Oct 5, 2006 5:20pm

Three More Former Pages Accuse Foley of Online Sexual Approaches

Three more former congressional pages have come forward to reveal what they call "sexual approaches" over the Internet from former Congressman Mark Foley. The pages served in the classes of 1998, 2000 and 2002. They independently approached ABC News after the Foley resignation through the Brian Ross & the Investigative Team’s tip line on ABCNews.com. None wanted their names used because of the sensitive nature of the communications. "I was seventeen years old and just returned to [my home state] when Foley began to e-mail me, asking if I had ever seen my page roommates naked and how big their penises were," said the page in the 2002 class. The former page also said Foley told him that if he happened to be in Washington, D.C., he could stay at Foley’s home if he "would engage in oral sex" with Foley. THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS READER DISCRETION STRONGLY ADVISED: Foley’s Exchange with Underage Page Foley Instant Message Chat While Waiting for a House Vote Click Here to Watch This Week’s Brian Ross Investigates Webcast The page told ABC News he was interviewed this week by FBI agents who had a six-page list of questions about Foley and the exchanges. The second page who talked with ABC News, a graduate of the 2000 page class, says Foley actually visited the old page dorm and offered rides to events in his BMW. "His e-mails developed into sexually explicit conversations, and he asked me for photographs of my erect penis," the former page said. The page said Foley maintained e-mail contact with him even after he started college and arranged a sexual liaison after the page had turned 18. The third page interviewed by ABC News, a graduate of the 1998 page class, said Foley’s instant messages began while he was a senior in high school. "Foley would say he was sitting in his boxers and ask what I was wearing," the page said. "It became more weird, and I stopped responding," the page said. All three pages described similar instant message and e-mail patterns, with remarkably similar escalations of provocative questions. "He didn’t want to talk about politics," the page said. "He wanted to talk about sex or my penis," the page said. The three new verbal accounts are in addition to two sets of sexually explicit instant messages provided to ABC News by former pages. An online story on the Drudge Report Thursday claimed one set of the sexually explicit instant messages obtained by ABC News was part of a "prank" on the part of the former page, who reportedly says he goaded the congressman into writing the messages. "This was no prank," said one of the three former pages who talked to ABC News today about his experience with the congressman.

User Comments

Doesn’t it seem like the media is two steps ahead of the facts? Obviously Foley did something wrong otherwise he wouldnt have resigned but how do we know these allegations are in fact, fact!? In this country youre tried by the media before you even get a chance at trial. Its pathetic.

Posted by: Msanchez | October 5, 2006, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Well, that should do it. Its all a question of how much the GOP leadership knew and when. Is there any indication that any of these new three pages told anyone about Foley’s behavior at the time? in 1998 or 2000?

Posted by: djp | October 5, 2006, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Bully! Great reporting Brian Ross and ABC!

Posted by: PJF | October 5, 2006, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Has ABC news asked any of these (or other) pages whether they have been approached by other congresspeople? Or whether they know of anyone who was?
It seems to me that a serious interest in this problem doesn’t begin and end with Foley.

Posted by: Ken Berwitz | October 5, 2006, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Foley’s toast, and so is Hastert. I’m a GOP’er but this is ridiculous.

Posted by: Thud | October 5, 2006, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

As far as i am concerned any congressman or senator,indeed anyone who knew what this scum was doing should not only be fired but prosecuted.The attitude seems to be whatever we need to do to keep republicans in office is acceptable.If dems knew the same applies to them.When is this country going to actually give a damn about its children,child molesters dont change their sexual preference just as we have finally accepted that gays dont.Wake the hell up America and keep these scumbags in prison forever when they molest a child.the recidivism rate is astronomical and i would bet its 100 percent, just some dont get caught again.When will our government quit worrying about the aclu and other organizations.These pedophiles wont ever change.Its past time our laws did

Posted by: tom | October 5, 2006, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Wow…it just never ends. How this could go on for eight years “unknown” is just too far-fetched to be believable. I’m calling “BS” on Hastert’s claims….

Posted by: Tad | October 5, 2006, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Have you asked these pages whether they know of any other congresspeople who have approached them? With 535 to choose from, including hundreds of both Republicans and Democrats, it seems to me that this is a fair question.
I hope your intent is to genuinely find out what is happening here, not to just nail Foley and call it a day.

Posted by: Ken Berwitz | October 5, 2006, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Foley is a scum. He is nothing more than a predator on children and anyone that would cover this up for political purposes is disgusting.
We need criminal charges brought against Foley.
This is how we protect our children?

Posted by: Denise | October 5, 2006, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

The Republican Party must think that the American public is asleep. This “Grown Man” is ignorant to the fact that we are not looking the other way when it comes to “Sexual Child Abuse”. What are they thinking? I am outraged at the “mess” that is coming off the Hill. The Republicans need to STOP making excuses and call for this “man” to step down and take legal responsibility for his actions. The law make sure that everyone else does. If this “man” does not step down, it makes a joke of the laws of this country concerning our children!!!

Posted by: T. Dickinson | October 5, 2006, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Who are they and where’s the proof? Can anyone just ring up Ross with a story and it’s suddenly reported as factual news?
I don’t get this.

Posted by: Nan | October 5, 2006, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.
I don’t buy Hastert’s assertion that no one knew about this. People talk about this sort of thing, and the house leadership was told long ago about Foley’s behavior. All they’re doing now is covering their behinds, too concerned with power to overn effectively or wisely.
As for Drudge, I’m not sure why ABC and the rest of the media give him so much attention. Besides the Lewinsky scandal, he’s never broken significant original news on his own, and as a partisan operative, it’s to his benefit to make legitimate news organizations look bad. Why help him?

Posted by: Smokey | October 5, 2006, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

I don’t read anything in the article that exactly substantiates the three “former pages” claims. How does ABC News know they are not lying? Has it been checked out? Are there copies of these messages linking these three to Foley? Just because they say it happened, how do we know? Unfortunately, sometimes in cases like these people want to be associated with the scandal. John Karr ring a bell. Hopefully a follow up article will give more details. Thanks.

Posted by: cs | October 5, 2006, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

i wish you would release the names of the people who knew all this was going on,this is great journalism because you are serving the public,isn`t that what its about.peace

Posted by: bob johnson | October 5, 2006, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

How do we get these bumper stickers?
SUPPORT FAMILY VALUES
VOTE DEMOCRATIC
PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN
VOTE DEMOCRATIC

Posted by: choppy | October 5, 2006, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Where is your proof? When someone makes this type of allegation they should be willing to reveal their name and their proof. Kind of like a rape victim. I could say my neighbor did something to me ….but can I proove it and is it true. Before revealing these things, you should back these things up with fact!

Posted by: deb | October 5, 2006, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

This is the last straw.
I’m a loyal Republican, but I’ve had enough. You know what they say, sometimes you just have to show a little “tough love.”
Looks like I’ll be holding my nose and voting Dem on election day.

Posted by: Seth | October 5, 2006, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

this is a nuclear bomb for the repubs…..
Hasert should resign to save his party….otherwise they may well find themselves facing a super-majority of dems in congress and much, much more trouble on the horizon.
If ever there was a time for maximal damage control it is now. This may be the bigggest scandel they have faced since watergate.

Posted by: Luke's 22 | October 5, 2006, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Thank you abc for directly addressing the misdirectional lying spin coming from Matt Drudge.
And thank you for this amazing and honest gutsy reporting.
The facts are coming out, no matter how much the republicans wish they were otherwise.
I hope the speaker now will step down. 1998, you have to be kidding me that no one knew about this

Posted by: Steven in Baton Rouge | October 5, 2006, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

I think both Democrat and Republican leadership should be under oath answering questions and I think that all Congressmen in both parties should have their computers seized and examined. I think Freeh was a good choice to investigate for the House – makes me wonder what Pelosi was afraid of to have blocked him,

Posted by: Jacqui | October 5, 2006, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Let’s throw every rotten one of them out (DEMS & REPUBS) and start over from scratch.

Posted by: PAG | October 5, 2006, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

As a Democrat, I never dreamed that something this horrid could happen–we are surely witnessing the meltdown of the Republican party. I can’t say that I’m sorry, as I think that a Dem majority is the only thing that will save us now, but geez, guys, this is a new low even for the GOP.

Posted by: loretta | October 5, 2006, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Asking people to resign without knowing all the facts is ludicrous. Obviously Foley had good reason too, but otherwise it’s just blood in the water now, and there is a partisan effort to sink the GOP.
Talk about an October surprise, this is dirty politics at it’s worst…

Posted by: Leo | October 5, 2006, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Note that this story doesn’t say whether or not any of these former pages reported Foley’s advances. I’d bet not… and how can you blame the gov’t officials for not doing something if these incidents aren’t reported??

Posted by: Larry | October 5, 2006, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

It is time to rid the country of the current congressmen/congresswomen, along if a lying president and his staff.
Our leaders do not have the moral right to lead this county.
Congress should impeach the president, and then they should resign. New people should be elected.

Posted by: Jesse Harden | October 5, 2006, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

This inappropriate action of Mark Foley should be punished to the fullest extent of the law, as should and circumstances that involve other people in the scandal. Democrats that try to turn this into a political issue need to back off. WE, THE GOP, DO NOT SUPPORT THIS PEDOPHILE IN HIS ILLEGAL ACTIONS.
God Bless Justice.

Posted by: Conservateen | October 5, 2006, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

This is disgusting and I think if there are any other congress people that have done things like this, now is the time for pages and interns to spill their guts!!!! Lets start cleaning up “OUR” House!!!! Get all the scum out of there now…Make them sweat!!!! If any of you pages or interns have what it takes, start opening your mouths and report any and all of these Holier then thou Represenatives that are suppose to be doing our business up there on that hill….

Posted by: Casey | October 5, 2006, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Unfortunately, the Republicans have become so used to being in power, that they have no moral compass anymore and cannot regulate themselves anymore than they can the President! Although I wish to God there was a viable third option, I’m giving my votes to the Democrats next time around. Gridlock is better than unchecked arrogance and corruption!

Posted by: Ehren | October 5, 2006, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

But Shimkus and Hastert didn’t take the logical next steps. The communications that Shimkus and Hastert knew about were serious enough to ask Foley to cease contact with the former page. But the Republicans didn’t pursue the matter any further and didn’t inform the Democratic member of the House Page Board about the matter. That lack of action is indefensible.

Posted by: Read it & Weep | October 5, 2006, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

This country is is in serious trouble. Both parties are a joke and only care about their little country club in DC. We need another party who really care about doing what is right.

Posted by: HM | October 5, 2006, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Ok, Ok, its a travesty and a scandal for Foley, but the bigger problem is the GOP protecting a predator like Foley because they want to win an election…..that’s what is wrong with the new GOP…no ethics.

Posted by: leo | October 5, 2006, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

You say that one pages reported that Foley “arranged a sexual liaison after the page had turned 18″. Did this liason actually occur, or did Foley just try to “arrange” it?
Foley claims he never actually had sex with any of these pages, so it seems to me the distinction is important here.

Posted by: pdq | October 5, 2006, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I’ll stipulate that there’s plenty of Republican *and* Democratic sex scandal under the rocks in Washington. But you know what the difference is? The Republicans — as a party, as a political movement, as a class of people — are simultaneously trying to jam their family values and religion crap down my throat 24/7. Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton have never tried to sell me their church religion along with their politics.

Posted by: Piehole | October 5, 2006, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Ouch, this has to hurt for the Republicans. They were hoping this would get out after the elections, but I guess that backfired! Rush Limbaugh compared this to the Clinton scandal, and he predicts this will backfire against the Dems. Ok ok, Clinton vs. Foley. One guy cheats on his wife with an adult female (pathetic, and the lying as well), but do not compare that to a pedophile. Dems will take back the house and senate, and hopefully we can return to something resembling a functioning government.

Posted by: Jeff | October 5, 2006, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

JUST TO SHOW HOW SICK SOME REPUBLICANS ARE, THEY EQUATE CHILD MOLESTATION TO CONSENSUAL SEX BETWEEN ADULTS.

Posted by: CAROLYN LUND | October 5, 2006, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

this is ridiculous. i mean my god. and they dump on democrats for “immorality” and “having no morals”. what the hell? they cover for each other so much and then when they get busted, they backpeddle like crazy and try to STILL blame their screw ups on anyone but themselves. absolutely pitiful.

Posted by: eleanor | October 5, 2006, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Why is the House Minority Leader, Democrat Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco, objecting to an outside investigation by former FBI Director Louis Freeh? Is she afraid some of her Democrat colleagues may be swept up in the scandle?

Posted by: Ron Babbini | October 5, 2006, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

How about investigating ALL congressmen and congresswomen for inapproprite contacts with pages and interns. I bet there are more from both parties. How about it, ABC news

Posted by: ken | October 5, 2006, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Drudgereport should be ashamed for the huge headlines earlier today trying to convince us GOPer’s that Foley’s parter was of legal age. Weak Drudge, Weak.
I am a republican but no more ‘republican news machines’ for me.
back to the goold ole ‘liberal media’ for me, a.k.a. the truth.
Sure the media makes Iraq look bad, and the president looks bad, and the issues we are representing look bad… and the reason I conclude it cause it is looking bad. Gay Marriage and Abortion. Weak GOP, Weak. whatever happened to honest fook like Colin Powell and John Mccain? Whoops look like our leadership stomped on them to get the idiots like Bush, Delay, Hassert in power.

Posted by: John Malone | October 5, 2006, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Foley is a pig.
So glad he is gone! But to try and blame Hastert for the actions of Foley is pathetic.
I wish Foley wouldn’t have resigned so soon, maybe wait a week and then be forced out.
The dems want blood, Foley’s resignation just isn’t good enough for them.

Posted by: Jane | October 5, 2006, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

I’m just so over the nasty, political arena going on these days. I’m so tired of one party steps down (as they should) and the other party appearing to condon actions of members of their party. Prosecute those who did anything to hurt any child under the age of 18…Prosecute anyone who held these messages for, what 3 years, before doing anything about it. In my opinion, those who knew about these IM’s and didn’t come immediately forward should also be prosecuted for endangering a child. “We the people” are no longer being heard.
Mary

Posted by: Mary | October 5, 2006, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Anyone who is serious about preventing this kind of thing in the future should advocate an investigation of all emails and ims to pages from all house members of both parties. Who is on board for that?

Posted by: Lynn | October 5, 2006, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Anybody who had any inkling and sit on it- allowing it to continue should be toast – whether for fear of seeming to be a homophobic or political gain. Republican here with three sons… and the anger is palpable.

Posted by: D Smith | October 5, 2006, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

It’s funny listening to the Republican spin once the shoe is on the other foot. There is nothing anyone, including Hastert, can do to sugarcoat this. The sad fact is, by Spring 2006, Hastert’s office had been told at least 4 times that Foley was a predatory pedophile. How can Hastert respond with anything other than a resignation?

Posted by: David | October 5, 2006, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Denny Hastert should hang in there as Speaker. He’s a shining example of the best and the brightest that Republicans have to offer America, and he should stay in the public eye to remind voters of that fact.
This will all blow over.

Posted by: attobuoy | October 5, 2006, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

The misinformation forces of the dishonored
including Mr. Drudge and the hypocrite Mr.
Limbaugh along with the Fox Propagandists
owe the Citizens of the USA an explanation of their obivous lies. Thank you to ABC News for
bringing this forward and to Mr. Brian Ross and Staff for their efforts to bring this important issue before the Public before the election cycle.
CdR.

Posted by: Comte de Rochambeau | October 5, 2006, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Its all silly! Foley is gone. Game over.
Dems always use scandal to detract from issues or ideas!

Posted by: Mike | October 5, 2006, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Why is it that Rush and Drudge defend this man

Posted by: King Fish | October 5, 2006, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

I’ve been a lifelong conservative Regan Republican, but this is just too much for me.
I live in Northern Virginia and both my incumbant Republican congresmen and my incumbant Republican Senator are in close races.
They won’t get my vote.
How can they DO THAT! Covering up a pedephile and letting him continue to molest youg boys. Just to win an election?
I hate to do it, but I have to vote Democratic in 06. I hope America joins me.

Posted by: Dan Flynn | October 5, 2006, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

This is the democrats fault, they are to blame because um…wait where did my conservative talking points go?

Posted by: An | October 5, 2006, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

This is all minor compared to others.
If you would read Tranceformation of America by Cathy O’Brien you would see how the big boys operate.
There have been no lawsuits and she is still alive so you decide if it’s true

Posted by: Lampinski | October 5, 2006, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

All I hear is we cant even trust our children with congressmen WOW. Thats not a good sign to any party or anything at all. Where are we headed and how do we expect other people and cultures to be moral.

Posted by: Robert | October 5, 2006, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

The Foley situation has nothing to do with Republicans vs Democrats. There is enough immoral activity out there to cover both parties.

Posted by: Buddy | October 5, 2006, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

A predator. That’s what Foley was, and that is what the Republican leadership was protecting. It is telling that Alexander, who decided to report the original “overly friendly” emails, went up the political chain and never said “boo” to the House Page Board.
Republicans are toast. Remember when Republicans were all about personal responsibility?

Posted by: Fred | October 5, 2006, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

i actually heard newt gingrich on a radio chat show today blaming the scandal on nancy palosi. unbelievable.

Posted by: wayne | October 5, 2006, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

I’m close to as far left as they come, and I find it hard to believe this is anything but a cut and dry case of a man who was attracted to young boys. I don’t think Hastert would have protected Foley, nor do I think anyone in the GOP leadership would allow this kind of thing to occur. This is the kind of stuff no one who can physically restrain themselves (Foley clearly couldn’t) would touch with a ten foot pole. It sounds to me like appropriate action was taken when things first surfaced, and I hope Foley is treated the way anyone with his M-O is treated. This isn’t a political issue. Fantasizing about underage boys has nothing to do with political alignment and I don’t think of this case should either.

Posted by: Jeff | October 5, 2006, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

This man is one sick person and alcohol didn’t make him do it. Its a shame this had to become a party issue;but considering the caliber of people in politics no big surprise. I just can’t figure out why the cover up. It could have been done and gone a long time ago. The mass confusion continues and the kids continue to suffer.

Posted by: whiskey | October 5, 2006, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

bu$h just expressed full confidence in Big Denny, which is bu$hese for, “you’re doing a heckuva job, Denny…you’re outta here.”

Posted by: OleHippieChick | October 5, 2006, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

What’s with the ultra-conservative suggestion that the sexual conversations between Foley and the page are the fault of the page because he “initated” the sexual conversation or because the whole thing was a “prank”? Aren’t we looking at what Foley did, how he responded with his pradation? As far as I’m concerned, this “spin job” demonstrates complicity.

Posted by: Jane | October 5, 2006, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

I remember a young student one confided to me that one of the muckety mucks where i worked was harrassing her and making innappropriate comments.
i went to my boss, told him this student needed advice about what options she had for filing a complaint. And I let me boss know that the issue wasn’t taken seriously and handled ‘right’, i would quit – I couldn’t work for an outfit that permitted that kind of abuse to take place.
hastert, reynolds, shminkus, and the others should have had the exact same attitude.

Posted by: Ako | October 5, 2006, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

This is just so gross. How can a Congressman get away with this kind of filthy, disgusting behavior for YEARS?????
I say don’t rush to judgement on Hasert, (I’m a big liberal, but believe in fair play unlike my Neo-Con friends) but if he knew that Foley was engaging in sexually charged relationships with minors and did nothing, he should be penalized just as much as Foley. Well, maybe a bit less than Foley…

Posted by: Disgusted | October 5, 2006, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Ok let’s not jump to conclusions. 3 kids coming out and speaking to an ABC investigation line? No emails, nothing written? Come on.

Posted by: no one | October 5, 2006, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Everyone MUST REMEMBER that is about a congressional leader who is accused of PREYING ON UNDERAGED teens for sex. He should be treated as any other sex offender and arrested if the accusations are true. People should be outraged by this, and any politician who tried to cover this up should be arrested for aiding and abetting a sex offender.

Posted by: Steve | October 5, 2006, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Republican or Democrat, a pedophile is a pedophile and in an affiliation all thier own – stop blaming parties, Hastert did not lure in young male pages, Foley did – place blame where it should be placed, with the individual who is and should be held accountable for his individual actions.

Posted by: sbbm | October 5, 2006, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

This is a horrifying story. Those poor, young men – I beseech them not to be permanently damaged by this, and to press on to bring good into this world. “We, the people, care about you.” In this case, our government does not speak for us.
No doubt these Pages are smart, respectful, diplomatic, young men interested in politics. Foley is apparently a pedophile. It is horrifying that Foley was able predate on them with such ease under the nose the federal government. I do not believe for a second that Foley’s peers were not aware of his behavior to some degree. Look at them scramble to cover themselves. They blame Dems, they blame gays. It’s disgusting. They (mostly the GOP) let a pedophile run loose in congress – the sacred place of American Democracy.
I am so angry the Pages were subjected to this treatment by our very own federal government, and it was permitted to go on. I am also disgusted at the defensive posture adopted by the GOP. It is plain they don’t actually care about the people (especially the children) they serve; moreover they haven’t learned anything about PR either.

Posted by: MomofTeens.xGOP | October 5, 2006, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

This whole thing is very amusing. Foley is a just a punch line for office jokes now. ABC can keep printing more IM’s every day and people will be bored of it by the time the election comes around. This is not significant, nobody was harmed and Foley has resigned.
If any Republicans are looking for a moral compass as a result of the transgressions of one gay congressmen they are not going to look across the aisle at the Democrats for hope. Liberals don’t get it . Disappointment or disgust with Bush, or Hastert or Foley does not suddenly make Hillary, Pelosi or Barney Frank people we want to elect.
I’m a Florida republican and I hope the Democratic plan is to keep this Foley thing in the news every day, dishing out more salacious details and trying to bring down more GOP leaders. When the vote results come in they will once again be saying “Why didn’t we gain control? The GOP base was upset over this. The polls showed it!!”
I’m glad Foley is gone and we do not miss him. But none of this has me looking seriously at Democrats as a viable alternative.

Posted by: Harley | October 5, 2006, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Hmmm.
This amusing interlude is going to end up biting the Democrats right in the butt. Give it another couple days.

Posted by: ed | October 5, 2006, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Question:
Did all pages receive warnings about Foley or just selected pages?

Posted by: Curious | October 5, 2006, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Foley’s Attorney mouthpiece news conference the other day shows Foley is still in denial albeit 3 days into “recovery”. He has the mind of a person who is a psychopath, unable to truly feel real feelings for another and has been one his entire life. NO glory or position of power in life can overcome it—deep deep emotional and mental therapy might. But 3 days into treatment he marches out an attorney to give us this baloney that he was always drunk when these occurred, and never actually met one in person. These recent Pages accounts are starting to get closer to showing us that there probably was in fact in person encounters. Give it time, someone will surface with it as being a sexual deviant going back to at least 1998, there is no way he couldnt.

Posted by: billy | October 5, 2006, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Do these Pages have any proof of these Instant Messages and emails?

Posted by: Pat | October 5, 2006, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

where the the actual IMs from these three pages? Proof please!

Posted by: pd | October 5, 2006, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

This is just ridiculous. I voted Republican in the last 2 elections but I’m sitting this one out. The Republicans knew about this guy and they just sat on their hands? Power corrupts, folks, and these guys are now corrupted to the core. Unbelievable. These guys were supposed to restire dignity to politics, but between Jack Abramoff, this and the war (I have alot of family in the service and the news from Iraq is bad, bad, bad) these guys are unfit for command. What a stab in the back this Republican party has been.

Posted by: RandyP | October 5, 2006, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Drudge and Limbaugh should be ashamed of themselves for trying to blame the victims for sexual predations of a United States Representative. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds, as has long been apparent, but this defense of Foley goes beyond the pale. Has their partisanship and self-serving bombast destroyed all sense of decency?

Posted by: bob | October 5, 2006, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

If you read the Drudge story referenced in this news report it’s obvious that the young man caught up in this scandal is fearful of being outed as a homosexual. Whether he is or isn’t gay is beside the point. His sexual preference does nothing to change the criminal intent of Foley in his email and IM exchanges with the boy. Hastert’s address today accepting full responsibility and, quote, “the buck stops here”, is so typical of the current GOP leadership. How many times have we heard this? They all accept full responsibility–for the Katrina disaster, for the Valerie Plame leak, for incorrect intelligence regarding yellowcake uranium and weapons of mass destruction, etc., etc. They accept full responsibility for their mistakes, but they never seem willing to step down. That IS NOT accepting full responsibilty. That is cowardice and hubris.

Posted by: Mary Coatsworth | October 5, 2006, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

While I agree that Foley is a disgrace and it’s good that he is gone, there are still many questions that need answered. Brian Ross needs to make public where this information came from. This gotcha politics crap needs to stop. If these pages knew years ago about this behavior, why are we only hearing about it now?

Posted by: greg | October 5, 2006, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

If they won’t step down then it’s time to fire all of them! This whole thing is sickening. Just imagine when you were a teenager and how you would have felt if this were done to you. Give our children a chance to grow up and make their own choices about sexual orientation and politics.

Posted by: mary | October 5, 2006, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Funny how people forget the past. Anyone remember news about Dan Crane (R)(sex with a 17 year old female page) and Gerry Studds (D)(sex with a 17 year old male page) in 1983? Crane apologized but never won his seat again. Studds never apologized and kept hold of his seat until his 1996 retirement. Our political system is a complete farce that is run by a bunch of clowns. They know absolutely nothing about how everyday Americans feel about any topic. I’m finsihed voting for anyone unless my name is on the ballot. Thanks Congress; we are the world’s favorite sitcom.

Posted by: Pete | October 5, 2006, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

who cares? Do the dems? do the Pubs? It is all politics whith the prize being the aquisition/retention of power. This is not about kids. Has anyone heard anyone ask how the “victims” are doing? Did anyone actually have sex?

Posted by: Joseph | October 5, 2006, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

I am sure the newest batch of 3 pages have been checked and re-checked for verification by ABC.
Although Tom’s post is showing some concern for child victims of these predators, Shamefully they are no longer the story. The violation of children has been reduced to a political food fight.
This is just the beginning. In the end, I think the bases will solidify and truth will win the day. We all know which side takes the higher road.

Posted by: mole | October 5, 2006, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

This is what happens when the Supreme Court puts a moron in the President’s office and every fool in office gets the message that the law no longer applies.
What’s child molestation compared to dropping bombs on thousands of innocent people?
The Party of Nixon does not honor human life in any form.

Posted by: Keith Gore Wiseman | October 5, 2006, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Maybe you Republicans who put these guys in office are finally starting to see the pattern the opponents of this administration have been seeing for a long time: no WMD but persist in maintaining there are until you can’t get away with it any longer; no link between 9/11 and Iraq but keep fudging it till you can’t get away with it any longer; maintain the position of “staying the course” in Iraq, maintain Dr Rice didn’t know anything about the possibility of 9/11-type attack on 7/10, cover up sexual predators to stay in power etc etc…The depth of the desperation to maintain power at all costs is finally apparent. Please, Republicans, get rid of this bunch of people who are simply bad for our country, all of us.

Posted by: Granny | October 5, 2006, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

In the past year we have seen 4 House Republicans facing prosecution or already in jail: Delay, Cunningham, Ney and now Foley. Meanwhile House Republicans continue to wait for federal prosecutors to uncover criminal behavior long after the problem is out of control. This sad case with Foley is just another example, with the problem first reported over 5 years ago.
Some Senators in response to the disclosure of the Abramoff and Delay scandal advocated an independent ethics watchdog, which could possibly detect some of these problems before they get to the stage of criminal behavior. Legislation was even drafted by these Senators, but was rejected by the Senate.
Perhaps an independent ethics watchdog deserves reconsideration – an independent office might have been contacted by these ex-pages years ago.

Posted by: Chris Baker | October 5, 2006, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Foley’s has resigned, Hastert is not the problem.
The problem is the drive-by media making up stories to sell the news – the news they want us to hear…and believe.
Get your news from a reliable source before judging others.

Posted by: charlotte | October 5, 2006, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Warning: I’m a Democrat to state my bias but this goes beyond political biases. I mean look at George “state of denial” Bush what does he do today? He commends Hastert…. When will Bush ever acknowledge that both him and his political party are not infallible (as anyone with an IQ above 60 knows).

Posted by: Andrew | October 5, 2006, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

I am appalled by the fact that the highest ranking members in our government cannot see that the protection and respect of children is paramount in our society, especially after years of hearing about clergy abuse and sexual predators. Does power corrupt our leaders to the point that they preach the messages of rightousness and faith, but do not practice what their words state. So much for the religious right! What a smoke screen.
Based on the existing exchanges from Mark Foley to minors, he is a pedophile, there is no other way of looking at it. When will our officials stop looking the other way and do their work with honesty and integrity? It is time to ‘clean house’, top to bottom.

Posted by: Tony | October 5, 2006, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

I just want to say thank you for bringing the truth to light about an individual who abused his power and manipulated minors.
If you hadn’t broken this story Foley would right now be seeking two more years of access to pages.
Those blame the ‘drive by media’ for Foley and Hastert’s problems, or far far worse blame the kids who Foley harassed, are missing the point. By a mile.

Posted by: Bruce M. Smithc | October 5, 2006, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

According to a Hill Republican source, another Foley-esque incident will soon erupt in the House. It’s a matter of time…

Posted by: hill | October 5, 2006, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Foley is a real monster. Taking all of these electronic exchanges into account, it seems a pattern is developing. He was very conscious of their ages, questions of that nature were asked repeatedly. When the kids were 15/16, he was probably cultivating them as sex partners until they turned 18. You have to bet that when he was certain a former page turned 18 Foley was ready to pounce. You can also bet someone will admit to it.

Posted by: jim coombs | October 5, 2006, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Drudge’s first name should be Mario because he just got one-upped!
Seriously, I’m getting sick Drudge’s partisanship on this issue. His shoddy journalism (releasing a victim’s name, implying that Foley is a victim) is beginning to show, at least for me, a longtime fan of his.
Keep up the good work, ABC. Show us what real journalism’s all about.

Posted by: Jonathan | October 5, 2006, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

I think in court it is called heresay. I don’t know what Foley did or did not do, I was not there. I do kinow that anybody can say anything about anyone and it is believed by the mindless masses. Foley deserves his day in court, so does Hastert. If they are guilty they should be punished, if not they deserve an apology.

Posted by: Rob | October 5, 2006, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

A good questions from another blogger…
I wonder why ABC is not interested in finding all pages that have been sexually harrassed by members of Congress? Why just Foley? Why don’t they put up a tip line that asks for any page to come forward? Would it screw up their story if a page came forward that had been sexually harrassed by a democrat?

Posted by: JC | October 5, 2006, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Astounding.
Just another hint that decency and morality don’t know party lines. Liberals and fundamentalists alike should think about that.

Posted by: Chris | October 5, 2006, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

This thing has blown up in the Lib’s faces. Young punks making up pranks and then it plays perfectly into the political scheme, a month before elections. It just strengthens my resolve to go all-Republican.

Posted by: Rocco | October 5, 2006, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

So far there is no evidence Hastert knew about the sexualy explict IM messages. However it does appear that Democratic operatives have been sitting on this “October surprise” sincxe at least this summer. Aparently they were more concerned with making political hay they stopping Foley’s misconduct.

Posted by: Paul | October 5, 2006, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Unfortunately,I find the timing of these “revelations” extremely suspicious. Wrong as it is what Foley did, it seems to me this had to have been known by more people and sat on until it could do the most damage, close to election time. There was another case somewhat similar to this many years ago, with the exception of the victim being an underage girl and the perpetrator being a Democrat. But there was no widespread outrage, uproar, or mass media coverage. Look up Mel Reynolds circa 1994. He was indicted of having sex with a 16 year old female campaign volunteer and asking her to take lewd pics of a 15 year old. Hmmm..his criminal actions were not covered as feverishly as Foley’s have been.

Posted by: Suspicious Mind! | October 5, 2006, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Foley never actually molested any of the pages, while Clinton & Monica really did have oral sex. Choirboy? Heh. Right.

Posted by: Matthews | October 5, 2006, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

I totally agree with Sam…Clinton was brought up impeachment charges and this Foley person may totally get away with what he has done! How very sick!!! WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

Posted by: Shelle | October 5, 2006, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

But this still makes no sense…again with these three, we’re talking about sitting on information for 2-3 years. Why would anyone do this if the allegations as made now are truly so serious?
It doesn’t add up…

Posted by: Paul | October 5, 2006, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

This isn’t that big a deal. He didn’t have actual sex like Clinton DID, he just wrote silly email messages. Clinton was and never will be a choirboy, but he is a pathological liar. Let’s move on to more important topics.

Posted by: Mary | October 5, 2006, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

You really are left wing plebes, aren’t you?

Posted by: Sharon Wilbur | October 5, 2006, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

I need to understand something. How popular was instant messaging in 1998?

Posted by: Mike | October 5, 2006, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

America is at War, and the topic changes to gays just before the elections. Dan Rather tried, and look at him now.
MSM is on the way out, and so is the Democrat Party…followed later by the weak Republican Party.
i never Voted until the mid-terms of 2002, and i am older than most. Simply put…i don’t Vote for the Republican Party, but do Vote against the Democrat Pary, and for “W”.
KårmiÇømmünîs†

Posted by: KarmiCommunist | October 5, 2006, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Instant messaging may not have been popular, but Foley reportedly stayed in touch with some of these pages for years so what difference does it make that IMing wasn’t popular in 1998. It’s entirely possible that he made advances to a boy that was a page in 1998!

Posted by: Laura | October 5, 2006, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

I think the media is having a field day with reporting on what they do not know. Lets get back to the election issues and talk about what the Rebublicans have done for you. All the Democrats do is smear.

Posted by: Janice | October 5, 2006, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Given all this action for Foley since 1995, how in the hell did he avoid getting stung by Chris Hansen on NBC’s “To Catch a Predator”? Wouldn’t THAT have been a sight??? “Hi, Congressman, I’m Chris Hansen with NBC!”

Posted by: Overly Friendly | October 5, 2006, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Isn’t there some more important issues than this? Its been a week.. Time to move on to another GOP bashing article

Posted by: Ryan | October 5, 2006, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

ABC has lost its credibility.

Posted by: Obvious Tag surrenders | October 5, 2006, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

The Republicans really need to watch what they say. When I heard them blaming ABC and the Democrats for leaking the story, my immediate reaction was that the GOP leaders must have been covering it up all this time until after the elections. When they compared this to past scandals by Democrats it gave the impression that they didn’t take it very seriously. These arguments certainly will not fly with the Values Voters who at one time liked to consider themselves morally superior.

Posted by: Tim Colby | October 5, 2006, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Laura a lot of things are “entirely possible” now that he has been shown to like young men, do you think this is so possible simply because he is gay? I hope you are never on my jury, should I ever need one. You’re like a shark with blood in the water, you can’t see anything but red and you are hungry to devour someone. So far, this guy has done less than most of the creeps we find in the chat rooms every day. He (so far) has not been accused of physically doing anything to anyone…stop licking your chops and think rationally for a minute. I don’t want to defend this guy, his career is already over, but now anybody can say he screwed their kid and you’ll say it is entirely possible. That’s nuts!

Posted by: TC | October 5, 2006, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Please don’t say things like all gay men are pedophiles. As a gay man, I find that a clumsy, horribly violent and closeminded statement — especially since you don’t have the facts and don’t even know me! If the situation was a straight man having sex with a girl, you wouldn’t say “lets keep straight people out of our schools, blah blah.” (ever read Lolita?) The point is, adults are responsible if they have sex with minors — period! That’s what our society has agreed are the rules. Let’s not use this as an excuse to gay bash. That makes you no better than Foley.

Posted by: Moe | October 5, 2006, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

There are many “mentally sick” elite types in Congress. Their egos are driven only by a lust for power and money.

Posted by: RP | October 5, 2006, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

no one knows yet if there was any underage actual physical contact
that is pivotal i think
but what a deviant mindset for a lawmaker
i wonder how many boys were approached

Posted by: sky | October 5, 2006, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

umm, is it me, or are you missing the point that clinton had sex with an adult? why have you all become hate the victim people? why do you hate kids? This isn’t about politics and stop joining with the group that says it is… it happened. it’s wrong. suck it up guys and let’s fix the problem and move on. but don’t be jerks and try to excuse it. it’s wrong. not because it’s homosexuality. it’s wrong because it’s underage, ambitious kids being solicited by a powerful adult. IT’S WRONG. pray about it. you’ll see.

Posted by: lud | October 5, 2006, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

To Rocco, who thinks the Drudge Report story is viable–
Get freakin’ real. Have you read the relevant IMs? This is not a “prank” set of IMs (and who has ever SEEN a “prank set of IMs”?!?!)–The messages are too stop-and-start, too disjointed, to be a “prank”. The e-mails read VERY CLEARLY like a drunk pedophile talking to a somewhat star-struck kid. Don’t embarrass yourself with support for this ridiculous story–Drudge will bury this “Drudge exclusive” within 2 days (because the STORY DOESN’T MAKE SENSE). Learn to evaluate your news stories more carefully, especially when they’re not delivered by real news sources. And think carefully before defending pedophiles–It just looks very, very strange.

Posted by: Kelly | October 5, 2006, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Gene, Gene, this is not about homosexuality, it is about a person in power abusing that power and using it to solicit sexual favors.
Homosexuality has nothing to do with it.
I’ll bet you think that women who are raped are “Asking for it by the way they dress” too.

Posted by: Emma | October 5, 2006, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

You are all sick get a life and stop thinking about your own small and feeble personal agendas. THIS WAS A KID FOR GOD’S SAKE!!!! Next thing you will be saying it’s the kids fault. GET A LIFE!!!

Posted by: BUBBA | October 5, 2006, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

how could the Dems have known about this, info was only given to the republican leadership back in june. Even the one dem one the 3-man page committee wasn’t given any info–kept in the dark. This is the republican’s own making–they sat on this since june–well more than five weeks before elections. All i know is all you republicans prove to me is u have no morals…..you will follow blindly your party no matter what they do wrong–well, family values–trust, character and religious convictions go right down the toilet when its time to decide party loyality or high moral values.

Posted by: robert | October 5, 2006, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Please don’t say things like all gay men are pedophiles. As a gay man, I find that a clumsy, horribly violent and closeminded statement — especially since you don’t have the facts and don’t even know me! If the situation was a straight man having sex with a girl, you wouldn’t say “lets keep straight people out of our schools, blah blah.” (ever read Lolita?) The point is, adults are responsible if they have sex with minors — period! That’s what our society has agreed are the rules. Let’s not use this as an excuse to gay bash. That makes you no better than Foley.

Posted by: Moe | October 5, 2006, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Great job! I am glad truth and courage still have a home in journalism.

Posted by: Summer | October 5, 2006, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Oh, I know this was all a prank and these young democrat undercover pages are now lying to the FBI. Our wonderful President Bush and those brave republicans have my support now more than ever. This is no time to be arguing over harmless e-mails while the vital war on terror is being fought.

Posted by: Rufus | October 5, 2006, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Don’t confuse “instant messaging” and cellphone “text messaging”. AOL has had IM for years. And yes, it was definitely in use in 1998. In fact, it was still relatively new– at least new enough that I know a number of my kids’ college friends said they discovered they spent so much time on IM that it started to affect their grades.
And I can certainly understand a 15-17 year old kid NOT saying anything about this. After all, it would have been their word against a Congressman. That’s powerful stuff to a young kid– especially one who perhaps has hopes of going into government at some point. They’re afraid to burn any bridges.

Posted by: Nani | October 5, 2006, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

I have to agree that we really should look at all Congressmen and not concentrate on just one individual. How about all those congressmen that hire prostitutes while holding a political office? This is apparently another instance of the media monopolizing on an individual Congressmen, who happens to be a supposed homosexual, making other gay men and women appear to be just like him. Show me the actual IM conversations and emails that ‘supposedly’ took place, and then I MIGHT believe that this whole thing actually happened. Why have these individuals waited 8 years to come forward and now there are all sorts of young men coming out of the closet (no pun intended).
I read that one top aide alerted Hastert two years ago, then why did this not surface then? Did Hastert have his own political agenda? Was he afraid that he had engaged in morally questionable behaviors himself and was afraid if he was investigated they would come to light as well?
Don’t you people see this as a political agenda that the media is benefiting from?????

Posted by: Brad | October 5, 2006, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Anyone involved in any type of cover-up OR DELAY of this should be removed from office. THIS INCLUDES REPUBLICANS, DEMOCRATS, NEWSMEDIA MEMBERS. The FBI also has some explaining to do since they supposedly “investigated” the initial allegations and found nothing criminal. BUT ONE THING NEEDS TO STOP: linking all of this to gay people. Democrats are showing their true colors in how they really don’t care for the gay community (hello, Bob Bechtel…equating gay men to killers) Republicans think gay men support NAMBLA. And the media, yes ABC..you too, is going to play this out not out of a concern for the kids involved…but because it equates to ratings. Its sad all around.

Posted by: alek | October 5, 2006, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Regarding the Mel Reynolds matter, plus the guy who molested and murdered the Amish girls this week, plus all of the men seducing teenage girls — things we hear about on a daily basis — it seems to me that heterosexual men are a menace to society. They must be kept out of schools, churches and anywhere else these sick perverts can get near their prey. Right, Gene?

Posted by: Chris | October 5, 2006, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

I serioulsy doubt and have yet to see any credible evidence that Denny Hastert knew the extent of Foley’s perversion. I find it hard to believe that should any ranking Republican have known that he was asking for “penis pics” he would have lasted for long. Seriously, these IM’s were released to political operatives on the other side – either mistakenly or with an ulterior motive – by the pages in question in order bring down the current congressional leadership and, in particular, Foley. To suggest that Hastert knew the specifics of Foley’s messages is to accuse him of engaging in them himself. Seriously? Does anyone really believe this. And if you do, then I challenge you to accept the fact that you too, then, if you are a manager or supervisor at a company are responsible for all the suspected suspicious online behavior of your employees. Some of the messages Foley was sending afterall were done from his personal PC. Are you responsible for your colleagues actions in your own life? Of course not. So why should Hastert be.

Posted by: American Mongrel | October 5, 2006, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

I believe the Republican party has an obligation to respond as swiftly and decisively as the Democrats have in similar past circumstance: the immediate censure of Foley and then give him a standing ovation.

Posted by: Standing O | October 5, 2006, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Do you really think that all that happened was provacative emails? Foley used his power as a government offical to prey upon children. This is an outrage!!! Who cares who released this information – we should be glad that this has finally been brought to light and hopefully this scumbag of our government can not hurt anymore children!! Think about how it would be if it was your 16 year old son -

Posted by: Mary | October 5, 2006, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

OK, Lets be honest. Foley is a creep. BUT, 17 year olds are of consent age in DC. They are considered ADULTS! These IM’s demonstrate that these men were GAY and knew what they were involved in or they should have STOPPED all communication.
After all they were considered ADULTS in Washington DC.
So, enough with the Pages coming forth! We know Foley was deranged. He RESIGNED. End of subject.

Posted by: Brit | October 5, 2006, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

I highly doubt the veracity of these new pile-on claims. 1998 pages using Instant Messenger? That application, though available, wasn’t popularized until well after 1998….

Posted by: Anon in CT | October 5, 2006, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Even if it was a prank, Foley played into it (and how!). So now what you have is a foolish predator.

Posted by: Jonathan | October 5, 2006, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

This story is fluff. Scandalous fluff. He broke no laws (at the time of the alleged emails/im’s). He helped change the law in 2006 for better. If the new change in law catches him, then that would be good. I’ll bet he was smart enough to cease and desist his ways when the new law was enacted. But will anybody give him credit for helping write this law. Will anybody be happy with a Congressman hitting on 18 year old pages or employees who are no longer, if ever under his or her authority. This story wreaks

Posted by: richard pierce | October 5, 2006, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

How long are we going to allow the Republicans to blame all of their misdeeds on the Democrats. The Republican talking points are encouraging its followers to blame Soros and Abc for their perversion. SHAMELESS!! Guess what….America is smarter than that. Vote them out of office. Every single one of the SHAMELESS Republicans.

Posted by: Jill | October 5, 2006, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Foley, just like Clinton, is a sexual predator. Foley resigned and will suffer the consequences. Clinton never paid for his crimes. Both are equal in God’s eyes. Unrepentent sinners

Posted by: TJ Hacker | October 5, 2006, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

This is so FUNNY – how suddenly the party of values is downplaying Foley. “Um… Um.. it’s just a bunch of gay teenagers trying to set him up! Clinton was worse! Democrats suck!”
Heehee – see you on election day, freaks.

Posted by: terry anderson | October 5, 2006, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

It amazes me that so many people are baffled by why 16 and 17 year old boys would want to stay quiet about this.
Leaving aside for a moment that the man they would be accusing is a US Congressman, and therefore one of the most powerful men in the world….
At 17 years old, most boys – even ones who are gay – don’t want people questioning their sexuality. Its hard enough being 1 7 without the entire nation wondering about your sexuality.
So please… Potentially outing yourself while simultaneously leveling charges at a sitting United States Congressman? It would take a very, very rare 17 year old to step forward.

Posted by: Alex | October 5, 2006, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Wow. Decent people everywhere are appalled at Foley, and appalled at the Republican leadership that protected him. Then there are those few wingnuts who only know one response: if it’s a Democrat scandal, it’s the Democrats’ fault; if it’s a Republican scandal, it’s STILL the Democrats’ fault. I particularly like the comment that wants to wait for the proof against Hastert (there’s plenty out there already) while gleefully engaging in the absolutely unsubstantiated gossip that, somehow, somewhere, some Liberal is at fault!
I also like the comments from those folks who can’t figure out why someone would sit on damaging information about a powerful politician who could ruin their lives in an instant. Gee, I can’t imagine why a 17-year-old might think twice before taking on a powerful senator. Just can’t. Nope.

Posted by: nwgal | October 5, 2006, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

P.S.
Monica was 22, not an underage teen. And most pedophiles are straight– and just like any other predator, it’s not about sex. It’s about power and control. Some of you ignorant people need to do some legitimate research based on facts, not your irrational homophobia.

Posted by: Angel | October 5, 2006, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Why don’t you admit that you are just trying to coverup that you are a part of “dirty tricks” just before the mid-term elections. Can’t you win on the issues confronting this country?

Posted by: Jt | October 5, 2006, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

“Foley’s has resigned, Hastert is not the problem.”
Hastert is a problem. Apparently he doesn’t equate “the buck stop here” with any responsibility to know what’s going on. We needed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to spell out to CEOs that “I had no idea” didn’t cut it. Perhaps we need a similar act for Congress.
If you don’t have the internal controls in place to know what you need to know, then you aren’t doing your job.

Posted by: CEH | October 5, 2006, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Foley was doing cyber sex. He never had sex. He needs treatment, and he should have resigned. Millions of men in the US do this, and it is a symptom of a greater problem. Our society approves of the pron industry, then convicts people when they engage in it. Stop the Pron industry, and stop the other problems

Posted by: TimmyJoe | October 5, 2006, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

The quote above doesn’t address the issue that these kids intend on going into politics themselves. To report something like this would ruin them before they even got started. No one would have a thing to do with them if they thought they wouldn’t play ball.
Most boys wouldn’t report something like this anyway and risk being called gay themselves, they would tell their freinds possible but not report it.

Posted by: dj | October 5, 2006, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

You people are just skirting the issues to cover for these republicans.The fact of the matter is that foley resigned and checked himself into rehab almost as soon as these charges were leveled and has not truly denied any of the charges wholeheartedly. Not the actions of an innocent man. Clinton and lewinski were consenting adults.there is a difference. get it

Posted by: jeff | October 5, 2006, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Funny George,
You say Drudge is partisan and you say you have been a fan for a long time. Well who is lying now…Do you listen to his radio program?…yes sometimes being right with the facts becomes partisan when you are defeating the lies of the Democrates and liberals in this country…if being truthful makes you Republican then spreading lies makes you Democrate you are correct George Matt Drudge is partisan…Oh and by the way if this gets posted its funny how ABC did not post my comments earlier when I questioned there biased on this issue.

Posted by: jtinphx | October 5, 2006, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

What Foley did was disgusting. The reaction of Republican leadership has been to blame someone else. This continues to demonstrate that absolute power corrupts as we have seen for the past 3 years. We need accountability, with one party in control you do not have it. Since we do not have a third party, we need a balance of power as neither party can be trusted. We need protection for our kids, the best thing that could happen with this is that the Republican leadership resigns or the American public turns them out so that we have balance of power.

Posted by: rob | October 5, 2006, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Instant messaging was definitely popular in the late 90s. As for the other accusations, it is possible that they are a political ploy. On the other hand, we should consider that the young men may not have felt that they were in a position to speak out against a congressman. I was in shock that some people would refer to the communications as “silly emails”. If the accusations are true, Foley was preying on teenagers while he paraded in Congress as a defender of children’s rights. Although Clinton’s error was grave, Foley’s alleged actions are inexcusable and, quite frankly, disgusting.

Posted by: Barbara | October 5, 2006, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

And one guy says they didnt actually have sex… WE DONT KNOW THAT. some of these ims leave that open to debate. ex: miss you lots since sandiego and having extended conversation about what the kids are wearing and these kids are still texting back. whats the deal there? doesent prove it happened and it doesent prove it didnt so dont say nothing happened we dont know that …..YET

Posted by: jeff | October 5, 2006, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

In no excuse for Foley, it makes a big difference. If IMing was hardly around in 1998, what kind of credibility can this story possibly have? “At least Monica was a female?” Sounds more like gay bashing. CLINTON COMMITED ADULTRY AND LIED!! DONT FORGET!

Posted by: Chey | October 5, 2006, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Let’s start a don’t ask don’t tell policy in the congress. Isn’t that how Clinton would have solved this.

Posted by: Edward | October 5, 2006, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

i swear americans are the funniest people on the planet. a constant continuum of contradictions and crappola that you shine and polish with such entertaining enthusiasm it makes my sides split. not only did you [twice !] elect a bona fide idiot to run the joint, but you did it with a massive non-turnout of people exercising what you then choose to use as your reason to obliterate civilians and people who disagree with you in military attacks called hollywood names like “enduring freedom”. Just thankful we here down under can observe from a safe distance while you flail around screaming about which politican had an urge for the wrongest reason. god bless you all!

Posted by: andy Wilson | October 5, 2006, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Hear no Evil, See no Evil, Speak no Evil running Congress? Is the American public supposed to be so gullible that we believe that out of 435 representatives working together for at least 2 years, no one even suspected or knew that Foley was acting a little too friendly to pages? Perhaps Foley is only the tip of the iceberg and some kept their mouth shut because they were involved in the same activities. There seems to be a “code of silence” when it comes to authority groups, a mentality of “protect your own” right or wrong. I’m inclined to believe this scandal goes far deeper than has been exposed so far. Every representative needs to be investigated by the FBI at the very least. The “who knew what and when” question should be who knew ANYTHING about it and how soon after they knew or suspected a questionable act by another member did they do anything about it. As far as trying to turn this into a gay issue is a diversionary tactic and every gay activist should demand and apology for associating them with an obvious act of questionable activities with a minor by a gay politician. Foley’s activities were wrong because of the age of the pages, not because he or they might be gay. Don’t let the offenders cloud the true issue of this scandal. Demand justice for all.

Posted by: Kris Flaneur | October 5, 2006, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

ims were HARDLY around in 98 but they were not nonexistent people with money had that capability esp. On capitol hill where people need to stay in constant contact with their undrlings. And so what if clinton lied. IT WAS NO ONES BIZZNIZ. consenting adults.

Posted by: jeff | October 5, 2006, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

IM has been going strong since 1996 BTW when ICQ came out.
Not that makes any difference whatsoever, its not like IMing someone is the only way a perv like Foley can prey on little boys.
Get a grip Neocons.

Posted by: Nunyabiz | October 5, 2006, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Charlotte is wrong. Just because Foley has resigned does not solve the problem. I was the victim of sexual assault when I was 16, and in the early ’80s the legal, medical and religious communities all knew about the man — a doctor. They went to great lengths to cover it up. When you’re a kid and so much power is against doing what is right, our whole system is topsyturvy. Find out who knew when and mete out the proper consequences.

Posted by: Joyce | October 5, 2006, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

And one guy says they didnt actually have sex… WE DONT KNOW THAT. some of these ims leave that open to debate. ex: miss you lots since sandiego and having extended conversation about what the kids are wearing and these kids are still texting back. whats the deal there? doesent prove it happened and it doesent prove it didnt so dont say nothing happened we dont know that …..YET

Posted by: jeff | October 5, 2006, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

No Republican is excusing Foley’ s actions. But, it is awful suspicious as to who actually had the IMs prior to their release.
Democrats have nothing to offer anymore. It is pitiful.
Even if the Dems manage to win this time. It will be the last.
You cannot stand for nothing and prosper.

Posted by: jeff | October 5, 2006, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

The big issue is the coverup by the republican party. If Foley resigned and nobody else had known about it, it would of been out of the mainstream news already.
Also, teenage boys who are manipulated by a rich man who holds power to influence their careers are not going to be thrilled about speaking out against Foley. They also dont want to be associated with a pedophile no matter how much they want him caught so it’s not suprising that nobody spoke out. (They actually did speak out to the people they thought would do something about it, they just never did)

Posted by: Seth | October 5, 2006, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

it’s funny how people who preached not being judgemental, are suddenly so judgemental.

Posted by: Ralph Thompson | October 5, 2006, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Was instant messaging even around in 1998? These new revelations sound suspect. I don’t doubt that Foley is attracted to young men, but this sounds like someone is just piling on.

Posted by: Roger | October 5, 2006, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

I’ve heard a lot of excuses and seen a lot of pointed fingers from the GOP. But it think whoever is claiming that ‘IMing wasn’t popular in 1998 so it must be some kind of hoax’ tops them all. IMing has been around since the 70′s, and the first graphical IM was in ’87 ICQ started in 1996, AIM started in ’97. Both grew very fast.. .
Boring stuff I know but it’s worth it if one person realized how stupid some peoples arguments are getting.

Posted by: Seth | October 5, 2006, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

I know I was using AOL’s Instant Messenger program in 1998 and I wasn’t on the cutting edge. So quit grasping at that straw.

Posted by: JP | October 5, 2006, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

isn’t it amazing that this is all coming out now?

Posted by: Ralph Thompson | October 5, 2006, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

I don’t know about anyone else but we should let the F.B.I. do their job, and wait till they find out what happened. Despite what happened we have more things going on then this. And as far as I’m concerned if we don’t pull together as a country. Those that want us to fail won’t have to do anything we’ll do it ourself. So think about that and votr who you think is best suited to do the job right.

Posted by: Greg | October 5, 2006, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Let’s not lose that this is a crime and those who covered it up by omission are guilty of more than a scandle. It really from my perspective is aiding and a betting the continued abuse of children to maintain power. Hassert needs to go and so does this arrogant congress.

Posted by: Jack | October 5, 2006, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

This man used his position to solicit sex from 16 year olds. Regardless of whether the actual sex act took place(he was obviously finding pleasure in the messages), please find the parent that would solicit this kind of relatiionship for their son. Foley used his position to coerce these children into a relationship at least online. He was the champion of protecting “children” on the internet. He obviously did not consider Congressional pages children. I find that the leadership of the House first considered the political implications before they moved to protect the pages. From the party that proclaims to have family values, I find it particularly appalling that by their silence they condoned the actions of one of their own based on political considerations. For Foley himself, the “rehap” excuse that liquor made me do it, is the sorriest excuse I’ve ever heard in my life. Pedophiles go after boys and girls alike. Foley happened to be a pedophile that liked young men and he was also gay. There are many pedophiles that are “family” men that abuse girls and boys. Just because he was a Congressman does not give him a free pass to solicit online sex from children who have been entrusted to the Congress for safekeeping. The excuse that they would have been accused of being unfair to gays is bogus. Pediiophiles like children – they are straight and “gay.” Anyone that things only “gay” people target children needs a great big wakeup call.

Posted by: kayceedee | October 5, 2006, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Sounds to me like Rush Limbaugh is saying we need an anti-’Adam Walsh’ law like Foley enacted. We need a law to protect adults from minors sexually preying on them over the internet.

Posted by: they say | October 6, 2006, 12:00 am 12:00 am

What does it matter which party people belong to? Foley did something horribly wrong and should be held accountable. Those that knew should be held accountable regardless of stature or party affiliations. Lots of people should be stepping down from their posts.
Affiliation with a particular party, religious sect, et al means nothing; your actions define who you are.

Posted by: Howie | October 6, 2006, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Once again we see the Media and the democrates having a field day while being extremely hippocritical. (spelled intentionally) Stuffed with their own self importance they believe that republicans are truly evil and enemies of their america. As a result they will assume the worst and accuse anybody of anything just to get back the power they so long enjoyed. Haster has explaind and their actions were consistant with ALL accepted practices in political and business enviroments. What was known was delt with appropriately.

Posted by: steve | October 6, 2006, 12:15 am 12:15 am

The people on here who actually believe the pages are at fault and call it a lib conspiracy are as bad as Hastert, Drudge, and the other scum who are or were involved in covering up and trying to divert our attention from the real problem of the sexual predator in Congress and his fellow Congressmen who knew and kept it hidden.
These idiotic comments of conspiracy and boys trying to bring down a Congressman make me believe we should have an intelligence test before people are allowed to vote!

Posted by: Scott | October 6, 2006, 12:24 am 12:24 am

It makes sense that in the middle of all this mess, those on the so-called right are still trying their hardest to find some way to blame Clinton, or blame the (Republican) pages that are coming forward. Anything to avoid the truth. This has been a common theme of the past woe-begone six years. It’s a sad commentary on what has become of the once-proud Republican party that so many are reduced (like Drudge, Rush, Hannity, Etc) to finding something, anything to shift blame away from this crony-infested administration and it’s hacks. These sad lie-mongers are going to have to come to grips with the fact that ABC News, not exactly a bastion of liberal bias, is the network that broke this story. So much for all of it being a Democrat-based October surprise.

Posted by: davenative | October 6, 2006, 12:25 am 12:25 am

What is totally lost in all of this – is the fact that Hastert is next inline for the Presidency if naything happens to Bush/Cheney! He can’t handle this issue/problem, how could he run the country! Gotta Go Friends! And KarmiCommunist – Russia is looking for more voters! And There “W” is basically the same!
Vote Nov 7th – For SOmeone you really believe in!

Posted by: Chan | October 6, 2006, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Earlier this evening, Pat Buchanan was equating the Mark Foley disgrace with the fact that Hillary Clinton marched in a Gay Rights Parade. What a laugh.
It’s unbelieveable that, even with the proof of these grotesque instant messages, the Republicans are trying to find a way to blame it all on the Democrats. It boggles the mind! This GOP led Congress has had a field day, so far, with their Tom DeLay chicanery, Jack Abramoff payola, Boehner buying pharmaceutical votes with campaign contributions, and now Mark Foley trying to seduce children, and they still blame it all on the dems. What gall!

Posted by: Gerry McNichols | October 6, 2006, 12:32 am 12:32 am

I am in disbelief that a sexual scandal such as this is dominating public debate forums again when the country needs to focus on important issues. My countrymen and women in Iraq/Afghanistan deserve better. If or when things go very badly in the future who is going to care about who Clinton, Foley or Paris Hilton was fooling around with.

Posted by: Ben | October 6, 2006, 12:32 am 12:32 am

What Foley did was disgusting. But all Hastert had was email, not the IM transcripts. He told Foley to cut it out with the email. When the IM transcripts came to light (easily falsifiable text documents, by the way), Foley resigned. Investigations are underway. Nothing to see here. Move along.
We still have 100,000,000 Jihadis trying to blow us up. Let’s stick to the serious issues here.

Posted by: Nastimann | October 6, 2006, 12:38 am 12:38 am

All you guys that think this is so HUGE, and it is disgusting no doubt, please put into perspective: he hasn’t committed ANY crime to date. Clinton committed adultery, purgory, Monica could have blackmailed the President over his actions, and furthermore, flat out LIED to the AMERICAN public. Foley resigned. The Demo’s still have Congressmen in office who have done far worse ACTS.
I especially like DEMOCRAT who says “At least monica was female” – oh, a little anti-gay are you?

Posted by: robert B | October 6, 2006, 12:50 am 12:50 am

I am disgusted by Foley’s actions, whether just words or actual acts, and by the partisan BS by both the Republicans and the Democrats. We need term limits, to try to reduce the impact of corrupting power, and finance reform. Neither party will enact either, just like neither party can eliminate the sexual misdeeds or desire for such misdeeds of a few individuals. Individuals are responsible for their actions (moral, ethical, and legal). Organizations are responsible for doing their best to monitor and hold individuals responsible for the actions of those individuals in the name of the organization, whether the organization is the House or either party. But, each of us, should also be hesitant to judge too quickly on partial and often inaccurate bits of information. Finally, exercise your responsibilty to vote, if you are qualified and eligible to do so. Vote for or against, but vote.

Posted by: Mark | October 6, 2006, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Lord, these GOP fanatics on here are a bit crazy! Would any of them want a 50-year-old man pursuing their 15-17 year old son or daughter? Because if you don’t have a problem with that, then maybe you shouldn’t have children. Send your name to the FBI and do America a favor. Foley’s behavior is indefensible; the children are not to blame. HE is the one who was supposed to be the responsible party. The man was grown, an adult. Democrats aren’t responsible for this, a Republican who had no respect for himself, who was hypocritical in his actions, one minute claiming to protect children and the next pursuing them, and a Republican leadership that not only didn’t address this man’s problems, but also didn’t bring in Democrats to deal with it. Why didn’t Shimkus even tell fellow Republican Shelly Capito about this? Was he afraid that she might demand some action on Foley? What sort of perverse game were these grown men playing? Would you want them to play these games with your children, whether you were a Democrat or a Republican? I think not–Lord knows, I hope not. They all need to beg for forgiveness, from the former pages, their parents, and the American people!

Posted by: Russell Lilledahl | October 6, 2006, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Just wondering how many other Members of Congress and also Staff are gay and working with these children??? Has either the Republican or Democratic leadership checked on the activity of the other 452 Representatives or the thousands on their staffs??? I think that would be called gay bashing. We have now added a new standard to the HOUSE of ILL REPUTE. Oral Sex isn’t sex but Republicans can’t talk about it on the net or they must resign. Democrats are exempt because they created the standard.

Posted by: SFW | October 6, 2006, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Spin away Bushies. It’s the only thing you got left.

Posted by: Musk | October 6, 2006, 1:10 am 1:10 am

“Foley’s a pervert so Hastert should resign!”
Huh? In the first place the Speaker probably didn’t know Foley was hitting on pages and ex-pages so why is he responsible? Do you think the Speaker of the House spies on Congressmen, has them followed around, keeps secret files on them? Hastert didn’t elect Foley; the voters in his district did. Why aren’t their feet being held to the fire?
While Foley is a homosexual creep, charges against Hastert et al are a trumped up poliitcal ploy, an “October Surprise” sprung just before a critical midterm election by leftwingers trying to win control of Congress by any means. It’s completely hypocritical because when Democrats were in power they had sex scandals, too, and were barely more than indifferent about these (Lou Studds, Barney Frank, Bill Clinton, etc.). This is not an issue the American public should pick Democrats over Republicans on. Democrats can’t honestly claim any “moral high ground” in this matter.

Posted by: Orion | October 6, 2006, 1:26 am 1:26 am

The ONLY reason this saw the light of day, was someone wanted it to. Don’t kid yourselves though….. for those of you too yuong, or with too short a memory, there is a simple explanation why Gerry Studds, the Democrat, was “let off the hook”, after a sexual relationship with a 17 y.o., in 1983. 3 words. “The Franklin Coverup”. Google it, and do some digging, and you will discover why the Republicans didn’t want to make a big deal out of a Dems sexploits. Both sides of the aisle give each other a hell of a lot of “professional courtesy”…. i.e., I’ll look the other way, if you will too. Clintons “Monica-gate” was far from the worst thing he did while in public office. Remember, the Clintons “accidentally” came into possesion of the comprehensive FBI dossier’s of every Republican lawmaker on the hill, when Clinton held the Whitehouse.
For the record, I’m a conservative, and I voted for Bush. Currently, I think the ship of state is out of control, and neither side gives a damn about the United States (read: The People), or the oath they swore to uphold and defend the Constitution….. unless, it’s election time. We couldn’t do much worse, if every single incumbent was voted out of office, regardless of the party affiliation voted in. The beltway has become a sewage pit, flat out, and the electorate is still bickering about “liberal” and “conservative”. Wake up folks. The train has left the tracks, some time ago.
Well, at least I’m not cynical. :)

Posted by: DJ | October 6, 2006, 1:29 am 1:29 am

Foley and Hastert are the most recent symptoms of a broken branch of government. Sadly, the four branches of goverment are corrupted: The Presidency, The Congress and the Lobbiest. So far The Supreme Court seems intact.I have become irreparably cynical with the government of the United States. While the media and some of the American people are focused on a sick pedophile and when a leadship did or did not know about his behavior, corruption of the United States government proceeds unabated with no indication of slowing down. I am sad for this country as we are sliced and purchased by China and others. Where medical care is in crisis and homelessness and immigration are brought out at times political convenience and the a global weather change continues unabated. Not much of a legacy for our children. It really doesn’t matter what Drudge or Rush or anyone else says, life will continue… at least for the time being unabated.

Posted by: Stephen | October 6, 2006, 1:33 am 1:33 am

A vote for Republicans is a vote for CREEPS!

Posted by: American Voice | October 6, 2006, 1:34 am 1:34 am

Gene,
Please get it straight. Child predation and homosexuality are two different things. Statistically, most child predators are heterosexual, and conversely, most homosexuals are not child molesters.
Foley is in trouble because he is a child predator, not because he is a homosexual.

Posted by: John | October 6, 2006, 1:35 am 1:35 am

So was 18 years old when he got suggestive e-mails and maybe embarrassing text messages which then led too…? There has been no suggestion of physical contact, plus the page was a young adult! Have we lost our minds? This is way overblown. It’s absurd how much attention this is getting from the media; another sad, stupid example of how technology has retarded the functioning of one of our major institutions. We are drowning ourselves in titillating, scummy nonsense. And the Democrats are hyperventilating. I feel like Colonel Kurtz in “Apocalypse Now”, but instead of saying, “The horror, the horror”, I’m clawing my face and saying,”the hypocrisy, the hypocrisy.” Our discourse is total rot.

Posted by: grant | October 6, 2006, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Angel,
Most pedophiles are heterosexual because most people are heterosexual, 95 to 97% are hetero or bi. Actual studies on pedophilia show homosexuals are just as likely as bisexuals or heterosexuals to be pedophiles. As you wrote, it is about power not sex. Regarding sex with minors, it is actual slightly higher with male homosexuals, the distinction being that sex with a 16 or 17 year old is not pedophilia.
Pedophilia is a mental illness.

Posted by: Ariel | October 6, 2006, 1:42 am 1:42 am

Foley is just a distraction to Bush redefining torture and gutting our constitution
Homepage

Posted by: Arc | October 6, 2006, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Foley is faced with incriminating emails and resigns. Clinton is faced with incriminating semen, lies and serves his full term. Foley should have emailed Clinton, they could have hooked up and perved out.

Posted by: Paul | October 6, 2006, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Why would anyone save all this on their pc. Blackmail later???????????? I really do not think these pages are innocent. 16 year old boys know what they are doing. Why didn’t they stop the communication instead of continuing with it.
How do we know for certain these emails were from who they say. If someone knows your password can’t they post messages and use your email to send emails using your password? Who would know the difference except the person that used it.

Posted by: Vicki | October 6, 2006, 1:59 am 1:59 am

And while we are on the subject of Clinton (which we’re not)…don’t forget Grover Cleveland! And what about Alexander Hamilton?
Clearly for some, there is no statute-of-limitations on a scandal…

Posted by: John P | October 6, 2006, 2:05 am 2:05 am

The Republicans have no one to blame but themselves for the timing of the revelations about Foley’s sexcapades.They have known about his proclivities for years but chose to cover it up. The Republicans could have had him prosecuted at any time of their choosing, but they chose to tolerate a pedophile in their ranks for partisan advantage. Their hypocrisy is truly putrid.

Posted by: Athena | October 6, 2006, 2:13 am 2:13 am

I love the way the party notorious for its “dirty tricks” and sarcasm over the accusation that it was conducting a “right-wing conspiracy” against the Clintons is now crying that this episode is a left-wing conspiracy, the result of dirty tricks by “Democratic operatives”, the news media, George Soros, and, naturally, somehow connecting this to Bill Clinton. Get a grip! And, yes, we should be concentrating on the disaster we have caused and continue to cause in Iraq; the Abramoff Scandals; the Social Security debacle; the Hurricane Katrina failures; the incredible deficit accrued since Bush took office; the 9/11 attacks, which Republicans are still trying to pin on Clinton; the lies about why we are in this senseless war;how we are going to extricate ourselves from Iraq;the pitiful voting structure we have, while we have the nerve to “teach” other countries how to vote;the pathetic ways we are making a pretense of “Homeland Security”….shall I go on?

Posted by: Ileen | October 6, 2006, 2:14 am 2:14 am

I hate to make use of a cliche that seems like it should be common sense, but since it appears that it is not as common as I thought, here are my two cents:
“Thou shalt not judge anyone hastily or harshly.”
One of the 42 Principles of Ma’at, the Goddess who personified the ideals of Truth and Righteousness, this saying was known to nearly all ancient Egyptians. So I ask, have we truly regressed so much from those ancient times that we can’t simply wait for the facts to be disseminated from the rumors? Is it so difficult for those of you passing snap judgments to admit that maybe the judgment would be better made by those with: direct access to those involved; the means to verify the authenticity of each IM, email, or phone call; and the training to determine which laws the findings prove to have been broken?
Does anyone here actually believe that their cursory readings of distanced journalists’ reportings have made him or her an overnight expert in what is a prosecutable offense? Throw in a few of the readily accessible video clips, “investigative” discovery claims, and “unbiased” opinion polls and you have the recipe for one convoluted version of what actually happened, cooked up by the shoot-first/edit-later media types.
Give this story a rest until the entire truth surfaces.

Posted by: Patience | October 6, 2006, 2:15 am 2:15 am

I,m sick of the republican stragle hold on america and the rest of the world please join me in throwing the bums out-vote for anybody except these creeps family values yeah right

Posted by: John googness | October 6, 2006, 2:19 am 2:19 am

OMG Adultery! Let me break out my law books. Oh, I don’t see that one in their. But soliciting sex from a minor sure is. Oh yeah, he lied under oath, but are you seriously willing to compare consensual sex with a 22 year old adult with pedophilia? I wouldn’t let my kids play in your neighborhood.

Posted by: Ben | October 6, 2006, 2:26 am 2:26 am

The Truth is always powerful and it will set us free. A true leader, Democrat or Republican, should always speak out when they discover that something is wrong. By speaking out, we eliminate future situations where our kids get hurt. Our hope is now to FBI who will do a good job discovering who did not speak out. This will be a great lesson for the political leaders of our country. Let’s fight pedophilism together!

Posted by: Ulf | October 6, 2006, 2:41 am 2:41 am

As a gay man and journalist, I find this story very interesting. Since when did the pages need to be protected from those that are supposed to be protecting us? Now we are going to in act new procedures to protect the pages from members of congress. What is going on with this country? As a gay man and journalist, I don’t understand those that chase anyone under 18. The law is very clear and every gay man knows.

Posted by: Steve Sparkenickle | October 6, 2006, 2:54 am 2:54 am

“The page said Foley maintained e-mail contact with him even after he started college and arranged a sexual liaison after the page had turned 18.”
Does that sentence mean that Foley had sex with an ex-page? Because if it does, the GOP just lost both houses.

Posted by: Larry | October 6, 2006, 3:02 am 3:02 am

This dialogue is getting disgusting. This issue has nothing to do with Clinton. We should not be questionning the credibility of the pages that are speaking out because “no teenage boy would keep a secret like this” or “there wasn’t instant messaging in 1998″. If you actually read the testimony from the other pages at this point, you would read that Foley actually did more than send emails. Also, not all discussed contact through instant messanging. In addition, as many people don’t know, email was actively used in the federal government before the rest of the world started using it (it was actually created by the federal government for internal communication). Additionally, a teenage boy is more likely to be too embarassed to tell others about sexaul advances from another man. And finally, for the very sick lot of you that thinks that this Foley matter is nothing compared to Clinton because Clinton had sex and these were just “harmless emails” – if the emails don’t disturb you, then you should read the latest testimony from some of the pages – it looks like there is sex involved here.
This dialogue is not about politics. Its about an irresponsible Congress. If we can’t see this with how they are handling the environment and war, maybe we can see it a little better when they chose to ignore evidence of child molestation.

Posted by: Charles | October 6, 2006, 3:06 am 3:06 am

N Korea is going to conduct a nuke test and all ABC can do is post stories from anonymous sources about IMs and emails. No wonder the media has no credibility anymore.

Posted by: Max | October 6, 2006, 3:07 am 3:07 am

“Get your news from a reliable source before judging others.”
I’ve read [similar to] this from a number of commentors. What reliable source[s] would you recommend?

Posted by: Amberlynne | October 6, 2006, 3:15 am 3:15 am

To Andy the Aussie,
Would appreciate you being polite enough not to paint the entire country with your broad brush. Many millions voted against the Chimp. Twice. Many millions recognized Iraq as a sham from the beginning. Many millions are working for change.
Yes, there are also many millions who are dead from the neck up. I feel sure the percentage of stupidity is fairly consistent across the globe, including Down Under.
Those of us with at least one or two firing neurons and an ounce or more of rationality need to stick together to fight the global menace that exists in all cultures.

Posted by: gorn | October 6, 2006, 3:21 am 3:21 am

Here is the thing everyone seems to be overlooking; A grown person was making sexual advances to a minor. What does it matter what party he is in? It seems all everyone is worried about is the fact he is a republican and that the republicans may loose a seat in the senate over this.
What about the innocent children who may have been abused or could have been abused if this didn’t come out?

Posted by: Robert | October 6, 2006, 3:33 am 3:33 am

In response to the issue of a 17 year old boy coming forward about this…
Unless you are a complete wimp, or you were raised backwards, ANY 17 year old boy would have come forward with this. I can say without question that at that age, I knew enough about what was appropriate and not appropriate that I would have blown the whistle immediately. Stop trying to defend 17 year old boys by saying “the big bad congressman was so intimidating”. 17 year old boys drive cars, they smoke, they drink, they do drugs, they have sex…they are more than capable of ratting out a sexual deviant.

Posted by: Joe S. | October 6, 2006, 3:39 am 3:39 am

It is refreshing to see an American news outlet actually doing real journalism. A refreshing change from the usual useless reporting about consumer trends, dogs down wells and lottery winners.

Posted by: Ben Parsons | October 6, 2006, 4:12 am 4:12 am

I’m with Jeff here. The ABC site seems to be saying that a recent report from a page indicates that he (the page) did have sex with Foley.

Posted by: Merg | October 6, 2006, 4:14 am 4:14 am

I love Edward’s comment from “down under.” A minor correction: the American people did not elect W in his first term … he was appointed President by the Supreme Court with a minority popular vote. Our freedoms here are disappearing faster than rats on a sinking ship. Some Americans may choose to believe the hype about our “democracy,” but I think it’s more out of fear of facing the truth. Just during W’s time we’ve legalized torture, arrest without cause, censorship, eliminated the right to legal counsel in addition to wrtiting gays out of the constitution in many states and banning abortions in others.
The Foley issue is probably a smokescreen for something bigger that Bush is trying to slip past the average American. That’s been the pattern.

Posted by: Guy Paul | October 6, 2006, 4:24 am 4:24 am

Brian Ross and team keep up the good work and find out all the facts.

Posted by: Dennis | October 6, 2006, 4:44 am 4:44 am

Wow. Reading some of the comments from conservatives makes me afraid of the future for our country.
When will y’all get a clue? The Republican party is rank with hypocrisy…moral majority huh?

Posted by: Joe Ha | October 6, 2006, 4:48 am 4:48 am

**********************************
Brian and his team MUST get over to the 19th Congressional District in New York. (Upper Westchester, Putnam, Dutchess Counties in New York.) Because of this story, it’s no longer the “Foley Five,” it’s the “Foley Six!!!”
**********************************
This story, today, was the first to PROVE that Foley was going off the deep end during the period 1998-2001, the period when Congresswoman Sue Kelly was Page Board Chair in the House. As a result, she’s all but lost her house seat to Democratic challenger John Hall!!! The local press up here are going crazy. NBC-TV/Channel 4 did a piece on Weds., BEFORE the ABC story broke. Now, the s***t’s hit the fan. Kelly’s freaking out. Rumor has it that she’s already been subpoenaed (Thurs. afternoon by the Ethics Committee). And, again, it was Brian’s Story which blew this race wide open. Hall was already in a very tight race with Kelly; but, this story takes her out! Bigtime.

Posted by: Bob Swern | October 6, 2006, 4:54 am 4:54 am

I love all the people here claiming IM’ing wasn’t bing in the late 90s. Really funny since I remember not only myself but all of my friends in college IM’ing each other back and forth in _1997_! *Everyone* in my school had AIM at that time!

Posted by: Meg | October 6, 2006, 5:31 am 5:31 am

Hastert or his aides said,”it’s been taken care of.” Foley’s not alone. His was one kind of violation of ethics. How many other violations have taken place without any checks and balances? We, the people, are responsible for voting in Republicans to all the branches of government knowing that the third would follow. Now we must get our House in order.

Posted by: Steve | October 6, 2006, 6:07 am 6:07 am

I see no reason for Hastert to resign unless there is something that comes out that shows he was trying to cover this up. Hastert was not my first choice for speaker but I believe he is a decent man.I also believe him when he says that all he had seen was the first email that was just overly friendly so there is no reason for him to resign just as there was really no reason for Lott or Gengrich to resign. gengrich was vindicated and had done nothing wrong. Nor had Lott other than trying to be nice to a very old man. We need to wait till the investigation is complete. Some would have all the Republicans resigning for nothing.

Posted by: John L Hamilton | October 6, 2006, 6:15 am 6:15 am

I see from the latest news that it was a ” prank “.
Seems the GOP washine machine has tried to clean its dirty laundry and has now reached the SPIN cycle.
Cant wait to see what Foley looks like when he is ” hung out to dry ” !

Posted by: david pratt | October 6, 2006, 6:22 am 6:22 am

Shelle,
President Clinton was impeached because he lied under oath (his deposition in the Paula Jones case), not because of a few BJs from an intern.

Posted by: Paul | October 6, 2006, 6:30 am 6:30 am

Did Drudge actually publish the former page’s name, or did the Drudge site simply link to a new website that disclosed the name?
There is a difference. If the name was already published elsewhere, then Drudge may have exercised poor judgement. It is not like Drudge had information that no one else had, and he published it.

Posted by: Paul | October 6, 2006, 6:43 am 6:43 am

That Foley would quit the House, declare himself an alcoholic and check into rehab, and then claim that he had been molested by a priest does not sound like something a victim of a mere prank would do. If Foley really was innocent, he, or anyone would defend themselves vigorously and not shrink away as he has. Thus, the prank story that is now being promulgated seems quite unlikely and a disingenuous attempt to blame the victims.
If responsible Republican would just ‘fess up to the cover up and announce their retirement from government, then we could maybe move on to the coverage of other Republican outrages, such as the legislated suspension of habeas corpus.

Posted by: poodlehead | October 6, 2006, 6:55 am 6:55 am

There is clearly an IQ indicator among those Republicans who are writing and saying that Republicans did nothing wrong because Democrats have done as much in the past. Of course, when the Democrats behaved badly, those same Republicans howled that Democrats are vile, evil people. Now those Republicans are saying “HEY! We are vile and evil too! So what’s the problem?” And in their inane logic, they manage to believe that cry is going to cause decent people to vote for them. And for what it’s worth, the Democrats were punished in the 1994 elections that brought Republicans to power. Now that these Republicans are asking us to treat them the same, I say go for it! (IQ deficiency duly noted.)
And one final point, Democrats did not sit on the information. According to several accounts, it was reported to both the House leadership and to the FBI as early as three years ago. They both decided to sit on it.

Posted by: Steve | October 6, 2006, 7:07 am 7:07 am

Please do what you can to make sure public opinion will dampen any attempt to give Mr. Foley any of our tax dollars for his pension or retiree health care benefits.

Posted by: Jim Courtney | October 6, 2006, 7:49 am 7:49 am

Since when is this about Clinton? To focus on a President who is no longer in office, when this pervert was praying on kids, is just stupid. Monica was an adult female, yes he was married, and news flash this happened long ago. This is not about Bill Clinton, John F. Kennedy, or Thomas Jefferson, this is about a sorry little man, that preyed on children. He is a wanna be
CHO-MO.
Mark Folley makes me sick, and he should be prosecuted, he is worse, for God’s sake he couldn’t even come out of the closet, till his text messages because public, NOW he is gay and an alcoholic.

Posted by: Kelly | October 6, 2006, 7:53 am 7:53 am

Having been a male teenage runaway in south Florida when I was 15 I know all too well the ilk of Mr.Foley. Privacy concerns notwithstanding, a peek through his internet history will reveal what a true pedophile this guy really is. Adult men who seek out young men and boys for their repugnant sexual desires prey for their victims everywhere: street corners, malls, hitchhikers and of course, the internet. There are sections in almost every major city where young men ply the only thing they have, their bodies, to survive. Trust me, Mr. Foley knows very well where to find his victims. Men like this don’t stop at provocatiive and boorish emails and IMs. These revealations are the type of Foley’s perverse iceberg.

Posted by: Tim | October 6, 2006, 7:58 am 7:58 am

As a life-long Republican, I am appalled by the duplicitous hackery in the house. The Dems have had their scandals and have suffered the consequences. The House leadership somehow thinks that their behavior is above reproach. They are sadly mistaken. I know that I will be voting against Tom Reynolds in my district, and hope that toher Republicans will bite the bullet and vote the hacks out. If the Dems do take control of one of the houses then the pundits will finally be able to actually blame the Democrats for something. When you control the whole show, you have nothing to blame but yourself. Look in the Mirror!

Posted by: Mel | October 6, 2006, 8:10 am 8:10 am

Trial by media has become a favorite tool to deal with anyone who opposes you. All that is required is a sympathetic ear of a newshound to report the story. As a society we believe anything negative reported in the news must be true or at least based on the truth. Whatever happened to innocent until PROVEN guilty?

Posted by: Mark | October 6, 2006, 8:15 am 8:15 am

lots of astro turf from
the right wing trolls
on this topic, just
doing Karl’s work Huh?

Posted by: Mike | October 6, 2006, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Everyone has a point of view about the Foley case…but the bottom line is that right is right and wrong is wrong. We all agree that Foley’s actions are abominable. Can we really just move on to more important issues? Discussing it to death will not change anything.

Posted by: Anita | October 6, 2006, 8:23 am 8:23 am

Talk about Spin?? The Republicans and their operatives are trying to spin it to shift the blame by making ABC and the Democrats the people who should have done something since Foley’s actions were known by some news agencies for almost a year. The Democrats waited until October to leak it out. It could not have been leaked if you had done something about it when you found out about it!! The News agencies and now the Democrats had to find out about it through investigating it, but the Leadership of the Republicans were told by their own people who the pages reported it to.
Just don’t ask anybody else why they did nothing, ask why you do nothing then? Don’t try to shift it to anybody else. You will fail again, just like to failed to do anything about it then.

Posted by: HH | October 6, 2006, 8:38 am 8:38 am

The allegations keep getting worse and worse. He is so arrogant only thinking of himself and self gradifaction. His family must be humiliated by the stories that keep coming out each day. He might not want to have hurt his parents by telling him that he was gay butthis circus atmosphere is only making it worse. Parents do know even if their not told. The man is 52 years old. I truly feel bad for his family. One last point, how would he react if someone was pursuing one of his nephews in the sexual manner he has. Mr. Foley you need help.

Posted by: Bryant | October 6, 2006, 8:41 am 8:41 am

C’mon folks, this is not a republican or dem issue it is an American issue! I wonder how many of you would sing Foley’s praises if it was YOUR child he had approached? Victims do not normally come forward quickly, predators use their power to control their victims…I agree we need all the facts, but this seems to be falling into one of those scandals that follow political lines. This man was victimizing children while passing laws to protect children from people like him…how ironic! As a victim of molestation, myself, I am appalled that anybody could defend his actions. He needs to fess up and take his punishment-preferably slow and painful! As for Hastert, if he knew this was happening, he should step down, as should anybody else. As for all this Clinton, Lewinsky talk, get over it…that is very very old history.

Posted by: pb | October 6, 2006, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Funny how republicans are complaining about the timing of this. They are the king of timley pre-election news. Karl Rove is the master. Let’s see the swift boating of Kerry, bringing up the gay marriage issues, raising terror alerts. Conveniently these issues all creep up right before the presidential elections just to sway voters..and it worked. The focus regardless of the politics and timing is the absolute abhorrence for the acts commited by Foley. It cannot be denied or or just swept away. Saying its a prank is ridiculous because if it were he would not have resigned.

Posted by: rauljg | October 6, 2006, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Considering comments from the so called conservatives on this board are so singuolarly venemous and reflect an almost complete lack of knowlege of computer pop culture (ICQ was developed in 1996) and knowledge of the law (i.e. most predators are hetrosexual) and moral boundaries (especially the poster who wants to segregate and gulag homosexuals), I think that you’d have to provide actual sexual footage to make these people back off from their zealotry.

Posted by: Div | October 6, 2006, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Amazing how the GOP is trying to turn this sordid mess into a leftist Soros “prank”.. and having the audacity to say it’s all about pre-election “timing”. Sorry, Reps, the gigs up! Sad, sad, sad.

Posted by: Jean | October 6, 2006, 8:53 am 8:53 am

People should watch this very closely and stop blaming the media for their continuous coverage of this very serious matter. The investigation should be intensive inorder to find out if he had any type of sexual encounter with any of the Pages. No stone should be left unturned. Especially, when a crime has been possibly committed against children and teenagers.

Posted by: Brandon | October 6, 2006, 8:58 am 8:58 am

This guy is a sick pervert and should be locked away for ever!

Posted by: Brandon | October 6, 2006, 9:16 am 9:16 am

“It became more weird, and I stopped responding”
Whay wasn’t this the response of every page ? Why wasn’t it reported to their page supervisor ?

Posted by: Neo | October 6, 2006, 9:33 am 9:33 am

The same folks who demonized Bill Clinton for an affair with a consenting adult cry foul with the outing of the far more serious, and possibly illegal, indiscretions of one of their own.
The GOP cannot own the moral high ground when there are folks like Foley in their ranks.
Never again let a conservative Republican lecture you on morality folks!

Posted by: Ray | October 6, 2006, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Wrong.
This report was presented one day after the last day to replace a candidate on a Florida ballot. Mike Rogers promised this was coming.
Why doesn’t ABC tell us exactly when they came into possession of the IM’s? Why didn’t the Democratic operatives come forward immediately upon coming into possession of the IM’s?
The emails were not actionable, said the FBI and the Miami Herald.
Hastert knew of the emails, but not the IM’s.
It’s amazing what people don’t know.

Posted by: drjohn | October 6, 2006, 9:37 am 9:37 am

This is a disgrace for Foley for sure but I don’t know about Hastert just yet. The media loves to turn this into a “conservatives vs. liberals” kind of issue but it really isn’t that at all. Of course given all the association that the GOP has tried to make with the Christian right and “moral majority” in this country, I can see how something like this scandal really goes at the heart of their credibility.
If politicians would stop catering to the poll numbers and start following their own notions of common sense and decency instead of worrying about their party’s public image, then this scandal would only be exactly what it is: a disgrace for Foley and nothing more. I hope Hastert didn’t sacrifice his integrity, not because im a Republican (I’m a Democrat, mostly) but because I think it will be really sad if any politician would sacrfice his ethics just to protect the interests of his/her political party.

Posted by: Cliff | October 6, 2006, 9:41 am 9:41 am

I agree about the whole Drudge “prank” story. They are really desperate, and Drudge will apparently print any BS they give him.

Posted by: A voter | October 6, 2006, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Hastert MUST resign. Ignorance is not an excuse. It does not matter if he knew about it or not, he SHOULD have known about it. I’m tired of the GOP always passing the buck. Our current political system has zero accountability and the Dems are no different. Plus, why are people above even mentioning Clinton??!!! Wake up and live in the here and now. If you are a Republican you should be embarrased.

Posted by: Steve | October 6, 2006, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Paul, regarding Clinton’s “impeachment”…after 8 years and $71 MILLION TAXPAYER DOLLARS – they even investigated the Clinton’s CAT and whether or not Sock’s fan club was financed by public money (it was not)…time for the GOP to engage in a little naval gazing and decide whether they have an ethical center or not. “MOrrally superior”? Don’t make me laugh.

Posted by: Kathy | October 6, 2006, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Partisanship should have nothing to do with this issue. If you or I solicited a 16 or 17 year old for sex, male or female, and the age of majority was 18 in our jurisdiction, and we got caught, and that became a part of the local news in Joe Six Pack America, we would be ruined, with a capital “R.” And, if we tried to blame our behavior on the Democrats, a former clergyman, alcohol, mental problems, Clinton, Barney Frank, NAMBLA, Hillary, the liberals, the leftists, San Francisco, etc., we would be the laughing stock as they slammed the jail door shut, and threw away the keys. So, all you apologists and spin doctors out there, get out of Washington, D.C. and the rarified world of Pat Buchanan, and welcome to the real world of just about anywhere else in America!

Posted by: JCJC | October 6, 2006, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Let’s get it straight. This isn’t about Clinton. This isn’t about homosexuals. This isn’t about politics. It’s simply about right and wrong and the facts. The fact is, Mark Foley, an elected 54-year-old Congressman was sending explicit and sexual messages to Pages. Parents do not send their High-School kids to DC to have some deviant Congressman hit-on their kids.
Foley is a 54 year-old elected official who has a Master degree in education. He should know better. So don’t blame it on the kids and make Foley the victim. Foley is clearly at fault and should take ALL the responsibility.
As for you Clinton bashers. Monica was a consenting adult. She wasn’t 17 high school student. That is a FACT and there’s a huge difference between what Foley did and what Clinton did. If you’re going to crucify Clinton for having sex with a CONSENTING adult, please apply the same standards to Foley and the Republican’s as you did to Clinton and the Dem’s. That’s right, all you NeoCon righties have two separate and distinct rules on morality depending on whether there’s a “D” or “R” after the name….pathetic.

Posted by: T-Axe | October 6, 2006, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Hi, I would like to know when Brian Ross first became aware of IM’s between Foley and pages/former pages.
Also, how did he obtain them? Somebody gave them to him. Who?
Thanks.

Posted by: Art | October 6, 2006, 10:09 am 10:09 am

I will be so happy when this congress is voted out in November. Maybe our country can once again be proud. Maybe then we can stop worrying about what this administration and congress is keeping from us and lying about. We don’t need anymore nasty surprises. It will be a relief to watch the news and not see a new scandal every week. What a bunch of crooks! If we did something like this in our jobs, we would not have lasted one week, would have been arrested, sued, and ruined for life.

Posted by: Ron | October 6, 2006, 10:10 am 10:10 am

How much you want to bet everyone gets away with this, I wouldnt be surprised if even Foley himself gets off with a slap on the wrist. I guess FOX news can continue to report Foley as a democrat and can continue to blame clinton, the media, and the democrats for this and we as citizens can be so darned confused with misinofrmation that we just stop caring alltogether, sort of like the Iraq war…

Posted by: Shelley | October 6, 2006, 10:16 am 10:16 am

P L E A S E ! ! !
Let’s NOT use this to GAY BASH….gay men/woman are NOT pedofiles…Pedofiles are in a whole different group. NOT ALL pedofiles are gay….NOT all gays are pedofiles. This kind of thought process will ONLY serve to show your ignorance!!!
I’m positive if you look at the sexual orientation of all pedofiles you’ll find the vast majority or HETEROSEXUAL…but they are not just heterosexuals..they are PEDOFILES!! Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater!!!!!

Posted by: cdriscoll | October 6, 2006, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Steve, get a clue! Do you really think that there’s a decent person at all in Congress? It’s about being untouchable and above the law. The fact that they don’t have to pay into Social Security and can collect $15k a month for the rest of their lives from the same system they don’t have to pay into (apparently for their servitude to the rest of us grunts) and then can vote themselves raises whenever they feel they deserve it. I really can’t comprehend how they can sleep at night, knowing how badly they’re screwing the people they’re supposedly SERVING. Since when should we be afraid of them, they should be afraid of us, we vote them in or out! If you think that’s true, I pity you!

Posted by: Maxx | October 6, 2006, 10:23 am 10:23 am

This issue is about a motivated pedophile with a huge amount of power whose actions were known by his bosses for years. Why are people are talking about a former President elected a decade ago? Who cares? The Republican party should take responsibility for this serious internal problem. They are losing more credibility every day and I am sick of them.

Posted by: Penn Voter | October 6, 2006, 10:28 am 10:28 am

I think that it is amazing that a person in the position of Senator Foley does not admit his guilt until he is caught. He said that he was molested as a child, but declined to share this information or seek counseling until he was caught. Not everyone has the option or finances to enter rehab to avoid prosecution and disciplinary measures. I also believe that it is sad that the Speaker of the House would blame Democrats and media for information that is apparently the truth ‘being leaked.’ I fail to understand how a flagrant disregard for the law, and engaging in illegal, unethical, and immoral sex – whether physically or emotionally – with underage young men is the fault of anyone but the person who does this. When will we take responsibility for our own actions? As a volunteer chaplain in a maximum secuirity prison, I see the results of many who do not take responsibility for their own actions, and must bear the consequences. They, like Mr. Foley, had a choice. We all do.

Posted by: Pat | October 6, 2006, 10:31 am 10:31 am

We will probably never know the truth of this matter. It is clear that former Congressman Mark Foley is gay and was living a life in the closet, which, being a Republican in a very conservative state, is probably the best he felt he could do with his life. However, the attempt by the right wing to link being gay with pedophilia is a false one: hard science has proven that this simply is not factual nor true. Once again, fundamentalist Xtians are using a wedge issue to divide people, instead of helping people come together to work on the common problems of society.

Posted by: James Lovette-Black | October 6, 2006, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Man oh man I wish there was a viable 3rd party out there that just tried to do the right thing. Instead we are stuck with these 2 parties today that can’t seem to accoomplish ANYTHING. Instead all they do is become power hungry, try to set each other up for a fall and then do anything they can to protect their turf. To me this Foley episode reeks of arrogance and dirty tricks on both sides of the aisle.

Posted by: JD | October 6, 2006, 10:33 am 10:33 am

My, my, my. What would the Republicans do, where would they run, where would they hide, if they did not have the Democrats and media to blame for everything? This administration and this congress have not taken responsiblity for one thing since they have been in office. It amazes me how anyone with any common sense at all can still believe their rehetoric and blatant lies. Pity.

Posted by: Ron | October 6, 2006, 10:41 am 10:41 am

So, in review. Predator GOP Congressman = Democrats are bad? Please. Every source indicates GOP leadership knew of potential issues, no Dem did. Oh, and the unsourced “prank” post by Drudge *6 days later* was raw meat to the frothing, rabid base: nice try.

Posted by: Eric | October 6, 2006, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Being gay is not the problem (or a problem). The fact that Foley is a sexual deviant is the real issue. He preyed on young vulnerable teenagers, because he knew he could get what he want easily that way. That is the REAL issue. Homosexuality is by no means the problem. Matt Drudge and the grotesque actions of Foley are.

Posted by: Tom | October 6, 2006, 10:51 am 10:51 am

This is probably just the tip of the iceberg … keep up the investigation and I bet you will find a child porn ring connected to these guys. Get them all out.

Posted by: Susan | October 6, 2006, 10:51 am 10:51 am

The Republicans have lost all claim to being the “family values” party. In attempting to keep the party safe from criticism, they shielded one of their own, thereby putting many young pages at risk. And instead of taking responsibilty, Hastert has tried to blame this whole scandal–which belongs entirely to the Republicans–to some vast left-wing conspiracy funded by George Soros. Add to that the fact that most Republicans can’t seem to tell the difference between a sexual predator/pedophile and a gay person. But what’s most troubling about this whole affair is that it clearly confirms something I’ve long suspected: that Republicans place the Party above all things. Above America, above decency, and above the safety of those they have been charged to protect. How can we trust them to protect America, when they can’t even be trusted to protect a few teenagers?

Posted by: Mark F. | October 6, 2006, 10:53 am 10:53 am

This Foley character is a horrible human being. Kudos to ABC for exposing this creep. It’s reporting like this that ABC should be most proud of.
I’m still not clear on which leaders knew about Foley’s preying on kids. Can ABC write a timeline? All politicians who knew about this and remained silent should be given the boot!
Also, when did Mr. Ross become aware of the existence of the instant messages between Congressman Foley and House pages? And were these instant messages given to Mr. Ross and the Staff of The Blotter directly by the pages, or were they filtered through an intermediary?

Posted by: Kevin | October 6, 2006, 10:55 am 10:55 am

We all need to play fair, and by the same rules. “United we stand”… we are being divided to conquer, folks!
Stop the name calling and partisan bashing and let’s deal with problems as fairly as we can.
Let’s start a revolution, and get all the lies out of campaigning… and while we’re at it, let’s revolutionize how campaigning and elections are run…. truth, interviews, published true resumes of candidates’ accomplishments and qualifications and shortcomings. who’s with me here?

Posted by: angela | October 6, 2006, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Why is everyone trying to make this an democrat vs republican issue? My issue is whomever has been trying to have sex with a minor regardless of the political preferance should be punished!!!!! & those who say their innocent until proven guilty must not be listening to the news because Foley is gulity and ABC News has the pages and email messages to prove IT!!!!!!!!

Posted by: nms | October 6, 2006, 11:14 am 11:14 am

We need a change. Too many of these guys are sick and deplorable. If they were common citizens they would be behind bars, where they belong. I am sad to say I definitely can not cast a vote for my party this year, so I will stay home and pray.

Posted by: Mark | October 6, 2006, 11:30 am 11:30 am

After reading the above comments, it’s confirmed. We’re no longer Americans. We’re either Democrats or Republicans. We pick our side and follow blindly picking and choosing which news story to believe based on how the light shines on our party. We can’t even watch the same news channel or read the same newspapers. We defend the indefensible and have become lap dogs to these parties. The heck with doing right by America, my party is more important so I must support her first. Iraq is not the only country in denial about a civil war. There’s one going on right here.

Posted by: Ed | October 6, 2006, 11:33 am 11:33 am

In response to… “Posted by: Robert | Oct 6, 2006 3:33:44 AM”…
who wrote, “Unless you are a complete wimp, or you were raised backwards, ANY 17 year old boy would have come forward with this.”
Most common-sense folks and psychologists will tell you that the power in D.C., or in any situation where one person holds power over another, results in people doing strange things. Have you ever heard about workplace sexual harassment? It usually happens because the boss holds more power than a subordinate and uses it as an advantage.
It’s the same in D.C. with a person of power and a subordinate, e.g. a congressman and a page. The page doesn’t want to rock the boat and does not want to hurt his/her chances of advancing professionally and/or personally. The situation can become even worse in that the minor might do things, illegal or otherwise, in order to advance.
Folks who don’t understand the balance of power, how it works, and what people will do when exposed to it really should do some studying before they voice their incorrect opinions.

Posted by: W | October 6, 2006, 11:33 am 11:33 am

A scandal that appears to be a lot of fluff and emotion that erupts a month before an election? Wow, what a surprise? What pervasive naivety in this blog.

Posted by: Richard | October 6, 2006, 11:35 am 11:35 am

That was totally disgusting.

Posted by: Tammy | October 6, 2006, 11:47 am 11:47 am

it amazes me that so many think this is just a left wing political attack. have you read this stuff? this is one sick man, and by the way minica was an adult.
put your party aside and look at this as a parent. no kid is gonna come out by himself against a setting member of congress. he knows that he would get crushed. the spin has already began. these where just jokes, the dems and abc are just out to get the gop. think about what you are saying, and that is it is more imprtant to protect your party than children. this is sad and i for one will not be voting for any gop this year. they’ve spent like drunken sailors, they done no oversite at all, and now they have put winning an election above the safety of these kids.and anyone who spins this as political is doing the same thing. throwing the kids under the bus to win an elelction. now you see why none of these kids came forward. because they knew the political machine would crush them

Posted by: conner | October 6, 2006, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Dear Brian Ross and Investigative Team:
I have been an attorney practicing law in the criminal law system for nearly twenty years. It seems to me that the ultimate question, and therefore “smoking gun”, is whether or not there exists any inappropriate emails and/or IMs (or for that matter any inappropriate contact of any type) by Foley AFTER the date that Hastert claims members of the House leadership spoke to Foley and told him to “knock it off”. If there are, then the Leadership conduct is not only negligent and/or reckless, there is specific and heinous damage that occurred as a direct result.

Posted by: bm | October 6, 2006, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Yeah, Foley is a disgusting guy. But there was NO sexual contact – just email and IM. So, was there a crime committed? Doubtful, and tough to prove. Glad he’s gone. But this is getting blown way out of proportion. Previous incidents where there WAS sexual contact were way more serious, and getting glossed over by the press .

Posted by: jb | October 6, 2006, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Where are those religious people with all the morals who were told by their church leaders to vote for George Bush because he was against same sex marriages and ati-abortions. Where are these people now!!! Would they protect their children from all the other Foleys or is it OK as long as they are of a certain political party. Where are these people and those outspoken church leaders.

Posted by: Elaine | October 6, 2006, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Wow. The neo cons are in such denial. Hastert will definitely resign in the days/weeks to come. Criminal charges should be filed for all those involved in the cover-up (but, sadly, probably won’t).

Posted by: Tom | October 6, 2006, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

I’m no Republicn sympathiser, and no American either. In the UK and most of Europe a 16-year-old man is old enough to consent to sex, gay or straight, so you lot might be getting hot under the collar, but a wider perspective than Americans’ famously narrow and insular world view might cool tempers a little. Might I also suggest that if Foley had been propositioning girls of 16-18, there would have been much less of an outcry, and if Foley had been a woman propositioning 16-18 year old boys, most of you men commenting would have a wholly different take on it. But then forgive me for intruding on your homophobic paranoia.

Posted by: Will | October 6, 2006, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Far-right comments on this blog try to dismiss the whole thing–real seventeen-year olds would have come forward if this were true–
wake up! THEY DID COME FORWARD, a long time ago. THEY WERE IGNORED BY LEADING MEMBERS OF THE SUPPOSED MORAL MAJORITY.
We hear that information about this cover-up was supplied by a Republican–why is that so hard to believe? SURELY there are Republicans who are horrified by this hypocrisy and would, after seeing this slime for a while, feel the need the speak up out of CONSCIENCE.
Or is CONSCIENCE a dirty word in the far-right Republican party now?

Posted by: can't stop won't stop | October 6, 2006, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

I first remember IMing in the late 80′s… AOL was an Apple only service and my girlfriend was impressed by the ability to do IMs…
Professional codes of silence suck… the pages receive an early education in politics and now not to make waves with potential powerful networking contacts… some of the pages admit “dancing” for this purpose… they are taught not to be transparent.
Many congressmen knew about this problem… it was a total cover-up and still is…
Let’s get back to real issues:
WMD, Iraq, our State of Denial and our crumbling Democracy and rights…
Too many have known about this page thing for years… congress is a small community… as past CA Senator and L.A. police chief Ed Davis said… hang ‘em high… Hastert and his staff and the page committee.

Posted by: brokenrose16 | October 6, 2006, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

“Then there are those few wingnuts who only know one response: if it’s a Democrat scandal, it’s the Democrats’ fault; if it’s a Republican scandal, it’s STILL the Democrats’ fault. I particularly like the comment that wants to wait for the proof against Hastert (there’s plenty out there already) while gleefully engaging in the absolutely unsubstantiated gossip that, somehow, somewhere, some Liberal is at fault!”
But didn’t you know, it is a liberal’s fault! Fox News has been peppering their info bars on the former congressman with (D-Florida) and even the AP picked it up. And a headline on a Fox News debate read something to the effect of “Did Dems keep Foley Scandal Quiet to Keep a Seat”.
New strategy – if the screwup is on your side, pretend he works for the other side!

Posted by: Amanda | October 6, 2006, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

what I find amusing is how several comments refer to the fact that Foley never molested any of these boys. How do you know that? WEre you there? Also Monica Lewinsky was 22 years old and the relationship was consentual according to both parties involved. There are some (rep and dems) who are so biased as to be blinded to any facts that contradict their preconceived notions. Wake up and use your own brains. you don’t need drudge to tell you what to think. I read that drudge article and it is all based on third party hearsay and no facts. Republicans could easily throw that stuff out there to confuse the issue.

Posted by: John | October 6, 2006, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

The partisanship on this issue (as much from the citizens, as from the members of Congress) is truly disturbing. I am a Democrat, and even what could be described as a Yellow Dog Bleeding Heart Liberal Democrat. But I am willing to bet that Foley is not the only one guilty of this type of behavior – and there are probably Democrats who are guilty also. I say identify all of them, and identify every creep who knew about it for even one day without trying to get something done to put a stop to it – and then prosecute every one of them who is indictable, and vote all of the others out of office. This stuff is unforgiveable, people. No matter the Party. These bloggers who are blaming the fact that Foley is Gay, or forgiving his actions because the children were adolescents rather than small children, or touting the fact that Foley is entitled to his day in court and infering that he might be guilty of nothing (and might even be due an apology) – in spite of his quick resignation and entry into rehab and acceptance of guilt (via the voice of his attorney)are sick themselves. How can anyone write that stuff and still look themselves in the mirror???? I am apalled – as much by the writings of those people as by Foley’s actions.

Posted by: Sandra | October 6, 2006, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

It’s over for the GOP, isn’t it? I mean, four weeks to the mid-terms and nobody in their right mind is going to vote Republican! The war in Iraq and now this Foley mess. GOP: Over.

Posted by: RJ | October 6, 2006, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

ABC and the Democrats are counting on the ignorance of the American people to not know the difference between e-mail and text messages. They will both be sadly disappointed!!
The e-mails were reviewed by Hastert and the FBI. They did NOT see the text messages until recently.
What was it the Dems said, “Stop the politics of personal destruction”

Posted by: ccoz57 | October 6, 2006, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

My question is isn’t there someone who internally monitors internet activity in both the Senate and Congress? If so why didn’t they catch this and if they did why didn’t they report this. Most government agencies monitor employees internet activity. If the public is being monitored(via phone taps, emails) by the government than why aren’t government officals being monitored as well.

Posted by: KC | October 6, 2006, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

What I find laughable about this is that most of you forget the words of a former Speaker of the House – Tip O’Niell. All politics are local. Foley and his association with the Republican Party will not likely change why people will vote for their local candidate – Republican or Democrat. They’ll lose Foley’s seat but all the rest will be determined by what goes on in the districts. Unless your guy or gal is involved somehow, does Foley’s crap really make a difference to your vote? If it does, you have to question your own principles.

Posted by: emery | October 6, 2006, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Some of you pretend to find it hard to believe that a 17 year old would withold information of Foley’s behavior. However, it is known that fully adult members of the GOP House Leadership witheld this information for 5 or 10 years.
No one disputes that the behavior happened, or that Reynolds and other Republican Congressmen knew about it well before last week. THAT is the crime that is of national interest now.

Posted by: George | October 6, 2006, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

I getting sick of Matt Drudge and his Republican bias. His headlines often imply something not borne out in the article it’s linked to. The whole Foley mess and the ensuing coverup is about power and the lengths to which politicians will go to hold onto it.

Posted by: Yance-man | October 6, 2006, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Some of you are really drinking the KoolAid that this was a Democratic conspiracy/October surprise. Facts are facts, Foley’s chief of staff revealed this to Hastert’s staff long ago, nothing was done. The organization CREW , an ethics organization, referred the Louisiana email message to news media last July (who didn’t go with the story) and to the FBI (who didn’t investigate.) ABC decided to run with it after a REPUBLICAN operative, through an intermediary, went to ABC with it. SO THOSE ARE THE FACTS. BLAME THE GOP’s, NOT THE DEMs. The problem with it coming out in October is their fault; if it had been dealt with a year ago, it would have “blown over” by now …
Jay , Minneapolis

Posted by: MN | October 6, 2006, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

I know quite a few life long Republicans, myself included, who have come to realize that Bush is really too opinionated and stupid to be president. POWER, POWER, POWER – lots of it and used poorly. BRAINS, BRAINS, BRAINS -forget them, never did have much. Yeah, ABC timed their investigation to do in Foley. Wake up you right wing dummies. I’ll take a smart president who likes sex over one who claims he is God’s gift to the American people. Makes one want to be an agnostic. Get your head out of the sands and face reality. This ex Republican is pulling the lever for everyone who is not Right Wing. They make me sicker than Monica doing oral sex .

Posted by: B Arizona | October 6, 2006, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

I can’t believe there are people defending Foley and the GOP. They surely have a Granite head. Hopefully, this is the end of the nonsense.

Posted by: Jay | October 6, 2006, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Hastert should resign, so should anyone aware of a crime (soliciting minors for sex) and not acting (how about the police?). Why is this so hard for anyone to understand, if anything, shouldn’t they be charged with abeiting? Even if the page (or pages) was of age, what about honoring the page program, protecting those young people intrusted into the care of the Congress?

Posted by: Susan | October 6, 2006, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Foley probably knew that the boys he was preying on were gay or at a point that they were questioning their sexuality. I don’t believe him being gay makes him hit on minors it is just as bad when straight people do something like this to a minor… just like the Lafave woman.. what did they do to her? nothing. Just like this they will probably do nothing. These people are educated and KNOW BETTER. They should be prosecuted and the people who knew about it should be also.

Posted by: Susie | October 6, 2006, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Why won’t Brian Ross answer a simple question: When did you first get the information regarding Mark Foley?

Posted by: David | October 6, 2006, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Foley is real gross/creepy and chased after teeenages? He has to go to JAIL. It’s a LAW to protect kids in the USA.

Posted by: Joe | October 6, 2006, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

The war in Iraq is in the toilet. If you take that and add the Intel report that says the war has increased terrorism and add Bob Woodward’s book “State of Denial”, the Bush Administration needed something to divert Media attention for the weeks ahead going into the mid-term elections. A nice sex scandal, intentionally leaked by the Republicans, is better than having the Media discuss the war, intel report and the book. The Republicans know that they can hold the public’s attention with their “full investigation” and dodge the fatal bullet of Iraq until after the election. The Media attention has already faded on the intel report and the book. The sex scandal will eventually reach across the isle befor this is over, so it’s a net gain for Bush and the Republicans when all is said and done. Anything to keep control of the House and Senate, especially the House, to avoid impeachment proceedings.

Posted by: Jeff | October 6, 2006, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

My favorite part of these comment sections are the atrocious spelling errors. My favorites are “washine machine” and “pron industry”.
P.S. Loved the Aussie input. Besides, his spelling was better than most Americans! :)

Posted by: hello | October 6, 2006, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

I fear that Foley’s homosexuality will be used by the evangelical right to link his sexual preference to immoral behavior by any gay man. Pat Buchanan said as much on MSNBC. Foley’s attraction to teenaged boys is not because he is gay. It’s because he has psychological problems. The fact that he worked so hard in Congress to prevent the very things he is accused of, as well as the fact that he is a member of the political party that champions family values, makes the whole affair absurd. If it is revealed that Foley carried out his perverse fantasies, I hope he goes to jail.

Posted by: Yance-man | October 6, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Dear Mr. Ross: It is good to see excellent jounalism in action, for a change.
The Republicans are hoisted on their own petard for their overly overly self-righteousness.
A further avenue to pursue would be how much in retirement money would Foley (and others) be getting as an ex-Congressman? I think that certainly justifies prosecution.
Thanks for the good work.

Posted by: Kay | October 6, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Studies show that (a) nearly all sex crimes against children are committed by men (93%); (b) 1/3 of all sex crimes against children are committed against boys, and (c)only 3% of the male population is gay. A subset of the 3% is committing 33% of all sex crimes against children — the math shows that while most gays are not pedophiles, gay men are 10 times more likely to be pedophiles than straight men. Everyone’s just to afraid to recognize this fact.

Posted by: Chewbacca | October 6, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

The Republicans just don’t get it…
Blaming the media or the George Soros for the Foley mess will not cut it with most people.
The fact that the timely release of the sordid emails and IMs allows the Democrats to make some hay over the issue is irrelevant.
The fact is, if the Republican leadership hadn’t tried to cover this thing up, the story would be over years ago.
And Puleeeeeeeeze, don’t try to say the leadership didn’t know until last Friday. That’s just not even remotely believable.

Posted by: Brian Norwood | October 6, 2006, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

its about time that the republicans get a dose of their own medicine.in politics,sadly, all is fair game.to say that the timing just before the elections was suspicious amazes me, like the swift boat was not!

Posted by: gabby | October 6, 2006, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

So far, unlike democrat predators Clinton and Studds, who had sexual contact wth an intern and an underage page, and whom their party and the media defended and praised, there is no account of physical contact with these alleged innocents.
I hope the sewage soon rises over the head of ABC, Ross and the phony democrats.

Posted by: Larry G | October 6, 2006, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

I’ll put this in conservitive language. RIGHT IS
RIGHT AND WRONG IS WRONG!!! There are no
“butts” or are there?

Posted by: E. Carufel | October 6, 2006, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

I live in Rep Foley’s district so I have the power to vote for his replacement next month.
With each passing day, the evidence brings former Rep. Foley closer to a charge of physical molestation.
To the pitiful Republican hacks on this thread who are trying to defend him and divert attention, please realize you won’t convince anyone but your own ilk that it’s all a Democrat conspiracy. No reasonable person could stop from laughing at your whitewashed rhetoric.
No wonder all manner of criminals and perverts and evangelical extremists gravitate to the GOP, because they know that if they promote and defend the party line they earn absolution for any sin imaginable as long as they do the bidding of the demogogues.
That explains why it took 10 years of predatory pedophile behavior by Rep. Foley to leak out. As long as you support the Grand Old Party of Perverts, it’s ALL good, right?

Posted by: Palm Beach Voter | October 6, 2006, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

I personally think that with all the Perv’s we seem to have in Gov’t, that any parent who lets their child go to Washington should be subject to child endangerment laws. Let’s throw out the Gov’t and start fresh.

Posted by: SST | October 6, 2006, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

I would like to know if that pervert Foley is going to walk out with his full pension and all other perks he can get away with at the taxpayers expense.
Is that the way lawmakers reward their sick perverted scum ‘brothers’ when they break the law? Yes indeed!
Any private citizen would have been arrested – handcuffed – and held for high bail and tried in a court of law.
I would bet sicko pervert Foley will get his full pension and other perks as a gift by his other “lawmakers’ – and I would bet he would be re-elected again if he ran – what a country.
I love it, but those lawmakers are a sick bunch – they knew about him long ago and did nothing about it – now they are all pointing fingers the other way.

Posted by: Dan | October 6, 2006, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

If any of you still think that Matt Drudge’s reporting isn’t fiar or balanced, why would he put a link to this story on his page?

Posted by: paulg | October 6, 2006, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

I just want to comment on people saying that those boys would have told someone about the advances/interactions sooner if they felt it was wrong. BS! I was molested by my grandfather when I was 14. I told no one about it until I was 21. A: I WAS EMBARRASSED AND FELT IT MUST HAVE BEEN MY FAULT. B: I FIGURED NO ONE WOULD BELIEVE ME BECAUSE HE WAS AN AUTHORITY FIGURE IN THE FAMILY. I couldn’t keep the secret anymore when I was older and told my boyfriend about it.

Posted by: mj | October 6, 2006, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

I just spent 15 minutes reading nothing but a bunch of hate-filled, name-calling BS .. from both sides; and I’m ashamed. It’s no wonder our government is out of control. If what all of you are spouting is any indication of what is happening in Washington, we’re in serious trouble. My child’s kindergarten class gets along better than the adults posting here. I admit that none of you will ever see eye-to-eye on any issue, but I would sure love to see rational discorse as opposed to this. This accomplishes nothing.

Posted by: Amy | October 6, 2006, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Liberals have swung and missed at every important issue there is. They’ve got nothing. They spend all their time accusing or trying to dig dirt on Republicans. Congrats. They found something to exploit from here to the election. Foley’s gone. Dems aren’t choirboys, either. Why don’t we just uncover every sin on every member of congress? Because we wouldn’t have anyone *worthy* of our representation. So get over it. Give me real reasons to vote FOR you and not AGAINST your opponents.

Posted by: Mike | October 6, 2006, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Once again. The age of consent is 16 in DC and most states. The pages are not considered minors at 16 for the purpose of having sex.

Posted by: Gls | October 6, 2006, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Do any of you really think the Dems needed this to bring down the Bush Administration? They have ruined this country and our reputation with the rest of the world all on his own, yet you keep believing thelies and voting for this party. Terrorism is at an all time high and breeding more each day. I love how the Republicants STILL use the Lewinsky thing because thats all they can come up with. It was sex between TWO CONSENTING ADULTS. GET OVER IT. How many 10s of thousands of people has Bush killed with his lies. Its amazing to me that people can be so blind to whats right in front of them day after day year after year. Its these ignorant, bigotted, selfish hateful idiots that keep this party in power and it gets worse every day. I’m really suprised how many of them have the smarts to actually use a computer and post things here. No wonder Bush is President.

Posted by: RealAmerican | October 6, 2006, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

Republican/Democrat… Same thing. Both sides would be fighting this thing. No one really has values, they all have agenda’s. This country is lost right now because of how polarized the country has become. The fish stinks from the head down; we need a strong leader. Sadly, the last meaningful president we’ve had was JFK. I think Barack Obama or John McCain could make a difference in this country and I hope one of them does in 2008.

Posted by: Carlos | October 6, 2006, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

I am surprised that America has not been taken down yet. We are so busy accusing each other of the many misdeads we have done while our country shelves the very big issues of our country. Something’s wrong with this picture. We are like little kids telling tales of the other hoping that you won’t be found out with your own indisgressions.
GROW UP!!!!!!!!!!!!! You’ve got a country to run.

Posted by: Frustrated | October 6, 2006, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

As a Republican, who voted for Kerry, I think this proves why the Party has lost contact with America. They think they are holier than thou and can’t come to grips with the real world. This behavior was WELL known, ignored and buried.People can make mistakes in life, the Party can’t accept it, so they bury . To admit that this is an imperfect world, would remove you from the high altar they sit on and you would lose your status. Some other holier than thou fraud would take your place. It’s a shame the USA is so polarized that people are afraid to make mistakes and admit it.

Posted by: Moner | October 6, 2006, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

I heard bob bennett on the o’reilly factor last night saying clinton’s pardon of mel reynolds was a disgrace considering his affair with a minor– but the truth is reynolds served 5 years in prison and the pardon was on the fraud charges. if people are going to talk, how about inserting the TRUTH. thank you.

Posted by: adrienne | October 6, 2006, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

It is important to note the salary these pages are getting. 18,000 for congress pages and 20,000 for senate pages. I to believe this is the price for silence, and what it takes to get a head (no pun intended).

Posted by: Scott | October 6, 2006, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

If one is standing up for family values and moral righteousness then they wouldn’t be e-mailing, sending IM’s or anything else. You wouldn’t have to worry about timing. Being right is about doing what is right, not about hiding another sad act, hopeful that no one will find out. And when you stand up presenting yourself as righteous there is no in between, no sometimes..its all of the time.

Posted by: Dig | October 6, 2006, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

From the party that gave us Clinton as President and his sexual affair with a young aged Intern and his steadfast defence by the Liberals etc it is funny that Dems are portraying themselves as spotlessly clean and holier when it comes to moral values.
The age of consent in Washington DC is 16 and Democrats have said gay sexual relationships at that age are normal and should be accepted. Now to turn back and indulge in a little bit of gay bashing is not going to fool voters. Dems and their media friends think voters are fool, they should not that there a lot of people in this country who are not fooled by their ons sided reporting and can think to differentiate propaganda from facts.

Posted by: Greg Hynes | October 6, 2006, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Gene – gays aren’t sexual predators in any larger percentage than straights are. Foley being gay just makes it look more lurid, but the two aren’t related.

Posted by: srmclellan | October 6, 2006, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

I remember when the page program was explained to some of us in High School. I was interested until a former page told me that there were some funny things that happen. I do not know if this was true but it stuck with me. I graduated High School in 1978.

Posted by: Robert | October 6, 2006, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

WHy is it that there are no hard copies of these newest charges? Drudge proved the first allegation was a prank so now Brian Ross comes out with a story about more Pages, but only their word (NO EVIDENCE). People in this country “copy cat” murders just to get some media attention, I’m sure their are many left wing nuts that would gladly lie and make false “copy cat” accusations. Show me the evidence. Also show me all the other allegations against democrat congressmen that Brian knows about but is not reporting.

Posted by: Tom | October 6, 2006, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

So, this makes Mark Foley little better than many Catholic priests. Funny, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid never called on any bishops or the pope to resign.

Posted by: Mike | October 6, 2006, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

What about the move “vagina monalogues” where the libs celebrated pedophilia. They made a movie about an older woman seducing (raping) a young 13 year old girl and just applauded the movie and how great it was.
Liberals are not upset about what Foley did. They approve of what he did. They are just using it for political purposes.

Posted by: Tom | October 6, 2006, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

The above article we’re all supposed to be commenting on here, has absolutely no journalistic value. It is merely sensationalism. This article only piles on Foley, who is already GONE (good riddance). The Foley part of the story is OVER.
The only thing that could possibly matter now, is whether Hastert should have done more when he received a compaint years ago regarding an innocuous email with very little evidence of anything in it. This same innocuous email was also recently regarded as NOT NEWSWORTHY by Brian Ross himself, as well as several Liberal leaning newspapers and the FBI. There was no story there, so they didn’t run with it. BRIAN ROSS SAT ON IT, enabling Foley to continue. So, if you’re going to blame anyone, blame Brian Ross.
Brian Ross himself said on O’Reilly that Hastert never knew about the nasty IM’s until last week. Start using your own brains, people. And some of you need to learn to spell.

Posted by: Valisa Wheeler | October 6, 2006, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Geez …
I can’t imagine how ABC would get such IM transcripts.
You just have to as wonder.

Posted by: John | October 6, 2006, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Nice try ABC. You guys have problems with gay bashing. Live with that….

Posted by: JJ | October 6, 2006, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

My sister was a senate page (late 80′s). No salary there, that’s for sure. Just a long commute and alot of getting coffee and making copies. Worst story she told was about Kennedy showing up drunk for votes. You’re talking about a bunch of high school kids being on their own, for the most part, for the first time. You can’t tell me there aren’t shenanigans going on on many levels.

Posted by: Amy | October 6, 2006, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Foley resigned and Hastert is trying to get to the bottom of who knew what, when, how and where?
Hastert knows that this is bigger than him. I believe that if thought that he could be implicated….he would be gone in a heartbeat as well.
What is wrong with Pelosi? This is a nonpartisan issue. Where in the hell is she?
The liberals and conservs had better start rowing in the same direction or Russia and China and Iran and NK and Vene and Indonesia and Germany and Spain and all the rest of the America haters will bury us in YOUR lifetime.

Posted by: Doug | October 6, 2006, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

If you think the boys are lying, then you have your Republican blinders on. You are hoping that your gods did no wrong. How would you feel if your son or daughter had this happen to them?
As far as the political spin on this, it really reminds me of the Clinton sex scandel. Only this is far far worse. And no one tried to hide what happened, much less for three years.
I am a Dem. and feel there are problems on both sides of the eisle. But, Replicans need to face up to this cover up and take the blinders off and protect your kids and the nations kids.

Posted by: ABRYANT | October 6, 2006, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

C’mon already…..can we have an interview with former Democratic Gary Studds from Mass…..he had ACTUAL SEX with an under age page!! Maybe he can help us understand how we did not resign and served several more terms!!

Posted by: Mark | October 6, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

valisa,
you’re no conservative if you voted for shrub.

Posted by: SLW | October 6, 2006, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

The no anwser liberals still have very short memories. Lets keep to the real issues. Foley is a freak and needs to fry. When a liberal had phyical Sex with a 17 yo page and stayed in office there was no outcry. Put the liberals in-charge and all of our loved ones will be in danger. Who do you think let all our spy’s go overseas. Who was offered OBL on a silver platter and said no. Get real!

Posted by: Frank | October 6, 2006, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Why does everyone keep pointing out former scandals? What other congressmen (and other people in power) did has no bearing on this particular case. I’m tired of people acting immature on this matter, I am reminded of my 5 year old son whining: “But Bobby did that and he didn’t get in trouble!” Grow up people.

Posted by: Trevor | October 6, 2006, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

This Republican is going to vote Democrat for the first time in many, many years, because someone needs to start watching over our all-powerful Congressional “perverts” who seem to have their slimey hands in the cookie jar and apparently other places too personal to even mention! It’s time to insert some much needed checks and balances back into the system.

Posted by: Joan Hafstatler | October 6, 2006, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Stop with the last minute dirty politics by the Democrats. The exact information reported by ABC, was reported by CREW to the FBI in July 2006. Now the FBI is playing the blame game…just like the Republicans. The US Attorney General is now investigating the FBI’s handling of this case. Go to the CREW website and see for yourself.

Posted by: Duane Kitna | October 6, 2006, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

You need to get real, “Frank”
Secretary of State Rice first cannot remember urgent cautionary meetings with counter-terrorism officials before 9/11.
Then within hours of this lie, her spokesman confirms the meetings in question.
Then she dismisses those meetings as nothing new — yet insists she wanted the same cautions expressed to Secretaries Ashcroft and Rumsfeld.

Posted by: RBBMIS | October 6, 2006, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Why are you Democrats blaming all Republicans for Foley’s stupidity? Why didn’t you blame Hillary for not knowing about Bill and Monica’s stupidity in the Most secure place on the Planet? If she could not keep Bill from doing Monica when he should have been trying to catch Osama Bin Laden, then why would not blame Hillary, Gore and other Democrats? Face the facts, Democrats are now and always have been hipocrits.

Posted by: Allen | October 6, 2006, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Karl Rove is behind all this. He is being funded by George Soros. He switched teams for the money. My blog has more information.

Posted by: Bob Johnson | October 6, 2006, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Foley made a mistake. Instead of quitting congress, he should have just changed parties! He would have been welcomed with “understanding”, “compassion”and for the “courage” to stand for his convictions… would have been given committee assignments and support from Soros and company. He probably would have been slipped a whole set of new email addresses from that side of the isle… if you know what I mean!

Posted by: gary | October 6, 2006, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

I love selective indignation! If only foley were “good” on abortion..the lefties just might give him an award! Oh wait…those go to Roman Polanski and the dude that produced the movie about the albino kid. Right now, the ENTIRE democratic party deserves an award for theirfeigned outrage. Perverts are your base people!

Posted by: Michele | October 6, 2006, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

For those on here who don’t get it: There is an enormous difference between being gay and being a pedophile. It would appear that Mr. Foley might possibly be both. Gay men are no more likely than straight men to be child molesters; in fact, most studies show that men who are heterosexual in their adult relationships are more likely to molest children — girls AND boys. Being gay, like being straight, is just a fact, a part of a person’s overall makeup, neither good nor bad. Pedophilia is a sickness and, for the sake of all of our children, must not ever be tolerated.

Posted by: Bob | October 6, 2006, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

The “underage” issue is non-existant as the age of consent in DC is 16. Foley’s acts, while creepy, were not necessarily illegal (however, internet communications potentially fall under a different jurisdication). This means the past scandals with 17-year old pages is also irrelevant.
The issue at hand is the GOP cover-up. Almost as bad as the scandals with the Catholic Church: while the perps can be removed, it is the institution, answerable to a great many others, that bears responsibility as well.

Posted by: kev | October 6, 2006, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Folks, this is not a Republican or Democrat issue….the issue is about sexual predators. Democrats have been hauled out just as Republicans have….this case is unique because of the length of the abuse and the fact that so many people ignored the problem.

Posted by: Thomas | October 6, 2006, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Drudge isn’t a “journalist”, he merely collects articles that interest him, and sometimes the right wingers, and posts the same on the net.
The entire leadership of the House needs to step back. I’ve been doing phone banking for a candidate and Republicans are sickened and shocked. They are also sick of Congress.

Posted by: Sully | October 6, 2006, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

abryant said: “But, Replicans need to face up to this cover up and take the blinders off and protect your kids and the nations kids.”
Pardon me, but no one is more tuned in to protecting our kids than Republicans, in my opinion. Why do you think alot of Republicans homeschool? One of the myriad of reasons is to keep our kids safe.
NO ONE is defending Foley – except the Left, who defends alternative lifestyles like Foley’s, that prey upon our children.
You assume that there’s a cover up. There is absolutely NO evidence of a cover up by Republicans.
What we do have is evidence of is political opportunism. We have Brian Ross and several Left-leaning newspapers sitting on these salacious IM’s for who knows how long, thereby enabling Foley to continue his alternative lifestyle and endangering our kids in the page program and elsewhere. This political motivation stinks almost as bad as Foley’s actions.
Brian Ross himself said that NOBODY, including Hastert and the Republicans, knew about the nasty IM’s until last week.
And when Republicans DID finally learn of the nasty IM’s and the truth of Foley’s actions, they took immediate action and made him resign. He is gone!
What angers Republicans first, is that one of our own is involved in such vile, disgusting activity; and then second, is that the Democrats and Media have seized upon the opportunity to bash Republicans without any evidence of a cover up. The Liberal hatefest just continues.
I predict an extreme backlash and the Republicans not only keeping the House, but improving their majority.

Posted by: Valisa Wheeler | October 6, 2006, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Um, what’s wrong w/ you Repub apologists? First of all, Drudge didn’t “prove” anything. He reported some flimsy inuendo, less supported than most of the other junk that has flown around about this, but you people accept every Drudge word as truth. And just because this came out at an inconvienent time for Repubs, it MUST be a conspiracy and/or a lie. Do you have any shame? A 16 or 17 year old who goes to Congress as a page likely holds lawmakers in awe… If you were a page and got an explicit e-mail from a powerful Congressman, and you didn’t know that others had also gotten them, it doesn’t seem too unlikely that you’d think twice about making public accusations. You might be embarrassed, you might be afraid, and you very likely would be worried that people would either think you are gay, or, if you were gay, that this incident would “out” you. I cannot BELIEVE that any self-respecting “values conservative” would try and blame this on these kids…
I also think Hastert probably did nothing “wrong,” i.e. there was no cover-up. But errors of omission are no less erious than errors of commission. If doubts were raised, they should have been investigated. Why didn’t reynolds tell the other two members of the page board about this? I think he is more to blame than Hastert. Hastert is a decent, busy guy, who had this happen on his watch.

Posted by: Keith Wolter | October 6, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

all I can say is, teenagers are not as innocent as you want to think they are…don’t believe me? go to myspace….

Posted by: spin sycle | October 6, 2006, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

There wasn’t much publicity from the Democrat that had sex with a 17yo probably because he wasn’t chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children. Republican Hypocrisy is delicious.

Posted by: Scott | October 6, 2006, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

RIGHT IS RIGHT AND WRONG IS WRONG NO MATTER WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE,OR WHY AND SHOULD BE PUNISHED BY THE LAW. ISN’T THAT WHY WE HAVE LAWS. PEOPLE GET REAL. THE COMMENTS BEING MADE ARE REALLY SCARY TO ME TO SEE HOW SO MANY PEOPLE THINK.

Posted by: JJ | October 6, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

I wonder how many of these people that are saying that this horrific American story is all hearsay and that we should not convict these men in the media felt the same way about the Michael Jackson, Scott Peterson, John Mark Carr, OJ Simpson, Robert Blake and countless other stories of people that were convicted in the media before they had their day in court? If you can say that you did not judge any of these men before they were convicted or not convicted, then you can use that line! Let’s face it, many of you are being hypocritical……..

Posted by: Teresa | October 6, 2006, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

It is not the presses job to safeguard our children when they are serving as Pages in Congress. The Congress serves in a Loco Parentis statis. That is they argee to act as the “parent” to our children while they are serving. The job only belongs to them-not the press. The “Parents” did not do the job they signed on for. Hastert is the the #1 parent.

Posted by: Doug | October 6, 2006, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

This should never have become a political issue but I’m not surprised it has. I am a therapist working with sexual offenders on a daily basis and as it is my job I understand clearly issues surrounding these offenses. Before someone assumes something completely offbase, although I work with them, I am an advocate for the victims and public safety. The ignorence streaming from these emails is appalling but perhaps this is the current direction of our country..don’t attempt to solve a problem, just find someone and blame them. These are children, and as children it is our responsibility to protect them. Not the president re-election! Not the speaker of the house’s position!, and certainly not Foley. His messages could only represent a small piece of his very complex sexual offending puzzle. Let’s keep our eyes on the ball people! Let’s think of the children, not blame them for the sake of some political idelogy. Foley needs help and hopefully he’ll get that help, which in turn protects all of us.

Posted by: D. Bruce Campbell | October 6, 2006, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Wondering how long before Rick Santorum tries to divert attention to a new stockpile of WMD’s to help the GOP…

Posted by: Pete | October 6, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

I have read the IM messages and what I don’t get is how all the pages seem to go along with Foley’s sexual advances. I mean, these are bright kids – they were congressional pages. You would think at least one or two would have had the sense to tell an adult what was happening or tell Foley what he was doing was sick and report him earlier. I know I would have.

Posted by: Jonathan | October 6, 2006, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

I’m not getting how there can be this idea that this thing was a prank? Uh…Foley admitted it, folks, remember? It seems like the comments from the right are either paranoid, delusional, or just ragingly homophobic. I think the Republicans and conservatives who have a brain are keeping away from this because they’re embarrassed. These attempts to blame a democratic conspiracy, or ABC news, or even The Clintons(?!) are so transparent and ludicrous it’s amusing. Democrats would reward Foley? Oh puh-leez.

Posted by: laurijst | October 6, 2006, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Perhaps we should prohibit anyone to “serve” in Congress if they’ve ever been overheard humming Judy Garland show tunes!

Posted by: gary | October 6, 2006, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Has Dennis Hastert thanked ABC yet for getting this story out? Hastert has told us that he wants to do everything possible to make sure the pages are protected from sexual predators like Mark Foley. Odd, though–since Hastert is so concerned about the safety of the pages, I would have though Denny would have issued a public statement thanking ABC for their part in exposing Foley. Instead, Hastert seems almost annoyed with ABC. That makes no sense in light of Denny’s public statements…

Posted by: Mark | October 6, 2006, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

It won’t work, trying to spin this into, “Well, you democrats had Clinton and Studds!” Why? Because we have never tried to legislate morality and shove it down your throat. Had Foley run on the democratic ticket, he could have c campaigned as an openly gay candidate and gone out with men his own age. But as a guilt-ridden Gopster, he cowered in the closet and was reduced to praying on “chickens” in his work enviornment.

Posted by: PS | October 6, 2006, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

“”He didn’t want to talk about politics,” the page said. “He wanted to talk about sex or my penis,” the page said.”
I’m laughing so hard at that.

Posted by: Duncan | October 6, 2006, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

I’m amazed by people who believe these boys are lying because any 17-year-old who isn’t a wimp would tattle immediately. Unbelievable. Foley was a congressman — in a position of authority. Who would be believed? When something traumatic happens, the victim often is shocked. They often think no one will believe them. They are afraid to speak up. They think they are the only one. The tip line is an excellent idea. I believe many people will come forward and law enforcement can sort it out.

Posted by: Suzanne | October 6, 2006, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Covering up or justifying for a Pedophile in order to maintain power, is all the reason I need to never vote GOP again.
Those political spinners like Drudge and Fox News should be ashamed at what they are trying to do, cover up for a sicko so ‘their’ side can keep power. Disgusting!

Posted by: BB | October 6, 2006, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Let’s face facts. If you are a Republican .. Foley did nothing wrong .. the Dems are behind it .. Bush is the greatest Pres since Washington and so on and so forth. You will never convieince a Republican that their party EVER does anything wrong and the Dems never do anthing right. It must be really nice living in a fantasy world. I hope some day you people will wake up and smell the coffee. With this leadership we are well on our way to being the most hated country in the world. It is going to take decades to repair the damage this administration has done both domestically and internationally.

Posted by: Grant | October 6, 2006, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Republican Hypocrisy is delicious.
Ha ha!

Posted by: sf | October 6, 2006, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Previous post: “As for Foley, he clearly is a homosexual from everything we’ve heard. IMHO, they should ALWAYS be segregated from children; be it in the schools, the church, the Boy Scouts, or the page program. We don’t want them preying on our kids.”
Well, in that case, we should segregate all grown men from teenage girls…or grown women (especially blonde teachers in their 20′s) from teenage boys. Maybe alcoholics should be banned from the internet? Or all victims of childhood sexual abuse? Or Republicans?
Please. This comment is pure bigotry…this issue has NOTHING to do with him being gay – if he even is, in an adult sense. Homosexual does NOT equal pedophile. He’s (poorly) using it as an excuse, just like his “supposed” alcoholism and childhood experiences, and insulting the gay population of this country. He’s grasping at straws, failing miserably, and dragging the GOP down with him. Bottom line…he’s a creepy pedophile who deserves to have the book thrown at him.

Posted by: Jamie | October 6, 2006, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Foley’s gone. Wasn’t that long ago that there was a Democrat by the name of Studds that did the same thing. He never went anywhere and continued to be in Congress.
Most of his fellow Democrats voted not to censure him and if anyone cares to they can look up the Studds censure vote and see how many of those hypocrites that say Hastert’s gotta leave town voted against even a mere censure of one of their own.
The Democrats haven’t any right to have any opinion at all on this matter.

Posted by: JCP | October 6, 2006, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

There are two arguments people are posting here that I don’t buy:
1) They claim the teenagers are liars because adolescent males would not put up with Foley’s advances. I don’t agree. There are over 70 pages in the house. All Foley had to do was target susceptible boys. And I’m sure being a congressman helped him leverage some power over those kids.
2) People claim what Clinton did was far worse because Clinton actually had sex with the intern whereas Foley did not. I don’t buy this either. Clinton having an affair with Monica is not illegal. She was an adult in her 20s. What got Clinton in trouble is he lied about it under oath. Foley is a child predator. He’s no different than those sick perverted old men that show up at the door hoping to have sex with a 14 year old who they met in an internet chat room.

Posted by: Avariel | October 6, 2006, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

This is a 52 yr old sending questionable e-mails to a 16 yr old. For those who thing that this is just shenanigans, are you going to stand idly by and twiddle your thumbs, when a 52 yr old has similar contact with your 16 yr old?

Posted by: Sinclair Hugh | October 6, 2006, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

For those who debunk Drudge’s credibility on reporting….are you aware that he had the scoop on Monica before anyone else in the media?
It is a given that people believe what they want to believe, with no evidence to believe otherwise!

Posted by: faye | October 6, 2006, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I must say that I think the idea that ABC goes trolling for contacts by a lonely gay guy is .. weird.
I mean if Jerry Falwell did this .. the yelling the screaming the gnashing of teeth .. from the folks at ABC would be deafening, not to mention any one else.

Posted by: Neo | October 6, 2006, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

this is for all the president Bush haters you should be happy !!
Foley has left and he is done . Do what you want to him !!!!!
but don’t forget this young intern
will be affected and that will be for how long the press will chase him.
and the rest of his life.
so you big grown up people think about what you are writting and doing.. it will be over in NOV. and then cry……

Posted by: LAURA AMELL | October 6, 2006, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

It is simply not credible that while a large number of Republicans and the FBI knew about this in 2003 not a single Democrat knew about this until about a week ago. NOT IN WASHINGTON!

Posted by: Bran | October 6, 2006, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

You know the GOP is in trouble when they start to bring back former ringleader Newt Gingrich. Obviously the lack of any fresh faces to fill the leadership breach causes a stumbling party to grasp for straws.

Posted by: erik vilius - chicago, usa | October 6, 2006, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

ICQ was established in July 1996
I’ve used it since then, and yes, it was very popular then. ICQ is IM Anyone using computers in the late 90s knows that for sure…

Posted by: lj | October 6, 2006, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

if this is all liberal, democratic politics, why are so many, including foley, resigning so quickly? that’s certainly not the republican way?

Posted by: s4burf | October 6, 2006, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

My first comment was not posted.
ABC and potential victims may not be able to have criminal acts prosecuted. The IMs are three years old– likely, the statute of limitations has run.
Thanks ABC for your immediate notification to the FBI via press release, held until one month before the general election (there are many good reasons for such a response to potentially criminal behavior). Now that is altruistic concern for the children.
Give me and this story a break and some facts, please!

Posted by: Jeffrey Peter Clagett | October 6, 2006, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Charlotte is smart, she gets all her news from a reliable source: Rush Limbaugh!!
According to Rush, this is a fabricated story by the liberal press to hurt the Republicans!
The liberal media working hand-in-hand with the democractic party.
Thank you charlotte for being on top of the real news and informing us easily fooled folks the real truth!
>Foley’s has resigned, Hastert is >not the problem.
>The problem is the drive-by media >making up stories to sell the >news – the news they want us to >hear…and believe.
>Get your news from a reliable >source before judging others.
>Posted by: charlotte | Oct 5, >2006 9:16:37 PM

Posted by: Mr. O | October 6, 2006, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

what Foley did WAS illegal. It doesn’t matter how sexually experienced he was. It was an UNDERAGED TEENAGER! Even if the boy had started the conversation, Foley should have stopped it or at least ignored it. Hastert didn’t even bother to look into it. That’s the problem. Show me where he contacted the page to find out what the message said, and I’ll apologize! I don’t have to worry about that though, becaue he didn’t.

Posted by: tidefan311 | October 6, 2006, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

I remember reading about Pages being used for sexual favors on one of the news tickertapes back just before the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal broke around February or so. This was apparently swept off the face of the earth, since I cannot find anything on it. I definitely remember reading it, because it was the first time I ever heard of the Page program. Not sure if this time the politicians will be so lucky. Maybe Korea will bail them out.
Its not a matter of what’s available in the world, it’s a matter of a highly paid person, with tax-payer funds, in a position of power and respect not holding up to the candle that he’s getting paid too. It’s the same with Clinton. If he wanted to dip his wicket, he could have at least had the decency to wait until his term ended and not further demoralize our nation and put us on the same morale plain as third world countries. If Bill Gates did this he’d never hear the end of it, much less Michael Jackson, but they both could afford most any perverted thing they desired without being supported by tax payer’s dollars. Rank or position has its privileges, but it also has its place of responsibility. People who abuse that become victims of friendly fire on the battle field.

Posted by: logan | October 6, 2006, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

For all the people buying the latest Republican spin that DEMOCRATS knew about this and waited to report it until the election, you’re ignoring several facts.
First, the original information about this came to ABC from a Republican, not a Democrat.
Second, if the Democrats had this information, why didn’t they use it in the last PRESIDENTIAL election, which was much more important? Even if Dems could win back one or two branches of Congress, they’ll still have a President using his veto on everything they do.
Third, Foley is in full damage control mode. He resigned immediately after ABC asked him about this. He immediately checked into rehab. He then released a statement saying he had been molested as a young child himself. His former chief of staff Kirk Fordham then resigned over this scandal. Are those the actions of an innocent man??? Think long and hard about that, and try to take off the partisan blinders.

Posted by: Brian | October 6, 2006, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

its a shame that Pat Robertson, and Focus on the Family propose that the problem of Foley is due to him being gay. Too bad they haven’t researched the facts that over 85% of pedophiles are heterosexuals!
Get Foley and Hastert out of office immediately and into jail where they belong.
When Dateline NBC runs thier Internet Predetors series, you know those men are going straight to jail, where they belong.
Foley, who tries to hide in Rehab, for being an “alcoholic”, (which he isn’t) and Hastert basically aiding and abetting this behavior for years needs to suffer in prison for years to come.
I will no longer vote Republican ever again. Bush has made my decision hard enough, but in light of this recent outbreak of known pedophilic behavior has pushed me over the edge!
ConConConConConservatives……. sad, sorry bunch of grown men…. Lets not even talk about Anne Coulture!
GDP

Posted by: G.D.P. | October 6, 2006, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

John Shimkus should be investigated as to why he refused to inform the rest of the House Page Board about Mark Foley. Few Republicans and no Democrats knew about Foley. The GOP leadership kept everybody in the dark.

Posted by: Amanda | October 6, 2006, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

RE: Age of consent.
Many of you are getting it wrong. Yes, the age of consent in Florida is 16, but only with a partner up to age 22. I was surprised to find that gray area granted to individuals in close age proximity. At age 23, it IS considered statutory rape and is actionable. So a 52 year old and a 16 year old is ILLEGAL in Florida.
Oh yeah, vast left-wing conspiracy … O.J. hide the IMs … and the illuminati is preparing to take over! Good immitation of a bat-poop crazy repub! Get the beer and the popcorn, the show’s about to start. Let’s watch a few heads explode out of frustration and sheer partisan demography.

Posted by: Mike | October 6, 2006, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

What a lot of B.S

Posted by: bilko | October 6, 2006, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Chewbacca:
Where are you getting your statistical information? You are citing stats that say gay men are more likely to be pedophiles. Please cite your sources; these are serious charges you are making against a group of people, so you should always give the source of your stats and information. Otherwise, you are simply adding to the inflammatory language and steering the discussion off course.

Posted by: Mary | October 6, 2006, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Boy, these Republicans are really smooth. The party of family values will stick with a guy who used his power to prey on teenage kids. So, the exposure of Foley’s predilection with man-boy sex was in October before an election, big deal. Republicans need to get their noses rubbed in their own hypocrisy. Remember, this is still the party of Joe McCarthy and Dick Nixon.

Posted by: elwood | October 6, 2006, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Blame the victims, blame the Democrats, blame the media. This is not much of a “party of responsibility” is it? Listen to Hastert say “The buck stops here” and then immediately pass the buck. It’s all pretty revealing to the average mom or dad or anyone who has followed the Catholic Church scandals.
Question: Do Republicans EVER take real responsibility for their screw-ups? EVER?

Posted by: Bart | October 6, 2006, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Injecting the Gerry Studds scandal to justify Foley’s behavior is like a child caught stealing a cookie who immediately says “Johnny took one too last week”. Children – immature whiney children incapable of assuming responsibility for anything bad.

Posted by: Dwayne | October 6, 2006, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Wait. Clinton is worse because he had sex with a consenting adult and Foley is not-so-bad because he only taunted underage boys with emails? Then YOU pay for their trauma 5, 10, 20 years from now. Kids who have been abused like this frequently don’t talk about it–ever. Until one of the victims breaks the silence. An pre-election stroke of genius from the Democrats? No, no and no,

Posted by: suzanneb | October 6, 2006, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

uhhh just an FYI—-
Instant messaging was new—and widely used—by me, friends, family and I imagine millions of other AOL users, as early as 1996…..don’t know where the rest of you kids were……..by 1998 it was SOP.

Posted by: IMer in 1996 | October 7, 2006, 3:29 am 3:29 am

Obviously Foley felt he had done enough wrong to resign abruptly. I feel we should all just wait until the “investgation” is completed. After all, we Americans ARE presumed innocent until proven otherwise. After the investigation we can ride him out of town on a rail!!!
As to my political leanings, I am a Republicrat. I vote for the person, not a party.

Posted by: faith | October 7, 2006, 7:04 am 7:04 am

I have now read that the “teenager” was actually 18 years old at the time that this was going on. Why isn’t ABC reporting this? I have also read that these emails were “pranks” that these pages were pulling on Foley….and somehow “political” operatives from the “other side” got these IM’s. Why isn’t ABC reporting any of these items. If he was legally an adult and these were published by political enemies of Foley and the Republicans….isn’t this worthy of reporting and doesn’t it completely alter the context of the story?

Posted by: Will | October 7, 2006, 7:26 am 7:26 am

I’d like to know if these pages that say that Foley sent them emails with all the sexual comments, have copies of these emails? While I think Foley is gross and disgusting. I’d really like to know if there’s something to back up their stories or is it just heresay?

Posted by: Jane Q Citizen | October 7, 2006, 8:39 am 8:39 am

So far, no one’s claiming Foley even touched any of these pages. He’s GONE!! Get oover it!! Clinton DID have a sex with a woman, over 18 but NOT HIS WIFE, and then LIED about it!! You go ahead and hold him up as your idol if you what to, but he’s still a liar and a cheater. The think about all the other women he had sex with or harassed while he was in a position of power. Makes you wonder who the real fiends and pervs really are, huh?

Posted by: John | October 7, 2006, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Most of you Americans are unbelievably stupid. This country has never been as divided as it is today, a time when unity is crucial to America’s future. “Divide and Conquer” is the most proven military strategy to defeat your enemy. It’s ironic to see that Americans end up being their own enemy. Osama is laughing all the way to victory.
The question is, who is most responsible for dividing this country as well as its important foreign friends? George Bush & Co, the “loving” evangelicals, Ann Coulter, Bill O’Reilly etc. Oh, how history will damn them.

Posted by: alcyone | October 7, 2006, 11:09 am 11:09 am

It is about time that the GOP gets what they deserve, and I do hope that they all fall and go to hell

Posted by: Eddie | October 7, 2006, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Why are so many making vitriolic comments about the press for doing their job? I don’t hear anyone bashing or faulting Chris Hansen of Dateline’s “To Catch A Predator.” Rightly, even Foley commented that the the show is doing it’s part to protect our underage children from online predators. So lay off the press for just doing their job.
To Chris who posted that the underage pages are “punks,” shame on you. Obviously you’re not a parent with underage sons. Comments like yours are why young victims tend not to come forward, especially against a powerful Congressman. Wonder what your comments would be if Foley sent a sexually explicit e-mail to one of your underage male family members?
Republican Fordham stated that two to three years ago he had informed Speaker Hastert about Foley’s inappropirate e-mails and IM’s to underage pages. So let’s stop pointing the finger at the Democrats. This isn’t a political issue, it’s a criminal one.
Where are the Republicans’ compassionate conservatism and family values when you really need them?
Let’s stop the petty party bashing and put Foley where he really belongs, in jail.
Noanie

Posted by: Noanie | October 7, 2006, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

The comment that the majority of pedos are gay is incorrect. Only the ones who seek boys are gay. The majority of pedos seek young girls. They are heterosexual. Please watch the Dateline To Catch A Preditor series that is done in conjunction with Perverted Justice. You will see that the VAST majority of pedos that are busted thru internet activity is heterosexual, seeking young girls.

Posted by: Molly | October 7, 2006, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Has anyone listened to Matt Drudge put the blame on the pages who he describes as “beasts.” Drudge, a gay man , is just one more self loathing closeted Republican. And that is the origin of this tale- closeted Republican gays afraid to speak up about Foley’s unprofessional/criminal behavior let this go further than it should have. Why would any gay person actually support the Republican party?

Posted by: delfina jones | October 7, 2006, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

It amazes me that no matter what happens..the head strong republicans will still think its unsubstantial and try to blame everybody else for their own parties misdeeds..One question…and one question only…what would you think if it was a Democrat that had solicited sex from minors and especially one that was supposedly their to protect them…you know YOU would be yelling “bloody murder” and trying to find everybody involved…a coverup is a coverup..

Posted by: David | October 7, 2006, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Why are the people who provided these IM’s not coming forward to testify before the House Ethics Committee?
Why did they chose to pass these IM’s anonymously to the press rather than go the proper authorities?
How long were the IM’s in their posession before they passed them to ABC?
How did they obtain the IM’s, since they were not the recipients of them?
Why is ABC not asking these questions and providing the answers?

Posted by: Patrick | October 8, 2006, 1:14 am 1:14 am

I tire of the idiotic games being played by some of the posters. They continue to fling insults like “lib” while the Constitution is burning. Wake up and cease these immature prattlings before there is no country left.
HERE’S AN APPROPRIATE SLOGAN FOR THE NEXT ELECTION: MAKE IT A ROUT, VOTE ALL INCUMBENTS OUT! LET’S START WITH A COMPLETELY CLEAN SLATE AND TAKE OUR COUNTRY AND OUR JOBS BACK!

Posted by: Madame Karnak | October 8, 2006, 1:38 am 1:38 am

So far we have at least 5 pages saying they received dirty emails/im’s from Foley.
We also have at least 2 staff members that say that Hastert and staff knew about Foley for 2-3 years, not the months that he claims.
We also have Boehner & Reynolds saying that Hastert knew about it.
We also know that Drudge’s claim of it being a prank has been called ‘a piece of fiction’ by the lawyer of the page.
We know all this. It’s been documented.
And yet what do conspiracy theory R’s want to focus on? That somehow, someway, it’s a D coverup. No proof mind you. No names. No facts. Oh yeah. And no personal responsibility.

Posted by: Dianna | October 8, 2006, 2:26 am 2:26 am

Bottom line: The Republican leaders had the “Trolling/grooming” e-mails at least as of November 2005, in which Pervert Foley is grooming these kids via the internet in an attempt to gain their trust and molest them. The “naughty e-mails” raised huge red flags that were ignored by the Republican leaders.
Very sick indeed.
Randy

Posted by: Randy Olson | October 8, 2006, 3:43 am 3:43 am

Shameful. The GOP has finally sunken to new lows by defending pedophiles in its ranks. Its bad enough that the party has destroyed the constitution, got us into an unwinnable war, put us in massive debt that can’t be paid off in 100 years, and has divided this nation politically that hasn’t been seen since the civil war. Now they have perverts and people who protect perverts.
What’s next, ritual baby killings? Come on Hastert, you will be getting a $125,000/year retirement anyway, just leave for the good of the party and cleanse the GOP of its ills.

Posted by: Steve Savage | October 8, 2006, 6:09 am 6:09 am

IM’s were not only around but going strong in 1998, it’s how I met my future husband. Now, Why is it that all of a sudden it’s a Democratic smear campaign? This man knew what he was doing and used his position and power to prey upon and yes terrorize young boys. Why did the other three send their emails, because they finally felt that someone would hear and believe them, instead of poo-pooing them. Funny thing is that most of the pages in the last few years have been from Republican families because thats who has been in power, soooooooo, please explain to me how these three pages are supposedly Democratic plants? It’s time to protect our children America, Wake Up NOW.

Posted by: Dee | October 8, 2006, 8:45 am 8:45 am

So let me get this straight. The Democrats are more interested in tracking instant messages of a gay man than those of a terrorist.

Posted by: Stuart | October 8, 2006, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Patrick, the IMs were all obtained properly through FOIA. Please keep better informed about topics you post on from now on, lest you embarrass yourself in public again.

Posted by: joe | October 8, 2006, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

OK, abc does not censor but your post may take some time to load. Pedos or not I want every person in Congress who signed on to the war in Iraq along with the bushco crime syndicate to be sent to prison forever for egregious violation of Geneva Conventions. You may not invade your neighbor’s house but that is exactly what US Congress and bushco did. Their punishment by the world is coming.

Posted by: joe | October 8, 2006, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Summer, GET A CLUE!
Foley’s emails were hardly “harmless”; they were, in fact, only the beginning; a “foothold” if you will, used to establish regular communication and trust. Once “in”, he quickly escalated to explicit IM’s and eventually, online sex. If he was capable of doing that ONLINE, you best believe he was capable of worse OFFLINE!

Posted by: Clued In | October 8, 2006, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

ABC: WHERE ARE THE REST OF THE IM TRANSCRIPTS?
I don’t want a two line quote in the midst of your analysis, I want to read them, in context, myself.

Posted by: Waiting | October 8, 2006, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

People seem to forget that the page program was already involved in a sex scandal back in the 80′s. Two congressmen-one dem and one rep- admitted to having consensual sex intercourses with minor pages…and as the age of consent is 16 in Washington, those congressmen were never charged…

Posted by: frenchyguy | October 9, 2006, 2:41 am 2:41 am

Hey you Aussies and Canadians … what’s involved with immigrating to your country? My wife and I give up. We’re so ashamed of the U.S. that we’ve decided to leave. Foley and the GOP reaction are the last straw. We both have some solid technical and medical skills, so we’re not looking to be welfare leeches in your land. Do you welcome ex-USA-ers, or are we spat at in the street? Thanks GOP for making us hated in the world.

Posted by: Mike | October 9, 2006, 7:49 am 7:49 am

It amazes me how much press is provided to sexual degradation and oppression; but the daily slaughter of thousands of Americans by coal-fired plants get no press. Those developing viable deployment programs to circumvent the extreme vacuum of modern energy commerce spend thousand of unpaid hours of work doing the research and work that needs to be done. If the partisan attacks really cared about those youngsters being exploited by Congressional members, they might use more of their press time to expose the extreme abuse of power exploiting our children daily with coal-fired mercury and particulate matter. Kansas ranks 18th in the nation for coal-mercury toxins. 72.5% of the electricity consumed in Kansas is generated by coal-fired power plants. In 2005 projects totalling over 55% increase were proposed with two 600 MWp coal plants proposed by Sunflower Cooperative to provide electricity for Colorado and the Renewable Energy Laboratory.

Posted by: EileenMSmithMArch | October 9, 2006, 8:38 am 8:38 am

I’ve read most of the comments on this site. I even agree with the majority of what has been written. But one thing hasn’t been said that I’ve read….it doesn’t matter much if the offender is republican or democratic. It doesn’t matter much if the victims are male or female. What matters is that human or not these people are there to represent our country. It’s embarrassing to think that the people of other countries are seeing what’s going on in the most powerful country in the world. I’m a democrat;However, I’m not trying to play the blame game. I just think that both parties should have to go through strict screening as if they were applying for a job working directly with children. Possibly the way to stop something like this would be to not let it start to begin with.

Posted by: Christina | October 9, 2006, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

I hate what is happening to our children.I wrote a letter to our news paper editor and said any preditor of children or abuse of them the person should be hung on the court house square and left there until the flesh dropped from their bones. I received a response from a man who said I was nuts, received a phone call from a lady who thanked me. I guess I am nuts because I still believe it,

Posted by: George | October 11, 2006, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Can you tell me why when McGreevy of NJ declared that he was in love with a male the bible-toting extreme right had a white hot indignation and wanted him to leave office immediately? Yet the family value right hid under the covers when Foley of Florida wrote to young page boys.
God Bless!

Posted by: John Borowski | October 11, 2006, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

“What we have here… is a failure to communicate…” (from the movie Cool Hand Luke)
I can’t help but notice what is NOT being stated in the posts I have read. I think that’s something akin to guilty by omission.
What is NOT being said is that what makes this offense so egregious is that this guy (Foley) was posing as a champion fighting to stop the same sort of abuse he himself was doing. There’s a word for that. Hypocrite.
Anyone who knew about his behavior and allowed him to continue to serve in the guise of ‘protecting children’ while he was stalking victims should resign themselves. They too are unfit to serve in my opinion.

Posted by: TUMBLEWEED | October 13, 2006, 11:54 am 11:54 am

it’s a shame to note that a honorable representative sets a bad example to his populace. although im not against Foley being gay but what he did was ultimately wrong… instead of championing the protection and welfare of the youth but what he did? he abuses his power just for the sake of LUST!

Posted by: mark | October 17, 2006, 9:07 am 9:07 am

The truth needs to come out on this.
Regards,
Keith Knutsson

Posted by: keith knutsson | October 18, 2006, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

I am just so sick and tired of the one sided reporting. If a republican does anything it is always a bigger deal and story than if it is a democrate. I think the Harry Reid’s story should have been reported on as stongly as the Foley story. Not so, can’t hurt a democrate. This why I watch very llttle from ABC and other stations with the same kind of one sided bias.

Posted by: Sherry Bell | October 25, 2006, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

The largest failure is our nations responsibility to our children. We have seen religious and now political officials toss aside our future generation like used tissues.
In this atmosphere of fear we now live in people are more willing to report a fellow ctizen who they may believe to be a terrorist rather than a pedophile. Oh wait to our children they are interchangable.

Posted by: Robert Costello | October 26, 2006, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Check your spelling. Check your grammar. Check your mind. You sound more sophisticated if you proofread. Rethink your bias. Impartiality is the way to go.
So you love violence, so you love hate, so you love blood, we reporters drooling like hogs before their trough. Where are facts? Where is truth?
To hang is to kill the man, make him finite, but to make him live is the greatest punishment of them all.

Posted by: Virginia | February 10, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

where is mark foley now?

Posted by: ADA | September 1, 2007, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.