He’s Out, But Some Still Want Rumsfeld to Face War Crimes Charges
Though he has resigned as Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld is expected to be accused of war crimes in a lawsuit to be filed next week in Germany. The Center for Constitutional Rights will file the suit on behalf of a group of Iraqi detainees as well as the so-called 20th hijacker, who is currently being held at Guantanamo Bay. "The former secretary actually authorized a series of interrogation techniques," said Michael Ratner, President of CCR. "They included the use of dogs, stripping, hooding, stressed positions, chaining to the floor, sexual humiliation and those types of activities." THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS Payback Time: Who the Democrats Will Target Report: Detainee Abuse Is ‘Standard Operating Procedure,’ Say Soldiers Click Here to Check Out More of the Brian Ross Page Those techniques, he says, amount to torture and violate the Geneva Conventions. Ratner will be traveling to Berlin next week and plans to file the suit on Tuesday. The suit is being brought in Germany because a "universal jurisdiction" law there allows German courts to claim jurisdiction over war crimes even if they were committed outside that country’s borders. CCR filed a similar lawsuit in Germany two years ago. That suit charged that Rumsfeld, former CIA Director George Tenet and other senior officials were responsible for the torturing of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison. The suit was dismissed, however, because German prosecutors said the case had no connection to German citizens nor to events that took place in Germany. Department of Defense officials at the time refused to comment on the allegations in the suit, and Rumsfeld himself has called such universal jurisdiction lawsuits "absurd" and "politicized." Despite the previous dismissals and Rumsfeld’s resignation, Ratner says he still thinks the former secretary needs to be held accountable for what Ratner calls "war crimes," and he also wants to put the U.S. interrogation policy on trial. "I think it’s important not just for the personal accountability of Rumsfeld but really to put the United States back into what I consider the letter of law," he said.
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
I completely agree with the CCR.
Posted by: John | November 9, 2006, 9:37 am 9:37 am
I think Donald Rumsfeld will be remembered as the best Defense Secretary since Robert McNamara.
Posted by: Jon Swift | November 9, 2006, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Yes, Rumsfeld as well as the United States should be held accountable for the war crimes commited under their so-call “save lives” I am a U.S. citizen but no one country should be above the law. Harsh interrogation techniques should be abolish. If we have to stoop to the terrorist level and torture detainees then we have become what we hate and have lost our humanity as well as our freedom.
Posted by: Ben | November 9, 2006, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Puhleeaze!
I am no fan of the war. But,where were these guys when Saddam was doing worse – a lot worse?
Seems like selective memory to me!
Posted by: Rich Halecki | November 9, 2006, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Your right Rich, Saddam committed a lot worse crimes than Rumsfeld. He is going to be hanged by the neck till he be dead! Being Rumsfeld committed lesser crimes, he should get a lesser sentence. Just because one criminal is worse dosen’t mean the lesser criminal should not be punished!
Posted by: David | November 9, 2006, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
The left won’t rest until they draw blood on someone in the current Adminisration. If they choose to go down that road,they might as well kiss “08 elections goodbye, people want to see what “great plan” they are going to implement now,not how may people they will waste time amd money taking down.
Posted by: Cindy | November 9, 2006, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
I keep hearing how the US is as bad as the terrorists……well, I don’t know where any American has chopped the head off some prisoner. It’s war and $hit happens.
Posted by: David | November 9, 2006, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
The big secret is out the Dems don’t have a plan for the war, for the economy, for healthcare. All they are going to do is get revenge for poor old Billy Bob Clinton.
This is for Ben.
If a terrorist was holding you captive and you only had hours to live I’d torture the heck out of him to save your life. And I’d be glad when you were found alive and complaining. Because we torture does not put us on the level of the terrorists. Now if we were sending our women into the Mall of America to set off suicide belts, or saw through the necks of innocent people then yes we would be on their level. Why can’t any one see the difference between the evil that are the terrorists, and us trying to stop the spread of that evil.
Posted by: SPO | November 9, 2006, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
I cannot believe how many people actually defend the terroist now. It seems as if we can no longer tell the difference betwween right and wrong. The man has served his country in possibly one of the hardest times.
Posted by: Ruben | November 9, 2006, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
I don’t think this guy Michael Ratner, President of CCR knows what he’s talking about.
Posted by: Dzung Nguyen | November 9, 2006, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Even if Rumsfield is charged with war crimes under international law, he won’t be arrested unless he leaves the US. Before Rumsfield the US military had a strong tradition of upholding the Geneva Conventions. However it was shocking how easily Rumsfield and Republicans in Congress were willing to abandon that tradition. After all organized terrorism has been with us since around 1800.
Under international law, to which the US has long been a signatory, a person cannot be charged with war crimes until they leave office. There is talk that Bush will be charged when he leaves office.
Posted by: Chris Baker | November 9, 2006, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Rummy will just hide in Florida like Jeb did to avoid Texas law.
That’s correct, fellow Americans!
Seems IL ol’ junior Bush committed fraud in the Lone Star state, then escaped to Florida and then ran for governor.
Bush senior gave him Florida.
Posted by: WildBill | November 9, 2006, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
If I were held captive, honestly I would rather die then know that someone else is to be torture and kill just to save my own hide.
Posted by: Ben | November 9, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
I would be more than happy to hand him over to them for trial.
Posted by: Mike | November 9, 2006, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Accountability should be the hallmark of a nation that heralds its own democracy. I don’t know if Ratner and CCR has a case, as I can’t see what is different now from the case that was dismissed. But it astounds me to see so many here appear to endorse and promote the use of torture. In the name of what? What has our nation become?
p.s. I’m no democrat.
Posted by: Nan | November 9, 2006, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
WAY TO GO SPO!!! I couldn’t have said it better myself. Just wanted you to know you weren’t the only one who thinks that way!
Posted by: Dianne | November 9, 2006, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Impeach both those two Texas road-kill then charge both for Treason.
Posted by: WildBill | November 9, 2006, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Ha looks like politics as usual. rather than get going on fixing the problems we’re just going to spend time and money getting an eye for an eye. we changed the diaper before the baby was done and it still stinks.
Posted by: Tim | November 9, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
I concur with a charge for warcrimes. The only question should be how can we get Rumsfeld, Bush and “Shotgun” Cheney to trial and make sure it is as fair as the one Presdent Saddam Hussein has been given.
Posted by: Charles | November 9, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
If you think you can do a better job – submit your resume – it is always easier to critize than it is to come up with a solution of your own isn’t it? What about the civil rights of all the victims of 9/11 or those of Sadam’s victims? The fact they are filing in Germany says a lot – they don’t want to face the citizens of this country with these outrageous claims.
Posted by: Paula | November 9, 2006, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
I think you must all remember that the end does not justify the means.
Posted by: Gerard | November 9, 2006, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
athere is general disconnect on the left when it comes to comparing right and wrong. The terrorists are not legal combatants and are therefore not entitled to the status of such under the Geneva Convention. Therefore, while you might want to condem the Bush administation for using harsh interrogation methods, it is NOT a war crime based upon international law.
Furthermore, to suggest that using such methods lower us to the level of indiscriminate, ideological, facist murderers shows that the poster is completely without judgment.
Posted by: Scott | November 9, 2006, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
If Rumsfield approved torture, let the chips fall where they may. More important is our own investigation of how we were misled into war, the billions in military contracts, and what really happened on sept. 11, (who did place all those put orders for american and united stock, anyway?)
Posted by: jack | November 9, 2006, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Serves him right – but they should waterboard first until he confesses.
And Republicans talking about how it’s gonna be in ’08? FUGGEDDABOUDIT. You obviously have no clue how it is in ’06.
Posted by: HOO-RAY | November 9, 2006, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
You all need to get over yourself… I dont see you fighting over there for YOUR freedoms. All you do is sit back on your couch and complain like some sissys. He is a great man.
Posted by: Chris | November 9, 2006, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Are we talking about coercive techniques or real torture? If we are talking about coercive techniques then we need to put a lot of people in jail. When my dad was in the army during Vietnam, soldiers captured during a war game would be “tortured” by our own guys. Anyone passing this “torture” got 2-3 days of leave. My dad only knew of one person who got the leave during his the time he was stationed there. One guy. ONE! Is this torture? Is it really? No permanent damage was done to these guys. Just mental stress and pain. Is that wrong?
People who think that stopping water boarding will make the terrorists more friendly or prevent us from dropping to their level have a distorted sense of morality.
Posted by: Jeff Gustafson | November 9, 2006, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Defend the terrorist? What are you talking about? Do you have evidence that all the people tortured at Abu Graib were terrorists? If you do, I’m sure Rumsfield would love to have it. The fact is, people were tortured that had no connection to terrorism. Innocent people were subjected to “rendition”. Laws were broken, period.
Posted by: Trystann | November 9, 2006, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
like the germans have anything to say about war crimes,, remember teh nazis?
Posted by: Tom | November 9, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
From the bottom of the employment line, all the way up to the President of the United States, people are placed in jobs to do a job. In doing any job, you must decide what is the most effective way to be productive, within the rules of engagement, and the laws, in order to be successful with the task at hand. Whereever you are employeed, there are “employee handbooks” that lay out the rules, and limitations. Same thing with the laws. Regardless of what our personal feelings are regarding the rules, you are responsible for knowing the rules/laws and follow them. You don’t follow the rules, you face punishment. You don’t follow the law, you face punishment. So this is pretty easy stuff.
If the rules and laws were broken, he should face punishment under the system in place.
If he did not break rules and laws, then he should not.
Simple stuff. Now, if you don’t agree with the rules or laws, engage yourself in the process which has a say so on those rules and laws. Until the rule or law changes, then your personal convictions..or how you feel are just that. YOUR convictions and YOUR feelings.
Posted by: Andrew Pruett | November 9, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
When Saddam gassed the Kurds the United Stated VETOED a UN resolution to place sanctions on Iraq. It wasn’t in the US’s interest to have sanctions at the time. Now that Saddam is going to face justice it is only fitting that a few of those who willingly aided and abetted him in his crimes swing along side him. And Rummy is near the top of the list!
Posted by: Jim J. Donaldson | November 9, 2006, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Rumsfeld should be first of many in the criminal Bush administration. But – it will get little note in the U.S.
Those that see differences between terrorist organizations and folks like Bush and Rumsfeld don’t see the hypocrisy of their position.
Posted by: Robert | November 9, 2006, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I think this is baseless and I feel no shame at the US doing anything that is required to win a war and protect our boarders. Since they are willing to fight a not traditional war with us, I fully endorse any tactics needed to get information.
Posted by: George | November 9, 2006, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Terrorists don’t have Constitutional rights, nor are they covered by the Geneva Conventions. They should have been shot on sight, not taken “prisoner”.
Posted by: Alex | November 9, 2006, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Bravo! It’s about time the United States was held to the same standards as the rest of the world! Why not file against the sitting president and his cabinet? They’re all guilty of war crimes!
Posted by: J. Greenway | November 9, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
If my mother, father, sister, brother, or friend were about to be executed by a terrorist group and I had one of the terrorist in my possession I would beat the cr*p
out of him until I got the information I needed to save my family or friends.
War is war not some silly game you play. It’s kill or be killed.
Posted by: Dave | November 9, 2006, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Most Americans are deeply ignorant about what goes on during these secretive interrogations. We know prisoners have been turned in by jealous neighbors and kept for years without any charges on file. We also know prisoners have died during our interrogations. How do we know we have not indeed stooped to the level of the terrorists by killing innocents in horrific ways?
Posted by: Stacey Capps | November 9, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
When “hooding” and “stripping” are classified as torture, we need to just surrender. If these techniques save the life of one person (American or foreign), Rumsfeld should be knighted.
Posted by: Bill Block | November 9, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
As an american, I could give a rat’s behind about what we have to do to get vital intelligence from terrorists. Terrorists target innocent civilians like me and my family. Any information that interrigators can get to keep me safe, I support. Terrorists are cowards and are lucky we are soft and don’t execute them on the spot (usually).
Rumsfeld went wrong by not going to war with enough troops to properly secure the country. He was stubborn and would not admit his failings. He stayed way too long and helped cause a historic shift in power in the US.
Posted by: Vince | November 9, 2006, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
“In order to save the village, we had to destroy it” –US Army officer, Vietnam, 1968
I’d hate to think Bush/Rumsfeld think the same about the principles of freedom–democracy, human rights etc. etc. they constantly harp on in media soundbites. If they do, they should stop waving the flag about and stop yakking about spreading this “freedom” they have so willingly violated as a matter of course since 2001.
The ends DO NOT justify the means. It IS about right vs. wrong. It is NOT about what is legal or illegal.
Posted by: Jim Steele | November 9, 2006, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
EVERYONE IS REALLY GOOD AT PASSING THE BUCK. TWO WRONGS DON’T MAKE A RIGHT. I HATED HEADS ROLLING AS MUCH AS ANYONE ELSE BUT I STILL DO NOT BELIEVE THAT OUR TROOPS SHOULD HAVE BRUTALIZED PRISONERS. RUMSFELD SHOULD HAVE STEPPED DOWN A LONG TIME AGO, ALONG WITH BUSH. YOU CAN ONLY GET AWAY WITH INSULTING THE INTELLECT OF THE MASSES BEFORE IT COMES BACK AROUND TO BITE YOU. THIS WAR IS JUST ANOTHER VIET NAM AND I OPPOSE IT TOTALLY. I THINK THE ELECTIONS TURNED OUT A-OK.
Posted by: Cheryl J. | November 9, 2006, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Hey SPO,
Just to summarize your comment to Ben. You are saying that, “The ends justify the means.” The supposition of innocent until proven guilty applies unless we are talking about terrorism? Possibly you believe that armed robbery or shop lifting would be appropriate crimes for torture as well. Do you trust the government to draw the line between support of terrorism and civil disobedience?
At the failure rates the goverment has seen in identifying terrorists, the government would be well within their rights to arrest every person in the US with a drivers license in the interest of saving lives.
Posted by: BooMan | November 9, 2006, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Silly far left liberals like Ratner, who probably never wore a uniform in defense of his country, and doesn’t understand what it’s like to be shot at, would make the US the evildoers of the world. Get out of my country you damned traitor and move to Iraq. Go peddle your nonsense over there where they’ll make head cheese out of you. BH
Posted by: Bob | November 9, 2006, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
You know what folks? War is a nasty business and it is designed that way…to be a so terrible and and horrific act that we do not ever want to see it again and will at all costs avoid it. As long a we try to “Civilize” war…those with the long fingers will be around to point blame. Everyone said this has gone on long enough and we should be out, Rumsfeld blew it, fire him…Give me a break! Dealing with Terrorism is a risky business in the first place, especially when only one side plays by the rules. You figured we would have learned from Korea and Vietnam on a correct course…guess not. Don’t shoot the Doctor because he didn’t cure the cancer. Rumsfeld did what he could under great difficulty and stress…WAR CRIMES? I don’t think so. Wake up people!! America has a very short memory…we were the ones attacked!!
This kind of talk and finger pointing if done during WWII would have amounted to nothing less than TREASON!!
Posted by: Mike | November 9, 2006, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
so to defeat the terrorists we must become a little like them? Is that the answer? I think what you dont comprehend is a lot of these guys are innocent, it is hard for to determine if they are terrorists, so innocent people are being tortured. Also torture simply does not work, people will say anything to make it stop and you will being chasing false leads. It is proven the best way to gain information is to gain a relationship with the prisoner. Then you can get further information down the line because they do not hate you for tortuering them. You can work with them, they are humans too. Also David the situation you talk about very rarely woul occur. You do not really know if an attack is that inement. Who do we allow to judge an attack is imminet? But of course if you somehow know by the grace of god that an attack will occur in one hour unless you ruff the guy up, you are going to do it and no court in america will convict the interregator. But! you do not write this system of torture into law and let this become common operating procedure! Come on people have some common sense
Posted by: james | November 9, 2006, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
It’s about time! Donald Rumsfeld deserves to be tried for war crimes. Our government has given him a pass. If our own government won’t stop him,unfortunately, it is up to other countries to bring justice for Rumsfeld.
Posted by: Victoria | November 9, 2006, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
My question is, Where was our American Supreme Court in all this? Lets get past the Geneva Convention,…no one follows those “guidelines” anyway,…
What happened to OUR American Constitution? I haven’t exactly seen Americans Protesting the decisions made by out Leaders, like in Vietnam. Just a few camp followers doesn’t count–Cindy Sheehan). It should be very embarrassing to Americans that it takes the Germans to bring up the War Crime issue against an American Leader.
Posted by: Amaris | November 9, 2006, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
There is plenty of evidence that this administration manipulated intelligence and used 9/11 as a pretext for the Iraq War and profited from it politically and financially. At the cost of thousands of lives and billions of dollars. When they should have been using all resources to capture Osama bin Laden who remains free to attack us again.
Why do we punish criminals? To hold them accountable for their crimes and to dissuade others from committing those crimes in the future.
It is the duty of our new leadership to investigate, try and convict all who committed crimes. If they do not, then they will have failed us too.
Posted by: Mel | November 9, 2006, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
So to defeat the terrorist we must become a little like them? What I dont think you guys grasb is we do not know if these people are terrorists for sure. It is hard to pick out a terrorist. Therefore innocent people will get wrapped up in this situation and tortured. This is where the American justice system thrives. You are innocent until proven guilty, you have a right to an attorney, you can defend yourself in court, and you are not tortured. This allows the innocent caught up in the system to protect themselves. Now some may say well this is war. Well this war never ends. There will always be terrorists. It is a war on terror like a war on drugs it is unclear and has no ending. The war in Iraq will end but new terrorist threats will appear, and so on… Are we willing to become a country of tortures to become a little more secure(probabl not more secure anyway). Also torture does not work! A person will say anything to get out of it. Studies show and gov’t officials say the best way to gain info is to build relationships, then you can even get info years down the line because these people do not hate you, remember they are people too.
And to David-
The ticking time bomb situation almost never occurs. You do not know when interregating that there is for sure an imminet attack. And in some case my the grace of god you did know they would attack in an hour you would ruff the guy up, and no court in america would convict you. But! you do not write this system of torture into law, and make this a systematic way to deal with suspects. Very bad things will happen! Lets all use some common sense. Is this really the road we want our country to go down?
Posted by: james | November 9, 2006, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Incredible. I don’t know how this group expects to be taken seriously. I think there’s a collective insanity in parts of Europe.
Posted by: Sam | November 9, 2006, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
This is something that needs to be said more often–
Yes, the terrorists are evil. Yes, they deserve punishment for what they have done. But when we sink to lying and torture, we make ourselves into terrorists. There are not levels of evil; evil is evil. There is no ‘us and them’; there is humanity.
Rumsfeld should be punished; saying that is not defending Saddam. Saddam should be punished; saying that is not defending Rumsfeld.
The world’s in colour, not black and white.
Posted by: Rosie | November 9, 2006, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
What do you think the chances are that a former senior US official gives a tinker’s dam about some tinhorn loony’s lawsuit filed in Germany?
Superfluous twaddle.
Posted by: Dave | November 9, 2006, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Saddam was a tyrant, but has anyone seen the 1982 photo of Rumsfeld shaking Saddam’s hand when he (Saddam) was our friend in Iraq’s war with Iran? Rumsfeld was President Reagan’s special envoy to Saddam. Did the U.S. seel weapons to Saddam that are now killing American GIs? Just a thought.
Posted by: Richard Ricahrdson | November 9, 2006, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Please, let’s all use our brains. Rumsfeld don’t give a damn about me or you. He had power in his hands and he exersied it. He was definitely power tripping. Probably smoking a nice expensive cuban cigar as they tortured those prisoners. This whole damn war is about power and the US, Middle East,Iran,Germany, China, Russia, and north and South Korea are all flexing to see has more of it.
Posted by: SLS | November 9, 2006, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Wow, it must be nice living in such a simple black-and-white world.
I think we can all agree that terrorists are bad, m’kay? But the way the current Administration has dealt with this so-called War on Terrorism has NOT effectively dealt with the problem. In fact, it has made the threat of terrorism WORSE, no matter WHAT the government tells you.
Rumsfeld and company have committed war crimes – we’ve known this for years, but it’s taken way too long for this to hit the mainstream. Rumsfeld is one of many people, all the way up to Bush himself, that need to be held accountable for their massive failure to deal with the threat of terrorism effectively.
That does NOT mean that people who called for Rumsfeld’s resignation and Bush’s impeachment are “defending terrorists”. It’s not so cut-and-dry, black-and-white, and I really wish people would get this through their heads. The terrorists, whoever they are, are evil and I agree they must be stopped if we are to return to peace. But the Bush Administration is ALSO wrong and is doing a BAD JOB.
The Democrats may not seem to have a cohesive plan right now mainly because there’s such a HUGE mess to clean up, it’s difficult to know where to start. You try running the country sometime – let’s see you come up with a complete plan to fix the mess in just a couple of days.
Posted by: KieferSkunk | November 9, 2006, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Unfortunately we are not living in a perfect peaceful world. We are living in a world where single individuals can take the lives of hundreds. I’m sorry, but if our military has to interrogate and torture a few terrorists to get information that could prevent the death of Americans, then I am for it. I wish that “building relationships” would allow us to get the information to help keep America safe. I just find it hard to believe that can happen considering that Israel and Palenstine has never been able to forge a peaceful relationship.
Posted by: Amy | November 9, 2006, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Seems to me , most of you don’t get it at all, 25 years ago it was predicted (CIA) FORTOLD ,,, The next war would be waged by TERRORIST .
With all it’s military might and technical superioritys , They COULD bring any Country to a standstill, Cripling commerce , trade , travel . Esentialy Force that nation to PROTECT ITSELF WITH ANY MEANS AVAILABE . Our ememy’s ride Donkey’s , Camel’s,,hide in caves , KILL so patheticaly cruly and for no other reason but ” reports say the athlets were killed because they wore SHORTS ”
In our history books or what we have learned from our prev. wars , have left us with very little Relevant , Practical or Battle Stratagies that can be aplied .This Enemy has shown that with only a few dozen men it can stop a nation in its TRACKS .
Geneva Convention,,,Give me a break
. Did Bin – Laden and his buddies sign it? Abide by it.
They BEHEADED MEN & WOMEN right in plain VIEW Recorded to Throw it in the FACE of the WORLD POPULATION .
For those who think that the Methods used to Interogate the prisoner’s Deemed to be EMEMY COMBATANS ,,,look back in history
What Country has used such soft handed interogtion techniqick ..none,
im sure Most Millitary and College
Faterneties do worse to thier own pleges dureing Pledge Week.
While our enemy Shoots Unarmed Civilian Contractors , Beheading Unarmened Civilians , SO BOLDLY to Vidio tape it and dish it up on the New’s and Internett and I hear not a SHOUT ,,AMAZING..
all in the name of Ahla,,
A book called Onward Christian Soldier’s.. tell’s of the Millions that have Suffered Tourtured , Savagly Burned , Trown to the Lions , All in the name of God…
One man has delusions , he’s deemed to be Mentaly Unsound hmm
Millions suffer from delusions ,
they call it Religion..
One sentance summs it up really
nice , to our Enemy .You all Need to Evolve
Posted by: C.P.A | November 9, 2006, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Amy: We villify the terrorists for torturing our soldiers. We call that absolutely wrong. We all agree that it’s a terrible thing when one of our soldiers dies at the hands of a terrorist, correct?
Think about how the rest of the world feels when they hear how our government tortures a person. Can you see how condoning torture could be seen as a bad thing?
Posted by: KieferSkunk | November 9, 2006, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Hello??? Did anyone happen to read this article? It isn’t the “LEFT” that’s wants Rummy tried for war crimes, it’s a group of former Iraqi detainees who were held in Guantamo Bay. If we gleaned such great intelligence from torture, we should have won this ‘war on terra’ a long time ago.!!
Posted by: mj | November 9, 2006, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
We should not compare what we do to what ‘terrorists’ do. We should follow our own laws and values. No one will know if Rumsfeld is a war criminal unless the issue goes to trial. Only a verdict will resolve this question.
I don’t think Democrats need a plan for Iraq. Clearly Bush and his supporters did not have a plan. They scrambled the egg and expect others to tell them how to unscramble it.
Besides no plan will work as long as Bush is in charge; incompetence matters.
The American voter who supported Bush in 2004 share a lot of responsibility in this.
Posted by: jim | November 9, 2006, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Alls I gotta say is my momma always used to say “If someone jumped off of a cliff, would you?” and for those of you who miss the analogy, when someone is doing something WRONG and/or stupid, it is NOT a justification for you doing it. Sometimes, just sometimes something is wrong because it is wrong….
Posted by: LSC | November 9, 2006, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
It’s ridiculous to argue about torturing terrorists to gain information, and the people who give the example of their family being held at gunpoint and they must torture someone to get the secret code is nonsense. The present US regime has used the most vicious techniques to torture a lot of innocent people to satisfy their racist and war-mongering power trip. Their logic is totally un-American. Presume guilty based on race or religion until torture gives you no valid answer. Shame on Rumsfeld/Bush/Cheney and the immoral lawyers who provided legal cover for their actions.
Posted by: anti-xenophobe | November 9, 2006, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Hey, Right Wing Whackos–
What century is this? I can not believe the ignorance I see on this page. The only argument I keep seeing people go back to is the hypothetical scenario, “if my mother, brother, sister, etc. was kidnapped”…. this is just lame. Of course we ALL love our families and would each take a bullet for every one of them, but you’re not taking into consideration that the info torture gives is rarely reliable. If you want to beat the cra* out of someone out of frustration, then just own that, but I wouldn’t want to do MORE damage for my cause than good. Not to mention that which others have also said–our record at identifying terror suspects has been shoddy at best. T
Posted by: Mike | November 9, 2006, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Everyone keeps putting up hypothetical situations about terrorists capturing their families, so its ok to torture. This is a ridiculous argument, because you dont even know if the guy your tortturing even knows anything about your family or anything else for that matter. It is a know fact that torture is ineffective and inhumane. If we start torturing people, then our other enemies like Iran and N. Korea, might do the same to us.
Second you say Dems don’t have a plan? Getting Rumsfeld out of office is a great start if you ask me!
Posted by: David | November 9, 2006, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Ummm Mike, You say we can torture because we were attacked? So you are either saying we have OBL and are torturing him, or we can torture anyone who looks like him…so by your logic, a guy broke in my house and killed my dog, he was big and fat and white, do I now have the authority to “get even” with all big fat white guys? And I will say it again and again SOMETIMES SOMETHINGS ARE WRONG BECAUSE THEY ARE. Period. No justifications. No excused
Posted by: LSC | November 9, 2006, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
I am sorry, but Rumsfeld was never held accountable for the war crimes he committed as Chief of Staff for President Ford and as Sec of Defense in 1974 and 1975. He and Dick Cheney were partt of the NSC that approved using enlisted men in human experiemnts with chemical weapons and illegal drugs such as LSD, PCP, etc at Edgewood Arsenal, they were committing war crimes long before Saddam was http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/8/6/102919/7467 the veterans and their widows still can not collect their veteran benefits or medical care due to the problems caused by these experiments 31 – 51 years ago
Posted by: Mike Bailey | November 9, 2006, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
I think it is important that government officials be held accountable for their actions.
Torture, secret prisons, and indefinite detentions without charge or representation. These sound like war crimes to me. Why should America be exempt from international law?
Posted by: Randall Brink | November 9, 2006, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Give me a break, the Democrats don’t have any plans, all they are out for is revenge, they are no better than terrorist. If clinton would have done his job we would not be in Iraq. OH he was really too busy with the woman and not acting like a PRESIDENT should.
Posted by: Buffy | November 9, 2006, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Of course Rumsfeld, et al, should be held accountable for their war crimes! Rumsfeld took us back to the dark ages. As an American citizen, I have been disgusted and shocked as to how complacent the American people have been over the last several years with this Administration. All you need to do is remember Nazi Germany and all the crimes committed against humanity performed in the name of “the better good” for their country. Haven’t we learned anything?
Posted by: Cathy | November 9, 2006, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
First of all coercive techniques do indeed work. It is a fact. Look it up. This fact has been reported.
Second of all, if an innocent person is captured on the battlefield it is up to their country to negotiate their release via diplomatic means. This has happened with people that we held at Gitmo (we ended up re-capturing some of them so I doubt that they are innocent). In a war, there is no habeas corpus for POW’s. Prisoners do not fall under the US Constitution. Prisoners are kept until freed by their friendlies or at the end of the war. This is the way it has always been done. Doesn’t anyone play “Capture the Flag” anymore?
This is also why the NSA does not need a warrant. They are part of the DoD and have no standing for warrant in civilian courts. Only when the information is passed from the NSA to the FBI are warrants involved. The reason the information is passed to the FBI is because the NSA feels they found another wire tap *target*. The target of the tap is what is subject to a warrant, not others that happen to call the target.
This is similar to if any of us called a criminal subject to a wire tap. Law enforcement does not need a warrant to listen in since they already have a warrant for the target.
I know this might be too much logic for some of the irrational people that must be reading this. Put aside your emotions and read up on the facts.
Posted by: Jeff Gustafson | November 9, 2006, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Donald Rumsfeld should be tried and convicted, along with Dick Cheney and George Bush, for war crimes. The hypocracy of these guys is unbelievable. They use claims that Saddam tortured his people as evidence of what an evil man he was but then turn around and do the same damn thing to people we have captured and try to defend it in saying they are just “trying to protect Americans”.
You can spin all you want and try to claim that “where is there compassion”. But if you make that argument I would love to see you volunteer to jump on board of 747, hijack it, and fly it into a building full of innocent civilians. I mean they did it right?
Posted by: Greg | November 9, 2006, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
torturing terrorist is a GREAT idea, make them want to get revenge EVEN more!
Posted by: Ned Pimple | November 9, 2006, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Accountability is a good thing. Closing the General Accounting Office in Iraq because they were exposing criminal activity in the reconstruction efforts and passing blame to the soldiers who executed torture orders from their superiors at Abu Ghraib is a disrespect to every soldier fighting over there. Considering all of the people who have paid for their lives, Americans and Iraqis, to hold no official accountable for the blatant mistakes in this war is criminal. The fact that it is even being debated shows how far this administration and the segment of America who support them have escaped rationality.
Posted by: Ken Moire | November 9, 2006, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Lets see, how about we send Cindy Sheehan and Clinton over to Iraq, I’m sure they can bring peace over there. Democrats don’t have a clue on how to run this country. Clinton era is proof of that, thats how we ended up at WAR !!!!!!!!
Posted by: Buffy | November 9, 2006, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Handing Rumsfeld over is ridiculous and impunes our sovereignty as a nation. I would never be in favor of Americans being tried by any else but Americans. If he was handed over, people, you’d be violating his 6th Amendment right to a trial by jury in the state or district where the alleged crime was committed. Rumsfeld didn’t commit a crime in Germany so this is absolutely preposterous and even entertaining it is selling out on American Constitutional Guarantees. Let’s not even start how this could be a violation of Due Process.
What is this? Torture to to save thousands of lives is okay, but violating the Constitution is okay, because its Rumsfeld and you don’t like him?!? How absolutely crazy.
Torture…I would allow it exactly in the form Rumsfeld authorized it. Saving thousands people, it wouldn’t cause me to lose sleep knowing I and my family are alive because someone was tortured…remember, torture doesn’t mean the torturee is dead.
Posted by: Phil | November 9, 2006, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
I love my country. I would take a job that allowed me to torture terrorists and I would also work for free. Torture anyone who gets in our way!!
HAHA
Posted by: Scott | November 9, 2006, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Everyone wants their pound of flesh one way or the other. War crimes – I don’t know – stupidity definitley – turning a blind eye maybe – have the wrong command structure yes. Having served this country during Vietnam, and knowing of what both sides dished out to each other – the ends never justifies the means. WE are involved in a Global War on Terror, but also involved in an occupation in a country that does not want us there. Excuse me the miniority in control want us to stay to protect them lest they be overthrown by a savage Radical Islamic group of warlords. WE have placed our youth in harms way – asked them to protect a fledgling democracy – seconded guessed any and all methods used to secure that democracy – no I do not condone torture, but I know from experience that when you are the one getting attacked with IED’S – make shift car bombs – suicide bombers – humans tend to sink to their lowest level – survival. It is easy for us to sit here nice and comfortable blogging away, and say sent them all to jail – until you’ve seen your best friend head blown off or mangled by a explosive device you cannot predict how you would act in the face of such an enemy. My only hope is that there will come a time soon that the Iraqi people will decide to live as civilized people, and take control of their own country, and say no to the Radical Islamic horde that wants to engulf the entire world in conflict. If you think that this is an ememy that you can win the hearts and minds of – you are dreaming – we need to stop making new ememies of those we simply suspect, and investing in real credible intelligence – not with torture or coercion, and not only on our own, but with our allies in this conflict, and when a really verified – confirmed threat is identified – eliminate it without mercy.
Posted by: Gene | November 9, 2006, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
I meant torture to save thousands of lives is not okay, but violating an American’s Constitutional rights is okay because, well, it’s Rumsfeld and you don’t like him?!?
Posted by: Phil | November 9, 2006, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
“I think Donald Rumsfeld will be remembered as the best Defense Secretary since Robert McNamara.”
I disagree. I think Rumsfeld is the best Defense Secretary since William Cohen.
Posted by: Andrew Elgert | November 9, 2006, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Now that the Democrated have the house and senate, they do not want revenge, they want ACCOUNTABILITY! If Rumsfeld and family are innocent, then they have nothing to worry about.
Posted by: David | November 9, 2006, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
It is interesting to see how “NOW” the government focus should be on working for the best interest of the people. What about the last 6 years? What about when those in charge where giving away our money (via tax breaks and policy) to corporate interest? I am no Democrat nor am I a Republican but, I am an American.
As such, I feel that we are held and should be held to a higher standard; as should our elected officials. We always put up our society as a model for the rest of the world. As such, we should have a higher standard for ourselves and those we “Elected” to represent (not govern) us.
In summation: if the current administration broke international law, they should be held accountable, we should not torture because, we are the rule not the exception, and as an American (not a representative of a party) I am more concerned with what is best for my country (I think longer term, what will benefit generations to come) not so much what is best for me in the present (this is what you term sacrifice, what our soldiers and their families are doing as you read this).
Posted by: Moe | November 9, 2006, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
It would not surprise me one bit if both Donald Rumsfeld and George
W Bush and Dick Cheney all end up
facing War Crimes Charges and that
they will be convicted of them!
Posted by: Sandy | November 9, 2006, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
I’m sad to see that so many Americans are confused and misled by their own propaganda. Please note that the Republicans in power have very little to do with the family values and social status quo that the party officially stands for. Instead, I see a lot of people religiously defending the Bush administration because they were put in power by the political party that once upon a time had some nice points on their agenda. Not so anymore. Republicans of America, you have created a monster. It’s time that you correct your mistake and clean up your act instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting increasingly insane interjections.
Posted by: Thomas | November 9, 2006, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
As a member of the Armed Forces, I can say, without a doubt that I think Rumsfeld should be held accountable for any crimes he has committed. Look at it like this: If Rumsfeld had been the guy in charge of defense in some non-allied middle eastern country, and he condoned (ordered) the use of torture against our troops, and he were caught, don’t think for a minute the US wouldn’t charge him with war crimes (especially this administration). We’ve become overrun by people in this country who would rather shoot first and ask questions later; but would we tolerate that from any other nation? If we torture, kill, or hold captive any innocent person, which is highly likely in a flawed system that has no safeguards now; we’ve committed the greatest injustice ever and we’ve totally eroded what we have remaining of our image of nobility. Even if someone, in their warped delusions of justice, could somehow justify torture; it’s not a perfect system so how could you do such a thing to an innocent person?
I’d be interested to hear the feelings of the people who have said that they condone such things if they themselves or their children were confined without due process, held in a dark room for a couple of years, or tortured within an inch of their life for no reason other than being suspected of a crime.
This isn’t an issue of political affiliation, it’s an issue of right and wrong. This administration has continuously taken the wrong path; and each one of them should pay the price.
By the way, this is a sentiment held by many of the soldiers, sailors and airmen I serve with. But don’t allow yourself to think for a second that because service members have an opinion that may go against the grain, that we wouldn’t follow lawful orders. After all, some government employees do have respect for their duties and the impact they have.
Posted by: Wes | November 9, 2006, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
During WW2 when Germany almost won the war; we were told “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself”
We won through strength, not fear.
We also prosecuted our own war crimes when they happened.
We still know right from wrong.
We have our constitution to show us what rights are to be granted a human, to preserve our own humanity.
What was done to the prisoners at Abu Ghraib was inhuman, no better than German war crimes; now we claim they were not electrocuted. They were electrocuted and then some.
It is a well know fact, since the Spanish Inquisition, that torture does not provide usable information. Give me an live extension cord and I will have anyone confess to the 9/11 attacks.
Posted by: norman | November 9, 2006, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
One of the best indicators of what makes a country great is the number of people who want to get out compared to the number who want to get in. On that scale, America is on the top of the list.
Posted by: Sam J | November 9, 2006, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
We’re not in this war because Clinton didn’t do his job. Prove it! Where are your facts? We’re at war because were were mislead by an administration that took advantage of one of our nations greatest tragedies. They played with the psyche of the American people to push their Big Business agenda. Why do you think HalliBurton is getting Billions in no bid contracts? Yes…Billions of taxpayers money…YOUR MONEY. Your children, your grandchildren, their children will be paying for this war decades after it’s over.
Why has the reason we went to this war changed so many times? Because Saddam has WMDs…oops none there…because he was helping Terrorist…oops that was wrong…because Saddam was a bad person….ooops…we’ve killed ~100k innocent Iraquis…because Iraq wants to be free…oops.. we’re breading more Terrorist… because we want to spread Democracy…what a bunch of bull.
“I’m not a Democrat or a Republican…i’m an American, watching our beautiful country being hijacked by Big Business.
Everyone is in bed everyone in that group…doesn’t matter if it’s a Democrat or a Republican in the white house now…and it’s been like that for decades. It’s not our country anymore…that’s the end result of capitalism… It’s Big Business that runs the show. Bush….he’s just a pond…Rumsfeld-Cheney…just ponds…you and I…? we’re not even on the board…At least they get their cut. Someone needs to be held accountable… if my job performance was that of Rumsfeld’s i would of been fired years ago…
“God Bless America”
Posted by: Worried American | November 9, 2006, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Posted by: Greg | Nov 9, 2006 5:29:19 PM
torturing terrorist is a GREAT idea, make them want to get revenge EVEN more!
Hey greg,
It’s a good thing you know what your talking about. The terrorists want to destroy America because we are “Zionist Devils”. Don’t worry they already hated us before the torture, and they will continue to hate us. Torture works, if it can uncover further terrorist plots to kill thousands of more American citizens, did you forget 9/11 already?
Posted by: Aaron | November 9, 2006, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Germany can proceed with its trial. It will bring a lot of issues to light. America, however, should not hand over Rumsfeld. For the first time in 6 years we have a chance to reunite. Unfortunately, it is once again the result of having to respond to a catastrophe. Let’s take this opporunity to unify and set ourselves on the course to discourse. Killing more people will never be a solution. This is a war that will only escalate unless we come to terms with our enemy. Demolishing a people until they are virtually gone will never work as a long term strategy as it may have in the past. The only solution in a world of conflicting ideas and ideologies is coming to terms with one another with optimistism and reason. Many religions and ideologies differ in their practices, but as far as I can tell, the only way to co-exist without an endless war is for religions and societies to exist such that they allow others to exist. The first step toward harmony on a planet of many faiths is to understand one another. But this is only the first step. The motivations behind the violence in the world goes beyond conflicting ideologies to the desperate need of water, energy, food, and other resources. There is no other country that epitomizes excess greater than the United States and sadly, the majority of the 6 billion people in this community aren’t getting what they need to live. All eyes are on us. We look like fools killing people who are fighting on behalf of the underserved. I still don’t believe terrorism is justified. However, I do believe it was our wake up call to respond to a world in need of help. We don’t need to seek further retribution. We need to seek solutions. For the first time in history we can make the entire world a better place. But the only way to do so is to offer our help in such a way that we respect the miriad cultures of the world without being condescending or self-righteous. Our country has done many terrible things in the past, as have many other remarkable civilizations of the past. But let’s not loose this magnificent system that is capable of improving life to flaws that we aren’t willing to admit to. The solution for the U.S. is to find ways to renew its goodwill in the world–to be a leader in addressing the needs of the Middle East, Africa, South Asia, and right here in the U.S. People need their faith restored in a system that at its worst looks like it is robbing the poor and at its best is actually improving and increasing productivity. Now to deliver the products and services the world needs.
Posted by: Andrew | November 9, 2006, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Rumsfeld is like Peter Angelos, owner of the Orioles here in Baltimore. Shrewd, successful, disliked, but respected and even feared within the confines of his profession. But doesn’t know jack about baseball, and drove the O’s into the ground trying to micromanage despite strident advice to the contrary from those who actually know what they’re talking about. Screwing up a basball team is not a crime. Screwing up the country, isn’t always either, but it sure as hell should. And when international law is violated, it IS. Last, I am sick of those idiots who have the nerve and utter indecency to draw a comparison to the US and “terrorists”. I think one quote was, “we haven’t chopped anyone’s head off”. That’s something to be proud of? The he11′s the matter with you? Of course we haven’t, because we’re better than that – at least we’re supposed to be. Raise the bar for pete’s sake, and act like AMERICANS.
Posted by: Hank | November 10, 2006, 12:13 am 12:13 am
For you ditto-heads and Hannitized posting your pro-torture screeds here I’ll make it real simple: Torture is evil.
Torture is evil. People who torture are evil. People who give orders to torture are evil. People who support torture are evil.
There. As simple and black and white as any inanity broadcast by Hannity (or ‘Drug’ Rush).
You’re either against the evil-doers, or you’re among them.
Simple.
Posted by: ctrl-z | November 10, 2006, 12:16 am 12:16 am
I have been worried for America. But after reading some of these posts…I am now TERRIFIED!
America is a GREAT country. And what has made it so great, what has made it stand out as shining beacon for the rest of the world to emulate is our due process of law. Our checks and balances. Habeous Corpus (you must be brought before a judge within 24 hours of arrest unlike China where you might never be seen or heard from again…disappear). The civilized way in which we honor the constitution regardless of how emotional the issue is.
We have a history of adhering to those values noblely when is comes to domestic issues.
But somehow, we seem to have collective amnesia when it comes to applying those same great principles to our foreign policy.
No. There is NO JUSTIFICATION for foresaking your VALUES!!! Once you do that, it is only a matter of time before we all start to excuse “fudging” on them domestically until, eventually, they are forgotten.
The oddest thing is that it seems to be the people that talk nonstop about “values” that have none!!! Shame on you ignoramus’ that justify foresaking our values.
Posted by: Susan | November 10, 2006, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Rumsfeld has committed war crimes and should be punished. To bad if Bush gets away with it. Law and order is important. You can’t place yourself or your country abow that just because you feeel special. There’s a big stain on the american flag that needs to get washed off.
Posted by: Jack Riley | November 10, 2006, 2:34 am 2:34 am
War is war. There are aspects that you civilians no NOTHING about and once you can say that YOU have been there…done that…have a nice cup of shut the heck up.
Posted by: Liz | November 10, 2006, 3:17 am 3:17 am
i really think that the new house and senate should focus on what will benefit the ordinary american citizen
the opportunity for change should not be wasted
things were badly done or not done at all
revenge or ‘bounty hunting’ is not going to improve the quality of life
that is what we all want need deserve and are entitled to
a better america
Posted by: sky | November 10, 2006, 4:00 am 4:00 am
None of us ever know the whole story, and if your not responsible for the lives of others, you have NO IDEA (not even a teeny tiny inkling) what you would do.
Posted by: another John | November 10, 2006, 4:45 am 4:45 am
The demand here is that the United States uphold it’s global leadership role as an ethical nation of laws. This suit has nothing to do with juvenile, meathead Neo-conservative claims of “supporting terrorists.” We just had an election in which such silly lines of logic were resoundingly rejected.
This has nothing to do with terrorists. This simply has to do with upholding the highest standards for America.
The goal of all Americans used to be that America would be BOTH the strongest AND the most ethical nation in the world. It’s a shame that Neo-conservatives are cutting and running from the ethical half of that equation. But the rest of us will continue to aspire to things higher and better and more noble.
Posted by: nocore | November 10, 2006, 6:00 am 6:00 am
In case anyone has forgotten, we invaded a Country that had nothing to do with 911, remember?
We are obligated, by International law, to the Geneva Conference. We agreed to not torture individuals, and thus we have broken the law. By-the-way, torture, according to the military, does not produce information of value.
Posted by: Judith | November 10, 2006, 6:07 am 6:07 am
It has been proven that torture does not work. The CIA knows this. The FBI knows this. The DOD and the Pentagon knows this. So do MI5 and MI6. However, it is done anyway. It is done for punishment. The truth isn’t being sought. They are getting people to confess to things that aren’t true.
They’re getting the answers they want instead of the actual truth. That is all that torture is really good for.
Posted by: Mark Collins | November 10, 2006, 6:42 am 6:42 am
I agree that War Crimes should be investigated and prosecuted. But nudity, stress positions, barking dogs? Why don’t we start with the real War Crimes? Beating and beheading would seem to be a better place to start to bring a government or country within the letter of the law. Oh, I forgot, the individuals responsible for those atrocities don’t represent any on goverment or country.
Posted by: Jon | November 10, 2006, 7:33 am 7:33 am
What? We’re kidding right? We’re actually resorting to defending Rumsfeld by saying that Saddam was just as bad?! Damn. We REALLY HAVE given up any and all hope of ever catching a glymps of the much vaunted “moral high ground”, haven’t we? OK, well, I guess it’s reality-teaching time again, so gather round, all you Fairly Imbalanced barking salivating GOP thunder-monkees. Firstly, Saddam WAS tried for war crimes and he was sentenced to death, and secondly, if we DON’T hold Rumsfeld criminally accounbtable, just think of what the next bastard holding that job title – DEMOCRAT or REPUBLICAN – will try to get away with, knowing that he or she is 100% immune from any standard accountability?
Posted by: G. Scott | November 10, 2006, 8:50 am 8:50 am
NO! If we start holding rich and politically powerful criminals accountable under the strict laws written for common people and minorities, sooner or later they’ll eventually get around to arresting our greatest, bravest, and wunnerfullest President ever ever ever, George W. Bush. Then we’ll have ANARCHY. That’s bad.
Posted by: BushFish | November 10, 2006, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Notice that decorated war veterans are always in leadership roles of the antiwar movement? And notice that mama’s boys and evaders who have never served in uniform are the ones shoving this war down our throats?
That tells the whole story right there.
Posted by: Sonny Lyons | November 10, 2006, 9:08 am 9:08 am
The entire Bush administration needs be tried and convicted. I am sick and tired of this fake war on terror that they came up – very clever, Hitler tried and succeded.
Posted by: steve | November 10, 2006, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld are the biggest terrorists in this world. Get rid of them and we’ll have peace and stability. Republicans, get back to your fiscal conservative, isolationist selves and you will be re-elected. The commies in power will increase our taxes and we’ll be like Europe – 1 works and 10 sucks the welfare money.
Posted by: White | November 10, 2006, 9:17 am 9:17 am
I swear I just saw a comment that said Rummy is a great man. Wow.
Look whether or not we’re as bad as “terrorists” or not, is not the point, and never will be the point. Why does someone have to be as bad as someone else when taken to court? Could I have used this in my case when I had to go to court?
“Well, your honor, I’m not as bad as that guy over there, so please don’t try me”.
Of course not. Because that’s idiotic.
Posted by: kevin | November 10, 2006, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Torture brings one end, ONE. The tortured telling you whatever it is he/she feels you want to hear, just so you will stop.
Posted by: joe | November 10, 2006, 9:36 am 9:36 am
I will be satisfied when Rumsfeld, Bush and Cheney, at least, are brought before The Hague. They are war criminals and should be treated thus.
Better yet, they should be charged as “enemy combatants” and disappeared to some tortuous country forever.
They may have been born in America, but they aren’t Americans.
Posted by: SPIIDERWEB™ | November 10, 2006, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Wake-up people! Our beloved United States is the terrorist breeding ground that you all think we have been looking for. Leading the thousands strong terrorist group is G.W. Bush. He is backed by cold and calculating advisors and henchmen Senate and Congress. Our state and local governments ,oil and pharmecutical companies are the tribal warlords with armies of federal and state law enforcment soldiers armed and ready to stamp out any uprising or dissention.
Saddam certainly was only doing what was best and most profitable for his country and those in it whom he felt worthy and shared the same intrest…Just like Bush is doing for the obsurdly wealthy in this country. Bush and Company have most certainly caused more death and suffering worldwide than any other administration (except 3rd Reich) in history…all the while not once since Dec.7 1941 has there been a legitimate threat to our country.——–dont say the trade center. That was a few motivated individuals who happen to actually believe in their cause and were willing to die for it. You think Bush is willing to die for the War on Terror? You think our troops believe that they are protecting their country? NO..they are fighting for each other after being put in a no-win situation by their maniacal Dictator. Just like the Iraqi Soldiers. Difference is- Our terrorist leaders have supplied its troops with cluster bombs, laser-guided missles, GPS, etc…etc.. If the republican guard had those type weapons and U.S. troops only had AK-47′s, grenade launchers and a few tanks..would the U.S. then be considered terrorists? Ooops, I’m getting confused Saddam is not a terrorist, he’s an evil dictator. Right? The terrorist are in afganistan commanded by Osama Bin Laden? Right?…like i said dont mention 9-11, its forgotten along with Bin Laden who vowed to hurt us infadels and claimed responsibilty for the trade center attacks. Oh yeah, now I remember…off to Iraq to remove those terrible “terrorists” weapons of mass destruction. NOT…no WMD’s! no uranium! no nothing! Saddam had not caused the U.S. ,or anyone else for that matter, one second of trouble since he surrendered to clinton. His military was all but disabled. There were no Taliban or Al-Qaeda in Iraq. Now Hussein is going to hang……so should Bush and Rumsfeld and anyone else who can be proven to have invaded, un-provoked, another country and caused loss of life. Does anyone truly believe that this new democratic government in Iraq ( the one that is hanging Saddam) is what the people of Iraq want? NO those are not terrorists blowing up your sons and daughters every day!!! It is the people of Iraq who want their country back from U.S. They want thinks like they were not how the U.S. Government* and Christian church* think it should be.(*one in the same by the way) Oh well..been on a rant.
Before I go: If we assume that laws are made to protect people and their property. You know laws are for the people…right? Well …What is a victim-less crime?, and how can it exist? isn’t that an oxymoron? or sort of like an anhydrous ocean…?
Posted by: Shawn | November 10, 2006, 10:25 am 10:25 am
If techniques were used against un-uniformed combatants for which our troops could not discern an allegience to a specific country, there should not be any concern to the Geneva Convention, they are outlaws. If techniques were used against recognizable uniformed combatants WHOSE country was a signer to the Geneva Convention, then we should abide to the precepts of the convention. You can’t and SHOULDN’T have it both ways.
Posted by: Ray | November 10, 2006, 10:56 am 10:56 am
HA! That’ll be the day that ANY of these neocons face ANY kind of charges, be it for war crimes, treason, illegally shoving thru a bill or law that is unconstitutional, etc, etc. I will bet my next 10 paychecks with ANYONE that NONE of the bush neocons are prosecuted, let alone convicted of ANYTHING. Whoever is thinks otherwise is delusional. Shrub will simple not allow it, or merely pardon anyone and everyone of anything and everything. DUH!!!
Posted by: nikolai | November 10, 2006, 11:42 am 11:42 am
What gets me is the number of posts that try to define what a terrorist is and at the same time, legal combatants versus illegal combatants, wth! As though the context of killing anyone is justified because you drop a bomb from an f16 is different than strapping it on your body…ridiculous! We all know we would anything and by all means to fight an invading force in this country and if were too poor to purchase uniforms or purchase an f16 then we are no longer afforded the rights signed by the geneva convention?! Rumsfeld and crew signed away our credibility as the flag wavers for democracy when we signed our liberties away and gave the ok to torture humans….we have become what we were fighting! We need to rise up and define the America we should be, that includes being a nation that will not give away its liberties because of Fear or strip another humanbeing’s decenty because of Fear. Its the only way we can become the light in the dark room for the world.
Posted by: Aaron | November 10, 2006, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
If it’s good for the goose, it’s good for the gander. Sadam went to trial for what he has done, if Rumsfield broke the law, he should pay for it. And, they should use the same intrerrogation tactics that he okayed to see if he confesses.
Posted by: jason morris | November 10, 2006, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
The Geneva Convention does not apply therefore there were no war crimes committed.
Posted by: irvin | November 10, 2006, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Few, if any of you, have one bit of truth in your possession to know what is truly going on over there or why this war is being fought. If you think the media is giving you any facts, you are also a fool. If you have ever worked at that level of government, you see things that would scare the pants off of the common citizen. And no decision is made solely by anyone. Did you know that the nations surrounding Iraq all quietly thanked us for eliminating Saddam? Do you also know that the new leader of Iran subscribes to a religion that says he cannot go to heaven until a war is waged with the West? Guess who that is. The war is being fought closer to the enemy right now, versus here. There are many, many dangerous plots in place as we speak, all waiting for the right time. I know that Rumsfeld is an honest and caring person. He is equally dislike in Washington because he tells the truth too much and shakes up the establishment. Be very careful with judging someone based on what you read in the papers. They are only showing you what fits between the advertisements. Lastly, it has become increasingly difficult to determine if my neighbor is an ally or enemy. Our country is filled with lots of opinion makers and few listeners who act. Time for that to change.
Posted by: Mike | November 10, 2006, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
If you believe torture works, you believe the Bush/Cheny/Rumsfeld propaganda. If you believe we have only tortured terrorists, again you believe the lies. Get a grip, we’ve been lied to, cheated and treated like fools by this administration. The end result they wanted was permanent bases in Iraq and a compliant Iraqi government of stooges. That plan is now over, and the architects of this criminal war deserve justice.
Posted by: arg | November 10, 2006, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
WE WANT ACCOUNTABILITY! WE WANT ACCOUNTABILITY! WE WANT ACCOUNTABILITY!
THEY LIED AND PEOPLE DIED!!!
Posted by: JG | November 10, 2006, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
My father, a career senior master sergeant and veteran of Korea, taught me the value, the courage and the honor of our Americans in uniform. He also taught me that when you are in charge, you are responsible. As Secretary of Defense, Rumsfeld failed to prevent 911. He appropriately invaded Afghanistan, but failed to get Osama. Iran is the country that has the weapons of mass destruction, the overwhelming support of terrorism, and the extremist Islamic leaders, not Iraq. Most of the 911 terrorists came from our “friends” in Saudi, not Iraq. He invaded the wrong country, and failed in a botched effort to secure the wrong country, creating a situation far worse than had he done nothing. I find it remarkable that anyone is concerned that he may have had a few terrorists humiliated, in the face of his unbroken record of failure in the defense of our country, and his responsibility for the deaths of thousands of Americans in uniform through incompetence.
Posted by: Frazier | November 10, 2006, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
For the worried american. The facts are plain as day, Clinton did’t finish what he started. You don’t have the facts. Too many people are buring their heads in the sand and not seeing th real problem TOO LIBERAL DEMOCRATS what joke. Let see them do something besides run there mouth
Posted by: Buffy | November 10, 2006, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
The Germans have a bit of a jurisdiction problem. A trial in absentia is a joke and I doubt very much if Rummy is going to go to Germany to face trial. So basically what they’re doing is thumping their chest.
Posted by: Anon | November 10, 2006, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
I can’t believe what I’m reading. Every blog I go to is the same old arguments. How can people seem to view every single issue so differently?
Posted by: nitpicker | November 10, 2006, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
He is a war criminal. He deserves this.
Posted by: NM | November 10, 2006, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Where does the terrorists keep “our” P.O.W’s ?
Oh, I forgot… they dont, they chop off their heads. Burn them and drag them through the street.
Geneva convention? I don’t think it applies here!
I say blow them all to hell! and get it over with.
We won world war II because we had a President that was not afraid to use the weapons he had.
Our President needs the same type of courage today. I’m not talking going Nuclear here, we don’t need that.
We are the most powerfull nation on earth and have enough bombs, rockets, tanks and aircraft to get the job done but are afraid of “public approval”…
Our sons and daughters are dying over there, not for “our” country but theirs. Maybe they need to do a little dying for “their own” country!
ENOUGH!
Posted by: Ben S | November 11, 2006, 12:26 am 12:26 am
An international justice group under UN sanction, I believe, is currently trying a Ugandan for war crimes. If we are to return to a christian nation and be accountable for our actions, it will be interesting if Rumsfeld is next up for trial. Too many continue to die, so who is to be held accountable for this mess?
Posted by: benvictor | November 11, 2006, 7:45 am 7:45 am
Ironicly we ourselves have unleashed weapons of mass destruction in the form of continued agression against Iraq. We have created a level of hatred against our nation in the hearts of millions of people – it is our children that will now be threatened by those that grow with fear and hate of America. This is a fear and hate that this misguided and illegal war has spurred.
Religious fanatics that threaten those who do not agree with them with war and destruction?? I am talking about the Republican war machine and the discredit and shame it has brought to our nation. This nation is founded on free thinking and freedom of speech and thought – not on domination of the weak and using brutality against those who live and think differently from us.
God bless America and our victimized soldiers – our soldiers are not to blame – the blame falls on the self rightious leaders that have failed to do their duty and that have followed their own self serving agendas. Our men in arms and a civilian Iraqis population have had their lives sacrificed by misguided leadership from Washington.
It is time to end the hate and fighting and strive for peace both in Iraq, in the world, and in our own nation. Peace starts in your own heart. Let’s forgive our misguided leaders and replace them with those who at least try to foster peace.
Posted by: synergy | November 11, 2006, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Rumfeld and Bush are the real terrorist. Trial them both.
Posted by: mike | November 11, 2006, 9:45 am 9:45 am
The issue here is that under international law, everyone has rights… even the terrorists. An accord was signed, by us, and we didn’t follow it. Thats the case being brought here. Yes, its unfortunate what the terrorists did, but thats irrelevant. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Most arguments against this trial are that they did wrong first. We broke international law, therefore, we must reap the consequences.
Posted by: james | November 11, 2006, 11:20 am 11:20 am
This isn’t a good idea…allowing other countries to have jurisdiction over U.S. actions means that we become subservient to them.
I definitely do not support U.S. tactics and the decisions being made about Iraq, but I don’t think that allowing other countries to be able to dictate American policy os a good idea.
-History and American Government teacher
Posted by: Nick | November 11, 2006, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Do you guys have any idea how many innocent people have died in Iraq for Weapons of Mass Destruction? I mean… they are jealous of our Democracy.The adminstration should be held accountable.Well their our self serving agenda. Our leaders need to be replaced. Starting with the Commanderin Chief.
Posted by: Jaime | November 11, 2006, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Help me out for one second… We detain Iraqis, who may or may not be trying to exact revenge against the armed men who bombed their wife,child, brother…ect, label them “terrorists”, torture them to get information about the fight they are leading against the American Invaders, and continue to occupy? The Iraqi people have every right to kill every single American who crosses the border of that country with a gun. Period.
If Kim Jong Il stepped foot on US soil with so much as switchblade I would end his life without a thought. Why do we think the Iraqis should be without that right?
Last thought, the people who hijacked the airplanes and hit the towers were not from Iraq. THINK!
Posted by: Jordan Jackson | November 11, 2006, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
I am happy that Rumsfield is out.
Yes, Rumsfield should face a war crime charges. He should be found guilty of a war crime. Donald Rumsfield was very disgusting man I ever seen. Showing naked men in Iraq. President Bush should also be facing a war crime charges for violating international law. It is wrong for U.S. troops to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. I would like U.S. troops to pull out immediately without delay.
Posted by: Sergio | November 11, 2006, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Rumsfeld should be held accountable for the part he played in violating the Constitution of the United States. It states that all men (not just citizens) have the right to the pursuit of happiness. The role he played in the Iraq war, and the War of Terror had caused many innocent people much sufferring. What kind of country is this of ours if we are letting criminals get away with murder?
Posted by: Aaron | November 11, 2006, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Donald rumsfeld is punishable for what he has done,but he is only a scapegoat.The actual person(bush ) is still behind the curtian and is the main force behind allthese atrocities in iraq ,which led to the death of american soliders and innocent iraq’s
Posted by: hari | November 12, 2006, 9:17 am 9:17 am
it is not a war crime torturing and exterminating terrorists. liberals are stupid people wishing to destory America and they even helped Uncle Joe Stalin get the bomb by passing secrets to the Soviets. I don’t recognize German authority beyond their borders. Germans, however, still have many un-arrested and un-tried war criminals living inside Germany. Let Germans deal with those if they are so hot-to-trot for “justice.”
Posted by: fred | November 12, 2006, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
aw, torturing and exterminating terrorists make poor liberals gag.
poor babies, find a corner and do a few kumbayas…..
Posted by: fred | November 12, 2006, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
it is not a war crime torturing and exterminating the scumbag terriorst.
Also, if you morons would realize just one thing you might keep your traps shut and that is…IF Bush was a well liked president then it would NOT matter to anybody what he or his staff did. It is only that he is not liked and so, everyone LOOKS for something to complain about. I think the prisnors should have been treated a lot worse then they were. I also wonder whos side Ratner is on
Posted by: Gary | November 13, 2006, 7:16 am 7:16 am
I think alot of you who are against the process used with these prisoners should remember 9-11, If it causes these men to talk about their plans of attack. Then go for it. Lack of sleep, and the rest have cause humiliation, but have yet to cut off a prisoners head. Let’s stop being soft on these people. If the USA is so damn bad, then simply leave.
Posted by: Craig | November 13, 2006, 8:58 am 8:58 am
It’s amazing how quickly we forget what happened in 9/11, and how quickly we as Americans would like to forget what happened during the 90′s remember that we lost several hundred lives at a couple of embassies? How are we so ignorant to believe that many of the people interrogated are not willing to do the same again? If we are using harsh techniques to get the information, we are avoiding true harm that could be done to OUR OWN people. How do we not prioritize the protection of our own? I think those in leadership during the mid 90′s should be held accountable for the losses of lives in our embassies as well as on 9/11 given that they could have done more to interrogate and find information. The Republicans were only in charge for 9 months before 9/11. What about the previous years that were wasted? How do you feel sorry for living terrorists but feel no sympathy for the dead and their families? Stronger early actions could have prevented lives lost today (for our soldiers and for the Iraqis/Afghanistanis).
Posted by: Vince | November 13, 2006, 10:43 am 10:43 am
arrogance => ignorance => incompetence
Posted by: an analyst | November 13, 2006, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Rumsfeld is a hero…not one attack on American Soil since 9-11. Thank God these liberal do-gooders were around during WWII. We would have never beat the Germans or the Japanese….What about Dresden…we killed over 100,000 (innocent) civilians in one night of fire bombing…should Roosevelt and Churchill be charged with War crimes?? stupid people…America is losing the initiative in Iraq, because we are too careful not to kill innocents and damage mosques…Total war is the only way to be an insurgency..I prefer the Golden Rule – He who has the Gold, Rules!!! Rummy should moon the Democrats on the way out, because the men and women in the trenches still love him.
Posted by: michael Hammond | November 13, 2006, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Univeral Law…? Puleez…. Oh, Rumsfeld will never be brought to trial. Nor would any country try to seize him (no smart country anyway)… Germany won’t… it needs our aid. Heck, most of the world needs our aid. You should also know that our Congress passed a law requiring our President to use military force to free any soilder, and government official, seized in one of the show-boat trials.
Posted by: Kurt | November 13, 2006, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
I highly recommend to CCR the addition of “President” George W. Bush, President-VICE Richard B. Cheney, and Secretary of State Condileeza Rice to the lawsuit. These individuals are just as culpable as Rumsfeld because they cooperated with this graduate of the Richard M. Nixon presidency.
Posted by: K Trout | November 13, 2006, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
I keep hearing how the US is as bad as the terrorists……well, I don’t know where any American has chopped the head off some prisoner. It’s war and stuff happens.
Posted by: David | Nov 9, 2006 1:20:09 PM
You haven’t heard about oh, a black man being dragged by chain behind a truck? That happened right here in America just a few short years ago. You didn’t hear about a latin woman being dragged behind a truck until dead? Happened here in America, this year.
Geneva Convention? HAH! American “leadership” does as it pleases, or didn’t anyone notice?
Rumsfeld lied, not just in this war, he lied during the George Sr. admin. to begin the war back then. He is not a hero.
He is a serial psychopath in a suit and tie in a professional position with a sociopathic smile.
IF “Americans” had any morals or human life values at all Donald Rumsfeld should have been removed all together a long time ago. Oh yes he should be tried for war crimes… He performed it using troops of our children.
Posted by: blondmadison | November 13, 2006, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Former administrations must be spinning in their grave. Not only was the Convention violated, but long after this was public knowledge, the Bush Administration *continued* to do their best to weaken it by redefining what “torture” meant. As a veteran, I am aghast at what occurred, and I sincerely doubt the bulk of the troops support him.
I’d stop using “Liberal” as a slur, btw – you do understand it stems from the word, “Liberty”?
Posted by: Drew | November 14, 2006, 12:01 am 12:01 am
It seems there is little doubt lines were crossed but as to whether war crimes were committed I can’t say. If I had to take sides I would probably give Mr. Rumsfeld the benefit of the doubt considering the threat not only the United States faced but as events have proven, the world.
Posted by: Howzilla | November 14, 2006, 9:37 am 9:37 am
WHAT?! The Germans are the absolute LAST people who should accuse anybody of committing war crimes. Get real. Donald Rumsfeld should have done a better job in the planning stages of the Iraq invasion, that much is true. But when people in a country like Germany, which still owns the trophy for top prize in “war crimes”, accuses Rumsfeld of such, it’s strikes me as outright absurd.
Posted by: mike garcia | November 14, 2006, 10:23 am 10:23 am
SPO, it is quite obvious that you neither have any basis for what you say nor are over the defeat suffered by the Republicans because of their own incompetence, stupidity, and corruption.
Let the trials begin! It will only serve to show the rest of the world that we do hold ourselves to the highest of standards – it will add to our credibility as a nation and eliminate a source of criticism from many nations, including our “allies.”
Cindy, I don’t know how you can bring up the money that will be spent on subsequent trials, are there to be any, given the pointless amount of time and money that Republicans spent on the Clinton impeachment because of him lying about his sexual exploits. Bush has lied countless more times about far worse things, but has yet to be put on trial because the corrupt Reupblicans have been in power.
Posted by: MKR | November 14, 2006, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
The quality of writing on here is abysmal. Spelling, grammar, just horrible, can there be ‘crimes against language?’ You’re all guilty.
Nevertheless, like it or not, Bush and Rumsfeld have done one thing that no one thought they could do…keep our enemies abroad from attacking us on our soil again.
Jack Nicholson’s performance in “A Few Good Men” was right on. To paraphrase: There are so many people in this country who rise and fall by the very blanket of security that the President and the Defense Secretary uphold, and then to question the manner in which they provide that security? Either get a weapon and stand a post, or just be grateful that you still have a country in which to complain about anything and everything.
I love my country. Through thick and thin, I love the USA. We had slavery, we had Jim Crow, we oppressed women, the Irish…the list goes on and on. It does for every country though, and in the end, I firmly believe that the power constituted by this great nation of ours, has been used to do far more good than evil. Republican or Democrat, I truly do not believe either one wants us to fail, wants to deliberately oppress a foreign populace or has grand designs on some new world order. We are a great nation, in spite or ourselves at times, we are a great nation. Don’t forget that.
Posted by: Jon Q | November 14, 2006, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Jon Q, your statement insinuates that attacks would have happened again had Bush not been in office. Aside from the obvious falacy in that argument, you are missing the fact that Bush knew about the attacks in advance and did nothing, so one could argue that the attacks happened in the first place because Bush was in office. (But, I cannot rightfully argue that because not all of the possibilities have been tested to determine that…)
I can argue, however, that attacking Iraq was not necessary to maintain security in America. The fact that we have to devote billions of dollars just to fix the mess over there that Bush helped create, including its own new cauldron of terrorism, should convince you of that.
Posted by: MKR | November 14, 2006, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
What utter nonsense! This is akin to the Spanish Inquisition, 21st century style, fueled by yellow journalism, rabid leftist ignorance and sour grapes.
Ratner and his misnamed CCR are circumventing OUR OWN Constitution by filing their allegations not in the U.S., but in Germany, a country which has no involvement in the issues at hand, and certainly no judicial purview or oversight of American policies.
Germany has previously declined participating in this farce and will do so again. Ratner and his CCR ought to find something legitimate to take issue with that benefits America in order to get themselves in the press.
Posted by: Paul | November 14, 2006, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
What utter nonsense! This is akin to the Spanish Inquisition, 21st century style, fueled by yellow journalism, rabid leftist ignorance and sour grapes.
Ratner and his misnamed CCR are circumventing OUR OWN Constitution by filing their allegations not in the U.S., but in Germany, a country which has no involvement in the issues at hand, and certainly no judicial purview or oversight of American policies.
Germany has previously declined participating in this farce and will do so again. Ratner and his CCR ought to find something legitimate to take issue with that benefits America in order to get themselves in the press.
Posted by: Paul | November 14, 2006, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Howdy there John Q! That was some mighty find paraphrasing ya’ll did back their above. That Jack Michelson guy is sure a great actor and he darn sure nows what he’s talking about.
And ya’ll write on that language thing. People aught to be shot for how they mispell words and such.
Posted by: gus | November 14, 2006, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
It’s amazing how out of touch the US is with the majority or world opinion.
Posted by: Ray | November 15, 2006, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
The Bush administration is developing a parallel legal system in which terrorism suspects — U.S. citizens and noncitizens alike — may be investigated, jailed, interrogated, tried and punished without legal protections guaranteed by the ordinary system — This is called the patriot act 2. If you disagree, i strongly urge you to go read the contents.
Donald Rumsfeld — The man who told you that Flight 93 was shot down over PA? The man who said there were WMD and then said that he’d never said there were WMD. The man who addressed 3000 American troops on enemy territory, when asked why they were being shorted on essential supplies replied, “You go to war with the army that you have, not necessarily the army that you want.”? The man that involved in the controversial 1994 deal in which the U.S. agreed to provide North Korea with two light-water nuclear reactors in exchange for Pyongyang ending its nuclear weapons program. As he sat on the board of the company that won a $200 million contract to provide the design and key components for the reactors. ? The man who on the last time saw Saddam Hussein,gave a cordial handshake. The date was almost 20 years ago, Dec. 20, 1983.
This all moulds in to form the man that he is..Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious arrogance, a duplicitous chickenhawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and tinker-toy Napoleon.
Posted by: Matt | November 15, 2006, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Donald Rumsfeld — The man who told you that Flight 93 was shot down over PA? The man who said there were WMD and then said that he’d never said there were WMD. The man who addressed 3000 American troops on enemy territory, when asked why they were being shorted on essential supplies replied, “You go to war with the army that you have, not necessarily the army that you want.”? The man that involved in the controversial 1994 deal in which the U.S. agreed to provide North Korea with two light-water nuclear reactors in exchange for Pyongyang ending its nuclear weapons program. As he sat on the board of the company that won a $200 million contract to provide the design and key components for the reactors. ? The man who on the last time saw Saddam Hussein,gave a cordial handshake. The date was almost 20 years ago, Dec. 20, 1983.
This all moulds in to form the man that he is..Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious arrogance, a duplicitous chickenhawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and tinker-toy Napoleon.
Posted by: Matt | November 15, 2006, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
I HOPE RUMSFELD GETS SENT TO IRAQ SO THAT AN IRAQUI COURT WOULD JUDGE HIM. HE DESERVES TO BE HANGED JUST LIKE SADAMM, I CAN BELIEVE THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DONT SEE THAT THE BUSH KLAN USED THE CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT TO MAKE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS YOU SUCKERS. THE BUSHES CONTROL THE OIL NOW THEY WANT TO CONTROL WATER IF YOU DONT BELIEVE ME THE BUSH FAMILY BOUGHT OVER 100K ACRES OF LAND IN SOUTH AMERICAN ABOVE THE WORLD LARGEST FRESH WATER RESERVOIR. I HOPE BUSH, CHENEY, ROVE AND ALL THOSE KLAN MEMBER GET WHAT THEY DESERVE.
Posted by: JUAN POLAINS | November 15, 2006, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Ray – what the heck? that was my original post..
Posted by: matt | November 15, 2006, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
I love it when people refer to Saddam and all he’s done as ‘worse’ than what we’ve committed. Could some of those people tell us what those atrocities were, actually tell us. I’m not extolling his virtues here, nor am I condoning his actions. But the truth of the matter is those who accuse Saddam of ‘worse’ can’t explain what ‘worse’ is. The most commonly known fact is that he gassed the kurds. Yes, he did. And my government has gassed me for my dissent, here in Canada, albeit I was not put to death but a rose is a rose. My government used chemical weapons to subdue dissent. Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney inniated a war, pre-emptively. And according to their own law, THEIR OWN LAW, they are to be punished.
If we let them ride in the sunset we will eventually be next. That probably sounds brooding to those who believe we live in a rainbow, but trust us, the ignorant will be the first against the wall.
Posted by: Dario Verrelli | November 16, 2006, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Bush attacked an innocent country. A criminal plain and simple.
AGAIN 9/11 HAD NOTHING HEAR ME
NOTHING TO DO WITH IRAQ
The torture, the deaths of hundreds of
thousands of civilians, Americans are criminals.
Posted by: Jean | November 20, 2006, 8:52 am 8:52 am
The Bush administration is guilty of killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, thousands of our finest military men and women, and diminished our respect throughout the world and among our own citizens. these crimes deserve the most severe punishment.
Posted by: john | November 22, 2006, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
They don’t play by any rules set out by the Geneva Convention and Cheney’s group Halliburton has made billions of this as has Blackwater — THEY SHOULD ALL FACE JAIL TIME
Posted by: HATETHEBUSH | December 11, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm