Oct 1, 2006 4:00pm

GOP Staff Warned Pages About Foley in 2001

A Republican staff member warned congressional pages five years ago to watch out for Congressman Mark Foley, according to a former page. Matthew Loraditch, a page in the 2001-2002 class, told ABC News he and other pages were warned about Foley by a supervisor in the House Clerk’s office. Loraditch, the president of the Page Alumni Association, said the pages were told "don’t get too wrapped up in him being too nice to you and all that kind of stuff." THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS Exclusive: The Sexually Explicit Internet Messages That Led to Fla. Rep. Foley’s Resignation Video Fmr. Page Says Foley Should Go to Prison Click Here for More of the Brian Ross Page Staff members at the House Clerk’s office did not return calls seeking comment. Some of the sexually explicit instant messages that led to Foley’s abrupt resignation Friday were sent to pages in Loraditch’s class. Pages report to either Republican or Democratic supervisors, depending on the political party of the member of Congress who nominate them for the page program. Several Democratic pages tell ABC News they received no such warnings about Foley. Loraditch says that some of the pages who "interacted" with Foley were hesitant to report his behavior because "members of Congress, they’ve got the power."  Many of the pages were hoping for careers in politics and feared Foley might seek retribution. Loraditch runs the alumni association for the U.S. House Page Program, and he is deeply concerned about the future effects this scandal could have on a program that he sees as a valuable educational experience for teens.

User Comments

This is disgusting. These poor kids were warned about Foley five years ago? And nobody took further steps because they were afraid he might abuse his power and hurt them?
I hope there is a special place in hell for Mark Foley and his ilk.

Posted by: Andy Santilena | October 1, 2006, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Puts Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky in perspective. (She was age 22 when she began working at the White House.)
And the “he had power” – and so people were “hesitant to report” his behavior thing is just sickening.
We asked for big government, and now we’ve got it, complete with a governing class which lives by rules remarkably distant from those which apply to, say, the average American who earns a wage, lives in fear of being accused of sexual harassment, and, if the volunteer to work with young people at their church, are subjected to extraordinary scrutiny.

Posted by: Doug Barber | October 1, 2006, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

i thank as soon as that was discovered, foley should have been forced to resign, now all the people that knew about it and covered it up to keep the seat in flordia should be helt accountable they was protecting a pedaphile, thanks a lot

Posted by: jack williams | October 1, 2006, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

How did Rep. Foley get the pages email addresses? I am not condoning what he did, but question why anyone would give him their personal email info.

Posted by: maggie | October 1, 2006, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Some people have wondered if Foley was a swing vote on any bills passed by Congress this year, and it turns out that Foley was sitting on the fence on the CAFTA bill that passed 217-215, and then cast the deciding vote.
Does anyone else think that the GOP leadership saw the pedophilia tendencies of Rep. Foley as an opportunity rather than a problem? An opportunity to control him makes for a good reason to stay quiet.

Posted by: Alan Stamp | October 1, 2006, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

How come we’re only hearing about the Republicans who do this AND NOT THE DEMOCRATS WHO DO!?!?!?
GEEZE THE MEDIA IS BIASED!

Posted by: Robert | October 1, 2006, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

This is ridiculous. I was a Republican Page sponsored by Congressman Foley in 2002 and there was never any warning about him. People knew he was gay but no one knew he was a potential child molester.
-Jason M. Gross

Posted by: JasonM. Gross | October 1, 2006, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

These revelations are utterly reprehensible! Foley is obviously a very sick man, but if Republican leaders charged with overseeing his behavior are found to have to have known about his attempts to engage these children in sexual activities and to have covered it up, this is this most hideous abuse of the public trust that I can remember. The pages had been proudly entrusted by their parents to serve the House of Representatives and our Nation. If my teenage child had been one of the pages targeted by Foley and then left unprotected by Hastert and other House Republicans, I would have demanded criminal charges be brought against the whole crowd long ago.
Susan Barta
Texas parent

Posted by: Susan Barta | October 1, 2006, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

“thick as thieves”,, OH WAIT most of em in DC ARE THEIVES… We know of course it is ALL political, “the other party” kinda thing. That or the OLD stand by, “I don’t remember”, I bet none of em will use the “depends how do you define” pervert excuse

Posted by: Kurt W. Sorenson | October 1, 2006, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Can we just call it a conspiracy now? I mean if it walks like a duck…
Seriously, what else can you call it? The pages sponsored by Democrats were not warned about his predatious behavior. The only Democrat on the page committee was purposefully kept in the dark. The leadership covered up a crime, defined in legislation the offender wrote for at least a year and possibly five years. Just so they could hang onto a seat.
The crime took down one congressman. The cover-up looks poised to take down a lot more, and they are in leadership, so they have a lot more to lose. Their craven disregard for the children entrusted to them is staggering.
The party of “Family Values” is hoisted on it’s own pettard after all the preening and posturing and holier-than-thou sanctimony. And boy do they have it coming.
Schadenfreude indeed.

Posted by: Global Citizen | October 1, 2006, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

I think we’ll be hearing about this story for a long time.

Posted by: TheOperative | October 1, 2006, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

It is time to search all the email traffic and instant message traffic of every government employee and prosecute those that are involved in such action.

Posted by: John | October 1, 2006, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

I am totally appalled at the behavior of this member of the house. In this day and age a person, who has the status of Congressman Foley, can play this game of “WOLF IN A SHEEPS CLOTHING”.He should be arrested, and anyone that knew about this should resign. I know they were all Republicans, they play games with the people of the United States.

Posted by: Billy Baker | October 1, 2006, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Well, so much for Republicans whining about Clinton’s consenual affair with an adult woman. I just read the full text of Foley’s little IM session with this UNDER-AGE BOY and I just about puked. This is a sick man.
If Speaker Hastert knew about this beforehand, he and anyone else who covered it up should resign immediately.
I don’t get outraged by much that politicians do anymore. Sex scandals, lies, etc. I mean, come on, they’re politicians. But this is repugnant. So much for the GOP Holier-than-Thou routine.

Posted by: Steve Slatten | October 1, 2006, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

If this guy were a democrat, people would be saying the same thing.. that they were afraid to speak up because of the power these politicians “hold”. It doesn’t matter if a pedophile is a Republican, Democrat, Independent, or “soccer dad”… the bottom line is they’re demented.. mentally ill… and in need of serious help (if not incarceration). Sick that no one in his party insisted that he be ousted? Yes… but can they force someone to resign? Probably not.. it took a moment of public revelation, and this man’s stupidity, to get that job done.
People in trusted public positions are just as fallable and “human” as the rest of society. Until we stop putting them on pedastals, they’ll continue to pull the wool over our eyes. We are all to blame.

Posted by: KC | October 1, 2006, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. It should come as no big suprise that the GOP knew about Foley’s scandal back in 2005, yet keep it under wraps.
Do you think that, just maybe, if the Dems at least controlled the House that they might have been able to investigate the early rumors on this Foley scandal?
Nah. No way. Banish the thought from your minds. All hail the GOP, Party of God and all that is right and just in America.

Posted by: Joe Bagale | October 1, 2006, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

To “Media Bias” Robert:
Why are we only hearing about the republicans who do this?
Because there’s only evidence that Republicans are doing this!
Get serious, man.

Posted by: Dan | October 1, 2006, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

if there is anything going on with the Democrats, rest assured the Rebublicans will find it. ‘The media is biased…’ riii..iii..ght. that’s why we never heard about any scandals during the Clinton administration. That’s why there were no questions about Kerry’s medals.
Please.

Posted by: Paul | October 1, 2006, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

I’m appalled at the lack of leadership in today’s Republican party.
I was a Republican up until after the 2004 election when Bush and his cronies completely hijacked the Reagan Revolution and created a big government party.
The fact that Hastert and co. would cover this up for well over a year is truly PERVERSE! Of course I would expect the Democrats to do the same damn thing because both parties are insanely greedy and petty.
If Republicans were truly as Machevellian as they seem wouldn’t it have been wiser to impeach Foley and demand he be replaced by a “true traditional values conservative” in a special election that a Republican could truly win!

Posted by: Kyle | October 1, 2006, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

This is shameful. As a conservative Christian Republican, I say get rid of the whole bunch if they knew about it. I would rather lose the House than support people who were aware of this but did nothing.

Posted by: Bud | October 1, 2006, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Everyone who covered this up needs to resign — everyone, no matter which party.

Posted by: amberglow | October 1, 2006, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Bill Clinton’s admittedly disgusting relationship with Monica Lewinsky happened when she was an adult. Seriously, is there one Republican anywhere in this country who can just admit to doing something wrong without trying to justify it by claiming that Bill Clinton did it first? Or to pretend that people of the other party are doing exactly the same thing that Republicans are doing but no one is looking? It seems to me that if there’s one thing Republicans CAN do, since they can’t seem to manage a war, a natural disaster, or a country effectively, is Oppo research. If they haven’t dug dirt of this magnitude up yet, then honey, there just ain’t any. I can’t wait to see how Republicans are going to try to avoid responsibility for this one!

Posted by: SheRa | October 1, 2006, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

While I hope Foley roasts, I wish the Democrats showed the same outrage with Gerry Studds. There was an abuse of power there as well, but the Democrats were willing to merely reprimand Studds. Newt Gingrich (in a rare case of being right) asked for censure. Studds turned his back during the reading of censure-and stayed in the house>
Double Standard, anyone?

Posted by: Jim Casey | October 1, 2006, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

How much longer will the American people out up with the Republican Party and its leadership, as more and more secretive dirt seeps out about them every day? Wake up America!

Posted by: Paul | October 1, 2006, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Representative Foley was very critical of President Clinton during the Starr witch hunt, but hypocrisy is the name of the game with the Republican wingnuts. Watch Hannity and Limbaugh try to divert attention from Foley by jumping all over Clinton for his sex scandals. Hannity is the worst of the lot when it comes to justifying Republican bad behavior by bringing up Democrat indiscretions. His hypocrisy is boundless. If you don’t believe me, listen to both of them on the radio Monday.

Posted by: Ralph Humphrey | October 1, 2006, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

tonight, Bay Buchanan said on cnn that every mother in the U.S.will be up in arms[paraphrased]to learn the GOP leadership knew about Foley,and if after the FBI investigation determins former Rep Foley broke the law,he should be tried in a court of law and if found guilty, be sent to prison,and if those that covered it up,to the jeopardy of the children,will have to resign be cause they have broken the publc trust,which is down to 20% now. jimdon

Posted by: jimdon | October 1, 2006, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

The powerful protect the powerful. Anything like this comes out, everything these guys have done in the past will be investigated. That is why they turn their eyes.

Posted by: walkingfeather | October 1, 2006, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

I hope there is a special place in hell for Mark Foley and his ilk.
If not, I’m sure Halliburton will dig the hole if the terms are right.

Posted by: Frank | October 1, 2006, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

I can’t belive all this! Bill Clinton’s at fault!!! I know he is. I just know he is. I can feel it.

Posted by: Jorge Quayle | October 2, 2006, 12:03 am 12:03 am

As we recall, Americans were subjected to 24/7/365 coverage of the Lewinski affair for four continuous YEARS, and then impeachment was brought, purportedly not because of the affair per se but because of attempts to cover it up. This repugnant media bias swayed the electorate just enough to allow Bush to then steal the office of President via highly questionable and unamerican Diebold blackboxes and an ensuing Supreme Court debacle, leading directly to truly disasterous consequences not only for our country, but for our world itself and future generations. Therefore, the very least the media by its own standards must do is cover the Foley story 24/7/365 for the next four YEARS. If it does not, we will demand to know why not.

Posted by: Liberty | October 2, 2006, 12:13 am 12:13 am

So why, exactly, were they already warning pages in 2001. All the e-mails and IMs that have come to light so far date only as far back as 2003, don’t they?

Posted by: Mike in Seattle | October 2, 2006, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Dear Maggie,
Please reread your comment.
Please reread your comment.
Please reread your comment.
Get it yet?

Posted by: no chance | October 2, 2006, 12:19 am 12:19 am

This is just horrible. If it turns out that the Republican Leadership stifled this to keep the seat, then they get what they deserve. And I am a Republican. There needs to be a full investigation and severe repercussions…if we lose both houses over this, it would be justified…

Posted by: Stacie | October 2, 2006, 12:28 am 12:28 am

This is looking more and more (to those who bother to pay attention) like a smear on Foley. What’s sad is how the public is jumping to conclusions calling him a “pedophile” for messages.
Isn’t it funny that if he had had sex with the kid, it would have been legal, but to send these e-mails isn’t?

Posted by: Rob | October 2, 2006, 12:28 am 12:28 am

To Alan Stamp: Do you have knowledge of any Democrats propositioning pages? If so, do your duty and report it. I’m sure the media will air the story. Otherwise, you might remember that the media doesn’t report what doesn’t happen.

Posted by: Linda | October 2, 2006, 12:35 am 12:35 am

I just read the chat Foley had with that kid. I don’t believe it until I hear Foley admit it.
Does Foley know how to spell “your”? (you’re)
If he actually wrote that crap and believed he could get away with it, that is unflipping-believable.
But, I also know how dirty and crooked Florida Politicians are, on BOTH sides of the aisle.
Hey, it is hard to believe!
Anyone that knew about this activity and didn’t report it to LE for prosecution should be thrown to the wolves along with Foley.
I am so sick and tired of these slimey crooks!

Posted by: Shannon | October 2, 2006, 12:36 am 12:36 am

the page program is the best thing that has happened to young leaders of this country. it teaches us responsibility and the importance of government. the leadership has done everything to support these goals, nothing to harm pages. it is a shame that the program is now jeopardized.

Posted by: Caroline | October 2, 2006, 12:37 am 12:37 am

But WHAT WILL WE TELL THE CHILDREN?
Remember that rallying cry from Republicans during the Clinton/Lewinsky fiasco? She was a consenting adult.
How about the typical Republican mantra, “but..but…but… Democrats have no plan?”
Reply, “Democrats have no plan to molest your children!”

Posted by: cowboyneok | October 2, 2006, 12:39 am 12:39 am

It’s Clinton’s fault.

Posted by: L. Moran | October 2, 2006, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Would all the liberals just get a grip already!? Foley is scum. Anyone who knew but didn’t report it should be prosecuted and excoriated. But now ALL Republicans from leadership on down are guilty? “Holier than thou?” Oh brother! Suck up that saliva, calm down and wait for the facts.

Posted by: Julie Meyer | October 2, 2006, 1:00 am 1:00 am

How dare anyone put this garbage in the same league as Clinton/Lewinsky. She was an adult!!!! These are teenage boys. Hello people….read the lawbooks. It’s plain disgusting, fine if he is gay..so am I. Find someone your own age or at least over 18.

Posted by: Dave Reyna | October 2, 2006, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Studds was censured, as was his Republican counterpart, Dan Crane, who admitted to having sex with a 17-year-old female page. Neither man resigned (contrary to another conservative talking point I’ve seen making the rounds.) Crane apologized, but was defeated when he ran for relection in 1984, Studds was unrepentent, but won — and was reelected four more times after that.
Make of it what you will. The voters in Studds’ district were certainly more forgiving than I am. Speaking as a father, I’d burn them all at the stake, age of consent or no age of consent. But they were treated exactly the same by the then Democratic House leadership.
What’s more, I’m not aware of any evidence, not even a hint, that the leadership knew about the affair before the story broke, or attempted to keep it quiet, or tried to protect Studds.
Can anyone say the same about the current House leadership? I mean, with a straight face?

Posted by: billmon | October 2, 2006, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Having been a victim of molestation as a teenager, the reactions of the pages are completely in line to me. The molester is an expert on getting the trust of the child, and moving the bar for what is acceptible higher and higher. I’m just stunned that it took this long for the media to get ahold of it. I would say that there were probably some blind eyes turned there as well.

Posted by: Dee | October 2, 2006, 1:48 am 1:48 am

Foley is a sick man and his actions were repugnant. However, the actions of the GOP leadership is far more reprehensible. they knew that this man is a child predator and they continued to support him. They placed politics over the welfare of our children. What can you say of such men?? words cannot describe… their cold blooded calculations. This is not about democrats or republicans it is about right and wrong and nothing more. To those spin doctors on the right, understand that these actions cannot and should not be defended. For gods sake, in this case be an American, not a republican. And if you cannot then be a mother, father,brother, sister or friend. but do not allow such action to be swept under the rug.

Posted by: kevin | October 2, 2006, 1:52 am 1:52 am

I hope the voters teach a lesson to bunch of people whose sole purpose is to hang onto power with bottomline interest for few instead of common good.This political circus is turnign out to wrose than some of the third world countires we ridicule. Time we set our house in order.

Posted by: Hosur | October 2, 2006, 2:02 am 2:02 am

“Isn’t it funny that if he had had sex with the kid, it would have been legal, but to send these e-mails isn’t?”
When you consider that Foley co-sponsored the legislation that made sexual contact with an under-18 via the internet illegal, it goes from funny to hilarious. In a really warped kind of way.

Posted by: Ka | October 2, 2006, 2:26 am 2:26 am

Republicans are such hippocrates! Americans in November will vote all these Republican liars out of office! IMPEACH BUSH!!!

Posted by: JC | October 2, 2006, 3:08 am 3:08 am

I say lets have term limits.

Posted by: Don | October 2, 2006, 3:12 am 3:12 am

Foley just gave us the house. WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Posted by: Cheech | October 2, 2006, 3:36 am 3:36 am

This is a gut wrenching story. It never ceases to amaze me how often the most condeming voice is the one actually commiting the acts he/she so vehemently condems. I hope Mark Foley is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. And for all those folks on Capitol Hill who were aware of Foley’s repugnant behavior, let’s hope they are proscecuted as well. Each one of them had/has a “duty to act” and chose not to do so. They are as quilty as Foley.

Posted by: Leslie | October 2, 2006, 4:04 am 4:04 am

Why aren’t people calling this what it is: The Biggest SEXUAL HARRASSMENT CASE IN CONGRESSIONAL HISTORY. Skip his “inappropriate email”. These CHILDREN where – SEXUALLY HARRASSED – period.
Now he claims he has a problem with alcohol – and is going to Rehab. The REAL scandal – besides him sitting on the committee that writes the laws for ordinary folks to go by, is ALL THE PEOPLE WHO KNEW ABOUT IT, and REFUSED to SPEAK OUT.
I also have an issue whith the PARENTS – who knew this stuff was happening to their children, and wanted to keep it quiet.
IF YOUR CHILD WAS BEING SEXUALLY HARRASSED AT WORK….WOULD YOU KEEP IT QUIET???

Posted by: Traci | October 2, 2006, 4:05 am 4:05 am

I am wondering if anyone has seen Dateline’s “To Catch a Predator?”
I think it extremely likely that the emails that Foley sent the 16 year old boy from LA were feelers to see whether or not this boy was willing to “play ball” so to speak. I wouldn’t think that a man of Foley’s stature would just jump right into “Are you horny?” with a congressional page. I would assume that a someone with the even the smallest amount of self-preservation would want to make sure that their target was receptive to such talk.
I wouldn’t be the least surprised if the intial interaction between Foley and the pages of the dirty IM’s didn’t start out much the same as the more innocent emails in question. There is actually a term that law enforcement uses for this behavior, it’s called “grooming.”

Posted by: MIGirl | October 2, 2006, 4:12 am 4:12 am

Just what do you all think the leadership should have done to Foley? Burned him at the stake? Foley was elected, by his voters, not by the other congressmen. They can’t remove him from office.
What crime was committed? What crime should he have been charged with? Talking sexy to 16 year old young men? Is that a crime? Just wondering.

Posted by: Janie | October 2, 2006, 4:16 am 4:16 am

This Republican Congress is
sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick
From its leadership on down.
Vote them out.

Posted by: John Longenbaugh | October 2, 2006, 4:39 am 4:39 am

I don’t care what party you are affiliated with…this was a crime..and if it is true that it was known about by others on the hill, they should all go down with Foley…

Posted by: alice | October 2, 2006, 4:45 am 4:45 am

Its not just the Repubs. There is something seriously wrong with “our” representatives. It is as if they think they have their own little stable of sex toys and they all protect each other from one another’s indiscretions.

Posted by: Terri | October 2, 2006, 4:55 am 4:55 am

Good lets get rid of him.
Like some said earlier go through every senators and congress amns e-mails to see who is doing what.
I understand some these were not e-mails but instant messages. I think you have to go the ISP’s to get copies of these. Get a court order do it right. I say hangem all and start over. vote em all out and put new blood in the hallways of congress

Posted by: Dave | October 2, 2006, 5:53 am 5:53 am

I think some people should put this in perspective. As disgusting as his behavior may be, the most ABC has been able to accuse Foley of so far is possibly engaging in dirty Internet text messaging with a willing teenage boy. I didn’t know it was a crime to be “overly friendly” — whatever that means.

Posted by: sharonj430 | October 2, 2006, 6:12 am 6:12 am

It’s just a liberal plot. Probably a set up.

Posted by: crlos | October 2, 2006, 6:21 am 6:21 am

Foley has now gone into rehab. Thank God he has an illness and isn’t just a lawbreaking child molester. This is what we get from the Republicrats and the Demonicrans. Time for a new party, one made up of sober normal people who are subject to the laws of the normal people, paid a more reasonable wage, denied the priviliges of power, and represent the people. There is no difference between the new “liberals” and the new “conservatives”. They are ALL self-centered, over-privileged, power-driven enemies of the people. I am not surprised in the least that they all have drinking problems… after all, nobody sober would seek office!

Posted by: Robert Smith | October 2, 2006, 6:26 am 6:26 am

I think I just became a Democrat. How disgusting. What an embarassment to the Republican Party

Posted by: Elle | October 2, 2006, 7:09 am 7:09 am

Let me get this straight.
In 2001, pages were warned about Foley but nothing was done about Foley.
In 2001, only Republican pages were warned, not Democratic
pages.
And the party involved is devoted to “family values”.

Posted by: CE Jackson | October 2, 2006, 7:40 am 7:40 am

I think there is a difference between a child molester and someone who preys on 16 year olds. I think if he were straight the tone here would not be so vicious. A 16 year old is much different than a 10 year old. That being said, what he did was wrong in that he abused his power and he should definitely resign and he should have been stopped along time ago.

Posted by: Steve | October 2, 2006, 7:41 am 7:41 am

And to think we keep voting these people back into office year after year. All of them need to go Democrat and Republican!

Posted by: fern | October 2, 2006, 7:47 am 7:47 am

We should just go in and CLEAN HOUSE, all of these house and senate members are scum, they are putting their own political careers above the well being of the country, TERM LIMITS will make these problems go away, it will help eliminate money as being the common denominator of who gets in and who does not.

Posted by: Tom Sachs | October 2, 2006, 8:28 am 8:28 am

I just heard on CNN that the Republicans have have appointed “independent” officials like Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and FL Gov. Jeb Bush to investigate whether any laws were broken, etc.
Give me a break! “Independent”, what a joke…

Posted by: Nancy | October 2, 2006, 8:33 am 8:33 am

This is what we can look forward to more of with BIG government, the TWO PARTY only system, and NO TERM LIMITS. TOO MUCH POWER, FOR TOO LONG, IN THE HANDS OF TOO FEW MEN RESULTS IN ABUSE OF POWER! WAKE UP FOLKS, KEEP CALLING YOURSELF DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS AND EVIL MEN WILL RULE YOUR LIFE!

Posted by: Mary | October 2, 2006, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Yes, what this repugnant, dispicable, and criminally-insane AND CONGRESSPERSON did is absolutely unforgivable, BUT THE IS SOO SIMPLE AND ELEMENTARY: “we give these “career-criminals” ONLY ONE-TERM CONSECUTIVELY”!!!! That is to say, that they CANNOT succeed themselves in “public-office” again, and again, and again whereby they BECOME “CAREER-CRIMINALS” because power and fame corrupts and destroys humanity!

Posted by: samuel m stewart | October 2, 2006, 8:34 am 8:34 am

remember…these aren’t young children….they’re 16. the age of consent is 16 in a lot of european nations so even though what he did may be illegal here in the U.S., these guys appear to be active participants. he wasn’t threatening them or bribing them. yea they were attracted to him because of his power, but that happens in a lot of relationships. i’m not saying what he did was right, but think about what really is emotionally between being 16 and 18. A relationship between in 18 and 54 year still has issues even though its not criminal.

Posted by: ted | October 2, 2006, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Oh Yeag a re-hab for drunks is really going to address his hunger for young Congressional Page’s. He is a PERVERT and is just another example of our present degraded soceity. The FBI will screw up the investigation anyway and another one ‘SICK PERVERT’ will slip through the cracks!

Posted by: DUH | October 2, 2006, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Why wasn’t the real reason for Gingrich resignation revealed. He resigned right after the Hyde revelation. Now he speaks on Fox News. Fair and impartial. Ha !!Why is it Fox News only takes people like Ollie North who lied to congress. Then congress allows him to receive his retirement from the military. It’s all a joke. Child molesters and liars and the sad part is the die hard republicans would still vote for them. I think they would vote for a trained monkey if it was a republican.

Posted by: Ed | October 2, 2006, 8:48 am 8:48 am

First of all his party affiliation has nothing to do with this. Republican, Democrat, Green Party; non of this matters he is a sick pervert that needs to be kept away from children. To all of you that keep saying the pages are not children, they are young adults. The only reason he is not corresponding (as far as we know) with younger children is because the pages cannot be any younger. His politics are not the issue; his corrupt usage of his position and potential abuse of these kids is all that matters. Anyone that covered up for him for any reason should also be removed.

Posted by: Michael | October 2, 2006, 8:56 am 8:56 am

What can one expect – since our past President got away with all he got away with? Why shouldn’t Congress people think that they can too.
I think EVERY Congress person should be investigated!

Posted by: Mollie | October 2, 2006, 9:15 am 9:15 am

I’m curious… Is Foley claiming that the booze made hime do it? And if booze turns you into a pedophile why isn’t the GOP trying to push for prohibition?

Posted by: Yirmin Snipe | October 2, 2006, 9:16 am 9:16 am

So everyone that claims they are a Republican, but now they are going to be a Democrat is going to change back when a Democrat has a sex scandal? Cause, it will happen. If the time table holds it will be in about 2 years.

Posted by: THX1776 | October 2, 2006, 9:18 am 9:18 am

No, this doesn’t “put Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky into perspective.” Clinton wasn’t impeached because of the affair, he was impeached because of perjury, trying to get others to commit perjury, etc.
Yes, Foley is disgusting, and it’s a damn shame no one took action on this long ago. Pathetic.

Posted by: JW | October 2, 2006, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Well, well, another wolf caught masquerading as a sheep. Too bad no one noticed the ears were not those of a sheep.

Posted by: Joe | October 2, 2006, 9:29 am 9:29 am

why are these elected officials not drug tested? we test garbage collectors but not the people with the power in government?

Posted by: Jeff Kimball | October 2, 2006, 9:33 am 9:33 am

If anyone (such as a Republican leader) had outed him, he would have been villified as a homophobic. Until they have the proof, their hands are tied. If he were a straight pedophile the Republicans could have garroted him straight away, and replaced him before the next election. It is unfortunate that all pedophiles are not taken care of. Whether he is 16, 17, 17 and a half, 18 and a day or 20, Foley is a pedophile.
John

Posted by: John | October 2, 2006, 9:33 am 9:33 am

READ THE ENTIRE TRANSCRIPT of the text messages he was sending to one youngman. –THIS IS NOT BEING “OVERLY FRIENDLY”, THIS IS CYBERSEX. THROW THE BOOK AT THIS S.O.B.!!

Posted by: Traci | October 2, 2006, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Republican, Schmepublican! Democrat, Schmomocrat! I can’t believe people are actually arguing over which side harbors more pedophiliacs?! I am now convinced that politics has made Americans plum crazy. Bottom line, he’s a pedophile and a criminal and should face charges and jail time like any of the other criminals we see surfing the internet for underage encounters. Take the blinders off, people and think about the children.

Posted by: Reese | October 2, 2006, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Goes into rehab all of a sudden, where, for the next 30 days or so, he cannot be reached for comment or make any statements that can be “misinterpreted” during the crucial last weeks before the November elections. How transparant is that? Wonder if the alleged cover-up was in any way “inspired” by those who brought us the infamous Roman Catholic Church Hierarchy and their unspeakable hijinks. Tell me, just where are the Leaders that CAN be trusted? Not in the U.S. Government. Not in the upper echelons of organized religion. Not in Corporate America.

Posted by: Marypo | October 2, 2006, 9:45 am 9:45 am

When Clinton was found to be a philanderer, the Democrats circled their wagons and protected him. I think the Democrats lost credibility with the American people for not holding Clinton accountable. Now that Foley has proven to be a pervert, the Republicans should throw him under the wagon. The American people need to know that Republicans won’t tolerate this behavior in there party. Unlike Clinton, Foley should never be allowed to exercise power or influence in politics.

Posted by: Sean | October 2, 2006, 9:58 am 9:58 am

I am amazed at all the comments offering up excuses for Foley’s behavior. Those of you saying that “16 is the age of consent” over and over again…remember that for the future. Remember that when your child is drawn into a relationship with an older individual. You wouldn’t be hypocritical…I’m sure. You seem so confident in your opinion now…just don’t forget it.

Posted by: Kevin | October 2, 2006, 10:02 am 10:02 am

In Congress, they call them young boys.
In Iraq, they call them soldiers, and they are getting killed.

Posted by: Mark | October 2, 2006, 10:02 am 10:02 am

It does’t just affect Republicans. Look at Mel Reynolds, former Democratic Congressman from IL. Now convicted child rapist, and on the Sexual Offender Registry in IL. Just look it up. Lets get of these Wackos, Democrats, Republicans, et al, who prey on children and put them in the big house.

Posted by: Norm | October 2, 2006, 10:19 am 10:19 am

I can not wait to hear how Rush spins this…I can not wait! It will be Clinton’s fault. If not Clinton, it will be Carter’s fault or President James Buchanan’s fault. Rush will surely not blame anyone or anything in the First Rebublican Church of the GOP!

Posted by: tom joad | October 2, 2006, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Hats off to the Republicans who are taking their party to task. I do the same to the Dems, and like you, everyone ignores me and pretends that the few excuse-wielding whiners represent us all. I think our main issue is with the people who are Republicans because they think they are oh so morally straight and narrow. Quit fooling yourselves. Washington, DC is a cesspool, and almost everyone in it is completely without morals and/or ethics. There are exceptions – a few decent people who manage to stay uncorrupted while there – but one thing is for sure… you can’t make it to the WH with your morals/ethics intact. Got a favorite Pres.? Think they are “good”? Think again.

Posted by: Bit of a cynic | October 2, 2006, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Now, this guy should go to jail, for a long time. But of course let us look at the politics of this. the dems are shouting ‘full investigation, what did they know and when did they know it, etc.’ Well apparently , they , and she have known this for years now. Let us also investigate the Dem leaders as well as the repubs. See how she likes it. think this is coming out now is an accident? the dems released this info now, because they think , it will finally get them back the house.

Posted by: phil | October 2, 2006, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Paul-
Do you have kids? 16 or 17 is still a kid. Young men? maybe, but the emphasis is on YOUNG.

Posted by: Bit of a cynic | October 2, 2006, 10:34 am 10:34 am

Seems like the norm anymore. Our country will go down the tubes. Government does what it should not and takes what it should not. We don’t really have a two party system. We have a two class system: Elitists and everybody else.

Posted by: r | October 2, 2006, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Foley, the Chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children. You can’t make this stuff up.

Posted by: Diane | October 2, 2006, 10:39 am 10:39 am

I love when something unique like this happens and all the crazy folks come out and wave their flags and make up slogans and conspiricy theories. The guy is an idiot, that’s for sure. And it’s good he quit and that people realize how inappropriate this is. And it’s good that, it seems, most people see the significant difference between this situation and the Monica thing. But for god’s sake… How in the world do you know if he’s a child molester? Is it because he’s gay, or because he said horrible things, or because he makes horrible choice of who to hit on? That’s a long way from actual physical molestation. It only demeans the situation when morons use it to be dramatic. Don’t try to create more of this situation than it is. It’s bad enough already – let the public focus on what is really, verifiably happened here.

Posted by: McUrbanLife | October 2, 2006, 10:40 am 10:40 am

A young boy and many more may have been abused and all people here can do is attack each others political parties. Shame on you.

Posted by: Pam | October 2, 2006, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Let’s remember that there is a difference between naughty IMs and actually attemping to arrange a meeting with a minor. I don’t agree with anything Foley did, he did not appear to attempt to arrange a liason with any of these pages, and therefore he did not commit a crime. It was inappropriate but not illegal.

Posted by: Abbie | October 2, 2006, 10:44 am 10:44 am

For those all Christians holier than thou, the base of the Republican Party? Wake up and smell the coffee, the slogan of the GOP is Sex, lies and audiotapes….instead of the Family values Party. It’s time for Americans to clean HOuse and sweep off these people. Please Vote in NOv.!!! Down with the Bush Regime, the world is pleading with all of you! and yes, God Bless the World not only America.

Posted by: tired of BS | October 2, 2006, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Power & Sex go hand in hand, Always has and ALWAYS WILL. DC is the center of America’s Power and (most, not all) Politicians will have sex. It’ll never change.

Posted by: RogernDC | October 2, 2006, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Every member of Congress should be given a lie detector test and have transparent e-mail.
This is disgusting. We need to “clean house”…literally.

Posted by: Joseph | October 2, 2006, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Favoritism is the only use of power.
Molestation of children is condoned
by the powerful..the Catholic Church
and the Republican Party. The concentration
of power–Corporate, religious, and
political is the enemy.

Posted by: Richard | October 2, 2006, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Foley is a sick man because a sane, mature 55 year-old will not be emailing 16-year olds with sexual insinuations (i.e. am I making you horny?) Republican supporters must stop making excuses and muddying the waters by citing … Clinton. Foley must be held accountable as well as Hastert & Boehnert. Disgusting that they allowed Foley to keep his position all these years. Those who knew should have told Foley to step down & to go into therapy. Now it’s too late.

Posted by: M.Stratas | October 2, 2006, 11:15 am 11:15 am

I don’t care what the political party is. This is pedophilia. What does disturb me (in addition to Foley’s abuse of position and power) is the leadership, again, did nothing to stop him (no doubt the only person in congress wanting a young man). Now, that the public knows, the Republican leadership is demanding investigations. Where were they 2 years ago? Oh, it wasn’t public then. Because you can never kick a dead horse too much, why didn’t the dems do the same with Bill? Oh it was “only” sex, and we must all remember it depends on what “is”, is.
Character is what you do when nobody is looking. Oh well. . .

Posted by: dedubya | October 2, 2006, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Come on. He didn’t have sex with anyone. He is guilty of being inappropriate and abusing his position. The “kid” was 16 and willingly engaging in communication. I don’t know about the rest of you but I had sex at that age, which in DC is the age of consent. You people are all freaking out because he is gay.

Posted by: Steve | October 2, 2006, 11:26 am 11:26 am

What Foley did was sickening and he should be punished to the full extent the law will allow. That being said, it also sickens me that the Democrats are siezeing this opportunity to act so shocked and disgusted. They knew about Foley’s conduct and they know about collegues in their own party that are engaged in immoral behavior. They just haven’t been caught and when they are caught it will be “different.” The timing on the whole thing is interesting. And I’m also sorry that I can’t say the Republicans wouldn’t do the same thing if the tables were turned. All this hypocritical posturing for any edge in the election makes me nauseous.

Posted by: David | October 2, 2006, 11:29 am 11:29 am

WHY did this kid respond to the instant messages and why did he save them.. and why are they showing up now right before elections. HMMMM….

Posted by: suzi | October 2, 2006, 11:45 am 11:45 am

So who is the next person that is going to say that the media is bias? A good investigative report was able to get ride of the trash in one day. Now we should feel sorry for him because he needs help since he acknowledge that he is an alcoholic and has behavioral problems. He should be treated like any other pervert that gets caught, go to jail without collecting your $200. Great job by the reporter who was able to save who knows how many other young men. They all knew, they kept the secret and they should also leave. Great example of family values.

Posted by: Albert | October 2, 2006, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Pedophiles seek sexual involvement with young children who have not yet reached puberty.
This is not a pedophelia case.
This young person was a 16 year old teenager .. not defending Foley but to brand him a PEDO is just wrong.

Posted by: rjp3 | October 2, 2006, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

I’m a staunch conservative right wing republican. I say purge him and everyone that protected that type of behavior on either side of the isle. We need to send a message that we will not tolerate this type of behavior from our elected representatives regardless of the politics. If that puts the Democrats in control of the house or the senate, then so be it.

Posted by: BG | October 2, 2006, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Ever heard of Democrat Rep. Gerry Studs? He was repimanded in 1983 for having sex with a 17 year old male intern and propositioning two others. The Senate voted to censure him and he told them to kiss his rear by turning around and not listening to the censure and by refusing to apologize. He was re-elected.
So, if Foley was pressured to resign, the standards have actually risen a little. LOL.

Posted by: Ted | October 2, 2006, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

I think Foley is completely in the wrong and should have been outed and reprimanded for his behavior long ago. I also think it is right for him to resign. That said, the press reports of “sexually explicit” messages seem bogus. All of the messages I have seem have been sexually “implicit”.

Posted by: RS | October 2, 2006, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Okay. A lot of misinformation on this blog.
1. The legal age of consent in Washington is irrelevant. Foley emailed one page who lived in Louisiana –the legal age there is 17. The emails sent to that first page were fairly innocuous. About what he wanted for his birthday, and wanting a picture of him.
2. In the above case, consent does not enter into it, as the page emailed to others that Foley was ‘freaking him out’ and mentioned the word “sick” 13 times
3. There were other emails to a page in TX (age of consent 18) In these, Foley wants to know masturbation techniques, penis size and comments on the guys butt. Foley was in Florida when he emailed the second page (age of consent 18)
Now. Age of consent matters only for State Prosecution. When a crime crosses state lines, it is a Federal offense as well as local. An act can be locally okay but be a crime if it breaks federal law. States have different ages of consent. The federal age of consent is 18. Once Foley emailed to another state he was breaking federal law conerning soliciting sex on the internet (he tells one boy to strip off his boxers for him and asks if he is hard) So understand, whoever keeps bringing up consent laws of DC–NOT RELEVANT, unless DC wants to prosecute. For the purposes of Federal law, definitely a good chance a crime was committed. Also, the age limit as established by Foley himself for internet sex crimes is 18.

Posted by: Sandra | October 2, 2006, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Anybody remember Gerry Studds?
This Massachusetts congressman actually had a relationship with a 17-year old page back in the early 1980′s. He was censured by Congress but unrepentant. He continued to be re-elected by his constituents until he retired.

Posted by: jb | October 2, 2006, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Funny how democrats have such a short memory concerning this type of disgusting activity. Remember 1983 and Democratic Congressman Jerry Studds, who actually had sex with a 17 year old male page, and was simply censored by the house and not forced to resign by the democratic leadership. Talk about a double standard, but I guess 1983 wasn’t an election year.

Posted by: Neil | October 2, 2006, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

One thing to note. After reading the above article it says the pages were warned about Foley in this way “don’t get too wrapped up in him being too nice to you and all that kind of stuff.”
That is a far cry from telling them to watch out for illegal sexual advances. I hope a full investigation occurs but it certainly can not before the election? I am glad to hear Foley is out of office, his actions were reprehensable.
We may want to be careful about blaming others before all the facts are in though.

Posted by: Dan | October 2, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

HMMMMM…..
Does anyone care that this perv was soliciting sex from CHILDREN?
We’re not talking about boys above the age of consent. It’s ILLEGAL (not to mention immoral) to solicit sex from children.
Foley’s just the tip of the iceberg – whoever knew about this (going back FIVE years!!??) and did NOTHING needs to be punished at the ballot box!
Or do “family values” include soliciting sex with minors? There is absolutely no possible justification or defense for this. At least Clinton stuck to those old enough to have a drink.

Posted by: Dangeo | October 2, 2006, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

i wonder how the gop s going to spin this one! let’s watch them burn while they try :)
democrats are singing, hurray for washington, here we come! hip hip hurray! hahahahah!

Posted by: denial | October 2, 2006, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

If Members of Congress are sending out e-mails and IMs via equipment owned, operated, and paid for by the U.S. Government, then the House Clerk’s office has the authority to review every e-mail and IM message sent by any Member of Congress or his/her staffer to see if anyone is sending inappropriate messages. There is no privacy in the workplace and neither should Members of Congress enjoy privacy in their Congressional offices. I’ll just bet a review of all e-mail and IM messages by the House Clerk’s office will show that Mark Foley is just the tip of the iceberg.

Posted by: David S. Maquera, Esq. | October 2, 2006, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Politics Politics Politics,
Lets give this person his day in court (or whatever that turns out to be ) and then right all the Political crap you want, personally I think Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa, worked with the GOP to subvert it all.

Posted by: DM | October 2, 2006, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

This blog is a prime example why this country’s future is in big, big trouble. It’s not about what’s good for the country anymore, it’s what’s good for one’s party or point of view. These responses are riddled with this very issue. The action’s of one person in no way demonstrates the action of all. Until we can get together and end this bitter, selfish, politcal correctness BS this country is buried in than I’m afraid we’re done; and we’ll all be yearning for the days when we could speak out like this. Speak out, but for the good of the whole – not the one.

Posted by: Curt | October 2, 2006, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

This beahviour has been goign on for years. I worked for a member of Congress from 98 – 03 and numerous times almost got run over by Cong. Foley dropping pages off at the dormitory just before curfew.
Any Member who claims to be shocked by these allegations is so out of touch that they would vote for invading the sun because Intellegnece says it is harbouring Osama Bin Laden.
It’s time for a change.

Posted by: Jonathan | October 2, 2006, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

OK, we now have the president of the page alumni saying that pages were warned to be careful of Foley back in 2001. Foley meanwhile, quickly checks himself into Rehab and through his attorney says that he has “issues” with the bottle and “emotional issues” And if that’s not enough, we have Hastert and other politicans scrambling to cover their collective butts. In case we have anything left in our digestive tracks, the FBI is now conducting a preliminary investigation in order to determine whether a full investigation should take place. Is it just me or does something or a whole lot of somethings seem horrible and obscenely wrong here?! I have emailed both of my Fl Senators and my State Representative and they will NOT come out publicly and demand an immediate full scale investigation in Mr. Foley’s “alleged” actions! As a matter of fact only one politician replied to my email… saying that while she shared my outrage, there was nothing she could do. I am sickened to the depths of my soul by Mr. Foleys actions and am HORRIFIED by the inaction of our justice system

Posted by: Angel | October 2, 2006, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Too bad they didn’t catch this hypocritical evil creep on Dateline’s To Catch A Predator.
There are other victims out there.

Posted by: Casey | October 2, 2006, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Will we widen the investigation far enough to catch all of the sickos that we call ‘leaders’? I seriously doubt it. Watch the big finger pointers cover their own butts, happens every time. The process is broken and thousands of corrupt politicians are allowed to continue their molestation of America unimpeded.

Posted by: b | October 2, 2006, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Foley, isn’t this the same guy who started a row over naturalist teens having a camp, and his so called conservative buddies jumped on a band wagon claiming to be worried over nekkid kids doing a summer camp?
he’s what those kids call a COG. When kids at nudist camp run into an adult that takes too much interest in them, they yell out a “hey rube” kind of warning : “COG ! creepy outside guy…”
and i guess rightly so..
this has nothing to do with being conservative..
and anyone who tries to brush it off as being an older guy with 16 year old “young men” is a COG too…
Teenagers aren’t young men or women, that’s why we call them teenagers..
after 21, they are all old enough to hit back…
i would wonder who else was sponsering that bill…..

Posted by: Gil | October 2, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Go through the email of every federal employee? No privacy for anyone? I thought some people supported our rights to privacy. Guess not.

Posted by: Jane | October 2, 2006, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

I don’t see anything about the pages being warned about sexual harassment. This article only claims they were “warned” about Foley’s attitude.
Is this article headlined in such a way to imply certain things that never happened???

Posted by: Keith | October 2, 2006, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Ok. So he is guilty of sexual explicite emails? Did he do anything physical to any of the pages? I think what he did was discusting but remember Democrats are looking for anything right now. This looks big in thier little eyes.

Posted by: Edward | October 2, 2006, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

January 2001: Just before leaving office, President Clinton (at the urging of Jesse Jackson, among others) commuted the sentence of former Illinois congressman Mel Reynolds, who had spent 30 months in a state prison for having sex with a 16-year-old campaign volunteer and was serving a five-year sentence in federal prison for lying to obtain loans and illegally diverting campaign money for personal use.

Posted by: mw | October 2, 2006, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Why are these showing up right before elections? Because it’s politics. I wonder which side is happier – the Democrats for being able to take shots at a Republican party that pushes ‘conservaitve social values’, or the Republicans who have something big and loud to distract the public from the controversial civil rights changes they are about to enact. Wag the dog, indeed.

Posted by: Scott | October 2, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

This could bring down some powerful people in Congress.

Posted by: Mike | October 2, 2006, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

And there is no evidence that republican knew anything about “SEXUALLY EXPICIT” IM’S! The hypocrisy! I am ashamed to say I am a registered democrat who , thank GOD is no longer a part of this hypocritical party of thieves. We have all those who gave a pass to Clinton, and all the other perverts out now screaming. Makes me ill.

Posted by: linda | October 2, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Virginia law puts the age of consent at 16. These are not “children” in the eyes of the law.

Posted by: BOB | October 2, 2006, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Since we are all so interested in when Republicans and knew, and what their motivations were for witholding this information, hs anyone asked how long democrats knew about it?
And how long did they sit on the story until that magical 40 days until election morning arrived?

Posted by: Dan | October 2, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

It is naive to believe this behavior is limited to Republicans. These people are everywhere in government. The important question is whether you want people like this to have control over your life? Keep in mind that the larger government gets, the more “leaders” there will be to control you. When you vote in November, ask yourself which candidate and which party advocates putting control back into your own hands. This is the only way to prevent perverts, thiefs, hypocrits (see the above list of “caughts”), etc. from affecting your life, i.e., by pushing their corrupt sense of morality on to you, or somehow “saving you from yourself.” The worst thing that can happen is to have a knee-jerk reaction and vote for Democrats simpy because they are Democrats. In the long run, you may very well have supported a candidate whose big government policies wind up putting even more Foley-like politicians in positions of authority over you.

Posted by: Brad | October 2, 2006, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

It’s funny reading the tit-for-tat ramblings between both sides. He did this, but he did that yada yada yada. Truth being that both parties have members who are not the idealistic icons we perceive them to be. They are humans with human faults.
Republicans are crying because once again egg is being thrown in the face of this administration’s members who preach the campaign of “Family Values” who once again are showing their hypocracy. They who focus their campaigns on people that are so blinded by religion that they can’t see the facts before them. Maybe this will open some of their eyes.
I’m also reading about the timing of the release of these e-mails and IM’s that it’s all a manipulation on the medias part prior to the mid-term elections, isn’t also amazing that our gas prices have fallen dramatically just recently, hmmm… just prior to mid-term elections hmmmm. It goes both ways on any issue but I am convinced that this administration has deceived Americans and the world.

Posted by: JMG in Austin | October 2, 2006, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

The Democrat pages weren’t told? Don’t they talk to the Republican pages?
Someone who knew about these instant messages gave them to the MSM. They apparently knew about Foley, but didn’t report him to anyone prior to giving the information to the MSM. Should they be prosecuted? Is it possible a Democrat knew and didn’t report Foley?
Is it possible that this whole thing (as digusting as it is) boils down (legally) to a mere breach of ethics?

Posted by: Jerry | October 2, 2006, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

D.A.R.V.O.
Deny
Attack
Reverse Victim & Offender
Remember that acronym. It’s what molestors and predators do when they’re confronted by their victims.
Already you see it happening from the Republicans.
Deny: “It was just naughty emails”
Attack: “The Democrats are doing this for partisan advantage”
Reverse Victim & Offender “Mark Foley is being persecuted for nothing more than sexy talk with young men.”
I don’t think it’s going to stick though. The Republicans have made too much political hay demonizing homosexuals for their base to let this slide now.
Talk about being hoisted upon their own petard!

Posted by: hosswire | October 2, 2006, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Okay, I’ve read enough comments regarding the pages being of the age of consent. If the allegations are true, what about the basic fact that Foley was entrusted with our children and abused that trust? Regardless of political affiliation or sexual orientation, I seriously doubt if any parent would be satisfied that her child was “the age of consent” in this situation.

Posted by: DeeDee | October 2, 2006, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Sorry, but age of consent in Virginia is 18.

Posted by: C | October 3, 2006, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Curious announcement that Foley is going to rehab because he believes he is an alcoholic. Relevancy?

Posted by: Art | October 3, 2006, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Well first I would like to thank ABC News for breaking this story and potentially saving some teens from being preyed upon. Sixteen year olds may look like adults but they are truely children that need our protection. There were a couple of posts I actually agreed with: Ultimate power corrupts and let’s do term limits. Lastly the only thing that made this a political problem for the Republican controlled Congress was that they made the choice to cover it up for political reasons. How sad and what a horrible choice.

Posted by: Deb | October 4, 2006, 9:52 am 9:52 am

I believe that Woodward’s book has been preempted by a sex scandal as revealed by Rove and friends. The Republicans were already likely to lose control of Congress, therefore this poison pill cost them little. This deflects attention from this incompetent reincarnation of the Nixon administration. And all the media bites down hard – lead by “Path to 9/11″ ABC.
Bob who?

Posted by: Bruce | October 4, 2006, 11:02 am 11:02 am

When are the people of this great nation going to finally WAKE UP and realize that WE have the power to put people in office and the power to get them out. It’s called the VOTE.
So WAKE UP AMERICA….it’s time to get up off your butts and VOTE…and, YES, your vote does count! Quit being so lazy…if you don’t vote then don’t complain.

Posted by: TK | October 4, 2006, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Does everyone believe that only the republican ilk in Washington could be involved in disgusting activity. The investigations should clear out all illegal activity for the sake of our children, and most of all our country. Leave no stone unturned, there are allegations of corruption all over congress. Clean it up once and for all. Throw out all the special interests,lobyists and donations. Take this opportunity to clean up all of Washington.

Posted by: Bob | October 4, 2006, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Fox News keeps labeling Foley a Democrat from Florida. This is a new low for the media in this country.

Posted by: Paul | October 4, 2006, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

We need to rid ourselves of these animals who prey on children

Posted by: ken | October 5, 2006, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.