By Brian Ross And Richard Esposito

Apr 17, 2007 11:12am

First Gun Bought March 13; No ‘Spur of the Moment’ Crime

Seung-Hui Cho bought his first gun, a Glock 9 mm handgun, on March 13 and his second weapon, a .22 caliber handgun, within the last week, law enforcement officials tell ABCNews.com. "This was no spur of the moment crime. He’s been thinking about this since at least the time he bought the first gun," said former FBI agent Brad Garrett, an ABC News consultant. Both guns were bought in Virginia, according to the officials. THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS Blotter Lapse of Federal Law Allows Sale of Large Ammo Clips Blotter ‘I Want to Clear My Name’ Click Here to Check Out Brian Ross Slideshows Under Virginia law, state residents can only buy one handgun in any 30 day period, suggesting Cho bought his second weapon after April 13, or sometime over the weekend. "He clearly spent some time figuring out how he was going to take care of business once classes began on Monday morning," said Garrett. Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage. The date of the first gun purchase will likely serve as the time of "some triggering mechanism that was very important" to Cho said Garrett, an expert on profiling murderers.    Watch the New York City Investigation’s Illegal Gun Buy: Links on the Right Side of the Linked Page.

User Comments

As usual the biased media gets it wrong. A 22mm hadgun does’t exist, bu hay never let the facts interfere with thestory.

Posted by: John Sims | April 17, 2007, 11:17 am 11:17 am

That was no random attack, he had planned everything out. You don’t just carry around chains to lock doors and keep people from getting in or out, for no reason. I wish he wouldn’t have killed himself, he deserves to rot in jail.

Posted by: Katy | April 17, 2007, 11:18 am 11:18 am

As usual the biased media gets it wrong. A 22mm handgun does’t exist, but never let the facts interfere with the story. On the news last night it was stated that you can buy a gun at a gunshow with out a background check. Lied again. Sales by any dealer are subject to Federal laws no matter where the sale takes place.

Posted by: John Sims | April 17, 2007, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Clearly it’s ok that this gentleman was allowed to purchase two guns in a month. Gogo gun laws!

Posted by: Chris | April 17, 2007, 11:31 am 11:31 am

I expect you meant to say .22 caliber and not 22mm when referring to the second handgun. Small mistake, huge difference.

Posted by: J.R. | April 17, 2007, 11:31 am 11:31 am

can anyone agree that below all the facts and un-answered questions, i think Bush should be answering why we are in iraq when our own Country is obviously Un-safe……….

Posted by: Jacquelyn | April 17, 2007, 11:33 am 11:33 am

A 22mm handgun would be bigger than a shotgun. Do your homework. He bought a .22cal handgun.

Posted by: Chad | April 17, 2007, 11:33 am 11:33 am

can anyone agree that below all the facts and un-answered questions, i think Bush should be answering why we are in iraq when our own Country is obviously Un-safe……….

Posted by: Jacquelyn | April 17, 2007, 11:34 am 11:34 am

can anyone agree that below all the facts and un-answered questions, i think Bush should be answering why we are in iraq when our own Country is obviously Un-safe……….

Posted by: jacquelyn | April 17, 2007, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Funny how there is no mention that he wasn’t legally allowed to purchase any handgun. Maybe that doesn’t play into their agenda.

Posted by: William Hofmeister | April 17, 2007, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Once again it reverts back to our ineffective gun contol in America. God Help Us.

Posted by: Jim | April 17, 2007, 11:35 am 11:35 am

can anyone agree that below all the facts and un-answered questions, i think Bush should be answering why we are in iraq when our own Country is obviously Un-safe……….

Posted by: Jacquelyn | April 17, 2007, 11:36 am 11:36 am

The Second Amendment should not suffer due to the actions of a mentally disturbed college student. The logic passed on by mainstream media makes about as much sense as taking away my fork so I wont be fat.

Posted by: Jason | April 17, 2007, 11:37 am 11:37 am

If only guns where outlawed then only outlaws would have guns! But, on the other hand, if guns where indeed outlawed then only outlaws would have guns!!!
Perhaps someone should have told this joker that guns weren’t allowed on campus.

Posted by: The Mikester | April 17, 2007, 11:37 am 11:37 am

First of all 22mm handguns do exist. I own one. Secondly the young man who plotted this has probably been thinking about the crime that was committed yesterday for quite some time.

Posted by: Martin Johns | April 17, 2007, 11:37 am 11:37 am

I wish that the media would stop plastering “deadliest shooting rampage in modern U.S. history” all over the headlines. They are setting the stage for the next wack job to grab the headline as the “deadliest rampage…..” We know how bad this was, just report the facts and stop sensationalizing.

Posted by: Chris | April 17, 2007, 11:38 am 11:38 am

True, a 22mm does not exist. They meant to say .22-caliber.

Posted by: sam | April 17, 2007, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Um… a 22mm pistol does exist.

Posted by: KNyce | April 17, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am

The guy was not a US Citizen, which means by law he should not have been allowed to purchase a weapon. Obviously he either used some kind of fake documentation or whoever sold him the weapon did not follow the proper procedures. That person should be brought up on bigtime charges.

Posted by: Eddee | April 17, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Here comes the attack on the second amendment. Brady bill round 2 coming to a house committee near you. Join the NRA now and protect your rights!

Posted by: Brian | April 17, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Give the press somewhat of a break. The guns are barely out there yet. No there is no 22mm handgun, but if I were a betting man the gun has some British or European origin and the 22 moniker is not a millimeter but inches as is the measure in Britain for example.
So the calibre is not 22mm but .22 inches which would be 5.6mm. These handguns exist. The writers, without knowing anything about firearms, see the .22 and assume 22 mm. How can we expect them to know all that? Although no regular person could be walking around with a 22mm pistol. It would be crazy.

Posted by: Scot | April 17, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am

“Cho Seung-Hui bought his first gun, a 9 mm handgun, on March 13 and his second weapon, a 22 mm handgun, within the last week, law enforcement officials tell ABCNews.com.”
This article is incorrect. There is no such thing as a 22 mm handgun. There is a .22 caliber handgun. Please get all of your facts right before you publish any article. Thank you.

Posted by: Steven J. Wolf | April 17, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am

John:
1. why would the media be biased against the type of gun he bought? Who really cares what type of gun he bought anyway, the point is about how he got it.
2. You CAN buy guns at gunshows without a background check. Undercover tv reports have proved this again and again. Federal laws are not enforced 100% at all.

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am

a 22mm handgun does exist. I own several.

Posted by: Fred Braune | April 17, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am

John, a 22mm hand gun does exist. I own one. Check your facts. Personally it doesn’t matter if he bought them legally or not, he was going to use them no matter how he purchased them. End of story.

Posted by: Paul | April 17, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am

I believe the posts by John Sims are focusing on the wrong thing- Does it really matter that the calibur of gun is wrong? The bigger picture here is that innocent people have lost their lives in this horrific event.

Posted by: Cara | April 17, 2007, 11:41 am 11:41 am

had those same gun laws applied to the people on campus mabey he could have been stoped

Posted by: lara | April 17, 2007, 11:41 am 11:41 am

There’s deffinately a .22 handgun. My buddy has one. Even though it’s not going to blow a hole in anyone, it’s extremely deadly. The bullets will go on and just bounce around in someone’s body. The 9mm is more likely to pass through. Also, you can aim and fire repeatedly with the .22, without having any kick. In the movies, a lot of assassins use a .22 handgun.

Posted by: rc | April 17, 2007, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Great editing guys; 22mm? Thats nearly one inch in diamter.
To answer the debate about the gunshow laws… In Virginia, all dealers at shows are required to do checks. The loophole is created when a private person rents a table.

Posted by: Ben | April 17, 2007, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Millimeter = Caliber–wikipedia
From Dictionary.com – I think it fits
Semantics is commonly used to refer to a trivial point or distinction that revolves around mere words rather than significant issues:

Posted by: Javier | April 17, 2007, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Oh here we go. Let’s blame it all on Bush. Did your milk go bad in your refrigerator? Must be Bush’s fault. Did you run out of gas? Blame it on Bush. Why are we always so quick to blame someone instead of accepting responsibility? Just like a liberal……

Posted by: Adam | April 17, 2007, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Wow! A 22mm. That’s got to be a lot to lug around. Idiots. It’s .22 caliber. As in .22 inches. Don’t write a story containing information on guns if you can’t even get a 22 correct.

Posted by: Ace | April 17, 2007, 11:41 am 11:41 am

22 millimeter handguns are illegal. Any firearm over 12.7 millimeters is banned by federal law in the United States.
I guess gun control works, because he murdered people with a gun that he could not have possibly owned legally in the first place.

Posted by: Eric | April 17, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am

This is great news for anyone else planning a massacre: You might have thought it difficult to obtain a gun! You might even have been put off your plan! But fear not: you have a friend in the State of Virginia. Now let’s go get those guns.

Posted by: Eric | April 17, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Please, for the love of God, don’t turn this into an anti-Iraq tragedy. It makes no sense.

Posted by: George | April 17, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Jacquelyn, I agree we should not be in Iraq, but what is your point? Our military can not be used to deter or control crime domestically.

Posted by: Mark | April 17, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am

John Sims is absolutely correct – the journalism here is pretty innacurate and disappointing; can you guys at least bring it up to a professional level? Anyway, in light of the date, perhaps this guy was aiming for Friday the 13th as his big day. Lord knows what his motive was…

Posted by: Jazz | April 17, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am

why do we care what kind of gun it was or wasn’t….the fact of the matter is, is that he was able to walk in purchase two weapons wtihine the last four weeks, without a problem…end of story…it’s obsurd to see you guys spit your knowledge about guns, when below the surface, a gun is a gun and in this case took the life of 31 people..

Posted by: macdadddy1 | April 17, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am

So wait, we’re now talking about killing the 2nd Amendment because of one wacko only a few days after killing the First Amendment via Imus? Wow, the America-haters are sure having a helluva week…

Posted by: Dan | April 17, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am

This is great news for anyone else planning a massacre: You might have thought it difficult to obtain a gun! You might even have been put off your plan! But fear not: you have a friend in the State of Virginia. Now let’s go get those guns.

Posted by: Eric | April 17, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am

the anti-gun nuts are crawling out of the woodwork and are blaming everyone regarding these shootings – except the guy who actually pulled the trigger.
it’s too bad that virginia shot down a right-to-carry law, otherwise there may have been a few people there packing who could have stopped this nut.
germany and canada have very strict ant-gun laws, yet they’ve experience school shootings also. the knee jerk reaction is to blame all people who posses guns instead of blaming the perpetrator. typical lefty logic.

Posted by: mark | April 17, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am

And just what evidence do they have to suggest that the first gun purchase was in any way “special”? Thousands upon thousands of guns are purchased every day/week/month, and virtually none of their purchasers are planning anything sinister.
I think the “triggering mechanism” here was the decision by this creep to kill a bunch of people rather than be a man and accept that a woman dumped him, not when he bought an inanimate object.
Who knows? Maybe it was the day he bought the shoes he was wearing yesterday…

Posted by: Alex | April 17, 2007, 11:43 am 11:43 am

If faculty (assuming their not a bunch of leftwing wackjobs) were authorized to carry weapons, this would not have happened. Effective gun control is only effective for criminals- no one shooting back.

Posted by: CCalley | April 17, 2007, 11:43 am 11:43 am

It doesn’t say a 22mm it says 22 caliber. The same as a .22 rifle only as a handgun. A very small bullet.

Posted by: John Simms 1 | April 17, 2007, 11:43 am 11:43 am

They should really make sure they report accurate facts: I agree with J.R., should have said .22 caliber.

Posted by: LK | April 17, 2007, 11:43 am 11:43 am

You are wrong, John, ever hear of a “private transaction” or “person to person sale” to in-state residents? Only FFL (licensed firearm dealers) have to do background checks/paperwork.
If you live in the South, check out local newspapers, it’s legal in most states to buy from a private individuals without any checks, that’s the “gun-show loophole” that the Dems are always referring to.

Posted by: Will | April 17, 2007, 11:43 am 11:43 am

this tragedy will give the democrats and their liberal media bedfellows more fodder to take away the innocent citizens guns. utah and oregon colleges allow professors to carry concealed weapons and you never heard of shootings at these campuses. if virginia had passed a measure last year pertaining to students carrying firearms this tragedy might not have been so deadly. remember, it is the people that kill not the weapon. think about it

Posted by: FRANK | April 17, 2007, 11:43 am 11:43 am

A 22mm doesn’t exist, but a .22 caliber does. We all know that the media is trying to get out information, good or bad, as quickly as possible. I’m sure there are a lot of other “semi-truths” out there about yesterday’s events. The issue isn’t the media.

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2007, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Lets just all hope the NRA is happy… serious changes need to be made.

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2007, 11:43 am 11:43 am

A few of you guys are missing the point. .22mm or .22cal…who cares? The man had two hand guns to kill over thirty people. Get you head on right and stop quibbleing over insignificant details!

Posted by: Terk | April 17, 2007, 11:44 am 11:44 am

So not only is it against the rules to carry a gun on campus, illegal to murder people, illegal to discharge a firearm inside the city of Blacksburg, etc. etc. ad nauseum, now we learn that a one-gun a month law failed to stop this nut job.
The LAW (specifically, gun control laws) failed these kids. They are old enough to defend their country – they should have been allowed the right to chose to defend themselves.

Posted by: CHris | April 17, 2007, 11:44 am 11:44 am

The gun in the photo is a Walther PPK (James Bond). It does not come in .22 cal or .22 mm, or 9 mm for that matter.
Why is that gun in the picture above?

Posted by: Curious George | April 17, 2007, 11:44 am 11:44 am

John Sims – What are you talking about – 22mm pistols sure do exist! .

Posted by: bklyn | April 17, 2007, 11:44 am 11:44 am

John, in Virginia, March has 31 days. The perp waited 31 days, M 13 to A 13, to buy the second gun. Doesn’t matter though. The deceased don’t care which gun he used, or if he only had one. Had he had none, he may well would have used some weapon of even more potent destruction than a couple of hand guns. This guy was determined, in case no one has noticed.

Posted by: Don L | April 17, 2007, 11:44 am 11:44 am

I wonder what new law the liberals will concoct to explain this one. What was needed was one concealed weapons permit holder in the right classroom. Behold and believe – Sarah Brady will keep you safe.

Posted by: Russ Harrison | April 17, 2007, 11:45 am 11:45 am

TO JOHN SIMS:
John,
It sounds like you are pro-gun…but you’re wrong. First, the story does not say .22mm…it says .22caliber…and that does exisit in rifle and pistol models.

Posted by: Brian | April 17, 2007, 11:45 am 11:45 am

uh..i’m sorry but there is no 22mm hand gun. anyone on this board who claims to posses a 22mm handgun is either lying or..well, they’re just lying.
that would be about a 1″ bore. that would not be a handgun, but rather a cannon.

Posted by: mark | April 17, 2007, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Perhaps if guns were allowed on campus, someone would have shot back? Oh, and I love the morons here who blame everything on President Bush…
Maybe Bush should concentrate on making cat food safer instead of being in Iraq…

Posted by: Frank | April 17, 2007, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Those pushing for more gun control should not that in Virginia, it is illegal for anyone other than officially designated personnel to carry a firearm on the grounds of a public university. Not even people with valid concealed-carry permits are exempt. So, it was already illegal for the shooter to have the guns on campus. Tighter laws would have made little difference.

Posted by: Alan | April 17, 2007, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Who cares what kind of gun it was. 33 people are dead. That can never be justified. I pray for the families. This is not a time for debate.

Posted by: Darrell | April 17, 2007, 11:47 am 11:47 am

The disturbing thing is not that he was able to buy a gun, which is a Constitution right, but that a non citizen can buy one.

Posted by: Phil | April 17, 2007, 11:47 am 11:47 am

In response to Mr. Sims’ comments, good to point out the inaccuracy of the story (22mm handgun?). Blaming the “liberal” media is so gutless!
Unfortunately, that’s not the point. If he seriously believes that the gun laws in this country work that way, I feel sorry for him. I’m sure all guns that are bought at gun shows, under the table, etc., are subject to federal laws. Good joke!
Too many guns in the hands of people that can’t control themselves or their actions. Way too easy to get guns and then nothing can stop them from destroying the lives of generations of innocent people. It’s not worth the ridiculously outdated view that anyone needs them! Period.

Posted by: brian dykes | April 17, 2007, 11:47 am 11:47 am

This was a meticulously planned act. How he fleed authorities for 2 hours so successfully still gets me though.

Posted by: BH | April 17, 2007, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Media did not get it wrong or meant to say anything different. When they say 22, it should be a given that they mean .22. And yes, there is a .22 mm pistol. I don’t know anyone that actually refers to .22mm handguns by saying, “point twenty two”. Stop pointing fingers needlessly at the media. Concentrate on what really matters. The issue at hand. This kid was a sociopath.

Posted by: Leo | April 17, 2007, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Why are people arguing over WHAT gun he used? Does it matter? Are the people LESS DEAD? Why are these types of guns (with extended ammunition etc) even legal? You can’t hunt with them and they are not ideal for target shooting. The second ammendment was written in a different time – it no longer applies. The constitution was meant to be amended and adapted and this rule is simply out of touch.

Posted by: JAG | April 17, 2007, 11:48 am 11:48 am

I just love how anytime something bad happens that the left immediately tries to point the finger at President Bush. News Flash…We all know you cant stand the man, so STOP being ignorant and childish, and leave him alone. Not everything bad that happens in the universe is a result of ” The evil Bush administration “…Bad things have happened BEFORE Bush took office, and unfortunately they will contiunue AFTER he is gone… I am very curious to see how the extreme left, who hate freedom and democracy, will try and blame Bush for all the bad things that will happen AFTER he is out of office. Especially if a Dem gets in office.

Posted by: always bush's fault | April 17, 2007, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Jacquelyn, give it a rest. We are tired of that old saw. Saddam DID have WMDs – people like you gave him time to ship them out to Syria. There are sat-pix of the convoys. Re: Virginia – proof that gun-control is loved by psychos – it gives them whole campuses of unarmed victims!

Posted by: RebelCat | April 17, 2007, 11:48 am 11:48 am

This is ridicules. We say things got really bad after 911. This has nothing to do with 911. This person is a U.S citizen. He lives in our country. This show’s that people are not safe anywhere no matter how much protection you have. We can not control those who are mentally ill, nor can we tell who they are by just looking at them. I wonder how in the world are we going to prevent something like this happening again. I even know the answer to that and it is, we can’t! We can’t tell if someone is all of a sudden going to lose it that day and go on a shootung rampage. What happened to VT should not be compared to 911. This is something more serious! This is someone who is supposed to represent our counrty as well as all the other citizens. Haveing metal detectors is not going to save us and upping security is not going to prevent someone getting buy and doing such a thing. If they are mentally ill there going to find a way to such a horrible thing. In my eyes there is nothing we can do,or we can put the whole U.S on some kind of examination to determine whether there mentally ill or not, but that would be just crazy! So what are we going to do about this and how can we prevent such a tragic thing from happening again?!?!

Posted by: Jillian | April 17, 2007, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Why was he carrying around the receipt in his backpack if he filed of the serial numbers? Seems kind of stupid for an engineering student to not see the foolishness in that, especially if this was planned out as meticulously as they say it was.
Either way..I hope VA Tech rethinks their policy on concealed carry. Obviously if someone is willing to kill multiple people, they are willing to ignore that little rule. Just like Luby’s…one person with a legally permitted gun could have lessened the casualties significantly. This is what happens when our hands our tied in terms of self defense.

Posted by: V | April 17, 2007, 11:48 am 11:48 am

You would think that after over 3,000 fellow citizens were murdered on 9/11 people would give up the notion that passing laws or returning to isolationism will make us all safe. The world we live in isn’t secure. That is true in London, Madrid, New York, Washington, Oklahoma City or Blacksburg, Virginia.

Posted by: Matt | April 17, 2007, 11:48 am 11:48 am

john sims, you didn’t read it correctly. it says 22 caliber, not 22mm. learn to read before you talk about the biased media. and also, even if they did get it wrong, that doesn’t make them biased, just stupid.

Posted by: mike | April 17, 2007, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Wow, Jacquelyn, I think we are in Iraq because we would be even LESS SAFE if we had to fight all the terrorists that are there, over here!

Posted by: Arnie | April 17, 2007, 11:48 am 11:48 am

so a kid that bought a gun a month ago is suddenly an expert shot who can kill 30+ people in that short of a time?

Posted by: jk | April 17, 2007, 11:49 am 11:49 am

It would be hard to kill 33 people with a fork!

Posted by: Tom | April 17, 2007, 11:49 am 11:49 am

I’m sorry to here that…
that man was korean…
I’m sorry..
now korea is panic..
I’m sorry as one person of korean
forgive that man..

Posted by: korea man kang jung han | April 17, 2007, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Honestly do you really think it is the gun laws or Bush’s fault that this happened? The blame solely rests on a sick individual who felt the need to take out his pain on others and carefully planned it over time. My question is why were there two seperate shootings and how could the second one have occurred two hours later? I find it inconcievable and unforgivable that Virginia Tech students were not immediately warned after the first shooting when the suspect was still at large. Anybody else agree?

Posted by: Austin | April 17, 2007, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Now let’s see how long it takes a politician to start blaming the guns. “We need more gun control.”
Folks, it is the person behind the gun that is responsible, not the gun. If you use that logic that it is the guns fault then you also must believe…
it is the pencil caused the word to be misspelled
–and–
it is the spoons fault that Rosie O’Donnell is fat.
Guns don’t kill people, people kill people!

Posted by: Dan | April 17, 2007, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Hey K. Nyce,
If you shot a 22 mm handgun it would probably blow your hand off and knock you on your butt. No such thing my man. The largest handgun I know of is the .50 cal Desert Eagle which translates to around 12.7 mm.
So if you have got one then I want to shoot it!

Posted by: Rod Burnette | April 17, 2007, 11:49 am 11:49 am

For what it’s worth guys, if the reporter got 22mm versus 22 caliber wrong, so does the U.S. government. A quick Google search turned up charges filed by the US Department of Justice against a felon in possession of a 22 mm handgun.

Posted by: Bob T | April 17, 2007, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Sadly this whole thing is going to be politicized to death. This event was horrific. I lived through a day not knowing if my parents and brother, all of whom work at Tech, were okay or not. Thank God they are all well and accounted for.
The point that needs to be made here is that all the gun laws in the world did not prevent this creep from wreaking havoc on a college campus. I wonder if the failure of the Virginia General Assembly to extend concealed carry rights to the college campus really made colleges any safer. Note that nobody but the bad guy had a gun. Is that how you’d like the non-gun-free zones to be too?

Posted by: DK | April 17, 2007, 11:50 am 11:50 am

When will people wake up? This college recently praised the failure of a bill that would have allowed licensed concealed carry of handguns on campuses. This is what happens when you disarm the population. These victims were sitting ducks and had about as much defensive options as a duck. The 2nd Amendment exists to protect our right to defend ourselves. The government denied these victims their right to protect themselves. By the way, notice that the evil gunman ignored all of the laws. The only people who obeyed the laws were the victims.

Posted by: John | April 17, 2007, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Why are you wasting your time arguing about the type of gun it was???? Think about the actual problem, he bought a gun and killed a bunch of innocent people. That is the only problem. Not gun rights, not caliber or millimeter, not biases media. A bunch of people are dead, do you think you can step off your soapbox for 1 freaking minute and mourn them?

Posted by: Allyson | April 17, 2007, 11:50 am 11:50 am

As long as we have such lax gun and useless laws, I am sure that these things will happen over and over again. At this point I am just anxious to understand why and how such a horrific event was triggered.
Guns (powerful weapons) are dangerous things. This is why we as a country actively try to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of other countries. Having too many around just increase the likeliness of some tragic event. Guns are the individuals version of a nuclear bomb.

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2007, 11:50 am 11:50 am

actually gun control doesnt work. if anyone wanted a gun, theres ways they can bypass these so called gun control laws and get one. you can have gun control, but in the end, it never really does anything to protect anyone

Posted by: josh | April 17, 2007, 11:51 am 11:51 am

The military has 20 mm guns. The gun weighs 248 pounds and fires 6,000 rounds per minute. Would you have us believe this guy had an even larger gun or could it be the writers don’t know what they are talking about? Let’s stick to FACTS.

Posted by: Johnny | April 17, 2007, 11:51 am 11:51 am

It’s called a typo (and many of you have made them today as I am sure I will) about the 22mm. Give them a break and certain foreign persons are allowed to purchase handguns based upon the type of visa they have. Stop throwing around the 2nd ammendment as a defense to this also. The 2nd ammendment was created to keep Americans, from back then, from being controlled and not having weapons to defend themselves against the British government that they were fighting to free themselves from. Not so any jackass with cash can purchase a weapon and go on mass killing sprees like this guy. Anyone ever notice that the countries with good gun control laws have much lower incidences of violent crimes?

Posted by: Tucker | April 17, 2007, 11:51 am 11:51 am

The fact is this nut used a .22 and a 9mm that he obtained ILLEGALLY to commit an ILLEGAL act on DEFENSELESS, LAW-ABIDING people who were DENIED the right to carry concealed weapons that MIGHT (I say MIGHT, hindsight is better than foresight) have changed the outcome of this tragedy.And as far as the other nut who is Bush bashing…it has NOTHING to do with this….geez, get a life.

Posted by: Eric | April 17, 2007, 11:51 am 11:51 am

I wonder what would have occurred had the policy been that anyone qualified and passing a background check be also allowed to carry a firearm on campus as they can in the rest of the state? Perhaps this would have ended much sooner?

Posted by: Wolf | April 17, 2007, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Wasn’t it a .22 Cal handgun? I can’t imagine a 22 Cal handgun would be anything a person could carry and shoot easily. Heck, a .45 Cal can be difficult enough.

Posted by: Joe | April 17, 2007, 11:51 am 11:51 am

I don’t belive most advocates of gun control want to take away the constitutional right to bare arms. But regulations can be made that could HELP keep guns out of criminal hands while still keeping them in the hands of law abiding citizens.

Posted by: LJ | April 17, 2007, 11:52 am 11:52 am

What we need is effective chain and padlock control. It is crazy that we live in a country where any nutcase can go to lows and walk out with 22 meters of this stuff – oops I meant 22 feet.

Posted by: John Galt | April 17, 2007, 11:52 am 11:52 am

who cares what kind of gun he bought, the fact of the matter is that he bought the guns and shot up the college, security anyone???

Posted by: Tracy | April 17, 2007, 11:52 am 11:52 am

It’s all the fault of George Bush… Isn’t he to blame for everything. LOL
The problem in this sistuation was a lack of guns. Everybody should be carrying one… Then let’s see somebody try to pull this type of thing off. You shoot me, I’ll shoot you. When are the gun haters going to wake up and smell the roses.

Posted by: Iain | April 17, 2007, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Nobody to blame except the shooter, really. Lets talk about personal responsibility here. This guy had it planned for awhile to do this. Dont blame Bush. Or the cops. Or the prez of VTU. That’s what’s wrong with this country…not enough personal responsibity.
God Bless VTU and this country.

Posted by: Jim | April 17, 2007, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Mikester, your 22mm handgun has a bore diameter of nearly an inch. Must be a bear to handle.
Jacquelyn, why wasn’t he legally allowed to purchase a handgun? I haven’t seen anything about a criminal background or being under age 21.

Posted by: bigdaddy | April 17, 2007, 11:52 am 11:52 am

If you think you own an 22mm handgun, then you shouldn’t own any guns. You don’t know enough to be safe. 22mm is close to an inch in diameter. Go to a gun store and ask for 22 millimeter ammo and they will laugh at you. Ask for 22 caliber and save some embarrassment.

Posted by: Bryan | April 17, 2007, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Now that we’ve succeeded in largely disarming the public, there’s nothing to stop the criminally insane from going on a rampage like this… No one could shoot back and stop this sniveling little so-and-so before he got going. Disarm yourselves at your own peril.

Posted by: Dr. Lizardo | April 17, 2007, 11:53 am 11:53 am

What the hell difference does the typo make? It’s a gun. He killed people with it. Those seem to be more relevant than the SIZE of the ammunition ripping through people.
And, Sam, he was a legal resident/alien – he has as much right to buy the guns as a U.S. citizen. THAT’s the problem. Everybody has, or can get, a gun with no problem at all.
What’s really disgusting is the number of posts all over the web with statements such as “if I’d been there, with my texas arsenal, the guy would have been dead…”. Do we really think this would have gone BETTER if half the students on campus were armed.
The NRA is as dangerous as any organization in the country.

Posted by: Dorothy Jane | April 17, 2007, 11:53 am 11:53 am

The question to me has always been…which is easier, changing human behavior or limiting access to guns? The answer obviously is that it’s easier to regulate guns than it is to change people’s heats and minds. We are required to jump through hoops to drive, buy a house, and all kinds of other things. Buying a gun should be equally well regulated. People who don’t want guns to go away need to convince the rest of us that thy’re are postive uses for handguns that outweigh the negative. What are they? Target practice? Shinging them for a display case? Not good enough. Protection? Protecton from what? OTHER GUNS!!!1 Get rid of the filthy things.

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2007, 11:53 am 11:53 am

I think President Bush needs to bring our troops home and concentrate on using our troops to protect our citizens here in the US, not abroad. The troops could spend time rounding up all of the illegal immigrants and putting them on a ship and dropping them off on a deserted island. Also, they could arrest the President of the NRA and drop him off on the deserted island, as well, but first arm all of the illegal immigrants with handguns.

Posted by: Scott | April 17, 2007, 11:53 am 11:53 am

All the gun control laws in the world wouldn’t have stopped this guy from carrying out this outrage. The Japanese have some of the strictest gun control laws in the world and CNN just reported that the mayor of Nagasaki was shot this morning.

Posted by: C Allen | April 17, 2007, 11:53 am 11:53 am

All this could have been prevented if he didnt have a gun but this country embraces the second amendment so we will alway have guns and crazy folks will always have easy time getting a gun for themselves. And why are some of you arguing about type of gun that was used? How is that relevent?

Posted by: Tony | April 17, 2007, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Thank you for stating the obvious… everyone is freaking out about whether it was a 22mm or .22 caliber or whatever. Over 30 people died because of the two weapons he purchased, that is the whole point. The question is now… what is to be done about it? I’m not looking for the “Banning of all arms and forget the Second Amendment”, I just believe we need to re evaluate gun control laws

Posted by: AJLaxEagle | April 17, 2007, 11:55 am 11:55 am

What you’ll never hear reported is that under VA law people are allowed to carry concealed handguns if they have a permit issued by the state, however VA Tech policy is to not allow staff or students to carry. Those that do will be fired or expelled no questions asked.
Great job keeping the people of Virginia Teach safe. The entire administration of the college should be terminated.

Posted by: John | April 17, 2007, 11:55 am 11:55 am

I’m afraid that he is korean. I think this occasion will intensely effect Korean immigrant society(even the political and educational relationship between Korea and US).

Posted by: Thomas Rhee | April 17, 2007, 11:55 am 11:55 am

I just get sick to my stomach thinking about this. Lets make more gun control laws right? Face it the guy was nuts with a gun. Punishing people with guns that follow the law isnt the answer.

Posted by: Will | April 17, 2007, 11:56 am 11:56 am

I absolutly guarantee, without effective gun control, this will not be the last incident and will not be worst in our United States.

Posted by: Jim | April 17, 2007, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Why was he carrying around the receipt in his backpack if he filed of the serial numbers? Seems kind of stupid for an engineering student to not see the foolishness in that, especially if this was planned out as meticulously as they say it was.
Either way..I hope VA Tech rethinks their policy on concealed carry. Obviously if someone is willing to kill multiple people, they are willing to ignore that little rule. Just like Luby’s…one person with a legally permitted gun could have lessened the casualties significantly. This is what happens when our hands our tied in terms of self defense.

Posted by: V | April 17, 2007, 11:56 am 11:56 am

In my opionion anyone who wants to buy a handgun should go through a class like we have here in Texas for people who want a concealed handgun licence. That would have stopped this guy from legally buying a handgun. We have got to make it tougher for people to own handguns or this is going to happen again.

Posted by: David Carmel | April 17, 2007, 11:56 am 11:56 am

He was a resident alien, and it has been reported that he was legally allowed to purchase guns. As the first gun was purchased March 13, and the shootings took place April 16, he could have purchased the gun anywhere from Friday-Sunday (April 13-15). Personally, I don’t care what kind of guns he had. He seems to have purchased them legally. So there was something wrong with HIM. What he did was horrific. Debating any of the aforementioned does not get us anywhere nor help anyone grieve nor honor the memories of those who have had untimely deaths as a result of his actions. Let’s instead focus our efforts on helping those who have been affected by this terrible tragedy.

Posted by: TW | April 17, 2007, 11:56 am 11:56 am

If teachers could be licensed for conceal and carry maybe more kids would have been alive today.

Posted by: geri | April 17, 2007, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Your right….outlawing guns is the answer…then only the criminals will have guns. As usual everyone is trying to assign blame. Welcome to America, the greatest country in the world. It won’t be long till the lawyers show up. Our society is going straight to hell.

Posted by: George | April 17, 2007, 11:57 am 11:57 am

If guns were allowed on college campuses then ordinary citizens could have stopped this whack-job before he killed so many. Also, armed citizens serves as a deterrent from even considering such an act. Don’t restrict more, restrict less! think about it.

Posted by: IndianaReader | April 17, 2007, 11:57 am 11:57 am

I knew someone would try to link this to Iraq…..
Anyway, the main thing here is the feet dragging of the school to get a warning out. I saw the interview, the President of the school said they assumed they had the gunman locked down in the building. What happens when we assume peolpe?? He needs to be gone. Plus, didnt Columbine have 3 shooters? What made them so confident there was only one??

Posted by: Hayes | April 17, 2007, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Okay, so there was a .22 caliber weapon, and they forgot a decimal point. Big Deal. It’s a common mistake, and .22 calibers are a common weapon. Anyone can figure out the size of the handgun they are referencing.
Besides if this detail is all you got from the news story, you’re the one missing the point. (Pun intended).

Posted by: Sarah | April 17, 2007, 11:57 am 11:57 am

The real irony is that the Viginia legislature tried to allow law abiding citizens with concealed carry permits to carry on campus. Virginia Tech was 100% against it saying they would keep students safe. Personel protection is your own responsibility and right! Several of the last school shooting were cut short by average people with concealed carry permits, one was a school employee and another was a parent.

Posted by: Eric | April 17, 2007, 11:58 am 11:58 am

I think they should outlaw murder. Then you wouldn’t need to outlaw gun possession, because people wouldn’t be allowed to kill with them.
Wait, murder already is against the law? And it still happens anyway? How can that be? We’re assured that if we had stricter gun laws, that these crimes wouldn’t happen. Hmm. Maybe laws aren’t always the answer, huh?

Posted by: Frank | April 17, 2007, 11:58 am 11:58 am

I don,t know what did he get our of it.

Posted by: Ahmad | April 17, 2007, 11:58 am 11:58 am

You people are sad, who gives a damn what kind of gun it was. Gun laws would’nt have prevented this from happening so get out of your dream world. And as far as the IRAQ shit, it has no relavence to this situation.

Posted by: Nick | April 17, 2007, 11:58 am 11:58 am

This bickering about gun control in this instance is irrelevant. The killer had planned this out. He was intent on killing people and he would have used whatever means he had available.
If it wasn’t a gun, it would have a been another weapon. Perhaps even a bomb.

Posted by: George | April 17, 2007, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Do you know how many lives would be saved from drunk drivers if we outlawed cars? And we should get rid of bicycles and swimming pools too. You know how many children die every year on bikes and by drowning? Remember, its the inanimate object that actually does the killing, not a person. So simple minded people conclude, remove the object and you remove the crime. Its that easy!

Posted by: Clyde | April 17, 2007, 11:59 am 11:59 am

I am amazed how so many people support more guns to prevent gun violence. How do you know what’s going through those people? How can anyone guarantee that that one individual who is permitted to carry that gun isn’t going to go nuts?

Posted by: Tony | April 17, 2007, 11:59 am 11:59 am

You wont take my Second Amendment rights to the United States Constitution.
Virginia is for Lovers.

Posted by: L | April 17, 2007, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Don’t blame gun laws or lack thereof. States with tighter laws have similar results to that of states with looser laws. Idiots that want to kill people will get guns, whether on the black market or at a dealer.
The issue is that this individual wasn’t even an American citizen from what I recall?

Posted by: Michael | April 17, 2007, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

He was a resident alien, and it has been reported that he was legally allowed to purchase guns. As the first gun was purchased March 13, and the shootings took place April 16, he could have purchased the gun anywhere from Friday-Sunday (April 13-15). Personally, I don’t care what kind of guns he had. He seems to have purchased them legally. So there was something wrong with HIM. What he did was horrific. Debating any of the aforementioned does not get us anywhere nor help anyone grieve nor honor the memories of those who have had untimely deaths as a result of his actions. Let’s instead focus our efforts on helping those who have been affected by this terrible tragedy.

Posted by: TW | April 17, 2007, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

All you have to do is read half of these posts to know this country is full of idiots and lunatics! The blame game, Iraq, arguing over the specifics of the gun .. geez! No wonder politicians don’t get accomplished .. they’re just a microcosm of this pathetic society!

Posted by: M. Weber | April 17, 2007, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

I bet that poor kid was all messed up on antidepressants, or stimulant ADHD drugs like Adderall. That all those drug pushing, dope dealing doctors have so many of you poisoned with. That stuff kills people, and makes them crazy.

Posted by: Unimpaired | April 17, 2007, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

he was a permanent resident of the US so by federal law that allows him to buy the guy. He purchased the first on March 13 and the second over the weekend so he bought it over amonth later.
Second, at a gunshow you can buy a gun without a background check if the seller is not a FFL holder and is just a citizen to citizen sale.
But above all who cares. It is not the guns fault it is this lunatic’s fault. And sadly the police departments fault for not swarming that campus and that town when they knew they had a gunmen on the loose who had killed two people in a college dorm. The campus should have had every cop in that town all over it looking for the suspect.

Posted by: shane | April 17, 2007, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

That he used a gun to kill is not the issue. The issue is he killed. If the guns were not there he would have used something else. Bombs, which could have killed many many more. When someone wants to kill they will use anything they can think of. Do not confuse the issue of killing with the items used to do this killing. The sensationalism of the story will now encourage others with mental problems to act on them also. This will probably be repeated one way or another by a person(s) who also wants to get in the news. What item of destruction they use will still be the same. An item of destruction to life. But the real problem is that the person(s) are mentally in trouble. That is the real problem. And that is what we as humans need to learn to try to discover and help so this does not happen again.

Posted by: DONNA | April 17, 2007, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

This is simply a tragedy. Simply horrible. However, I think we all need to take a step back. When compared to just about any other country in the world, this is just a blip on the radar. There are bombings, suicide and otherwise, nearly everywhere else at least once a month. Before we start blaming others (the media, military, Bush, liberals, conservatives, etc), we need to take time to reflect on the relative safety we enjoy. Also, we should also all thank all our troops for risking their lives for the ideals our country stands for. Whether you agree with the war or not, these brave men and women deserve our respect, support, and admiration. Peace.

Posted by: marshall | April 17, 2007, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Sadly enough, after reading a majority of the comments from readers, most of them are complaining about the 22 mm pistol not existing. Hey, Sims, do you really think most of the gun salesmen abide by the rules? Just reading most of these comments makes me realize that 33 people dead isn’t the key issue here. It’s that 22 mm – how dare they.

Posted by: Dustin | April 17, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

CAN PLEASE STOP ARGUING ABOUT THE GUNS? Does it really matter whether it was 22mm or .22? All that matters is that he used two guns to shoot and kill a lot of people including himself. I frankly don’t care what kind of gun he used. The fact he had guns is what upsets me. Talk about gun control, talk about the morals but quit trying to find reasons to hate the media for getting facts incorrect, it happens. Geez.

Posted by: JasRey | April 17, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Actually I believe the VT had its own regulations against carrying a weapon on campus. It certainly didn’t help in this situation and may have made the body count higher than otherwise.
It does show how limited the ability of police to protect us is.

Posted by: burt | April 17, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Everyone blames gun laws, George Bush, the president of the school, but nobody looks at how kids are being raised these days. People are not allowed to decipline the child anymore because they are afraid of being accused of abuse. Teachers can’t control kids in school because they don’t have any respect! Quit pointing the finger at our leaders. Look in the mirror! It is not just this inncident, it is everytime something tragic happens! 25 years ago I wasn’t even alive, but it was twice as easy to get a gun, but did stuff like this occur, NO! Because parents and teacher instilled respect and fear in child to do what is right!

Posted by: Chris Stone | April 17, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Millimeter != Caliber.
.22 caliber means .22″ bore ID. I own a ruger markII, a .22 caliber gun.
If students hadn’t been prohibited from having guns, this murderer could have been stopped in his tracks at 7:16.
I’m a firm believer in a persons right to defend their life. The university has removed their right.
In its place, the university says they will protect the students. As usual, the police serve as investigators.
Had any professor been armed, at least 25 of those killed would still be alive.
Would the gunman have gone in knowing he faced armed professors?
Until this changes, schools will continue to be the easiest target for these deranged madmen.

Posted by: Derek | April 17, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Gun control, only controls honest people!!!

Posted by: jason | April 17, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

The shooter obviously violated “the law”. Those who outlawed self defense by preventing law abiding citizens from carrying firearms on campus are as guilty as the murderer. An armed “victim” could have stopped the murderer and saved lives. We must take the personal responsibility of being prepared to defend ourselves at the moment the immediate need arises. This means – stop viewing ourselves as victims.

Posted by: Nathan | April 17, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Frank i love the comment…All you people who are talking about Bush need to get life…..33 people just died and you want to make this your opportunity to rant about Bush…you are jokes….

Posted by: bill | April 17, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

I agree with those saying that if faculty or CWP holders had the ability to legally carry on campus that at the least the guy would not have been able to do what he wanted to do. He may not have done it at all.

Posted by: Wolf | April 17, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Teachers (but not students) should be allowed to get a Conceal & Carry Permit and carry a handgun. If only 3 or 4 of the teachers in Norris Hall had been armed, there would be far fewer victims. Do you really want totally defenseless people who must depend on the speed (?) and common sense (?) of the local police? Stop this insane thinking that the government can take care of everything in your life.

Posted by: Kevin | April 17, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

He carried a chain to lock the door; he kicked the door to try to kill everyone in the classroom; he was a well-trained gunman whom I believe used to be a soldier; he suicided by shooting his face…All these mean that it was not a random attack, he planned, he did in purpose!!

Posted by: Minnie | April 17, 2007, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

No Alan, tighter laws have made a difference. They ensured that when the perp went into West AJ and into Norris Hall, he’d be the only one there with a gun. The politicians have played right into his steady hand.

Posted by: Don L | April 17, 2007, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

as you know, the horrible killer was such a loner.
according to the article, he bought two guns. in my opinion, it is not impotant to know.
the u.s government have to amend the law and the u.s government need to prohibit to sell weapon in a shop.

Posted by: David Kim | April 17, 2007, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

What is the point in arguing about what kind of gun it was? If that is the part of the story that bothers you, you may have some serious issues that need to be addressed. Also, let’s not turn this into an anti-Bush discussion. Should he have had the military prowling one of thousands of college campuses on that particular day? Come on.

Posted by: Dan | April 17, 2007, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

The problem here was that all the students were not carrying guns. If they didn’t have that stupid no guns rule for law-abiding students, Mr. Hui would have looked like swiss cheese a few seconds into his act.

Posted by: Wyatt Earp | April 17, 2007, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Sadly, I wish the Second Amendment zealots were as vocal in defending, you know, the other nine amendments in the Bill of Rights. Those that don’t, for example, heavily criticize on intrusions into Fourth Amendment search and seizure protections can’t fairly characterize themselves as civil libertarians – they’re just gun nuts. So unless we also hear a vigorous defense of the right of the criminally accused to have an attorney (Sixth Amendment), or the protection of a free press without influence or censorship by the government (First Amendment), etc., then please just say “I am a gun fanatic”, and stop hiding behind the Second Amendment.

Posted by: B. | April 17, 2007, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Is a 22mm is it a 22 caliber…I’m sure the average American couldn’t tell you the difference so get of the author of this story’s back. I think we’re missing the point. Over 30 people were senselessly killed. It doesn’t matter what kind of gun was used. Gun control does not exist in this country. All you ignorant NRA banner toting morons need to come back to reality. I know, guns don’t kill people, people do. but they do it with guns. How many people do you think this guy could have gone through with his bare hands. Had he not the access to the weapons in the first place, none of you would be arguing about what of gun was actually used. I’m getting concerned about most of you. You are arguing the model of the gun as if it was the most important thing that happened yesterday. Ask the parents of the 30 plus kids that died yesterday and ask them if they care what kind of gun was used to kill their child.

Posted by: Jim | April 17, 2007, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

I don’t see how handheld guns are legal. A shotgun for hunting, yeah, but handguns? In Ohio, im not allowed to smoke in my favorite bar because of the law, but because of the law i can get drunk and carry around a gun. I know..sounds illegal…that’s not it, it’s that it is POSSIBLE!

Posted by: Nick | April 17, 2007, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

The 2nd ammendment is a joke. Things have changed in the last 220+ years. The fact a kid who isn’t a US citizen can buy 2 guns is a major issue. Why are guns like that even for sale?

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2007, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Unbelievable ignorance about historical events. Guns keep people free; no guns, no anything except long food lines, little red books, and gulags.

Posted by: dave | April 17, 2007, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

holy crap people. I live in VA but if i wanted to buy a gun i could get one from anywhere. Do you think that more gun control will keep people that premeditate from getting guns? have you ever heard of black market? Criminals? I know plenty of ways to get weapons – and anybody planning a mass killing would know how also

Posted by: jim | April 17, 2007, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

OK, so now let’s debate the accuracy of Wikipedia! Aside from the Great Caliber Debate which is so incredibly relevant to the issue here; I fear that every time somebody goes balistic in a public place, the wrong long-term lessons may be learned about gun control. If only the government is eventually able to use any form of weapon, we might as well go live in China. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” But I definitely understand the other side of the issue – I just hope we don’t over-simplify the solution.

Posted by: John | April 17, 2007, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

So what the righties are saying is that if everyone was packing, then there wouldn’t be any gun violence??? Hmm…yah…okay. And I am the Pope. And if we have more fast food places no one will eat there and become fat. Yep. I agree. Go Dubya! Beat Iraq!

Posted by: my | April 17, 2007, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

And quit complaining about Bush. Yes, he’s a terrible president. We get it. However, not every bad thing happens because of him so shut up already.

Posted by: JasRey | April 17, 2007, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

I’m sure the survivors of those killed are taking comfort in the fact that there is such great deabte roiling over a typo on the size of the round that ended thier lives.
More importantly, has anyone noticed the trend? Don Imus says something insensitive and people want to ban words. this is an unfortunate and tragic event. Is it worth making the @nd amandment null and void. What’s next? Would we all be safer with soldiers living in our homes? three down, seven to go. (most of you will not get that last reference).
Liberal America: Saving America by losing one Amendmeant at a time.

Posted by: Walter | April 17, 2007, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

For the individuals claiming that as a “non-citizen” he should not have been able to buy a firearm legally: WRONG – much like the rest of the bill of rights, the 2nd amendment applies to citizens and non-citizens alike. He was in the country legally and, while he’s here, he can buy whatever he would care to. Go NRA!

Posted by: Jason | April 17, 2007, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

The NRA is happy? What kind of misinformed liberal jackass are you to say that? The NRA promotes SAFE gun handling, SAFE gun use and SAFE gun ownership. Your idiotic comment is like saying the AAA is happy whenever there is a fatal car accident. You would be better served to look at FACTS instead of drooling in front of your Rosie O’Donnell videos.

Posted by: Larry | April 17, 2007, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

50% of gun deaths in America are suicides and another 25% are drug and gang related. Yet we only hear about the sensational stories like this which are always followed by ignorant calls for more gun control. America’s problem is a moral and cultural one. The same hypocrits that put out movies for youth with gangsters and heros shooting things up with handguns will be calling for more gun control. Meanwhile they acknowledge no repsonsibilty for helping to train people like this to solve their problems is this way. I’ll tell you why this continues to happen in this country. Open borders and no discipline at home, in the courts or in the schools. Period.

Posted by: Bill | April 17, 2007, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Resident Aliens in the state of virginia are allowed to purchase weapons. The guy lived in America since 1992. The fact is that the way he was able to legally obtain guns is nuts. There’s nothing to say he may not have carried out the act if laws were more stringent, but we’ll never know. The fact remains, he did buy the guns legally. He did kill a ridiculous amount of people. In a comparison with other nations, the US is miles ahead (on the negative side) regarding guns and violence. I’m not anti gun, but the second ammendment was there because our military was small and the individual Americans may have been needed to form up and stand for the country. These were real patriots. They didn’t own guns because they loved them, they owned them because they needed them. It’s a far cry from their writing of the ammendment, and our current interpretation of it. Don’t try to hide behind the right to bear arms because it’s a cop out, and it’s off base. Study your history righty.

Posted by: Michael | April 17, 2007, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

The Dems are shying away from gun control as a party issue because they lose on it. But they won’t be able to ignore it any longer. Pelosi said they would re-visit gun control “when the time is ripe”, and I’ll bet that’s right about now. So they will go for, say, handgun registration and it will cost them the white house.
Funny how politics is.

Posted by: Rob | April 17, 2007, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Why are you arguing about 22mm or .22 caliber? No one cares about your fascinating knowledge on guns. And this has NOTHING do with the war in IRAQ! There is NO connection. We need to learn all we can from this to do our best to prevent these things from happening…who knows what that might be, but lets do out best to figure it out.

Posted by: Alana34 | April 17, 2007, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

I would think people would do research before they post — reports and civilians alike. Legal Aliens can buy guns in this country. ANY criminal can buy a gun — that’s why gun laws don’t work.
In most states with a CCW law, you CANNOT legally carry on campus.
The shooter also filed off his serial numbers.
HENCE, HE WAS A CRIMINAL and no law was going to alter his plan. There are already laws on the books against killing, but that didn’t seem to stop him. Right????

Posted by: ErricZ | April 17, 2007, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

GUN LAWS DONT WORK PEOPLE

Posted by: josh | April 17, 2007, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

I’m sitting here listening to some hot head talking if there was a ban on guns this wouldn’t have happened. BS. He would have found some other way to do what he planned on doing. If we are going to ban guns let’s go ahead and ban alcohol (remember prohibition, that really worked), fertilizer, as a matter of fact vehicles too people use them to kill too. Yeah it sounds silly, so does trying to ban an instrument, figure out why he did what he did (no matter what his weapon was)

Posted by: Chris | April 17, 2007, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

I’m sure the survivors of those killed are taking comfort in the fact that there is such great deabte roiling over a typo on the size of the round that ended thier lives.
More importantly, has anyone noticed the trend? Don Imus says something insensitive and people want to ban words. This shooting is a sad and tragic event. Is it worth making the 2nd amandment null and void. What’s next? Would we all be safer with soldiers living in our homes? Three down, seven to go! (most of you will not get that last reference).
Liberal America: Saving America by trimming one Amendmeant at a time.

Posted by: Walter | April 17, 2007, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

From what I understand, the guns were purchased legally. But, it was illegal to have the guns on campus. Of course, criminals overlook laws they don’t want to follow.

Posted by: Scott | April 17, 2007, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

ban gun free zones-its for the children!

Posted by: mike | April 17, 2007, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

It is legal for a resident alien (which is what this guy was) to purchase a gun in the United States. The person had to get approved which takes about a week before his/her application is processed. You can only blame one person for what happened and it was the guy who pulled the trigger. You can not control a mentally disturbed person and if he did not use a gun he could have used a bomb, car, truck, etc. anything like these can be used to kill people intentionally!! Look out law abiding citizens, the gun grabbers are coming!!

Posted by: CMB | April 17, 2007, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Largely disarming the public?
Mr. Lizardo, you are living in a fantasy world. Where do y’all get this stuff?
History and daily current events prove your statement to be jest. How anyone could actually believe that is beyond the range of most logical and moral thought?
Takes all kinds, I guess?

Posted by: brian dykes | April 17, 2007, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

The point of this article is not gun control. The point is premeditation. Let’s not lose sight of what is important.

Posted by: Erin | April 17, 2007, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

To all of the gun control people consider this. The Campus has a gun control policy: No guns on campus. He broke that law. A criminal will get a gun with or without permission. That is why they are CRIMINALS!. Perhaps if some of the students or professors had access to a firearm and could shoot back the toll would be less

Posted by: Scott | April 17, 2007, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

It really doesn’t matter what gun or knife, or bat, or bomb, or car was used in the slaughter of innocent lives. Folks, any way you slice this an individual did this. He planned and executed a plan to take as many lives as possible and then his own. I wish someone there had the werwithal to take action. How as a society do we get to the point where able bodied men line up like sheep to be slaughtered. 3-5 students could have ended this rampage if they had just realized that the only wrong thing to do is nothing. Fight back people, Mr. Cho was a predator, where was the Todd Beamer of this incident. Knowing that all was probably lost making the decision to stand and fight. “Let’s Roll”

Posted by: Keith | April 17, 2007, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Doesn’t exist? Well, since I’ve fired a couple before and my father owns one…..i must be on an acid trip. Please, for the sake of my eyes, get your information right, and proofread before you post it.

Posted by: Tom | April 17, 2007, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Many are still trying to figure out what the connection was with the first shooting and the 2nd. Have you ever thought about the fact that the first shooting was done to divert every ones attention to the dorm area in order for the shooter to invade the more populated area where he knew the majority of the causalties could occur? This surely was well orchestrated and a sad situation.

Posted by: Gloria | April 17, 2007, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Why do people want to make defenseless herds out of the masses? They seem OK with a few getting picked off here or there.
Look at the herds in Africa? The lions would have no chance if the herds teamed up and challenged their enemies.
We need to recognize the bad apples and get them under control.

Posted by: Joe | April 17, 2007, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Guns don’t kill, people do! Don’t tell MSNBC “MSLSD” that. If this guy couldn’t buy a legal gun, then he would get it on the black market. Do illegal drugs ring a bell? Anyone can get it. It just costs more.

Posted by: chris | April 17, 2007, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

We clearly need more effective gun control laws. The fact that a foreign national can by 2 handguns is a joke.

Posted by: Sean | April 17, 2007, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

It is not feasible to eliminate guns from society. Pass a law eliminating guns entirely, and tragedies such as this will only continue to increase, and with deadlier results. Citizens need to be an integral part of community security, both through awareness of potential threats and the ability to respond. Being defenseless sheep have only resulted in planes crashing into buildings and rows of bodies from execution style murders. It is way past the time to depend on “stricter laws” to protect us…personal responsibility is the key to building a stronger community, not dumping more money toward building up a government that cannot serve its people nearly as effectively.

Posted by: James | April 17, 2007, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

If the students were allowed to carry guns, every time two drunk frat boys got into a bar fight over some chick, it would end in two dead frat boys, instead of two bloody nosed frat boys. Just what we need – kids carrying around guns to get into shootouts with other kids – brilliant!

Posted by: Wyatt | April 17, 2007, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

I’m wondering if anyone saw him chain the doors to the building and wondered why, questioned him or tried to report it.

Posted by: Heather | April 17, 2007, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Walther does make a .22LR PPKS, and did, at one time, make a .22LR PPK – I have one in my safe. Jammy piece of crap, but interesting enough to keep.

Posted by: Lee | April 17, 2007, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Perhaps if the students had been able to be armed thamselves this person could have been stopped. Disarming the law abiding public is no answer to this type of disaster.

Posted by: Dave | April 17, 2007, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

“22 mm.. no, 22 cal..” A little petty, don’t you think?
If I recall correctly, from 2nd grade, the 2nd amendment provides for an organized militia. Buying rapid-fire guns just for the sake of having them is not the same thing. What’s more, there is nothing stopping any of us from earning a blackbelt in martial arts. Martial arts doesn’t “misfire” or “go off by accident,” doesn’t hit innocent bystanders, and teaches individuals to avoid harming others. So if you really want to carry a deadly weapong (supposedly your right as a human being), consider karate, as it is less bulky than an automatic machine gun. Seriously though, you people have bizarre priorities when it comes to “personal safety.”

Posted by: Nina | April 17, 2007, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Wackos armed with guns are much more deadly than those armed with, for example, knives or weed whackers.

Posted by: Ken | April 17, 2007, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

OK the point about the 22MM(milimeter) gun is that someone
that owns that gun does not know
what their talking about AND will not listen to facts A 22MM would be .86 CALIBER Please sell your gun to the next gun buy back.
Also dropping the “clip”
will not render a gun safe one round can be in the chamber.

Posted by: DG | April 17, 2007, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

C’mon guys quit arguing about the .22 cal or .22 mm. It’s no big deal they made a mistake, let it go. A .22 mm gun would be a “cannon”. A .20 mm cannon is used on fighter aircraft and a few ground soldies but it has to be mounted solidly or it would knock you down when you fired it.
The big picture is we have a mentally ill person who committed a horrendous crime. Banning guns won’t stop such people from killing just see what’s happening in Toronto, Canada or the large cities of the UK and Australia since they totally banned guns by law-abiding citizens. Nutz or nutz and if they want to kill they will find a way.
About 125 people per DAY die in auto accidents in the US, where’s the outrage?

Posted by: Jerry | April 17, 2007, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Fact. It wasn’t 22mm, it was 22 cal. So what?
Fact. The PPK does come in .22 and .32 and .380. So what?
Fact. He was a legal resident alien and it was legal for him to purchase firearms in Virginia. So what?
Fact. Virginia does have concealed carry rights, but they are not recognized on Virginia Tech campus. The students had no way to defend themselves because that right was taken away from them by the administration. Gun control advocates will explain that making this heinous act more illegal than it already was would stop the next one. That is ridiculous. You cannot stop a madman intent on killing others without regard for his/her own life by passing more laws. You can only stop it with a bullet. The sooner that bullet arrives on target, the sooner the carnage stops. As long as there are madmen, we should be allowed to defend ourselves against them.

Posted by: Ed | April 17, 2007, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

You people blaming Bush already are unbelievable…barely 24 hours later and you have your tried and true scapegoat on the chopping block again. You don’t like your 2nd Amendment rights? Why don’t you just give up them all and forfeit your right to free (ALTHOUGH IDIOTIC) speech. Everytime I read a comment by another hate-spewing liberal I laugh because behind your finger-pointing is only a person so ill-informed and uneducated that blaming the President seems like a logical step to take.

Posted by: E. Anderson | April 17, 2007, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Why don’t you guys stop worrying what type of gun it was and just mourne for the fact the guy was able to kill 33 people no matter what kind of weapon it was.

Posted by: Aj Johnson | April 17, 2007, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

The Mikester…if you do own a 22mm handgun then you have a very rare weapon. Also, if you do then you know that a 22mm round is a very large projectile. Slightly smaller than a XM25 grenade launcher use as an anti-tank weapon. I think the difference here is that .22 caliber is what was used not a 22mm handgun. Lastly, as far as the shooting goes it seems amazing that people can blame Bush for anything and everything (Jacquelyn). I think maybe he missed stopping this shooting because he must have been busy shirking his duties to stop the storm from hit most of the midwest and northeast parts of the country. And no doubt he should have called home the troops to stop both events. How about letting the shooter from South Korea be responsible for his own actions and not drag Bush or guns into the picture. The guy was a nut case. Innocent people usually are the victim of nut cases.

Posted by: Michael | April 17, 2007, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Clearly this is fault of the president. If we weren’t in Iraq, humans would have never invented gun power which would have ment that humans would then not have invented sun shine, and of course, roller coasters would never have been invented and caused this disaster. Totally Bush’s fault! How much clear do you non-idiot liberials need?????

Posted by: vap | April 17, 2007, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

You can buy a gun in VA if you are not a citizen of the US – you just have to have proof that you currently live in VA. Hope that helps y’all.

Posted by: Chris | April 17, 2007, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Why don’t you guys stop worrying what type of gun it was and just mourne for the fact the guy was able to kill 33 people no matter what kind of weapon it was.

Posted by: Aj Johnson | April 17, 2007, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

We have heard the same argument for gun control for the last 10 years. Basically the NRA runs congress, so no real change can happen there. The issue comes down to why isn’t there any outlets for teens to obtain mental help from. Suicide in colleges are ever increasing, address the foundation of the issue (psyche) is the real key to solve the problem.

Posted by: dan | April 17, 2007, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

I also read that the serial numbers on the guns were scratched off. This leads me to think that either he got the guns illegally or he was smart enough to remove them himself. Further proof of premeditation.

Posted by: Heather | April 17, 2007, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

I don’t even own a gun but a 22mm bullet would be the thickness of approximately a 20 gauge shotgun shell.

Posted by: Craig Bush | April 17, 2007, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

I hold a concealed-carry permit in Virginia. Still, I would seriously object to changing the law to allow guns on the grounds of any school, including- especially, colleges. Think testerone and alcohol.
As determined as this guy was he would have found the means. A truck full of fertilizer, industrial dynamite, driving a vehicle into a crowd.
How about getting a student pilot’s license and renting an air-plane on the day of a Hokie football game?
The kind of so-called debate we see in this thread frequently only reveals the fervently held prejudices of the debator.

Posted by: Oldflyer | April 17, 2007, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Wrong! A legal resident alien can purchase a firearm in his state of residence under federal law.

Posted by: Eric | April 17, 2007, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Liberal? Democrat? Who cares! Today is a world-wide day of mourning for the families and friends of those who lost their lives yesterday. Focus on that instead of petty name-calling and party division. Enough is enough!

Posted by: Allie | April 17, 2007, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Washington DC has the strictest gun control laws in the country. It is also the place with the most crimes involving guns. Gun control does not work.
Remember, Guns do not kill people – people kill people.

Posted by: Bruce | April 17, 2007, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

It doesnt matter about the type of gun he used or how he got the gun, the main thing is that 32 people were murdered. i just cant understand why, if someone wants to end their own life, why they have to take other lives with them

Posted by: christian | April 17, 2007, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

I bet dollars to doughnuts that when is all said and done, it will be for the same reason most of these school shootings take place. Failure to fit in or be popular. School has become more of a place to show who has the best clothes, car, atheletic ability, etc. Academics are what is important, but they are not revered like who is prettiest or can throw a football the farthest. These things usually don’t add up to anything once you are out of school. Just like Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, this guy probably was picked on, thought of as a nerd, and rejected by several women. God help us all if we do not fix this problem. The shootings will only continue. Dress codes in all schools, limit sports to only those who can take real courses and pass, and take away the homecoming king and queen. Yes, he was obviously mentally unstable, but what was it that caused those brain chemicals to mix and cause these thoughts? Read this post agin.

Posted by: Michael | April 17, 2007, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Gloria- how do you know that the first shooting was “in fact” a diversionary measure? How about the “fact” that the second shooting was a follow up to the first shooting because he did not get his intended target the first time? Maybe he wanted to exercise by carrying a backpack across teh campus? What about the “fact” that he forgot his glasses in the morning, went back to his room to get them and then went to the second building? My point being that your idiotic assignment of “fact” status to your guess is almost as stupid as the argument over the caliber of fire arm used. He used two guns and killed 30 people. Does the gun size REALLY matter? Do the families of the dead really care about your postulated “fact”? No, i doubt they do and you would best support them by keeping your fact inventions to yourself for now.

Posted by: Larry | April 17, 2007, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

A 22mm handgun fires flares…

Posted by: Greg Depp | April 17, 2007, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

I have to agree with the pro-gun people. Outlaws manage to get guns either way, laws or not.
Anyway, my heart goes out to the victims.

Posted by: BCJ | April 17, 2007, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

I like how this guy’s already been found guilty of mass murder before his trial’s even taken place.
So much for American justice.

Posted by: Randy | April 17, 2007, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

How exactly would more gun laws help? Would they deter crime any more than existing laws against murder, robbery, rape, etc.? Laws are only followed by people willing to observe them (in other words, bad people ingnore laws). If stabbings increase, will we outlaw knives? How will I cut my steak?

Posted by: scott | April 17, 2007, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Obviously we need more restrictions on South Koreans. There is no need for any South Koreans in this country unless they’re members of the military or law enforcement. And they certainly serve no useful sporting purpose. They’re a threat to everyone’s safety and need to be taken off of the streets. If there had been a ban on South Koreans in Virginia, this tragic event would never have occurred. (Hey, this makes as much sense as restricting firearms!)

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2007, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Imagine banning free fire zones…
Banning piles of sheep from slaughter…
Thats right issuing a handgun to every adult with the express purpose of banning these free fire zones with no one to shoot back

Posted by: Colin | April 17, 2007, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Honestly, I don’t understand this talk about ‘if the teachers could have guns’ or ‘if people could have guns to protect themselves’…it doesn’t make any sense to me personally. I don’t want to have to carry around a gun to feel safe. Carrying a gun would make me feel unsafe on a very large scale. The more guns there are, the less safe we are. It seems like a logical argument to me. Guns don’t equal safety, they equal danger. Even if a person is trained in firearm safety, the gun is still dangerous. Now don’t tell me that it’s not the gun that’s dangerous, but the person. I know that is true, but who’s to say that if I was carrying a gun, I know how to use a gun, and I am safe with guns, but somone randomly mugs me from behind, and discovers my gun…now what? Guns are bad for humans in general.

Posted by: Brian | April 17, 2007, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Why does the media refer to the shooter as a gentleman! He was anything but!!!

Posted by: Patty | April 17, 2007, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

I like how these idiots are trying to blame this on president bush-what does that have to do with anything? Instead we should be remembering and praying for the families of the victims.

Posted by: Ryan | April 17, 2007, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

This will continue to happen as long as handguns are legal. When the constitution was written, very few people owned handguns, most owned rifles or shotguns. It’s extremely difficult to sneak up on 60 people using a rifle. This country thrives on violence, just watch any movie or TV show

Posted by: Veral | April 17, 2007, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Yes, you can debate gun laws and calibers and even the war in Iraq…
However, the major issue at hand is that this was a major tragedy that ended the lives of several innocent people. This is a sad event in our nation’s history and my thoughts and prayers go out to the victims and their families as well as those at Virginia Tech and their alumni as well as Blacksburg as this will be a stain on their history.
This event needs to be a wake-up call for all universities and colleges much like Columbine was to high schools to improve campus safety as well as student counseling and mentoring. Violence takes many forms and this incident tragically ended the lives of 33 people.

Posted by: Martin | April 17, 2007, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

do you understand how pathetic you all sound when you’re fighting over whether a 22mm gun exists or not? Who cares! Is bush to blame? No! is NRA to blame? NO! Is God to blame? No! There was only one person to blame and he took his life like a coward. Your thoughts need to be with the family, friends, and classmates of those who lost their lives.

Posted by: Robert | April 17, 2007, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

are you kidding me, I own a .22 pistol, so once again the ignorant public blames the”liberal media”

Posted by: pete | April 17, 2007, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Well, seems like everyone who
was not there is an expert.
Bottom line, if someone is of
a mind to commit a crime such
as this and they don’t care
if they live or die, then it
will happen regardless of
laws or gun bans. I think it
will be weeks or months
before all the facts are
known. Whatever bad thing
happens, dismanteling the
Constitution is not the way
to deal with it.

Posted by: Glenn | April 17, 2007, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

What’s really interesting is that no one has noted that Virginia is a right-to-carry state, which means that a citizen who has undergone a background check and has completed the required training can carry a handgun for self-defense. The law, however, forbids these individuals (many who have law enforcement and/or military backgrounds) from carrying on campus. Apparently the Virginia legislators thought the harsh rhetoric of the law would be sufficient to prevent a deadly shooting on a campus while ensuring that no trained law-abiding citizen could prevent it.

Posted by: Jamie | April 17, 2007, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

How would more laws against buying guns have stopped this guy? If it’s true he broke the law to buy would breaking a bigger law or more laws have stopped him?

Posted by: Gregg | April 17, 2007, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

“As usual the biased media gets it wrong. A 22mm hadgun does’t exist, bu hay never let the facts interfere with thestory.”
As usual, submitter has a snarky comment but fails to realize that the story indeed says .22 caliber, not mm.

Posted by: J Jones | April 17, 2007, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Washington DC has the strictest gun control laws in the nation. It is also the place with the most crimes involving guns. Gun control laws do not work. If guns were outlawed, only outlaws would have guns. Remember, guns do not kill people, people kill people.

Posted by: Bruce | April 17, 2007, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Just for the record: According to law you do not have to be a US citizen to purchase a handgun. But foreigners MUST BE permanent residents of the US, ie, they must possess a “green card”.
If Cho did not have a green card then it would be illegal for him to purchase a handgun anywhere in the US.

Posted by: Bill in New Hampshire | April 17, 2007, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Larry, your post is the smartest one i’ve read so far.
How is this Bush’s fault? You liberals really need to get a clue!

Posted by: cmt | April 17, 2007, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

No one has mentioned that Virginia is a right-to-carry state, which means that a citizen who has undergone a background check and has completed the required training can carry a handgun for self-defense. The law, however, forbids these individuals (many who have law enforcement and/or military backgrounds) from carrying on campus. Apparently the Virginia legislators thought that having a law would be sufficient to prevent a deadly shooting on a campus while ensuring that no trained law-abiding citizen could prevent it.

Posted by: Guy | April 17, 2007, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

The same ideologues who are undisturbed about our open borders and the inflow of illegal drugs, aliens and possible terrorists want guns banned. Were they to succeed in making guns illegal, the only people who will have them will be those criminals — like drug dealers and street gangs — who obtained them from criminals smuggling them in across our porous borders! You can’t have both the absence of guns and open borders.

Posted by: Angus | April 17, 2007, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Someone stated, “why are we in Iraq when our country is unsafe?” Well we are in Korea and look what happened! I don’t see any connection to our being in any of the two countries. Disturbed people are everywhere!

Posted by: John T. | April 17, 2007, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Jacqueline, right on. We should immediately withdraw from Blacksburg!

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2007, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Actually he was a legal permanent resident so he was well with in his rights under federal and state law to purchase a firearm. Look it up on the BATF website.
Only non-immigrants and undocumented alieans are bared from owning firearms

Posted by: Curtis | April 17, 2007, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

There’s only one man ultimately responsible for this crime: George W. Bush.
It’s his administration and his policies that set the stage for this.

Posted by: Stephen | April 17, 2007, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

I could not believe someone would committ such a selfish act of crime. I am wondering if the school has any kind of awareness/support progams for students that are stressing out from personal issues that are occurring in their lives.

Posted by: Gary Breckel | April 17, 2007, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

We are all in the stage where we want to figure out what went wrong. Let’s not be so quick to point fingers. There are some things that nobody can stop but there are things that we can do POSSIBLE deter violence. Let’s start by acting like responsible humans and not think we are above anybody else.

Posted by: Gabe | April 17, 2007, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

I’d just like to point out that 22mm is almost an inch (24.5mm). So when you say that a 22mm handgun exists and that you have one, look at the bullets for it. Are they almost an inch in diameter? Or do they look more like a quarter of an inch (0.25 inches) across?
What scares me is that it sounds like there are a lot of people out there that own guns and don’t know the difference between inches and millimeters.

Posted by: Craig | April 17, 2007, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

You can have all the gun laws, rules & regs — the person who is outside the law will ALWAYS be able to get a gun or 2! The only people who might abide by the laws are not the ones who need to be reached by them!
More bureaucracy is not the answer – never is!

Posted by: rrowe | April 17, 2007, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

First off i think it is wrong to start pointing fingers at any police figures for not locking down the college. How would anyone know that this would be a crazy kid who decided to play god and start killing innocent people before he killed himself. Why does this tragic event have anything to do with iraq. Just another way for bush haters to express that they hate bush. One has nothing to do with the other. If this kid wasn’t a us citizen why and how was he able to buy not one gun but two.

Posted by: David | April 17, 2007, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Mark -
Absolutely brilliant. Couldn’t say it any better than that.

Posted by: ChillyPop | April 17, 2007, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

This shooting is actually bad for anti-gun supporters. No assault rifle was used. It was simply two hand guns. There will never be a time when handguns will become illegal. Even in the wake of this horrible tragedy I bet some anti-gun lobbyist almost wish an assault rifle was used. This is definitely an isolated incident and the hundreds of thousands of responsible gun owners shouldn’t suffer for a deranged lunatics actions.

Posted by: Lando | April 17, 2007, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Read the article…there was no mention of a 22mm weapon…rather “and his second weapon, a .22 caliber handgun”. Read before offering a comment!

Posted by: JHD | April 17, 2007, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

I have a question…Why is it okay for politician’s personal security details to carry guns yet the same whining Liberals want to take our guns away? In their liberal minds it’s okay for them to be protected but we shouldn’t be allowed to defend ourselves. Hypocrisy at it’s best people.

Posted by: Richie Aprile | April 17, 2007, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

More gun laws won’t help but less will. We cannot legislate humane behovior. One should at least have the right to die fighting. If one legal citizen student had a legal weapon it could have been over quickly since we cannot depend on 911 to protect us. Also, the Bill of Rights should apply to only US Citizens not green card holders or anyone else. Overseas all countries do not allow legal or illegal immigrants or visitors the same rights of a citizen. Wake up America we should’t either. Read the statistics from our own goverment “More guns equal less Crime. You cannot argue with the facts.

Posted by: John F. Salemme | April 17, 2007, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Jazz..the gun was simply the implement..get it straight..the killer was a being (I hesitate to use either man or human)..the gun is an inert item until it is in the hands of a shooter..try and get it right instead of regurgitating the leftist media disinformation.

Posted by: spencer | April 17, 2007, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Protecting lives is more important than the right to bear arms. If guns werent readily available to purchase the likelyhood of this occuring would be reduced. It seems like some people are more concerned about this leading to changes in gun laws rather than the victims. Thats sad.
The less guns out there the better!!!

Posted by: Emilio | April 17, 2007, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Guns are NOT the problem. Guns have been available for years without radical problems of the past few years! It is other law, Judicial system, violence in video games, TV, movies etc. Parents not teaching respect for fellow human beings!!!! Bruce B.

Posted by: Bruce | April 17, 2007, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Most are wrong here about the legality of this guys handgun purchase.
Resident aliens can buy guns here in the US.
Non immigrant aliens must prove 90 day residence before they can buy a gun here.

Posted by: Vegas | April 17, 2007, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

“The NRA promotes SAFE gun handling, SAFE gun use and SAFE gun ownership. ”
Safe gun use? How do you kill someone safely? Interesting.
So sick of the nra. Might you think differently about guns if your kid got killed yesterday?

Posted by: ss | April 17, 2007, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Come on folks, 32 people lost their lives and your worried about the size of the handguns he used and the way in which he purchased them! Right story, wrong focus.

Posted by: Lyn | April 17, 2007, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Too bad the stock photo of PPK in graphics has nothing to do with the story, must not have had a stock “Glock” photo. I usually avoid and consider “Weapons Free Areas” to actually mean “enhanced victimization zones” since criminals are much less likely to encounter someone who is armed and has the will to resist.

Posted by: W R | April 17, 2007, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Wow, a 22MM! This guy was brilliant. COnstructed his own handgun and his own custom ammo.
Obviously they made a mistake as there is no such thing as a 22MM.
The main question is why they didn’t shut the campus down and allow this loon to shoot the others TWO HOURS LATER.

Posted by: Jarhead | April 17, 2007, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

nice photo of a .380 walther ppk/s. too bad it has nothing to do with the article.

Posted by: bob | April 17, 2007, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

This shooting is actually bad for anti-gun supporters. No assault rifle was used. It was simply two hand guns. There will never be a time when handguns will become illegal. Even in the wake of this horrible tragedy I bet some anti-gun lobbyist almost wish an assault rifle was used. This is definitely an isolated incident and the hundreds of thousands of responsible gun owners shouldn’t suffer for a deranged lunatics actions.

Posted by: Lando | April 17, 2007, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

1) Gun laws are only as effective as their enforcement
2) If gun laws were effective, Washington DC would be the safest city in the country
3) At the risk of cliche: “if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns”.
4) Gun crimes are down in states that have ‘right to carry’ laws on the books; that is fact.
5) VA Tech was officially a ‘gun-free zone’; meaning the killer knew he had open season to prey on defenseless victims

Posted by: Bob S | April 17, 2007, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

once again,. Guns don’t kill people, People kill people.

Posted by: andy | April 17, 2007, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

You know what… if say 50 kids in that school were packing guns, heard the shots and all came out firing at anybody else holding a gun we would be looking at even a bigger disaster. These kids would not know who had a gun for defense and who was the wacko. They would most liekely have little to no experience with a gun and no organizational experience in how to work together. They would be running and firing at everything that moved! Trained army units have a big big problem with friendly fire, let alone your average engineering student. Come on, the argument that if we all had weapons we would be safe just does not work!

Posted by: ezekiel | April 17, 2007, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Liberals can ban all the guns they want but a NUT will still be able to buy any gun on the street. Then the only people to have guns is the criminals and nuts, and people have no way to protect themselves.
And why in the world did VA Tech not start locking down and notifying students immediately? Yes, it would be hard but it may have saved someone’s life. And they “thought” it was a domestic incident. Who made that judgement call? I hope it wasn’t the police who were just guessing.

Posted by: Marsha | April 17, 2007, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Even a .22 pistol can do some serious damage, depending on the type of ammunition used, the range at which one is shooting, and where the bullet enters. Aside from the “execution style” of the killer on his second visit, has anyone established these facts?
The answer is enforcing existing gun control laws, which should have prevented him from buying any weapons.

Posted by: Matt | April 17, 2007, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

First off i think it is wrong to start pointing fingers at any police figures for not locking down the college. How would anyone know that this would be a crazy kid who decided to play god and start killing innocent people before he killed himself. Why does this tragic event have anything to do with iraq. Just another way for bush haters to express that they hate bush. One has nothing to do with the other. If this kid wasn’t a us citizen why and how was he able to buy not one gun but two.

Posted by: David | April 17, 2007, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

it won’t be long before Pres. Bush gets blamed for this – if it hasn’t begun already

Posted by: sol | April 17, 2007, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Regardless of loop holes, laws or the caliber of the gun, this guy was bent on doing this. He, just like any other criminal, would have obtained the weapon desired to carry out his task. That’s the whole argument. Gun control would not have stopped this and the right to carry would, I’m sure, be not apply to a college campus, just like a bank or federal buildings.

Posted by: Todd | April 17, 2007, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

It is not the guns, it is not Bush. It is people making bad choices.

Posted by: mary | April 17, 2007, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

First…thoughts and prayers to the victims families and friends. The ONLY person to blame is the shooter. Not the guns, the NRA, 2nd Amendment, Bush, etc. He pulled the trigger and he killed those innocent people. Are we going to ban cars because some drunk causes a wreck…more people die in auto accidents each year than in shooting deaths. When the State of Virginia passed the law that no guns were allowed on campus, didn’t they then accept the burden of protecting those that they prevented from protecting themselves?

Posted by: Anthony | April 17, 2007, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

This bickering about gun control is irrelevant in this instance. The killer planned this. He was intent on killing. He would have used any means available to kill. If guns weren’t available, it would have been some other weapon. He could have used a bomb. If he couldn’t buy the guns, he may have stolen them.

Posted by: GeorgeT | April 17, 2007, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

“Ineffective Gun Control?” What are you smoking, Jim? The campus was a “gun-free zone” by law — the law that the alleged shooter didn’t obey. What makes you think any MORE laws are going to solve the problem?

Posted by: Bob | April 17, 2007, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Why not compare the number of gun crimes to “gun friendly” states to “anti-gun” cities, like DC for example

Posted by: michael aus boonton | April 17, 2007, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

i like how the picture featured in the story is a walther ppk. it’s not a 9mm or a 22 cal, but it looks scary!!!!!

Posted by: chad | April 17, 2007, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

I wonder how the liberals are going to bame THIS one on George Bush.

Posted by: Dan | April 17, 2007, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Tools vs. programming. We seem to always have plenty of rah-rah energy to focus on the tools of a crime (like guns) every time there is a massacre (much like the predictable calls to investigate oil companies every time the price of gas goes up). But there is little appetite for looking hard at what programming our society is feeding younger generations, particularly as it pertains to the onslaught of violence in movies, games (particularly the zero-value mass murder games), and other ‘entertainment’. No matter how many laws we make or how tightly we button up our society we cannot compete against the destructive power of bad programming.

Posted by: Glenn | April 17, 2007, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

just like a typical liberal. blame it on Bush. why dont you just go ahead and blame everything on Bush? including your own existence?

Posted by: john p. | April 17, 2007, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

If & buts only make candy nuts,lets wait untill all of the facts come in however that being said: I have several questions: 1. why when officials were still investigating the first shooting with shooter still loose there was notification when the very least they could do was call each buildings main number to notify staff to secure each building 2: After last year’s shooting why was there no emergency broadcast system?
with today’s multi media tech they could’ve sent a email/text alert to the staff/students.

Posted by: Stephen EVC014 | April 17, 2007, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Guns are not allowed on campus…thats the problem. No I dont want students with guns on their person on campus, but let them keep them in their car. let profs. keep them in thier offices.

Posted by: Kevin | April 17, 2007, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

No matter what this will be a political issue, although I don’t think what kind of gun, loophole purchasing, or Bush should be the focal point. We should debate what went wrong and how it can be prevented. Let’s not forget, this ahas happened quite a few times in the last 8 years.

Posted by: Bear C | April 17, 2007, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Whether you are pro or anti gun, don’t you think that in this case, this individual would have taken some other extreme measure if guns were not available? Say a knife or axe wielding episode or worse the creation of some explosive device? Doubt if this guy was turned away at the local gun shop that would have been the end of it.

Posted by: tim | April 17, 2007, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

It’s quite literally amazing how you liberals can find a way to attach Bush and Iraq to every news story. For once…let it go!

Posted by: Jim | April 17, 2007, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

First…thoughts and prayers to the victims families and friends. The ONLY person to blame is the shooter. Not the guns, the NRA, 2nd Amendment, Bush, etc. He pulled the trigger and he killed those innocent people. Are we going to ban cars because some drunk causes a wreck…more people die in auto accidents each year than in shooting deaths. When the State of Virginia passed the law that no guns were allowed on campus, didn’t they then accept the burden of protecting those that they prevented from protecting themselves?

Posted by: Anthony | April 17, 2007, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

No such thing as a .22 handgun? Well blow me down, I guess the .22 cal handguns I own musn’t be real…….., but what does the caliber matter anyway dude?
The facts are this guy used two guns to kill 32 people…..caliber is irrelevant

Posted by: nick | April 17, 2007, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

The funny part of the coverage is the notion that the police can protect against this sort of thing in a free society.

Posted by: cse | April 17, 2007, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Actually, .22 handguns do exist… they just aren’t common. My grandmother had one… I think it held something like 20 rounds (looked like a revolver).
John

Posted by: The Rancid Monkey | April 17, 2007, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

First I heard of the serial numbers being removed.
If you haven’t heard a rumor by 10 AM start one.
If the serial numbers were removed they can still be read.
The type of gun used has no bearing on the story.
A nut job killed 32 people and he alone is responsible.
I know the anti-gun crowd wants to blame the gun but as usual they are wrong.

Posted by: AC | April 17, 2007, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

This was sad and definately tragic. I’m so sorry for those affected by this tragic incident. God be with you and bless you!!!

Posted by: Joy Hunt | April 17, 2007, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

…but a .22clbr does…what’s your point? They got a factual tid-bit wrong, small detail left for the obudsman, imho.

Posted by: Larry | April 17, 2007, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Guns don’t kill people!Stupid people with guns kill people!If you want better gun control address the court systems that are more concerned about protecting criminal rights than protecting the public.

Posted by: JO | April 17, 2007, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Wow. I am shocked to see that everyone here is concerend with laws and Bush and this that and the other. The blame is on the gunman. HE decided to murder innocent people. HE decided when to do it, HE decided how and who. My deepest sympathy for the families who have lost loved ones. Do you honestly think that if we put several laws into place that it would abolish crime? NO. There will always be a person who for one reason or another, has the desire to harm others.

Posted by: lac | April 17, 2007, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

The Iraq comments may not yet be appropriate. That being said, it may be appropriate to look at the 32 deaths and the effect they had on our society. Scenes like this are happening every day in Iraq. Sometimes the dead are guilty insurgents. Often times they are civilians just as innocent as these college kids and professors. Why doesn’t Mr. Bush express his “shock” for the innocents in Iraq, or “keep them in his prayers”

Posted by: steve | April 17, 2007, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Guns don’t kill people!Stupid people with guns kill people!If you want better gun control address the court systems that are more concerned about protecting criminal rights than protecting the public.

Posted by: JO | April 17, 2007, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

To “Richie Aprile” – Perhaps it is not the best timing on your part to call those who are shocked and infuriated that this firearm crime took place “whining liberals.”

Posted by: Nina | April 17, 2007, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

You claim you love this country but you clearly hate Americans by using a word like “liberal” as a bad thing. The majority of your fellow countrymen and women support stricter guns laws. Just as the majority of Americans voted for Gore over Bush, but we still must accept Bush as our President.

Posted by: sam | April 17, 2007, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Gun laws won’t stop future crime. Gun laws preventing the carrying of a firearm on a campus clearly didn’t stop this crime. What would have stopped it is if a student was legally carrying a firearm in the campus and shot the suspect before more lives were lost.

Posted by: Jake | April 17, 2007, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Yes the guns had the serial numbers filed off, but why would he do that and then carry around receipts showing the purchase of the guns in his backpack that he had on him at the time of the shootings? And for that matter, if he’d planned on killing himself, what would he care if they were discovered to be illegal or legal? This whole thing smacks of an opportunistic gun grab. A disarmed populace is a safe one (for tyrants and outlaws).

Posted by: V | April 17, 2007, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Mark: Germany and Canada have less than 1% of the number of gun deaths of the United States per year. Your argument defeats itself.

Posted by: Rob | April 17, 2007, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

22mm handgun?? that means the diameter is over 3/4 inches… talk about packing heat!
“got cannon”!

Posted by: GMAN | April 17, 2007, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

If one maintains that “Gun control laws don’t work”, one must logically be in favour of allowing private citizens (with clean records)to purchase fully automatic machine guns, bullets that can penetrate vests worn by law enforcement, and even bazookas. And strict enforcement of the death penalty is hardly a solution in cases such as this one.

Posted by: jon | April 17, 2007, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

I’m tired of those who say (as in a post above) that “it” (meaning the gun) killed 32 people. The gun has no power to kill unless SOMEONE pulls the trigger. And are you anti-2nd amendment people trying to pretend this guy wouldn’t have found a gun illegally if he had been forced because of gun-control? Virginia Tech was a “gun-free zone” and I didn’t see him follow that law.

Posted by: Serra | April 17, 2007, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

As a legal permanent resident of the United States, he was legally entitled to purchase the guns. He came to the US when he was 9.

Posted by: NancyGallagher | April 17, 2007, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Two different Circuit Court of Appeals (NY and TX) have ruled that the “Police are under no obligation to protect individuals, only society as a whole” Therefore;the police are there to apprehend the purps AFTER THE FACT. If you rely on the police to protect you, you are living in a fools paradise. Virginia voted last year to prevent these students from protecting themselves by legally owning and possesing a firearm on campus. When you deprive people of the right to self defense, you essentially deprive them of life in a situation such as this.

Posted by: Steve Prunier | April 17, 2007, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

I surprised the media hasn’t blamed global warming yet !

Posted by: Jim Baker | April 17, 2007, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

I can’t believe that someone who says, “I own several 22 mm handguns,” owns any! With rare exceptions, decimal values of calibre indicate fractions of an inch bore. When the calibre is >1, mm is the indicated unit of measurement. A 22 mm gun would be .866 calibre! If you’ve ever shot a .44 or .50 cal handgun, you know that one nearly an inch bore would be impossible to shoot a second shot because your wrist would probably be fractured.
If you don’t know your guns, you should have some instruction before you hurt yourself or someone else.

Posted by: John | April 17, 2007, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

gun laws are like locks, they’re only effective for honest people!!
the type of guns sold to individual should be controlled, but stopping the sale of guns for personal protection is unconstitutional and subjects people to being more vulnerable to these wacko’s!

Posted by: keith | April 17, 2007, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

They got a picture of the wrong weapon in the photo! That’s a Walther PPK that is only made in .380 ACP and .32 ACP.
But I’m only surprised they didn’t put up a picture of a street sweeper shotgun. The media doesn’t really know which end of a weapon the bullet comes out.

Posted by: Bob | April 17, 2007, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

First of all there is no such as a 22mm handgun. It’s a .22 caliber, meaning .22 of an inch. It doesn’t surprise me that gun dumb people don’t know this. Second it is LEGAL for non resident aliens to purchase firearms in the US if they have the proper forms of identification. It takes four forms of documentation for them to buy a gun. It’s time we change that law. We should not be affording the same rights to non citizens as we do to citizens. You will find that in few other countries in the world. Last, this moron broke a number of laws before he started shooting. When will people get it that only law abiding people obey the law. Cocaine and other drugs are illegal. Does that stop people from buying them and using them?? Of course not. Stricter gun laws will only disarm law abiding citizens and make them prey for criminals. If you think the police can protect you, you are a fool. They obviously didn’t protect the rest of the student body after the first shooting.

Posted by: southern man | April 17, 2007, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

There are no 22mm handguns. All who claim to own them are lying or else they do not know what they themselves own. It was a .22 CALIBER (inches) round.
Stricter gun laws would only further the defensibility gap between the law-abiding and the law-breaking. They will not disinvent guns, just make it even harder for law-abiding citizens to protect themselves.
If someone on campus would have been armed it might have literally saved dozens of lives, but don’t let that thought into your mind if your partisanship disallows it.

Posted by: tamdar | April 17, 2007, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Just to clarify the 22mm/.22 caliber issue in the article. When the article was first posted it read “22mm” since then it has been changed to read “.22 caliber” As far as some of these folks claiming to own a 22mm (as in 22 Millimeters/2.2 Centimeters to those of you that don’t know what mm stands for)handgun, please post the manufacturer and model number of said gun. I doubt anyone can come up with a “22 Millimeter Handgun”

Posted by: Mark | April 17, 2007, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

I wonder how Rosie is gonna blame this one on President Bush. Karl Rove maybe? Have another Twinkie, Honey…

Posted by: Scott | April 17, 2007, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Once they outlaw guns these problems will disappear. Just like pot, heroin, coke, meth, and xtc all disappeared once it was declared illegal. Get real people, laws don’t make problems go away. America made alcohol illegal once, do some research on how that worked out. Murder is illegal in every state plus the supposed creator of the universe made it wrong in the 10 commandments yet murders take place every day. Real problems require realistic logical solutions.

Posted by: Ben | April 17, 2007, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

So, is a 44mm larger than a 22 cal. ?

Posted by: Bob | April 17, 2007, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Richie is correct, it’s a Catch 22. We need to have guns to protect ourselves from people with guns.
But your gun permit does not state you have the right to kill innocent people with your guns. If we as Americans cannot be smart enough to pass effective gun control through legislation, more blood and tears will be shed. Pass the Kleenex.

Posted by: river | April 17, 2007, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

god bless america for its gun laws that allow this kind of incident.

Posted by: tom | April 17, 2007, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Everytime a tradegy occurs like this, the media and the left blame the gun. This is an elementary way of thinking. Do we ban pools for causing deaths? Cars? The gun was the not problem. They never are.

Posted by: Aaron | April 17, 2007, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

If one maintains that “Gun control laws don’t work”, one must logically be in favour of allowing private citizens (with clean records)to purchase fully automatic machine guns, bullets that can penetrate vests worn by law enforcement, and even bazookas. And strict enforcement of the death penalty is hardly a solution in cases such as this one.

Posted by: jon | April 17, 2007, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

stop blaming…find out what went wrong..did students pick on him and make his life miserable..

Posted by: d | April 17, 2007, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

How is Bush responible for any of this? Nobody is responsible for any of this except for the shooter and the SLOW response of campus security. Wanna blame someone blame the rent-a-cops. Its not the gun, its not the President, its not any excuse, its the attacker.

Posted by: Justin G | April 17, 2007, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

True Nina. Why is this column a debate of right versus left? We all have the same goal: We want this to stop. The media thrives on controversy and pitting groups against each other for ratings(black vs. white, red state vs. blue state, religious conservatives vs. gay, etc.) Can’t we rise above this baiting? With such vitriolic rhetoric I’m not surprised people go postal.

Posted by: Non-Hater | April 17, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Wow, first a post about high-capacity magazines that was a complete LIE, and now a stealth correction from 22mm to .22 calibur. Journalistic integrity at its finest, here at ABC News!

Posted by: Master Shake | April 17, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Two words…GLOBAL WARMING! Watch the liberals not only blame President Bush (as they already are) but somehow tie this to SUV’s causing global warming.

Posted by: M | April 17, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

These are some of the stupidest comments I’ve ever read. Every other comment is about the .22mm thing being right or wrong. Who gives a flip? Y’all are nuts.

Posted by: Bobo the Clown | April 17, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

I used to carry a gun to both work and college, but since both passed rules forbidding it, I don’t. I am also hyper-aware that the possibility of workplace and school violence leaves me vulnerable if some wack-job has a grudge against his ex-girlfriend.
There are 3 things that are bothersome about violence: 1)school violence has continually diminished over the past 30 years (look it up), yet it’s all we hear about; 2) When Columbine happened, there was a bill in the Colorado legislature that would have let teachers carry concealed weapons in the classroom and that bill was subsequently killed (I have no idea why – it’s exactly the situation the bill was attempting to address); 3) Americans have become wusses.
Since the draft, or at least some type of mandatory military service, Americans (particularly American youth) have become a soft, lazy, nothing-can-be-solved-with-violence bunch of pussies that call the media whenever they see someone spank a child or write their congressman when their kid gets disciplined at school. We have cultivated a nanny-culture that is scarily like that of communism, except that instead of having it imposed upon us, we have demanded it.

Posted by: Paul | April 17, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Barely a year ago, the Virginia General Assembly blocked a law that would have allowed LICENSED individuals to carry guns on campus. Virginia Tech’s spokesman PRAISED the defeat of the proposal. Wonder how the spokesman feels NOW after seeing what can happen in a Victim Disarmament Zone.

Posted by: HankB | April 17, 2007, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Everyone hang loose. A congressional investigation is coming. What else has Congress done the last 100 days? Then they’ll find a cause, gun control, to focus on and claim it will cure all.
I live in Florida, if you believe laws — which if enforced would have kept this killer from buying a gun — will protect us; let me sell you some land!

Posted by: linda | April 17, 2007, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

There is no answer to these kind of horrible acts. We live in a rather unhappy world. America’s love affair with the gun and the uncompromising stance of the N.R.A. is not going to allow for change in the ready availability of guns in America. When the angst builds up and guns are available there will be more killings. Nothing will change America’s ‘cowboy’ culture.

Posted by: Tom | April 17, 2007, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

To Nina please this was a crime not a gun crime

Posted by: Colin | April 17, 2007, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Just a few things. In the state of Virginia it is LEGAL for a resident alien to purchase a handgun. Virginia has conceal/carry permits. They are by no means difficult to get, nor are they extremely easy. However, on college campuses a student’s 2nd Amendment rights stop at the gates. Agree or disagree, these are facts.
This nutbag was going to kill people. Gun control laws DO NOT stop desperate criminals from obtaining a firearm. Two things stop desperate criminals, police with guns and citizens with guns. Liberal or conservative I think we can agree that while stricter gun control laws may have delayed this guy a week or two, but he was going to commit this crime. Gun control laws are followed by one group of people, law abiding citizens. It would be a gross error to believe otherwise, and THIS KID was NO law abiding citizen.

Posted by: Eric | April 17, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Mike, you do realize that a 22mm hand gun would fire a bullit about an inch in dia. dont you? 12mm is a 50 cal. There is a hand gun that is .50, (12mm). Please provide make and model of 22mm handgun. I would be intrested in one myself.

Posted by: bassndude | April 17, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

There is nothing wrong with the 2nd ammendment (right to bear arms), but I don’t see a section where it says a person has a right to own bullets.

Posted by: scott | April 17, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Did laws prohibiting gun possession, or carrying guns onto school campuses, prevent what happened at Virginia Tech?
Obviously not. The killer ignored any such laws.
Did gun prohibition laws perhaps prevent someone at Virginia Tech from stopping the killer before his death toll rose so high? Perhaps so.
Law abiding citizens tend to obey the gun prohibition laws. Criminals do not.

Posted by: Jim E | April 17, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Instead of focusing on the size of the gun, which seems to dominate this discussion, can we focus on the fact that lack of adequate security at a major facility such as virginia tech allowed someone to walk around blasting away with little or no resistance?

Posted by: Avi | April 17, 2007, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Rock on Bobo!

Posted by: VOG | April 17, 2007, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

I see to laws… no three… this fella broke… and that doesn’t even begin to address the ones I haven’t seen yet. First… non-US citizen can not purchase firearms. Second, if he was on an antidepressant… now sale. Third, no guns on campus. Only if the professors could have guns in class… might have made the difference.

Posted by: Joe | April 17, 2007, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Quick butchery with fifty-cent machetes is what killed 1 million in Rwanda and 3 million in Congo, according to the Washington Post. In three minutes, a determined Cho could have hacked even more than he shot, and no police response plan could have stopped him. The apathetic citizenry of Russia and Iraq demonstrate daily that looking away empowers killers. American society has worked well until now, because our law doesn’t just allow us to act against known threats, it requires us to. Who shot back?

Posted by: Tom Bright | April 17, 2007, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

People need to quit pointing blame to everyone else until they learn what the motive was for this horrible tragedy. I understand everyone is angry and they have every right to be. Nothing will ever make up for the lives of the innocent people that were lossed!!

Posted by: Heather | April 17, 2007, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Guys and girls Walter does make a 22 but it is a 22LR P22. That looks like the PPK which only comes in .32 & 380 acp. There is no 22 mm handgun, it it was it would be the size of a large rifle scope. Go Figure
Peace

Posted by: jammasterjay | April 17, 2007, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

So if I run a stop sign and t-bone a minivan and kill a family of 4, it’s my cars fault, not mine – lack of car control in this counrty??

Posted by: Brian | April 17, 2007, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

What did Tech know about Cho’s mental condition? Chicago media reports that Cho’s writings were bizarre, he had started a dorm fire and had been stalking some one. There is more to this angle I am sure

Posted by: Babba | April 17, 2007, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

For any of you people claiming to own 22mm handguns, I would love for you to e-mail me a picture of one or at least tell me a make and model. Or better yet, maybe a video of you shooting a bullet almost an inch in diameter from a handgun and not having your arms broken…

Posted by: Chris | April 17, 2007, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

yes, there is such thing as a 22 handgun it’s a much smaller caliber than the 9mm but handguns do come in 22 caliber just like rifles

Posted by: Courtney | April 17, 2007, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

to adress several points made here
1. the alleged miswording of caliber vs mm is largely irrelevent
2 countries with very tight gun laws like japan, uk, and germany have virtually insigificant number/percentages of gun crimes and only on or two school-college shootings ever. this fact is only partially due to lack of guns and tough laws rather it is due to the culture, community and poverty levels. interestingly they are also much less religious…and if you take away drug and gang related shooting the US is still off the charts comparitively
3 with the impossibility of guns being banned, the focus on the restriction on type of guns and magazine capacity would only apply to making rare rampages less lethal because people can run.

Posted by: mike | April 17, 2007, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

I am sick of hearing that the gun killed 32 people. The gun didn’t kill anyone. The insane lunatic killed 32 people. When the old guy drove into the street fair in Santa Monica a few years back no one said a Toyota killed them.

Posted by: Ryan | April 17, 2007, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Cho was a permanent resident who had a green card so he would not be excluded from buying a handgun. The earlier news reports said it was some Chinese student here on a student visa — who would be forbidden by US law from buying the guns.
Just want to clear up that detail of the law.

Posted by: Bill in New Hampshire | April 17, 2007, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

I agree…but I heard it was actully a .23mm pistol. A very deadly weapon.

Posted by: T | April 17, 2007, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Yeah, the solution is for everyone
in America to be armed–things will
be so much safer.

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2007, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

An amazing display of ignorance here by both pro and anti gun people. There is a difference between mm. and cal., a very big difference, but it doesn’t matter much in this case. What does matter is the laughably easy availability of guns of all calibers and kinds in this nut-case country. Beyond that, not even gun owners (I am one)can arrange a cogent argument for high-capacity magazines (mark my words, he used them in the 9mm Glock) that allowed this man to pump out so many slugs so quickly, and what gave his victims no real opportunity to ever overpower him because he reloaded so infrequently. The long clips serve absolutely no purpose outside of securing some reassurance of masculinity in their confused owners. They make the weapon inordinately heavy and uncomfortable to carry for any length of time. And, if the NRA gunfight freaks out there still think they need between 16 and 20 rounds to settle their disputes, I suggest they go more often to the range to target practice.

Posted by: John | April 17, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Walther should sue abc news! First a Walther PP or PPK/S pictured is not even chambered in 9mm or 22. Yet they are associating murder to their company. The liberals have been attempting to sue the manufacturers , the manufacturers should sue them for putting their products on display without any validity .

Posted by: John | April 17, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

VOG wrote: First… non-US citizen can not purchase firearms.
Incorrect -Legal permanent resident aliens may purchase firearms in the state of Virginia

Posted by: C | April 17, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Jason, you sound like a typical naive liberal who would be the first to blame a ‘shiny metallic monstrosities’ rather than an erratic criminal. You should live in the liberally beloved Europe where guns are illegal for all even for the criminal who just broke into your house and is threatening to kill you and your family with his (many times over and already) illegal gun…

Posted by: M | April 17, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

i wish i could have killed him myself slowly so he could feel the pain caused by his victims, the same should have happened to saddam, killers dont deserve to die quickly…i hope “cho” rots in hell

Posted by: dan | April 17, 2007, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Resident U.S. aliens (green card – legal immigrants) are permitted to buy guns. As a former green card alien I had a conceal carry permit although since 9/11 my state has changed that law. Now that I am a citizen (I still have a carry conceal permit and so should you) I fail to see the distinction between a legal immigrant and a citizen given the fact that legal immigrants are subject to FBI background checks and scrutinized before entry.
If liberals want to give Gitmo detainees Constitutional protection, how can they deny second amendment rights to a legal resident alien. Don’t they have the same need and right to defend themselves.

Posted by: Robert L. Barney | April 17, 2007, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

To the gun-nut who said you can’t buy a .22 handgun: wrong! I own one and I think you should have to have a license to own one. Otherwise, idiots like this take advantage. It’s just common sense.

Posted by: realist | April 17, 2007, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

The sad thing about all of this beside the awful event itself is the reaction of people, who are clearly afraid, that are trying to place blame on the school, or ‘immigrants’, or guns themselves. This is a tragic event by a person who was clearly troubled. His Race is not relevant, because we all migrated here at one time or another (that is why we have the freedoms we have). The school could not have predicted something so awful, period.
As a person who does not believe in or appreciate guns, I do understand that we have freedoms that I do appreciate, like the right to say what we want and treat our bodies in the fashion we see fit; unfortunately guns are a part of this freedom, taking one away is the same as all of them. The guns will still be available, and with or without them people can still be killed. The only rational thing to say in this situation is to educate people on dealing with aggression, and feelings they cannot control, educating others that we should not push people to such limits where they feel no way out, education is our refuge in this tragedy, to learn and teach others about freedoms and responsibility.
As a 3rd generation American on both sides, I understand perspectives for others and respect them, and I respect someone coming here to better themselves… it is what we all have done to be here.

Posted by: kay | April 17, 2007, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

By the same logic, we need better traffic laws. Reduce speed limits to 25 MPH nationwide, force everyone to move to small hybrids with nerf bumpers. Take the trucks off the road, move freight to rail. Why?
Because over 100 people a day die on the roads. What carnage! What a horrible loss! And the news media practically ignores it. We need to move now!

Posted by: Richard | April 17, 2007, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

He was allowed by law to purchase the guns, since he had a green card.

Posted by: Bill | April 17, 2007, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

I am shocked. As a Korean, I am dumb struck and shamed by this guy’s behavior.
I hope that this is not going to result in Asians as a whole being looked upon as dangerous; much like the way Arabic people are discriminated against now.

Posted by: Min | April 17, 2007, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

No ones mentioned video games, yet. This script is right out of a current blood ‘N’ guts arcade and PlayStation game.

Posted by: Bill C | April 17, 2007, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

great thanks to the spokesman we now have 32 counting the killer dead

Posted by: mike | April 17, 2007, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

We should worry about educating Americans before educating aliens.

Posted by: chris | April 17, 2007, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

I like how ABC news mentions the 1966 clocktower shooting, but fails to mention that in 1966 the sniper was held at bay by students on campus who got their own rifles from their dorms and vehicles and returned fire, effectively penning the sniper down and preventing him from causing further mayhem until the police could arrive.
Imagine what might have been prevented in 2007 if the students and faculty who possessed legal and valid concealed carry permits had been allowed to bring their own guns with them on campus.
We can’t say for certain, but he may have been stopped before this escalated any further.

Posted by: Ben | April 17, 2007, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

An amazing display of ignorance here by both pro and anti gun people. There is a difference between mm. and cal., a very big difference, but it doesn’t matter much in this case. What does matter is the laughably easy availability of guns of all calibers and kinds in this nut-case country. Beyond that, not even gun owners (I am one)can arrange a cogent argument for high-capacity magazines (mark my words, he used them in the 9mm Glock) that allowed this man to pump out so many slugs so quickly, and what gave his victims no real opportunity to ever overpower him because he reloaded so infrequently. The long clips serve absolutely no purpose outside of securing some reassurance of masculinity in their confused owners. They make the weapon inordinately heavy and uncomfortable to carry for any length of time. And, if the NRA gunfight freaks out there still think they need between 16 and 20 rounds to settle their disputes, I suggest they go more often to the range to target practice.

Posted by: John | April 17, 2007, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

It’s too bad that we are so distraught that we allow ourselves to fall in the trap of short sighted logic.
If we were to ban every tool, instrument and piece of technology that was used to hurt people in large numbers, we would have outlawed vehicles, knives, matches, clubs, ropes, etc. long ago.
Please consider that those guns he used were simply a resource for his purposes. For every violent crime committed with a firearm, there are dozens committed without one. Just ask coutries who have stricter regulation than ours. It is inevitable that criminals will find a way to carry out there evil desires with whatever is available.
Consider that just as any other tool, great things have been done and will yet be done with firearms, especially ensuring that the U.S. will be forever a nation governed and not ruled as the forefathers had intended.

Posted by: Phil | April 17, 2007, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

For goodness sakes people, I have never read so much crap in my life. First of all, if you are waiting on the idiots who write this stuff to know anything about guns you are in for a long wait. It was a .22 caliber handgun, probably a pistol, and a 9mm semi automatic Glock. there are no automatic handguns legally available. The Glock uses a magazine, not a “clip”. The .22 pistol is not a very effective weapon unless you just want to make a lot of noise, but it might be effective if used at very close range. It has very little penetrating power. The 9mm is carried by NATO, FBI, and others. It is smaller and not as powerful as a .40 or a .45 caliber, but it doesn’t recoil as much either. Legal resident aliens can buy a handgun if they have proof of residence and undergo the same background check as citizens. Dealers at gun shows have to do the same background checks as any gun store, if they are doing it legal. However, I can sell a gun to anyone I want in a personal transaction without any background check at all. I have bought several in personal transactions, but the guys made me show them an ID and they did a bill of sale. In most, if not all, state guns are not allowed on school grounds, including most colleges. I doubt that fact bothered this guy.
The students would have been safer if the RA at the dorm or the professors had been armed. I personally would be in favor of allowing teachers to get training and carry concealed weapons. If you think more restrictive gun laws would have prevented this, you are living in lala land. Or your name is Jacquelyn and it was all President Bush’s fault anyway.

Posted by: jeff | April 17, 2007, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Too bad all the students and faculty members weren’t packing, maybe the death toll would only be three or four at this point!

Posted by: steve | April 17, 2007, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

if you don’t want this to happen, here’s some really simple tips to deal with it:
one, stop arguing over bullet size
two, put more strict laws on gun purchasing so people can’t just use a loophole to get guns. that way, responsible people get guns, nutjobs don’t. everybody’s happy
three, beef up security. come on people, it’s a university! of all places where you need security, this is one of them

Posted by: So Called "Stupid Democrat/Leftist/Liberal" | April 17, 2007, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Has anyone else seen the story about the student who got into trouble at VT a few months back for possessing a handgun on campus? He, or like-minded others could have been helpful in this situation, but the college took away his right and….. people died. I have a friend who tells his kids…”there is no need to call the police, only the fire department.” It takes hours for the police to arrive, but only seconds for me to pull the trigger. I’ll choose to use my finger in other ways than dialing 911.

Posted by: Nik | April 17, 2007, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

The bottom line is that one person carrying a firearm could have stopped this killer. Even if firearms are made illegal they will still be available to anyone willing to pay the price same as alcohol during prohibition. “People willing to trade liberty for security will have neither”. Ben Franklin

Posted by: Brian Nelson | April 17, 2007, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

It is very unfortunate that this event happened. There are many many people who are suffering because of this. It is clear that the individual premeditated these shootings. I doubt that the dorm shooting was a diversion, but more likely the individual that the shooter was looking for was not in the place (dorm) that he expected. At any rate, a sad lose of many lives.
If however, there had been someone who was armed in Norris this carnage could have been stopped or avoided nearly completely. If the left leaning self rightous would actually do some homework they would see that in ALL areas where conceals carry is allowed, violent crime decreases. What a joke to think that more LAWS will do anything when enforcement of the current laws does not happen. Remember, the law abiding citizens that own guns followed the law and did not bring their guns to campus
My two cents!

Posted by: Ryan | April 17, 2007, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

no, “barney”, aliens aren’t citizens in the U.S., therefore they dont have the right to our second ammendent

Posted by: dan | April 17, 2007, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Family unity when your kids are young and education about how to be a good person in life would definetly lower acts like this one.

Posted by: Manuel Villamil | April 17, 2007, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Since colleges and universities are clearly unsafe places I think hey should be banned.
That goes for high schools as well.

Posted by: Bribo | April 17, 2007, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Loner, quiet…. seems to fit the profile. I am curious if he played video games excessively especially the games that help train our young minds to kill. Remember the old proverb, “As a man thinketh so is he”.

Posted by: Swany | April 17, 2007, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

This man seems to have followed the rules to procure firearms. If so, then the rules need to be changed.
Why not add to the approval process not only a background check, but also require the purchaser to undergo a psychological evaluation prior to acquiring the weapon. In this way, weapons will still be available to those who are legal and well…sane enough to carry one.
What would be wrong with THAT, pray tell?

Posted by: rob | April 17, 2007, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

amazing…….He was on an anti-depressant! Hello? people…..nearly every horrible crime has been traced back to someone on a drug. Good grief! We never hear about that, do we?

Posted by: Terry | April 17, 2007, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

I can’t believe what I am reading!! Everyone is looking for someone to blame. A gun is a gun. Cho, not the gun, decided to kill innocent people. Cho, decied when and how he would do it. We should be focused more on the mourning families. All of the victims were a brother, sister, aunt, uncle, father…. Even if “Anti-Violence” laws were put into place, a person dedicated to carrying out a horrific plan as Cho did, will find a way to do it. So blaming Bush or the NRA helps no one.

Posted by: lc | April 17, 2007, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Let’s see….it’s illegal in Virginia to have a radar detector but it’s ok to purchase a gun? Things that make you go hmmmmm.

Posted by: Tami | April 17, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Making guns illegals will work as well as making murder illegal. Oh, wait… *rolls eyes*
I’m disgusted that the school administration ensured that everyone was disarmed. Blame the shooter, but blame the administrators too – for forcing the students to become helpless victims.

Posted by: AndyC | April 17, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Why would anyone file off serial numbers only to carry the receipt on him as he went on his rampage?
Wouldn’t that defeat the purpose of hiding the gun owner’s identity?
And, if the receipt was for the first gun he’d bought, why was he still carrying it around in his back-pack when he didn’t even carry any id on him? Where was the receipt for the most recently purchased gun?
Makes me wonder if the receipt for the first gun was real. Also, really, why would you carry around a receipt?
And, what about the bomb scares just last week? Could someone have actually been a target at that school and this whole massacre was done to disguise the true intent?
If his girlfriend was first killed back in the dorm, why on earth would he walk all the way over to this particular building and just open up and start firing?
As an English major, was he also taking any engineering courses? Did he expect to find her new boyfriend there? Why that particular building?
Was the girl killed in the dorm his ex-girlfriend, and the guy her new one? So,if so, who did he want to get in the engineering building?
Two hours later? Maybe there is another gunman still loose?
So, the receipt was for Mar. 12, and they figured he’d bought the second gun a month later, because of course a mass murderer would follow the law, but what if he didn’t buy the second gun? What if someone else did and owns it and even used it? What if he knew who did the first killing and went looking for that person to kill in revenge? But still, why file off the serial numbers unless you planned to survive the shooting and not get caught?
We need a lot more info!

Posted by: Linda | April 17, 2007, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Well said, Kay.
Thank you for an objective, realistic viewpoint.

Posted by: Phil | April 17, 2007, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Being Korean has little to do with the events. Being willing to die while you kill as many people as possible is the story.
This guy was a suicide killer/bomber, nothing more. He would have found another weapon to use if guns were unavailable to him.
Considering how large this country is and how many universities there are, this is an exceptionally rare event. We can only make the US so safe without going overboard.
Very tragic and probably not very preventable given this guy’s desire to die.

Posted by: Hugh R | April 17, 2007, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Responding to Jaquelyn… of course I know someone out there would blame this whole thing on Bush.. thats stupid and ridiculous and arrogant. What happened was sick and a major tradgety and the University has a lot of questions to answer. In no way is this Bush’s fault so stop blaming him

Posted by: Mark | April 17, 2007, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

“it’s obsurd to see you guys spit your knowledge about guns, when below the surface, a gun is a gun and in this case took the life of 31 people..”
How utter drivel to state that a gun took the life of anyone as though a gun had a mind, a will and the means to act on its own. What crushing ignorance. If guns kill people, why are cars still on the road as they are far more deadly … unless, of course, guns can reload themselves. Gun control is not a remedy for crime. Gun control is the cure for rebellion.

Posted by: Grits | April 17, 2007, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

The picture is a Walther PP/K. According to the Roanoke Times he had a Walther P22, which was purchased recently. Not exactly the choice for mass murder. I have one for target practice; cheap ammo. You are not going to kill many people with a 22. Obviously he was using the Glock.

Posted by: FLR | April 17, 2007, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

How does President Bush have any control over how an individual deals with their anger? He cant watch everyones every move everyday and he cant control their thoughts or feelings. He protects us as a nation and if we wasnt going to war we would be taken over by other countries and wed be living by Hitlers rules or Bin Ladens rules. Wake up you anti-war people. Your children are able to be what they want to be and do what they want to do because of our country fighting for its rights. Lets concentrate on the people lost at Virginia Tech!!

Posted by: Heather | April 17, 2007, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

It’s too bad that we are so distraught that we allow ourselves to fall in the trap of short sighted logic.
If we were to ban every tool, instrument and piece of technology that was used to hurt people in large numbers, we would have outlawed vehicles, knives, matches, clubs, ropes, etc. long ago.
Please consider that those guns he used were simply a resource for his purposes. For every violent crime committed with a firearm, there are dozens committed without one. Just ask coutries who have stricter regulation than ours. It is inevitable that criminals will find a way to carry out there evil desires with whatever is available.
Consider that just as with any other tool, great things have been done and will yet be done with firearms, especially ensuring that the U.S. will be forever a nation governed and not ruled as the forefathers had intended.

Posted by: Phil | April 17, 2007, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

The 1966 clock tower sniper also had a massive brain tumor which was certainly the cause of his behavior.

Posted by: Hugh R | April 17, 2007, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

FYI, non-US citizens are allowed to purchase firearms. If the non-US citizen is in the country legally, as the shooter was, then have extra steps to go through to get a gun, but still can get the gun.

Posted by: Alex | April 17, 2007, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

you can’t blame this on a playstation game, i think people need to stop making up lame reasons why a person would do it…and look at the real cause…the kid was just downright messed up in the head

Posted by: dan | April 17, 2007, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

This guy was So.Korean and the Chinese invented gunpowder. He used at least one German gun, so tell me…how is this Bush’s fault?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward | April 17, 2007, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

macdadddy1,
You said, “it’s obsurd (sic) to see you guys spit your knowledge about guns, when below the surface, a gun is a gun and in this case took the life of 31 people..”
It’s absurd you believe an inantimate object can kill anyone. Having said that, it is deplorable that VA Tech is a gun-free zone. Those that made it illegal for citizen’s to protect themselves are responible for this tragedy along with the shooter.

Posted by: Black Beard | April 17, 2007, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Legal non-resident aliens cannot legally purchase a firearm in VA UNLESS THEY HAVE A HUNTING LISCENSE!! Then there is NO RESTRICTION – the individual can purchase ANY firearm. I think that’s what you call a loophole, the kind you shoot through.

Posted by: clarkep | April 17, 2007, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Ummm … few observations..
First of all … He lived in the US for 15 years, had a green card … which is almost the same thing as being a citizen. My guess is that the reason he is not a citizen is that South Korea does not allow dual citizenship. They also have mandatory army service, so he probably did have army training. Anyways, don’t make this into a discussion about aliens, cause it has nothing to do with it. He lived 15 years in the US, so a max of 8 outside. Also, keep in mind that people like Liviu Librescu gave their life to save students.
Second, a dog could probably purchase weapons in Virginia. Does it matter that he had a .22 caliber (which is only a 5.6-5.7 mm) gun or how he got it. He most probably got it legally, and even if he did not, the person before him probably got it legally. This discussion is about gun control, not how and what gun he used.
This guy was messed up in the head … sure. But don’t tell me that we don’t need to talk about gun control. We don’t live in the 18′th century anymore. We don’t need to own 5 guns anymore. You want a gun for hunting … sure … apply for a license … get printed … etc. Don’t tell me we need to have a gun under the pillow anymore. This is and will be a discussion about the NRA and the repulican support of the NRA.

Posted by: odin | April 17, 2007, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Jacquelyn, instead of trying to turn this into a GWB bashing why don’t you drive down to your city hall and ask the Mayor why he allows his prosecuting attorneys to make plea deals. It is not only quite common, but the rule, for the PA’s to drop the gun related charges if the criminal pleads guilty to a releated crime, robbery for instance. Gets around many of the “three strike” law too.
I have bought as many as four firearms in a given month and never felt the need to go shooting rampage.

Posted by: TimG | April 17, 2007, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

The laws on buying guns were not followed in this case. Of course, some peoples response will be to pass more laws that will be ignored in some cases.

Posted by: wayne | April 17, 2007, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Another error: Your photo depicts the wrong model handgun, and should be corrected. You show what appears to be a Walther PPK or PP/S, the basic design of which predates WWII, and is most commonly chambered in .380 or .32. News reports say a Walther P22 was found with the shooter’s body, which is an entirely different and much newer design that is marketed for target shooting and general “plinking.” The shooter also reportedly had a much more lethal 9mm Glock (probably a Glock 17, although I have not seen the exact model reported).

Posted by: Kn | April 17, 2007, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Permanente Resident Aliens can legally purchase guns within the United States. They in fact have all the rights and privileges with the one exception of voting. I have read newspaper articles today blaming the NRA, and everyone but the shooter. This young man made a decision to kill. He had previously been referred to a councilor for his disturbing creative writings. He was clearly a troubled man, but it isn’t an excuse. Since Virginia does have a 30-day waiting period this was clearly not a crime of passion, but one, which was premeditated and planned. He carried chains so that he could lock his fellow students in with him. Gun control laws to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those who are not mentally sound are great, but don’t use one person’s actions as an excuse to remove constitutional rights from everyone. There are no legal guns in the UK and shootings still happen. There are bans in mainland Europe as well and shootings still happen. When you outlaw guns, only outlaws have them. I am deeply sorry for those that lost loved ones and my heart goes out to them. If you want to blame someone though, look no further than the man whose finger pulled the trigger.

Posted by: Lana | April 17, 2007, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Who cares about the facts of how you can buy a gun right now. The main thing is 32 innocent people are dead. It is cold to start complaining about little things like there is no such thing as 22 mm gun. Does that really matter, does it? Whatever type of gun he had, he used it.

Posted by: Frank | April 17, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

“Lets just all hope the NRA is happy… serious changes need to be made.Posted by: Steve”
That’s sick – I’m an NRA member and resent that sick statement like I’m sure all our members do.
As for the comments from mike regarding “countries with very tight gun laws like japan, uk, and germany have virtually insigificant number/percentages of gun crimes” sorry .. you are dead wrong. Gun control in those countries make crime go sky high. Check your facts. NOBODY is getting my guns. That’s my last line of defence. Oh yes, I also have a CCW and pack everywhere I go.And I’m in California.

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Here is why a very, very simple fact matters. The people who know the very least about firearms are the very first to call for them to be banned.

Posted by: Eric | April 17, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

In response to Sam who posted: The guy was not a US Citizen, which means by law he should not have been allowed to purchase a weapon. Obviously he either used some kind of fake documentation or whoever sold him the weapon did not follow the proper procedures. That person should be brought up on bigtime charges.
As a permanent legal resident, Cho was eligible to buy a handgun unless he had been convicted of any felony criminal charges.
The campus should have been locked down after the first incident, IE: No one leaves their dorms, and police barricade the streets leading to the campus so no commuters could have entered. The president of the university should step down. He was wrong.

Posted by: LuAnn | April 17, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

can anyone agree that below all the facts and un-answered questions, i think Bush should be answering why we are in iraq when our own Country is obviously Un-safe……….
Posted by: Jacquelyn | Apr 17, 2007 11:33:02 AM
In response to this post, if we weren’t in Iraq, then Al Qaeda would have a nice place to plan attacks on the U.S. You’re comparing apples to oranges when it comes to this horrific tragedy.
As for the people against guns,what happened here was a case of a person who went crazy. Getting rid of guns isn’t the answer. If we did that, then what about cars? They can be used as a weapon, what about knives, screwdrivers, forks? Pretty soon we won’t have anything.

Posted by: Chris | April 17, 2007, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

As we see in this case, gun laws create a free fire zone for victims
The campus police didn’t protect anyone
Since his victims were unarmed, the foreign national just took his time and shot them one by one

Posted by: Mark Clark | April 17, 2007, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

This should be a wake up call to the anti-gun people. But of course it won’t, They are live is a fantasy world ignoring the fact that this planet is full of violent predators. Raising your children to be sheep el should be considered a crime! Think about it, what causes these 30 people to just line up at a crazy mans request and let him shoot them without a fight – teach your children to be responsible for there own safety. No amount of police or security would have stopped this nut bag. Had the legislation passed in January for conceal carry — someone might have been armed and ready to defend themselves.

Posted by: vic Carter | April 17, 2007, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Can I summarize some of these posts?
- The shooter bought guns
- The shooter was not a citizen
- It is illegal to sell a gun to a non-citizen
Maybe we need a National tamper-proof ID or maybe a gun dealer broke an existing law.
It sound to me like there were sufficient gun laws in place but having a law and breaking the law are not the same. Let’s have more laws to break!

Posted by: Bill | April 17, 2007, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

The university administration at VA Tech actually prohibits student guns on campus even if the student has a Virginia State Concealed Weapon permit. The permits require a very specific background check and training followed by approval by a Judge. It is unfortunate that none of the students who were killed or those who were injured had any means to defend themselves. The administrqation first denied them the right to carry a firearm even though the state legislature and governor had established a process for the licensing and then the administration denied them the knowledge of the first murders so those who desired could take precautions. A first step in making this campus a safer place would be to remove the Chancellor and the chief of security and a second would be to recognize state concealed weapon permits of those properly cleared by the police and a judge.

Posted by: Ray | April 17, 2007, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

So whne he filed off the serial numbers, he committed yet another felony. He committed several felonies before he even pulled the first trigger. I don’t ever plan on dyaing for lack of shooting back. And you people that don’t carry? look into a theory of economics called “free riding” you get the benefit of me carrying while you dont have to. And these vultures in the media, EVERY night on EVERY network they show gun violence, but when something like this happens, they blubber all over themselves in amazement. Well into the 60′s and 70s people frequently took guns on campus in high school & college for rifle clubs and there were no mass shootings. even the UT shooting in the 60s was partially stopped by kids going to their cars and getting rifles and shooting back.

Posted by: Tim | April 17, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

If they hadn’t removed the rights of students to carry guns on campus with the appropriate permits, someone could have stopped this lunatic.

Posted by: sup | April 17, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

This is the clearest sign that there could possibly be that the U.S. needs much stricker gun contol laws. It is not a coincidence that other western democracies rarely have mass murder sprees while America seems to have one almost monthly. The difference? Easy access to guns. Americans should be ashamed at how backward our country is when it comes to the lack of gun control laws.

Posted by: Richard Marcus | April 17, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

I don’t think this is about being red or blue here, people. We allow guns in our country. Others don’t. Still, other countries have shootings. So the fact that we allow guns here is irrelevant. He obtained both of the weapons legally (the first one in March and the second one 30 days later). Making laws to toughen gun control wouldn’t help this situation because it’s obvious he planned it for some time. As for the whole chat on guns and guns control, I believe Bush opened himself up to attack when in his press conference, he mentioned guns and gun laws. No president should recieve a soapbox for personal tragedy- I don’t care who he is. The fact that he brought that up is offensive.

Posted by: friendlyguy | April 17, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

It seems to me that all the gun control laws in the world couldn’t have stopped this tragedy. Even if guns were allowed in classrooms, seriously, how many professors would ever pack iron??? And how many would be prepared to make the split-second decision to blow someone away in this sue-happy society, even if they had the opportunity and presence of mind?
We all need to realize that evil exists in the world, and sometimes it’s going to take good people, chew them up and spit them out. It’s the circle of life. Just thank God if we/our loved ones weren’t there, and comfort those who are affected.
We also need to realize that it’s easy to sit here in our “safe” little corners of the world and criticize those who did the best they could with what little they had to go on as events unfolded.
I would add that the media also needs to stop “making” stories by hyping what so-and-so should have done. What does that accomplish? Do we think the officials don’t already feel awful enough at having this happen and that they aren’t searching their souls to see what they could have done differently? It saddens me to witness the pack mentality. We’re here to serve each other, not devour each other.

Posted by: Diane | April 17, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

Earlier this year the Virginia General Assembly failed to act on House Bill 1572. If this had become law it would have been legal for holders of a concealed weapons permit to be on campus. If properly trained and armed civilians had been present to stop this murderous individual many lives could have been saved. Armed citizens have saved lives each year for many decades.
Federal Form ATF F 4473 (firearms transaction form) has blanks for aliens to provided identification and state residency.
How would creating more laws to restrict firearms ownership stop a person like this guy? He broke the law against murder over 30 times. Firearms are merely dangerous tools. An inanimate object can not be bad or evil. Governments can only try to deal with the acts of people.

Posted by: Farwalker | April 17, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

The genie is out of the bottle. With so many guns in the country, banning them would only serve to empower those who unlawfully keep them. You could melt every gun down today and by tomorrow the streets would be full again just like drugs.
The gun is IRRELEVANT!!!! It was only the tool used. No legal loopholes were used, nothing was out of the oridinary when he purchased the guns. He waited 30 days in between each purchase like the law allowed. This was a premediated slaughter. He could have achieved the same outcome or even worse with fertilizer and diesel fuel if he wanted.
Horriffic things like this will occur in our society no matter what. If you want to reduce crime, then find a way to rid evil in the hearts of men. Until there is a moral fabric in this country that is not humanistic, prepare for more of these actions.

Posted by: Kris B. | April 17, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

What a shame that someone needs to turn this tragedy into Bush’s fault for entering into Iraq years ago and not focusing on gun’s in America.
We have laws in place for purchasing weapons. It isn’t Bush’s fault that someone chose not to follow those laws and give this lunatic 2 guns.
If you want to rid America of all guns, then you need to challenge the 2nd amendment and not President Bush.

Posted by: Craig | April 17, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

So Called “Stupid Democrat/Leftist/Liberal” I can only remind you we have over 25000 (read the zero’s) gun laws in this country. You want more?

Posted by: steve | April 17, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

You people don’t know the slightest thing about handguns. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A 22MM HANDGUN. NO, YOU DO NOT OWN “SEVERAL”…YOU JUST THINK YOU DO ! However, there is a .22 caliber handgun (of which I own several).

Posted by: Tim | April 17, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Ok, for one, making stricter guns laws is just stupid. If he really wanted too, he could get the guns some other way. No law is going to prevent that. Second, blaming this on security is just as stupid. Anybody could walk on to any college campus in the US and do the same thing today. Its unfortante but don’t try to pass the blame where it shouldn’t be!

Posted by: Brad | April 17, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

To all the idiots who say they have a 22 mm handgun, please check again. It is a .22 cal handgun. A 22mm would break your wrist, and if you happen to be aiming it, you will most likely crack your head open when it smacks you in the face. Oh and I love the stealth correction in the post above. BTW to the people who keep saying that talking about this irrlevant, its not. People are just pointing out that a journalist should at least check his facts before writing something. But as we all know, Liberals never let the facts get in the way of a good story.

Posted by: Justin | April 17, 2007, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

“Lets just all hope the NRA is happy… serious changes need to be made.
Posted by: Steve | Apr 17, 2007 11:43:54 AM”
I agree with Steve. If the concealed carry laws were not so restrictive, one law-abidding gun owner could have stopped this mass murder very quickly.
I am prohibited from carrying a firearm on campus, which means I am prohibited from reasonably defending myself if someone else decides to go ona killing spree.
I hope the NRA and common sense individuals will urge law makers to allow law-abbiding citizens the right to defend themselves everywhere.
Gun free zones are nothing more than killing fields for a mass murderer.

Posted by: Eric | April 17, 2007, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Let’s clear some things up. He was a resident alien. A legal immigrant allowed to purchase firearms. He bought one on Mar 13 an bought another earlier this week.He could have been outside the window of a month. The pistol pictured is a walther ppk/s, available in .22 long rifle and .380 acp(AKA 9mm kurz(short). A private party sale STILL HAS TO GO THROUGH A DEALER WITH A FFL!

Posted by: Jeremy | April 17, 2007, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

As a resident alien, he had the right to purchase a gun. He also bought the guns more than a month apart, also legal. We don’t know where he purchased the guns at yet, so don’t blame gun shows. The most extensive background checks would not have shown he was a nutjob, unless you like complete invasion of privacy. Americans have the right to arm themselves for protection. If law-abiding citizens were allowed to carry firearms on campus this could have possibly been stopped before so many people were killed and injured.

Posted by: Bill | April 17, 2007, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Loner….quiet….wouldn’t answer when addressed…probably a misfit in society… seems to fit the profile. I am curious if he was an excessive user of video games especially the ones that train our young minds to kill? A news article claimed that he shot with eerie calmness… Again seems to fit the profile. Remember the proverb, “As a man thinketh so is he”. What did he fill his mind with to allow himself to come to this point? Anger….obviously. Almost all action is preceded by thought. Parents should teach their children to guard their thoughts and to fill them with productive and positive thinking that they may be better equipped to handle conflicts….However, not a guaranteed solution. I wonder if his parents were too busy to spend time with him when he was young? Just curious. I hope the news reporters will address some of these issues that we may learn and understand as parents when he begin training our children to be productive citizens in the pursuit of happiness. I feel extreme sadness for the parents of the victims and for the parents of this young man. What a tragedy!!!

Posted by: Swany | April 17, 2007, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

I’m appalled at the mainstream media’s attempts to trivialize this event into some kind of political discussion. The simple fact is that this disturbed individual planned this attack over some time, and no amount of gun law or different course by the administration was likely to stop or even significantly alter his senseless actions. He would have found a way to obtain the weapons, and the means to use them.
Thoughts and prayers to those involved … may you find peace and comfort in your time of mourning.

Posted by: Reason | April 17, 2007, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

To those of you hiding behind the virtues of the 2nd amendment…here are a few other things written in the orignal constitution: slavery, women barred from voting. obviously blacks being banned from voting since they were the slaves…
laws should change with the times…

Posted by: besdayz | April 17, 2007, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

22 millimeters is .87 of an inch. The largest handgun made is .50 of an inch (American Eagle…developed for the Israeli police to penetrate a car’s engine block) so it was NOT a 22 mm. If 22 is part of the description it is 22 cal., not mm.

Posted by: Tim Eldred | April 17, 2007, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Instead of ranting for tighter gun control, maybe we should be discussing the need for conceal to carry expansion. There is no way the police could have prevented or even lessened the carnage. If Virginia didn’t have laws against legally carrying a gun on a college campus, maybe there would have been someone in the classroom that could have defended the denfenseless. Criminals don’t obey the laws that we have established. Maybe we should keep that in mind before tightening our existing gun control laws.

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2007, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

If hypothetically, 5% of students on campus carrried a concealed gun then the probability that atleast one of the 31 people who were killed would have had a gun is 80%.
According to reports currently available a large number were clustered together in one room. That makes it even more likely that a large number of lives could have been saved were it not for the Virginia legislature passing a law banning concealed carry on campuses. A law that was promoted by the Virginia Tech administration. Hence the president of that institution should resign.

Posted by: Joel | April 17, 2007, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

The Walther P22 does exist. It is very small, easily concealable. The posts above refer to the PPK made popular by James Bond. The P22 was more than likely what was used in this terrible tragedy. Why are we concerned about all of this anyway? There are many bigger issues than the size of the bullet here.

Posted by: Matt | April 17, 2007, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

My heart goes out to all of the families. I can only imagine what they are going through. It is horrific and senseless. The weapon was not the problem. The person with the weapon was. – and this is from a fairly conservative person.
Obviously he was deranged and this was well planned out. He took the cowards way out too. Perhaps though because a lot of the country have bleeding hearts, they would have evoked sympathy for him. A strange country we live in. The thought of sending my children to school contemplating the day and then learning they are gone; It is just too much to bare.
I will keep all of the students and instructors who lost their lives in my prayers.

Posted by: SES | April 17, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

If hypothetically, 5% of students on campus carrried a concealed gun then the probability that atleast one of the 31 people who were killed would have had a gun is 80%.
According to reports currently available a large number were clustered together in one room. That makes it even more likely that a large number of lives could have been saved were it not for the Virginia legislature passing a law banning concealed carry on campuses. A law that was promoted by the Virginia Tech administration. Hence the president of that institution should resign.

Posted by: Joel | April 17, 2007, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Who cares if the gun was a 22mm 22cal 22 whatever. The man killed 30+ people. Not to mention he had it planned out. Its not the fault of not enough security, gun laws, response time, what could of should of been done. Lets just focus on the families that are hurting.

Posted by: Diane | April 17, 2007, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

It amazes me how vacant history is within most Americans who are anti-gun.
Back in 2002, a disgruntled student at Appalachian Law School, Peter Odighizuwa, allegedly shot and killed the school’s dean, a professor and a student on campus before being subdued by two armed students.
Just think how differently the outcome might have been on Monday if law abiding Virginia citizens were permitted to be armed at Virginia Tech.

Posted by: SecurityWonk | April 17, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Would all you paronoid NRA types relax? The 2nd amendment will always be alive and well in this Country. Ask yourself this question, though, if you would:
Should people who are on or have been on serious anti-deppresant drugs be allowed to own guns. Period. To the gentlemen who brought up the 1966 shooting in Texas: For all those people who fired at the tower and missed? Where did that bullet end up?
Sorry, the answer is not MORE guns.

Posted by: Bill | April 17, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

I’m a mechanized Infantry officer and can emphatically say there is no such thing as a 22mm handgun. In fact, the projectile for the main gun of one of my Bradley’s is only 25mm. “.22″ is not the same thing as “22mm”. I don’t see why so many fail to realize that and continue to insist that they own a 22mm handgun.

Posted by: chad | April 17, 2007, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

First of all look up a 22mm pistol
on line. Not there! Huh. Now think
about the size of a 22mm shell.
huh!

Posted by: Trent | April 17, 2007, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Unfortunately – most of the posted comments are based on the broad inexperience of young college age people – I appreciate your interest but your opinions are biased by your youth and lack of experience and wisdom — there are no simple fixes and there in no single cause – it is a wonderful world with a heavy dose of problems
db

Posted by: DB | April 17, 2007, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

I don’t think he would have made it too far if law abiding citizens were allowed to carry on campus. You notice he didnt take his cowardly act to a police station or a country bar

Posted by: jfm | April 17, 2007, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Would all you paronoid NRA types relax? The 2nd amendment will always be alive and well in this Country. Ask yourself this question, though, if you would:
Should people who are on or have been on serious anti-deppresant drugs be allowed to own guns. Period. To the gentlemen who brought up the 1966 shooting in Texas: For all those people who fired at the tower and missed? Where did that bullet end up?
Sorry, the answer is not MORE guns.

Posted by: Bill | April 17, 2007, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

A lot of discussion has been wasted (initiated by John Sims) on whether the shooter used a 22mm handgun, or a .22 caliber handgun.
READ THE ARTTICLE!
The authors write, and I quote:
“and his second weapon, a .22 caliber handgun, within the last week…”
Mr. Sims, and whoever else think they’ve caught the journalists out in a mistake by saying they report he had a 22mm handgun, simply haven’t bothered to read the article.

Posted by: John | April 17, 2007, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

The article says .22 caliber. What’s the point anyway?

Posted by: ROBERT | April 17, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Why is it that instead of actually enforcing laws that already exist for guns, everyone starts proclaiming the things should be abolished? Swimming pools kill more kids and adults than pistols, but I don’t see anyone arguing for federal regulation of pools or their banishing from our country. Cars, too. Alcohol kills more than just about anything, but how many of you (esp. you college kids) partied hearty and were hungover when you learned of the shooting?

Posted by: Matt | April 17, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

The F-14 Tomcat had a 20mm Vulcan Electric Cannon used for aerial dogfighting, I would love to see one 2mm bigger in a pistol model! Wow, what a sidearm!

Posted by: Jay | April 17, 2007, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

I got a really bad sunburn on my back in Hawaii. It ruined my whole vacation! OUTLAW THE SUN!
Get real, anti-gun nuts… PEOPLE kill people! Not guns. It was MY fault I got a sunburn, NOT the sun’s fault!

Posted by: Reid | April 17, 2007, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

His careful planning shows he would have taken the time to figure out how to use a bomb if guns were not available. He could have killed a lot more people. Gun laws could not have prevented his attack only the form.

Posted by: Bob | April 17, 2007, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Well people please stop saying they own a 22mm handgun? You don’t. A 22mm handgun would be .86 caliber. There is no such pistol. You own a .22 caliber handgun. That is an entirely different measurement.

Posted by: Joe | April 17, 2007, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Non US Citizens may not purchase nor legally own firearms in the US. So much for legal gun ownership, when illegal gun ownership (and usage) occurs!
Another point about his pistols, he must have had many magazines loaded since over 50 rounds were shot.
Ron Reagan’s press secretary was crippled by a .22LR handgun – so for those of us who accept the responsibility of gun ownership, we all know that any firearm is deadly

Posted by: Dave Folts | April 17, 2007, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Maybe the harsh reality of 33 American’s murdered on an American college campus, can bring a little more realism to the fact that at least that many humans, die every other day in Iraq.

Posted by: john | April 17, 2007, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Security at all schools is a joke. On any day you can walk into my son’s high school and never see anyone until you go into an office. Cameras in the dorm would have been a good idea then maybe this guy could have been identified and his killing spree could have been stopped there.

Posted by: Karan | April 17, 2007, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

People the gun in the picture is indeed a Glock and no, there is no such thing as a 22mm handgun.

Posted by: David | April 17, 2007, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

We are in Iraq because terrorists thugs took out over 3,000 Americans in one day. Have you forgotten about that? Would you rather fight the terrorists here or over there?
God Bless Our Soldiers and God Bless Bush, all are Americans with backbone.

Posted by: Beverly | April 17, 2007, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

This isn’t about gun control. Wherever the kid got the gun, legal or otherwise, he was NOT licensed to carry! However, if there had been teachers or other students licensed to carry and carrying yesterday, this thing could have been STOPPED. THE ISSUE HERE IS MIND-ALTERING LEGAL DRUGS – anti-depresssants. There have been MANY killings, violent crimes and bizarre behavior over the past few years, especially by KIDS prescribed these anti-depressants. My husband experienced a very BAD reaction to a doctor-prescribed anti-depressant. Thank goodness we recognized it and he stopped taking it….and returned to normal. What happens after this stuff has YEARS to screw up your mond?!! The most important thing they can do is release the name of this drug the kid was on!

Posted by: Stephanie | April 17, 2007, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Even in death Cho is evil and a coward. “You caused me to do thi” no Cho you did this all by yourself BECAUSE YOU WERE EVIL.

Posted by: Bill NH | April 17, 2007, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Come on ! Come to Brazil you won’t find this kind of problem in our universities , you ‘ll find it just in the streets.
Now tell me why in the universities , why students, why all this hate?? Can any american answer me?

Posted by: Nunes | April 17, 2007, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

People the gun in the pic is indeed a Glock and no, there is no such thing as a 22mm handgun.

Posted by: David | April 17, 2007, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

can we remember that the media always lies.. or tries to in things like this…the point isnt if he got a .22 caliber, but what do we do now.. it happened .. we need more security.. we need to help the families now

Posted by: Monica | April 17, 2007, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

The NRA must be proud today. Another 33 to add to the body count.

Posted by: Yay NRA | April 17, 2007, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

How in the world was he allowed to purchase a weapon at all!!!!!!!!! He isn’t even an American!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Jeremy | April 17, 2007, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

I’ll bet neither of the handguns jumped up and shot someone. It was being held by a person. We don’t need more gun laws, we need to allow God his proper place in our lives and live without hatred. Laws are a bandaid.

Posted by: James | April 17, 2007, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

The problem with gun control today is that the laws are not harsh enough or enforced vigorously enough.
Why not outlaw all guns, with a 5-year mandatory imprisonment penalty for first offenders and ‘two-strike law’ life imprisonment for 2nd offenders.
Guns would go away immediately. The NRA is at fault for this tragedy.

Posted by: ghost of VT | April 17, 2007, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

He was a U.S. citizen so yes he was allowed to buy a gun…maybe you should research some before you comment.

Posted by: Chelsea | April 17, 2007, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

The outcry is coming, but hit them with these facts. After guns were effectively banned in Washington DC, murders spiked by 300%. They have since gone back down to pre-ban levels, with one caveat. Murders in neighboring counties have skyrocketed because the thugs have been pushed out by gentrification. Only law-abiding citizens suffer as a result of gun control.

Posted by: irreverent | April 17, 2007, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Sorry to get preachy, but I truly believe that until people learn how to deal with sin, bad stuff will continue to happen, with or without guns.

Posted by: Chuck | April 17, 2007, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

who cares what kind of gun it was ? we should keep our concern on the victims and some way to keep our kids safe.

Posted by: kyle | April 17, 2007, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Interesting, no note about the correction from the author on his error of using mm instead of cal. with the 22.
BTW to give an idea on what a 22mm gun is like, the CIWS on ships is a 20mm gun. This would be even bigger then that.
Each round for a CIWS gun weigh 0.58 lbs each and are 4″ long. You really think you can make a hand gun to hold those?

Posted by: Jeff | April 17, 2007, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Take the handguns away? We can’t even control or find people getting into this country illegally what makes you think we can control illegal guns. Take them away and only the criminals will have them. As usual punish the ones who follow the rules not the person who is always breaking the rules. It’s eveyone else who suffers for the few after all isn’t it society’s fault they can’t be responsible for their actions!

Posted by: Dennis | April 17, 2007, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

There seems to be a constant thread that if students on campus also had guns they could have defended themselves. If there were 50 students in that building with hand guns who all came out to take care of the gunman I am not sure their good intentions would have worked out so well. They would have little to no experience/training in how to actually use a gun in a real combat situation. They would not know for sure who was the gunamn and who was another student with a gun trying to defend himself. They would have no sense of organization and in the mass hysteria would be likely to make a mistake. Friendly fire is a problem in highly trained and competent army regimens, let alone a bunch of college student with guns.

Posted by: ezekiel | April 17, 2007, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

So not only is it against the rules to carry a gun on campus, illegal to murder people, illegal to discharge a firearm inside the city of Blacksburg, etc. etc. ad nauseum, now we learn that a one-gun a month law failed to stop this nut job.
The LAW (specifically, gun control laws) failed these kids. They are old enough to defend their country – they should have been allowed the right to chose to defend themselves.
Posted by: CHris | Apr 17, 2007 11:44:21 AM
I totally agree with you, Chris!
Gun control only benefits the criminals.

Posted by: DustyG | April 17, 2007, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Just another example of how horrible incidents like this reinforce the ridiculous claims that gun control would have prevented this from happening. Gun control laws are necessary, but they don’t change the mind and heart of a derranged, mis-informed and cold-blooded killer. Guns don’t kill people…without a person pulling the trigger.

Posted by: Matt | April 17, 2007, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

god love us think about it

Posted by: pr | April 17, 2007, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Here is a thought… Had any of these people been armed how far would the shooter have gotten? Gun control… It only keeps guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens making them a victim of outlaws and the government. We have a duty our founding fathers entrusted us with… bear arms!

Posted by: Sean | April 17, 2007, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

The problem with more “gun control” is very obvious. It makes it easier for sickos like him. They see that more and more people have less defense, therefor making it easier for them to do something like this. I guarantee that if more people were patrolling WITH guns, this most likely wouldn’t have happened. Protection is how survival happens. People need to realize that and stop saying that we need more gun control, because if guns are taken away from people that do have good intentions, the well being of our country is taken away. People like this guy, WILL find a way to do things like this. It is not preventable, it is inevitable. We need to stop trying to control it, and use guns to our advantage as upright citizens. We need to band together as a united nation UNDER GOD and stop people like him, with the resources we do have before it’s too late. We need to stop the pettiness and start acting like a country, that doesn’t weaken itself by going against our government and each other.

Posted by: Camille | April 17, 2007, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Good gravy, so they write “22 mm” instead of “.22 cal.” is that the end of the freaking world? All you perfect people out there, and yeah, HA that is evidence of a liberal media??? Get lives, all oc you, lives other than the ones rush and sean provide. Thanks. Out.

Posted by: pikkel | April 17, 2007, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

one thing is clear from the body of evidence that is the comments – ABC News on-line readers are bunch of rednecks from god knows where. who the hell cares about what kind of guns were used. go watch your nascar and drink your beers idiots and leave the public discussion to people with brain cells left from not drinking moonshine.

Posted by: arnold | April 17, 2007, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

This killer immigrated to US when he was only 8 years old.
It’s obviously that his behaviour of today is a result of his education experiences of here in the United States, South Korean has nothing to do with this.

Posted by: gail | April 17, 2007, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

I could care less what type of gun. My question is, how can we save our children?

Posted by: Mary | April 17, 2007, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

The problem with more “gun control” is very obvious. It makes it easier for sickos like him. They see that more and more people have less defense, therefor making it easier for them to do something like this. I guarantee that if more people were patrolling WITH guns, this most likely wouldn’t have happened. Protection is how survival happens. People need to realize that and stop saying that we need more gun control, because if guns are taken away from people that do have good intentions, the well being of our country is taken away. People like this guy, WILL find a way to do things like this. It is not preventable, it is inevitable. We need to stop trying to control it, and use guns to our advantage as upright citizens. We need to band together as a united nation UNDER GOD and stop people like him, with the resources we do have before it’s too late. We need to stop the pettiness and start acting like a country, that doesn’t weaken itself by going against our government and each other.

Posted by: Camille | April 17, 2007, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

It should be mandatory that people pass a federal check before they can post on a blog.

Posted by: yoq | April 17, 2007, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

the whole point of the matter is, and this is something that EVERYONE’S missing, right or left, is that if someone wants to do something like massacre the school they’re not going to take legal routes to do it. you can have all the legal paper in the world and it’s not going to stop someone from doing something ILLEGALLY. think about it.

Posted by: leah | April 17, 2007, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

The two largest mass murders in U.S. history involved fertilizer, box-cutters and knives. (9/11 and OK City) No guns!

Posted by: Kevin | April 17, 2007, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

First of all, I am wondering why they had to hold the doors shut. I mean, do these doors not have locks on them? Why not? Secondly, my heart and prayers are with all that lost anyone close to them and all students at VT. Thirdly, I do wish the far left extremists would shut up for once! You’ve already almost single handedly ruined this country by dividing it at a time we all needed to be united. We will not allow you to ruin this country as the far lefts have ruined Europe. For once in your lives, think about this country and not your pathetic agendas.

Posted by: Debbie | April 17, 2007, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

I think you’re all missing the forest for the trees here. How could this tragedy have been prevented? The laws obviously did not work; they rarely do on madmen and criminals. I remember the phrase that popped into my head when I saw this on the news. “Those poor, defenseless kids.” They were defenseless because the authorities failed to protect them after denying them the ability to protect themselves.

Posted by: Eric | April 17, 2007, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Where is the praise that school shooters are now more accurately portraying the diversity of their student body?

Posted by: Nolan | April 17, 2007, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Who cares if someone typed 22mm instead of 22 Caliber? Get over it. Get over yourselves. Plenty of countries have strict gun laws and they only people moaning about are Rambo types.
What are you afraid of?
Amazing how these gun loving aplogists are more concerned about unrestricted access to guns than having an honest discussion about guns in America and our culture of fear.
Watch: Bowling for Columbine.

Posted by: Albert Kohl | April 17, 2007, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

You all sound so ridiculous arguing about what type of gun was mentioned in the media. Shut it up and change your focus. I agree with others in that the gun did not kill these people, the person behind did!!!!

Posted by: T | April 17, 2007, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

What kind of assumptions are you making? Do you honestly believe that if legislation had passed last year the professors at VT would be walking around with a gun on their hip or in their drawer? Or that students would always have one next to their laptop in their backpack?
I don’t think that just because some carrying law is passed that suddenly everyone will have more ammo that the cops.
It still is legal for all those students to buy guns, it is legal for me to buy a gun, but that doesn’t mean I own one.

Posted by: chuck | April 17, 2007, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

There’s a deeper story within a story here. The magnitude of loss is a direct result of ignorance and conditioning. Why is no one talking about this????
These students were of age to be soldiers. A slight, inexperienced shooter with the smallest of handguns, inaccurate without extensive training, was able to walk around a group of over 20 strong, youthful people, shooting and reloading, shooting and reloading.
If these students were dropped on a base in Iraq with no training whatsoever, knowing their inaction would mean the death of their peers, their actions would be seen differently.

Posted by: Mark | April 17, 2007, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

When the “Old West” ended around 1900, Americans should have been disarmed. In addition, at the same time, the manufacture and sale of handguns should have become law of the land. As to the 2nd Amendment, there is no mention of the “individual” right to bear arms!

Posted by: benster | April 17, 2007, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Yes please stop blaming the poor gun. Guns are so demonized. It’s so unfair. Just because it has the ability to kill doesn’t mean it WILL, nor that it shouldn’t be carried around by everyone who has hands. Isn’t it really the HANDS fault for HOLDING the gun and making it do things?
A gun is an instrument designed to take a life. There is no reason in this day and age to manufacture and destribute firearms to the general public. If you want to defend your self, learn self defense. This kid would never have killed so many innocent people if his only weapons were his fists.

Posted by: Toby | April 17, 2007, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

How could something like this happen? I think Bush should be protecting his people, not Iraq’s.

Posted by: Mila | April 17, 2007, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Funny how so many poeple talk about gun controll now. I have never seen a gun kill someone without the trigger beiing pulled. Plus make guns harder to get for average joe will not stop people from getting them by other means. Do not kid yourself people, guns will still find ways into bad guys hands. Gun controll will not sotp that. Why not address the real issue of slidding morals in our country. Just look at pro sports.

Posted by: todd | April 17, 2007, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

“If the left leaning self rightous would actually do some homework they would see that in ALL areas where conceals carry is allowed, violent crime decreases. What a joke to think that more LAWS will do anything when enforcement of the current laws does not happen. ”
-Posted by: Ryan | Apr 17, 2007 1:15:19 PM
Yet another NRA lobbyist speaks.

Posted by: Emma | April 17, 2007, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

It is very sad behavior when the governors in the whole United States failed to fly all colleges and unversity flags at half mast to hornor the students. It’s UnAmerican and disrespectful.

Posted by: O'Hara johnson | April 17, 2007, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

A .22 caliber gun shoots a bullet .22 inches in diameter. A 22 mm gun would shoot a bullet .87 inches in diameter. I am no expert, but the largest handgun I am aware of shoots a .50 caliber bullet which is .5 inches in diameter.
Sadly, those gun owners that think they own a 22 mm handgun does not speak well for the caliber of gun owners.

Posted by: Ken | April 17, 2007, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

If the perpetrator of this crime had been unable to buy a handgun then 32 people would probably still be alive today.
Shouldn’t finding ways to save lives be the subject of the conversation instead of petty banter about what kind of weapon it was or incoherent defenses of our right to bear arms.
I just can’t resist the urge to say that all of these right wing, Christian fundamentist, redneck, gun-toting idiots thoroughly sicken me.

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2007, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

It is always difficult to come to grips with a senseless act. The mere fact it is senseless makes it that way. Perhaps if the students had guns they may have stopped him or you may have had a case where panic indivduals may have accidently shot each other. It’s been pointed out that rules and laws have not been the answer. I agree. You can only regulate things so far. How feasible is it to completely secure an entire city which is what the campus was? Probably worth the costs I’d say, but yet something else is still amiss. We need to REALLY change our behaviours in society. Racial slurs, hurtful comments are just an example of a greater wrong within us. This senseless act is a far more devasting one, but still one.
Less arguing over calibers and liberalism versus conservatism and more working together to solve our wrongs is what is needed. And it can only happen within each of us. WE control that. Join me in doing everything within yourself to change your world. Change how you view yourself in the mirror. Perhaps together we can change society so that this type of incident really will be just a sad event in ancient history.

Posted by: Jeff | April 17, 2007, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

It is very sad behavior when the governors in the whole United States failed to fly all colleges and unversity flags at half mast to hornor the students. It’s UnAmerican and disrespectful.

Posted by: O'Hara johnson | April 17, 2007, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

If your responding to JOHN SIMS STOP and read this.
A 22mm doesn’t exist, but a .22 does.
2nd You idiots are misquoting the author. I have physically copied and pasted what the author wrote , and here it is.
“…on March 13 and his second weapon, a .22 caliber handgun, within the last week,…”
The author DID say .22 and not a 22mm. Now, lets talk about what is relevent and quit showing our ignorance!!!!!!!

Posted by: leighton | April 17, 2007, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Who cares if the article made a mistake in the calibre of the handgun? It is not important. What is important is the readily available supply of guns in ouir country, purchased legally or illegally, make these events more likely to happen. Of course, the individual who commits the action is ultimately resposnsible, but if you say that there is no clear realtaionship between the availability of guns in our country and the amount of gun violence, then you are either extremely dishonest or extremely stupid.

Posted by: TC | April 17, 2007, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

are we really arguing about if a 22mm exists??? 33 college kids are dead!!!

Posted by: Tony Calabrese | April 17, 2007, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

I believe any foreign students (or otherwise) should not be in the US at this time. WE ARE AT WAR.Why is the US so polite to anyone coming into the US but try going to another country at War. WAKE UP AMERICA

Posted by: Cindy | April 17, 2007, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Blame this on gun “control”.
Someone should have told him that no guns were allowed on campus. Because i’m sure that would have fixed everything…

Posted by: Nandan | April 17, 2007, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

One student CCW (concealed-carry) holder would have ended this rather quickly.
FYI, 22mm = .86″
I feel for your wrists after firing a 7/8″ diameter round out of a handgun.

Posted by: John | April 17, 2007, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Why didn’t someone tell Cho Seung-Hui that Virginia Tech is a gun-free zone? We could have averted this disaster!

Posted by: Comp | April 17, 2007, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Would the student have gotten away as easily had he been carrying a rifle? Is the reality that a hand gun is more easily concealed, and rarely used for things outside of shooting humans a factor?

Posted by: jr | April 17, 2007, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

I believe any foreign students (or otherwise) should not be in the US at this time. WE ARE AT WAR.Why is the US so polite to anyone coming into the US but try going to another country at War. WAKE UP AMERICA

Posted by: Cindy | April 17, 2007, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Guns don’t kill people, gun laws do. Gun laws create pools of defenseless victims.

Posted by: rambo | April 17, 2007, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

No, “Ryan” Permanent Residents have and should have the same rights as an citizen. As far as I know the only difference is that they can’t vote.
Thank you.

Posted by: Elsa | April 17, 2007, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

i think that we shoulldnt be worrying about what kind of gun he was using or what race he was… just the fact is that he walked around the campus with 2guns and killed 30+ people. my heart goes out to all the victems and their familiys

Posted by: jose | April 17, 2007, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

It a sad day in the U.S. when students in any school have to be afraid for their lives. What is wrong America ? People need to turn back to God. Give their problems to him and stop shooting and killing others.

Posted by: Marie | April 17, 2007, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

What is really sad! No could have paid much attention to this young man for if they did they may have seen signs that he was not thinking well, or that he was isolating himself from others, maybe his professor’s noticed grades failing or not going to class like he had been. Did anyone take the time to observe and changes in this young mans behavior that could have stopped this from happening. If the answer is no, then no matter what he used as a weapon, be it a gun or bomb could have stopped this from happeing.

Posted by: J Moore | April 17, 2007, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Let’s just blame Bush for everything wrong in the world then. Hey, my tomato spoiled overnight…is that his fault too? If we weren’t in Iraq, maybe I could have eaten it for lunch!!!

Posted by: Tara | April 17, 2007, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

To Jason,
You say :
The logic passed on by mainstream media makes about as much sense as taking away my fork so I wont be fat.
I say: no one ever killed 31 people because he had easy access to several deadly forks!

Posted by: Bob | April 17, 2007, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

22mm would be the same as a .86 caliber, it doesn’t exist unless it is a real custom job. The largest commercial caliber chambered is .5 caliber and it is a beast.

Posted by: will | April 17, 2007, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Dan,
Under the 14th Admendment, equal protection gives everyone in the United States constitutional protectin regardless of citizenship. EVERYONE has due process.

Posted by: son | April 17, 2007, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

I am not a huge fan of guns, however, those of you that want to blame the gun laws need to re-think things. This guy went crazy it was HE who caused the crime, not the guns. If a psychopath killer wants to get a gun to go on a killing spree he/she will find a way to do it, NO MATTER HOW STRICT the laws are! Now lets talk about the real issue here, the victims and their families. Any sympathy for them?

Posted by: Jenny | April 17, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Exactly it’t a .22 Cal handgun. Not a metric 22mm. I’ve been around handguns all my life, and I’ve never shot anyone. Guns availabity isn’t the problem. Criminals and murderers will still get them. Those who have a tough time will be law obeying citizens who want to protect themselves form those criminals.

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

I JUST HAVE TO SAY THIS IS VERY SAD , ESPECIALLY FOR THE PEOPLE WHO LOST THERE LOVE ONES , I AGREE WITH SOMEOF THE COMMENTS .
We should worry about educating Americans before educating aliens.

Posted by: AMERICA | April 17, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

the real wackos are those who spend their life categorizing and collecting weapons. And from the looks of it, you seem to carry so much hate against those whom you call liberals that you would use such weapons on them. right. . . you wackos?

Posted by: jose | April 17, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

the readily available supply of guns in our country is what’s important? there are guns available in any part of the world, legal or not. if this kid wanted it to happen, it was going to happen, quit blaming his insanity on our freedom. as for those of you complaining about our troops being overseas and bush doing nothing while our country is unsafe, stop being so damn ignorant! honestly, what can he do besides place troops around the campus? and since this isn’t north korea, that’s not going to happen. this stuff is going to happen no matter what the gun laws are or how the presidency is being handled, it’s a fact of life.

Posted by: mike | April 17, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Just imagine how many lives would’ve been saved if the students were required to be trained in firearms and to carry handguns for their own self-defense.

Posted by: Rodney Dill | April 17, 2007, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

As a former “Permanent Resident Alien”, now a US citizen, I was barred from owning firearms until I became a Citizen. So how did a Permanent Resident purchase two handguns, that is the question that needs to be asked and answered.

Posted by: PV | April 17, 2007, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

you americans love your guns.

Posted by: JJ | April 17, 2007, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Stopping these crimes start way before they happen.
Obviously this guy is a nut. Someone who sees people on the edge should try to intervene. It may not be appreciated but it will at least send a message that people can tell and they are being watched.
Most people just need to vent, words are better than actions.

Posted by: James Troscinski | April 17, 2007, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Yeah, the caliber of the gun is wrong in the article, we got it. Anybody want to focus on whether or not ANYONE should be able to buy a semi-automatic pistol? Let me guess, you use is for hunting, or is it to organize and regulate that militia?

Posted by: Wade Jensen | April 17, 2007, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to protect the people FROM their government. The Framers understood that the biggest threat to liberty was power and that the only way to protect liberty was by having a populace that could fight back. That was true 230 years ago and it is still true. Even if it weren’t, the fallacy that we can somehow eliminate guns from the world is childhood fiction. We can’t even secure the border so how are we going to secure every gun in existence? Short answer…we’re not, and that means that anyone that wants a gun will still be able to get one. All the laws in the world haven’t protected ourselves from ourselves and yet the sheeple demand more and the idiots they elect are more than happy to comply.

Posted by: Joe | April 17, 2007, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

“Elsa”,
For you to point to the fairy tale called “Bowling for Columbine” during any intelligent discussion, just shows that you haven’t even paid attention as even the liberal media has had to admit that the facts are few and far between in that movie.

Posted by: Ken | April 17, 2007, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

All one has to do is read the responses to know why it will happen again and again, you gun lovers are blind to reality.

Posted by: rob | April 17, 2007, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

More then 30 People are killed and all anyone is arguing about in this blog is what type of gun was used and how this event is related to Bush’s apparent lack of judgement in Iraq. None of this makes sense.

Posted by: Ryan | April 17, 2007, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

More then 30 People are killed and all anyone is arguing about in this blog is what type of gun was used and how this event is related to Bush’s apparent lack of judgement in Iraq. None of this makes sense.

Posted by: Ryan | April 17, 2007, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Whining liberals is too merciful of a name. More like “why didn’t someone shoot this pervert before he killed so many innocent people!”. If on campus firearm carry (for responsible and trained firearms owners) were permitted, this horror could have been mitigated. Anyone ‘marginally’ trained in defensive pistol shooting could have taken this pervert out and saved lives!

Posted by: woody | April 17, 2007, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

the pro-NRA gun-nuts are out in full-force with their vacuous (and dangerous) arguements. if students and professors were “packing”, there’d be alot MORE instances of gun-related violence on campuses / schools… every arguement, every breakup, every bar-fight, every small issue there’d be a doubt in everyone’s head that someone will pull out a gun. how can you feel safe carrying a gun if you know everyone around you is carrying one too, and will kill you before you have a chance to use your own weapon? let alone the fact that the MAJORITY of college-going americans wouldn’t WANT to own a gun even if they could. what we need is gun-CONTROL… you don’t give a car to someone without requiring a test and a licence, right?

Posted by: z s | April 17, 2007, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

This act was clearly premeditated. he was an English major, why did he go to an engineering hall? Bravo to the profs who tried to shield their students.

Posted by: Jay | April 17, 2007, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

How can someone wake up and say i want to kill people what was so wrong in his life that he felt he had to do this. O and as some people are saying that he wasnt an American citizen. If he wasnt then how was he in college. He had to be an American citizen. I believe that the guy whho sold him the gun should get in trouble for selling him 2 gunns in less than 30 days.

Posted by: Aaron | April 17, 2007, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Well well
It seems this young man had been refered to counsuling for the distrurbing content of his creative writing class papers and was known to be troubled
Seems that this one was allowed to fester and erupt not sure how guns caused him to be so troubled he had to kill to deal with it
but I’m sure some anti-gun whinner will find a way to blame guns and not the people who clearly admit the knew he was troubled yet did nothing about it

Posted by: Ed | April 17, 2007, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

After reading this entire monolog… I (as an AMERICAN) have decided that EVERYONE has gone insane! This is a tragedy and should not be about race, religion, gun control or no gun control, size of gun, mm or cal…who really cares…Rosie or BUSH. This is about an individual who OBVIOUSLY didn’t get the right support or help when it was needed.
God pray for all of us!

Posted by: Terry | April 17, 2007, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Manchurian Candidate. No different from Columbine. Interesting that the first story that ABC cited, about a 1/3 of the page down, had a poll “Should American’s be allowed to have guns?” How predictable can you be? This is the next step (WACO was first, followed by OKC, Columbine, DC Sniper, and other campus shootings) in disarming americans. God help us all.

Posted by: JB | April 17, 2007, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

The end of the World is near !!!
People killing people, Nature killing people, and on,…. and on,
…. and on …………

Posted by: GOD | April 17, 2007, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Maybe if another student on campus yesterday had been allowed to bring their OWN handgun onto campus he could have been stopped….maybe.

Posted by: Fancy | April 17, 2007, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

those of you who say the reporter should have said 22 caliber rather than 22 mm should learn to read, he did say “caliber”. if you NRA-nuts actually read, maybe you could become one of those “liberal elites” that get everything so wrong.

Posted by: Wade Jensen | April 17, 2007, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

To Martin Johns: If you own a 22mm Handgun, it is the only one in the world and I sure as heck wouldn’t want to shoot it! Considering that 30 Caliber is 7.62 mm, your handgun is what, a .90 Caliber? Better check your facts guy!!

Posted by: Russ Briggs | April 17, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

To all the people (leighton) who keep on saying the author is being misquoted…. remember this is a website, it can be edited…. obviously ABC picked up on the typo and corrected it…
Passing laws because of fear is never a good idea…. look at the patriot act!

Posted by: bob | April 17, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Gun Control or not if someone makes up thier mind to do something like this gun control is not going to stop it. It was not the gun but the person holding it, THE person holding it shooting it at innocent people. We can tear this story apart from all different angles, you did this wrong you did this wrong. I’m sure there will be areas of improvement that we come across,and we will learn from them, but never the less it won’t bring them back. Hold you anger for the person that pulled the trigger, too bad he cannot face us now, he got off easy. Maybe you can take some justice knowing that he will have met his maker on the way down. God bless all the families directly effected by this, and may God keep you strong.

Posted by: Gail | April 17, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

If gun laws will stop gun crimes then how come drug laws havn’t done squat to stop illegal drugs from pooring into the country by the truck, boat and plane load?
Jason

Posted by: Jason | April 17, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

What the guy did was just bad, at this time we should not worry about where the article made the mistake but wat made him do this and how he purchased the guns in just a month. We should pray for the poeple eho were killed and their families and what are they going through now after loosing a child or an husband or just a friend.

Posted by: rich | April 17, 2007, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

The pro gun people are misinformed and or lying when they say only criminals will have guns, Federal and State laws tack on severe penalties for crime with guns, in the parlance it is called “gun time” another 10 years or so just for using a gun in a crime, and that is even if the gun is not fired. Convicted felons know if they are caught with guns they face severe penalties. The gun people try to scare people by saying that only criminals will have guns,and so far that has been effective. Also statistics bear out that murders in countries with severe gun laws are a fraction of the US.
As long as guns are legal and easy to get,these tragedies will continue.

Posted by: JoJo | April 17, 2007, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

“Federal laws are not enforced 100% at all.” Umm, you mean like, in “illegal aliens”?

Posted by: Tom Perkins | April 17, 2007, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

…but hay never let the facts interfere with thestory.
Hay is for horses

Posted by: K_Kelly | April 17, 2007, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Try this for an analogy: there IS a clear relationship between drug laws and drug availability. The relationship is this: those under 21 can acquire illegal drugs easier than they can acquire legal ones (alcohol). I have yet to hear a coherent rebuttal to the argument “if guns are made illegal, the only people with access to guns will be criminals”. Discuss.

Posted by: Jim | April 17, 2007, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

1. The gun pictured is a 9MM Glock
2. The NRA’s position is enforce the 20thousand gun laws we now have as we do not need more only strict enforcement of the ones we have.
3. You better read the second amendment.The reason we have the right to bear arms is to protect us from a out of control government.

Posted by: Bill | April 17, 2007, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Crazy people can and will do crazy things no matter what the law says. I hope this does not become an excuse for more 2nd Amendment bashing.

Posted by: Kevin | April 17, 2007, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

No one cares if it is .22 or 22mm. And only someone like Jacquelyn could blame Bush for this. Give it a rest please.

Posted by: tiredofthis | April 17, 2007, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

There’s a reason many people expected this to be done by a Muslim. It has to do with their religion.
ABC is a Leftist news organization. And like most major media outlets, produce sloppy reporting. I don’t expect them to report facts, only politically-based editorials on society.

Posted by: foobar | April 17, 2007, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

The main point here is that Schumer, Kennedy, Clinton and the other ultra-liberals should take full responsibility for this attack. They’re the primary ones who are illegally disarming American citizens, which makes them directly responsible for all those who had to just stand there and wait for their turn to be shot.
If people were armed like they should be, they could have shot back and stopped this guy right at the beginning. Schools should safe places for the good guys, not the bad guys.

Posted by: Rich Woods | April 17, 2007, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

You can have as many gun laws you want, I don’t think you’ll be able to stop a determined individual from arming themself.
There are mentally disturbed people everywhere, many who are more than capable of violence. It’s just a matter of time before one of them goes postal, and there isn’t much that can be done about it. There will unfortunately be more of this in the future.
As far as school violence, I’m surprised no one’s brought up Andrew Kehoe.

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2007, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

There is a HUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE difference between a .22 Caliber and a 22mm.
Those two designations are two totally different measurements.
Anything that says Caliber means its measured in INCHES. Hence why most “Caliber” measured bullets, are almost always less than 1 . IE, .45, .40, .22, .308. IE, they are smaller than an inch…
when the caliber size is designated by mm, it means milimeter. Its the difference between metric and english. If your all to stupid to think there is no difference, you are dumber than a sea-sponge.

Posted by: Jacob | April 17, 2007, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Wow, so now a “typo” has become more important than the tragedy itself. I suppose that is all we can control…typos, because people…you can’t control people and you can’t predict what would trigger a psychopath. The issue here is not guns or gun control. If the killer didn’t have guns he would have set the building on fire…with a box of matches. Try to stay focus people.

Posted by: Angel | April 17, 2007, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

How dare you equate a law-abiding, permit-holding citizen with a wack-job that shoots up an office or school. An emotional statement regarding someone you know little about or an issue you are blindly fearful of is appalling. Would you take us back to the stone age, where we’d defend ourselves with rocks, so when we’re outnumbered, our wives get raped and our property stolen without recourse? Would your solution be to file a complaint? Or would you, like many gun-control proponents, simply demand that there is a policeman on every corner of every neighborhood, in every school, in every workplace, hospital and post office? What world do you live in, and why on earth would you force such a disconnected reality on the rest of us? God help you if you believe that. BTW, I’m not advocating religion. I just know that on your planet, nobody else would be able to help you except him.

Posted by: Paul | April 17, 2007, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Lots of great points in here and a bunch of irrelevant stuff. Another gun on campus, in the dorm, may have saved lives. Speaking of irrelevant stuff, I can’t let this go, because that picture is not a Walther PPK. It’s a Glock. Looks like a Glock 17 to be exact, …a 9mm. So, “Keith” and “CHris,” the media did get one right.

Posted by: John | April 17, 2007, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

That looks like a Glock to me in the picture.. it’s that G logo on it.

Posted by: huh | April 17, 2007, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Who cares what type of gun was used? Are we going to bring the guns up on charges? The fact remains over thirty lives were lost. we have lost future leaders, researchers, inventors, teachers, doctors. We have probably lost the one who would have found the cure for AIDS or the one who would have been he parent of the person who finds the cure for AIDS. Now what are we going to do? How do we stop this scourge on our society that is unleashed with amazing regularity? What do we do now?

Posted by: Dawn T | April 17, 2007, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

This is incredible. 32 students murdered, and we have conservatives on the defensive with liberals. nit pickers debating 22 caliber vs 22 mm and feeling justified in doing promo work for the NRA. I can basically see it now, people not looking past their noses just making sure no one tries to take their guns out of their cold dead hands. Maybe mother nature needs a rest from all of the idiots walking on her and start anew, because compassion is definitely lacking in this society.

Posted by: john | April 17, 2007, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

If it were widely known that there were armed, competent individuals on campus it may have prevented Mr. Cho from taking this action.
Also, once he killed wouldn’t you assume he would kill again? Where were the campus police?

Posted by: tomo_666 | April 17, 2007, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

When will people stop referring to the 2nd Amendment as rationale for everyone to own a gun…..if the “founding fathers” were alive today, they would be appalled by what America has become….violence begets violence….guns and more guns.

Posted by: Ellen | April 17, 2007, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Please, let’s get off the 22mm. Yes it is the ignorance of the press that doesn’t get facts. And yes you can buy a hand gun at a gun show without a back ground check. (Just not from legal gun dealers) You do not have to have a back ground check to buy from a private citizen.( Don’t pay any attention to the fact that he bought them legally)Key: legal resident, doesn’t say US citizen. The guy planned this out, multiple weapons, chain, extra ammo, the note. Come on; you can’t stop crazy! It is a shame that some other students were not armed, maybe they could have stopped this sooner. Oh, that’s right, it was a gun free zone.

Posted by: Duane | April 17, 2007, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

As you roll out the old saws….gun show loophole….readily available supply of guns….too many guns, can someone of that enlightened persuasion explain to me why there were apparently only 2 guns (a criminal’s) on this campus when this madness occured? While you’re at it poll the UK and Australia and find out how that civilian disarmament thing is working out.

Posted by: accipiter | April 17, 2007, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

I hate Koreans. Hope that they will get it back soon.

Posted by: USCirizen | April 17, 2007, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Ok, I am amazed at how many people on this thread post comments that quite simply put, are not true. First off, there is no such thing as a 22mm handgun. Bacis mathmatical conversion translates this to .86 cal. The largest hangun inthe world is .50 cal which came out in 2004 by Smith and Wesson. Next, there are several .22 cal pistols that exist. Walther, Ruger, Sig just to name a few. And for those of you think gun control will limit this kind of activity, remember, Columbine happened duringthe assault weapons ban. Gun control has never kept guns outof criminal hands. This guy did purchase both guns legally. No matter how much people play armchair quarterback, there is no simple way this tragity could have been prevented.

Posted by: JP | April 17, 2007, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Kansas has the conceal and carry law, but guns can not be carried onto college campuses, high schools, etc. SO illegally having a gun on campus may not do you any good. You may get arrested for carrying weapon on campus before the crazy person does.

Posted by: peterson | April 17, 2007, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Why aren’t gun purchase restricted to citizens only? We have more than enough of them going nuts without arming non-citizens.

Posted by: PFi | April 17, 2007, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

and just to drive this into the ground one more time, 22mm is monstrous. It’s like over an inch bore and the kick would snap your wrist in half. Quite honestly, if anyone on this page thinks they have a 22mm HANDGUN, they are wrong. If they continue to think they have one after consulting a metric RULER, they become an absolute MORON. That’s like an anti-aircraft cannon caliber, so just shut up if you don’t know what you’re talking about. Caliber does NOT equal millimeters–they are not synonyms.

Posted by: dan | April 17, 2007, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

How come gun purchases aren’t restricted to U.S. citizens only? We have enough of them going nuts with guns without allowing non-citizens access to join in.

Posted by: Pfai | April 17, 2007, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

This just re-inforces my belief that I’d rather be tried by twelve (jurors)then carried by six (pallbearers). Maybe if a few responsible young adults, who by the way are old enough to go and defend their country..had a concealed weapon this might not have gone as far as it did. Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. We are pointing the blame on everyone but the lunatic who carried out this horrible action.
If we can send responsible young adults to war, we can also ready them to defend thier lives over here.

Posted by: Donnadiva | April 17, 2007, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

So the story is about one of the worst tragedies of our time, and all the dimwits among us can do is gripe about how the so-called “biased, liberal, drive-by media” got the technical data on the gun wrong. Grow up.

Posted by: Blind Willy | April 17, 2007, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

How many people get up for their 9 am class…take a shower…brush their teeth…get their books together then pack a gun…come on saying that these students would have carried guns and this would have been ended sooner if the laws were less strict is ridiculous. The kid who did this, the gun allowing him to do this so quickly, and the universities lack of action caused this disaster. As an alumnus of VaTech I know that Charles Steger takes pride in the fact that the university is practically always open, and in this instance his pride cost him dearly. Gun laws and lack there of would not have changed the outcome…please don’t use this as a means for debate. My heart goes out to all involved.

Posted by: Dave | April 17, 2007, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Yeah seriously you guys seemed more concerned about wather it was a 22 mm. or a 22 calaber that he killed the people with, then you care about the people who acutually lost thier lifes!!! This man was on a mission and he completed what he wanted. Now we cant let him bend the back bone of America. Its time to go strait to the healing proccess.

Posted by: Jsekich | April 17, 2007, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

I wonder what He is Korean, but I think He is not Korean because, he lived USA long time.. and when he was 8 years old, He lived in USA…..

Posted by: ssy | April 17, 2007, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

How does only a NATURALIZED VISA carrying person buy a handgun in the USA? Did he have a SSN number? You have to have one to buy a handgun anywhere in the US. Gun show purchases have to go through the same routine, an FBI check! So no lying out here. Also, if reporters can’t get the caliber of the weapons straight how can we be sure if the rest of the story is true or just another HOAX or BOGUS story like the latest “Global Warming” nonsence from the FAR RADICAL LEFT
!

Posted by: Snakebob5 | April 17, 2007, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

According to MADD, more than 300 people are killed by drunk drivers *each week*. For the victim’s families, these deaths are just as senseless and has horrifying. Yet no one even thinks about banning alcohol. Why is that? Even the anti-gun crowd, who tell us that saving “just one life” justifies a gun ban, are curiously silent about the average 460 children that die every year in the US due to drunk drivers. Is it because they suspect a ban won’t work?

Posted by: MW | April 17, 2007, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Maybe we just need to ban english majors

Posted by: Harry | April 17, 2007, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Would that SOMEONE in those classrooms had had a gun.

Posted by: Joe | April 17, 2007, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Some of you seem to think that the millions of RESPONSIBLE gun owners who haven’t shot anyone should be penalized for the actions of a few. How about the next time someone drives drunk and kills someone we ban alcohol?

Posted by: Mark | April 17, 2007, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

M — As could be expected of a troglodytic conservative, you misread my point: the problem is not just the shiny, metallic monstrosities, but also ALL who choose to own them and propogate a culture of violence. If you’re not part of the solution, you are part of the problem; and in this instance the solution is eradicating both guns AND the crazy notion that they have a place in civilized society.

Posted by: Jason | April 17, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

The European press is going so far as to blame Charlton Heston (as the former pres of the NRA) for the massacre. When are liberals (Europeans? same thing) going to get it through their heads that neither gun ownership nor a gun is responsible for the murders. The guy that pulled the trigger is responsible. Yeah someone else with a gun and a legal permit would have had a chance to stop him if VT didn’t ban guns from campus but the responsibility for this tragedy lies on the shooter alone. Without a gun he would have found another way to do it.

Posted by: Jerry | April 17, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Hmm, still no link provided to prove the existence of the fabled “22mm handgun”. Shocking.

Posted by: Farticus | April 17, 2007, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Okay people… quit arguing about what “type” of gun was used! IT WAS A GUN! Quit trying to correct a simple mistake written and PRAY for the victims and their families! My deep and heart felt prayers go out to all that was involved.

Posted by: Karen | April 17, 2007, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

TC is apparently the one who is either “extremely dishonest or extremely stupid”. There are no honest studies that show a correlation between gun ownership and gun violence. In fact there are many studies that show just the opposite. In every state in the US that has passed concealed carry laws, gun violence has gone down significantly. In Great Britain and Australia where private gun ownership is all but none existent anymore, violent crime with guns is skyrocketing.

Posted by: BB | April 17, 2007, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Im waiting for Katy , whose knee jerk reaction to media bias showed she did not read the article. It said 22 caliber as they say when I went to college ( Katy obviously did not get that far ) RTFQ or in this case READ THE ARTICLE DON’T LISTEN TO RIGHT WING CRAP.

Posted by: Butch | April 17, 2007, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Jacquelyn, I think that you are right that it’s Bush’s fault…………if he hadn’t been so busy personally destroying levys in New Orleans while at the same time personally heting up the world with a secret bunsen burner in the basement of the White House, he could have been standing outside the dorm room to tackle the gunman as he left……….idiot, what color is the sky in your world.

Posted by: michael | April 17, 2007, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

I guess I’ve been so desensitized by the carnage in Iraq that I’m not really even phased by this incident. The only think I get out of the deal is people kill people – and it doesn’t matter what weapons are legal and which are not, they’ll find a way. There is a large grey area between the ‘GUNS ARE THE DEVIL’ and the ‘ARM YOUR 4 YEAR OLD’ crowds out today, but unfortunately we have a president who has perversed the nation with his “wit’ me, or ag’nt me” rhetoric.

Posted by: Paul | April 17, 2007, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Everyone who is blaming Bush for this and saying that our troops should be here rather than fighting against the terrorists…..would you feel better if our country was under constant military rule, so that everyone’s actions were constantly scrutinized for possible violence? Would that make you feel safer?
Thought not….try thinking before you spout off about whose “fault” it is. This kid was obviously not mentally well and was determined that others were going to suffer with him. He is the one at fault – no one else.

Posted by: Angel | April 17, 2007, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Just another instance of Goverment’s failure to protect the sheep. As the old saying goes,
“Judged by 12 or carried by 6.”

Posted by: Minnie | April 17, 2007, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

The picture on the Tube is the wrong handgun, they got the wrong caliber, they have lied about the gunshows, and on and on. Next they will be blaming the shootings on the NRA instead of where it really belongs: the ACLU.

Posted by: Phillip | April 17, 2007, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

This is in response to the comment of J.R. Bush in Iraq-country unsafe…… We as citizens of this great country are individually responsible to make this country safe. This is not a police state where the military is responsible for our safety. If the liberals would stop teaching our students that this country is the cause of all the evils in the world and within, then maybe we will raise God fearing, decent, moral, patriotic young people.

Posted by: Merchi | April 17, 2007, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

This is so very sad. To turn this into a gun control debate is ridiculous. Kids are so angry today, just listen to their music. It is an experssion of the way they feel. Wether or not they have guns is immaterial. We need to find out what is making these kids feel so angry that the only way they can deal with the anger is to resort to violence.
We need to concentrate on the cause of the behavior. People are always going to have weapons. If not guns, chemicals, bombs ect. Lets put more effort in trying to figure out these kids before they get to this point. Instead of beating out chests in favor of gun control.

Posted by: Deb | April 17, 2007, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

I think if the students with conceled weapons permits were “allowed” to actually carry their guns on campus, there would have been far fewer deaths. an armed crazy person is always dangerous, but less so if his intended victims can fight back. There is always 2 ways to look at something, but it is true, if guns are outlawed, then only outlaws will have them. The students should have been allowed to defend themselves.

Posted by: GI in Germany | April 17, 2007, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Guns aren’t the problem, folks ! The mindset of the user is the issue. If you want to ban guns, you should check out the crime statistics in Australia since they outlawed private ownership of guns and made commonfolk turn in their guns. Your eyes will be opened.
BTW…
What is 0.171 ? It’s the number of deaths (due to accidents/mistakes) annually per U.S. physician.
There are 0.0000188 deaths (due to accidents/mistakes) annually per U.S. gun owner.
And to those of you that are wondering, I don’t have the figures for intentional deaths by boths groups. But, I would bet that the data would surprise us.
We’d be better off sinking money into medical training than banning guns.

Posted by: Eureka | April 17, 2007, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Read this, that is exactly how it is.
Charlton Heston said:
“Here’s my credo: There are no good guns,
There are no bad guns. A gun in the hands of a bad man is a bad
thing. Any gun in the hands of a good man is no threat to anyone,
except bad people.”

Posted by: Hank | April 17, 2007, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Gun control and high capacity magazines didn’t stop the 911 hi-jackers did it…

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2007, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

It’s easy to point to gun control but I must add that it’s across the board music, movies, video games and reading material. I have many hand guns, hunting rifle, shot guns and a assault weapon. If you would have been in LA during the hurricane you would have begged for one. It’s about a morally bankrupt culture. God help us.

Posted by: Robert | April 17, 2007, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

It’s amazing that people focus on a very minor editing mistake in relation to the dimensions of the gun rather than the stupidity of our gun laws. Typical gun nuts.

Posted by: Dan | April 17, 2007, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

1> You can buy a gun at a gunshow without a background check only from an individual, not a dealer. But then again, you can buy a gun from an individual at any time without a background check.
2> No matter how hard to try to make guns illegal, they’re horribly easy to manufacture. We’re tlking about 19th century technology here folks!
3> If he hadn’t had a gun, he might have made a bomb. Are we going to outlaw fertilizer?
4> in Virginia (and many other states) a legal resident alien CAN buy a gun. Same as a citizen.

Posted by: Robb | April 17, 2007, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

I see that the owner of the gun shop was interviewed. It’s too bad that he didn’t figure that this kid is a student at VT living on campus, and that VT prohibits firearms on campus. Of course, the shop owner isn’t supposed to be concerned about that. Why is this society subsidizing the operations of gun shops like this who contribute to social problems and can’t even notify the campus administrators that this person may have some kind of trouble in mind! U.S. firearms laws are BROKEN!

Posted by: PT | April 17, 2007, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Can’t resist stating the obvious: A 22 mm handgun must actually translate into something that is mounted to the frame of a fighter aircraft or battle tank, since 22 mm equals almost 1 inch in diameter. Anyway lets get over the size of the guns and back to the real issue of finding a way to cure or heal the deep wounds these acts of violence have on our world.

Posted by: Rex | April 17, 2007, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

How could this happen? Isn’t there a law that prohibits murder? Isn’t it illegal to carry a firearm on Virginia campuses? Well…I guess passing laws doesn’t work all that well. What about police? Don’t they protect us? How about facing reality? Predators don’t follow the laws. Police get there after the crime. The notion that restrictive gun laws make us safe is inane. Being defenseless makes us vulnerable. There has always been crime and there always will be. So, let’s make crime a riskier business for the predators.

Posted by: DD | April 17, 2007, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

To all the anti-gun folks.
Why don’t you simply pass a law forbidding gun ownership by crazy people.
That should solve your problem!
This guy would have got guns or bombs or whatever it took. He was deranged. You can’t legislate against it.

Posted by: DGR | April 17, 2007, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Let’s see… ban guns and hope the authorities protect all of us. Oh wait… the authorities are being reamed for not stopping this after the dorm killings. Bodies can’t even get buried before the gun grabbers launch their agenda via the driveby press.

Posted by: Kurt | April 17, 2007, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Owning guns/firearms should be used to ONLY protect oneself, NOT to kill.
Gun laws should be changed in the state of VA and all states from this day forward.
Tazer guns would be a much better alternative.

Posted by: John Anderson | April 17, 2007, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Keep in mind that .22 handgun was the smallest caliber handgun one can buy and its 10 round magazine was legal even during the Asault Weapons Ban that expired few years back.
Guns don’t kill people, criminals kill people. You can’t expected criminals to follow the law. People were killing each other long before guns existed, more laws against lawful citizen gun owners won’t change that.

Posted by: Jason | April 17, 2007, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

More people need to legally be allowed to carry a weapon. When something like this happens a citizen with firearm training and gun may have been able to stop this sooner.

Posted by: TD | April 17, 2007, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Its quite sad that when the President orders all flags to be at half-staff, that the great ole gov’t. in Charlotte(26th largest city in the country), wont lower its flags on the Police Dept. or at the Federal buildings, being a resident of Charlotte im quite disappointed that the City has absolutely no respect for its closest neighbors to the North!

Posted by: Chuck Jones | April 17, 2007, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

You all need math lessons. 22mm is only .8 inches. .22 mm would be microscopic – the bullet would be the diameter of a hair. Browning makes a 22mm pistol – meaning that the barrel is 22mm wide, not long.
In any event, a tragic event, reminding us to take time to embrace as many people as we can — almost 100% of the time people who do these things are described as “loners”

Posted by: J | April 17, 2007, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

“False is the idea of utility…that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils, except destruction of liberty. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…such laws serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”_ Thomas Jefferson, ‘Commonplace Book’, 1775

Posted by: RWC | April 17, 2007, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

He was a legal resident with a legal resident green card which means he could legally purchase in Virginia a weapon. Please learn to understand before you speak.

Posted by: T-Ann | April 17, 2007, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Please, enough about new gun laws.
Guns do not kill……….BULLETS DO……

Posted by: Texan-American | April 17, 2007, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Yet another left wing spin job. Allowing a tradegy like this to spark political debate on gun control. Unbelieveable.

Posted by: Rick | April 17, 2007, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

What happened is not the fault of the President, the lack of gun control legislation, or the gun’s fault. The responsibility falls at the feet of the guy who did this – no one else’s fault. When will we get back to PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY for our actions. He simply twisted off. He could have done this in many different ways in many different scenarios, many of which he could have taken many more people with him. It’s too bad the Virginia legislature has taken the right to protect yourself away from students and faculty.

Posted by: todd | April 17, 2007, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

What happened is not the fault of the President, the lack of gun control legislation, or the gun’s fault. The responsibility falls at the feet of the guy who did this – no one else’s fault. When will we get back to PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY for our actions. He simply twisted off. He could have done this in many different ways in many different scenarios, many of which he could have taken many more people with him. It’s too bad the Virginia legislature has taken the right to protect yourself away from students and faculty.

Posted by: todd | April 17, 2007, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

The need for so many people to fixate on a mistake that the media made in reporting the caliber of weapon, and trying to use that to discredit the report is pure idiocy. When there is a difficult issue that demands discussion and reasonable introspection only the feeble minded seek avoidance through distraction tactics. It’s like citing the second amendment in the case of gun control while supporting 100% of the Patriot act, the latter infringes on constitutional freedoms. These are all difficult issues, all sides need to come to more informed opinions, and then make your case legitimately, myself included.

Posted by: Rob | April 17, 2007, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Did anyone see the first shooting as a distraction to set up the mass killing across campus – also what about the bomb threats, I believe he called and didn’t go throught with it- similar to when thieves/bank robbers call in a bomb threat across town to distract the police while they hit another location.

Posted by: A | April 17, 2007, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Here come the “ban all guns, toss out the 2nd Amendment” nuts.For those that forgot it says “prohibits infringement of “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.”
Think of what this nut could have done if he had a bomb – or fertilizer, or gasoline poured on the floor, wit hthe doors chained shut. Do we now ban them? I have a better idea. Students with carrying permits passing courses in firearm safety are allowed to hold concealed weapons. Next time a nut or a terrorist decides to kill unarmed kids he has no idea who will be shooting him in the back. Same idea as unmarked air marshalls on planes.

Posted by: Paul Orlando Florida | April 17, 2007, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

I would just like to give my regards to everyone who has been touched by this terrible tragedy. You will be in my thoughts and prayers. It also seems funny to me that people are taking advantage of this time to attack politics, this is not about politics its about victims. Leave those views out of this and remember Virgina Tech.

Posted by: Evie | April 17, 2007, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

“having an honest discussion about guns in America” and “Watch: Bowling for Columbine” are mutually exclusive frames of reference… you can’t do one and tolerate the other.

Posted by: Tim B | April 17, 2007, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

I would just like to give my regards to everyone who has been touched by this terrible tragedy. You will be in my thoughts and prayers. It also seems funny to me that people are taking advantage of this time to attack politics, this is not about politics its about victims. Leave those views out of this and remember Virgina Tech.

Posted by: Evie | April 17, 2007, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

If it had not been a gun, it could have been a jug of gasoline, a 3000 pound SUV, a piece of pipe and gunpowder. Clearly the gun had nothing to do with it, as it is an inert object. It was the deranged shooter, who could have used any of the above to suit his purpose. I’ll keep my guns, thank you!
BW

Posted by: Barry Wallace | April 17, 2007, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

According to Virginia law, a legal resident alien is allowed by law to purchase a hand gun. So stop with the conspriracy theories that someone sold this to him illegally. Criminals never go to the trouble of back ground checks when acquiring their guns. What would change if we enacted “tougher” gun laws? And it seems this guy had thought this through for a month or so. If he wanted to do this, he could’ve found a gun through illegal means. Gun laws aren’t going to stop someone like this.

Posted by: Kevin | April 17, 2007, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

How many people are killed on US highways in every month?
Automobiles are a LOT more dangerous than handguns. Therefore they should be BANNED!!!

Posted by: scott | April 17, 2007, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

I figured people would turn this into an issue of gun control. Is that to suggest that a person, intent on killing dozens, would choose ONLY to do so if he could jump through a million hoops to LEGALLY purchase a weapon? Please. GUNS don’t kill people. PEOPLE kill people. Take away the guns and the ONLY people who will have them are criminals. And then we will all be likened to one giant college campus … unarmed, vulnerable, and unable to defend ourselves.

Posted by: melissa | April 17, 2007, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

This is exactly why we need to increase security inside the country. If we were to leave iraq, Al-Queda would re-group and the threat from within would become even more serious that it is already.
NEW GUN LAWS. You should have to file a 100 page document to the governent to why you need the weapon.
I’m not a hunter, but if guns didn’t exist, I would be perfectly happy.

Posted by: AL | April 17, 2007, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Maybe if students had been properly warned about 2 murders on campus, they wouldn’t have gone to class and they wouldn’t have needed a weapon to protect them. A little communication can go a long way.

Posted by: EMB | April 17, 2007, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

If people didn’t kill with guns then they would start to find something else to kill with. They are going to kill regardless and if it were me on the other end I would much rather be taken quickly with a bullet than slowly with a machette or explosive or fire.

Posted by: Beth | April 17, 2007, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

VT should allow concealed carry.
Having 17 and 18 year olds carrying guns would make the professors much more polite. Probably improve grades too!
And why is it we can’t carry guns in the workplace?

Posted by: Lars Jenkins | April 17, 2007, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

leighton — you are copying from the CORRECTED version of the article. The author originally confused a 22 mm (which doesn’t exist) with a .22 caliber (which does, of course).

Posted by: bobby | April 17, 2007, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

The comments posted here by the majority of people on here are more frightening than what happened yesterday! It is a testament to social level of the general American when they pounce on the opportunity to showcase their gun knowledge without a breathe of concern or sorrow for the tragic event. The moral fiber of your everyday American is almost non existent…it is tried tested and true just post a video image on youtube saying bloody aftermath of Virginia Tech and see the record hits it gets…

Posted by: Coop | April 17, 2007, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Can anyone explain why Jaquelyn felt the need to post the same inanity multiple times?

Posted by: MacRobert | April 17, 2007, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

They changed the wording of the article several hours ago, it DID read 22 mm. I imagined they changed it after someone informed the reporters, who probably don’t know squat about firearms, sent them a 5th grade math textbook on the metric system.

Posted by: Nathan | April 17, 2007, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Gun control doesn’t work. How about the cities that outlaw guns now? Are we to believe that the criminals there don’t have guns?
Also, what if he would have used something else, some type of explosives? All the laws in the world won’t stopped the Timothy McVeigh’s of the world.
It’s sad that this happened and we need to mourn for these people that lost their lives because of this SICK individual. The guns didn’t kill the people, Cho Seung-Hui did. If he couldn’t get the guns, legally or illegally, he would have used something else.

Posted by: Ramona | April 17, 2007, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Get rid of guns, Get rid of the sinceless killings. How many innocent people do we have to lose by allowing guns to dictate who has the power? How long will we continue to justify having guns in our socity at free-well? How long will we grive the lives we lose every day due to guns? Not long enough. We have lost some many innocent people, not only in
our schools, and colleges but on our streets, as well. I’m outraged.
Wake-Up!!!! America!!!!!Stand-Up America!!!

Posted by: Deon | April 17, 2007, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Ah, I see they also changed the picture. Earlier, it was a PPK. Now it is a Glock. Maybe they are reading these posts.

Posted by: Nathan | April 17, 2007, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

The mayor of Nagasaki Japan was just shot to death by a criminal in a country where guns arn’t just controlled they are banned. Gun laws do not stop anyone who wants to get a gun from getting a gun. It just prevents law abiding people form getting guns to protect themselves when no one else can or will protect them.

Posted by: Collin | April 17, 2007, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

There are no .22mm = diameter hand guns not unless you thinking of civil war muskets. There are 8mm = diameter .22mm = length hand guns.
Regardless the greatess loss of life ( mass murder) was committed using box cutters, pocket knife, duct tape and an airplane or fertilizer and gasoline. If one is intent on killing, one will find a way.

Posted by: Michael | April 17, 2007, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

How in the world could a possible background check be done when he lived here for what a few weeks, month a year? Seems to me immigrants should have extensive background check for weapons and a longer wait to be approved. How many Americans have been killed by immigrants. Seems like its not just one, always a number of others are killed when they snap. Would appear America might be in to big of a hurry to grant citizenship to immigrants. As for guns laws my opinion is criminals will always have guns. Drugs are illegal and look how many of them are in our country. Gun laws won’t help stiffer immigration laws might help.

Posted by: Cheryl | April 17, 2007, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

You folks who mention that a gun-free environment worsened this situation are full of it. Maybe we should allow people in clubs and bars to carry concealed weapons because the alcohol wouldn’t impair there judgement at all. Maybe we should allow everyone to have nuclear weapons while we are at it, after all if you don’t control one type of weapon of mass destruction(guns, and yesterday proves they can be) why control any of them.

Posted by: Dame | April 17, 2007, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Let’s just make guns illegal, like drugs. Then all of this will go away. Right? We are doomed if people are this freaking stupid. I’m keeping my guns. Come try and take them you stinking hippies.

Posted by: Jeff | April 17, 2007, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

It doesn’t really matter what kind or size of gun he had. It matters that he was a troubled person who received no care and then went on to kill innocent people. Why argue over the bullet size??? That’s just plain ridiculous and missing the point entirely. Liberal OR conservative… we NEED to begin looking at our own country and trying to solve our own problems BEFORE we try to fix everyone else in the world. I DO agree we need to care about the world as a whole but come on, only someone very naive would believe we don’t need help ourselves. Charity begins at home and while he was a legal alien, he WAS here in our country and he was going to one of our universities and his family DID live here. As such, if he’s disturbed and likely to go “off”, he needs help. The biggest problem I see is apathy. Too many of us want to ignore the signs, STILL after so many tragedies, believing it will never happen to us.

Posted by: Debbie | April 17, 2007, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

You folks who mention that a gun-free environment worsened this situation are full of it. Maybe we should allow people in clubs and bars to carry concealed weapons because the alcohol wouldn’t impair there judgement at all. Maybe we should allow everyone to have nuclear weapons while we are at it, after all if you don’t control one type of weapon of mass destruction(guns, and yesterday proves they can be) why control any of them.

Posted by: Dame | April 17, 2007, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

So this foreign nutter was taking happy pills? ANOTHER triumph for the pill-pushing quacks of modern psychiatry, just like Columbine and most other like situations. (It’s very hard to find a school shooting where prescribed psychoactive drugs were NOT involved!)

Posted by: Larry | April 17, 2007, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Let’s try to keep our eye on the ball, shall we? 32 people are dead.
The size of the guns that caused those deaths is irrelevant at this point. Those people are dead, their families devastated.
Arguing about whether the media, in the haste of trying to file on deadline – and I’ve been there – may have made a mistake that will get fixed in a later edition/feed, won’t bring those folks back from the dead.
Questions worth debating, IMHO, are a) how he was able to purchase a gun when he was a resident alien?; and b)why VA TECH and probably many other colleges across the country do not have a workable emergency response/communications plan in this post 9/11 age?

Posted by: dismayed | April 17, 2007, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

I noticed that the mayor of Nagasaki, Japan was shot twice in the back and killed today. In Japan? But they have gun control, how could that be? With the implementation of gun control only the criminals will have guns. Can’t you see that?

Posted by: Hoax Buster | April 17, 2007, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

The gun control crowd does everything it can to create gun-free zones like this campus by disarming law-abiding citizens and then they’re SHOCKED that innocent people are defenseless against murderers and other criminals! It’s not how many guns there are, it’s use has them and what they’re used for. Less than one percent of all guns are used for criminal purposes and gun control laws have no effect on those. Criminals love gun control! Liberals, stop siding with the criminals.

Posted by: David Lampo | April 17, 2007, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

The fact that he bought and legally registered his weapon is the best and ultimate evidence that a ban on guns in public absolutely necessary. You can have as many guns as you want in your home, bug if you’re caught with a gun off of your private property — life in prison. Period. End of story. End of gun related crime.

Posted by: BanGuns | April 17, 2007, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Its a proven fact. Coolies go crazy over white pussy.

Posted by: johnB | April 17, 2007, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Although it is a little outrageous that the articles and media are getting some information wrong…
shouldn’t we be more focused on the fact the 32 people died? (excluding Cho Seung Hui)
Hopefully it will not lead to racism/descrimination/etc. towards South Koreans.

Posted by: moon | April 17, 2007, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Steve said I hpoe the NRA is happy.. Serious changes need to be made. I agree. Had any one been carrying a cancelled weapon, that he met up with, he would probably not have had the opportunity to kill himself. A person that carries a legal concealled weapon always has hours and hours of training.
It is a persons’ responsibility to protect himself. The police can not protect you. they are called in after the fact. The changes that should be made is to do away with the federal gun free zones.
Also did any one notice the numbers were filed off? Which does one of two things, he either bought it illegal, as it is against federal law to file the numbers off a gun, or he filed the numbers off himself. The only reason to do so is to use a gun and drop it, so that it isnt as easily traced back. He was hell bent on doing what he did. Had he been in some other place where there are no guns he still would have accomplished his goal. In most parts of the world it is illegal to have explosives, but we still see stuff blow up all the time.
Guns are not the problem. The ownership of a gun is not the problem.

Posted by: Robert | April 17, 2007, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

It defies logic to see the NRA goons make the patently false claim that the country would be safer if ‘everyone carried a gun’. Walking around paranoid that the guy standing next to you might snap and blow your head off sounds like ‘fun’.

Posted by: Eric | April 17, 2007, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

If private gun ownership makes the ‘world safer’, then why:
1. Why has the US military been CONFISCATING guns from the Iraqi public sincd 2002? Maybe it’s because they don’t want to get SHOT? Brilliant.
2. Why can’t a licensed gun owner carry his/her weapon in the vicinity of high ranking US officials? Doesn’t the government trust it’s own citizens, and if not, why should any of us trust ‘Joe Blow’ with a gun?

Posted by: Eric | April 17, 2007, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

this has nothing to do with gun laws, the NRA, or government regulations on firearms. Guns dont kill people, crazy people do.

Posted by: Justin | April 17, 2007, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Maybe if students had been properly warned about 2 murders on campus, they wouldn’t have gone to class and they wouldn’t have needed a weapon to protect them. A little communication can go a long way.

Posted by: EMB | April 17, 2007, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Does one have to have U.S. citizenship to be eligible to purchase a firearm?
A buyer who is not a citizen of the United States must have lawful alien status and must establish that he or she is a resident of a state by providing a valid photo identification and documentation such as a utility bill or lease agreement which would establish that he or she has resided in the state for at least 90 days prior to the date of the sale.

Posted by: Derek | April 17, 2007, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

What’s wrong with people that thing guns are so bad. You don’t want anyone to have guns until you’re lying in bed and someone breaks into your house. Would you want a gun then?

Posted by: Nick | April 17, 2007, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

What everyone fails to understand about basic human nature is that in every single one of us–every single good, honest person–there exists a more ancient, reptilian instinct. Any sane, moral person can be reduced in the heat of moment to think solely with their passion and to be blind to all sense. It is in that period of time, when a person is weakest, that even lawful access to firearms and other weaponry is inherently wrong. And it is because we should be very suspicious of ourselves and our ability to not be reduced to an animalistic state at any given moment (when perceiving and attempting to thwart mortal threat to our loved ones, for instance) that we should greatly limit our own access to weaponry, except when it is absolutely clear what our role is in wielding such weaponry, as is the case with law-enforcement or military personnel.
When citizens bear arms, they bear such weapons while acting in their own personal interests, however nationalistic they may be. The average citizen would not nor should not want to trust his or herself with such violent tools at their ready disposal.
No, limiting access to handguns will not solve the problem, but every process that gets placed between someone and their goal in acquiring lethal weapons gives everyone involved (including that someone) another chance to review and revise the correctness of their choice. Human logic only goes so far before passion prevails. Recovering from the impulses of passion, when it is possible, is almost always a function of time it takes for the realignment of a more healthy perspectives.
.

Posted by: Sean | April 17, 2007, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

They edited the article from 22mm to .22 cal later – the article is reposted on a number of websites and still says 22mm. I’d say its a trivial point, but you may end up with somebody like Feinstein screaming to ban 22mm handguns because you could shoot down a plane with one.
In any case, while its easy to demonize firearms the fact of the matter is that had Cho not been able to attain a handgun and was still hell bent on killing himself and dozens of others, he could simply spent $30 for hydrogen peroxide, other materials and a few pounds of nails at Home Depot and made himself a peroxide based bomb, for which the recipe is readily available on the internet. You gun grabbers seem to forget the reason why you can only take three ounces of liquids on a plane now days. Nobody is talking about banning peroxide and acetone, now are they?
As far as this getting rid of the second ammendment, the ammendment is so that people can protect themselves from tyrannical governments. So that things like what happened to the Jews in Nazi Germany don’t happen. Or what is happening in Darfur.

Posted by: JohnG | April 17, 2007, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

So if I drive my car into a group of people and kill them we would blame it on my car and not me, right?
Gun’s don’t kill people. People do.

Posted by: Tyler | April 17, 2007, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Let’s hope that this episode causes decent law abiding citizens to take personal responsibility for their personal protection. To think that you are safe because you have a local police department? Where are they when you are awoken in the middle of the night by a burglar who would just as soon kill you as leave without your Rolex. I see the requests for Concealed weapons permitts skyrocketing. God rest the souls of the victims, and GOD BLESS AMERICA

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2007, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

JohnG said: “In any case, the statistics on crime in states with liberal concealed carry laws indicate that more guns are generally better.”
Yeah, until some high ranking US official comes to town for a speech or something. THEN, the government won’t allow you and your licensed gun anywhere near the venue. Evidently private gun ownership is dangerous in those situations, but not when it concerns the general public. The rules are different because the government knows exactly how dangerous it is to allow people to carry weapons into the public. Why can’t we all be aforded that same protection?

Posted by: Eric | April 17, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

I want to respond to this Albert Kohel.You call people like me, who believes in the ownership of guns, and SELF PROTECTION, “Rambo types”. I have a question. Has any one ever broke into your house in the middle of the night? Someone did break into my house. Luckily, I own guns. I lived to talk about it. Oh, and by the way , I am not a Rambo type.

Posted by: Robert | April 17, 2007, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

What does it matter what kind of gun this young man used? He used a gun. Why do they even care where he got the gun… you should be asking Why didn’t the school have a lock down on the first shooting.. “They assumed that the shooter left”. Well as you can see the police and the school were NOT prepared at all. Everyone in a community should work together so everyone knows what to do in a situation like this. If the police and the school were not lazy and just assumed everything was going to be fine after the first shooting maybe lives would have been saved.

Posted by: Alicia | April 17, 2007, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

this guy signed his note ismail ax. ismail is another name for eshmael the father of the arabs. ax is what ibrahim (abraham) used to destroy the idol’s his father had made. look it up !

Posted by: gary | April 17, 2007, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

I have nothing but sorrow for the families who have lost their children. And I have sorrow for the murderer, who was obviously so distorted early in childhood– likely through molestation and abuse– and who clearly had no religion to help remediate his homicidal impulses. He was tortured, and he wanted to share this torture with the world, with the innocent people who couldn’t otherwise relate to him.
Now, however, there will be the knee-jerk response by many Americans. People never seem to realize that knee-jerk responses to take action only further limit freedoms, and do nothing to solve the real problems. Now there will be a strong push to outlaw handguns, but little done to prevent children from turning into murderous monsters. That problem would be too hard to solve… Easier to just ban guns and hope for the best. There was notorious bloodshed before guns were ever invented. If not for guns, this man would have used a bomb or some other means to do his work. Don’t people understand that? Gun laws would do nothing to stop a man with intense murderous ambitions. If a capable, armed person had been in one of those classrooms they would have killed him, and the death toll would have perhaps been much less so.

Posted by: Gregory | April 17, 2007, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

I think that with this situation everyone needs to stop accusing people. THe fact of the matter is; many people were killed and wounded. We need to come together and make a change in our world.

Posted by: Selena | April 17, 2007, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

guns dont kill people, people kill people. Same goes for knives, swords, shovels, ice picks and long drops off high places. People kill people. If some one wants to kill someone bad enough and there is no gun available they will find a way. Period. The big question is why is america a killing field? What is the matter? Does anyone else see the thin layer of name brands and t.v. we are trying to pass as culture? We have to find a better identity beyond diet fabs and medicine commercials to ground us as a community. no wonder we are unhappy when your worth is your money and material possesions and your looks. Spirituality does not have to come from an organized religion, a proper name for a higher power or that we all even agree on the subject, spirituality comes from within. When you are at peace with yourself you can recognize trouble in another. It is a domino effect, stop being so concerned with others and start with yourself. Inner peace can be contagious. Reach out. Its noones fault what happened but if we were a more cohesive nation body, mind and soul it would be more difficult for some one to become like this. seems it is way too easy to get this disturbed in america. Don’t blame Bush, remember Nuremberg???????

Posted by: Anonymous | April 17, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Every school shooting has had a prescribed anti-depressant involved with the murderer. Research online to see the tens of thousands of lawsuits involving suicide/homicide results from taking (prescribed) anti-depressants. This is NOT a gun issue, this is a mind altering DRUG issue!!! Suicide/homicide behavior is a major side effect of these DRUGS!! If not guns, these anti-depressant drug users will find knives, autos, chemicals, etc. to manifest their psychotic thoughts which are the result of their anti-depressant use!!

Posted by: Beti Ann | April 17, 2007, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

so funny. i didnt think americans r this pathetic. no insights or thoughtful comments whatsoever, expect maybe one. seriously do you americans know anything about philosophy or psychoanalysis? you r just puppets on strings that the media pulls.

Posted by: NiN | April 17, 2007, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

The PERSON who committed this CRIMINAL (“against the law”) act violated LAWS – bringing the gun on campus, multiple murders, etc.
More LAWS would not have helped.
European Countries, Australia, Canada, Japan, Washington D.C., New York City, Chicago all have strict gun control and bans – all experience high “per capita” gun crime rates (use google and do some research)
States that have allowed concealed carry have seen gun crime rates significantly reduced – that is why 48 states have some form of concealed carry.
I and my wife own multiple guns – why? We shoot in competitions (“sport”) for handguns, rifles, shotguns – We also hunt multiple species of game animals around the U.S. – we also train people to safely use and handle firearms so that hunting and competitive shooting does not fade away. I know thousands of gun owners and none have ever committed a crime.
My wife and I also will never have to wait for a police officer to show up to protect ourselves – as there will always be crazy people and criminals (“people who break/disobey/ignore LAWS”) you should always be ready and able to protect yourself and your loved ones. Why would you ever snivel about gun control laws when it is not any government’s or law enforcement’s responsibility to protect YOU – it is YOUR responsibility – wake up!

Posted by: tholmes | April 17, 2007, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

who care’s if the media got the 22s mixed up. The point is it was and still is a horrible thing that took place. May god bless everyone that was lost and all there loved one’s.

Posted by: marcel | April 17, 2007, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Ban Guns?? What about Oklahoma City? Timothy McVeigh killed 170+ people and we still haven’t banned Ryder Trucks!

Posted by: JR | April 17, 2007, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Yes, politicians enjoy an increased level of gun control in their vicinity. You’ll note that didn’t stop someone from shooting Ronald Reagan. It also didn’t keep people from shooting at the White House during both Clinton and GWB’s terms. Which is why the politicians last line of defense is a bunch of guys with guns. Until such time as its practical to provide ever American citizen with their own Secret Service security detail, we’ll just have to make do with concealed carry licenses.
Incidentally, when Francisco Martin Duran fired 27 rounds at the White House, private citizens took him down before the Secret Service could.

Posted by: Keith | April 17, 2007, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

I feel that we are doing a great injustice to the victims by spending so much money and effort to try and knock gun control, or to blame everyone else for what has happened. The problem is and always has been the simplest of problems. It isn’t making more gun laws, we have thousands of them already, that is going to take care of this problem. The problem is that we have always classified each other into these little groups that should fit so well and everyone should stay within the group that society sets for us. There is only one group and it is the Human race, deal with it. We need to start realizing things for what they are and stop blaming everything that actually has no bearing what so ever on these events. Who cares what size the gun was or what laws could have been put into play to stop this. Wake up people we aren’t going to stop anyone from being mad and angry at everything. That is just our reality, so go home hug your family and be glad for the time you do have left. My condolences to the families of the victims.

Posted by: Jer | April 17, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

How could this happen? Isn’t there a law that prohibits murder? Isn’t it illegal to carry a firearm on Virginia campuses? Well…I guess passing laws doesn’t work all that well. What about police? Don’t they protect us? How about facing reality? Predators don’t follow the laws. Police get there after the crime. The notion that restrictive gun laws make us safe is inane. Being defenseless makes us vulnerable. There has always been crime and there always will be. So, let’s make crime a riskier business for the predators.

Posted by: DD | April 17, 2007, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

I would suggest to the gun enthusiasts that by any name this weapon couldn’t have been deadlier if it had fired lead the size of a breadbox. The point being made is that the NRA is responsible for the weak nature of U.S. gun laws. You don’t need to be fondling a pistol or know anything about the metric system to weigh in on this. Thirty-two innocent lives were taken; I doubt their last thoughts were on the need to protect the Second Amendment.

Posted by: Tom | April 17, 2007, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

If you think England and Japan are compelling arguments for gun control, then you should consider Switzerland an even more compelling argument against it. The Swiss have an assault rifle in every home and a lower gun crime rate than either England or Japan.

Posted by: Keith | April 17, 2007, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

this is one of the saddest thing to happen in the whole world because i am in college too and when i saw what happen i just cried all day . i want to tell the vt the all of those that who lost their lives that you are in our mind. New york feels your pain. may gold bless you.

Posted by: Sophia | April 17, 2007, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

I agree with the folks who believe if the other students or teachers had a concealed weapons permit and were carrying lives MAY have been saved. For you folks out there who think passing laws or banning guns would fix the problem just Google “Homemade handgun”. An automatic weapon can be made with supplies from your local Home Depot! People in VA with concealed weapons permits are forbidden by law to carry on school property. Rembember the guy last year in Utah that shot five people in a mall? You probably don’t. He had lots of ammo and planned to kill lots more people. Got shot (and killed) by an armed off-duty cop. Admit it, there is EVIL in the world. Holding hands and singing KUM BA YA and keeping honest folks from owning guns won’t stop EVIL people from committing EVIL deeds. Well armed responsible citizens will!
Democracy-Two wolves and a lamb voting for what to have for lunch. Freedom-A well armed lamb contesting the vote!
Our prayers are with the families. We are sorry for your loss. Peace!

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2007, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

If he was okay with committing 32 counts of capital murder, do you think he cares VT is a “gun-free campus?” The blood of these students is on the administration’s hands who did nothing to warn them of a killer, and stripped them of their right to carry guns. They left them defenseless sitting ducks. The 50+ police officers did absolutely nothing as everyone was dead including the gunman before the first officer even went inside the building.
A gun in hand is worth two police and two prayers in the bush.

Posted by: john | April 17, 2007, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

I think that the bigger issue to be addressed is the fact the Creative Writing professor saw something that disturber her in the unhinged mans writing and brought it to the attention of the authorities and nothing was done about it. There were signs of antisocial personality disorder and there was no mandatory counseling, even though his writings were alarming. Counseling was recommended, but that is the last kind of person who would seek help voluntarily.
The other issue is the slow response of the University to the first shootings. Assumption is the mother of all Charlie Foxes, and the police assumed that the gunman had left campus? If that kind of thing had happened in any small to midsize community, there would have been a bulletin about an at large armed and dangerous suspect.

Posted by: James | April 17, 2007, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

I don’t understand how people keep confusing .22 Caliber and 22mm. 22mm doesn’t exist, that would be almost 1 inch in diameter, a size appropriate for a Cannon, certainly not a handgun. .22 Caliber does exist, which is .22 inches, which is what one of the guns used was.

Posted by: Zach | April 17, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

On each and every day 43 people are killed by impaired drivers on roads in the United States. It may be at the hands of a number of people, but the effects are compounded on a daily basis.
I am of the opinion that a legally carried firearm may have allowed this situation to be brought to a sad conclusion sooner, but I do understand that the chances of that are limited even under the best of circumstances. The victims still deserved that chance. The shooter had to be stopped, and fast.
“Be Good All Day”
Paul

Posted by: Paul | April 17, 2007, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

this is a sad for the school and the united states

Posted by: raymond | April 17, 2007, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Today, two highly trained US Secret Service agents were wounded at the White House when a service weapon accidentally fired. Now imagine a college campus with pistols in every 100th pocket.
I have a concealed carry permit in Virginia and I never carry. It’s too much trouble. Can’t carry it into a house of worship. Can’t carry it into the post office. Can’t carry it into a restaurant that serves alcohol. Don’t want to leave it behind anywhere, either, except locked in a safe at home. They are messy, stinky, oily and bulky. The liability is enormous. You can’t legally use it to stop crime (even in your own house) except in the case of violent crime against yourself or a family member (as opposed to a thief in your dining room silver). If you shoot at a bad guy and hit an innocent bystander, it’s a serious crime.
Notice in the articles about the gun seller that he claims he’s sold so many guns, and only six have been used in murders or suicides. What he obviously leaves out is what the gun lobby always yacks about – how many people their guns have saved. I don’t see him bragging about that, because it probably hasn’t happened.
I have taken the firearms course in Virginia and I firmly believe that if anyone wants to own a gun, they should be required by law to pass a firearms safety and legal responsibilities course.
If you are a gun owner who has not taken one of these legitimate classes, then you have no basis upon which to disagree. I know what it is like to be an ignorant gun owner, and also a slightly educated gun owner. And I can tell you from experience, a slightly educated gun owner is much better, because we’re the ones who leave our guns at home in the safe. Where they belong.

Posted by: Earl | April 17, 2007, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Do you not see the gun seller talking about how many lives have been saved by guns he sold because he didn’t bring it up or because the people writing the articles decided not to include that information?

Posted by: Keith | April 17, 2007, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

What would George Washington or Thomas Jefferson have to say about the matter….
“Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence. From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events occurrences and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable. The very atmosphere of firearms
everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that’s good.”
– George Washington, Commanding General of the Continental Army, Father of Our Country and First President of the United States in a speech to Congress, January 7, 1790
“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government.” — Thomas Jefferson, Author of The Declaration of Independence, and President of the United States

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2007, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

The media attention devoted to this crime has become excessive. Yes, it’s a tragedy, but turning it into an iconic event only glorifies the violence. Others will see it and say “I want that.” We should be very wary of our curiosity, this pressing desire to know every detail of the crime. It only feeds the beast, as it is undeniable that media attention has become a significant lure in provoking individuals to commit this type of action. Likewise, the implication that we have all somehow been injured by this action is irresponsible, as it too only elevates the violence to a status that will encourage more.

Posted by: Erik | April 17, 2007, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

Funny….So if we weren’t in Iraq we would have a perfect society here? Whomever posted the correlation between Iraq, and a crazy young man at VT is silly.

Posted by: Angel33 | April 17, 2007, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Don’t be stupid – if you do a quick search on the internet, you will find that a .22 caliber handgun does exist.

Posted by: Sally | April 17, 2007, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Ok Al,
So we get it all wrong when we compare crime rates between countries. Fair enough.
Let’s instead compare crime rates across states in the US. And be sure to pay particular attention to the historical trends that resulted as states began passing “Shall Issue” carry permit laws that made it easier for law abiding citizens to get permits to carry concealed weapons.
And, be sure to include the drastic drop in crime that resulted in Florida when they passed such laws in retaliation for the out of control crime rate that the gangs were committing. After the criminals could reasonably expect any given citizen of Florida to be carrying a handgun, they targeted the tourists instead. Remember when all the rental car companies started removing the rental stickers there? That’s why. Because the tourists were relatively certain not to be carrying a handgun to protect themselves.
And every state that has followed Florida’s lead has seen a sudden and dramatic drop in crime. As someone earlier mentioned, the police come to the scene of a crime after the fact. The primary person with any hope of preventing or lessening a crime is the victim. Second in line would be the chance law abiding citizen with a legal handgun in the vicinity of the crime as it was being committed.

Posted by: Ken | April 17, 2007, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

A .22 is not the same thing as a 22mm. .22s exist but 22mms do not.

Posted by: Keith | April 17, 2007, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

What Chu says about open carry in a restaurant is correct. It just may not be a good idea. For a quick rundown on Virginia laws, see http://www.packing.org. The site goes down frequently, however.

Posted by: Kang | April 17, 2007, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Get your facts straight – per yahoo.com news:
“One law enforcement official said Cho’s backpack contained a receipt for a March purchase of a Glock 9 mm pistol. Cho held a green card, meaning he was a legal, permanent resident. That meant he was eligible to buy a handgun unless he had been convicted of a felony. “

Posted by: Sally | April 17, 2007, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

The unit of calibre measurement in our country is the millimetre, but in Britain, the unit is the inch,” he said. “So the calibre of 0.22 is not 22mm but 0.22-inch which equals only 5.6mm.

Posted by: Juicey | April 17, 2007, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

The unit of calibre measurement in our country is the millimetre, but in Britain, the unit is the inch,” he said. “So the calibre of 0.22 is not 22mm but 0.22-inch which equals only 5.6mm.

Posted by: Juicey | April 17, 2007, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

just think, had any of those students had the right to carry a firearm, this crazy would have been stopped earlier with a much lower death count.
but, no guns are allowed on campus, therefore, only renta-cops and crazies are carrying. And look at the result.

Posted by: David | April 17, 2007, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Another Founding Father’s comments and signer of the Declaration of Independence…
That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms… — Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at 86-87 (Pierce & Hale, eds., Boston, 1850).

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2007, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Is there any similarities between the Guns& Roses song Mr Brownstone and his play Mr Brownstone?

Posted by: tim | April 17, 2007, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

The “bias” in the media now is overwhelmingly toward conservatives–conservative corporations have bought the media in the last several years. Conservatives whining about media “bias” show how completely they are living in a fantasy of their own making.

Posted by: kc | April 17, 2007, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

The “bias” in the media now is overwhelmingly toward conservatives–conservative corporations have bought the media in the last several years. Conservatives whining about media “bias” show how completely they are living in a fantasy of their own making.

Posted by: kc | April 17, 2007, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Great to see a bunch of Americans bashing Bush. Yes, use him for all of the problems the US faces. Good answer. Can’t anyone come up with a better scapegoat than Bush. If you are so displeased with living in the States, try moving to Canada where they hate all Americans. You ALL would fit right in.

Posted by: Tom | April 17, 2007, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

An armed society is a polite society.

Posted by: Charlie | April 17, 2007, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

hours behind the computer screen. Laboring painstkingly over a masterpiece no one will ever read because in this day and age social interaction has been replaced with electronic entertainment and other hollow shadows of joy. I blame this alienating, lonely culture we live in. Sure it isn’t that way for everyone, but there are a lot of lonely people out there. Some people learn to cope. Many people become alcoholics. It has been this way for quite some time, but it has gotten very much worse in the past 20 years. Look at all the commercials for anti-depressants. Any doctor who has been working a while can tell you more people are taking these than ever before. Especially young people. Stop telling us life is fucking beuatiful and free when you expect us to throw ourselves out into the world and sell our souls into lonely ass wage slavery so we can keep up with the Jonses…only we find it is impossible to keep up with the Jonses because the Jonses have an insider friend. The elite. Stop classism. Stop the mechanization of entertainment and everything. Stop the alienation. It’s 1984 people. That said….My prayers do go out to those poor people who were killed. Jesus, why didn’t someone tackle a bitch

Posted by: Marlon | April 18, 2007, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Questions:
Does anyone have a problem with police officers carrying guns on campuses? I didn’t think so.
So why can’t people who have carry/conceal permits carry guns on campuses?
Why do police officers need to have guns anyway?
Self protection? Why is it OK for a police officer to have a gun for self protection, but it’s not OK for civilians to have guns for self protection?
I know, I know, someone will say “training”. My friend, who is a police officer, thinks that’s funny.
Suppose we offer the same level of weapons traing to civilians that we give to police officers, can those civilians now carry weapons where policy officers carry weapons?
Sign me up for that course.

Posted by: Robert L. Barney | April 18, 2007, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Amen Robert L. Barney! Sign me up too!

Posted by: Mike | April 18, 2007, 12:41 am 12:41 am

I am so tired of hearing all the bs about Guns, Gun control etc…
First let me say to any family or friends who might be reading, My heart, my love, my prayers go out to you I have no Idea how much pain you are in as I have lost my father to a tragic death and no one could know how I felt. I don’t advise you to read these points of views as it is not time for that it is time for you to be healing. However if it helps or you feel the same as I do then Its not my right to tell you not to. As I said I can not know how you feel or what would help.
That being said on to my P.O.I
1) If one of the teachers or students had a gun on them they could have stopped this crazy SOB, as it is legal to own and cary a gun but It is illegal to do so on School grounds but Crooks and Psycho’s don’t follow the laws…. which puts Us Law Abiding Americans at risk and in this case at risk against a Foreigner which was another reason for the Amendment.
2) As I said above crooks don’t follow the laws they have no care for them in the first place, so all this stuff about gun control and how long, what type of gun, or any other bs only applies to law Abiding citizens as everyone else doesn’t follow the rules thus again it puts us law Abiding citizens at risk. More laws and rules more people who follow the letter of the law will be harmed by Crooks and Psycho’s.
Yes Cho followed the Law but that goes to show you that even a psycho who has a plan to harm people will wait any amount of time to accomplish this. And will use any means necessary to do it, He was a Psycho who planned this out methodical cruelness and he could have as easy made bombs and be glad he didn’t. So stop blaming guns! Actually if he wasn’t such a loner he could have found a gun much faster I’m sure. But these rules and laws don’t help us. Why isn’t their many Laws preventing any Foreigner from purchasing a gun and covering all areas of this matter? The law was written for US Citizens and all these stupid laws that end up harming us, have missed a Crucial point and now allowed a Foreign (Korean Citizen here on school visa)a Psycho Killer to buy a gun and of course he didn’t follow the rules and he had not 1 but 2 guns on School grounds! and committed mass murder so horrific this is world news.
When If just 1 of the Teachers or just 1 Student (I wont say kids because they are not they are gown adults lets not forget this!) if 1 had been armed they could have potentially stopped this and if everyone was armed or even just the teachers I guarantee he would not have done this and if he was indeed stupid enough the teachers who put their life at risk could have stopped him at the first sight of a gun! An been alive to talk about it! Instead these laws or lack of proper laws have harmed and killed not only the students but the Teachers who gave their life for their students! And one of which survived the worst Massacre ever… Don’t you think this man should have had the right to defend his students with a gun and stop this psycho instead of having to give his life to do so!!
So all you gun control people Stop harming us! Start helping to Protect us from Psychos and Crooks who Don’t follow these laws you force Law Abiding US Citizens to follow!
ALSO SOMEONE THIS CRAZY AND METHODICAL DOES NOT NEED A GUN TO HARM PEOPLE HE OBVIOUSLY WAS INTO BOMBS BE GLAD HE DID NOT USE BOMBS! So stop blaming guns! Crazy people will find a way and preventing The law Abiding citizens from Protecting our selves only let these Psychos do more harm! Instead they should have locked this Crazy, Murdering Stalker up Before hand! he set a fire, He stalked girls, he wrote disturbing papers which were flagged? why wasn’t something done? why isn’t their laws helping teachers with this? nooo lets blame guns its easier!
Second rant:
Im sick of hearing about “High cap Mags” or “serious Guns” These were a Glock 9mm 15 rounds not Hi-Cap if it was it would have stuck out the hand grip and allowed for 17-25 rounds. Second the next gun was a 22.cal not a 22mm as reported (which btw is what #1/2 was saying he wasn’t wrong he was correcting news) and the only 22. that I know of that has a Hi-cap mag is no longer made. So he did not have Hi-Cap or “serious” Guns he had 1) a Glock which is used by most law enforcement because of its safety of use 2) a 22. cal which is a few steps above a bb gun in fact there is a 22. cal bb gun. They can kill but 90% of the time they just harm people. But that’s not the point anything can kill but they are making it sound like these are AK or m4, m16, ar15 tec-9 style guns and they are not those listed are all assault weapons the guns used in this horrific crime were not.
and again I want to say to any family or friends who may read this my heart goes out to you, My love and prayers go out to you, I know how much pain it is to loose a close family member to a tragic passing. I hope in time your hearts will mend. This was a horrific assault on your children, husbands, wives, sisters, brothers and I am sorry that this psycho who had no knowledge of the people he murdered or the pain he was causing the family and friends. I wish he was able to feel your pain and I hope he is, I do wish he was alive so that you could either do what you needed to so that your healing process could begin. But this sad excuse for a person was not only a murder, a psycho, a loner he was also a coward who harmed THOUSANDS to Millions of people and couldn’t face his punishment. To those who are glad he is dead I’m glad you can find some healing in that knowledge. I am so so sorry for your loss for your pain for this horrific act that has harmed so many may god bless you, watch over you and help you through this extremely sad time.

Posted by: Sorrow | April 18, 2007, 1:00 am 1:00 am

The tragedy at Va-Tech is symptomatic of a larger disease in this country… and the on-going gun control debate on this site in the aftermath of the tragedy is disturbing…
The problem in the US is that the extremists seem to be in control of everything… and the majority of us who are somewhere in the middle get used and abused by those people who are at the extremes…
The right-wing gun lobby wants NO restrictions on their God-given right to bear arms… the left-wing wants us to emulate Britain and ban all guns. And the truth is that neither of these camps have credibility with the 80% of us who inhabit the ‘middle ground’ of the political landscape…
Ditto the left-wingers who proclaim that the right to free speech provides license to any and all speech — despite the Supreme Court’s insistence that speech should fit within the mores of the society in which it is made… on the other end of the spectrum, the right-wing wants to be able to frame the discussion and maintain veto power over speech… and again, neither extreme has credibility in the middle
The fact of the matter is that MONEY prevails in the Good-’ol-U-S-of-A in the 21st century… if you have the most money and the best Washington lobbyists then your position will carry the day… because our political system has made our politicians a bunch of political whores seeking the almighty dollar for the next re-election campaign.
Right and wrong is seldom part of the discussion in Washington…
The Constitution needs ot be a living, breathing document that evolves to address the issues of concern at any point in time in history… our Founding Fathers never foresaw movies like “Hostel”, video games where it is ‘a game’ to kill cops (or ANYONE, for that matter), the proliferation of pornographic websites, automatic weapons, WMD, or any similar blight that is killing our society.
I reside in the center politically…
I believe that movies like “Hostel” and “Saw” and that entire genre should be eliminated…
I believe the extensive availability of sexually explicit material should be severely curtailed…
I believe video games that are violent should be destroyed — IMO, anything that connects violence with the concepts of “fun” and “game” is poisonous to our youth…
I believe people should be allowed to own a handgun and a rifle… maybe even a semi-automatic handgun… I dont think our Fore Fathers had the intention of allowing for the type of weapons that plague our society… I think they are rolling in their grave today that we are having this debate at all in this country…
especially today…
I reside in the center of the political dialogue in this country, and I am proud to be there… those of you with your agendas who are spouting your partisan diatribes pr asserting your personal agendas today should be asjamed of yourselves…
IMO, YOU are all part of the problem that led to yesterday’s tragedy… because you have restricted the dialogue in this country to exist as angry debate at the extremes… thus, most people in the middle are exhausted by the debate — because it cannot be a profitable discussion it must be an angry, partisan, personal attack…
…and because “the middle” has become exhausted by this angry debate, and because they have turned a deaf ear to all of you who are creating the problem, then no one is actively engaged in the middle… that ground has been ceded to the lobbyists — who have made money the most important part of the equation
The decision-making process is about dollars, not about right and wrong…
Thus we have “Saw”… and “Doom”… and uzis…
and the young people in this country have become de-sensitized to gore… and pain… and death… and mass-murder…
…and tragedy.
A pox upon all of our houses…

Posted by: Jeffrey | April 18, 2007, 1:50 am 1:50 am

This has nothing to do with the gun.
It has everything to do with the mentality of those that surround this kid. No one tried to help him. He has given off many warning signs for a long time. Everyone thought of him as a loner, troubled kid, who wrote killing stories.
Who tried to help?
He just as easily couldve stolen a gun or slashed peoples throats.
The method of destruction is not to be blamed. He couldve done anything he wanted to kill anyone.
He had specific targets in mind, he carried through a plan that he had prepared for quite a long time, and he let out clues screaming help me along the way.
If “the rich kids” werent too wrapped up in themselves and their popular group to ignore this troubled child then hell they may have given a damn and saved their own lives.
It only takes extending your hand a kind words to save lives.
Instead they wanted to save face in front of friends.
Good grief.
God bless everyone.

Posted by: Tim | April 18, 2007, 1:52 am 1:52 am

First, if the teachers and students were armed, what makes you think they would do any more good than the hordes of armed police hiding behind things outside the building? Few people are brave enough to engage in armed combat at close range, not even cops.
Second, this guy was a nut. So there wasn’t much anyone could do once he had a gun in his hands.
Third, you have to be somewhat clever to put together a bomb, but even a nut can walk into a gun store and plunk down his cash.
Fourth, even trained professionals kill the wrong people by accident or overreact and shoot when they shouldn’t. I don’t think I want a bunch of average untrained Joes dealing out frontier justice.
Fifth, the reason this kid was messed up was probably TOO MUCH discipline. If he was a career car thief, you could argue “too little discipline”. Some people are born unhinged, but most become that way from being treated harshly as children. My guess is this was an abused kid.
I don’t think gun ownership should be banned, but there needs to be a way to weed out the mentally ill. Maybe a background check and a psychiatric evaluation?

Posted by: solomon | April 18, 2007, 3:33 am 3:33 am

Everyone overlooks the always present aspect of these killings. Whether shotting, drowning ones children etc. Mind altering anti depresants. Suicidal ideation is connected to all the manufacterer of effexor just added homicidal ideation. Whwn did he start meds before or after gun purchase. my mother had thoughts of starting our house on fire, he tried in his dorm. she warned me four times dont sleep i love you but want to kill you. an 86 year old woman coming off lexapro. She told her sister she wants to choke her and had thoughts of killing herself. I ran into a woman who was in the metal unit with my mom her daughter told me she wanted to choke her grandaughter til meds. where change. They alter your brain chemistery and when they get a back fire deny everytyhing. effexor had homicidal ideation added to side effects. These drugs all act the same on the brain. to much money fltting aroud in washington and wall street and the public has to suffer in silence.

Posted by: sarge115b | April 18, 2007, 4:58 am 4:58 am

The death of 32 people is a small price to pay for the joy we all get from being able to play with guns. This is a great country!

Posted by: Rich | April 18, 2007, 5:01 am 5:01 am

I am a teacher and arming a teacher for the unlikely event of defending my class from a school shooter is not the answer. What about the other 179 days of the year a teacher carrying a loaded gun in class and all the possible accidents that may happen? Then people will be clamoring over a loaded gun being in school. The statistics are overwhelming — more guns, more accidental or passion-ignited deaths. (I would not trust myself or a colleague with a loaded gun on a Friday afternoon with a wild class–too tempting to use it as a classroom management technique!) The possible accidents are not worth the “protection” from an unlikely event.

Posted by: Shannon | April 18, 2007, 6:03 am 6:03 am

I’m sorry for those who lost their relatives…
Here in Russia where I live firearms is TOTALLY restricted.
And I don’t know if it’s good or bad…
But look, if some desperate (- how it may seems to himself) would decide to revenge somebody for an insult, last thing he’d ever think about here in Russia is to have a gun for it!
1) Do you realize how hard is to get a handgun here for ordinary man?
You can’t just buy it in a store by brandishing out there with your passport.
So if you’d need a gun you’d realize that it may take a year just to find seller cause it totally illegal here. You can’t just post it in billboard “need a gun, call #”.
Now, I personally don’t know anybody who’d have a gun, so where would you go?
2) Ok, let’s say after 8 moths of hard seeking you finally find a dealer, didn’t change your mind yet and somehow GET NOT CAUGHT, cause asking around for gun is very suspicious in itself.
But black market is a luxury you can’t always afford. How much 9mm Glock is? Have no idea…
Let’s say $2000 so on black market it will be $6000 cause it’s a very danger business, they can get in prison anytime. It’s a lot of money! Got nothing to lose, so you sold everything and got the money?
3) Then how can you be sure you’ll get the gun after all? They will never even show you wares till you bring the money, right? But when you satisfy them what will stop them to take your money and keep the gun. Suit them! Don’t you understand it takes you mafia backup at least?
I doubt they‘ll let you go just like that. Promise them more money… why should they believe you?
4) Presume you were SO persistent, lucky, rich and non-policeman-looking guy, who had a local childhood friends which became a criminals now and can avouch for you and you finally got the gun, still alive and free. Are we still talking about an “ordinary man”? (Even an “Tech student”, “English major”?)
Don’t you see it makes gun the last thing he’d ever dream about to get!
And how then even SCHOOLBOYS will ever get it? (- I do realize the guy wasn’t schoolboy, I talking about other situations now.)
I’m 31yo and never seen any handgun but policeman’s and in museum. I’m interesting in any firearms and often reed about it in internet, magazines and books. (Military developments were always the mover of science and engineering.) However I haven’t hold firearm in my hand yet, I personally just don’t know anybody who’d own it legally or illegally nor heard fire shoots in real live. I live in 6000000p. city now, lived in Moscow (which is 12mln) for some time and other cities here in Russia. I can watch some fire shooting there on tv almost every week, but it always criminals or terrorists – not a common people.
Of course if smbody wants to kill – he will kill – lack of firearms won’t stop him.
But without this perfect special-designed for fast ’n easy killing device (especially easy-to-hide handgun) he would never kill so many… (If all sewing-machines will be outlawed of course we’ll continue to sew but output will be different).
He’d use a knife probably and would kill one, max two, but third guy could stop him putting a chair or laptop on his head for example. If I would there standing face to face with murderer in locked lecture-room I’d prefer he would have any weapon but gun – knife, sword, chainsaw, anything but gun please. If it’s a gun, then I’m dead.
With all respect and sorrow, ak

Posted by: ak | April 18, 2007, 7:01 am 7:01 am

I think it is so strange that people in the US seem to think it is some kind of achievement that with the control laws it is only possible for an individual to buy 1 gun in a 30 day period. ARE YOU JOKING WITH THIS???? This is not an achievement, it’s complete madness and totally bizarre that some people believe that this can be considered ‘control’. The US reality is bizarre to, at least, most of the rest of the World. Why on earth would the vast majority of people be allowed to have a gun, let alone numerous guns.
I seriously don’t understand your gun culture. I know that you will talk about your right to carry guns……. but this really doesn’t make sense to the rest of the World….. no matter how you want to argue it.
There is fundamentaly something wrong and I sincerely hope that you will manage to find a solution so that you can all live more safely. It is the very least you deserve.
My heart goes out to those who have suffered during this most recent shooting and those of the past. I hope that the US or any other country doesn’t have to go through this again.

Posted by: Jilly | April 18, 2007, 7:08 am 7:08 am

A Small Town in KY hates to hear the News from V-Tech! Our Hearts are with you!
Do we Lock our doors that have been open for years, Yes!
Do we say NO! We need to kick some Butt and Pray for our Children! They are our only Future!
GOD BLESS VA TECH!
Jeff/KY

Posted by: Jeffrey M. Cole | April 18, 2007, 7:21 am 7:21 am

Gun Control is not an Issue, There is nothing in his background that would have prohibited him from purchasing a Handgun. Every state would have allowed him to purchase a handgun. The fact is that he was of a criminal intent. Because criminal intent is not found .. you think that law abiding citizens shouldn’t be allowed to purchase hand guns either? Using that same mentality, then we better outlaw alcohol to stop drunk driving accidents, let us not forget to outlaw automobiles, for the auto accidents and the deaths they can cause. Currently drugs are illegal, yet almost daily drugs are in the news, drugs have caused more deaths then the occasional human that has snapped, that gets a hold of a gun and kills. If guns were not available the snapped person would find something else a bomb perhaps. It’s time to look for the answer where the problem lies. That is in human nature, perhaps the education system that pushes the students so hard to excel it forgets they are human. We have film of cop(we give cops a license to carry a loaded weapon) beat a defenseless bartender over a drink of alcohol… so the problem is the gun?? no it’s the alcohol, but you don’t have the slanted news trying influence to ban alcohol, you don’t give immense press time to those that want to ban alcohol, the press trys to control the american public by reporting the news extremely slanted.

Posted by: J. Rietman | April 18, 2007, 7:44 am 7:44 am

HE GOT A GUN! That is ALL!

Posted by: Jeffrey M. Cole | April 18, 2007, 7:56 am 7:56 am

Jeffrey M. Cole had it right..Go re-read his post. The problem here is not him purchasing a gun, the problem here has nothing to do with the problems over in Iraq. The problem is this dude was crazy and decided it was ok to run a rampage through a school.

Posted by: sam | April 18, 2007, 8:22 am 8:22 am

“Using that same mentality, then we better outlaw alcohol to stop drunk driving accidents, let us not forget to outlaw automobiles, for the auto accidents and the deaths they can cause.”
This analogy is as erroneous as it is prolific. It is very hard for a drunk man in a car to inflict the same level of damage as a crazy man with a few guns. Guns are designed for the purpose of killing animals and people. As such, they are much more effective than cars and alcohol. Reason must be used in the creation of law. Despite the many deaths caused by automobiles, their benefit to the average citizen is obvious. What is the benefit of unrestricted gun access to the American citizen? That it fulfills a right as sworn in the constitution? Is this as important as the welfare of America’s young students? If the law isn’t serving the best interests of the people, it should be changed. There’s too much money in guns though, so that’s unlikely to happen. Greed will likely win out.

Posted by: Douglas | April 18, 2007, 8:25 am 8:25 am

Don’t have to outlaw cars to keep drunk drivers from killing people. Just have to outlaw alcohol. That will put an end to drunk drivers, alcoholism, and a host of other alcohol related social ills and its not like alcohol serves any purpose other than getting people drunk. Oh wait, we tried outlawing alcohol. Somehow people still managed to get the stuff. We’ve also outlawed drugs but somehow people still get their crack. But if we outlaw guns that will be different. Yeah, right.

Posted by: Keith | April 18, 2007, 8:35 am 8:35 am

OK, folks. This has nothing to do with gun control–he may very well have had a perfect background check when he bought the first gun, i.e. this could be the first offense. What our country needs to focus on is actually teaching our kids how to be healthy adults and how to be angry without shooting 32 people over it. But maybe we need to focus on figuring out what makes these kids so darned angry–There are a lot of angry kids out there; most of them don’t kill anyone, but the anger’s there. Why don’t we spend our energy finding out why rather than wasting it over the gun control agenda?

Posted by: Trish | April 18, 2007, 8:40 am 8:40 am

“The very atmosphere of firearms
everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that’s good.”
Great – then let’s make it lawful for people to carry the very same weapons refered to here (that would be flintlock pistols and rifles).
As much as i respect The Founding Fathers i find it hard to see how they – despite their wisdom – could be able to anticipate a situation where 1 person could carry a weapon capable of killing a dozens of people within minutes…….
The shooter was a US. Citizen who just chose an act of evil – regretfully he had easy access to modern firearms – but if he had been restricted to buy at the black market he might have been arrested earlier in the process, buying the weapons, clips or ammunition – or to use eg. a baseball bat which i doubt would have caused 32 casualties……

Posted by: Raid | April 18, 2007, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Yeah, if he had to buy a gun on the black market he might have been arrested earlier. Of course most people who buy guns on the black market aren’t arrested for doing so so it seems a stretch that Cho would have been an exception. And its also possible that if he could only get a gun on the black market he might have decided to make some bombs using readily available materials. After all, we do know he had bombs on his mind and they would have enabled him to kill a lot more people than he did.

Posted by: Keith | April 18, 2007, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Ok Al,
So we get it all wrong when we compare crime rates between countries. Fair enough.
Let’s instead compare crime rates across states in the US. And be sure to pay particular attention to the historical trends that resulted as states began passing “Shall Issue” carry permit laws that made it easier for law abiding citizens to get permits to carry concealed weapons.
And, be sure to include the drastic drop in crime that resulted in Florida when they passed such laws in retaliation for the out of control crime rate that the gangs were committing. After the criminals could reasonably expect any given citizen of Florida to be carrying a handgun, they targeted the tourists instead. Remember when all the rental car companies started removing the rental stickers there? That’s why. Because the tourists were relatively certain not to be carrying a handgun to protect themselves.
And every state that has followed Florida’s lead has seen a sudden and dramatic drop in crime. As someone earlier mentioned, the police come to the scene of a crime after the fact. The primary person with any hope of preventing or lessening a crime is the victim. Second in line would be the chance law abiding citizen with a legal handgun in the vicinity of the crime as it was being committed.

Posted by: Ken | April 18, 2007, 9:30 am 9:30 am

On the subject of only being allowed to carry the same guns as the founding fathers had: things change.
When one of the founders was annoyed about something another had said it was legal back then for them to go out and have a duel, too.
Using your logic, if it were legal for 2 people to go out and blaze away at each other over some greivance, I rather suspect the amount of gun violence in this country would go up drastically, flintlocks or not.

Posted by: Wayne | April 18, 2007, 9:44 am 9:44 am

It is absolutely ludicrous to think for one second that some madman would observe a stupid law not allowing him to have a gun. The answer it for the citizens to be allowed to be trained and carry a firearm. An armed citizenry is the deterrent.

Posted by: Charles King | April 18, 2007, 9:48 am 9:48 am

‘If everybody carried a gun, he would have been stopped sooner’.
Maybe they should make cell phones with a .22 caliber gun built-in so everyone has one ready for action.

Posted by: Andy | April 18, 2007, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Seriously People!!! Who cares if it as a 22mm or caliber!?!?!? The point is that the killings happened. So MEN shut up already.
By the way, he WAS a legal resident of the US. He held a green card which obviously made him a legal. That is why he was able to purchase the weapons.

Posted by: Focus People | April 18, 2007, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Be warned this is going to become regular, theres nothing anyone will be able to do, as it happens more often it will enter the minds of others and they WILL act.
Death is forever and if life is unbearable and those around you enjoy it you hate it and them even more, and by killing as many as you can you’ve ruined the happiness not only of those who die but thier friends and familys and maybe just maybe everyone will UNDERSTAND why? Or at least think about things for once from the view that guess what we are NOT all the same and what works for some just doesn’t work for others.
GUNS dont kill people, people kill people. Stop making guns People still kill people
Society is blind we all watch the news and think we know whats going on sadly we dont and what he did proves it.
He was a sad, depressed individual who had probably been given grief every day of his life for not conforming for being different for not doing the done thing , and dont get me wrong he did a bad very bad thing im not sure there are words to decribe it, but he did the only thing that in his mind he could take revenge on those that belittled him.

Posted by: danny | April 18, 2007, 10:22 am 10:22 am

I think once everyone stops worrying about what type of gun it was, or how ill this individual was, or what security or vtech should have done, or BUSH and focus on the actual reality of what just happened and has been happening to our country, then our nation will begin to change and we can begin to prevent things like this from happening. Instead we remain divided on issues that don’t protect and preserve the everyday living of those within the united states! The truth of the matter is the solutions lie within the grey area, not the extreme black or white, left or right!

Posted by: realistic mind | April 18, 2007, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Be warned this is going to become regular, theres nothing anyone will be able to do, as it happens more often it will enter the minds of others and they WILL act.
Death is forever and if life is unbearable and those around you enjoy it you hate it and them even more, and by killing as many as you can you’ve ruined the happiness not only of those who die but thier friends and familys and maybe just maybe everyone will UNDERSTAND why? Or at least think about things for once from the view that guess what we are NOT all the same and what works for some just doesn’t work for others.
GUNS dont kill people, people kill people. Stop making guns People still kill people
Society is blind we all watch the news and think we know whats going on sadly we dont and what he did proves it.
He was a sad, depressed individual who had probably been given grief every day of his life for not conforming for being different for not doing the done thing , and dont get me wrong he did a bad very bad thing im not sure there are words to decribe it, but he did the only thing that in his mind he could take revenge on those that belittled him.

Posted by: danny | April 18, 2007, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Danny’s got a point (which does not become more ‘pointy’ by beeing posted twice).
People kills people – stop making guns – people still kills people.
Completely correct.
However there should be a little add-on to that:
- people still kills people – but less efficient.
And that is the whole point; the less effecient a killer is the less he will kill.
Not a single gun-advocate has answered why there is less gun-murders in eg. Scandinavia – where gun control is strict.
The rate is about 15 times as high in the US. should make people think…..

Posted by: Raid | April 18, 2007, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Youre 100% right danny.
The problem is people always want a scape goat. They dont want to admit “hey, we ignored the warning signs..”
or “Oh, shame on us, we never thought he would act out all these horrific thoughts he had”.
And when the person does, all they can do is point the finger somewhere else, and Guns are the easiest place to point them. No one wants to admit that they could’ve stopped it.. its inevitable, blame it on the guns.
Its time for people and society to take some responsibility. If he went in there with a sword he probably couldve killed just as many people if not more. You dont need to stop and reload a sword do you ?
The problem here is still the fact that this kid has had some trajic problems in life.. partially family, partially not being accepted by fellow school mates.
Gun or no gun, this kid wouldve done it regardless.
You can change the weapon but you cant change the crime.
At least a gun is a quick, semi painless death.
Imagine if he went around slicing everyone open.. yes, much more safe than a gun right?
He wrote about killing.
He wrote about angry deaths.
He hardly showed any signs of emotion.
He wrote a question mark for class sign in. That right there holy moly the guy just screamed out i need help. Am i here? I dont know. Physically yes, i made a mark. Mentally, no, thats a question.
This may not have been preventable but to blame the gun is ridiculous.
Blame the people that describe how this troubled kid was but never told of it or never tried to help him.
Those are the true failures in this case. Like I said before, it doesnt take much to make a friend and save some lifes. But everyone else was too good to help him.

Posted by: Tim | April 18, 2007, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Clamoring for gun control after this horrible murderous rampage, will not solve the issue of madness in society. A madman can easily kill with other types of weapons.
The putrid legal system does not protect society from the dangerously mentally ill, until after a horrible atrocity.
A mentally ill and dangerous person, who does not have a criminal past, will always be able to purchase guns in a free society.

Posted by: John H. | April 18, 2007, 11:57 am 11:57 am

The issue is not the law, it’s not the knee jerk reaction to say government is the answer. There WERE laws, he broke them. For me living in metropolitan New York it is easier and cheaper for me to get an illegal gun than it is for me to get a legal one. Does that mean we need more gun laws for criminals to break? Would it be better for someone to break 6 laws instead of 5 laws to get a gun? They had just recently passed a law making it against the law to bring guns on campus, he broke it. If he broke 1 law or 10 it realllly doesn’t matter, the outcome was the same.
We need to look much deeper for answers my fellow Americans. Not just for one feel good answer that will end us up right where we are today.
I put this out for conversation:
Political Correctness and the I’m OK, Your OK mind set. How did or did this not have a part in this event and formulating policy going forward?
- A) This person was identified as having raised concerns to people in authority. What was done? What is allowed to be done? What do we as a society allow to be done when people raise red flags?
- B) How do we handle the situation when I think “I’m OK, but you on the other hand, well You seem a little nuts”. Are we, you, I, allowed to say that? Should I be concerned with violating your civil rights? Or should I say Oh, were All ok, were just different?
I don’t know, what do you all think?
- C) Is political correctness used to stifle dissent and opposing voices? When we say, “Oh, you can’t say that” is it good or bad?

Posted by: Big Mama | April 18, 2007, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Yeah, without a gun Timothy McVeigh was so inefficient that he only managed to kill 168 people and injure another 800+.

Posted by: Keith | April 18, 2007, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Wow! This whole thread is so frightening. The most ignorant, obtuse individuals on the planet are advocating “everwun neeuds ta hav a gun er 2! tha’ll fixum.” And the law agrees. Sell your guns and use the money to get your teeth fixed.

Posted by: rs | April 18, 2007, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Clamoring for gun control after this horrible murderous rampage, will not solve the issue of madness in society. A madman can easily kill with other types of weapons.
The putrid legal system does not protect society from the dangerously mentally ill, until after a horrible atrocity.
A mentally ill and dangerous person, who does not have a criminal past, will always be able to purchase guns in a free society.

Posted by: John H. | April 18, 2007, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

They should have suspected something was not right when they would read his plays and stuff. They even said how violent they seemed and I mean comeon noone carries chains around for no good reason. After the first shooting they should have warned the professors and the students to becare and warn them about what had already happened.

Posted by: Keri | April 18, 2007, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Tim has some good points,except the last one, “But everyone else was too good to help him,” Not True,.. this was a tragic event that could have been stopped…
3. If VTECH security had locked down the Campus..fast, after the first shooting….and searched for Cho…
2. If students and faculty had the CHOICE…. to be armed, then Cho might have had second thoughts….
1. The Most Regrettable,…. that the NO ONE…. No One… in a position to ACT,.. chose to respond to the Faculty warnings of this tragically disturbed Student.
It’s NOT about GUNS,… It’s about the people, individual & Corporate, and the choice to intervene ,before tragedy strikes.
Beyond that, our deepest sympathy to those who lost so much,.. so tragically.

Posted by: Robert | April 18, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

“Raid” above is closest to the truth. This is not a gun or no-gun law issue, although gun laws help (see England for example.) However, our problem is FAR DEEPER than that. This is a societial problem that must be solved at its roots. Our society doesn’t do enough to UNDERSTAND and HELP its members. This poor guy developed into a murderer –wasn’t born that way. He wasn’t stupid. His IQ allowed him to get into VT and reach almost graduation. I don’t condone his acts or murder of any kind or for any reason at all. BUT I do understand how he could have been alienated and brought to this limit by a society who glorifies “being number one” and “money” as signs of success. Average guys and girls needing help and understanding to survive do NOT MATTER ENOUGH in our country. A society who accepts violence without absolute rejection (examples: bullying in school, invading other countries to maintain our dominance of the world power, etc.) should not be surprised to see this kind of consequence. The VT Massacre is just a symptom of our societal sickness; if left untreated, other Massacres will follow. Gun or no gun.

Posted by: concerned guy | April 18, 2007, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Why is it that conservatives believe the 2nd Amendment is written in stone, but the 1st and 4th Amendments, are written on toilet paper. (See USA Patriot Act)

Posted by: Kurt | April 18, 2007, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Guns exist. that will never be taken away. there would be no way to organize an event to remove them all from people. So instead of trying to shut down illegal downloading.. embrace it and work with it. (semi bad reference but works the same way) you can’t prevent psycho’s from commiting evil, unless you know its going to happen in advance. I own several guns, with no intentions of using them to harm anyone else. It is more of a hobby and target shooting. But I would not hesitate to use them in self defense as well. I own a glock 19 9 mm handgun with a capacity of 15+1 which means 15 in the clip, one in the chamber. there is no such thing as a 22 mm handgun. like the guy said above, that would be nearly a bullet that is has a 1 inch circumference (from side to side) I’m curious to know how many rounds were fired. a .45 caliber is a harder pistol to shoot multiple times quickly and stay on target, but a 9mm is fairly easy if you know what you are doing. both sizes .22 and 9mm are still very very deadly. but there is no way to control it anymore. maybe more security? it just cant be fixed.

Posted by: Chris | April 18, 2007, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

I wouldn’t be bragging about the liberal devotion to the 1st Amendment when the past year is full of examples of the exact opposite such as the liberal attacks/riots designed to silence conservative speakers at Columbia University. And Bill Clinton threw the 4th Amendment out the door when he had federal law enforcement agents illegally search the homes of Cabrini-Green residents and seize legally owned firearms in the name of gun control.

Posted by: Keith | April 18, 2007, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Keith, have you ever been to cabrini-green? I have. Trust me, the less guns found there, the safer Chicago is.

Posted by: rs | April 18, 2007, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

I want to say and will apologize to everybody for my country that a Korean student caused this shooting. Soon as I got home , I heard that an Asian male had shot 32 students and I was very shocked. The next day coming home, they unounced that the Asian male was from Korea and I nearly passed out, it was so unbelievable.. I am a student also, and I just ran to my computure and try to find all the info many as I could without thinking I had a exam tomarrow. The first thing that I saw was that he was very depressed and lonely. So he took medications which does alot of damage to the brain. It kills me when someone I know takes medication when they can take care of it with help from other people. But this I and YOU must understand, when you are from a different country and try to change everything in you mind into English, it is extremly hard and you feel lonely because you can’t get along with the other students.. I am telling you this because I have experianced this with many students and TEACHERS that were treating me like I have came from a different planet or something..as all of us were, he was lonely but could not take it through as I and all of us did, but you should see, he took medication.
So my point of writing this, is to say all of us Koreans are sorry and sorry, please you must understand us that we are suffering with this unbelievable news too.

Posted by: Sammie | April 18, 2007, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

rs, I realize that Cabrini-Green is a terrible place. The problem is that they didn’t take the guns from any bad guys. They didn’t disarm any drug dealers or the like. They disarmed law abiding citizens who had legally owned firearms and they did it in direct violation of the 4th Amendment. The raid didn’t reduce the crime rate in and around Cabrini-Green at all but it did leave people who had a legitimate concern for their own safety and that of their families with a reduced ability to protect themselves.

Posted by: Keith | April 18, 2007, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Its not about the guns… Gun dont kill people people kill people. If eveyone carried asmall gun for self defence mabe 32 people wouldn’t have died.

Posted by: Jay | April 18, 2007, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

how could someone do this..

Posted by: RH | April 19, 2007, 1:01 am 1:01 am

We have bad gun control laws, not too lax of laws. We need to enforce the ones we have, scrutinize purchases more carefully (none to psychotic temporary visitors on medication) and punish criminals with jail time so they don’t get loose on the street to kill people.
Most crimes happen by repeat offenders, not first time lunatics that kill over 30 people in schools. Don’t make gun laws based on this tragic event. Make laws for the thousands of criminals that get guns illegally after getting released from jail on parole for “good behavior”.

Posted by: Mouthpiece | April 19, 2007, 1:56 am 1:56 am

I am really impressed with the way “mike” links not having guns enough to genocides, and i hope that the time invested in it is handsomely rewarded by the gun-lobby.
However – how about this ‘fact:
In the 20th. Century the moderne handgun got widely available to people and that resulted in the genocides of 56 million people.”
Furthermore; If weapons make any places safe why are the boys in Iraq coming home in bodybags.
With the amount of guns presently in Iraq it should be the Safety Capital in the World.

Posted by: Raid | April 19, 2007, 4:54 am 4:54 am

What does it matter what sort of gun he used
he has done it now taking all those lives leaving so many families and friends with so many unanswered questions
my heart goes out to all
But why show his face all over the world why do we want to remember him after what he has done
do not give him the glory he was looking for
let us grieve for those who have lost and not for the one that caused it all
To all the families and friends i pray for you all

Posted by: Julie | April 19, 2007, 6:35 am 6:35 am

Raid, by the same token if guns have no legitimate defensive use, if their only purpose is to kill, why do we allow the police to carry them? Last I checked they aren’t empowered to act as judge, jury, and executioner so obviously they have no reason to carry guns.

Posted by: Keith | April 19, 2007, 7:13 am 7:13 am

Your right, Jay. Guns don’t kill people, people kill people….WITH GUNS! Hell, hand grenands don’t kill people, people kill people. Using that logic, should people have the right to carry hand grenades?

Posted by: Kurt S. | April 19, 2007, 9:24 am 9:24 am

I have been reading the comments on the what kind of gun and who has one and what ever. THE TRUTH TO THE MATTER IS 32 PEOPLE ARE GONE, A GUN IS A GUN AND HE USED IT TO TAKE LIFES AWAY-THE BOTTOM LINE-REMOVING OUR GOD FROM THE SCHOOLS.

Posted by: janesa | April 19, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

No one can predict these things ok J.R., they couldn’t predict and stop columbine nither could this have been stopped. And those people in Iraq have the same right to be free from terrorism as your biased self does.

Posted by: US Army Spec. Blondeaux | April 19, 2007, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Isn’t it stupid that in NY and NJ (and a couple of other states) you can’t even buy an electric stun weapon by mail or in person no matter what, but in Virginia and other states you can just go and buy guns with not much of a problem? If people don’t want things like this to happen you gotta make guns a little harder to buy.

Posted by: TekWiz | April 19, 2007, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

The type of gun and the fact we are in Iraq has nothing to do with this story. I worry when you think of arming others who you think are normal to keep us safe. The police have the law let them keep the peace. Soo’s origin has nothing to do with the crime. Being Asian has nothing to do with this crime what does is,this herific crime was committed by a young mentally ill person who killed with nearly every shot he took. The anger was apparently builded up until it explored and took precious lives. Soo needed to be saved, maybe if he had not killed himself, he would at least have been saved, before he had been was sentenced. He never knew the “Lord Jesus”. If he had he would not have been so angry. He still would have had to pay for this herific crime. This was not a rot in jail crime. If he had gotten saved he would have known he would had to pay. The Lord says vengents is mine, I will repay,says “The Lord”.

Posted by: Rose | April 19, 2007, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

I just think that while people are mourning with the loss of so many innocent lives… you are all on here arguing about the type of gun and what we should do about guns… its plain and simple that guns wont be outlawed because of hunting and population control of animals, but yes i agree that a more strict system of purchasing should be looked into. Now that that is out of the way, god bless and watch over all those impacted by this unwanted act, and hopefully from this we wont have copy cats because in my area alone there have been 6 bomb threats to local schools. Its not funny, and i feel that anyone who does such an act should be severly punished not a slap on the wrist dont do that again… Thoughts and Prayers VT!

Posted by: JH | April 19, 2007, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

No man with any mental issuses ( once declared) should be allowed a right to bare arms. I am a sportsman. I enjoy hunting. but I have never been declared a threat to myself by a judge. There needs to be stonger laws for purchasing guns. But as a avid hunter I believe there needs to be common sense involved.

Posted by: jonathan slaydon | April 20, 2007, 12:00 am 12:00 am

I agree with you john… im an avid hunter myself but my point was that people are going to be pushing a gun ban and i just wanted to throw it out there that it would never happen to push for strict laws against gaining laws. Just watched the local news and 8 people were shot in 4 different accounts today… there is a need for some type of restriction but it should not take away from people who are responsible and only use guns for sport… not walking around and gaining respect cause they are packing…

Posted by: JH | April 20, 2007, 12:06 am 12:06 am

This individual was without question ill minded.Compiled with his feeling of being discriminated against resulted in terror spreaded by a man that gave up on life.It’s my guess that he was teased by some due to his nationality.He was probably made to feel like a misfit.He claimed he could not take anymore and di a Post Office.I pray for the victims…..

Posted by: Ceasar | April 20, 2007, 5:16 am 5:16 am

Fact: People have been killing and dying since biblical times. Don’t take away guns because of this incident. Has anyone heard of the thousand year war? People will kill no matter what. If I can’t kill someone with a gun I will with a sword. If anything needs to be regulated it is people who are capable of inflicting serious damage to society.
ALSO, please don’t believe everything you hear from the media. The government LIES to you!

Posted by: joe | April 20, 2007, 7:30 am 7:30 am

posted by ‘Keith’: “Raid, by the same token if guns have no legitimate defensive use, if their only purpose is to kill, why do we allow the police to carry them? Last I checked they aren’t empowered to act as judge, jury, and executioner so obviously they have no reason to carry guns.” (end quote)
And in eg. England they don’t.!!
Why ?
Because they dont have to.
Why ?
Because the criminals (and others) are not heavily armed.
Why ?
Because England has a responsible gun-law.

Posted by: Raid | April 20, 2007, 10:28 am 10:28 am

And come on ‘Joe’ (and others);
Are you really going to suggest that a shooter would just walk around slicing people to death with a sword – not 32 times i think.!
Guns do not kill people – they just make it SO easy…..

Posted by: Raid | April 20, 2007, 10:32 am 10:32 am

This is to the people who believe carrying a gun is for self Defense.
It’s pretty depressing when people have to carry around guns to defend themselves against other people carrying guns to kill. We’re just as bad if we think that carrying around a weapon to kill someone who may kill us is a just cause. Maybe if society wasn’t so disturbed we wouldn’t have these kind of problems. But this is just a teen’s opinion.

Posted by: Chantal | April 20, 2007, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

I agree with Chantal we would be just as bad as the person coming after us if we shot at them! And for all of you worrying about what kind of gun he used take a minute to think… Does it really mastter? What if someone u cared about was shot and killed would u rant over what kind of gun it was?? Seriously people get a life.

Posted by: nikki | April 20, 2007, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

This started long before Cho bought his gun.
Maybe there’s more to all this than people care to remember.
Consider watching this from the FDA advisory hearings of 1991.
Brought to you by the Citizens Commission on Human Rights
http://www.cchr.org/index.cfm/19863

Posted by: Chris | April 20, 2007, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

“This is to the people who believe carrying a gun is for self Defense.
It’s pretty depressing when people have to carry around guns to defend themselves against other people carrying guns to kill. We’re just as bad if we think that carrying around a weapon to kill someone who may kill us is a just cause. Maybe if society wasn’t so disturbed we wouldn’t have these kind of problems. But this is just a teen’s opinion.”
You’re young, and I work with young people everyday so I’ll say this gently. This is also addressed to many of the people who posted here so far.
I don’t know you, but I’m terribly disturbed to see that you find no value in yourself and your loved ones. After all if you believed your life had some amount of value, or that you had something to offer this world, then you would be willing to defend yourself.
I own ten firearms, 4 of which are handguns. I have a concealed carry permit and I carry concealed everywhere except work(I’m a High School Teacher). My worst fear is that I will someday have to use a firearm in defense of myself or the ones I love. However I will never succumb to the idea that killing an evil person in defense of my own life would somehow make me a bad person. My life has value, I believe I make a positive contribution to this world and the future. I will not let someone end that.
If you don’t feel the same then you have some self esteem and self worth issues to deal with first. The men and women of this country who choose to carry a firearm legally don’t go out looking for a gun fight. We are just like you, We want to live a peaceful life devoid of violence, but we will not be sheep led to a slaughter. Taking our firearms away will not prevent crime, it will make us just as helpless as you choose to be.

Posted by: Chuck | April 21, 2007, 1:58 am 1:58 am

You people need to drop this gun discussion on whether that 22mm exists or not. Who cares. I have been reading all these commments about the Virginia Tech Mass…Hello?? This is about those innocent students that was shot to death not some stupid guns. I am getting tired of reading all these comments about these guns. Show some consideration of all the families that lost a loved one at V Tech. That is the important thing we all should worry about.

Posted by: Tash | April 21, 2007, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Isn’t it strange how people are trying to get God’s name off of our money…and out of our pledge of allegiance…. But, yet when tragedy happens people start praying? I think we all know the only true thing in this world and the only thing that can bring us true hope is God.

Posted by: KG | April 21, 2007, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Let me just make a few points. Ok, first, outlawing guns will not do anything. If someone wants to kill they will do with whatever means. You saw it yourself. He carried a hammer in one picture. Books can be purchased online on how to create bombs out of fertilizer and amonia. Your point to outlaw guns in order to reduce violence is unpertinent and won’t change anything. Secondly, You all live in America. When the founding fathers founded the country they set it up to be centralized and governed by us… the people, now we are becoming socialized and are slowly shifting over to communism all of the time. Just look at all of the Government-iad programs so that people can get something for nothing. Communism. Did you know that now, illegal-aliens can utilize social programs without ever having payed into them. Your hard-earned tax dollars. Communism. It’s coming. Move to China if you hate bush so much. Third of all, The NRA (National Rifle Association) has too much power. Too much say and they are securely concreted into our congress and aren’t going anywhere. Good luck trying to outlaw guns. The Psychos that are going to kill will do someway or another. Look at Timothy Mcvay…. Just think about everything. Cho was a nut and the Authorities who released him from the mental hospital are at fault.

Posted by: Nate | April 21, 2007, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

One of the guns was a Walther P22 with a .22 cal, the other one a 9 mm Glock 17. According to the police the killer fired a little bit more than 100 rounds and hit his victims 2 or 3 times. This makes it look like every shot was a hit. It’s not an easy job to kill that many people with just 2 pistols of medium and small caliber. This guy was a highly efficient killer. Many self-declared “gun experts” underestimate the .22 caliber. The VA Tech killer has shown how dangerous a .22 pistol can be in the hand of somebody who knows to use it. BTW the .22 caliber is often used for assassinations, e.g. by the Israeli Mossad.
However the main problem that this massacre could happen are the gun control laws. This incident is another proof that gun control is extremely dangerous and plays into the hand of mass murderers. We need immediately a law that makes gun-free zones illegal or a similar tragedy will happen again. If there had been a few people on the campus with guns, this would not have happened.

Posted by: Mortran | April 21, 2007, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

LOL If there had been a few people on the campus with guns, this would not have happened. LOL
No because they would have been shot up long before last monday……
Youngsters deprived of sleep, under academic pressure and having problems with the lovelife, partying away in weekends, some experimenting with drugs – yes, lets arm them all.!!
This incident is that lax gun-control is extremely dangerous and that only the police and army should carry.

Posted by: Raid | April 23, 2007, 3:35 am 3:35 am

It may be true that one political wing is trying to make ‘political hay’ on this tragic incident.
What may also be true is that the gun-advocates are trying (and for the moment succeeds) in making
a huge pile of money on all the scared, stupid, confused and evil people out there – and completely
ignoring their victims.
I hope the highly payed, professional, pro-gun debaters consider this;
Your family could be the next victims in line – and no amount of guns will protect them if the maniac chooses them as first targets.
They are the ‘Benedict Arnold’s’ of modern USA – giving the nation away to the gun manufacturers.

Posted by: Raid | April 23, 2007, 3:37 am 3:37 am

Wow. I can’t believe that normal adults would go on arguing about the size of a handgun. That isn’t the real issue. Lay off the guy who wrote this I mean come on, it’s a simple error.
Also, leave the President out of this. He could not have prevented this no matter how much “DEBATING” you go through. I am not saying I support everything that President Bush has done but he is our leader and I believe we should back him.
Stop trying to find everything wrong with him. He won’t be in office much longer and he sure isn’t trying to send the U.S. to hell.

Posted by: Jacob | April 23, 2007, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

he needed help

Posted by: Kai | April 23, 2007, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

This has nothing to do with 9-11 or the president. The president could not have prevented this nor could anyone else. The kid was mentally ill. How did anyone know he was going to do something like this.
And who cares what kind of gun it was, no one is perfect. Why would anyone in there right mind even argue about something stupid like that??!! Whatever kind of guns they were, were used to shoot people that didn’t deserve it.
Some people just need to grow up and realize what the real purpose is, it isn’t the president or what happened on 9-11-01. There were people killed that didn’t deserve it and the kid was mentally ill and there was no way we or anyone could’ve prevented that.

Posted by: ?????? | April 23, 2007, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

I have gone through the same trauma that he had gone thru.. even I feel my soul had been raped by bullies all around.. even I feel bullies should be hit but innocent people should be left alone.. bullies should be taught a lesson to realize their mistakes but should not be “murdered”.. everyone is thinking, he was a pyscho but nobody talks why was he a psycho.. nobody loved him… everyone hated him.. laughed at him.. kicked him.. he felt lonely.. powerless.. weak.. felt friendless though it was up to him to become stronger.. but America has so many people with similar egoistic problems.. so many people feel lonely and uncared for.. i am an Indian and happy to have a social culture like India.. i don’t feel lonely.. there are people to support me.. what do you guyz do to curb the situation.. have you ever really cared for a stranger? do that someday and you will come to know what I mean. god bless.

Posted by: ??? | April 23, 2007, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

dude a 22mm would blow his head off if he shot it its 22 cal

Posted by: bob | April 25, 2007, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Folks have got this whole thing all wrong, as usual. It’s not about gun laws or first amendments or immigration law. It had to do with one individual that caused havoc to an entire community. Though I despise the very DNA Bush has, what the hell does he have to with Virginia? Nothing at all. Frankly, there was/is one point in time that every single one of us hated and felt victimized so deeply that you wished, and only just wished, that you could have done the same thing, just for being wronged. Yes, Cho was psycho to say the least but if anyone would try to separate themselves from this and point fingers, just know you and I are capable of doing the same thing. The difference is, we didn’t snap.

Posted by: Alicia | April 25, 2007, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

The gun laws or fine but a better background check should be allowed

Posted by: Dakota R. | April 27, 2007, 9:00 am 9:00 am

That man knew exactly what he was doing and he did a very coward move on killing his self. His parents are probably in shock cause they worked hard so htere children can go to college and obviously its not how he was raised if his sister went to Princeton. He killed them people for no reason. He did a coward move he should have went to jail for his actions.

Posted by: baby grl | April 27, 2007, 10:15 am 10:15 am

When the barrel diameter is given in inches, the abbreviation “cal” is used in place of “inches”. For example, a gun with a diameter of 0.22 inch is a .22 cal; the decimal is dropped when spoken, so this would be called a “twenty-two caliber”.
I’m British and so have no experience of guns, but i still knew it wasn’t going to be a 22mm handgun!
Now focus on the important issue here… Why is your society producing these nutters??

Posted by: Ed | April 27, 2007, 11:11 am 11:11 am

I think he should have gotin put in jail for 7 months.

Posted by: Morrell | May 3, 2007, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Who cares what size gun it is? it doesn’t exactly make a difference anymore these people are dead. not trying to be insensitive. If America woke up to the fact that America has the highest murder rate by guns maybe something would change? Howcome canada can have 7 million guns in 10 million homes and have on 3 or 4 murders a year? yet America can have thousands and they are so close together..makes you wonder.

Posted by: Bush | May 29, 2007, 3:56 am 3:56 am

listen folks, haven’t we all thought of killing some one at least once in our lives? we know (and knew) it was a wrong thought. now imagine if while you were having this thought you have all the hatred of all the years of being picked on as a kid going through your mind. do you think that you would kill… I’ve thought about it. alot actually.the only differance is i know better now.but if i had the means when i was younger i would have probably done something like all the other school shootings.
Now i work with kids at risk in a central canada city. don’t spread the hatred! embrace all as though you can help, because YOU CAN!
It only takes the right ears to listen to you when you are asked the right questions.
do your part in it and prevent these needless shootings.or would you just rather cry about it when it happens again?? it will you know… I’M trying are you?

Posted by: John Keaton | June 4, 2007, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Guns dont kill people. People kill people. Just a good example here.

Posted by: Travis | August 3, 2007, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

To Curious George The hand gun in this photo is in fact a Glock. I use the same one in my training courses. P.S. You can tell its a Glock because of the G emblem on the slide near the muzzle.

Posted by: Jim K.O. | November 30, 2007, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Now we know Cho purchased and used P22 .22LR and Glock Model 19 9mm Hydra-Shock ammunition which he reloads approximately 15 times (the picture shows Glock 17 with 2 magazines).

Posted by: Allison | January 29, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Let people who are responsible, such as: Military or Ex police officers and the like carry if they want to go!!! To Go to the classes so they can prove themselves. Give only to people with a smear proof backround. Let these people also defend and protect our Country and Innocent Bystanders If Need Be!!!!! For The Saying Goes: For the People By the People. To Keep And Bear Arms to Protect Property and Loved Ones. For it is not the Weapons We Have That Kill. It is in FACT The People Who Pull The Trigger. Anyone who does not realize this is just plain Ignorant…. It is like a Fire Work(s), If you don’t light it, It won’t explode. Same as a Candle, if you don’t light the candle, there is no flame. Ask yourself these Questions People. To make a long story short. It takes a kind of person to be cruel, unjust and Bad to the Bone to Hurt other Human Beings, Whether it is with words, Fire, Guns, Or any other means involved. This is Most Certainly True. Life is Precious!!!! Everyone wants to live. So Bring Down the ones who Don’t want to live by the laws of this World. I mean the People who due a Crime and Become a Criminal in Society. Fit The Punishment For The Crime or Crimes They Committed. If they killed. Kill Them. If They stole, Cut off a Hand. Etcetera, Etcetera, Etcetera.

Posted by: Ken S | February 14, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

LORD JESUS HELP US. OKAY FIRST OF ALL THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A 22MM HANDGUN, DUH, YOU MEAN A .22 CALIBER. AND SECOND WHAT IS WRONG WITH BUSH, OKAY WHEN YOU PLOT SOMETHING OUT YOU NEED TO HAVE A PICTURE OF EVERYWHERE YOU ARE GOING TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO DO. SO IF YOU CHECK HIS DORM FOR THE BLUEPRINTS AND YOU FIND THEM, CHECK FOR FINGERPRINTS. CHO DIDNT KILL THOSE 32 PEOPLE BY HIMSELF, BECAUSE WHILE HE WOULD CHANGE THE MAGAZINE(BECAUSE HE WOULD HAVE TO, OBVIOUSLY NO MAGAZINE HOLDS THAT MANY BULLETS) SOMEONE WOULD HAVE THE GUTS TO GET UP AND ATTACK CHO SO IF YOU WANT TO BET THAT SOMEONE ELSE WAS IN IT WITH HIM. AND IF SOMEONE ELSE WAS WITH HIM NOONE WOULD BE ABLE TO ATTACK HIM. THE ONLY REASON THAT PEOPLE WOULD SAY HE WAS ALONE IS JUST BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT THE OTHER PERSON IS ALIVE AND THAT THE PERSON WHO HELPED CHOU WOULD KILL WHO EVER TOLD ON HIM. THANK YOU FOR LISTENING TO MY STATEMENT.

Posted by: SEBASTIAN | March 15, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

i think his working for the feds thats all i gotta say.

Posted by: davidlopez | September 22, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

what,he ain’t even an American have to do with any thing

Posted by: davidlopez | September 22, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.