Whistle-blower Had to Fight NSA, LA Times to Tell Story
Whistle-blower AT&T technician Mark Klein says his effort to reveal alleged government surveillance of domestic Internet traffic was blocked not only by U.S. intelligence officials but also by the top editors of the Los Angeles Times. In his first broadcast interview, as seen tonight on Nightline, Klein describes how he stumbled across "secret NSA rooms" being installed at an AT&T switching center in San Francisco and later heard of similar rooms in at least six other cities, including Atlanta, San Diego, Los Angeles, Palo Alto, San Jose and Seattle. "You needed an ordinary key and the code to punch into a key pad on the door, and the only person who had both of those things was the one guy cleared by the NSA," Klein says of the "secret room" at the AT&T center in San Francisco. Click Here for Brian Ross’ Nightline Report on Mark Klein. The NSA is the National Security Agency, the country’s most secretive intelligence agency, charged with intercepting communications overseas. Klein says he collected 120 pages of technical documents left around the San Francisco office showing how the NSA was installing "splitters" that would allow it to copy both domestic and international Internet traffic moving through AT&T connections with 16 other trunk lines. "It’s gobs and gobs of information going across the Internet," Klein says. President Bush has acknowledged he authorized the NSA to intercept the communications of people with known links to terrorist organizations "into or out of the United States," but that "we’re not trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans." Intelligence experts say the NSA has the means to filter out suspect communications with sophisticated machines that spot key words, names, addresses or patterns. Eventually, Klein says he decided to take his documents to the Los Angeles Times, to blow the whistle on what he calls "an illegal and Orwellian project." Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage. But after working for two months with LA Times reporter Joe Menn, Klein says he was told the story had been killed at the request of then-Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte and then-director of the NSA Gen. Michael Hayden. The Los Angeles Times’ decision was made by the paper’s editor at the time, Dean Baquet, now the Washington bureau chief of The New York Times. Baquet confirmed to ABCNews.com he talked with Negroponte and Hayden but says "government pressure played no role in my decision not to run the story." Baquet says he and managing editor Doug Frantz decided "we did not have a story, that we could not figure out what was going on" based on Klein’s highly technical documents. The reporter, Menn, declined to comment, but Baquet says he knows "Joe disagreed and was very disappointed." Klein says he then took his AT&T documents to The New York Times, which published its exclusive account last April. As the new Washington bureau chief of The New York Times, Baquet now oversees the reporters who have broken most of the major stories involving the government surveillance program, often over objections from the government. After The New York Times story appeared, Klein filed an affidavit in a lawsuit against AT&T brought by a civil liberties group, Electronic Frontier Foundation. The NSA says it will not confirm or deny the existence or the purpose of the "secret rooms," but in a filing in the court case against AT&T, Negroponte formally invoked the "state secrets privilege," claiming the lawsuit and the information from Klein and others could "cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security of the United States." Klein says what he knows won’t help terrorists. "The only people that are being kept in the dark is the American people who are being misled and not realizing, not being told that their private information, that their liberties are being destroyed and tramped on," he said.
Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
My quote…Fascism is like a fog that comes in the night which you will not see until the light of morning, at which time you will have no idea of its duration.
ERGO
Posted by: daddy | March 6, 2007, 11:19 am 11:19 am
This guy sounds like another case os somebody sticking their nose where it doesn’t belong. I serioulsy doubt that 120 pages of documents outlining the methodology of a top secret government operation were just “left around” the office. Maybe he needs a good IRS audit or two…. or three…..
Posted by: Jeff | March 6, 2007, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Will the U.S.Government now pay him WHISTLE BLOWER MONEY?seems that the people in Government can’t tell anyone what there illegal plan is SO they run over us lie to us FOR WHAT!
SPENDING RIGHTS TO OUR TAX MONEY!
Posted by: Releafer | March 6, 2007, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Osama bin Laden hides in plain site dressed in the traditional garb of muslum women. It is likely he is in site of US troops. He is a coward hiding behind a womens skirt.
Posted by: terri cicatello | March 6, 2007, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
So the media is now responsible for the cover up of information.
Call it Un-News.
Interesting… I guess there’s a first time for everything, eh?
======================
“Those that don’t read the news are un-informed. Those that do read the news, are mis-informed”
… Mark Twain
Posted by: JelloBiafra | March 6, 2007, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
I can understand if the information was on Americans who are innocent of any wrong doing. But Mr. Klein has more of a personnel desire to release this information based on need to for public recognition and self indulgence. Gentleman, we are in a state of War, Mr. Klein in his hate of the Government and the President found himself right in his own mind to release this secrect information. He claims this does the enemy no good. What makes him so smart in the dealings on National Security. Where did he serve as in Intelligence officer in our government? I quote a long standing thought, “Loose lips sink ships.” A bit old for todays times, but just think about what Mr. Klien is trying to do, who does he help, the public, no..the public already knows of our intelligence gathering over the internet. But who is Mr. Klien realy helping, the current news service which will prove some kind of royalties for releasing the story. Maybe. I tell you who is going to lose, We are, Americans who are defending this nation from terrorist in and out of our country. Oh you don’t care, as long as the President and the Intelligence community of America don’t have the tools to fight international terrorist and Tyrants. You don’t Care…? Well get ready folks, the War is coming to our shores and cities, that is the realities of this War. Gentlemen like Mr. Klien, though his intension might be good for some, will cost our country in lives lost do to the fact our intelligence community could not monitor and Identify protentual terrorist in and out of our boarders. That is a fact..
Dario Gonzalez
USAF Retired
Posted by: Dario Gonzalez, American | March 6, 2007, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
It only takes something like this to give weight to all conspiracy theories
Posted by: mad kat | March 6, 2007, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Whistle-blower Klein: A unique war requires unique weapons. In this Information Age, we need to use acquired information as one of those weapons. Let’s not tie the hands of every legal agency that is trying to secure the safety and liberty of the US like we tied the hands of the US soldiers fighting in Iraq. That country would have been stabilized months ago if it weren’t for our internal polarization.
Posted by: Andrea | March 6, 2007, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
This is another reason why the world do not trust this moron that the supreme court has installed in the white house, a long time ago my father once told me “When you’re dumb, you’re dangerous, and the occupants of the white house are a very dangerous bunch, lets hope the change in the election of late…would stop these war hungry men from starting world warIII.
Posted by: barry storr | March 6, 2007, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
this is typical of the total lack of respect for the contitution that has been the hallmark of the Bush Administration. Why these people have not been impeached is a wonder
Posted by: John | March 6, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
how about prosecuting this guy???
Posted by: Scott Johnson | March 6, 2007, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
It’s another case of, ‘Just thinking about this violates state secrets’. How many terrorists are there in the world? How many with means? .0001% if that? Yet everything we do now resolves around that small number. 99.999% of US citizens have their rights eroded for what? With our government today, the only thing we have to fear is everything.
Posted by: Scott | March 6, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
I also work in the telecommunications industry.
Contrast this story with the apparent resurgence of a monopolistic setting of the telecommunications industry and the aggressive A&M activity of AT&T. Makes one wonder whether the recent FCC rulings weakening CLEC footprints across the USA is due to sound fiscal reasoning by the FCC or ease of controlling and monitoring communications by the NSA. Orwellian for sure – of course only those doing something wrong should worry. Big government is our friend.
Posted by: Ross | March 6, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
With the way radical Islamists use the internet for manipulation and communication, I’m glad national security is onto this. I’ve got nothing to hide. Makes me wonder what Mark Klein’s been up to. If NSA and AT&T can help catch the people that are trying to kill us, go for it.
Posted by: John | March 6, 2007, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Scott,
It took only 19 to bring down the two towers of the World Trade Center and to destroy a huge section of the Pentagon. I have no problem with the government monitoring emails until they find the others.
Posted by: Lane | March 6, 2007, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
It’s appalling that they very government designed to ‘preserve, defend and protect’ the constitution daily is finding ways to subvert the very basis of our country’s existence. Mr. Bush and his cohorts are one of the greatest dangers to world peace we have today. The removal of basic rights, government intrusions into our privacy is exactly how dictators began their reigns. Other countries are telling us they consider the US as the greatest contributor to world instability. Where did our values go? George Bush has been responsible for more American deaths than Osama Bin Laden. You go, Mark Klein! Thank you, from a fellow American.
Posted by: dsm | March 6, 2007, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
No more secrets as they say. They read your mail, videotape you like 60 times a day, your creditcard information, and now all your internet traffic. Don’t think there is much left. Way to go big goverment supporters. Can’t wait to see if the democrats take over. Then we can be watched and fed along with everyone else.
YEAH.
Posted by: Mark | March 6, 2007, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
“If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy” -James Madison
Some of you trust the government way too much. It is a body of people, corruptible fallible people, and yet some of you shrug and think that ‘our government won’t do that to us!’
Power will always attract the corruptible. We have a Constitution to insure that there are boundaries. Lately, we’ve been pushing those boundaries to the breaking point.
Guard your privacy and individual liberties, or risk having America devolve into another Rome.
Posted by: Joe | March 6, 2007, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
These comments read like a horrible cliche. “He must have something to hide!” “He just hates our government!” “Anyone who doesn’t want to help our government must be a terrist! [sic].”
It’s somewhat sad to see Americans indulge themselves in such petty fear over an inconsequential group of homicidal maniacs. More people die from drunk driving than terrorism in the US, easily.
What’s most humorous is the cowards who wrap themselves in bravery and act like the brave thing to do is give ourselves over to nanny government, when in fact they’re the ones crying themselves to sleep over a 1/1000000 chance of terrorism actually ever affecting them.
I guess I’ll indulge in a cliche myself – “if we go on like this, the terrorists have already won.”
Posted by: Joe | March 6, 2007, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
I can not believe the number of people commenting on here who are willing to turn over their lives to the government. We spent countless lives in two World Wars, one Cold War and now three wars in the Middle East to prevent just that. And shame on the LAT for not going forward on the orignal story.
Posted by: Josh | March 6, 2007, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
You people scare me.
You are afraid of rag-tag groups of people who want us dead, so you are fine with letting us be monitored…”because I have nothing to hide”?
We went for 40+ years, with thousands of nuclear missles pointed at us, without desecrating our liberty as we have done since 9/11. I’d rather risk another strike that hurts my countrymen, than to smother my liberties, which would kill my country.
That power to monitor won’t go away…it will only solidify, and spread…and remember, the same power that the Repubs use now, the Dems can use later. Do you think they won’t use it for internal monitoring of ‘unamerican activities’? Who defines that?
Sigh…I guess a free country doesn’t necessarily yield a love for freedom.
Posted by: Ken | March 6, 2007, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Anyone who thinks the Federal Government, once given access to information, would voluntarily relinquish it once the “war” is over is exceedingly naive. If it were up to our Beloved Leader, the state of emergency would go on forever – the better to keep We the Sheeple from asking too many questions.
By condoning the actions of the Bush Administration and the NSA, you admit defeat. The terrorists have won. They want to destroy our free and open society, and it’s working. You frightened children, willing to sacrifice anything in order to be kept safe, are not good Americans. You are slaves to your terror, and our enemies’ best friend.
Posted by: Conscientious Object. | March 6, 2007, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Mark,
You took the words right from my mouth. Being a 23yr conservative male nothing in this world scares me more than the way this country is going.
Posted by: Andrew | March 6, 2007, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
This is old news. We already know this is going on. This guy has to shop to get a buyer. That in itself speaks volumes. This does nothing to bolster unity in America. Have some cheese to go with your whine. Our freedoms were lost a long time ago when the people of America ‘gave’ less to the states and more to the government. It’s just really ironic to me that a Republican leader is the one to put the accent mark on top. There is a balance between security and freedom and though it doesn’t bother me to have this kind of invasion of privacy on a temporary basis, I wouldn’t want a permanent policy….certainly not if Hillary were Pres.! If you think Bush’s politics are without thought to outside arguments or by bullying tactics, Hillary will exponentially increase those statistics!
Posted by: Ellen | March 6, 2007, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
They believe that any portion of power confided to me, will be exerted in opposition to their schemes. And they believe rightly; for I have sworn upon the altar of god, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. But this is all they have to fear from me: and enough, too, in their opinion.
-Thomas Jefferson to Dr. Benjamin Rush, Sept. 23, 1800
Posted by: Adam | March 6, 2007, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Alright a couple of points here:
“Loose ships sink ships.” is what is referred to as a straw man argument. Yes loose ships sink ships but that has nothing to do with our privacy rights and freedoms being infringed upon. No ships are at stake in this case, and even if they were these are civilians that are being monitored not servicemen. This is about illigal and indiscriminate inteligence gathering on US citizens not legitament war time stadegies. This is about a man calling attention to a law being broken, a law that is every bit as legitiment as any in our country including our constitution. This is not about a man telling the enimy about a ship that’s about to attack them. It’s more like a man telling the country about a ship that’s about to collide with the statue of liberty. If you can’t see the difference, then something is seriously skewed with your logic.
We take Bush’s word that they are only surveying “suspected terrorists” and even if this were true, as suspects and not convicts they still have privacy rights. The moment we start allowing law enforcement, intelligence, or the military to arbitrarily remove rights when they have suspicions is the moment our rights are nothing more then a delusion of semantics.
By gathering intel on everyone, and filtering it out to just suspects they effectively are putting the cart before the house. By having such a large pool of information they have enough to determine suspects based on that pool, thus justifying it’s collection. This is a convenient bit of circular logic that means anyone, anywhere is a suspect if they do something suspicious. Such as what I’m doing now by exercising my free speech and giving an unpopular opinion about something they’re doing.
Posted by: Paul | March 6, 2007, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
I find it totally odd that everyone is so trusting of the same government that has lied and caused the deaths of many innocent soldiers, treats it’s veterans like crap and financially supports all types of people instead of its own. Our freedoms stem from people who left opression and tyrants, not to be followed up by another form of it. I agree, some things are necessary but we could be spending money on more productive things than spying on internet traffic.
Posted by: Norman Williamson | March 6, 2007, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Mark Klein is a patriot. He risks his job to expose physical evidence of a crime against our constitution. This is grounds for the impeachment of George Bush. War or no war, this is an infringement to our most basic rights as American citizens.
The Fourth amendment to the United States Constitution is one of the provisions included in the Bill of Rights. The Amendment guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, and was originally designed as a response to the controversial writs of assistance (a type of general search warrant), which were a significant factor behind the American Revolution.
Once our leaders start disregarding what is written in the constitution, the terrorist have won the first battle of the war.
God Bless America. Because we’re going to need it.
Posted by: Tony | March 6, 2007, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
The sheer asinine comments of those willing to let the government run their lives is a testament to the sedentary ‘see, hear, speak no evil’ drones of middle america. It’s preposterous to allow things like this happen ‘because we want to protect you’
Protect you from what? Terrorism? What’s Terrorism to you may be free speech to most..Terrorism to you may be worshipping what god you want to choose to most…Terrorism to the guy doing the Big Brother may be an ordinary way of life to most. The point is that giving up little freedoms to a faceless ‘mothering’ is a true real terror. Little freedoms add up and then big freedoms begin to erode.
And to the people who say ‘he should not be sticking his nose in’ I got three words for you – The Pentagon Papers. Look it up and find out why sometimes ‘sticking your nose in’ is needed.
‘For your own good’ is NOT an answer to impeding on what people bled for today, yesterday, and inevitably the future.
Posted by: Tim | March 6, 2007, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
A lot of you people are funny. Do you think the Bush Administration was the 1st to to a national wiretap? The NSA has been around along time prior to them coming out of the closet. Think about how many years NSA and other agencies gathered info on the masses. Stop using Bush as the one who started this. Our government has been spying on its people for 50+ years now and all of a sudden people are like “OH MY GOD IT SO WRONG” Wake up and smell the roses. Only reason we know about it now is because technology is more abundant and the media is all over the place. Goes back to another old saying, “what you don’t know can’t hurt ya”
Posted by: Shameless | March 6, 2007, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
The actions of this administration since 9/11 has been suspect at the very least. We have opted out of the Geneva Convention and theatened war with the Netherlands if an American were brought up on charges and we have detained the usual suspects for five years or more without access to family, lawyers or any due course guaranteed under a democracy.
How are we suppose to trust those who went to war under the guise of promoting democracy, yet deny them the benefits of democracy?
Anyone can be considered a terrorist at any given moment, including those who criticize the administration or the war.
The words ‘National Security’ is being used as a rationalization as it was during the Nixon administration to cover up that administrations crimes against the American people. Then, covert spying on American citizens were rampant, especially those who criticized the Viet-Nam war or the Nixon administration. Sound familiar?
Posted by: Kate | March 6, 2007, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Very well done Jerry.
Posted by: Kevin | March 6, 2007, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Gosh …. and all this time I thought it was “Loose lips sink ships.”
Posted by: Kevin | March 6, 2007, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Remember this: Wars are between governments, and, big government will protect only itself. OBL hates our govt seemingly, but, its more about what he wants to see the world shaped into. OBL uses our govt as his whipping boy for recruitment, and our govt uses OBL as its reason to clamp down. EVEN IF the monitoring is not being used in abusive way, a person someday in the future will say, “get me the internet traffic for that Greg Sudderth guy, find something, find something where he supports OBL and let’s pick him up.” If its a resource, someone will use it. We don’t leave loaded guns around the house on the sofa, do we?
Posted by: Greg Sudderth | March 6, 2007, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
As someone who works in the IT field, I can tell you first hand that 1) The government does not care what the average joe does on the internet and 2) The government does not have the resources to capture everything on the internet, at this point in time it is impossible. That amount of data (even per minute) exceeds the limitations of mass storage and would call for warehouses full of drives/tapes etc (and that might only capture 1 days worth of information).
Posted by: DW | March 6, 2007, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
“Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” – Quote by that pesky, left-wing nut Benjamin Franklin. Let’s remember what it means to live in America, and stop freely sacrificing our liberties. If we do, the “bad guys” have won, haven’t they?
Posted by: Dawn | March 6, 2007, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Why it it so easy to picture Klein and Jane Fonda in the same picture??????????
Posted by: Kerry | March 6, 2007, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Our president has tried to make this country safe from these terrorist since 9/11. How soon some people have forgot what this country went through amazes me. There are people in this country like this Mark Klein that wants to put his policial agenda ahead of the safety of this country. I say if you are not doing anything wrong why would you worry about this. It makes me feel safer for me and for my family to know that the government is watching what these terrorist are doing. Mr. Klein does not care about our safety or our soldiers safety. What is wrong with this man! I agree totally with Mr. Dario Gonzalez which stated it so correctly.
Posted by: Terry Lawson | March 6, 2007, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Who can you trust these days?
Posted by: MacDonald | March 6, 2007, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
This guy knew ATT was involved with secret government work and decided unilaterally to tell all. Was his motivation to protect us all? I doubt it. Maybe he grew up watching too many superhero cartoons thinking he too could save the world. More than likely he was just looking for a book deal and his 15 minutes of fame. Either way he should be prosectuted to the fullest extent of the law for revealing secrets and possessing secret material without a clearance.
Posted by: Don Lester | March 6, 2007, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Lane, it also took only 19 people to rollback over 200 years of rights. What happened to the motto, Live Free or Die? It’s only valid if there is no risk of harm? What have we become in this country? Why not check in to some government controlled town and never leave? It’s like people are afraid to live, afraid of their shadow? You are move likely to die driving home tonight!
Posted by: Scott | March 6, 2007, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
I think the guy was right to let people know what was “behind that curtain.”
And as others have written here, once the equipment has been built, finding out if AT&T is still gleaning from our private conversations will be as easy as finding WMDs in Iraq. Just because the law might change later after this stupid war is over, doesn’t mean the equipment and actions of AT&T people in power will stop.
Don’t forget that AT&T had been declared a monopoly more than 20 years ago and broken up, but look now… it’s one big happy family again (as long as you say nothing about what’s behind that door).
Posted by: WatchfulEye | March 6, 2007, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Anyone who thinks that this type of blanket surveillance is OK has a serious reading comprehension problem. I would advise all of you to re-read the Constitution of the United States of America. You may find that you are entitled to certain rights that the Bush administration has blatantly ignored. Also note, that nowhere in the document does it say “Void in times of war”.
Posted by: Ralph | March 6, 2007, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
What are you guys so afraid of that you’re willing to turn over all your personal information over to the government? Land of the free, home of the brave my foot. We’re rapidly turning into land of the controlled and home of the manipulated.
Posted by: John | March 6, 2007, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Erm i’m from England just reading this via a link on another site and I am really really shocked at how readily most of the people posting here are happy to just lose their civil liberties. Have you learned nothing from your useless government yet? I mean our isn’t much better but at least everyone here realises that. It’s INSANE how many of you seem to be just regurgitating all that’s been fed to you through the media and politicians. I used to love America but i really must say i’ve never found a country so at odds with the image it promotes. Land of the free? Or land of the watched? I never really equated freedom with the ability for someone to eavesdrop my entire life. Please get rid of your moron in power – we’re trying to do the same.
Posted by: Not Tony Blair | March 6, 2007, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
25 years ago (during the Cold War) there were rumors that NSA recorded every overseas conversation. I think the big story here is to answer the question regarding how long this has been going on. Terrorism is only the latest lamest excuse. If these agencies had been doing their jobs in the first place, using Constitutional means, there would not have been a 9/11. So explain to me how giving up our liberties is preventing another one?
Posted by: kbbpll | March 6, 2007, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
As one who has been in communications for over thirty years, both in and out of the military, I can assure you that domestic electronic intercepts dealing with “subversive” (defined by those in power at the time) communications has been effectively been going on since the capability existed to filter out the unwanted (private citizen) communications. Basically, this began when NSA (or was it the FBI?)bought their first Cray computer. This is continuing still today. It has also transcended presidencies from both parties. When somneone releases information they should reasonably know is classified (such as a telephone company employee telling a suspected criminal that the police have a wire tap on his phone), that violates laws. In the case of my example, it would be a local or state law. In the case of national security , it violates federal law. Whether you decide the information should be made public is not an individual’s choice to make. There are procedures to challange the security classification. If you violate the law you should be held accountable. If the government is taking precautions to filter out the undesired information before it reaches humans (which they are), they have not violated your privacy. If you are contacting or contacteed by known/suspected terrorists (whether you know it or not), you can expect to have your conversation intercepted (just as you would expect if you contacted a suspected criminal and the FBI or local police had a wire tap on them). I think what most americans really object to is who has the authority to authorize the intercepts. When dealing with highly sensitive information, secrecy demands the authority be kept close hold. The NSA is the proper authority when dealing with the global war on terrorism. Whether you agree with the concept of attempting to stop terrorist attacks or not is another matter.
Posted by: tim | March 6, 2007, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Its amazing what “the people” are willing to give up for sense of security. No im not moving to another country, I love my country and I love my people, my government on the other hand has some issues that need to be resolved. One if one innocent person’s privacy or freedom has been violated that is enough. It would be stupid to think that the terrorists don’t know they are being monitered via the internet or cellphones…
Posted by: Aaron C | March 6, 2007, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
What I don’t understand is…in the 90′s the woods around Idaho and Arkansas were full of guys in camo, stashing weapons and following a cultish affiliation to thier fantasy that the “government” was coming with black helicopters to impose World Domination on them. Fifteen years later we are in fact much closer to that dangerous outcome, but now these same conspiracy theorists are slapping flags on their vehicles, are glued to FOX news and are the first to say that we must support our government right or wrong. Let me rephrase that; they see no evil, thier Fearless Leader is always right and the government should be allowed to do what it wants in all cases because they have our best interests in mind. Really? What has this government done for you lately? Think for yourself. Stop being so scared. Develop a little backbone and protect your rights!
Posted by: Sonora | March 6, 2007, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Terrorism is a lame excuse for destroying personal liberties and making a mockery of the Constitution. I fought the Cold War and I guarantee you our enemies had FAR more resources at their disposal than Bin Laden and his sympathizers. Yet, somehow we came out on top without destroying our freedoms, installing a dictator, or frisking 95-year-old women at the airport in the name of “security”.
Posted by: Trystann | March 6, 2007, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
If you’re innocent, why do you need rights? :)
Posted by: Observer | March 6, 2007, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
There are some scary comments posted here! Condemn the guy, prosecute him, etc. He should be given a medal for reporting this illegal activity by da gubment!! An illegal war is not cause for trampling citizens’ rights. The Bush administration lost all credibility when they abandoned the war on terror to pursue Iraqi oil. It is shocking, though not surprising (because people are so stupid), that G.Dumbya still has supporters. Kudos to Klein!
Posted by: UscareME | March 6, 2007, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
I am in favor of surveillance that is monitor by both sides of the political spectrum.
Unfortunately, the current Cheney Administration* is using this surveillance to gain an information edge on their political opposition to create smog screens for the American People and continue their personal agenda.
Posted by: Marc Gonzakez | March 6, 2007, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Does anybody else think this sounds similar to the movie, “Three Days of the Condor”, starring Robert Redford? The main character “had a story” and took it to the newspaper… You know the rest.
Is this something new? No, and it won’t go away either.
Posted by: marian | March 6, 2007, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
tim – “If the government is taking precautions to filter out the undesired information before it reaches humans (which they are), they have not violated your privacy.”
So Tim, if an automated machine opens all my mail, scans it, then searches it for keywords before turning it over to an NSA goon, it is not violating my privacy? If a robot comes into my home, sniffs for bombs, photographs everything, then scans it for suspicious objects before turning it over to an NSA goon, it is not violating my privacy? If we are innocent we have nothing to fear (except rendition to a country that practices torture).
When my wife calls her mother overseas and the NSA records this conversation without a warrant, or when she exchanges emails with her overseas sister and the NSA opens the email and scans it without a warrant, you can be damn sure this violates the Bill of Rights regarding unreasonable searches. The terrorists have won.
Posted by: kbbpll | March 6, 2007, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Good for Mr. Klein!! And to those who are naysayers, yes, documents like the details of the NSA rooms are left laying around, I have witnessed things such as this for over 30 years in the telecommunications industry. Bush is a bully and it is time for him to answer for his actions
Posted by: D2 | March 6, 2007, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
It is not in the NSA’s charter to operate within the borders of the United States unless authorized by the FISA court system.
The Bush administration their his pet Alberto Gonzalez decided to allow intelligence gathering without the consent of FISA, effectively removing the safe guards that protected the liberties of Americans.
I applaud the whistle blower spoke of in this story because it shines a light on the depth at which the neo-con’s will go to in order to consolidate power to the executive branch.
Even with FISA it is hard to know how much abuse we have in the intel gathering system within the US. I’ll take all the whistle blowers I can get.
Posted by: Daniel | March 6, 2007, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
I read your email…
Posted by: Strongbad | March 6, 2007, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Amazing. A lone individual makes a decision to stand up for the basic civil liberties of millions – and folks here want him tried, arrested, audited, drawn, quartered, and branded a traitor.
I salute Mark Klein for doing the right thing.
May the folks here never have to face the tragedy of losing the rights they are so ready to hand over…
Perhaps you folks aren’t old enough to remember Shamrock or Minaret, but it bears some repeating: our track record ain’t the greatest on this one.
Posted by: Bryan | March 6, 2007, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Mark Klein should be rewarded for his bravery and patriotism for uncovering a MASSIVE illegal operation run by the government. Without whistle blowers like Mr. Klein we are doomed to an oligarchy.
Posted by: Eric | March 6, 2007, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
All you people are “INGNORANT BUFFOONS.” While our civil liberties are stealthly being taken away and slowly eroding by our criminal government, “WE” citizens of the U.S.A sit twiddling our thumbs. Someone stated we are at “WAR!” I don’t remember the United States of America declaring war on anybody! Congress passed a resolution giving President Bush the authority to initiate offensive measures on terrorists. Any yet, we have not captured UBL. Is it that hard to catch one man. Why would the US government need to see what I surf on the internet?
Posted by: George Orwell | March 6, 2007, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Observer: soppose someone hates you because you are white, black, male, female, homosexual, hetrosexual, or any other silly reason. They say you did something you did not do, they say you can’t vote, they say you are sub human. You are innocent, do you still think you don’t need rights. Quick reminder: the U.S. Government enforced slavery.
Posted by: ReallyObservent | March 6, 2007, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Mr. Ross,
It’s good to see you are now on the Klein story, but your piece neglects to mention that Wired News published a large chunk of Klein’s documents in May 2006.
Posted by: Ryan Singel | March 6, 2007, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
But, more onto the point. The government doesn’t have the right to intrude into our personal lives in this manner. Period. It violates the Constitution. Hopefully the next president will have some respect for the foundations this country was built upon and will not trample over our basic rights.
Posted by: Billy the Kid | March 6, 2007, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
“If the government is taking precautions to filter out the undesired information before it reaches humans (which they are), they have not violated your privacy.”
What??? It is NOT the government’s right to filter information to me! As an American I have the right to decipher for myself what I chose to read and then agree or disagree with.
They are talking about monitoring our conversations. If I choose to discuss the idiocy of baby bush with my mother online, keywords in the conversation are going to get flagged. Stopping me from talking about and congregating with others to talk about how stupid our current president is is my right as an American—NOT the right of selected individuals holding a government job!
Posted by: WatchfulEye | March 6, 2007, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
These people who defend the government’s illegal actions and criticize the one person who’s actually trying to preserve their freedoms are more worried about losing their precious BMW’s and McMansions than they are about their fundamental rights to liberty. To those people, I would ask, do you think our forefathers willingly risked their lives, their families’ lives, and all that they owned in their fight for freedom only to have us turn it over so easily because we’re afraid of Al Qaeda? If we weren’t willing to subvert our freedoms for the Nazis and the Communists, which were much bigger threats, why we are we so willing to do so now?
Posted by: Pete | March 6, 2007, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Pete, you hit the nail on the head!
Posted by: WatchfulEye | March 6, 2007, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
It’s amazing how well the propaganda is working on Americans. Citizens in other countries get it. So sad to see how many of you are in favor of illegal surveillance. Go back to sleep and continue watching television! Didn’t you all learn anything from history?
As long as amnesia is America’s favorite pastime, you will remain brainless slaves.
Posted by: Morpheus | March 6, 2007, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Just keeping chipping away at democracy, and what are you left with?
Those surveillance tools are a wonderful thing for the spooks, they make it easier than ever to build dossiers against your political opponents. And anyone who thinks that these tools are just being used against terrorists has a screw loose. All you have to do is change your definition of terrorist. Are you against the status quo? Uh-oh, you’re a potential terrorist! Remember when Ashcroft said “If you’re not with us, you’re against us”? That utterance speaks volumes.
The world is MUCH less safe with the Bush/Cheney dynamic duo in charge. Boy, that Iraq/Oil thing was a good idea;-)
Up next, WWIII starts in Iran.
(American nutjobs vs. Iranian nutjobs)
Haven’t you heard, Iran has WMD!
Don’t worry, the corporate media are on top of the story. They’ll uncover the truth just like they did in Ira….oh never mind.
Posted by: Mike | March 6, 2007, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
To all you “citizens” that see no harm in having the US intercept and monitor our privileged communications, do you have any idea what you’re losing? The freedom to privacy and to be secure in our communications and property is a paramount concept guaranteed by our constitution. There are no exceptions to this, even if you have nothing to hide or don’t mind.
Remember that when you give up these civil liberties, you can *never* regain them. The gov’t does not willingly give back rights that it has reserved or usurped. Our society is free because of these protections, and as soon as one of them is infringed, we all suffer, and come one step closer to losing them all.
Even if you have no problem with Bush murdering our constitutional rights, remember that the political winds change frequently. As time passes, evil men can and will be elected president. It is mathematically inevitable. These evil men will think nothing of abusing you, and if the civil liberties put in place to protect you are already gone, there will be no defense left. *You* will disappear unaccounted for in secret CIA prisons, instead of terrorists. *You* will have no right to the courts to challenge your torture and detention, instead of the terrorists. *You* will have destroyed the greatest country on earth, instead of terrorists.
Posted by: Seeker | March 6, 2007, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
I agree with you Seeker. What many of these people do not understand is this system can easily be used to blackmail somebody. Lets say that some congressman or reporter or group is causing problems to the administration. All they would have to do is to order the NSA to filter and look for any information dealing with these entities and record there conversations, URL’s they visited, and any sources secret phone numbers that they have called to get information. Also if we want to admit it or not, people say and do private things that they don not want other people to know about.
If anything look in your personal closet and ask yourself, are you willing to have your life an open book for anybody to see or use. Some will say they don’t care, but in reality what they are saying is that nobody will find out about my secrets because it will not happen to me but to someone else.
Yea, keep Dreaming.
Posted by: Buck Johnson | March 6, 2007, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
The Internet has *never* *NEVER* been secure. How do you think Google, Yahoo, and all the other search engines come up with all those links when you look something up? They “sniff” the data stream looking for key words. I don’t see anybody complaining about that. The NSA’s not doing anything different than they are.
If you’re worried about you privacy, use an encryption program. Or, better yet, don’t use the internet at all.
I’d be willing to bet that ABC News has a program that records the IP address of everyone that posts here. They know *where* you are, and it won’t take too much effort to find out *who* you are, too…..
Posted by: Unbelievable | March 6, 2007, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
They who would give up essential liberties for personal safety deserve neither. –Thomas Jefferson
Get a grip! Did the colonists quiver in fear at the mere thought of the Redcoats? Did our parents and grandparents hide under the bed during the Cold War? America has faced foes before and will again.
This generation is ready to chuck our proud history of freedom to save their own butts.
Posted by: Merilee | March 7, 2007, 12:05 am 12:05 am
“Klein says he then took his AT&T documents to The New York Times, which published its exclusive account last April.”
If this story is almost a year old the real question is who is flogging it now and for what reason? It also appears to me from the broadcast that Mr Klein has got an image upgrade and some media training. Further does anyone really think their communications over the internet are confidential? They’re all on servers somewhere people.
Posted by: Charlie | March 7, 2007, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Thank you Mr. Klein. I am not surprised at what you uncovered.
Posted by: watchful | March 7, 2007, 12:21 am 12:21 am
IMPEACH BUSH – This time he’s gone too far. Just like all the other times he went too far.
Posted by: Bullocks | March 7, 2007, 1:56 am 1:56 am
The average citizen is not likely at risk from this latest unconstitutional invasion by the Bush administration.
What this does however just as the private citizen phone record collection did is provide administration officials access to information that could be used to the advantage of the administration’s many corporate friends.
Libby’s conviction today is the tip of the iceberg with the corruption in this white house.
Impeachment should have begun long ago, for many offenses, hopefully the new congress will have the courage to do the right thing.
Posted by: Mark Heiden | March 7, 2007, 3:09 am 3:09 am
This “whistle-blower” Should be arrested. We are a country at war. Since when is the internet a “private domain”?
Posted by: Rick G | March 7, 2007, 3:27 am 3:27 am
THANK YOU MR. KLEIN.
just an analogy.
if some E.T.’s took over our country to free us from this ‘oil maffia’ who stole 2 elections, the little group supporting the spying, ‘in the name of security’, would be hiding home behind their mommies, ‘in the name of security’; YOU, me and most true americans will be out to expell the invaders: we believe “THOSE WHO GIVE AWAY FREEDOM FOR SECURITY DESERVE NEITHER”.
second point.
i have nothing to hide, BUT, the more they know about you the easier to manipulate you (and enslave you). you know there is a dpt. of propaganda in the white house?
MR. KLEIN CONGRATULATIONS, YOU HAVE THE GUTS TO FACE GOLIATH.
THANK YOU AGAIN FOR YOUR HELP TO PROTECT OUR FREEDOM AND OUR CONSTITUTION.
Posted by: gino raffo | March 7, 2007, 7:18 am 7:18 am
What war are you guys talking about? Only Congress has the authority to declare war. So while it’s clear you’re feeling free to call it one as a matter of law there is no war.
Posted by: Cletus | March 7, 2007, 11:03 am 11:03 am
This guy is a technician, not an engineer. He has no idea how a larger telecom network is configured, he only knows how to plug in a patchcord. San Francisco is one of the locations where the US telecom network connects to international trafic. The NSA had their splitter connected on the SDH side, not the SONET side. NO DOMESTIC WIRETAPING LAWS WERE BROKEN. The only crime was the NSA guys leaving documentation out for an idiot technician with an agenda to get access to them and the NY Times & Nightline not doing their homework to find out the truth.
Posted by: Chris | March 7, 2007, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Is anyone else creeped out by the psy-ops people that show up here and post messages that while always being unabashedly pro-government make little or no sense within context?
Every time there’s a decent news story like this, the message boards read wrongly. Not like a discussion of people, but more like an emotionless and poorly thought pat on the back of the government.
Posted by: Bob | March 7, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
I see two problems here: the first is the electorate confusing the Republican Party with conservatism. Unlike the Republican Party, conservatism begs for smaller, less obtrusive government that doesn’t attack its own people or foreign countries that have done nothing to us. The Republicans, on the other hand, are money-grubbing pigs. As they screw over the financially less fortunate, they have to be authoritarian to keep the peace. Government and cancers grow until they are forcefully stopped.
The second problem is equating what’s going on here with fascism. Most fascists couldn’t have cared less what others thought–provided they weren’t perceived as a threat to the ruling class. It was the communists who were obsessed with thoughtcrimes. It is not enough to accept Big Brother; You must LOVE Big Brother….
Posted by: Dunnyveg | March 7, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
This website has been approved by the NSA for your reading.
(that means if the government did not want you to read this article it would not be here)
Posted by: jaralawahl t. jones | March 7, 2007, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Tim what part of FISA court to authorize wiretapping and the 4th amendment do you fail to understand? The NSA is not the proper body to decide whether Americans most basic constitutional rights to be violated, but rather the government must get a warrant to do surveillance on it’s citizens. As is in:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
(4th Amendment to the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution)
So Mark Klein has done a great service to the American people exposing these unconstitutional activities by the NSA.
Posted by: Mr. Raven | March 7, 2007, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty or safety…” — Ben Franklin
“Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.” — Ben Franklin
Men have fought and died for the rights and freedoms ensured to the citizens of this great nation by the Constitution.
Every day those rights are being attacked and eroded. It is not foreign terrorists that are destroying our freedoms…it is our ELECTED officials.
Posted by: Derek | March 7, 2007, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
They are watching right now sipping coffee. Dont think there not.
Posted by: scott | March 7, 2007, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Oh, they’re illegally domestically surveilling alright and the papers may also be complicitous. One of my email editor letters to FLORIDA’S Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel(/LA Times/Tribune Company) identified me as residing in San Jose. A traceroute Command Prompt revealed that the Sentinel email address routed my letter through ATT, San Francisco. I reported it to the Sentinel, with NO RESPONSE. I LIVE IN WINTER HAVEN, FLORIDA!
Posted by: Bruce | March 7, 2007, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Yeah, not surprised…NSA is a joke! Terrorist don’t communicate through cell phones…16 year old kids dealing drugs know better than to talk on cell phones…lol
We are dealing with intelegent terrorist, who were able to surpase the entire United States millitary to destroy the world trade centeres. Why would anyone not give enough credit to these people to not speak on cell phones about terrorist activities…OPEN YOUR EYES!!!!!! The NSA is a joke!
Posted by: Gene | March 8, 2007, 5:27 am 5:27 am
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Benjamin Franklin
Posted by: Franklin fan | March 8, 2007, 9:32 am 9:32 am
i think that this is what america is all about and remarks like “This guy sounds like another case os somebody sticking their nose where it doesn’t belong. I serioulsy doubt that 120 pages of documents outlining the methodology of a top secret government operation were just “left around” the office. Maybe he needs a good IRS audit or two…. or three…..” are both unpatriotic and uneducated.
Posted by: kyle k | March 8, 2007, 10:34 am 10:34 am
“MIC’ is alive and well.
Posted by: James E. Tribble | March 8, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Try reading Joe Conason’s book ‘It Can Happen Here’ to understand the kind of authoritarianism we’re all up against.
Posted by: Steven | March 8, 2007, 11:56 am 11:56 am
What this guy is whistle blowing about is nothing new. In the 60′s the NSA could check key words and phases on telephone conversations. Seems to me that there are too many people who want a spot in the sun for a short period and maybe even affect the security of our country.
The people of our counrty are beginning to sound like ancient Rome, look what happened to them!!!
Posted by: sport | March 8, 2007, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
NSA – 1
Liberty – 0
It wasn’t the news story, but some of the comments that left me feeling sick and chilly inside. It is absolutely disgusting to see people justifying the secrecy of something that violates their privacy and civil liberties.
It -can- and -is- happening here, and the mindless, bovine-eyed justifications made by American citizens for the NSA’s surveillance is just one more reminder of WHY THEY ARE STILL GETTING AWAY WITH IT.
Posted by: Soror | March 8, 2007, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
-Benjamin Franklin
Think about it!
Posted by: Julia | March 8, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Wow, as usual, the same old lines I’ve heard over and over again. I love the “If you’re not doing anything wrong, you don’t have anything to worry about” one the most. That one was used in Germany in the 30′s and 40′s alot. Now, for the people that say that, you should not care when then Police stop by your house to do an inventory of your possessions, or just to see what your up to. Just invite them in, nothing to worry about, if your doing anything wrong. What is going on here? We have done exactly what the insane people of this planet wanted us to do, live in fear and terror. Checkmate and game over. Wait till Bush abolishes elections, cause its “wartime”…. Sheep.
Posted by: g | March 8, 2007, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
For those with nothing to hide:
Please forward your name, address and SSN to me. I promise I won’t look at it but just send it back to you unread.
You can trust me, after all I was selected by my peers to rule you.
Posted by: Whiner | March 8, 2007, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
I would like to take this as an opportunity to thank Mark Klein for having the courage to come forward. You can talk about him just wanting: “fifteen minutes of fame” but the truth is historically whistle-blowers are not lauded as hero’s and thrown ticker-tape parades.
If you want proof he didn’t do this for “fame” you don’t have to look any further than a lot of these terrible comments calling Mark un-American and unpatriotic. Rubbish there is nothing more American than trying to expose and fight the corruption that is destroying this country.
Way to go Mark!!!!
Posted by: Rhoda IV | March 8, 2007, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
The “secret rooms” at AT&T aren’t even the full scope of what is happening with the surveillance of citizens. That is just the tip of the iceberg.
Posted by: Chris | March 8, 2007, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Just remember my neo-cons, If Hillary gets in in 08…SHE WILL HAVE ALL THIS SNOOP POWERS!! and who knows what all that info can/will be used for…think about it!
Posted by: Mike | March 8, 2007, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Mr Klein should have just put his head down and kept on doing whatever he was doing. If I had the NSA hanging around……I’d just let ‘em hang around. He might be prepared for some serious fallout over being so overzealous.
Posted by: Dave | March 8, 2007, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
FACT:A TRUE REVELATION OF WHATS REALLY HAPPENED. Someone has exposed another someone doing something Illegaly. If we support lies, and untruths, their is nothing left of ANY freedom, much less Democracy in this country. I voluntered for the military, and was treated like DIRT because of a physical disability. What we are seeing today, is what has already been fortold: Men shall believe a delusion, to be true!! Just believe big brother, doesn’t anyone remember the dishonest lies by Nixon? What about “i’m innocent” Clinton, he lied also. When the TRUTH is withheld from you, there is always a reason. A BAD ONE!! What comes after lies, and dishonesty?? Only Worse things! Are you ready, America??
Posted by: terrance | March 9, 2007, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Last summer a Verizon tech told me
that my connection speed was so slow because of all the data being
handed over to the FBI and the NSA
in the way of email and server logs. No one at Verizon executive level denied this when I asked, nor did they admit to it either.
Posted by: Asclepius | March 9, 2007, 7:57 am 7:57 am
I cannot remember the exact quote, but Ben Franklin said something like “If we give up our freedoms because of our fears we have lost”
Posted by: Richard | March 9, 2007, 8:15 am 8:15 am
Thank you whistle blowers!! This government is not ours an more, if you look at HR 6166 it might tell you something!
they have shredded the constitution of this Great Republic! and No wiley Arabs attacked us that day. War games and drill were going on that day WHO HAD THE KEYS!! and look at all the lies. Thank You! Look at Sibel Edmonds gagged all the way to the supreme court.! What do they have to hide. I see so many misinformed people on this board that is a shame! For it is your Country you are giving away! The enemy is within the gates .. Look at all the draconian laws they are passing, when will the uninformed wake UP!
Posted by: AB | March 9, 2007, 8:18 am 8:18 am
As a very young adult, when I got my first paycheck and saw taxes come out, I thought there was something fishy about that. As a young fast approaching middle-aged woman when I compiled an Affirmative Action report, I was even more convined of a fishy world. Now, as an intelligent human being I know the world is fishy. I tried an experiment, just think of the majority of news you hear as the “exact oposite” of the truth and it makes more sense. We even now have phishing on the internet. Also, look at the skies for evidence of fishiness. God Bless all those that tell the truth. Thank you Mark Klein. Everyone continue to search and read use your open mind, that is the reason we have one.
Posted by: DC | March 9, 2007, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Great to know that ABC reports on something like this. However, the fact that the government collects data on Americans and foreigners is nothing new.
This isn’t about terrorism, it’s about the government sticking their nose where they shouldn’t.
Posted by: N. Esach | March 9, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am
well if anyone has bothered to remember september 11th theyd know there was an overabundance of information that the white house and world trade center were going to have planes crashed into them. its government incompetence not lack of ability to gather information that is the problem. also we have these things called warrants for people that are engaging in illegal activities.
those willing to sacrifice freedom for safety deserve neither -jefferson
Posted by: camden | March 9, 2007, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Thank you Mark Klein.
Posted by: Robert Batson | March 9, 2007, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
What is America when it no longer stands for what once distinguished her from other police state countries? What moral authority will the US have to lecture the world on upholding the rule of law and civil liberties when once model government constantly tramples on these rights? Yes, surveillance is key to national security, but only when its justified and does not undermine the rule of law.
The recent abuse by the FBI in the use of National Security letters only underscores the fact that domestic surveillance is not being used for the purposes it was intended for. Unfortunately the very effective brain washing mechanism of repetitive, unnecessary fear mongering has many failing to realize that America will never be the same nation it once was, if it abandons the principles it was founded on under the guise of being a police state. What next? Shall Americans have their mail screened as it would be in a prison setting so as to catch so called terrorists who resort to letter writing in lieu of email?
Posted by: Mike | March 10, 2007, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
The NSA does not exist. Anyone who claims that our government opens our mail, or craziest of all, intercepts our private internet traffic, is a tinfoil-hat wearing conspiracy theorist. No government would ever engage in mass surveillance, because the fact is, they’re far too afraid of getting voted out of power. So why would they monitor groups who dig up sensitive political issues? It doesn’t make sense. Most importantly, government contractors like AT&T would never, ever, in your dreams engage in any illegal activity on behalf of the government, since they’d rather snub their best customer by turning away billions of dollars worth of lucrative surveillance contracts than simply cooperate and keep one more corporate secret. Therefore it can not happen, it has never happened, and it will not happen.
Oh, and Watergate never happened either. Neither did Iran-Contra, Ruby Ridge, Waco, MK-Ultra or INSLAW. The US Government has never broken a single law.
Sleep… sleep…
Posted by: Doug Brenner | March 10, 2007, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
I have enjoyed reading the comments regards the acquisition of information by the NSA from the internet and personal phone conversations of the citizens of these United States of America.
I imagine very few of the correspondents who think this is justified ever remember that paragon of virtue, J. Edgar Hoover, who managed to remain in control of the FBI for so long by harnessing its power to accumulate information on the members of the congress whose task it was to oversee him and people like him. I would hesitate to use the term “blackmail” in reference to him and his activities, but others may not, especially those who were show his private files on their behaviour.
The Civil Liberties of a nation of free men and women are not to be removed at the whim of either a faceless bureaucrat or an elected official seeking to justify their own actions in the face of very warranted criticism.
Robert
Posted by: Robert | March 11, 2007, 3:59 am 3:59 am
You blinkered sheeple defending the corrupt, criminal, incompetent NSA are too stupid to be allowed to have an opinion, much less vote. The NSA has NEVER, NOT ONCE, intercepted a “terrorist threat.” What they HAVE done is spy on, plant false information about, and arrest political opponents of Chicken George, the Moron Who Would Be Dictator. The regime that “hit the trifecta!” was complicit in helping 9-11-01 to happen so that they could do exactly this: institute a fascist dictatorship. And if you don’t think they’re spying on YOU, then you ought to really enjoy Gitmo.
Posted by: Dian | March 12, 2007, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Basically this guy is claiming that the government has set up the facilities to do what they have told the American people they are doing. There have been no terrorist attacks in the U.S. since 9-11. That is not a coincidence. The government doesn’t care that I am looking at porn sites, they are looking for terrorist. Let them do their job.
Posted by: Ben | March 19, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
This whole Homeland Security and NSA growth reminds me of the mayor who wanted more taxes. Why? To buy more fireworks? Fireworks? Yes, we set them off every night to scare away the wild elephants which might trample the crops and crush our children. But there are no wild elephants in all of North America! See, that proves how effective the fireworks program is.
Posted by: Erik | March 27, 2007, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Impeachment…get Dick first. They’ll never tell us the truth, never. What they are doing with that NSA stuff smells bad.
Posted by: bob crawford | May 26, 2007, 9:42 am 9:42 am
SPEAKING AS A JAMAICAN WHO HAS NEVER LEFT OUR SHORES, FROM MY LIMITED KNOWLEDGE OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION, ITS JUST THE BILL OF RIGHTS (THAT BULWARK) THAT IS KEEPING THE FORCES THAT ARE SO INTENT ON TRAMPLING OUR RIGHTS UNDERFOOT FROM LAUNCHING AN ALLOUT ATTACK ON OUR GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
Posted by: PETER COCKETT | May 31, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
These conservatives Burn the constitution then Kill a baby and drink its blood and say they did it to protect america. Im sure hitler thought he was a cool guy too.
Dracula was obviously one of these constitution burning types
Posted by: blob crawford | June 12, 2007, 7:58 am 7:58 am
All I have to say to all of the people against government surveillance is Boo Hoo. Yes I know how to read, and I am well aware of the Constitution. In reality, all I care about is that my family and friends are safe from the scumb of the world, which was not the case on 9/11, and everyone is aware of that. Our soldiers gave up their freedom to protect civilians in this country, and they did it without crying about it. It’s time that the public sucks it up and chips in in what is very stressful times. Im not saying I am pleased with the Bush administration, but we do what we have to do to survive. Trust me, no one will come knocking on your door for saying something bad about Bush or for talking dirty to your spouse…That is not their concern. Let them do what they are best at, they are just trying to protect the country.
Posted by: Amanda | July 19, 2007, 4:09 am 4:09 am
Wow Amanda,
How can you call the people intent upon upholding the constitution the crybabies, when you openly admit that you would give up all right to privacy as long as all of those you love are safe? That is a statement of pure cowardice.
Let me ask you this, would you allow just one of the people on your friends and family list to be sacrificed if it would guarantee the safety of all of the others? How about two of them…or three…or?
The terrorists have won, like so many have stated above, when “citizens” will give up all rights for their own safety.
And sorry, I don’t trust you when you say that no one will come knocking at my door for saying something bad about Bush. Maybe they won’t, but if we continue on our present path, it won’t be too far in the future before this happens if you say something bad about the country’s leader. And you can trust me on that. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Posted by: Bryan | August 10, 2007, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
I find this very disturbing considering we are hoping that the House Judiciary Committee will at least look at cases like ours where the government is actually crossing way over the line, and abusing the criminal justice system to SILENCE WHISTLEBLOWERS! Wrongfully jailed Whistleblowers like John Carman, and others, have no prayer for justice with INJUSTICE like this. Where is the “main stream” media in all of this??? They use to be the ultimate check and balance for our Government. Now, sadly, they are not. Our only hope is for organizations like the Government Accountability Project (GAP), The Project on Government Oversite (POGO), the No Fear Coalition and The Patrick Henry Center – all Whistleblower protection / government watchdog organizations, to become as strong as the government entities that they are watching. Currently the Whistleblower Protection Act (also known as the Akaka Bill, after Senator Akaka) sits idle at the Senate. Further, the No Fear Act two (2), additional much needed Whistleblower legislation, is currently waging it’s war to get passed Congress. This is, now more reason than ever, exactly why this legislation MUST BE PASSED! If this was in place now, there would be no need to hide in the shadows in order to speak truth to power. What we all need to do is to help these brave organizations get these bills passed, and subsequent future legislation to stop this kind of obvious retaliation and attempts to silence the very folks we need to be SUPPORTING! Alone we accomplish nothing. We need to LOCK ARMS with these organizations and speak with one loud clear voice – in the words of Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr., “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
Darlene
Posted by: Darlene Fitzgerald | November 1, 2007, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
It is disturbing how many respondants to this issue use the same warmaking, fearmongering propaganda to rationalize the erosion of the fundamental rights the government is suppose to protect. The government doesn’t GIVE us our rights, it is suppose to PROTECT them. They are said somewhere (gee, lets see what that was…) to be “inalienable”… they are recognized as fundamental to who we are as human beings– not privileges given to us out of the goodness of someone’s heart. All the militarisitc “you can’t handle the truth…” rhetoric is just the sound of the fear-driven and fear-driving voices trying to convince us that our rights as human beings (and the rights of Iraqis, and the rights of Somalis, and Moslems, and athiests, and Arabs, and {fill in the blank} are in fact alienable.
So this ‘whistleblower’ is sounding an alert to bring this to our attention. Shame on us if we make HIM out to be the problem.
Posted by: A. Citizen | March 24, 2008, 7:32 am 7:32 am
people are foolish to trust any of these corporations and the government.
they are joined at the hip in corruption and lies.
Posted by: a new world order | January 31, 2011, 2:26 am 2:26 am