Sep 21, 2006 10:58am

“Worst Dictators in the World” Speaking at the U.N. Assembly

The opening of the 61st United Nations General Assembly includes men considered some of the "world’s worst dictators."  Of the 20 people listed as the world’s worst dictators in a new book, Tyrants: The World’s 20 Worst Living Dictators by David Wallechinsky, a best-selling author and historian, at least two are in New York this week: the President of Sudan, Omar al-Bashir, and the President of Pakistan, the U.S. ally Pervez Musharraf. In ranking the worst dictators, Wallechinsky says he used four main criteria: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly and free and fair elections. "I then give…extra credit for those dictators who use torture, who kill their political opponents, who invade other countries," he says. Wallechinsky calls Omar al-Bashir the worst of the dictators for his role in the killing of hundreds of thousands of civilians in Sudan’s Darfur region. "I’ve seen long reports on Darfur without anybody mentioning Omar al-Bashir, the head of Sudan," says Wallechinsky, "as if somehow this tragedy were happening all by itself or without any human making the decisions that these attacks should take place. In reality, al-Bashir is the one who makes these decisions, and he has caused the death of hundreds of thousands of people." Of Pervez Musharraf, considered an ally of the United States, Wallechinsky says he’d be "hard pressed to find a democratic reform that Pervez Musharraf has brought into Pakistan since he overthrew an elected government in order to take power."  According to Wallechinsky, in 1999, Musharraf, the top general in the Pakistani Army, took control of the government in a military coup. He appointed himself president, consolidated power between the presidency and the military and has held one election in 2002, where he ruled that anyone running against him had to have a university degree, no bank debts and have paid their utility bills.  He also banned all public rallies in Pakistan. Other nations on Wallechinsky’s list with representation at the U.N. Assembly this week include China, Saudi Arabia and Ethiopia, whose presidents sent their foreign ministers to speak at the Assembly. Wallechinsky says that the United Nations is not equipped to handle dictators committing human rights violations. "The  United  Nations is great when it deals with health matters and, and cultural matters, but when it comes to human rights, the United Nations is hobbled by its charter, which guarantees a place for the government of every nation in the world, regardless of their political system," says Wallechinsky. "As long as there are dictators in the world, they will always be part of the United Nations." A U.N. spokesman told ABC News, "The United Nations is an organization of all member states, and consequently all members of the 192 member states have the right to speak."

User Comments

United Nations is a free platform for every nation. It doesn’t belong to any country. The United Nation’s head office is incidentally in US, it doesn’t mean that the world leaders intended to be in US soil to criticise the injustice being committed by the super power. They are only using the stage.
On the other hand US media/military are brainwashing people of Middle East with western culture and agenda everyday for the oppressed rulers in that region by forcefully broadcasting TV/radio programs to the native people. What comes around that goes around.

Posted by: nasreen | September 21, 2006, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Why do you American have such problems with democratically elected folks like Hamas, hezbollah, Arafat or the Shia government in Iran then?

Posted by: Aamir Ali | September 21, 2006, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Mr. Ross,
Where is president Bush on Wallenchinsky’s list?

Posted by: Bryan | September 21, 2006, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Brian Ross needs to get a real job.

Posted by: schmee | September 21, 2006, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

first of all if these people think for one minute that we can not do something will they are wrong…we can stop free trade with all the countries and see what will happen..we need to help our people
here in the state and forget about the other counties. we have people in our country without food..without an education..if the goverment would invest in there own people we would and are a great country…our children are not able to get an education due to it being very expensive…if the colleges and university would be free for the united states citizens then all our children would be educated and we would grow a great nation…..

Posted by: anna drake | September 21, 2006, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

I do not want to sound overly idealistic; but, unless I am mistaken, the United Nations was conceived as a venue for DISCOURSE among the world’s nations (who, for a variety of reasons, are unlikely to ever agree about anything). It is easy enough to point a critical finger at the United Nations for allowing dictators to speak. However, the REAL criticism comes from the fact that each of these speeches is an isolated event from which no discourse ensues. In his own way (whether we liked it or not) Hugo Chavez used his podium time to try to initiate discourse with Bush; and Ahmadinejad has made public statements inviting Bush to engage in that discourse. Unfortunately, it would appear that the United Nations is more interested in the ritual of their formal agenda than in supporting such discourse; and it really makes me wonder what its founders would think of such an administrative decision.

Posted by: Stephen Smoliar | September 21, 2006, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

I agree with Bryan, where is Mr. Bush on this list? He is the real terrorist of the world–I was truly shocked last week when Bushy got all up in a tizzy because nobody wanted to agree to his sick ‘torture’ methods used against POWs. How the hell is torturing anyone going to solve the worlds problems? Most of them say what the US wants them to just to get the abuse to stop, not because they really know anything.
Lets not forget that Mr. Bush has also killed more people in the time he has been in office than any so-called ‘terrorist’ has done. And do we say anything about it??? Of course not…we just sit back and enjoy our comfy couches and gourmet dinners while innocent people are being bombed by this administration on a daily basis.
No wonder the Muslim world hates America….

Posted by: Brandy | September 27, 2006, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

I love how this blog is a bastion of pathetic liberals. “Where is Bush on the list?” they wail. Never mind that Iran’s theocratic president never saw a democratic reform he didn’t quash or that the thug leader of Sudan is committing mass genocide. They get a free pass, while America is always to blame.

Posted by: Gordon Erkmeyer | September 28, 2006, 2:04 am 2:04 am

Well – thats because *discourse* to the imperialist West is the same as conforming to Western ideals. There is a self-righteous arrogance running amuck which is unable to let others, with their totally different ways and ideas – even exist. Its be Yank or else. Well, f*ck you.

Posted by: Mubin | September 28, 2006, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Over the last 3 to 5 years I have come to learn “Democracy” and “Dictatorship” seem to have different meaning for different people. For example for me and for millions if not billions of people around the world the worst dictator alive is no one else other the president of the USA, George W. Bush.

Posted by: Balegorade | January 6, 2007, 3:45 am 3:45 am

Dictators are good boys who are going to hell.At lest i hope so/brendon.
He a nasty human being that has caused alot of people misery and death. I think that the world would be a better place without him.Sasha.I wish Pol pot never lived for what he has done.They are all murderers/brendon.

Posted by: brendon/sasha | July 4, 2007, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Brandy, what free pass are you talking about, all the US needs to do is tell the world that a certain person is bad and then the entire country believes it.
and it’s not liberal to say Mr.Bush is a terrorist its just straight up facts from evidence of acts that he has done is all. I dont know how you think the dictators you listed have a free pass they have been virtually condemend by the U.S and the rest of the world just because the governments says so. How could you trust a government such as ours, that has destroyed millions of innocent lives.to pick out what places are bad or good?

Posted by: Dan H | May 11, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.