Sixteen-Year-Old Who Worked as Capitol Hill Page Concerned About E-mail Exchange with Congressman
A 16-year-old male former congressional page concerned about the appropriateness of an e-mail exchange with a congressman alerted Capitol Hill staffers to the communication. Congressman Mark Foley’s office says the e-mails were entirely appropriate and that their release is part of a smear campaign by his opponent. In the series of e-mails, obtained by ABC News, from Rep. Foley (R-FL) to the former page, Foley asks the young man how old he is, what he wants for his birthday and requests a photo of him. THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS Congressman Ney Pleads Guilty to Accepting Lavish Gifts NY Moneyman Arrested in Teen Sex Scandal Check out the Brian Ross Webcast on Home Page The concerned young man alerted congressional staffers to the e-mails. In one e-mail, the former page writes to a staffer, "Maybe it is just me being paranoid, but seriously. This freaked me out." Foley’s office acknowledges that Foley wrote the e-mails to the young man but says they were completely innocent and that Foley is at most guilty of being "too friendly and too engaging" with young people. The e-mails were sent from Foley’s personal AOL account, and the exchange began within weeks after the page finished his program on Capitol Hill. In one, Foley writes, "did you have fun at your conference…what do you want for your birthday coming up…what stuff do you like to do." In another Foley writes, "how are you weathering the hurricane…are you safe…send me an email pic of you as well…" The young man forwarded that e-mail to a congressional staffer saying it was "sick sick sick sick sick." Foley’s office says it is their policy to keep pictures of former interns and anyone who may ask for a recommendation on file so they can remember them. The Congressional page program was started in the 1800s. In its current form, juniors from high school work on Capitol Hill after school or over the summer. The young man in question did not work or intern for Foley’s office. Elizabeth Nicolson, Foley’s Chief of Staff, said they believe the e-mail exchange began when the page asked Foley for a recommendation and that the subsequent exchange was totally innocent. She said Foley’s office believes the e-mails were released by the opposition as part of an "ugly smear campaign."
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Brian Ross, the King of sensationalistic crap. Way to go, Brian. Do they pay you commission on this gossip?
The Democrats can count on you for parrotting their attacks on Republicans, can’t they?
Posted by: One_American | September 28, 2006, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
What is the relevance of reporting the gender of the page?
Posted by: Will | September 28, 2006, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Witch hunt? Give me a break…… Must be a slow news day. Oh, that’s right – it’s 41 days from mid-term elections and time for the left-wing media to slap the Republicans yet again, right?
Posted by: Kathy | September 28, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
The rationale provided by the Congressman’s office seems plausible – but it begs the question….if these exchanges were simply so the Congressman could build an archive file for his office there are two questions I have 1) why was this not being done by his staff and 2) why was it done using his personal email? It is my experience that politicians don’t share their personal and private means of communication with every intern/page/volunteer that graces their office.
Posted by: Brent | September 28, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
In this day and age, who knows?
Posted by: Lee | September 28, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
How warped is this kid? It is a very sad day when we must worry about being friendly to others. Without more, the words shown in this story are very innocent. It is the sick mind of the reader that reads dark messages into them. We should be aware of sexual predators, but me must not make a boogie man out of anyone being friendly.
Posted by: Stephen | September 28, 2006, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
This is NOT news! Quit wasting my time with this worthless questionable garbage.
Posted by: tmblweed | September 28, 2006, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
I think this is being blown out of proportion.
Posted by: Deb | September 28, 2006, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Overly stupid ,not overly friendly.
Posted by: Owen Klein | September 28, 2006, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Good grief……are all of these ‘witch hunts’ really necessary?? Had one of my teenage sons received an e-mail in that context, I would not have thought it at all ‘untoward.’
Posted by: Judy | September 28, 2006, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
This seems completely innocent to me – and I’m a confirmed Bush-hater. Why do we see something like this as a crime?
Posted by: Jim | September 28, 2006, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Sounds like this might be someone trying to get attention. This seems like the kind of dialogue that might take place at an internship type scenario between a boss and a fellow. Age? Interests? A picture for records? Only someone looking to make a big deal of this sort of thing would notice something like this.
Posted by: adam | September 28, 2006, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Yeah, because those e-mails sounded soooo “policy related.”
Posted by: Burke Hamblin | September 28, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Doesn’t seem so bad so me. On this alone I don’t see the issue.
IF this is all the info then what is the problem?
Posted by: Todd | September 28, 2006, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
That a Congressman would use his
personal AOL account and then use
casual slang “what stuff do you like to do” does not sound as if it was a “professional” conversation. As a mother I find myself concerned. As a voter in his district I am even more disturbed.
Posted by: Mary | September 28, 2006, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
MAYBE I’M NAIVE AND I’M USUALLY TRYING TO SNIFF OUT ANYONE THAT IS INAPPROPROIATE IN ANY WAY TOWARD YOUNG PEOPLE – HOWEVER – IN THIS CASE, JUDGING FROM THE NARROW AMOUNT OF CONVERSATION RELEASED, I DO NOT SEE ANYTHING OUT OF LINE. PERHAPS THIS YOUNG MAN OVERREACTED TO AN INNOCENT SITUATION. I’D HAVE TO HAVE SOMETHING A BIT MORE CONCRETE THAN THAT TO THINK HE WAS BAITING THE BOY.
Posted by: Cheryl J. | September 28, 2006, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
I think the congressman was only being friendly. You are trying to grab a headline by dragging the poor man into the dirt. With over-reactions like this, you are encouraging our elected officials to become cold and standoffish. By the way, I’m a Democrat.
Posted by: Barbara | September 28, 2006, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Where’s the story? Is there a story here?
Is ABC just participating in a non story to smear a politician?
What’s the deal?
Posted by: Marc | September 28, 2006, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
This is a bizarre story….but the emails cited here seem like there is more innocence here than “sick,sick,sick”. Were these unsolicited emails? Where are the pages responses? This does smack of a smear and I am not a republican.
Posted by: jonwash | September 28, 2006, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
There is nothing to this story. I bet if Foley was from the other party it would not have even been mentioned. Do your due diligence and then report if it is worth anything.
Posted by: Stuart Gray | September 28, 2006, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
I believe where there is smoke, there is fire. If this young man sniffed out that something was wrong, then he was probably correct. Shame on the congressman.
Posted by: Rudy | September 28, 2006, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Brian:
First you hide manure in the capitol…now you fling it around…shame on you and ABC for this garbage
Posted by: Fred Mason | September 28, 2006, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
This email has all the classic signs of a pedophile beginning to reel in a victim. The classic pedophile approach is to befriend the victim with innocuous chatter, then to ramp it up to more personal and sexual contact.
Foley’s claims of innocence don’t wash. Why did he use a private AOL account? Why didn’t a staffer ask for the photograph?
People who think this is “innocent” have their heads in the sand. Foley is 52 according to his website. The kid is 16. This is total inappropriate and warrants criminal investigation. (I happen to be a lifetime Republican, if anyone cares.)
Posted by: Ryan | September 28, 2006, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
As a former page myself, and one who requested recommendations, this one leaves me pondering. I was never asked for a photo or my age. In general pages are 16-17 years of age, something any Member of Congress should know.
That aside, I know Members of Congress go out of their way to be friendly with Congressional Pages, as these young pages are subject to long hours in a business environment away from family for months on end. But again, this happened after the page left the page program and some of the questions are a little odd.
It does have the ring of inappropriateness behind it.
Posted by: Joni Kirk | September 28, 2006, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
And the U.S. national media wonders why they are accused of being biased against Republicans? This is a transparent attempt by ABC to unfairly label a Congressman as a pedophile. Have you no shame?
Posted by: Tatiana DeSouza | September 28, 2006, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Innocent? Are any of you parents? If an old man sent emails like this to my kids, that sicko would be investigated.
To say nothing of his inability to write the English language — in 12 years of school, he couldn’t learn the different between YOUR and YOU’RE?
Posted by: Shelly | September 28, 2006, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Why do you even write this crap is there no news out there???
Posted by: Bill | September 28, 2006, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Would you still be skeptical if you knew his sexual preference?
Posted by: WPB | September 28, 2006, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
I’m not sure there’s proof of anything happening or not happening. But I agree with the young man, it sure looked strange. However I found it facinating that within an hour or so of the story first being postes. Five people wrote in within 30 minutes or each other ( in one case seconds) with totally pro-Foley case. Good staff work is always to be admired.
Posted by: Ray Shea | September 28, 2006, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
this is ridiculous…there is not even a story here… even a democrat knows that this is an absurd report about a 16 year old who just wants to get his name in the papers. just by even suggesting that a republican is doing something “sick” will get anyone publicity..
Posted by: sam | September 28, 2006, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
this is creeepppppyyyyy
Posted by: ross | September 28, 2006, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
It has been widely reported in the press that Foley is gay and he refuses to deny it, stating only “my sexual orientation is unimportant.” He withdrew from the race for Florida’s senate seat, now held by Mel Martinez, because the press reported he lived with and was involved in a longterm relationship with a man. Foley always breaks ranks and votes pro-gay and against the GOP’s “marriage protection” platform. So it’s pretty clear he has an affinity for males. There’s something here, and thank goodness ABC has the guts to report it.
Posted by: Marianne | September 28, 2006, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
WHY WASTE SPACE WITH THIS DISCUSSION? IF YOU THINK THIS IS MORE THAN A PERSON TRYING TO BE NICE TO ANOTHER THEN YOU ARE THE SICK,SICK,SICK,PERSON.
Posted by: rham | September 28, 2006, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
I absolutely agree with each and every comment.This young man is merely confused (I understand I am repeating the same thoughts as others but I wanted to be opinionated myself),and with previous accusations of other highly important figures (priests,fathers,and even pop icon michael jackson),I am surprised (not entirely),that this young man would take it to this level.Republican or Democrat,this incident SHOULD NOT,at all,give Mark Foley a negative image or reputation…
Posted by: Jermal Allen | September 28, 2006, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Foley is yet another example of hypocrisy from the Republicans, the self-proclaimed party of morality. Wake up, folks, and stop making excuses. Foley was getting a little too cozy with a 16 year-old, plain and simple, and his conduct is inexcusable. He needs to come out of the closet, admit his mistake, resign his seat in Congress, and move on with his life.
Posted by: Bryan | September 28, 2006, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
just further proof of how low the media must go,always looking for the lurid headline, with no substance behind it…ABC should be ashamed at this kind of blatant “tabloid” garbage.
Posted by: common sense | September 28, 2006, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Obviously the recipient of the e-mail was disturbed at the ‘tone’ of the Representative’s behavior (non-consenting). Being a Representative in office requires some tact that apparently this Representative lacks. Personally, I think the Representative’s apparent behavior is a bit too personal for comfort.
Perhaps these Republicans should reconsider their mantra of ‘FAMILY VALUES’ and ‘MORALITY’ and focus on the sensitivity of the governed. Every electorate deserves to be treated with respect; and down-talking to a former staffer with a patriarchial air is insulting.
Posted by: Frederick C. Lee | September 28, 2006, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
LOL, as soon as I saw it was an ABC site I knew it had to be about a Republican. Why all the hate?
Posted by: Steve | September 28, 2006, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Weird. This sounds like Foley is trolling for underage gay sex. Another corked up Republican coming out of the closet. It makes no sense that Foley would send these messages from his personal email.
Posted by: mark Scarratt | September 28, 2006, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Just take a look at his internet logs to see what kind of man he is. With the white houses take on privacy I am sure you woun’t need a court order to get them.
Posted by: Chris | September 28, 2006, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
If this were two females would we even be having this discussion?
Posted by: Jimbo | September 28, 2006, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
This story is oddly placed as story #1 on abcnews.com Why? Who forwarded to the press? What is the anticipated result of this story? I used to go onto abcnews.com to find the latest news, now I must compare with the other news organizations to find out whether it is the latest news or just a biased political stance.
Posted by: linda | September 28, 2006, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
So, what DID he want for his birthday?
Posted by: Steve Greene | September 28, 2006, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
The boy seems to over react and then somehow these emails end up in the press. Sounds fishy. He did not work for Foley’s office so who did he work for? Why doesn’t the story say? Why is he asking for a recommendation from someone he never worked for? Perhaps because this is a setup?
Posted by: Gary | September 28, 2006, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Republicans can get away with anything. George Bush and Ronald Reagan proved that.
They control media content. Bush is a horrible president, yet the media has not created enough public outrage for him to be impeached.
In Clinton’s case, it was the exact opposite: the media went out of its way to create the (undeserved) “outrage” to get him impeached.
Posted by: bc | September 28, 2006, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
I don’t know what to think about this. He’s a bit too friendly, perhaps. Perhaps he had ulterior motives.
He seems to know the difference between your (possessive of “you” and you’re (contraction for “you are”).
Posted by: Sue | September 28, 2006, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
What a sad state of affairs when any contact with a page, regardless of gender, is presumed by the press to be sexually motivated. It is even more pathetic that his opponent is apparently trying to turn this into a Monica Lewinsky situation.
Posted by: Brad | September 28, 2006, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Typical of Democrats, you ruin everything. You can kiss the page program goodbye. If I were a Republican congressman, I would refuse to participate in the page program from now on and would only let pages have direct contact with low level staffers at most. No references would be written from my offices for any page, period. It is a matter of self-protection. Don’t tell me that this kid is not a liberal. There is an obvious agenda in the timing of this release.
Posted by: CHris | September 28, 2006, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Only one comment – contrary to Shelly’s high and might criticism of the Representative’s English language usage, “your” instead of “you’re” is in fact the appropriate usage.
While his usage may not be picture perfect, in casual email communication the standard now is relaxed usage rules (which for the record I’m not a fan of). But the phrasing you chose to criticize was not, in fact incorrect.
Posted by: JR | September 28, 2006, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
There is not enough information here to say one way or the other. There are folks who grew up with the habit of putting their hand on your shoulder when they greet you. Would it be right for a woman to accuse this person of sexual harrassment because this fellow may have put his hand on her shoulder? No.
The same is true here. Perhaps he is just a friendly person who shows it in an odd way. There is simply not enough evidence yet to say one way or the other. Anyone saying exactly what it was at this point is full of it, because they really don’t know, either.
Grow up people.
Posted by: Kimberly Kamen | September 28, 2006, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Gee it must be election time again. The Democrats are digging and slinging mud at a faster pace than usual.
What a shock!!! I guess when you can’t win elections on your own merits, you have to smear the opponent so he loses. I guess when you have no ideas and no good plans for the country, you resort to smear tactics.
What a bunch of losers.
Posted by: Joyce Romero | September 28, 2006, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Smear campaign from the left? Stop trying to spin this against your opponent. I interned on captiol hill and no one asked for my picture.
Posted by: C | September 28, 2006, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
You can bet if this Congressman was a Democrat that Fox “News” would be all over it. GOP hypocrites.
Posted by: SoonerThought | September 28, 2006, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Wow, so any adult who asks a kid what they want for their birthday must be a pedophile? Guess I must be one too since I asked my 5 yr old what she wants for her upcoming birthday…and my cousin who is turning 18 in a few weeks. Wow, I must be sick sick sick to ask what my daughter’s babysitter likes to do after school besides watch kids. Come on…this story was crap, and people who are looking for something to hang the guy with need to get a life.
Posted by: KC | September 28, 2006, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Is this news? Yawn…………..
Posted by: Bob | September 28, 2006, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Without a doubt that is inappropriate. The Congressman should be ashamed, but not nearly as ashamed as the people who are willing to let him off the hook because he is a Republican. Finally the right-wing corporate news sources aren’t hiding Republican scandal.
Posted by: marc | September 28, 2006, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
” ‘too friendly and too engaging’ with young people.”
Uh… yeah. This Republican is obviously fitting the mold of conservatives with sick secrets in their closet.
Posted by: Josh | September 28, 2006, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
I wonder what that recomendation looks like now…
Posted by: odhran | September 28, 2006, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Give me a break! After this kid leaves, asks for a professional reference, Foley asks him for some unnecessary personal information and a PHOTO from Foley’s personal AOL acct! This is clearly an attempt to groom this kid for something else. When I gave references for any of my employees, I always used my work email address and never my personal one. Remember this is a business request – not a personal one and why should this kid know Foley’s personal email address? I wonder if any others will come forward?
Posted by: An Independent | September 28, 2006, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
I think this tells you all you need to know:
“The young man in question did not work or intern for Foley’s office.”
Posted by: Newton | September 28, 2006, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
You have GOT to be kidding me. Not only is this premature and almost certainly BS, you have the gall to make it the “top” story on the website!
Thank you for giving me a reason to never look at the ABC “News” website again.
Posted by: Scott | September 28, 2006, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Gosh, I didn’t know Michael Jackson also served in Congress.
Posted by: Fritz Krelock | September 28, 2006, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Despite myself being a liberal [which I don't even think matters in stories like this], I think this kid is either overly paranoid or it’s a set-up. The congressman only appears to be friendly. The request for a pic is legit … it’s hard to keep track of intern names, especially those who come back for a recommendation.
Posted by: annette | September 28, 2006, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
This is one of the dumbest news stories I have ever read. This 16 year old seems very paranoid and has probably just ended any career in politics. Oh wait, based on how he handled this he will make a great Democrat.
Posted by: Tom Shaw | September 28, 2006, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Oh please, the man’s quite obviously a perv, pretending otherwise just makes you look stupid
Posted by: Phurge | September 28, 2006, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Where is the news? The conversation doesn’t sound out of line to me. Mark Foley is a good Congressman and this is nothing but a vicious negative smear by a candidate who has no chance of winning.
Posted by: fortlaud | September 28, 2006, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
based on the few sentences of foley’s emails that have been released, i fail to understand the hysteria.
i dont think this is a republican bashing issue, i think its a gay bashing issue (this assumes that he’s even gay).
Posted by: angela | September 28, 2006, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
We don’t really know the context here. I send a lot of emails to students (they are adults in foreign countries, by the way) via both my private and office accounts. I have never thought anything of it. I have had young men and women (some kids even) who want to be friends with me and I am a 55 year old woman! They even send me their pictures. Big deal. They are just students who live in a foreign country and want a penpal. Anyone can read anything “sick” into anything if they want to.
Posted by: English teacher | September 28, 2006, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Whoa, thats a pretty heavy allegation to make toward someone isnt it? Accusing them of something like that?
Without evidence even if the guys guilty I would side with him, no one has the right to impugn your character like that without evidence.
Isnt it possible for a defamation of character lawsuit? Thats just ridiculous. Obviously political of course, what a fun place capital hill is!
Posted by: william kalbacher | September 28, 2006, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
How’s your day going? Have any big plans? How’s your family? Wait…is this perverted or what?
Posted by: Tim Daniels | September 28, 2006, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Would everyone think this is just a witch hunt if the emails were being sent from a teacher and it was your child receiving the email? I think not. We have taught this generation of children to beware of predators online and on the street. Why should this be any different? The child right or wrong felt uncomfortable with the line of questions and requests. Did he not do as we have been teaching?
Posted by: Dans | September 28, 2006, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
If this was so innocent why was he emailing from his personal account? The boy was uncomfortable and that’s what matters. I commend him for speaking up about this man’s behavior towards him. As we know most teenagers hide innappropriate behavior so I applaud him. And it’s very disgusting when I see comments from women blowing off this perv’s behavior as innocent! This is classic of how pedo’s work! If you’re son or daughter came to you and said some man is emailing asking for pictures and what he/she wanted for their birthday.. would you not be alarmed??!
Posted by: Mizbhaven | September 28, 2006, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Oh, where there’s smoke there’s fire, how nice “Rudy.” Well, let’s hope no one you’ve ever known claims you grabbed them, or wrote “love Rudy” on an e-mail that made them feel uncomfortable. The day we throw out “innocent — not just ‘not guilty’ but INNOCENT — until proven guilty” and replace it with “Where there’s smoke there’s fire,” we can kiss our civilization goodbye.
Posted by: Albert | September 28, 2006, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
If it was business related, he would not have used his personal AOL account. In addition, while they do keep photos of interns for their files, this intern did NOT work for Foley. Finally, friendly or not why do ask a sixteen year old boy what he wants for him birthday. This intern did NOT intern for Foley so he doesn’t know him.
Posted by: Eric | September 28, 2006, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
“The classic pedophile approach is to befriend the victim with innocuous chatter.” Ah, great, so there is no “innocuous chatter.” If this guy treated his staffers like crap, that would be in the news – say, not remembering their names. Do we have no innocence left? I’m also sorry to read that, apparently, we still believe that all gays (although it’s only been “reported) are pedophiles. How hompophobic, except when you go after a Republican everything is fair game, right? On another note, Clinton was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice, not the oral sex from the affair (note no “alleged”.)
Posted by: Albert | September 28, 2006, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
A predator and people want to ignore it because of stupid politics. The congressman is dangerous, thinks he is above the law and ready to blame others rather than take responsibility for his evil actions. Any parent that would ignore notes their children receive like this, should not have children to raise.
Posted by: Rand | September 28, 2006, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
“What stuff do you like to do???”
ewwwwwww!!!!!!!!!!!
He’s just like the teacher who tried to mess with me in high school. Tried to be my buddy. Make this guy go away! By the way… he can’t spell either!
Posted by: Tomkat | September 28, 2006, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
This is why I dont watch the news, or read a newspaper.
A pure waste of brain.
Posted by: jackspastic | September 28, 2006, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Come again? Why was he emailing this teen from his personal AOL account? Keep an eye on this “Peter Pan” freak.
Posted by: Kala | September 28, 2006, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
So what was this minor supposed to do when he felt uncomfortable receiving these emails?? Keep quiet?
Posted by: mizbhaven | September 28, 2006, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Other than the sender, the best judge of the intent of the emails is the recipient. A sixteen year old kid is pretty well attuned to incoming passes. If he’s creeped out, it’s probably for good reason. Kids get hit on by older pervs all the time and they have pretty good radar for detecting and evading it.
In my opinion, the real telltale is the photo request. That guy is a foul owl on the prowl!
Posted by: Rill O'Biley | September 28, 2006, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
I have no problem with the young man being uncomfortable with the emails, always trust your instincts, but the former page states that he initated the exchange. That being said, why not tell the Congressman he is uncomfortable with the tone or discontinue the correspondence. The fact that they could just as easily be innocent as provocative begs the question, why release these to the media. It smacks of a publicity stunt.
Posted by: Cindy | September 28, 2006, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Congressman Foley has always positioned himself as a champion of child protection.
Back in 2003 he was outed by the gay media in Florida (as a Republican conservative his record is anti-gay) – he quickly changed the subject by launching an attack on camps for nudist children, which was dropped after the state found no problems, and the outing issue had passed without much notice.
Posted by: Blue Mark | September 28, 2006, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Congressman Mark Foley is sexually attracted to young boys?? Wait a minute! This is news to everyone??
Posted by: Gary | September 28, 2006, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Wow! What a misleading story. It seems the inappropriate behavior was the intern fowarding the emails to his peers causing this uproar. If the initial emails were truly inappropriate, he should have gone to proper authorities. Besides, the mundane questions (in question) give no credibility to the interns accusations. Further review should only be done with responsible scrutiny of the facts. The facts being presented in this article are lacking credence.
Posted by: geckomon | September 28, 2006, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
I think that we should reserve judgement….until we see the photo of the boy,then we’ll know what was on the congressman’s mind.
jk.
Posted by: Juan | September 28, 2006, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Another Republican bites the dust.
Posted by: Caroll | September 28, 2006, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Write an article complaining about proper behavior when a Congressman actually asks for a sexual favor not this crap.
I’m sure if the good Congressman had ill intent he would have taken it to the next level if the Intern would have continued the converstion. Now all you do is leave doubt in the minds people who can argue their point either way. The only person that looses now is the Congressman.
Posted by: chris | September 28, 2006, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
I wonder if there are any other male pages out there that have had any dealings with Foley? I would like to hear some of them weigh in on this. If another kid turns up as having past questionable contact with Foley, I’d say that would be pretty damning.
Also, is it common practice for any Rep to keep pictures of pages? I’m just wondering. Reporters should ask other Reps if they keep photos, or if Reps know of any other Reps that keep photos routinely. Just curious if it’s a regular practice done by other Reps or if that’s something unique to Foley.
Finally, if it is Foley’s policy to keep pictures of pages, can we see his files? That would help him clear this up. I would hope that those files contain pictures of every single page over the years, male and female, and not just a handful of certain males. Awfully fishy sounding, at least on the surface.
Posted by: Mike | September 28, 2006, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
For those whining that this is just the left-wing media going after poor innocent Republicans a month or two before mid-term elections, I say this…
WHERE THERE’S SMOKE THERE’S FIRE.
If this was right wing radio nuts or Fox News attacking Dems for the very same behavior, I doubt conservatives would be complaining. Most politicians are lying scum regardless of party affiliation.
Posted by: sick of lying politicians | September 28, 2006, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
English Teacher,
Are the e-mails themselves proper? It depends on whether or not he normally talks to pages/interns that way, and if he collects their photos.
Posted by: Sue | September 28, 2006, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Wow. Just wow.
Politics is like the strings that pull peoples brains.
We have become a sick and decadent society that we get so bent out of shape and start calling each other names.
What’s happening to us?
Posted by: Barry | September 28, 2006, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
“Billy, have you ever been in a Turkish prison?”
Posted by: zach | September 28, 2006, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Aww, poor Republicans. Getting all upset that someone insinuates that one of their guys might be gay and grooming a young boy. Its okay if you make wild accusations against Democrats, but watch your mouth if you’re talking about a Republican.
Welcome to the new game boys. You made the rules, get used to playing by them.
Posted by: Texas Democrat | September 28, 2006, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Oh it is a smear job by the left wing,Funny when its a republican its an attack but what happened to the Monica tirade by the right wing?That was’nt political was it ?
Posted by: francis Hackett | September 28, 2006, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Using personal email doesn’t help the congressman in this situation because it is usually not public record, but why didn’t the authors include the entire email correspondence rather than these excerpts that only incinuate? In a day when the media is so quick to print the sordid details, I find it odd that this is all we get to read. Who were the “congressional staffers” and in which office did they work? Which office did the boy perform page duties? The boy asked for a recommendation; is he in Foley’s district? Maybe the Congressman WAS being overly nice and not looking for a boy-toy. The what-ifs leave only more questions rather than uncover answers!
Posted by: Brian Hudson | September 28, 2006, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
For all the republican hyppocrites that are saying “Oh that’s fine. What’s the problem with that.” One question: What would you do if this guy was sending the email to YOUR kid?
Posted by: zach | September 28, 2006, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
This is another reason why no adults will have any contact of any kind with any minors for fear of being sued, slandered and ruined.
All kids are being taught that all adults are dangerous perverts waiting to nail them. Perhaps Foley is one, who knows? But this attitude is destroying lives and leaving kids distrustful of everyone in society.
Posted by: Michael | September 28, 2006, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Election time, Brian Ross,ABC News……those three items tell you a lot about this story right there. Expect more smears against Republicans before election day.
Posted by: Ron | September 28, 2006, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Wow. This qualifies as news? I guess war and famine, terrorism and disease have become too tiresome. Hey, whatever it takes to get ratings!
Posted by: Tom | September 28, 2006, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
people who think something is wrong with the emails are the ones that are sick…..so innocent…If they know mark they would know what a kind gentle caring person he is to people in general.
Posted by: dont | September 28, 2006, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
They didn’t publish the worst of it here, which may explain some of the disconnect here. This is the creepiest of the emails, I think:
“I just emailed will…hes such a nice guy…acts much older than his age…and hes in really great shape…I just finished riding my bike on a 25 mile journey now heading to the gym…whats school like for you this year?”
Yes, I certain agree with the apologists here that there’s nothing creepy about this, nope. Just talking about what great shape some other kid is in, how he acts “much older than his age,” bragging about his physical stamina. Totally professional. It’s amazing, though not surprising, to see the contortions some people hear are going through to deny even the faintest whiff of inappropriateness in this situation, just because the guy’s on their “team.”
Posted by: chuzzlewit | September 28, 2006, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
I can’t think of many people as opposed to Republicans as myself, but the emails are completely underwhelming. Without more, this doesn’t rise to level of news. It can be easily read as crying wolf, which is a bad habit in a world of real wolves.
Posted by: Patrick Keyes | September 28, 2006, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
This is what comes from a bunch of liberal lunatics who tell kids, at the age of five, all about sex and how they should explore they sexuality out in the opem without shame but to report every and anyone who looks at you funny.
I remember being in school and having teachers… male or female… hugs us, stroke our hair, ask us questions about our families and likes/dislikes. It was harmless. It was caring about kids.
Today it is mistrusted and evily turned into something dirty.
Posted by: Karen | September 28, 2006, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
So how old is the page? If he is of concensual age then is there anything inappropriate. What baffles me is that this page didn’t work for Foley, so why was he contacting him. Surely he must have known he was rumored to be gay. Maybe Foley is into younger men. If the page had been a former page then it might be reasonable to assume that he was in his late legal teens or early twenties.
Posted by: Charlie | September 28, 2006, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
It’s time to call in Karl Rove, Sultan of Sleaze and Slinger of Slime. He and his amoral assistants can surely mount a quick swift-boating of a concerned, scared sixteen-year-old. Congressman Foley and the republicans can then celebrate their holy morality and ruination of a young man for exercising good judgment and civic responsibility.
Posted by: Jimmy Ep | September 28, 2006, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Never thought I’d see the day when the GOP would actually defend a pedophile. Anything to sustain a majority I guess… Sick people.
Posted by: Al | September 28, 2006, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
“This is a transparent attempt by ABC to unfairly label a Congressman as a pedophile. Have you no shame?”
Oh yeah, right, the liberal media boogeyman. And this would be the same liberal ABC that put out that piece of crap propaganda The Path to 9/11 a couple weeks ago? You’re right, ABC has no shame. And neither do you if you try to paint this as a “liberal media” witchhunt. This is just a case of media grabbing onto any voyeuristic sensationalism that they think will appeal to a sick society. Hell, Fox probably is covering it too.
As for the issue itself, it looks fishy but there’s hardly enough information there to convict a guy. I don’t think this deserves media attention, but then I’m just one of those permissive liberals so what do I know!
Posted by: President Lindsay | September 28, 2006, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
As a life-long member of the CA Democratic Party, and a gay man in middle age, I am somewhat disturbed by this story. Perhaps I am naive but I just don’t see wanton and overt pedophilia here. Not yet in any case. I sure hope the Democrats beat the be-jesus out of the Republicans and finally take Congress away from the control of the miserable rightwing yahoos like Bush, Cheney and Condia Rice. But at this point (with the information given) this story is character assasination of the Congressman and goes way too far even for this left-leaning Democrat.
Posted by: rick | September 28, 2006, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
So, I read this and thought – weird. Really weird. If I’m honest, if I received email like this, I’d think there were certainly overtures being made. It was just too personal and casual. Asking for a pic as well? It’s definitely weird.
Plausible deniability? Certainly…
Now the weird has turned into creepy after thinking about this further.
Posted by: TDiddy | September 28, 2006, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
I was a page for Congressman Foley about 4 years ago… He didn’t do or say anything inappropriate to me then. This does seem out of the line though.
Posted by: JMG | September 28, 2006, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Don’t blame the 16 year old – most his age yet to fully form what is appropriate and what isn’t – though he did do a better job than his correspondant. The congressman, on the other hand, should know pretty precisely what is okay and what isn’t. He ought to also know that when in public life, you not only avoid unwise behavior, you also avoid even the slightest appearance of it.
Posted by: Mark Wade Stone | September 28, 2006, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
Congressman Foley has been rumoured for years to be gay, well before this happened.
If this guy was a Democrat you can bet all the Repubs in this thread would be all over him.
Posted by: MQ | September 28, 2006, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
What a crap story….how much did the Democratics pay you people to run this …uhhhh….CRAP!!!!
Posted by: dave jimenez | September 28, 2006, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
There should be(there isn’t any) a level of respect this kid has for the senator. You have a character assassination taking place in this situation. “IF” something needed to be brought to the attention of the public there needed to be hard and sound information.
Posted by: Robert Habsberg-Guise | September 28, 2006, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
I had a stranger say “Hi” to me today–what a CREEEP!!!
Posted by: mjfay | September 28, 2006, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Looks like a class in “Stupid Proofing for Congressmen” is in order. I can’t believe someone this stupid is a congressman. It is bad enough Republicans lose seats in congress on election day but throwing a congressional seat away because you are an idiot is unacceptable!
Stupidity should be painful!
Posted by: mE2 | September 28, 2006, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
It seems as though a lot of people who are replying are make a link between homosexuality and a proclivity towards teenage boys. Are people implying that there is a connection between the two?
Posted by: Dylan | September 28, 2006, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Lastly, if it was well know in Florida that Foley is a homosexual man, could this entire situation have developed because the young man in question had heard some of the rumors and being a Republican page “overreacted” to the situation. I think the young man knew of Foley’s reputation and felt “creepy” because he felt that Foley found him attractive and was making harmless pointless banter with him. God….grow up…
Posted by: Robert Habsberg-Guise | September 28, 2006, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
its not a witch hunt and it is news if for no other reason that it is a widely known fact in FL that Foley is gay. There is NOTHING wrong with that but the pattern of unsavory and unethical behavior he has exhibited on MANY occassions to underage males is entirely inappropriate and relevant. its no ones business as to what he does in his personal life but it is our business if he overtly courts trouble and breaks laws. he is jim mcgreevey he just hasnt admitted it yet and once he does, he would be gladly accepted for what he is.
Posted by: Jonathan | September 28, 2006, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
I have written several e mails and letters to congressmen and senators. If I am lucky to get a response at all, it is in the form of a form letter from a staff member. I have never received a personal e mail from a legislator. What does the kid want for his birthday? Send me a picture? Yes, the Senator can explain this one away I am sure. But this kid isn’t stupid and neither am I.
Posted by: Boone | September 28, 2006, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
I think if you see the actual e-mails, it might clear up some of the uncertainty about their appropriateness.
To read them, it’s clear they are a little too friendly (and perhaps a bit creepy). If that’s the case, then it’s not an issue of whether Foley is gay or not, but the inappropriateness of a middle-aged man making advances toward a 16-year-old boy. Whether that inappropriateness rises to the level of misconduct, I don’t know; but it gives me pause.
Posted by: Mike V. | September 28, 2006, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
What a zero story! Honestly, maybe the page was just a good worker and this congressman was just appreciative of his efforts and innocently wished to get him a gift for a job well done. It is afterall hard to find good, honest, hardworking teenagers. Most just do minimal effort for their employers, just ask any that employs today’s youth!
Posted by: Ray | September 28, 2006, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Congressmen hitting on pages is an old story. Pages hitting on pages is an old story. Pages hitting on Congressmen is an old story. That’s life, folks. Get over it.
Posted by: Jim Miller | September 28, 2006, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
Well, all of the politicians and lawyers on both sides have succeeded in turning our society into a hate-filled and lawsuit-happy free-for-all. If we threw as many bombs at the terrorists as we throw at each other, then our troops would be long home.
As for the story about this 16 year old and the congressman, if the kid didn’t first express his discomfort to the congressman and see if the communication stopped, then I don’t see what the “news” value is here. Many people are just getting sick of some who seek their 15 seconds of fame by taking shots at public figures – hoping to maybe hit the lottery in the process.
Posted by: Stuart | September 28, 2006, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
When is ABC doing a follow-up on Ross’s report that House Speaker Dennis Hastert is being investigated by the FBI? Just wondering …
Posted by: Skeptical | September 28, 2006, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
In looking at the linked PDF file and the context, also in looking at how much has clearly been edited out of what’s been written, ABC’s doing a hack job. They are doing what the times did this past weekend in presenting the portion of the intelligence report they saw fit to divulge. Integrity is not so important to newspeople, whenever you see those little … there are important bits of text missing that might change the entire meaning of a sentance or paragraph. For instance the section where age is mentioned in the email it looks like part of an ongoing conversation. What has been left out intentionally? Where it looks like the boy might have mentioned something about his birthday having passed recently. If that’s the case, then why would ABC have left that part of the conversation out? To mislead? To cast doubt? If my guess is right I hope a good lawyer gets to abuse them properly but if it obstructs with an election I hope a bunch of them go to prison for many a year.
Posted by: Interesting editing | September 28, 2006, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
I’d like to know the financial concerns of the boy’s parents. Sounds like some manipulation is going on.
Posted by: G | September 28, 2006, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Here’s a quick test. If you are a straight male over 30 years old, would you ever request a pic of a 16 year old male, via email or otherwise?
Posted by: GRG | September 28, 2006, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Another day…another low for the MSM.
What sensationalist nonsense. Extremely irresponsible to run with this story given the destructiveness of the implied accusation and the lack of evidence. Shameful.
Posted by: Jess Edwards | September 28, 2006, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
I used to work for a Congressman in his Washington, DC office. I also supervised the intern program and the Page recommendations. We always requested a photo of the staffer or page that we sponsored. In Fact, we typically had a photographer come in and photograph the Congressman with the intern or page. One copy went to the person, the other was kept on file.
Although, Foley always did seem a little strange
Posted by: Former staff member | September 28, 2006, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
I’m another somewhat-democrat here who thinks that Bush has been the worst Pres ever, but I agree that this is a complete non-issue. How rediculous. Our culture has become over sensitive to things. Everything has become so politicized. I’m a registered Dem, because I believe that they are more moral at the core, but I’m not so ideological that I think that all Dems are pure and good, while all Reps are evil. There are parts of both platforms that I agree with, and parts I think are crap. This is crap.
Posted by: Chris | September 28, 2006, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Ross… Liberal tool… enough said.
Posted by: Ron | September 28, 2006, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Republican or not has nothing to do with it. Yes, there are gay republicans!!!!
And yes, this guy (the congressman) was looking for trouble!
Posted by: Joker | September 28, 2006, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
I’m perfectly happy to see actual scandals involving Republicans, of which there is an abundance. These e-mails, if that’s all there is, don’t qualify. One wonders what’s going on here, but it could be completely innocent. “Sick, sick, sick” is a gross overstatement.
Posted by: Frederick | September 28, 2006, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Foley was my rep when I lived in Florida. I’ve been in his office and met his staff. Everyone knows he is gay hypocrite, but there are plenty of straight hypocrites as well, so no big deal. BUT Foley is obviously coming on to this 16 year old and that’s a real problem. Foley has never been good for Florida and it’s time for him to go.
Posted by: Dan | September 28, 2006, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
I think this could be construed as totally innocent. Congressmen are human too and if they nature is friendly or have a weak moment and being friendly to a 16years old may have been a way of venting out in a friendly way to an unknown innocent, I don’t see how that could be such a news. and I too am a certified Bush hater.
Posted by: Toni | September 28, 2006, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
The moral of the story here is: if its not your kid do not under any circumstances have any contact with them. I am talking to the normals out there, if someone is a pedophile nothing will stop them, but if you’re not for your own protection just stay away from other peoples kids. If you’re a Republican don’t even look at a kid because the liberal media will nail you to the wall and the sick liberals will sling mud at you. Yes people that is what this country has come too. Welcome to the new tolerant leftwing PC America!
Posted by: Sam Ludlum | September 29, 2006, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Everyone knows Foley is gay. Biggest closest case around.
Posted by: Tony | September 29, 2006, 12:22 am 12:22 am
I was in the Navy (USS Frederick)during the first Gulf war and we received mail from grade school kids. Many of us wrote back, I know I did and asked many of the same questions. I didn’t ask about birthdays but I did send ship memorabilia. I’m just glad the DNC wasn’t envolved. Who knows how much trouble the Navy and the schools that sponsored those letters would have gotten into if they were. “Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.” Freud
Posted by: Kevin | September 29, 2006, 12:23 am 12:23 am
I haven’t read all the posts, so if mine is redundant; please forgive.
Unless this man has a history of strange acts, you shouldn’t come to any sort of a conclusion. Sometimes things are nothing more than what they are.
Posted by: Charles Shampine | September 29, 2006, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Had this been a liberal Democratic congressman sending similar E-mails to underage pages, the conservative posters here criticizing the attacks on Rep. Mark Foley would be all over the liberal congressman and making a big stink out of it.
Conservatives are such hypocrites. They talk out of both sides of their mouths.
Posted by: Andrew in Phoenix | September 29, 2006, 1:09 am 1:09 am
here’s the deal…it’s just not appropriate for ANY adult to ask for a picture of a teenager at ANY time.
I would call this an error in judgement at the most, though not exactly front page news, certainly good enough for A15 or so.
Posted by: Dogbert | September 29, 2006, 1:35 am 1:35 am
I searched the archives and could not find any article written by these two so-called journalists about Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. In that case, more than an email was exchanged. It would be so nice to find a journalist who is actually unbiased and who actually has integrity. If anyone finds such a rare creature, please let me know.
Posted by: Michael Michalko | September 29, 2006, 1:37 am 1:37 am
There’s a perfectly valid reason for asking how old the kid is. A quick google search shows the age of consent in Florida is 18, in D.C. it is 16.
As a survivor of sexual abuse a child, this sounds eerily reminiscent of my own experience with an older pedophile. My read is that Foley was trying discreetly to find out if the page was legal to pursue.
Posted by: Smartypants | September 29, 2006, 2:19 am 2:19 am
To give some context, I’m a Republican, and a conservative Christian. I think that if someone wrote my son (he’s only 18 months now, but work with me) this email, I would be a little uncomfortable. But then, I would monitor the situation, and see what happened. If Foley did say anything inappropriate that would actually point to something illegal, *then* I would do something.
Call me crazy, but giving someone such a damaging label as “child molester” based on these messages is premature.
Posted by: Jon Craft | September 29, 2006, 2:34 am 2:34 am
This is completely inappropriate for a grown man let alone a congressman. If you moron Republican apologists can’t see that this guy is showing more than casual interest in a KID then you need to get your heads checked.
He’s trying to talk like a teen, which is sickening for a grown man, and he’s hoping to give gifts and receive pictures. What more do you need?
The language is not that of a mentor giving advice to a young man, quite the opposite, it’s chatty: “…wow thats really hot…well did you miss DC…” He’s hoping they can be ‘buds’ and ‘hang out.’
Posted by: Greg | September 29, 2006, 4:41 am 4:41 am
This isn’t BS. I have a friend who used to be a paige whom Foley also came onto. Nothing happened, but you have to wonder given the apparent frequency if at some point, something with someone did.
Posted by: utuby | September 29, 2006, 4:53 am 4:53 am
So what happened? Is this a story? I’m missing the news here. A congressman asked a voluteer page what he wanted for his birthday… did I miss something?
Posted by: tiger | September 29, 2006, 6:37 am 6:37 am
A quick review of the Congressional Page program reveals that pages are run out of a page office as more or less messengers and are only there for one month. Gee, is it possible that Mr. Foley didn’t quite remember which one of the twenty or thirty pages that were in and out of his office was requesting a recommendation?
Posted by: Don | September 29, 2006, 6:50 am 6:50 am
Nasty disgusting pedofile. This is really pathetic…
Posted by: JerryK | September 29, 2006, 6:58 am 6:58 am
I am a gay Democrat who was abused when I was 13. The general tone of the e-mails is fairly similar to what happened to me. My abuser was less subtle but perhaps abusers have gotten better at their “craft”.
I’m torn on what it all means based on the limited amount of info we know. It’s true that everything I read so far is consistent with predatory sexual behavior. It’s also true that nothing has been presented which conclusively proves anything.
I’ll say one thing though, the question about what he wanted for his birthday really hit me as questionable. This was, according to Foley’s people, a professional type of contact and the context of the question…imbedded between comments of a non-professional nature, makes the question seem personal.
Posted by: Don | September 29, 2006, 6:59 am 6:59 am
Scoop: Mark Antony says that Julius Caeser once took Octavian, the boy who would be Caeser Augustus, as a lover.
It all adds up! Somebody call Brian Ross for the exclusive!
Posted by: dave | September 29, 2006, 7:00 am 7:00 am
As someone who regularly writes to her reps in Washington, I can say using personal email is not unusual. I’ve gotten alot of replys from aol accounts. I’d also like to add it’s the Repubs that tend to personally reply, and the Dems that send a standard form letter or a reply email, letting me know they’ll get back to me.
Posted by: Debi | September 29, 2006, 7:11 am 7:11 am
Ask those that know Mark, and the fact that he’s interested in young men won’t surprise.
Posted by: ruth | September 29, 2006, 7:23 am 7:23 am
Well the Congressman is openly GAY so i think that is how this became news.
Posted by: Scott | September 29, 2006, 7:27 am 7:27 am
I agree that he fact Foley used his personal e-mail address is the biggest red flag to me. The office address is public communication. Therefore, why would Foley send official correspondence through an aol account?
It is also my immediate perception that many of the previous comments were sent by Foley himself, or his supporters. They sounded like the same voice.
Posted by: sea | September 29, 2006, 7:34 am 7:34 am
Com’on Brian…Gimme a Break……
Wasted time and effort on “low hanging fruit”. Surely the world has more worthy news to offer than this stuff….
I’ll check CNN out to see if this was time & space worthy to them…
Posted by: dreek | September 29, 2006, 7:58 am 7:58 am
Dan Rather is working on the memo right now to prove he is guilty as alleged. It will probably be “leaked” to the NY Times
Posted by: Right Wing Conspiritor | September 29, 2006, 8:00 am 8:00 am
The congressman isn’t too bright, big clue: he still uses AOL, what an idiot! The story is non-news, hyped up to make it seem more than it is.
Posted by: Curiousgeo | September 29, 2006, 8:09 am 8:09 am
i can’t believe that you would insinuate that the congressman was up to something no good on nothing more than the flimsy basis of this exchange. thats sad.
actually, i can believe it. thats sad, too…
Posted by: Michael | September 29, 2006, 8:13 am 8:13 am
I’ve worked on the Hill for many years. If the congressman was simply wanting to obtain information for his office files, it should have been done from a House account, not his personal account. Totally unprofessional. And to do this during an election year just shows poor judgement for a sitting U.S. congressman, whether he is gay or not.
Posted by: Bob | September 29, 2006, 8:21 am 8:21 am
I’m a democrat, and I too have to say Brian, you are really streching for stories here. It’s sad you have to stoop this low. It’s people like you that have ruined our party.
Posted by: Lori | September 29, 2006, 8:49 am 8:49 am
This is NOT the first time a MALE Congressional staffer has reported Foley’s overly friendly behavior towards them. Has the Congressman ever denied being gay? If he did deny it, wouldanyone really believe him? This is well known in DC.
Posted by: L" | September 29, 2006, 9:07 am 9:07 am
What concerns me, is that so far all that is printed is one sided! Yes taken alone they sound on the border line of inappropriateness, but if they are in response to the teens questions, then what is the problem??
I would like to know why the teen was contacting this particular congressman, for a recommedation, in the first place,since he did not work in his office.
So how about everyone step back, take a breath and see what happens before convicting the congressman or teen for anything.
Posted by: mom | September 29, 2006, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Foley comments on how hot the teens friend is, then chats about hes getting pumped up exercising as well.
He was prossibly trolling.
Posted by: Steve | September 29, 2006, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Foley writes: “such a nice guy … acts much older than his age … and hes (sic) in really great shape.”
I cannot read this any other way than, “he’s got a great body.” Is nd frankly, this is hardly the first scandal involving closeted congressmen and pages… doesn’t anyone this appropriate for an email to a 16 year old? “really great shape” means “hot body.” There are no two ways about it.
Posted by: Corn | September 29, 2006, 9:34 am 9:34 am
My then thirteen year old daughter was targeted by a pedophile online, and this is EXACTLY how it started. Seemingly innocent emails expressing interest, offering friendship. Don’t be naive, there is no reason for this type of interest by a fifty year old man in a sixteen year old boy to whom he is not related. This is why pedophilia is such a hard crime to prevent, people are too afraid to offend someone by suggesting that their behavior is inappropriate, or report that inappropriate behavior to a person in authority. Wake up!
Posted by: Diane | September 29, 2006, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Foley writes in another email about the intern:
I just emailed REDACTED…hes such a nice guy…acts much older than his age…and hes in really great shape…i am just finished riding my bike on a 25 mile journey now headed to the gym…whats school like for you this year?
Answer that one! ‘He’s in really great shape’?!?!?! This guy was trolling for boys. And he’s on the commision that is supposed to protect our kids from pedophiles! Get him off the commission now!
Posted by: Will | September 29, 2006, 10:20 am 10:20 am
I cannot believe how many people would defend this guy. Anything to stay in power I guess. Let’s suppose there turns out to be a lot more to this, are you going to come back here and apologize? I think not.
Posted by: Will | September 29, 2006, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Hmmm lets see…where there is smoke there is fire, he doth protest too much. Mr. Foley has been like a crazed man battling and seeking laws against sex offenders…I have always been suspicious of the motives of rabid individuals. Usually this is to cover up what THEY are doing. These emails definitely sound like grooming behavior. Since Mr. Foley is so very active in the area of sex offenders, he should be very aware of this and therefor would/should never indulge in the very behavior he would warn, and attempt to prosecute others on. In other words, Mr. Foley knows better than to indulge in this behavior…unless he just couldn’t help himself (wink, wink)
Posted by: Cheryl | September 29, 2006, 10:47 am 10:47 am
It is entirely possible that the congressman has a sexual interest in the page. There are many Republican politicians who are married, with children but are actually gay or bi. This is, I realize, incredibly ironic since many of these same politicians are very vociferous in their support for measures that marginalize gays.
Posted by: Garry | September 29, 2006, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Imagine if this had been a teacher, they would have lost their job. Republicans need to be at least as accountable as those they say needs more accountability.
Posted by: Dave | September 29, 2006, 11:20 am 11:20 am
is’t there news going on somewhere? i’m a liberal democrat, but plese don’t feed partisan paranoid crap to our public as if it were news.
Posted by: Mike | September 29, 2006, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Listen at you stupid neocons! Calling a pederast a liberal smear. This man likes to hit on 16 year old boys, and yet you neocons defend him. You people are sick.
Posted by: Jeff | September 29, 2006, 11:40 am 11:40 am
I think it is a sad day when a young man makes his feelings public about inappropriateness by an adult, and all people can say is he is trying to smear that person. My gut reaction is this man is coming on to this child.
Why would he send emails from a personal account, instead of his congressional account, or have a staffer, write it and he sign it?
How many other pages did he send personal emails to that did not work in his office?
This screams of impropriety, whether his is a democrat or republican. The public should be concerned for the child involved and stop bashing him and turn their attention to the adult involved whether politician or not.
I am sure if you had a 16 year old who received emails from a politician from his PERSONAL account and not an offical account it would raise red flags.
Posted by: patw | September 29, 2006, 11:42 am 11:42 am
I think this kid has the right to be upset. Paranoid??? No!!! That’s the way guys get to kids…make them feel important and then jump them and take what they want. IF this senator and his people were honest about the emails, why didn’t he use his legislative email instead of his personal one? That indicates that there’s too much personal intent in the messages sent. Also, why the picture??? IF it’s really needed, why didn’t they get it before he left or why didn’t one of the office assistants call the kid and ask for it??? Too much, too much…. Good for the boy for hanging in and outing this guy for what he did… It took a LOT of courage!!! IF he felt weird about the emails, that is a strong indicator that there was something wrong. God has a way of letting us know when we are in danger… This boy was smart in paying attention to his gut feelings…
Posted by: Patricia | September 29, 2006, 11:45 am 11:45 am
The number of Foley apologists here is simply sad. People, this kid used to work for Foley. You think he maybe met him? Er, yeah. Chances are, SOMETHING else happened to creep this kid out.
I am biased on this by my background: in the past, as a lawyer, I have represented school districts who have to fire teachers for sexually harassing students. The students I have interviewed tell the same stories: they ignore the first few comments because they think the person is kidding, or they think they are overreacting. They only tell someone (usually another kid) when they are creeped out enough to feel unsafe. That this kid came forward tells me that there were other things, not recorded on paper, that happened with this guy. And the fact that the cons posting here refuse to put on their thinking caps says a lot.
Posted by: B-Rob | September 29, 2006, 11:58 am 11:58 am
I can’t believe how some of my fellow republicans can just dismiss this as innocent! You people must not have kids! All in the name of victory in November I suppose. Voting republican is not worth this. I’m voting for the democrat!
Posted by: Registered republican | September 29, 2006, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
As a resident of Foley’s congressional district I can tell you that his opponent is going all out with smear and misinformation. Regardless, Foley will still win in a landslide. He is a very good congressman and represents us well.
Posted by: Bill | September 29, 2006, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
I’m not a Republican or a Democrat. I’m not even American. I’m a Canadian who finds American attitudes across the political spectrum to be baffling and frightening, to say the least. I simply ask you all to disregard the gender of both the Congressman and the page, and even disregard the fact that this story concerns a public official, and look only at the content of the e-mails. An adult used a personal e-mail account, weeks after the teen’s internship had ended, to contact the teen and ask personal questions. There is no way that this person was contacting the youth in the context of that internship, and if you’ll just look at this as a story about two human beings, you can’t help but see that. Why must Americans insist on dehumanizing everyone, and turning everything into a political issue? This has nothing to do with politics, it has to do with an adult preying on a child. And yes, at 16, he IS still a child.
Posted by: C Elkin | September 29, 2006, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
If this boy was a former page of a different congressman- why would he be asked “What do you want for your birthday”. Is it customary for congressmen to have this type of chatter with former pages who didn’t even work for them? I don’t know what the motives would be for requesting this information- it wouldn’t seem necessary just to give a reference. Just seems alittle strange to me- and the congressmans office did confirm that he did indeed send these emails. I don’t think it matters what political party he’s with- I’m just looking at this being a situation involving an adult in a position of power and a minor
Posted by: Hmmm | September 29, 2006, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
I don’t have a problem with this kid reporting his uncomfortability with this, as I’m a firm believer in “better safe than sorry”. However, I don’t see anything suspicious here, though I’m sure that the Democrats will try to have a field day with this. Just remember…most people are turned off by negative campaigning.
Oh, and Congressman Foley? I like to play music, watch football and write software. I would really like a 12-string guitar for my birthday (last week). Pics on the way.
Posted by: Brian Levine | September 29, 2006, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
While it could be a smear campaign, i can totally understand the concern of the page. I too received “interesting” comments from Mark Foley. I didn’t think anything of it at the time. Looking back though, his comments could have been questionable. Many people would be surprised to find out about the gay subculture that exists on the hill.
Posted by: A Former Page | September 29, 2006, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
I would say it was about time for both of you self-absorbed Democrats and Republicans to take your head out of the sand.
The only important thing here is how the boy felt. If he was uncomfortable, then there was probably something wrong with the emails.
Posted by: Sue | September 29, 2006, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
It is funny how this works. This is the guy who promotes the witch hunt on ex-sex offenders; 90% of them who should not be on the list. Now his followers and himself are crying about being under the scrutiny. How many Constitutional Rights has this idiot taken from ex-sex offenders and their families just to grandstand for his own purpose. I hope this moron is ran through the coals.
Posted by: Matt | September 29, 2006, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
{“Foley’s office says it is their policy to keep pictures of former interns and anyone who may ask for a recommendation on file so they can remember them.”}
I’m a bit confused. Was this teen-ager a page with Foley’s office? From the quote within the story it seems the boy was an intern within Foley’s office. My nephew worked as a page in one of our state senator’s offices. The senator knew the pages within his office during each session.
As a parent of grown children and teen-agers, I would question the judgement of someone wanting a picture of my child, especially one for whom he had worked at one time. Foley may have innocently wanted the pic to remember who the kid was; however, say that in the email.
Posted by: purplefarmer | September 29, 2006, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
I wonder how many of the Republican dittoheads defending Foley know he’s gay, and how their opinion would change if he was a gay Democratic Senator, instead…?
Read some messages by pedophiles to kids — they all start out just like that email.
Sorry GOP voters, but fair is fair. This guy is shady as hell, and you know it. Is the safety of a minor less important to you than your blind partisanship?
Posted by: Sui_Generis | September 29, 2006, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
If it doesn’t feel right…it’s not right. Give the young man some credit……
Posted by: Grannyrock | September 29, 2006, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
As a father I would be concerned about any adult that was not family or a close personl friend asking my child “what they wanted for thier birthday” and asking them to send a photo of themself. I think there may be a mistake on the Congressman’s part but he certainly leaves open the opportunity of doubt about his motives. If I was the child’s parent I would confront him on these motives.
-Bela
Posted by: Bela | September 29, 2006, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Here are two questions that no one seems to be asking, and they are of vital importance in beginning to decide who did what, and why:
Who intiated this e-mail activity, and how did that person get the other one’s e-mail address?
If the kid is the one that started the whole thing, that would put a completely different spin on things, wouldn’t it? There are some very basic questions here that no one seems to be asking, or even interested in.
Posted by: Walker Evans | September 29, 2006, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
I didn’t see what the Congressman’s e-mails responded to. I understand the student mentioned that he’d celebrated his birthday. In a friendly conversation, the Congressman could easily have asked “oh, how old were you” and “what did you want for your birthday”. Additionally, I understand the student wanted a recommendation. If the congressman wanted to help, but couldn’t put a name to a face, perhaps he wanted a basic picture to help. I had to refresh a professor’s memory when I wanted a recommendation after graduating from college. He wanted to remember who I was and also be able to cite specific things I’d done in his law school recommendation. I’m guessing the student did NOT get a recommendation from the Congressman after raising this stink. I didn’t vote for Bush and I don’t really like this Congressman at all, but I don’t think this is a big deal.
Posted by: Jen | September 29, 2006, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Silly people, read the included pdf emails.
The real question here is why… does… this… guy… have… such… a… curious… affinity… for… ellipses…? Talk about sick; there’s your red flag. Kid’s right. It… is… creepy…. All those damn dots would freak me out, too.
Anyway, any reason to hate a winger is a good one!
Posted by: Ceej | September 29, 2006, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
We have taught our kids to be wary of unsolicited gifts and requests, this kid obviously felt this wasn’t exactly appropriate and said something, for which of course he will be slim ed. Now if this were a Democratic Congressman, he would be wiretapped, investigated, his bank accounts seized and probably be on the Rove surveillance list. But then it’s a Republican so it’s o.k. I mean they are the MORAL MAJORITY RIGHT? Grannysue
Posted by: Sue Filutze | September 29, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
I wish all of our children had the sense to be suspect of an adult asking questions like this. This is so totally not political!
Posted by: roz | September 29, 2006, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Hmmm. The posts here are more entertaining than the actual event. :)
It’s possible for the scenario to be legitimately read in one of two ways — whether pro- or anti-Foley. Find out more information before taking such extremist stances and slandering each other’s motivations.
The November elections might not actually tear the country apart, if we bothered to listen and think about the other point of view once in a while.
Posted by: DMc | September 29, 2006, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Instead of saying yes that is wrong the republican brain washed Americans are trying to make excuses and blame it on the Dem. give me a break and take responsibility. Just admit it, it is not looking good for republicans.
Posted by: jace | September 29, 2006, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
NOT NEWS, NOT EVER CLOSE.
Posted by: amcghee | September 29, 2006, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Its common knowledge in south Florida that Foley is gay. He has been propt up as the GOPs token gay . That being said,for anyone to say that this guy was asking innocent questions is the ultimate flip-flop of all time. Thats why only naive people vote republican .Ilove to listen to a republican pop off as if they are the worlds authority on law enforcement and crime fighting, yet they are not smart enough to see a predator stalking a potential victim.Riddle me this batman… How long should a victim wait to tell an adult that another adult is asking bizarre questions? I cant wait for this b.s. answer.
Posted by: GPWPB | September 29, 2006, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Everyone knows Foley is gay. That’s old news. And while I never paged on capitol hill, a friend of mine did. He said people would be shocked at how sleezy a lot of these congressmen are. Hitting on young boys and girls is par for the course for a lot of these guys. I suspect this is just the tip of the iceberg. There are probably a lot more children out there Foley has done a lot more than email with. It’s time to call Dateline. This Congressman just got busted.
Posted by: Thad | September 29, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
All this talk about left wing media trying to damage the credibility of a Republican. We all know that they need no help in destroying their own credibility. If this was so irrelivent, why did he resign?
Posted by: Kevin | September 29, 2006, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Another defeat for “Values Voters” The hypocracy continues. Se. Foley just announced he will withdraw from the Senate race. Apparently there are other e-mails to young men surfacing. The closet is a terrible thing…for an ex-Govenor and now a Republican
Posted by: John McLaren | September 29, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
CNN just reported that Foley is stepping down. They report he is concerned over other e-mails that are more explicit becoming public.
Posted by: Newton | September 29, 2006, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Excuse me. Why is he resigning? His health?
Posted by: Jerry | September 29, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
This seems pretty innocent to me. I think this intern sieze the opportunity to slander the congressman. I am pretty sure that an investigation has been conducted…what is puzzling…why did her resign???? Is there something he is affraid of??? If not the worst thing to do is to give up…We must fight for what is right and not be so quick to give up…this leaves questionable doubt to many as to his innocense.
Posted by: WiseOne | September 29, 2006, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
and the innocent congressman resigns over an innocent email.
russia’s big and so is china.
Posted by: unhipcat | September 29, 2006, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
It’s just amazing how you conservatives get all up in arms when the press makes a report on Republicans. All of a sudden the media, is anti Bush. I bet if the report was against a Democrat, you conservatives would be saying see I told you so. Way to go, you would be praising the press. God forbid anyone attacks Republicans. The so called party of the wealthy, the inclusive party that is filled with racists. If it’s an attack on Democrats it’s ok, but Republicans then you question. You conservatives make me sick, nothing but a bunch of hypocrites.
Posted by: ronan | September 29, 2006, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Check the news now, seems the misunderstood senator is putting in his resignation after other interns have come forward. I applaude the young man for coming forward and shining some light on the cockroaches we call politicians. When will we as a society finially put an end to the abuse of our children?
Posted by: cuda | September 29, 2006, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
So for all of you above that thought this was a liberal smear attack what do you think now?
Posted by: Espynb | September 29, 2006, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Well, Foley just resigned. What do all you people who defended him have to say now?
Posted by: smarterthanyou | September 29, 2006, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
If there weren’t any truth beind it, he wouldn’t have resigned. Another hypocrite bites the dust.
Posted by: Reality | September 29, 2006, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Ya gotta love it! Wonder what his voting record is on gay rights? You know, those consenting ADULTS acting in private. Another self-righteous, right wing, judgemental Republican in the closet while persecuting gays. I’m personally glad that this filth resigned.
Posted by: Mark | September 29, 2006, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Congressman Foley just resigned. Where there’s smoke?
Posted by: Steven Doss | September 29, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
I read the e-mails this morning, and they creeped me out, but I didn’t think there was enough substance to have any impact. But, I guess I didn’t think that he might have been pervy to other kids, too.
Sad. I don’t know anything about this guy’s record, but what a way to ruin a career.
Posted by: Makr1964 | September 29, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
I am sure that the furor, and the reason that the congressman so quickly resigned, were not due to his embarassment over this seemingly inocuous message, but were due to other emails that were reported:
“Hours earlier, ABC News had read excerpts of instant messages provided by former pages who said the congressman, under the AOL Instant Messenger screen name Maf54, made repeated references to sexual organs and acts.”
If the page had seen other, more explicit messages, he would certainly have cause for concern.
Posted by: Open Mind | September 29, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Oops he just resigned. Guess it was kind of a big deal after all.
Posted by: OOps | September 29, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Well, it’s all academic now-he’s resigned…Just adds to the suspicion, maybe he fears much nastier stuff will come out?
This happened w/MD GOP Cong. Bob Bauman in 1980, except he was actually charged with some lewd act on a young man in a restroom, ewwww.
Posted by: philip | September 29, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
And he’s now resigning after sexually explicit Instant Messages were found where he talks about underage boys’ sexual organs.
Not so much the witch hunt you right wingers thought, eh? I guess maybe the kid wasn’t so much confused as he was….exactly right.
Huh.
Posted by: Dan | September 29, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
This might be totally innocent, or it might not. But all of you people touting the tired “it’s just the the liberal media to attacking republicans again” seem to be neglecting one crucial aspect. If the e-mails are nothing innappropriate, why is Foley resigning for fear of other emails being used against him? Imagine that, republicans ignoring key evidence in order to advance their agenda? Who’d a thunk it?
He could be a perv, or just a little strange but harmless. But I’m inclined to believe there is at least a little something to this if he’s resigning 40 days before the election.
Posted by: Bryan | September 29, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
It is inappropriate any how you slice it dice it or try to minimize it. The man needs to find other friends – leave little kids alone! Stop supporting these people who keep targeting our little kids! It cannot be tolerated in any way!
Posted by: summer | September 29, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Wow.. put yourself in the kid’s shoes. No matter what your age or gender, it’s creepy for someone you work with to want a picture of you. Since when has any office kept a personal file of pictures of interns???? Get it from the HR dept! They have everyone’s pictures from when they get a photo ID pass.
But what i’m curious about is where it says in the article that “hours earlier ABC released a report” that this guy made references to “organs”…? Where exactly is that because i can’t find it.
Posted by: Nina | September 29, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Well gosh, I guess there was something behind this after all. The ability of some people to make excuses for any and all behavior from Republicans is truly sickening.
Posted by: Bobo | September 29, 2006, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
When the truth comes out about Republicans, they blame it on “liberal” media. How wretched an excuse!
Foley would not be resigning unless he knows there’s a pile of incriminating evidence against him. The emails revealed so far are just a lead-in to more that will be shown later by broadcast. GOP apologists should therefore not bother trying to insult everyone’s intelligence by whining that the lead-in emails aren’t “that bad.” Foley knows better.
Posted by: A+ | September 29, 2006, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Foley Resigns. Ha! What a perv!
Posted by: redjellydonut | September 29, 2006, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
If there is nothing to this story, then why is Foley resigning? If these emails were truly as innocent as some people on this post think they are, then why isn’t he fighting to defend his reputation? And all the crap about this being a left wing witchhunt, I think Republicans know quite a bit about witchhunts (remember Whitewater?). Both sides use the controversies of the opposite party to their advantage, that’s American Politics isn’t it?
Posted by: James Zyon | September 29, 2006, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Hey republicans! WHY DID MARK FOLEY RESIGN???
Heh,heh……another pedophile republican bites the dust!
Posted by: buffyb | September 29, 2006, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Ha, ha. He just resigned! If he was so innocent as so many of you Republicans claim, then why would he resign?
Posted by: BlueTexan | September 29, 2006, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
How did Foley know that the kid had an upcoming birthday? Was he researching his background before the call? You wouldn’t ask that question out of nowhere.
Posted by: L M.W. | September 29, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Anyone still think this is a witch hunt???? Must be tough being a conservative Republican these days. What with a phedophile running the abused children committee, legalizing torture, driving the defecit out of control, believing gay marriage is more important than any other issue in America, failing miserably at the war on terror, not even trying to capture or kill Bin Laden, and presiding over a civil war in Iraq…. Man I wish I could run on that record. Stop the insanity, vote Democratic in November.
Posted by: Matt | September 29, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
I only have 2 words to say to our right-leaning friends:
Got him!
hehehe, see you in november…
Posted by: harry clark | September 29, 2006, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Er, uh… OK, I’m not a fan of Repub congressmen, but it seemed on the innocent side to me — until Foley abruptly resigned today.
Whassup? Does this mean the opposition smear campaign is THAT powerful? Or is there a spark in there amongst the smoke?
Posted by: Mojo | September 29, 2006, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
And now he’s out o’ there. Another Republican bites the dust for an unconscionable lack of ethics.
Posted by: DKB | September 29, 2006, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
The guy just resigned. Turns out the emails contained explict references to sex organs and acts. I guess it wasn’t just “partisan paranoid crap.”
Posted by: Steve | September 29, 2006, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Foley’s resignation is tantamount to an admission of guilt. By the end of today’s news cycle we’ll have discovered that Foley behaved inappropriately with many youngsters.
Where are the apologies and “my bads” of those who not only supported Foley but slandered those who were suspicious of Foley’s behaviour.
Rich
Posted by: Rich | September 29, 2006, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Given the fact that the Congressman just resigned, with profound apologies to his wife and constituents, I’d say there was definitely something “untoward” about his conduct toward underage interns, and it’s not just an invention of ‘left wing media’
Posted by: windrider | September 29, 2006, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Leftist media witch hunt ?
Ummmm…who broke the story again ?
ABC ?
The same ABC that aired “Path to 911″ …yeah, really leftist indeed.
Posted by: dabinduppes | September 29, 2006, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Well, he’s resigned. Doubtful he’d do that without reason. ABC News has some info that haven’t given out. There was a link early on to the actual emails that got pulled. I think there was much more to this than has been revealed. Latest reports indicate the guy also contacted other male pages with sexual overtones via text message. This man knew he was caught and was just trying to overcome his grief after spending so long trying to hide it behind his position. It’s a sick twisted tale.
Posted by: The Informer | September 29, 2006, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Uh guys he resigned.
Posted by: BusMan | September 29, 2006, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
To all of you out there who accuse Mr. Ross of being a gossip monger – here is the headline of the hour:
FOLEY TO RESIGN OVER SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MESSAGES TO MINORS. Yes, the conservative congressman from Florida – who advocates the safety of children (yea right), resigned effective immediately. Maybe you all ought to check facts before you accuse … oh yea, that’s right not your style. Thank you Mr. Ross for your excellent reporting. And good riddance to another sexual predator from the right.
Posted by: pc | September 29, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Um he just resigned from Congress
Posted by: Dreyno | September 29, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
If you look at the other emails related to this story and the Congressman’s comments about one his pages “acting older than he really is . . . and he’s in really great shape” and you don’t think there might be something suspect, then you are living in a delusional world.
Posted by: BIA | September 29, 2006, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
I guess all those Republicans who thought there was nothing wrong with Foley’s behaviour will have to wonder why he resigned so quickly. Yes, the way Foley approached the young man is exactly classic pedophile strategy. And the think that Foley was Chair of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children-so he could learn some tips? Is he also a closet member of NAMBLA?
Posted by: Sheila | September 29, 2006, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
If this investigation is an unfounded witch hunt, why did the Congressman resign and apologize?
Posted by: Claire | September 29, 2006, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
If the man wasn’t a goofball, we wouldn’t have a reason to resign now wouldn’t he? When will elected officials WORK for a living – and simply made their districts a better place?
Posted by: Joe N. | September 29, 2006, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
I wouldn’t have thought anything of the emails either, until I heard his statement:
“I am deeply sorry and I apologize for letting down my family and the people of Florida I have had the privilege to represent,” he said in a statement issued by his office.
Why would have have resigned, effective immediately, if there wasn’t something funny going on?
Posted by: Lani | September 29, 2006, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
If the congressman is innocent, why resign? If I were falsey accused I’d hold on to my office and fight to clear my name.
Posted by: peter | September 29, 2006, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
I love reading all the quotes from the Republican’s at the beginning of this page now that he has resigned, especially the word “Witch-Hunt”
Posted by: Dan | September 29, 2006, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
What do all those defenders of Foley think now that he has resigned?
Posted by: jahgreen | September 29, 2006, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
in whatever context foley corresponded with this boy, it’s plain wrong! i wouldn’t want a grown man emailing any of my children asking for a picture. it’s just sick.
Posted by: javas | September 29, 2006, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
I’ll sit this one out and wait for more info before believing one way or the other, but, the hair on my neck still went on end when I read the story. It also disturbs me that he resigned so quickly.
Posted by: bentsmom | September 29, 2006, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Warning to anyone who runs for office: If you demonstrate that you care about the well being of anyone in your office it will be twisted to imply sexual harassment!
Posted by: Jason D | September 29, 2006, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Why do you blame Brian Ross or Democrats for a Smear Campain? It was the Congressional Page that freaked out and perceived the e-mail exchange as “sick”. It was also the page that reported this. If you want to blame someone, blame the boy for making this out to be more than it was. It’s the media’s job to report such things. If it had been a democrat you sending e-mails to a page you would immediately call him a pedophile and demand his resignation. The usual conservative double standard and lack of integrity is disgusting!
You have to wonder why Foley resigned so easily? A guilty conscience perhaps? Maybe Foley isn’t as innocent as you make him out to be.
Posted by: Floosie | September 29, 2006, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
If nothing is wrong, why resign? Where there is smoke there is fire.
Posted by: KG | September 29, 2006, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
If this is an innocent exchange of e-mails, then why did the Senator resign and not defend himself? This is a very strange action for someone who is being portrayed as an innocent person being slammed by the other party. Politics aside, why did he resign???
Posted by: Jeff | September 29, 2006, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Ha! For all you conservatives who tried to dismiss this as a completely unfounded “non-story” and the others who, in your comments, sounded like you were defending Foley as a “victim” of a smear campaign. You’re all pretty quiet now that the man has just resigned from Congress after ABC called him out on being a sick-o pedophile.
Posted by: Hill Staffer | September 29, 2006, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Hey you conspiracy idiots “FOLEY RESIGNS”.
Total sexual predator but you can say it was a smear campaign all you want and believe it.
Cannot wait to see how many others he has set up for propositions.
Posted by: Patrick | September 29, 2006, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
In the emails he is trying to
get personal info on what he likes and do.
He will later use this to try to lure this 16yr boy in.
He is a gay pedofile.
Posted by: Tony | September 29, 2006, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
The blinded Folley Followers are sure quiet now. Seems there is more to the story and it is exactly what ABC reported AND MORE. Shame on those who follow blindly and do not ask questions…expecially about our children’s safety.
Posted by: Stan Kent | September 29, 2006, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Oh, I think more transcripts of the exchange are coming and it will become very clear the intentions of this man, the founder for the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children. Are you kidding me?!?!?!?!? Unfortuantely, this sort of lifestyle deception is common on both sides of the isle. Just remember, we’re the individuals who elect these clowns!
Posted by: Tim | September 29, 2006, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Looks like a number of Republicans owe you a very serious apology, Mr. Ross.
My thanks to you and your staff for doing what journalists are supposed to be doing – uncovering corruption and scandal that threatens the stability and credibility of our government. This type of work, I am certain, is what the Founders had in mind when they used the Constitution to guarantee freedom to the press. Regardless of the demonizing you’ve suffered, you did your job, and are a credit to ABC.
Posted by: Aaron | September 29, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
If the exchange between the page and Rep. Foley were as innocent as everyone is trying to make it, why did Foley tender his resignation effective immediately? I am definitely not one to cast the first stone, however Rep. Foley is the one who is choosing to “bury his head in the sand and run and hide.” Why not continue on with your elected position and fight the allegations if they were as innocent as everyone is trying to make them out to be. I am sure what we are seeing as far as excerpts of the email communication, are just that, excerpts, and not being disclosed in their entirety, for obvious reasons. I think the allegations should at very least be investigated fully, and let the chips fall where they may.
Posted by: jsm | September 29, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
For all you who claim it was pointless news, now that the Congressman has admitted to wrongdoing and resigned, what do you have to say for naivete!!
Posted by: SierraBW | September 29, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Face it, Foley is a perv.
Posted by: Paul | September 29, 2006, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
I am “confident” that all of those persons who were so sure that this was a smear by the democrats and the media will now demonstrate their superior maturity and wisdom and will acknowledge that they were wrong and apologize to those people whom they attacked. I think that will happen the same time that they admit that no WMD/s were found in Iraq and that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 (after all, even President Bush has conceded that).
Posted by: Howard | September 29, 2006, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Now I’m going to go back and sue everyone who asked me how old I was growing up. I’ll start at all my birthday parties. Yea!!!! I’m rich!!!
Posted by: FraidofLibs | September 29, 2006, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
If he is innocent, why did he resign? There must be more to this than meets the eye.
Posted by: Mike | September 29, 2006, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Gee, for all of you who posted earlier, if Foley is so innocent, why did he just agree not to seek re-election?
The silence is deafening.
Posted by: Jason | September 29, 2006, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Congressman Foley did NOT resign because of the e-mails. Apparrently, ABC reported that there were explicit instant message conversations also discovered. We have to wait until the ABC Nightly News to get the details. All the network would say is that the messages involved “organs and acts”.
Posted by: A Republican | September 29, 2006, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
As someone who worked on the Hill, I can tell you it is NOT normal for a Congressman to have that much personal contact with a page. Very few people besides interns and young staff assistants have real conversations with pages. Furthermore, MOC do not write their own letters that are sent to constituents, and do very little if any office administrative work, despite what people might think. They are way too busy attending hearings and putting in face time to be bothered. That is part of what makes these emails suspect. Not to even begin with the fact that he used his personal AOL account, which is pretty much unheard of. All MOC have blackberries, so it’s not like he needed to send email but was out of the office… These correspondance are NOT innocent.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 29, 2006, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
FOLEY RESIGNS: “I am deeply sorry and I apologize for letting down my family and the people of Florida I have had the privilege to represent.”
With this resignation, Foley is owning up to his inappropriate behavior. It’s pretty clear now that he was not innocent, and it also suggests that he has even more to hide. I do hope the investigate this formally. Ew. Yucky men in power. Ew!!
Posted by: DUH | September 29, 2006, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
If. Rep. Foley is totally innocent, why resign? I would fight like hell to protect my good name. Why won’t he? As for this being a ploy by the Democrats, I am not that worried. I remember who swiftboated Max Cleland, John Kerry and anyone who, like a true American, exercises his or her right to dissent.
Posted by: Prudy | September 29, 2006, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Gee, kids– the Congressman has resigned! I don’t know about YOU, but it’s been MY experience that congressmen don’t RESIGN over innocent misunderstandings, slander by the evil press, or 16-year-old pages who are hell-bent on destroying a man’s career just to get their names in the paper (every 16-year-old’s dream, of course). Gee, you know WHAT? Maybe Ross’s journalism was entirely accurate. Maybe this wasn’t a “non-story” after all, but an actual important piece of investigative reporting. I feel immense pity for those of you who cannot see the TRUTH when it smacks you in the head. And I will say a prayer for all of you now, that you may, by the grace of all that is RIGHT and JUST, have the scales fall from your eyes. Why? Because, as I recall, both God and Jesus, in a little book called the Bible, said some important and releveant things in there about honesty and truth.
Posted by: Josh Mooney | September 29, 2006, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
If it was innocent why would he resign?
Posted by: Robin | September 29, 2006, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
He resigned. If it was all innocent, this would not result in resignation, and public apology by him. Nobody’s perfect. Resignation was the right thing to do.
Posted by: Donnie | September 29, 2006, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
It is really interesting to read these comments from the beginning. I’m hoping the Foley apologists are able to recognize themselves for the pedophile-protectors they are and learn the meaning of shame.
Posted by: Aidan | September 29, 2006, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Forget all the stupid political banter… while the initial reports that were released were inconclusive, that’s no excuse for not checking out the story.
And since the Congressman resigned, it suggests there was wrongdoing.
We need to quit painting with such a broad brush and start getting rid of the problems on both sides… demanding high ethical standards of our public officials and getting rid of those who don’t measure up!
Posted by: GOP guy | September 29, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
“Slow news day” on a post dated Sept. 29? He just resigned!!
I saw this on a blog the other day and thought it was overblown. Foley has just confirmed it is not.
Posted by: Tom | September 29, 2006, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
We have the constant threat of terrorism by a world that by and large, hates our guts, two wars going on, an environment that needs some serious attention to name just a few issues of the day. Why are midterm elections turning into a “who likes who” high school girl calibur discussion and what exactly did he mean by, “what stuff do you like to do?” Could we maybe focus on the country’s many many problems? Could we keep our eye on the ball for once?
Posted by: Mary | September 29, 2006, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Surprise, surprise…Foley resigned. Do all the lame-o Repubs on this thread care to respond?
Posted by: jd | September 29, 2006, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
slow news day? are we still at war with iraq? last i checked we were. if this wasn’t a big deal, i’m sure abc could spend all day telling us how HORRIBLE things are over there. if any thing, the republicans should be happy about this. everyday spent talking about anything besides iraq helps them. this perv is a martyr for the republicans. at least for a couple days.
Posted by: mat | September 29, 2006, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
We can never be too careful, can we? We must remain vigilant in our war on those that wish to do harm to our citizens. In that effort, phone calls, IMs, letters, bank statements must available for scrutiny by the justice department and our homeland security department. The future of our citizens is at stake. An hint of an improper activity must be brought forth so we can take the appropriate action. We must stop them before they harm us. We must stay on the offense. No small detail is unimportant in this matter of protecting our youth from pedophiles.
Posted by: bobcf | September 29, 2006, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
What the kid wanted for his birthday was more democrats in congress. Brian is just trying to fulfill the boy’s birthday wish!
Posted by: Kevin Bates | September 29, 2006, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
HAHA! he resigned! another GOP pedophile outted!
Who let this guy be the chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children? Thats like putting the dog in charge of the hen house!
He introduced a bill in 2002 to outlaw websites featuring sexually suggestive images of preteen children, saying that “these websites are nothing more than a fix for pedophiles.”
Guess he knows from experience!
Posted by: johnb | September 29, 2006, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Isn’t it Republicans who were heavy supporters for the rights of whistlblowers, yet when it’s one of their own they promptly pounce the messenger?
Hilarious.
Posted by: Mr Correct | September 29, 2006, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
Well well well Republican apologists, looks like y’all are BUSTED!!! Hope West Palm likes its new Democrat
Posted by: Busted! | September 29, 2006, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
I think Foley’s resignation was the right thing to do. It is obvious he has some serious issues to deal with and it is naive to think that his IMs to the 16 yr old boy were innocent.
For Foley to take the risk of sending a boy he hardly knows inappropriate IMs shows that he is likely out of control–his behavior is sloppy and he is taking risks a rational person would not take. My guess is that we will hear more things Foley has done (similar to this) in the upcoming days. He would not have stepped down unless he knew more evidence of his inappropriate behavior had been discovered. If he wasnt guilty he would not have apologized to the public and his family.
Posted by: nn | September 29, 2006, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Let’s see here… he’s the the chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children…hmmm…. This guy’s got a giant screw loose to be making overtures like this to a child. Sounds like he’s honing in on innocent kids to me. It is what it is, regardless of who blew the whistle on the situation. I don’t care which side of the aisle he’s on, the guy’s gotta go and seek some serious mental health evaluation…
Posted by: Esther | September 29, 2006, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
I don’t enjoy people losing their career over their stupidity. It’s a shame.
Posted by: Chris in Chicago | September 29, 2006, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Well Chris, as far as I can see that’s all that happens anyway. Voting for the Republicans without considering the merit of the candidates. That would require actual thought on the part of the voter, and we all know “The Party” doesn’t want that. If you thought before you voted we may not have record deficits, war in Iraq, record high gas prices, escalating crime rates, scholastic programs dreamed up by someone whose parents bought him a college education, and many of the other ills of this administration. This story is EXACTLY why you should wake up and not be a zombie for “your party”, but instead take control of your party and make much needed changes. I am not anti-republican, I have voted for many, but this current crop couldn’t be worse.
Posted by: tim | September 29, 2006, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
The guy resigned. Do you get what this means? If this were an innocent exchange, do you think he would have resigned? Really.
Posted by: Tony | September 29, 2006, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
As a citizen who’s fed up with the way the government’s been run for the past six years, I admit I was gleeful to hear a Republican was bowing out over this. But having read the email (or that which is reported to have been the email’s contents), it begs two conflicting questions: They seemed innocent enough, so what’s everyone in a tiff about? But if they are innocent, why did Rep. Foley bow out so quickly? There’s more to this tale, I’m sure…
Posted by: jeff | September 29, 2006, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
I too am a huge Bush hater, but come on, be sensible, this is a huge witch hunt. I hate Democrats, not nearly as much as I hate Republicans, but to have this guy resign for being friendly is just downright cruel. I feel bad for him, his life is in shambles for reaching out to a kid.
Posted by: Jim | September 29, 2006, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
if there isn’t anything to this, why did the representative RESIGN? hmmmmmmmmmmmmm?
Posted by: pat | September 29, 2006, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Although this may be a smear campaign – and the timing is very suspect – we cannot overlook the fact that meat of this story is being saved for revelation on TV tonight with Charles Gibson. Everyone here is commenting on what has been currently released but from what I am reading about the other items in the text, it included discussion and commentary about “sexual organs” among other completely inappropriate subjects. When this is finished, it appears that this is a real story about a man with real problems.
Posted by: Michael | September 29, 2006, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
“take off your boxers” in the text is disturbing be you Republican or Democrat.
Posted by: css | September 29, 2006, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
I am amazed at the number of people who think this is a witch hunt and want to call ABC news left wing. This young man did not work for the congressman. There was no need for them to communicate on a personal level. Also, if the congressman feels that he has done nothing wrong why did he resign? The man is a freak and you all know it.
Posted by: John | September 29, 2006, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
I agree with Curiousgeo, the real story here is that a Congressman was using AOL. Not too bright.
Posted by: michael | September 29, 2006, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Mr. Ross…you’ve done fine work and it is amazing to me how many conservatives went ballistic over Bill Clinton’s sexual exploits yet cry foul when one of their own is caught in sexually inappropriate situations. You did not bring Foley down. He did it himself and no one has described this situation better than the young male who received the e-mails: sick, sick, sick, sick, sick
Posted by: Jerry Dale | September 29, 2006, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
what witch hunt? the guy resigned even if no one asked him to do that. which is really surprising since there’s nothing in his emails really…and which makes you wonder – what is he trying to hide by his resignation? did anyone check out Foley’s website? seems like he really had a fondness for children…i dunno the guy but….
Posted by: Clara | September 29, 2006, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
If it was nothing. . .why did the man quit? You do not quit, becuase of some e-mails. What has yet to come out must really be bad. Forget whaich party he is from. . .you just do not cross that line with anyone under 18.
Posted by: DL | September 29, 2006, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Love seeing people defend stuff like this. PARTISON MONKEY BUSINESS FOR LIFE!
Posted by: Dela | September 29, 2006, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Why would someone so innocent quit so quick?
Posted by: Bell | September 29, 2006, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Put the pervert in jail.
Posted by: themim | September 29, 2006, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
It seems that a few folks only read the cursory story before commenting. This is a guy who was having sexually explicit conversations with a minor including the discussion and mention of “sexual organs.” The meat of this story is being saved for Charles Gibson’s Prime Time special this evening so many are just reading the tame versions out right now. Dig a little deeper and you will see a sick man regardless of your political stance.
Posted by: Michael | September 29, 2006, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
It’s clear this is more than “innocent chatter” – as a person in the public domain – he has a standard to meet – this behavior doesn’t cut it – and whether or not he’s rep. has nothing to do with it – he demonstrated poor judgement – and his interactions didn’t fit the context of the relationship a member of congress has with a page – bottom line – republicans need to disavow themselves of this man – and his behavior – and accept they have no moral high ground here
Posted by: Joe | September 29, 2006, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
C’mon folks, open your eyes, wake up and smell the coffee. You’re totally ignoring the OTHER messages that have come out…the ones from maf54 where Foley asks the kid if he’s wearing his boxers, and says he’d like to take them off, and asks the kid if he’s getting “horny” to which the kid says “a little!” I so LOVE LOVE LOVE watching a right wing Republican moralist like Foley getting caught in the worst kind of hypocrisy like this. They used to say “the only thing would keep (insert name) from getting elected would be getting caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy!” I LOVE IT!!!!
Posted by: Richard | September 29, 2006, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
ok, so today more information is released with “actual” excerpts…I guess some of us were wrong…however i think many of us were reacting to ABC’s initial report which did not provide any sexual IM excerpts..
Posted by: Aaron | September 29, 2006, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
I am gay. The words in that email are those that could be of an “older” gay man. That doesn’t mean he was looking to get in this 16yo’s pants though. A lot of middle aged gay men like to have younger guys around them strictly as friends, and in the gay community it’s not uncommon at all.
Posted by: Darren | September 29, 2006, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Stop it already! This is not a Witch Hunt. With just a small amount of objective investigation (15 minutes of time perusing present and past info on Foley), one can conclude that this man is indeed Gay and attracted to young boys/men. This in and of itself is not a crime, but at best, he’s a hypocrite (but who isn’t in Congress?!). He rightfuly resigned because his actions (both discovered and undisclosed) were inappropriate for a Congressman (Congressperson?).
Posted by: Darius | September 29, 2006, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Score another victory for the “family values” party. Sexual predation is not a family value in most parts of the country, but I guess as long as you’re in the GOP having it come into the light of day is just a partisan witch-hunt. Boy I would love to hear more apologies from the PURE IDIOTS on this board who jumped in to defend Foley before knowing the full extent of the story.
Posted by: mattfwood | September 29, 2006, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Did you read the IM transcripts, FOLEY is a predator!! Asking the boy to measure his penis…SICK, SICK, SICK, SICK!
Posted by: Rebe | September 29, 2006, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
I wonder if you Foley defenders feel a bit foolish, now that the DETAILS of his IM’s have been released to the public? Or do you still think the poor “confused” child misinterpreted the meaning of “strip down and get naked”???
Posted by: Joe Dinnerbucket | September 29, 2006, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Anyone who thinks anything about a 50 year old starting an email string with a 16 year old is anywhere close to appropriate needs to take a reality check… if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and swins like a duck, it’s probably not a turkey.
Posted by: Scott | September 29, 2006, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
None of the people who defended the slimy pedophile will come back and post an apology, they all lost their jobs when he resigned.
Posted by: Piper | September 29, 2006, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
This is sort of an ironic, and excerpt from an old article….
Representative Mark Foley, a Florida Republican, said, ”We track library books better than we do sexual predators.”
I am awaiting for Mr. Foley to start knocking on doors and stating, “Hi, I’m Mark Foley, I live in your neighborhood and I’m a pederast”
Posted by: biggie | September 29, 2006, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Three critical factors here. 1st – The kid is 16 page. 2nd – Foley is in a position of authority, as a Congressionman and co-chair of the House Missing and Exploited Children Caucus. 3rd – He contacts this kid on the premise of determining how he (the kid) is doing after Katrina.
Two critical determinations here. 1st – No way this is the first time – Foley’s approach is text book. Review behavior profiles on predator tactics. 2nd – It’s a community’s responsibility to protect its children. (16 year olds think they’re grown, but they’re not.)
One critical question. What will Foley’s peers do about this?
Posted by: Nic | September 29, 2006, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
If this e-mail is all so innocent, why did Mr. Foley resign? Can we hope to find that bush, cheney, rove, rumsfield, rice, and the complete coven of thugs will follow suit? They are the worst….EVER!
Posted by: brendnomaidian | September 29, 2006, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
It never ceases to amaze me how defensive the “holier than thou” get when one of their own is caught doing something illegal, unethical or inappropriate. However, when someone of the opposition does anything that has any remote resemblance, they will crucify him/her. This is a clear example of double standard that typifies the “compassionate conservative” republicans.
Posted by: Joe | September 29, 2006, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
For the love of ,Pete, this is journalism ?!!! OMG … ! Sounds like the NY Times !!
Posted by: alan miller | September 29, 2006, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
The question that begs to be asked to me is…if these emails were , why is Foley resigning??? Who would resign over emails?
Posted by: Ron | September 29, 2006, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
I agree with the others who question “why did he quit”?? Regardless of political affiliation, quitting an affluent position such as a U.S. Congressman sure makes me wonder.
Posted by: SARG | September 29, 2006, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
If you think Rep. Foley was just being “nice” to engage a 16 year old kid in suggestive and off-color emails, then I think you just fell off the proverbial turnip truck. Foley didn’t resign because his “niceness” is misunderstood and I wouldn’t doubt there are more kids with a Foley story to tell.
Posted by: Lin | September 30, 2006, 12:32 am 12:32 am
What is it with you hardcore Republicans? When Clinton lied to the grand jury, I was furious. I am a hardcore Dem, but I was still furious, that he would do this to our party and to our country.
It is so sad that we have gotten to the point where it seems our side is always right and the other side is always wrong. I might be able to manage a tiny bit of respect for the GOP if more of you would come out and condemn this “anti-family value” behavior.
Foley also allegedly asked the teen, “Do I make you horny.” How innocent is that?
Posted by: shawn | September 30, 2006, 3:31 am 3:31 am
What the heck is wrong with half of you people? Did you write that this was no big deal or a “smear campaign” before you read the entore story. This is obviously not innocent. It is disgusting and anyone who makes excuses for this sick-o Republican should have their own head examined. Read the transcripts people! Stop making excuses
Posted by: cwg | September 30, 2006, 6:10 am 6:10 am
This is sad, here he is supposedly protecting our children from on line peverts. And he is acting like one . What is he the M.J of congress. The hypocrisy of him charing the commitee on missing and exploited children and in his private time he is doing the same thing.Is sick sick sick reality of the world we live in. This is not a republican or democrat issue. It is an issue when a man who is a public figure abusing his power to acheive sexual gratification from a minor. Who knows how many more pages he sexually assulted verbally over the internet. A grown man who is old enough to be his father. What is going on that now we have to make sure that our publice officals are not pedophiles. Like I said this is not a republican or democrat issue it is a national issue to protect our children from men like Mr.Foley.
Posted by: tisha | September 30, 2006, 8:44 am 8:44 am
It’s interesting to me how these Republicans who write here are defending blatant child abuse. As I recall they made a big deal of Monica Lewinsky. I think this is far worse especially considering the fact that the boy could have become a page for Foley. I read the transcript of the instant messages between them and in my mind damage has already been done to the victim.
Posted by: Don | September 30, 2006, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Smear tactics? Witch hunt? If ABC News reports favor the left-wing then they’re only making it a fair fight. FOX NEWS has been attacking the left-wingers for 10 years now. If this had been a Democrat accused of this act, FOX NEWS would have SPECIAL REPORT’s on the case for the next 2 months.
Biased media is wrong. However, to attack one and not the other (just because it’s your opposing party) is even more wrong.
I would also like to add that I am a Democrat and I don’t believe that what Mr. Foley said was harmful in any way. See, some Democrats know how to play it fair.
Posted by: Jimmy | September 30, 2006, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Congressman Mark Foley’s office says the e-mails were entirely appropriate and that their release is part of a smear campaign by his opponent.
LOL.. Wow.. the funniest thing on TV in the new Fall Season raves “me”.
You smeared yourself sweety. I wish he’d get vengeful and take down some of the other hypocrites in Washington with him.
Posted by: David Taylor | September 30, 2006, 10:10 am 10:10 am
This is a 52 year old man trying to seduce a 17 year old boy. My son is 17 – I would have taken those messages to the police right away! I understand Republicans are upset thinking this is a witch hunt. Maybe it is. But don’t lose focus on the facts here. The senator’s behavior was inappropriate. Shame on Republicans that instead of recognizing that, keep accusing Democrats of a smear campaign! Shame on Democrats to use this is as a political victory! This is about unacceptable behavior from a man who happens to be a US senator. Get your act together! All of you that think this is an innocent conversation between a man and a child need serious professional help!
Posted by: Cristina | September 30, 2006, 10:38 am 10:38 am
How can you people defend Foleyz? A man charged with protecting children from predators? and he is a predator! Even if it was political timing, does it make a difference? What he did is in no way excusable.
Posted by: MM | September 30, 2006, 11:40 am 11:40 am
to those claiming there is no story here… set politics aside for a moment and concider this:
a 52 year old man is asking a 16 year old boy for his picture.
Posted by: plunderpunk | September 30, 2006, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
I’m a man who would love to see the Democrats take control of Capital Hill again, but nothing in this story comes close to implicating Mr. Foley.
Although it is questionable as to why he is having conversations with a 16 year old on the internet from his personal account, he does not deserve to be hung out to dry based on the content of this story. ABC lets report on his record, not the lame contents of his emails. It would serve his constituents and Americans much better and more meaningfully.
When did ABC News decide to go into the tabloid business anyway?
Posted by: Kevin | September 30, 2006, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
How ridiculous. It’s truly sad when genuine concern for another person and their well-being is miscontrued as some sort of sexual advance. It only serves to underline the moral degredation of our society, in which distance and passivity in relationships has almost become a virtue. This story lacks any intellectual merit, and is merely another sterling reminder of the sensationalist and alarmist tastes of this confused, and I daresay, backwards, country.
Posted by: AaronDareon | September 30, 2006, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
I know that it is difficult for most people to understand or believe how common sexual abuse of young people is. It is a complex issue.
All adults in a society should take any and all accusations very seriously.
It far to common for people not to want to believe it and turn their backs on the victims. It is devasting for anyone who has had their trust violated.
In this case an investigation shoud be launched to see what happened, who knew what when, what steps were taken if any to confront the behavior.
Instead of attacking the messengers, the page, or even Mr Foley we should be asking thoughtful questions and receiving clear answers.
Posted by: jon | September 30, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Anyone who thinks this guy has done nothing wrong needs to read the IM conversation that he had with that teenage boy. It is absolutely sickening and he should be ashamed of himself for using his position of power to prey on children.
Posted by: Colleen | September 30, 2006, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Please read the whole story before you make comments. If you read this guy’s IM conversation that he had with a high school boy you will clearly see he was not in any way concerned with the well being of these kids, he was using them to satisfy his own twisted desires. He is a clearly a pervert who deserves to be treated just like any other pedophile regardless of his political affiliation.
Posted by: CK | September 30, 2006, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
AaronDareon,
Are you living in a cave? The guy was sending sexually explicit instant messages to an underage teen. Open your eyes!!!
Posted by: hamish111 | September 30, 2006, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
The notion that Democrats have poisoned political discourse by pointing out that a Republican crusader against pedophiles is himself a pedophile is silly. Framing this as a gay issue is wrong, too. It’s about a Congressman using his position to make a personal approach to a minor .
That Foley resigned rather than defend his messages as innocent suggests that there’s more to this story than the ABC reporters could verify well enough to support publication. If, as some have suggested here, it’s an open secret in Foley’s district that he’s gay and he gets elected anyway, his sexual orientation alone is not what he and the House Republican leadership want to hide.
Posted by: Chuck | September 30, 2006, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
I really have no idea why may of these postings side with the former Congressman. What is scary is that he is a closet case (or was) and he was hitting on young boys, using his stature to seduce them. Do you really think a 16 year old would get “kinda” horny over a 50+ year old pock marked guy? Come on.
Posted by: greg | September 30, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
I am a Republican, living in foley’s district. this is not about whether he is gay or not (I don’t care) He is a hypocrite and that bothers me. Hope he hangs.
Posted by: bill | September 30, 2006, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Hey, for all those who say this is being blown out of proportion, You are totally WRONG. Read the Instant message records, this guy is a predator just like the ones you see on Dateline NBC,
This guy is well connected, I would be really surprise if something came of this, but it shows what the republican party is hidding in their closets.
If there is any law in this country he deserves to be thrown in jail and leave to rot.
Posted by: jerry | September 30, 2006, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
this isn’t a joke- and it’s only going to get worse for foley- this is just the tip of the iceberg, trust me. wait until the truth REALLY starts to come out. this guy is SICK. let’s just say it goes beyond email- including sleepovers at his townhouse in DC, explicit sexual conversations online (there’s nothing vague about these- unless you consider asking about the size of a penis as “harmless”), etc. the guy resigned because he’s not stupid- he’s sick.
Posted by: page | September 30, 2006, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
The quotation in the article may indeed sound innocent. But before you start defending Foley, folks, read the whole transcript of his IMs.
You can easily find whole transcripts if you just bother to google for it.
Foley is a walking definition of a pedophile. Not only that, the House Republicans knew it 11 months ago and DID NOTHING to stop him.
MCh
Posted by: M.Chrobak | September 30, 2006, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
I cant believe that some are talking about Foley being gay. That is so not the point. He was seducing a child….a child!! It doesnt matter if it was a female or male. Anyone who attempts to put any blame on the child is just as bad as Foley. Those on the right need to live up to their claims of being good Xians, and recognize that Foley was immoral and dangerous. Your true colors have come out….Your party first, your moral values second. Sad.
Posted by: PH | September 30, 2006, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
As a former Congressional Page, I can attest that it is absolutely out of line for a Congressman to message a page using his personal email account. While serving, all my contact with Congressmen was conducted in person on the floor or through staff on government email accounts. Pages are underage government employees, and relationships with Representatives are expected to be 100% professional. While I got to know with some Representatives, male and female, quite well, they would NEVER have messaged me using their personal account.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 30, 2006, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Also, Gary:
All pages are employees of the Office of the Clerk, not individual representatives. Some pages may, however, ask their sponsoring member of Congress or a member they know well to write a recommendation for them. I doubt it’s a setup.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 30, 2006, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
If there was questionable content in any of his emails to the 16 year old, the writers didn’t use any as examples. Asking someone what they want for a birthday is not a crime, nor is showing concern that this young adult was in a huricane. Sounds like a boring week at the office for these reporters.
Posted by: DR | September 30, 2006, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
What about that “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” from Clinton’s era? What is person guilty of–I did not see him on the Dateline Perverts. What is wrong out there? Too much so called news-
Posted by: Mary | September 30, 2006, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
So why did he resign…All you who assume this is a “liberal media” smear campaign ought to think a little deeper…have you noticed the prevalence of hypocrisy throughout the current administration? This is just one of the more recent and painfully obvious examples…Try to see beyond your blind support for the bogus “morality” you’ve been sold and get a clue.
Posted by: chris | September 30, 2006, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Yo Vinnie…
Those men on the Dateline show “To Catch a Predator”…first of all, a member of the clergy at our (former) temple, who was “a nice guy” was caught “red-handed.” He will no longer have the “option” of abusing the hundreds of children who attend activities at the temple.
Do you know what sexual harrassment and pedophilic behavior is? It’s highly illegal.
Those were real “men” on that show who were trolling for jailbait online. Why, Vinnie, do you not understand that this is REAL.
Posted by: jeff p. | September 30, 2006, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
What about our Governor’s statement? “…I hope he (Foley) doesn’t have to go to jail”.
Pathetic remark.
Posted by: karen | September 30, 2006, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Judge not, lest ye be judged.
Matthew 7:1
So a chicken hawk comes home to roost – even Jeb Bush has deserted the ship and advising fellow Republicans to cut and run -
Posted by: bob | September 30, 2006, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
I read that one of the emails asked the kid to take off his shirt. No way would a normal adult ask a 16 year old to take off his shirt.
You didn’t get the whole story in this article.
Posted by: Jackie Aldridge | October 1, 2006, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Any objective viewer of this story must recognize the inappropraiteness of a 52 year old man sending sexually suggestive messages to a 16 year old boy. It is especially ironic that Congressman Foley helped to enact laws that he may now be charged under (soliciting underage sex). While I believe a person’s private life is their business, adults in positions of authority should not take sexual advantage of underage minors, nor should they be the hypocrites who condemn others for the very acts they themselves are guilty of.
Posted by: Tired of hypocrisy | October 1, 2006, 12:38 am 12:38 am
It is amazing that the Great Republican Part is so interested in protecting themselves rather than children. HAVE YOU NO SHAME! Stop making excuses for this low life. The Republican Leadership have been covering for a child molester over a year, allowing him to continue molest children. Those who do not speak out against this pernicious child molester are suportive of molesting children – YOU ARE ADULTS – THERE IS NO MIDDLE GROUND. Being a Republician should not mean being supportive of a child molester.
Posted by: Ralph | October 1, 2006, 2:06 am 2:06 am
Democrat attacks on Republicans? This is a sexual predator of children. If you mean to imply that such activities are the exclusive province of the GOP, you are simply wrong.
Posted by: A guy named Bush | October 1, 2006, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Mr. Ross, don’t listen to these fools here. Foley shouldn’t be in Congress. He should be in jail.
Posted by: Megan | October 1, 2006, 4:11 am 4:11 am
Why is anyone defending Foley? In terms of things that should get you kicked out of Congress, soliciting sex from 16-year-olds qualifies.
Posted by: Scott | October 1, 2006, 4:14 am 4:14 am
The focus of American journalists on these issues is a distraction from the more important issues, such as the tens of thousands of dead Iraqi civilians, theft of billions by US contractors working in Iraq and Afganistan, and 2,707 dead US soldiers as a result of lies by George W. Bush and an illegal invasion of a foreign nation.
Posted by: Ken | October 1, 2006, 7:55 am 7:55 am
Thank God that this man didn’t hit a capitol policeman or get arrested for dui at 2:00am on his way in to congress to vote.
I say ,give him the same treatment or 10 day re-hab, and lets get on with real problems.
Posted by: Dave | October 1, 2006, 8:24 am 8:24 am
What about Mark Foley´s telling the young boy that he´d like to take off the boy´s shorts?
Posted by: Jureusa | October 1, 2006, 8:56 am 8:56 am
Just end the page system. And no more altar boys/girls either. Ever heard of Little Red Riding Hood – “grandma what big teeth you have!”
no more!
Posted by: Sam | October 1, 2006, 9:33 am 9:33 am
The party of Hypocrisy
Posted by: Republican Hypocrisy | October 1, 2006, 9:34 am 9:34 am
ok, so maybe many reader here did not read the actual transcripts, and are bading their opinions on the brief excerpt in the story. please, please read the transcript. it is horrifying. and it details an adult male in sexually explicit converation with an underage person. there is no “fluff” no room for other interpretation. it is wrong, and as a mom, i am SHOCKED at all the folks coming to this guys defense. shame on you. shame.
Posted by: nina | October 1, 2006, 9:43 am 9:43 am
As usual, the GOP polticians and their fanboys will accept anything , cover anything up, and lie to the people just to support one of their own.
They preach “family values,” but will happily allow the continuous molestation of young boys and help to keep it quiet – just to keep power.
It is so sad – I weep for my country and pray we can remove these evil people from power.
Posted by: matthew | October 1, 2006, 10:11 am 10:11 am
How to avoid being found out by the media:
Never ask questions in any emails to teens
Register as a liberal politician
If it gets hot, come out of the closet don’t resign. It makes life terrible for the left.
Posted by: warren | October 1, 2006, 10:31 am 10:31 am
“I am deeply sorry and I apologize for letting down my family and the people of Florida I have had the privilege to represent,” -Mark Foley
Why would he apologize and resign over this unless there is more to the story? If this man was truly innocent, he wouldn’t have resigned…Election or no election…
Posted by: Ian | October 1, 2006, 10:59 am 10:59 am
I love it! These republicans demonize the opposition as morally bankrupt; but most of their scandals involve homosexual behavior! Incredible that anyone still listens to them ponificate on so-called values. What a bunch of liars and hypocrites, it permeates the entire party: they wouldn’t know reality if it came up an bit them.
Posted by: Fred | October 1, 2006, 11:03 am 11:03 am
When a minor has the courage to bring concerns of inappropriate contact from an adult to the attention of others with the power to address them, it deserves more than this apparently loose & pathetic “investigation” by the House staffers and leaders. Kudos, again, to our country’s free press; the b.s. or sloppy reporting that we all need to weed through at times are well worth enduring for the stories which protect and inform us.
Posted by: Barb | October 1, 2006, 11:28 am 11:28 am
This guy is a serious perv! He says that he works hard in Congress to put internet predators in prison for soliciting sex from under age kids…Can you say hypocrite?
Posted by: Candace | October 1, 2006, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Why would a man want a picture of a 16 year old boy? Why is he still on the streets?
Foley should get the same treatment as anyone else accused of this crime. Jail,court,sentenced,jail,
probation,treatment and a stigma for life.
Mr.Foley assisted in passing laws against this type of crime,therefore he should pay the price reguardless of his money and position.
Posted by: Tom | October 1, 2006, 11:50 am 11:50 am
I’m a registered Democrat and I’m embarassed to admit after all this scandal. Mark Foley has an incredible reputation in this community and for all of Florida. I’m also an Adult leader for a youth group in South Florida. Mr. Foley has always been a great supporter of this youth group and has always been a person to count on. He also has been one of the few politicians who truly support our troops in the military. Mr. Foley was one I could count on for any support when it came to recommendations. He was considering recommending my own son to help him get into the US Coast Guard. My son completed a 3 year program the Congressman believed in a we hoped would have recommended my son based on his completion of the program. I think this ruthless attack on such a dedicated indiviual is really showing how insecure the Democatic party has become. Mr. Foley’s email that I’ve seen have been totally innocent in every way.
Posted by: Anthony A Ramirez | October 1, 2006, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
With all the scandals regarding pedophiles, even if the emails were “innocent”, Senator Foley did not excercise good judgment by communicating with this underage person.
Posted by: Steve | October 1, 2006, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
If Rep foley was not guilty, why did he resign so quicky huh huh. Think about it. Why a young boy, so many available adults out there men and women. So this wonderful man goes after the innocent. He should go hide his head in hot coals. Maybe this way he can come out of closet now, ha ha. Shame on you Republicans for defending him. A loving Democrat.
Posted by: Bev | October 1, 2006, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
i dont know if there is any smearing going on here or not, but in any case, judging from the conversations released, there doesnt sound like tere’s anything “sick” whats wrong with everyone? there’s NOTHING going on here!!!!
Posted by: meladee | October 1, 2006, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Was it a weekend assignment for the entire staff of the Republican National Committee and the GOP Congressional reelection committee togo on this ABC blog to make excuses for why this is not serious, to claim ABC is blowing this out of proportion, and to assert that these emails are innocent.
Are we supposed to believe that a Congressman resigned abruptly because what he did was innocent. Only Tom Delay would do a thing like that.
Posted by: peter warren | October 1, 2006, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
I cannot believe how many freaks are defending this guy. You people need to get a grip, get your news from other than FOX, and get educated on what really is going on in this country. “Totally innocent” and “the liberals at it again” Give me a break.
Posted by: Gary Walker | October 1, 2006, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
someone days ago said, “he is gay. Lots of gay guys like teen-agers.” Whoa. that is not true. He was someone on the foley side.Foley probably isn’t gay, he’s a pedophile. He likes children and THAT is against the law.
Posted by: Idaho | October 1, 2006, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
The amount of excuses people are using for this man is unreal. There is no conspiracy against him. He acted inappropriately and should resign. The leadership was dishonest in their attempts to squash this.
The dishonest leadership behavior has become and is indicative of the normal and usual way they behave. The sad part is that Americans no longer see dishonesty as immoral.
Posted by: Sharon Dupree | October 1, 2006, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
What the hell is wrong with some of you people? How the hell can you defend this guy? Recent developments have revealed that Foley sent “Are you wearing boxers”? “Strip.” There were other references to sexual organs. Wake up and smell the damn coffee, will you?
Posted by: Ed | October 1, 2006, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Has anyone ever noticed that these creepy guys always get the jobs “protecting” the children? I saw a couple of posts here that said Foley was just being friendly. Ha! How many “friendly” people over fifty do you know who is jonesing to undress a teen? He’s just another creepy pedophile who should be thrown UNDER the jail! And by the way, please understand that this is NOT a political situation, nor is it a gay/straight situation. I have many gay friends, and not one of them would harm a child.
Posted by: jack e | October 1, 2006, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
chairman of exploited children committee, criminal charges should follow
Posted by: david | October 1, 2006, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
some comments that i have been posted, obviously some of these individuals have not read some of the e-mails sent from Mr. pedophile Foley, I , suggest if anyone out there thinks these e-mails about masturbation are not inapropriate, then they too are pedophiles, or so in a trance by the run away gop that they are sick………….
Posted by: david | October 1, 2006, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
I think Foley is a disgusting perv and he belongs in jail for even talking to a child the way he did. He makes my skin crawl. He is no better than any other pedophile on the street. He should be brought up on charges for the things he said. Who the heck is protecting our children from this jerk?????
Posted by: Janice | October 1, 2006, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Oh come on people, those emails are not casual conversation! There is no reason for a grown man to inquire about the sexual practices of a teenage boy. Foley was getting his kicks off those emails.
No conspiracy here!
Posted by: KS | October 1, 2006, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Despite what some idiots on this blog are saying, this is a big news story. As usual with a beltway scandal, the focus will be on the cover-up and the fact that top Republican congressmen knew that Foley had inappropriate relationships with teenage boys but did nothing. The real question will be what will the Democrats do this this. My guess is that they’ll let this slip through their fingers as usual. If they do, then they don’t deserve to be elected because they still haven’t learned to play the game that the Repuplicans are so good at playing. It’s your turn up to bat, Democrats–do try not to screw it up this time.
Posted by: Idabell | October 1, 2006, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
This is not about Republicans and Democrats or being a heterosexual or homosexual. It is about protecting our children. I do not have any children but there is nothing that angers me more than people (lack of a better word) who prey on children.
If you think that what Mark Foley said in those e-mails are innocent; I also worry about you.
I would not think of asking anyone’s child to send me a photograph via e-mail. I think that it is twisted.
Once again the victim is being persecuted!
How many chidren (perhaps, now adults) in your family are keeping dark secrets because of people like you?
Posted by: M.I. | October 1, 2006, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Politics aside. Mark Foley has a serious problem. Not like, hey he needs some kind of psychological help, but rather he needs to be taken off the streets. I live in his district and yes, I voted for him a few times. I don’t really care about his sexual orientation, but I do have a problem with his lust for young underage boys. I’m sure The National center for Missing and Exploited Children have alot to say about Mr. Foley. He should to be held accoutable, criminally, for his actions. And so do all the people who covered for him and hid this for the last 5 years. Any other average Joe who did this would, I hope be arrested. So why not Mark Foley? Oh yeah, I forgot, he’s a U.S. Congressman and is above all us other mere mortals.
Posted by: John | October 1, 2006, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Apparently you guys didn’t read the AIM chat transcript in the other article related to this guy. It was totally explicit, and the fact that the page is a male wouldn’t matter except for the fact that this makes a REPUBLICAN congressman a gay pedophile. And I hate hypocrites. Also… there’s no such thing as the liberal media, in fact I would say it’s quite tame. When will people realize? Maybe when Republicans start a WWIII?
Posted by: Lauren | October 1, 2006, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
I cannot believe, or stomach, the number of comments here that excuse or minimize the seriousness of Foley’s alleged behavior! Are you the same people who didn’t give a fig about Clinton’s behavior with Lewinsky, or brushed off the Catholic priests accused of molesting boys? People, these guys REPRESENT our country, our religion. What the hell is wrong with you? If serious allegations are made, against ANYONE, they DESERVE a full investigation. Nothing less will do. Do you think you, as a common citizen, would get a break if the accused were you?! Sheesh!
Posted by: Bewildered | October 1, 2006, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
The GOP must be taking crazy pills if it continues to suppress information and hide stuff like this. Its bad enough that they suppress information about the iraq war, about weapons of mass destruction, about insider contracts to connected companies, but this is just plain intolerable if the GOP is suppressing pedophilia in its own ranks.
Posted by: Steve Savage | October 1, 2006, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
I’m guess Tom hasn’t read any of the most recent transcripts.
I too live in the Congressman’s Congressional District and I was flabergasted that he would resign over the first few e-mails that were released to the public.
And now we know the rest of the story.
Posted by: PGJudy | October 1, 2006, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Witch Hunt? You think the comment saying “strip down and relax” was acceptable? What’s this country coming to?
Posted by: Robert | October 1, 2006, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
So you all think that a 52 year old man telling an 16 year old boy that he would like to take his pants off is just blowing smoke. You people are the problem with the Country today.
Posted by: Judith | October 1, 2006, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
I can’t believe after reading some of the emails/SMSs that some of the (Republican) people commenting above thought all were innocent conversations. And one person said that if it was the other party it wouldn’t be reported. Does he forget what the GOP did to the US and to Clinton by logjamming all legislation for 2 years over his affair with Monica? I would say that action is more defensible than trying to talk a 16 year old boy into having sex….or maybe the Republicans have different “family moral values”.
Posted by: mike | October 1, 2006, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Unless there is more to the dialogue, the only thing inappropriate in this email dialogue with the young page is that the young page asked for a reccommendation from a congressman he didn’t even work for during his tenure.
This is horrible that this man’s career has been smeared over a witch-hunt.
Posted by: Rupe | October 2, 2006, 12:04 am 12:04 am
I don’t know why everyone commenting is so naive on this topic but if you guys looked at the additional correspondence between the page and the congressman, the text gets a lot more explicit, asking the kid if hes wearing boxers and about his masturbation practices.
Its way beyond innocent friendliness.
Posted by: diana | October 2, 2006, 1:17 am 1:17 am
This congressman is disgusting and perverted. He needs to be punished somehow..
Posted by: 11111 | October 2, 2006, 2:00 am 2:00 am
The emails are NOT innocent. People’s stupidity about a 52 year old man sending email to underage boys speaks of why pedophiles prosper in this the US. Yeah the emails are nothing compared to the Instant Messages that will come out in the upcoming days. Just how far Foley went is up to a law enforcement agency, a prosecutor, a defense attorney and hopefully one day a jury!!!
The man knew what he was doing by sending them to former Pages. You are not being naive you are being down right stupid in 2006 and say there is nothing to what took place. I honestly hope none of the people that see what has been presented thus far are parents. If you are are you have a lot to learn about what adults are saying to your children via the Internet.
Posted by: Stay Tuned, more to come | October 2, 2006, 2:11 am 2:11 am
The Congressional leadership knew about this situation a long time ago and chose simply to tell Foley not to do it anymore rather than to impose harsher discipline. So any complaint about the timing of this story is moot because the Republicans had a chance to take care of it months ago when it would have faded somewhat in the minds of voters by November.
This was an opportunity for the Republicans to show that they were tough on inappropriate behavior. Now their cries for an investigation is too little, too late.
BTW, Foley’s behavior, if verified (which it appears to have been verified) is grounds for termination at best and a basis for a criminal trial at worst.
Posted by: Brad from Utah | October 2, 2006, 2:23 am 2:23 am
The bottom line on this Foley business is that he is a gay pedophile who abused his position of authority to prey on a teenager. Does this outing of Foley benefit the Dems? Of course, but it has no bearing on the issue. We need to know who knew about it, when they knew it, and what their role(s) were in not doing anything about it. Heads need to roll.
Posted by: Will Walker | October 2, 2006, 2:31 am 2:31 am
Never ceases to amaze me how many republician morons jump to this sick clowns defense. The fact of the matter is this is a 52 year old man telling a 16 year old boy how he would love to slip off the shorts he was wearing! If you idiots don’t find anything wrong with that then this country is more screwed up that anyone could ever imagine. What great family values you all seem to have.
Posted by: Mark | October 2, 2006, 3:07 am 3:07 am
As a retired teacher and school administrator I applaud the 16 year old for telling someone. If this type of information had come to my attention, I would be obligated by law to file a police report. Our nation has never made the welfare and education of our children its top priority, so this type of behavior and cover up does not surprise me. If what I read is correct, his staff should be indicted for aiding and abeiting solicitation of a minor. I will never be convinced that his staff, including Elizabeth Nicolson, did not know or suspect that Congressman Foley had an “unusual interest in teenage boys.
Posted by: Carol | October 2, 2006, 4:08 am 4:08 am
I’m not an American, therefor having no ties to Democrats or Republicans whatsoever, but it never ceases to amaze me that such news items in the US always seem to culminate in partisan bashing.
I’d say it’s quite simple: there is a kid that came forward with some sort of allegation, apparently backed up by a number of e-mail messages… let the DA or prosecutor or whomever is supposed to act on this investigate it and be over with it.
Posted by: pg | October 2, 2006, 6:04 am 6:04 am
All men should take a moment and really think about any sexual activity that in retrospect you now know was probably not appropriate for whatever the reason and reflect on any circumstances when you were dishonest and lied to your significant-other,spouse, friends, family or co-workers to cover your sexual “fingerprints’-
Justification is not a good substitute for good judgement, as good judgement needs no justification.
Posted by: Gay in Atlanta | October 2, 2006, 7:09 am 7:09 am
Deceit is Discreet’s next-door neighbor or co-worker or family member or hotel stranger or bartender or one-night stand or internet buddy or ….
Posted by: Atl | October 2, 2006, 7:37 am 7:37 am
Reading this story about Congressman Foley reminds me of the series of reports that NBC has done on the subject. It goes something like this, an undercover agent goes online to a chat room and is approached by a doctor, lawyer, policeman, or priest. The agent sets up a time and place to meet and the subject actually goes and meet the agent, only to find television cameras and police aiming their weapons at them. I guess now we can add politicians to the group eh?
Posted by: John | October 2, 2006, 9:26 am 9:26 am
I can not believe people do not have a problem with Foley’s emails. Shame on you for putting politics ahead of principals. Is this the way republicans think? What if it were your child he was hitting on! Shame, shame, shame on you!
Posted by: Drew | October 2, 2006, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Surely by now you know that this was NOT innocent. How is this a democratic ploy? Foley is co-chair of the Committee to protect missing and expoited children. If this were a Democrat, he would have not had the opportunity to resign, he would have been run out of town on a rail. DISGUSTING, these pages are not here for those freaks pleasure. They are to learn about politics and the workings of our government. Don’t make this partisan. Dem. or Rep. this is wrong, and the only reason he went to Rehab is so he can say he is an alcoholic. Being an alcoholic DOES NOT MAKE YOU A PEDOPHILE. And don’t mention Monica Lewinsky, though that was wrong and STUPID, she was over 21, even though she was an intern. Pages are all young teens.
Posted by: DEE | October 2, 2006, 10:34 am 10:34 am
We’ve finally gotten to the point where we can look an obvious pedophile in the face, ignore the actual victims, and slip right into political debate. Shame, shame, shame on all of us. And if you’ve read the IM exchanges and believe this is innocent, you are criminal jaded.
Posted by: JD Greenfield | October 2, 2006, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Maybe we all need to chill out for just a moment and let’s gather all the facts. For a country who purports “Guilty until proven innocent”, we very often tend to go the other direction. No matter what the media “reports”, let’s not prejudge. I’m a Democrat at heart and I do perceive the Congressman’s emails as scary, but I still want to hear the rest of the story. Ultimately, the Congressman will pay the price one way or the other. There’s a lesson to be learned in EVERYTHING we do or say!
Posted by: Dane in Baltimore | October 2, 2006, 11:25 am 11:25 am
I’m correcting my own blog above… Instead of saying “guilty until proven innocent”, I really meant to say, “Innocent until proven guilty”. Which one really applies in our society now??
Posted by: Dane in Baltimore | October 2, 2006, 11:39 am 11:39 am
A man who’s innocent doesn’t resign as quickly as that, and without a fight. Give me a break with the “why can’t people just accept niceness;” if this were a Democrat I think a lot of the people here would be quick to say, of course, he’s “liberal” and “godless,” but it doesn’t work out so nicely when it’s a GOP who heads a committee on child welfare!
Posted by: H | October 2, 2006, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Oh how hilarious in retrospect are the initial reactions from the republicans above from 9/28! You sad people…”a slap from the Left”? Try unmasking a predatory pedophile, people. Thanks ABC News.
Posted by: franny | October 2, 2006, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
If this is no big deal, why did Foley quit? Wake up people this is not a sex scandle, its a pedophile scandle. It is a big deal
Posted by: David Nunez | October 2, 2006, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
hmmm maybe the right wingers that are crowing about a “witch hunt” would be well advised to read the additional pages that have texted back and forth, most notably the one that Foley continously asks how he masturbates and if he was hard.
Posted by: Tim | October 2, 2006, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
…off to rehab?..what next… a spiritual conversion? this guy is a true scumbag.
Posted by: cup | October 2, 2006, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
witch hunt… how about kid hunt! this guy is a perv… what if it was your kid he was lusting after… what a joke! by the way I have this lovely peace of land to sell on the GULF… any takers… eply if interested, I’ll give u a po box to send the cashiers check… becuz as stupid as some of these responders are and sound I know someone will bite my offer.
Posted by: sam I am | October 2, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
I wanted to point out, the first post is from “One_American” complaining that this report is partisan, but look what happened the very next day — Foley resigns.
And it looks like Hastert knew about this for a year.
Remember when Larry Flynt offered big cash rewards for the dirt on politicians, and he was able to force at least one to resign- some guy was a moralist crusader, but had a 15 year old girlfriend. Forget his name. Hopefully Flynt will do it again.
Posted by: Steve White | October 2, 2006, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
As a single father of two girls and one boy, I had to be extra careful of my conversations with minors. This is not a political issue, but a personal one. The Resignation seemed to lead one to believe that ‘where there was smoke…”
Posted by: Bubba | October 2, 2006, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
I bet all you right wingers feel really stupid for backing this guy now. I just got done reading the IM’s he was sending a 17 year old boy. I don’t care if he’s a democrat or a republican the guys a jackass. With that being said who cares about his politics. Why waste time defending them? Jerks.
Posted by: Kimberly | October 2, 2006, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
In 1995 I went to DC to rally congress for our “Right to Life” movement. Congressman Foley was extremely polite and helpful. We each signed our names in the visitor’s book and every year since then he has personaly sent my husband and I a Christmas card. Not even my good friends and neighbors have done this. I am only pointing out what an expressive person he seems to be. When a friend ran for Congress, he took her under his wing and personally acquainted her with the individuals in Congress who could help her the most. He did not ask a page or an assistant to do this, he escorted her around the capitol himself.
Posted by: jay | October 2, 2006, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
The instant messages…google them, they’re all over the net… if they are from Foley, are vile and disgusting, no matter how wonderful he was/is to friends and constituents
Posted by: lacie | October 2, 2006, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
IT IS SAD THAT SO MANY ARE BLAMING EVERYONE… EXCEPT MARK FOLEY!! MARK FOLEY IS A PEDOPHILE…AND PEOPLE ARE BLAMING THE REPORTER..DEMOCRATS..ETC!!
THINK PEOPLE…DONT BE LEMMING!
Posted by: jan wint | October 2, 2006, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Ummm.. Jay, honey…I don’t mean to burst your bubble and Foley might have been nice to your friend..but I’ve read the emails and it didn’t seem to be Grown women that he was interested in..it seemed to be underage boys. I applaud the young man for coming forward! In this day and age when there seems to be more perverts out there preying on our kids, it make one wonder how many of our kids that we send to become pages are approached in such a manner.
Posted by: Shirley | October 2, 2006, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Foley voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, so America is safe from the spectacle of having two little bride figurines stuck in the frosting on the top of wedding cakes, but whether teenaged page boys are safe is another matter.
Posted by: Teresita | October 2, 2006, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
This scumbag got what he deserved. HE shouldn’t be in power of anything.
Posted by: jimnorden | October 2, 2006, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Republicans are unbelievable. Blaming the liberal media, then the victim. When are these people going to realize the irony of their supposed moral superiority?
Posted by: RB Tony | October 2, 2006, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
The IMs in question are posted ON this site — just not with big arrows pointing to them; you have to hunt a bit. ANYONE who reads them will learn more about former Rep Foley (including how he masturbates and what kind of sexual fetishes he has, as well as watch him, with one’s mouth agape in shock and horror, as he requests the former page to perform a sex act). NO ONE who reads the transcript can keep up the willfull ignorance and media-bashing.
I confess to being almost as appalled by Foley’s near-constant grammatical and spelling errors as I am by his lurid pedophilia.
Posted by: Sandy | October 2, 2006, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
I’m always amazed at how these so-called “men of power and prestige” seem to think this type of behavior will go unnoticed. I don’t care what their sexual orientation may be or their personal gratification habits are, but to knowingly enter into an online conversation and express such things with a minor is unacceptable on all levels … from the local pastor to the president of the United States. Common sense doesn’t cost anything. Too bad, most people seem to lose it when they get power. Forget the party baiting. This issue is simple. It’s about unethical, immoral behavior. That doesn’t change no matter what side of the ballot you butter your bread on.
Posted by: JK Benson | October 2, 2006, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Rep. Foley is one sick puppy. You just know that a page is going to come forward with damaging information regarding a sexual encounter with him.
Posted by: Dennis | October 3, 2006, 12:11 am 12:11 am
clinton more worse then foley…right!
Posted by: yt | October 3, 2006, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Right on!! Foley is so guilty he ran right into rehab. It wasn’t him, it was his other personality. It only comes out when he drinks. The rest of the time he is on the lookout for those big, bad child molesters.
Posted by: Ron | October 3, 2006, 7:05 am 7:05 am
The man is twisted, why was he not done like dateline and carted off in handcuffs…the intent is obvious. I could care less if the man never touched the child…the child. What was his job title? Job description? Again, republicans and democrats talking out the side of their mouths.
Posted by: msztonia | October 3, 2006, 7:33 am 7:33 am
I get a real kick out of Republicans who think that this political. Are you REALLY so blindly loyal to your party that you’d let a pedophile continue on with his behavior because it might disrupt the stranglehold you have on power? Get real.
So, the timing is inconvenient to you, big deal! If he hadn’t gotten so specific about his masturbatory habits, you wouldn’t have this problem at all. How about some accountability where it belongs… with Foley and the Republican leadership for not doing anything about it when it happened. (Oh, btw, don’t bother raising issues about Dems doing the same thing… they’re just as wrong if they do and it doesn’t reduce the culpability of Foley, Boehner, Hastert and the others)
To paraphrase… “it’s your government, stupid” – get involved in it!
Posted by: Progressive and NOT Stupid | October 3, 2006, 7:51 am 7:51 am
Lawton Chiles is turning over in his grave! Foley is a pedophile, just read the transcripts! Having a child describe his privates to him and how the child masturbates??? Come on people! This is not a right, left, moderate, conservative, Republican, or Democrat issue!!! This is a grown man, an elected official sworn to protect our rights, and best interest, hitting on a 16 y.o. child… Absolutely horrible, and then for people to just focus on the political spin… Give me a break! The guy needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. He’s lucky that I am not the boy’s Father, he would have a lot more to worry about, than just political fall-out!
Posted by: Rick Neighbours | October 3, 2006, 9:09 am 9:09 am
If you read the other emails he has written, you would see that his discussions move toward much more explicit sexual language. Pedophiles don’t just jump into such discussions with potential victims; they groom them first, and they often back off if the response from the other suggests the possibility of getting caught. I think that is what was starting to happen with this page. Look at all of the communication he has had with the various pages and not just this one exchange and you will see the pattern.
Posted by: Terry | October 3, 2006, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Hastert doesn’t remember, Boehner wasn’t sensitive to the nature of what was going on. These are the people who voted for a bill to do away with habeas corpus? These are the Leadership of the Party. These are corrupted politicians who don’t ask, don’t tell. I have come to agree that these people aren’t Republicans at all but Liberals who “spend and spend” and “create bigger government.” We do need a real third party, a conservative party that is compassionate, not the phony Republican Party that exists to feed the piggy snouts of those who now hold office. Let’s get these smarmy guys out, Foley and Hastert and Boehner, and the Abramoff crew including Mr Bush who, you may remember, was good friends with Lay at Enron, and the forty (?) others who have been convicted eating our taxes and depleting our Treasury. Where is the surplus that Clinton, another dummy, left us? The sooner Bush is gone and a real conservative takes his place, the better; in the meantime the only hope is to balance these clowns off with a Democratic majority for the short term.
Posted by: OCPatriot | October 3, 2006, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
In reading the first posts through to the last, it is fascinating how the tone changes as more information about the nature of the communications surfaces. My question to the Republicans is, If this is a problem now, why wasn’t it a problem last year, when the leadership was informed, and before it got to the media.
What kind of values do you purport to hold if you were to intentionally squash investigations of misconduct involving a minor. To hold a political seat? Have you lost your mind? Did you think it would just go away?
Posted by: Ron | October 3, 2006, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Wow, I can’t believe anyone had the guts to defend Foley after his resignation. So the emails weren’t sexually explicit, but the guy resigns anyway? Gee, maybe he just wanted to jump out of the frying pan before it got too hot? Only he knows what a full investigation is going to uncover regarding additional emails and instant messages that haven’t yet surfaced. And I agree 100% that this is NOT politically relevant, it is a matter of a PEDOPHILE being exposed for exactly what he is.
Posted by: Julie | October 3, 2006, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
if mr. foley were a democrat, he would have been removed from office, convicted as a child molester, and put in prison by now, all to the accompaniment of a sensational media campaign about how immoral democrats are.
Posted by: steve | October 3, 2006, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
For those of you who are defending Mark Foley, you obviously haven’t read the rest of the e-mails and instant messages that leave no doubt about whether his actions were inappropriate. I’m 15 years old and I have had everything there is to know about avoiding sexual predators drilled into my head countless times and am often told about how much effort police are putting into stopping them, so why is Foley still walking around? And for people who are looking out for the best interests of the American citizens, the Republicans were sure trying hard to keep people from discovering a man who was preying on under-age boys.
Posted by: Rachel | October 3, 2006, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Why is it that everytime something bad happens to the Repubublicans they have to bring up Bill Clinton?
Posted by: Rivet_Mile | October 3, 2006, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
And another thing….. If Foley is a drunk all the sudden, how could he type on a keyboard so clearly?
Posted by: Rivet_Mile | October 3, 2006, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
It is so sad and unfortunate that this being played out as a political scandal. This has nothing to do with political parties and everything to do with a pedophile using his position to exploit children. It is unfortunate that some of us are so wrapped up in trying to defend that we are not concerned with the horrible situations that we are allowing our children to be put in.
Posted by: sad American | October 3, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Foley quit so fast that it is obvious things are far worse than we think. Wait until we hear the rest of the story…. I’ll just bet there are plenty of youngsters who will come forward. There is a great liklihood that Mr. Fooley has had sex with them according to the haste with which he resigned. I agree with the rest of you who say that those who knew of Mr. Fooley’s deeds should burn in hell with him.
Posted by: Disgusted in Roseville, CA | October 3, 2006, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
As a Republican I feel utterly disgusted not by the report but by other ignorant and stupid republicans that keep on trying to defend Foley. Its obvious what he did just let it go. It makes us as republicans look like idiots. Our inability to deal with this and accept this situation and speaking in defense of Foley is making it worse.
Posted by: Disgusted | October 3, 2006, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Thank You to the above statement!!That’s all that needs to be said.
Posted by: Q | October 3, 2006, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Anyone crying that this MUST be persecution, that the emails were not untoward, etc., you must read the texts of the IMs sent from the former Congressman to the 16-year old page. There is nothing appropriate about a Congressman soliciting sexual information from a child. There is NO misconstruing the IMs in the least. His sexual orientation is not an issue – the fact that he was soliciting a child is the offense.
Posted by: Caroline | October 3, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Thank goodness the rest of Foley’s messages were made public and he resigned ON HIS OWN before Hastert forced him out like DeLay was. Today, when I read the first messages that were posted on September 28 and 29th,I could tell a lot of Rovian Republicans wanted everyone to believe this scandal was a plan by Mr. Ross, ABC, and the Democratic smear machine just before elections for political reasons only. What about the kids? How can so many Americans be so dumb?
Posted by: Dottie | October 3, 2006, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
it is beyond sad how many people defend a man because he is a republican
Posted by: adam | October 3, 2006, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Folks laugh at, or point political fingers about this, to cope with the horrible toxicity of it. This is victimization. The young have been victimized and there was no one protecting them. In the Catholic Church investigations, victims still suffered trauma decades later, physical contact or not. Yet again, we are vividly reminded that children live in a country which has still not ratified the UN Declaration of the Rights of the Child. (Only 2 countries have not signed.)
Posted by: Pontiac | October 3, 2006, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
I just read through the comments below of all the fools who are so politically brain washed as Republicans that they can’t see RED FLAGS when a 54 yr. old Congressman is personally comminicating with a 16 yr. old. Brian was ahead of the news in breaking this on Sept. 28, 2006 before it got really big coverage. When he did, most of you said oh it’s not big news, why is it so bad, another Dem. attack, and otherwise chastised Brian for reporting the truth. But, the reality is you’re so pathetically attached to your party that you don’t care if children are molested so long as it doesn’t hurt your political party. You’d just assume ignore it, b/c it’s some pedafile that just so happens to be in your political camp. I’m disgusted. And Rep. consider themselves moral. Bunch of hypocrites.
Posted by: CHAD | October 3, 2006, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
What is really going on??
This appears to be just more conjecture and political foolishness.
While the politicians and media fiddle about what is happening behind the scene??
This is most likely a smoke screen to cover up something bigger going on in the government.
Both parties are self interested and not doing their elected jobs.
It appears that government is broken and the media just fuels the melt down.
The media is sex crazed and irresponsible, that all.!!
Wake up before it is too late!
Posted by: Wisdom | October 3, 2006, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
I am a Republican but I am changing my registraton to Democratic tomorrow. Huge kudos to the Blotter for exposing the party of “values” that I stupidly adored.
Posted by: DR | October 3, 2006, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Yeah this is news. Pervo news. The kind the networks like best. What galls me is that the msm brings up crap like “will this hurt the gop in the upcoming elections?” why should it? a perv is a perv is a perv, democrat or republican, either should get rid of him. why should there be fallout against the gop? it’s this kind of biased, one-sided crap that gives cnn, abc, etc. a bad name, and why fox kicks their asses. Thanks, -Nick, Honolulu, HI
Posted by: gak | October 3, 2006, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
An adult, let alone a Congressman, that writes to a teenager using sexual and suggestive language, should be punished. I do not feel that this is a witch hunt. I feel that that this man has disgraced himself, his constituants and his fellow Congressmen. He should have resigned! This is just the tip of the iceberg though! Wait and see. Hey maybe we can catch this pervert on NBC Dateline “to Catch a Preditor” soon! If it were your child that was involved maybe you would feel differently. What you don’t realize is that these pages are your children!
Posted by: Rich | October 3, 2006, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
It’s all Clinton’s fault….
Posted by: Richard | October 3, 2006, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Kudos for reporting the story. The fourth estate has a job to do and people trying to shame YOU for putting this stuff out there are seriously confused. Almost all, “Oh, the Republicans this …,” and “Oh, the Democrats that …” is bogus, temperamental foolishness. But trying to shame members of the press for exposing to our view the things that we’d rather not see … that’s an incalculable danger, a very serious evil, and THOSE people need to be shamed in a BIG way! Write on, Brian
Posted by: Carol | October 3, 2006, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
I am a sickened by the actions of Mr. Foley. No one should be communicating with an underage child in the fashion that Mr. Foley has done. Yes this is an abuse of power but it happens and has happened in both political parties. Mr. Foley resigned from his post, as well he should have, but let us not forget a few short years ago when we had the President of the United States wagging his finger saying he didn’t have sex with the young intern. And, I might add that he made this statement while under oath. So no party is immune to these types of disgusting acts.
Posted by: Pete | October 3, 2006, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Seems a little strange that now of of sudden he says he was sexually abused as a teenager. Sounds like a lame excuse he’s trying to come up with now.
Posted by: Brenda | October 3, 2006, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
ouch – now all you nay-sdayers apologise……
Posted by: kaeri | October 4, 2006, 12:27 am 12:27 am
As a retired gov’t employee, I find his questions troubling to a person under 18 years of age. Most of all he is a government employee he is suppose to try to hold his self above reproach and to be an example to the public. I have investigated cases like this and the context of the messages are questionable even if there was no more than has been shown, and I am sure there is more that will come out later. bottom line is a 52 year old man does not need to be asking questions like ” do i make you a little horney” Also as someone in this commentary suggested this might have been a setup by politically motivated people. and I say to that, even if it was Foley should not have taken the bait. remember 52 year old talking to a minor…
Posted by: Jon | October 4, 2006, 12:55 am 12:55 am
wow…that the first time i have ever seen a man use his lawyer to come “out”…
Posted by: cup | October 4, 2006, 2:40 am 2:40 am
Foley is breaking laws passed by himself to prey on children for his own sick pleasures. Why would he resign for sending “friendly emails”. And I don’t know about you all but asking someone if you make them horney is more than friendly chat.
Posted by: Hank | October 4, 2006, 6:59 am 6:59 am
Why are so many so upset about the truth? It is what it is, disgusting. So sad that this man represents the Republican party. Maybe the Republicans should keep a more watchful eye of who they “support”. Pretty sad that it was “covered” up for so long. Great timing!
Posted by: Citizen of USA | October 4, 2006, 7:01 am 7:01 am
Isn’t this the same behavior that gets people wrestled to the ground by police in the sensationalist series Dateline Predator? What’s the difference?
Posted by: The Real Deal | October 4, 2006, 9:39 am 9:39 am
It seems like half the people responding here have not read the rated x email.I dont think they would be saying ” Where’s the New’s here.”
Posted by: Steve Lynch | October 4, 2006, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Have any of you actually read the transcript? If you think that is “OK” behavior, or you would think nothing of a grown man texting this to your child, you should not have Children. What is the matter with you people! Grown Men Do Not Hang Out or Email Young Boys!!!!
Posted by: Kim | October 4, 2006, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
It is disgusting isn’t it “CITIZEN OF USA”? So he represents the Republican party. What party did Pres. Clinton represent when he did his disgusting things with Monica in the Oval office while “running our country” on the phone.
PLEASE!!!! Guess it doesn’t matter what party one represents, does it???
Posted by: Judy | October 4, 2006, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
This is why I do not vote or have any interest in politics as a whole. All of the politicians are criminals. Some of them are the unfortunate ones who get caught.
Posted by: Dee | October 4, 2006, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
The real issue is whether OTHER Pages were exposed to inappropriate behavior because of the failure to censure Foley’s known conduct. Foley can do anything he wants with whomever he wants as long as everyone involved are NOT minors. There is NOTHING appropriate about the communications with the MINOR Pages and it is clear he is using his position and his access to entice teenage boys for his sexual arousal.
Posted by: Mark | October 4, 2006, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
I think people are missing the point-Republican, Democrat-it doesn’t matter. Even if the boy WANTED it-which he didn’t-it is Foley’s job as the ADULT to know it is wrong. Everyone is also getting two things mixed up-homosexulaity and pedophilia.If Foley was with an ADULT male, I don’t really see a problem.
As far as Bill Clinton-look Lewinsky was a 22 year old woman. His judgment may have been skewed, but she was an adult.
Posted by: Tiff | October 4, 2006, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Simply put: This was the act of a pediphile, beginning the process of seduction. feeling things out so he could eventually feel his victims up. Those who ride high horses, fall the furtherest. Now let’s see if Foley’s bones –and those Republicans who attempted a cover-up–are picked as clean as those folks in another not-so-distant scandal. At least, that was between two of legal age for consent. The wheels of justice turn slowly, but turn they do–literally and figuratively.
Posted by: d.r. | October 4, 2006, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Umm, Was Monica not of legal age at the time?
Posted by: muck | October 4, 2006, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Why have all of the “excuses” being issued if his e-mails were “innocent?” First, he was molested as a child. Not only that, but secondly, he was molested by a priest (a little late to be coming out with this isn’t it), Thirdly, he’s gay (now that’s Gay Bashing – being gay makes you a predator). Fourthly, he’s an alcoholic (boy, he made it to rehab just in time so the media can’t get to him). But wait, we’re yet to see the Race Card (they’re picking on him because he’s a Black Female). Just give us a break and let’s get some honest, decent people in Congress
Posted by: Warren | October 4, 2006, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Mark Foley may have been molested as a child – and he may be a gay man. HOWEVER – neither of these would explain or justify his reported behaviors with teenage boys. These are the behaviors of a pedophile — adults of all sexual orientations are drawn to other adults as sexual partners – not to children. AND the Republican “leadership” in this matter has taken a page from the playbook of their friends the leaders of the Catholic Church — hush it up, hide it away, deny deny — they are equally complicit in the matter!
Posted by: tertel | October 4, 2006, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
“How can a Pedophile get help in an alcohol rehab place???”
perhaps it was a rehab place that specializes in underage drinkers…in which case he’s just crusing. ;)
Posted by: obvious | October 4, 2006, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Fire both of those men that are responsible for the inapproriate behavior and language that this horrible man wrote to those kids, and fire that Speaker of the house for not doing his job correctly and hiding that information. That is the most ridicious , obnoxious, disgusting thing a politican or any person could ever do to a minor-young boy. Please do not embarass our country we have enough of embarassment allready with our White House Staff.
Posted by: Cynthia | October 4, 2006, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
enough with the clinton/lewinsky comparison already. she was 22 and consenting. the child was 16 and, if you read the instant messages, clearly not comfortable with the conversations.
how on earth can you equate sex between consenting adults with a man hitting on a minor? that’s just wrong. not to mention stupid.
Posted by: sine nomine | October 4, 2006, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
This is not about Clinton. This is about Mark Foley. We discussed Clinton at the time and he was roundly criticized as he should have been. But to somehow make this about Clinton is disengenuous at best.
Posted by: Thomas | October 4, 2006, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
Don’t you love a group that takes the moral high ground and yet, as a whole, their behavior is that of liars, cheats, thieves,and ultimately, bafoons.
Then one gets the privilege to read comments from the ignorant that support such behavior.
LMAO!!!
Posted by: Jehovah | October 4, 2006, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
Did anyone else notice that Foley actually used his initials and the year he was born “maf54″ as his IM name? Not the sharpest tool in the shed in addition to his other problems discussed here.
Also, it is disturbing that all of the recent shocking news involving childen, John Mark Carr (Jon Benet Ramsey) The Amish school murders and now Foley all involve men who claim to have been abused as children. How do we end this cycle?
Posted by: Al | October 4, 2006, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Comparison of the congressman’s actions with those of President Clinton’s is ridiculous. Monica was 24, this boy is 16. How many other pedophiles (straight or gay) are lurking in Washington? Maybe recognition gays (equal rights) in America will encourage folks to come out of the closet and help clean up our political system.
Posted by: Jack_Omaha | October 5, 2006, 4:16 am 4:16 am
I hardly think the democrats are in any position to preach about morality as the lady above did. I, as a republican, am appalled at the behavior of Foley. And we republicans must make it clear that it is unacceptable. However, Foley stepped down. How many democrats have stepped down after their scandals? I can’t think of one. At least when someone on our side of the aisle screws up they step out of the picture. And as far as republicans having a “moral high ground,” we do. And the proof lies with the democrats themselves. Compare how outraged and surprised they are with Foley compared to when their own cast of characters pulls charades like this. But perhaps what’s most laughable about the left’s political mudslinging in all of this is that they still manage to insult President Bush. Their hate is mind-boggling.
Posted by: Scotty | October 5, 2006, 4:34 am 4:34 am
This is absolutely ridiculous! I logged onto comcast’s website and they said “Foley is gay?” From a few emails people are making the worst of assumptions. And by the way Charlie, this has no parallels with the OJ case… that was a murder-this was an email. I’m a moderate and this is a classic case of slanted press bashing one side to make the other side look better. I yearn for the day where we can get some nonbiased news. Come on ABC, why stoop down like this? This is garbage. Get some real news to report. Maybe it’s time to start checking out CNN instead. This is ridiculous.
Posted by: Paul | October 5, 2006, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Foley’s office acknowledges
- that Foley wrote the e-mails to the young man
- that e-mails were sent from Foley’s personal account
- that it is their policy to keep pictures of former interns
- that they believe the e-mail exchange began when the page asked Foley for a recommendation
But the young man did not work or intern for Foley’s office. Old men have no reason to ask for this kind of pictures, or what do u want for birthday and what stuff do u like to do FROM A TOTAL STRANGER, who was a 16-year-old dude. Suspicious i say.
Posted by: a finnish guy | October 5, 2006, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Hey guys…
Why would a man of his position ask a minor personal questions to begin with? He crossed the line between appropriate and inappropriate, regardless of the actual words exchanged.
By the way, Mr. Bush wouldn’t have addressed the matter had it not been fully substantiated. Why do you all think we are hearing the whole story while this is still an ongoing investigation… Wow.
Posted by: Ryan | October 5, 2006, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Considering there is no sexual content in any of the emails, why do the media says he’s a pedophile? By your standards he could be a anything you want… a killer… a kidnapper… a terrorist… there’s as much sex content in the emails as there are personal threats. What ever happened to reasonable doubt? Gimme a break!
Posted by: Rick | October 5, 2006, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Nobody ignored anything. There was nothing wrong with the emails. Those people have better things to do than worrying about emails that have nothing to be worried about. What were they supposed to do? Tell this very important guy who’s been working for our country for decades : Stop writing emails asking people how they are? According to the logic of these media people whose only purpose in life is to find who to blame and who is responsible… the media and the democrats… are they going to blame AOL too? Gimme another break!!!
Posted by: Rick | October 5, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
I am so tired of all of these high and mighty republicans crying the blues . Foley is clearly out of line . As a parent I would go after this guy myself after the first e-mail that had that kind of content. It has nothing to do with which party he is part of, it has everything to do with the fact that this guy is a pedophile . The only reason this guy was not repremanded in the first place is because the republicans did not want to loose the seat in the house.Republicans claim to be the “Family Values” party, think about it, turn the guy in and loose the seat in the house, or sacrifice the 16 year old and sweep it under the rug , obviously they chose to sacrifice the boy. What a bunch of hypocrites.
Posted by: John | October 5, 2006, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Hey Jim Moran … the reason the Democrats aren’t saying anything is because they don’t have to.
The Republicans are doing a good enough job smearing themselves by trying to distance themselves from Foley as quickly as possible … or blaming the victim … AFTER they puffed themselves up and said this was all a smear campaign by Foley’s opponent.
There’s nothing the Democrats could say or do to make the Republicans look worse than they are making themselves look.
Signed, an Independent
Posted by: Ambs | October 5, 2006, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
I find it so funny that some Republican shills attribute the outcry to the “liberal media.” Are they trying to imply that Fox, CNBC and CNN have a liberal bias? If anything the media has a conservative slant these days.
Posted by: Paul | October 5, 2006, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
These comments discounting the story vindicate traditional network news and disredit internet-based slime.
Posted by: Jack Blackwell | October 5, 2006, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Jim Moran,I am a democrat.I am pro-life.I am a christian.I vote democrat mainly because I am middle class.Republicans only take care of the rich.I need my job and I don,t see Bush showing any concern about people like me.Mark Foley is guilty.It does not matter how he was caught,just that he was caught. Barb
Posted by: BARB | October 6, 2006, 11:01 am 11:01 am
I don’t think ABC is out to smear Foley. Remember that ABC showed that ridiculous “The Path to 9/11″. If anything, ABC (owned by family values Disney) probably loves the Republicans.
Posted by: pris_72 | October 6, 2006, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Monica Lewinski was 23 in Nov.1995. Though what a relationship between two adults has to do with a man going after someone’s kids, I don’t know.
To those claiming Monica was only 19, you need to turn off the FOX. They like to change the facts when they don’t fit. I’m sure out there in FOX land they think Foley was a Democrat.
Posted by: Dawn_MI | October 6, 2006, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Why are so many blaming the victim? This has nothing to do about the right or the left, this child obliviously was uncomfortable with Foley’s behavior. Should we just ignore that and keep child predators in Congress? By the way this e-mail was only one out of several that were overtly “friendly” and inappropiate. Don’t make excuses for this man, he has issues, but Republicans are so swift in cover up and protecting their own they lose sight of the interests of common people. Don’t blame this teen to excuse a child predator…
Posted by: Tamara | October 6, 2006, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
I read the e-mail over and over and all I can say is ‘what’s the big deal’? Did I miss something?
Posted by: JEG | October 6, 2006, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
At the expense of being “unpatriotic” or “assisting terrorists” . . . it’s way beyond the time to begin to start walking the ethical walk rather than just talking it.
I’ve observed that generally the more moral a person, the less ethical. The way the Republication leadership has handled this situation so far seems to support this observation.
Every time one of these guys gets caught (lying, stealing, etc.) they claim it’s a political plot to smear them. This gets very old after the 5th, 10th, 20th scandel.
Posted by: Bill | October 6, 2006, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
monica lewinsky was 22….and an adult…
Posted by: dina | October 6, 2006, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Good grief. I want to ask the other posters here… what do you like to do for fun besides come to this page. OK arrest me now for being friendly to you. Drive-by media attack does not equal “news” again. I wish I could have these 2 minutes of my life back.
Posted by: G. Eaglebarger | October 6, 2006, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
Interesting reading the immediate comments calling this a witch hunt and that the only sick people are the ones who suspected a more sinister scenario.
We don’t understand the whole Democrat v Republican issue from my country, but it’s obvious that some people are so blinded with their loyalties that they refuse to even consider that somethink nasty was occurring.
It’s also very strange reflection on American society that someone has to remain a closet gay for fear that their sexual orientation will affect their ability to be elected.
Posted by: Overseas Viewpoint | October 6, 2006, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Interesting to look at the comments one week later. Most that I read (and there were many) were blowing this off as overblown hype. Sounds like people hear what they want to hear. Do all of you complaining about the witch hunt, rumor mongering and help for the Left still stick by your commentst that this is all a tempest in a teacup?
Posted by: Greg | October 7, 2006, 8:35 am 8:35 am
Anyone who is not quilty of any sin, let that person step forward and cast the first stone! We are all humans, created by God Himself. There are a lot of worst crimes going on in America and the news media, etc should be addressing those matters and leave Mark Foley alone. Is the teenage page going to be affected by this media attention? Probably not; however, Mark Foley’s career has been ruined by the media. If Mark was my congressman, I’d vote for him again and again.
Posted by: D. Scarborough | October 7, 2006, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Me & my friends used to joke that even if Bush was found in bed with boys, the Repubs would still back him to the hilt. The Foley incident shows that our joke is not far off the mark! It’s amazing seeing the “family values Free Republic” right-wing crowd defend pedophilia!
Posted by: Carl Christensen | October 7, 2006, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
As a father and an American I cannot for my life believe some of the post on this subject. You shrub loving people are kill me..you really are. A witch hunt? give me a break..this freak should be in a jail cell right now. This freak should be brought to justice for his illegal actions. He, and his GOP buddies, are total and complete disgraces to this nation and the office they hold. Under the leadersip of the GOP the congress has become morally bankrupt. I cannot believe that some of you are actually defending this freak. if this was any other place besides DC…any other American in Folleys shoes would already be in jail as we speak. Only in America can a man like Folley be allowed to roam free after something like this comes out. Why is he allowed to remain free…all one has to do is look at who really controls the DOJ and the AJ’s office…a disgrace of a President..shrub!
Posted by: Justin | October 8, 2006, 3:40 am 3:40 am
Appreciate Brian Ross and his investigative team. Too bad about your “entertainment” division.
Posted by: catsmeow | October 8, 2006, 9:21 am 9:21 am
There IS joy in Mudville tonight. At last the red’s are getting a small return on their investment in sleaze. When will this all end and a discussion on the issues begin? Try, for instance, renewable energy or education or tax relief for the not so wealthy. How about a face lift for our state dept and secretary of defence. How about an acknowledgement from # 43 that he was wrong about the war? Oh well , I can dream can’t I?
Posted by: Richard Aldrich | October 8, 2006, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
I assume that everyone defending Foley failed to read the IM correspondence about masturbation and asking the kid to measure his penis size. I hope so. Even without that the first emails are suspicious, though admittedly not definitive. Adult strangers – and a professional contact is essentially that to a teenager – do not give birthday gifts (why ask if not planning to give) or need photos. If those who saw them as not concerning are parents, please cancel your internet service and take down your child’s My Space page. You are not informed enough to protect your child from the internet to which you are exposing them.
Posted by: blessedly apolitical | October 8, 2006, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
hahahaha, im a republican and even i think this is funny. all you guys jump on here before the evidence is clear and defend foley, all you all did was make asses of yourself. an innocent man doesnt resign and hide.
Posted by: Brian | October 9, 2006, 6:03 am 6:03 am
you know what i dont get is why are we talking about this i mean they spent how many dollars on putting bill clinton on trial for having oral sex with an adult and we have a child molester and thats what he is running around stalking little boys and this is a no brainer he should be under the jail i mean anyone else would be locked up and having a date set for his trial i dont who told it they should be thanked this guy has been at this a while and a molester is a molester money or not lock him up and let the courts work it out hell anyone else would have been in jail i guess if you are rich and white the rules dont apply justice should not only be blind but it should apply to all
Posted by: connie | October 9, 2006, 10:31 am 10:31 am
whether Foley was a democrat or republican doesn’t really matter. He made a huge mistake and has to be dealt with in a non-partisan manner. his actions are completely untenable and it bothers me that certain conservatives don’t have a problem with it.
Posted by: Sanjay | October 9, 2006, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Congressman Foley actions are an indication of how bad things have become in the american society. Retrospectively, past western civilizations like ours, have gone on the same path leading to destruction. I am reminded of the fox and the hen house. Have we lost our moral compass, or does it really matter? Otherwise we are forced to bare the consequenses of a few who seeks to live outside of our chosen and preffered moral boundaries.
Posted by: Slydog00 | October 10, 2006, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Hello….this MAN is sending these messages to BOYS. I can’t believe people are trying to justify and even defend his actions. This is absolutely crazy I really can’t believe what I’m reading. He knows he’s guilty of flirting with boys, i’m sorry, excuse me…children. That’s why he submitted his self into rehad and now he claims he’s gay. This is an effort to justify his actions. Foley: “I sent those messages after I had been drinking, and I’m gay so it’s perfectly normal for me to have done what I did.” Give me a break. Send him to jail and let him “get some” in there.
Posted by: Jarrod | October 10, 2006, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
This is about protecting minors! Does it matter the timing matter. More importantly the congressman disgraced himself, not for being gay, but for being completely dishonest. He helped write the laws he broke…literally. IF YOU HAVEN’T DONE SO ALREADY, READ THE IM TRANSCRIPTS. IF YOU CAN SAY THAT THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT, THEN YOU NEED HELP ALSO!
Geez you have got to be kidding me, has the morals of the country gone completely down the tube. By the way I am a conservative.
Posted by: Vincent | October 11, 2006, 9:31 am 9:31 am
I won’t presume to read the of mind of Mark Foley. I only know that when someone is a pedophile that they do what comes naturally and I believe that if he is a pedophile (of older boys) that he has done it before and will continue to do it again. If this is just one of those things that happen, and the press has made more of it then what’s necessary, we will never hear of this happening again, but . . .
I guess what matters to me if he has broken the LAW, then why isn’t he being prosecuted for breaking the law. If this were anyone else, they would have been locked up in a heart beat. This kid had been smart and really looking for puplicity he would have waited to set Mr. Foley up for a bigger opportunity to really make a fool of himself.
Posted by: Eva | October 11, 2006, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
For the people who think this is “being blown out of proportion” and who think this is “just another slap for republicans”, HAVE YA’LL NOT SEEN HIS IMs????? He used sexually explicit words when speaking with a page! I am a former senator page (not from the same place) and NONE of the people that I have ever worked with have ever spoken or even made references to that. Not only did he contact a page in a non-proffessional manor, but he also asked him if he was in his boxers! What is that?? I think you people who are sooo concerned with “republicans being slapped” need to take another look at what is going on.
Posted by: Bethany | October 11, 2006, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
This isn’t about Foley being gay, it’s about Foley trolling for underage boys. I am a lesbian and I refuse to accept Mark Foley into our community. Now is NOT the time to come out Mr. Foley, I don’t know any self-respecting gay person that will acknowledge you and/or accept you as one of our own. We do NOT prey on children, contrary to what some may believe, but thank you very much for perpetuating that myth. You should have stayed in the closet, found men of consenting age and continued being yet another hypocrital Republican.
Posted by: Amy | October 13, 2006, 1:26 am 1:26 am
As if this recent scandel of a politician ( Foley) is shocking?!!Come on,,they all live in crooked houses! What makes me mad is, We the tax payers are picking up the tab for their lurid internet trists!
Posted by: d | October 13, 2006, 5:38 am 5:38 am
The Republican right wing will come to the defense of any pervert so long as he has the big “R” behind his name. No one in their right mind would beleive that Foley’s personal message to this 16 year old was an innocent inquiry. The Kid certainly thought it was strange or maybe “sick.”
Posted by: ed cluster | October 13, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Oh Wow , What a substantial News story, I hope the terrorist don’t use this to bring down our country.
Posted by: Randy | October 14, 2006, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
I think all of the ad hominem attacks here are rather syptomatic of the course that American Politics has taken.
Please, people, can we debate this without the name-calling, slandering, and without trying to label the other side as some evil, sickos
Posted by: RL | October 15, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
scroll up to the first few postings from our right wing friends…..talk about jump on the defensive bandwagon. Its over for you guys…
Posted by: ramblinman312 | October 17, 2006, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
IT IS A SAD DAY WHEN SOMEONE ( REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRATE ) BLAMES AN EVENT IN HIS OR HER CHILDHOOD FOR THE REASON .. LORD HELP THEM THESE PEOPLE ARE GROWN UPS .. IF YOUR ARE GAY BE HAPPY YOUR ALIVE AND STEP OUT .. IF YOU’VE BEEN ABUSED STEP UP AND GET HELP .. SO MUCH AVAILABLE , YES IT IS HARD BUT DON’T HURT OTHER PEOPLE WITH THE SAME INJURY GIVEN TO YOU .. PUT AN END TO IT .. PEOPLE IN THE PUBLIC EYE SHOULD JUST SPEAK UP WITH THAT OLD THING CALLED THE TRUTH IT STOPS THE FIRES FROM THE PRESS .. IN THIS CASE HE IS A SAD EXCUSE FOR A MAN .. FIGHT FOR CHILDRENS RIGHTS .. FIGHTING BECAUSE YOU WERE HURT BUT NEVER HAD THE GUTS TYO SAY .. SO YOU HURT ( YOU KNOW THE PAIN ) OTHERS WITH THE SAME INJUSTICES DONE TO YOU .. THAT MY FRIEND IS A COWARD .. MANY POLITICIANS ( DEMOCRATE OR REPBLICAN ) .. YOU TWO HOPFULLY WILL PAY FOR YOUR WRONG DOING .. THIS IS A SAD AND COWARDLY MAN .. GOD HAVE MERCY !!!
Posted by: SAD READER | October 19, 2006, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Just another hypocritical republican. When will decent people wake up and throw these guys out of office. For me, a republican of some 25 years, I am going to vote the straight Democrctic ticket for the firs time in my life. It’s not so much a pro dem vote- but and ant-Bush administration vote.
Posted by: Dave | October 25, 2006, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
From what I have read here I see nothing more than a political figure taking a healthy interest in one of the youth’s of today who wrote to him. We are in sad times when we have to watch every innocent move we make and not be friendly to others for fear of a smear campaign.
Posted by: Pamela | November 9, 2006, 9:51 am 9:51 am
HOW WILL ANY OF YOU GUYS FEEL IF THAT BOY BEING SOLICITED WITH E-MAILS WAS YOUR SON. THE NEXT TIME YOU DECIDE TO PASS JUDGEMENT, IMMAGINE IT BEING YOUR CHILD. TO ME, HE WAS WRONG, HE’S A REAL SICKO!!!!
Posted by: dee | November 12, 2006, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Well, to all you posting Republicans “HOW’s THAT CROW TASTE?” All the feedback about this conjecture and smear campaign should feel pathetic…you were covering for a child predator. A gay pedophile. NICE ! You’re good people. You stick together.
Posted by: George McDrought | January 23, 2007, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
WOULDN’T IT BE GREAT TO TURN ON THE TV AND HEAR ANY U.S. PRESIDENT, DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN GIVE THE FOLLOWING SPEECH?
My Fellow Americans: As you all know, the defeat of Iraq regime has been completed.
Since congress does not want to spend any more money on this war, our mission in Iraq is complete.
This morning I gave the order for a complete removal of all American forces from Iraq. This action will be complete within 30 days. It is now to begin the reckoning.
Before me, I have two lists. One list contains the names of countries which have stood by our side during the Iraq conflict. This list is short. The United Kingdom, Spain, Bulgaria, Australia, and Poland are some of the countries listed there.
The other list contains everyone not on the first list. Most of the world’s nations are on that list. My press secretary will be distributing copies of both lists later this evening.
Let me start by saying that effective immediately, foreign aid to those nations on List 2 ceases immediately and indefinitely. The money saved during the first year alone will pretty much pay for the costs of the Iraqi war.
The American people are no longer going to pour money into third world Hellholes and watch those government leaders grow fat on corruption.
Posted by: Haskell Hamilton | February 4, 2007, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
That has got to be a long post.
Posted by: online casino | April 13, 2007, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Where is Mr. Mark Foley now? Has he been investigated for the email(s) to a 16 year old? Did he have other contacts with other young people? Did anyone check his private accounts to see if he sent other emails to minors. I may have missed it, but is Mark Foley getting a “free” pass because of his political power? Why did he run off to a clinic? Why didn’t his staff do the contacting? Why did he use his private account if it was official business? Who is responsible for checking Mark Foley’s actions?
Posted by: Bill | August 18, 2007, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
How pathetic it is to see all the Republican slandering and “Republican hypocrites” commentary. This isn’t about parties. Who cares if the Congressman is a Republican or a Democrat, right is right and wrong is wrong. Party should have nothing to do with it. If he’s done wrong, that will be dealt with accordingly. Republicans and Democrats sin alike, and each is guilty of doing something wrong at some point in their lives. Enough with the party blame game.
Posted by: R | September 12, 2007, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Thats true, but we should pay attention to patterns. I think the moral of the story is to remember to tell our kids that if a republican asks you to get into their car – tell an adult!
Posted by: Dan | June 18, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
This doesn’t seem like Foley is a pedophile? Why did he resign? These two little quotes? All this time I was lead to believe the emails were sexually suggestive are there more or what?
FOley a sex offender? Where do all these notions come from certainly not from these little quotes. I hope.
Posted by: tomebaden | December 18, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am