Instant Messages Obtained by ABC News Cast Doubt on Claims from Foley’s Lawyer
Mark Foley was sexually molested by a clergyman when Foley was between the ages of 13 and 15 and "wants you to know he is a gay man," his lawyer, David Roth, said late Tuesday. Mr. Roth said the disclosure was part of his client’s "recovery." Asked why the former congressman did not reveal this information sooner, Roth said, "Shame, shame." "As is so often the case with victims of abuse, Mark advises that he kept his shame to himself for almost 40 years," Roth said. THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS EXCLUSIVE New Excerpts of Instant Messages a Former Page Said He Had with Foley New Foley Instant Messages: Had Internet Sex While Awaiting House Vote Click Here for More of the Brian Ross Home Page Foley, who checked into an alcohol rehabilitation facility in Florida, also "reiterates unequivocally that he has never had sexual contact with a minor," Roth said. But instant messages obtained by ABC News do reveal that Congressman Foley met with an underage page in San Diego, a meeting which they spoke about in an instant message exchange from April, 2003. Maf54: I miss you lots since san diego. Roth said he knew but could not reveal the name and denomination of the clergyman who molested him. According to Foley’s biography on his Web site, he was raised as a Roman Catholic in the West Palm Beach area. Foley’s lawyer said Foley takes responsibility for sending sexually graphic instant messages over the Internet and was under the influence of alcohol when he sent many of the messages. He denied, however, that Foley ever offered to provide alcohol for teens at his Capitol Hill apartment. But according to an instant message provided to ABC News by a former page, Foley did make such an offer to a former page in April, 2003. Maf54: then we can have a few drinks
Maf54: lol
Teen: yes yes ;-)
Maf54: your not old enough to drink
Teen: shhh….
Maf54: ok
Teen: thats not what my ID says
Teen: lol
Maf54: ok
Teen: i probably shouldnt be telling you that huh
Maf54: we may need to drink at my house so we dont get busted Read Foley’s Attorney David Roth’s Complete Statement.

Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Mark Foley is not a gay man, he is a pedophile. Homosexual men have relationships with men not boys.
In vino veritas, in wine is truth.
Under the influence of alcohol people often will do things that in a sober state they have thought about….
Posted by: Cristina Smyth | October 3, 2006, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
It seems to be a spider’s web of lies. Hastert says one thing, then another. He can’t remember. Foley suddenly is a molested alcoholic. It sure sounds like people knew, or should have been smart enough to know that there was something evil going on…but NOTHING substantial was done.
Posted by: g wildin | October 3, 2006, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
I Know Barney Frank and Foley is no Barney Frank
Posted by: Baba Booey | October 3, 2006, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Its a shame that he’s going to come out this way. Now the idiot flocks of sheep in america will assume that all gay men are pedophiles, just like they’ve been taught from the likes of the GOP conservatives. Gay men are NOT pedophiles. I hope the enlightened people of america will use their brain for once and separate things. Given the sad state of our country these days, I am not counting on it.
Posted by: Heath Blain | October 3, 2006, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Mark Foley is a Disgrace to public servants everywhere. I am in a public servant, I am in the Military. What he did distained himself. Thank God Congress, are President, and Florida wants something done. May God Continue to Bless this great nation
Posted by: James | October 3, 2006, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
Geez… maybe I should commit a horrendous crime and blame it on the pervert who molested me when I was 11. Can I get a “Get out of jail Free” card now, please?
I’m ready for my close-up Mr. DeMille. Be sure to get my good side, I’m thinking of running for Congress or at the very least, opening a bordello.
Posted by: Ain't Buyin' It | October 3, 2006, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
It is unlikely that someone goes fishing for 5 or 6 years (that we know of) and never catches a fish. All of his IM’s are trying to get an underage person to meet him for sex. He must have been successful at least a few times, or he would not have continued. I think we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg. I also believe that this may be a common practice and that is why they are covering it up. I don’t think it was only him. There is much much more to this story, and it is going to be the biggest scandal we have seen in a long long time.
Posted by: Dalton Ferguson | October 3, 2006, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
As a true conservative who has never had a problem with individual liberties such as gay rights, I think this new “news” is appalling.
Now Foley is an abuse victim and is gay. Yeah. Play the trauma card. Did Rove write his statement? Seems to me that the Republican leadership is still suffering from an ’04 hangover. When in doubt, try to demonize gay people. It worked well in ’04 so why not try it again?
When will most Americans wake up and realize that being “conservative” is not about the bible? It’s certain principles. Less government and more citizen responsibility.
Posted by: Former Republican | October 3, 2006, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
The 21st century “Get out of jail free card”: “I’m a Gay American molested by a priest…oh yeah a Catholic priest”
Posted by: I'm Sorry...4 real | October 3, 2006, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
This is the worst type of fraud a person can commit…IF Foley walks then every individual ever convicted of any crime while under the influene should be EQUALLY treated and pardoned, should that be the outcome…ITS ONLY FAIR….the spin doctors are at it hard and heavy…now its “I was molested”…what next…”the dog told me to do it” …..please…this is a prime example of the fox watchin the hen house….
Posted by: StarFishHunter | October 3, 2006, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
HE SHOULD GO TO jail. I THINK HE IS USING THE CHURCH THING TO SAY THIS IS WHY I DID IT. SHAM ON HIM. I DON,T THINK HE WAS EVER WITH A PRIST!!!!!!
Posted by: gARLAND | October 3, 2006, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
As a mental health professional, I’ve been bothered by the recent misuse of the word “pedophile” by the media and others. Pedophilia refers to a pattern of attraction to people who are physically children (ie prepubescent), and has nothing to do with age of consent laws. My understanding is that the minimum age for pages is 16. While sexual contact with 16 year olds is against the law in many states, it does not make one a pedophile.
Posted by: Tim | October 3, 2006, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
First the alcohol, now the clergry…Seems like the man will place the blame anywhere but where it belongs….on himself! What happened to taking responsibility for your own actions?
Posted by: Newsy in WV | October 3, 2006, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Funny how the Republicans that made such a fuss out of the Lewinski affair are now complaining about the publicity the Foley business is getting. Personally, I think there is a difference between consenting sexual encounters among 2 adults and an old geezer abusing his power position to get hot on young boys. Especially considering the geezer was in charge of preventing pedophilia in the internet. The hipocrisy of the whole thing is simply repulsive.
Posted by: Lone Star Lake | October 3, 2006, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Just because he is a big shot with money, he is no better than anyone else that does the same thing but goes to prison for it. I am sure money will pay his way out, probaly our tax money. That sliming dog.
Posted by: Dorothy | October 3, 2006, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Foley, and only Foley, is responsible for his actions. The Republican party is not responsible for the things that he did. He used his position to take advantage over young men that aspire to serve this country. All those that were aware of his acts and seeked to cover it just to hold a seat in Contgress should step down and be sanctioned. I just hope he never got to do anything with these young people, although I believe by reading one particular IM that he met at least one and offered to provide him liquor in his house. shame on him.
Posted by: junie | October 3, 2006, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
What I want to know is, would everyone be as upset if this were a young GIRL? Although that would be as bad as this is, I somehow think that because it was a young BOY this is getting more coverage. This is so sad because this guy is a monster and should be put away. For him to “blame” alcohol and claim to have been molested as a youngster is even sicker.
Posted by: Chelsea | October 3, 2006, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Foley needs to give us a break. A pedophile is a pedophile.
“Gay” isn’t an excuse for being a pedophile. “Alcohlism” isn’t an excuse for being a pedophile. I’m gay and I’m offended that Foley is attempting to connect this to being gay.
Posted by: Ryan | October 3, 2006, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Gee, of course Mark Foley is not lying to the public when he claims to be a molested alcoholic who never had improper physical contact with a minor. Why should we doubt him? All his other lies certainly don’t illustrate a pattern? Of course, based upon Foley’s claims, we should feel sorry for him, because he is obviously a victim here in claiming he is the only one who was ever molested.
No wonder the GOP leadership ignored the red flags and is blaming the Democrats for this scandal. Not accepting responsibility for anything seems to be one of the “core values” nowadays for Republican. Sick.
Posted by: Lisa | October 3, 2006, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
An alcohol rehabilitation facility? ….really? since when does being a pedophile means that you can be treated for alcoholism???!!… and recover from engaging in sexual interactions with minors?
It’s time for the republican majority bozos in D.C. to submit their resignations and go home !!
Posted by: Maurice Perllier | October 3, 2006, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
any more excuses? so let me get this straight he’s an alcohlic sexually abused gay man. why can’t people be accountable for their own actions and not blame it on real problems and a way of life. one thing’s for sure he is totally sick in the head! and he needs more than a slap on the wrist!
Posted by: erica | October 3, 2006, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
HMMMM…it sounds like,”I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT LEWINSKI WOMAN” to me. same old …..different day!
Posted by: Katherine | October 3, 2006, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
How convient for there to have been a pedophile priest in Foley’s background that he can use as an excuse for being a dispicable human being! How clever of him to tell us of his alchohol problems and to sign into “rehab” and have this come out at such a convient time. I’m sorry, I don’t buy it either. The man is a perv and a typical politician – voting for legislation that would make internet contact with minors a crime – while committing that same crime as he goes along. If you ask me – the republicans are going to cover this up, like they cover up everything else that happens under their watch AND I AM A REPUBLICAN! I’m ashamed of my affiliation, and more ashamed that people KNEW this was occuring a year ago, and let it go on and on.
Posted by: Yeah I Bet | October 3, 2006, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
for GOD sake…vote Democratic so we can get these bozos out!
Posted by: Dave | October 3, 2006, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
What’s important to remember is that we can only make judgements about what we KNOW not how we choose to connect the dots. The guy clearly was into lascivious with chatting young boys, and we can make a judgement about that. But, so far, there is nothing other than a reference to San Diego that indicates it went any farther than that. So all those who choose not to connect just existing dots, but imaginary or hypothetical dots as well, are doing not Foley but justice a disservice. Maybe the guy got off talking naughty on the net but didn’t take it further–who knows . . . we certaintly don’t. And while there is certainly something perverse about nasty messages, there’s a huge gulf between that and real life behavior. Let’s judge this guy by what we KNOW he’s done, and hold off condemning for what he MAY HAVE done until we get facts there.
If those same facts show that the people in charge of things on the hill knew what this guy was up to and looked the other way–which again is still not certain–then they should be slammed hard as well.
Posted by: MIke | October 3, 2006, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
He makes me physically ill. It’s the public relations version of using civilians – especially children – as a bunker shield. Hiding behind the labels “gay man” and “victim of priest abuse.” McGreevey was a gay man, but while he did cheat on his wife-and is an idiot-, he didn’t engage in acts of child sexual abuse. A victim of clergy abuse? “Hey! Look over there! It’s a pedophilic priest!” (exit Foley stage right)
That former page said it correctly, “sick, sick, sick…” (ad infinitum)
Posted by: bef | October 3, 2006, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
I find it wierd that he already has a cival atty.Is more comming?????
Posted by: cheryl | October 3, 2006, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Apparently this party can suspend habeus corpus, lead America into an occupation of Iraq, condone torture, hand out corrupt military contracts, run up a huge deficit, etc. etc., but it takes a pedophile to bring them down. What does this say about our nation that only sex gets people’s attention?
Posted by: Claire | October 3, 2006, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
This is a joke. I agree with the previous comment… this seems to reinforce the belief that all gay men are pedophiles and/or were abused as kids. Foley is not a gay man. He is a pedophile, he is an adult who sought to be involved with an underage boy. A pedophile, just like a man who seeks to be involved with an underage girl. Alcoholism and previous abuse are just cheap excuses. He lied to our faces a few days ago… how can he expect people to believe THIS?
Posted by: Angelo | October 3, 2006, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
I dunno – Mr Foley makes a point of ‘splaining how he was victimized (and we assume, traumatized) as a young teen by a person of authority and trust, then dismisses his own actions because he didn’t have a “hands-on” encounter (we are to believe)?
Honestly, as the parent of a sex offender, I am more than familiar with the “its-not-my-fault” mentality. Sexual predation is not a black and white issue, but real responsibility for one’s actions is definitely the best first step!
Sorry, but this is another example of the “Values” party showing that they are just like the rest of us (heathen Democrats included).
Cut the morals crap GOP – you don’t wear it as well as you would have us believe!
Posted by: TypicalGirl | October 3, 2006, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
gee, what a nerve — so now He Is a Victim? ‘been a bad boy because he was molested by a priest’? – I don’t believe it for a second!
Posted by: bee | October 3, 2006, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
It’s ridiculous the way Foley’s people are trying to pass his repugnant behavior off as that of a man molested as a child. To say it’s part of his “recovery” when he’s been in that recovery for two days is an insult to our intelligence. Is he suddenly on Step 9 now? We need less spin and more of him taking responsibility for his actions. I write this as a gay person who is appalled. His behavior is shameful.
Posted by: Bill K. | October 3, 2006, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
Mark Foley’s situation is identical to the scores of Roman Catholic priests who are arrested developmentally and emotionally. These pedophiles prey on the goodness and innocencce of youth, then manipulate them for sexual control. The young page said it all…”sick, sick, sick”. But the Republicans who were there to protect the pages preferred not to listen to him be in denial rather than jeopardize their power and control.
Lock ‘im up!
Posted by: Mike Steingraber | October 4, 2006, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Mark Foley’s situation is identical to the scores of Roman Catholic priests who are arrested developmentally and emotionally. These pedophiles prey on the goodness and innocencce of youth, then manipulate them for sexual control. The young page said it all…”sick, sick, sick”. But the Republicans who were there to protect the pages preferred not to listen to him be in denial rather than jeopardize their power and control.
Lock ‘im up!
Posted by: Mike Steingraber | October 4, 2006, 12:01 am 12:01 am
How many times, people, how many times? Let’s all say it together one more time, “The moral majority is neither.”
Posted by: Will He Meet Mel in Rehab? | October 4, 2006, 12:08 am 12:08 am
Mr. Foley’s behavior is part of a larger societal trend – taking no personal responsibility for your actions. Like so many other people, he chooses to blame some other event or other person when in fact, he is the real culprit and 100% responsible for his own actions. AND by the way, a homosexual man loves other men, pedophiles love underage boys!
Posted by: Doug Blakely | October 4, 2006, 12:16 am 12:16 am
I’m just glad to know that Republicans do have sex no matter if it’s gay or straight. I th0ought they didn’t. However, this scum is a perverted pedofile. Pedofile is the key word here. He used his office to abuse children — 16 year olds are children. Even republicans knwo that.
Posted by: BJ | October 4, 2006, 12:28 am 12:28 am
This man resigned and checked into a facility to HIDE ; nothing else. He is a coward and so are his co hearts in the congress who knew this about him. Hasert DID KNOW. Did he participate? He didn’t report it. You repubs do recall Monica Lewinsky don’t you. AT LEAST SHE WAS GROWN!
Posted by: AJ | October 4, 2006, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Where there’s smoke, there’s fire! I think someone will come out of the woodwork eventually and tell of their inappropriate sexual relationship with Foley. Foley is a predator and didn’t just develop an attraction to boys within the last few years. To think that he only satisifed his sexual urges with instant messages and e-mails would be niave. Foley knows those he abused and knows that if they come forward to tell their story then he is definetly going to jail. This is a man who is desperate and I wouldn’t be surprised if pressure has already been put to those he abused to keep quiet.
Posted by: Keith A. | October 4, 2006, 12:33 am 12:33 am
I was molested when I was six years old and I have never molested other children. Nice try Foley, but this isn’t going to work. If anything, you would have know how deep the scars run from being a victim and you wouldn’t have victimized other children yourself. The fact is that you are a pedophile and you used your power to groom teenaged boys so you could gratify your own desires. You are a sick man, but I don’t feel sorry for you. Blaming this on alcohol and being a victim this late in the game makes you more despicable than I already thought you were. You are trying to hide behind the walls of a rehab facility and blame your troubles on someone other than yourself. How typical from the party that spews moral values not to practice what they preach. And for Hastert, Boehner, Reynolds and the other who have sheilded your disgusting sexual appetites, there will be no hiding either. Americans see right through all the lies and excuses and you are all done. We’ve had enough of the corruption, lies, and cronyism to last a lifetime. At least be a man and own up to harming countless children who went to DC hoping to learn how our government works, with the hope of future careers in politics. Your diseased contact with these kids will be like ripples in a pond and I hope that they will realize how badly they’ve been used by you and seek to ensure it doesn’t happen to others.
Posted by: ASurvivorInUtah | October 4, 2006, 12:44 am 12:44 am
ABC news still have not revealed how they have verified that the AIM chat transcripts are valid. Nor do they make a distinction between chat transcripts and the email that was sent by the former Congressman. I have called Brian Ross’ office several times and no one in his office will comment on how they verified the chat transmissions.
Let me explain for those that don’t understand the difference. All emails have a digital signature that can be traced back to the sender. These transcripts from the AIM chats are mere text files that can be manipulated.
If all ABC NEWS has are these “chat logs” then it is basically a he said, he said thing.
As a user of AIM for nearly 10 years I have saved chat logs all total of 2 times. I know no one that saves chats files so I question the validity of the 52 chat transcripts.
Posted by: Jay | October 4, 2006, 12:56 am 12:56 am
Foley is disgusting, not because he is gay, he gives gay men a bad name, not because he may be an alcholic, because he can’t tell the truth and neither can the Republican majority who are more concerned about power and not the people.
Posted by: michael | October 4, 2006, 1:06 am 1:06 am
I’m absolutely sick of this adminstration and all the harm they have caused this country. But, I’m just a middle class working single mom trying just to live a good life and teach my kids right from wrong. Paying bills, living paycheck to paycheck, is easy compared to trying to teach kids what’s right, wrong, moral or immoral when you see the leaders we have had as examples in our country.
Posted by: JP | October 4, 2006, 1:09 am 1:09 am
To be a Congressional Page you must be 16 years old. To have consenual sex in DC you must be 16 years old. I see no laws broken and a lot allegations of wrong doing. Where is the proof? Mark Foley has, perhaps, distastefully to some, engaged in relations with those who by nature must be of legal age to do so in the District. Change the law and increase the age of consent if you think these kids are being abused by power and sex hungry pols. For that matter, lets outlaw sex in Washington. Otherwise, give me proof he propositioned underaged kids in DC….UNDER 16 and with criminal intent….or move on to the next story.
Posted by: pierce | October 4, 2006, 1:10 am 1:10 am
Thank you ASurvivorInUtah. As you will know, one of the things that is really showing up in the Foley scandal is the extent to which the culture of enabling is alive and well. I was a victim of the priest Tolkien, son of J.R.Tolkien of Lord of the Rings fame. He too had the power of money and the Catholic Church to which he was giving $mmm form the inheritance from his father. Power and money continue to weave a screen around these criminals. In the case of my abuser, his prosecution was put off again and again until he eventually died without even being brought to court. The sick paradox is that all those children who paid money for the books and the movie unknowingly funded his escape from punishment. Hundreds of his victims were terrified ever to come forward because of the campaign of his lawyers and the Cathilic Church. Seem like deja vu all over again except this time in the Church of Congress. Meanwhile, I am in my third year of therapy at 60+ years old with a broken life behind me. And like you it wouldn’t occur to me to abuse children.
Posted by: PriestAbuse_Survivor | October 4, 2006, 1:15 am 1:15 am
I did think of one way to authenticate the chat log transmissions. When the file was created the computer has a time stamp as to when the file was created. I would like to know if ABC was given access to the victim’s computer.
Posted by: Jay | October 4, 2006, 1:17 am 1:17 am
If the chat transcripts were not authentic … do you think Foley would have resigned? Wouldn’t he, instead, be standing on any soapbox he could find and loudly professing his innocence? His actions are the actions of one who knows he committed a grievous malefaction.
Posted by: Amberlynne | October 4, 2006, 1:21 am 1:21 am
In a society which boasts protection of democracy around the world, we seem to have no problem trying people in the press. What happened to innocent until proven guilty? We have already found Mark Foley guilty of and exercised “diagnosis” of a psychological disorder which he clearly does not have. Foley is not by definition a pedophile. According to the DSM IV diagnostic criteria he does not meet the essential requirements, at least by the information the press has reported. Granted, adult relationships and sexual overtures are frowned upon in our society but how different would the country’s reaction be if the same emails were from an alleged drunk man to a 16 year old girl? How many times have we seen heads turn by “adult males” to look at under age females, i.e. high school cheerleaders? The double standard is clear. We are a confused nation. If we are going to fight wars around the world claiming to defend democracy we need to start at home and practice what we preach.
Posted by: Lev | October 4, 2006, 1:22 am 1:22 am
ASurvivorInUtah: No one has challenged the validity of the chats. Sure they are somewhat questionable, but Foley would not have resigned if at least the general tone was true. I imagine he is not so much a coward that he would resign instantly over fabricated AIM messages.
BTW, I log ALL instant message conversations. Most clients do this by checking a box, many by default. A 17 year old kid would know this, since it’s a primary means of communication and they often want to go back and read what people said. This would especially be true if you were chatting with a Representative.
Posted by: Alex N | October 4, 2006, 1:23 am 1:23 am
questions
1) Why didn’t hastert, boerner, etc. tell the democrats, the media, and us about this pedophile months ago? Seems like they, and Rice too for that matter, just can’t seem to remember their
powerlusting incompetency behaviors. That lust for power has corrupted the entire leadership.
2) GOP has been in control for years. Why have they let the Ethics committee die? eg – Foley, Ney,
Cunningham, Delay, Lewis, at al. None have faced ethics violations.
They’ve really enabled a large group of criminals and crooks. This is much worse than the check cashing scandal the Dem’s allowed. Time for the GOP to be swept out.
3) If Foley was drunk, let’s check his emails and im’s for grammar,
syntax, and punctuation. Just like driving, drinking will impair the
typing and thought processes. Curious to see them analyzed in this way.
Posted by: Independent Joe | October 4, 2006, 1:26 am 1:26 am
Isn’t it hilarious that a political party that is constantly railing against the gay community, gay marriage, sex before marriage etc etc has a loon like this in its ranks, chasing after a 16 year old boy. What a bunch of hypocrites. I wonder how many of the twisted morons are as deeply troubled as Foley.
Posted by: Bud | October 4, 2006, 1:26 am 1:26 am
The first sentence of this report should be clarifed. ABC News has not confirmed that “Mark Foley was sexually molested by a clergyman when Foley was between the ages of 13 and 15″ – that is Foley’s allegation.
Also I agree that ABC News should say if they got the messages from the Pages or an independent source. Suppose one of the Pages was faking messages or e-mails?
Posted by: Chris Baker | October 4, 2006, 1:28 am 1:28 am
Amberlynne – I can’t answer that, I know what I would do but I have never met, or for that matter even heard of this guy before Friday. It certainly doesn’t look good for him, I would just like ABC News to have all their facts in line and disclose how and when they found this information.
I still believe that the law of the land is that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Considering how in recent years the mainstream media has reported inaccurate news stories near election day I am slightly skeptical. It would be nice that someone would do their homework once in awhile, but the mainstream media is just lazy and we the viewers are suppose accept what they report without questioning them.
Posted by: Jay | October 4, 2006, 1:40 am 1:40 am
I am just thinking of another way to verify these stories. I am sure that AOL has some log that shows when a user logged in.
Posted by: Jay | October 4, 2006, 1:53 am 1:53 am
Jay, are you being naive or just displaying some kind of blind loyalty? You actually believe that
a man in such position of power and authority will simply resign and walk away without as little as demand for a proof if these transcripts were fabricated by ABC?
Come on wake up to reality and stop trying to make yourself into some kind of computer geek who knows everything.
Posted by: tollik | October 4, 2006, 2:06 am 2:06 am
dude, my IM saves all my messages all the time. I have all my IMs dating back years and it’s neither difficult nor confusing. it’s a simple setting on my messenger.
in fact, I don’t know anyone who doesn’t save their IMs.
Posted by: yo | October 4, 2006, 2:06 am 2:06 am
When are we going to wake up to the fact that this is just another case of lies and cover ups by the Republican Congress who would sell their mothers to stay in power. May all the lies and deceit be answered by the American people on Election Day 2006.
Posted by: COLONEL ROBERT FREITAS | October 4, 2006, 2:14 am 2:14 am
While it’s true the age of consent is 16 in D.C., these pages were not contacted until they had gone home and we do not have all the places where they live to know the laws in those states. I think we all need to wait and see what the investigation turns up to determine whether or not laws were broken, and which laws apply to the internet. People who are brushing this aside need to take a step back and wait for the facts.
Posted by: kat | October 4, 2006, 2:15 am 2:15 am
As a user of AIM for nearly 10 years I have saved chat logs all total of 2 times. I know no one that saves chats files so I question the validity of the 52 chat transcripts.
That’s the problem. You’re a user, Not an admin. Perhaps you aren’t aware that your chat sessions can be logged on the server without your knowledge.
He isn’t denying it because he knows they are legit. Do you really think he would have resigned over a few suggestive emails? Not a chance.
Is it just a bit ironic that the laws he sponsored are the ones he violated and can be prosecuted under?
Posted by: GasBag | October 4, 2006, 2:27 am 2:27 am
I find it interesting that Mark Foley heads to an alcohol treatment facility upon his being outed for his sexual predatory behavior on kids. Alcholoism doesn´t ¨cause¨ pedophilia. Alcohol abuse is the result of suppressed conflict and/or anger and one´s predisposition to getting the disease upon exposure to the trigger, or alcohol. His actions are despicable no matter what, but particularly so in light of the fact that he was a person in a power position. I just hope America wakes up to these self-righteous right wingers who walk around preaching purity and moral values while they molest our children while doing so. A hypocrite is worse than a liar. Vote them out and start fresh.
Posted by: George N. | October 4, 2006, 2:32 am 2:32 am
Mr. Foley has admitted his guilt by his words and his actions. A full accounting of the unsavory facts is necessary to put this matter to rest. Even if 16 is the age of consent in DC I doubt very strongly that families are particularly interested in sending their kids to Congress to be preyed on by people who hold power over these children by age and position. We’re talking about a 54-year old male and a sixteen-year old boy, remember? Give him his day in court and let’s see what ensues.
Now the second question is whether Mr. Hastert or others shielded him from exposure. That would be criminal too.
Posted by: Torgeir Hansson | October 4, 2006, 2:51 am 2:51 am
I want to know where ABC got the AIM transcripts from, and when? How long have they been sitting on this story?
Posted by: Lucas Roebuck | October 4, 2006, 3:18 am 3:18 am
What I find hilarious about this whole thing is that Foley’s actions are only illegal because of legislation he himself pushed through congress, criminalizing online what is legal in person. What an idiot. He deserves whatever he gets, for pushing irrational and indefensible laws.
Posted by: Gena | October 4, 2006, 3:21 am 3:21 am
I can’t beleive the people who in this blog section are trying to defend this scum bucket. they are obviously openly very stupid or pedophiles or maybe both. this guy was a real scum and so are the ones who covered it up. He should have resigned a long time ago but was allowed to remain for political reasons thats sick.
Posted by: CJ | October 4, 2006, 3:27 am 3:27 am
Brian Ross and team keep up the god work and find out how much the republican party knew of these perversions and when.If Hastert,Boehner,Reynolds,Alexander and Shimkus knew of the nature of his stalking 5 years or 5 months ago and kept silent,then they should all resign.
Posted by: Dennis | October 4, 2006, 3:29 am 3:29 am
“If all ABC NEWS has are these “chat logs” then it is basically a he said, he said thing.” – Jay
Consider for a second that the man resigned in disgrace. You don’t resign from a power position unless you are (a) guilty as sin and usually also (b) caught red handed.
“As a user of AIM for nearly 10 years I have saved chat logs all total of 2 times. I know no one that saves chats files so I question the validity of the 52 chat transcripts.”
Wow, convincing argument! I know plenty of people who save chat transcripts. Doesn’t seem unlikely to save one where your perv boss is coming on to you – just in case you need it in the future as evidence.
Denial is an amazing thing. Even in the face of this type of total disgrace, people can deny, excuse, obfuscate, blame, etc.
Posted by: gorn | October 4, 2006, 3:31 am 3:31 am
Let Hillary be the special prosecutor. She knows how to get to the bottom of giant right-wing conspiracies.
Posted by: jim | October 4, 2006, 3:34 am 3:34 am
To those of you who will say sixteen is the age of conscent go ask any parents of a sixteen year old boy or girl if your 50+ year old freind can have a date with them and then stick your face out with your hands at your side, let me know what happens next.
Posted by: CJ | October 4, 2006, 3:34 am 3:34 am
Shame on anyone who is a legislator, or priest, or parent, or anyone who says he or she is protecting children and then preying on them. This is a sad case, and I can only hope someone pays for this. The so-called leadership in the House and Senate should merely dissolve into thin air with this disgusting, unseemly mess.
Shame on Hastert and company.
Posted by: Lloyd Arriola | October 4, 2006, 3:37 am 3:37 am
Believe me, there is more. Not one of these “RATS” would give up his cheese without a fight. Let’s wait for the other shoe to drop.
Posted by: Joanne | October 4, 2006, 3:40 am 3:40 am
Thank you Amberlynn you are absolutely right ! Yes, why would he resign if it wasn’t true or if he wasn’t caught red handed so to speak. By that I mean he knew the jig was up because he knew investigators would seize his PC and examine the hard drive. And YES, Jay you are probably right in your 2nd comment. We won’t know how Ross got the information until his investigative reporting on this is over but then he might not want to reveal his source. Remember Ross just asked Foley some questions when the guy up and resigned not knowing 100% if the transcripts were in fact from Foley. Looks like he got his answer.
Posted by: Juanita Mckenzie | October 4, 2006, 3:57 am 3:57 am
Special to: Ain’t Buyin’It, ASurvivorInUtah and PriestAbuse_Survivor, I’m very sorry for what happened to you. Your abusers deserved to be tarred, feathered and dragged through the streets and much worse. We four are perfect examples of just because you were a victim of sexual abuse does not mean that you too will be an abuser ! But maybe more aware. You three are 110% correct in your statements. Please don’t allow it to define you, who you are as a person. Because it doesn’t. You deserve better and much much more !
Posted by: Juanita Mckenzie | October 4, 2006, 3:59 am 3:59 am
For those who see no problem with this issue, or try to blame the victim, I’m sure also saw no problem with the Lewinsky affair, or blamed her.
A 52 year old man having sexual relations with a 16 yr old boy is not normal, let alone a 52 yr old politician with a 16 yr old under his ‘care’. Let’s look at this situation for what it is, a sick act by a sick person. It was wrong for the President to have sex with Lewonsky, it’s wrong for a congressman to have sexual relations with a page. Let’s not cloud our judgement based on our political point of view.
Posted by: G.R. | October 4, 2006, 5:10 am 5:10 am
These conversations do not appear to me to be the words of a man who is just “chatting” with some underage males, rather the words of a man soliciting sex. I can’t believe he maintains that he did not have sexual contact with these kids, pedophiles dont just have conversations, they molest.
Either way, I’m glad he’s not in the House any longer.
How have we come this far, electing child-molesters as representatives?
Posted by: Bryan Perryman | October 4, 2006, 5:26 am 5:26 am
He’s not a pedofil. A pedofil goes after prepubescent youths. 16-year old males able to live away from home are not children, but young adults. While this whole matter does have a strong yuck factor, it’s not about a pedofile.
Posted by: Michael Evans | October 4, 2006, 5:27 am 5:27 am
Foley himself admitted he wrote the emails and instant messages…
Posted by: Chris | October 4, 2006, 5:35 am 5:35 am
I just want to know, what gives Foley any more rights than any one else.?
I was molested several times as a younger person, should that be okay for me to molest some one because I was? does that make me gay? personally it makes me physically ill to even think about it! I would never do that to another human being.
questioning your sexuality is one thing, but actually going after a child, someome under the age of 18 just because it happened to you does not give you a right to do the same. If it was any one else, they would be in prison.
It is wrong, plane and simple!
He should not expect any special treatment just because of what has happened in his past! he knew it was wrong, but he continued to do it! it happened to him, he should know how it feels!
Foley should be put in jail, and the others who knew about it should also be put in jail for covering it up, no matter who they are!
This is a disgrace, and I think that these people are the reason why there are so many laws are being held back!
they all should be blocked out of any government office! and should be put in jail.
Posted by: Teri | October 4, 2006, 5:40 am 5:40 am
Jay: There is no such thing as a “digital signature” on most emails. I could send an email to you, and there would be absolutely no way to trace it back to me. That’s actually how a lot of spam and virus-laden emails go through. Some emails ARE signed, but it’s only a very small minority.
As to saving chat transcripts: Why did Monica Lewinsky keep the blue dress? Why didn’t she have it dry cleaned? It’s pretty clear that she didn’t originally intend to bring down the President, that idea was Linda Tripp’s, after the fact. I suspect the transcripts were saved as some sort of trophy, just like the blue dress.
Posted by: Denis Robert | October 4, 2006, 5:54 am 5:54 am
There is a lot of difference between being gay and a phedofile. 99.99% of all gay people does not interact with young boys sexually.
/anders
Posted by: anders | October 4, 2006, 6:31 am 6:31 am
All of a sudden, Foley is an alcoholic? Although this has never been mentioned by anyone before, and never impaired him in his job? I don’t believe it for a second. Rather than pleading the 5th, his lawyer has advised him to plead A FIFTH, of vodka!! How riduculous. No one will believe the “I’m a molested alcoholic victim” plea that the lawyer has cooked up.
Posted by: Lisa | October 4, 2006, 6:46 am 6:46 am
{Chapter 117, 18 U.S.C. 2422(b)} forbids the use of the United States Postal Service or other interstate or foreign means of communication, such as telephone calls or use of the internet, to persuade or entice a minor (defined as under 18 throughout chapter) to be involved in a criminal sexual act. The act has to be illegal under state or federal law to be charged with a crime under 2422(b), and can even be applied to situations where both parties are within the same state, but uses an instant messenger program whose servers are in another state.[3]
Posted by: Roy Kniskern | October 4, 2006, 6:51 am 6:51 am
This is NOT a republican or democrat problem…it is one disgusting human being that shielded his sexual deviancy through his office. He is DISGRACED and joins the ranks of O.J./Hitler/Stalin etc. as the most despicable humans on the face of the earth.
Posted by: Johnny | October 4, 2006, 6:54 am 6:54 am
1. AIM automatically logs conversations by default. Didn’t you all know this? Such a silly, small thing, but something that might well be the key to this entire mess.
2. I am a Republican from KY and I cannot fathom the hypocrisy that is taking place at all levels of our government now. I expected GWB to at least come out and demand an investigation and speak about it… but he’s done almost nothing!! WHY?!
3. Foley is guilty as sin. The events surrounding the information surfacing make that very, very clear. He did molest at least 1 teenager, maybe more. Hastert did know about, if not the details, then the substance of all this, and did nothing. Why?
Posted by: Anthony | October 4, 2006, 7:04 am 7:04 am
I’m not condoning what’s going on, but it was fine when Barney Frank was having a prostitution ring out of his basement and being a flammer but when a Republican behaves in the same manner the world is coming to an end! This is just too coincidential that all this bullshit is coming out before the election. The Dems will do anything to win and I think if you get to the bottom of this you’ll see who’s behind it. Books being released and now this???? Win by hook or crook. It’s really a shame that an election can’t be won on a persons’ merit instead of all this behind the scene scheming!
Posted by: Eyvonne | October 4, 2006, 7:18 am 7:18 am
Republicans are nothing but hypocrites.
I don’t think I could possibly trust a republican again inmy lifetime.
they preach a holier then thou lifestyle, and then we find out they are just disgusting liars who are more horrible then the rest.
Posted by: republicans are evil | October 4, 2006, 7:19 am 7:19 am
Mark Foley is using 3 bad excuses why he did this, first I am 42 was raised by alcoholic parents, was molested by my father from 5 to 15 and I am a happy gay man. I have never had sex with kids and have never know any gay men or women who do. To use this as an excuse is going to make it hard on Mark Foley to live any kind of normal life and will make it hard on the gay community in the future.
Posted by: Bruce | October 4, 2006, 7:20 am 7:20 am
Foley’s gay. Big deal. A 16 year old? TALK ABOUT “CUT & RUN”! Liars, cheats and self centered folk are Republicans. Can honestly say, will vote straight Democrat ticket for years to come.
Posted by: Duque | October 4, 2006, 7:21 am 7:21 am
Just a curiosity, do Republicans have to take the “HYPOCRITICAL” oath? I think that’s the one where one is obliged to confuse a loving relationship between two consenting adults with pedophilia and beastiality. In this way the “Grotesque Old Perverts” can justify their pedophilia, while still claiming to be the party of Family Values!
Posted by: Defense of Marriage | October 4, 2006, 7:26 am 7:26 am
If the average American citizen had gotten pegged for doing this, the government would put them under the jail. Just because he is in politics does not give him the right to be soliciting young boys. As a matter a fact, it does not give him the right to solicit ANYONE! As a political figure (especially one that fought for crimes against children) there is a morals clause that comes with any job. Apparently his morals do not flow with the majority of United States citizens. Foley needs to “get a life”, quit blaming the alcohol (if that is the case then everyone that has a drink is a pedophile), and stand up and take his punishment like a “real man”. Being gay has nothing to do with this situation at all. It all comes down to moral turpitude which of which he apparently does not have.
Posted by: ac | October 4, 2006, 7:36 am 7:36 am
Jay, how often as a 16 or 17 year old did you chat with a congressman? perhaps in that case, you would have saved those chats?
Posted by: BD | October 4, 2006, 7:39 am 7:39 am
If possible I would like to say to Mr. Foley, because you claim to have alcohol problems doesn’t excuse your behavior. Not all alcoholics are pedofiles. Yes Mr. Foley that is right you are a pedofile. Haven’t you watched NBC’S special to catch a predator. You fit the pattern. Of course they all stated they didn’t do anything wrong. It appears to be very easy for you to blame alcohol and that fact the you now reveal you were molested as a child ( would you have revealed this info if you haven’t gotten caught)? I sincerely doubt it. I myself was molested as a child, but I realized that as an adult I no longer can blame my past for the actions that I do as an adult. Your current behavior and the fact that you blame your past for your current problems gives all victims a bad name. Not all victims who were molested go on and molest others. It appears as though you have jumped on the victim band wagon as a way to explain you troubles. Shame on you and shame on anyone in congress who knew what you were doing. You and anyone with knowledge of what you were doing should be relieved of office. You all should be men enough to step down because you failed at your positions. You were given responsibility to lead and teach our youth. But you in turn decide use our childern for our own perverted ideas. Mr Foley your behavior disgusts me.
Posted by: Arline | October 4, 2006, 7:40 am 7:40 am
I have worked with mental illness and addiction clients for 25years. I am blown away (no pun intended) with “our leaders”. What the hell is going on? How can they think we can’t see through any of this. Why is Foley such a coward? We wonder why our reputation is suffering around the world. I have serious doubts about his diagnosis!…
Posted by: Brad Mc | October 4, 2006, 7:42 am 7:42 am
Now I know why pedophillia, child molestations, and Internet stalking of kids are at an all time high. People (mostly men) are actually trying to defend this perv Foley! Do you all remember a story earlier this year of a kid that posed nude on his webcam at a very early age to grown men for money. He testified on the Hill and gave them names, phone numbers and credit card numbers to THOUSANDS of men. Only ONE was arrested. When it comes to sex, men think anything goes. One blogger even cited the age of consent is 16!! SO WHAT?!?!? This kid’s parents sent him to DC for a unique opportunity (esp. for white kids), not to meet some perverted, disgusting Congressman. Do we really care about our children? Dont blame ABC, dont blame the kid. Foley is a gay, pedophile. PERIOD! And the Republicans didnt care. PERIOD!
Posted by: Valarie | October 4, 2006, 7:49 am 7:49 am
Mr Foley behavior can be described in an old saying. “Do as I say not as I do”. That must be excatly what he was thing when he spoke to the America’s Most Wanted Television Show. Mr. Foley you are a pedophile. Blame your parents, alcohol the person that molested you, but you are an adult with the abililty to know right from wrong. Shame on you and shame on anyone who supports you.
Posted by: chrissy | October 4, 2006, 7:55 am 7:55 am
What is really sad is that the GOP leadership knew of this issue and did nothing about it; enabling this man to go about his business instead of getting any kind of help. What would be really refreshing would be for someone to admit responsibility instead of having to hear the spin on this from now until election day
Posted by: kjzd | October 4, 2006, 7:56 am 7:56 am
I say: Lay off the gay lawmaker. He’s just another DOM (dirty old man) in the pursuit of his menopausal happiness.
By the way, thanks to Foley, the male pages and the Republicans and to all the writers of the posts and comments above, for the huge and many laughs I’ve gotten from all of you.
Posted by: Mark | October 4, 2006, 8:07 am 8:07 am
There is no god.
And leave the poor guy alone.
Posted by: Ted | October 4, 2006, 8:09 am 8:09 am
It’s interesting that O’Reilly (who, as you all know, is no shrinking violet on the conservative side) who weighed in on this issue. He had a page on his program last night, who claims that all of the pages on the Hill had this saying about the former congressman. According to this person, the pages referred to Foley over the years as “FFF.”
So, with that said, I’m not finding much credibility with the House leadership that they didn’t know…looks like they looked the other way and tried to suppress the story. Instead, unfortunately, the story blew up in their faces, with the story now taking on a life of its own.
P.S. To all of the disbelievers out there, MAF54 at aol.com was Foley’s handle on IM – initials for Foley’s name (Mark A. Foley) and his year of birth (1954). I’m willing to bet that a subpeona is in the works to obtain IM server logs and even the e-mail messages for Foley’s AOL account to find out if there’s more to this story.
Posted by: walters | October 4, 2006, 8:09 am 8:09 am
1) Someone many posts above talked about homosexuals needing to get back in the closet. Now, I’m heterosexual. Should I get in the closet, too? I mean, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander!
2) People are hypocrites, not democrats or republicans. Make your argument based on logic and fact, not emotion. If one does a careful reading of history, it’s pretty much a 50-50 split along party lines as to whom breaks the most laws and tries to wiggle their way out of it.
3) The law is the law. You mess with a person, male or female, under the age of consent, you’re guilty.
Posted by: gus | October 4, 2006, 8:13 am 8:13 am
Mr Foley’s lawyer states he did not have sex with a minor. Fine. The question that should have been asked was, “While you were in office, did you engage in any sexual activities with any individual who was currently employed as a page?” You are legally not a minor when you are 16. When he asserts he has not had sex with a minor, he is stating he has not had sex with anyone 15 or younger. That does not include pages who are 16 or older. Thus, he could have been having a lot of sex with other pages who do not meet the legal definition of “minor”. I would think there is some law on the books about a sitting Congressman having sex with a currently employed page. It would be sexual harrassment possibly, if nothing else, and I believe that is illegal.
Posted by: DAN SMITH | October 4, 2006, 8:24 am 8:24 am
How low can this fellow sink? After he is caught, he comes out with all sort of his “victimization” – “I was abused by a priest”, “I am an alcoholic”, “I send the messages when I was under the influence of alcohol.” Does he expect us to feel sorry for him? And what is up with Mr. Hastert blaming the incident on the Democrats? When are these Republicans going to take responsibility for their own deeds?
Posted by: nyakairu | October 4, 2006, 8:24 am 8:24 am
It will not matter come election day and they will still vote Republican and run over us and control everything like they have for the past 8 yrs.
Posted by: Dave | October 4, 2006, 8:28 am 8:28 am
As a gay man and recovering alcoholic I am outraged that this twisted little man is now dodging responsibility for his sleazy behavior by claiming to be an alcoholic, a gay man and having been molested by a clergyman. I am also outraged that the Republican leadership swept this under the rug for years. At least when Bill Clinton engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior it was with an adult. Where are all our “leaders” in Congress now? Why wasn’t something done when this first came to light? I hope that America will wake up and smell the pig’s swill and realize that the Republican Party cares only for power and does not care what kind of filth they elect to office. I hope that Americans will also realize that this man is a pedophile. Gay men have sexual relations with other men not underage boys. Of course the “moral majority” and Christian right wing would have you believe otherwise to impose their morals, or lack thereof on the whole nation. Wake up America and turn this sleazy immoral bunch out of OUR government!
Posted by: Brian G. Finlay | October 4, 2006, 8:30 am 8:30 am
I think Mark Foley is innocent of the charges. This is just some attempt by liberal hate-mongerers that want to throw off the upcoming elections. The left-wingers put that boy in front of Mark Foley like a twinkie in front of a fat kid. What was he supposed to do?
Posted by: Albert Coleman | October 4, 2006, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Such a glowing example of that “Family Value” “Moral Majority” propaganda the Republican party claims to embrace. Whether Foley is criminally liable or not, as a Floridian, I’d like to see him REIMBURSE the state for every dime he made while “working” (trolling for young men) in Congress!
The same self-righteous Republicans who have hidden the behaviors of Delay, Foley and others (we may never know how many offenders) are the same folks who screamed “impeachment” of Clinton because he engaged in an extra-marital affair with an ADULT. Please! The Republicans historically have attempted to cover up more immoral, illegal, and downright criminal incidents — Foley is just the latest.
This election, for the first time in my life, my vote will be cast not necessary “for” a candidate as much as AGAINST anyone who has the audacity to say they stand for morality and family values and therefore are a Republican. HA!
Posted by: SandiT | October 4, 2006, 8:45 am 8:45 am
i am a married women from nc everyone needs to stop and take at look at what this world is coming to.according to the way the system see’s it the america people put this perverts in the office they are in they do that so when things like this happen well ya’ll put them in office.i don’t care democrat / republic this is something that has been going on for the long time and you all know how people talk the whole bunch knowed about it,and where is bush /and what is the vice president’s name how come neither of them have come out and said anything they are both hiding somewhere out of dc they knew this was fixing to come out so as usual they take off.and i can honestly say i had nothing to do with that i voted for kerry & edwards i would have voted for anyone other than any BUSH his father started a mess and left and then this bush come and picked up where his father left off.I hope Hilery Clinton runs or Bill for that matter he didn’t do nothing the rest of them hadn’t done he just got caught.at least his was between 2 concenting adults.and he was all man not prending to be something he wasn’t.
Posted by: tammy | October 4, 2006, 8:50 am 8:50 am
This swing voter is going to “cut and run.” This stuff just turns my stomach. I think we should create the “Cut and Run” club. How fast and far can we get away from this stuff.
Anyone care to join me???
Posted by: Red | October 4, 2006, 9:03 am 9:03 am
We are all disgusted by this appalling illegal act of pedophile stalking by an elected offical. What makes it hit home all the more, our tax dollars paid for it. How many more illegal acts are our tax dollars paying for? We will never know….because this group of politicians have all the power and are Masters of the cover-up.
Posted by: Laura | October 4, 2006, 9:03 am 9:03 am
Sexual Harassment
Sexual harassment is a special type of gender discrimination. It can be defined broadly as any kind of intentional sexual behavior on the part of any supervisor or employee that is unwelcome to some other(s) in the workplace. Sexual harassment can embrace unwelcome verbal behavior, whether negative or not (e.g. requests for sex, “come-ons” and propositions, derogatory sexual comments, and even crude or “dirty” jokes if told under the right circumstances).
Sexual harassment may also occur by visual methods (e.g. pictures of naked men or women, sexually suggestive pictures, posters, signs, cartoons, drawing, etc.) And sexual harassment may come in the guise of some sort of unwelcome physical behavior or unwelcome acts such as kissing, grabbing, touching, brushing against, or even leering.
Sexual harassment can be committed by an owner, a supervisor, managers, lead persons, forepersons, co-workers, subservient employees, and, in certain circumstances, even from customers.
Sexual harassment is a violation of State and Federal Civil Rights Acts. SO,WHAT ARE THE REPUBLICAN ATTORNEY GENERALS OF THE US AND FLORIDA WAITING FOR?
Posted by: JCJC | October 4, 2006, 9:08 am 9:08 am
He has checked into a rehab center for the simple reason that he can hide in there without anyone (press) getting to him. what a coward!
Posted by: Curtis | October 4, 2006, 9:12 am 9:12 am
The same party that was going to bring ’family values’ back to this country has caused more damage and grief to this countries families. Both in the form of this lie of a war as well as this Foley scandel. I am sure this is just the tip of the iceberg with this nasty administration, and I am sure more info will come out as the days pass. I was sick that the GOP stole both elections, and watched as this country backed a moron named G. W. Bush. I am counting the days until this joke of an administration is gone and we can begin repairing the damage they have caused. Foley is a liar and a coward who is using child abuse and alcholism as a shield to hide behind. Nothing new from a desperate administration that is full of power-trippers, liars and sickos.
Posted by: Andrew Fuellhart | October 4, 2006, 9:12 am 9:12 am
I have saved every chat conversation I’ve ever had — years and years worth. And it’s harder than you think to manipulate the data and not have the edit reflected in the file properties attached to the transcripts.
Since Foley admits the conversations why would you persist in believing this to be some sort of smear campaign? Those of you who cannot let yourselves believe that this particular Republican has fallen off your altar of worship should also check yourselves into a facility to be de-programmed.
Posted by: TheScree | October 4, 2006, 9:13 am 9:13 am
What angers me most about this entire situation is that if Foley was a regular Joe he would have already been put in front of a judge sentenced accordingly and and been boldly marked as a sex offender!But because he is a public figure this is called a scandal, rather than a crime! Now he tries to claim he was an abused alterboy? That is a sick cop out. Along with a pedophile chage he should als be charged with corruption of a minor…anybody else would be for telling a child they were going to liquer them up! It’s sad to think but likely probable he will get off with a slap on the wrist. Sick Sad world we live in.
Posted by: Angel | October 4, 2006, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Alright enough is enough, their are over 50 republican senators and to make judgment that they are all perverts and this is just a republican problem is ridiculous; get your heads out of the sand so you can breath! Wake up; this is not a rep vs. dem issue. It is a moral society issue and as long as we use try to cover issues by blaming one party over the other the only losers is this country. Both parties have skeletons no one party is better than the other party. Why are the dems using this as an issue? Could it be the all time high stock records, lower prices for gas, unemployment record low???
The answer is know the people you are electing don’t vote just party lines. Here is one for the dem’s —- B. Frank was elected several times after he and his partner had child porn in the Senators home basement, T. Kennedy was involved in an accident which resulted in the death of a female. Kennedy paid off the family and no investigation was conducted. Let the party without sin cast the first stone. Our order of priority should be 1st. country; 2nd. People of the US. 3rd. our beliefs of what is just and right and 4th our political party; and not party first as many elected officials try to make us believe.
Posted by: bob | October 4, 2006, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Obviously, what he did was awful. However, I think trying to blaim Republicans is distasteful as well. A political affiliation does not make a person morally right or wrong. Those choices are made by the person. There have been plenty of troubled times in America that can be placed at the door of democratics and republicans alike. This is about one man and his actions. I think people should focus on that.
Posted by: Sue | October 4, 2006, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Foley can’t blame his sick behavior on alcohol either. I’ve done a lot of drinking in my day and never once did I have the urge to exchange sexually charged instant messages with boys OR grown men. These feeble justifications given by his lawyer are a total joke. They are supposed to Jedi mind-trick us into feeling sympathy for this guy. No matter what has happened or is happening to you, you have no right to try to corrupt teenagers 30 years younger than you.
I love the hypocrisy of this guy. He heads up a committee dealing with the exploitation of children, and he called Clinton sick after his stupidity with Monica Lewinsky. I’d say Foley has Clinton pretty well beat in the sick department. Having ‘sexual relations’ with a woman of legal age is immoral, being a pedophile and sexual predator is sick.
Posted by: geoff | October 4, 2006, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Here is the solution for our government officals to do a job for us, not to be babysitters to interns, pagers and so on, these kids should remain in school and learn like everyone else and go into the working world when it is time stop dangling the carrots in front of the rabbits, do the job you’re getting paid and I am getting charged by taxing me for without distractions of minors who have no business there in the first place and move on, enough is enough. This country really needs to wake up we have so many problems that need attention at to be focusing on waht Mayors, Senators, Governors and so on that have so much time on there hands as to text mussage, fool around play games is a scary thing no wonder palnes go into buildings we are turning into a lauging stock to other countries, and while all this goes on little girls are bing gunned down execution style, what nooone else can see this is a problem!! Kathryn in Connecticut
Posted by: kathryn | October 4, 2006, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Poor, poor Foley:
I admit it, “I seduce young men”
I couldn’t help myself, “I’m an alcoholic”
It’s society’s fault, “I was molested by a clergyman when younger”
I’ve been hiding in the closet, “I am gay”
Woe is me…
“I stubbed my toe”
Gi’me a break for Pete’s sake, where and when will the excuses stop?
Posted by: SAb | October 4, 2006, 9:39 am 9:39 am
I cannot believe the mealy-mouthed slime balls who are trying to defend Foley with silliness like “innocent until proven guilty”. He ADMITTED inappropriate emails, and resigned because he knew what else was likely to come out. He has proven his guilt himself by admitting it. Of course, he sprinkled his admission with self-serving lies (e.g. molested as a teen himself, never offered liquor to underage people, never actually had sex with any pages, etc.) But those lies are now being debunked one by one. Closet perverts are often the one’s who scream loudest about the evils of child abuse. And here we go again with Foley! By the way, quit already with the stupid excuse that in DC the age of consent is 16. Irrelevant. Many of these communications happened when he was in Florida and both Federal law & Florida law are specific about sending sexual come-ons and sexually explicit messages to anyone under the age of 18. He was soliciting 16 year old kids. And as a Mom of a 16 year old kid, he is lucky he didn’t mess with my kid because I would immediately go the the FBI and if they didn’t act, to the media to out this pedophile. (And by the way, he isn’t a homosexual. He is a pedophile. Two different things entirely). The parents of the kid in Louisiana were very wrong to ask that his pursuit of their underaged son not be pursued. Now they are partly responsible for the kids he molested between then and now.
Posted by: LG | October 4, 2006, 9:42 am 9:42 am
To alcoholism and catholic clergy molestations the ex-Republican congressman from Florida might consider adding the “twinkie” or “fast food” defense. There is not a person in the world over 18 years that could not scour over his/her life and come up with a bad expierience…fortunately most grown-ups get passed it and never have to use it to justify obscene behavorior…at least we never had to listen to this kind of dribble when Bill Clinton got caught and impeached by the sanctimonius now shamed Republicans.
Posted by: final nail | October 4, 2006, 10:07 am 10:07 am
He should have been set up by Dateline NBC’s “To Catch a Predator”. He is a very sick person. Does he have children?
Posted by: Arkansas-democrat | October 4, 2006, 10:07 am 10:07 am
For a man who is “not blaming anyone or anything else” for his actions, I can already count four excuses we’ve heard from him via his attorney: alcoholic, mentally ill, molested, gay. And, by the way Mr. Roth, to play the semantics game that Foley is not a pedophile (because this only applies to someone who is attracted to pre-pubescent children) is just that, a sad, sad semantics game.
Posted by: LJB | October 4, 2006, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Ahh, the lawyer is just trying to establish mitigating factors, and continue to deny the deniable. His job is to minimize the amount of criminal punishment Foley could face.
Posted by: abadman | October 4, 2006, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Is this any different than all the stories we have heard lately of teachers having sexual encounters with their students? Think about it….these kids are in DC trying to get a specific education. No parent sends their kids to school to get this “special” type of knowledge. The “teacher”, Mr. Foley, abuses his power for his own sick gratification. A teacher, in my home state, was recently sentenced to 12 years in prison for having sex with her student. What Mr. Foley has done is right along the same line. We just haven’t heard from the pages he violated, physically, yet. Hold on tight folks, we will. I hope he gets the same prison time. He will have lots of male company there in which to make “friends”.
I also have a hard time with the “circling of the wagons” so to speak. I have a sneaky feeling that if his party affiliation was more to the left, no one with an “-R” after their name would be defending him.
The Repulisicans are scared…..
Posted by: cindy | October 4, 2006, 10:11 am 10:11 am
My Grandmother always said ‘The bigger the cross, the bigger the whore.’ Rep. Foley is certainly proving this to be true! I have always believed that many of those who talk the loudest about morals have the most to hide. They almost never live up to what they are preaching. By virtue of the fact that the Republicans have run as our ‘moral conscience’ in past elections, they are now held to a higher standard – and have failed miserably! Give me Clinton with his female and legal-aged extra-marital sex any day. He didn’t do anything that most of our previous presidents and lawmakers didn’t do. And a majority of us too for that matter, according to published polls.
Posted by: Sharon | October 4, 2006, 10:14 am 10:14 am
I want to know why criminal charges were not filed a year ago. I want to know why the republicans covered all this up for Foley. If they cannot be trusted to put our childrens safety ahead of their own selfish agendas then how can we expect them to be trusted to make decisions for the people of this great country. Those who knew should be prosecuted for their role as accomplices to being a pedophile because they covered the crime up and allowed the children to remain in danger. Most likey they are all just trying to figure out how to keep themselves from being found out. We will probably never get the truth of how deep the cover-up went.
I am trying to understand why the republicans would feel the need to attack a man and spend millions and millions of dollars to prove there was an adulterous affair between 2 consenting adults, yet they encourage a possible child predator to continue to victimize children by covering up and hushing up to protect a pedophile?
Anyone watching , “To catch a predator”?
Posted by: jean | October 4, 2006, 10:15 am 10:15 am
It’s interesting, isn’t it, that this “Do Nothing” Congress can’t address securing this nations Mexican border; can’t nail lobbyists on the Hill: can’t demand that there be some resolution to the slaughter of American troops in the Middle East; allows the rights of detainees and citizens, as well as the Constitution to be shredded by the leaders of their own government; and, now, covering for a smarmy degenerate House-member, with a voracious appetite for teen-aged boys! Since Congress gets nothing done for the nation, often fails to answer correspondence from constituents, yet has, apparently, loads of time for “sex-chat”, they all need to be “booted”, and without delay! To retain them in office is to ENABLE their arrogance, and ensure the steady decline of this country.
Posted by: PAULA DUVALL | October 4, 2006, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Eyvonne, I believe that if this was election related, Foley would not have resigned as quickly as he did. He would have fought the battle to retain his integrity. I am certain that we will not discover that indeed this was an attempt by the democrats to undermine the republican party’s reputation.
I think that anyone who had been forewarned about this situation prior to Friday who did nothing should be held accountable.
Posted by: km | October 4, 2006, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Just has troubling is the news of Mr. Foley is how both Democrats and Republicans continue to use this awful situation as political leverage to benefit themselves. Any elected official that speaks of this in any political tone is just as bad as Foley.Just for a moment the political gloves need to come off and both parties should unite in purging their halls of anyone that could have protected these children but chose not to, especially for political gain, both Republican or Democrat. Let’s protect our children without politics!
Posted by: Kenny | October 4, 2006, 10:42 am 10:42 am
So, now Foley wants to claim to be a victim with his sudden claim of an alchohol problem and claims of being molested as a youngster himself. Whether or not that’s true, I’m sure he does need treatment if he gets turned on by children. But I’m not feeling sorry for Mark Foley. He’s a lying, deceiving, hypocrite that is trying to weasel his way out of the mess he’s made of his life. He needs to stop with the excuses. It’s just pathetic.
Posted by: Trystann | October 4, 2006, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Mark is a predator.Any one who kept that a secret is the same as mark.The voters trust those guys.The republicans are talking about family value at the same time there are abusing little boy.There are more coming out soon wait and see.
Posted by: lyonel janvier | October 4, 2006, 10:50 am 10:50 am
G O P = CERO TRUST.
Posted by: Zuzu | October 4, 2006, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Mark is a predator.Any one who kept that a secret is the same as mark.The voters trust those guys.The republicans are talking about family value at the same time there are abusing little boy.There are more coming out soon wait and see.
Posted by: lyonel janvier | October 4, 2006, 10:55 am 10:55 am
I don’t know which is more shocking:
a) That Republicans put a known child predator in charge of Missing and Exploited Children, or
b) That all the Republicans who are blindly defending the deriliction of duty by House leadership all seem to have encyclopedic knowledge of the minimum age for sexual consent for children in each state!
Why on earth would anybody have that kind of information at their fingertips??
Posted by: MK | October 4, 2006, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Here’s what I think. This man is in a position of power and is asking us all to allow him to make important decisions about the way we live in America. I don’t care who he goes to bed with, I have absolutely no problem with gay American’s what I do have a problem with is that someone in the position to affect my daily life with his voting choses to not stand up like a man and say: Hey that’s what I like, I did it and I knew what I was doing was not going to be looked on favorably by most people but that’s what I did. All of us have sad stories to tell but that is not the definition of who we chose to be. You make choices, stand up for the choice you made, don’t run and hide. You demean those folks who have been molested and have reached inside themselves and decided that was not going to be the one moment that made them who they were. I don’t want anyone leading me who can’t stand up to their beliefs, gay or not.
Posted by: Edna | October 4, 2006, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Ok, so why didn’t my previous comment post?
Do gay men abuse 16 yr olds?
These excuses need to stop. Why isn’t Foley under arrest? I see pedofiles get arrested on TV. Had the 16 yr old been the son of one republican congress men, this would be a different story. I guess Foley didn’t think he’d ever be caught.
Posted by: Dupe | October 4, 2006, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Things that are irrelevant:
The fact that Foley is
1) Gay
2) A former victim of abuse
3) An alcoholic
4) A republican
Things that ARE relevant:
1) He clearly has an addiction to SEX
2) His addiction was so out of control that he jeopordized his career
3) He used his position of power to proposition sex from people that worked there (sexual harrassment, not pedophilia exactly)
Posted by: Newzhound | October 4, 2006, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Victim + drunk + gay = excuses
Ok Foley lets go with this. I knew it was wrong to sexually stalk children but I did not care. I only wanted to do what I wanted to do no matter who I hurt just as long as it pleased me.
That is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me God.
Now sign here……….
Posted by: Kathy | October 4, 2006, 11:11 am 11:11 am
It’s really a shame that an election can’t be won on a persons’ merit instead of all this behind the scene scheming!
The republican Party is the KING of such mudraking and blowing out of proportion of anything a democrat does.
Finally-The Republican’s are getting a dose of their own medicine. Even better, it’s for Real stuff that EVERYONE (except foley’s cohorts) agrees to be wrong. All this and Bill Clinton calling journalist on their facts! I’m so glad the Dems are getting some Backbone and fighting fire with fire. Keep up the good work boys!
Posted by: AboutTime! | October 4, 2006, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Is anyone else tired of hearing about Republicans breaking the law and then blaming someone else?
Why do they keep doing that? And why do Americans keep voting for them?! Just because they claim to be the “moral majority” doesn’t make it so. Just because they blame others for their own criminal behavior, doesn’t make it ok. Just because they say they do what’s best for our country, doesn’t make it a fact. Let’s stop listening to all the Republican lies, and start examining facts! We should not live in fear of the government that we elected.
Posted by: Mr Adkins | October 4, 2006, 11:20 am 11:20 am
I thought all the people who were molested in life ended up on the rag bag of history. I don’t believe Foley was molested. But in the unlikely chance he was, it did not seem to affect anything he did during his life having been elected to Congress over and over.
Is he saying the alleged molestation made him gay? I never heard that line before. Why is the molestation relevent to the situation? Oh, I get it, he did not become gay because he was molested; he just got attracted to boys because he was molested as a boy. Sorry, don’t buy it. Also don’t buy Foley is gay. If he were, there are plenty of gay men around DC for him to deal with. Why just the boys? What Foley is is sick, plainly sick.
Posted by: MattXq | October 4, 2006, 11:20 am 11:20 am
In listening to the Savage Nation last night, I was appalled by the speaker’s seeming greater concern about the control of the house versus protecting our children. It is time for a third party in this country. It is obvious absolute power corrupts, it happened with the Democrats and the Republicans have taken it to a whole new level. We need a balance of power in Washington as we cannot trust either party to stand behind what they preach. I never thought I would say this but we need Ronald Reagan again.
Posted by: Rob | October 4, 2006, 11:24 am 11:24 am
I grew up in a house of alcholics, where I was sexually abused and raped and beaten, I didn’t become a phedophile, an alcholic, msss murderer, or bank robber. I got married had kids raised them, worked since I was fifteen and have twelve grandkids now. I’m sick and tired of these people when they get caught doing something they know is immoral, illegal or both then all of the sudden low and behold their an alcholic, gay phedophile, who was abused. OH PLEEEZZZZZZE! All of these guys in government need to get the boot from the top down. Our country has been ruined, our economy is in the toilet, our brightest and best are being killed daily in Iraq and Afghanistan and we have these so called Morally, Religious, right wing individuals trying to hit on kids, give them booze and worse. And what did the OVERSIGHT committe do, same thing it’s done with Bush, give him a big kiss and a wink and say, now don’t you do that again! These fat cat rich, morally corrupt individuals should all be thrown out.Grannysue
Posted by: Sue | October 4, 2006, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Why is everyone carrying on about Republicans? Clinton was not a Republican and he was actually screwing in the White House.
Hello!! If the law states 16 is legal, then get over it. It is grose but legal. If these “children” were home when Foley contacted them then I guess he didn’t use his “power” over them while they were in D.C.
Enough already. It’s not Republican, It’s not pedaphil, It’s not sexual acts in the House or government office. What someone does in their private time (whether we think it is grose or not) is there business.
If it is abuse of “children”, where are the police? If this is abuse to “children”, why hasn’t he been arrested yet?
Everyone needs to chill. I personally think it is abuse but if the law states differently – move on!
Posted by: Confused | October 4, 2006, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Along with the other facts of this situation, it was an abuse of power.
Posted by: Margaret | October 4, 2006, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Forget the Foley thing. We’ve lost 17 soldiers since Saturday in Iraq.
Posted by: Psmooth | October 4, 2006, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Foley’s a liar. He’s using alcoholism as a cop out and “being gay” as both a cop out and as a way to give truly gay people a black eye. He is a sexual deviant. Being gay doesn’t necessarily make you a deviant, just as being a deviant doesn’t make you gay. Gay men have sex with age apropriate men, they don’t molest children. Perverts molest children, This guy is pervert that abused his power, plain and simple. He and Hastert need to go to jail for a very long time with all the other deviants and perverts. I bet if you dig hard enough you’ll find that Hastert behaved inappropriately with these young boys as well, hence the attempted cover-up. Foley likely ruined some young kids lives and he’s looking for the easy way out. Lock the SOB up and throw away the key!!
Posted by: todd | October 4, 2006, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Along with the other facts of this situation, it was an abuse of power.
Posted by: Margaret | October 4, 2006, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Why didn’t all of this come out BEFORE Bush was re-elected? He might not be serving a second humiliating term.
Posted by: The Editor | October 4, 2006, 11:37 am 11:37 am
In listening to the Savage Nation last night, I was appalled by the speaker’s seeming greater concern about the control of the house versus protecting our children. It is time for a third party in this country. It is obvious absolute power corrupts, it happened with the Democrats and the Republicans have taken it to a whole new level. We need a balance of power in Washington as we cannot trust either party to stand behind what they preach. I never thought I would say this but we need Ronald Reagan again.
Posted by: Rob Harris | October 4, 2006, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Valarie,
He was messaging these “boys”. They don’t have to read the messages. No one has proven that he has done anything physical with any of these “boys”. Their parents didn’t send their “boys” there – the young men decided this was what they wanted.
If 16 is legal, get over it. He messaged these boys. wow!
Pedophils are proven sexual offender to children. No children were involved.
Regardless of our personal opinion that this is not “acceptable” behavior, legal is legal. Let’s wait for the proof of a real crime. If he did actually commit a crime – let’s cheer when the police arrest him.
Posted by: Confused | October 4, 2006, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Simple minded people are lead easily. They’re like dumb sheep. Simple minded people who supported Mark Foley are probably believing this crap story about him being molested as a child, and that this is the reason he did what he did. B.S.!!!! I do not believe that gay men are pedophiles…. sick men like Mark Foley who try to pick up 16 year old boys are pedophiles. Don’t try to get over on the rest of the thinking world Mr. Roth. We all know a horse from a pig. And Mark Foley is most definitely a pig.
Posted by: Kristi L | October 4, 2006, 11:43 am 11:43 am
I agree if the GOP leadership knew of this and did nothing they should also resign. According the FBI they knew of about the instant messages and the GOP leaders said they would handle it. As for Mr. Foley trying to blame this on his problem with alcoholism is a joke. So does this mean he was drunk while he was on the hill and during voting sessions.
Posted by: psk584 | October 4, 2006, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Does ABC News speak the whole truth?
Posted by: Norm | October 4, 2006, 11:58 am 11:58 am
as a democrat, i dont understand all the republican bashing, and deciding that everyone must have known about this… is there any proof that anyone knew about this besides those directly involved? i don’t know what my coworkers are doing, and they don’t know what i do — they don’t even know i’m typing this response.
obviously foley is disgusting and guilty (his actions — resigning, checking into rehab, saying he was abused as a child — show it). but the others, let’s not judge so soon. not all republicans are bad… just like the majority of gays are not pedophiles, and the majority of democrats do not sleep w/ their interns.
btw, to the republicans out there that say wait to see if he’s guilty… how are you not upset that somehow a gay man ran on your party’s ticket and got elected???
Posted by: sfd | October 4, 2006, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
It would be odd that the Evangelical Republicans will lose Congressional seats not about real issues that matter but because of a pervert. I just find that ironic. I bet they are really really mad right now.
Posted by: Ran | October 4, 2006, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Being abused is NO excuse to abuse another person. Being an alcoholic is NO excuse to abuse another person. Foley is a sick man for what he did. The men and or women who covered up for him in any way are sick too. Both disgust me.
Posted by: Winter | October 4, 2006, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
You know what is pathetic, people who post things like ‘Republicans’ are evil.
Pathetic and so lost in life.
Posted by: Mark | October 4, 2006, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
It is scary to think that the Herald & St. Pete Times, both papers tend to favor the right, kept this story under wraps. WE should all be grateful, our children should be grateful, for Brian Ross & ABC for bringing out this well-guarded secret. The question is whether these pages will be bought off to not admit that they had sexual contact in person. Are we supposed to believe that this guy drew the line at online contact only? Incidentally, how could he be sober in his duties, but drunk online with these kids? Doesn’t the revelation of the IMs during the pause in voting in 2003 take away that preposterous story? Was he drunk sending the IMs, but sobered up to go vote on government spending in Iraq?
Posted by: l | October 4, 2006, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Personally, I don’t see this as a Republican or Democratic issue. There is enough dirt in the closest to crucify both parties. We have become a nation of bankrupt morality. This isn’t a party issue — it is a national crisis. No one is responsible for anything. It was the alcahol, my preacher, my teacher, or my parents. The buck never stops here.
Posted by: Fred | October 4, 2006, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
I totally agree with the comment left by Christina Smyth…”Mark Foley is not a gay man, he is a pedophile. Homosexual men have relationships with men not boys”
I am tired of hearing that all gays are pedophiles. Watch Dateline and see how many Heterosexual men are pedophiles. Pedophiles come in all shapes, sizes, backgrounds. If Congress knew something about this a year ago, and did nothing then yes he should be in the hot seat and resign. If he were a democrat, the republicans would for sure hang him out to dry when they first heard of it. This does not surprise me at all coming from a right wing party.
Posted by: Oliver | October 4, 2006, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
I am so glad that as an American I live in London and not the Country Bush has created!!
Posted by: Jerry O'Mara | October 4, 2006, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
The Democrats need to back-off and stop turning this issue into a Republican power-play. Denny Hastert would never have covered up something so sickening and disgraceful. He’s a brilliant man who would have understood the consequences if he chose that path.
Posted by: Michele | October 4, 2006, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
As soon as Congressman Tom Reynolds first heard of this, law enforcement should have been notified, hard drives siezed and imaged, and search warrants served on yahoo, aol, and all other third party servers.
If the same hint of wrongdoing came to a Jr. High school admin, this is exactly what would follow.
Reynolds seems to think that Congress operates under a lesser set of standards.
Posted by: Steve | October 4, 2006, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
I don’t blame Republicans. I don’t blame Democrats. I blame a 2 party system that gives us no viable options when both partys are liars and abuse their power…
Posted by: Lewis | October 4, 2006, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Foley’s attorney’s comments are very helpful: his behavior is all the fault of the Catholic Church. I KNEW it!
Posted by: MFB | October 4, 2006, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
This just showcases republican hypocrisy (do as I say and not as I do) and projection (most critical of behavior in other people that you are doing yourself). And what about “personal responsibility” that the republicans are always screaming about? So far, Foley has blamed alcohol, a clergyman for abusing him, and mental illness. I hope all the republicans are voted out in November!
Posted by: JE | October 4, 2006, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
This incident highlights the hypocrisy common within the GOP. Foley is sick for using his powerful position to take advantage of young and impressionable boys. And now he is calling himself gay and saying he was molested to gain some sympathy? No way…I hope America can differentiate between being gay and being a pedophile, which is what Foley is, plain and simple. I’m a 25 year old gay man and would never think of writing perverted messages to a 16 or 17 year old!
Posted by: Mike F. | October 4, 2006, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
I WAS ALSO SEXUALLY ABUSED WHEN I WAS A CHILD BUT I HAVE NOT NOR WILL I EVER SEXUALLY ABUSE ANY CHILD. I AM ‘NOT’ A GAY MAN! I AM A FATHER AND A HUSBAND. I HAVE OVERCOME BY THE GRADE OF GOD. NEVER HAE I EVER EXCUSED ANY IRRESPONSIBILITIES TO MY ABUSE. SHAME ON FOLEY.
I FIND IT REPULSIVE FOR ANYONE TO SAY THAT HE IS NOT A PEDOPHILE. HE IS SICK! HE IS DEMENTED! HE SHOULD CRIMINALLY CHARGED.
P.S. I ALSO DO ‘NOT’ DRINK ALCOHOL.
Posted by: JR | October 4, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
He’s is not gay this is just a cover up for what he did. Druk or not drunk there is no excuse for this kind of behavior. Why is it that they can’t admit that they have a problem or that things happend to them as children until they get caught and they need an excuse for thier behavior?
Posted by: Disgusted | October 4, 2006, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
How our government representatives close their eyes when things like this go on is a mystery to me. Aren’t they working for us? Whose interests do they really represent?
I am so sick of all the corruption and graft that goes on in all aspects of business and government. No wonder we have so many deficits. Doesn’t anyone have ethics anymore? What about person responsibility?
This is not a Republican or Democratic issues but a humankind one.
These people need some shakin up some how. I wish I knew how.
Tena
Posted by: Tena De Cicco | October 4, 2006, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Foley’s lawyer said Foley takes responsibility for sending sexually graphic instant messages over the Internet and was under the influence of alcohol when he sent many of the messages.
So…was he drinking then when he voted on the Iraq spending bill? Or did he indulge in that little predatory cybersex session stone sober?
Oh the tangled web we weave….
Posted by: Chicklet | October 4, 2006, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Why is he being allowed the time to come up with a story? I say he can sober up in a jail cell. If this was any no-political person we would be doing just that. The shame he has brought upon every elected official and office. The to top that all off he it’s the Catholic churches fault.
Posted by: Mark in VA | October 4, 2006, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
The United States of America is in great need of morality. This and many other situations are simply red flags as to the ill condition of the heart of man within this country.
Dr.
Posted by: Dr. Burnex | October 4, 2006, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
We need to avoid, I believe, making any comparison between Barney Frank, a courageous American legislator, and Mark Foley. Mark Foley, unlike Mr. Frank, is hypocritical and untrustworthy. He may or may not be alcoholic. He deserves our prayers. Our scorn and blame, however, will only serve to keep others like him in sexual purgatory and perpetuate the kinds of behaviors that we wish did not occur.
Posted by: Stefan P. Kruszewski, MD | October 4, 2006, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
So is Foley or his people implying that being a gay man means you prey on young boys? Just like there are men that prey on young girls, there are those that prey on young boys. It’s called pedophilia and it’s illegal. Being gay, an alcoholoic or a molestation victim have nothing to do with his perverse obession or choice for that matter to use power and control to get sex from children. I know our government democrat or republican is just plain hypocritical, but this takes the cake!
Posted by: ADelgado | October 4, 2006, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Just another example of, do we Americans truly know who we are putting in office to lead this country.
Posted by: politikz | October 4, 2006, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
he should absolutely be prosecuted for solicitation of a minor. these e-mails are not confusing. they are soliciting minors plain and simple. he wasn’t even subtle about it. what a creep-o.
Posted by: ellyn | October 4, 2006, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
People in positions of authority that abuse children should be punished. Our society has turned away from the harsh reality of abusing priests, boy scout leaders, police officers and member of governemnt. When Foley finishes rehab he should be prosecuted and sent to prison to send a clear message to abusers.
Blaming alcohol or prior abuse does not excuse his crimes.
Posted by: Paraglide-Tandem | October 4, 2006, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
I think that it is sick to justify what he has done because he now claims to have been molested. People high in our Government need to be scrutinized better. This person was voted in to this spot by the voters of his county. Give me a break and don’t take up for him. He is a sick pervert.Punish him as you would punish anyother pervert. In an institute put him behind bars.
Posted by: DOTTIE | October 4, 2006, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
I am a 29 year old female Republican from Portsmouth Virginia, and I am not only disgusted by what Mark Foley has done. But I am disgusted that Democrats seem to be pointing the finger at all Republicans. That is just stupid to do. He should be punished as any normal pedophile should be. Obviously he never let it be known to his party that he was into being perverse with little boys or he would not have gotten the position he did. Has this country gotten so one sided that no one is paying much attention to what he did? Instead the focus is being put on what party he belongs to. The political party he belongs to is the absolute least of his problems.
Posted by: Katie Mills | October 4, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
From the party that diverted our attention with Monicagate for over two years, we now get this! Bible belters please take notice, the GOP does not own or direct our moral compass. For the next several weeks you will be bombarded with damage control and fear tactics to “keep you in the fold”. Open your eyes! Look at the world! Don’t believe everything you hear on FoxNews! Keep this in mind on election day when you automatically vote straight ticket republican. Wake up people and think!!!
Posted by: waterguy | October 4, 2006, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Mark Foley’s expanations (but not excuses) for his conduct are absurd. No one in Washington seems to be aware of any alcohol abuse. Granted, molestation as a child is traumatic. But are we to believe that his penchant for underage boys is related to this? So what if he’s gay? Normal gay men are no more prone to this behavior than straight men. Foley was in a position of power. Any personal, and certainly sexual, relationship he had with young boys is an abuse of this power. He’s a disgrace and guilty of violating the trust placed in him by the parents of the pages he hunted.
Posted by: Chuck | October 4, 2006, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Hypocrite! HypocriteS! You point your fingers, wag your tongues, and spew your self righteous judgement like vomit. But as you point one finger you’ve got three pointing back at you! Your tongues are rudders of deceit! You pollute your own bed with your vomit!
Even now you cast suspicion on the innocent with your insidious excuses. Grow a backbone and take responsibility for your actions!
Prosecute! Prosecute! Prosecute!
Posted by: J. Greenway | October 4, 2006, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
How long has Mr Ross “sat” on this story? I find it quite interesting that it comes out no less than a month before an election.
Posted by: veteran | October 4, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Why is foley aloud to inter a rehab and not in jail like all of the other pervert’s
Posted by: don249264 | October 4, 2006, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Lets face facts here. This will all
blow over much like the FBI raid
that turned up that money in the congressman’s office. Didn’t our congressmen vote that the search and seizure was unconstitutional? Makes you wonder who else has 80k saran wrapped in their office freezer. Does anybody even remember that?? Bush gave a 40 day cool down period and no-one has heard a thing about it since. Yes what Foley did was terrible but he ain’t the first and he won’t be the last. Look at how many senators are currently under indictment. Then when one gets caught the others crucify him to take wayward eyes off themselves.
Posted by: SCOTT | October 4, 2006, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
How can we sit here and talk about the Democrats or Republicans? They both are in the same pot. More money, more power. Remember Clinton? His deeds were worse than Nixon. Now this! This two party system does not work anymore. I as for one will vote for any independant not tied up in all of this mess. Wake up both party supporters. You hear this guy saying this about this party and another cutting the other. They both are in this for themselfs. Until we get a honest working man in the whitehouse, its going to be more of the same thing as always.
Posted by: Ron | October 4, 2006, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Foley is giving people who are alcoholic and/or gay a bad rap. He is a MOLESTER and a PEDOPHILE! What else would you call someone who gets turned on by boys and exchanges sexually IMs with them?? He is sick. However, sicker are the people who ignored this to protect his seat and their party. C’mom – if you have such a powerful position like SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE – you know things… they chose to handle it “administratively” at the expense of the children.
Posted by: momof2 | October 4, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
“How long has Mr Ross “sat” on this story? I find it quite interesting that it comes out no less than a month before an election.”
If Ross were “sitting” on the story in an attempt to influence the election, he would have released it a week before the election, not over a month before. Nice try, though.
Posted by: Qoheleth | October 4, 2006, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
In less than 10 years of Republican leadership we have gone from “I did not have sex with that woman” to ” I did not have sex with that boy”. America this is the contract you made.
Posted by: you asked for it | October 4, 2006, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Actually he is an ephebophile not a pedophile.
Posted by: PH | October 4, 2006, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Foley needs to be prosecuted. I know out there somewhere there is a young boy that he has molested, and I am hoping that he has enough courage and faith in himself to come forward so this does not happen to another.
Posted by: smalldog | October 4, 2006, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
PLEASE! Priority one should be to protect our children! Let’s not get the issue convoluted with politics. Thus far, it is known that this is an adult that has conversed sexually with a child AND has offered the child alcohol. This is illegal whether democrat or republican, hetero or homosexual, constituent or political official.
Posted by: PamReed | October 4, 2006, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
If the Republicans would have made a big deal out of the situation the Democrats would have claimed sexual harrassment because Foley is gay.
Posted by: Pam | October 4, 2006, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Some of you are obviously intelligent people and realize that party membership has nothing to do with morality or ‘moral compasses’. Foley is disgusting and if any laws were broken, he needs to go to prison, no questions asked; but where is everyone getting information that he molested boys???I have only heard about e-mails. Am I missing something here??It doesn’t matter if someone is a democrat or a republican; most politicians are in office for money and power and nothing else. It has always been government by the rich, for the rich and we continue to believe the lies and deceipt. It’s our fault that we have put our country in the situation that it is in today. Again, don’t go accusing all Republicans as being hypocrites, most Republicans that I know do have high moral standards and are just as disgusted with Foley as the rest of you.
Posted by: Throw The Bums Out!! | October 4, 2006, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
I am a gay man in the U.S. and for this piece of trash to claim that he is a gay man is an insult to my intelligence and should be to everyone else. Gay men do not go after children those people are called pedophiles and are a disgrace to humanity. This man should have to serve a very long prison sentence as anyone else in the world would have to do that committed such a horrible act with a minor.
Posted by: Chris | October 4, 2006, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Is the age-of-consent in DC only for residents of the district or for visitors as well? Foley is a resident of Florida. The boys he was involved with were residents of other states.
Some state age-of-consent laws apply not only to acts committed within the state’s boundaries but also acts committed by its residents when outside the state.
What of the Mann Act? (In 1910, Congress passed the Mann Act which makes it a federal crime to transport individuals under the age of 18 across state lines to engage in any sexual activity.) Did Foley, through his congressional position, have any input into the selection of pages? If so, could he not be charged with a violation. The original intent of the law was to stop prostitutes from being moved from one locale to another. It now also applies to an adult taking a *consensual* minor to another state. Penalties can include being fined for $5,000, or imprisoned for 5 years, or both. The penalty may be doubled if a minor is involved.
Posted by: DWL | October 4, 2006, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Thie guy is a grade A idiot. He cant admit clearly before any incident that he is an alcoholic and then on top of that he “fesses” up to being molested by a clergymen when he was younger. Is it not clear through critical thinking that he is a coward in all types of ways. Honestly if u have any brain, if u get molested then you have felt the pain, why in all the world would you want to go and cause the saem pain that hurt to you? ….THINK!.
Posted by: B-Dub | October 4, 2006, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Frankly, I’m really sick of people convieniently using the “I’m an alcoholic” excuse when they do something inappropriate. Liquor doesn’t suddenly make you chase little boys, being a sicko pedophile makes you chase little boys. Pedophilia isn’t the result of alcohol…
And I’m sorry, but suddenly admitting you were molested by clergy – that’s just cheap. Way to divert the attention from your own disgusting actions to alcoholism and/or the church. It also makes a mockery (for lack of a better word) of the people that actually DO suffer from serious alcoholism or people that HAVE been molested.
Foley is a liar, and it makes me sick to think that this man had a part in the legislative processes in this country.
Posted by: Stephanie | October 4, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
When will it end?! “Blame the Party (repubs/dems)”, “blame the gays”, “Blame the church”! HOw about people taking responsibility of their own actions. Vote the person, not the party…now maybe the “Right” will see- there is no party that holds a “moral majority”.
Posted by: Rebecks | October 4, 2006, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
If being molested were an excuse for becoming a pedophile, the numbers of women predators would far outweigh that of men.
Pedophilia is about power and control, not about gay or straight.
Posted by: Eve | October 4, 2006, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
This guy seriously needs to be locked up. It’s absolutely hilarious that he was in charge of anything to do with “protecting” children. Not.
For these people, the urges never go away. Like I said, for him, a long prison term is the only cure. Maybe then he’ll find out all about predation.
Posted by: nicholas robinson | October 4, 2006, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
David Roth also said when Foley sent IMs he was always drunk. But in one of the IMs, Foley states he’s taking a break to IM while voting on a Bill. Unless Foley was drunk while voting, this too is a big fat lie.
It is hard to believe David Roth even went to law school. Every assertion he makes gets contradicted in writing by his own client. Maybe he should go back fronting Van Halen.
Posted by: Chris | October 4, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Even in political death, Foley is trying to galvanize the Conservative cause by subconciously equating homosexuality with pedophilia. Homosexuality (nor previous molestation, nor alcohol for that matter) is NO excuse for the psychiatric derangement and criminal action which is pedophilia. I write this as a straight man in support of all the gay people who have just been slapped across the face as a parting shot from “representative” Foley
Posted by: AJ | October 4, 2006, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Email every congressman who knew of this behavour 5 years ago(ABC NEWS) and demand their resinagtion,complicity in a crime this heinous demands their resignation if not prosecution for being complicit in a crime.
Posted by: Dennis | October 4, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
It does not matter in the least that Foley may have been molested in his youth. Anyone that can read and has any functioning brain cells can come to the conclusion that this man is a pedophile AND a REPRESENTATIVE OF OUR COUNTRY! It sickens me that he has been allowed to continue in office and to date I know of no criminal charges against him! Any person off the streets would have been tossed into jail by now….I have a hard time understanding why he hasn’t been!
Posted by: Leigh | October 4, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
remember:
what we see we do. what we do we become.
if a child is exposed to a pedophile in a sexual manner, then over time, they too may become one or possibly mentally ill, damaged at least. this is not limited to male children.
maintain a trusted relationship with your children and they will tell you before it’s too late when they are confronted as some of the washington pages have done.
typically, it all comes out in the wash.
look at history.
Posted by: not gay | October 4, 2006, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Foley is not gay. Hes using that as an excess. He is nothing more then a child pedophile.
Posted by: Chris | October 4, 2006, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Luckily the Republicans brought us a platform of Governance based on “values”.
However my personal opinion is that we should reject their values of corruption, greed, dishonesty and paedophilia.
Posted by: DS | October 4, 2006, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Should the molestation that Mr. Foley suffered in the hands of a clergyman be true, he should take that as the most powerful example and NOT engage himself with minors. What was he trying to do? To avenge the past by using underage guys?
Posted by: Will R Thomaz de Aquino | October 4, 2006, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Jay – I know TONS of people that archive their conversations.
Mark Foley is a pedophile, and should be punished severely for abusing his position as a Congressman to try to solicit sex from UNDERAGE pages.
Posted by: Disgusted in DC | October 4, 2006, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
I’m 59. I was born and reared in a staunchly Republican county in KY, thus I grew up as a Republican sympathizer. At the age of 37, the scales fell from my eyes and I began to see the world and our country through Democratic eyes. I told you that to tell you this: I’ve been on both sides of the political fence, and I have been humiliated by individuals in both parties. I was pro-Nixon and stood by him throughout the Watergate mess — casting aside all commonsense. I was embarassed and betrayed by Reagan and the Iran-Contra scandal. As a Democrat, I suffered anger and disgust during Monicagate. With all the flap over Mark Foley’s transgressions, I am concerned that we Democrats are taking too much pleasure in this turn of events. We Dems have had our turn in the Hall of Shame, and we will have it again — just as Mark Foley will not be the last Republican to earn a seat of distinction therein. Let us not express too much self-righteous condemnation; that tack will come around to stick us. A little compassion is not altogether a bad idea, especially since we will soon enough find ourselves standing in the need of same. I choose not to express my opinion relative to Foley’s fate, there being no shortage of “opinion” on this specific subject.
Posted by: Sundance | October 4, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
It’s unfortunate that his lawyer has to come out and mention Foley’s molestations when he was young, alcohol abuse and being gay. Just because you have problems or in his case is gay, doesn’t give you carte blanche to go after boys. He’s obviously a very disturbed man, that’s all there is to it.
Posted by: Gayle | October 4, 2006, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
I have a real problem with a number of conservatives who are now trying to link Democrats to the disgraceful Foley matter. It isn’t just that the Republican leadership in the house traded the welfare of teenagers for a safe seat in congress, now they are all singing from the talking points trying to suggest that Democrats and the media knew all about this and timed the release of this information to coincide with the election. Hello? Obviously, conservatives think the best defense is a strong offense, but the big problem is this: the evil muckrakers the Republicans are trying to sniff out are actually the young men who are victims. So to recap: Republican Leadership sweeps Foley under the rug, Victims reach out to media and firestorm erupts, More victims come out with their own stories and many are much worse than the initial emails, Republicans and Conservatives begin infighting, then decide to fight the people who caused them all these problems, the victims. Fox news even took the next step and labeled Foley a democrat. This is mudslinging on a whole new level, and I am disgusted. I guess we shouldn’t be surprised with the republicans since they did give us Abramoff, Delay, Ney, Cunningham, and Iraq.
Posted by: CC | October 4, 2006, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Guys, Foley had ADMITTED he sent the messages…look at his lawyers statement from Oct. 3rd. So it’s no conspiracy by the liberals, nothing fabricated – it’s real. Real and disgusting.
For all the staunch Republicans who post here, remember, by defending HIM you are defending PEDOPHILIA. My question is, without bringing up some other scandal, try and defend Mr. Foley’s actions.
Posted by: John P | October 4, 2006, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
A man molests young girls.
A man molests young boys.
A woman molests young girls.
A woman molests young boys.
All are perverted, straight or gay. All are protected. Shame on those of you who protect those adults instead of the kids they harm.
Posted by: Appalled | October 4, 2006, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
I love the way Foley’s attorney said last night that “the statute has run.” Also, apparently Mark Foley has never seen Dateline’s “To Catch a Predator.” If I was one of those caught on “To Catch a Predator” I would definately use the “Foley Defense.”
Posted by: Cathy | October 4, 2006, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
So, let me get this straight. Disgusting and reprehensible behaviour can be voided in Washington DC by closeting one self in a rehab clinic! How absurd! Alcoholic rehab clinics have become the mantra of sleezy politicians of both parties. I wonder what the cop who gave me a ticket for speeding would have to say, if my defense was, “Officer, I am an alcoholic and a pevert”.
It seems to me that we are reversing the Napoleonic Code by creating special laws and rules for our elected politicians, and then a common code for everyone else.
I say vote the bums out in November.
Posted by: Max | October 4, 2006, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
i really am astonished that some people are defending this man or blming democrats and the timing if the story, hastert knew of this months ago and said nothing is that not worse ???? either way this man needs locking up, a sitiuation like this reveals how truely blind and gullible republican voters are
Posted by: alan | October 4, 2006, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Mark Foley resigned last Friday. He’s old news. Who cares whether he’s gay or a drunk, or that he was molested? The only thing that matters now is that the people who let this stuff go on need to be held accountable. Before the full investigation is even underway, it seems Hastert and many more of his cronies in the leadership had reason to know something was afoul and totally failed to act accordingly.
Posted by: padrig | October 4, 2006, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
This isn’t a Red state Blue state issue. Don’t make it one. We need to vett out all who are of poor moral character and enact term limits to take the good ol’ boy network down. Process needs to replace people. We have way to many people in the senate and congress that have very checkered pasts. This is not what our founding fathers would have imagined this country would be like now.
Posted by: RH | October 4, 2006, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Those of you who are trying to defend Foley by questioning whether the IMs were from him, please read the comments of Kirk Fordham, his former Chief of Staff, who said when ABC News called and said they had the Instant Messages, he went to Foley and told him, and asked if they could be from him; and Foley responded, “Yes, they probably are.” Foley has no defense and shame on him for trying to pass this off as a gay issue. It has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not he is gay. I do not think Foley would have resigned if he could have found another way!
Posted by: Pat | October 4, 2006, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
W has never borne the consequences of his actions — why should anyone in “his” party be expected to do otherwise? This is leading by example – er – corrupting by example. My experience of this Administration, and the leadership mantra of Bush & Co. and the Republicans is simply this: the facts just don’t matter.
Posted by: Sick of W & Co. | October 4, 2006, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
“Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.”
Mark Twain
Posted by: Mary | October 4, 2006, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
He is not really a pedophile, since pedos are only attracted to pre-pubescent children, and these kids were at least sixteen. I have read that the age of consent in DC is sixteen, so he is technically not a child molester either. He is unethical, however, and if it turns out he violated his own law by sending sexually explicit messages to minors under 18, then he deserves to be prosecuted for that.
Posted by: Joe | October 4, 2006, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
I didn’t read all the posts but I did NOT see anyone mention sexual abuse in the workplace. It is a federal offense to abuse anyone sexually in the workplace. That means if a manager or person of power seduces or sexually uses a worker via his office or position of power he can be prosecuted for sexual abuse. Foley obviously falls into this category even if the kid was over the 16 year age mark in the DC area. The age doesn’t matter. FOLEY CAN BE PROSECUTED for SEXUAL ABUSE IN THE WORKPLACE. He know it. His lawyer knows it. All the lawmakers (representatives) or officeholders in DC know it since most of them are lawyers also. His career is over and he now faces charges of sexual abuse if anyone will testify that Foley had “sex” with him. Foley is now on a downward spiral of fighting lawsuits against him from any kid that feels he was sexually abused. Now that his reputation is besmirked by this tale of horror in the press he is much more likely to lose a case against him. And oh yeah, he’s lost his powerful position too. It’s not over yet. He will be fighting this for years.
Posted by: Just a Reader | October 4, 2006, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
I AM AN ALCOHOLIC and I am offended by Mr Foley’s glib claim through his attorney that he is “in recovery” for alcoholism and his preemptory defense that many of his emails were sent while “under the influence.” This person gives alcoholics a bad name.
Posted by: Publius | October 4, 2006, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
This just goes to show how deceptive and what liars republicans are. All they can do is brainwash the “stupid” American people about morals, when behind the scenes they have no morals and DO NOT practice what they preach! Sick, how sad for him and for Republicans who can still stand up and call themselves Republicans!
Posted by: Gary | October 4, 2006, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
As a gay man I second Chris.
Posted by: Troy Masters | October 4, 2006, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Typical conservative hypocrite. Do as I say, not as I do. At least liberals are honest about their perversions. And to those who refer me to Jim McGreevey… homosexuality is not a perversion, pedophilia is.
Posted by: Jonathan | October 4, 2006, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
“Remember Clinton? His deeds were worse than Nixons!”
THAT has to be the funniest and saddest thing I have heard all day.
Posted by: Marcus | October 4, 2006, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Turns out it was a man and not a boy after all. Read some other news sources not just one you idiots.
Posted by: Mark | October 4, 2006, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Will the Speaker resign, if he covered the relationship with the Page, did they also have sex with youngters, in some type of orgy,
Uhm, it makes me think~ let the lies out.
Posted by: manolito | October 4, 2006, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
“a man” Which one? All of them??
Posted by: Ted | October 4, 2006, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
LOL
Posted by: Kelly | October 4, 2006, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Hey Gary, do you say the same things about Dems when they get caught doing stuff like this or worse? Probably not…is it because the Dems don’t claim to have any morals?
Posted by: Geo | October 4, 2006, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Well I don’t know about you, but I’m staying home on election day. As a lifelong Republican I have to vent my anger somehow. I hope the Democratic voters turn out in droves. Who’d have guessed?
Foley-the REAL ‘Unifier.’
Posted by: Dorcas | October 4, 2006, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Pierce said:
“To be a Congressional Page you must be 16 years old. To have consenual sex in DC you must be 16 years old. I see no laws broken and a lot allegations of wrong doing. Where is the proof? ”
Funny how when Clinton had consenting sex with a 25 year old intern, THEN it was an outrage…bad moral example. Now it’s just perfectly legal….My daughter is 17, and I would not in any way find moral justification if SHE were to be hit on by a 57 year old congressman.
The Kool-Aid drinkers in the Republican party, I am convinced, would condemn Jesus Christ Himself if he returned to challenge Republican power. So sad.
Posted by: Diane | October 4, 2006, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
What crime did Foley committ? Is chatting on-line a crime? Has he been arrested, convicted and proven guilty? Although I agree that pedophiles should be punished to the full extent of the law, perhaps Americans can at least wait and see what exactly has transpired. Americans (generally) are reactionaries and this is a perfect example – Iraq, Afghanistan etc notwithstanding.
Posted by: Confused Canuck | October 4, 2006, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
What’s disgusting (beyond the sheer creepiness of the matter at hand) is how the Dems are jumping all over this story as if party politics matter, and as if they have never been creepy, kiddie sex scandels within their party.
Posted by: Ugh | October 5, 2006, 12:09 am 12:09 am
I USED TO BE A STAUNCH SUPPORTER OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AND ITS TRADITIONAL VALUES.
THIS ADMINISTRATION DOES NOT REPRESENT THOSE VALUES AND CAN HARDLY BE TERMED “CONSERVATIVE.”
Others who grew up supporting the GOP may still vote Republican BUT NOT ME OR MY FAMILY!! We’re not “staying THIS course.” It’s all about pandering and rhetoric.
Posted by: A Former Republican | October 5, 2006, 12:09 am 12:09 am
Oddly enough, this scandal comes out on the eve of an election. Life has taught me that coincidences do not exist. What are the odds that the Democrats knew about these appalling actions yet DID NOTHING until the time was most opportune.
Republican or Democrat it all boils down to these simple truths.
They don’t care about the welfare of the pages.
They care about being in power.
Posted by: Iconoclast | October 5, 2006, 12:58 am 12:58 am
he is not a gay, he is a pedophile person, and even you are drunk, yo can still remember what you are eoing, meaning even he is drunk, he knew that he send that mssges to his lover, shame on him… but anyways, also in our country, we have gay congressman, he even elected and senator.
Posted by: oscar | October 5, 2006, 1:51 am 1:51 am
This is Monica all over again! Impeach the bast…. ah…. I must be confused…. No, I’m ABUSED!!! Its not MY fault!
Executive Branch Morons, Congressional Clowns… what next?…. a clueless, Layabout Electorate?
Lets get moving people! The Right Wing Republican Machine has ZERO credibilty. Lieberman Democrats are not far behind.
I blame the entire mess on Rick Santorum’s barber.
Posted by: miguel | October 5, 2006, 2:31 am 2:31 am
No matter these guys still get their pentions and benefits the rest of their lives and we have Americans who have work 5 times harder (all their lives) and lose their pentions because we line the pockets of the “Washington Robbers” !! SAD SITUATION
Posted by: Nancy | October 5, 2006, 4:12 am 4:12 am
-quote-
What crime did Foley committ? Is chatting on-line a crime?
-/quote-
yes. under the so-called “Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006″ (of which Foley was a co-sponsor), along with 18 U.S.C. 2251, discussion or solicitation of sexual acts between Foley and any “minor” under the age of 18 would appear to be a criminal offense (see Adam Walsh Act, Sec. 111(14) (“MINOR.–The term ‘minor’ means an individual who has not attained the age of 18 years”) and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2256 (1) (“’minor’ means any person under the age of eighteen years”).
…., that in-person, actual sex between Foley and a 16-year-old page would be perfectly legal in D.C. and in most places in the U.S., but it seems that it is a criminal act for Foley to discuss or solicit sexual acts with the same page over the Internet.
Posted by: Jim Neighbors | October 5, 2006, 5:18 am 5:18 am
Odd how we are finding out today that the IMs are with an 18 year old boy and Foley. So is ABC saying all gays are perverts? Hasn’t this been a Brian Ross lie all along? Foley is a dumb gay guy who like 18 year boys. Should we put all gay men in jail? ABC has been doing George Soros manipulation, and now we find out that Brian ROss has lied to get him democrats elected.
Posted by: Karen | October 5, 2006, 8:28 am 8:28 am
After McGreevey and Foley and Studds and Frank, let us just not elect gays, right Brian Ross?
Posted by: Karen | October 5, 2006, 8:29 am 8:29 am
I don’t save all my IM’s I have a life and have never had the need to go back and read old IM’s… Plus I have better things to do with my hard drive space.
What a dork to say everyone saves there IM’s,,, I throw away most of my email with in hours of recieving it too…
Posted by: Geek | October 5, 2006, 8:37 am 8:37 am
One excuse after another.
“I’m an alcoholic!”
“no wait, i’m gay!”
“no wait, i’m a victim of sex abuse!”
What a disgusting liar. The only people who could believe this tripe are people who have never heard of “alocholism,” “homosexuality”, or “abuse survivors,” and will believe those words and experiences can be connected to any behaviour at all. Maybe i’ll go rob a bank and then use these excuses… This man ought to become a monk because i dont see any other way for him to receive salvation after this.
About the saved IMs – even if you delete them, they remain on your computer in some capacity.
Posted by: Nina | October 5, 2006, 10:29 am 10:29 am
I find it interesting to see the Republican rats scurry to their holes whenever they’re exposed. They’re masters at coverups and it’s obvious Hastert is doing his best to follow in his predecessors’ footsteps…like Dick Nixon. Foley runs and hides in rehab blaming everyone but himself for what he did. No matter how anyone feels about the topic, you’ve at least got to hand it to Pres. Clinton in his scandal. At least he did own up to what he did and he didn’t blame it on alcoholism, victimization or anything. He admitted what he did and that it was wrong. And oh, by the way, not that it makes things right, but what he did was with a consenting adult woman. Not a child.
Posted by: Wasatch | October 5, 2006, 10:37 am 10:37 am
wasnt that mark foley, on dateline to catch a predator. sad
Posted by: steve | October 5, 2006, 11:06 am 11:06 am
I’d say the kid saved the IMs for the same reason Monica Lewinski saved the dress
Posted by: KoWT | October 5, 2006, 11:22 am 11:22 am
The GOP has harbored a pedofile who preyed on children….shame shame shame.
Posted by: G J | October 5, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Jay, above, says he “know[s]” that no one saves IM transcripts.
Apparently, God is writing as “Jay” because only God knows everything. And, as is totally apparent, someone does save IM transcripts – at least 3 Congressional pages do. When they get Foley’s computers, I’ll bet we’ll learn that at least 4 people save IM transcripts. And that’s all that matters!
Posted by: Keith Gore Wiseman | October 5, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
MARK FOLEY IS NOT A PEDOFILE.
He is a pervert and a possible child moleser and it is good that he is gone. Pedophilia is the desire for pre-pubescent children. It is a completely separate deviancy. Please be correct in your comments so that correct punishment can be made. Being a ‘legal’ minor or child is different from being sexually undeveloped.
Posted by: JohnF | October 5, 2006, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
For everyone reading, let’s get one thing straight; the “pedo” in pedophilia refers to an attraction to children. Specifically, children prior to puberty.
Foley might be a lot of things. A predator of underage males under the color of authority comes to mind. But he isn’t a pedophile.
Jason
Posted by: Jason | October 5, 2006, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
So many people keep saying it is the Democrats who are pointing fingers…
I watched the news channels for several hours last night and didn’t see ONE SINGLE Democrat even interviewed. It was all Republicans posturing and pointing fingers and playing the blame game… and trying to salvage their party for next month’s elections.
Seriously, count the number of Republicans versus Democrats that you see weighing in on this subject!!! You may be very surprised.
Posted by: Horton Who | October 5, 2006, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Amberlyne said:
> What happened to innocent until
> proven guilty?
>
The Republicans changed that a couple weeks ago. Remember how they needed new laws to convict “terrorists”, so they eliminated people’s right to Habeus Corpus?
When are conservatives going to wake up? The Republicans have no desre to “conserve” anything other than their wealth and power. A true conservative would not eliminate an 800 year legal precedant just because the current administration found it inconvenient.
Now that the rules have changed they change FOR EVERYBODY, or do you believe Republican congressmen have a special priviledge reserved to them alone?
Posted by: Bob | October 5, 2006, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Mark Foley should move to Spain. Where anyone can get married, and you can have sex with teenagers starting at 16.
That way, he’d get the hell out of my now not-so-democratic country. Thanks a lot, Mark, for representing my state- and gay people- so well all these years.
Posted by: Mark | October 5, 2006, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Mark Foley betrayed the trust given to him by the public,but i think the Republicans have a share of the blame as well,they had this information since last year and just covered up for him, while the pervert continued to hunt young boy’s issue is not that he is gay, but the fact that he was hunting under age boys.
Posted by: grace | October 5, 2006, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Why are the Republicans called the GOP. They are not a Grand Old Party. By European and civilised terms they are a Far Right party.
It is sad that the USA has now fallen so far behind civilised norms.
Posted by: Edward | October 6, 2006, 7:34 am 7:34 am
Mark Foley is a pedophile. His being gay is meaningless — it would’ve been just as disgusting if he’d been soliciting a 16-year-old girl. GAY DOES NOT MEAN PEDOPHILE! Please, America, remember that if you remember nothing else about this debacle.
Some people have expressed frustration and confusion that partisanship has been entwined with this whole incident, and say let’s not make it about parties. Here’s the reason why it’s unfolded this way:
Republicans put themselves forward as the beacon of “family values,” of moral superiority. And yet here is one of their prominent members revealed as a pedophile. It riles people because it suggests hypocrisy. And of course there’s the issue of why his leadership — who clearly knew that it was a problem — sat by and did nothing, presumably because they didn’t want to lose his seat.
The whole thing reeks.
Posted by: Andso | October 6, 2006, 8:50 am 8:50 am
It is not party lines that we should be concerned with. Remember “Let the first person be with out sin who cast the first stone”. It is what Mr Foley has stated that he did that makes him guilty. He “yes” he stated he wrote sexual messages to under age children. Some of those messages being several years ago. Because he states he is homosexual is no excuse to indulge in pedophila. Being homosexual and a pedophile are two totally differant things. All who have participated in a cover up are just as guilty as Mr.Foley and they in turn should give up their positions. Whether they be democrat or republican should not be the issue. It is a sad day for america when you have to decide bad and worse when trying to vote for someone in public office. These are the people we have placed in office to lead our country. It is to bad that we could not kick them all out and start over. There is too much big money in play lining their pockets.
Posted by: chrissy | October 6, 2006, 10:13 am 10:13 am
I think that his using the molestation story from his youth is a despicable attempt at making him out to be the victim rather than the criminal. It’s a pathetic attempt at creating a better image for himself. Selfish politician? Couldn’t be…
Posted by: nolongerseen | October 6, 2006, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Why are you posting this stuff? The guy left office. What’s being gained here? I have not seen any concern for the young man he was talking to. I think we all know what the object is here.
Posted by: Anthony | October 6, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
It’s amazing to me that the conservative media keep making this scandal about homosexuality. NOBODY CARES IF FOLEY IS GAY!! More power to him if he is! I care about the fact that what he did was pedophilia and it was a felony.
And there is no comparison between this and the Monica Lewinski scandal, for a number of reasons:
1) Monica was a consenting ADULT! Foley’s loverboy was a minor
2) That was a private matter between President Clinton and his wife…Foley did his business on the Internet, for the world to see!!
Can we PLEASE get a clue people? If I can make these points and I’m only seventeen, why can’t Rush Limbaugh do it??
Posted by: Priorities, People!!! | October 6, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
As a kid myself, I think Foley is a sick, twisted man in need of help. I mean, who would honestly do something that harsh that has authority. Some of the things he has said cannot have been said while under the influence of alcohol. I believe Mr. Foley to be an utter shame of politics, and should be a prime example of pedophile. And a message to kids like me, don’t fall under these twisted men’s lies, they’ll just break you, seduce you and ruin you future. Do not fall into the sick trap they try to pull on you.
Posted by: Thomas | October 7, 2006, 11:48 am 11:48 am
What was he supposed to do, Albert? WHAT WAS HE SUPPOSED TO DO??!!! He was supposed to act like a decent human being. He was supposed to be the ADULT! Let’s turn this around for just a minute. Sometimes young girls will become “infatuated” for lack of a better term with an older married man, a friend of the family perhaps or a teacher. She might flirt a little, bat her eyelashes — like the students in Indiana Jones’ class in the first movie. Sometimes the man behaves badly. Usually, he does the RIGHT THING. He is the adult, the strong one, the mature one, especially if he, as I, was molested as a child. He should know the dreadful scars that can leave. The inability, or at least added difficulty, of making and maintaining intimate relationships. WHAT SHOULD HE HAVE DONE?! OOOHH, I am so angry right now, I could spit!
And as far as the questions about him being 16, well it is not quite as gross as molesting a 5 yr old (like me), but it is still pretty darned perverted and sickening. Foley was a 54 year old man, for goodness sakes! If Foley was 19 or 20, that argument MIGHT have merit.
AND if he didn’t do it there is NO WAY he would have just resigned. It is either totally true OR there is so much worse stuff he has done, that he knows he cannot survive an investigation, so he hoped to cut and run, and then confuse the issues and remove focus from his behavior with these RIDICULOUS excuses of his.
Posted by: Jennifer | October 8, 2006, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Interesting how Foley wasn’t molested, or an alcoholic or gay prior to everyone finding out he’s a pedophile.
Now, all of a sudden he’ll be just about anything to divert attention from the truth.
You’re a kid-toucher Foley. Admit it, take your punishment, get help and get on with what’s left of your sorry life.
Posted by: JimFromJersey | October 11, 2006, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Why just except the IM? Post the whole transcript.
Posted by: how | October 11, 2006, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
I like a lot of people on this blog don’t care who’s gay. My concern is were they born with those feeling or did something in their life time happen to help make the lifestyle..There is a difference and like all other things in this world that influencenes young people this I think can be a bad thing for our young. As a grandmother I well do everything in my power to protect my grandchildren from preditors-NOT ON MY WATCH-will this happen to children. Priest’s are well know to have been found out as well as others, it’s time we stop this and get justice for those who can’t speak for themselves. And lets continue the story to find out all about the sex rings on capital hill.
Posted by: Barb | October 15, 2006, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Hmm, act all self righteous and puritanical, but in the meantime have a secret life where your power and your money buy you everything your nasty little mind ever dreamed. This to me is the real wrong, and it sets a lot of other wrongs in motion.
Posted by: Xtina | November 18, 2007, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Hey, Granny Barb – fyi most of the pedophiles I have met have presented as straight to the world. Two were married – how does that grab you? There is no real connection between pedophilia and hetro vs homo sexuality. Please don’t bark up the wrong tree.
Posted by: Xtina | November 18, 2007, 11:07 am 11:07 am