By Brian Ross And Maddy Sauer

Oct 3, 2006 1:22pm

New Foley Instant Messages; Had Internet Sex While Awaiting House Vote

Former Congressman Mark Foley (R-FL) interrupted a vote on the floor of the House in 2003 to engage in Internet sex with a high school student who had served as a congressional page, according to new Internet instant messages provided to ABC News by former pages. ABC News now has obtained 52 separate instant message exchanges, which former pages say were sent by Foley, using the screen name Maf54, to two different boys who began their exchanges with Foley at the age of 16 and 17, and continued through the age of 18. This message was dated April 2003, at approximately 7 p.m., according to the message time stamp at a time when the teen had been 18 for just six weeks. (Some sharp online readers spotted that the boy was technically legal when the exchange took place). THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS EXCLUSIVE New Excerpts of Instant Messages a Former Page Said He Had with Foley Internet Messages Show Foley Sought to Rendezvous with Page Click Here for More of the Brian Ross Home Page Maf54: I miss you
Teen:   ya me too
Maf54: we are still voting
Maf54: you miss me too The exchange continues in which Foley and the teen both appear to describe having sexual orgasms. Maf54: ok..i better go vote..did you know you would have this effect on me
Teen:   lol I guessed
Teen:   ya go vote…I don’t want to keep you from doing our job
Maf54: can I have a good kiss goodnight
Teen:   :-*
Teen:   <kiss>

The House voted that evening on HR 1559, Emergency War Time supplemental appropriations.  According to another message, Foley also invites the teen and a friend to come to his house near Capitol Hill so they can drink alcohol. Teen:   are you going to be in town over the veterans day weekend
Maf54: I may be now that your coming
Maf54: who you coming to visit
Teen:   haha good stuff
Teen:   umm no one really Maf54: we will be adjourned ny then
Teen:   oh good
Maf54: by
Maf54: then we can have a few drinks
Maf54: lol
Teen:   yes yes ;-)
Maf54: your not old enough to drink
Teen:   shhh…
Maf54: ok
Teen:   that’s not what my ID says
Teen:   lol
Maf54: ok
Teen:   I probably shouldn’t be telling you that huh
Maf54: we may need to drink at my house so we don’t get busted Read an exclusive excerpt of the actual instant message exchange. Vote: What’s the Correct Punishment for Foley?

User Comments

Foley is a sick deviant and, by blaming alcohol, is demeaning alcoholics. There is no excuse that will justify his years of perversion and child abuse. Every member of Congress who was aware of his behavior but took no action should be required to resign.

Posted by: Margaret Benson | October 3, 2006, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Anyone who is looking at this as an “attack on Republicans” by the ‘leftist Democrats’ needs to get off the Bush Bandwagon long enough to realize that this is about PEDOPHELIA and not politics! As a Dad I am horrified by this predator using his elected office to virtually shop for teen meat. It is sick. It is unforgivable. Anyone in Congress who knew of this and did nothing is equally guilty. Foley resigning should just be the beginning.

Posted by: Rob | October 3, 2006, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

As a mother and grandmother, I am outraged that Hastert et al aren’t in jail. If this was me or you , they’d lock us up and throw away the key. It’s sickening that they knew and let it go on. Anything for politics. They’d throw their mothers to the wolves. I am crazy with anger.

Posted by: patricia licopoli | October 3, 2006, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

That’s extraordinary. And disgusting.
But why do you say Foley “interrupted a vote on the floor of the House”?
What is the specific evidence for that assertion? Do you know where he was when he sent the messages? Could it have been from a portable device? If you’re implying he was in his office, isn’t it permissible for a Rep. to come and go from the House floor, even during a vote?
It seems to me that a lot more details and context are needed here.

Posted by: along | October 3, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Sick sick sick. He needs to be locked up, along with those who knew it was happening and failed to act to stop it.

Posted by: Merrin | October 3, 2006, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

OK you doubters out there, this is predation at its worst. Anyone who swept it under the rug needs to go right along with Foley!

Posted by: JCJC | October 3, 2006, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Was he drunk before the house vote? He entered rehab to make this all go away didn’t he. So was he hammered moments before voting on legislation?

Posted by: Jeff | October 3, 2006, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

52 seperate instant message exchanges… I think ABC News better start verifying the authenticity of the documents. These are easy to recreate.

Posted by: Peter | October 3, 2006, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

The time has come to impeach
the whole greedy, crooked bunch.
Starting with the White House
and all of congress!

Posted by: Dave Kaspersin | October 3, 2006, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Hey how are all you defenders of this jerk feeling now (see blog from Oct. 1st)? Still think its an attempt by the Democrats to smear this guy? Had Hastert taken care of it when it first came to light, the Republicans wouldn’t have to worry about the timing of the elections!
And I agree with what Wanda Sykes said on Leno last night: “Being drunk doesn’t make you a pedophile!” Alcohol rehab is not going to change this man! He is a pedophile…

Posted by: Charmer | October 3, 2006, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Where’s the sweeping under the rug? I agree Foley should be gone, but more evidence that there was truly a cover up will be needed before anyone else should be ousted.

Posted by: DrLao | October 3, 2006, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Hastert, Shimkus and the rest of them that KNEW, need to go and I mean NOW.

Posted by: Constituent | October 3, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Foley’s behavior is disgusting enough, but to think that a number of high-ranking Republicans knew what he was doing and failed to act is beyond belief. Each one of them should forfeit their jobs. Ironically, Foley may be prosecuted under the same law he helped write. As a psychotherapist who specialized in adult survivors of abuse, I think everyone should take a good look at what politicians so vehemenly protest and question what they may be trying to repress.

Posted by: Dr. Gretchen Helm | October 3, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Mark Foley needs help and I would say more than alcholic counseling will provide.

Posted by: Jane | October 3, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Would someone, maybe Brian Ross tell us when and who gave up these im’s. The man is sick of course, but who sat on these e-mails.

Posted by: Bren | October 3, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

EWWW…and dumb.
How stupid to go after one of the pages.

Posted by: KSR | October 3, 2006, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

I want to see a full investigation into this and do not want to blame anyone (Hastert or whoever) until we know who knew what when. But in any event, I have to say that I am ashamed of my party today (yes, I am a Republican). At worst, they knew about this, and at best, they had enough clues to investigation. That anyone would have an inkling of this and do nothing is just disheartening. I think I am sitting this next election out. I won’t vote for democrats, but can’t vote for republicans right now. Gross.

Posted by: Mary P. | October 3, 2006, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Any Republican who isn’t demanding the immediate resignations of Reps. Hastert, Shimkus, and Reynolds — each of whom knew about this sicko but covered it up to protect themselves politically — should be condemned and voted out next month.

Posted by: JB | October 3, 2006, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

I am having a great deal of diffulty believing something this blatant was only known and hidden by the GOP. I agree that everyone who knew and didn’t take action should resign or be forced to resign and that includes anyone who was sandbagging this information in order to use it as an October surprise.

Posted by: Robert Williams | October 3, 2006, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

This is about a sexual deviant who was put in a position of power and he abused that power and should prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
It’s unfortunate the left is going to take this and politicize it just as the right would do if the tables were turned.
I just hope we take advantage of this situation and set presidence so this never happens again!
wishful thinking huh..lol

Posted by: Tim C | October 3, 2006, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

This is not just a republican thing, and it should not be made political. This is about sick perverts that need to be run out of town. Before this is all over, there will be blood on both sides of the isle…….

Posted by: Jim | October 3, 2006, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

This is a SETUP! Who ever saves instant message?

Posted by: Field | October 3, 2006, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Regardless of any political affiliation if what the former pages are saying is true, just about any member of congress should have known about this. Throw them all out!

Posted by: Bill | October 3, 2006, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

If he’s blaming alcohol, that means he was drunk AND having virtual sex while he was supposed to be voting in congress! This is beyond sick. Shame on anyone who is trying to change the subject and blame Clinton for this (believe it or not, Sean Hannity and Brit Hume both did). And shame on those who tried to cover this disgusting offense up.

Posted by: Randy L | October 3, 2006, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

We’ll never know who knew what, or when, but as the father of a teen, and a conservative, I’d like to see our side “clean house” on this predatory issue. There’s no place for it in our Congress or society and we voters need to take a good look at who we’re sending to DC to represent us. Foley and his ilk certainly do not represent me.

Posted by: wolverine79707 | October 3, 2006, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Why is all this information coming out now?
Foley deserves to be locked up.
But the timing reeks of politics.

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Why is ABC News, and Brian Ross specifically, drip drip dripping these IMs so slowly? This is why people think this is more about politics than the public’s need to know. These are all IMs between Foley and the same 2 pages but, for some reason, it has taken 5 days, so far, for ABC News to leak this out? Why not release it ALL at once? Why is ABC intentionally dragging it out so that they have a BREAKING NEWS headline everyday? JUST RELEASE IT ALL! Or is this all simply for ratings??

Posted by: Christine | October 3, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

JCJC makes a good point, if his excuse was that he was an alcoholic and that these episodes occured when he was drunk, then he has to have by his own admission been drunk while voting on legislation.

Posted by: Detro | October 3, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

This is a serious issue and has been dealt with as Rep. Foley has resigned. Now comes the politicization of the whole affair. If there was so much of a concern for the kid involved this would have reported a long time ago, especially since ABC and other news outlets have been sitting on this for awhile now. Wow, what a political hit job. Lets now get on with what affect our lives- the war,economy, etc.

Posted by: carey mcdaniel | October 3, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

How convenient that ABC news trickles this out over a period of days. How long will you be able to get ratings over this perversion? How long was ABC a party to this? Ratings over children – typical American media. Foley isn’t the only party that is disgusting.

Posted by: chicago | October 3, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

I don’t remember “stop propositioning underage children” being listed in the twelve steps . . . and the issue isn’t Foley, it is leadership, coverup, and decisionmaking.

Posted by: RK | October 3, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

I hear rumors that the FBI knew about some of these e-mails months ago. This is all too sicko for me. Its time for regime change. And since power corrupts so thoroughly, we ought to legalize term limits – and throw Foley and a few other folks in jail. Show the world that the “I’m an alcoholic” excuse is no excuse.

Posted by: Debo | October 3, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

So What does this do for profiling preditors? is anybody safe anymore.?

Posted by: Ron | October 3, 2006, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

I remember how angry the speaker was when the FBI dared to approach their hallowed offices. Im a life-long conservative but it’s time for all incumbents to leave Washington. The speaker is a hyrocrite as he makes himself a wealthy man. Doesn’t any resign anymore?

Posted by: Ed Flynn | October 3, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

I am appalled at those of you who are calling for the Republican leadship to resign or to be put in jail before having seen any facts to implicate them. We have a system of Justice that should be followed. You may find that it is the other side of the house that actually knew about this.

Posted by: honestypays | October 3, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

I think they should take away any pension that he had coming and use it for the counciling sessions that the pages need. If this is what goes on in Congress, no wonder the world is in the shape it is in. This is disgusting!!!!

Posted by: sharon | October 3, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

What a twisted, sick man! You don’t do this with kids! What a shame.

Posted by: Mike | October 3, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

This is so unreal. He is a sick man to even be typing this to a child! But this also reads like someone is telling him what to type. Is this whole thing a set-up for political gain? It makes me wonder???? The answers this child comes back with almost sounds coached?

Posted by: tipton | October 3, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

i am wondering who has also endangered these kids. Ross is saying he had the emails back in AUGUST! Several FL newspapers had the bad on Foley as well back then. Foley is not to be excused one bit, but looks like this was also a nicely conducted Oct political surprise that was surpressed! what about that, aren’t these people also endangering kids if they knew earlier as well? My guess dems/liberals are giddy as a school boy page over this now! Politics have been played over this at the expense of getting FOley out and away from male pages by all parties! Brian Ross said he was too busy to look at the emails, HaHa..LOL too.

Posted by: marek | October 3, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

This is one sick puppy. More of ‘em got to go.

Posted by: James Thomas | October 3, 2006, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Where did Ross get these iMs?
Why did that source not do something about Foley in a timely fashion?
Their decision to do nothing – yet hodl onto the info and release it to Ross at this late date – only increased Foley’s opprotunity to to hurt kids.
Who was the source?
Disgraceful.

Posted by: Jane | October 3, 2006, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

When you say anybody in congress that new about Foley and his deviant flirtations with Pages, I hope you include Democrats in that. Apparently they have known for several month if not years about this and only now did they come out with it. So much for the protection of our youth by either party.

Posted by: Thr_mezzaz | October 3, 2006, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Tony Snow, Press Secretary for George W. Bush stated today that “it’s these type of naughty emails…” Am I missing something? Innocent children are being preyed on here and it seems anything to “stay the course” to win the November election.
Here’s a prediction: The Democrats are going to win because the American people have had ENOUGH!
:)

Posted by: samiam | October 3, 2006, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

To any other pages, staffers or other House or Senate employees: now is the time to come forward and let the public know, anonymously if you need to, who the offending Members are. Produce evidence if you can, or the names of people who can corroborate your story. This is not something that can be permitted or ignored, and now is the time to stop it.
Thank you in advance for doing the right thing.

Posted by: DCPR1 | October 3, 2006, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Hello! He entered rehab so that he couldn’t be reached!

Posted by: maemer | October 3, 2006, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Did Foley actually engage in any physical contact with these underage pages? All I have read about is these e-mails and text messages. This is immoral but is it truly “illegal”?
I mean, Gerry Studds, D-MA, engaged in sexual relations with an underage male page in the 70′s. He said it was no one’s business and was reelected until his retirement in 1996. This was also immoral but I do not remember the moral indignation that is being expressed by so many today.

Posted by: paul | October 3, 2006, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

While I have no doubt of Foley’s guilt (he’s basically admitted it), how do we know all these ABCnews IM transcripts are genuine? An instant messaging transcipt, when saved, is nothing more than a simple HTML script (a web page). Any bright gradeschooler can draw one up without any trouble, making up time stamps as they go. I have to assume these transcripts are submitted by pages, because I’d hate to find out that internet providers are logging our instant messaging conversations.
Regarding the overall controversy, it is sick, but I can’t say it’s unexpected. Congress has always been a mostly corrupt body, though the problem is getting worse.

Posted by: Skeptic Mike | October 3, 2006, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

I’m a Conservative and side with the Republicans most of the time…but this is total crap. Anybody, regardless of political loyalty should be disgusted at this crap. What the democrats need to be careful with is politicizing this, and this would begin with calling for anybody’s resignation without letting the investigation take place. Due process is a part of this country…no matter how much we may not like it.

Posted by: Matt | October 3, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

This is sick and he had to go. What I still have not seen is that everyone had hard evidence that he was doing this. Absent an official complaint by a page or e-mails that had the kind of talk in these IMs – just what the heck was anyone to do? Act on rumors? Looks to me like he was doing this by way of IM because he was to stupid to realize that people (in this case the pages) could cut and past from an IM into a perminate form.

Posted by: Keith | October 3, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

As repugnant as it will be for me to do so, for this and many other reasons, I will be doing something this coming election day I have never done before: I will be voting a straight Democratic ticket. That’s not because there is a single one of them in whom I place an iota of hope for general improvement of anything, but because the current crop of power-leaders has left me no No NO other choice..

Posted by: David Weber | October 3, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

I am still shocked that Republicans dropped the ball on this one – I mean this is an issue that will resonate with every American and not in a good way. This is disgusting – a predator on the loose in the halls of our own government from the party that claims to be all about morality and family values. Having said that, Hastert claims he was informed about the emails asking for a photo but claims he never saw the email nor did he ask to see it, WHY? A red flag would have gone up for anyone else. Was holding onto to Foley’s seat more important that the welfare of children??? Haster must resign!!!

Posted by: Darry | October 3, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

It amazes me that in this day and age people think that any email/IM’s are confidential. Talking about sexual activities, as far as I know, isn’t illegal. It’s weird, to be sure. But not illegal. I think for a mature man to want to discuss this with teenagers shows a degree of mental problems. That being said, Providing a minor with Alchol & possibly ‘hooking up’ is very illegal. We can’t persecute someone for bad judgement.

Posted by: ann | October 3, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Remind me to use Alcoholism as an excuse if I suddenly turn into a pervert.

Posted by: theTruth | October 3, 2006, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Foley is sick. No question.
But rather than focusing on Foley and predatory pedophiles like him, you (ABC and Brian & Ross) have timed this story so as to coincide with and effect a national election in hopes that people will be so disgusted with and by Foley’s behavior that they vote against the GOP.
It would be nice if you would set aside your political agenda and just report the news.
Rob

Posted by: Rob | October 3, 2006, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Well, it is about pedophilia and not about politics. Except for the fact that a lot of Right-Wing bloggers and commentaors (Limbaugh, for one) are making extraoridinarily, almost comically self-parodic) comments blaming this on the Democrats and Liberals for fostering an environment of permissiveness. This is about repression, not permissiveness, for one thing. And it’s about adults not behaving like adults and protecting kids. Those adults happened to be Republicans (this time) and deserve to be blamed. If Denny Hastert last until election day I will eat my hat.

Posted by: Bruce | October 3, 2006, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

I think the system is all screwed up. They are all a bunch of hypocrites. Perverts.

Posted by: Michelle | October 3, 2006, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

I think this is unacceptable. He should resign, then sent to a hospital and treated if that is possible for his addiction. Obviously this man is sick and needs to be treated. Then he needs to go to jail for this incident that he got busted for and for all the other ones that he got away with, because I know this is not the first incident. This is just the first one in which he got caught in the act.

Posted by: Alice | October 3, 2006, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

I am a conservative Republican and a Mom.
Foley and Hastert need to be jobless and investigated.
This is not politics, it is criminal and criminal cover-up if ignored.
If Foley were the guy next door he would be arrested by now and on his way to the sex offender registry.
It is a total ruse he is in rehab.
As a voting Republican I will be watching how my party handles this.
A cover up hurts all Republicans. It makes those of us who despise underage sex as crime look like we are advocates of it.
I am not. I have children and expect that any policy maker voting to protect them needs to abide by his own damn laws.

Posted by: KB | October 3, 2006, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

What Foley did was disgusting and as a Dad, I would have trouble holding back my anger.
However, I am equally angered if anyone knew about the explict messages and did not report it. THis applies to Republicans and liberal.
If you are going to be angry at Republicans, you need to hold liberals accountable for thinking more about how this will help them than the teens. Think a bit about this…it is not a Republican vs liberal issue. This is about the person and his actions.

Posted by: kevin christensen | October 3, 2006, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

I hate that fact that important issues such as this are politicized in an election year. Both parties are at fault. The Republicans should have done more to stop it based on what they knew, and the Democrats should have released the information right away instead of holding onto it to use as an election-year October curve-ball. I do have to say that the Republicans are doing the right thing by not backing him. I was disapointed by a similar but more severe circumstance about 20 years ago that involved a certain Democrat who was backed by his party and received only a censure as punishment. I have to hand it to the Republicans for not “circling the wagons” on this one and agreeing to call a spade a spade.

Posted by: Josh | October 3, 2006, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Once again this has nothing to do with politics other than the complete hypocrisy of politicians. Someone is always lying. If the democrats say white the republicans say no it is black. If the democrats say yes, the republicans say now. If someone says he did it, the other says I did not. It goes on and on and no matter what, someone is lying. Now the leadership of the house is scrambling to find some way to spin this disgusting chapter into something it is not. As always noone is accountable for anything, whether it be the war in Iraq to pedophiles in congress. In a world where there are no secrets, and we all know there are none on Capital Hill, now can these lying liars like Hastert expect us to believe the this is all some kind of surprise that nobody knew about. But, sadly for all of us, they are right about one thing. The American people are totally ignorant, gullible and pathetic (after all they elected GWB two times), so they will likely let this one go as well.

Posted by: Richard | October 3, 2006, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

I am a very conservative Republican who is extremely upset with Foley and the leadership in Congress. I hope Hastert resigns, and the party (in the last few weeks before the election) cleans house. I would suggest the House GOP caucus name new leaders in advance of the election…people who are thoroughly vetted for ANY improprieties!

Posted by: AnotherBlogReader | October 3, 2006, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

What kind of idiot would think other members of congress would have access to another person’s IMs and emails? Are you all stupid? How would the House leadership know…NSA spy program that intercepts IMs from members of congress and immediately reports them to leadership??? Come on, this was one very sick pervert that should be in jail…not the whole Republican party.

Posted by: Kory | October 3, 2006, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

I’ve noticed that some news outlets, notably NBC News and Fox are reporting the rumor that the Democrats knew of these emails and withheld the information until right before the election.
What does ABC News have to say?

Posted by: Amy | October 3, 2006, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

I hope they make an example out of the moron pedophile! For one it’s just plain disgusting, and secondly to think someone like him is representing the people of this great land is just as disgusting and finally how stupid do you have to be to have any communication that can be validated like this. I hope they fry him.

Posted by: J Bollman | October 3, 2006, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Drinking?!? Alcoholism is not responsible for this perversion.
This man needs jail time! Where is Dateline NBC when you need them?
It breaks my heart that he is a member of my party. I most heartily agree that Foley and ALL those who knew about his perversion be removed from office and server time in prison!
That is what would happen to any regular citizen.

Posted by: Atarian | October 3, 2006, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

This is not about politics nor is it a referendum on whatever party this guy belongs to; it’s about inexcuseable behavior and he needs to be punished.

Posted by: Claude | October 3, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

I completely agree with and would like to echo the remark by Ms. Benson. Had Foley been playing his online games with an ADULT while delaying a vote, that would be scandalous enough on its own terms. The fact that we’re talking about pedophilia pushes his transgressions so far into the realm of sheer depravity and criminality that ANYONE in that building who knew about it — regardless of title or party affiliation — ought to resign, or be outed by the press. Drain the swamp, I say!

Posted by: Lyle Wallace | October 3, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

The focus should be on sick this man is not the party he is with. Pedophiles are everywhere no matter what party they are signed on to.

Posted by: Wendy | October 3, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Does anyone actually think that it was only the republican leadership that knew what was going on. There are democrats that knew just as well. The bottom line, however is that as much as republicans or democrats may have known that Foley was a little odd and a little too friendly with these pages, there was no one who had ever come forth with any evidence at the time that indicated that his behavior was anything more than a little too friendly. Now that someone has come forth with info to indicate otherwise, all concerned have called for a full investigation. So for anyoe to call on the republican leadership to resign, perhaps you should rethink, and also consider the fact that it was no secret for democrats either. So should they resign as well.

Posted by: J. Hebert | October 3, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

This is wrong on so manu levels, however what is worse is that it is not used to protect the people it was held until political gain could be achieved. Who ever knew about this also be eliminated and trown in jail for not doing something to protect people from monsters like this.

Posted by: greg | October 3, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

As a fifteen-year-old girl, I feel that this man should be put behind bars. Who knows how many other minors he might target? I don’t think that men like these deserve to hold any political position and I am absolutely disgusted by the doings of men like him.

Posted by: linda | October 3, 2006, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

I like how ‘along’ takes exception to the article saying that the vote was interupted. WHO CARES. The guy was abusing a child – does it matter whether he had to leave the public forum to do it, or was able to do it with a portable device?

Posted by: Brad | October 3, 2006, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

This is strong evidence that our government has fallen to it’s lowest moral standing ever. It’s hard not to ultimately feel despair when some of our highest ranking elected officials are found guilty of the most repugnant offenses imaginable. What could one in such a position do that could possibly be more damaging to our society as a whole?

Posted by: keith feather | October 3, 2006, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

I fought for this? This is sick and everyone involved should be investigated and sent to prison. I cant belive this is what our gov. has come to. It makes me not want to tell anyon that I served in the armed forces for this sick gov. if the rumers of others doing the sme thing with highschool females and males tnan the entire federal gov. should be locked up. maybe we should revolt… or just vote them ALL OUT!

Posted by: Iraq war vet | October 3, 2006, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Uh VA Resident before you get to high up on that high horse the democratic leadership knew of this too and were waiting for the right time to let it lose, also large newspapers were burying this as well. So if we are cleaning house lets clean it all.

Posted by: LA Voter | October 3, 2006, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Foley should pay for his actions, no doubt. But condemning all republicans? Can you democrats guarantee you don’t and won’t have a Foley among you?

Posted by: Peter | October 3, 2006, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

We are all looking forward to ABC outing the other two members of Congress mentioned. Good job!
Apparently the rule has been that if you are Republican then whatever else you may do is excusable in the eyes of other party members, unless you are caught of course. After that you can only count on the support of dope-addled pundits like Limbaugh.

Posted by: Sam Handel | October 3, 2006, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

I think if investigators dig deeper they will find that Foley actually had sex with a minor. How could he not act on his urges?

Posted by: chet baker | October 3, 2006, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

This incident, and particularly the Republicans’ response to it, is symptomatic of a bigger problem with their control over Congress.
Republicans will do anything to stay in power. We’ve seen how they have sold their principles on things like the deficit just to keep the bread and circuses operating. Now we see that they would sell their own children — correction, YOUR children — to keep the reigns.
Hopefully, the voters, if not entirely aware of this, have at least the vague sense that there’s something rotten in Congress and a great need for wholesale changes.

Posted by: Jim M | October 3, 2006, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

This is beyond pale. Foley should be sent to prison and have to post bail. His DWI Clinic stuff is just a ploy. Finally Speaker Hastert should resign as he has demonstrated an unprecedented level of Congressional House Management incompetence in this utterly embarassing scandal.

Posted by: Ken | October 3, 2006, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

The thing that REALLY gets me is no one is calling Hastert on the basis of his statement. He keeps saying that he knew about the “overly-friendly” emails, but not the IM’s. That is EXACTLY why there should have been a TRUE investigation when the emails came to light. By inaction, heck, NOT EVEN telling EITHER of the other two members of the Page Committee (one Dem, one female Rep), no one bothered to check with other pages if they had inappropriate contact, etc. Hastert can NOT claim to have vigilence and care regarding the minors in his care when he didn’t do ANY follow through.

Posted by: Trebs | October 3, 2006, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

I agree that any Republican who knew about this and did nothing should resign. Also, any DEMOCRAT who knew about this and did nothing should ALSO resign. Fair?

Posted by: Eric | October 3, 2006, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Here it is happening in our government and seemingly no one took it too seriously, not even mentioning it to the Page Board. He just got a “word” from an associate?
Does this story not have a familiar ring to it? Our church bishops did the same thing for decades where sexually abusive priests were concerned.
Does it never end? Are we never to hold these people accountable?
Our archaic state laws need serious updating across the country and that includes a “look back window” to prosecute sexual predators who have been protected by authorites for so long.
Sister M. Immaculata Dunn

Posted by: Sister M. Immaculata Dunn | October 3, 2006, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

I know someone whose father was a page in the Senate 25 years ago and he said that the coatroom attendant at the time pointed out 4 men on the floor and said to “run like hell” if any of those guys ever get friendly. Nice. No one talked about this stuff back then, but I wonder HOW long it’s been going on? My grandfather was a page before WWI – I wonder about THEN! This never even occurred to me before – naive.

Posted by: Karen | October 3, 2006, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

What I find funny is when this story broke last week there was tons of responses on this forum from right wingers saying this was nothing more than a smear campaign. Now that the truth breaks where are the right wingers now?

Posted by: James | October 3, 2006, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Was Hassert provided with any of the IM transcripts? I am not trying to make excuses but if he didn’t have them he didn’t have them.

Posted by: RJ | October 3, 2006, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Mark Foley was my congressman here in WPB, FL and I think we haven’t heard the worst yet. Based on this exchange it sounds like Foley was doing a lot more than sending IM’s. I believe we will find that he actually consumated some of these relationships. Why is he not already under arrest? Can criminals just check themselves into alcohol rehab to avoid prosecution?

Posted by: LEE | October 3, 2006, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Obviously this man is sick but….to say this is a GOP problem or restricted to one party or the other is absurd. Republicans are not the only ones that sat on this story because it is not a coincidence that this story broke four weeks before an election. Politics is a nasty business & politicians have as many faults and problems (if not more) as the rest of us.

Posted by: Marc | October 3, 2006, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

I hope the Democrats watch what they say because, watch, next time a scandal comes out like this it will be a Democrat. This is not about politics, people. Perverts and sexual preditors don’t discriminate between political parties. Don’t think that there aren’t any Democrat perverts or preditors out there. They just haven’t been caught. And just because one is a pervert, doesn’t make them all perverts; if your brother turns out to be a pervert that doesn’t make you a pervert. He, and he alone, has to deal with those consequences and if not in this lifetime, then in the next.

Posted by: out of bounds | October 3, 2006, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Power, money, and improper sexual activity seem to go together. There’s no surprise that it exists; the surprise is that if other members of Congress were aware of it, they took no action to stop it. It’s a close call to say adult relations with a 17 year old is pedophelia, but it’s certainly improper between a Congressman and a page.

Posted by: Shelia | October 3, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Republican or Democrat, Conservative or Liberal it simiply does not matter. It is beyond wrong! And to excuse it by saying “I’m an alcoholic” makes me even more angry! Take responsibility for your actions!!!!

Posted by: shoegirl1102 | October 3, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

What disturbs me most is he’s going to get away with this and someday receive a fat government pension

Posted by: Jack | October 3, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

There is an epidemic of sexual brokeness and deep wounds in our culture – nevertheless – that does not excuse Mr. Foley’s actions. He is not above the law and needs to be brought into account and forced to pay the consequences. This would send a message to the rest of our leaders.

Posted by: Ken | October 3, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Don’t anyone get fooled by any of this. This was know by both parties well before it came out. We all see Dem vs. Rep, but they are an exclusive group in DC. They all know what the other is doing. So the question is, who is more to blame – those covering it up? or those holding on to it for political gain in the election?Everyone who knew is to blame for letting this go on. These kids look up to us adults as mentors. Any 16 year old that is interested in politics is to be commended and we should protect them.

Posted by: OH Repub | October 3, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

FYI
Pedophilia describes an attraction to pre-pubescent boys/girls. There seems to be no evidence whatsoever that Foley is a Pedophile. The proper name for attraction to post-pubescent boys/girls would be Ephebophilia. There is a significant amount of dispute as to whether such an attraction is inherently pathological. It could just be an uncommon manifestation of normal reproductive biology. Other view it as a milder form of Pedophilia. Needless to say, what truly makes this situation reprehensible is the fact that Foley has abused his position of power with young men who are psychologically immature despite their physical maturity. This is, at the very least, a significant problem in a workplace that is taking on boys and girls as interns/pages.

Posted by: Criminal_D | October 3, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Unanswered Questions:
1. Why hasn’t Foley been arrested?
2. Why hasn’t an INDEPENDENT investigation been launched

Posted by: Skip | October 3, 2006, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

And his behavior has been known to the House Republican leadership for quite some time, but they decided that keeping a Republican in that seat was more important than the safety of their pages. Does anyone really doubt now that the Republicans will do absolutely anything to stay in power, even allowing animals like Foley to prey on young boys? If he’d been doing this for as long as it looks like then it’s almost certain that he was having sex with some of them, something the Republican leadership was happy to turn a blind eye to as long as Foley did it discreetly while bringing in the money and keeping a seat for them.
Party before country is the Republican way, in all matters. And that goes for the safety and security of our children as well as that of our country.

Posted by: garryowen | October 3, 2006, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Yes, this is indeed sick and should be treated with the appropriate outrage, as well as any criminal investigation necessary.
I do think the timing of this is ridiculous. Obviously, people have known for some time that this happened. On the one hand, they act so concerned about the children that might have been harmed. On the other hand, they were too busy to do anything about this until now. Yeah, right!

Posted by: Jeff | October 3, 2006, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Don’t tell me that he’ll get his retirement package and benefits!! How to we stop it?

Posted by: Florida | October 3, 2006, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

I lived in Palm Beach, FL for 13 years and actually voted for Foley twice. I am personally disgusted that I wasted my voted on such a person (i can no longer call him a man). This is not a case against republican’s, but a case against an individual using a position of power to seduce teens. Anyone, reguardless of their party, that knew of these actions should be forced to resign immediately… of course Foley will be the only one punished and since he conveniently entered rehab, his actions will be blamed on alcoholism and the rest of this will be simply forgot about after this upcoming election. Man I would love to be a politician so I could be above the law too…

Posted by: Steve | October 3, 2006, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Foley should be behind bars forever! Members of congress who knew about the instant messages should be be forced to resign, the e-mails are a different story, while disgusting they fall short of “internet sex”. But what about the news sources who knew but held onto the information until now? don’t they bear some guilt also?

Posted by: Tony Polo | October 3, 2006, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Foley and everyone that knew of this second set of messages and didn’t come forward immediately should be behind bars. That includes any Republicans that swept it under the rug and any Democrats that kept the story quite over the last year to release it just prior to the elections.

Posted by: Jay | October 3, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Don’t vote Republican or Democrat on November 7. Congressional members of both parties knew about this and neither did anything. To have this stuff hit the news cycle 5 weeks before the election smells bad for the Dems and the Reps have nothing to smile about here. Vote them all out! Fresh blood may do some good here.

Posted by: Bill | October 3, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Absolutely odious behavior by Foley.
Has anyone asked ABC how long they have been sitting on this story. Or whether they have been coordinating its release with Democratic hatchet men?

Posted by: snl | October 3, 2006, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

I cannot help but laugh at the hypocrisy! It’s probably the only way to deal with this kind of behaviour! It’s utterly outrageous and appalling! I expect he won’t be charged with any crime though

Posted by: Talon | October 3, 2006, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Foley needs to be thrown in the clink for a long time. He misled his peers, his constituents, and the country… and Hastert needs to resign if it is shown that he had knowledge of it. He should also go to jail if it is found that he covered it up. It’s not a Democrat or Republican thing. One gfuy is a pedophile, and the other is an enabler. Shame on them. BTW – I’m a Conservative.

Posted by: New York Bruce | October 3, 2006, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

any republican OR democrat who knew before this week should resign in shame. i expect there are plenty on both sides of the aisle who kept it quite for their own reasons — republicans to avoid scandal, democrats to release scandal at a strategic point. both are equally disgusting.

Posted by: me | October 3, 2006, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

All you have is alot of sex charged talk. So far there is no pedophilia. Look at those emails. Nobody is forcing anyone into anything and the word exchange is very adult with both parties understanding what is implied. If your going to stain this man and ruin his reputation and profession you better get some “action”.

Posted by: Robert Habsberg-Guise | October 3, 2006, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

The thing that gets me most about this story are the allegations that going back several years, Republican pages were privately warned about this predator and Democratic pages were not.

Posted by: NM resident | October 3, 2006, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Someone show me some real hard proof these so called IM’s are not fake. They are the easiest thing in the world to edit. Most people do not log their chats. And who keeps them for 3 years.
I have no doubt he is guilty of the inappropriate behavior toward the boy I just think that someone is wanting to pile up more than what is really here.

Posted by: MS resident | October 3, 2006, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

These moral elitists protected a man they knew was a pedophile and even permitted him a seat on the committee charged with protecting children from people like him.
What more do we need to know about these guys? Throw the bums out.

Posted by: Phil | October 3, 2006, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

While Im not in any way condoning Foley’s behavior, is it not also partly the fault of the teens involved? I myself am a teen, and I understand how unlikely it is for anyone of our age group to be truly forced into something like that. The teenagers should also have known that what they were doing was wrong.

Posted by: Kelsey | October 3, 2006, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

As a mom and grandmother-and a VOTER- I am appalled at this entire situation. First of all to have a highly regarded elected official behave in such a manner/ the teens responding the way they did to him in the IM’s and the way congress has handled these complaints. Alcohol does not make a person a sexual predator to anyone be it a minor or an adult. If Foley needs REHAB it should be in a prison with all the other misfits of our country.

Posted by: fran | October 3, 2006, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Oh dear God. I feel dirty just looking at this. Foley is gone, the criminal investigation has begun, etc. It is Boehner, Hastert, and anyone else who knew about Foley’s “predeliction” who have much to answer for. And would someone in some media somewhere please tell these Foley defenders to stop equating pedophilia and homosexuality? Please?

Posted by: Geoffrey | October 3, 2006, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

This is disgusting and to think that he is making the laws of the land. What hypocrisy!!! Everyone who knew this was going on should be made to resign or is the GOP going to say that different laws apply for those in power?

Posted by: Anita | October 3, 2006, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

After rehab-an orange jump suit and chains is what his attire should be. And majority leader Hastert should step down. Any hit should have been nipped at the bud.

Posted by: Joe Ybarra | October 3, 2006, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Did Foley actually engage in any physical contact with these underage pages? All I have read about is these e-mails and text messages. This is immoral but is it truly “illegal”?

Posted by: Paul | October 3, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Like all who have written before me, I know that what Foley did was wrong, and should be punished far beyond his merely resigning from congress.
But, instead of targeting who found out in the past few months about this matter, I think we must determine who had this information since 2003 and did not disclose it? That person needs to be identified and charged with child endangerment.

Posted by: Tom M. | October 3, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

The boy was at least 16, so it’s not quite pedophilia. In most places in the world, this is legal and acceptable. In fact, it’s even legal in Washington DC, where age of consent is 16! Blimey!

Posted by: mark | October 3, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

I wonder where Foley’s computers are…and what is on them……Living in Foley’s district I find the man to be repulsive. I have never voted for him…hmmm…come to think of it…i have never voted for a Republican ..ever!

Posted by: Ray Gavin | October 3, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

These are not little children. This is not pedophilia. A majority of 16 year olds are having sex. What Foley did is shameful and he should be shamed but all of you wacko hypocrites who are claiming that he should be in jail are going way overboard. What I want to know is how long did the Democrats hold onto these messages to use for purely political reasons? Remember this is the same party that refused to even shame their own politicians when they engaged in similiar immoral activities.

Posted by: Mark | October 3, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Where do you begin with this scandal? Foley should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, and any lawmaker who was aware of his “contacts” with minors should resign. No matter how you look at this situation it looks bad for the republicans. They didn’t ask the tough questions on Iraq, WMD, The Patriot Act, or Detainees, so now look at the mess they are in!!!!!

Posted by: Mike | October 3, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Politics aside, if true, this is certainly inappropriate. More importantly, I am even further confused about what ‘conservative values’ represent (Foley?).
I’m certain there are more of them preying.

Posted by: J.V. | October 3, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Foley’s actions are reprehensible. This country is going mad. God help us all.

Posted by: Eliot | October 3, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

This is strong evidence that our government has fallen to it’s lowest moral standing ever. It’s hard not to ultimately feel despair when some of our highest ranking elected officials are found guilty of the most repugnant offenses imaginable. What could one in such a position do that could possibly be more damaging to our society as a whole?

Posted by: keith feather | October 3, 2006, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

First, let’s not forget innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. With all the evidence we have there is probable certainty he will be found guilty, but the sentiments here that we convict and “hang” someone before a trial goes to the fabric of our democracy. Don’t demean it…and when the likely outcome comes true, it will be very much appropriate.
Furthermore, I think ABC has been very negligent in their reporting on Hastert, et al. From the evidence, these guys did NOT see any explicit emails over the last few years, only an email of a “friendly nature” by Foley. He was confronted and he assured it wasn’t anything. So what do you want those guys to do? Censure a rep for a “nice” email or throw him out because they “think” it “might” lead to what it unfortunately has. At least in the end, when it counted, the Repubs threw him out.

Posted by: joe | October 3, 2006, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Something smells here….IM’s saved for over 3.5 years? There is more to this story than meets the eye….and now the revelation that there are more than 50 of them? I wonder how long the Democrats have known about this….

Posted by: Chris | October 3, 2006, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

At LEAST he wasnt doing anything REALLY bad, like playing poker online. Now that would be serious. Thanks congress for keeping us safe.

Posted by: Byrne | October 3, 2006, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

This guy is a sicko! We all agree. He’s now toast!
BUT, no one has asked how ABC got the e-mails. Do you think they got them from the Republicans? If not, how do we all feel about being manipulated politically?
Personally I don’ t respond to this kind of crap from either side. It’s blatantly transparent, and, I won’t be taking my eyes off the big issues…border control, the war, terrorism. The rest of you can do what you want and regret it later.

Posted by: Peter | October 3, 2006, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

I’m relieved to see others see through the B.S. of him all of the sudden saying, “oh, I’m an alcohalic”, gotta’ go now and get fixed. As if all of this proof he is a pedophile will simply dissapear. Do they think we, the people, are that stupid!

Posted by: Marg | October 3, 2006, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Is this the new Democratic campaign strategy? A few months ago, it was lock up Bush’s Cabinet. Now, it’s lock up Hastert because Foley is a pervert. Get some perspective.

Posted by: ted | October 3, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Rep Brown of Ohio was the first to come out and say that anyone in Congress who knew about this and did nothing should resign. HOORAY FOR HIM!! This Foley guy is a total pig. He need to be in jail, not rehab. These people who think going into rehab will make everything go away are just using that as an excuse for their vile behavior. How dare he treat our youth this way!! Bush called the terrorists EVIL…well Foley is EVIL. I would be terrified that this would ever happen to one of my grandchildren. I hope this does get swept under the rug like so many of these political wrongdoings! Punishment needs to be meted out, strong punishment. And others need to be brought down too and booted out of the Congress.

Posted by: Norma | October 3, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Bootom line – Republican or Democrat – this is a disgusting act by a liar and deceiver who needs to be put away for a long time.
If it comes out that Hastert and the political leadership of the Republican party knew about this and did nothing about it (and don’t blame it on Katrina), I am going to become an independent. I am so sick of both parties’ lies, scandals and political manuuvering that I am about to become and issue only voter.

Posted by: Joey | October 3, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

The repulicans have one agenda. Stay in Power. They would sell their souls to the devil to stay in office. This episode is just the tip of the iceberg. They think the people are so stupid they will forget all about this before November. Everyone who knew about this and said nothing should be tarred and feathered and ran out on a rail.

Posted by: valerie | October 3, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

I’m a STRONG Republican – but this sick puppy needs to be put in the pound for a long time!!!!

Posted by: Jim Olson | October 3, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Hey, as a Republican, I’m as disgusted as anybody. This should never happen. But ease up, if going to rehab will help him with one of the apparently many things amiss in his life, then great. He should be prosecuted for any violation of any law, but be careful saying that this is “predation at its worst”. If he actually descended to sexual contact with them (not internet sex), then we can say that. Let’s allow everything play out before demanding the heads of Hastert or anyone else who “knew”. I don’t care what drudge says, a “story” or a “source” doesn’t always speak truth.

Posted by: Scott | October 3, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

This whole Foley mess is indefensible and scandalous enough, but Brian and ABC: where’s the “internet sex” in these IMs? I see some repugnant flirting, but no mention of any overtly sexual or physical sexual activity between Foley and the “teen”. If this is what “internet sex” is, I’m glad I’ve missed out. Your headline is deliberately misleading for prurient and selfish ends. Shame on you.

Posted by: Muck Raker | October 3, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

WHERE DID MR. ROSS GET HIS INFORMATION AND HOW LONG HAS HE HAD IT????????? Did he get it from the former page? Did he get it from the former page’s parents? Did he get it from AOL? Why is the former page’s name blotted out? Didn’t he go with this willingly? Are these “former pages” being paid for the relese of this information? Many, many questions arise from this Mr. Ross. It would be nice if some of these were answered since you are not posting any comments from the opposing side of this issue. So much for being “balenced” eh….

Posted by: Concerned American | October 3, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

I think the saddest part of all of this is people are starting to confuse ‘gay’ with ‘pedophile’.
I really wonder if this guy is gay.. no one is talking about his adult partners..
Thank goodness the media confronted this guy so he is now GONE. Sad the leadership of the GOP didn’t do something long before now.

Posted by: Cherie | October 3, 2006, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

no comparison to clinton. spin it all you want, but they were both consenting adults.
this man is disgusting..

Posted by: gatech07 | October 3, 2006, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

I think his behaviour is quite inappropriate. He should have sent such messages to men of his own age group.

Posted by: prabal, India | October 3, 2006, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

This is truly sad. I am actually scared for my kids. Who can we entrust them with? Foley shouldn’t be hiding in rehab. He’s a sick man. Wonder what Bush’s thinking now…

Posted by: Dupe Sole. | October 3, 2006, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Why do we always try to hold our leaders to a higher standard? Haven’t you figured out yet that they are not in it for us…they are in it for themselves. Our politicians are so power hungry that they think we are too dumb to realize that they are looking after number one, themselves. Sure, Foley is a disgusting pervert but if we knew about all the skeletons in every politician’s closet, the world would be a very scary place. Vote Independent in 2006!!!!!

Posted by: Stan | October 3, 2006, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

I understand the parents not wanting to go public with this but by not going public they contributed to ongoing acts that certainly harmed more children. Thank God the youngster know enough to come forward. I’m sure more will come out now that they see others doing so. We all have to do our part in NOT prepetuating pedophilia.

Posted by: Cindy | October 3, 2006, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

I think most people would agree, regardless of their party affiliation, that Mr. Foley’s behavior was absolutely disgusting and reprehensible. Why does this incident have to become a partisan issue?

Posted by: Kalibr | October 3, 2006, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

“Foley’s attorney, David Roth, told a news conference in West Palm Beach. Fla., on Monday that Foley was “absolutely, positively not a pedophile” and had never had inappropriate sexual contact with a minor.”
Someone needs to go back to law school.

Posted by: Chris | October 3, 2006, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Navin:
You wrote: “As to how and why he was left in Congress, it’s obvious: the Republicans place their grip on power well above the safety of you, me, our children, etc. It’s time to put an end to their lawless, corrupt reign. Vote Democrat on November 7.”
What do you think about Clinton pardoning a man convicted of the same offense? How about a Dem doing the same exact thing, but consummating the relationship in ’83…and then being re-elected? No comment, right?
All of these people are disgusting- REGARDLESS of party.

Posted by: Jay | October 3, 2006, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Brian Ross, if a Democratic congressman held back this information until close to the election before feeding the information to you, he should also be expelled from the House? Who was the source of your investigative report?

Posted by: Dennis | October 3, 2006, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

I am so disappointed to see what is going on. I served as an intern in college then worked in the House full time for another 4 years. I never experienced this, and was proud of my job. I feel awful for future pages/interns as the prestige of this job is gone.

Posted by: Former Intern | October 3, 2006, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Any one who uses something like this as fodder against the entire party is just a hate-monger and is worse than someone who simply follows the party through thick and thin (ala Congressman Studds and Mel Reynolds). The point is there are sick deviants in every class of people and when found, they should be weeded out and punished. But to believe this is an indictment of an entire party is just wrong. Indict a party on the issues or because of something they did to put the nation at risk. Not because of someone who is clearly a perversion waiting to happen.

Posted by: Robert Nunemaker | October 3, 2006, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

I happen to be a Democrat, but in no way would that change my feelings that whatever party you represent, this kind of behavior (Foley’s) is despicable. Tune into that windbag Rush Limbaugh however, and you will see how he has dedicated every minute of his show since this news broke to excusing Foley. He is convinced this is a political stunt brought on by Democrats close to the election just to further blacken the already tarnished GOP party. Is he nuts????? Does he think we, the voting public, are so stupid that we would vote out an entire party based upon the lack of judgement of one Senator? Rush goes so far as to beat the Clinton drum over and over as if what he (Clinton) did can be considered pedophillia. Pulleez – and is it just me, or does every sicko deviant enter rehab the minute their dirty little secrets are revealed. Once a pervert always a pervert – I agree, anyone who didn’t follow up with this guy after the warning he was given is just as guilty!

Posted by: Sue E. | October 3, 2006, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

“i expect there are plenty on both sides of the aisle who kept it quite for their own reasons — republicans to avoid scandal, democrats to release scandal at a strategic point. both are equally disgusting.”
Well, so far we only have proof that the Republican leadership knew (but only for five years or so).
Would you care to share your source for any Democrats having known about it, Mike?

Posted by: Paul | October 3, 2006, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

I am getting so sick of people telling the rest of us how to live our lives when they are pulling stuff like this. Foley has been a big proponent of censorship in the adult industry. I hope he rots in hell.

Posted by: Rich | October 3, 2006, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

This is as shameful as it gets; I’m totally embarrassed to have voted Republican, only to find out the need for power trumpts the safety of our children.

Posted by: RLV | October 3, 2006, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Why does anyone assume that Hastert or anyone else knew anything? Hastert says he only knew about email contacts of a nonsexual nature and told Foley to stop. Foley told Hastert that he was just concerned about the kid after the hurricane. Is Hastert supposed to monitor the emails and instant messaging of all congressmen?
This is about a sordid deed by one man. It does not involve a group or party.
And one more thing — how is it that someone had these messages for all this time and releases them right before the election? This is as if Foley had murdered someone, and someone knew it, but released it right before the election in order to smear the other party. So, there ARE two wrong here. Foley is sick. And someone on behalf of the Democrats is a sick conniver.

Posted by: Ted | October 3, 2006, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

snl- ABC ran with it. others, including St. Petersburg Times, The Miami Herald and Fox News were given copies of the e-mail, but refused to run it. shoudnt they have run it when they got the e-mail?

Posted by: Ric | October 3, 2006, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Its just come out that Fox News had the original mails months ago and refused to run the story. So can all you Republicans looking for an excuse ( no matter how lame) get off that this was some how surpressed by the democrats.

Posted by: mo curtis | October 3, 2006, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

This guy stinks and I don’t like him.

Posted by: Jimmy Norden | October 3, 2006, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

If it is possible, I’m now even more disgusted with Foley’s behaviour.
IF it is found that others did know about this then ALL should be investigated fully.
I’m angry that BOTH parties are trying to use this scandal as a political ‘score’ for their side.
This is NOT about politics-this IS about one mans aberrant behaviour and how he took advantage of his position.
As disgusting as this matter seems to be growing, one thing I keep trying to remind myself of is;
EVERYONE in America is PRESUMED INNOCENT unless they are PROVED GUILTY and convicted in a court of law-
not this court of opinion.
It makes me physically ill thinking that someone may have held this story in order to time it to the mid term elections. I’m not stupid-I know this kind of sleazy politics goes on all the time, but I would hope that it wouldn’t include EVER placing our YOUTH at harm.

Posted by: Oldwoman | October 3, 2006, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Please Please Please, I beg of all the news organizations, to see that everyone involved in this scandal is brought to justice. The speaker should be fired since he won’t resign. Any adult, who would rather protect the institution of government and sit on this secret, rather than protect the interest of a child, has no place in the US Government. That is not what we are about. I call on all journalists to put pressure on everyone who knew about Foley’s initial inappropriate behavior and see to it that their services are no longer required.

Posted by: Scott Schalk | October 3, 2006, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

How many more of the Foley’s are in our Congress? All of them should be run off. Both parties make me angry. One is using this to gain power and the other is trying to keep power. Pointing the finger is the political way. Neither party is interested in the good of America or they would weed out everyone of these kind of people.

Posted by: Doug | October 3, 2006, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

People need to stop calling this Pedophilia, by definition it is not.
It was disgusting, but in many states still legal. (some states even have a consent age of 14.) It’s ridiculous to call that Pedophilia.
He still needs to go to jail if he broke the law and any politicians who knew about this should resign immediately. We just need to keep this in perspective.
The difference between this and Lewinsky is just a few years. The crime is abuse of power, the same crime ALL politicians are guilty of, no matter the party.

Posted by: Todd | October 3, 2006, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

The only difference between Foley and those pedophiles caught in internet sting operations is that Foley is hiding in rehab whereas the others are in jail…but is there really any difference beyond that?

Posted by: Collective Sigh | October 3, 2006, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

BTW, people who keep bringing up Clinton. First, do 2 wrongs make a right? More importantly, what Clinton did made him subject to blackmail and he lied under oath. Have a problem with that? Then complain to the JUDGES that indicted him and to the bar association which disbarred him. That kind of stuff doesn’t happen just because of politics.
Now, get rid of Foley, find out WHO LEAKED IT because they may have known for months or years and waited for an opportune time thus putting the kids at risk, and let’s get some problems fixed!

Posted by: Robert Nunemaker | October 3, 2006, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Yes, This is beyond sad. The cover up is worse.
The real sadness because of this is the fact that Adults can not risk even talking with young people for fear of an accusation.
As a youth I had loving suppport of Neighbors (invitations to dinner) Teachers (rides to School in bad weather) Church Family (picnics and vacations).
That is not available in todays hysterical enviornment. Sad indeed ! There are good kids that are in need of attention. No one can help.

Posted by: Bill | October 3, 2006, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

I still can’t believe that some of you are making this a political issue and/or comparing it to Clinton/Lewinsky affair.
It has NOTHING to do with either of those issues. If it were YOUR child he had preyed on, Bill, Monica, Republicans and Democrats would be the last thing on your mind. The only thing you’d be thinking about would be justice for your child and punishment for the pedophile who harmed him.

Posted by: shannon | October 3, 2006, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

We’re all better off without Foley. My only question is – why would ANYONE keep instant messages from 2003?? Has anyone looked into these IM to see how authentic they are and find out why someone would be sitting on these for so long? As glad as I am that Foley is out, the timing on this and the way it’s unfolding seems a bit suspicious.

Posted by: Marie | October 3, 2006, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

This is completely sick…I’m sure he wasn’t the only one who’s guilty..The others know who they are and are probably fighting with all their might not to be exposed!! So I guess now that he’s in rehab does that mean he can’t get arrested?? So I guess if you or I were to commit a crime and then check into some excuse building rehab we could get away clean too!!

Posted by: Dee | October 3, 2006, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

This man should not be allowed to “hide” in a rehab center. He should be arrested. Just because he is a politician, it does not give him any special rights. The Republican party better deal with this man’s behavior Harshly and send a message that nobody is going to put up with this type of behavior.

Posted by: Jackie | October 3, 2006, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

This criminal pervert along with anyone who covered for him belongs in prison not hiding in some alcoholic treatment program. I wonder how many other protected, elected perverted pedophiles are stalking the halls of Congress.

Posted by: Hank | October 3, 2006, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Linda, this info from ABC is going public as they get it. The story started when they got the “overly friendly” email on Friday, and has snowballed since then, with apparently multiple pages coming forward with additional transcripts. You’re welcome to put on a tinfoil hat and scream about a Dem conspiracy, but in all honesty, I don’t think the Dems are capable of orchestrating the Perfect Storm that this scandal has become. If there was any question about whether the GOP was fit to lead this country, I think it’s safe to say that it’s been answered quite clearly.

Posted by: Eli | October 3, 2006, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

I think Foley is a disgusting human being, but I have to ask why is it OK for the Democrats to plaster private electronic communications between two US citizens all over the media when they are fighting vehemently to protect the rights of foreign Terrorists to make phone calls to the US in private?

Posted by: Will | October 3, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

No matter what, people will always try to find a way to make the democrats look bad. This is a GOP (the party of moral values) Congressman, and the scandal involves the GOP leadership,period. Any talk of dem involvment in the timing etc is cynical and morally relativist—this is bad on its face, end of story. All you Republicans looking for a Dem to blame; its a good idea before you vote to see if all the values rhetoric matches the people/party’s ACTIONS.

Posted by: guy1 | October 3, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Oh come on, HOW many people, let alone Congressional PAGES save IMs from 3 years ago? I’m not saying what he was doing was right, but it looks like a set up to me…no one has 3 yr old ims saved for nothing…..
IT’S A SET UP…..ASK WHO GAVE THE INFO UP????

Posted by: Kevin | October 3, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

The authenticity of chat logs is also in question. They are simple text files, with no cryptographic signatures — only his screen name. They would themselves are not even admissable into court as evidence against Foley unless their authenticity can be validated — perhaps by finding the same chatlogs on Foley’s computer after it has been sized by the FBI.

Posted by: Thomas | October 3, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

WMD – Washington’s Moral Decay – Sorry folks you can’t blame this one on Clinton!

Posted by: Steve Ulrich | October 3, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Why not look back my fellow Americans and examine your own moral values. Sodomy is now legal in most parts of the USA; homosexual unions are ‘blessed’ by many Church demoninations. Foley is worse than most but he takes his example from the morally corrupt nation we live in.

Posted by: Mayer in MA | October 3, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

The evil spirit(s) in this world is being embraced by our goverment leaders. All of their morals have gone to hell.
Foley and others should be sentence to time in jail. I’m sure he will have a party of males waiting to upkeep this habit.

Posted by: justice for all | October 3, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Did anyone know about the Instant Messages or did they just know about the e-mails. It doesn’t sound like the e-mails were as alarming. Foley has problems. I wonder if he ever tried to be a boyscout leader.

Posted by: M. Rush | October 3, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Just so we’re clear, Foley needed to go, he’s disgusting. However, there’s a thin but real line between pedophilia and plain old perversion. I’m not advocating sex with inappropriately young people, quite the opposite. But 16 is the age of consent in some states and is above it in others. This sort of behavior with a 16-year-old, though inappropriate & disgusting, is not “pedophilia” by any reasonable definition of the word. Pedophilia is adults having sex with children. Sixteen year olds are NOT children, they are young adults who, I agree, should not be preyed upon by perverts and deviates like Foley. As for hiding behind alcoholism, Foley is merely exhibiting the same sort of denial people with problems, in his case multiple problems, often do. Hopefully he will wise up and get well.

Posted by: Greg | October 3, 2006, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

And how come is hasn’t been arrested yet? Seriously what kind of catholic church golden ticket did Foley get to no to jail for this. Oh wait that is right he is a Republican Congressman not a american like the rest of us.
And what about this kids parents are they outraged? How come they are pressing charges?
Man I need to run for office.

Posted by: Patrick | October 3, 2006, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Sorry, my message was for SNL, not Linda…looked at the wrong ID.

Posted by: Eli | October 3, 2006, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Mike – Monica Lewinsky was 23 at the time she was involved with Clinton. An adult, a college graduate and the relationship was both legal and consensual (even if stupid). THAT’S the difference. And I do believe that ABC, as well as every other MSM venue covered the Lewinsky story in great and continuing detail.
What information do you have that ABC “had this info for awhile”?

Posted by: phantasm | October 3, 2006, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Mike, if you’re referring to Monica Lewinski, she was 22. Not 19.

Posted by: Oregon | October 3, 2006, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Monica Lewinski was 22 years old and a college graduate, a clearly consenting adult, at the time. A pathetic try.

Posted by: James, Los Angeles | October 3, 2006, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Lewinsky was 22 years old – See what happens when you get your news from Hannity and Fox, it’s always factually wrong!

Posted by: Terry Bradford | October 3, 2006, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

As the law says, if you had knowledge of the crime, then you are considered an accessory to the crime and are just as guilty. Get rid of the whole lot of them!!! To think we have sick and demented people running our country. This has nothing to do with politics. It has everything to do with crime. Put these criminals behind bars and throw away the key. Why should they be treated any differently than the average American? What a disgrace!!!

Posted by: Momick | October 3, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

When you are blaming those who ‘knew but did nothing’, look at Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert first and foremost. He wants his people in power NO MATTER WHAT. Look at the way he tried to handle the Abramoff scandal. People were fired for telling the truth. This is no different

Posted by: Judy | October 3, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Where has this instant message been for the last three years? How was it saved? The only method I know is to cut and paste into a text document. It appears Rep Foley was very careful what he wrote into emails which everyone knows are archived, but was “stung” by these IMs, there is a lot more here. Did the Dems and/or ABC have this info for years saving for an Oct suprise? If so who is more responsible for Foley staying, thus having continued opportunity to prey on the young, the Republicans who had only emails or those who had knowledge of the more incriminating IMs?

Posted by: Paul | October 3, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Excuse me Mike, but Miss Monica was 22 at the time of her dealings with Clinton. It is all so disgusting and disheartening. Are there any politicians from any party that have morals, a conscience, decency? I am so sick of the willingness that these pols have to chuck everything we know to be right in favor of preserving power. It is wrong, and we must demand accountability.

Posted by: Sick of them All | October 3, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

The difference with this and Clinton is that Foley is targeting UNDERAGE children. Adultery with two consenting people over the legal age, as irreprensible as it is, is not a crime (although you can get impeached for it). Getting involved with people under the legal age is a crime, and people like him should be treated like criminals. If he was doing this stuff with another guy above the legal age, I could care less. But when this is occuring with children, it is disgusting. And as much as the Republicans want to counterattack with “but the Democrats do it too”, they can’t because by saying that they are admitting that they have lost the “moral high ground” between the two parties that they used to distinguish themselves from the Democrats. Boy, talk about being boxed into a corner.

Posted by: Shaun in TX | October 3, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

The man is very sick, but apparently did no serious harm to anyone. Putting him in jail would be a waste of the taxpayers’ money. However, the members of Congress who knew about his awful, sick behavior and did nothing about it should all resign too.

Posted by: Stan | October 3, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Foley definitely deserves all that he gets from the fallout over this. At least he had the good sense to resign and not attempt to hold his seat.
But there is one important point to remember when looking at this mess; it’s unclear if anyone, (R) or (D) had access to these IM logs prior to the story becoming public. The only thing the (R) leadership admits to seeing are the much less sexually overt emails. Those could be considered overly friendly but are no where near the level of these message logs.
If it becomes known that someone had access to these chat logs prior to the story going public, I hope that person, if they hold public office, is run out on the same rail that Foley is.
Then there’s the questions of any legal ramifications. I’ve seen somewhere that the age of consent is 16 in Washington, so he might not have actually violated any law, just a gross violation of ethical standards for Congressman.

Posted by: Bic | October 3, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Do you trust the GOP to investigate themselves on this?
The only way for the truth to ever come out is if the DEMS take over the house and launch a real investigation.
If you want the truth – vote blue

Posted by: what | October 3, 2006, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Rather than indulging knee-jerk reaction, has it ever occurred to anyone to ask who else has/had access to Foley’s computer?

Posted by: Sammi | October 3, 2006, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

To all the idiots out there who question ABC’s timing on the release of this information, you really need to get your heads out of the sand. The real issue here is CHILD ABUSE! Why do you people always need to make everything about politics? For once drop your agendas and take something for what it is, troubling.

Posted by: Chris | October 3, 2006, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

I agree with the cusp of the room when you say that this ammoral pederast should be shown no quarter,but there is a bigger hypocrisy at work here. If it were an older man, someone venerated, and a woman in her late teens, early twenties, would this discussion even have grounds? We all know that older men, it has become recent unfortunately, lust after younger men and women, and our society gives it as much attention as one does combing his hair. Something is truly wrong with most people.

Posted by: addison | October 3, 2006, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

So after the Republican leadership huddles, the best quote they can present is “This is a political problem, and we need to step up and do something dramatic.”
REPRESENTATIVE RAY LAHOOD, Republican of Illinois.
THIS is a legal and moral problem first and foremost; that the party of the accused still insists on veiwing this crisis through the myopic lens of politics alone speaks volumes about their level of committment to serving the interests of the American public.
I hope Foley knows that the walls of a rehab clinic do not provide legal sanctuary.

Posted by: michele | October 3, 2006, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Given the fact that there have been congressmen who have actually had sex with pages, this outburst of indignation is so out of line when compared to the previous scandals. This story is also overblown when compared to the school shootings, Iraq war, runaway government control over our lives, and the list goes on. Have you read your teen’s email and IM’s lately. The majority of them write the same things to each other! Punish the guy and get on with more important topics of discussion.

Posted by: Bruce | October 3, 2006, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Be sure to blame ABC.
Be sure to blame the victims.
Blame Clinton.
Blame the Liberals.

Posted by: Paul B. | October 3, 2006, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Simply sickening.

Posted by: Rich Pope | October 3, 2006, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

To answer a couple technical questions that were raised above, Mark Foley “might” be using a Blackberry device for Instant Messaging some of the time. He could have been in the hall or Men’s Room while typing many of these exchanges. Certain types of Blackberry devices handle IM. We should not think about sitting in front of a monitor these days or even a laptop screen. Somehow this makes this activty even more demented.

Posted by: Donna | October 3, 2006, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

This is one sick circus show from our elected officials. Do not vote any one of them back in. Maybe Congres should have to take a breathalyzer before each vote.

Posted by: wwjd | October 3, 2006, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

“How did you guys get all this info but nothing on what Clinton did with a 19 yr old intern.”
She was 22, champ.

Posted by: Me Too | October 3, 2006, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

It is sad that their is a strong suggestion of Republican’s wanting to hold onto their Florida seat by letting Foley’s behavior slide all this time. What does this show the world?

Posted by: Steveomedic | October 3, 2006, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Well, after reporting the latest on Foley, CNN ran a side story last night on alcoholism, not only missing the point but enabling those who want to excuse Foley’s behavior as a drunken aberration. I hope and trust that ABC isn’t doing the same thing.

Posted by: Lisa | October 3, 2006, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

How could the House Leaders allowed this to go on. And try to hide it. Sick Very sick

Posted by: Raulin Angulo | October 3, 2006, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Please see this for what it is! Our country is so divided,power hungry,hyprocritical and self righteous. We are being led by those who were going to bring dignity to the White House. What a shame that our children are being exploited by this same party. It is just wrong, not democratic or republica! Pleasae save the young!

Posted by: Estelle Hunter | October 3, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Who keeps IMs around? and how do you print them off if they’re on a Blackberry, e.g.?

Posted by: Torquemada | October 3, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Where are the Right-Wing Christians that attacked President Clinton for the Monica Luinsky scandall…where are your loud opinions on this sick pedophile!

Posted by: US CITIZEN | October 3, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Policy positions aside — Did any voter ever believe for even a nanosecond that those we elected to congress would endanger teens for political expedience?
They’re toast.

Posted by: IpseDixit | October 3, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

as a 20 year old I am disgusted with foley. But Hastert didn’t know about the sexually explict messages. someone else sat on them for 3 years to release them at a critical election. I would lock those guys up. For all you democrats out there your congressmen are no better. Your scandals mostly get swept under the rug. I am glad republicans found that out cause as far as I am concerned he was no republican when he didn’t uphold our values.

Posted by: austin | October 3, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

I’ve been drunk on occasion, and never did it cross my mind to go have sex with children. I do not see where going beyond “been drunk on occasion” to “alcoholic” would make one think that was okay, and really, I kind of resent them thinking that we are actually stupid enough to believe that is a valid reason.
*sarcasm* Oh, it’s okay, he can’t help it, he’s an ALCOHOLIC *end sarcasm* Suuure it is. And when they force that one down our throats, then they will fill in the caps letters with any other pidgeonhole they can label a criminal with. Old. Gay. Black. White. Feminine. Foreign. From a ‘bad home’. Slow.
As was previously pointed out, I do not see where he “inturrupted the vote”, either. The facts are bad enough without adding sensationalism to it.
See? Lead by example really works! Our leaders are turning out to be child predators, and it seems much of the citizenry is following.

Posted by: Coaster26 | October 3, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

It’ll be fun to watch and see how Limbaugh will try to pin this one on Bill Clinton. The Republican Party of Fear is going down folks…and it’s about time!

Posted by: BlameClinton | October 3, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

And the F.B.I. decided that there was nothing here to investigate?

Posted by: Scott D. | October 3, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

I agree Foley is a mental case.
But where is the sexual content I keep hearing about. Where are the
messages about orgasm you refer to ….
I have heard how horrible this guy and how the IM’s were sexual in nature but unless I am missing them somewhere I have seen nothing but allegations.

Posted by: ???? | October 3, 2006, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

MORE QUESTIONS:
1. This man obviously is an idiot recording these messages.
2. I guess I would wonder about my kid accepting these messages from an adult? Why not turn off the phone, show the messages to parents, teachers, police officers moments after they were sent?
3. Who in the press knew about this and DID NOT report it? Would they be accessories?
4. If any other adults (congress or otherwise) knew about this, are they subject to any violations of any laws? Accomplices?
5. Hastert must reveal EVERYONE (both parties) who is currently suspected of any wrongdoing to clear house. That will cause some sweat.
Don, Houston

Posted by: Don, Houston | October 3, 2006, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Enough with the left verus right on this one. This is down right sick. I hope they throw the book at Foley. Anyone in favor of brining back public punishment?

Posted by: Adam | October 3, 2006, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Do most people save instant messages? Did someone advise this kid to save the messages for his own protection or as evidence so they could bust Foley? I hope he never touched anyone.

Posted by: M. Rush | October 3, 2006, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

O.K. This guy is a genuine pedofile and pervert. What has that got to do with any particular party of candidate ? Foley is now gone. He ought to be prosecuted like any other pedofile. He and every other Congressman and Senator who uses his/her position to prey on youg men and women should also be hounded out of office and prosecuted. – I expect as in the past, this will apply to members of both parties.

Posted by: Scott-Sarmite Bentley | October 3, 2006, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

While his actions are certainly unseemly and probably illegal, he is not exhibiting pedophilia, which is a desire to have sex with pre-adoloscents. One’s sexual proclivities do not distinguish between 17 and 11 months and 18 and 1 month. The media, stupidly, seems to draw the line for pedophilia at this legal fiction. Foley likes young men and abused a position of power to reach them, but he is not a pedophile or nearly as sick as one.

Posted by: Correction | October 3, 2006, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Mike, snl,
What makes you think that the timing of the release of this information has anything to do with Democrats?

Posted by: James | October 3, 2006, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Hitting on 17 year old is not PEDOPHELIA. pedophelia is, by definition, attraction to prepuberty children. The age of consent in DC is 16. Its gross, but its not illegal. I’m not defending the guy, we just need to use the correct terminology.

Posted by: chris | October 3, 2006, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Oops, sorry “me” I meant to respond to Mike.

Posted by: Patrick | October 3, 2006, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Our “esteemed” elected leaders will probably follow the usual path. They will call for hearings and sit in grand rooms looking stern for the photographers. They will express outrage to any news camera that is in sight. All of them will claim they were deceived by one of their own. And after all the huffing and puffing and acting they will retire to their offices having not accomplished a thing. They will attempt to “ride it out” until we the people forget about it. It’s up to us to keep the heat on or absolutly nothing will be done.

Posted by: Phil | October 3, 2006, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Whatever Lewinski’s age was the was a consenting adult. Foley’s action were with a minor. He should be thrown in jail, period.

Posted by: Paul | October 3, 2006, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

I wonder who is in possession of these instant messages and is providing them to ABC. What are the dates of these IMs? Have congressional democrats or their staff been aware of these messages? If so, for how long? If so, shouldn’t they be required to resign as well? Certainly the democrats only required censure of their own Rep Studds in 1983 when he had sexual relations with a teenage intern. Is precedent of any value in an election year?

Posted by: jim cunningham | October 3, 2006, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

This is a great reason to just empty Washington DC out and start again. We need to super-chlorinate in the political gene pool …

Posted by: CB | October 3, 2006, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Greetings from Canada, where this story is getting some play anyway. It reminds me of the Chinese saying “Big
front, big back.” I asked several friends, and no one had ever heard of Foley before now.

Posted by: Bob Tobias | October 3, 2006, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Uh, someone’s missing the point entirely. 19=Adult. Under 18=MINOR. This has nothing to do with what Clinton did during his time in office! It seems like anytime a Republican does something inexcusable, the first thing they do is make excuses and point out how Clinton did something similar. This has to stop. It’s called NOT taking responsibility for your actions. And it makes the entire party lose credibility.

Posted by: Noirling | October 3, 2006, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

My understanding is that many folks “knew” Foley was gay, just not necessarily preying on teenagers. If they did know about it before hand, whoever did should be forced to resign.
On another note, I think the behavior is atrocious but I love the double standard in our society, because this is a gay thing. If this was a 24 year old guy who slept with a 16 or 17 year old girl it would be statutory rape, but because its a 50 something guy preying on a 16 or 17 year boy its pedophilia. To me this is more of a statutory rape and inappropriate behavior thing. Just think folks, 80 years ago it was not uncommon for people to be married at 16 or 17. I am NOT justifying the behavior and do think he should be charged especially since he is an elected official–I just don’t think this falls in the range of pedophilia/child molester type definition I normally think of. Is he a perv? Yes. is he a child molester/rapist type, I don’t think so. Sometimes that’s the problem with the unseeing face of the law.

Posted by: MJ | October 3, 2006, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

the moral righteous:
they’re hypocrites.

Posted by: michael stark | October 3, 2006, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

foley is a disgusting perverted lying piece of crap & stop comparing him to clinton clinton wasnt going after underage boys he had an affair w/an of age person get over the republican democrat crap HE IS A HYPOCRIT THAT WAS SOLICITING A 16 YR OLD BOY

Posted by: MELANIE | October 3, 2006, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Five years of warnings and no investigation? We should be thankful that Foley resigned before the Republicans tried to rewrite the rules for him like they did for DeLay and Bush’s NSA practices. The house is a mess!!!

Posted by: Dottie | October 3, 2006, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Couldn’t they tack on the charge of providing alcohol to a minor if that is what actually happened in the supposed meeting referenced above? Actually two minors. This guys has a on-going history of this type of behavior.
He needs to be made an example of because the whole world is watching. Hopefully we will not prove ourselves hypocrites again by only slapping him on the wrist. He needs jail time if a crime has been proven to have occurred.

Posted by: cinattra | October 3, 2006, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

MJ in VA,
As a country we have decided that 18 is old enough to date anyone of their choosing. Mr. Foley used his position to solicit sex from someone who definetley looked up to him and was under the age of 18. Monica at 19 could defend herself but these under age boys are more like 14 when they are 16. For that matter even girls are acting 14 when they are 16. Mr. Foley took advantage of that and for that anyone Democrat or Republican must resign if they were involved or were an enabler.

Posted by: Guillermo | October 3, 2006, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

I think the Clinton issue is not even an issue. What he did was have an affair with a consentual ADULT! He did not prey on minors. Although what Clinton done was morally wrong, he did not prey on young children. That’s more than I can say for the God forsaken Republican leaders. It’s time to stop the Republican reign over our country. Do the right thing & VOTE DEMOCRAT!!

Posted by: Princess | October 3, 2006, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

I agree with the outrage, but I mind the ignorance:
Pedophilia – being sexually attracted primarily or exclusively to prepubescent or peripubescent children.
The proper term is “pederast” which specifically applies to homosexual attraction to adolescent boys.
Be mad AND accurate!

Posted by: MD Resident | October 3, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Some of his constituents must have known about him. They had a level of responsibility to out him! Where were they?

Posted by: Janet | October 3, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

It is time for this country to clean house. Republican or Democrat, it doesn’t matter. Power corupts and we are certainly witnessing an enormous amount of coruption in the name of politics. What is right for this country is right, regardless of politics. What ever happened to the common citizen of this Nation?

Posted by: Steve | October 3, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

There’s a big difference between the Monica situation and this case. Clinton was not sick or stupid enough to engage in sexual contact with a minor; Lewinsky was over 18 at the time, so, while it was a terrible personal family crisis for the Clintons, it was not, and should not have been treated as, a legal issue. Of course, the Republicans used it to political advantage anyway. The Foley case is an entirely different matter by virtue of the fact that MINORS were involved; this definitely warrants a criminal investigation. From what I’ve read, it seems as though Hastert knew about the less explicit emails that were revealed last fall and earlier this spring, but failed to conduct any further investigation. This is very disturbing as one would think that at the slightest sign of children being at risk, our congressional leaders would take swift action to prevent a predator from advancing through the halls of Congress. Alas, as has been the case for the last several years, all these GOP nutjobs care about is holding on to power. Barring another “surprise! weekend before the election” Osama video, the country should get some much deserved relief from this insanity come November 7.

Posted by: John D. | October 3, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Disgusting, yes. But something is not right. April 2003 emails and text messages appearing on 10/3/06? Where has this info been for 3.5 years?

Posted by: Howard Kaplan | October 3, 2006, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

The saying “what goes around comes around” is Karma. A person may think they’re going to get away with hypocrisy and injustice. However, they will usually find in life that there’s no escaping conscience and in some cases, justice.
I’m always amused at those who proclaim themselves as advocates of humanity and proclaim conservatism are the very ones who participate in the indecent acts which they denounce. “Oh, but they’re sinners. They no not what they do.”
There’s a common thread with human behavior that negative actions are caused by something they feel is beyond their control. In this case, congressman Mark Foley is insinuating that his alcoholism is to blame for his pedophilia. Why can’t people accept responsibility for their actions? I’m HIV positive because I did something to get it. It wasn’t drugs, alcohol, or any other vice that caused me to get HIV. I contracted this virus by action. Foley acted on this behavior. It wasn’t alcohol.
It is becoming all too common in our society to blame our bad behaviors on others or even things. But the fact is a person is responsible for their own existence.

Posted by: ben | October 3, 2006, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Would people really be as upset if Foley was engaged in this type of IM-ing with a female Page? Or is the specter of homosexuality what’s really freaking people out? Because, from what I hear there are more than a few dirty old men in Congress who love nothing better than to ask out an attractive young girl.

Posted by: Oklahoma | October 3, 2006, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Foley is sick!!! and alcohol played no part in his behavior!
And because he has resigned…he should NOT get any pay whatsoever!! Give his last paycheck and all retirement monies to charities. He won’t need money where he is going!!

Posted by: Karen | October 3, 2006, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

As an Ohioan, the state of John Boehner, I’m ashamed and hope he’s among those forced to resign. Did these MEN (most of them) learn nothing as they watched the pedophilia scandal evolve in the Catholic Church? Are they that blind and consumed with power that they couldn’t be bothered to care about kids? Every single one of them who KNEW ANYTHING and did not report it, who did not call 241-KIDS or the D.C. equivalent of a child abuse hoteline, who did not demand an ethics investigation, should be asked to resign immediately. And if they don’t, and if you’re a voter, remember that in November. And if you’re smart, you’ll elect more women/moms/grandmothers and people who actually care. How sad that the GOP worked up more rabid, crazed energy to “save” Terri Schiavo but couldn’t lift a finger to help living, breathing 16- and 17-year-olds employed BY THEM from a sexual predator. Get a clue, Congress. Everyone else has.

Posted by: Ohioan, sickened | October 3, 2006, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Yea it is sick and he is sick. Very sick. But condemning him does no good. Likely this behaviour has been in his life from a very young age. I say “go get help” and suffer the consequences. That is the way life works. The political implications are questionable- but certainly the democrats will twist every last drop out of it. But why people are so “shocked” that a Congressman or Senator could be involved is weird. Why couldn’t someone in a position such as that be involved in that? They come into office as flawed humans and some far more flawed than others. It’s ironic that the American public holds politicians in such disdain and then act totally shocked when one does what others in the general public have done. The sad-outrageous part is that he may not be held to the same standard as those in the general public- (ie- “Perverted Justice”)- but then again we have the OJ fiasco- so go figure.

Posted by: MARK RICHMOND | October 3, 2006, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

that is just very sick he should not be able to do those kind of things i think he should be locked up

Posted by: pelo | October 3, 2006, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

I have to wonder just why we keep voting for these bozos?
Clean the house. These long-serving incumbents think they are above the laws that apply to everyone else.
They MUST go

Posted by: Mary | October 3, 2006, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Lets wait for the investigation to finish before we start yelling and screaming about a cover-up. Let not all be judge and jury w/o all of the facts

Posted by: Delaware | October 3, 2006, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

As a life long Republican, I can finally say that my party has left me speechless. Whomever knew, or had an inkling of Foley’s actions should be brought up on criminal charges. ANYONE, regardless of political party or position held. Any defense of their actions is ludicroius.

Posted by: Dennis Gibson, Mr | October 3, 2006, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Greg, I see where you’re coming from with your response, but the age of consent in Florida is 18, and Foley should be held accountable by the same laws as everyone else in his state. Also, my biggest issue with him isn’t the age difference, but how he used a position of power to influence employees at a vunerable age.

Posted by: Steve | October 3, 2006, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

NBC Dateline does the show, “to catch a predator”, in which people doing the same thing go to jail. Why has he not been arrested?

Posted by: Mike O | October 3, 2006, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Not in any way condoning this activity and personally finding it repulsive, but in some states, isn’t the age of consent 16? Aren’t these congressional pages 16? If so, is it true that if Foley was representing from a state where the age of consent was 16, he was not breaking the law in this case? I think that in DC, the age is 16, but in Florida it’s 18.
If he didn’t break the law as far as age of consent goes, why is he considered a pedophile?

Posted by: Age of Consent | October 3, 2006, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Greetings,
Some questions to which perhaps you can provide some answers.
I know why I am appalled, but why is ABC appalled? Is ABC aware that this sort of thing has taken place before by others. And not only in words but in action? Where was the outrage then?
From where did ABC News obtain these IMs from and why is that if these message were generated back in April are they just now coming to light? Got any answers?

Posted by: Dean Terry | October 3, 2006, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

This is just SICK!!! For the life of me, I can’t understand why some things are excused just becuase of who that individual is, or who that person works under. Why is it that the punishment is decided on the person and not on the crime. I pray to our heavenly father that he may give us strength to deal with people such as this man. I also pray that the young children that he did this to can get help and/or peace with who they are. I pray that if any one of those children are reading this article they know that no matter what they have gone through or are going throught. GOD loves them and they were not put here by mistake. GOD choose them for a purpose and may the LORD come into their hearts and the heart of Mark Foley. From the looks at our world today, GOD is or ONLY CHANCE!!!

Posted by: Andrea | October 3, 2006, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Everyone is making this out to be a political thing… eventually this will possibly take a political toll. but the raw data on this suggests that one is a child predetor and the people who did not investigate in congress helped cover up a crime. If Foley is found guilty all those who help hide this should also pay the the legal price. If someone came and told me that the 52 yr old man next door asked for my 16 y/o son or daughters a pic of them, i would not tell him to stop i would go to the cops(expect i have nothing to gain by not going to the cops. The people who decided to pretty much try and sweep this under the rug are criminals as well.. also note i’m a republican and i would be dammned if i vote for any of these hypocrites… unless somthing substancial happens i have a feeling i’m voting democrat.. too many crazy things going on with our party and now you can’t even count the incidents on one hand.

Posted by: SPF | October 3, 2006, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Sick!!! Sick!!! Sick!!!
Time for him to go! I am a Republican (not much longer) and am sick of the double standard. How and why could a leader of our country slip through the cracks for so long and obtain an Office of such notariety. I don’t care what media outlet had this info or for how long…..all moot issues. How many people on “the inside” knew of this habit/illness and stood by without exposing this creep. I was never a fan of Bill Clinton (a.k.a. the “Coward in Chief”) but his actions pale in comparison to this. He was cheating on his wife with another woman. While that does not justify his actions at least it was not done via the internet where child predators will do anything to step into a child’s world. I am sure this is not his first time…..only the first time he was caught.

Posted by: jeff | October 3, 2006, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

If the interns were warned of getting to close with this guy, are there any others in the House or Senate who are also on the ‘watch out’ list? I’ll bet there are others who are preying on the teens. Do we have to wait for a news outlet to identify the unknown sickos to bring them to our attention? Where is our Congressional leadership?

Posted by: Ed Thomas | October 3, 2006, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

ABC could not just have released this information without diggin into it carefully, i can bet they did not have this info for a while……and i can also bet no democrats knew about this, how could they?…do you think haslert would have given ammunition to the the dems….the funny thing is this guy was all over clinton-lewinsky……i will protest if he does not go to jail….and finally we as a country need to make preying on kids a national crime….all those conservatives that care so much about abortion shame on you…..is this what you really represent….hypocrites is what you all are

Posted by: bobby | October 3, 2006, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Isn’t is interesting how quickly these scoflaws check into rehab when they are caught? Didn’t a well-known Congressman from Rhode Island recently check into rehab after a late night accident at the Congressional building? It’s as if they are pleading innocent by reason of alcohol addiction or substance abuse.

Posted by: Magic | October 3, 2006, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

There have been a rash of poloticians and celebrities lately trying to overshadow their public mistakes with claims of achohol abuse. The perception is that an achoholic seeking treatment is suddenly a victim of abuse and therefore not accountable for thier actions. Should we extend the same courtesy to serial killers because they were abused as children? Its damage control at its finest. Taking full responsiblilty seems to be a foreign concept to public figures because they cling so tightly to their vanity. Don’t be suprised when the next public screw up suddenly checks into rehab.

Posted by: TYLR | October 3, 2006, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

He needs to go and to go without all the perks that congressmen get for the rest of their long long lives. Not like the rest of us working stiffs who have no retirement. Maybe while he was having sex with himself he should have voted against all the perks they get. I no longer care of they are Repulican or Demorcatic they are all in for themselves and all they can get. Why is he not in jail!!! Again all of us dumb working stiffs would be.

Posted by: Illinois | October 3, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Mike must have been watching Hannity’s sorry excuse for television when he stated Lewinsky was 19 when the Clinton affair took place. Hannity gets it wrong as usual. She was 22.

Posted by: DJShay | October 3, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Foly is bad but the House leadership is worse! They enabled this sick man to continue this charade at tax payer expense.

Posted by: Jon Levy | October 3, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

We are the laughing stock of the world and rightly so

Posted by: joan adams | October 3, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

no typos in his IM’s…wow

Posted by: k~ | October 3, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Give me a break.
You make it sound as if the fact that he was a Republican automatically made him evil.
The problem is that he is a pedophile and is using the excuse of alcoholism to excuse his actions. Not to which political party he belongs. Or would a Democrat pedophile act more nobly or be handled differently by Congress?
Fix the problem. Don’t promote a political agenda because it is convenient.
The problem is not political – it’s PEDOPHILIA!

Posted by: California | October 3, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

People since most of you haven’t figured this out here’s some insight. ONLY the MIDDLE CLASS have a sense of morality. The poor can’t afford it and the rich (like Foley) are above it. So your “moral outrage” means nothing to those who make your laws. They prey on you and they play you like pigeons. They pass stringent laws but they themselves don’t abide by them. They raise their own slaries but they won’t raise your wages. Yet they tell us that they are all — all honorable men.

Posted by: Eric | October 3, 2006, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

I’m just amazed someone who doesnt know the difference between your and you’re can become a Congressman.

Posted by: aaron | October 3, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

For those who talk about Monica, homosexuality, and sodomy, do you really think there’s no difference between adult sexual behavior and a 50ish-year-old man seducing a 16-year-old? Do the moral values against homosexuality and sodomy mean that this would have been OK if Foley had seduced a 16-year-old girl? Examine that, then let’s talk about moral values.

Posted by: Lynn | October 3, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

It is so obvious from many of the comments, who is commenting on politics and who is commenting on law. I think any reasonable person finds Foley’s action deplorable. The correct immediate action was for him to step down and he did. Surely there are statesmen from both parties that have fallen short of morals throughout history and I suspect there will be more in the future. Where we fail as constituents, is to revel in this, rather than to say goodbye to Foley and get on with the very important issues facing all of us today. It show’s the simplistic mind set of the population at large. Frankly, I am embarrassed for all of us.

Posted by: Mole | October 3, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Fox News sat on this story for over a month and refused to run or investigate it. So much for you abc/democrat conspiracy.

Posted by: mo curtis | October 3, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

without a doubt this is criminal behavior. it has been for some time and any person with knowledge of this sick pervert should go down right along with him. my god what has this country come to when the people that run it are pedophiles preying on our young and given license to lie, cheat, and steal whenever they please. god help america!

Posted by: mother of 5 sons | October 3, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Seems to me that those who accuse the Dems for bringing out this information weeks before the elections forget that it was ABC that reported it. The same ABC that brought you Path to 9/11. Didn’t see many Republicans complaining about the untrue Clinton bashing weeks before the election. I doubt that Ken Starr will spend 6 million taxpayer dollars to investigate this Republican coverup.
Gaye, Illinois

Posted by: Gaye | October 3, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

if this guy was drunk on the house floor, wouldn’t that mean he wasn’t able to think clearly while voting, and there for his votes wouldn’t count?

Posted by: Diana | October 3, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

As a Republican I am ashamed of my party. As a parent, I am outraged by the lack of concern and action by Dennis Hastert. He must go. The time has come. He is now officially in the same league as the guys we see on Dateline showing up to have sex with underaged children.

Posted by: Loyal Republican | October 3, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Bet you 10 to 1 that their are more liasons like this out there right now.
He needs to be punished just like any other man trying to have sex with an underaged person.
Gee, I think I see a even newer TV show, “Let’s Bust the Senate”

Posted by: J.G. | October 3, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Good thing Republicans have Diebold voting machines on their side, and the Democratic leadership is snoozing.
Think they’ll lose both houses? Think they’ll lose even one house? Don’t make me laugh.

Posted by: ProfessorVP | October 3, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Could someone enlighten Newt Gingrich….this intelligent man thinks like the Vatican. He equates being gay to being a pedophile. He also was Speaker of the House and having etramarital affairs while trying to impeach Clinton. At least there’s no hypocrisy in the Republican Party!!

Posted by: MT | October 3, 2006, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

I think all republicans OR
democrats, anyone holding office, should only hold it for 2 terms. These lifetime pols are sicking, they only help the rich and to h*** with the poor, the kids, ect.
Two terms for all offices everywhere.

Posted by: Liz | October 3, 2006, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

i’ve voted republican in every single election since i was 18 and this sickens me, just no reason to vote now.

Posted by: matt | October 3, 2006, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Shame on all of you trying to blame this lowlife’s activities on homosexuality or gay marriage! Pedophiles have been praying on children long before gay marriage or gay rights were even an issue. In fact, most pedophiles and child killers are heterosexual men! I knew the so called “Christian right” would jump at the opportunity to blame this on gays to rally their misinformed base!

Posted by: Sara | October 3, 2006, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

According to the DSM-IV definition, pedophilia involves sexual activity by an adult with a prepubescent child. Some individuals prefer females, usually 8- to 10-year-olds. Those attracted to males usually prefers slightly older children. Some prefer both sexes. While some are sexually attracted only to children, others also are sometimes attracted to adults.

Posted by: Mr. Wilson | October 3, 2006, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

The folks that knew about this information most likely would use it against Foley for gain if it didnt go public..think about it and you’ll realize this is how things work until all goes public. Republican and Democrat alike play this game everyday…favor for a favor. There are no morals, just what you can get for your constituency.

Posted by: Tom | October 3, 2006, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Wasn’t there a Democrat from Massachusetts who was re-elected for thirteen years after he admittedly had sexual intercourse with under age pages? Why is this a Republican / Democrat thing? You can’t honestly think this is the Republican Party’s fault, can you? If you do, you must have voted for that individual from Massachusetts as well, Jerry Studs (D) from Massachusetts – look that up.

Posted by: Concerned | October 3, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

I’m shocked, though I shouldn’t be, that a scandal that has nothing to do with politics or political parties is being portrayed that way by some. Everyone should be disturbed at Foley’s behavior regardless of their political affiliation.

Posted by: Shaen | October 3, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

without a doubt this is criminal behavior. it has been for some time and any person with knowledge of this sick pervert should go down right along with him. my god what has this country come to when the people that run it are pedophiles preying on our young and given license to lie, cheat, and steal whenever they please. god help america!

Posted by: mother of 5 sons | October 3, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

I find it appalling that NeoCons are throwing Clinton out there like he was a pedophile like Foley! She was an Adult, not a child. That ridiculousness right there should get all you idiots right out of office. No one was saying All Republicans are Pedophiles – they were blaming the man who did it and looking for those who covered it up. I hope Democrats use this to show how sick with power the republicans are and that they will salvage our children to retain their power. SHAME on all of them and you who refer to Clinton!!!! Clinton was no pedophile but FOLEY IS AND HE SHOULD PAY!

Posted by: Allyson | October 3, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

This is all so disgusting. All these corrupt and deviant actions by the ones in the party who pat themselves on the back saying they are the Party of Family Values. They are the Moral Party.
It makes my skin crawl to know that these people are in office representing all us Americans.
It make me sick to think that this “Moral Family Value” Party would stoop to all time lows to protect their own and their control in Government.

Posted by: Misty | October 3, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Anyone who thinks this has anything at all to do with politics (except the fact that this may have been covered up) is insane. Don’t think that these guys don’t look out for each other, no matter what party they are in. I’m a conservative Republican and I know it goes on in both parties. Yet another argument for strict term limits and no “professional” politicians… but this guy is a nut and a pedophile who is trying to blame his deviancy on alcohol??? who is he trying to fool?
Oh yeah, all of us…

Posted by: Scott | October 3, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

How is that “describing an orgasm”???
He’s a pedophile and shouldn’t be allowed near children. However, the excerpts the public has been shown are being blown out of proportion.

Posted by: Kendall | October 3, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

He said he was drinking… That is sufficient for me…
Nobody cares anymore, you liberals just need to get a life…

Posted by: Proud Cuban | October 3, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Frankly I am disgusted, but I am also live in the real world. I am a Conservative and I think he should go to prison if he gave the boy alcohol or had sex with him. Second, this crap happens all the time albeit a government official, school teacher, or next door neighbor. Parents need to be more aware of what their child is doing instead of letting them run amok. When it comes to your child do not trust anyone except yourself. It is a sad way to think, but it is a reality. The libs do smell blood though and they are going sink their teeth in deep. Are there not more important things out there now than this crap? Let the boy’s parents bring charges. Let the prosecutors prosecute and put him behind bars and for God’s sake let’s worry about the country. Oops I apologize to the libs I said the “G” word. Separation of Church and something that was not written in the Constitution…

Posted by: Mike | October 3, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Make sure this guy winds up incarcerated for the rest of his life.He is less than scum, he abused the public trust and now he should be publically brought to account.
BS on the alchoholisim as a cause, he is a PEDIOPHILE and why is he NOT IN JAIL ??????

Posted by: R.L. Edgar | October 3, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

I believe that we are missing the point. Because it does matter whether it was boy or girl. It would concern me that he is sending emails to kids. Anyone reading the email would sniff out a predator. If the parent ask them to leave it along. Fear of becoming public.

Posted by: Ricky G. | October 3, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

I don’t believe it! He was set up, no one would keep all those messages unless there was a reason!! They certainly wouldn’t give them to the MSM to be exposed themselves. Rotten, really Rotten people out there!!

Posted by: RitaN | October 3, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Classy that Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Matt Drudge, WSJ, Denny Hastert, etc. are all trying to blame either the liberals, the gays, or the victims.
Wasn’t this the party of personal responsibility and moral & family values?
Absolute power does, it appears, corrupt absolutely.

Posted by: Shawn Fassett | October 3, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

This is pretty disgusting. If I were Speaker of the House and I heard about allegations of *any* sort of impropriety between a minor and another member of congress, I’d have acted on it immediately instead of waiting until election season.
Hastert has no intention of resigning of course, and who knows how gentle the slap on the wrist will be for Foley. In my opinion, Foley blaming his alcoholism is passing the buck, and Hastert has no excuse for not acting. The congressional leadership is very much about “accountability” only if they themselves don’t have to be held accountable.

Posted by: lkim | October 3, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Alcohol rehab? Who is Foley kidding? His problem is not with 12 year old scotch. It’s 12 year old boys!

Posted by: Kevin | October 3, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

What I don’t get is Hastert saying in one breath that they knew about the emails last year, then saying they didn’t know anything. “The parents didn’t want us to pursue….” What crap. It’s the LAW to pursue it! And they didn’t. They’re just as sick for sweeping it under the rug!

Posted by: Mel | October 3, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Vile and repulsive and all should fall not just Foley but those who knew or even suspected such dispicable behavior was going on.

Posted by: REPULSED | October 3, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

OR ARE YOU ALL JUST UPSET THAT HE WAS MOLESTING YOUNG MEN, AND NOT YOUNG WOMEN? WHO HAS THEIR PRIORITIES OUT OF LINE NOW?

Posted by: Mr Kelley | October 3, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

his actions and any reason for his actions are unacceptable. period.

Posted by: ma | October 3, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Former Chicago Democratic Congressman Mel Reynolds received a six-and-a-half-year federal sentence for his convictions of wire fraud, bank fraud and lies to the Federal Election Commission. He also was convicted of having sex with a 16 year old campaign volunteer.
Reynolds was among the 176 criminals excused in President Clinton’s pardons.
Later Jesse Jackson added Reynolds to Rainbow/PUSH Coalition’s payroll.
Deroy Murdock, a columnist, wrote back in 2002: “This is a first in American politics: An ex-congressman who had sex with a subordinate, won clemency from a president who had sex with a subordinate, then was hired by a clergyman who had sex with a subordinate.

Posted by: Mark | October 3, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

I have coined a new term to describe how politicians and celebrities — when caught in embarrassing and/or illegal situations — all of a sudden decide they are alcoholics and check into treatment: “rehabracadabra” As if claiming it’s a disease will make it all disappear. WRONG. Foley isn’t an alcoholic, he’s a pedophile.

Posted by: Tim Howe | October 3, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Fascinating. We now have the Mel Gibson defense at play on the Hill. The only thing that this guys alcohol issues create is a drunk pedophile.
I think that is needs to be looked at closely to see if the GOP leadership kept this data under wraps, and in so doing condoned it, so as not to risk losing a seat in the House. If that is determined, that the Nixon era, “what did they know, and when did they know it” cover-upstory is back, then there needs to be a raft of resignations.
Bending the rules has always been a practice on the Hill, but to have covered this up, if that is indeed the case, is well beyond that bending the rules.

Posted by: Jack | October 3, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

In all probability, this despicable Foley character will still be eligible to
draw a huge Government pension, after his “Alcohol Treatment”

Posted by: John | October 3, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

After looking at the facts of this whole episode it is becoming clear that Foley did not violate any laws as far as I can tell.
Furthermore, if 16 years olds are now considered children by many why are they allowed to be “Pages” in the US House of Reps?
16 year olds are not children unless they fulfill an urgent political need.
BTW, Foley is an idiot that should be gone. Nobody that stupid should be a Congressman. Freak.

Posted by: Hugh | October 3, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

What is the specific evidence for that assertion? Do you know where he was when he sent the messages? Could it have been from a portable device? If you’re implying he was in his office, isn’t it permissible for a Rep. to come and go from the House floor, even during a vote?
It seems to me that a lot more details and context are needed here.
Are you serious? The context here is about a sick man who preyed on children. Is it permissible for an elected official to sexually text message children? I wouldn’t need to know any of the gory details about some serial killer any more than you need to know “details” about this pervert. Your lame attempt to circumvent the onus of responsibility into some convoluted “know-it-all, look at me, I’m so smart” deflection is pathetic.

Posted by: Steve Diller | October 3, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

I think Foley’s punishment should be left alone with John Walsh and all the other fathers who lost their sons to these deviant psychos.

Posted by: Tom O'Donnell | October 3, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

I’m amazed. “IM’s” from as long ago as three years come out 6 weeks before mid-terms and no one is asking who had these. Everyone assumes it was Hastert. That’s nonsensical. In no way does this excuse Mr. Foley. Instead, he has resigned in disgrace and will be prosecuted if evidence reaches the necessary level.
I want to know who had these IM’s or who data-mined them. I smell democrat dirty tricks all over this sordid tale.

Posted by: Steve | October 3, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Ew…what a sicko.

Posted by: Dean | October 3, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

He’ll apologize, check in to rehab, find Jesus, check out of rehab and start a new career either counseling others like himself or hit the speaking circuit telling everyone how he had this “problem”, that it wasn’t really his fault, and how Jesus fixed everything.

Posted by: W.Barnes | October 3, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

These are the same hypocritical, twisted freaks who just snuck in an on-line gambling ban to a port security bill. They’re telling me I can’t spend my already taxed money on internet gaming while they’re gaming underage boys on the internet. And I’m the one endangering the moral well-being of the country playing cards? Do not confuse this with a liberal rant either. I’m a registered republican and have been for 20+ years.

Posted by: Peeker643 | October 3, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

his actions and any reason for his actions are unacceptable. period.

Posted by: bill | October 3, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

I’m surprised and dissappointed that the Speaker and the party officials; who have been informed of the matter did nothing. It is very easy for a young man to be coerced by those who are in greater power; and at the age of 16 or 17; we have generally accepted a lack of maturity. Hastert (who I had greatly respected) ought to have been on the case immediately and reviewed the Page program in order to protect these future politicians and bureaucrats who could do so much for this country. It’s a damn shame the program has been defiled by this filth. Resignation maybe, apologies and fixing the problem: that is an absolute must.

Posted by: twelveaddict | October 3, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Doe anyone find it odd that this took place in 2003 and it just now comes to light 5 weeks before a mid-term election. I’m not saying it’s OK, I just hope that all of you who are calling for the heads of anyone who knew will include ANYONE (R) or (D) that knew about this pervert. If not then lets tell it like it is and say every republican should resign.

Posted by: Lee | October 3, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

sad to see so many coming to conclusions based upon party lines…if this is true, and it seems to be, but there is room for error here as info is coming in so quickly, the guy deserves whatever he gets…
but im sickened by those on both sides who look to use this event for political purposes….
everything today, from soldiers dying in war to violence in the streets to disgusting things like this, are all seen with political eyes, for what opportunity it may present to score political points…and that is just sad…

Posted by: JIM | October 3, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

As was stated above, Democrat or Republican–whomever had knowledge of this and did nothing about it should be gotten rid of. But you know Democrats are smelling blood in the water with this one and are just loving it…

Posted by: Matt | October 3, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Hey — anyone who thinks that ABC are “leftist leaning liberals” needs only to look at the corporation. They are pretty much next in line to Fox when it comes to kissing up to Bush and company. So, in other words — if ABC is breaking this stuff, then we are all in a lot more trouble than anyone had imagined. This is coming from INSIDE — and the news is not good.

Posted by: Sammy | October 3, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

I am a Republican and am DISGUSTED by this. I don’t care who does what Rep. or Dem. Sickos like this need to be locked up! It is ashame everything gets politicized. Let’s get back to basics. Right vs. Wrong. This is clearly WRONG. No justification. Lock him up.

Posted by: dtb | October 3, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

This is not pedophilia. This is incredibly common. Take a look at Myspace, Yahoo chat, or any other online communication service, and you’ll see how incredibly typical this sort of thing has become. Why attack a Congressman when the country has chosen to ignore how the trend is affecting our entire culture?
A nation of hypocrites indeed.

Posted by: David Arts | October 3, 2006, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Excuse me, M., but do you know any 16 year olds? They ARE children. My niece is 16, and I think she’s reached a fairly average level of maturity for her age, but she is definitely not adult enough to conduct herself like a grown-up. These are HIGH SCHOOL KIDS. Teenagers may be sexual beings, but their emotions and life experience do not match the level of most adults. Would you want to leave your 16 year old son/daugher/niece/nephew alone in a room with this guy? Thought not.
And blaming it on booze…gimme a break. Why on earth are you sticking up for this behavior?

Posted by: Tuco | October 3, 2006, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Foley stepped down. He should step down. Anyone who covered up should not step down but resign leadership roles. Anyone who gave Clinton a pass on the Monica thing can’t object to Foley’s behavior. In fact, I’m still waiting for THEM to step down.

Posted by: BD | October 3, 2006, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

This man is a sick, twisted individual. Actions like these are exactly why pedophiles get off the hook….the pedophiles are the ones making the laws!

Posted by: Kelly | October 3, 2006, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

I can’t believe the posts from people who right away go political with the “OMG Clinton too” lines. Give it a rest already. This isn’t a position of power issue or a Democratic hatchet job. Tt’s a pedophelia and covering up said pedophilia issue.
Bill Clinton was dumb, wrong, stupid…yes. It was also legal, consenting, and with a 23 year old woman who knew what she was doing (for the most part). This man, Foley, solicited sex from minors. He is a pedophile. It was covered up in the name of politics to save a house seat during a midterm election season that was close. Comparing it to the Clinton scandal is like comparing apples to front bumpers of a 67 chevy. If you swing Republican deal with it…this is your scandal. If you swing Democrat remember that there are scumbags on your side too.

Posted by: Hunter | October 3, 2006, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

If the network could expose this, why couldn’t our government uncover it? All the more reason we nead “leaks” to keep the public informed. This party surely won’t do it.

Posted by: Lydia | October 3, 2006, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Please let us know how you were able
to authenticate these IM’s? Log files can be created at will. Find it hard
to believe 3 year old IMs are for
real. And what kid would keep talking
to a pervert over IM? How about
turning on privacy or ignore? This
whole thing smells.

Posted by: shark | October 3, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

It is time we clean up our United States congress! There is so much corrupt and filth in the offices of most politicians. I am disgusted! I go to work every day! I pay my taxes! For what? So that corrupt politicians with no morals what so ever can continuously abuse their positions?!? More women need to run this country! Things would definitely be different!

Posted by: Toni | October 3, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

It is time for ABC/Ross to prove that these IMs are actual logs and not simply dialogs created by a DNC staffer using notepad.
Where are the sworn statements attesting that these are valid transcripts?
Where is the certification that a valid “chain of custody” exists attesting to the accuracy of these transcripts?
It is time for Ross to PROVE that Foley was a participant and these exhanges are true and not “fake but accurate.”

Posted by: George | October 3, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

By Foley going into Rehab it means he can be free from questioning for 90 days. So let’s see we will not hear from him till between Christmas and New Years.
The November mid term elections will long be over by then. I am sure he was advised of this before he resigned.

Posted by: jg | October 3, 2006, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

No one is arguing the fact that this is disgusting, but you need to look at how old these are how long someone has been holding on to it and why they waited till now to realease them when we here of someone having these for years. It is obviously politics if someone waits 30 days till an election to release them.

Posted by: Jay | October 3, 2006, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

I find it unbelievable that this predator has been able to get away with this. This knowing but keeping it a ‘secret’ mentality should be history by now. I was abused by an uncle as a preteen. I find out now that many of my relatives knew about his perverse actions but kept it a secret until long after his death. These sick creatures need to be castrated and then put in prison for their actions along with imprisoning all that knew but chose not to do something about it. Everyone needs to vote this year and make sure that those responsible are pushed out of public service.

Posted by: MN Father | October 3, 2006, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

I don’t doudt the guilt but I do question the authenticity of the IMs. I’m a computer geek and don’t know how to readily save an IM. So a teen saved embrassing IM for a number of years? How / why did they do it?

Posted by: RD | October 3, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Sad that ABCNews keeps helping the Democrats out by digging up more and more dirt. This isn’t reporting anymore, it’s slander.
If the page was so bothered by it “then”, he should have REPORTED it “then.” Not five weeks before an election.
Sad state of this country.

Posted by: Mom Of Three | October 3, 2006, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Foley’s a pig and should be arrested but there’s somebody out there that knew about this and held on to those messages until now. I wonder when Brian Ross got these IM’s and who gave them to him after sitting on them for so long.

Posted by: charlie | October 3, 2006, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Starting to look like set up by page(s). Wonder why he was saving IMs?. Wonder why media didnt expose this when they found out.
We need to give the administration and congress authority to access IM without warrents?

Posted by: Marty | October 3, 2006, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

If this wasn’t about politics and about pedophilia as some of you are claiming, why didn’t those that had this information come forward at the time it either happened or the time it was discovered.
For it to be about pedophilia, that is when it should have come forward. But instead, the holders of this information allowed this creep to remain in office for three additional years where he could continue to have this type of contact with minors just so they could release the information the day after it became legally impossible to replace Foley’s name on the Florida ballot.

Posted by: Aragorn | October 3, 2006, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Keep in mind that this is pederasty, not pedophilia. He is homosexual. Also keep in mind that most homosexuals have their first encounter with an older man while they are in their teens (minors).
This case is by the books homosexuality.

Posted by: NEal | October 3, 2006, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

I don’t know which is worse; What Foley did, the fact that so many Republicans covered up for him, or the fact that so many Republicans are defending their leadership’s response.
They are all a bunch of really sick people.

Posted by: DefendUSA | October 3, 2006, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Responding to S. Ulrich… Yes what Foley did was unforgivable and we should be outraged that one of leaders and a person we put our trust in would do such a thing, but why must we always take what one individual does and lump them with other groups of people that are law abiding citizens. Pointing the finger at homosexuals and any other group you feel in your eyes is morally corrupt is not the correct approach. Why not focus on the person who commits the crime and keep “moral judgements” to God and not you. Do we need to start looking into your personal life 24 hours a day to see if you are always morally correct?

Posted by: Dale | October 3, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Who cares about Foley.
The story is NOW about the House Leatdership and their INACTION!!!
Votes and $$ were more important to Denny and Crew than these boy’s safety.

Posted by: Bob H | October 3, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Give it up Republicans. You have no counter-arguments. Your days are numbered.

Posted by: GIve it up | October 3, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Foley is a sick man. Good riddance.
I hope he gets what he has coming to him. But don’t hand me this crap
that all republicans are like that just because it’s near election time. The democrats have more than their share of drunks and perverts. I wonder if all this is coming out now by design. Does anybody remember Anita Hill?

Posted by: Gilbert | October 3, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

David Arts,
Just because it is common doesn’t mean it isn’t pedophilia.
You go ahead and have a sexually explicit contact with a minor, and see what happens!

Posted by: Van | October 3, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

I am confused. Foley should be punished for any laws he has broken, but 1) why would a page save IMs back in 2003, especially when this is obivious not an unwanted advance, and 2) why would the page turn them over now, right before an election? Strange.

Posted by: steve434 | October 3, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Too bad that teh 9-11 plane that went down in Shanksville was the one headed for the Capitol (with congress in session). I’d trade one WTC tower, or the Pentagon for the capitol and the scum in it anyday.
They can’t bablance a budget, can’t defend our borders, can’t even get together to fight a war. We all know why now, they are a bunch of perverted scum, death to them all, to hell with them all

Posted by: dave | October 3, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Ricky, Did it ever occur to you that these message logs came from someone other than foley, like…the person he sent them to? …

Posted by: Joe | October 3, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Foley violated the public trust, but to say he is a pedophile is overreacting. In England and most of Europe, for example, the age of consent is 16. People need to calm down and focus on the real issue – Foley and the Republicans are hypocrites.

Posted by: Bob | October 3, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Hey, VA resident – I haven’t heard any Republican defend this guy. In fact, he is gone already and went the day the news broke. Yet Barney Frank is still in Congress and Gary Studd was re-lected and both were defended by Democrats. It’s just a little hypocritical, don’t you think, as well as a case of selective Democratic indignation?

Posted by: Jim | October 3, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

What he did was disgusting and deserved to resign….but do you all remember the democratic senator who actually had sex with a page and was pardoned by Clinton, don’t make this political!!!!

Posted by: Bob | October 3, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

WOW! Internet SEX, unlike Stubbs, who got an under aged Male Page drunk, then had REAL SEX with him.
Too bad the “credible” and “objective” journalists let that one get away.
I believe they were advocates of “this kind of thing should not force a congressman to resign.”

Posted by: J. Evans | October 3, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

actually Lewenski was 24 yrs old. She was 22 yrs old when she first started to work at the white house. She was 24 yrs old when her affair started with Bill Clinton

Posted by: bcriss | October 3, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

I probably missed something somewhere but how or from whom did these instant messages come? Who saved them? How were they retrieved? And why are they being given to ABC and not to the proper authorities first? If the true motive is not political then these tapes could have been given directly to a prosecutor and not to ABC. Is this ABC’s way of getting a “scoop”? Hang out all the evidence in the newspapers? Well, he certainly has been proven guilty. No need of a trial here–forget the prosecutor. Just “hang ‘em high”.

Posted by: Wondering | October 3, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Lewinsky was 22, a college graduate and an adult, when she first met Clinton. As disgustingly stupid as that was of Clinton do to, there was nothing illegal about it.
Mike, any response?

Posted by: GOFD | October 3, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

sick, sick, sick!! foley should be arrested wherever he is hiding out at, just as all those alleged perverts where on all those dateline NBC stings were!! whats the difference, at least i dont see any. maybe some thin legal question, but i personally see nothing between those arrested on the spot for those offences, and this activity done by foley.

Posted by: jay | October 3, 2006, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

I hope Foley is prosecuted to the full extent of the law and does not receive any special treatment. He is the kind of sicko that Bill Clinton pardoned: Mel Reynolds a convicted child molester.

Posted by: Craig | October 3, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

This isn’t a party problem because a bit of research can turn up members of both who have lived thier lives guided by thier groins.
This is about one gay man’s inability to control his desire for underage boys combined with a culture of career politicians feeling entitled to live as they wish beyond the rules of us mere mortals.

Posted by: J | October 3, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

RitaN- Most IM programs keep logs of instant messages or store them automatically.

Posted by: vladykins | October 3, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

This has nothing at all to do with being a Democrat or a Republican. It is a case of a sexual deviant making his way into the Congress.
A common practice in parts of the Middle East, they are likely wondering why we keep trying to destroying ourselves.
This has occurred before. We really need to be more careful who we allow to be in a position of power.

Posted by: ShinyBrass | October 3, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

OK, can we all agree now that sex between someone over 18 and someone under 18 should be prosecuted? Or is this just a way for democrats to bash republicans? Where was the demand for democrats to resign? Clinton was certainly sexually harrassing an intern yet we hear no more about sexual harrassment in the workplace since that mess. It was only about sex. Foley (so far is guilty of writing disgusting emails) resigned immediately. Clinton hung on with the full protection of the democratic party who said it was his private life and only about sex. OK so she was not 16 years old. So what about Gerry Studds D-Mass who admitted having sex with an underage page? No call to resign by the dems and good ol Gerry continued to keep his job for another 13 years. If anyone does not know this is politics and smells of an October surprise with the willing media in hot pursuit they must not be able to add two plus two equals democrats behind the scenes. Didn’t barney frank of gay prostitution ring boyfriend fame threaten to out anyone who screwed with the gay agenda?

Posted by: joeh | October 3, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Okay Rita…so we’re blaming the messenger?

Posted by: Jacci | October 3, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

The people calling this an “attack on Republicans” are truly disgusting. That is what Fox News, and other individuals from the extreme right, are calling it.
/No Child’s Behind Left

Posted by: True Conservative | October 3, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Funny, same thing happened to a mayor in a small city in NY… he was soliciting 15 year old girls, and when he got caught and went to trial, blamed it on the alcohol. Incidentally, also a Republican. Apparently this is in the Republican handbook? (yes, it’s a sweeping generalization, but I had to say it)

Posted by: bob | October 3, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Wow. Set up? By his own arrogance, maybe. As a public official he, more than anyone, should know that the Internet is not Las Vegas. What happens there goes everywhere. Emails, IMs — everything is retrievable and it’s not that difficult, particularly on public systems. Even small municipalities have Internet rules and pollicies and have their own IT bureaus or departments that backup and otherwise store everything that happens. Email is monitored and I would imagine IMing would fall under that category. You’d have to be either beyond naive or beyond arrogant to presume otherwise. I think we can safely guess arrogance had some role to play. Pity the men who think themselves gods…
I do agree with some others who have posted that censures for all those who conspired to contain this story — regardless of party or affiliation — should at least be made, if not resignations and special elections. But I doubt we will see that level of accountability take place. It would be refreshing nonetheless.

Posted by: RowanF | October 3, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

The story couldn’t be released with so-called questionable timing if there was no story to release.
Foley is a pedophile predator, whether that was released in 2003, 5 weeks, 5 days or 5 hours before an election, the fact that Foley preyed on underage pages does not change.
There is no honor in protecting a pedophile and people that are doing so in the name of political loyalty need to have their heads examined.
Or maybe they’re just drunk.

Posted by: Chris Hanson | October 3, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Where do you draw the line? If Foley had IMed this filth to a young male over the age of consent, it would be okay? I guess so because then it’s just homosexual behavior and not pedophilia. That’s the difference between Barney Frank and Foley-Barney’s boys are older. According to the Democrats, Clinton would have been wrong if Monica had been a couple years younger, but because she was of the age of consent, it was okay!?? I guess bestiality is okay because we have no age of consent laws for animals? Deviant behavior outside of marriage to the opposite sex is deviant behavior.

Posted by: Jean | October 3, 2006, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

To me, it doesn’t matter if this happened in 2003 or last week. A crime is a crime, no matter when it happened. And if this did happen, then Foley should be brought to justice.

Posted by: Jon | October 3, 2006, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

To — Posted by: Mike | Oct 3, 2006 2:51:48 PM — Monica Lewinsky was 22 years old, not 19, a postgraduate intern, not a page, an adult woman participating in a consensual extramarital affair. That’s got it’s own problems, but abuse of a minor it’s not.

Posted by: el | October 3, 2006, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

To those who ask why it’s just coming out now . . . it would have come out a lot sooner if the House leadership had not worked so hard to cover it up all this time.

Posted by: Stevie | October 3, 2006, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Geez! How does anyone know these message exchanges are real and not phoney?
Ditn’t we all recently go through this kind of shock reporting with x-anchor man Dan Rather?

Posted by: John | October 3, 2006, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Can we say “hyperbole?”
Cheese and rice, you people sound like he raped a 5 year old.
16 years old is above the age of consent in most, if not all states. This may be a little creepy, because the guy is 53 years old, but lumping him in with real pedophiles (i.e. People who go for prepubescent children) does no one any good.
If anything he should be punished for his hypocrisy, but let’s put things in perspective here.

Posted by: andy | October 3, 2006, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Not sticking up for what Clinton and Monica did… However, they were both consenting adults. So, please don’t bring Clinton into this. THIS is completely different!!! Once the investigation is complete and Foley is a “legally” found to be a pedophile, he should be put away for a long time.

Posted by: Laura | October 3, 2006, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

First off if these IM’s are real then Foley is a sick man. But what I am wondering is how are these transcripts being verified? Does AOL have logs that can match time stamp and ip addresses? I mean really I can create the same transcripts with the same font and everything. And Foley has admitted that he has a drinking problem has he admitted that he had internet sex with teenagers? Keep in mind I am not defending Foley I am just interested.

Posted by: Jay | October 3, 2006, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

“Dateline” where are you when we need you? Shouldn’t this be a story for the “Predator” seris they have been doing? Those guys get LOCKED up for doing what Foley did. Only Foley did it with a REAL underaged individual. So why is he not behind bars?

Posted by: Deni | October 3, 2006, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

This is not about pedophilia. It is about pederasty. It is not kosher to mention this in America today. And I will be lambasted for speaking it, but pederasty and homosexual culture are closely connected.

Posted by: r | October 3, 2006, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Foley will get nothing but a slap on the wrist, and it’s not because he’s a Republican or a member of Congress. It’s because the laws against this sort of thing are embarassingly weak in this country. Molesting a child rarely gets a person more than a couple years in prison, even for repeat offenders.
Maybe the outrage over this comparatively minor crime will spur people to reconsider our child abuse penalties. Criminals get more time for stealing a car than they do for hurting a child.

Posted by: greg8898 | October 3, 2006, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Slander? Are you on crack? I’d like to see Foley sue ABC for “slander” for publishing these IM conversations. I’m sure he’d win.

Posted by: ashley | October 3, 2006, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

If you democrats are licking your chops over this….let me remind you that Monica Lewinsky was a page also when she was giving Bill a BJ in the Oval Office.

Posted by: Twarrior | October 3, 2006, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Foley resigned and entered himself into rehab. When Dems do this, they stay in office and often get re-elected. Now the media and the Dems want to take political advantage, and most of the willing idiots that have posted comments here go right along.

Posted by: Steve | October 3, 2006, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

He was set up, no one would keep all those messages unless there was a reason!!Rotten, really Rotten people out there!!
cyberland saves that stuff, it’s recorded in the memory of computers. funny that you are more concerned w/protecting a pedophile than busting him. all those people who don’t think 16 yr olds are children, i suppose you would feel that way if a 50 yr old guy were targeting your 16 yr old boy?
guess you party comes beofre your morals. yeah, you shine bright and clear.

Posted by: potter | October 3, 2006, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Finally postings from people who get it. What Foley did was disgusting, but not pedophelia…the kid was 16!!! old enough to consent to actual sex in many states!
What is more interesting is that someone sat on the information for over two years before making it public a few weeks before the elections.
That person needs to be found and charged with child endangerment!

Posted by: Tom | October 3, 2006, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

While the age of consent may be 16 in some locations, I’m not sure there is any state which allows men in their 50′s to copulate with teenagers, as most states limit the permissible age difference.

Posted by: scott | October 3, 2006, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

We as a nation are doomed, in no small part to ‘people’ like this that are in power.

Posted by: des | October 3, 2006, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

This is not about politics, it is about pedophilia, but yet the Dems can’t help making it about politics. Strange bed-fellows- no pun intended. Politicians by their very behavior and nature are prostitutes.

Posted by: Archie Collins | October 3, 2006, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Is pedophilia endemic white amerikan males?

Posted by: Sparky | October 3, 2006, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Who knew about these activities and when? Someone who leaked them obviously had knowledge of this illegal activity possibly even several years ago. Why aren’t they being accused as well?

Posted by: Teri | October 3, 2006, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Dave, it’s the GOP that has made this a political issue by not lifting a finger to either remove this sicko as the head of the missing and exploited children’s caucus or investigate further to see if any of the friendly emails were more than just that. GOP leadership swept this under the rug, and are now paying for it.
Along with Foley’s reprehensible (and possible criminal) behavior, that’s the issue here.

Posted by: GOFD | October 3, 2006, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Foley is a sicko and needs to be strung up along with the other sickos. But what is almost as bad is the selctive moral outrage being practiced by the politicos. In 83′ the democratic controlled house did no more than slap two members on the hand for banging underage pages. One of them never even acknolged doing anything wrong and continued to serve for another 13 years! At least Foley ran away in shame.

Posted by: RW | October 3, 2006, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Palm Beach must be real proud of this guy.So who needs to press charges and who CAN press charges..more of the same.people dragging their feet and not doing the right thing.And people complain about the cost of the war?? Look at the bang for the buck we get out of politicians…and that includes ALL of them.

Posted by: jon | October 3, 2006, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Two points – Two, this is not pedophilia. Look it up – pedophilia is an attraction to PREpubescents of either gender. Creepy & inappropriate yes, pedophia no. Two, there is no hint of coercion or deception in these IMs. It’s not like he was posing as someone else. The boys knew exactly what they were doing and who they were talking to. That doesn’t excuse his behavior – certainly he abused his power & influence, and squandered government time – but reading these IMs I see a two-way street. It should also be noted that the boys are NOT powerless ciphers – they had more power in the relationship. What power? The power to do cause what Foley’s public disgrace and possible imprisonment. Think about it.

Posted by: Martin | October 3, 2006, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

As bad as this case is, the kid was of the age of consent in DC. Though I think Foley obviously has issues this isn’t much different from zippergate.

Posted by: Mike | October 3, 2006, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

It’s a sad commentary on our society when predatory and perhaps criminal activity is seen as political. I am also horrified that public figures are using alcoholism as a catch-all excuse for their behavior, from pedophilia to anti-semitic comments. Shouldn’t we be modeling for our youth how to take responsibility for our actions and face the consequences instead of making lame excuses?

Posted by: Ashlee | October 3, 2006, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

What I find most offensive is that thre are so many idiots in this country (and a few on this board) that are more upset about this because the guy was a gay pedophile. Are you people actually saying if the kids had been girls we’d all be having a big laugh about this? The issue is pedophilia, dummies, not homosexuality, though I know whether it’s this, 911 or the cost of price of tea in China, you always find a way to blame it on gays!

Posted by: George | October 3, 2006, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

sounds like the rehap is a way to duck the reporters and avoid the press. No one mentioned that they thought he had a drinking problem. so the new seclusion from the press is rehap?

Posted by: mark | October 3, 2006, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

First, here’s what Mark Foley had the audacity to say about President Clinton when the Kenneth Starr report was released:
“It’s vile,” said Rep. Mark Foley, R-West Palm Beach. “It’s more sad than anything else, to see someone with such potential throw it all down the drain because of a sexual addiction.”
What’s worse, the Republican leadership tried to cover this up so they wouldn’t lost the Congressional seat in next month’s election. Fortunately, they are going to lose a lot more than one seat.
Throw the bums out!

Posted by: StevefromSacto | October 3, 2006, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Short memory?
Didn’t we go through this in the 80′s or 90′s with Congressman gary Studds when he had a homosexual relationship with a page?
Why didn’t anyone resign then? Why didn’t anyone demand his head? Were there even headlines?

Posted by: John | October 3, 2006, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

People bring up the Clinton/Lewinski relationship. Lewinski was no minor and at least is was a male/female assignation. Foley is a despicable predator who is hiding behind a bottle. ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE.

Posted by: jill | October 3, 2006, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Sick… This guy is a pervert of the worst kind. He should be put out of office now and in jail just as fast! I don’t care what political party he’s with… he shouldn’t be breathing free air. The Dem’s shouldn’t be using this as a chance to ding the GOP but should go after this sick-o with the full force of the Law! Don’t worry about political pasitioning, but rather focus in protecting our youth and the central good of the country. This is a repulsive thing that has been going on with Foley but to use it for political means is just as sick! Stay focused on putting this perv away for a long time.

Posted by: Rob | October 3, 2006, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Besides this being a minor, it was a person of authority using undue influence over someone they had an impact on. Yes, Monica was an adult, but Clinton had overt or covert influence over her career, as did a congressperson over a page. Regardless of if the issue was illegal, it was a moral and ethical lapse.

Posted by: CCK | October 3, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

As a Dem I certaintly taste blood on this one, but as they say…the scandal is in the cover up and not the “crime.” First off other than salicious exchanges on a computer it does not appear that Foley commited any crime. That needs to be clear. Of course its disgusting and all that, but if he didn’t touch anyone inappropriately, then he will not, and should not face any jail time.
Think of it like this: If I email someone saying “i want to kill someone” but don’t do it, should I be locked up?

Posted by: DenverGuy | October 3, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

I appreciate all of the work that Mr. Ross has done to uncover this terrible, terrible story. What we need to be doing now is not continuing to release all of this awful information, but be working just as hard to put this guy away and others like him.

Posted by: Cari | October 3, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Rove promised an October surprise during a speec at the American Enterprise Institute. Could you envision, “Karl Rove” written all over this? Why not if it achieves your political objective, throw one of your own under the bus. The American people will be watching this and the Iraq War will be of the cover page for a while. Democrats and the American People should not fall in this trap.

Posted by: josh | October 3, 2006, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

If one were to look at history, specifically, the fall of the Roman Empire, what is currently going on with the rulers of this country is only a repeat of history, and I fear is a prediction of dire things to come for our country and civilization as we know it . Things are going downhill in a hurry and It doesn’t appear that there’s much the common man can do to stop it. While I am as disgusted as the next person, I’m not really surprised.

Posted by: TL | October 3, 2006, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Will Foley really retire with a pension and health care ???

Posted by: dan | October 3, 2006, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

At the end of the day we as the American voters are responsible for the people we elect to represent us in our government
Isn’t it time for us to look and check carefully at the candidates that this 2 corrupt parties select and put in front us to vote for
The message must be that this is the time to brake up the hold of this corrupt parties by electing independent candidates
To congress to move toward a real multi choice democracy as being experienced in other parts of the world.

Posted by: kooshy | October 3, 2006, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

AS AN AMERICAN AND A FATHER OF TWO CHILDREN I AM SPEECHLESS AND OUTRAGED.HOW CAN OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN?ALL THE WARNING SIGNS WERE THERE.
IT IS SAD THAT THEY PLACE THEIR OWN SELFISH AMBITIONS ABOVE INNOCENT CHILDREN.THE ENTIRE CONGRESS IS TO BLAME.HAVE WE LOST SIGHT OF WHAT IS GOOD? GOD,FAMILY AND COUNTRY.

Posted by: RANDY | October 3, 2006, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

I cannot believe that Foley’s lawyer issued that statement that said was should “focus on the good Foley has done while in office” and that he is in “no way, shape or form a pedophile” That is a ludacris statement and an insult to the American people’s intelligence. So maybe the guy didn’t actually go as far as to actually touch children, but he’s a sexual predator to say the very least, and should be charged accordingly.

Posted by: Samantha | October 3, 2006, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

GROPER GOPERS
When caught these days they claim DRUNK.. well it doesn’t cut cheese in the real world when six-pack joe gets caught!
I wonder if Foley will get his pension & insurance after this?
I think those who knew & cover-up during the 2002-2004 election process, should all go to jail and we should now Take back Congress due to Voting FRAUD by illegal witholding of NAUGHTY EMAILING EVIDENCE from a guy who was passing the very bill he was busy breaking!!! ;o)
ah just think if a Democrat congressman had done this? just think?
24/7 heads would roll.. instead of DUCK n Cover..

Posted by: chil420 | October 3, 2006, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Studds is remembered chiefly for his role in the 1983 Congressional page sex scandal, when he and Representative Dan Crane were censured by the House of Representatives for separate sexual relationships with a minor – in Studds’s case, a 1973 relationship with a 17-year-old male congressional page. The relationship was consensual, but violated age of consent laws and presented ethical concerns relating to working relationships with subordinates.

Posted by: Remember | October 3, 2006, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Ahhh, you have to love republicans and the way they eventually implode. The man is DISGUSTING… I cringed when I read the sampling of the txt msg. Next?

Posted by: E.C. | October 3, 2006, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Those saying Foley should be put in jail must be basing that on the offer of alcohol; the legal age of consent in Washington DC is 16. What Foley did was morally wrong, certainly, but at least the sexual part appears legal.

Posted by: Brainster | October 3, 2006, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

To the person that commented “Anyone who is looking at this as an “attack on Republicans” by the ‘leftist Democrats’ needs to get off the Bush Bandwagon long enough to realize that this is about PEDOPHELIA and not politics!”. WAKE UP. Democrats (aka Libs) sat on this information and allowed children to be victimized for the sole perpose of using the information as political ammunition for the upcoming election. If you would get off the Cinton Bandwagon for a moment you would realize that there is a huge double standard here. Folies boys were 16 (age of concent) as was Monica (19). What this man did is a travisty, but lets stop the hipocracy!!!

Posted by: Mike | October 3, 2006, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

The guy is sick, he needs to be put in jail, and yes, it’s just another example of this ‘epidemic’ going on in America (maybe it’s just coming to light and has always been here, like gays used to be). At any rate, it’s NOT normal behaviour with anyone under the age of 18! Are you people crazy???

Posted by: Cate | October 3, 2006, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Foley should be thoroughly investigated, as should House and party leadership, to find out the extent to which crimes were committed, if at all. That several people here choose to politicize this, or choose to dismiss the incident as mere politics, is very disheartening.
That similar incidents have happened before, may have happened before, or are being compared to the current situation is simply foolish and misleading: a crime is alledged, and appropriate steps need to be taken. Anything that came before from this side or that side simply doesn’t change that fact. Our system of government doesn’t allow a “gimmee” for me and my side, of equal magnitude to some failure of yours. There is only law and punishment for failure to adhere to it. Don’t like it; change it.
Remember it is the teenagers who were the victims here, not Republicans or Democrats.

Posted by: Tom A | October 3, 2006, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Foley was clearly a pedophile,a drunk and a liar. It makes me ill to think that he was engaging in pedophilia while voting on important issues such as the war in Iraq. Also, I can’t help but wonder if this issue would have received the same attention were he IMing with a younger female. This is a crystal clear expample of what is plaguing this country on so many levels. I hope that November will bring about new leadership in Washington. Can’t wait for 2008!!

Posted by: Annie | October 3, 2006, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

One question I would be asking is – How exactly is ABC getting these im logs? Are the boys he had them with providing them or has somebody hacked into private computers to obtain them – which is a crime in itself.

Posted by: Rick | October 3, 2006, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Its people like this who are parasites of society. Theres only one solution for this type of behavior, exile. I hope my generation will have a new and better method of extensively examining elected federal officials already in office and those who are coming into office. This is the greatest nation in the world and that means we need the best leaders to interpret our laws and symbolize our country. Let me say to the rest of the world that this particular case of unacceptable behavior in our government has been sought out, and hopefully will be put through our justice system. Don’t feel embarassed as I initially did my fellow patriots. Let us be glad that this man has been caught and let us hope that the good people of our nation will always outnumber and destroy the bad.

Posted by: Scott | October 3, 2006, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

According to some sources, the age of consent is 16 in D.C. This is in conflict with the “Values” of America. Can these guy get away with this???

Posted by: CLAYTON | October 3, 2006, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Where was all the outrage when Sudds (D) from Mass actually had sex with a page back in 1983? He never resigned and served congress until ’95 or ’96. I agree Foley is a pig and should be behind bars but all the Dems screaming about how bad Reps. are can’t have it both ways.

Posted by: HM | October 3, 2006, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

I don’t see anyone asking the obvious question: Why is it so often the case that those who preach loudest about morality are those most firmly in the grip of vice? Foley got on his soapbox often about registering sex offenders and protecting abused children. It’s a common pattern.
The same goes for those who constantly rail in public against homosexuality — my impression is that those, like me, who aren’t homosexual don’t worry too much about gays threatening my marriage.
It raises some interesting questions. In general, the more someone goes on about morality and “family values”, the more I wonder whether they’re hiding something.

Posted by: Grant | October 3, 2006, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

The Catholic Church learned the hard way. Big Brothers/Big Sisters will learn. The Boy Scouts are still being pressured. Don’t ask, don’t tell. The consequences are coming to light. Now the Republicans are to blame. What irony ? ? ? ?

Posted by: Not Surprised | October 3, 2006, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Last time I got drunk I still didnt want to hit on young boys! He has more problems than just drinking.

Posted by: CB | October 3, 2006, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

This seems awefully tame for Internet sex. Yes, it was inappropriate. But it is pretty normal IM chat. If he acted on this, I say hang him.
I was all for prosecuting Mel Reynolds back in 2000. He was a congressman from Illinois that got caught having sex with a couple of 16 year old girls. The amazing thing was that Clinton pardoned him. I say lock anyone up having sex with underage people and make the punishment without parole. If you cross the line a second time, throw away the key.

Posted by: Paul | October 3, 2006, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Just to clarify, it was reported on the news last night that the Speaker kept this information secret, NONE of the Dem party leaders knew of Foley’s problem, and yes, obviously he knows he has a problem if he resigned and is blaming alcohol.

Posted by: AP in Wash | October 3, 2006, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

I don’t care if Foley is a Democrat or a Republican. Infact, I could careless if it is a Democrat or a Reppublican that covered this up. This is about our children and whoever is responsible for with holding this information or sweeping under the rug, should face criminal charges and resign from their seat immidiately. Let’s not finger point. Let’s get the facts and arrest whoever is responsible.

Posted by: RSF | October 3, 2006, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

What’s truly discouraging is that attention is being drawn away from the true issues our country faces. We are actively engaged in multiple conflicts, we’re enduring an energy crisis, and our economy is shaky at best. Are we to determine the future of our country based on the “flavor-of-the-month” scandals that are presented to us to consume prior to when we make a decision for who we want elected to run our country? Our current political environment is poisonous and bleak. We should all call for a vote of no confidence.

Posted by: Tim | October 3, 2006, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

He is in “rehab” for alcoholism for a very simple reason people…out of the spotlight, no interviews to give, no reporters on his doorstep, no press conferences to give…he can stay incognito until after the election. His rehab is what, 8 weeks? Hmmm, election is in 5 weeks. Probably was hoping this might blow over but instead it has blown up.

Posted by: houstonray | October 3, 2006, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

“Geez! How does anyone know these message exchanges are real and not phoney?”
GEEZ Jon — Foley resigned so quickly why? Get a clue.

Posted by: Vaughn D. Taylor | October 3, 2006, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

House Republican leaders had had over 10 months to investigate Rep. Foley and to clear the house. If they had done that, this news would not have become an “October Surprise”. Instead, as in the case of Tom DeLay, they looked the other way despite repeated warnings or mounting public pressure. It is their ignorance, ineptitude, and stupidity that this news blew up in their face, why blame the messenger – media, for exposing it?
What is the difference between Mr. Foley, who preyed on young pages while he was the chairman of Missing and Exploited children committee, and Mr. Dick Cheney, who screwed American public by having closed door meetings with big oil companies while drafting energy bills?

Posted by: Phoebe | October 3, 2006, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

The sickest part of all was the snow job he put forth on the American people and other members of congress daily while on that special committee to fight child sexual predators.
Talk about being in denial!

Posted by: BeBe | October 3, 2006, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

We, the American people, should not rest until every one of the congressional, judicial, and administrative personnel that knew about and covered this up are out of office. It makes me sick to my stomach that these pedophiles and their friends are running our country. Then, this pedophile. Foley, tries to turn things around by entering alcohol rehab. I guess he’s only a pedophile when he’s drunk. DISGUSTING.

Posted by: Burke | October 3, 2006, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Well I’ll be damned! The Miami Herald is right in the middle of the Foley cover-up just like the House Republican leadership. The paragon of press virtue had access to Foley’s e-mails last year just like Hastert.
Folks here’s how the paper pardons itself,”Our decision at the time was … that because the language was not sexually explicit and was subject to interpretation, from innocuous to ‘sick,’ as the page characterized it, to be cautious,” said Tom Fiedler, executive editor of the Herald. “Given the potentially devastating impact that a false suggestion of pedophilia could have on anyone, not to mention a congressman known to be gay, and lacking any corroborating information, we chose not to do a story.”
Just like the House enablers of Foley, The Herald chose to be so “cautious” with the story that Foley went on for another year trolling for young boys.

Posted by: Carolyn | October 3, 2006, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

It is pretty clear from the excerpts that have been released that the boys involved had little interest in Foley and were perhaps even just letting the situation play out so the truth about him could come out. I think they participated in this as a means to get him caught. Foley should be ashamed.

Posted by: Nicole | October 3, 2006, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

While I feel Foley is sick and should be arrested, I don’t see any evidence that the leadership knew the content of any emails and nothing Foley has done changes my political philosophy oif lower taxes and national defense, so I will just vote for a republican replacement for the perv.

Posted by: Tiffany | October 3, 2006, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Jail?
When are we going to learn. He should be in jail in general population. With everyone.
Sick. I am disgusted. Republican here and already wrote my congressional representatives asking all to resign if they knew.
Time to clean house and get this element out of our society. I am in favor of all pedophiles being released into general population. If they survive, then they can get some freaking counseling later.
Oh and blaming this on drinking is a cheap slam on alcoholics. I am recovering for 20+ years.

Posted by: Jimmythefish | October 3, 2006, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

So the timing is bad for the GOP? (Forget that this story is about a powerful Congressman preying on children – actually using the page program to recruit new teens! BTW, in case you’ve forgotten, the GOP is the party of family values).
It seems to me that the GOP leadership was in control of the timing. If they had acted responsibly and morally, this story would be history right now.

Posted by: Mom2 | October 3, 2006, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

What Foley is exhibiting in these cases is technically neither pedophilia nor adult homosexuality, even if he is an adult homosexual also. It is ephebophilia: sexual attraction for and action with teens. As with some many Catholic priests, it is homosexual ephebophilia, since it’s with his own gender.

Posted by: RLA Schaefer | October 3, 2006, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

You all act suprised by this story but if you were to read in the bible it clearly states that “Satan is the leader of the governments on earth. GOD is the leader of the governments in Heaven”. Where do you think these people get there direction from? It only makes sense that they would do the things they do. None of them have any moral backing. All of them have a personnal agenda. And you people act supprised, outraged, disgusted. Wake up! You are the ones that support them. You are just as guilty.

Posted by: Heidi | October 3, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Profile data on pedophiles is kept in every state thru the Department of Health and Human Services. In EVERY STATE, the profile data on pedophiles shows over 90% of molestation activity to be a middle-age, white, HETROSEXUAL male with two or more childrent that has been married at least 5-7 years. Those of you who are SO DESPERATE to blame every child abuse case on Gay Americans are committing cultural slander; and it ain’t cutting it any more. Go find some one else to hate, Gay Americans aren’t putting up with it any more.

Posted by: Alma Jackson | October 3, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

He’s sick – that’s not in question. The question is why does all this info just “trickle” out? If the people who knew about this wanted to protect children, it would all be on the table. The way that there is a new round of IM’s every few days, it APPEARS this is becoming more and more about politics.

Posted by: RKirch | October 3, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

And the Republicans preach morality and family values to the rest of the country?

Posted by: KS | October 3, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

So, now that this has happened, it’s clear what the next course of action will be for the GOP.
First, blame actions on some sort of dependency, perhaps alcoholism or drug addiction. Second, blame the internet, specifically the instant messaging programs that make this activity possible. Next, blame movies and television programs that feature teens and children provocatively. Finally, make sure everyone knows that you are best buddies with Jesus and that everything will be okay.
But, NEVER, under any circumstances, should you admit fault. Being wrong is not an option.

Posted by: Mr. Fancypants 2000 | October 3, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

The timing of this is interesting. This/ these teens sure don’t appear to be victims, more like mutually consensual. Could this have been a setup by Dems? Pay the kid to entice Foley, since the ‘secret’ he is gay was all over D.C.?? Why don’t the kid’s parents want charges filed? I smell money.

Posted by: Skeptic | October 3, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

If you don’t believe evil is alive in the world, you just aren’t paying attention. Rather than blame people and acuse people, focus on personal redemption and being who Christ has called us to be.

Posted by: Paul | October 3, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

HE IS SICK, BUT NOT ONLY THIS GUY SO MANY LIKE THIS IN HERE,BEST THING IS GIVE HIM A HARD PUNISHMENT THEN NEXT TIME OTHER PEOPLE THINK BEFORE THEY DO THIS KIND OF UNHUMAN ACTIVITIES.

Posted by: MOHAMMAD | October 3, 2006, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Everyone really needs to wake up, and realize that sick people are in the world. Some are liberal, some are conservative. As a survivor of abuse from a family member, I can positively say that there is no possible way for parents to keep their children safe from everyone who could hurt them. Just raise your children to know what to look for, and punish those who betray the legal bounds with their sickness and abuse.

Posted by: Susan | October 3, 2006, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Wow! Two MsOC (Patrick Kennedy and Mark Foley) both going into rehab when they got caught in a wrong. Is this going to appear as a new defense for other scumbags when they are apprehended? Kennedy’s driving (hereditary?) got him in trouble; Foley, for turning a page (no pun intended).

Posted by: disgusted | October 3, 2006, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

This whole think is a stunt by Democrat party.

Posted by: BIll | October 3, 2006, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

While I feel Foley is sick and should be arrested, I don’t see any evidence that the leadership knew the content of any emails and nothing Foley has done changes my political philosophy of lower taxes and national defense, so I will just vote for a republican replacement for the perv.

Posted by: Tiffany | October 3, 2006, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

I am totally disgusted by Foley’s behavior. I also agree that those (Reps. AND Dems) that knew and withheld the information should also be censured (I wish that meant fired!). I also hope that this horrible incident does not give people another reason to hate homosexuals. My partner (of 15 years) and I are deeply disturbed by these events and hope that ours sons (15 & 17) would never find themselves in this kind of jeopardy. Before anyone forms a lynch mob please remember that most homosexuals are hard working, tax paying, law abiding, military serving, and even church going citizens. We are equally as disgusted and concerned about this tragedy!

Posted by: Matt in NC | October 3, 2006, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

That is a great point CLAYTON. This is something that both repubs / dems must aknowledge.

Posted by: Roy | October 3, 2006, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

I am as outraged as the next person (Democrat or Republican) about the alleged behavior of Mr. Foley. It is unfortunate that our society has spun into a mindset that anything reported on a website or cable news network is 100% fact before it is confirmed. That said, I would caution the media and the public from jumping to conclusions before the facts are verified.

Posted by: A Concerned Virginian | October 3, 2006, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Henceforth, I suggest that the “I was drunk” alibi be called the “Mark Foley / Mel Gibson defense.”

Posted by: Zartregu | October 3, 2006, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Thank God that ABC got the information out to the public. We would have never heard of this story had the page went to the authorities first. Scare tactics will let any evil prevail. Remember that….

Posted by: T | October 3, 2006, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

The sordid case of Congressman Foley shows what a bunch of hypocrites the Republicans really are. They impeach Clinton for lying about his girlfriend but they do nothing about a child molester in their own ranks just to SAVE a house seat. If there was ever any doubt about the arrogance, corruption, and hypocrisy of the Republican Congress this should remove all doubt. Time to throw the bums out. The do-nothing Congress does little more than to rubber-stamp the failed policies of a do-wrong president.

Posted by: NorCalRuss | October 3, 2006, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

One word “FINISHED”.
Bye, Bye…..
Game over.

Posted by: maui | October 3, 2006, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

I am a staunch conservative. My first vote when I turned 18 was for Reagan and I have not stopped voting Republican since then, and I vote in Every election. That being said I would be repulsed by any Republican that said this was a political hit. This guy is sick, deviant, and I am shocked he did not end up on one of those Dateline specials. He needs to be locked up and registered as a sex offender. For Republicans to demand anything less would only make them hippocritical as a party that allies itself as being tough on crime.

Posted by: KEN FLASK | October 3, 2006, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

A couple of comments:
This isn’t a Republican vs. Democrat issue. It’s about immoral interaction with minors – period.
To be sure, Clinton lied about his interaction with Monica Lewinsky. But she was a consenting adult. And, as I recall, the Republicans went after him because they saw the political gain. Why the uproar when the Democrats try to do the same?

Posted by: Robert | October 3, 2006, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Foley is getting hit so hard because “protecting children” was how he marketed himself as a lawmaker.

Posted by: Nancy | October 3, 2006, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

we need to start thinking about mandatory term limits for these people. they get to comfortable and use “our house” and institutions as their personal playground. anyone with prior knowledge should be removed and prosecuted.

Posted by: patrick | October 3, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Some of you people are flat out crazy. Just because one guy did something the entire party is NOT corrupt. I vote based on a core belief system. One guy doing this isn’t all of a sudden going to make me think we should bail on Iraq, appease our enemies, acknowledge enemies, think gay marriage is ok, think we should ban guns, raise taxes, become an athiest, and legalize pot!
Bottom line Foley is wrong for what he did. So are a lot of liberals in power for laws they break. It happens on BOTH sides so get over yourselves. All of us have to admit when someone in power does something like this that it’s wrong. EVEN if you vote for their party. Call them on it.

Posted by: John | October 3, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Interesting that Focus on the Family’s news website describes Foley’s actions as “dalliance”, which according to Websters is defined as: an act of dallying: as a: PLAY; esp: amorous play b: frivolous action: TRIFLING. I can’t imagine them being so blythe had the perp been a Dem or liberal. What hypocrites.

Posted by: Susan | October 3, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

well being born in asia and been living in this country for 13 years I realize that the US law is so confusing…in some states such as Utah, Colorado where polygamy is allowed..an aldult can get married with a minor even under 16 and it is totally acceptable…16 year old to me is “aldult” enough to know what is right or wrong..wouldn’t it be any different if Foley had done it with an 18 year old? or would it be ok if 16 is a legal age which is true in some countries in Eupore…
And we are also comingle this scandal and politics..I don’t think this has anything to do with politics…

Posted by: taisaome | October 3, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

I believe 15 is the age of consent for sex in the District. Disgusting, yes. Unusual, I think not. Illegal…remains to be seen. Relevant to the political debate? Not at all. BTW, Democrats stay in office when caught in similar scandals, some are even proud of it. Some get presidential pardons and go on to become Chicago youth counsellors.

Posted by: Frank | October 3, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

If anybody is honest with themselves it will come down to one thing. Guilt is guilt. ANYTIME ANY minor is put in this situation it is criminal. Why any body would bring up Clinton over this belies their sheeple mentality to keep their party in power and be truth be damned and the hell with facts. For many it is easy to say ‘don’t confuse me with the facts”. Well, guess what? The one undeniable fact is this man is a proven Pedophile now and any body who protected him committed a felony. I am a conservative independant and have seen the conservatives taken over by scum CLAIMING to be Christian Conservatives. They are Demons in my eye.

Posted by: Bill | October 3, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Here’s (yet another)congressman, for heaven’s sake, as evidence that homosexuals can and do prey on children. Makes you nauseated to think that gay rights and same-sex marriage advocates are hoodwinking the courts into letting them, and the pedophiles among them, adopt children.
I now have no confidence whatsoever in our government agencies’ abilities to protect children from sexual predators. If the powerful U.S. Congress can’t detect and deter pervert members from preying on children, how can we citizens possibly expect underfunded, overworked social workers to identify homosexual pedophiles posing as prospective parents?
Shame on everyone in Congress who knew about this pervert, knew he had been sending children inappropriate emails and never bothered to follow up. How shocking that the pages approached by this weirdo were never asked about the IMs by House leadership. Every one of them is guilty of child endangerment and has been an accessory to this pedophile.

Posted by: Cindy | October 3, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

This whole thing stinks. I don’t know what’s true and what’s not and won’t pretend to, but why are we at all surprised? DC has been morally bankrupt for years. Politicians on both sides lie, steal, coerce, and manipulate so much that we expect it. The media protracts, embellishes, hides, and ignores what doesn’t fit their own agenda. So why the outrage now?
People are obvioulsy very worked up about this. Probably some of the same people who support children’s right to privacy, minor’s abortion on demand, homosexuality, free love, amoral education, and acceptance of all “loving” behavior. If this was consenual, which it appears to be based on the above IM, then why would we have a right to impose our morals on them? We tell Christians all the time that they can’t impose their morals, but now it seems as if a whole bunch of us are doing exactly that. Can we have it both ways? Seems like we want it that way.
IMO, if it’s true it’s disgusting, but afterall it’s my opinion which in reality is meaningless.

Posted by: brian | October 3, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Isn’t this the same thing that democrat Barny Frank did? On no, he actually had sex with the pages and he is still there!

Posted by: Bob | October 3, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Groper Gopers,
First, Dem congressmen have been caught doing this also. THEY were censured by a Democratic congress and went right back to their corrupt congressional seat without missing a beat.
HOW LONG has this e-mail mess been known by those who brought it to light just before this election? Appears this would be termed an ‘accessory’ to a crime! Lock ‘em all up, including those who broke the story. You can’t convince me that they haven’t been sitting on this waiting for the right time to spring it!!

Posted by: JB | October 3, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

We have substitute teachers engaging in sex with students. We have pedofiles hunting minors on myspace.com. Now we have congressman partaking in sexually explicit, homosexual acts with a monor. WHY THE HECK IS THIS GUY NO IN JAIL????? Congress is supposed to protect Americans, but especially the children of America. They should be held to the highest of standards, to which they have taken an oath. He should be picked up from rehab and booked on child endangerment charges!!

Posted by: James | October 3, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

I think this is totally disgusting and for all members that kept it quiet they are just as guilty as he is. They should serve time for harbouring a criminal.
Alcohol is just an excuse not a reason!
The only remorse the sob has is getting caught!!

Posted by: Carole Clarke | October 3, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

What about all the other hundreds and thousands of children who this Republican Congressman *didn’t* go after?
Doesn’t he get credit for that?

Posted by: Mia | October 3, 2006, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Once again, elected Republican Party officials are exhibiting behavior that the rules either don’t apply to them and that covering up potential scandals that could cost the party seats is the priority. This latest scandal involving Rep. Mark Foley and his sexually explicit instant messages and inappropriate emails sent to male children proves that the Republican Party makes decisions based upon what they consider are for the good of the party and that they couldn’t care less about the public. Teachers are required to report suspected inappropriate actions towards children as a condition of employment. Do we expect less from our elected officials? And let’s call this what it is; this is a pedophile and these are children working as pages. To say anything less makes it seem as though it really isn’t that serious. Immediately, the Republicans should stop accusing Democrats of politicizing this issue. The Republicans did that the second they knew of this and chose to exclude the one Democrat that was on the committee. Foley and those that helped to cover this up be prosecuted by the very laws that he helped to enact.

Posted by: Robin | October 3, 2006, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

As a life-long Republican I am so angry at this crowd of morons that I could spit wooden nickels. They deserve to be tossed out on their ears for letting us down at a time when we should be celebrating the successes of all that we Conservatives worked and voted for in the 90′s. Instead, we have pork, corruption, no achievements, and ass covering.
I don’t necessarily blame Bush and still support him. But, this Congress blows. Pelosi and company are no alternative and even more depressing.
The term ‘Republican Leadership’ is an oxymoron….

Posted by: Tom Devine | October 3, 2006, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

IM’s for most Internet Services are usually Archieved and available to the sender to retrieve and review going back a few years. So for the folks who asked, they’re not “saved” by the sender but by the Service..if you ever sent one, you should be able to find it relatively easy.
The guy’s an addict—only not with liquor but with sex and sex directed at the wrong audience.
He’s as guilty as all the men who show up on the DateLine stings and needs to be treated as any other American doing the same thing–if in fact it is proven he set up in person meetings for sex.

Posted by: Billyboy | October 3, 2006, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

barf

Posted by: Anon | October 3, 2006, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

“This whole think is a stunt by Democrat party.”
This is supposed to be funny, right? You honestly don’t care about what Foley did, but just want to write it off as a political stunt?

Posted by: Mom2 | October 3, 2006, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

1. Because its boys this makes the news? How long has this type of thing gone on with female pages and nothing was reported? It is somehow “OKay” for congressmen to have these conversations with girls.
2. Blame the gays again, because striaghts cannot be pervers.
3. If the leadership was aware something was going on, why did they not investigate further and uncover the depth of the issue instead of avoiding it so they could claim ignorance?

Posted by: Bt | October 3, 2006, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Alcohol is a “sympton” not and “excuse.”

Posted by: Dan Fraser | October 3, 2006, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Yes, Foley is repugnant. Having said that… Today’s WSJ: “Mr. Foley’s explicit emails — which were sent to a former page who had returned home — clearly crossed the line into “vile and repulsive,” as Mr. Hastert put it yesterday. And the Floridian has now resigned in disgrace and is being criminally investigated. This is harsher treatment than was meted out in the past to some Members of Congress who crossed another line and actually had sexual relations with underage pages. Democrat Gerry Studds of Massachusetts was censured in 1983 for seducing a male teenage page, but remained in the House for another 13 years and retired, according to the Boston Globe, with a rich pension.”

Posted by: DoubleStandard | October 3, 2006, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

He should stand in a court room like anyone else who lures teens into that sort of thing, from the sounds of it, he had been with the boy before, not just in cyberland…why wasn’t he arrested like others are when they commit such acts! makes me glad my kids cannot be pages in congress. As a mother I would be afraid to send them to DC now.

Posted by: McGee | October 3, 2006, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Where there’s smoke there’s fire. Aren’t we all waiting to find out what ELSE happened?

Posted by: Linda | October 3, 2006, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

To begin with, we still have some semblance of a Judicial system, innocent until prover guilty IN A COURT OF LAW!! That means ALL parties involved. Some of the posters are right, it’s not a political thing. It has to do with POSSIBLE pedophilia. Not sure if it is because I don’t know the laws in that State. In any case, GET OFF THIS REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT THING. You can find scum on both sides of the isle. If your one of the ones trying to attach blame on one side of the isle or the other, YOUR in trouble, you can’t even see the real problem!!!

Posted by: Miker | October 3, 2006, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

I would like to know where Rush Limbaugh gets off blaming this on the pages. This over weight pill popper is just as guilty to put these thoughts on the air waves as Foley was. This is not and should not be political it’s both parties making it that way. Remember if your in your out don’t vote for the incumbent

Posted by: Guy | October 3, 2006, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Why isn’t an arrest and a Trial pending here? Also why was Foley not fired especially if there’s evidence that he sent these emails were sent at work? Someone, please help me understand!!!!!

Posted by: kay | October 3, 2006, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

And they wanted to impeach Clinton for consensual sex. BS hypocrites. At least he didnt kill 100′s in a stupid war

Posted by: ss | October 3, 2006, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

no matter how many ways this is story is wrote. its not going to make me sweep all gops with one brush its not going to make me vote for dems how many ways can you tell the same story

Posted by: toner | October 3, 2006, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

I’m pretty sure I’d be fired just for READING the IM’s at my job!

Posted by: CO | October 3, 2006, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

H A D E N O U G H ?????????
Vote Democratic!
Grandmother of 4, Great-Grandmother of 3.

Posted by: alice | October 3, 2006, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Foley’s behavior is sick and disgusting, and if the Republican leadership had any whiff of the extent of it, they are culpable too. I do have to wonder why, knowing the nature of what was going on, Brian Ross was “too busy” with Katrina and 9/11 anniversary stories to “get around to this.” Was HE not concerned at the possibility of other youngsters being exposed to Foley’s predatory behavior? Is there not a stench in the fact that Ross waited until just before the midterm election to let loose his stink bomb? If Hastert et al are guilty, so is Brian Ross, perhaps more so since he apparently had access to more than the suggestive emails the House leaders had seen. Before condemning the leaders, we’ve got to remember that hostile media (St. Pete Times doesn’t exactly love republicans)and the FBI had examined the emails and found them not rising to the level needed for exposure or action.

Posted by: Yaldah | October 3, 2006, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

This demands western style justice. String this guy up and apply a pruning hook in an appropriate manner.

Posted by: Jason | October 3, 2006, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

HE WAS FIGHTING TO GET PORNAPRAPHY OFF OF THE INTERNET BECAUSE HE HATED THE COMPETITION!!!!

Posted by: TOM | October 3, 2006, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Wouldn’t it be great if the democrats would attack terrorists the way they attack the Republicans?
More dirty tricks from the
party of dirty tricks!

Posted by: Tom | October 3, 2006, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Simple matter – not conservative nor liberal:
1) Foley is off the leash and a child predator;
2) Parents of one kid complain to
House Leadership which happens to be REPUBLICAN
3) They do nothing. Just like every other potential scandal or misdeed by Republicans during this congress, including the whole list.
4) This one is the worst and now they give up power because the people won’t stand for it
Now those of us who think its about time and would have thrown ‘em out years ago are on the same page. This is just part of the pattern exposed in books by Richard Clarke, The Ex Treasury Secty, and others! The Rovites will never fire anybody, but the people of this country definitely will!

Posted by: Greg Marx | October 3, 2006, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

The comments regarding pedophilia are misplaced. This is pederasty, sex between adults and post pubescent teens. If these were 17 yr old females I do not think the outrage would be as great. Thus he is not a pedophile. I think what no one wants to say is that this is of a homosexual nature. I really think that is what really disgusts people. And…it is disgusting. Moreover, it appears so far that certain members of congress only knew about the emails which were not that revealing. If they knew about the IMs then that is a different story and off with their heads. But I doubt they knew. I think judgment must be withheld until you know.

Posted by: MO Resident | October 3, 2006, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

This is sad. As a father of two children 3 and 2, I was hoping to get my kids in to American political system. After I read this, I am not going to allow my kids to be abused by elected officials like this. What the hell were all the leaders of the house thinking? You all need to go to hell, not just jail.

Posted by: Sam | October 3, 2006, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

This country is so guilt ridden with sex. And we all got here that way.

Posted by: steve | October 3, 2006, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

I agree Foley is a sick pervert using his power to prey on the powerless and should be fully prosecuted, just as Bill Clinton should have been when he hit on an intern while occupying the most powerful position in the world.

Posted by: Janet | October 3, 2006, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

He should not get his congressional pension. That is how we can punish him.

Posted by: nam | October 3, 2006, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

If a fair investigation finds that others in Congress knew of these exchanges and covered it up and/or stalled on it, they too should be booted from office. This appears to be disturbing evidence of the vilest corruption, typical of entrenched office holders.

Posted by: Mark | October 3, 2006, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

IMs are stored on the ISP server. They dont disappear. A simple subpoena to Yahoo, or a similar company can get old IMs

Posted by: Yo | October 3, 2006, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Politics, Politics, Politics. What this guy did was wrong and he resigned. But that doesn’t satisfy the democrats. They want to smear all republicans with this. The democrats had members that had sexual scandals with pages and Barney Frank’s boy friend ran a prostitution ring out of his house. Of course Barney had no knowledge of this. And what do Democrats do, they beat the drums of morality. What a joke. Democrats the party of homosexual marriage, abortion on demand and pro terrorist civil rights advocacy. Give me a break.

Posted by: KK | October 3, 2006, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

You cannot blame this on the Democrats. Foley did it, other Republicans knew he was doing it. They did nothing to stop it. They should be investigated and forced to resign also. If they had been Democrats, then the same punishment. Its funny to once again see the Republicans turn this around to say the Democrats are playing on it. Hell yes they are, the Republicans would have done the same thing. The Democrats really dont have to do a thing, just sit back, keep their mouths shut, and watch the Republicans screw up, as they have been for almost 8 years. They are doing themselves in. They are the new “Keystone Cops”. But I dont recall a “village idiot” in the Keystone gang…Oh well…always room for George W.

Posted by: Mark | October 3, 2006, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Why is this sick person not in jail?

Posted by: Lisa | October 3, 2006, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

In my opinion, Foley is a Power Creep. Any person or persons who knowingly looked the other way should be charged with complicity.
This makes our whole nation look bad, but the worse part is those kid’s who were manipulated by a sick creep like Foley.
Anyone in any party who tries to use this situation for political gain, should be forced to resign and be placed on a sex offender registry.
See how fast the smear campaign would stop!

Posted by: Jack Meove | October 3, 2006, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

when will republicans wake up and stop defending all these idiots like cunningham, delay, foley, abramoff, etc. etc. etc… and stop repeating old trickle down economics ad nauseum…. time for a change in congress… time for checks and balances again… vote democrat!

Posted by: eric | October 3, 2006, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

To Eli:
Since when is adultery legal? You claim President clinton and m. lewinsky had consensual sex and that it was legal. Since when is it legal to have and adulterous sex affair in the White house legal? You liberals have nerve. A pervert is a pervert no matter what age or persuasion you want to color it. This foley debacle is nothing less than a political party trying to bring the other down before November voting begins! To Lee: I agree wholeheartedly with you. This is an example of what is wrong with our morally bankrupt nation. There is not a day that goes by that you don’t read of an adult that preys upon children. Just look at the number of public school teachers convicted of criminal behavior since the year 2000 in this nation or the number of priests convicted of molesting young boys. foley is a microcosm of of his surroundings. My prediction is that he (foley)is just the tip of the iceberg and more heads will roll from the fallout of this tragic waste of taxpayers hardearned tax dollars. Hey congress, I want my money back!!

Posted by: webrunner | October 3, 2006, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Umm…When I was 16, I don’t/didn’t think of myself as a child. I made my own sexual decisions. Why is everyone freaking out? It’s not like the “kids” were 7 or 8. These are young adults. My goodness..at 18, we let our “kids” go off to war, but emailing and IMing is criminal? Give me a break!!!

Posted by: Bat | October 3, 2006, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Very disturbing. People are correct in saying that it is not a Republican/Democrat issue. As more information comes out it is too bizarre to think that any member of Congress would have known about this and not done something. How long did someone sit on this information before making it public and why now? Whoever sat on it should be questioned too as other Pages may have continued to be in contact with Foley.

Posted by: Rick | October 3, 2006, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

To James, Bob, Brian, Cindy, John and all other posters who so desperately want to label Gay Americans as Pedophiles, I DARE YOU TO CHECK THE DATA IN YOUR OWN STATE on the profile of pedophiles in your areas. I dare you to read the data that says over 90% of pedophile activity is HETROSEXUAL not HOMOSEXUAL. I dare you to look at the numbers that identify, IN EVERY SINGLE STATE, that pedophiles are married men in their late 30′s to early 40′s that are church-going, supposed pillars of the community who have at least two children. I DARE YOU TO LOOK AT THE TRUTH BECAUSE YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH.

Posted by: Alma | October 3, 2006, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

I’m going to be devil’s advocate here: where at any time throughout the whole exchange of these published transcripts, did the alleged victims say something even remotely discouraging ? We are not talking about prepubescent children here, because I assume that to be a page they would have to be at least 16-20 years old and of high scholastic achievement. The objects of this man’s totally inappropriate attention should have told him to eff off right away and threatened to report him, but instead engage in coy, flirtatious banter. So I’m not so sure we are talking about completely “innocent children” here.

Posted by: tdoa | October 3, 2006, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

As a conservative I am disgusted by Former Congressman Foley…even more disgusted that the Republican leadership knew about the red flags in e-mails from Foley to pages. They let him remain on the committee for missing and exploited children, even as he himself was exploiting pages.

Posted by: Katie | October 3, 2006, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Foley needs to be out of office, but I don’t feel sorry for the teen.
The teen doesn’t exactly appear to be traumatized to me.

Posted by: Mary B | October 3, 2006, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

“in Studds’s case, a 1973 relationship with a 17-year-old male congressional page. The relationship was consensual, but violated age of consent laws and presented ethical concerns relating to working relationships with subordinates.”
Dude, this called statutory rape.
Foley should be treated in the same manner as Mel Reynolds, i.e. Bush should simply pardon him.

Posted by: drjohn | October 3, 2006, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

answering ricky g.
I don’t believe it! He was set up, no one would keep all those messages unless there was a reason!! They certainly wouldn’t give them to the MSM to be exposed themselves. Rotten, really Rotten people out there!!
kinda like a blue dress being put in a safety deposit box LMFAO

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I’ll continue to vote for the conservative candidates…at least when a Republican breaks the law, he resigns and is chastised and disciplined by other Republicans. The Democrats don’t resign, and they make excuses like “he or she was of the age of consent” or “I didn’t mean to drive off that bridge and run from the scene and let that woman drown.” Give me a Republican any day!

Posted by: Justice | October 3, 2006, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I’ve read comments from CBS, ABC, FOX and NBC web sites, and the common theme is; the “victims” were 16 or 17, and in many states a 55 year old and a 16 year old doing what is reported is legal.
Are these Republicans really that sick? To think that abusing your power to take advantage of minors is O.K. in their view is obscene.

Posted by: EP | October 3, 2006, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

“Isn’t this the same thing that democrat Barny Frank did? On no, he actually had sex with the pages and he is still there!”
Why is the moderator of this comments section allowing sladerous nonsense like this? Barney Frank NEVER had sex with an underage page as much as the neo-con gay bashers would like to reflect history to refelct. I guess the same guy behind “Path to 911″ is approving the messages that appear here!

Posted by: George | October 3, 2006, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

It’s high time to get to the bottom of this and hang anyone who had anything to do with covering this up. Do the muslim extremists have a point?

Posted by: Danial Lisarelli | October 3, 2006, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

The Republicans came into office with the unstated assumption that they were more moral than the Democrats. So-called Christian!? Last week our congress voted to legalize torture and jail without trial and this anti-climatic when you think of all the rest that’s happening: i.e. the savaging of the middle class and the poor!!

Posted by: Jane | October 3, 2006, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

It’d be great if Republicans went after Osama Bin-Ladin as vigorously as they pursue children on the Internet.
Too bad Osama isn’t a 15 year old child… Repubicans would have nailed him already.

Posted by: Sean | October 3, 2006, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

I wonder if all of this is Rove’s October surprise …..
To those that say that this is a Democratic Party conspiracy. SO WHAT. Politics is a hardball of exploiting negative perceptions of your opponent and his/her party. Hardball perfected by the likes of Republicans Karl Rove and Lee Atwater.
Conservative/Republicans even have their own cable news channel (FOX News), with it’s constant drone of liberal bashing, anti Dem pro Repub, “give us daily Repub talking points and we will repeat them ad nauseum”, Clinton bashing RANTs

Posted by: LivinNDC | October 3, 2006, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Mr. Foley is a sick man ~ who has terrorized numerous young men on capitol hill serving as pages, and has been for a long time, who now finds himself exposed as the pedophile he is. How dare he reduce his dysfunction to alcoholism. What’s next to explain his sick behaviour, he was a catholic alter boy and was abused by his parish priest which turned him into a homosexual pedophile?! Give me a break. He needs to be prosecuted under the laws he helped write, and then he should be sent to Gitmo w/the rest of the terrorists!

Posted by: C.Krieger | October 3, 2006, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

this is what give’s the gay population a bad name. but odly enough the fact that it is a man messing with boys it hits the news. what would have happened if it had been a young girl he had been hitting on. most would have just said dirty old man and gone on. it is sick either which way. I think the jap’s have the right Idea i do believe they call it HaireKarie so give him a samari sord

Posted by: Gary F | October 3, 2006, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

How did ABC get these IM’s and for how long have they had them?
The timing is quite fortuitous.
And quite curious.

Posted by: drjohn | October 3, 2006, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

I guess this is another time where Democrats are just going after Republicans. Immediately following Katrina, if Repubs were questions Dems were being insensitive, there was work to be done; wait too long, and then they say its time to move forward. They seem to never want to answer to anyone. I pray for the victims and Foley himself, I hope all involve find relief and help to pain and suffering they are going through.

Posted by: danmanley2299 | October 3, 2006, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

Foley is one sick individual who will reap accrued benefits from the government for being a pedophile. What is even scarier is how many more are doing the same thing but have not been caught. Most politicians think they are above the law and this is one example of that attitude.

Posted by: Larry | October 3, 2006, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

all you need to know about conservatives is said in the 1st 4 letters of their name CONS.it unfortunately says what conservatives are all about.nothing but a con game is all they are. a complete sham is their game. bad thing is american public sucks it all up.and are conned by these clowns.conservatives = CONS. enough said.

Posted by: david | October 3, 2006, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

As much as I dislike the Republicans (and the Democrats), the key difference between the two with respect to this issue, is that the Republicans resign when evidence of sexual misconduct surfaces while Democrats do not. It’s nice that at least one party’s members still have a sense of shame.
And again, posters who keep referring to this as “pedophilia” need a pocket dictionary.

Posted by: Rick | October 3, 2006, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

This is one of the more disgusting scandals to hit Congress is recent times. Everyone involved in keeping this quiet, having any knowlege of this and not acting on it, should be removed from office – if not be legal action then by their contituents. It is time that the voters of this country begin cleaning house in the House – no re-elections for incumbents again, regardless of party affiliation! It time to fight back!

Posted by: Mark | October 3, 2006, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Foley is not only a sick OLD man hiding behind his suit and power, now he’s playing the “Alcoholic” card….I don’t think so….oh and by the way he’s a COWARD…but then again, so are ALL child molesters and pedophiles!!!

Posted by: DRL | October 3, 2006, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Not to make light of this abhorrence by any means, but I didn’t see the “orgasm” portion of the messages. Did I overlook it?

Posted by: RWW | October 3, 2006, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

As a father, I am horrified. I hope that he rots in jail forever.

Posted by: S.Hart | October 3, 2006, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Send Foley aka Fouley To GETMO
Because people are plucking feathers
and boiling tar and looking for tall
oak tree with boiled 3″ hemp rope!

Posted by: James | October 3, 2006, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

I think before you take and run with this “evidence” as newsworthy you would be wise to remember the Dan Rather documents he reported as authentic regarding Bush’s national guard service. without true electronic digital signatures, encryption methods and a true means of identity management, no one can be sure he really sent these. of course none of that really matters when trying to advance an agenda does it? this can always reported then plead technical ignorance if they are shown to be fake. if he did write these i think he should be punished in the same way as Frank, Studds, Lukens, Crane, other deviate politians who i offer as a reminder that immoral/distasteful behavior sits on both sides of the aisle and is NOT party specific. Clinton may not be a pedophile, but he is a predatororial lip biting rapist.

Posted by: Dave | October 3, 2006, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

ABC News, How long did you know about this issue? Why wait until election time to break the news?
I am thinking that this does not have anything to do with a 16 yr old kid.Tell the public how long you have known about the IM’s. ABC News is just as immoral as Foley.
Brian Ross and Maddy Sauer should be investigated and put on trial for their actions.Withholding the truth, Misleading the public into beleving that this Foley mess JUST HAPPENED. ABC NEWS – Lib Liars

Posted by: JT | October 3, 2006, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Why is this a political thing? Whats wrong with you people that are trying to make it a political thing? Is nothing important to you? Have you lost all ability to reason? INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY IN A COURT OF LAW!!!

Posted by: miker | October 3, 2006, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Am I the only one who is reminded of the decadance of Rome during it’s demise? I don’t see much difference here.
BTW, I am a dyed in the wool Republican and am disgusted beyond description by Foley’s behavior. Thsi country had better come to terms with the extent of our moral depravity and deal with it before it is too late.
If the GOP wishes to survive, they must act quickly and decisively and root out and expose all such behavior. There can be no political agenda, no circling the wagons, no stone-walling. If our own political leadership has lost its moral compass, they must be removed from office and replaced with those who act in private as they speak in public.

Posted by: Kaidog | October 3, 2006, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

I consider myself a strong republican, but there are not two sides to this sort of behavior. He should be thrown in jail. The end.

Posted by: Chris | October 3, 2006, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Brian, you are brilliant. Mr. Foley needs to be exposed for his most inappropriate, unlawful behaviour. Running to an alcohol clinic is a little ridiculous, don’t you think! But then again, I guess people like him who thinks they’ll never get caught also thinks that we buy the bs story about his alcohol abuse.

Posted by: pat | October 3, 2006, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I can’t believe they’re trying the old “rehab” ruse.
It seems every time Republican elites get caugh red handed they scamper off to the nearest rehab clinic.
It worked for Rush Limbaugh.

Posted by: Sean | October 3, 2006, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

why do people keep refering to other people and what happened to other people, we are talking about foley, and the GOP leadership that covered it up and we will continue to talk about it all the way to victory in the nov midterm elections, get over it lol

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

This smacks, by the way, of the same type of cover-up that the Catholic Church has now disavowed. It cost the Church millions of dollars and resulted in great shame. Hastert & Co. are as smarmy as the Church was in their cover-up. One, he and Reynolds and Boehner and any others who covered up need to go in shame. Two, a fund needs to be created for the interns affected by all this, carved out of Hastert’s personal fortune, or a lawyer needs to be appointed to charge Hastert with conspiracy and perjury, and to sue for injuries and damages. Three, the interns or pages need to sue the papers for covering up a crime, conspiracy, and sue the hell out of them. If those who perpetrated this, and helped to conceal it, are taken care of, the Republican Party can claim clean hands. Remember, this is not the rank and file, this is the Leadership of the Party.

Posted by: OCPatriot | October 3, 2006, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

What Foley did was absolutely disgusting, and wrong wrong wrong, but and there is a but here, my heart goes out to him he has a serious addiction, and I feel that instead of ripping into republicans or democrats, we should pray for Foley because he needs help and support. That is to say if you want him to change or reform right? Surely we want him to seek help, and get better, correct? We aren’t just hoping he gets his “punishment”, right?
-Thank you

Posted by: Matt | October 3, 2006, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Monica Lewinsky was born July 23, 1973. She met Bill Clinton on November 15, 1995. Do the math! This blame Clinton business is pathetic… And KK (or Ku Klux),congressional republicans brought this scandal on themselves…because they just don’t have the moral will to do the right thing – not even for the “least” among us – our children. Any republican with an ounce of decency would not even question the outrage and would distant themselves from these predators and power freaks. It’s sick! No excuses.

Posted by: Cherry | October 3, 2006, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

I’m a republican, burn Foley…now..and every other member of congress involved in this cover-up…but don’t stop with him..get them all. Bunch a’ corrupt, lyin’, overpaid fat, suckin our country dry bums.

Posted by: jam0167 | October 3, 2006, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Some of the comments here are mind-boggling, like those who try to equate homosexuality with pedophilia. Clearly you are rightwing hacks trying to spin this into “our side has pedophiles but your side has gays”. That’s NOT what this is about and no sane person mixes consensual with nonconsensual.
And Patricia… please… does it really matter if he left the room during the vote to send IMs? He was SUPPOSED to be paying attention to running our country, and instead was propositioning kids. Way to focus on what’s important.

Posted by: ih | October 3, 2006, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

shame shame shame. Can it get any worse than this? how old is he? is he married? does he have kids? arent you suppose to be busy doing work for your country?

Posted by: dan | October 3, 2006, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

I’ve read all the comments posted so far and am encouraged that people see that this is wrong. I believe we are seeing a tsunami of sexual predators due to internet porn. Porn addiction is stealth and is more addictive than cocaine. Different porn=different perversions. Porn changes the neural pathways in the brain. Just watch one of Dateline’s Catching a Sexual Predator(Friday) or do a search on Pornography Addiction. More access to porn=more sexual predators. Enough of the consensual excuse. Addicts lie.

Posted by: Marianne | October 3, 2006, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

For God’s sake, people! Look it up! As some have said, a pedophile feels an unhealthy sexual attraction to sexually immature children (of either gender). An EPHEBOPHILE feels an unhealthy sexual attraction to sexually MATURE/teenage young adults. Most teens are not yet mentally/emotionally mature and are risk-takers for several more years.
This is NO different from a 50YO man lusting after Britney Spears in her “I’m a virgin” persona.
And NO gay man I know would even WANT a teenager. They’re mature grownups who have or are looking for grown-up relationships. Foley has LOTS of issues and hang-ups, obviously! He may be emotionally stunted by the dichotomy of being closeted AND against gay rights.
Or he may get off on the power trip. That’s what this is really about – ABUSE OF POWER AND PRIVELEGE.

Posted by: Lyonside | October 3, 2006, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Why is it that the leaders we so trustingly elect are so easily corrupted by the power we give them?
Is it a reflection of the apathy of the American people that we let this kind of behavior go on and on? When politicans feel their job is to stay in office at all costs rather than represent their constituants we have a serious problem. AND for heavens sake, STOP making this about parties. They are both EQUALLY corrupt.

Posted by: pamie | October 3, 2006, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Beyond the fact that both Foley and the 16 year old are sick, my question is, where are ABC and the other networks getting all of these IM chat logs? Is there some sicko at the ISP getting his jollies by snooping into emails and chat?
I suppose this should be a lesson to everyone to watch what you type in emails and IM, you never know who may be logging it!

Posted by: Mike | October 3, 2006, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

How is it that the IT industry in the private sector can figure this out in a matter of hours and yet, the government can’t catch their own guys abusing the system? I can’t send an email from my work address that has the word *** in it without getting a nasty gram from the security squad – immediately. Given that – you can bet LOTS of people knew about the stuff that this guy was doing. The problem is that no one had the integrity to speak up and stop him.
We need to get a grip on the government!!

Posted by: KLC | October 3, 2006, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

some need to read some more facts. like the one about a watch group in DC that did, in fact, turn over to the FBI some of these IM’s ur wondering why The boy didnt turen in to authorities until now, they were turned in July1, so why didnt the FBI take a little action? Like maybe storm FOLEYS house like they did jefferson’s? Why did they wait for the signal from hastert, when it got to big for hastert to handdle with his appointed committee? Who Know’s huh?

Posted by: Mike | October 3, 2006, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

To say there is hypocrisy (infering that all Republicans knew of this pedophile’s actions), to make references to the GOP as a “gang of pedophiles” (real cute), and to in any way continue to politicize this issue is so unbelievable short-sighted that it makes me almost as sick as Foley does.
Keep this on topic and don’t make this yet another “Bush bashing.” All that does is to minimize the seriousness of the issue.

Posted by: David | October 3, 2006, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Dave . . . I really doubt Mr. Foley would have resigned the same day this story broke if there was some question about the authenticity of the messages.

Posted by: Burt Skurge | October 3, 2006, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

This guy gives alcoholics a bad name …

Posted by: DownHomeAmerican | October 3, 2006, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Hmmm…according to Democrats, it would be okay for an old congressional homosexual to be IMing a 23 year old on the house floor this disgusting stuff but not a 16 or 17 year old. After all it was okay for Clinton to get it on with Monica in the Oval office during business hours. And I guess what Clinton and Monica did with cigars (pardon my graphic words, but our former president did do it) next to the oval office was okay as long as he didn’t have internet cigar sex with her during office hours and she wasn’t under age…. The hypocrisy and logic of the left and the media (that’s redundant, though, isn’t it) is mind boggling.

Posted by: Chan | October 3, 2006, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Can someone please tell me when alcohol became an excuse for contributing to the deliquency of a minor, being a pedophile or a sodomist? This pedophile does not require a congressional investigation. Call the cops. Oh, and NO PENSION FOR YOU SICKO!

Posted by: Pam in Fresno | October 3, 2006, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Why is this a political thing? Whats wrong with you people that are trying to make it a political thing? Is nothing important to you? Have you lost all ability to reason? INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY IN A COURT OF LAW!!!

Posted by: miker | October 3, 2006, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

abc airs a so called “documentary” trying to blame clinton for the war bush got us into and when dems complain we are told “deal with it” but when abc airs something bad about them they are biased. lol deal with it till nov 7

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Hastert did not just fall off the turnip truck. You have to be goofy to think that he would not have “canned” Foley if he knew of the salacious instant messages.

Posted by: Jim | October 3, 2006, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

This is truely a sad day for Americans and our society. We have been infiltrated by the very predators that attack our youth, schools and communities. Although it is not clear whether Mr. Foley had any physical contact with these children, his actions clearly state his intent. Due to this I feel he should be prosecuted if possible to the fullest extent of the law. This is not a partisan issue as some would like to suggest, but rather an issue based on morals and laws possibly being broken by someone who holds a responsibility to both our society as a whole and his own community from which he was elected.

Posted by: robert deleon | October 3, 2006, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Patricia, comment nr 2, I’m not defending Foiley, but you seem to be blaming men who knew nothing of the instant messages- only the one email. Get up to speed with technology- there’s a big difference.

Posted by: chris | October 3, 2006, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

This is just the latest diversion that libs have thrown out before the election to provide smoke and mirrors for the fact that they have NO SOLUTIONS to put forth for the problems our nation faces. It’s all they can do. Pathetic. Even though Foley is gone, and we should all go on to SOLVING OUR PROBLEMS, the libs will talk about this ad nauseum until after the election. It’s also the latest thing to try to get rid of the Republican leadership. How many other tries have failed? Chalk this up as another failure.

Posted by: Patsy | October 3, 2006, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Simply put, Foley is a predator. What makes this situation more disgusting is that he is a member of congress. The very people who are suppose to protect the people. The thought that some Republican Party members knew of this situation some time ago, is simply intolerable. They all must go. The most dispicable aspect of this scandal is that it involves a member of the supposedly more righteous party in politics. Clearly, the Republican ideology of family values is a joke. The conservative movement is a fraud.

Posted by: George | October 3, 2006, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Whether or not the teenagers involved were 16 or 17 years old is irrelevant they were still MINORS! Until they are 18 years old any kind of sexual relationship or enticement of a minor is ILLEGAL! I love how the Republicans portrayed the fully adult and fully consenting 22 year old Monica Lewinsky as a “young woman” during the Clinton years and yet they dismiss a 52 year old man sending sexually explicit IM’s to minor children as an election year “conspiracy.” Foley’s conduct (whether or not there was actual sexual contact) is not only reprehensible, unethical, disgusting and WRONG but it is indicative of possible illegal behavior and is not acceptable from any adult in ANY position of authority. For a Republican or a Right wing “family values” person to defend Foley or the clueless posse that protects him to this day is despicable!

Posted by: MB | October 3, 2006, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Foley is sick and deserves whatever punishment comes his way; however, how is that Rep. Gerry Studds admitted to having sex with a 17 year old page and he is left to be reelected numerous times to enjoy a nice, fat pension? Double standard. Was there a cover-up? Seems there was by the Dems and the GOP. The Dems knew of Foley’s misdeeds for quite a while. The GOP did not act immediately or appropriately when the red flags were flying. Face it – congress sucks. We need to send them all home and start over.

Posted by: Scott | October 3, 2006, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

okay isn’t this like a BILLION times worse than what Clinton did? I mean at least he “wasn’t having sexual relations” with a female consentual adult…not a prepubescent zitfaced boy!
For the republican party to have covered this up or as Hasert has said “not remembered this being brought to his attention”…makes me think maybe this is going on quite a bit. I mean if someone came to me telling me a 50+ year old man that I WORKED WITH was emailing teenage boys sexually explicit emails…hmmmmmmmmm I think I’d remember that.
Good luck republicans…I think you’ve just lost the congress!

Posted by: jax | October 3, 2006, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

It will be revealed who was sitting on this information and leaked it to Brian Ross for political purposes. The pundits are saying it will “backfire” on the Dems if they were responsible but it is my sense that the Republicans are “toast”, loosing both the house and the Senate for several reasons. Dick Morris has come out this afternoon saying Hillary will be the next President. Time to pray!

Posted by: Len | October 3, 2006, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

What has happened to these people? Is there no honor left in washington? Does the position and power warp ones mind so much that anything goes? It’s time for a long overdue cleaning house. Doesn’t matter who, or what status, clean them out of there. Rep or Dem, clean house. Our government is infested with filth. How can we expect the rest of the world to look upon us favorabily when stuff like this is exposed. Makes me sick to think that the people running this country are involved in such business. Congressmen chasing young boys, presidents having sexual encounters in the most powerful office, what is next? We need to clean things up here before we can ever hope to clean up any of the rest of the world’s problems. No wonder we are viewed and the “great satin”

Posted by: kelvin | October 3, 2006, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Foley is sick and deserves whatever punishment comes his way; however, how is that Rep. Gerry Studds admitted to having sex with a 17 year old page and he is left to be reelected numerous times to enjoy a nice, fat pension? Double standard. Was there a cover-up? Seems there was by the Dems and the GOP. The Dems knew of Foley’s misdeeds for quite a while. The GOP did not act immediately or appropriately when the red flags were flying. Face it – congress sucks. We need to send them all home and start over.

Posted by: Scott | October 3, 2006, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Has anyone noticed that no EMAILS have been released, only INSTANT MESSAGES that are not routinely saved. This begs the question, who saved these IMs? If the pages saved the IMs, why? especially those that would could prove embarrassing. If they didnt save them, then who did and how did they get access to them. If the pages sent text messages on a cell phone, as would seem to be the case when Foley was voting, how were they saved and who saved them.
Also, the age of consent in DC is 16 so technically anything that happened between a consenting page and Foley, even sex, in DC is not a crime.

Posted by: mark | October 3, 2006, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

To that person who brought up Gerry Studds. The page in question was 17 at the time of their romp-the age of consent in DC. Do yourself a favor, don’t get ALL your news from Drudge.

Posted by: Starman | October 3, 2006, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Agreed, NO PENSION FOR THIS PERV!

Posted by: Seth | October 3, 2006, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Why is this a political thing? Whats wrong with you people that are trying to make it a political thing? Is nothing important to you? Have you lost all ability to reason? INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY IN A COURT OF LAW!!!
sorry!!!!!!! was not polical until hastert and company decided to sweep it under the rug instead of investigating and dealing with it, the seat was more important. now deal with it!

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

How symptomatic of the illness of our society that public figures such as Mel Gibson and a U.S. Congressman Foley have evoked the alcoholic excuse for revealing their true nature. Too bad Senator George Allen can’t use that excuse. Perhaps it was the the devil that loosed his tounge?

Posted by: Bion Blunt | October 3, 2006, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

I find it interesting that pedophile crimes and every other newsworthy crime commited by someone in a postion of power is male. I think we are sending men in to do a ladies job? Women are rising to the CEO positions of major corporations and should soon rise to more prominent government positions. I think that is the way to go. Ponder that.

Posted by: Jay S. | October 3, 2006, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

This is an attack on republicans. Democrats own up to their sexuality, so they know to keep it legal! When you deny being gay for long enough, you think it’s evil anyway, so you don’t care whether it’s an adult or a child you’re having sex with. Real gay people(the ones that admit it) only have sex with other adults.

Posted by: Mike H | October 3, 2006, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Hastert and others claimed they were only aware of Foley’s over friendly email to the page. Then they confronted Foley to ask if there was anything more than just over friendly emails. He lied. They “believed” him and warned him not to engage in any further communications with the page. When cops investigate a crime, they just don’t ask the suspects if they committed a crime and stop there. I think Hastert and others could have done more. Such as, question current and former pages, request Foley to hand over his personal PC, or do what Pres. Bush does with suspected terrorists (coerce).

Posted by: HT | October 3, 2006, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

To MB..
I haven’t heard any of us “Right Wing Family Values Persons” defending Foley. From what I’ve seen, they have only been pointing out the hyprocrisy on your side. If it is a democrat, it’s OK..pardon him. If it is a Republican…hang him high.

Posted by: JFT | October 3, 2006, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

I am a Republican that agrees 100% that he should have resigned as well as anyone who aided him. I also think every Democrat that knew about it and hung on to the information should resign. If you think it is a coincidence that this broke 1 month before the elections then you are a fool. As for the Democrats that are now on thier high horses. I have a few names for you. Gerry Studds, he acutually had sex with a 16 year of page and never resigned not did the Democrats call for his resignation. Barney Frank, his boyfriend ran a gay prostitution ring in his appartment and he the Democrats turned the other cheek. We all know Clinton but apparently adultry in the Oval Office is o.k.. Mel Reynolds had sex with a 16 year old campaign worker convinced him to lie about it and was pardoned by Clinton. Once again no Democratic outrage. So don’t try to have a moral voice now.

Posted by: Bill | October 3, 2006, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Sorry folks, I agree he should be out of office but should be voted out. THe democrats do not take things like this seriously and there is no reason the repubs should either. Interestingly,
The facts are A congressman, alcoholic or not, communicated sexually explicit messages to a 16 year old page whether in session or not. According to the laws in DC so far, no laws have been broken.
Age of consent in DC is 16. FWIW

Posted by: JT | October 3, 2006, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Another closet psychotic repulican bites the dust

Posted by: Steve | October 3, 2006, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

I think Foley did the right thing and resigned. He is a sick person and if he did anything beside writing to the teens, he should be prosecuted. As the left reminds us all, if he was just writing, Free Speech. I find it interesting that ABC News sat on this story since Hurricane Katrina last year. I guess there was not an election then!

Posted by: Dennis | October 3, 2006, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Just to set the record straight, President Clinton and Monica Lewinsky were indeed consenting adults when their “affair” began. But, both were on the federal payroll and on the job in the West Wing at the time of their many indiscretions. Therefore, it was not a private matter as many have said. Because they were “on the clock,” we as taxpayers (and therefore their bosses) were entitled to know about it and expect some sort of punishment. If they were employed in the private sector and their activities had been made known to their employer, both would have been fired on the spot. I’ve seen it happen many times. As for the Foley scandal, he too was on the job when he was engaged in these e-mails and instant messages, and he was somewhat in a position of authority over the pages. Even if the age of consent in D.C. is 16, and it is legal for him to message the teens in that respect, it is still unethical to do so in his position, and especially while in his office. One final thought: I don’t buy the alcoholism excuse!!

Posted by: Alabama independent voter | October 3, 2006, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Since all of the major players in the Republican Party have agreed that the Democrats and Independents in Congress were not informed, and since Ol’ Dennis and the President are always talking to each other, I wonder what Bush knew and when he knew it. Ol’ Dennis must have told him fairly early on, not just last Thursday, that the stuff would hit the fan over this one.

Posted by: Bill in Texas | October 3, 2006, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

He is a sick prson who needs our prayers!!!!!

Posted by: Tony Beltrani | October 3, 2006, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

I’d respect most of generically anti-Republican commentators more if they could spell…anyhow, I regard this as a disgusting yet isolated incident of misconduct by a single congressman that in no way represents the integrity of the political party as a whole. What he did was entirely reprehensible, but the fact that this is being propagated throughout the media so soon before election time (which I doubt was the intent of the young men involved who wisely informed other adults of the situation) does give it the smell of a smear campaign – sure, Foley’s career is rightfully over, but exploiting an event that was certainly disturbing for the youth involved is a political tactic far more disgusting than any attempt by the G.O.P. to handle the situation discreetly.

Posted by: Kristin | October 3, 2006, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

yeah…because if this were a Democrat…the Republicans would NEVER try to use the bad press to their advantage. Nope…not gonna happen.
WHAT. EVER!

Posted by: Dave | October 3, 2006, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Yes- Foley is one sick, perverted piece of work.
He deserves the full weight of our Judicial system wrapped around his
neck and thrown overboard.
What bothers me is the political blame game- Democrats pointing fingers at Republicans. Democrats trying to crucify as many Republicans as possible by stating they were aware of what Foley was doing and therefore are just as guilty as Foley. Seems that it doesn’t matter if the knew or not- “Guilty by association”. It seems to me if these “Finger Pointers” are pasting out guilt- then they shouldn’t overlook the Parents of the Pages. The same Parents that let this perversion carry on, & they knew it was. And what about the Pages- the were old enough to know what was going on. Only now do they come forward. They could have reported this to FBI, Police or others 2-3 years ago. I’m from West Palm Beach- Yes, I did vote for Foley. Just like others I didn’t know. Hine sight is 20/20.

Posted by: WhistleBritches | October 3, 2006, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Don’t worry everyone Foley will get his due – and the GOP will take lumps and bruises, yay. The good news is if he were a Dem we could just re-elect him!

Posted by: xjthorn | October 3, 2006, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Some of you talk about how Monica Lewinski was 22, as if, somehow, that is different… Apparently all of the sex, how ever deviant and disgusting, was consensual, or as consensual as the Lewinski incident could be.. (Given that the HIGHEST EXECUTIVE in the nation was telling her to do what she did, OF COURSE there was no harassment whatsoever!) When Barney Frank was busted having a homosexual prostitute ring that ran out of his office, SOME people said that critics were gay bashers! Also, we haven’t heard much outcry about the Chandra Levy incident…. (of course we could go on, but we all know that the DC politician is the scum of the earth….)

Posted by: Steve | October 3, 2006, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Rep. Foley’s action were completely unprofessional, and (depending on age of consent laws) illegal. However, to use the term “pedophile” so cavalierly is irresponsible. Pedophilia is certainly not Foley’s sin; unprofessionalism and social impropriety are more accurate charges.

Posted by: Aaron | October 3, 2006, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

If Foley were female and with a 16 year old male, I bet there would be a much different reaction. There would be a lot of chuckles and remarks and people thinking it was awesome. People need to be honest about homosexuality playing a big part here. And the pages here were over 16, sexually mature, and over the age of consent in much of the country. That isn’t pedophilia. Most guys that age are sexually active anyway, just with girls/guys their own age.

Posted by: Dan R. | October 3, 2006, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Where are these I.M’s coming from??? Why now and not back in 2003??? Why isn’t the source of the I.M’s part of the story?

Posted by: Pepsiholic | October 3, 2006, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Blame Clinton. Blame the victims. Blame the Democrats. Blame the media.
Blame anyone except the pedophile and the Republican leadership that covered for him.

Posted by: teh grassroots | October 3, 2006, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

And we wonder why the Iraqis resent our trying to impose our system on them.

Posted by: JLS | October 3, 2006, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Someone mentioned that 16 year olds are not children. Last time I checked, 16 year olds are children. The law says they’re children. It was as if this person was excusing this PEDOPHILE because some people see 16 year olds as young adults…well, what about 15 and a half year olds or 14 or 13… No excuses!!! This is as bad as those female teachers who molest their male children but then get off!

Posted by: Jessica | October 3, 2006, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Clearly, living in the closet all those many years has taken its toll. I suspect that if Mr. Foley had come out (years ago), he’d have been able to engage in a safe, healthy same-sex relationships. Conservatives, take note; forcing people to hide in the closet can lead to disastrous results.

Posted by: Jon | October 3, 2006, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

maybe it was not him that sent these newest ones? and as people known of them for years, now why did they come out now?

Posted by: sterling | October 3, 2006, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Absolutly disgusting! What a pervert! What an embarassment for the GOP and the Nation! It would have been better for him to tie a millstone around his neck and jump into the sea than to corrupt these little ones. Think of the millions of children that will read these transcripts on the internet…giving them unnatural ideas. Do you suppose he has dirty thoughts about sheep and pigs, too?

Posted by: David Moore | October 3, 2006, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Alcoholism DOES make people act on impulses and creates temporary insanity. Many alcoholics under the influence commit acts of violence and yield to sexual temptations that they would not at all if sober. This does NOT excuse Foley’s unacceptable acts of pedophilia but if he is indeed an alcoholic, then his disease has to be taken into consideration. He ruined his career for nothing. That is certainly a pitiful act of active alcoholism.

Posted by: ipse | October 3, 2006, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Its funny how in our “two party” system it’s not so hard to find scumbags on either side.
..while third parties, like libertarians, get depicted as the party that wants to make this stuff LEGAL. :) Which is ridiculous.
A pox on the whole House. Get rid of the incumbents, all of them. Show them we’re tired of the same old game. GOP and Dems are both just institutionalized panderers to whomever they can find to vote for them. Vote for policies and effective government, not for parties.

Posted by: Libertoid | October 3, 2006, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

ABC doesn’t want you to know it, but in the 80′s there was a DEMOCRAT HOUSE MEMBER who actually had SEX WITH AN UNDERAGE PAGE. They didn’t ask for him to be removed, and didn’t ask for the Democrat speaker to be removed either! He went on to be re-elected 6 more terms. Well, well, now what we have here is more democratic hypocrisy isn’t it?

Posted by: phil | October 3, 2006, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

What part of “jail bait” does Foley (and his supporters) not understand? Predation by an much older man on underage kids is unacceptable period. And one might question if he is pushing homosexual behavior on impressionable yound kids that may not know enough to make a decision in that regard?

Posted by: Dianne | October 3, 2006, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Clinton never pardonned Mel Reynolds. Get your facts straight.

Posted by: teh grassroots | October 3, 2006, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

How come cheerleader Georgie Bush is not angry nor upset about what this scum was doing to a child?
16 year old teen is still a child!
Throw the pervert bums the heck out of our White House!

Posted by: Sagittariusdame | October 3, 2006, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

The timing is very, very suspicious. ABC needs to disclose how they came about this information immediately! This is an outrage if ABC knew about this and let it go on.

Posted by: gary | October 3, 2006, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

I find “patricia licopoli” comments rather disturbing… To ask for context and more detail as to assertions is just wrong. The context of the communication with these teens speak for itself. Doesn’t matter whether it’s from a portable, or whether from his office or on the floor of the HOUSE. It’s the simple fact, Foley would have such conversations with teens under the age of 18!!!

Posted by: David Jordan | October 3, 2006, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

My understanding is that the Republican leadership was not aware of what Foley was up to. All they had access to was a single inappropriate, but not necessarily predatory, email exachange between Foley and an aide. Which they took action upon. More proof is needed as to a republican cover up before they are blamed for Foley’s perversion.

Posted by: gm | October 3, 2006, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

So now it’s because he was molested by clergy? This man will stop at nothing and deserves NO pity. He, of all people, then, should be most aware of the havoc and destruction his behavior was wreaking on those young people.

Posted by: D | October 3, 2006, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

..and the plot thickens…now his attorney says he was molested as a child and is gay. Is that supposed to excuse what he did?
…and the “this Dem did that”…”this Dem did this” argument is LAME. Even steven is the best the Republicans have got?

Posted by: Dave | October 3, 2006, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

With more and more information coming out, will someone look into whether Foley actually met up with some of these children??? As horrible as these IM’s are, some seem to suggest that maybe he did more than just “talk” to these kids!

Posted by: david | October 3, 2006, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

E-mails are not personal. Foley is like your regular Barney Frank.
Why are we digging up this dirt after so much time has passed, and just before elections.
This whole thing smells of dirty politics. I think if the people involved are at least 18, who is to say what is good and what is bad. I think that Mr. Foley showed poor judgement in involving a congretional page.
Was this a crime? No
Was this foolish on his part? Yes
For the good of everyone, he should not have resigned. He is as we say. Outed.
Why we are blowing this up and all out of proportion, I can guess. POLITICS front and center.
Lets get of this junk, and concentrate on winning in the war on terror.

Posted by: Bob | October 3, 2006, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

“The timing is very, very suspicious. ABC needs to disclose how they came about this information immediately! This is an outrage if ABC knew about this and let it go on.”
probably as long as hastert and company knew!! again, another kill the messenger. losers.

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

I think it’s interesting how ABC is groveling in the mud publishing all the lurid details of the IM’s. It’s not necessary. But anything the libs can use as an excuse for indulging in their low-life escapades I guess…..they love it.

Posted by: pamela | October 3, 2006, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

There are only two possible actions more disgusting than Foley’s.
First, if (*if*) Hastert knew about them and let them slide.
Second, if (*if*) the Dems have known about them for almost a year now but held onto them for an October surprise.
(Of course, the Dems have no problems with a perv in Congress. They let Gerry Studds keep his chairmanship and sent him back for five more terms until he chose to retire.)
Both these parties make me sick.

Posted by: jdb | October 3, 2006, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

It’s funny how all the comments in here are basically in line with the accepted way of thinking. I posted a different view and my post was never included. So much for fair and balanced viewpoints from ABC news.

Posted by: Arjuna | October 3, 2006, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

one final important thing to note here, not that this makes the person any less sick or what he did any less wrong, but there was no actual sex that ever took place, unlike Barney Frank and other democratic polticians that were busted in underage page/inter affairs including that one with a 15 year old girl.
Which is worse, chating a 16 year old boy or molesting a 16 year old girl and attempting to have sex with a 15 year old girl.
Cause that was a democratic politcian who did that, and he was relected!

Posted by: Cee | October 3, 2006, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Is anyone bothered by the fact that if a sixteen year old who engages in sexual conversation is deemed a “child” needing to be protected, but a sixteen year old who murders someone is an “adult” who needs to be locked away for life?
What the Congressman did was wrong not because he is an “adult” and the sixteen year old pages are “children”, but because the level of dishonesty between this nation accepts when we discuss sex, sexuality, youth and what it means to be an adult. By all accounts many of the exchanges we are hearing about seem consentual. Isn’t it a shame that once again the nation is sending a message to its teenagers that they are “children” unable to make a decision about their sexuality, desires, wants or abilities. It is hardly a wonder that American teenagers are less curious, self-critical, analytical or accomplished than their European or Asian counterparts. We are a nation of hypocritics and emotionally underdeveloped adults.

Posted by: Stuart | October 3, 2006, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

“My understanding is that the Republican leadership was not aware of what Foley was up to. All they had access to was a single inappropriate, but not necessarily predatory, email exachange between Foley and an aide. Which they took action upon. More proof is needed as to a republican cover up before they are blamed for Foley’s perversion”
we have proof, reynolds admittedly told hastert, which he does not deny, that foley was involved in “over friendly e-mails” and nothing was done, infact, hastert does not even recall being told the chair of expoloited children was sending inappropriate e-mails, which also begs the question if he does not remember the reynolds conversation, then how did he deal with the e-mails? either he remembers the conversation or he didnt

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Jay: The Hewlett-Packard corp might have an issue with your conclusion and your notion that women would do a better job than men is unfounded.
Aside from the LAST two female chairs of H-P, also consider Martha Stewart, Leona Helmsley, Rosie O’Donnell, and Kate Moss. Nope, women are not any better at running businesses, not even their own, as men.
As far as abusers always being men, how about all those school teachers, and female coaches, and female scout leaders who have been having sex with boys (and girls) AS YOUNG AS ELEVEN YEARS OF AGE.
This is a “human” problem, not a “male” problem.

Posted by: secant | October 3, 2006, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Both Foley & Hastert should resign (I know Foley has done so already) AND face criminal charges. We pay these guys, we voted for them. Personally it doesn’t matter to me, Republican or Democrat. I vote Republican. They need to be fired. Foley broke the law by engaging with a minor & Hastert for obstruction of justice. Foley is on the clock. We’re not paying him to be playing txt message sex games while voting on something so essential as War time appropriations. I mean come on, I can’t respect a ‘man’ who plays little boy games. He doesn’t deserve our respect. Foley certainly proves he doesn’t respect his position & his constitutes.

Posted by: Sharon Sullivan | October 3, 2006, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Lets do a fair investigation. In addition to investigating Congressional Republicans, ABC needs to explain why 3 year old messages are just now being revealed. Were people paid off to provide this information? Why release it now? What is the democratic party’s role in leaking this information. How long have they known about this information? Why are they outraged now when they defended Clinton’s misdeeds.

Posted by: Gary | October 3, 2006, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Yes, the age of consent in D.C. is indeed 16 years of age as I have just verified by looking at the statute. Therefore, any sexual relationships Foley may or may not have had were legal. And as a matter of fact, the statute defines “child” as anyone who has not yet reached the age of 16, so these are not children, either. For the statute, please see: § 22-4101 (3).
Stop equating this situation to a predator luring a child on the playground with candy and calling it pedophilia, which if you look up the term in the dictionary, it is not. These are young men. You’re attacking homosexuality under the guise of pedophilia.

Posted by: Dan | October 3, 2006, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

A nation gets the leaders it deserves…regardless of party.
Is anyone really shocked?

Posted by: John | October 3, 2006, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Alcohol does not cause you send sex e-mails and convert with minors. I say 20 years should do it. AND LET’S PULL HIS CONGRESSIONAL PENSION!!!!!!!

Posted by: fred | October 3, 2006, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Instant Messages (IMs) are NOT EMAIL and are not saved unless one of the parties actively saves them. So if Foley didnt save the IMs and I am sure the pages didnt save them (especially the IMs with embarrassing admissions) then WHO saved them, how did ABC get them and why so long after the fact.
Maybe someone should check the computers in the page dorm for spyware.
Also, the age of consent in DC is 16.
In the eyes of the law, a 16 yo page is a consenting adult.

Posted by: mark fern | October 3, 2006, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

There is no doubt, what Foley did is disgusting and he deserves everything he gets if found guilty. I must say that the majority of the comments on this site about everything else is equally disgusting; so much doom and gloom and conspiracy theorists. All of sudden, everyone is guilty. It is the same thing as saying, if you are in a cubicle next to a pedophile, you must be one too. We are truly becoming a bunch of socialists; everyone is guilty until proven innocent…the divisions will continue to run deep.

Posted by: Coop | October 3, 2006, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Looks like we have a feeding frenzy over the Foley affair. My view is that there are a lot of hypocrites here and on Capitol Hill only worried about protecting their self-righteous and political asses. Foley did not do anything that probably all those horny senators and congressmen have already done or thought about doing. Only difference is they were not caught doing it. Sad, very sad.

Posted by: Dennis Lan | October 3, 2006, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

ANYONE making excuses for this type of behavior is “Sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick sick!” if you bothered to read the IMs you would see even the page thought so!
People under 18 are considered children and MINORS for a reason, their minds are still young, therefore they cannot vote, drink or get drafted. The age of sexual consent was permitted in the cases of sexual relationships (which experimenting teens will have) that were a few years older, not 40 years older. It does not matter if the child is male or female, someone that tries to solicit sex from a minor should be in jail (a few Dateline episodes should convince you of that)
Foley met with these kids in San Diego and his house.. they drank alcohol and I’m sure did other things (otherwise he wouldn’t “miss” them so much)
The Republicans that are defending him should be ashamed of themeselves! Calling the kids “beasts” as Matt Drudge did is just sick, especially the page that was trying to get help from other staffers by alerting them to the problem. For Republicans to not see that these are “young impressionable minds” and not “beasts” and hints at their own underlying problem!

Posted by: Chris | October 3, 2006, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

you just have to love all theese knee jerk reactions. it is a sad state of affairs when we the people, who have the power of the vote, wont get rid of every compromised politician. that would require voting out every one and i do mean every one. time for change and we are not going to find it in a two party system

Posted by: stephen | October 3, 2006, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

As the democratic party claims to be the party of “compassion”, the level of their hate I hear in this venue for fellow Americans that simply disagree with them (politically, not about Foley) continues to amaze me. It doesn’t matter what the issue is….you people just hate! “Republicans, right wingers, etc.) Get a life, learn to understand how to be happy, educate yourselves on the issues (not the normal media), and please don’t pass your anger on to your children. Either that, or just stay miserable. My “yellow dog democrat” grandmother has worn herself out, turning over in the…

Posted by: JFT | October 3, 2006, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

I keep reading comments like “this guy should be put in prison for the rest of his life”. Gee, until we find out that he actually had sex with these teenagers, dont you think that might be just a little harsh.
I admit that he definitely crossed the line and his behavior was inappropriate, and there should be an investigation to see if things went further, but at this point his life is pretty screwed!
As far as the leadership knowing of this interest, how could they keep quiet not knowing if it could advance further to include sexual contact? In many ways they might be more criminal than Foley in this matter!
I think they should resign their posts if only for the good of their party. This would take away an issue for the Dem’s, but as a bleeding heart liberal I hope Hastert sticks areound!

Posted by: bob | October 3, 2006, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

So, if the victim is under 16, Foley is a pedophile, and if the victim is 16, Foley is a homosexual?
Is treatment for homosexuality similar to treatment for alcoholism?

Posted by: Joe | October 3, 2006, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Well, now Foley is trying to blame his actions on the clergy. What a guy!

Posted by: JLS | October 3, 2006, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

It seems everyone has an opinion about this. First and foremost call it what it is SIN, so was Barny Frank’s and Clinton’s behaviour SIN. Just to spread it around so is the pre planned release of information SIN. And the gossip going on SIN. We need the wisdom of Solomon for our vote and lots of prayers. God help us!!!

Posted by: Valerie | October 3, 2006, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

this is ridiculous …we need to get rid of these bums in washington!!!

Posted by: jonathan siebrandt | October 3, 2006, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Dear Mr. Ross:
I think Mr. Ross you and the Dems are really overplaying your hand. Will this be another Wellstone moment? You forget the Democratic Party has yet to answer how they plan on protecting the American public. Oh. I forgot, there are no terrorists out there to kill us. The New York Times says so. Of course, you have to have been in a coma for the last thirty-five years not to know it. And after 30 documented terrorist attacks during Bubba’s reign, I guess, I am supposed to forget that too.
What a delusional world you guys live in
Tata

Posted by: Kristen | October 3, 2006, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

This is a classic case of pedophillia, older person going after a pre-pubescent person.
If it was a case of a 16 year old girl, it would STILL be pedophillia
Gay people are in ADULT relationships.
Straight people are in ADULT relationships.
Pedophiles go after children.

Posted by: Ursus | October 3, 2006, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Isn’t ABC the one that came up with the fake “draft dodger” letter for Bush. Funny this comes out this close to election? Shouldn’t there be a real investigation and not rush to judgement???

Posted by: David | October 3, 2006, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Thank goodness Congress doesn’t allow members to bring their computers on the floor of the House or Senate. I used to think that was a Luddite rule, but it would boggle the mind to think that Foley conducted that IM exchange on the House floor.

Posted by: Chris | October 3, 2006, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

After the news conference of just a few minutes ago by Foleys lawyer, there seems to be something that doesnt pass the smell test. Considerin that the MSM has again jumped the gun, one might consider that the possibility that there was NO crime committed. I would think one would want to wait until the FBI bring everythin to lite. This has happened before, jumpin ahead of the facts. Does Dan Rather ring any bells. I want to find out who held back all of this until now. Thats the story. thank you. Moon

Posted by: Moonspats | October 3, 2006, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Who cares what the age of consent is in D.C. I keep seeing all these comments, “the age of consent is 16 in D.C. so it’s okay” Are you kidding me? Foley is a pervert…period. Hastert did NOTHING to stop Foley, or to protect the kid. They both should suffer consequences for their actions. As regards the Dem vs. Rep issue—shouldn’t be an issue. The R’s are in charge of the House. Take responsibility and act like grown ups. If the D’s win the election they will win it on a whole slew of other things that have pissed people off about the Republican lack of leadership, this is just the latest, yet probably the sickest.

Posted by: karl | October 3, 2006, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Every post here displays an amazing ignorance or naivete’. Do you people really believe this is unusual behavior for Congressmen? Oh, I see; it’s only Hollywood celebs and S.F. gays who are this way, but they get a pass. Our Congressmen, why, although they must keep church separate from State, they are still required to be saints. There is little difference between the two groups and for that matter between what goes on in Foley’s mind and in yours, you hypocrites!

Posted by: Uhhuh | October 3, 2006, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Dear Kristen:
The Iraq war has only made the US more of a target. We are no safer than we were on 9/11.
What a delusional world you live in.

Posted by: Dave | October 3, 2006, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

This is disgusting. I cannot believe the ways of politicians. Someone mentioned that is this was the average Joe Blow on the corner, with this much evidence, the police would already have him in custody. He is a pedophile. Period.

Posted by: Ryan | October 3, 2006, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

If this guy was a democrate not a word would be said. It would be swept under the rug. This guy is sick and needs to be in jail

Posted by: Tonia | October 3, 2006, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

WOOOHHOOOOO!!!!
Hey everybody… have a drink before committing a crime… and you get a free pass! I LOVE THIS COUNTRY!

Posted by: Fern | October 3, 2006, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Is Foley a closet Scientologist also? He was courted by them attending their meetings, receiving special leather bound editions of their books and supporting them in their fight against attacks in Germany. Reportedly he is in Clearwater (Scn HQ) for rehab.

Posted by: Gary | October 3, 2006, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

If Foley had talked about having merely “Oral sex” in the e-mail would it still be “Sexual misconduct”? We’ve been trying to explain the difference to our kids since Clinton left office.

Posted by: Craig | October 3, 2006, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Again, the prude Americans pretending they are so shocked, as if the sky fell over the earth. First of all, the pages Mr Foley chatted with are NOT children (a 16 year old has sexual maturity). This is not the first time this happens. In the past a Representative had sex with a female page and nothing happened. These young people at 16 and 17 already know what they want. If they hang out, or chat online with anybody, they do it voluntarily, they were not raped. I remember when I was 16, I wish I had as much sex as I could get. In countries where the age of consent is 14 such as in Canada, sociologically this wouldn’t be an issue at all, but we are in Jesusland!!!

Posted by: Andrew | October 3, 2006, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

No doubt Foley is a pedophile and a rat. He also needs to spend time in big boy prison in the gay weight lifters cell block. However if he were a Democrat the ruckus would be much less. He would be quietly forced to resign. The New York Times might even run a story on how Mr. Foley was just spreading “sexual diversity”. Think I’m off base? Remember when the media was in full defensive mode protecting Bill Clinton? We were at first treated to stories of how Monica had a “screw loose”. And once the blue dress came to light, we were treated to commentaries on how this was a “private matter” in effect none of our business. And finally how lying about infidelity was admirable as it saves peoples feelings. So save the GOP is responsible crap, it won’t fly. Mr. Foley and only Mr. Foley is responsible here. The media has no credibility anymore, not since they’ve chosen sides.

Posted by: David | October 3, 2006, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

SIN?? Only religious nuts refer to mental illness as SIN. No wonder we can’t get anyone to care enough to provide mental health insurance. Our society is mentally ill starting with Mr. George W. Bush. He keeps sending mentally ill troops back into Iraq who are on PROZAC. How sane is that? Get HELP for the GOP; send them all to qualified psychiatrists (M.D.’s) – Please!

Posted by: Granny | October 3, 2006, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

I am a gay man, 38, and I have three childern that I love very much. I have never had a desire to draw the attention of that age (20 or under). Being gay does not mean you are a responsible person who needs to act as such. This congressman should be ashamed of himself.

Posted by: Erik | October 3, 2006, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Foley is just another of the many phony hypocrite politicians, who has or has not yet been exposed.
It makes no difference whether Foley is Republican or Democrat, I will not be among the fools that will waste time making this a partisan issue.

Posted by: richard kobzey | October 3, 2006, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Hey, at least this page isn’t dead at the bottom of some river…

Posted by: Not Drunk | October 3, 2006, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

DEMOCRATIC LOGIC: Blame the Republicans for Foley boy terrorism and blame Bush for world terrorism. That’s how the Dems think. Bush didn’t fly into the Twin Towers and the Republicans didn’t send those IMs. How about convicting the perpetraters!
But the Lefties are a bunch of hypocrites when they don’t convict their guys for drownings, relations with boy minors, adultery on government time, homosexual
prostitution…and the list goes on!

Posted by: Joey | October 3, 2006, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

The difference between the GOP and the Democrats here is that this will keep many GOP voters home, to punish their representatives involved. In the case of Clinton, Studs, Frank et al, Democratic voters made excuses for them and continued to vote for them in droves anyway.
Maybe Foley would be more at home in the Democratic party. He wouldn’t have to go through rehab, just blame a “vast right-wing conspiracy”.
Interesting that CREW, the group that had the e-mails, is largely funded by George Soros, further proof that he owns the Democratic party. ;)

Posted by: Ben | October 3, 2006, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

You know what sucks about this is that if this had been me or any other regular joe blow that wasnt in our congress, etc etc…they would have my butt in jail so stinking fast it would make my head spin and thats the sick truth! I know, as a parent, that if this guy did this to my son I would kick the living snot out of him!

Posted by: Lorrie | October 3, 2006, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

To all you people calling Foley “sick” and then calling for his punishment. Where is your compassion? Shouldn’t people be treated, and people punished?
Where is the compassion for Foley’s poor family?
Why is there so much anger and hatred in America?

Posted by: Joe | October 3, 2006, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Foley is just another of the many phony hypocrite politicians, who has or has not yet been exposed.
It makes no difference whether Foley is Republican or Democrat, I will not be among the fools that will waste time making this a partisan issue.

Posted by: richard kobzey | October 3, 2006, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

I am not shocked. This is the kind of thing that is happening all the time, men with power abusing those who have no power. Our government has mutated to a system that breeds sick behavior.
Power begets power….The Bush Family.They abuse us by maintaining their powerful lifestyles fueled by our need for their oil.

Posted by: js | October 3, 2006, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Monica may or may not have been consensual depending on how you look at Sexual Harassment in the Work Place by someone in an obvious position of power. But there were certainly a lot of allegations against Clinton in respect to women where it was not consenual. Anyone remember the names Wiley and Broderick? Most of you do gooders did not get upset with Clinton over these very similar circumstances. You got angry with the accusers. I agree that if Foley is guilty (and his actions would lead me to believe that he is) he should resigned and be charged if what he did was illegal. Anyone who covered up on either side for any reason should also be punished. However, wouldn’t it be nice if people could get the facts before they go off the deep end and start calling for people to be crucified? If you are calling for people to be fired or forced to resign, when you don’t have any facts, you are making this a Republican attack and playing politics. A rose by any other name is after all a rose.

Posted by: Rick | October 3, 2006, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

“If this guy was a democrate not a word would be said. It would be swept under the rug.”
I love this. It WAS swept under the rug for over a year by Hastert and the rest of the Republican leadership in the House!

Posted by: Newbomb Turk | October 3, 2006, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

I think that it is time before this really gets out of control that we all take a step back and take a deep breath. Yes the X-Rep. Foley needs help and looked into for criminal activity. The news media needs to stop trying this man and the other people in the house including the Speaker in print and on TV. Then all of us out in the public need to allow the law officials to take the correct steps into who did what and when. I am sick of the people esp. Rep. Pelosi and others of lynching the Speaker and others before they have had a fair trial. And if they have done something wrong and or unethical it should be handle appropriatly not like it is now.

Posted by: K | October 3, 2006, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

I had to read carefully to find some actually people to defend this man on this blog. I knew someone would pull out the Clinton/Lewinsky thing. And, they smartly used the incorrect fact from Hannity. She was not 19, she was 22. But, why does that matter? Just so you blind NeoCons can harmonize with “teen”? Please tell me that you Dobson disciples see a difference between consenting adults, no matter how inappropriate, and Foley and this young man/page. If a Democrat did this, you would have him chemically castrated and put in front of a firing squad. For the bloggers above trying to rationalize this, put your son or daughter in this young man’s place. Finally, please learn to think for yourself.
If Hastert knew about inappropriate emails 11 months ago, he should step down as Speaker. That is not leadership, that is cronieism at it’s worst.

Posted by: Scott | October 3, 2006, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

They need to do the same thing to Foley as they did to Stubbs, Frank, Mel Reynolds and Clinton.
Oh, I forgot, those guys didn’t have cyber sex with thier pages/interns.

Posted by: Ed | October 3, 2006, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

You know what…I am sick of all of them. I think we should vote in all new people all the way around. Boy that would shake everybody up…and remind them all that we ARE watching.
Voter apathy is our worst enemy.

Posted by: Lucinda | October 3, 2006, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

A.) I am a Republican, NRA member, conservative, etc…neck as red as a sunset.
B.) Foley is NOT a pedophile – 16 is not pre-pubescent.
C.) Predator is a bit much. From the IMs I’ve read, his cyber-paramour was more than willing.
D.) Anyone using this to score political points is an ass. Comparisons to Studds or Clinton are inaccurate, and only muddy the waters.
E.) Any ranking Republican who tried to conceal this should resign in disgrace.
F.) Any Democrat – or member of the media – who sat on this until weeks before an election, in an attempt to score political points, influence an election or score a scoop, should have to resign in disgrace.
G.) Foley is an evil creep, a pervert and a hypocrite. He belongs in jail (general population), after castration, and at least one good to-within-an-inch-of-his-life beating.

Posted by: Steve | October 3, 2006, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

keep on blamming the messenger. the fact is the GrOPers dropped the ball. abc probably kept the e-mails and instant messages as long as linda tripp kept the blue dress. the simple soulution was not to lure 16 year old children for sex. lol talk about an october surprise!!!!!!!! surprise surprise…………

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

It needs to be a felony for a teacher, preacher, politician, or cop to have sex with anyone they work with. These perverts have been trying to screw these Paiges since the idea was conceived. They have too much time on their hands and need to be working instead of screwing kids.

Posted by: They won't listen anyway | October 3, 2006, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Is heterosexual pedophilia somehow “better” than homosexual pedophilia?

Posted by: Bella | October 3, 2006, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

I beleive Foley did the right thing and resign. Any member of Congress that behaves this way in either Party should take note to what Foley did. My questions are, why did ABC News who broke the story, sit on the story until now. ABC News got this info last year at the time of Hurricane Katrina. Apparently it was not as big of a story then. Oh, there was not an election. Not to condone Foley’s behavior, it was sick, but as the Constitution states in Article 1, and what the Democrates fight for, what is the problem with emailing messages, as sick as they are, as long as there was no action. Foley and anybody else that knew about these IM’s or harbored them until now should also resign in disgrace.

Posted by: DMJ1313 | October 3, 2006, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Foleys conduct is reprehensible. It is amazing how NAMBLA has been able to exist for years with the support of ACLU. This organization has allowd men to solicit underage boys for years without any trouble. Perhaps Foley should join this outfit which operates beneath the radar.

Posted by: jack | October 3, 2006, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Now he is saying he was molested and is gay. Why didn’t he just say he was gay before? Why now? A lady I work with met him briefly at a luncheon and said he was proudful, cocky and strutted around making sure he was in front of the cameras! He sure is in the spotlight now!

Posted by: tk | October 3, 2006, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

I read a post by “Mike” above:
Are there not more important things out there now than this crap?
Where were brilliant Conservatives like you, Mike, when Bill Clinton was being distracted from important issues like terrorism and Bin Laden?
NeoCons are the poster children for double-standards.

Posted by: Scott | October 3, 2006, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Monica was 19 when it started, and everybody forgot about power and harassment. Anybody have 19 year old daughters out there that think they’re just fine with predators like Clinton?
Stubbs (D) -with a 16 year old page. Nobody in the Democrats ever asked the guy to leave.
Franks (D) – with a boyfriend running a prostitution ring out of Frank’s own apartment. Still there.
Kennedy (D)- with a 23 year old staffer who just ends up dead because he drives off the bridge (probably drunk), and leaves her there.
Foley – forced to resign. By Republicans.
At least they chastise their own. Democrats DON’T CARE about any of it.

Posted by: Sharon Wilbur | October 3, 2006, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Having been in the various House and Senate office buildings several times, I must say that I always feel like a need a shower when I leave those places. The young interns, pages, and staffers are often drop-dead gorgeous and skin-tight business suits. It doesn’t take much to put 2 and 2 together. I’m not surprised about this and I wouldn’t be surprised to learn about rampant sexual misconduct (sexual misconduct, that is, not pedophilia) on the hill.

Posted by: Rick | October 3, 2006, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Foley might be a twisted pervert with kids but I bet that at least 20% of the democrats in Congress and the Senate are also screwing around in some fashion also. The Dems are a bunch of losers; calling the kettle black!

Posted by: Barry | October 3, 2006, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Hey people, relax.
Foley was only trying to do to these boys the same exact thing he and his republican cohorts have been doing to this whole country the past six years.
But on the other hands, it serves the country right for voting so irresponsibly.
Go to Hell, America.

Posted by: t. model ford | October 3, 2006, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Well North Korea is ready to launch a nuclear missle, China is holding at least 50% of our debt,Venasula is buddying with Iran to aim missles at us and our congressmen are cutting deals,etc and having online sex. This is ancient Rome all over again.We need a third political or fourth party to clean this mess up.

Posted by: Carl | October 3, 2006, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

To the person above who asked “do the muslim extremists have a point?” read up on Islam. Sex with a minor isn’t forbidden, hell their prophet Mohammed married a 6 year old and the Ayatollah Khomeini wrote that a woman should enter puberty in the house of her husband not the house of her father. Islam made pedophilia a pillar. (stand by for mass rioting over that)

Posted by: Tiffany | October 3, 2006, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Nobody wants to open the door to this closet, because there are many closets like this in Congress, Courts, Classrooms, Pulpits, Studios, etc…

Posted by: N Tony | October 3, 2006, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

The FBI cannot question you when you are in a Hospital. Thus the rehab.

Posted by: MEinHOUSTON | October 3, 2006, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

So last Fridays excuse was alcohol. Yesterday its mental illness. Today it’s that he was molested as a child.
What is it going to be wednesday?. Blame it on mommy for not breast feeding him ?. On Thursday he will blame the aspartame in diet soda.

Posted by: rjn | October 3, 2006, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

The current and former pages appear to be safe from Foley at least. The issue of the profound lack of oversight has yet to be addressed. Does anyone in this Congress know how to ask the right questions? Why didn’t the pages feel comfortable raising these issues with the Page Committee or the Clerk? Are there any other problems like these lurking in shadows?

Posted by: Chris | October 3, 2006, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Revolting and narcissistic, but a not an uncommon pathology among entitled, white males; if convicted he should, and probably will, serve time. The only thing more shameful is the “abuse excuse” that we are now being fed. Please. Heaven forbid he should own it. Oh for antiquity, where the mortally shamed just opened a vein.

Posted by: Lyle | October 3, 2006, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

why is there talk of cancelling the page program? is it because it’s too tempting for these guys who can’t control themselves?
Hastert should be ashamed of himself for letting this go on for far too long…

Posted by: K | October 3, 2006, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

I think Mark foley is cute

Posted by: joey | October 3, 2006, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

I read a post by “Mike” above:
Are there not more important things out there now than this crap?
Where were brilliant Conservatives like you, Mike, when Bill Clinton was being distracted from important issues like terrorism and Bin
enjoyin the great economy, safe environment, how about you

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

BUSTED!

Posted by: BigBad | October 3, 2006, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

It’s perversion and depravity plain and simple. Unless a Democrat does it, of course. Then, he’s merely “helping a young man find his true gay identity.”
How can you make it OK for high schools to have gay advocacy groups, yet deny that older gay people will be attracted to young adults, and try to gain entry into their sexual world?
This man is a pervert, a pederast, and ephebophile, but sadly he only will hang while life-long dedicated perversion is OK to do when viewed from the left. For democrats, it’s not ‘predation’ when they do it to each other–it’s ‘true sexual expression.”

Posted by: Jerry | October 3, 2006, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

So let me get this straight. First he blamed it on alcohol. That didn’t seem to garner the sympathy he needed. Now he’s a molestation victim?
If this doesn’t work, what’s next? Can nobody be accountable for their actions these days?

Posted by: FormerConservative | October 3, 2006, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Not only was this sweept under the rug for a “while”. But, here is the questions that need to be answered.
1. Who knew and when?
2. Who told these “kids” how to archive instant messages? (no IM program auto archrives conversations)
3. Who contacted these “kids” to get these IM’s? Most partents have no idea what there childern are doing in chat rooms, or instant messageing programs.
What I find amazing, is that the was sat on and no one seems to be worried about the kids

Posted by: D | October 3, 2006, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT PARTY YOU ARE IN.WHAT THIS CREEP FOLEY DID WAS WRONG.IT IS TIME FOR PEOPLE TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN ACTIONS.NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE.OUR GOVERNMENT WANTS THE PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT PARTIES TO FIGHT LIKE KIDS.GET A CLUE.LETS MAKE THEM ALL DO THE RIGHT THING OR GET THEM THE HELL OUT ON NOVEMBER.GO VOTE FOR THE WORKERS,NO MATTER WHAT PARTY!!!!!!

Posted by: scott | October 3, 2006, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Yea like -
Garry studds
or
Barney frank
or
Mel Reynolds (who was pardoned by slick willie)

Posted by: kEVIN | October 3, 2006, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

I LOVE IT, no matter how much you try to compare stuff from years ago to today to justify this great october surprise. lol, all the bitchin in the world is not going to stop us from taking the house in nov.

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

I’m a parent of 2 young kids. It’s hard to imagine ever sending them anywhere – even to school. Teachers, coaches, mentors, lawmakers, et. al.,: Who do you think you are?! Keep your dirty, disgusting hands off our children!! Why does this even need to be said?

Posted by: kat219 | October 3, 2006, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Bandwagon conservative-bashing for errant homosexual behavior. Kind of similar to over & over the “Catholic priests” being blamed for raping little boys, but never, not even a single “fair & balanced” newspaper ever mentioning that the male priests were practicing their homosexuality, not their Catholicism while engaging in their homosexual rapes.

Posted by: t | October 3, 2006, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Over 50% of all Democrats have more skeletons in their sex closets then you can shake a stick at! They are the biggest hypocrites in the world!
Too bad Dems; you are still going to lose the Senate & House races this Fall; nice try – you losers.
Barb in DC

Posted by: Barb in DC | October 3, 2006, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

I’m sorry, but does anybody ACTUALLY believe that these IMs are genuine? Compare the text to the previously released IMs. They don’t match. They’re not even close.
Oh, wait, I just got confirmation on their authenticity . . . from Dan Rather.

Posted by: UndeadBeav | October 3, 2006, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Mike,
don’t be so sure..

Posted by: HM | October 3, 2006, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Oh, now the pervert says he was molested. When all else fails, blame someone else. I really don’t give a d…. if he was molested or not. At some point people have to start taking responsibility for their actions.
This is where a liberal society leads you. Waaaaa… it is never MY fault, it is ALWAYS someone elses. And if that doesn’t work, then run with the moral equivalency! Joe Blow did it, so it can’t be too bad.
Stop rationalizing evil behavior and call it what it is. Just plain repugnant and WRONG! There is such a thing as black and white. Not everything is grey as the liberals would have you believe.

Posted by: Suz | October 3, 2006, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Look Even Republican Child Sexual
Predators Go To Jail Not Rehab!

Posted by: Sandy | October 3, 2006, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Has anyone verified that the instant messages are legit?
Either Foley or the teen would have needed to have logging software for the IM to even have been saved wouldn’t they?
Do you know how easy it is to fake an IM conversation? It’s incredibly easy.

Posted by: Paula | October 3, 2006, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

I’d like to know how all the people on this forum who blithely say that Foley didn’t have sex with a minor would feel if it was their 16 year old exchanging IMs with Foley. Pages have been informing each new class to avoid Foley since 2001. Yet according to one of the IMs whch refers to a meeting in San Diego, it’s very possible that there was actual physical contact between Foley and one or more of these pages.
Furthermore, since 1983 when Studds and a Republican Congressman were admonsihed for having sex qith pages, the laws regarding pedophilia have been strengthened. One of the chief sponsors of the “Adam Walsh” pedophile law WAS Foley. This is what makes his actions particularly hypocritical. Hoist by his own petard…

Posted by: Andrea | October 3, 2006, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

You know, I hope there is a whole big shake up. I am a republican and I don’t care. I want the people to be heard not this continual PC crap that all politicians shove down our throats. Anyone new coming in though? Well, they are going to have to be real careful…because in this day and age, there aren’t any secrets anymore. Things get exposed and broadcast loud and widely. All newcomers are going to have to be like Caesar’s wife…above reproach.

Posted by: Lucinda | October 3, 2006, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

I wonder whatever happened to Juanita Broderick. (Oops! Probably not allowed to point out the elephant in the living room to Democrats, am I?)
BTW – Glad Foley is gone.

Posted by: DB | October 3, 2006, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Why was this information held back for three years before coming to light? If you are part of whatever is behind this delay– in any way–you should turn in your journalistic credentials. Have other pages been exposed to this danger because you held back? What kind of person exposes young people to possible danger while he holds onto a story? Please explain.

Posted by: Laura | October 3, 2006, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

I’m finished with all this BS.
Michael Savage is right it’s all a
big scam “REPUBLICRATES” are gonna get us all killed.
Send me a guy or girl that has had a real job, not a life time politition.
If your concerned about my AMERICA i’ll vote for you.

Posted by: Philip M. Key | October 3, 2006, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

“Too bad Dems; you are still going to lose the Senate & House races this Fall; nice try – you losers”
keep dreaming, we have a contract to buy the house and will close the deal nov 7,
oct-surprise, surprise

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Okay, we need to clarify a bit… it does not matter if this man is republican or democrat, gay or straight. It matters that Foley is an adult human being living on this planet earth in this country and in a POSITON OF POWER over these young boys and girls. Most straight men & women are well-adjusted, moral, law abiding people. Some of them are sexual deviants & pedophiles (pederasts). Most GAY men & women are well-adjusted, moral, law abiding people. SOME of them are sexual deviants & pedophiles (pederasts). See where I’m going with this? Leave it to the republicans to come up with excuse after excuse: homosexuality, alcoholism, abuse. Whatever. Foley preys on children. He gets hot talking dirty to children! Someone’s son, someone’s daughter…his sexual orientation has absolutely nothing to do with this and yet I am afraid that all loving gays everywhere (who only want the rights to love & to marry & to have the same rights as women & other minorities in this country) will get the short end of the stick (no pun…) because of this. This is about a human being taking advantage of another human being. And of course, those other human beings in positions of power who did nothing to stop this.

Posted by: H | October 3, 2006, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

In answer to ‘Why hasn’t he been arrested’
Because the age of consent in DC is 16!!!!
16 16 16 get it!
16 is the age of consent in DC
Look it up for yourself….16 16 16
You don’t see that in the news anywhere, do you????

Posted by: Tony | October 3, 2006, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Even as a Republican I have to say that the finger pointing about this whole issue sickens me. Why are some people trying to justify this by saying “Well Senator So-In-So did this 3 years ago, why aren’t we looking at him?” We need to focus on this pervert and what he did. He needs to punished under the law, to its fullest extent.

Posted by: Jay in La. | October 3, 2006, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

I feel sorry for Foley’s family and friends (if he still has them). Imagine being the wife and hearing your husband has been in the closet the entire time and then only finding out in this manner.
I feel sorry for America and the world as I think this is more of a symptom rather than the core illness itself. There are a series of viruses quietly wreaking havoc on our future and we are too busy pointing fingers to notice. It goes way deeper than political party affiliation or family background. It’s been coming for generations and is being kindled by horribly poor use of available technologies like TV and Internet.
What a shame we turn away from a brilliant future of peace, happiness, and the like to follow this path of self-destruction and foundationless beliefs.

Posted by: Scott | October 3, 2006, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Uh the released IMs were pretty much “authenticated” when Foley’s own attorney admitted his client made them.

Posted by: Dana | October 3, 2006, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Stop the partisan sniping! This man is a sicko, and I frankly don’t think party has anything to do with it. Based on what I’ve seen I have one question: Why were these emails witheld until the election? This guy’s sick and should have been confronted ASAP. The partisanship before justice angle is unconscionable.

Posted by: HDalton | October 3, 2006, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

This is about the only time you will see the Democrats “gay bashing”

Posted by: Frederick in NC | October 3, 2006, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

You are absolutely right Paula. It is incredibly easy. We used to do it all the time in AOL and make up these hysterical and very realistic IMs. No way to tell them apart actually.
So on face value, IMS mean nothing but I gather the Foley camp is not disputing them.

Posted by: Lucinda | October 3, 2006, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Foley is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law!!!! I am tired of the media trying to convict him and others before their day in court!
A good example of the media frenzy is John Mark Karr!!!!

Posted by: Mark | October 3, 2006, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Why do my comments never get posted to this blog? Do I not have 1st Amendment rights?

Posted by: Kingsnake | October 3, 2006, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Mark Foley’s current predicament has absolutely nothing to do with being right wing or left wing, nor has it anything to do with being an alcoholic. His indecent internet sex with minors is simply inexcusable, yet this monster attempts to politicize it, and desperately attempts to reason his way through it by stating he was a victim of a pedophile himself – as if that somehow justifies his behavior. If that is the case, then he should have known better than to use his position of power to influence children to engage in such improprieties. What a jerk! No excuse Mark! No excuse! Don’t even try to squeeze your way out of this one!

Posted by: Carla | October 3, 2006, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

What 15 year old kid would have the foresite to save these emails & IM’s for three years to say I can affect the next election. Get real, its a plant!!!

Posted by: DJ | October 3, 2006, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

So how long did anyone, including the media and democrats know about this and keep it quiet until a few weeks before an election?
How many more kids were exposed to this stuff while someone waited for the “opportune time” to expose it.
Disgusting all.

Posted by: Keith Emery | October 3, 2006, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

You got my vote Scott – doesn’t matter if you’re a hypocritical Republican or wimpy loser Democrat.

Posted by: Joe | October 3, 2006, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

I feel even sorrier for the family of that guy who killed those Amish girls.
Inexplicable.
What ever happened to the days of Ozzie and Harriet and Leave it to Beaver?
How did we all get so lost?

Posted by: Lucinda | October 3, 2006, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

All that outrage and disgust… Jesus would say that whoever has not sinned should throw the first stone. Do you people feel better about yourself when you put other people down? Are you sure you are that perfect? Would you judge your brother/sister/father/mother or child the same way if they had done something similar?

Posted by: B | October 3, 2006, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Uh Mark, he resigned and said he was sorry. I think it is rather obvious.

Posted by: Lucinda | October 3, 2006, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Forget for the moment about what Democrat did this before what Republican did that. Let’s simply state that the only person responsible for this sick behavior is Rep. Mark Foley (R) FL. Not his drinking, not his Mom or Dad, not Uncle Ernie,…Mark Foley.
No has suggested credibly that anyone in the Republican leadership knew or tolerated Foley’s sickness. If he broke the law he should be tried and sent to jail. No more, no less. If anyone is trying to exploit this for political gain, I say they are not much better than Foley because they are using a tragedy for their own gain. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if, just once, something bad wasn’t turned into a politcal sideshow designed to further one party or the other’s fortunes?

Posted by: David Grey | October 3, 2006, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

I can’t believe the denial some of you are living in. His own attorney admitted he made the Instant Messages! There’s no plant! There’s no “faking”!

Posted by: Dana | October 3, 2006, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Pages turning over chat transcripts? Pages worried about elections? Don’t you think goverment officials are given laptops that log communications since they often have privy to top secret docs. This is 2006. GOP is reading your email right now! Getting an IM history is so easy a 13 year old can do it.

Posted by: Katie | October 3, 2006, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Wait a minute. 16 might make one sexually mature but not emotionally. My husband is a HS teacher and he tells me all the time about this or that 15 or 16 year old who come on to him for an “A” They are 16 going on 25. Nevertheless it is no excuse. Adults and adults in particular who are in a position of authority and trust should KNOW BETTER and rise above the hormonal surges of adolescents.
There is just no excuse when someone in power or has glamorous power like a government official or authority figure should pick their sexual playmates from an older crowd – not someone teetering between adolescence, childhood and young adulthood. Shame on them.

Posted by: Lucinda | October 3, 2006, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

“God Help America if the democrats regain power. I like Toronto Canada…maybe I will check out Realtor.com”
lol, you are so blinded by hate that you dont even realize that toronto is 100 times more liberal than any dem. i would love to see all GrOPers move to toronto.

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Foley needs to tried and if found guilty punished to the fullest extent of the law. Thankfully we have a President in office that won’t pardon sexual predators like the last one we had did.
The Soro’s group(Democrats only club) that had these IM’s for months and possibly years without turning them over to Law Enforcement should be tried and if found guilty punished to the fullest extent of the law.
These poor gay children should not have been used by a predator nor exploited by partisans on the left, like so many who have posted on this today.

Posted by: Zimba7 | October 3, 2006, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

What evidence is there that this IM was ever written or sent? Are we supposed to take ABC’s word for it? How do we know that it wasn’t made up, given to ABC and they didn’t bother to vet it? We don’t. It’s not like ABC has a reputation for careful reporting. Foley’s clearly a creep, but that doesn’t mean that half or more of this stuff isn’t made up.

Posted by: gina | October 3, 2006, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Looks like he can’t blame the alchoholism anymore. Unless he was voting while drunk @ 6 pm.

Posted by: poosnake | October 3, 2006, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Hey everyone. This is your America. This is your Congress, your Senate, your Judiciary Branch and your Presidency. If you feel surprised by the actions of this politician, or any other for that matter, then shame on you! This is the exact reason for the degredation of America. Politicians who care not for anything but themselves and their position. He is not the first and not the last.
Maybe if we make politicians tell the truth from the start instead of saying what a certian constituency wants to hear at the time, we might find out how dishonest and mentally deranged our Government really is!

Posted by: Cliff | October 3, 2006, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Foley is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law!!!! I am tired of the media trying to convict him and others before their day in court!
A good example of the media frenzy is John Mark Karr!!!!

Posted by: Mark in KS | October 3, 2006, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

If Foley isnt prosecuted to the full extent of the law for this– I won’t vote for a Republican dog catcher for many years to come.

Posted by: Capdeblu | October 3, 2006, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

and you GrOPers thought swiftboat was a good october surprise, lol, surprise, surprise

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

I just LOVE how Republicans are trying to say media insitutions, some of whom first forwarded this on to the FBI, are more responsible than GOP leaders who bear ultimate responsibility for it and did nothing while taking PAC money from Foley. I mean, I understand the need for partisan defense, and I know that the media often IS out to get Republicans. But at a certain point defense starts to sound like delusion.

Posted by: Ken | October 3, 2006, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Gina,
Does a congressman resign IMMEDIATELY after these archives are released if there’s not some truth to them?

Posted by: Jon | October 3, 2006, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

I am a registered Republican from Florida’s 16th district. I am ashamed to say I was duped into voting for Foley in 2004. I will not vote for ANY Republicans this time around. I have never voted a straight-Democrat ticket in my whole life but in 35 days I will do just that. In Washington they have treated the country like dirt, allowing thieves (Duke Cunningham), con men (Abramoff-Tom DeLay) and now perverts to “serve” as long as they vote the Party line. In Tallahassee they have bowed to every big business interest they could get by with, while ignoring public education. We can not stay this course one day longer.

Posted by: Howboy | October 3, 2006, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

If you read this thread all the way through, the combination of toxic partisanship and just plain stupidity expressed makes it clear how we have sunk so low in the political process and, as a nation, lost the world’s respect.
It’s not just Foley, it’s the two-party political system that is perverted these days. There’s not a politician on either side of the aisle that could be called — with a straight face — a leader or a statesman or even honest. They are not in the business of running the government or protecintg citizens; they are only in the business of election.

Posted by: rj | October 3, 2006, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

How many boys did he get…..?16 is the age of consent…he is gay…..leave him alone….the 16 year old boys no what they are doing…they want sex just like everyone else….

Posted by: Rick | October 3, 2006, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Swiftboat was a great October surprise. This will die and the stupid Rep. will stay in office.

Posted by: HM | October 3, 2006, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

just goes to show what type of people are in the government. it makes me sick. especially since the news is making a huge deal about it. it has been on the news for 3 weeks now….dont ask how its been three weeks. time is a complicated cycle that many dont understand.

Posted by: anonymous | October 3, 2006, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

i just heard foley admitted to being gay. he is republican, i wonder why he did not take his colleages advice and go and get “cured”

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Please stop using the term “pedophilia” to describe this situation involving 16/17 year olds. GO LOOK UP THE WORD IN THE DICTIONARY. This is not pedophilia. We’re talking about young adults here: 16/17 years old, not 10 year olds. As if tons of teenaged guys this age aren’t dating and even having all manner of hardcore sex with multiple partners already. STOP EXAGERATING. If they weren’t flirting with Foley, they’d probably be out having booze and sex parties with their peers anyway. Were you people born yesterday? Honestly… I’m certain though, that if people (or even their parents) find out the identities of the pages involved that they WILL suffer psychological harm from public exposure of their homosexual sex lives… but ironically, not from the sex itself (or in this case, no sex, as there WASN’T ANY SEX).

Posted by: Ryan S. | October 3, 2006, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

The idea that Democrats have more sexual closet fodder than Republicans is complete fantasy.

Posted by: Gls | October 3, 2006, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

From what I remember…Karl Rove talked about the “October Surprise”…not the Democrats. The “blame the gays” argument from the republicans is certainly not a suprise. Foley using the fact he was molested by a “clergyman” is not a surprise. Republicans have always had the knack of going on the attack mode. What does amaze me is that people do not realize what the impact of Foley being closeted as a gay man…working as a republican representative…has on this issue. Foley being a gay man is not the issue…being a closeted gay man…trying to pass himself off as something he was not…is the shame of it all. Whether he wrote “naughty” (to quote Tony Snow) e-mails to boys or to girls under the age of 16…Foley shows himself to be a pig…

Posted by: JK | October 3, 2006, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Please check your facts before you post or you end up sounding really bad. CREW (the liberal group who received the emails a month ago) sent them to FBI to be investigated. The FBI declined to do so. The only people “sitting” on this story was Hastert and the other Repubs on the Page committee.
The lewd IMs that Foley has admitted to writing weren’t turned over to the media until this frenzy began a few days ago.

Posted by: Dana | October 3, 2006, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

im a republican. a pretty staunch one. i dont care. this is just gross. kick him off.
and for those who say “how did abc get this…”
i dont care.

Posted by: whiterice | October 3, 2006, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

RJ you have made the most intelligent post out of all 400+ of them. I can’t believe the way people cling to their party lines. It’s sick.

Posted by: Dana | October 3, 2006, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Foley’s behavior was obviously disgusting, but it is odd that the pages saved the IM’s, just like it was odd for monica to save the blue dress(at the urging of linda of course). It’s also becoming clear that the media knew about this months ago but waited until now to release it. Sorry folks, but the sad truth is that this is just the usual b.s. politics and everyone involved looks pretty pathetic.

Posted by: scot | October 3, 2006, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

The 2 party political process is a failure and reading all the neo left and neo right comments only proves it. Demand a change instead of sticking to the binary choice of 0 or 1.

Posted by: Schmaus | October 3, 2006, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Innocent until proven guilty!

Posted by: JESUS SAVES! | October 3, 2006, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

No defense to Foley – but if this has genesis to his childhood – then he is not completely at fault.

Posted by: TT | October 3, 2006, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

The age of consent in DC is 16.

Posted by: Gls | October 3, 2006, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

This action by Foley and any other persons (and I’m sure there are plenty more)who does this is disgusting!
But what else can we expect when we have to teach our children all about sex starting in the first grade or kindergarten. If Foley is guilty he should be prosecuted according to the law, but the teenagers should also bear some responsibility.

Posted by: Sharon | October 3, 2006, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

RJ is spot on!! Its only about staying in power and getting re-elected. The two party system is broken and can’t be fixed.

Posted by: HM | October 3, 2006, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Foley was a homosexual man that was to ashamed that his party would denounce him that they made him resort to this idiotic crime. Shame on the Republicans

Posted by: djv | October 3, 2006, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

The idea that it’s perfectly OK to engage in sexual behavior with 16 year olds because “they are doing it with their peers” anyway is ridiculous. There is a reason why 16 year olds are MINORS. Do you remember the terrible decisions you made when you were 16? We can’t stop kids from having sex with each other, but we can stop adults from taking advantage of the naiveness of kids.
We’ve made the age of majority 18 because we, as a society, figure that once you’re old enough to go out in the world and do your own thing, you need to be responsible for your own decisions. 16 year olds still live at home with their parents and go to compulsory school. They aren’t capable of making decisions like who to engage in sex with. Maybe they do it all the time. That doesn’t mean that adults who know better should be allowed to take advantage of them.

Posted by: Dana | October 3, 2006, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

One: ABC has already stated they got the IMs directly from the pages. There’s no mystery there.
Two: Many many people, including high school kids, routinely save their IMs. It’s called “logging” — you turn it on in the preferences, and AIM automatically saves every message you send or receive. You don’t need to choose to save any individual IM. I log all of my IMs, and there are things in there I just haven’t bothered to delete — spam messages and the like.
Three: Are Republicans really bringing up something that happened *23 years* ago? Me, I was eleven when Studds was censured — for something he did when I was *one*. Should I have spoken up then? That makes as much sense in the context of criticizing the modern Democrats as bringing up Watergate.

Posted by: jere7my | October 3, 2006, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Can we *please* remember that homosexuality and pedophelia are separate issues? NOT THE SAME. Most gay people have relationships with consenting adults. Foley’s problems are not that he could be gay, but that he likes young people.

Posted by: jammel5 | October 3, 2006, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

I could care less what the “rest of the world” thinks about this. This is a US problem. It is about lack of accountability in government…and do you know who is to blame? We are…the voters who don’t insist that these elected officials follow the rules.when they don’t do their jobs and behave they should be removed from office.
Back when Clinton was in office this crap went on all the time and it was tolerated by the Democrats in Congress and the voters, where was the outrage then? This is nothing more than a pre-election plan to make all Republicans looks bad. It is dirty politics plain and simple. If someone had these emails and IM’s why didn’t they report the activity before now? I think you know the answer to that one, at least if you are being honest to yourself you do.

Posted by: LJS | October 3, 2006, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

This is more than a pedophile. How did ABC get this information? Must have found the Page? or did they get if off a file server somewhere?? If MaF54 was using his PHONE, who is intercepting these messages??? Its unlawful to listen to anothers telephone messages or calls. COME ON ASK QUESTIONS!!!

Posted by: Barry | October 3, 2006, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Why not the old “alcholic, check into rehab” excuse? It worked for Kennedy. They’re all disgusting.

Posted by: Lucy | October 3, 2006, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Whoa, righteous people! I was only 16 when a man my father’s age took me under his wing and changed the direction of my life by helping me to accept myself, by introducing me to music, literature and history, by steering me to college and–most importantly–by loving me. I shudder still, at age 70, to think what my life might have been without his intervention. Yes the relationship became mildly sexual, but to label him as a “pedophile” is just legalistic and ludicrous. This mentoring relationship between an older man and a young man is as old as the Greeks and has flourished at all times and in all places. Foley has surely violated his special responsibility as a congressman, but he doesn’t deserve the vilification from the self-righteous.

Posted by: Howard | October 3, 2006, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Foley’s actions were absolutely wrong. He should be prosecuted by the fullest measures under the law. The timing of this is absolutely political. Let he who is without sin in Washington cast the first stone!!! STOP WITH THE SUDDEN PIOUS PRETENCE YOU DEMOCRAT HACKS. Do your research – In 1983, Democratic Rep. Gerry Studds of Massachusetts was caught in a similar situation. In his case, Studds had sex with a male under-aged teenage page. Studds ignored congressional censure and was reelected several more times before retiring.

Posted by: TruePatriot24 | October 3, 2006, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

I would like to know how anyone can get IM’s or emails off AOL, Yahoo, or MSN or MySPace, assuming thats where they came from. The Foley act its self is bad. But getting the personal email or IM’s of someone may be a bigger crime in the end.

Posted by: BillD | October 3, 2006, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

So, a Republican unethically and immorally makes sexual advances to his underlings, and he is a “depraved pervert.” If a Democrat does it, like former NJ governor Jim “McCreepy”, then he’s just a “confused, gay American.”
Got news for you. The only difference between a Republican homosexual sex fiend and a Democratic one is the closet door. Depravity knows no party lines, and prosecute and persue these twinks.

Posted by: T | October 3, 2006, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

I am so sickened with the thought of Pedophiles even being in our Country, let alone, one of our Leaders. This is where all our Freedom of Speech has gotten us. Our system that sticks up for the guilty one, as long as they have money. Put Foley away for a long time. All sex offenders with minor children are the scum of the earth. NO SECOND CHANCES for Pedophiles.

Posted by: Grandma of 13 | October 3, 2006, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

This will backfire very badly on the Dems… those homophobic gay bashers. Who saves instant messages for three years? After the election in which the Repubs will landslide defeat the pathetic Dems an investigation will reveal, not the money trail since that will have been erased, but that there may have been an attempt at extortion, but no proof. In any event, even mid pres term elections have become wicked sport. All pols need note to keep every aspect of their lives sqeakey clean.

Posted by: Jim | October 3, 2006, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

At the factory I work at, a co-worker’s 16 year old son had an affair with a woman in her late thirties who also worked with me (legal here). The relationship was exposed. Everyone at the plant talked about it daily for months. All the guys I worked with thought it was great, made endless jokes, and made comments like “God, I wish I coulda got my hands on her.” Etc, etc, etc. Even his own dad bragged him up. Out of dozens and dozens of people I heard comment about it, perhaps a couple people thought it was inappropriate. The only person who really seemed to care was the woman herself, who abruptly quit and moved outta town like a batt outta hell. The boy came to the refinery some time after it was exposed, and when people mentioned it to him he just blushed and got this contented grin on his face and the guys joked around with him about it. To him, it was a good thing obviously.
So, this has me thinking. Is this Foley thing really about the age so much as it is about the homosexuality? ‘Cause up ’til now I got the impression that everyone thought the teen boy with an older woman was pretty darn cool or something.

Posted by: Richard | October 3, 2006, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

This is a perfect example of why there should be one term limits. Power just corrupts, pure and simple. One term limits
would put a stop to this kind of stupidity on both sides of the aisle.

Posted by: Scott Newcomer | October 3, 2006, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Another family oriented republin at his best….

Posted by: Easy | October 3, 2006, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Foley should be prosecuted…….
…..
any fool knows that.

Posted by: Raymond | October 3, 2006, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

If he were on your competitor’s show, “To Catch a Predator,” he’d be on his way to jail by now. Thanks to your work, he will be soon.

Posted by: drc | October 3, 2006, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Two words: Gerry Studs

Posted by: Stan | October 3, 2006, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

If MaF54 was using his PHONE, who is intercepting these messages??? Its unlawful to listen to anothers telephone messages or calls. COME ON ASK QUESTIONS!!!
Posted by: Barry | Oct 3, 2006 8:25:25 PM
Probably the “watergate” burglars. You do remember watergate don`t you?………hehehe

Posted by: StringBean | October 3, 2006, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Do all of these comments about Gerry Studd mean that if it turns out Foley DID have sex with a page/pages that you will eat your words?

Posted by: Dana | October 3, 2006, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Let’s see…first he’s caught doing something he definitely shouldn’t be doing, then he claims to go into rehab, then he claims he was molested by a clergyman but can’t name him or the church. If this man were pinocchio, his nose would be as long as his genitals should be stretched, before they castrate him.

Posted by: LouisianaResident | October 3, 2006, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

“I would like to know how anyone can get IM’s or emails off AOL, Yahoo, or MSN or MySPace, assuming thats where they came from. The Foley act its self is bad. But getting the personal email or IM’s of someone may be a bigger crime in the end.”
can you believe the gull of republicans, NOW they have a problem with listening to conversations without a warrant, go figure.

Posted by: mike | October 3, 2006, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Kudos to RJ! Realistically and succinctly put. And both Dems and Reps can just shut up.

Posted by: thegEEk | October 3, 2006, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Tonight, at 7:40pm, Fox News showed a picture of Congressman Foley and had the word, “Democrat” printed under his name. This is almost as bad a scandal. Will any other news agencies call them on this?

Posted by: Phyllis Martin | October 3, 2006, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Just lookin at Foley`s picture makes me glad he IS NOT my kids wrestling coach.

Posted by: Bilderberger | October 3, 2006, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

I am extremely bothered by some posts here that seem to equate Foley’s behavior and pedophilia with homosexuality.
Foley’s behavior is inexcuseable, amoral, and hypocritical. It is horrifying, disturbing.
But homosexuality is not pedophilia, and homosexuals are no more as likely to be pedophiles than heterosexuals.
When something as overwhelmingly disturbing as this happens, I think we tend to lash out at people that make us uncomfortable and sometimes “throw the baby out with the bath water.” But I think it is important to remember that there are healthy gay men and women out there that equally condemn pedophilia and Foley’s behaviors just as much you or I do.
Homosexuality is not illness, though we may not approve of it in our own lives. And let’s not equate it to sex offense.

Posted by: Matthew | October 3, 2006, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

One question. If he was your neighbor what would want to happen?

Posted by: ericshoe | October 3, 2006, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

I think the timing of the release of these IMs should be investigated. These should have been released as soon as they became available. Foley should have been stopped long ago.

Posted by: MIke | October 3, 2006, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

This is interesting. All these liberals and dem stating that this homosexual relationship is wrong, and that one of the two consenting parties should be sent to jail, and the key thrown away. What a turn of events! Can we count on their suppot against gay marriage in the future? Of course not. Not because one of the parties was 16 (of age in DC), but rather it is opportunistic now to blame the entire Republican party for one man’s wrong.

Posted by: Dave | October 3, 2006, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Dana: if Republicans agree Foley should resign for cybersex with a 16 year old, shouldn’t Democrats have at least asked Studds to resign for REAL sex with a 16 yr old? “As the House read their censure of him, Studds turned his back and ignored them. Later, at a press conference with the former page standing beside him, the two stated that what had happened between them was nobody’s business but their own”

Posted by: stan | October 3, 2006, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

First our President is having sex with interns in the Oval Office and lying about it and now a Congressman having sex talk with miner boys on the House floor. This is bigger than Democrat and Republican it is a reflection of our society.

Posted by: RTC | October 3, 2006, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

This is one more extremely good reason that we need term limits…these folks have the ultimate entitlement and believe that the law does not apply to them. The perversion, perks, addictions all smack of imperial Rome, where the Senate was also very much a job for life…Lets rotate these people in and out so that they can better relate to the real world…Remove their ultimate benefits also and put them on Social Security and Medicare while we’re at it.

Posted by: Frank | October 3, 2006, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

The only way Republicans can keep the power in the house and sentae is if everybody resigns, now and move on.
Do it for your country. Do it for the troops who are figthing for your freedom in the Islamic Republic of Iraq.
Just do it.

Posted by: Richard | October 3, 2006, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Foley shouldn’t have resigned, he should just have announced that he was changing parties from Republican to Democrat. The Democrats have a long history of defending pederasts etc. (can you say Gary Studds?) Foley would still in congress, happily collecting his retirement benefits, getting his jollies while he votes, and being actively defended by the Democratic leadership if he had only announced that in his heart of hearts, he’s always been a Democrat. Clearly he’s an unimaginative pederast, otherwise he’d be a Democrat.

Posted by: rehash | October 3, 2006, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

If Foley was a Democrat he would have just earned consideration for ’08 ticket. However, the GOP did the right thing and flushed him.

Posted by: GMark | October 3, 2006, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

I am a Democrat and have voted Democrat most of my life. That is changing now. I will not vote this Fall. I am sick and tired of my party using stupid issues like this to attack the Republicans. Can’t we beat them on THE ISSUES? Sure, what Foley did is sick, but the media and my party’s reaction to it are disgusting!!!

Posted by: DemVoter | October 3, 2006, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Gerry Studds, Gerry Studds. At least people are spelling his name right. Too bad they’re forgetting the Congressman censured with him in the same vote–Republican Rep. Dan Crane of Illinois. He didn’t resign, either.
Oh, but it’s very different. Crane’s page was 16.

Posted by: Tri | October 3, 2006, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

What a depraved and immoral society we are living in!
Makes me say-” even so Lord Jesus come.”

Posted by: Martina | October 3, 2006, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Any one in a position of Authority over a minor (ALL of congress) and having knowledge of abuse of a minor in must report to authorities immediately. If they held on to these IM’s for ANY length of time before their “release” to the media, THEY and all parties concerned are GUILTY of a CRIME themselves or NOT reporting such abuse – MEDIA OUTLETS and POLITICIANS of BOTH PARTIES INCLUDED. Grandmother PELOSI should be aware of THAT.

Posted by: Greg | October 3, 2006, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

I think the timing of the release of these IMs should be investigated. These should have been released as soon as they became available. Were they?

Posted by: MIke | October 3, 2006, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

It’s no use arguing. People are irrational. The fact that 16 is the legal age of sexual consent is being completely ignored. Everybody wants to think it’s 18 or older.

Posted by: Gls | October 3, 2006, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Congressman Foley needs to be painted with the brush he helped shove through Congress. Jail, Level 2 Sex Offender Identification, and hounding…er…listed on the National Sex Offender Registry, wiht picture and address, for the next 15 years.

Posted by: Kws1949 | October 3, 2006, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

I also wonder why this kid happened to save those IMs and emails, but now that I think about it, if I get messages from somebody famous, I’m going to save them too. I’ve got love letters from a well-known professor. I’ve never had a reason to show them to anyone, but I’ve got them. . .

Posted by: larkie | October 3, 2006, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Funny how as soon as they get caught red-handed they check into some BS rehab. If rehab is so good at whitewashing such crimes, why didn’t the GOP leadership entered him into one when they found out about this months and possibly years ago? Perhaps they believe the only value rehab has is a tool to deflect public anger.

Posted by: Ron | October 3, 2006, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Hang on!
IM produces a plain old text file that can be easily modified using word pad or note pad. Both are native, easy to use Windows text editors. Moreover, you can use those editors to create brand NEW IM chat logs of an incident the NEVER, ever happened.
Let the FBI and others sort this out before folks start a lynch mob! Remember everyone except illegal aliens have “Due Process.”
And don’t bang the GOP in general for this fool’s bad deeds. There is way, way too much at stake. Get a grip. Calm down. Let the process work!
TJ

Posted by: tom joad | October 3, 2006, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

So Foley now is an alcoholic and an abused child and that justifies his disgusting behavior, ha. If that’s the case, they should open the doors of all prisons, since it apears that all criminals that are alcoholics and abused children are innocent.
Gimme a break.

Posted by: Lone Star Lake | October 3, 2006, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

NOPE. The Legal Age Of Consent in Florida is 18 years, NOT 16. Look it up.
At the time of Jesus, kids got married off at 13.

Posted by: FRANK | October 3, 2006, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Regardless of the age of the boys (age of consent issues), the moral element and the integration of sex play whilst “doing the people’s work” is reprehensible.

Posted by: Franklin Pierce | October 3, 2006, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

foley’s sick and disturbing behavior is unacceptable, and should go punished. however, what some of you fail to realize is that this is not exclusive to his party. what this is being made out to be is an attack on the republicans. and this goes further than just the foley instance, because there is mention of other issues in some of these comments, and it makes me sick to see that this is what they are using as their weapon. when will the democrats realize that this country will not fall to their name calling and finger pointing until they actually do something that proves them capable to run this country?

Posted by: jen | October 3, 2006, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Everyone needs to hear the bell and go back to their political corners. The referee in this case will be a judge, jury and the voters if anything criminal comes out of this, which appears unlikely.
The age of consent issues are bogus. What the guy did is wrong and foul, and it is politically unbiased, DEm or Republican, anyone who conducts themselves this way is no leader, and not worthy of a vote.
Hiding behind this evenings latest excuses is also a pile of crap. How many people / things can he blame for typing his IM’s?
Patriotism is often the last refuge of a scoundrel…….in Foleys case he stopped just short of that……

Posted by: Esteban | October 3, 2006, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

So checking yourself into a Rehab Clinic, hiding behind the “Doctor/Patient” confidentiality clause, will NOT make this go away…
You should not use the Crutch, SO many people use..”Oh, he/she was abused as a child”.
So, if you grew up Poor does it give you the right to STEAL, later in life? NO!
For once TAKE Responsibly for your actions Mark Foley, and not hide behind the doors of an Alcoholic Rehab Clinic!

Posted by: Patricia | October 3, 2006, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

It’s ironic that the “true Americans” don’t need any evidence at all to lock up “terrorists” for years without trial, but cannot for the life of them spot a pervert who is recruiting right under their noses. Oh, but don’t worry. I’m sure they’re doing everything they can to keep our country safe.

Posted by: T66 | October 3, 2006, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

That sick…Real sick

Posted by: Lucy Klingel | October 3, 2006, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Gimme a break, so what if Foley checks into rehab. Poor excuse… wait til he finds out that one of the lessons of recovery is being accountable. True, alcoholism is a disease but so is pedophiles (it has got to be a mental illness) and sociopaths but they still go to jail. If someone murdered someone under the influence of alcohol, they are not called alcoholics, they are called murderers. The same goes for pedophiles. AND, although alcoholics are very good at manipulation and secrecy, most people in their company would notice SOMETHING! Last but not least, I am very dissapointed with I believe is the DA who said “he is an alcoholic, not a pedophile” and with our highest ranking government official in my state who said “I have known him for ___ years..if this is true, I hope he doesn’t have go to jail. What if it were your kids, friend or no friend, this is one who should fry. AFter all, there are AA meetings in jail.

Posted by: Floridian resident | October 3, 2006, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

First, the alcohol made him do it. Second, it was the unknown clergyman, from the unknown denomination that caused him to do it. Who next? Marie Leveau, the voodoo queen. Perhaps she cast a spell over him.

Posted by: Ronald | October 3, 2006, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

I’m not sure what’s more shocking – foley’s abuse of minors; the failure of house leadership to report the suspected abuse to the FBI *immediately*, as required by the federal law Foley helped write; or the people on this list trying to give Foley a “get out of jail free” card because either (a) some adults had sex with other adults or (b) there are also pedophiles on MySpace, or (c) those who are trying to paint this as some conspiracy on ABCs part due to its timing, while completely ignoring the fact that timing would not have been an issue if the Republicans had fulfilled their legal responsibilities at the time they became aware of the suspected abuse.
This man harmed minors – children under the age of 18.
The leadership of the house was informed of allegations that he might be harming minors, and did nothing, even though federal law required them to do something.
That’s the issue. No excuses.

Posted by: Lee | October 3, 2006, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

From Washington Post article by Howie Kurtz today:
“On Friday afternoon, a strategist for Rep. Mark Foley tried to cut a deal with ABC’s Brian Ross.
The correspondent, who had dozens of instant messages that Foley sent to teenage House pages, had asked to interview the Florida Republican. Foley’s former chief of staff said the congressman was quitting and that Ross could have that information exclusively if he agreed not to publish the raw, sexually explicit messages.
“I said we’re not making any deals,” Ross recalls. He says the Internet made the story possible, because on Thursday he posted a story on his ABC Web page, the Blotter, after obtaining one milder e-mail that Foley had sent a 16-year-old page, asking for a picture. Within two hours, former pages had e-mailed Ross and provided the salacious messages. The only question then, says Ross, was “whether this could be authenticated.”

Posted by: stark | October 3, 2006, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Say it with me: Term. Limits. Now.

Posted by: aol | October 3, 2006, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

term limits, Term Limits, TERM LIMITS!
Power + privilege + time = Corruption

Posted by: Kelley | October 3, 2006, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Opinions vary widely regarding the harm caused by what Foley was involved in, but one thing is for certain. Foley demonstrated hypocrisy at its very worst. His campaigns and political career were based on “family values” and “protection of minors from predators.” His party is matched only by the Catholic Church in its efforts to marginalize any type of same-sex relationships. How ironic that this “family values” Republican is involved in what is possibly illegal, and definitely unethical behavior with young men.

Posted by: cbg | October 3, 2006, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

A highly unpopular war, whose death toll of soldiers is nearing that equal to the casualties of 9-11 itself, and along with other things, now a sexual scandal? Not just a sexual scandal, (as a president having an affair with an intern, a consenting adult is more of a sexual scandal) but pedophilia?
Now, what is good is he is resigning and is getting help, (and this is just my opinion) but this should clue people in to the fact that republicans/conservatives are not morally superior to others as they so often portray themselves. Beware of individuals such as these (ann coulter, bill oreilly…) and what darkness lurks within (…i’d mention george bush, but his darkness is in plain view, although he sees it as a bright white holy light). But like I said, this is just my opinion…
Don’t vote republican ever again.

Posted by: the patriot | October 3, 2006, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Pedophelia? Cover-up? What about the lies for war – mass murder for Cheney’s et al profits? The desire to draft 18-42 year olds? Bush’s great need to have ‘generations of war’ for the USA? If people are disgusted with pedophelia, what about all the other unethical things the USA gov’t does? Nowadays we Americans are afraid of our government. The USA was once a government ‘of, by and for’ the people. I’m glad I’ve lived overseas for nearly 20 years and haven’t paid taxes for the USA pedophelia racket and war machine.

Posted by: A. D. | October 4, 2006, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Hey Mike, 16 years old is NOT the legal age of consent in ALL STATES. It depends where this pervert was when he was sending the twisted IM’s. I cannot believe that anyone would stick up for Foley in this situation! So 15 is too young but 16 is ok because it’s “legal” in some states?! It is WRONG, it is SICK and the man deserves to be put in prison-Bottom Line. With great power comes great responsibility, and this is the most irresponible behavior I could ever imagine!!!

Posted by: Coffey | October 4, 2006, 12:06 am 12:06 am

The entire congress is involved. Every single one of them needs to be dumped. No more career politicians, one term and you are gone. No retirement plan either. Let them pay into SS like the rest of the sheep. This is the new Roman Empire with all the perversion.

Posted by: Lan | October 4, 2006, 12:09 am 12:09 am

The Studds scandal happened over a quarter of a century ago…The leadership in Congress behaved inappropriate then and the leadership in Congress is behaving innapropriately now…We cant do anything about the past, but we sure can do something about it NOW…Vote the rogues out of office!

Posted by: Eli | October 4, 2006, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Bla bla bla…who really cares out there: Republicans are outraged becuase it involves homosexual sex, and they hate it (but love the sinner????) Democrats are in glee because they want the House back. And the media would like nothing more than to get to all those pages and have them tell the tentalating details…. But what of the lives of these young adults… and their relationship to their families who may or may not know about their sexual orientation, or the struggles they are going through. Age of consent or not, to take advantage of one’s position to gratify one’s sexual urges is low. But so is this country’s need or necissity to destroy, distrort and manipulate human beings for the sake of their own cause or needs: Its all just sad. And what about all the others out there affected by a family member who do similar things. And all we have is blame and righteous indignation. Lies becomes truths, young adults becomes enfantilized sex object, and then vitims of both conservatives and liberals. Children become the object of violence. And our leaders who appear to have no vision… just spew the same old rhetoric. What ever happened to ‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you?’ I guess it’s what you get when you invest so much in a dogma or political view, and not enough in love.

Posted by: john | October 4, 2006, 12:17 am 12:17 am

It’s sad to see all of the anti-gay posts. Think about it. Who are the pederasts? Is it the closeted gays, or the ones who are out and who have dealt with the ignorant discrimination you see posted here? It’s the closet cases every time, same as in the Catholic Church scandal. Give me an out gay any day, they are decent and moral people just like most of us. So stop scapegoating them.
It’s pathetic that this creep Foley came out as “gay” right after getting caught. So typical. Like he came out as an alcoholic seeking treatment. Somehow he thinks that identifying with these groups will help him. Neither group wants him, obviously.

Posted by: BB | October 4, 2006, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Yes he should face criminal charges. If he were one of those freaks videotaped on dateline do you think he would be prosecuted?
I bet they were, even if they were Republican.
What gets me though is why the good ol’ family values party is rallying around this guy. They should be thinking of the welfare of the minors involved before worrying about how this will affect their party and impending elections. In fact, if they had presented a more responsible image about this, among many other issues, they wouldn’t be scurrying like cockroaches to scavenge a few votes at the last minute.
Probably, the reason they are circling the wagons around Foley is in hopes of limiting an investigation which is certain to open up yet another can of worms.
Worms, worms…hmmm..yep sounds about right.

Posted by: Jeff Eidson | October 4, 2006, 12:21 am 12:21 am

to Gls and all of the others who have posted in regards to the legal consent age being 16, while that may be true, there are still limits and and statutory laws in place. A 53 yr old can in no way lawfully solicit or have inappropriate relations with a 16 yr old legally in the United States. All States have a maximum of 3-4 years in age difference for those under 18 for a sexual relationship to be considered lawful and consentual.
As for the politicization of this, that is definitely out of line, both the dims and the repugs have their fair share of losers. I honestly believe it is time to start fresh and remove every incumbent, they have become drunk and fat on power and do nothing to serve you or I, and worse yet, they do it on our dime. I don’t feel represented, do you?

Posted by: thepatsy | October 4, 2006, 12:22 am 12:22 am

It may not be illegal because of the legal age of the participants, but what is equally outrageous is that Brian Ross of ABC News and others who knew about these explicit messages and waited until now-more than 3 years after the fact!-to report it. They don’t seem to care at all about the innapropriateness of this or the harm caused to the young people. they only want to create all tornado right before the election!

Posted by: Rob | October 4, 2006, 12:22 am 12:22 am

What an abhorrent, sordid mess … what else would you expect from the repressed troglodytes in power? That such a monster could ascend into the GOP’s upper echelon speaks volumes about the Grand ‘ol Pedophiles. Snow’s first comments were bliss for us libs: “naughty,” Mr. Snow? The Daily Show was TV gold: Foley Erect hedline, video of Caligula the film and of a 10-year-old boy page telling James Stewart’s Mr. Smith that if he “needed anything, call a page.” The Radical Right is in decline and will eventually return to its proper place in political discourse: the fringe.

Posted by: Chad | October 4, 2006, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Mike,
Lewinsky was 22, not 19.
Sean Hannity also lied about that today.

Posted by: Anon | October 4, 2006, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Hastert acts like he is entitled to his job. He is entitled to be Speaker.
He is shocked anyone would try to interfere with his entitlement – no matter what he’s done.
Pathetic.

Posted by: Anon | October 4, 2006, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Mr. Foley and all those who knew he was sending inappropriate emails should be sent to jail!
This is sexual perversion, not alcoholism. What a bum excuse for something that is inexcusable.
But you who want to blame all Republicans remember in 1993, while the Dems were in power, a Democrat was caught having sex with a page, not just emails. He DID NOT resign. The Democrat leadership DID NOT expell him or insist that he resign. He went on to be elected again until he finally retired several yrs later.

Posted by: PS | October 4, 2006, 12:30 am 12:30 am

This is just another Republican scandal that can be clearly traced back to being the fault of Democrats.
Republicans aren’t responsible for anything.
Ever.
I used to be a lifelong Democrat but this latest Republican scandal is the final straw and now I’m voting Republican Family Values all the way!
Democrats simply can’t be trusted to protect our country from Republicans.

Posted by: Confused | October 4, 2006, 12:31 am 12:31 am

I can’t recall – did the media ever invesitgate the timing of the swiftboaters allegations? Charges from almost 40 YEARS ago?
Answer: no.

Posted by: Anon | October 4, 2006, 12:31 am 12:31 am

When I hear his lawyer say his client has never done anything with any of these young males, and then read these IM’s I get a bit confused. Am I the only one who thinks these imply he has met with some of these boys alone before. “We can get some Ice Cream” … or talking about coming to his place to drink. Me thinketh there are some pages out there with a story they are to afraid to tell.

Posted by: Ray | October 4, 2006, 12:37 am 12:37 am

It’s interesting to read that some people here are saying that Monica Lewinsky was a teenager when she had her affair with Clinton. Where do they get that from? Why … from the right wing folks, of course. Today Sean Hannity repeatedly said Monica had been a teenager. A caller corrected him and he acknowledged the mistake and said he had the correct information right there in front of him. And then … again … not much later Hannity again called Monica a teenager. They know that the Bush supporters will beleive their lies if they repeat them often enough.

Posted by: Robert D. | October 4, 2006, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Finally, someone put the politics aside, and mentioned that the age of consent in a majority of states is 16. If a 16 year old kid, willingly engages in sexual conversation, flirtation, and intercourse, however “immoral”, it is still their choice. Thus they share accountability. Anyone remember Gary Studs? Save your feigned outrage for the voting booth and act like the tools you’ve all become. Truly sad.

Posted by: Zed | October 4, 2006, 12:42 am 12:42 am

I am a republican and VERY mortified at Foley’s behavior. I have children, and this sick SOB needs to resign and be prosecuted. I am a small business owner and thus far have voted for Rep. b/c of the tax benefits and general moral compass of the GOP leaders. From now on, I will base my votes on morality which will pretty much eliminate any politician I know. I am disgusted and ashamed for the GOP. I know how the Dems felt when Clinton had his trists, I see no morality on either side at this point

Posted by: Amy | October 4, 2006, 12:44 am 12:44 am

It seems to me if this page was a female instead of a male this would be statutory rape and discussion of pedophilia wouldn’t even be discussed. This has been blown way out of proportion. The Leaders of the House told him to stop after seeing the emails and with no knowledge of the Instant messages a member of power like Hastert would ultimately think that his telling him to stop would be suffice. This talk about House leadership really is total crap

Posted by: Jim | October 4, 2006, 12:48 am 12:48 am

October surprise. Way to go Mr. Ross. When you consider Barney Frank, KKK Sen. Byrd and Clinton, Foley should change parties where he belongs.

Posted by: Djohnson | October 4, 2006, 12:49 am 12:49 am

I just find it interesting that he used “your” instead of “you’re”
what an idiot!

Posted by: lisa | October 4, 2006, 12:49 am 12:49 am

DemVoter, in case you hadn’t noticed except for calling for an investigation (the right thing to do) the dems have been largely silent on it.
Which is all they need to do, the story has legs of it’s own and the GOP’s inept reaction and constantly shifting story is enough to keep it on the frontpage.
Nice troll though.

Posted by: Siberian | October 4, 2006, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Although, not surprised to find out that a congressman would do such a thing, I am pleased to hear so much of America blasting him as the scum he has chosen to be. As the mother of a child who was molested by a man who’s position as a policeman protected him from prosecution, I say that the harshest penalty possible should be given this pervert, and every community in America should follow in removing those “public servants” who prey on children. May God bless and cleanse America.

Posted by: Amy | October 4, 2006, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Everyone thinks they know and understand this situation. Republican leaders are distancing themselves and pretending they didn’t know what was going on and Democrats are backing away from their previous Clinton ideals of ‘personal life shouldn’t matter.’ Being a card carrying Democrat I am ashamed by everyone’s behavior, especially Rep. Foley. Foley did something that is unforgiveable and should have resigned before this point. But the one thing I must remind everyone is that he is a man. He has admitted to being abused. He is seeking help. He has lost his job, friends, family and his dignity on national television. This should be prevented from ever happening again but he has become a rallying cry of the political parties. I can guarantee everyone posting would not want their sex lives broadcast on TV…. Foley:get help. Our Representatives: make sure this never happens again. Everyone else: don’t make sex lives part of politics.

Posted by: DC | October 4, 2006, 12:56 am 12:56 am

I think the GOP should learn a lesson from this…when they lie with ‘dogs’ who live liberal lifestyles, they get up with ‘fleas’. They should have stuck with their moral standards instead of being politically correct. How hypocritical for the Democrats to exploit this scandal and act so shocked that the scandal involves teens when the Democrats are the ones who introduced and support the gay lifestyle in public schools, teaching kids all about how to have safe anal and oral sex. And hey, what’s this about Foley saying he was sexually abused as a boy? I thought gays claim that they were born that way and that homosexuality wasn’t an ‘acquired taste’.

Posted by: Cecilia | October 4, 2006, 12:59 am 12:59 am

My personal feeling is that none of this is actually against the law – Washington has an age of consent, and the kid was above it.
However, REGARDLESS of that, it is profoundly creepy, a misuse of power, probably sexual harassment regardless of age of consent, and did I mention profoundly creepy. That the Republican leadership knew something was going on and did nothing more than ask him to stop is, again not illegal, but reprehensible nonetheless. And honestly, I would have no complaint if they’d just forced him to resign quietly, since he apparently committed no crime – and then gave the state of Florida a little warning, since the age of consent there is 18 when the other party is over 24. The cover-up is just as stupid and disgusting as the act itself. And if the release was held up for political reasons (as opposed to attempts to go through law-enforcement or ethics channels instead of creating a national scandal), then that is also stupid and disgusting.

Posted by: David | October 4, 2006, 1:00 am 1:00 am

Republicans have proven they are willing to excuse lies which started a war, they excuse America using torture and now they excuse pedopiles in their ranks.
I’m sick of the excuses, there obviously is no crime sick enough to turn these creeps into decent citizens.
We are all being preyed upon by the Republicans but their willingness to look the other way when our children are molested by their own leaders just so they can keep their majority? It’s time for some convictions and a whole lot of resignations.
This is disgusting, like Abu Ghraib, like the new gulag and torture Bill, and like Jeff Gannon. Sick and hypocrytical traitors.

Posted by: DAVID | October 4, 2006, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Did I miss something? This Foley is a bad seed, but I thought what was known up til now was in bad taste but not like this. That is what I heard today at least. Did anyone notice that the reports on CNN mentioned a very important right wing paper the (Washington Times, circulation of 100K) has asked for Hastert’s resignation, but forgot to mention the WSJ (circulation over 1 mill) did not?
This guy is bad but lets be sure we are thinking clearly about the whole of it.

Posted by: smg | October 4, 2006, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Who’s been harboring a molestor for THREE years? If you knew these things were going on, and did nothing about it, you’ve obviously not only condoned this behavior, but also protected it. Why did you wait til not to disclose the info? To protect the child?

Posted by: Eunice Eichel | October 4, 2006, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Excuse me. When one looks at what constitutes seuxal abuse, the rules go thus: is the abuser older?
does the abuser have more authority or

Posted by: Woujer | October 4, 2006, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Foley’s only crime was being a republican gay hypocrit!
Yes, he was wrong to have disrespected the “rules of engagement” against fraternizing with a congressional page.
But what he should have done was come out, and have healthy open relationships with other gay men of legal age.

Posted by: Chas | October 4, 2006, 1:13 am 1:13 am

in florida, it is considered rape to have sex with a minor if you are an adult. this ‘age of consent’ thing is a little strange to me. of course it wasn’t real sex, was it? either way, the timing couldn’t be more important, considering foley was up for re-election. as far as ‘october surprises’ let’s wait and see what the republicans have in store… unless of course they decide they can’t afford to play their hand now that the dems beat them to the punch. personally, i think it’s time to throw out all of these bums and start over with some fresh faces that haven’t been involved the last terms miscarriage of democracy in the name of fear.

Posted by: jon | October 4, 2006, 1:18 am 1:18 am

Excuse me. All of you who want to exuse this man, either because you hate Clinton or because you support Republicans. It really doesn’t matter at all. What matters is the impact this man had on kids. Yes, kids. Argue however you will about whether the ‘kid’ in question was above or below sixteen years old. Sexual abuse is defined as a matter of power. Part of that power is usually defined in terms of older/younger. Usually, we look at an older teenager versus a child under twelve. In this case, (as in many sexual harassment cases) the ‘child’ was 16 years old. Certainly not an adult, but not a child, either. This is where the question of power comes in. A page has no power. A Congressman does. A 52 year old Congressman certainly has the power to intimidate a 16 year old. (Do you remember when you were 16?) Someone in a position of power over someone who has no power, who makes suggestions of sexual activity, is guilty of sexual harassment, at minimum. Period. Period. Period. Even if the guy were only a regular old jerk who held some power over a kid, asking him to measure his penis would be harassment. In a position of Congressman, as well as the guy in charge of preventing child endangerment… a 16 year old page with ambition will hardly complain. That’s why the power disparity is a problem, and why it’s looked at. There is no question who had power, here.

Posted by: Woujer | October 4, 2006, 1:18 am 1:18 am

I think what Foley did was fine. What’s the problem? Sex is the most important thing in the world, right? I can’t watch TV without being bombarded with commercials for Viagra, Cialis, Levitra, and sex on Desperate Housewives, Greys Anatomy, et al. It seems the whole world revolves around the male sex organ.
What do you expect people to do when they are not grounded?
And trying to hang this on others- Hasert, ABC or Democrats is stupid.

Posted by: Rich | October 4, 2006, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Send him to Abu Ghrab. Oh wait, thanks to the traitors on the left, the terrorists are living the life of luxury. I’d rather have Foley in office than the hate-America crowd like Pelosi, Reed, Turbin……Pass a bill forcing liberals into re-education camps before they do anymore damage to the country they hate.

Posted by: Dave | October 4, 2006, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Wow! How ineptly partisan…can’t even wait for the story to develop before “removing all doubt”.
Fine! Cut the child in half.
All who participated in OR “knew about” any sexual malfeasance should resign from their positions in Congress. All at the same time. Bring on the “Special Election Extravaganza”.

Posted by: Troy | October 4, 2006, 1:21 am 1:21 am

I email dateline awhile back about a case of a white man from Indiana who have issues but his family kept it undercover and moved him to flordia. This guy married and killed his wife like an animal. Again, it is a lot of these kinds of white males in America and have always being there,since 1776and before. I think most families members know how they are but want report it or just be in denied. All men in this country are not the same. But, this is what this society want us to believe to protect men like foley and all of his lookalike. Also, think about the school shooting in the country.

Posted by: Andrew | October 4, 2006, 1:46 am 1:46 am

Is anyone getting tired of this story? Yawn

Posted by: qwerty | October 4, 2006, 1:57 am 1:57 am

[quote]It’s no use arguing. People are irrational. The fact that 16 is the legal age of sexual consent is being completely ignored. Everybody wants to think it’s 18 or older.[/qoute]
So both parties were in DC? or different states?

Posted by: chuck | October 4, 2006, 1:59 am 1:59 am

If Dems knew about Foley for months and waited until just before the election to release this, aren’t they guilty of a politically- motivated coverup?
This is more about dirty politics than about paedophilia.
And…how do we know these messages are not forged? How does an Instant Message get saved for 3 years?

Posted by: Rob | October 4, 2006, 2:07 am 2:07 am

Foley is a sick man and should be prosecuted for what he did. But it is simply not logical to connect everyone in the same political party to his *personal* actions. He may call himself a Republican but nobody in this party wants him. Hastart is not his daddy, and is not responsible for what he sneaks around doing. Nobody, I repeat NOBODY, can an inclination of the explicit side of these emails. Believe me, the Republican party is not stupid, and would not think that could just be “brushed under the rug.”

Posted by: bulldog | October 4, 2006, 2:09 am 2:09 am

Gosh I have a long distance relationship. We’re both adults and we sound very tame by comparison. UGH! Sick that anyone in Congress is doing this with someone underage. I think he should be taken from rehab to a sexual predator program.

Posted by: Jenny | October 4, 2006, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Any wrongdoing should be punished. Foley should have stuck with over-18 males if he must do this. That said, Democrat sshould not use this a political issue which I’m sensing they are. This is Foley problems. It deals with our fallen human natures and it plagues both sides of the aisle, whether Democrat or Republican. If not pedophilia, then probably other sins.

Posted by: Ray | October 4, 2006, 2:20 am 2:20 am

Although disgusted with Foleys behavior let us not forget that the same Democrats who are shouting their disgust had their own congressman Studds who admitted to sleeping with a 17 year old male page.Was he even removed from congress…no…went on to serve another 12 years. And before President Clinton left office he managed to pardon and commute the sentence of another congressman…Mel Reynolds…who was arrested for having sex with a 16 year old volunteer and possessing child pornography. That is the hypocracy.

Posted by: scott | October 4, 2006, 2:33 am 2:33 am

I consider myself right-wing and very conservitive…but I don’t think Foley represents my party and beliefs, infact…I hope he ends up in jail for his actions.
Makes me wonder about something my dad told me long ago, Even if you support a party, a view and an overall cause in Washington…in time that party will break apart and make mistakes and crash themselves.
Wonder if thats happening to the GOP as we speak?
I’m voting for some democrats this year, not for my personal views, but for my country.

Posted by: Natef | October 4, 2006, 2:33 am 2:33 am

2003? It is now 2006…Why wait until now to spill the beans…It this was really about protecting children then it he should have been jailed then…all who knew since 2003 should pay the price…waiting for political gain…sad, sad, sad

Posted by: John | October 4, 2006, 2:45 am 2:45 am

No one has mentioned that besides the obvious predator behavior from Foley towards an underage boy this is also a form of sexual harrassment in the work place. Foley was in a position of power over the page. If there is lack of success prosecuting Foley under the laws regarding internet solicitation of minors, then the next route is to prosecute for sexual harassment in the work place. Foley needs to go to jail. Whatever route the prosecutors have to use to get him there for a while is fine with me.
The whole story is astonishing, I’m sure especially for those crazy Florida voters who voted him in so many times. You never can tell about people. Parents, we need to beware. There’s sicko’s all around us – just check your address in the registered sex offender database. What has bothered me looking at that list in the past is that these molesters dont get jail time – most get parole and that is it. Maybe this national scandal will outrage people enough to elect tougher judges that will give harsher sentences including jail time to get these life-ruiners off the street, off the net, and out of our neighborhoods. Our children’s lives and well being depend on it.

Posted by: judy | October 4, 2006, 3:02 am 3:02 am

Many here are questioning whether these IMs are genuine, pointing out how easy they are to forge and reminding us of Dan Rather’s story.
Excuse me, but didn’t Foley resign as soon as ABC news called him? I wonder why HE didn’t yell “forgery?”

Posted by: jshree | October 4, 2006, 3:08 am 3:08 am

It is so upsetting to think about the fact that politicians can get away with things that would get us civilians locked up.

Posted by: Robert | October 4, 2006, 3:16 am 3:16 am

How hypocritical we are becoming!
Adultery and lust are almost “virtues” broadcast on every TV program and commercial. We are eating it up. But when the age limit is suddenly 1-2 years too young than it is considered a grave sin. Repent America, while you can.

Posted by: Richard | October 4, 2006, 3:17 am 3:17 am

This guy sponsored legislation to protect children from predators, using the internet. I guess he wanted to have them all to himself.
It really concerns me that anyone who knew would cover it up.

Posted by: Jimbob | October 4, 2006, 3:19 am 3:19 am

I absolutely agree that Foley and anyone with knowledge should remove themselves or be removed from office. I also believe that anyone found to have aided or abetted his actions should face repercussions in accordance with the appropriate laws. I believe an investigation is needed to determine the full extent of the fault/crimes of all involved. I don’t, however, believe this investigation should be limited to congressional members associated with the republican party. I find it kind of interesting that this information was “leaked” right before a vote. It would be very hard to convince me that this was a coincidence. If any members of the democratic or an independent party had information on Foley and held on to it for the purpose of releasing it right before the elections (somehow I doubt the republican party would do it), then the involved members of those parties should be found just as guilty as those members of the republican party who ignored the situation.

Posted by: F | October 4, 2006, 3:21 am 3:21 am

It’s amazing to see what lengths the republicans will jump to justify Foley’s behavior. What makes this really stink, once again, is that the republicans think they are morally superior to democrats. The republicans are the party that ran with the “family values” slogan. The past six years has proven to be one of the most morally bankrupt periods of U.S. history.

Posted by: Ann | October 4, 2006, 3:48 am 3:48 am

I am curious to know more about where these IMs are coming from? If, as I suspect, they have these exchanges because they were on the house network servers, then I think that the best course of action would be to order a “dump” of all IM exchanges from ALL reps. As I understood the law, it is illegal for congressman or staffers to use official government equipment (ie. computers) for anything other than official business. Make public ANY and ALL non-official IMs on the server. Trust me, the you know what would truly hit the fan on BOTH sides of the isle…and maybe then we would the people might actually learn what kind of government we actually have. I suspect most would be shocked.

Posted by: Former Staffer | October 4, 2006, 3:50 am 3:50 am

I think if anyone is to blame here, besides Foley, it’s the voters that put him in office… not eough people vote, and that number is split into half of people who actually care obout this country rather than their hidden agendas.. The Government is the Problem, it’s the Politics at work.. Sign up, Vote, or Stop Complaining!

Posted by: Patrick | October 4, 2006, 4:08 am 4:08 am

LOL Ive been drunk many times, and it has never led me to PM with under-aged boys! What a idiotic excuse. If anyone buys that lame defense of his actions they are extremely naive!
Its all the more damaging since he passed legislation that would safeguard kids against this sort of deviant behavior.
I would like to know where Dante would put this guy in hell, especially for his devlish hypocracy!

Posted by: patrick fontes | October 4, 2006, 4:41 am 4:41 am

“and the home of the free”….

Posted by: morten | October 4, 2006, 4:47 am 4:47 am

I too am a gay man who was raped by a clergyman when I was a teen but instead of punishing the rapist…I was the one blamed. It is sick. I am happy that the Republicans are getting this medicine now…hopefully they will be all kicked out next month! Family values party…NOT. It is not easy being gay in America during this Bush dictatorship. I grew up as a child being forced to say the pledge of allegiance which ends in the big lie “with freedom and justice for all”. That is NOT true. I served the US in the Army proudly as a gay man. It makes me sick to think of all the fine gay men and lesbians forced to leave the military. What about all the heterosexual crimes going on by members of Congress? Is that ok? I will vote Democrat next month and so will many other gays and our vote will count and the Republicans can’t do anything about it!

Posted by: Been there | October 4, 2006, 4:48 am 4:48 am

Interesting isn’t how the hatred and the indignation of the Republican Party spent millions durin the Clinton Lewinsky trials, yet Clinton ran the country well and NOBODY died as a result of it. The USA is in shambles and of young American men and women have been killed in Iraq…for what? Oil and lies? Shame on you Republicans!!! Why are not Bush’s daughters over there? Are the children of Congress and the Senate members over there getting killed and maimed. I think not. As usual the Republicans need to blame gays. Foley did worng true…but the Republicans need to wake up! God bless the Democrats!!!

Posted by: Democrat | October 4, 2006, 4:57 am 4:57 am

Who cares?
People all over the world can talk about sex, its just a mather of time anyways, and still there should be alot to learn, AND. for all we know he was talking to friends thats over 18 years old, untill you find out who he talked to then you have nothing to charge him with.
But still, it’s pritty childish of him.

Posted by: Steffen | October 4, 2006, 5:23 am 5:23 am

Any Republican or Democrat who knew about this and said nothing should be PROSECUTED!
As far as “liberal” media outlets holding on to this info until now… What about FOX NEWS? They were some of the first to know, and said NOTHING until now…
There’s plenty of shame to go around for everybody.
Let’s ditch this whole Republican/Democrat plan we’ve been going with… clean house… and start over by voting for PEOPLE who we believe in.

Posted by: Rich | October 4, 2006, 5:39 am 5:39 am

The media circus surrounding this story is understandable. I hope we deal with this guy and those who may have masked the truth quickly and conclusively and with every legal recourse. Then swiftly get back to the business of managing the country, something both aisles struggle doing. This story has the potential to be yet another diversion from the macro-issues we face. I wish our legislative branch would get back to dealing with the important challenges, like steroids in baseball…

Posted by: Dan | October 4, 2006, 5:55 am 5:55 am

Those who call for “the whole bunch” to be thrown out should remember who resigned when Gerry Studds, Bill Clinton, and Barney Frank were caught in far more ugly situations – no one.

Posted by: Phil | October 4, 2006, 6:09 am 6:09 am

blah, blah, blah…do something important, like bring the soldiers home, and feed the poor. I have never seen so many people in the U.S. who all they can do is move their mouth!

Posted by: working american | October 4, 2006, 6:17 am 6:17 am

Other than sending a few emails, what proof is there he has done anything? And they’re not kids, they are 16+ years old. I don’t understand what all the fuss is about.

Posted by: James Monroe | October 4, 2006, 6:22 am 6:22 am

Will all the other politicians who molest their own children and other kids that are not theirs, please resign all public offices today? I doubt it.
Will America stop hatred for gays so that behavior can be open and honest instead of hidden, dark and twisted by adults who have been thrown into a hell created by religions? I doubt it. I pray for it every day.
Will America ever understand that pedophilia is not the same as being gay? I have not seen it. Own up to YOUR responsibility as a human. What are you doing that is just as horrible?

Posted by: Kit Miller | October 4, 2006, 6:27 am 6:27 am

As long as the GOP (God’s Onerous Pedophiles) are in charge, you’ll be seeing more corruption and hypocrisy.

Posted by: Lowell | October 4, 2006, 6:30 am 6:30 am

John said: “2003? It is now 2006… Why wait until now to spill the beans…”
Why didn’t they spill the beans in 2004 if Democrats had the info in 2003, as is being alleged by the conspiracy theorists here?
At least then they could have spared our country another 4 year term of huge deficits, debt and disgrace.

Posted by: Brian | October 4, 2006, 6:49 am 6:49 am

What took Brian Ross and ABC to report on this information. Brian Ross himself reported that he and ABC have had this information for many months, but were to busy to report on it.
Why did they put these children at risk? Please answer this Mr. Ross and ABC.
By the way this in no way excuses Mark Foley from what he did, it was dispictable and should be investigated and charges brought if possible.

Posted by: David | October 4, 2006, 7:04 am 7:04 am

Just a comment from overseas:
Finally, your politicians are exhibiting some interesting features. Scandal, debauchery and repressed sexuality are the hallmarks of exciting personalities in politics. Nice to see you’ve come around at last. Cheers!

Posted by: Eirik | October 4, 2006, 7:06 am 7:06 am

I can’t believe they put this guy as the head of Missing and Exploited Children!!!
It’s time to clean house and everybody who knew about this has to do the right thing and resign NOW!!
I can’t believe they want to hold on to their power so much that they’re willing to risk losing the entire House of Representatives instead of admitting they made a mistake, resigning and moving on!
They’re falling right into the Democrats trap!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Steven P. | October 4, 2006, 7:09 am 7:09 am

Which state do we use for the age of consent – wasn’t the boy in Louisiana at the time this took place? Age of consent in Louisiana is 17. The boy was 16! That makes it illegal.

Posted by: Hankster | October 4, 2006, 7:15 am 7:15 am

Who cares?

Posted by: Josh | October 4, 2006, 7:19 am 7:19 am

This guy is clearly a sicko but everyone needs to slow down a little bit and verify all of the information. All of you liberals out there yelling and screaming for this freak and the other Republican leaders to be publicly flogged should consider giving them the same “fair” legal process as you and the ACLU always demand. I am amazed at the double standard applied between this situation and the demands for fair and just treatment of the terrorists we’ve captured. Let’s let the legal system work and those who should be punished will but we need to drop the “guilt by association” attitude.

Posted by: GTR | October 4, 2006, 7:26 am 7:26 am

Why haven’t the people of Florida demanded that this predator be immediately removed from his office? Also, why haven’t the DC police formally charged this man as a predator? Alcohol has nothing to do with being a pedophile (as does being gay as it was suggested this morning!) This man has no right to represent his “constituents” in his home state and he certainly has no business being allowed to “resign” and then blame everything on alcohol and a bad childhood! When is this country going to hold EVERYONE accountable to the same set of laws and code of conduct! Lock him up and set up an investigation against all of his “good ole boys” who covered for him all these years!

Posted by: Angie | October 4, 2006, 7:26 am 7:26 am

Isn’t it a shame that due to the Libs. taking every opportunity to make this a Republican issue, we all will become victims after the election. Where was the same outrage from the Dems. when Clinton was getting serviced by an intern in the Oval office. They were unamimous in their support fo Clinton, stating that it was a private matter. This Bum should be treated severly, charged if necessary and Hastert should step down if he knew about this. All of these bastards in congress, are guilty of doing anything to protect themselves and their party. Thank God for the occasional independants who are strong enough to fight and win. Now, for the next month, we will experience mud slinging like never before as the Dems see this as their chance to regain power. After all, in the end, that’s what it’s all about.

Posted by: Mike | October 4, 2006, 7:30 am 7:30 am

1. It is definitely past time for new leadership. Hastert and everyone else involved with this crime and coverup should be jailed along with Foley. Where the hell is the real leadership in this country?
2. ABC, if you did know about the story much earlier and not report it, then I have little respect for you.
3. From another line of thought: Given the scrutiny that Bush has been under, could it be that the Rove/Cheney gang has thrown Foley under the bus to take the heat off Bush?

Posted by: Chris | October 4, 2006, 7:33 am 7:33 am

He just needs his butt kick
Just because he resigned, still don’t change the facts.. It is what it is..
kp

Posted by: karen p | October 4, 2006, 7:44 am 7:44 am

I understand the need for the “concrete evidence” for a criminal investigation, but for those asking to see more validated evidence before forming an opinion-GIVE ME A BREAK! This guy is a sick predator and I don’t care if all he did write were “overly friendly” emails (which is doubtful!) how do we know what he was doing-or has done. The obvious fact is that he is out looking for young boys and that makes me furious. People who sweep this under the rug are guilty of letting this society sink further into this kind of sickness. And yet some of you still need to “see the facts”. That’s for the lawyers. It is all self evident to me. Those “friendly” emails turn my stomach. In cases of pedophilia, intensions should be enough to put someone away for treatment. Otherwise, some poor kid is going to pay the price for our negligence.

Posted by: Hope | October 4, 2006, 7:46 am 7:46 am

It’s amazing how when the tables are turned liberals are in an outrage, speaking of cover-ups and how everyone going up to the very top should be ousted. Where was the outrage when Patrick Kennedy’s drunken antics were covered up by capitol police?

Posted by: Brian | October 4, 2006, 7:46 am 7:46 am

To those of you morons that keep bringing up that (allegedly) the Democrats knew about this as well… Seems to me that if that is true then they are just following the examples of the GOP for using scndalous news for political gain. Oh? That’s different you say? The GOP are just a bunch of hypocrites!!
Term limitations is the only long term solution for some of the ills of this country. Career politicians need to end!

Posted by: Tuvok | October 4, 2006, 7:51 am 7:51 am

It’s obvious that this guy is a sick predator. In these cases intentions should be enough to send people out and into treatment or else some poor kid will pay the price. Those “friendly” emails turn my stomach. There is no doubt that whatever proof does or doesn not exist-foley is a sick man. I just can’t believe some people are on the fence about this. It makes me furious. Anyone who didn’t act on this should be considered grossly negligent at BEST.

Posted by: Hope | October 4, 2006, 7:52 am 7:52 am

I was just reading that Foley’s attorney claims that he was under the influence of alcohol when he was sending these IM’s in the middle of a vote. Doesn’t that mean that he was drunk during the vote as well?

Posted by: WENDY | October 4, 2006, 7:54 am 7:54 am

Foley appears to like young men and is interested in their activities, there is nothing illegal about that.
Foley chitchats with someone and ABC News calls it Internet Sex which is a false reporting.
Unless ABC News can provide evidence Foley was doing something other than writing or talking, their story is a witch hunt.
Next.

Posted by: Chemical | October 4, 2006, 7:57 am 7:57 am

With the intermittentcy of breathing, it is amazing that while the “people” complain and are “appalled” at the actions and “morals” of those that are in the positions of the greatest and highest levels of “our governemnt” it is those same “people” that re-elect the same garbage year after year. It is time to finally, get rid of the trash. What pride is there in seeing that this is what our government has come to? We all need to look into the mirror.

Posted by: Senator | October 4, 2006, 7:57 am 7:57 am

Foley does not belong in the Republican party. He should have been a Democrat where his behavior would not only be defended as “his personal life” but approved as an outreach effort to turn pages into Democrats.

Posted by: Brian Clarke | October 4, 2006, 8:01 am 8:01 am

Foley should be prosecuted, no doubt. But before we throw all republicans under the bus, we should determine what exactly was known and whether or not any attempts were made to investigate Foley. Clinton’s abuse of power over an intern, although she was not a minor, was just as much an abuse of office. Let’s get Foley out, and everyone else who injures our youth because of their political status. I wouldn’t mind wiping the slate clean, getting rid of all incumbents throughout the entire country, and starting over.

Posted by: Tory | October 4, 2006, 8:01 am 8:01 am

What Foley did was absolutely wrong and did the only thing he could do-resign. However if, as some say, the Repbulicans knew so did the Democrats. In the past ten years its been a search and destroy type of campaigns run by political organizations. It works at times. But in the mean time reputations and families are destroyed. If anyone would take the time to check every member of the House of Representatives and the Senate you might find cause to ask about seventy five percent of them to resign for one reason or another. But as someone said what does Foley have to do with the issues at hand? Do we not need to concentrate on those? Or are we going to allow the news media and the Democrats to not confront who is best to gevern and why? Lets get on with our lives.

Posted by: Tony | October 4, 2006, 8:04 am 8:04 am

I guess it’s not so easy being morally superior to everybody else after all.

Posted by: Abe | October 4, 2006, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Now isn’t it time to take our country back from these vile ,digusting criminals there is no difference between them R’s or D’s every last one of them needs to go top to bottom. Forgive me, but these criminals are consfiscating 59% of your earned income while having esex in the back room and then having an $5.00 hr illegal clean up the filthy mess. All of them should be in prison.

Posted by: dave | October 4, 2006, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Clinton doesn’t seems so bad. Floridians elected this guy…no surprise….cess pool of America so who do you think they would vote in.

Posted by: Jason D | October 4, 2006, 8:11 am 8:11 am

I guess it’s not so easy being morally superior to everybody else after all.
What almost as frightening as this Republican leadership’s dereliction of duty is how all of their blind defenders seem to know what the precise minimum age of sexual consent is in each state.
Now that’s scary!

Posted by: Abe | October 4, 2006, 8:14 am 8:14 am

people people people~~ predators of this nature will not ask of ours kids what congressional party do they belong to. That means nothing to them, this guy is mentally sick, its a shame he was in government and voting to create laws to protect our society. He should be thrown in jail for life. Rep/Dem does not matter here, he is our worst nightmares to parents.

Posted by: D | October 4, 2006, 8:21 am 8:21 am

This entire Foley issue is not about Republicans or Democrats it is reflective of a larger issue that is bipartisan on Capitol Hill and that is the abuse of power. The page system is about granting certain teens positions as pages because their families are owed a favor by a politician. Making this a partisan issue puts the investigational spotlight in the wrong place. Anyone who has lived inside the beltway knows that the page system
is a flawed one, with a lurid history and should be investigated. So put Foley in jail, investigate the page system, and stop throwing mud in the house and senate and start governing the country.

Posted by: Mary Beltway Insider | October 4, 2006, 8:23 am 8:23 am

Foley is repulsive.
That his superiors knew about “over friendly” communications with exclusivly male + underage pages, that Foley had a reputation 5 years ago for being too friendly too often so that they warned each other about him… How could they fail to investigate that or connect some dots? Would they have missed it if it was thier kids? I doubt it. That is incredibly negligent, incompetant or worse.
The Leadership is elected to do better than this. Far better.

Posted by: disgusted | October 4, 2006, 8:29 am 8:29 am

Anyone who knew about this and waited or did nothing should go. That includes the Republicans. That also includes all the Democrats who knew and held it back to release it right before this election!

Posted by: Truth | October 4, 2006, 8:30 am 8:30 am

No excuses for Foley. Glad he’s gone. At least he had the decency to resign. Why didn’t democratic Rep. Gary Studds, who did worse and served another 13 years. Why didn’t Democratic Rep. Barney Frank who’s episode was as bad, and that 1989. The Dem’s evidently knew about this for a while. How long have they been holding it? Why didn’t they go to Republican leadership with the info first?

Posted by: Phil_L | October 4, 2006, 8:31 am 8:31 am

I condemn what Foley did and if he had sex with underage boys he should pay the consequences. But let’s not forget 1983 when Democratic Rep. Gerry Studds had sex with a teenage page and got caught, he basically told everyone to screw off, he then retired in 1996. What about Barney Frank another Democrat who lived with a male prostitute who ran a gay sex for hire ring out of Frank’s apartment. I could go on with this but what would be the point. So don’t talk to me about hypocrisy.

Posted by: Jim | October 4, 2006, 8:37 am 8:37 am

The leadership of BOTH parties knew about this for almost a year, IF NOT LONGER, but neither side did nothing.
I can understand the REPs keeping it quiet, but it is the heighth of hypocricy for the DEMs to set on it until JUST BEFORE the elections.
We have the best Congress money can buy, because MOST of them have been bought off by “campaign contributions” in return for favorable votes on bills favoring big corporations like Microsoft and other special interest groups.
It’s time to “clean house”, and the Senate. When you go to the polls in a few weeks VOTE for independent candidates and if there are none then vote AGAINST the incumbant. You couldn’t get any worse than what we have now. If you keep your representative because he bring Pork to your district then you deserve the corruption you’ll get.

Posted by: Independent | October 4, 2006, 8:38 am 8:38 am

I don’t understand how the GOP leaders can argue that the dems released this as part of a pre-election political thing. If the GOP leaders didn’t know, how wopuild the dems know? In other words, how would the Dems know so much about it if the information about the IMs were not available to the GOPs? They can’t have it both ways.

Posted by: Sad to be Repub | October 4, 2006, 8:53 am 8:53 am

If these allegations are true? Let the true facts come out. The only true facts are when Ex President Clinton abused the office as a true sexual predator and abused Monika. The democrats tried all they could to say this was not a case of abuse. Well, I say this is where it all started. Clinton is a sexual predator from way back. Why isn’t he put on the front page as to what he really is. With Foley you do have a possible paper trail, but is it set up? Lets wait for the facts.
Wayne

Posted by: Wayne | October 4, 2006, 8:59 am 8:59 am

hey if these pages didnt have a problem with it why should i, oh yeah right they were minors, i say we send the entire republican party packing, they cannot be trusted

Posted by: shelley | October 4, 2006, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Once again, a perv is a perv is a perv. That said, I would like to see ONE prominent Democrat speak out against the ACT ITSELF, instead of the REPUBLICAN accused of it.

Posted by: Kevin | October 4, 2006, 9:05 am 9:05 am

I think whoever is stupid enough to say they are just not going to vote at all because of this just describes what kind of lemmings America has populating her soil. Vote on ISSUES people!! NOT whether you like Democrats or republicans. What is this? Kindergarten? Might as well say, I dont like red any more because people say it’s gay, but I never liked blue, so I’m not voting. Idiots!!

Posted by: Maya | October 4, 2006, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Tuvok: Term limits are not the answer to what ails this country. That’s just a fancy way to duck what you,as a citizen of this country,should be doing…reading up on the candidates,deciding who you think is the better one…and VOTING. THAT is true term limits. But,then again,that would require getting accurate information instead of relying on campaign ads and infotainment. It’s no wonder the percentage of people who’ve checked out of the voting process has been going up over the decades.

Posted by: Carl | October 4, 2006, 9:17 am 9:17 am

I think the only way to wake up our political leaders is to vote EVERY INCUMBANT OUT…. I don’t care if they are Republican or Democrat, VOTE THEM OUT….. Don’t wait for them to resign or do the right thing, just VOTE THEM OUT…This would send a CLEAR message to those left, and to the newly elected to get busy working for us, doing what is best for the American people.
If there is not visible change in how the Congress and President are conducting themselves, VOTE THEM OUT TOO at the next election too. Keep doing this until we get our political leaders working for us, not just to pad their pockets or protect their buddies. There is way too much of this going on in our government. Their main focus should be governing not just how to protect their political office or how to best position themselves to get re-elected. VOTE THE INCUMBANT OUT……

Posted by: Tom Heile | October 4, 2006, 9:23 am 9:23 am

I can’t believe that this person helps run our country. Goodness.

Posted by: JAS | October 4, 2006, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Can you believe that one of Hastert’s Illinois colleagues wants to prevent this from happening by eliminating the page system. I take it to be an admission that he doesn’t think our representatives in Congress can be trusted to keep their hands off the fine young people who have been selected for this honor and opportunity to serve and learn about our fine government.

Posted by: yourekidding | October 4, 2006, 9:57 am 9:57 am

It would be nice for Brian to explain this at this stage…
But since he hasn’t…
Why is it no one took the time to educate themselves on the difference between pedophilia (pre-puberty) and pedarasty (post)?
I agree with some that they should investigate the entire hill, it’s about these teenagers… not politics.
BTW, this is not a case of consent… it’s 16 in DC as well as Florida; It’s a fed case because it’s the internet and under 18.
Foley not only preyed on kids… he totally abused the office as representive in this great country.
BTW… I heard Foley doesn’t drink, and i’m trying to see if the ‘clergyman’ is still alive.

Posted by: Carmen | October 4, 2006, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Anyone who knew about this, but put there paychecks ahead of the childs safety should, arrested for child endangerment

Posted by: Donna | October 4, 2006, 9:59 am 9:59 am

I think it’s impossible for news agencies to put aside political agendas, because as institutions themselves, they become political bodies, b/c they have to survive, like other institutions, in a task environment that can be extremely hostile to the viability of the institution and its ability to survive and sustain itself over time. And then you’ve got all that market-driven competition and profit–how can a news agency not be consumed by politics when, by it’s very nature today, is deeply embedded in a political and capitalist system, that by its very nature is extremely hostile.
This is not to excuse any ethical misconduct that may have occurred on the part of the major media–I don’t tolerate corruption in any form, but it might explain this misconduct and motivate us to scream louder for FCC reforms that will break up media conglomeration.
Everyone is political. and we will never escape the politicization of media reporting, but balanced and ethics driven news was born in an environment and an ara of DIVERSITY OF OWNERSHIP, which naturally produced a more diverse (and hence more balanced) perspective of appriate news content. The grassroots mom and pop stations were better able to maintain ethical standards because they were held accountable at a local level by their consumers in their market–people they actually knew and cared about. This was the check and balance of the old non-conglomerated system.

Posted by: macro perspective | October 4, 2006, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Has anyone thought that maybe the teen did give these to someone back when it happened and that someone held onto them until the election year?

Posted by: Donna | October 4, 2006, 10:12 am 10:12 am

What if some Democrats knew and held on to the story for political reasons? Hastert knew about the Email, which wasn’t sexual in anyway. It’s not like he asked him to send a nude picture! But who all knew about the IM’s, and how long have they held back? That is the real question!

Posted by: David Smith | October 4, 2006, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Foley and friends need to be ousted and imprisoned after a full independent investigation.
Side note: Anyone else see how Fox News has been labeling Foley a Democrat in some of their broadcasts of this story?
Side note: Anyone else notice the great similarity in names and writing styles and content from many of those defending Foley and friends? I bet there’s a political operative adding fake dissenting voices.. ABC, care to trace some IP addresses?

Posted by: ENDIF | October 4, 2006, 10:17 am 10:17 am

There was no Democrat and media outrage when it was discovered that democratic congressmen Barney Frank and G. Studds were having sex with teenage pages. The Democrats and the media smell blood and are in a feeding frenzy. Any word on the true victim or is that not what’s important?

Posted by: Robert | October 4, 2006, 10:23 am 10:23 am

I am SO tired of people saying that WE elected perverts and liars. The people that are elected, no matter what party, are Wealthy people that can afford to buy Space and Time to tell us their lies. We can only go by what we see and Hear, to make the best choice. If WE actually knew the Truth and Nothing But the Truth, about who we are electing, we could sure do a better job of who we put in office. Don’t blame the Voter, who is trying to do the best, with the knowledge that they are given. Blame the ones that cover up the Lies.

Posted by: Grandma of 13 | October 4, 2006, 10:36 am 10:36 am

I agree get rid of the trash. Vote for Kinky (Texas)

Posted by: thomas | October 4, 2006, 10:54 am 10:54 am

The easiest solution to this issue as far as voters go is to not vote for any incumbent. To think their wasn’t whispering going on and to think all of congress didn’t know about it would be ignorant. They all knew it and they all protected the good ole boys club. Vote em all out of office and then you’re sure to get everyone who deserves it!!!

Posted by: Skip | October 4, 2006, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Reality check time. If he had been cybering with a 16 year old female would any of you be so outraged? I doubt it. Yes what he was doing was wrong. But let’s not dramatize this into a case of “predatory pedophilia” just because the person he was cybering with was male. Had it been a female, you would have shrugged and said “she looks grown up to me.” Having said that, he really should resign

Posted by: NoName | October 4, 2006, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Come now, folks. There have been paedophiles and paedophile rings all over Washington, D.C. for decades. Just look at the one highlighted by John deCamp, for instance, and by the many victims of that particular ring. There are other congressman who have been caught engaged in paedophile activities but never forced to resign. I guarantee you that there are many more in Washington who are doing much more than just cyber-sex with teenaged boys. Even if they were only mildly perverted in this way to begin with, it is a classic means of compromise to get a politician high on drugs or drunk and then encourage them to engage in illegal activities (sex is a common one). Then, you can use this leverage to manipulate them. The mafia does similar things. So, if there are so many paedophiles in D.C., you can be quite sure that those who do not resign are being manipulated in some way by criminal elements.

Posted by: Matthew | October 4, 2006, 11:10 am 11:10 am

I’ve often said that we really need to clean house, no pun intended. By that I mean all the way down White House to Congress. Because when the NEW ones get in the Olders one are still there and it’s buiness as usual. Just teaching the new one the old ways. It’s a real shame that as a great country we have all this garbage going on. I say LOCK them up and throw away the key. Also stop trying to hide behind excuses. Grow up and take responibilites for your actions.

Posted by: Ada | October 4, 2006, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Victim + drunk + gay = excuses.
Ok Foley lets go with this.
I knew it was wrong to sexually stalk children but I did not care. I did what I wanted to do no matter who it hurt as long as it pleased me. That is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me God.
Now sign here…………..

Posted by: Kathy | October 4, 2006, 11:24 am 11:24 am

When did BR become aware of the existance of the IM’s?
Was it one of the pages involed providing the source information or a third party?

Posted by: Gmac | October 4, 2006, 11:29 am 11:29 am

They released all of this information way too soon, the y should have waited and set him up on “tO catch a predator” that my friend would have been priceless.

Posted by: Kiwi | October 4, 2006, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Great! Now he’s blaming Catholic priests for his perversion. Even if it’s true, that’s no excuse for what he did. The timing of his so-called admission is suspect. It also makes one wonder about the bill he introduced to protect children from predators. This whole incident is just too twisted for words.

Posted by: Peggy | October 4, 2006, 11:37 am 11:37 am

This is not a party issue (im a republican) this is tatally about children. All the leadership should resign and should withdraw from being elected again. The speaker is a former teacher and knows about red flags when it comes to children and for him to say he didnt know and when he did know he should have let the public know and taken care of it. He talks about his grandchildren and then allows this, HE GOES AND ALL OF THE LEADERSHIP

Posted by: joe dillard ga | October 4, 2006, 11:39 am 11:39 am

For all of you, who turn this into a political issue, shame on you. This isn’t about politics, sick’os across the world exploit children every day. “Foley the Pig” is no different than any pedophile out there except for the place he works. It is too bad the media, democrats & republicans use this to better their positions.
I’ve had to type this message twice because when I try to post it the ABCNews server is busy. Bet their ad revenues are going through the roof. Democrats (those with and without skeletons) are using it to their advantage in an attempt to gain majorities this Fall. Republicans (those with and without skeletons)will use this to their advantage by getting in front of cameras or the press and sighting their voting record on child crimes to protect their seat this Fall.
Making this a political issue takes away from those that need our help – children. Awareness needs to be heightened, laws stiffened and punishment harsher for anyone who takes advantage of children in sexually explicit ways. That’s what this issue is truly about; those that use it to gain an advantage are just as guilty morally as those doing these despicable things to our kids.

Posted by: James | October 4, 2006, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Alcohol problem? How about sick pedophile? Charge Foley with a crime first then investigate everyone who held onto this information just for their own agenda. They are all worthless and should be exposed regardless of party line or media affliation.
It’s time to clean house in Washington.

Posted by: karen | October 4, 2006, 11:58 am 11:58 am

What ever happened to freedom of speech? It doesnt matter what Foley said, its what he did that counts. And why don’t all of you who vote, make the absolute right choice and vote libertarian? Voting Dem or Rep is the same thing, they both do the same things.

Posted by: libertarian | October 4, 2006, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Foley must be brought to justice ASAP! He is a perverted child molester, who uses his influence and power to lure kids for his lower instincts.
I have yet to heard a regular person that got away with a pedophilia charge because he was an alcoholic or because he was gay. This is a bunch of bull.
How in the world the White House spokeperson Snow qualifies the emails and IM’s as “OVER FRIENDLY”. how will Tony Snow feels if his daughters or sons received perverted messages from grown old man, will he dismiss them: “oh, don’t worry hon, that is an over friendly guy, he.he,he…) yeah right!
This is a proof that we do not have “justice for All”
that phrase is a cliche, and do not apply to rich or politicos…

Posted by: jackie | October 4, 2006, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Hmm, shouldnt have done that. But nothing about the email is demented, The kid is 16, we were doing faar worse…

Posted by: Kiru | October 4, 2006, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

EEEEEWW!!!! REALLY PUTS MY HOME TOWN (LAKE WORTH) TO SHAME

Posted by: stina | October 4, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Wolverine 79707,
Yes they did and still do. They may have got rid of a pedophile but those that knew and did not come forward to the authorities immediately are still there representing not only you but me and the rest of the country. The Republican leadership had an opportunity to force this person out of his place in congress and didn’t do it. It wasn’t only male House Pages at risk, it was any young male with whom he came in contact.

Posted by: nellieh | October 4, 2006, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

This man needs to be put in jail. I think that any Republican or Democrat in congress that knew about Foley behavior should be required to resign immediately. For people like Rush Limbal to have Hastert on the radio making it sound like this is something the Democrats did is absurd! Mark Foley is the Pedophile and anyone that knew about this enabled him. I am outraged as a gay man that this has happened and would like people to know that all gay men are not Pedophile just like all straight men aren’t. For people to try to make it seem as if this is related to alcohol I say BS!!!

Posted by: chaz | October 4, 2006, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Enough of the ‘set-up’, ‘phony messages cause they’re not encrypted’ and ‘he didn’t do anything illegal’ garbage.
This guy would throw himself under a bus if he thought there was a young boy waiting for him.
The ony thing political about this fiasco is keeping those in the know in office. Seems Bush is saying the exact words ad nauseum (You’re doing a great job) that he did about ol’ Brownie right after Katrina…..

Posted by: Crevice | October 4, 2006, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

To all the people shocked by this sexual deviancy, it is only a matter of time before the liberals also push down the legal age of consent. Just like sodomy which was illegal in many states, the age of consent will get changed too. While you can say homosexuals are “born that way”, so are pedophiles. Being born a killer, sexual deviant, etc does not excuse one’s behavior. People choose whether they act out on their weaknesses.

Posted by: GW | October 4, 2006, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

I am a Rebublican, but today I have to admit that with shame. Foley and ANYONE ELSE, on either side of the isle, who knew about this and either actively covered it up or simply ignored it should resign or be impeached.
That said part of the blame for this staying under wraps belongs to the boys parents who didn’t want this matter persued. If it had been my son I would have raised holy hell. What is wrong with people today?

Posted by: Julie | October 4, 2006, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

People are crazy, and it just goes to show you that what ever you do in secret will come out in the open. Politicans, need to do what they are elected to do, and is to be honest, help the country be succesful, in all areas lower class, middle, and upper.

Posted by: James Brown | October 4, 2006, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Has Brian Ross ever actually watched a vote on the House floor? He must not have, or he wouldn’t have said Foley “interrupted” a vote.
I realize Ross is desperate to keep his ratings up, but this isn’t journalism, it isn’t even news. How long the Democratic Congressional Committee and other Democratic arms have known about the emails and the IMs – now that would be news, and would be pertinent, wouldn’t it?

Posted by: Mary McLemore | October 4, 2006, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

I CANNOT believe that anyone would attribute this to Democrats or Republicans, Gay vs. Straight, etc. The fact is that THIS is about pedophilia- while these may not have been little children, they are Teenagers-There is always something wrong w/ folks that refuse to date people THEIR own age. Anybody who knew about this and turned away, dem or repub, gay or straight should be ousted.
And to top it all off, inviting the page over to his house to booze up in privite so as to not get busted?
as the mother of a 17 year old, God help any grown man or woman that comes- a -courting my teenager-loosing your job would be THE last of your worries…

Posted by: Solange | October 4, 2006, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Who cares why ABC, Brian Ross, et al are trickling this information out. Why try to redirect the attention to the media. The bottom line is that a US Representative has been having solicitous internet communication with minors….PERIOD!
It’s not ABC’s responsibility to govern the action of the House of REpresentatives btw….let us not forget that if it weren’t for the Media, we’d never know this type of stuff happens because it’s CLEAR that those in charge are willing to do everything in their power to cover it up.
If anything is sickening, it’s the pervasive culture of lies, cover-ups, arrogance, corruption and self righteous ideology that is prevelant in our government today. This is a perfect example of what happens when a single party controls all branches of governments. NO CHECKS & BALANCES and the result — CHAOS AND CRIME.

Posted by: Jeff | October 4, 2006, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

The clearest issue is the gross abuse of POWER. I don’t think this is pedophilia because 16 is actually the age of consent in some places. Regardless, it was PREDATORY and he should be punished more quickly and more severely than the “average American” given the public nature of his job and his responsibility to behave morally. Also, it’s a slap in the face of all who’ve been molested for him to strategically invoke his own apocryphal history of being a sexual victim. And the alcohol rehab card…The spin doctors are hard at work, aren’t they?

Posted by: Mark Insko | October 4, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Shameful !!
Did he think he was above the law ?
If he was a Dem, the story would have a 36 hour life span in the news.

Posted by: john | October 4, 2006, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

This guy needs to be dealt with like any common criminal. And the guys that covered it up should have their jobs taken away. I can’t belive we pay for this crap!

Posted by: Jaime emerine | October 4, 2006, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Why are we grouping a pedophile with other people on his party ticket? What does this have to do with them? He has resigned but should still be held accountable(bring charges against him)for his disgusting actions. Do we call for the resignation of the NBA or Coach of 1 (or even several) person’s actions or what about the NFL or the local police force or even the entire Firefighters Union for a few individuals who are creeps? Did we punish the entire Democratic party for Bill Clinton or McGreevey’s sexual misconduct? NO! When are we going to make Individuals be accountable for their actions? Parties don’t commit these crimes – People Do!
I, for one, hope he gets the maximum penalty (because he was in a position of authority which helped him to manipulate these poor kids! I feel so bad for these boys, who probably never had a homosexual thought, until he introduced it to them – they went along reluctantly at first. They are scarred for life. So let’s go after Foley (and of course anyone who KNOWINGLY allowed it to continue, but keep our political opinions out of it.

Posted by: Melissa | October 4, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Foley was questioned as to the authenticity of the emails and he verified them himself. It doesn’t matter if he “met” the boys in question. He broke the law by solicitation of a minor. If I ask a prostitute for sex I go to jail whether we consummate the act or not. And SHE would be an adult, not a child!!

Posted by: Mike | October 4, 2006, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

some of the comments here have made me disgusted to be an american citizen. i understand those republicans who will still vote republican after this but to blame the democrats?? you are nuts!! i dont blame the republican party for one man sexually harassing these boys, i blame the man – i dont care what politcal party he is in. where have some of your values gone?? reading all of this have just made me so upset and ashamed at my country. some of you here (not all!) really need to think about what you are saying.

Posted by: lauren | October 4, 2006, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

I am a democrat. I would have to say this is a new low, not just for Foley but for all democrats and republican who knew of this issue in prior months. They should be all resign, be stripped of any pensions and benifits and serve appropriate jail sentences. People in politics in Washington- hang you head in shame

Posted by: jason | October 4, 2006, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Does the Congressional health insurance policy cover rehab or is Foley paying for it out of his own pocket?

Posted by: Bob | October 4, 2006, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

If you are using Yahoo, in preferences it gives you the option to SAVE all instant messages to the ARCHIVES. I always save all of my instant messages. Just for the reason stated.
It’s pitiful that our government has come to this. Why can’t these grown men go after men their own age? I mean, if he IS gay, I’m sure there would have been a lot of willing men for him.
But, I too, think that all players in this game should resign!!

Posted by: Dawn | October 4, 2006, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Boy the Vast-Right-Wing sure has to go back some 30 years to find a page or 2 … don’t they?
this is 2006 and this GOP House sat on this crime against Teenage pages for the last 6 years or more!
for what?
POWER!
I would say since the day this creep came into office!
all these excuses on this blog for supporting a 16 year-old kid getting those nasty email & other messages is insane. I am a grandmother and if it was my grandchild, I would be down on the floor of the House with my broom.. chasing down U KNOW WHO.. givin him U KNOW WHAT…
JUSTICE for JUST US!
it really is time for these GOPers to come to terms with their power grab & give it up for TRUTHINESS…

Posted by: chil420 | October 4, 2006, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

I’m really surprised by some people who are making this out to be some liberal/ liberal media political hit job. The fact of the matter is that Dennis Hastert (oh excuse me… I guess ‘his people’) and other members of the GOP leadership have had this information for years. If they didn’t want it to sneak up on them in the middle of an election year, they should have taken care of it themselves at a time THEY chose. They would have had time to spin it whatever way they wanted and had time to find a replacement. Instead they sat on it and ignored. And now that decision has come back to bite them. In law and especially in politics if you think its going to get out, its ALWAYS better to air your own dirty laundry– or someone else will… right before an election. I have no sympathy for the GOP over the timing and I’m generally disgusted by Foley. The ‘I’m an alcholic’ excuse just shows how much in denial he really is…

Posted by: Mandi | October 4, 2006, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

ew.

Posted by: josh | October 4, 2006, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

I must comment on this latest GOP stuff …
Foley is just another hypocrite that “thinks” he can avoid the law because of his “political” protection from HIS GOP friends and leadership. It is fairly typical of politicians gone amuck.
Question: If the government is listening to all of our conversations for certain words, then they should also be listening for words that are of this type of crime — especially in the protection of children. But then again, maybe the President even knew about Foley and did absolutely nothing …
It wouldn’t surprise me.

Posted by: Peter | October 4, 2006, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Yes, it’s predation but remember that there are people in (mostly) the liberal ranks who effectively want to legalize this behavior by lowering the age of consent for homosexual umm, intercourse to 16 or even lower. Would this still be crime then?
I hope this will all be remembered the next time there is a vote on whether homosexual seduction of a minor is a crime.

Posted by: George | October 4, 2006, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

It is his private life… who cares ?

Posted by: John | October 4, 2006, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

You know what amazes me? A member of the Republican party is outed as a pedophile who has been preying on teenage boys for years, and suddenly other Republicans (not ALL of them, to their credit, there are some who are justifiably disgusted) start screaming and pointing at Democrats. It must just be an automatic reflex.
What exactly do Democrats have to do with Republican Foley being a pedophile? What do Democrats have to do with Republicans shushing this, covering it up and hiding it? If people are going to claim that the Democrats “outed” this right now for electoral reasons, then I say why didn’t the Republicans who KNEW about this going way back do something about it long before now? They could haev AVOIDED this. They could have approached Foley privately, let him know what they knew, told him they won’t tolerate this in Congress or in their party, and he has to resign. He doesn’t have to say why, but he has to go. Why didn’t they do that, so as to avoid all this?
I mean, come on and all, you know there’s a pedophile in Congress in your own party and you just look the other way?

Posted by: Kathy | October 4, 2006, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Personally I feel he should be castrated!Democrat or Republican we are all made of the same parts and he used a position of authority to take advantage. I can only imagine what happened prior to documented evidence. ALSO: A person that say this story would have sustained only a few hours or days in the news had it been a Democrat, is just a plain jackass! I wouldn’t say that the checks and balances of modern day journalism really side with anyone so don’t turn it into a partisan issue.

Posted by: Justin R. Brown | October 4, 2006, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

“Where was the same outrage from the Dems. when Clinton was getting serviced by an intern in the Oval office.” posted by Mike
Democrats weren’t upset? WRONG!! However, big diff between the Lewinsky scandal and this…where to start??? How about with gender and age? At least Lewinsky was a consenting female ADULT, and his actions weren’t federal offenses, although the republicans tried to impeach him for it. Hmmm, what do you suppose they were most upset about…the fact that he was getting oral sex, or that it was from a woman??? And the Republicans are the “Family Values” party?? Give me a break!! The Clintons went through an inquisition while they were in the White House and stayed together as a family through thick and thin. And let’s not forget about that charming Newt Gingrich who served his wife with divorce papers while she was in the hospital with cancer. He was having an affair….yeah, lots of family values in the “Republic” party.

Posted by: Sandra | October 4, 2006, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

I HOPE this sparks a national debate on sexuality. This country is SOOO afraid of SEX. sex is natural.Apes and dogs have sex in public places and it is natural. OUR RIGHT WING so-called Christians need to get over it. THIS IS A FREE country and the stigma attached to sexuality is redundant. Remember the Romans? I know their empire fell but NOT because they were open about the sex they were enjoying . America…..get over yourselves. come out and enjoy being a human and have all the sex you can because one day when you get old you will not be able. If you stop having sex ,even gay sex, then THE TERRORISTS have won.

Posted by: JinKtown | October 4, 2006, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

It is very nice to hear about how everyone thinks Foley is a pervert. I personally believe pediphilia is very wrong. But have you thought about how it is that some men and women joke openly about pedophilia. The definition of pedophilia says “sexual desire in an adult for a child.” It doesn’t say “sexual actions toward a child.” What happened between Foley and the underaged youth under his domain is repugnant ( which by the way is a word found just below Republican in the dictionary). But this sort of thing has been going on for 1,000′s of years. YEAH, don’t get me wrong, I for one am very glad to hear all of the fuss being made over this issue, I only would like to address how our society may be part of the problem. There are men who marry girls under the age of 18 in our country. There have been songs sung by the Rolling Stones that would suggest the sexual desire for young girls. There have been jokes and comments made in my presence by gay and straight men about the sexual desire for young boys and girls. The perverts cross a line that our society runs along the edge of. I would like to ask that we pull away from this line if we are to criticize the perverts for crosing it.

Posted by: Janice Bailey | October 4, 2006, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

That Foley’s pathological diddling with 16 year old pages is revolting enough but holding up a vote to engage in pedophilic, on-line sex demonstrates how truly disengaged he is from the responsibilities of high office – so typical of the supreme hubris, arrogance and self-serving criminality of this Republican leadership in general – one of the most perverse and shameful chapters in American history.
Throw them all aut!

Posted by: Bill Lawrence | October 4, 2006, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Mark Foley is a disgusting sick pervert! How dare the republicans cover up for this heinous act. All who knew needs to turn in resignations right now. What a shame and disgrace! How can this administration speak to any other country about morals. Shame Shame Shame on you. Just sick!

Posted by: justice58 | October 4, 2006, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Being a Republican and having interned for a Congressman, all I can say is I am appalled at Foley’s comments. I think it is awful that the Republican Party has been claiming the moral high ground while what Foley did and the lack of punishment from within the party (possibly covering it up) is far worse than Bill Clinton’s affair. Honestly, I hope the upcoming election is won by the Democrats. Foley’s actions are not only ethically and legally wrong, but the fact that he placed online sex above his Congressional duty and therefore the welfare of the country is just uncomprehensible and has made this truly a black day for politics.

Posted by: Graham Hall | October 4, 2006, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

I want to know how long has CREW been feeding Brian Ross information about Foley. I want to know when the first communication happened, and I want to know why it wasn’t immediately reported.
I want to know what journalistic principle Ross applied to justify hiding information that Foley had progressed from a writer of creepy e-mails to an online sexual stalker.
I want to know why Brian Ross didn’t turn these facts over to the police to prevent Foley from committing a crime and instead held them to take them public himself.
Pulitzers are, one supposes, more important than a child being sexually abused.

Posted by: Quilly Mammoth | October 4, 2006, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

For those who question the authenticity of the posts…teens—particularly in that age range—save posts for myriad reasons. There are programs that many have that will automatically save the convos whether you want them to or not. These are widely-used programs, too, that were popular starting at about that time. Further, Dem though I may be, I agree that it is good to get this man out of there and all of those who knew about it. I believe that they should be prosecuted, as this man was soliciting sex from a minor. Federalism or no, anyone considers a child a minor until they are at least 18 years of age. We all know that. Allowing this to go on is equally as criminal. We would say this in any situation about any crime. Make it not a partisan issue. Make it an issue that we all work together to eradicate; we’ll need everyone’s help on this.

Posted by: Southern Democrat | October 4, 2006, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

The kid wasn’t being COACHED. He was CLEARLY uncomfortable. Anyone with any sensitivity can tell that. His responses were completely confused. Does that REALLY bespeak sexual maturity? Those of you who say that anyone under the legal adult age is sexually mature or that he was trying to ensnare the former congressman are clearly missing some key cerebral components.

Posted by: Manda | October 4, 2006, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

I am a Republican to the core and will vote republican still because I understand that, the republican party historically stands for strong national defense, lower taxes and smaller government. I have been disappointed in the lack of effort of the republicans to control spending and the size of government but I KNOW that a Democrat led house will not control spending, will not shrink government and will degrade national defense. Tom Foley’s e-mail have absolutely nothing to do with the big issues and should have nothing to do with changing your vote. Anyone who makes a voting decision based on anything Tom Foley wrote or said or did is voting with their emotions and not there brain. Tom Foley is gone and will never be up for a vote again. If you still choose to vote with your emotions thinking your vote is a sward against Tom Foley, Do you really believe that as a party and as individuals that the Democrats are of a higher moral stock? All men are flawed and men make up both political parties. Vote on the big issues and vote with your brain for the party who stands for strong national defense, lower taxes and smaller government. Tom Foley may or may not be guilty of anything but it is so obvious that the timing of this is designed to help the democrats take control of the house. If they are behind the timing and sensationalizing of this then that aspect of this is the dirtiest of politics and shame on anyone who falls for it and changes their vote based on it.

Posted by: Rick | October 4, 2006, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

God Bless America.

Posted by: nominal_plumage | October 4, 2006, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Get over it! These teens that were involved in the IM conversations knew what they were doing. They were not forced to continue it. Do you remember when you were 16? Don’t try to tell me you were a helpless little child that needed to be protected from everything in the outside world. Sixteen year olds are having sex all over the place and in many places 16 is the age of consent. These boys were not children, so there is nothing here to say that he is a pedophile. These boys were also finished with the page program, therefore you cannot say he has abused any sort of power he may have had. These messages are very old, speaking in context, where have they been? This is all political, if it wasn’t it would have surfaced long ago. He is not solely to blame for this, the boys could have ended this at the beginning, but they knowingly chose to continue. It seems as though they liked it as much as he did.

Posted by: think4once | October 4, 2006, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Why is there so much fuss over Foley’s alleged e-mails and instant messages? I don’t condone what he did at all. It’s disgusting and sickening. However, why is this all we hear and see on the news? I don’t remember this much media coverage when Clinton had sex in the White House and lied about it!!!! At least Foley stepped down and committed himself for rehab. That’s more than what Clinton did.

Posted by: Donna | October 4, 2006, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Not posting my light criticsm of Americans is predictable; however, it re-inforces the ugly American stereotype that is prevalent and pervasive throughout the world – and rightly so.

Posted by: Confused Canuck | October 4, 2006, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Let’s all just calm down. What Foley did was wrong, but he is human and should be forgiven. Clinton had cyber-sex with Monica (among other things) and no one seemed to think it was a big deal. The democrats are going nuts as are the mainstream liberal media, playing politics with this issue. Foley admits he’s gay and nothing has happened other than messages back and forth; not condoning it but just stating a fact. Before we get into a gay-bashing and throw them all out mentality let’s wait for some facts and perhaps a little compassion.

Posted by: Steve | October 4, 2006, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Yeah, we all know, that, although it is dispicable, and disgusting, none of what occured was Illegal. Foley was paid off, so he would keep his mouth shut, and he stepped down because he knew he wouldn’t win his election at this point.

Posted by: mwolfrey | October 4, 2006, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

And we all know that it was really CREW that withheld the info, so they could release witin 6 weeks of the election. Crew is lying about sending it to the FBI.

Posted by: mwolfrey | October 4, 2006, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

This is sickening! I can’t believe republicans actually think that the democrats will be using this as a political power! The dems have not done anything but ask for further detailed investigation. It is the republicans that are stepping on their own tail! They can’t seem to get their stories straight! This is not a political issue and the dems will not treat it that way! Get rid of all of those who knew and did nothing about it!

Posted by: Anthony | October 4, 2006, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

The only thing I know: all of them are a bunch of hipocrits and bi-moral. As same as their leader: an alcoholc man, called Bush.
You should take care of this country, but no to figth against muslims or foreigners, but the power behind the power. Do you remeber the Roman empire?. So, it’s up to you..!!
Peace with you..!!

Posted by: Luis | October 5, 2006, 12:17 am 12:17 am

This,again,confirm that the GOP is a culture of corruption and sleaze.

Posted by: Chavez | October 5, 2006, 12:46 am 12:46 am

He (Mark Foley) learned form the best…CLINTON. Under the desk with an Intern. This is the kind of example the Clinton Era has left.

Posted by: TB | October 5, 2006, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Ya ya ya…the system appears to be broken.
I heard it overheated after years of fabricating excuses for the ring knocking good ol’ boys (both republican and democrats) in their ivory towers who think they know how to govern our country?
Let’s start by contracting out the Foley investigation and outsourcing witness’.

Posted by: 15 Year Federal Employee | October 5, 2006, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Fact Check:
It should be noted that in the 1983 page sex scandal that both Dan Crane (R-Ill.) and Gerry Studds (D-Mass.)had relationships with pages who were of the age of legal consent (17 y.o. at the time).

Posted by: Rob | October 5, 2006, 2:14 am 2:14 am

Does the media talk in breathless tones about adults who get drunk on their 21st birthdays?
“He had only been 21 for just six hours!”
Do they talk about how alcohol consumption by a 21-year-old is only “technically” legal?
I detect a partisan stench to this, anyone else? Note that they had to change the article when they got busted on the IM participant’s status as an adult.
Corruption and sleaze? How about admitted Democrat page-turner Gerry Studds being re-elected?

Posted by: Mike | October 5, 2006, 7:08 am 7:08 am

As I read the comments I am irritated that anyone can walk away from this thinking Republican vs. Democrat vs. WHATEVER! Was the leak of the news timed to coincide with the elections? Most probably! Have there been blemishes or incidents like this on both sides in the past? DEFINITELY!
This is about someone operating as a predator. This is also about a damaged system that enabled him to do so. No matter what side the offenders are on, they need to be prosecuted!
The alcoholic argument makes me sick! Yeah, it may have lowered his inhibitions, but it did not place those desires and thoughts in him. Those desires had to be already there.

Posted by: Joe | October 5, 2006, 8:41 am 8:41 am

So, a 16/17 year old boy **willingly** engages in internet sex chat with a man…..what’s the big deal? In many countries (including mine), the homosexual age of consent is 16.
Americans are a funny people. All talk about freedom and rights, yet they are nothing more than bigoted, self righteous, religious zealots who reject anything they don’t understand.

Posted by: Tony | October 5, 2006, 9:39 am 9:39 am

“I LOVE IT, no matter how much you try to compare stuff from years ago to today to justify this great october surprise. lol, all the bitchin in the world is not going to stop us from taking the house in nov.
Posted by: mike | Oct 3, 2006 7:22:29 PM”
You dont know Americans very well, do you?

Posted by: Demon Lazeros | October 5, 2006, 11:23 am 11:23 am

there are many men & women sitting in prison today for raping underage children now. Some for up to 50 years to life. I am sure they wished they just got to go to a drunk rehab center & claim they were just an abused teen & were on drugs or had mental problems.
let’s face it.. today in the GOP we have the best politics MONEY CAN BUY!
I don’t think the GOP can squirm out of this one…
the cover-up is worse than the crime.
to blame the pages, to then blame the Democrats for trying to blast the GOP for the election OCT surprise.. if we were going to do that… we would have waited until a week before the election!

Posted by: chil420 | October 5, 2006, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

What is really disturbing here are the number of male, Republican leaning posters who believe that sex between an adult and a teenager (above the age of consent) would be justified.
Do all of you moral high-ground right wingers realize that in your partisan appeal to “reality” you are advocating for the same treatment for your teenage sons and daughters?

Posted by: Voter in GA | October 5, 2006, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

This whole thing has gone from the rediculous to the political (to coin a phrase). When the GOP began calling the affair a political surprize perpetrated by the left, I was not surprized. However, when Dennis Hastert’s defense of his lack of due dilligence is that to resign would give the Democrats the House, I just fell off my seat.
Just who is being political and just who is using this for politcal fodder? Is this about kids or the GOP holding on to power despite its lack of responsibility?
It makes me cringe.

Posted by: greyghost | October 5, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

why doesn’t ABC release the full transcript of the instant messages?

Posted by: philip | October 5, 2006, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

I think Foley will be remembered as the man that brought down the GOP…

Posted by: DoU | October 5, 2006, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Well, here we go again. Watch what happens in this high profile case because from celebrities to politicians, it doesn’t matter what they do because they will never serve a day in jail for ANY crime(s) they commit be it drunk driving (Hi Mel Gibson) or underage drinking(Hi Lyndsay Lohan) or this clown Foley. Whatever they do and this is BAD, they NEVER get the punishment that Jane or Joe Public would get doing the same thing. This is not a political incident, but because it was brought to light near an election, that is what it will be called. The timing was suspect, but, it was done. All I know is that Foley and his minions WILL make excuse after excuse for his behavior. It would be nice if Congress listened to the American people and passed laws so that when one of their own resigns or is found guilty of a crime that they forfeit their cushy pensions and free lifetime healthcare. We all know i would never happen, but, it might make some of these clowns think before they act.

Posted by: shalcon1725 | October 5, 2006, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

This confirms what I always suspected…. Republicans=Hypocrites
They claim to stand on higher moral ground, but are as low as they come.

Posted by: rylee | October 6, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

this LA teen must be taught a lesson to lie about such things and ruin lives, where are his parents in not condeming such trash.

Posted by: JB | October 6, 2006, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

It’s all about power, using it controlling it and keeping it. How can any congressman or staff member that knew about this deviant and his actions and did nothing can ever look at their children and say that they are good parents. They are all cowards because they didn’t stand up to power!

Posted by: don | October 6, 2006, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Gerry Studds actually had sex with a 17 year old boy and got three standing ovations from the Democrats! But hey, that was over 20 years ago and I guess it was OK back then. Right?

Posted by: rick | October 6, 2006, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

I find it fascinating the defensive cries of VICTIM from the Republican party and its constituents and the requests for patient investigations and witholding of judgement. They pathetically whine of Dems politicizing this scandal a month before the November elections when Rove and his cronies wrote the book on that strategy. They simper about the merciless attack of the “liberal media”(where is this media…is O’Reilly sitting on it?)
When Clinton’s scandal(involving a 24 year old adult) erupted he was thrown to the dogs like a piece of raw meat. No Republican cautioned patience. The investigation was a witch hunt. Overnight Clinton was the downfall of civilization and he and his party were expelled from town like Rodin’s Bergers of Calais.
Go Dems Go! Give as good as you got. No mercy.

Posted by: darkcircles | October 6, 2006, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

this is why i am not INTEREST in politics.
for a great country, USA is going to the dogs.

Posted by: kazz | October 6, 2006, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

If this is the best commie lib Brian Ross can do he should be fired. A big make to do about nothing. I’ve heard 10 year olds talk worse to one another.

Posted by: Shane Freeland | October 6, 2006, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Hey, George Washington had an affair with his secretary so that must mean Foley is innocent….LOL. You wingers are funny with your history excuses.

Posted by: Keith Miller | October 7, 2006, 1:24 am 1:24 am

I don’t condone paedophlia, nor do I condone a married person to go find sex somewhere else. But one of the facts is that here in Michigan, the age of consent is 17. I’m not sure if the republicans made 17 the age of consent, but the law still reads this. I know that when I was younger, I gave consent to have sex with an older man, it was good. There should be an investigation to find if these pages were the age of consent. Still, Foley should answer for his crimes, as I’m sure he looked for pages under the age of 18. This scares the hell out of me!!!!

Posted by: Mark | October 7, 2006, 8:52 am 8:52 am

His lawyer is now saying that he only naughty emailed when he was drunk and only at home. But obviously he must have been drunk at work cause he nasty IMd the boy in the middle of voting!! A drunk voting perv congressman…Great!

Posted by: April | October 7, 2006, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

I think Mark Foley is a sick freak and he shouldnt be getting at kids just because he cant get no one that is his age so he should just get fired from everything he does and just die!

Posted by: Maxine Rios | October 9, 2006, 11:09 am 11:09 am

First of all, the clinical definition of “paedophile” is an individual who possesses a paraphilia for prepubescent or peripubescent children. The children in this case, however, were hardly preteens. According to the DSM-IV, erotic or romantic attraction to adolescents exclusively — that is, children who have already begun puberty and are developing secondary sex characteristics — is NOT a psychological dysfunction in and of itself. Second of all, adults who have any degree of prurient interest in teenagers (exclusive of abusive behavior whether that be assault, rape, etc.) is known correctly as pederasty. Pederastic relationships do not statistically coincide with adults who seek out to psychologically and physically exploit and harm “little boys and girls”. The two groups are in fact, quite disparate.

Posted by: RKrause | October 9, 2006, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Maybe Foley can get a job with the Catholic church. That way he wouldn’t lose his job, they’d just relocate him to somewhere he can prey on other innocent children when he’s done raping the others.

Posted by: Bob | October 9, 2006, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

surprise. another right-wing, konservative hypocrite busted. the wheels of justice won’t be the only thing grinding in cell block D

Posted by: konservative kristian | October 10, 2006, 10:20 am 10:20 am

It’s amazing how ABC News breaking this story could have possibly changed the outcome of the November elections.

Posted by: David Betesh | October 10, 2006, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

What is exceedingly outrageous is Hastert’s assertion that this scandal was brought on by the democrats and the media. What is the underlying presupposition of that statement? That had it not come out they would have continued to cover it up????

Posted by: hadenough | October 12, 2006, 9:05 am 9:05 am

well, plane crash, a Yankee
more news .. 24/7
why can’t we see the hearings on the teen-molesters?
we pay for them! I think it is a plot, keeping everything in a conspiracy fashion… so many enemies … so many secrets…
this is no longer about Foley.. it is about who knew what when and why they did not do anything about it.
Foley will face the legal system and I am sure Bush has already pardoned him.
I am sure Bush has pardoned his entire regime.
why wait for Xmas Eve 2008?
if we live to 2008
chil420

Posted by: chil420 | October 12, 2006, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Polosi voted for Studs to remaine in Congress!!( look up ALL the facts)…it is a R/D issue to her.This is made clear by her vote- So Ms, Polosi it was ok for you are a D but not if you are a R. Polosi should GO she is purly political and she should go with Foley!

Posted by: bj | October 16, 2006, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Foley = Disgrace

Posted by: Kant | October 27, 2006, 2:18 am 2:18 am

These Fools that didn’t take action against this pervert should be shown the door Bush and all his Religion crap is gettig old to . Can’t the Republicans see he would do anything to keep the house and senate. Even at the cost of many young men and women. We need an investigation Of all his messy actions.

Posted by: Terry Kilby | November 2, 2006, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

It’s possibly just because I’m from Europe but I genuinelly don’t get why you’re all so het up over this. In the UK the age of consent is 16, in France, 14. Maybe if you weren’t such a bunch of gay-bashers he could have had a normal relationship.

Posted by: Alex | November 8, 2006, 6:01 am 6:01 am

There is nothing sick and/or disgusting about pedophilia. Pedophilia is humanistic and natural as any other sexuality. It’s just that we have a negative hysteria going around something that is different or taboo. Foley is a great man who served our interests well. Why do we need to put our noses into his personal life; especially when he didn’t commit any criminal offense, I don’t know. I do know that we’re a bunch of hyprocritical idiots by reacting negatively to such. Pedophilia is about “child” “love” not “child” “molest”, plus I’d like to believe that these individuals were young adults. Why must we continue to repress child sexuality when it exists and persists despite all our stupid efforts? Why must we remain oppressive to pedophiles who only want equality and freedom, just as your dummie has? Why does society want to continue to demonstrate hatred and taint what pedophilia really is?

Posted by: DW | February 3, 2007, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

I agree on every word Mr.Liembal had said. Thank you for aiering this.We need more good combingtary; about thing like this. This will keep the American People abrest as to the evil that is in this world. Sorry about the spelling, I didn’t learn to spell in school like I should have, I spent most of my time protesting the Vietnam war and getting high. Thanks again for you good work. Don

Posted by: Don | April 25, 2007, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

I really don’t understand why everyone keeps calling what Foley did pedophilia. That’s not what its called. What he did was first and foremost statutory rape, because they were of the age of legal consent, however Foley was obviously too old. Pedophilia ranges from birth to about 12 years old. After that its adolescent-philia, or adophilia, which ranges from about 13 to 16. Foley is not guilty of pedophilia, he is guilty of consensual sex or sex related activities with a minor who is of the legal age of consent. Oh, and by the way, Alex, thats disgusting. True that pedophilia basically means loving children, but children are not meant to be sexually active. Their minds are far too undeveloped to comprehend what they are doing, and it is a traumatic experience for them.

Posted by: Josh | July 16, 2007, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Who knows, maybe they set him up, since he is a politican. And someone may want to take his position up………

Posted by: Best Resort | September 3, 2007, 10:40 am 10:40 am

t’s possibly just because I’m from Europe but I genuinelly don’t get why you’re all so het up over this. In the UK the age of consent is 16, in France, 14. Maybe if you weren’t such a bunch of gay-bashers he could have had a normal relationship

Posted by: Drew | October 4, 2007, 10:27 am 10:27 am

im sorry but i dont see the sex in this if anything it jus means the guys is gay. its his life i dont think anyone should be worring about him legaly hanging out with someone…u people need lives….

Posted by: mariah | May 20, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Ewwww. Sick

Posted by: Bri | September 26, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

salut

Posted by: samir | October 12, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.