Jan 28, 2007 5:42pm

Mitt Romney: The Interview

20070126 dubuque04 lrg Mitt Romney: The InterviewSo after spending a long day campaigning in Iowa with Mitt Romney, I was struck by a couple of things: First, the number of people who came out to see him even now, a full year before the caucuses. There were a couple hundred people in both Waterloo and Dubuque–for a candidate with low name recognition at this point in the race. There’s clearly a lot of buzz around this guy right now.

And there’s something else. This winter, Iowa is burning with presidential political fever–in both parties. Veteran activists and reporters find it striking just how tuned in so many Iowans are to the race at this point, how intense the game’s already gotten. This early enthusiasm for the presidential race might stem from many factors–the wide-open nature of this coming contest, the sense many people have that the country’s off course somehow–but it also seems to me it’s a sign the Bush era is over. Even for many Republicans, the president is a such a thoroughly known quantity–a man who will not surprise anyone and whose course is set in stone–that there is a palpable sense the time has come to look forward. Eagerly.

The other thing that struck me is Mitt Romney himself: He is personable and smart. He’s done his homework. He takes tough questions without blinking and dodges them like a member of the great Average Joe’s ‘s squad–just as all top politicians do these days. And he’s already got what seems to be a crackerjack team on the ground. Watch for him; he’s a real contender.

Here are a couple of excerpts from the sit-down interview I had with him. You can see it on ABC News’ World News Sunday, Good Morning America on Monday, and a of course a full report on Nightline Monday night.

I’ll be blogging more about it later.

ON PRESIDENT BUSH:

Moran:  “Would you describe yourself as a Bush Republican?”

Romney: “I describe myself as a conservative who I hope will be thought of as a thinking conservative. And that means I don’t just knee jerk react to every issue that comes up. I’m a little different than other folks. I don’t think anyone can be pigeon holed in one particular bucket or another–if you pardon the mix of metaphors. I’ve said, allow people to understand who I am, understand my perspective on issues. Understand where I stand, understand my principles and values and then they can decide whether that’s for them or not.”

Moran:  “So one of the issues before voters will be President Bush’s leadership. Grade him.”

Romney: “Well I don’t give grades to anybody, including myself.”

Moran:  “But that is an issue.  How well has he done?”

Romney: “Well, when I look at President Bush, I respect that he is a man of character and conviction. I don’t believe for a minute those people who ascribe ulterior motives, or say he’s not telling the truth. I think he’s done as well as he believes he can possibly do and he’s done it out of a compassion for this country and a belief that what he is doing is right for America….Has he made any mistakes? Of course, he’s a human being. Clearly our conduct with the conflict in Iraq has not been something which has been perfect. Part of the problem that we face today is a result of the mistakes that we’ve made over the last three years. That being said, our president is a person who is doing his very best, listening to his advisors, and doing whatever he can to help the American people.”

ON IRAQ:

Moran: "Was it the right thing for the United States to invade Iraq?"

Romney: "Well I supported the president at the time. He indicated that based on intelligence we had weapons of mass destruction as a threat to this land. He proposed a solution and I supported it. And I’m not going back and trying to second guess that. I don’t have the data or the inside sources to suggest doing that."

Moran: "We have a lot of data now though.  Would you, knowing what we know now, have supported an invasion against Iraq?"

Romney: "I’ll go back and say again, I wouldn’t make a decision like that without extensive data and analysis, and without the input of a lot of different people. Putting Americas men and women in harms way has to follow a process which has a very high bar to clear. And im not gonna try and go back and look at that particular conflict. But I can tell you what I’d do now. And, that is that, as long as there’s a pathway to success, we ought to pursue that. If the pathway gets closed off and there’s no visible way of achieving our success then you go to plan B. But plan A is to try and achieve a success….But that’s far from being a certain thing. And it may not even be a high probability. But as long as there’s a reasonable probability of success, it’s something you have to pursue. And if you reach a point where milestones aren’t being met, and there’s no prospect of success, then and only then do you consider any other options."

Moran: "So you’d be prepared as president to pull the troops out even if there was no success in Iraq?"

Romney: "I’m not going to describe scenarios I don’t want to think about. We are where we are today."

ON BEING A MORMON

Moran: “You’re a Mormon. Would you describe yourself as a devout Mormon, a true believer?”

Romney: “Absolutely. I’m proud of my faith, part of my heritage. I think the American people respect individuals of faith. That’s the kind of people want to lead the country. I don’t think they get into doctrines and if you will the periphery of a faith. My faith has made me a better person than I would have been otherwise…

Moran:  “You may be the most serious Mormon candidate for president the country has ever had, and a lot of Americans don’t know much about the faith–at some point polygamy was involved, et cetera. Is that a hurdle for you?”

Romney: “I think people are going to not spend a lot of time looking at a religion of a candidate. Everytime I consider our history of the nation, I look back at someone like John F. Kennedy, people thought his faith was going to be an issue that just got overwhelmed by the differences and the perspective and character and viewpoints and issues. When I ran for governor of Mass. At the beginning people said gosh what do you think about his religion? And that was quickly brushed aside and the real issues because the central focus. I think the same thing will happen at the national level. After all I subscribe to what Abraham Lincoln called American’s political religion. That is you abide by the constitution and the rule of law. And when you take the oath of office, that’s your highest responsibility.”

Moran:  “I don’t want to press you on this. As people get to know you and get to know your faith they may have questions…for example, like do you believe that the garden of Eden was in Missouri  and that Jesus Christ’s Second Coming will be there. Or that God has a physical body? Do you expect those questions? How would you handle them?”

Romney: “I don’t expect those questions. What I expect people to do is to say there are differences between faith, theology is different, but we don’t judge a candidate based on the theology of the religion they grew up in. my family’s heritage is in our faith and I’m proud of that. But I’m not going to go through and cafeteria style talk about each doctrine, and which I accept. That’s not the nature of a campaign. As Dr. Richard Lance said, I’m not running for pastor in chief. And the differences between faith really aren’t what’s critical. Instead I look at the commonality of faith. And in our faith, like the other faiths in this land, we try and serve others with compassion. We believe in a divine creator. We believe in the family nature of humankind, we believe in marriage, and devotion to our spouse, and to our kids.”

User Comments

Outstanding Interview, can’t wait to watch Nightline tonight!
Here is a great site about Mitt Romney where people can educate themselves and decided if he is the right person for 2008:
http://www.mittreport.com
www dot mittreport dot com

Posted by: Mitt Report | January 29, 2007, 10:57 am 10:57 am

More and more, I’m becoming very impressed with Romney! I think that he is the best Conservative in the field!

Posted by: Jacosta | January 29, 2007, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Very impressed with Mr. Romney, as he sounds like what a president should be. However, speaking of faith, my faith in the America voters and media to actually elect somone like Mr. Romney is very weak. It’s rather funny to see nowadays how there are few issues that matter, like race or gender, in electing our president. But I think the Mormon question is sometimes a topic that brings out the worst in some people. For Mr. Romney’s sake, let’s hope people judge him for his record, accomplishments and values instead of the inner workings of his religion.

Posted by: MJ | January 29, 2007, 11:59 am 11:59 am

The pigeon who punched a hole in the bucket of my knee jerk dreams of peace.
Straight shooter, fast talker, Romney has this game down.
I have no doubts as to his integrity, but I’ll take Obama to diffuse Osama, a man with the symmetry and track record to say no to Iraq and back it up in action…kill him with kindness, if you will.
Just having seen the documentary “Why We Fight”, I’ll lay a small wager that should Obama win, and follow a path for peace, he’ll be dead inside of a year.

Posted by: jm burkard | January 29, 2007, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Terri! Open your eyes! Do you think that squinting like that makes you look thoughtful? I don’t think you were really thinking, the sun must have been in your eyes, because those questions have been asked hundreds of times before, of Governor Romney. Aren’t you guys getting tired of asking the same old things over and over and over?

Posted by: mike | January 29, 2007, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

You have to give it up. Mitt Romney is good. Obama come on, the guy has no expierence but the media are just so in love with him and Hillary, its sickening

Posted by: W of DFW | January 29, 2007, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

America will not elect as president another child of privilege (Mitt Romney, like george Bush) who refuses to directly answer a question. The war was either right or wrong. if you haven’t analyzed it by now, you never will. Get out of your SUV and put your ears to the ground!

Posted by: Joe | January 29, 2007, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Mitt Romney is going to turn a lot of heads in this race. Finally we have someone who has an impressive record, morals, and who is smart…very smart. In my opinion, it will be a Romney vs. Obama battle to the end.

Posted by: ian C. | January 29, 2007, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

I was disappointed that you were so caught up in the fact that he was a mormon that you actually misspelled the word on your poll to read “Morman”. More time should be spent on more important questions instead of absent-mindedly asking ridiculous questions with little or no bearing on his political position.

Posted by: Brett | January 30, 2007, 1:24 am 1:24 am

On being Mormon
We have no problem with presidents and prophesy…didn’t God tell George Bush to invade Iraq? (he said God, I think it was the red guy with the tail).
And didn’t George Washington have visions of the Virgin Mary and the end of the republic?
Finally, somebody tell Mitt’s wife that there have been 3 documented cases of healing MS using the rosary.

Posted by: jm burkard | January 30, 2007, 3:29 am 3:29 am

As a citizen of Massachusetts, I find Romney repugnant…a self-serving, self-important, hypocrite who flagrantly and shamelessly manipulated and used the people of the Commonwealth for his own political purposes.
And he’ll do the same for this country.
The man is a silver spoon elitist, a poser, and not to be trusted.

Posted by: Peter | January 30, 2007, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Hey Peter…he balanced Massachussetts books and even gave them a “rainy day” fund. I would say that is a great feat to perform while posing!

Posted by: Kurt | January 30, 2007, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

In addition, did he not provide health care for everyone in MA that did not already have it? Libs should be signing him praises except for the fact that it was a Repub that accomplished this feat. Also, I found it quite refreshing that he stepped out of the limelight and did not run for Gov. again because his running for President would hamper his ability to govern the state. Kerry & Kennedy could learn something from Mitt.

Posted by: Mark | January 30, 2007, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Terry,
I would have liked to hear you speak about what real evangelicals think of Mitt Romney’s candidacy, given that you spent so much time on the “mormon question”.
Check out http://www.evangelicalsformitt.com if you haven’t already.

Posted by: murphy | January 30, 2007, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

I saw Mitt on Nightline and read the transcript of his interview. As a Republican, it was all extremely embarrasing. He is obviously a poor communicator at a time in our national life when we need an excellent communicator in the White House. By his bumbling interview, he has clearly disqualified himself to be our next President.
Liberals would love to have Mitt to run against next year because he would be easy to defeat. So, you can be quite certain that they will do everything they can to see that Mitt is the Republican candidate in the next election. That, of course, would be the worst of all scenarios because the nation would then be zapped were he to win and zapped were he to loose, i.e., heaven on planet earth for all liberals.

Posted by: Sunny | January 31, 2007, 2:00 am 2:00 am

Do not get me wrong the constitution is the greatest document ever. At the same time I question on its protection of its citizens women, civil rights and all. I cannot trust a presidential canidate that will not stand up to protecting my rights as an American I take my vote seriously and that is what scares me more religious rhetoric making the constitution of the United States into the Neo-Conservative Laws of America. We are a democracy, not a land of theology.

Posted by: DJW1TX | February 2, 2007, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

The United States is rightfully a democracy and not a theocracy.
There is an old caution that goes,” Don’t get above your raising.”
One of our founding followers, James Madison, is often called the “Author of the United States Constitution”.
Let me enter the following paste please:
At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, James Madison proposed the plan to divide the central government into three branches. He discovered this model of government from the Perfect Governor, as he read
Isaiah 33:22;
“For the LORD is our judge, [judicial]
the LORD is our lawgiver, [legislative]
the LORD is our king; [executive]
He will save us.”

Posted by: ebbarn | February 14, 2007, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Terry –
Guiliani was married three times. McCain was married twice. Romney is married only once. Why are we asking Mitt Romney about his views of 19th century polygamy? He’s the one with the fewest wives.
Next time you get a chance to interview a presidential hopeful ask him/her the tough questions I want to know…Where do you stand today with Iraq? (not five years ago…today!) Where do you stand with Iran? And how do you expect to cut government spending without losing services and while building a stronger national defense? Mitt has voluntarily told us where he stands with family values. It’s the media’s job to find out what he has not told us. Forget the polygamy question, please.

Posted by: Russ | February 15, 2007, 2:36 am 2:36 am

While polygamy was a practice of the Mormon faith, it has been disavowed and is only practiced by extreme splinter groups today. While more recent in the Mormon system polygamy was practiced by ancient Old Testament culture.
Christianity has been picked apart for 2 millennia. Later prophets have fostered strange sects seeking to claim to be Christian, but are as far from the Christian faith as can be imagined. We must always be wary of such sects. If they seek to exist, then they have no legitimate right as being called Christian.
I think a comparison of the Lord God Jesus Christ and his apostles of the New Testament to Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, and the early Mormon leaders. Just what did they actually do and what was their personal lifestyle and social system? Is the Christ of the New Testament the same christ of the Mormon practices? What are the differences and why?
Could I vote for Romney? Yes I could but that would depend on how the political field plays out. It would depend on who was running against him as it would my support of any candidate. I do not commit to Democrat or Republican parties. I am not attached to either.
Again the religious faith is legitimate scrutiny because it is a dominate basis on which decisions are made.

Posted by: ebbarn | February 15, 2007, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.