Apr 2, 2007 6:15pm

Exclusive: Iran Nuclear Bomb Could Be Possible by 2009

Iran has more than tripled its ability to produce enriched uranium in the last three months, adding some 1,000 centrifuges which are used to separate radioactive particles from the raw material. The development means Iran could have enough material for a nuclear bomb by 2009, sources familiar with the dramatic upgrade tell ABC News. The sources say the unexpected expansion is taking place at Iran’s nuclear enrichment plant outside the city of Natanz, in a hardened facility 70 feet underground. THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS Blotter Why Iran Seized British Marines World News Video Meet Iran’s Death Squad Click Here to Check Out Brian Ross Slideshows A spokesperson for the United Nation’s International Atomic Energy Agency, the IAEA, declined to comment citing the "extreme sensitivity" of the situation with Iran. Iran has already declared its above-ground operations at Natanz have some 320 centrifuges. Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage. The addition of 1,000 new centrifuges, which are not yet operational, means Iran is expanding its enrichment program at a pace much faster than U.S. intelligence experts had predicted. "If they continue at this pace, and they get the centrifuges to work and actually enrich uranium on a distinct basis," said David Albright of the Institute for Science and International Security, "then you’re looking at them having, potentially having enough highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon in 2009." Previous predictions by U.S. intelligence had cited 2015 as the earliest date Iran could develop a weapon. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has publicly predicted his country would have 3,000 centrifuges installed by this May, but few in the West gave his claim much credence, until now. "I think we have all been caught off guard. Ahmadinejad said they would have these 3,000 installed by the end of May, and it appears they may actually do it," Albright said. The new centrifuges are in open defiance of the U.N. Security Council which last week imposed a new set of sanctions on Iran for refusing to halt enrichment. Iran maintains its enrichment facilities are only meant to produce fuel for nuclear power reactors. But the uranium they are enriching could not be used in the Russian nuclear power reactor they are currently building. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack declined to comment on the details of Iran’s new centrifuges but told ABC News, "This kind of expansion of Iran’s centrifuge capability is why we went to the U.N. Security Council and pushed for a stronger resolution and stronger sanctions."

User Comments

Has anyone else noticed that this sudden breaking news comes right at the time that 15 British soldiers have been kidnapped and an American formber-FBI agent is assumed missing in Iran?
It seems that the Bush administration is building toward another unnecessary war.

Posted by: Doug | April 2, 2007, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

There are two things the United States should be doing at this time. 1) Continue to pressure the international community to in turn pressure Iran. 2) Conduct convert operations to destabilize the Iranian economy in the hopes that the people of Iran will rise up. The United States must show no weakness in this regard.

Posted by: Steve G. | April 2, 2007, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

I’d like to know where this info is coming from on Irans Nuclear processing.
If it’s the same as Iraq and from Bush and his friends.
Beware of their voices. WE don’t need another needless war on our hands over lies like we’re in now.
Jim

Posted by: Jim Healey | April 2, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Ah, “sources.” Who could argue with ironclad evidence like that??

Posted by: Dave J. | April 2, 2007, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

I believe that a visit from Hillary Clinton and then a threat to leave her in Iran would be enough to bring the Irani hard liners to heel.

Posted by: robert J. Navin | April 2, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

It looks like it may be up to Israel again.

Posted by: harold | April 2, 2007, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Maybe we should just try to be nice to them and they will like us. duh

Posted by: Jim | April 2, 2007, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Thanks for tonight’s World News and for limiting the ads.
The reports on Iran’s nuclear facility and on Kiribati were very good.
KP

Posted by: Kentledge Pierce | April 2, 2007, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

I hope that we have learned something over the past 6 years and that we don’t buy into this load of garbage that we are being fed again. Sounds like “WMD’s” all over again.

Posted by: Bill | April 2, 2007, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

They are out of control and need to be stopped immediately before this world becomes a deadly playground.

Posted by: mike carrico | April 2, 2007, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Name the sources!
Otherwise, rational Americans can only assume it’s more Bush administration lies.

Posted by: Jon H | April 2, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

“sources familiar with the dramatic upgrade tell ABC News.”
Ok, let’s have it. Who, in fact, are your “sources”. We want names, titles, positions, experience and political affiliations.

Posted by: Eric Wachsman | April 2, 2007, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

All this reminds me of the movie “The wizard of oz”. Iran with its defiance of U.S. demands is removing the symbolic curtain and exposing that the Oz is nothing but a little midget!

Posted by: Reza | April 2, 2007, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Who are your mysterious ‘sources’? Sounds like the same b.s. that was fed to us during the lead up to the Iraq war. How long will the government and news agencies continue to conspire and lie to us before we all wake up?

Posted by: Eric | April 2, 2007, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Without a decent source, this story sounds like propaganda to whip up public opinion to favor (or at least tolerate) the coming war. Is it true or is it an outright lie? Can you say Tonkin Gulf? What exactly do you have to back up these claims?

Posted by: carol | April 2, 2007, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Two things fascinate me: 1) the media supposedly has one slant, then, publishes stuff that one would think would help the Prez start another war.
2) People on both sides see what they want to see.

Posted by: Greg Sudderth | April 2, 2007, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

If the kind of thinking in the above comments are a majority thinking in America then we are all doomed.
How can anyone in their right mind not take this at the upmost seriousness.
This article is not from the White House,State Department or Pentagon folks.
I am not a big fan of the main stream media nor trust the majority of their so called journalism but this time I am paying attention considering whatnews agency it is coming from.

Posted by: M Ingersoll | April 2, 2007, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

This story should even be published. Who are “sources”?
The sources say the unexpected expansion is taking place at Iran’s nuclear enrichment plant outside the city of Natanz, in a hardened facility 70 feet underground.

Posted by: gre | April 2, 2007, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Bush lies Bush lies… that is the only thing the left can come up with. If ABC wants to do a service to the country they will create and air a special detailing all the DEMOCRATS who stated unequivocally that Saddam had WMD before Bush ever came to office. I am sick of hearing the LIES of the loony left concerning WMD and Iraq. The history is clear, everyone including Democrats thought Saddam had WMD even prior to Bush being elected. The only lies in this whole sorted mess are the ones repeated by the liberal hate Bush above all else crowd.

Posted by: Cecil Trotter | April 2, 2007, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Who among you really believe that Iran, which has extremely vast amounts of oil/natural gas, really needs nuclear electricity….?
Ahmajinidad talks daily about wiping out Israel with one great flash of light – What do YOU think he means???
I’ll teel you – A nuclear explosion in the atmosphere over Israel. This would send out an electromagnetic wave that would put Israel back to the 19th century, and posibly ‘dud’ most all their ability to hit back.

Posted by: dave | April 2, 2007, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

typical liberals, Iran has lied about their nuclear facilities many times in the past, they admit they are developing nuclear material, but liberals want proof of this. Why can’t they add up one plus one and come up with two. How hard do you have to slap these people in the face with the obvious before they get it. Maybe the day Iran test a nuclear weapon then they might believe it, oops it will be too late then to do anything about it. And no don’t name the sources I would rather have those spies keep their identity secret, Hell lets just disband our network of informants and spies that is basically what you are asking. The intelligence isn’t perfect but no administration looks at one piece of intelligence they build a case with all the intelligence they have

Posted by: Brian | April 2, 2007, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

These are the facts:
Iran has 70 Million population and growing fast. Iran has plenty of Uranium ore. It has the technical know-how to build nuclear power plant and extract nuclear fuel from raw uranium. Fossil fuel reserve is ought to be depleted in the future, it is highly pollutant and an expansive investment. The nuclear industry can not be set-up overnight and needs at least 10-20 years preparation. An average Uranium enrichment faciltiy which extract fuel from UF6 needs 30 000 centrifuges to work in cascade to produce nuclear fuel needed for 10 megawatts of electricity per year. Setting up a cascade of 1000 centrifuges is not a lot for the purpose of starting a nuclear fuel industry in the next 5 years.
the motives of US/UK/Israel are much more suspicious than Iran’s.

Posted by: Hayden | April 2, 2007, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Let me remind all of you Bush haters that the intel you’re complaining about didn’t come from the Bush administration. There are dozens of great quotes from Clinton administration folks about the imminent threat posed by Saddam and his WMD’s. Take a reality pill and realize that Bush wasn’t the one who made it up and there are evil people in the world that are actually trying to attain weapons to harm the West… and trying to be nice to them and appease them isn’t going to solve anything.

Posted by: Eric - Boise, ID | April 2, 2007, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

It is really sad that because of the Iraq fiasco that most of the world is going to turn a blind eye to the biggest threat that the world has seen since WWII. People need to put aside their hatred for Bush and look at what we are facing here. This is a regime that hates all that we stand for and will do whatever it can to destroy us!

Posted by: glenno | April 2, 2007, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

It’s amusing how all you “we need sources” posters show up on stories like this but not on any of the many stories that appear to implicate America as being “bad” or somehow to blame for something bad that has happened.
I would be careful with simply assuming that just because you believe the Iraq war was started under false pretenses there can’t be any other real threats lurking out there. Especially in cases when the country in question has flat out stated that they primarily exist to destroy Israel and its allies (America).
The hypocrisy is borderline hilarious and unquestionably ludicrous.
How can you not see that?

Posted by: Chris | April 2, 2007, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Are we all to buy into this again? I would like the sources name and title. This sounds like the begining of what happen six years ago. They still think we don’t have brains, ahh… we do and we use them, they don’t however.

Posted by: Gregory Tompson | April 2, 2007, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

The hostage situation is NOT a figment of our imagination and it wasn’t done by the US or the Brits.
You can pretend that WE did this to try to start something. The UN is politely asking them to return the hostages. If they don’t do it the UN may even pass another resolution!

Posted by: Pythagoras | April 2, 2007, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

How is it that any war seems unnecessary to the lefties. They only fight they are prepared to wage is against there own countries. Is it a good thing for Iran to have nuclear weapons in the hands of extreme fanatics. Please no more stupid “George Bush is dumb” jokes. It’s tired. He made a promise after 9/11 and I expect him to fulfill it before he leaves office, because I am certain that whomever is the next President will not have the courage to do what needs to be done.

Posted by: Ralph | April 2, 2007, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Reality Check… Bush and the administration have repeatedly told us that the security of the nation is an energy security issue. The control and access to vast amounts of OIL is essential to the U.S. economy. The current lynch pin to that security is IRAN. They are the only nation that can possibly disrupt the U.S. empire in the near term. The War is for Profit (Oil) and a sustainable economy. The American people would not support a war directly for profit so the Propoganda machine must spin a socially acceptable reason to invade… “WMD” “Nuclear Build-up” “British Hostages”… Just Google “PEAK OIL” and you will see why the U.S. is living in fear!

Posted by: SBrannen | April 2, 2007, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

For all those who continue to perpetuate the myth that Saddam having WMD’s was a great big lie – there are tens of thousands of corpses in Irag (Kurds) and Iran (1980-1988 war) that beg to differ. In fact, the U.S. DID find chemical weapon shells in Iraq – buried leftovers manufactured prior to the 1991 war. The CIA was wrong about more recent production, but the track record and inherent capability was unmistakable. So if Iran’s intentions are peaceful, why is their president running around threatening to incinerate Israel. I know, must be more Bush administration lies! Maybe they hypnotized him.

Posted by: Bo | April 2, 2007, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

When the Iranian A-bomb goes off in Israel or New York City, will everyone who hates George Bush right now blame George Bush for inaction?

Posted by: Old George | April 2, 2007, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

If the fools who are suggesting that ABC is a stooge for Bush really think that, I guess they think CNN and Howard Dean are too. It’s like the whole Democratic party has the mentality of the British PM in 1939.

Posted by: Fowlowl | April 2, 2007, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Wow you guys are more ignorant then ever. Bush did not lead a war into Iraq over some hearsay of a couple people he and there. he was told by high ranking official as well as leaders of other nations. he never blatenly lied at all to start a war in iraq. if you believe that you are the one who needs to wake up and stop listening to what people are telling you and find out yourself before you make such an idiotic untrue statement.

Posted by: Paul | April 2, 2007, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

I guess we should wait till we’re all dead then go after Iran. If todays left was running the show during wwii the UK and all of europe would still be goose-stepping.

Posted by: Bob | April 2, 2007, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Another wolf? Who is yelling “WOLF”
this time? or was that “WMD” ? Huh?

Posted by: bob | April 2, 2007, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

You don’t even use the phrase unnamed
sources. When you use “sources”, it probably means lies. We do not trust our own government, or mainstream media. We did once, and that got us into Iraq, is this more lies to get us into Iran?

Posted by: Dennis Castaneda | April 2, 2007, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Although I disagree with the outcome of the Iraqi war I do not believe in back-dooring our President and our troops on the field. Iran is playing a dangerous game with the world and the US is the only nation with the means to control the situation. With commets like, “wipe the Israeli’s off the face of the earth” and threatening to use sleeper cells in the US, I strongly support an invasion of Iran and doing the same thing over there.

Posted by: Jose | April 2, 2007, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Here we go again. More of the anonymous “sources” propaganda. It’s hard to believe Bush and the corporate media think we are so stupid that we will buy this twice, but they do believe it. And from some of the posts here, they are right. To quote a GOOD American president: “You can fool some of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.”

Posted by: mgm | April 2, 2007, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

We need to stop Iran. I see what is going on over in Iraq everyday. These IED’s and weapons that are being used against use arent being made by the Iraqi’s.
Chris G
Balad, Iraq

Posted by: chris | April 2, 2007, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

My summation of the Bush haters is that they are still bitter that Bush won by around a 1000 votes. Then Bush won a close election against Kerry. If Bush is that bad as a president, then Kerry must have been an awful candidate to lost to him.

Posted by: Maz | April 2, 2007, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Here we go again. More of the anonymous “sources” propaganda. It’s hard to believe Bush and the corporate media think we are so stupid that we will buy this twice, but they do believe it. And from some of the posts here, they are right. To quote a GOOD American president: “You can fool some of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.”

Posted by: mgm | April 2, 2007, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

If Iran had a nuke would they use it? I don’t think so because they are looking down the barrel of a gun. One move of hostility and it is goodnight.

Posted by: Josh | April 2, 2007, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Till it hits a non-US media source I’ll consider this American propaganda.

Posted by: dave | April 2, 2007, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

This doublespeak will soon have our young men and women spilling blood upon the ground of another country unless the people rise and reclaim their sovereign right to say no to a federal government rabid with the virus of EMPIRE…

Posted by: Ken B | April 2, 2007, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

God help us all if Iran gets the bomb.

Posted by: RD | April 2, 2007, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

First they have to produce a weapon small enough for their missile fleet to deliver which will take years. Second, they have to develop a guidance system that will deliver the warhead reasonably close to the target and Third, the Quods force isnt making a particularly complex new explosive device. A directional shaped charge can be made with a piece of pipe and a coffee can. The more we patrol in vehicles, the more will be blown up.

Posted by: Cole Stewart | April 2, 2007, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

I can’t believe Americans are stupid enough to be fooled by unatributed sources again! It’s lies, all lies!!

Posted by: JR | April 2, 2007, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Maz, It’s easier to steal elections than to know how to lead.

Posted by: JR | April 2, 2007, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

For all the fanatics blaming Bush for WMD’s in Iraq fail to remember every intelligence agency in the world believed Iraq had them. Britain, Germany, and France all said Iraq had WMD’S so give me a break.

Posted by: Thomas | April 2, 2007, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

But what if they are right and Iran has NUKES. And we simply could not muster the political will to stop them because people are upset with George Bush. Don’t let your hatred for Bush allow the Iranian regime to acquire the means to destroy other countries. It will be the same people who will blame Bush if Iran does acquire the bomb and we did nothing.

Posted by: frank | April 2, 2007, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

May I ask why Iran should not be allowed to have nuclear power? Isreal has it America has it Russia has it. It is not the place for America to tell the rest of the world what they should do,

Posted by: James | April 2, 2007, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

If the US strikes Iran it will be this year or not at all. Remember 2008 is an election year. Nine months to go.

Posted by: Joe | April 2, 2007, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Sleep well America. Pelosi and the liberals are running the country.

Posted by: Peter | April 2, 2007, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Excuse me. But as a soverign nation Iran has every right to enrich uranium for use in a nuclear fuel cycle or in nuclear weapons should they see fit to develop them.
If you don’t like that, then it is up to you to enter into a treaty with Iran – negotiate and offer them someting that is more valuable to them than their nuclear fuel cycle.

Posted by: Scott Nudds | April 2, 2007, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

I guess Iran is in a hurry to get more electricty. I mean I beleive them when they say its for peaceful purposes. I don’t believe them when they say they want to wipe Israel off the wipe. It’s Bushes fault! Only Bush lies and America is evil!

Posted by: Gman | April 2, 2007, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

You may ask James,but not knowing the answer is disturbing to say the least. How many other countries are threating to wipe out and to destoy other countries(Israel and the US)? Who else has suicide bombers running around threating the civilized world? What country is supporting terrorists worldwide? What country is run by religious fanatics hoping to bring Armageddon to the world. Are you serious?

Posted by: Thomas | April 2, 2007, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

So just because Iran is a sovereign nation they get to have nukes. Wow! That’s easy.Lets just go home and pray. How many other countries are threating to wipe out and to destoy other countries(Israel and the US)? Who else has suicide bombers running around threating the civilized world? What country is supporting terrorists worldwide? What country is run by religious fanatics hoping to bring Armageddon to the world. Are you serious?

Posted by: Thomas | April 3, 2007, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Perhaps the people that believe that Bush is making this up should note that it is Iran, not the US, that is boasting of the speed in their production. Perhaps they should also note that our intelligence agencies remain skeptical that it’s as fast as they say but still growing at an alarming rate. Maybe Bush deserves the “little boy who cried wolf” treatment, but it’s clear where Iran is headed. Anyone who thinks this is a conspiracy is a fool.

Posted by: SFC D. | April 3, 2007, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Hey,
Don’t you realise that it’s not about the wmd’s,iran, or propaganda? It’s about the children and their safety..that’s right, everything is about the children! They are our future! Wait…hold on a minute, maybe it is about propaganda, but who cares? What is ANYONE going to do about it? Vote? =)

Posted by: nomrbs | April 3, 2007, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Perhaps the people that believe that Bush is making this up should note that it is Iran, not the US, that is boasting of the speed in their production. Perhaps they should also note that our intelligence agencies remain skeptical that it’s as fast as they say but still growing at an alarming rate. Maybe Bush deserves the “little boy who cried wolf” treatment, but it’s clear where Iran is headed. Anyone who thinks this is a conspiracy is a fool.

Posted by: SFC D. | April 3, 2007, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Iran is clearly not a threat. If they were, the Bush Administration would have invaded them INSTEAD of Iraq in 2002. Furthermore, Col. Oliver North, the right-wing’s favorite son, sold 1000′s of weapons to Iran in the 1980′s during the Iran-Contra affair. If Oliver North doesn’t think Iran is a threat, and thinks they can be trusted with any manner of weapons, why should anyone else be afraid of them?

Posted by: Eric | April 3, 2007, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Put up or shut up: No more “sources say.” That’s the same bogus tactic that took us into an illegal war in Iraq.

Posted by: buddhistMonkey | April 3, 2007, 12:29 am 12:29 am

All you ‘Bush lied, people died’ can’t see past your own bias to maybe think for a minute that Iran is dangerous? You know, these are the same people that:
1. have taken our people hostage before.
2. are well known terror sponsors.
3. whos leader wants to ‘wipe the Zionist nation off the face of the earth’, along with OUR COUNTRY!
Just take the Iranian man at his word: he wants a war. Why can’t you see that?

Posted by: NoName | April 3, 2007, 12:33 am 12:33 am

The centrifuges may be real or imagined but that is not the issue. The ABC source for this story is not some spy or any other person in Iraq, but some person here in the USA. But if this person is in the Bush administration then the story is pure spin (truth being irrelevant for this administration).
JUST MY HUMBLE OPINION.

Posted by: Bill | April 3, 2007, 12:46 am 12:46 am

“negotiate and offer them someting that is more valuable to them than their nuclear fuel cycle.” -Scott Nudds
How about this: shut down your enrichment facilities and we’ll let you live. That’s a negotiation.

Posted by: Jeff | April 3, 2007, 12:51 am 12:51 am

David Albright is the same Bush liar that got around real evidence with his pathetic hypothesis that Iraq was a Nuclear threat. He is a LIAR! He also only has a master’s degree. LOL

Posted by: Me | April 3, 2007, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Those who doubt ABCNews might have a point…but blaming the Iranian “nuclear issue” on Bush is absurd.
Either Iran will have nuclear weapons in 2009, as predicted by some…or by 2015 as predicted by others.
Either way, the result is the same: A method to attack Israel and “finally” get rid of the Jews…a goal which Iran has been very public about for years.
So…pick your date. Either way it will come.
Then, as nuclear clouds descend on to the ME, Africa and Western Europe… the leftist anti-war activists will ask the question: “Who let this happen?”
The answer. THEY did. By creating the perception that Iran is not a threat.
sanjosemike

Posted by: sanjosemike | April 3, 2007, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Iran is building a bomb, and will use it once completed. Then and only then the world will wake up. Bush should have gone after the real source of terrorism in the World IRAN. It is not too late yet. The only way out of this to take Molla’s regime out, and US is the only answer world has.The regime who killed 1000′s of it’s own people to stay in power will kill more of others to achive its stability

Posted by: Jvaad | April 3, 2007, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Out of Iraq and into Iran!! While your at it, get rid of that region in Pakistan that is a hot bed of terrorists.

Posted by: David Brown | April 3, 2007, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons to defend against an US attack. Iraq was never a real target; it was just a strategic way point on the way to Tehran. Afghanistan, then Iraq and now Iran is surrounded. This is madness.
The prediction that it would take 10 years for them to get a bomb was always ridiculous. It took us 3 years with 1940′s technology, and we didn’t even know if it was possible. It is equally dubious that Iran would threaten us with nukes if they did get them. Having nukes would force them to behave responsibly or be anhililated.
This is the 21st century. We can’t buy peace with blood. We can’t change hearts and minds with guns. We must talk. We will be experience a cooperative and peaceful relationship at some time in the future. This is an absoulute certainty. Why must we sacrifice innocent life to get from here to there?

Posted by: R Whitten | April 3, 2007, 1:29 am 1:29 am

To SFC D. Glad to hear to hear you have a cogent and up-to-date report on the right-wing and Oliver North. The people who point and accuse Bush of lies and the the misfortune in Iraq will also be first in line to blame him for either doing too much or not enough when the day comes that we rue Iran’s “peaceful” nuclear program. I remember how peacefully they held the US hostage (under Carter) for 444 days. Incidentally, the reason Iran should not have nuclear weapons is that they signed (1972) the Nuclear NonProliferation treaty. Simple.

Posted by: DFS | April 3, 2007, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Iran will be very dangerous if they get a nuclear weapon. Given their statements denying the holocaust, I believe they would not be rational with a nuke. Therefore, I’m in support of taking out their capabilities at whatever the cost.

Posted by: J | April 3, 2007, 2:29 am 2:29 am

Everyone seems to be hung up on the notion of Bush vs media lies. Truth is, Saddam was the liar. He fooled the world’s intelligence communities into thinking he was building CBWs. He miscalculated the response of Bush. That may be what the Iranians are doing now to foment dissent and divide their adversaries. We should be as careful about Iranian lies – either about having HEU or only wanting it for power plants – as we are about Bush and the media.
There’s no one here to get in bed with.

Posted by: rdverb | April 3, 2007, 2:30 am 2:30 am

“sources familiar with the dramatic upgrade tell ABC News” and “sources say the unexpected expansion is taking place”
-
Ah, yes, the same good old zionist “sources” who brought us Saddam’s nuclear program. Their motto where the US and middle eastern countries is simple: “Let’s you and him fight”.

Posted by: Harry | April 3, 2007, 2:46 am 2:46 am

I think that sanctions cannot prevent Iran to produce enriched uranium. Nigotiation shall be the only way to settle the problem. Iran should have the right to use the nuclear energy peacefully but should be under the surveillance of the UN.

Posted by: Jons | April 3, 2007, 2:58 am 2:58 am

We have a huge stockpile of nukes and they are in the hands of Bush/Cheney. Just think about that for a moment.

Posted by: Druthers | April 3, 2007, 3:23 am 3:23 am

It’s a shame that people can’t distinguish between “lies” and misinformation. I consider myself a liberal but find this current knee-jerk assumption that everything is a “lie” insulting and stupid. First, this information isn’t coming from Bush, and there is unanimous agreement world wide that Iran is up to no good. Even China and Russia are on board. One would have to be mega-stupid to think that Bush or anyone wants to go to war with Iran. I suspect it’s the last thing in the world the administration wants right now, given its problems with Iraq. Use your heads, folks. This is a terrible, but very real and dangerous situation. The only lies are coming from Iran.

Posted by: emdee | April 3, 2007, 3:44 am 3:44 am

As far as the Islamist are concerned, Bush did not go to war with them. WE, The United States of America went to war with them. Spent many years in the Middle East, those guys really hate every single one of us. And there is no way you can change their mind. So, stop blaming Bush and ask yourself “are you truly involved in the democratic process?” or do you sit at home on election day and blame Bush for everything. The buck stops at the doorstep of each and every one of us Americans.

Posted by: F Gibson | April 3, 2007, 6:20 am 6:20 am

I don’t know y any country can’t have the nuclear energy if it needed to cope up with their growing demand of energy requirement.If the world wants a nuclear free world than why the powerful countries are still having nuclear weapons.Why are we always having war if we want to live in peace?Japan,Vietnam,Afganistaan,Somaliya,Iraq and now Iran is also targeted, do you think there are no human beings in this countries?Stop the war against humanity.Live and let live should be the policy of every one.

Posted by: Abid | April 3, 2007, 6:55 am 6:55 am

This doesnt surprise me at all. What does, are all the people posting comments like ‘needless war’ or ‘more lies’ you are hopelessly naive. sigh.. Iran wants to be the power in the middle east. They also WANT a confrontation with, and the destruction of the west. So… what should be done? Something involving firepower.

Posted by: Laconix | April 3, 2007, 7:27 am 7:27 am

No senseless war for Israel and oil profits, driven up by shortages on the world market artificially created by our own military disruptions in the Middle East!!!

Posted by: Walt | April 3, 2007, 7:32 am 7:32 am

2009 or 2019, some day, terrorists will get a nuke.
If we are unwilling to stop them, then we shouldn’t act supprised when they use it on us. Hopefully it will just be one bomb, and not ten.

Posted by: Eric | April 3, 2007, 8:01 am 8:01 am

Iran tells the world they have a nuclear program. North Korea says they are going to attain nuclear weapons. Iraq insist they don’t have either. But that’s the country we go to war with, while we ask the U.N. to impose sanctions on Iran and try to talk N. Korea out of an arms race. Kudos to everyone who voted for our current president the first and second time.

Posted by: SPC F. | April 3, 2007, 8:13 am 8:13 am

Blair doesn’t have the backbone to stand up to the Iranians; the French are appeasing them as usual; the Russians and Chinese are helping them; so I guess the only grownups in the world–the US and Israel–will have to take care of business–again. The rest of the world will hide behind our shield and complain about us, but that comes with the territory when you’re king of the hill.

Posted by: Rob | April 3, 2007, 8:13 am 8:13 am

So… Iraq had no WMD’s? Anybody remember when Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons to wipe out Kurds in his own country? So we didn’t find any when we invaded… they probably weren’t stupid enough to keep them there when an invassion based on their existance was about to occur. We should always be vigilant. Iran, North Korea, etc. should all be watched. Turn a blind eye and you have yet another “Perl Harbor”. Maybe your loved ones will bite it in the next one?

Posted by: Pat | April 3, 2007, 8:22 am 8:22 am

Iran will likely target the UN building to shut it up. Is Bush going to attack IRAN before his term is up? He is technically permitted a full scale attack for 2 month without any approval from congress senate. Simple speak, the democrats can’t stop him before it’s too late.

Posted by: Artan Jadon | April 3, 2007, 8:25 am 8:25 am

To anyone who does not consider this to be a threat you must be really stupid. Bush has not promoted this – but we really need to verify as much as possibhle the data. And lets be real about it – can you ever fully know for sure and the answer is NO. You won’t have all the answers but you will have to go with what you do have. I don’t forget the threat against Israel – how could they be so confident unless something was going on??

Posted by: Mike | April 3, 2007, 8:25 am 8:25 am

The WMD info came from the CIA along with intelligence from other nations. The CIA is not a political group. They don’t care who is in office. As a matter of fact, Clinton got the same info as Bush. For those of you that think that this is all from “….Bush and his friends…”, you are uninformed of how the government functions. Reality check, folks. Despite what you may think, we are not out looking for trouble, trouble is looking for us. Iran has been after us since they took hostages for those 444 days in the late seventies. We need to look at the facts and quit listen to how Rosie feels about things. You can not base anything on feelings. It is time we stood up and fought the enemies of the US and quit apologizing for how we live.

Posted by: Shaler | April 3, 2007, 8:32 am 8:32 am

And here is the same article, using only the factual information, taking away all the spin:
“Iran’s nuclear enrichment program is right on track. Iran has just added 1,000 centrifuges to its nuclear separating system, the first step in a plan to add 3,000 by the end of this May. Iran tells us that its enrichment program has been put in place to save oil and produce less expensive, cleaner energy.”

Posted by: Tim | April 3, 2007, 8:41 am 8:41 am

An abusive child grows up to be an abusive adult. And how do we handle abusive adults? We bring them before justice and remove them from society.
Consider Iran as an abusive adult. The 70s hostage crisis demonstrated they were an abusive child.
Now their hate is spreading across the region as they plant their abusive people in the societies across the middle-east. They have taken advantage of their neighbors to plant military personnel in their countries in the form of Republican Guards, Hizbulla and Hamas.
Now their neighbors are held hostage by the abusive regime in Tehran, and it can only get worse before it gets better.
But doing nothing only means more abuse from Iran.

Posted by: dead mike | April 3, 2007, 8:47 am 8:47 am

Its not only Iran trying to get nukes. Its about 25 other countries too. We only hear about Iran because the people who are in power now want to control the mid east. How long can the U.S. and the U.K. stop everyone from getting WMD? Sooner or later, Bang… Live for today, because the future is bleak…

Posted by: Lamont Barger | April 3, 2007, 8:48 am 8:48 am

Im glad we have a strong president that will not allow this dangerous and unpredictable enemy of the United States to attain a nuclear bomb. Hail to the chief!!!!

Posted by: Frank S | April 3, 2007, 9:02 am 9:02 am

wow I cannot believe some of you. First off a few of you are right, I don’t think Iran would use a nuclear bomb once they have it. They would be destroyed. Instead they would give them to hamas to use and when that happens who do we attack? It will be a much worse situation, because how are we going to prove who gave the bomb to Hamas.
And for those who think we can just talk to them and make everything alright, how can you believe this. Lets ask Daniel Pearl how much talking helped him. He just wanted to talk. These are also the people who have their fathers or brothers murder their sister if she was raped, because now she is no longer pure. Does this sound like a sane rational civilization where dialog will help?

Posted by: brian | April 3, 2007, 9:03 am 9:03 am

I can identify one source high in the Iranian government – Ahmadinejad. He has made his intentions perfectly clear, to destroy Israel and the West. Heck, the fuel being made won’t even work in their only reactor.
Know this, evil does exist and you can’t make it go away by pretending it doesn’t.

Posted by: Ron | April 3, 2007, 9:07 am 9:07 am

This is just another cry for help from the poor Iranians. “Death to America” chants are a sign of how we have mistreated them over the past 30 years. Has anybody thought about a giant group hug? Fighting hate with hate becomes a vicious cycle.

Posted by: Craig | April 3, 2007, 9:07 am 9:07 am

I have to say one thing to a lot of the posters here. Before you post please do some research on the subject. It is obvious you have access to the internet so research some of these stories before you respond, as with everything else you do in life, get the facts before you try to have an intelligent conversation about any topic. It is pretty obvious that all you who say bush lied has not done one second of research and those who say we can talk to Iran has not done any research, and those who say Iran should have nuclear technology if they need it, hasn’t done any research.

Posted by: Brian | April 3, 2007, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Actually Iraq did have wmd’s prior to the invasion. A top ranking Iraqi general in Saddam’s army has repeatedly stated that” Saddam sent 15 commercial jetliners to Syria just before the start of the war, these planes seats were removed and the wmd’s were loaded on the planes”. Our intelligence and military surveillence did indeed pick up these planes leaving Iraq. We were told that they were carrying humanitarian aid and personnel to aid Syria who was dealing with a dam collapse. His story has never changed, and has also been confirmed by lower ranking military personnel.

Posted by: Maggi | April 3, 2007, 9:20 am 9:20 am

While all of thoughts here are certainly good and raise some needed thought before embarking into a bad situation. Just remember Iran’s leader has openly expressed the desire to eliminate Israel and the United States. We must be alert and prevail against someone so bold to openly make threats of this degree. larry

Posted by: Larry | April 3, 2007, 9:34 am 9:34 am

All of the people saying it’s Bush administration lies are disregarding some very hard facts.
The Clinton administration and many top Democrats well before Bush was in office were calling publically for Iraq regime change due to the threats of WMD and traditional warfare with their neighbors. Not to mention the 17 violations of the 1991 cease-fire. Also, do you not believe the British and Isreali intelligence being on-board as well? It is very ignorant to blame the current US president for years of non-partisan intelligence.
Get a clue please.

Posted by: ChrisJ | April 3, 2007, 9:35 am 9:35 am

If you all think that Iran is the only threat in the production of WMD, think again. North Korea, and South America’s Hugo Chavez are setting up the TRIANGULAR principle of WAR. Just think, Iran, North Korea and South America aiming all of their WMD towards the only country that they consider a threat to them. That’s right, our own back yards. So, lets wake up and seize the opportunity to stop all of these lunatics that are aiming to destroy us and bring them to their knees so that we can go on living in the freedom world that we are all so use to living. These dictators of these three countries need to be brought to justice and hung so that the rest of the WORLD can wake up and smell the roses without the fear of aggression in the form of WMD that will destroy not only the USA but the parts of the WORLD that they consider a non value of interest and a possible future threat to them. I say, stop them now, before it is too late, to regret. I am an American Fighting Man, and I believe in the FREEDOM that our fore fathers had set forth for us to cheerish and enrich our lives with the joy and happeness of FREEDOM. The words IN GOD WE TRUST is a part of our constitution and is printed in just about every part of our monetary exchange process, lets get rid of all of those that believe that “ALLAH” and “JIHAD” should be what is in the new print, and let them know that “IN GOD WE TRUST” is the only trust that we have for them. “GOD BLESS AMERICA and PRESIDENT George Bush for his outstanding leadership in the WAR that he wedged towards TERRORISIM”

Posted by: Tony Aquiningoc | April 3, 2007, 9:35 am 9:35 am

**
Posted by: F Gibson | Apr 3, 2007 6:20:14 AM
I don’t know y any country can’t have the nuclear energy if it needed to cope up with their growing demand of energy requirement.If the world wants a nuclear free world than why the powerful countries are still having nuclear weapons.Why are we always having war if we want to live in
**
Any country in the world can take the model of peaceful nuclear power. Again, we have a case of informational ignorance. The IAEA was built to produce nuclear power for second and third world countries. The key element here is to abide by the Non-Proliferation Treaty and allow the G8 to control the fuel cycle. No new fuel-cycle countries is the policy. You take the fuel from a G8 nation, process it in your reactors (also usually built by outside contractors) then hand back the exact amount of spent uranium or plutonium.
People, please get out there and read more instead of carrying party-line rhetoric.

Posted by: ChrisJ | April 3, 2007, 9:40 am 9:40 am

I think we should worry about protecting ourselves from these bombs—missile defense systems, etc. Oh yeah! you liberals said Reagan was crazy when he said that. It has come full circle. Let’s just get over the WMD argument. We took out a horrible dictator, and Bush did the best he could with the information he was given. Move on now. As far as the media, I would like to see some positive information about America once in a while…Let’s report both…There’s an idea!

Posted by: mjones | April 3, 2007, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Better pay attention to the words of Iran, They mean real harm to the West sticking one’s head in the sand and hoping our kindness will change that is a joke! Time to blow them back to the 5th century.,

Posted by: Ron | April 3, 2007, 9:41 am 9:41 am

There must be something in the water. It amazes me at how everyone seems to think this administration is SO corrupt and filled with lies. This situation with Iran is much different than in Iraq. To be fair, Bush did NOT lie. I think he was very clear after Sept 11 as to what action the US would have to take to thwart another Tragedy like 911. As an American I am grateful for the rights we have as citizens but ashamed of the Anti American Bush bashing that I hear from everyone. The Entire World believed and provided the evidence that brought into Iraq. It is a justifiable war…Period. Yes War is ugly but the bleeding hearts in this country are the ones to blame for the slow success we see in the Middle East. Saddam had WMDs. I don’t care where you are, if you were given 12 years to develop a program and hide it where it cannot be found….Pee Wee herman could do it. With or without WMDs, Saddam needed to go. The Axis of Evil was called out by Bush and since we have persued and End to those intent on bringing this country down. I think the leaders of I ran have been very clear on their intentions. Unless you prefer living under Sharia Law, I suggest you get behind the ones that are fighting for your right to whine….Boo Hoo the war is ugly..boo hoo…if we just sit down and play nice maybe we can work it out. It took 12 resolutions and more than a decade to eventually get Saddam and his thugs out of the picture. Iran is run by a Terrorist whom Kidnapped and held hostage AMERICANS for 444 days. Stop listening to the crap they keep saying on the news about OUR leader. He is not the Satan they’d like to make him out to be. And in my opinion it is whiney little American brats like you that give our enemies the impression that this country is so weak. Funny how all the countries named by BUSH as the Axis of Evil, all started acting up right after he called them out. If they North Korea, Iran obtain nukes, we will all pay. Iran can hold the World Oil supply hostage.That would make you greasy cheeseburgers, Milk and anything else you spoiled people charish 10 times more expensive. So please if things are so bad here…maybe you should go over to Iran and try to fix it yourself…or just sit back, gripe and moan until you see two suns in the Sunset….Hmmmm. There is no D in Victory…but there is in Defeat. It’s time for Americans to shut up and stand up. Your whining not only irritates me it emboldens an enemy that would just assume lop your head off than look at you. Stop running to our enemies defense or get out of the US.
Blame Yourselves you brats.
Signed
The Patriot

Posted by: The Patriot | April 3, 2007, 9:48 am 9:48 am

I’m sure most of you are unaware of this fact, but Iran is totally justified under the NPT (Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty) to acquire the full nuclear cycle. Meaning they have every right to develop the capacity to enrich uranium to 3-5% to run their nuclear reactor. The problem is…once a country has the ‘know-how’ to accomplish this, there is absolutely nothing to stop them from enriching uranium to 85-90% which is what it takes to make a bomb. It’s a weakness in the treaty itself, but they have the right…just like they claim.
They are a signatory to the treaty, as was North Korea. North Korea opted out of the treaty by giving the required 6 months notice. Then conducted their own nuclear test.
If Bush & Co., have proof that Iran is indeed building nuclear bombs; then show us…
Give us detailed proof that they have violated the treaty and then I’m behind you all the way. Until then, don’t expect me to believe a proven liar like George W. Bush…
Either the NPT has force and effect; or it doesn’t.
I’m through with buying into the grand deception.

Posted by: David | April 3, 2007, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Perhaps I’m mistaken as I don’t know much about nuclear proliferation but does “having enough highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon in 2009″ equate to having a nuclear weapon in 2009?
From what I understand, building a nuke is much more complicated than having the raw materials.

Posted by: Adam | April 3, 2007, 9:59 am 9:59 am

@ Brian. Give me a break! You must be out of your mind to think that American/Israel is acting more suspicious than Iran! You mean to tell me that you would rather believe the tyrant of Iran, the same person that denies the holocaust!! Have you ever read any of the Koran?

Posted by: KJ | April 3, 2007, 10:07 am 10:07 am

The IDF is very busy these days planting “intelligence” about Iran and its nuclear capability. If this “intelligence” is no more valid than the WMD “intelligence” used to sucker the Bush Administration into the Iraq invasion, we can sleep well.By the way, has anbody seen a casualty report of IDF personnel killed in Iraq? How does it compare to American casualties?

Posted by: eblair | April 3, 2007, 10:07 am 10:07 am

We should let Iran build their nuke and use it. It’s the only acceptable course of inaction.

Posted by: Perrin Ehlinger | April 3, 2007, 10:11 am 10:11 am

So many people post comments that we cannot trust the Bush administration on this matter because it reminds them of the WMD claims about Iraq. Mean time Iran itself is telling the world exactly what its plans and aims are. So because people feel Bush mislead us in Iraq, we should do nothing about Iran’s pusuit of the bomb and stated intentions to use it? This isn’t about support for George Bush, this is about preventing a nuclear exchange that will kill millions and render the middle east uninhabitable as well as end the world’s supply of oil. Oh, and the world-wide effects of the fifty nuclear bombs Israel would launch at Iraq in response. I think we need to put those concerns ahead of any dislike for George Bush and whatever errors were made regarding Iraq.

Posted by: Glen | April 3, 2007, 10:11 am 10:11 am

>> The War is for Profit (Oil) and a sustainable economy. The American people would not support a war directly for profit so the Propoganda machine must spin a socially acceptable reason to invade
There are hundreds of thousands of children in Africa and the broader Middle East who are able to eat BECAUSE America has oil. There are people across the globe who receives AIDS treatment BECAUSE America has oil. America GIVES THE MOST to the world’s needy. So, if it takes a propaganda machine to fool the American people into stabilizing the world, so be it.
BTW: Amadenejad would have to be involved in order for this to be an American (President Bush) conspiracy. And that’s just a dumb conclusion to make.

Posted by: Jon | April 3, 2007, 10:22 am 10:22 am

ummmmmmmmm
Were not the only superpower, and it should not be left up to us to stop Iran. Russia is helping them along with there reactor, Russia borders Iran, Any tactical strike at Iran could cause nuclear fallout to occur in Russia.
I say the US pulls out, and stops thinking of Iran totally. Let them have their nuclear toys while we finish up our missle defense shield. At that point, the only people that need to worry are Isreal, and Russia. Isreal has been at it with the Palistines (phillistines) since biblical times and there simply not going to stop as long as there funded. If Russia is OK with a lunitic at there back door with nukes then so be it. They will not be able to reach the continental US as long as we have a missle defense shield.
In time, Russia, Isreal, India, China, and the other regional powers will rise up against a nuclear Iran. At this point they will come to us for help. Then at least its on our terms and THEN we can pose as a condition for our help no nukes for that REGION. Not just Iran.

Posted by: jalively1971 | April 3, 2007, 10:24 am 10:24 am

>> If Iran had a nuke would they use it? I don’t think so because they are looking down the barrel of a gun
On the contrary, Amadenejad BELIEVES the fire will cleans the world of the Zionists and bring the true believers (mainly their faction of Muslimism) to glory. So, to him, he isn’t ‘looking down the barrel of a gun’ but instead fulfilling a great destiny.

Posted by: Jon | April 3, 2007, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Unnecessary war? That’s cute… and exactly the problem. Our sworn enemies, and make no mistake they are, want you dead. Do you not get that? They want you, personally, to die. Is defending your life “unnecessary?” Things can always be done differently in war. The fact is we need someone more steadfast than Bush. We need a Churchill.

Posted by: J | April 3, 2007, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Let’s stop fighting over where this news came from. No matter where it came from, this is horrible news and may God help us all if the Iranians press the button.

Posted by: Veronica | April 3, 2007, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Several things:
1) Obviously 15 British troops had no business being anywhere near Iranian waters. They were captured. UK/US leadership knew they’d be captured. It was a planned PR stunt to drum up public anger against Iran.
2) No Iranian armada of warships are headed towards the UK or US. Iran poses no threat.
3) All immigration legal and illegal should be cut off. If Iranians or their Muslim proxies can’t get into the US or UK they can’t hit us. They only can hit us if we allow them to enter the country. They have absolutely no business coming into the US or UK in the first place. Muslims have 24 Islamic countries they can feely worship Allah in and associate with their arab brothers.
4) The corporate and politcal “no borders” elites want war with Iran and the rest of the Middle East.
5) Why not just make surgical missle strikes to hit Iranian nuke production facilities and leave it at that? Or use similar means?

Posted by: RealityCheck | April 3, 2007, 10:28 am 10:28 am

I think it is time to stop talking and start acting. Obviously talking is not taking care of the Lunatic running Iran.

Posted by: Mike | April 3, 2007, 10:28 am 10:28 am

What part of this do you people not understand. Have you not read what their president thinks of us and Israel? Do some research, the level of which hate towards America is practiced over there is sickening. All of you who think this is a big joke and pure propoganda from the Bush camp can be the US’s “human Shield” after Iran finally builds it’s nuke. The fact that even some Americans (I use that term loosely) feel that we should wait until we have undeniable proof, (read attacked), that someone intends to harm us before we do something about it is a disgrace.

Posted by: hooligan | April 3, 2007, 10:31 am 10:31 am

>> First they have to produce a weapon small enough for their missile fleet to deliver which will take years.
They already have missiles which can reach Israel, not to mention their moderate neighbors.
>> Second, they have to develop a guidance system that will deliver the warhead reasonably close to the target
No they don’t. A scud missile can hit within a couple miles of a particular target (and with a nuke, that’s good enough).
>>Third, the Quods force isnt making a particularly complex new explosive device. A directional shaped charge can be made with a piece of pipe and a coffee can.
It’s not the capability to cause the device to explode in a particular direction that implements the Iranian. It’s the precision of the materials used to form into a more lethal projectile.
>> The more we patrol in vehicles, the more will be blown up.
The more Iranian’s (terrorists) we kill or capture in Iraq, the less we will be blown up too. Hmm.

Posted by: Jon | April 3, 2007, 10:34 am 10:34 am

If Iran ever used an EMP (electromagnetic pulse) bomb above Isreal, essentially frying every electronic device in the country, the U.S. would make Iran a sheet of glass!! This will not happen, of course, because Iran’s military infrastructure and nuclear facilities will be long gone before they reach this capability! Iran is the State equivilent of a suicide bomber and MUST be stopped!!

Posted by: Todd P. | April 3, 2007, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Wow, Dangerous people who dont care if we are nice to them or not are obviously developing dangerous weapons that could kill hundreds of thousands of americans with one blast (and they would like that) and all most on here can do is call people names…. Real solid bunch of Americans….

Posted by: Matt | April 3, 2007, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Not to all the right-wingers bashing liberals for wanting sources:
We liberals who are asking for sources are doing so in order to validate the means to another possible war. I think I can speak for most liberals when I say that if it is proven to us by more than one source (the Bush administration, who at this time polls show have long since lost America’s trust) we are willing to go along with another possible war. We just want to make an educated decision. We care about the lives of our American soldiers and certainly want the facts before we risk their lives. Asking for some evidence isn’t cowardly, it’s intelligent. This is what educated people do. This concept is only difficult to understand with a narrow mind.

Posted by: Jacob | April 3, 2007, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Iran has a population of 70 million people. Oil is not enough and will not be enough to sustain thier economy. Their nuclear program is under IAEA supervision as it is. The IAEA has cameras set up in thier nuclear facilities. I don’t know any other country that does this. There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that their nuclear program is for anything other than energy. Believe me folks, the Bush Administration is using propaganda to generate yet another war. And many of us are still believing his garbage.

Posted by: mohammad | April 3, 2007, 10:52 am 10:52 am

North Korea has the bomb and nobody seems to have a care or worry about that anymore. I wonder why.

Posted by: Brandon | April 3, 2007, 10:52 am 10:52 am

>> May I ask why Iran should not be allowed to have nuclear power? It is not the place for America to tell the rest of the world what they should do
No one has ever denied Iran nuclear POWER. They were offered all the nuclear material they could want for their nuclear POWER plants.
No other nation on the face of the planet comes CLOSE to America’s generosity. We feed hundreds of thousands of starving children and provide billions to fight AIDS around the globe. We have GIVEN BACK land that we liberated from Japan and Germany. We don’t target civilians but spend an exorbitant amount of money using precision guided ammunition to try to limit civilian casualties. Governments around the world ASK us to intervene to broker a settlement between two factions. The bottom line, even though yes, Iran and America are both sovereign nations, they are not equal in maturity.
Just for clarity, I am speaking of the regimes NOT THE PEOPLE. The people of Iran may or may not be very mature, but the regime is very immature.

Posted by: Jon | April 3, 2007, 10:56 am 10:56 am

As witnessed by so many of the comments here, the Left’s hatred of Bush has become so internalized and deep-rooted that they are blind to real risk staring them in the face. Iran’s nuclear program is not an illusion. Ahmadinejad’s repeated threats against Israel were not cooked up by the Bush administration. The levels of ignorance, paranoia, pure bile and wishful thinking is astonishing-and terrifying, when you consider that these people vote.

Posted by: Jay | April 3, 2007, 10:56 am 10:56 am

I guess when all of us here in the US have to learn Iranian in school, then maybe the reality of things will sink in. The Govt of Iran has always hated us. Ask the hostages from 1979. Ask the Iraians if they remember being gased by Saddam in the 80′s. The Lefties would like everyone to leave each other alone but in the reality of the world, this will never be possible. If no one believes that radical Islam is real. Go on the internet and watch the beheadings of Zionists. Do not eat before you do

Posted by: Pete | April 3, 2007, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Iran has been developing their nuclear industry in secret for the last 20 years. Aside from what they’ve declared to the IAEA, what are the chances that they have some secret, well protected military installation somewhere in the mountains and/or underground in the tunnels, spinning thousands of centrifuges for years already and getting really close to building a nuclear weapon. They already have the blueprints of how to build the nuclear warheads, purchased from Koreans, as evidenced by the documents that they’ve turned to the IAEA a couple of years ago. When pressed about how they’ve obtained this detailed information, they responded that they’ve got it “by mistake” along with the other technical documentation. Yeah, right. Make no mistake, that once that these religious zealots WILL NOT hesitate to detonate a nuclear weapon in US or Israel or other European country. Worse yet, they can and will pass this weapons to the terrorist organizations, the likes of Al Qaida, Hamas, Hisbollah, Chechnya’s rebels. Once these weapons reach these terrorists, they will surely not hesitate to detonate them for their “religious” causes. Some doves do not understand this or do not want to face the reality or seriousness of this situation, but when they wake up one day and CNN news will announce that Iran has successfully detonated a nuclear weapon, will they admit they were wrong? By then it will be too late. I hope this day never comes. Can we afford the chance of letting Iran’s regime go ahead with their nuclear activities? I don’t think so.

Posted by: David S. | April 3, 2007, 11:17 am 11:17 am

I wonder if the Iranians are worried about Global Warming? I bet that Pelosi can use “diplomacy” to bring peace, with an understanding “that as watch the effects of Global Warming, we won’t attack you, if you can guarantee that you will not attack anyone too. Maybe we can work together for the greater interests of everyone … everywhere?”
Hum. What a GREAT IDEA !!!
I don’t think that the Bush Administration has wanted to make that type of political guarantee … since Republiicans like to control everybody …… everywhere!!!!!

Posted by: Peter | April 3, 2007, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Let’s just sit back and do nothing and let the terrorists come to us. Some of you people have a very short memory. Let’s not forget that we have not had one terroist attack on our soil since 9/11. You say that we instigate hate by starting wars with Islamic Countries, but how much do we have to take??? There were plenty of attacks on the United States before President Bush took office, i.e. 1993 World Trade Center Bombing and bombing of U.S.S. Cole.
We can all play Monday Morning quarterback and say the Iraq war wasn’t the right thing to do, but the bottom line is that we eliminated an evil dictator. Does anyone realize that Saddam Hussein sent thousands of dollars to Palestinian suicide bombers families after the suicide bombers blew themselves up in Israel killing innocent women and children? This is the same mentality we are dealing with in regards to Iran’s President. These religious fanatics want to live in the 4th century times. Our two main goals right now should be to stop the proliferation of nuclear bombs by these rogue nations like Iran, and work to try to eliminate our need for fossil fuels

Posted by: Ed | April 3, 2007, 11:49 am 11:49 am

You can build a cascade of centrifuges but if they aren’t enriching Uranium then all they are are is a pile of metal.
Iran is probably saying look we did this, we can do it, what we want is a civil nuclear capacity, are you going to help us or not.
Problem is that there is an idiot in the White House listening to an even bigger idiot Dick (Who voted for me) Cheney. With a fellow called Bolton (No one voted for me either) acting as a cheer leader on the sidelines

Posted by: Chris | April 3, 2007, 11:52 am 11:52 am

UMMM correct me if I’m wrong but Iran said 3,000 centrifuges by May, this is April they are now putting in 1,000 or the 3,000 and even those don’t work yet and they are trying to tell us they are “ahead” of schedule? Sounds to me like they are behind schedule, but then commen sense and facts never much seemed to matter to this administration and their spinmaster puppets in the media

Posted by: Melissa | April 3, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

It is unbelievable how the press can control the minds of many in this country! Reading the comments here by many make it cleas that is Iran does get a nuclear bomb it will be blamed on Bush! These weak minded who want to surrender before the war has began, who want to blame anyone but the perpetratures are really decieved! It has been the Bush administration who has led the fight to stop Iran from getting a nucleur bomb! If Iran get the bomb and usues it on Israel who willthe sheep blame? It will be Bush of course.
Talk about twisting the truth inside out! Those who oppose stopping Iran will rue the day they did not support Bush. Iran is led by religious fanatics who want to start WW3. What is so hard to understand here? All the people in this country who hate Bush so much should open their eyes and look at the truth. The press has managed to manipualte their minds so they do not remember Clintion, and the United Nations resolutions against Saddam Huessan. They are the kind of people who like to look back, weep, wring their hands, and say;”We should have done something to help those people.” But they do not have the courage to do anything! After Iran starts a nucleur war they will say; We should have stopped those fanatics. Those people are always looking back blaming others because they have no courage to stand up to evil.

Posted by: Walt | April 3, 2007, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Who cares. Let them have nukes. No one else cares

Posted by: John Fullerton | April 3, 2007, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

John Kerry > January 23, 2003
“Without question we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator leading an impressive regime. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he’s miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. His consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction.”
Ted Kennedy > September 27, 2002
“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”
Nancy Pelosi > December 16, 1998
“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”

Posted by: Bob Daniels | April 3, 2007, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Please tell us who your “sources” are for the story on Iran having the N bomb by 2009. Considering the past 6 years it is very worrisome that the Administration is feeding this kind of info to the media with the idea of getting the public to accept a confrontation with Iran. Why now? You have done your listeners a disservice and I am so disappointed in ABC. Is David Albright an authority on the subject? Seems the International authorities are keeping mum. Please address this issue.

Posted by: Mary Levenspiel | April 3, 2007, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

@Melissa
UMMM, what difference does it make if they’re ahead of schedule or behind schedule if their schedule is to make weapons grade uranium? They’ll get there eventually, no? spin that, puppet.

Posted by: Jay | April 3, 2007, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

As with most countries that hate the U.S, the answer why lies in the last 50 years history in which we put leaders into place in their countries that liked the US more than their own people. Why do Iranians hate us? Look up the Shah of Iran. We put him there in the 50s. He sold his country out to us until the Ayatollah and his kind forced the Shah out in the late 70s. Do I think we should attack Iran now? Not yet. To those here who fault “liberals” for not believing the White House; if you caught your spouse repeatedly in lies, would you still believe him/her?

Posted by: paul wheeler | April 3, 2007, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Someone cried wolf wolf….
and now no one believes us.. :(
stupid republicans…..
This is a real problem. To have a WMD in the hands of Islamic Extremists (Yes, in Iran) would be a very dangerous situation.
Its about time the international community take some serious action, including striking Iran’s capabilities, militarily. Israel would not be far with a plan…
Hope the security council grows up to the real Irananian threat.

Posted by: Jay | April 3, 2007, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

I say we do nothing, no I’m serious. New York City (again), San Fran, and L.A. will be targets. All far left hubs! I personally will be living in my beach house in Utila watching the fiasco unfold, left blaming right, right blaming left, and neither having the guts to stop it.
Cheers,
PO

Posted by: Passive Observer | April 3, 2007, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

So now ABC is the propaganda machine for the Bush administration? Hardly.
Acting on the same intelligence as the Whitehouse Dems were calling for the removal of Saddam (by force.) So if Bush lied, all the Dems did as well. This the libs conveniently forget as they do any fact that does not justify their hatred.

Posted by: Tony | April 3, 2007, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

ALL of the above is of no consequence. WWII was a LONG time ago. The days of each side wearing a uniform are over. Our men and women are cruising around Iraq and Afghanastan with bullseyes on them. The real problem for them is, how do you fight what you can’t see? If we do wind up at war with Iran (along with Afghanastan, and Iraq), it will be only more of the same. Terrorism has changed the face and rules of war. It will gruel on for years, with NOONE winning. Glory days are over. Just ask Britain or the IRA. Or the poor kids over there trying to defend us. Its time the US recognizes this. It’s lost before it’s begun.
We have approached this war by traditional means. Terrorists BANK on this. It makes it all very predictable for them. Uniforms, patrols, tanks, humvees, ALL stand out. EASY targets. When you watch an old movie about the American Revolution – how stupid do the Red Coats look? Banging on drums wearing royal red uniforms – gee – that must have been hard for the minute men to spot. Time to fight by THEIR rules (which are NO rules)? Time to stop fighting amongst ourselves, Repulican, Democrats – its all so mundane. Face it folks, BOTH sides lie. Politicians don’t climb the ladder of success by being honest. Time to find alternative fuel? The ONLY thing these countries have that anyone wants is oil. If we find a way to operate without their oil, then they have nothing. Then they have sand, and their God. Stop spilling the blood. Put the manpower, the muscle, and the money into technology. Good old American know how. Make fuel not widows man.

Posted by: kate | April 3, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

after reading most of the posts in regard to said topic one thing seems clear. the conservatives writing about the imminent threat of of iran posessing nuclear weapons seem to be as gullible as ever. having learned nothing from our folly in iraq. the time it takes to enrich a large enough quantity of uranium to build a nuclear device means there is plenty of time to assess their intentions without becoming gripped in a paralyzing fear which seems so evident in what most on the right portray in their posts.
we can dispatch a team of aircraft to destroy a given target in literally hours, and certainly possess the technology (including nuking them first) if the situation requires it. i would suggest that before you start building a bunker or take up permanent residence beneath your beds you sit back, take a deep breathe and allow our intelligence agencies to do their jobs. if and when our agencies and those of our allies reach a consensus that what you espouse is indeed true, there will in fact be plenty of time to act accordingly, by whatever means necessary to nuetralize the threat. lets not repeat the same mistake we made when we invaded iraq, which has not made any of us more secure, and has only polarized an entire region against us. that mistake has made fighting terorism that much harder now that we have exponentially increased their numbers, and only served to further fan the flames of their hate towards us.

Posted by: amused | April 3, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

It all comes down to one thing, Oil and Corporate greed. We are funding these regimes by buying Opec Oil. Our government is doing nothing to promote alternative fuels. Why would they, our admin built their fortunes with oil.
If we did not need to purchase oil, these countires economies would dry up “overnight” and they would not be able to purchase the technology needed for nukes.
Also, corporations are outsources thousands of US jobs to where? India. As an employee of a large multi-national US firm, I have been seeing our jobs go to the “lowest” bidders worldwide. I know for a fact that many of the techs come from Pakistan, Afghanistan etc. We are funding our enemies for the sake of profit. Building their economies while ours goes down the crapper.

Posted by: Jim | April 3, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Looks like the libs have to see a mushroom cloud in their backyard before they believe anything, I fear the action they would take after the attack is to ask for forgiveness for not sending Nancy Pelosi to talk to them.
Get with it libs our country is under attack.

Posted by: Jim | April 3, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

If you read the Bible, it seems to me that it is becoming closer to being fulfilled. The earth will be destroyed by fire, so I am sure that a Nuclear Bomb could completely eliminate part of the world. We need to be on our knees asking God for mercy. This man in Iran wants to destroy Israel which is God’s chosen people…you and I both know that God will never stand for that to take place. Our world needs to be in prayer like never before. We will face times that have never been faced before on this earth.

Posted by: Elaine | April 3, 2007, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Condi should send Richard Armitage to Iran. Make them an offer they can’t refuse. Like they’re own grand canyon. 700 ft deep not 70 ft. Get it over with.

Posted by: charlie b | April 3, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

There is a big difference between enriching uranium up to 5 percent, which is as far as the Iranians have gotten by now, and up to 90 percent required by weapons. Cascading the centrifuges is a big deal, and may be beyond their capability for several years. On the other hand, buying plutonium from N. Korea could happen within weeks after a U.S. strike on Iran, if it has not happened already.

Posted by: James Fox | April 3, 2007, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

This is Orwellian. No one would trust a U.S. claim that its intelligence knows that Iran is on the brink of developing ‘weapons of mass destruction’. So the U.S. claims instead that its intelligence underestimated, miscalculated and had no idea how advanced Iran’s nuclear program truly is–thereby lending apparent credibility to the claim that Iran is on the brink of developing WMDs.

Posted by: Brent Cox | April 3, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Let’s take them out before they take us out. There goal has always been to eradicate Jews and Christians since the beginning of civilization. These bleeding heart liberals need to wake up or get out this country. When your at war there’s going to be casualties and you have to except it. There is no way to rastionalize with these animals. These are the same people who are providing insurgency with weaponry. Take them out!
Chris

Posted by: chris | April 3, 2007, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

I can’t believe all the previous posters that think this is all a lie by the Bush administration. The UN agrees that there are undisclosed nuclear activities going on to probably build a weapon, the IAEA suspects the nuclear program is for nuclear weapons, and lets not forget that Mahmoud Amakeajihad calls for the destruction of Israel. How is he going to do that, with nuclear weapons. All the international pressure and sanctions are going to do nothing, so the only viable alternative is to bomb all their nuclear facilities.

Posted by: Tom | April 3, 2007, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Better to die for freedom than
live under tyranny.

Posted by: karl anglin | April 3, 2007, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Bush Lies
Americans Die
IMPEACH!

Posted by: Mike in NY | April 3, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Are you watching the same developments that I am? Have you not seen footage of WWII and the events that led up to it? Iran’s president is not different. He is an unstable person who has been given way too much power. Our fathers who died defending this nation must be rolling over in their graves. We have been nice enough for too long! We we sit back and “play nice” is when we will be hit with a nuclear bomb. We must stop things before they start. Remember WWII

Posted by: Allison | April 3, 2007, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Time for Action!!! Send in our first team — The Leadership: Hillary Clinton & Nancy Polosi,the Diplomats: Madelyn Albright & Dennis Kosenich, The Jesters: Jessie Jackson and Ted Kennedy,The Intellectuals: The Al’s, Gore and Sharpton, the Military: Lt. Watada and Jane Fonda, The Legal Team: Ramsey Clark & Allan Dershowitz. This will end the Bush lies and make the world a safe place once and for all.

Posted by: Matthew | April 3, 2007, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

The hypocracy is blinding.
We insist that the Iranians stop all research into nuclear development for civilian or military use at the same time that we announce that we’re moving forward with a massive upgrading of our old nuclear arsenal which is large enough to blow our entire planet out of orbit.
Meanwhile since the bombing of Hiroshima, we and other members of the western alliance, far too numerous to mention have performed over 2000 nuclear weapons tests on a wide assortment of deserts, atolls, islands and under ground sites.
These had nothing to do with power for civilian use, but that was internationally acceptable.
Iran on the other hand is prohibited from so much as lighting a home with nuclear powered electricity.
Go figure.

Posted by: Zach | April 3, 2007, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

quoting Doug: “Has anyone else noticed that this sudden breaking news comes right at the time that 15 British soldiers have been kidnapped…” Think about Doug’s statement for just 10 seconds. The Persians are more than tripling their capacity to enrich uranium, and they kidnap 15 British sailors to create a distraction. Yet, in Doug’s mind, this is all part of some larger “evil George Bush consipiracy”. I think poor Doug needs a trip to the “Rosie O’Donnell Ward”.

Posted by: Afarki Sudarki | April 3, 2007, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Sorry, in my last post I said “Persians”. I think the euphemism for the last 70 years has been “Iranians”. Talk about trying to run from your own past!

Posted by: Afarki Sudarki | April 3, 2007, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

WOW!!! How soon we forget… Didn’t 9/11 wake anyone up??? The middle east does not like the USA. They didn’t like the United States LONG!!! before Clinton and Bush even claimed the Presidency. If Iran get’s the chance and has a nuclear weapon, Isreal won’t be the only target. This country will experience more than Hurricane Katrina “Wake Up America, we have not been attacked since Bush has all of them on the run” Maybe we should use Rosie O’Donnel as our savior instead.

Posted by: Dennis Wagner | April 3, 2007, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

I’m very curious to know where these centrifuges are comming from. Are they being manufactured in Iran or imported from another country? If the latter, then simply blocking their import is a simple solution, but the media never addresses this issue. I wouldn’t be surprised is they are coming from Russia or France.

Posted by: Frank | April 3, 2007, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Does anyone remember Hans Blix, the Swedish investigator who, after spending several months in Iraq searching for WMDs, declared to the U.S. and the world that there were none? Remember also the derision he received following his announcement? Send in Hans Blix to determine if the centrifuges exist and if Iran is harboring WMDs. I trust his judgement more than Bush and the Bush White House.

Posted by: Jim | April 3, 2007, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

NEWS FLASH!
- Iraq did not attack us on 9/11
- Iran did not attack us on 9/11
- Iran is a vast majority SHIITE muslim country
- The terrorists attacking US troops in Iraq are SUNNI muslims.
- NONE of Bush or Cheney’s children are in the armed services, nor are they fighint in Iraq.
- If Bush or Cheney cannot convince their own children that the war is worth fighting, why should anyone else believe it?

Posted by: Eric | April 3, 2007, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Iran does not need a “delivery system” for a bomb, all they have to do is give it to Rosie O Donnell, she will be glad to blow up America.. BET THIS WON”T MAKE THE POSTING

Posted by: Airmanc5 | April 3, 2007, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

i personally the united states should try to stop this its put our country in alot of danger and this coming out of a 14 year old starting tomorrow isnt good at all we all need to do something MAYBE PREPARE FOR THIS!!!!!!!DUH!!!!!WHAT SHOULD WE DO JUST SIT AROUND AND LET OUR WHOLE COUNTRY BE DESTROYED AFTER ALL WE HAVE DONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!THIS IS WRONG…….

Posted by: erica wilson | April 3, 2007, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Who cares if Iran has nukes, obliterates Israel, and gives nuclear material to Islamic extremists to terrorize western civilization. Europe has practically surrendered to Islam already, so why should we make such a fuss over this? So, not to worry, Pelosi and her appeasers are now in charge!

Posted by: Frank | April 3, 2007, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

I’m dumbfounded how everyone’s just got their eyes on whoever the media decides to engage, and the rest of the world goes completely unnoticed. We talk about “removing a terrible dictator” (Saddam Hussein) and see it as justified, while Africa suffers from hundreds of these megalomaniacs. We talk about “stopping the nuclear threat” and how it might not be such a bad idea to risk it all and go after the Iranians, but N.Korea with its own brand of unpredictable nutcase gets away with conducting underground nuclear tests.
America seems obsessed with reductionism at the moment. Everything always has to be black/white, wrong/right, republican/democrat. Unfortunately the world doesn’t work that way. It’s much more complex than getting down to “You’re an idiot. No, you’re an idiot” style argument. I know we don’t all strive for wizdom, but everyone who believes in something strongly owes it to themselves to study the opposing viewpoints in as unbiased a fashion as possible…

Posted by: Cat | April 3, 2007, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

“Some Say”….

Posted by: L. Johnson | April 3, 2007, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

I’m not sure the Iranians would actually allow inspectors into their sites, but a third party inspection by someone like Blix certainly seems like a starting point. If Iran refuses, though, then what can one do?
Also, to address the issue of “why do some countries get to have nukes, and others don’t?”, it just makes sense that states who have stated objectives of the complete destruction of others would make a good argument for the latter.

Posted by: Jazz | April 3, 2007, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

For all those asking for sources:
Ahmadinejad is your source! If you read what he says, you would know exactly what he intends to do to Israel, the UK, and America. Ahmadinejad and his Muslim handlers intend to attack the free world once they have the nuclear weapons. They publically state they will force the world into Islam. How’s that for your source!

Posted by: Sliderulex | April 3, 2007, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

It’s funny how the major news outlets LIVE and DIE on anonymous, undisclosed sources…
Now that the information favors the republicans, the lap-dogs are sent in to attack these very same ‘sources’…
Peculiar… very.

Posted by: JelloBiafra | April 3, 2007, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

I could blab on about WMD’s, this, that, and the other thing, but I’ll simply say it straight. Iran wants to pursue ‘peaceful enrichment’. Well tell me then why they refused the deal for light water power plants and opted instead to go along their merry way into economic sanctions? I’m pretty sure it’s not an issue of national pride. Why would an apocolypse-obsessed leader of a war-like religion want nuclear capabilities? It’s not like he’s raving about making Israel and the West ‘disappear in a blast of fire’ or anything like that, right?

Posted by: Jeff Carew | April 3, 2007, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

…and I COULD be a billionaire by 2009.

Posted by: shingles | April 3, 2007, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Shame on ABC News. A first-year college student in a third-rate journalism school should be able to see this article for what it is–yellow journalism not fit for the National Enquirer.
Reading this article, I have no confidence at all that your so-called “source” isn’t playing a sick game of broken-telephone with everyone.
Even the Enquirer would have some sort of information on their sources. I’m horrified that after the events of the past five years, you would still choose to highlight this story on your website’s front page absent any independently verifiable evidence, and with nothing more than a “sources familiar with” to back up your dubious claim. I’m horrified! I suppose Judy Miller will soon be on the staff at ABC “News”?
Mike

Posted by: Mike | April 3, 2007, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

You liberals need to look no further than Iranian state television to see what kind of a threat they are. Look up some info on their president and the 12th Imam. Deterrence would not work with their current leadership because they are looking to bring about the cataclysmic fight which will bring about the coming of this 12th Imam or the Mahdi. This event will bring about the rule of Islam over the whole world. But nooo, I’m sure Bush is just feeding him these lies or secretly authoring the Shi’ite texts.

Posted by: steve | April 3, 2007, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

We will find out soon enough on 6th April, Good Friday. Apparently this is when George and Dick have decided to attack Iran.

Posted by: Chris | April 3, 2007, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

We’ve had a problem with Iran long prior to our invading Iraq.
We even aided Iraq with funding, intel and weaponry so Saddam could fight a proxy war with Iran.
But if Iran was a genuine threat to the US, why would we have invaded Iraq for all the wrong reasons after 9/11 when we could have just as easily invaded Iran on the same pack of lies, misrepresentations and “faulty intel”???
Why?
Because Iraq has been nothing but a strategic base of deployment for the over all agenda of eventually destabilizing and waging an offensive against Iran.

Posted by: Zach | April 3, 2007, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

We are living at the end of the ages right now. As the bible predicts that nation shall rise against nation and rumors of wars. It has to happen to fulfill anyway. Can’t nothing stop God doing not even man.

Posted by: Kim | April 3, 2007, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

It doesn’t concern us here, they only want to take over the Middle East & Europe & slaughter all the Jews and the non-believers. We should stay out of it. Oh, wait, that sounds like what we said in 1939 just before Hitler tried to take over Europe and slaughtered 6 million Jews and another 6 million undesirables and 20 million Russian peasants who were in the way of his advance into Russia! Far too late, the US was forced into war and it cost 400,000 American lives. It cost an additional 5,000 American lives each year that we occupied Germany AFTER they surrendered. I hate war, I grew up in the Viet Nam era, but, tragically, sometimes evil must be met with force, even war, to stop it before it takes over the world. Freedom can only be bought with the blood of patriots.

Posted by: CL | April 3, 2007, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Before all you wonderful neocon Bushies decide to invade yet another country that had nothing to do with 9/11 (which had a wonderful distraction and diversion away from bin Laden, thanks a gob), and before we all sing the tune of “imminent threat”, could we maybe have a wee bit more sound evidence other than speculation and conjecture about bomb production? I’m hoping we’re all a little smarter from our “librul” press reporters like Judy Miller and Cheney’s buddy Chalabi throwing us “Curveballs” to help stovepipe intelligence for one war, because I think a healthy dose of skepticism on unnamed “sources say” from any agency, whether it be from the government or the media. If such events are true, then by all means neocons go on in with your guns blazin’. I’m sure you Bush supporters and your family will be the first in line for military enlistment considering how incredibly stretched our military already is with it’s occupation and civil war in Iraq (and Afghanistan). But until that time comes, please forgive us reality-based folks for wanting a wee bit more evidence before we go off and blow off the heads and arms of a coupla hundred thousand more innocent folks in yet another country. Whadya say?

Posted by: MisterOpus1 | April 3, 2007, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Since when is our national security a volleyball??! I’m one of those whose skeptical about the sources cited and certainly about the wisdom of OUR intervening militarily when we’ve more than got our hands full extracting ourselves from the last blunder, but the comment thread here reveals a bunch of people trying to score points one way or another when the question first and foremost should be “how do we best achieve the security of the US?”

Posted by: Paul Dirks | April 3, 2007, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Some uninformed conservative said: “I guess when all of us here in the US have to learn Iranian in school, then maybe the reality of things will sink in.”
Really? The Iranians speak ‘Iranian’ (sic)? And Iran has a plan to invade the United States and force everyone to learn ‘Iranian’ (sic)? Thank you for that very informed, correct, and reasonable analysis, conservative. This shows how much you know about Iran and their native language, let alone their intentions, let alone the world and politicts. This is why the US voted to take the keys away from the conservatives last year. None of you have a clue.

Posted by: Eric | April 3, 2007, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

I can’t judge what this means, until I konw what the source of your intel is. Sorry ABC – let’s get those sources NAMED, so we can decide for ourselves how truthful this info might be.

Posted by: IncandenzaH | April 3, 2007, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

ABC news should be ashamed. Regardless of your political views, there is ABSOLUTELY no news story here. The crux of the story comes from UNNAMED SOURCES. ABC News needs to behave like a news organization and not a gossip rag.

Posted by: tm | April 3, 2007, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

WHAT SOURCES THE SAME ONE THAT GAVE US WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. ABC SHOULD AT LEAST TELL US IF THEY ARE FROM OUR GOVERNMENT,THE NATIONAL REVIEW.OR THE BROOKING ISTITUTE. THEN WE CAN DECIDE IF WE CAN BELIEVE THEM.

Posted by: ben glick | April 3, 2007, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Forgive me if I don’t rush out and tell the world Iran is “gonna go nukular.” This story seems to have as much credibility (and the same “sources”) as the Iraqi WMD story. You know – the one Shrubya’s Mal-administration had to admit was bogus.

Posted by: Bryan Hayward | April 3, 2007, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

All of these simple minded people parroting the party line of “Bush lies” and “this is like the Iraq WMD’s that never existed” are doing nothing more than repeating the talking points of left wing websites such as Democratic Underground and the like. The lemmings that buy into the left wing propaganda will never change their minds until they or their loved ones are victims of Islamofacist terrorism. The world is more dangerous than ever, and now you have the added spectre of religous fanaticism in addition to the usual fanatic nationalism or advancement of a particular type of social economic system. People will do much more for their God than they will for a country or an economic system. The only thing that will keep the radical Islamists from tearing down the door of your house and beheading you and all other “infidels” is maintaining an offensive military stance that occupies them in other parts of the world. It is a miracle that nothing else has happened in the U.S. since 9/11 in spite of the best efforts of the liberals to force our military to fight blindfolded with one arm behind their collective backs. Had the liberals truly backed the troops as they claim they do, this could have been over long ago, because we could have pulled out all of the stops and killed those that needed killing, and destroyed what needed destroying.

Posted by: j simpson | April 3, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Sources. As in who? And where did they get their info? And when? And how?
Boy howdy, I should have been a journalmalist!

Posted by: Earl Scheib | April 3, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

I’m old enough to remember when we expected transparent imperialist fabrications like this from the Soviet Union. It seems the current US thugocracy is religiously committed to the same ironclad path to extinction.
When Constitutionally loyal forces regain control of the Executive branch, FCC-controlled government outlets like ABC News will need to answer for their part in the ongoing US atrocities being perpetrated for world domination.
The truth will set us free. Unconfirmed spoon fed propaganda will not.

Posted by: Rod | April 3, 2007, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

The IAEA is keeping a very close watch over everything Iran does with its uranium and Iran is gladly letting them. The IAEA makes sure that the uranium isn’t enriched too much. You need uranium enriched over 5% to use for nuclear power. You need uranium enriched to over 95% to use in a nuclear weapon. The headline is very misleading because you can’t legally enrich uranium to weapons grade under the NNPT. The IAEA is monitoring them and will catch them. And you think that Iran would advertise that they are enriching to weapons grade by installing 1000 centrifuges and enriching to over 95%?? People don’t be so easily misled bythis propaganda. Please.

Posted by: Alejandro | April 3, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Where did ABC’s reporter Brian Ross get his information?
With no attribution and no verification of his information, Brian Ross’s reporting has all the credibility of a White House press release or a Collin Powell speech before the UN Security Council.
Is this supposed to be what ABC now substitutes for journalism?

Posted by: Rick | April 3, 2007, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

J Simpson
You ever thought that the world is a more dangerous place because of the idiot in the White House?

Posted by: Chris | April 3, 2007, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

A few points:
1. The Islamic world doesn’t want to kick down our doors. They want us to stop kicking down their doors! Proof: The majority of Islamic countries are actually U.S. allies. Iran & Syria are the major exceptions.
2. The U.S. has a long history of manipulation of M.E. countries, going back well before the Iranian hostage crisis. The U.S. is hardly the injured party.
3. The U.S. helped Saddam Hussein acquire his chemical weapons to use against Iran in an offensive war started by Hussein that cost over 1 million lives. Even after he had used them against the Kurds, the Bush-1 admin. was still trying to arrange loans for him to acquire more. We still await the U.S. apology to Iran.

Posted by: Andrew | April 3, 2007, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Wolf!! Wolf!!
How about a break?

Posted by: Scorpio | April 3, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

For all the people questioning who the “sources” are:
Ahmadinejad PUBLICLY PREDICTED that he would install thousands of new centrifuges! It’s his stated goal! It says so right in the story. The rest is just math. How could Bush make that up?

Posted by: Joel | April 3, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

tell president “tom” he has 72 hours to hand over the sailors or clean out his capital. no more talking no more of this UN crap. don’t make us pass another resolution.

Posted by: marty | April 3, 2007, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

This story is so irresponsible. The public deserves to know who these sources are, or if their identity must be kept secret, we deserve to know why these sources are credible.

Posted by: C.B. | April 3, 2007, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Shorter ABC: Fool me once, you can fool me as often as you like.
3000 centrifuges is the required number. You can’t get there with 1000. Not in 2 years.
I thought journalists were supposed to at least check the facts before running with a story.

Posted by: Audrey Yoeckel | April 3, 2007, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

If the Bushies want to take us into war against Iran I suggest that only the military-service age children of Republican politicans throughout the land be drafted and go first.

Posted by: Dem-agog | April 3, 2007, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Iran has every right to nuclear energy and nuclear enrichment. The NPT allows enrichment. The UNSC resolution is illegal.

Posted by: Bob Dole | April 3, 2007, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

wag the dog but the truth is a new war is coming

Posted by: Dennis | April 3, 2007, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

I think Iran have many nuclear weapons allready since 1987 . Pakistian have nuclear weapon now make out of Pu-239 not U-235 which is only 3% of all Uranium when you can in a fast breeder reactor yurn U-238 into Pu-239 an 97% of sll,Uranium is U-238.

Posted by: DefenderofIslam | April 3, 2007, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Let them eat cake. Let them build the bomb. A middle-eastern nuclear engagement would eliminate 1/2 to 2/3 of the world’s oil production, thereby reducing global warming. Not to mention resolving some major conflicts that the world would be better without. As to the people of the middle east… well, that problem would be eliminated

Posted by: jusme | April 3, 2007, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

This is the kind of bull one gets after exposing the CIA front company that actually investigated Iran’s nuclear capability. I won’t trust any American media outlet on security issues when they don’t name their sources. EVER AGAIN.

Posted by: Crempole Stalwart | April 4, 2007, 12:03 am 12:03 am

I understood that Iran already has 4 small tactical warheads, purchased from the mafia in Kazakhstan during the early 90′s.

Posted by: Paul | April 4, 2007, 12:27 am 12:27 am

“The IAEA is keeping a very close watch over everything Iran does with its uranium and Iran is gladly letting them. The IAEA makes sure that the uranium isn’t enriched too much. You need uranium enriched over 5% to use for nuclear power. You need uranium enriched to over 95% to use in a nuclear weapon. The headline is very misleading because you can’t legally enrich uranium to weapons grade under the NNPT. The IAEA is monitoring them and will catch them. And you think that Iran would advertise that they are enriching to weapons grade by installing 1000 centrifuges and enriching to over 95%?? People don’t be so easily misled by this propaganda. Please.”
Great Point by Alejandro!
Further more, the quality of the uranium being processed is too poor to be processed to such a high percentage (95% pure) to be used in a nuclear weapon. The fact is that the uranium available today is mined in known locations with known contaminants and impurities. These impurities and contaminants in the Uranium oar react with the equipment during processing. It would be impossible to process the oar to the purity necessary, as one of the known contaminants would destroy the centrifuge; literally eat the machine to pieces before the process was finished.

Posted by: teknikAL | April 4, 2007, 2:28 am 2:28 am

God help Iran if they don’t develope a nuclear weapon sooner rather than later. With so much valuable natural gas and oil, the Bomb is the only thing that will stop us setting siege (which has already begun) and eventually invading them.

Posted by: Fred Rolig | April 4, 2007, 3:51 am 3:51 am

I’m sorry, but you’re going to have to give me more information about your sources before I went my pants in fear, as you seem to want us to do. Who are these sources? Your crank paranoid next door neighbor? An Iranian defense official? A Bush administration official that you socialize with regularly? It all smells terribly fishy to me–very much like the news stories leading up to the Iraq war.

Posted by: Mary | April 4, 2007, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Iran is creating an A-bomb and is planning to hide them next to Iraq’s WMD’s. Saddam was a criminal, but it turns out he WAS in compliance with the UN mandate and we needlessly starved the Iraq people for 10 years… prior to Operation Iraqi Bush-Lies. Maybe we should listen, monitor and stop bullying the middle east. Our threats to their countries is why they want weapons.

Posted by: Mike | April 4, 2007, 11:31 am 11:31 am

If we “hit them before they hit us” with a nuclear weapon, wouldn’t that have the possibility to ignite all of the underground oil in the region?
I’m no scientist, but it sounds probable.

Posted by: Doug | April 4, 2007, 11:59 am 11:59 am

My American friends,
If you won’t impeach your president during his term, I hope that some honest group in the US will bring war-crimes charges against him after he leaves office.
Don’t forget Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz too.

Posted by: Mark | April 4, 2007, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

You’re violating your own policy on sources. There needs to be some general description of who you’re talking to? Why do you believe they are credible Brian?
If you think we’re going to take the media BS again like we did with Iraq you’ve got another thing coming.

Posted by: padcrasher | April 4, 2007, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Wow. The human race never ceases to amaze me. I am awed by the way some people have turned outright comments by Iran’s president into the lies of the Bush Administration. Iran openly stated they would have 3,000 centrifuges by May. They may actually do it. And if you think it’s all just a huge plan by the Bush Administration to turn anger towards Iran, so be it. Stay in your closed-minded bubble and you’ll see the truth in the form of a huge, bright flash. As for the capturing of the 15 British soldier being a political ploy, let the person who said that be sent on the next “mission.”
Come on people, grow up. Quit spitting in Bush’s face and give him the respect he deserves as our president, whether you like him or not.
-beth

Posted by: Beth | April 4, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

“sources familiar with the dramatic upgrade tell ABC News.”
What does that mean? That’s not a source? Familiar with the dramatic upgrade tell ABC News?
I’ll tell you why there’s skepticism regarding the media. Whether it’s ABC News or any other outlet. Iraq media war orgy.
So before all you 30% ers out there start calling people names for expecting diligence and facts from our media outlets, let’s try and remember what helped get us into the international crisis we are currently in. A complicit media. A propaganda spewing media.
The 4th estate has been compromised already by the complicit nature that led us into war with Iraq.
For those that believe everything they read, answer me this, if Iran has a nuclear weapon, what would happen? They’d nuke Israel? Why? There would be mutual destruction on both sides. What is the point?
Be skeptical, be vigilant. The 4th Estate has sold us down the river before, do not believe everything you read. Skepticism is a vital ingredient to being an Patriot. Blindly following whatever Bush or the media says without question is just stupid and deadly.

Posted by: Hype the Hype | April 4, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Name your sources or don’t bother printing. What is it with the 4th estate that journalists have turned into propagandists for a demented White House?
Or is it that you were already salivating at the thougt of bombing Iran under the guise of helping the Brits but Iran just destroyed your little dream? So, now you are back with some unnamed, vague source, quacking about Iran getting a “nukular” bomb by 2009?

Posted by: Devil's Advocate | April 4, 2007, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Leaning heavily on one source which could be a neighbor or the clerk at the grocery store.

Posted by: Deb | April 4, 2007, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

NK has nukes. Are we preparing to attack them? Shouldn’t we be preparing to attack them? Air strike from 4am to 4pm on a religious holiday?

Posted by: Netsurfer | April 4, 2007, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Reading these comments scare the hell of me.
Folks get over your Bush hatred. This is serious. I suspect many of these insane comments are made by college educated people. That just floors me. Start thinking about your country and not your political squabbles. I am a Republican and I can remember I thought the Clinton hatred by some conservatives was too much. But this is on a whole new level. It is like yall recieved a PHD in hating those that you politically disagree with. Except this time it could have affects on my Children and Grandchildren in the worse way.
Bush in the end will do what is right. Iran getting the bomb is unthinkable. Before he leaves office this will be resolved one way or the other. Thank God
JH
Louisiana

Posted by: jh | April 4, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

You people honestly believe Iran is NOT building nuclear bombs??!! Come on kids, they have publically said we will burn in their fiery! This is a people who do NOT believe in our values what so ever. Playing nice will NOT work. Put down your text books and pick up those bibles cause this going to happen. Our only hope to delay this nightware is unity in prayer.

Posted by: Hank | April 4, 2007, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

You people honestly believe Iran is NOT building nuclear bombs??!! Come on kids, they have publically said we will burn in their fiery! This is a people who do NOT believe in our values what so ever. Playing nice will NOT work. Put down your text books and pick up those bibles cause this going to happen. Our only hope to delay this nightware is unity in prayer.

Posted by: Hank | April 4, 2007, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

The problem is not that Iran is enriching Uranium, it is that Iran is presently led by people who beleive they can and should kill all others who do not submit to them. Islam is at war until Doomsday with everyone who does not confess their Allah as the supreme god who cannot be disobeyed. Doomsday is now quite close. If Iran obtains a nuclear weapon, making or buying it, they will use it against Israel, and if they have two weapons the second will explode on an American city. I live near an American seaport that has a lot of trouble keeping itself secure. A ship with an A-bomb does not have to unload its cargo, it can detonate it in proximity to the target. A cargo container with a bomb can be driven to an exact location by truck. Sorry to tell you, America is at risk. Instead of cursing the administration, why not put some thought into helping the President deal with the terrible situation we are in. It doesn’t matter if it is a Republican or Democrat in the White House, either one MUST act to prevent a nuclear attack on our country. When someone says they are going to kill you, don’t passively wait for them to do it, take action to stop them.

Posted by: Richard Easton | April 5, 2007, 2:45 am 2:45 am

“Folks get over your Bush hatred. This is serious. I suspect many of these insane comments are made by college educated people. That just floors me. Start thinking about your country and not your political squabbles.”
I’m sure Iran wants a bomb.
I am also sure that our president would knowingly lie about Iran’s progress toward building a bomb to generate fear. He would use that fear to his own advantage in “political squabbles”. I know he would be willing to do this, because he has done it before.

Posted by: Njorl | April 5, 2007, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

The problem is that we are looking at a nation that is run by a religous zealot who believes in an “end-time” religous scenario.
Worse, he is politically unpopular and so he may believe that igniting a conflict could allow him to regain popularity or, even worse, seize the reigns of power.
Besides, he knows his country can’t “lose” the conflict. True it can’t be won either but that is okay. A permanent state of conflict serves his purposes just as well.
Couple that with an economy on the brink of collapse and there is every reason to move forward with a war.
Z

Posted by: Z | April 5, 2007, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

“Iran is presently led by people who beleive they can and should kill all others who do not submit to them.”
You could replace Iran with the words “The American right-wing” and it would fit perfectly.

Posted by: erik28com | April 5, 2007, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

I could have it in 2009? Last time we believed the government sworn testimony about the WMD about Iraq it turned out to be a lie. How can believe in a “could”, “if”, or “possiblities”. Yeh, I guess I could win the lottery too.
Besides, why don’t we focus on those who have the nuclear bomb now. Oh, say for example, Israel.

Posted by: Maz | April 5, 2007, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Saddam decided to stop accepting dollars for oil. He was soon invaded. Iran has recently made the same decision.
Bush CHOSE the “Intelligence” he used to decide whether or not to go to war in Iraq. He told people what to tell him. Remember Joe Wilson’s trip to Niger? He came back & reported that Saddam was NOT buying yellow cake. that made people mad in the Bush camp & Joe wilson’s wife got her name outted. Valerie PLame is her name. You folks who trust that man are just either too goofy to see straight or willfully blind.

Posted by: Justin | April 6, 2007, 2:39 am 2:39 am

The Iranian’s are known to have manufactured centrifuges based on two AQ Khan designs, the P-1 and P-2. The latter type is about twice as efficient.
In order to produce enough Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) for a single bomb, Iran would need between 6-9000 P-1s spinning continuously for a year, with no breakdowns or maintenance down-time.
There P-1 and P-2 centrifuges are notorious for their lack of reliability and high maintenance — they are just about the least efficient in the world.
Do the math yourself. There is absolutely no way that 1,000 machines could produce enough HEU for a single bomb by 2008, even if all of them were P-2s. The report — which cites no specific sources — is simply wrong.

Posted by: leveymg | April 6, 2007, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

“The problem is not that Iran is enriching Uranium, it is that Iran is presently led by people who beleive they can and should kill all others who do not submit to them. Islam is at war until Doomsday with everyone who does not confess their Allah as the supreme god who cannot be disobeyed…” R.E. (from an above post)
How many times have the countries of Islam militarily invaded or occupied any country of the west?
I ask this because one or another country from the west has repeatedly been invading and playing slice and dice with the Islamic or Muslim middle eastern territories since the 1200′s.
The French, Germans, Spanish, English several times) and currently the US (for the second time) are just some of the many.
Please recheck your accuracy.
I believe you and many others here, blinded by nationalism have lost sight of who, historically has been the real victims through out.

Posted by: Zach | April 6, 2007, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Zach asked:
“How many times have the countries of Islam militarily invaded or occupied any country of the west?”
Between 700 and 1700, the West was under repeated waves of military conquest from Islamic forces.
Spain was under Moorish rule until 1492.
The Byzantine Empire (or Eastern Roman Empire), the home of the Greek Orthodox Church, was destroyed by the Ottoman Empire in the 1400′s. The capital of Turkey, Istanbul, was originally Constantinople.
France was invaded by Islamic armies which ended with their defeat in the Battle of Tours.
Athens in Greece was conquered by Islamic forces, as was Serbia, Bosnia, and Crimea
Otranto in Italy was an Islamic conquest.
It was not until the titanic, history-changing Battle of Vienna in the late 17th century that the Islam invasions of the West ended.

Posted by: yale | April 7, 2007, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Unnamed sources. Unverifiable facts. This sounds like ABC News doing another Iraqi WMD story. Or maybe ABC News doing another Iraq responsible for the anthrax story (I always liked your breathless reporting that “UN inspectors have been told by unnamed sources that the anthrax is similar to anthrax found in Iraq” stories).
So, is your source Dick Cheney, or Karl Rove? And is your senior editor Ahmed Chalabi??

Posted by: JP173 | April 8, 2007, 5:43 am 5:43 am

Wow and thanks, Yale.
That’s some great ancient history research.
There’s something to learn every day.
Unfortunately it doesn’t offer much in the way of explanation or rationale for everything that’s happened in the 400 years since the 1600′s.
You don’t think the crusades of the 11th century through the 13th and all that led up to it for a few hundred years might have had anything to do with stoking the fires, do you?

Posted by: Zach | April 8, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Hear the drums of war in the distance? That’s the federal government building up support for another war of aggression to secure natural resources at the behest of their corporate masters.
How can people be fooled by the same lies again and again? At this point the only American who isn’t skeptical of any move by the U.S. government towards war is a fool.
Here comes another war of aggression to conquer and occupy a nation that “may” become a threat in the future. Personally I’m just hoping the U.S. isn’t stupid enough to stir up the Iranian bees nest. The U.S. military cannot handle the wars we have sent them to in Iraq and Afghanistan let alone Iran which has 3x the population of Iraq and much more land mass. An aerial bombing campaign would invite massive retaliation against our troops in Iraq and our oil supply lines in the Persian Gulf. There really is nothing the U.S. can do about the situation and Iran knows it and therefore pursues nuclear weapons to solidify their invulnerable status with regards to the U.S. forever.
Why wouldn’t they? A nation with nukes is an immovable object on the geopolitical stage.

Posted by: ateo | April 8, 2007, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

oh my.
“I proudly announce that as of today Iran is among the countries which produce nuclear fuel on an industrial scale,” President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told a gathering at the Natanz uranium enrichment facility in central Iran.”

Posted by: jjay | April 9, 2007, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

It’s a good thing they only want nuclear for energy because they don’t have enough oil. Or maybe the skeptics are just being paranoid.

Posted by: Jack, Peoria | April 9, 2007, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Oh, I dunno. I’ll go with the odds.
Lots of countries have nukes and many of those have had them for some time.
But there’s only one country I know of that has a history of ever actually using them on another coountry’s population.
And did it twice!

Posted by: Zach | April 9, 2007, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Let’s not forget, it is the Iranian president who says he will wipe Israel off the map. Their nuclear progress has nothing to do with the 15 uk’s that were taken by the way. Read the book of Eziekiel in the bible. There you will find Iran and Russia and what is going to take place.

Posted by: wes | April 12, 2007, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

What hyperbole!Anyone with half an IQ should be able to discern Iran’s intent. They will acquire nuclear weapons and they will use them against Israel and, if possible, the US. And, to those who believe they wouldn’t use them because they are “looking down the barrel of a gun”, these people have a total disregard for human life in that they believe in greater rewards of matrydom. Their religion pomises them “72 VIRGINS” if they give their lives for Islam. Can we afford to turn a blind eye, at this point in history? I think not. Someone like Hiter (or worse) waits in the shadows. Please, don’t allow your bias of the Bush administration color you and your family’s safety. A war is coming and it is up to the US to decide now whether it will be coventional or nuclear.

Posted by: Nancy Ramsey | April 14, 2007, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Uh, the war being spoken of is already underway.
And it happens to be us against “them” all through out the middle east.
The hypocracy is that while we are occupying and preparing to invade other countries that we accuse of supporting terrorism…we (and the rest of the western alliance) feel perfectly free to support our own brand of it.
The war that is coming (as you put it) will be fought in a new way with terrorism as the weapon of choice.
And both us and “them” are equally guilty of supporting, creating and using terrorism.

Posted by: Zach | April 15, 2007, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Iran is producing more and more material to make a nuclear bomb, but if they do, will they really use it? Yeah a lot of the nations have nuclear power and weapons, but the main question is will they really use it on others? Probably against Iraq, but that’s a whole differnt story and another war to talk about. 2009 is still a long ways away, but you never know what will happen.

Posted by: Kaitlyn D. | April 17, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

The U.S. will no longer be the powerhouse in the world. If Iran want nuclear power then it’s their right. We call so many countries agressors or evil but look at hour own history. What happened to all the indians??? I really hope there will be more countries to gain nuclear know how. Iran is nothing. Wait till china comes out of the shadows to release it’s fury…

Posted by: Anton | May 29, 2007, 2:26 am 2:26 am

For those who say negotiate witth them: They won’t negotiate. It’s their way or the highway. They have been diverting attention and gaining ground on the centrifuges for the last three-four years. They have a fountain in Tehran that has a red fluid in it that they say is the blood of martyrs who fought Sadaam. They sacraficed unarmed children who ran through mine fields when attacking the Iraq soldiers. Tough negotiators these guys.

Posted by: bill | September 9, 2007, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Hmmmm. This report has the whiff of Alexis Debat. Got to love the smell of right wing propaganda and fraud. Smells like victory!!

Posted by: Earl Scheib | September 13, 2007, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

This story doesn’t need le whiff de Debat: the central innuendo that “the uranium they are enriching could not be used in the Russian nuclear power reactor” is probably not true and irrelevant regardless:
a) Iran contracted that reactor to be fueled by Russia in the first place, and hasn’t stopped trying to get them to fuel it.
b) Iran is building other reactors intended for an indigenous fuel cycle.
c) Not one reason is offered why Iran couldn’t fuel that reactor themselves.
The only explanation that comes to mind is Iran’s continuing inability to produce the necessary quantities of low-enriched uranium.

Posted by: buermann | September 15, 2007, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

i think this is supid

Posted by: ,k,mmnn nnbnnnnn | November 10, 2007, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Here’s a nice little reality check…
500K dead in Darfur any day now. Does anyone care? There seems to be something we should take action on… but, why not? Because it’s no threat to Israel?
Take your facts from history, folks:
Countries that wage war as a solution have always raped and pillaged the remains. Now the US and every other war-like nation cover that with excuses before and after.
All of you that say “duh, we have to kill others to remain safe”… got kids? Well, spend as much quality time as you can with them. By your plan they’ll all be dead on the field of battle before they’re 30. Great plan.
Everyone reading this… stop for one second and ask yourself how would you stop a bully on the playground? Everyone stand together against him, peacefully… you don’t kick the kids ass. That’s not legal or just to simply be more of a bully to him. It’s time for us to stand as one against all of this… no more war. That means we establish relationships at the individual level with Iranians, North Koreans, US, UK, Sudanese… all citizens… and stop pointing fingers and start acting like the tiny little rock full of beings that we are. One people with one future.
KILL, KILL, KILL… that’s a fool’s game if there ever was one. You can say “we have to be militant to control everything in our favor”… that is not a lesson that is taught by historic standards. The guy on the corner with the big stick eventually gets taken-out and in a big way, never to rise again. Can you say Rome? Do we just grind the peasants under our wheels until they are Soylent Green? (sigh)

Posted by: Citizen of Earth | May 30, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Wake up Liberal fools. Adolph Ahmadinejad is a religious fanatic
He believes that by Bombing Israel he will be starting the events rolling that will lead to the return of the 12th Imam. Even In the midst of the Cold War with 10,000 warheads aimed our way the world was not as close to WW3 as we will be once Iran achieves the Nuclear goal.

Posted by: BB | May 30, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

If I were the president of the USA, I never even blink and would act first on Iran before they could use their WMD. This country is full of evil.

Posted by: Peaceful living | June 3, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

sources? you guys are stupid iran doesnt deny having these facilities……der der der your probably the mainstream ******* that re-elected bush what ever the majority does you do and right now the majority bashes the bush admin.

Posted by: adam | June 6, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

I remember reading about Iranian development of IRBM and ICBM technology in the late 1990s, they currently have missiles which can reach most of the middle east, and will eventually have missiles that can reach as far as London, with even a 3 stage ICBM in development with a 11,000 km range, this will be enough to hit New York and possibly Washington DC. These systems have been in development since the mid 1990s, and with oil prices where they are today, they will have no problem purchasing the technological know-how and resources to make it happen.
One might ask why would Iran be developing such systems if all they planned to deliver were conventional munitions? it makes no sense to deliver a 1000 kg bomb with an ICBM, it simply does not justify the cost of building the launch vehicle, in terms of actual military use. however a 1,000 kg Nuclear warhead could easily range into megaton yields, in which only 1 would need to hit a city or military base to destroy it.
It is unfortunate that the situation in Iraq has managed to blind most to the real emerging threat to the west, which is Iran. And unlike Iraq, Iranian WMDsare not suspected, they are common knowledge to the UN as well as US and European intelligence agencies.
Duce

Posted by: Duce | June 19, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

I love how the generation that hated the Vietnam war has place mine in another useless war but it also has jaded most of us. I think we all know there are countries that want to do the US harm……….just because this government led us in the wrong direction does not mean that their are not real threats. Fighting imaginary demons can blind you to the real ones. We dont need another war but we definitely dont need a nuclear weapon set off!!!
Iran wouldnt have a nuke!! They have only been fighting with Isreal for hundreds of years, so I doubt they will take drastic measures,,,,,,,come on people!!!!! Chavez, Iran, Russia and a few others would love to see the US fall. Ask someone from one of these countries, they will tell you.

Posted by: 1977!!!! | June 21, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am

For all we know, If Iran builds the bomb, it may very well be ww3.
ALL nuclear weapons should be banned & the knowledge on how to build them destroyed.
We most defienaly don’t need another ww. We’re still reeling from ww2.
An a-bomb today is 100x more powerful, more efficiant than 1945. If an a-bomb is developed today & dropped, bye bye life on Earth.

Posted by: Mike Mccarthy | June 30, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Several problems:
1) The situation with Iran is very serious. I don’t think anyone can disagree with that. However, our recent experience with Iraq makes me and a large portion of the country very suspicious of the motives involved. How can we be expected to separate the true from the fake? The boy who cried wolf was killed in his tale. Only this time, the entire village is in danger.
2) The current administration seems to want a war and I’m not surprised at all about this development. They don’t care to actually discuss with Iran and ratchet up the pressure for several years now. Wouldn’t it then be in Iran’s interest to try to get a bomb ASAP to force us to talk, as we had to with North Korea?
3) Even if Iran technically loses a war with us, they know that in the end, it will bring us to our knees. We simply are not in a position to fight with Iran, even if you consider it necessary.

Posted by: Nick B | June 30, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

time for a new strategy: propose a threat reduction plan which includes benefits for Humanitarian services resurrected in iran and iraq. give them other incentives in the form of aide and sercurity if they, in fact stand down any and all threats. remind them the USA will not make the first move , ever, for a war situation. no other country that is a memeber of the United Nations would ever break a promise of peace. the UN is the overall decision-maker for our world today on Human rights. they should not get involved with anything but Human rights. if in fact, the countries in question, are in violation of those rights entitling the people of that said country to be a free society and freedom of culturally practices being oppressed, the UN is to make sure the individuals that violated the ‘trust’ are removed from office and or position. the defense for those countries are souly meant to secure the country and the people and be on stand-by in the event of an emergency. at NO time are they to accept orders outside those that are conditions of the UN security agreement!!

Posted by: augusta | June 30, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Well, let’s see….you can blame it on the Democrats for every mess we’ve gotten ourselves into! Social Security, for one, The Federal Reserve, for another, and now Iran! They create a quagmire and then cry “Wolf”! Jimmy Carter was in office when the Shah of Iran needed help, but what did Jimmy Carter do? He turned him out into the cold! That’s the same as murder, in my book! The rest is history!

Posted by: Linda | July 1, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

The U.N. did nothing for Sierre Leone. If I remember correctly, Neill Ellis and his MI-24 Hind attack helicopter was the only thing that stood between the civilians and the RUF. Now you want us to trust the U.N. to act against IRAN? I wouldn’t trust the U.N. to run a lemonade stand. I’ll give the Iranians credit, at least you know where they are coming from. The bad part ( in my opinion ) is that they will use nukes.

Posted by: Chad Lares | July 1, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

People, It’s all BS. The IAEA says iran is not building a bomb.
Iran has not invaded a single country for over a 1000 years.
How many countries has America bombed and invaded. Stop watching American idol. Get a grip on Geography. You people will lose this country eventually because you are all morons.
Peace

Posted by: bb | July 1, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

I think its inevitable, we will have to deal with Iran one way or another. Just like the rest of the Middle East Countries they are prolonged to only listen to the Koran and their religion. Even though it might seem preposterous at this time we need to get over with the dirty work and disarm Iran because it will pay off in the future. You need to have a long term futuristic approach to everything in life and plan ahead. Its always better to be early than too late right?

Posted by: NAeagle89 | July 1, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Israel is cornered ..something usual in there history and when you have no other choice you go full throttle ,if you have preserved brains integrity you are capable of unexpected achievements,times may soon change…

Posted by: rovid | July 1, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Cheney said the same thing about Iraq. Fast forward 5 years later and there’s no nuclear program in iraq, no weapons of mass destruction, no poison gas, no anthrax, no threat of any kind.

Posted by: Rick Cain | July 1, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

two words: bunker buster
better yet” MOAB size bunker buster….

Posted by: TonyT | July 1, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

July 3 1988:
America has been a bully for over 30 years. Did any one expect that to stop. We are the enemy of Iran.

Posted by: none | July 1, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Iran won’t stop

Posted by: Jeff | July 28, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

The UN does pose greater threat to Iran than Iran poses to the United States. You can’t really be too upset at people who refuse to give in to the Bush administration because it was them who manipulated us to begin with and caused many of our loved ones to be killed in a pointless war so called war on terrorism.

Posted by: Missy | July 30, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Diplomacy is something most Americans have no concept of, and ignorant of the fact that our country is already borrowing 3 billion a day from China to pay for Iraq . Also the military isn’t able to recruit anymore troops to fight another war,are you going to volunteer. Not only do we not need another war,we cant afford another war.

Posted by: Steve Wilson | July 31, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Bush selected the most convenient information and intelligence to support his agenda,there were equal numbers of people in our intelligence agencies and foreign agencies that believed and reported that Hussein neither had the capability nor the will to attack the United States.

Posted by: Steve Wilson | July 31, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

this page is tooooo long

Posted by: todd | September 9, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

occupied government

Posted by: william f mcdonagh 3 | September 16, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

hmm, could this be what Biden was referring to when he said that Obama would be tested and that we would just have to trust them that they were doing the right thing????? A nuke in the hands of Iran would be more than a test.

Posted by: TH | October 22, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

I think Obama is to weak as a president, talk talk talk and soon it will be to late ! Iran will have somekind of nuclear weapon in 2009, maybe we will not know it but they will have it.

Posted by: Joey | April 16, 2009, 7:59 am 7:59 am

THE WORLD MUST ACCEPT THIS AS TRUE AT THE MINIMUM TO PROTECT THEMSELVES. IT IS BETTER TO BE SAFE THAN SORRY-RIGHT? MOST OF US DO NOT WANT TO LIVE OUR LIVES IN FEAR. SO WHY CAN’T OUR GOVERMENT-PRESIDENT BACK OFF, TAKE CARE OF HIS OWN COUNTRY THAT ELECTED HIM AND LET THESE THINGS GO. WHY DO WE SPEND SO MUCH OF TAX PAYERS MONEY ON OTHER COUNTRIES ANYWAY? NOBODY DOES THAT FOR US- CAN SOMEONE ANSWER THAT FOR ME?
IT IS TIME TO START BELIEVING AND NOT TAKING THIS INFORMATION FOR GRANTED. I HAVE KIDS AND WANT TO SEE THEM GET GROW UP SAFE. IF I COULD I WOULD STOP ALL THE FIGHTING AND CALL IT FINISHED. PLEASE TELL ME WHAT HARM THAT WOULD DO? I MAY RELOCATE MY FAMILY OUT OF THE WASHINGTON DC AREA IN AN EFFORT TO PROTECT US IF THE NUKES ARE USED. THEY WILL HIT DC FIRST. GOD BLESS TO ALL THE WORLD! EACH DAY IS A GIFT AND WE ALL MUST LIVE OUR LIVES WITH THAT IN MIND-

Posted by: KIM | April 29, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

The United Nations must do something about it.
satellite tv for pc

Posted by: Jessie James | July 15, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.