needs to learn it’s role in society as reporters, not terrorist bombing concept designers, leave that up to our enemies. If somone sees a potential threat, report it to authorities, don’t test it. I think ABC is sending the wrong message here.

Posted by: nathan wallner | September 10, 2006, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

There has to be more usefull news going around the world than some crazy paranioa scam to get the public worried. How about some news that might benefit us in a good way. Or how about telling us about a law that got passed that went quietly over our heads that we should probably know. Dont tell me how you snuck some stuff you bought at some farm at a wherehouse in DC. Journalism sucks nowadays. There is only a good 2% of your people that actually give the public news that we actually care to hear that actually affects our everyday lives.

Posted by: worried man | September 10, 2006, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

OK Brian…you’ve indicated your absence of journalistic talent.
Perhaps you could go back to spreading that fertilizer daily.
What has happened to the news media to do stuff like this?

Posted by: Fred Mason | September 10, 2006, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Brilliant! Brilliant!
Thanks for this GREAT story.
NOT!

Posted by: BT | September 10, 2006, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Brian please. Not only are you making the people who feed and clothe use look bad, but you are handing over information to the bad guys. How do you sleep at night? As someone who respects agriculture and the people who work in the industry, shame on you! Now Mr. Ross, we question who is the real patriotic American? I would pick a farmer over your hack job journalism anyday!

Posted by: Lynn | September 11, 2006, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Why do we continue to give the enemy our weak points on national TV??? I don’t get it. Now they now our loopholes. Just like the story I saw where the armed forces showed their fighting techniques on nationwide TV. How dumb can we be?????

Posted by: Geigh | September 11, 2006, 10:31 am 10:31 am

First story: You complain that the feds dont do enough to track your purchases and movements within a couple of miles…
Second Story: You complain that the Feds track too much information and are violating your rights…
Next Story: You complain that the feds dont do enough to track….
Make up your mind. Why dont you do a story about how exactly it should be done.
What is good enough for you?
How far should be go?
Tell us how you would do it? Exactly, not is some vague terms – because that is easy.

Posted by: cmmguy | September 11, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

So, you guys knowingly purchased bomb making material and then transported it to a sotrage facility about 1/2 mile from the white house?
You have already admitted to a crime!
Where is the NSA, CIA and FBI when you need them?
They should be putting you guys in jail for what you have done…

Posted by: Charles | September 11, 2006, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

I think it’s a worthwhile article, but it’s incomplete. You had an opportunity to introduce this to the Bush administration or Congress before it hit the air, as a means for them to introduce real positive needed change in our policies, not just illicit a quick emotional reaction. Imagine that….the media working WITH government to identify real problems and motivate positive change. What a story THAT would make….and you were there!!! We could actually leave from watching the news feeling GOOD about both our country and our media, as presented by you.

Posted by: Michael | September 11, 2006, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

I have seen how foolish security is, and has been, even since 9/11. someone pointed out that 911, the emergancy number, and 9/11 are the same.
Foolish stories about this stuff is practicly sreaming, “We are unprotected enough for another attack.”
I am only 13, but I am not as rediculas as to post something online as dangorus as this.
If this artical was read by a terrorist, it would show them how open we are to attack again.

Posted by: Azora | September 11, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Wow after reading ALL of the responses to this story it is a wonder we have a country at all. Backbiting – complaining – whining – BS. Yes, as a free society sometimes we are too free with the information that gets published, but this is nothing new – I personally would like to see ALL news agencies more responsible in their reporting, but those days are long gone. The story isn’t that AN was purchased it that there is no accountability for this one particular bomb component. The Agriculture lobby should be the first to step up and say lets put some controls in place, but it won’t happen because it will cut into some “pork barrel” spending. If you have nothing to hide then having a purchase of AN tracked should be no problem. Given the times we are living in we have to expect and realize that some of our “freedoms” will be at risk, but I don’t count having to show ID to purchase a hazardous chemical a loss. In order to safeguard ourselves – that is all of us – quit whining and think of a solution. Hell, in Oregon you have to a prescription to buy Sudafed, and show ID. The public doesn’t like it, but in order to try to stop the manufacture of a truly deadly chemical – METH – they comply. We as lawful citizens should have no problem with following the same requirements for AN – except we are relying on those in elected positions to put our collective safety over the special interest lobbies – good luck to us all.

Posted by: Gene | September 11, 2006, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Very shoddy article. Ammonium Nitrate is not an explosive. It is an oxidizer. It is a fertilizer. Big difference.
Fertilizer grade ammonium nitrate does not work well for explosive use because it is prilled.
Did you know you can purchase lead without a background check? Lead is used to make bullets.

Posted by: Mike | September 11, 2006, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Pure drivel ABC.
Do you realize there are about 10 million military vets that have been trained in how to make shaped charge bombs using gasoline, home heating oil, or LP gas?
Do you want us to have to show our IDs the next time we fill up the old gas guzzler?

Posted by: John | September 11, 2006, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.