Apr 13, 2007 4:48pm

Imus and Hip-Hop

I’m no expert about rap or hip-hop–far from it. Loved Public Enemy as a young man, still have Missy Elliott’s "The Rain" on the iPod. But aside from the purchase of Kanye West’s "The College Dropout" a couple of years ago–on a friend’s recommendation that it was great (not for me)–my musical tastes run much more toward the propulsive piano stylings of Robert Glasper, the timeless sophistication of Johnny Hodges, the limpid insights of Maria Joao Pires. And, of course, Cheap Trick.

So I’m a fogey. But I live in our common American culture, and thus breathe the atmosphere of young America’s delights, distractions and obsessions. You can’t avoid them. We worship youth in this country; there is a kind of hidden message coded in all our media that one must know and at least pretend to enjoy that which the young create and enjoy. "Thou shalt be hip," is the first commandment of the culture. But I’m hopeless in that regard–and glad of it. I miss "The Waltons."

I have a 10-year-old daughter, though, and so I simply can’t ignore what goes on in popular culture. And that brings me to the debate about Don Imus, his despicable slur against the Rutgers University women’s basketball team, and hip-hop music.

A lot of bloggers and others have noted that what Imus said on the air is no different from what many rappers and hip-hoppers have said in their songs. It’s true. Go to any popular lyrics site (like this one), type in the terms Imus used or other racist and misogynist slurs, and see for yourself. Look at rap and hip-hop music videos–but make sure your ten-year-old is out of the room. Much of what you will find in this music is a puerile fantasy of male power, frenzied irresponsibility, and the degradation of women. What’s so depressing–as columnist Bob Herbert of The New York Times, educator and actor Bill Cosby, the Rev. Eugene Rivers of The Baker House in Boston, and so many others have pointed out for so long–is that this repugnant fantasy has become an ideal of manhood for far too many young Americans–black and white.

So why is Imus fired for what he said, while so many rappers are idolized for using precisely the same language? Is there a double-standard?

Of course there is. And there is no longer any excuse for it.

There are those who tell us that somehow when a young black man says "bitch" or "ho" or uses the "n-word," it’s OK. It’s all about the context. It’s culturally specific. It’s art. It’s a black thing–I can’t understand.

This attitude was captured in a fine story my ABC News colleague Deborah Roberts filed last night for "World News with Charles Gibson." Deborah interviewed Danyel Smith, who tracks hip-hop for Vibe magazine, and who believes, as Deborah put it, that "the gritty world being described in popular rap lyrics is artistic expression, not to be confused with mainstream name-calling."

"I think there’s a difference in a black person saying something about another black person," Smith said. "I think the way those words started out, white people were using them against black people in a way that kept them down."

The rapper Snoop Dogg put it a little more pungently:

“It’s a completely different scenario,” he said. "[Rappers] are not talking about no collegiate basketball girls who have made it to the next level in education and sports. We’re talking about ho’s that’s in the ‘hood that ain’t doing sh–, that’s trying to get a n—a for his money. These are two separate things. First of all, we ain’t no old-ass white men that sit up on MSNBC going hard on black girls. We are rappers that have these songs coming from our minds and our souls that are relevant to what we feel. I will not let them mutha—-as say we in the same league as him."

All this is pernicious nonsense. "Horsefeathers," as Grandpa Walton might put it.

Most Americans seem to believe–rightly, in my judgment–that you don’t get a pass on civility in this country because you’re a black man who raps; that you aren’t entitled to call women "ho" or "bitch"–whether they’re in "the hood" (an exegesis I simply do not buy from Mr. Dogg) or in my family; that just because you claim that a repugnant slur comes from your "mind and soul" does not give you a license to hurl it at people.

And many Americans ask: How is it that so many parents are supposed to tolerate the bombardment of our daughters with the most degrading imagery and language? Because it’s promulgated by black artists? Huh? A white man says stuff like that, and he must be fired–but a black man can degrade women and himself, and it’s "art"? Where’s the real racism there? Which man is being treated as beneath our shared values and standards?

All of the claims for a "culturally specific" exception to civility seem to me to rest on a myth–the myth that somehow hip-hop culture is the pure self-expression of urban black America. But the facts are otherwise. Ask yourself: Who sells this stuff? Who buys it? If it did not sell, would it get made? An honest appraisal of the hip-hop music and fashion market would see it for what it is–the exploitation of a part of black American culture by mega-billion, white-owned and white-controlled corporations who sell the stuff to millions of suburban teen-age white boys. This isn’t folk art. It’s business–big business. A few black people get rich from it. The rest, one can argue, get degraded.

Perhaps the most salutary thing that could come out of the Imus story is a revolution–a revolution by girls and women, black and white, by their dads and brothers and husbands and friends–a revolution against the utter misogyny that permeates so much of our mass-market, money-driven popular culture. It wouldn’t be hip. But it would be hope.

User Comments

How come no one has yet mentioned how many times Quentin Tarantino uses the word “Niger” and other racial slurs in his movie Pulp Fiction? Oh, or is it acceptable because most enjoyed the movie or all his movies for that matter? This issue with Imus is not the first, nor will it be the last. We must all be able to distinguish the differences between racism, sexism, and freedom of speech, only then will there be changes.

Posted by: B.N. | April 13, 2007, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

I do not agree with what Mr. Imus said about those women it was very degrading and rude. I am a woman of color I do not listen to rap. I refuse to let my children listen to rap it is degrading to women of any race, I think it is just wrong. We need to take control of our families and teach them right from wrong and how to respect each other. My boys are not allowed to listen to hip hop, will they listen to it when I am not around maybe I can’t say, but they better not bring into my home. (Stop stereotyping) I don’t believe hip hop is an American Culture I am an American and I do not purchase any hip hop music. I think it is wrong to use the n-word b-word or H-word regardless of race or gender. Lets stop and teach our future generation, remembers learning starts at home, that’s where we all need to start I don’t care how much money someone has, that doesn’t make disrespecting a person ok.

Posted by: TLA | April 13, 2007, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

I do not agree with what Mr. Imus said about those women it was very degrading and rude. I am a woman of color I do not listen to rap. I refuse to let my children listen to rap it is degrading to women of any race, I think it is just wrong. We need to take control of our families and teach them right from wrong and how to respect each other. My boys are not allowed to listen to hip hop, will they listen to it when I am not around maybe I can’t say, but they better not bring into my home. (Stop stereotyping) I don’t believe hip hop is an American Culture I am an American and I do not purchase any hip hop music. I think it is wrong to use the n-word b-word or H-word regardless of race or gender. Lets stop and teach our future generation, remembers learning starts at home, that’s where we all need to start I don’t care how much money someone has, that doesn’t make disrespecting a person ok.

Posted by: TLA | April 13, 2007, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Don Imus was used to making racial remarks about Blacks. And to say that he can say those words just because rappers say them is not excuse. Since when did he drop down to the level of a rapper? When he can make a rhythm to music and bop to the beat in time with the music and wear a grill on his teeth, then he can then be considered on the level of a rapper. Also, if he calls those black college girls “Hos”, what does he call the little black girls with cancer who come to his ranch. Does he call them little black “Hos”?

Posted by: Sheena | April 13, 2007, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

In my high school classes, the word, “ho,”
is common parlance. It is used primarily by
Blacks and Hispanics, not Caucasians.

Posted by: Mike | April 13, 2007, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Terry,
Quick: publish links to all of the stories you did before this one, where you call out the scumbags in the rap industry (the rich Jewish owners, the corporate media companies, the pimp labels, and the slimy rappers) for their misogyny, racism, pornography, and all around cultural sickness.
(cue crickets … )

Posted by: Jerry | April 13, 2007, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Terry Moran-
You declared your self not be an expert in the fields of rap or hip-hop—I assume humility prevented you from stating that you are indeed a leading authority in the propagation of white-guilt.
Imus said something offensive. He is a radio entertainer. An apology is appropriate, but by no means should it be requisite. The market would “sort-out” any potential consequences via ratings and/or advertising revenue.
You sir, on the other hand spout ignorance of a particularly distasteful variety. You are news commentator, not an entertainer. You should be fired.

Posted by: BCD | April 13, 2007, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

The market did work itself out. If you believe Imus was fired because of the statement he made you’re an idealistic leftist. Imus was fired because of the advertisers who bailed on the show. He was no longer worth the contract CBS was paying so they took the opportunity to cut their losses. He’ll resurface on satelitte radio within 1-2 years.

Posted by: Kevin | April 13, 2007, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

…and while we’re on the subject…does anyone else think it’s hilarious/apporpriate that this guy looks so confused in the picture at the top of this page???

Posted by: Kevin | April 13, 2007, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

I had no idea Walt Goggins, who plays Det. Shane Vendrell on “The Shield” on FX writes a blog for ABC news.

Posted by: Vic Mackey | April 13, 2007, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Vic
Don’t worry, Terry will be back on the beat (where all Irishmen belong) before you know it.
Mics really aren’t cut out for the newscasting life.

Posted by: Soon enough | April 13, 2007, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Revolution indeed. This is the loudest outcry I’ve heard from philosophically conservative people on the internet. It’s interesting, but predictable, that he refrains from endorsing Imus’ firing. He certainly implies it.
An interesting view into the mindset of a mainstream journalist. Certainly not suprising, everyone knows they are required to view the world through these lenses.
Calling for Moran’s firing would be grossly hypocritical, for me anyhow. Probably a fine chap, if not a little misguided.

Posted by: Bill P | April 14, 2007, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Let’s just save time and have two standards of morality based on race. The “do no wrong” and the “do no right.”

Posted by: Sam | April 14, 2007, 3:57 am 3:57 am

Mr Moran, I wasn’t quite sure what to think about the issue but by the end of your post I was convinced by your arguments.

Posted by: Iskandar Rabeendran | April 14, 2007, 6:02 am 6:02 am

I’m supposing there is one big blowback from the Imus lynching and this weathervane of a reporter is just following the trend.

Posted by: John Wilson | April 14, 2007, 8:23 am 8:23 am

Your beloved Grandpa Walton would see you for the bigot and race-baiter that you so clearly are.

Posted by: bob | April 14, 2007, 9:57 am 9:57 am

It’s a shame the young students from Duke don’t meet Mr. Moran’s lofty standands, being too white, too male and too rich to deserve sympathy, let alone respect. If one were to suggest that the so-called rape victim had deserved to be assaulted because she is a poor black woman of doubious morals, that person would rightly be branded a callous bigot. Mr. Moran judges the three real rape victims based on their gender, their race, their social standing and their assumed morals and then he pats himself on the back for being a compassioned liberal. A bigot by any other name….
Having adopted the phrase “rich white boy” as his version of “nappy-headed ho,” Mr. Moran might do well to consider that the one thing that money can’t buy back is a destroyed reputation. Having joined the chorus of those who stubbornly believe that being innocent of a crime isn’t enough justification for ceasing to slander the Duke students, Mr. Moran might do well to remember that their reputations were stolen from them by a liar, an opportunist and a lazy media more interested in getting a story than getting honesty. On the other hand, Mr. Moran has flushed his reputation down the drain by his own hand: I don’t see how I can ever watch him do the news again without doubting his integrity or his sense of decency and fairness. Is that fair? Well, he is just another “rich white boy of privilige,” so why should I treat him with respect? And should his ill-conceived diatribe permanently damage his career, I promise you I won’t feel too much sympathy for him.

Posted by: Merwyn | April 14, 2007, 10:59 am 10:59 am

I would like someone to explain to myself and others who might be wondering the same thing. Why can the entertainers, lets say those that are on Comedy Central, can say far greater racist type remarks, an thats ok. Yet Mr Imus, whose show was part comedy, an the remark came as a result of it, he is fired an condemend. My opinion is that no racist remarks, no matter what venue, should be allowed. Maybe if the Democrats would stop trying to waste money an time on a fishing expedition trying to find something on Karl Rove, who they are obsessed with, an do something about difining what is free speech an who can say what.

Posted by: Ed | April 14, 2007, 11:59 am 11:59 am

I told you so “STUPID”! Only thing people are going to remember about you is your comentary about the DUKE BOYZ. You can write articles from now to the end of time and the only thing folks are going to remember is the DUKE comentary. Maybe an apology is in order or do you consider yourself so enlightened that you don’t believe you were totally wrong. We will remeber, ALWAYS. How does that CUSHION feel now? I imagine it will get more and more uncomfortable as time goes on.

Posted by: john | April 14, 2007, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Free Speech now has a whole set of clauses that don’t belong.
If white people can’t say the N word OK blacks can’t say cracker or whitey.
The rules need to be the same if Imus gets fired because he offended a basketball team than anytime someone is offended they should lose their jobs.
I do many anyone by anyone.
I think we need to get over ourselves.
I do believe for a second the girls basketball team is scared for life because someone said 3 words on the radio.
If so those girls need to grow a spine and thicker skin.

Posted by: Mark | April 14, 2007, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Terry,
I think what alot of people involved in the argument miss is that to a large majority of us Don Imus was merely repeating language which we interpret as representative of black urban culture. Just by chance I was watching Imus that morning. I did a double-take when I heard the comment and thought “you know, he said that just as it woould probably have been said down in the ‘hood.” If you want the perception changed – change the messages being sent out by the artists. If I mimic a comment made by somebody should I be publicly stoned and hung because people need a poster boy for numerous side causes?
Don’t Imus me for repeating what I’ve heard on the TV this week….

Posted by: bluestarj2 | April 14, 2007, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Try and backpeddle all you want, Terry. From now on, you will be known as “The Rich White Boy” reporter, and I use the word ‘reporter’ very, very loosely. Hope you enjoyed whatever reputation you used to have, because you’re garbage from now on. The “Dukies” are now your legacy.

Posted by: bob | April 14, 2007, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

As long as ABC News allows someone such as Terry Moran to spew such ‘Moranic’ things using their pulpit I will not watch ABC in any manner….Dear ABC exec, please e-mail me when you fire him…I kinda like Gery’s Anatomy and will miss watching it.

Posted by: Brent M | April 14, 2007, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

There IS a double standard! Why can Rosie O Donnel say, ching chong on national television, plus all of the other “objectionable” stuff she says on The View, and keep her job? Why can a back woman FALSELY accuse three white boys of rape and Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson quickly chastize them? Why do my children continually tell me about the videos they watch on MTV: this ho, that ho, that b****, and the grinding of the women in a very sexual manner. And Don Imus gets fired? There is an extreme injustice in American television and it is making me feel ashamed that I am from the USA!

Posted by: Ben Wilson | April 14, 2007, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

There IS a double standard! Why can Rosie O Donnel say, ching chong on national television, plus all of the other “objectionable” stuff she says on The View, and keep her job? Why can a back woman FALSELY accuse three white boys of rape and Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson quickly chastize them? Why do my children continually tell me about the videos they watch on MTV: this ho, that ho, that b****, and the grinding of the women in a very sexual manner. And Don Imus gets fired? There is an extreme injustice in American television and it is making me feel ashamed that I am from the USA!

Posted by: Beth Wilson | April 14, 2007, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

By the looks of this topic and repsonses and the responses to Terry Moron’s other idiotic rant aginst the Duke lacrosse players and white people in general, It seems as though a) ABC should fire Terry Moran, b) no apology or expression of regret can prevent this action, and c) Americans should boycott ABC.

Posted by: Ricardo Max | April 14, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Rather than attack the messanger, here’s a point I would like to make about the actual issue.
No white person would know to use the term (either rightly or wrongly) “nappy-headed ho” if the the rap/hip hop community had not created the language in the first place.
Nappy-headedness is not generally a caucasion hair issue. And although “whore” has been a part of the vernacular “ho” is new this current culture.
I’m not sure why so many respondents feel like they have to tie this story to the Duke story, but as I see it, as a woman, their primary link is in the stories being about men behaving badly.
In the documtentary “HIP HOP – Beyond Beats & Rhymes” the film maker Byron Hurt not only chronicles the movement of rap/hip hop but gets shut down too by those at the top when confronted with their being responsible for the perpetuation of denigration of specifically black women.
Not one of the current “movers” of the industry would address their culpability in any meaningful way.
By the way, Mr. Hurt is African-American. As were those he interviewed from the “old school” rap movement which was about having a voice and starting a revolution that included their sisters in a meaningful way, who echoed their disappointment with the direction the art form has taken.
Today, mainstream hip-hop is really just about men behaving badly and not much else. Of which Mr. Imus mearly joined in and did what the hip hop culture appears to celebrate.
What a bunch of hypocrites.

Posted by: Amy | April 14, 2007, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

This is back-peddling all the way. Moran, you should be fired. I hope you are sitting in your office sh*tting your pants because you have been fingered as the next head to roll over this race debate. I am also going to boycott any advertiser who advertises on any ABC program until you are fired. I hope your booses are reading this blog You’re finished buddy.

Posted by: jimmy | April 14, 2007, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Rap and Hip-Hop are, for the most part, just acoustic pornography and worse (murder, etc.)
They are a blight and disgrace on our (America’s) culture. Money means TOO much to the purveyors of this junk.
I’m not sure how Terry got from “Duke” to this commentary, but he was way off on the First Principle of the Duke issue, “Justice for all”.
He’s pretty close on this Hip-Hop issue if his First Principle is “Dignity for all”.

Posted by: Jim | April 14, 2007, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

I haven’t been following the story of Imus completely, but here is how I view it. An individual with access to the public airwaves stated an opinion that was offensive to a great number of people, including myself. Its unfortunate, its disrespectful, its hurtful to the women of Rutgers University but protected by free speech. Should Imus have been reprimanded, absolutely, but I do not believe he should have been fired. We can either support free speech or we should revise the bill of rights to allow free speech with the exception being that if what you have to say can be offensive to someone else. And, if we did that….I bet we’d have far fewer blogs out there!!

Posted by: T. Simon | April 14, 2007, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Double standard; yes. If you do not think so…answer this. The movies, White Men Can’t Jump and White Chics. Could a white film producer create a film called “Black men cant…(add any stereotype)” or could there be a movie about two white guys dressing up as black women and playing to stereotypes…not likely. For those who say, well those movies are for entertainment…I reply so to is Imus. If you don’t like, turn the channel.
I seem to have done pretty well not listening to sexist shock jocks like Howard Stern.

Posted by: K. Bailey | April 14, 2007, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

For one thing I Imus singled out the rutgers basketball players. Plus there were racism back in the day you forgot. Blacks being dragged and hanged for no reason.

Posted by: Ranier | April 14, 2007, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Are you racist ? It is relevant. I am black and my grand father been called worse and it takes it took a toll on him.

Posted by: Ranier | April 14, 2007, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

While I don’t agree with shock jocks, I think it is outrageous for people like Jackson and Sharpton to nail Imus for his remarks when hip hop and rap artists are far worse. In an interview with another network Jackson wouldn’t even address the question when asked what should be done about these artists and their language. Enough of the racist card being played everytime a white person says something off color until blacks address the problem in their own culture. We could all stand to be more tolerant.

Posted by: L.Crandall | April 14, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

There is some truth to Snoops statement about black females being called hoes. I believe that everyone is missing what is really going on. What came out of Don Imus’ mouth was strickly racism, but rappers are strictly talking about the life that they live. Both are bad, but there are two seperate issues that needs to be addressed, racism and degrading women.

Posted by: Westley Smith | April 14, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Imus has to accept responsibility for what he said and accept the consequences of what he has said.
I believe this is a perfect example of people today being De-sensitived regarding all the inappropriate language and name calling people are used to hearing from the music industry,and the acceptance of what is typically described as racial comments. How is it people of color are able to speak freely to each other, sing the lyrics about what they come back as saying offensive. I do not believe that the role models and leaders of the music industry do not understand the profound influence they instill in people of all ages and races. It does not make it acceptable in any forum. If people are offended so deeply by what is this laguage represents it does not matter the context of what is said or how it is said or where it said or when it said or by whom it is said, it needs to STOP!

Posted by: bill d | April 14, 2007, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

I am a 22 year old educated black man, I grew up on Rap music and I live the Hip-Hop way of life. Everyone is taking this situation too far, and it seems as though people are using this as fuel to change the world. This is America people “freedom of speech”, everyone knows what Imus said was wrong, him losing his job over it should be nobody’s business but the people he is connected too, listeners, accusers, sponsors, etc. This will not stop the way people think and how they speak, comparing this to rap music is insane. I wish people just move on, I am sick of hearing about this.

Posted by: Lindsay | April 14, 2007, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Ithink thatMrImus should have been fired he was on national airwaves and made a statement that he thought was funny. Funny to who? He is a 66 yr old man and for everyone info I have never heard a rapper or a hip hop say nappy head that is so seventy. Noone I know sings about a nappy head and furthermore where did he hear this at I know he doesn’t watch BET or listen to black urban music he also used the all mighty word you people which all black people know that is how whites used to address us.But when said we automatic know what they are talking about so for me Mr Imus is a very unhappy man that gets off by name calling other people. I bet he will watch what he says from now on to me if he said it once he has said it before. pb

Posted by: Rose smith | April 14, 2007, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Here is my comment I Told my son’s some time ago me being 56 My son’s 26 an 32 do not call any women a name that you would not call you mom or sister. Were did i get this from my Grandmother who raised me. An yes i am a black male an my son’s are to.There are a lot of people that been after the rapper’s for some time about what they say an do.But never get printed in main stream meadia or aired.Sa i was growing up wit my grandmother as a kid an being in the south i could tell you some stories that would make you say what the —- but i want. Thanks for hearing me out.

Posted by: Theodore L | April 14, 2007, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

In a country like ours where it is unpatriotic to disagree with the government, I’m not surprise about the uproar over Imus. We are happy to give up rights just to have more people agree with us. America is too precious a word to dissect. Many have given the ultimate gift away, life, to ensure this country is the beacon to the world. Americans should know these words, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…”. Please also note that “Only if we agree with you” is not there.

Posted by: Chuck Thompson | April 14, 2007, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Mos Def, Prez, Talib Kweli, The Roots, Common, De La Soul, these are some hip hop artists who continue to express the experiences of blacks in America through their lyrics, as many artists did during 1980s when the art form was dismissed and then embraced and manipulated by white controlled music companies. They are not artists in heavy rotation on MTV, VH1 or most other musical outlets because they don’t glorify degrading images of black women or criminal activity. The latest one-sided debate about hip hop, rap and rappers by journalists, mainstream media and uninformed whites, blacks and other Americans, does not allow for any constructive debate about positive versus negative images of blacks in hip hop and American society. Many of the artists I mentioned have had to find alternative ways to get their music heard because music executives prefer artists who use degrading language towards black women and glorify criminal behavior and turn away hip hop artists who do not make music that portrays this. Also important to this “debate” is the fact that the majority of people who support hip hop/rap music are white people, not black people, and that has been the case for that last 20 or so years. I really wish that the hip hop artists I first mentioned, who I would classify as “positive” or relevant, would address the unfair and uninformed generalizations about hip hop that are being used to justify Imus’ remarks.

Posted by: shani b | April 14, 2007, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

After listening to the nightly news tonight, I decided that I had to put my two cents in. There was a comment made that the word “ho” is accepted in the black culture. This is an untruth. The word “ho” will never be accepted in my household and I am an African American woman. Imus and many of these factory made rappers (corporation made) should all be fired for their comments. I used to be a lover of rap back in the 80′s and around the 90′s is when rap began to change and the videos turned to soft porn. The “n” word will never be accepted in my household regardless of their nationality. Yes, there is a double standard and that is not fair. It is about time that someone regulate the airwaves. The music and videos are very degrading to women. I do not watch BET or MTV for this reason. There are many corporations and artists who pockets are getting rich by degrading women and it appears as though no one cares or pretend as though this is not happening. The only defense that can be given is this is “freedom of speech”. There are some good rap artists such as Common who has not sold out his soul to obtain finances. For this reason, he is not as popular as the Ying Yang Twins.

Posted by: trina | April 14, 2007, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

I would just like to say that I don’t understand why rap music always comes under fire when something like this happens? Granted, there are certain rap lyrics that are degrading to women, and negative. But not ALL music reflects this. To those of you who may not be aware, there have been, AND STILL ARE, many positive rap artists out there, that respect and uphold black women, and the entire black race in general: Talib Kweli, Mos Def, Common, Nas, KRS-1, The Roots, The Fugees, to name a few. There was Will Smith, who was the first rap artist to win a grammy, LL Cool J, who has made the successful transition into movies/tv, Queen Latifah, now an oscar nominated actress, who, as a rap artist, always spoke highly of black people and made positive music; the list is much longer than this, I just don’t want to take up too much more space, this comment is going to be long enough. I don’t hear anyone talking about Grandmaster Flash, who were recently inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. Or RUN DMC, who were one of the pioneers of Rap, and who never said anything negative about women. Everyone just wants to say rap is bad…period. We need to educate ourselves. First of all, rap is simply poetry put to music. There are messages and lessons to be heard and learned, in the more POSITIVE rap songs. And another thing, if rap is soooo bad across the board, then why do so many companies use artists such as T.I., Snoop Dogg, and Ludacris to sell their cell phones and automobiles? I think we’ve become a society that has let so much go on for so long, that the line between right and wrong has become blurred. I think we all, each one of us individually, need to really step back and reassess ourselves, and before opening our mouths to speak, really ask the question, is what I am about to say going to offend someone? Is this a nice thing to say about another person? ANY person of integrity and character, wether they be WHITE or BLACK, should know what is deemed appropriate to say and/or do. Just because an artist may use certain language in a particular song, it does not mean the next person should do it. NO ONE SHOULD DO IT!!! it’s that simple. I’m so tired of us going over, what is okay to say, and what is not? if you have to ask yourself that, then it’s pretty obvious that maybe it’s something you shouldn’t say….DOUBT means DON’T….And as far as the comment someone said about Rosie O’donell being on tv, maybe she shouldn’t be on either. And I also feel that Howard Stern should have been taken off years ago as well. But that’s just it, we’ve become the kind of society where anything goes, and IT’S NOT ALL RAP MUSIC where this happens -that is all I have to say.

Posted by: Tonisha Cook | April 14, 2007, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Art is Art no matter how vulger; like beauty it is in the eye of the beholder, if one dislikes don’t look or listen, or participate in the mediam, a supposedly gauranteed right of the U.S. Constitution. In stark contrast the publicly sanctioned air-waves and broadcasting media neither are nor free accessible, none has a right to a radio show or to have a TV spot. The comparison being made here is a whimsical diversion, a ninny minded distraction from the truth tantamount to making Venus by Canova porno. The problem here is not Mr.Imus, Mr.Fifty, or Ms. Brat, it is the nuckle-headed white only execs making the decision in the various media board rooms. Just like other U.S. industries the media, including all its varying factions and related sub-industries such as advertising, broadcasting etc. is stymied by the overwhleming and limiting dominace of a single race controlling to of the thought process and innovations, truth is lost to the exploits of self respect, (thus the revenge factor in this debate), a true melting pot relies on all parts to contribute. Soon just like the phenominon of the dying U.S. Auto industry so too will we be relying on imported media,(i.e. Brithish invasion of Rock, “American Hockey”, “American Baseball”) Get a grip racism and art are not the same. The board rooms is where the racisim is. Imus was just a tool. So is the Rap they “think” people will buy. You know what you are dead wrong.

Posted by: Reese | April 14, 2007, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Dear Mr. MORON– You have NO CREDIBILITY after that Duke blog.
I’M DONE 100% WITH ABC NEWS AND IT’S HACK STAFF.
GOOD BYE RATINGS!!

Posted by: WEAK - HACK WRITER | April 14, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Racial tensions have been with us a long long time and aren’t ging away until we get to the core of the problem.
Unless people (of all skin tones) begin to see as, and act as one people, we’re going to have the differences magnified.
I am not racist at all yet I am so sick and tired of racial tensions that I’m ready to move away, yet, there’s no where to move to! So why not make it work here ? How?
As I said, I’m not racist, yet the tone of racial attention will not go away as long as we have what is called “Celebration” of the black color.
If there were to be “Red Miss America” contests, or “White History Month” or any celebrations of ethnicity that shut out one another of a different etnicity, we ARE going to have tensions and problems arising from such ideas.
If we were to have ‘White only’ colleges, or ‘Yellow entertainment T V’ stations, there would be lawsuits flying about like bats in a dark cave. Perhaps that’s where we are today, walking in darkness, living in caves of separatism, so the ‘Parent-land’ we stem from can be held on to instead of upholding THIS country and it’s diversity of people and nationalities, blended together in appreciation of one another.
I was born in the ghetto. All my neighbors where so thoroughly blended in color that we ALL loved each other, respected each other, helped each other, and saw each other very simply as My Neighbor and My Friend.
Bottom line is this: If continue with celebrations of ‘Color’ , we will continue to exasperate the problem by holding it in from of each others faces more as a Threat and a Challenge or a Brag, than what it claims to be.
Anything that irritates someone else becomes a problem, and anyone outside of the color of the days and/or weeks of celbration that I mentioned before will continue to keep the rub raw to many people of a different etnicity.
Is it worth at least trying to let those days go by for a couple of years to see if it helps?
“Black History Month – Black Miss U S A, Black Miss America, Black Entertainment Television, Black Colleges, Black Holidays”, all are days or weeks that promote racial tension instead of appeasing it. There are more days given to celbrating “Color Differences” than there are celbrating the men who founded this country.
Isn’t it time we celebrate ‘Where we live”, and “Why we have the freedom to live there” instead of those other celbrations that tend to stir and agitate tensions that we “say” we are tryin so hard to control and extinquish?
Isn’t it worth trying?

Posted by: Douglas Veer | April 14, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

You are such a Ghey, Moron. HAhahahah. People are laughing at you! hahahahahha….It’s like when you were in high school.

Posted by: Bill Grand | April 14, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Stop writing. People are not going to take anything you say seriously after your DUKE column. I have a feeling that it will come to haunt you. We’ll see.

Posted by: Joseph Holliday | April 14, 2007, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Racial tensions have been with us a long long time and aren’t going away until we get to the core of the problem.
Unless people (of all skin tones) begin to see as, and act as, one people, we’re going to have the differences magnified.
I am not at all racist yet I am so sick and tired of racial tensions that I’m ready to move away, yet, there’s no where to move to! So why not make it work here ? How?
As I said, I’m not racist, yet the tone of racial attention will not go away as long as we have what is called “Celebration” of the black color.
If there were to be “Red Miss America” contests, or “White History Month” or any celebrations of ethnicity that shut out one another of a different etnicity, we ARE going to have tensions and problems arising from such ideas.
If we were to have ‘White only’ colleges, or ‘Yellow entertainment T V’ stations, there would be lawsuits flying about like bats in a dark cave.
Perhaps that’s because that truly is where we are today, walking in darkness, living in caves of separatism, so the ‘Parent-land’ we stem from can be held on to instead of upholding THIS country and it’s diversity of people and nationalities, blended together in appreciation of one another.
I was born in the ghetto. All my neighbors where so thoroughly blended in color that we ALL loved each other, respected each other, helped each other, and saw each other very simply as My Neighbor and My Friend.
Bottom line is: If we continue with celebrations of ‘Color’, we will continue to exasperate the problem by holding it in front of each others faces more as a Threat and a Challenge or a Brag, than what it claims to be.
Anything that irritates someone else becomes a problem! And anyone outside of the color of the days and/or weeks of celbration that I mentioned before will continue to “keep the rub raw” to many people of a different etnicity.
Is it worth at least trying to let those days go by for a couple of years to see if it helps?
“Black History Month – Black Miss U S A, Black Miss America, Black Entertainment Television, Black Colleges, Black Holidays”, all are days or weeks that promote racial tension instead of appeasing it, by giving prominant notice to the differences. There are more days given to celebrating “Color Differences” than there are for celbrating the men ( of all color)who founded this country.
Isn’t it time we celebrate ‘Where we live”, and “Why we have the freedom to live there” instead of those other celebrations that tend to stir and agitate tensions that we “say” we are tryin so hard to control and extinquish?
Isn’t it worth trying?

Posted by: Douglas Veer | April 14, 2007, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

a few months back i was involved in a debate over racist terms…as a hispanic woman raising a daughter who’s father is black, i weighed in my thoughts…here was what i wrote back then and what i stand by now:
“i try to imagine what an african slave felt when a white man beat him and used the word nigger…my horror and disgust is just a minute sliver of the horror and absolute disrespect that slave tolerated…out of respect for these souls from the past, i won’t allow the word in my house, from the mouth of my child or her friends…no where around me…i am not african american, my child is…i can only venture a guess into the experience of black people in this country…i struggle with what shames me about this country’s past and with what to do or feel about the consequences that exist today due to that past…
my thoughts are this…here is a culture whose very identity was attacked…whose very sense of self was torn from them, an attempt at spiritual and cultural genocide was waged on these beautiful human beings, simply because the white european feared him/her and coveted what he/she possessed…the descendents of the slaves on whose backs this country was built must be encouraged NOT to make positive a word that was nothing but trash talked by racist pigs…they must be encouraged to find their own beautiful words and use them instead…there’s nothing positive about the word nigger…even if you replace the last two letters with an a…that word is shit…throw it out…
my two cents, for whatever it is worth…i sit here and feel so sad…every culture is so rich in it’s potential beauty and God given worth…i ask that we delve deeper into ourselves…let go of that which was used to bind and destroy both in the physical and spiritual sense…this word was/is like the whip used to beat down the black man…throw it out… “

Posted by: mora | April 14, 2007, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Art is Art no matter how vulger; like beauty it is in the eye of the beholder, if one dislikes don’t look or listen, or participate in the mediam, a supposedly gauranteed right of the U.S. Constitution. In stark contrast the publicly sanctioned air-waves and broadcasting media are neither gauranteed nor freely accessible, none of us has a right to a radio show or to have a TV spot. The comparison being made here is an obvious whimsical diversion, ninny minded revenge an obvious distraction from the truth. Which is tantamount to making the sculpture Venus by Canova pornography.
The problem here is not Mr.Imus, Mr.Fifty, or Ms. Brat,(a woman who raps vulger I might add), it is the nuckle-headed white only execs making the decisions in the various media outlet board rooms. I beleive that just like other U.S. industries the U.S. media is now doomed, including all its varying factions and related sub-industries such as advertising, broadcasting etc. because it is stymied by the overwhleming and limiting dominace of a single race controlling all of the thought process and innovations, truth is lost to the exploits of “self respect, and preservation” (thus the revenge factor in this very debate), a society formed as a true melting pot has to rely on all parts to contribute in order to succeed. Soon, as been witnessed by the phenomenon of the dying U.S. Auto industry so too will we import media,(i.e. British invasion of Rock, “American Hockey”, “American Baseball”) Get a grip racism and art are not the same. The board rooms is where the racisim is. Imus was just a tool. So is the Rap they “think” people will buy. You know what you are dead wrong. At least thats my view after seeing this story played on the BBC.

Posted by: Reese | April 14, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

I am surrounded everyday by people who dream of having the “most pimped out Cadillac Escalade eva” and idolizing rappers for their music. The former I have no problem with, it’s the latter that bugs me. I’ve heard what filth is put on the radio and I’m quite frankly sick of hearing people just idolizing a man in a recording studio encouraging America’s youth to repeat the filth coming out of their mouths. These rappers are sending messages of praise through songs like “Cocaine Dreams” (by 50 Cent) in which the first verse has eleven lines and only two lines which is “50 Cent, you heard me” don’t include any sort of profanity. This isn’t even the sadest part. Out of the whole song which is about 40 lines long, only about 10 (if that many) are printable on this site. that leaves at least 30 lines using words such as the “N word” and the “F word” like they are perfectly acceptable words in normal conversation. People are getting paid to produce songs that are immoral in more than one way. And the worst part is that America’s youth are making these people their role models. If you just skimmed over this let me sum up my message: People are getting paid to corrupt our youth with violent and immoral images every day. Something must be done. Now.
Here is a link to an example of what rappers put in their music: http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.nsf/Cocaine-Dreams-lyrics-50-Cent/32428D588472C2C948257156002B54C0

Posted by: SV | April 14, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Racial tensions have been with us a long long time and aren’t going away until we get to the core of the problem.
Unless people (of all skin tones) begin to see as, and act as, one people, we’re going to have the differences magnified.
I am not at all racist yet I am so sick and tired of racial tensions that I’m ready to move away, yet, there’s no where to move to! So why not make it work here ? How?
As I said, I’m not racist, yet the tone of racial attention will not go away as long as we have what is called “Celebration” of the black color.
If there were to be “Red Miss America” contests, or “White History Month” or any celebrations of ethnicity that shut out one another of a different etnicity, we ARE going to have tensions and problems arising from such ideas.
If we were to have ‘White only’ colleges, or ‘Yellow entertainment T V’ stations, there would be lawsuits flying about like bats in a dark cave.
Perhaps that’s because that truly is where we are today, walking in darkness, living in caves of separatism, so the ‘Parent-land’ we stem from can be held on to instead of upholding THIS country and it’s diversity of people and nationalities, blended together in appreciation of one another.
I was born in the ghetto. All my neighbors where so thoroughly blended in color that we ALL loved each other, respected each other, helped each other, and saw each other very simply as My Neighbor and My Friend.
Bottom line is: If we continue with celebrations of ‘Color’, we will continue to exasperate the problem by holding it in front of each others faces more as a Threat and a Challenge or a Brag, than what it claims to be.
Anything that irritates someone else becomes a problem! And anyone outside of the color of the days and/or weeks of celbration that I mentioned before will continue to “keep the rub raw” to many people of a different ethnicity.
Is it worth at least trying to let those days go by for a couple of years to see if it helps?
“Black History Month – Black Miss U S A, Black Miss America, Black Entertainment Television, Black Colleges, Black Holidays”, all are days or weeks that promote racial tension instead of appeasing it, by giving prominent notice to the differences. There are more days given to celebrating “Color Differences” than there are for celebrating the men ( of all color)who founded this country.
Isn’t it time we celebrate ‘Where we live”, and “Why we have the freedom to live there” instead of those other celebrations that tend to stir and agitate tensions that we “say” we are tryin so hard to control and extinguish?
Isn’t it worth trying

Posted by: Douglas Veer | April 14, 2007, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

I agree Imus should not have made derogatory remarks about the young female basketball players. He doesn’t know if any of them are “hos”.
It’s common to hear blacks call each other “ho”, “nigga”, “nappy hair” on national television talk shows with not so much as an eyebrow is raised. NOW a caucasion says “nappy haired ho” & it’s a national scandal. Hip hoppers & rappers use the same dialogue – no problem. Caucasions would NEVER be allowed to use those same words in the lyrics to their songs. Gimme a break. This is just another example of reverse discrimination.
Imus will be back on the air soon as if this whole ridiculous double-standard incident had never occurred.

Posted by: Yaesu | April 14, 2007, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

I wouldn’t expect a WASP male who has had all the benefits of American society at his feet his entire life to understand anything concerning this situation. You will NEVER understand how it feels to be oppressed in this country. When statistics show that a black man does 6 times the amount of jail time that a white male does for the same offense, we have a problem. Can you understand that? Is that acceptable to you? As an educated black man in America, I understand all too well. I do NOT excuse blacks for using derogatory and self depreciating terms with reference to themselves; but that is not an excuse for whites to use this language, especially in light of the fact that it is because of the oppression and degradation of whites that wrought forth the sociological conditions which are responsible for the language. You don’t understand? …… I’ll explain it to you …… White slavers created the word ‘nigger’, not black slaves. White slave masters used black women as ‘hos’ not black slaves. It is extremely important that you understand what racism is. Racism is when one has POWER and uses that power in a way that can oppress or influence others. Imus certainly had power since he was on the national airways and he certainly had the platform to influence others. Without that platform he was just another prejudiced person. Without power, racism is nothing more than prejudice or predilection. But more to the point is the fact that Imus was using inflammatory language for decades. In 1976, he used the word ‘nigger’ while being the featured speaker at a communications conference attended mostly be college students, black and white. He should have been fired long ago and white America’s tolerance, even acceptance of this only shows that the entire corporate world doesn’t give a damn as long you make money for your sponsors ……… or your ‘massa’, just like a plantation overseer. Let’s get it straight. I wouldn’t be insulted if someone called your wife an ugly name, but you would. That’s why you don’t hear the insult of Imus’ words but black people do. And concering hip hip, hip hoppers aren’t on the radio for free. If you want to hear their music you have to BUY it or download it or do whatever the digital generation does for it’s music. Imus was on FREE radio for hours everyday …. And do you REALLY believe that a black radio personality would survive calling a bunch of country white girls ‘trailer-trash, redneck, hillbilly hos’? If you say yes, then you’re either a liar or just plain naive and are REALLY the thing Black America needs to fear. I’m glad Imus said what he did. Now the people know what he’s been thinking for years. Don’t smile in our faces and talk badly about us behind our backs. Be upfront about who you are and how you feel. And he finally did …. and he finally got what was long overdue. This is America and everybody has the right to be heard. Everybody just isn’t worth listening to. Imus is one of the latter.

Posted by: bruce bennett | April 14, 2007, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

I don’t see why many or most of these hip-hop, rap or whatever the musical style is, videos and songs are not considered pornography. What is the redeeming social value of promoting violence, drug use/abuse, prostitution and generally degrading women? Oh, they don’t actually show uncovered titties, dicks or buns. So they comply with the letter of the law but surely not the spirit of it.
I don’t listen to rap-hop (my new term for this so called “music”). I think it is terrible as music. There might be an occasional song that is ok but most of it is braggadocio from some urban thug, the majority of whom seem to be black (African, negros or whatever word I’m supposed to use – how about “niggers”). In fact, my impression of all rappers is that they are “niggers”. It doesn’t matter if they are black, latino, white (m&m, k-fed, etc). They all put out trash and claim to be artists.
In my opinion, from what I see and hear of “rap-hop”, it is nothing more than inciting violence and criminal behavior. It is creating a homegrown urban insurgency in America, just like they have in Iraq. Street gangs are flourishing in big cities and many smaller cities and even rural areas. What is the inspiration? I think it is rap-hop. Even if many of these street gang types are not in the more well known and larger gangs, they are wannabe’s and go out and do crimes to prove and make themselves. Ever hear the term “street cred”? I’ve been arrested, therefore I’m cool. This isn’t cool. Anyone who aspires to having “street cred” is an idiot.
Maybe I should start a new musical form that glamorizes being a child molester. Or maybe something that glamorizes torture. I know, lets glamourize buring down black churches. Or killing cops. “Yo, yo, if you really want to be man and get lots of hos, go burn down a black church…..” Or “I woke this morning with a hard on for the 4 year old boy next door…. This make me a real man that all the hos will want. Make my tool big and hard….” Etc. Oh, and for a pedophile, being attracted to children is their reality. They would just be singing about something that they experience. Just like the rap-hoppers blowing about their so-called reality in de ‘hood.
By the way, if you want to call me racist – let me say thank you, I’m proud of that.

Posted by: PimpPopper | April 14, 2007, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

There is a fundamental difference in the manner in which Don Imus referred to the young black women of Rutgers basketball team and the lyrics of Rappers. When Imus referred to the Rutgers University basketball team as “Nappy headed hos” he was speaking of Black American women in general terms because he did not know these women. He only knew them to be young Black American women. Therefore, his remarks were a general reference to young Black American women. In this regard, it was totally inappropriate for the ladies to meet with him. They need not prove anything to Imus or anyone like him. Further, those of you, black or white, who are avoiding discussing this fundamental difference are either just plain stupid or without good intentions. How would you have reacted if a black TV personality had referred to all white girls as “stringy headed hoes” or “Bokra Bitches”?

Posted by: Winfield G. James | April 14, 2007, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

According to all the press reporting, the only racists and people who make racist comments belong to the white race. Black people can make whatever comments they want against their own race or anyone else’s and everyone shrugs it off. But lets hang the guy who did make a offensive comment and was suspended for it. Please check out some of Malcom X’s comments from the past or Al Sharptons’currently. They were and are more racist than any of the people I know of including Don Imus. Lets start publizising some of the most visible black politicians and artists and lets see who is really the most racist in this country.

Posted by: Fran Jones | April 14, 2007, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

I think that people should forgive Imus and stop being stupid. He meant what he said as a joke, then apologized for it. Imus shouldn’t have said what he said in the first place, however, people say worse stuff everyday. I go to high school and I hear worse stuff then what he said. It’s a part of life. People aren’t going to be all friendly with you all the time. Some just don’t like you and are going to try to bring you down by saying bad and stupid stuff to you. Discrimination happens everywhere and to everybody whether you like it or not. So people, GET OVER IT!!!

Posted by: Autumn | April 14, 2007, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

I do not for one moment condone Imus’remarks, but on the other hand where is Mr. Sharpton and the rev Jesse Jackson when these remarks are made everyday on the radio by rappers and comedians of their same race? Is that not considered dehumanizing? Now who is racists? Whatever happened to “forgiving and forgetting”?

Posted by: San | April 14, 2007, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

I do not for one moment condone Imus’remarks, but on the other hand where is Mr. Sharpton and the rev Jesse Jackson when these remarks are made everyday on the radio by rappers and comedians of their same race? Is that not considered dehumanizing? Now who is racists? Whatever happened to “forgiving and forgetting”?

Posted by: San | April 14, 2007, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

The only white people in America that can say anything about discrimination are poor white women. The rest of these comments come from naive opinion, no experience whatsoever. Speak about what you know, not what you think.

Posted by: Bruce | April 14, 2007, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Don Imus’ words were reprehensible—sexist and racist. So is Gansta rap which denigrates women of all races. Yet, rappers are allowed, encouraged, and paid enourmous amounts of money for their misogyny in the name of “poetic expression.” As a woman and a human, I’m offended by both Imus and rap. However, if one is allowed, so should the other. If one is censored, so should the other.
Imus should have been suspended, fined, etc. for his irresponsible public display, but instead he got a bum “rap.”

Posted by: Nancy W. | April 14, 2007, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

As a black female I find it far more offensive that many (black male) rappers refer to women in such a derogatory manner. And, while I believe that Imus’ reference was completely out of line, I am having a hard time feeling as much outrage as the many so-called black leaders are claiming to be. Is there a double standard here? I think it very hypocritical that they have not defended women of color with the same intensity when it comes to rap lyrics. How about boycotting and demonstrating against companies that promote these artists?

Posted by: Jackie | April 14, 2007, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

So why are the folks at ABC.com pulling blog posts??
————————-
This is a very interesting debate for several reasons and something that continues to come up in our society…something that doesn’t seem to go away.
I won’t bring up many very public instances of racism that are alive and well today like the government’s direct racist singling out of those of Arab descent all over the world, or the continued exploitation of Hispanic immigrants, just to name a few…
I think there is an inherent misleading string in this discussion…Are we talking racism or are we talking sexism. Both are equally wrong and shouldn’t be tolerated but is calling a woman a hoe racist? Not quite. Further, has anyone thought that those making the real money off artists calling women hoes and bitches aren’t Black? Maybe not… Is it racist to fund the continued misrepresentation of Black artists in order to develop this perception that all rap artists are sexist/racist? Some would likely say yes. The fact of the matter is that these few artists in hip hop are funded by large record companies funded and run by you guessed it… White men…
Now, let’s go back to the current topic. First I’m appalled by this continued perception that ALL hip hop culture and music is sexist and racist. If you refer to the beginning of this blog you see the names of artists that pride themselves on being progressive. Pubic Enemy addressed the issues of a nation for many years, Kanye West discusses integrates social commentary into his music, Common, Living Legends, NAS, and so on are artists that communicate something in their music – speak of their experiences, etc.
Is it racist that this commercialized rap that spews this sexist banter which does not make up the majority of artist out there is being seen as something that “black men” are getting away with?
Why are we baiting the real issue – Imus racially insulting a group of well educated, athletically talented women – and switching it to a discussion on all of rap and hip hop culture?
I guarantee that 99% of those that have posted things like “I don’t list to that vile music and don’t let me kids listen to it” have never really listened to hip hop artists outside of reading about a few artists in the newspapers or watching on the news. 90% of what you see about hip hop on the news or read in mainstream media is negative and reflects less than the majority of artists that are out there. Just like the view of Arabs on mainstream US TV and in print. The vast majority of coverage that include Arabs in this country show them as terrorists or in a negative light, when the reality of it is less than 1% of Palestinians are terrorists. Yet living here you would think 99% are.
This is the same for hip hop and rap… All of the comments and coverage portray 90% of hip hop as being negative or sexist when that is not the case. Is this racist?
Back in the 90s when kids were killing themselves because of Heavy Metal music did the media say that all Heavy Metal was dangerous? When groups of Satan worshippers would listen to rock groups that were on the Billboard top 10 because of their satanic lyrics did the media say that all rock was bad? No…They portrayed it as a small minority of rock and Heavy Metal music. Why? Why is it when an art form dominated by African American men has a minority that portraying such a negative message being portrayed as the majority? Is it racism?
I think the real issue in this debate is where we are as a nation when it comes to racism and sexism. Let’s look at the facts – for every $1 that a white man gets paid in the U.S. an equally qualified black man in the same job gets less than 85 cents, a white woman gets 80 cents, African American woman gets 69 cents, and a Hispanic woman gets 56 cents. In voting, states are preventing non-profit groups from holding voter registration drives – the same groups that in 2004 helped to register under-represented groups like ethnic minorities, the elderly and disabled. Why would the government not want all of its citizens to be able to vote? While white men make up only 48 percent of college-educated jobs, they hold over 90 percent of the top jobs in the news media, 96 percent of CEO jobs and 85 percent of tenured college faculty positions.
Let’s look at the real issues involving racism and sexism. This debate is more than just what a few rappers are doing; this is about an institutional problem that goes beyond “name calling”…This is life.
I’ll close with a hypothetical:
K. Bailey posed the question, would a white producer be able to make a movie like Black men can’t… or Black Chicks, etc. The assumption is being made that Black producers/directors created the movies White Chicks and White Men Can’t Jump (Rob Shelton director/writer). Well, the assumption was right for White Chicks K. Bailey, but like so many other movies that fit in that exploitative genre White Men Can’t Jump was written and director by a White person. In fact the vast majorities of producers and directors in the movie industry are white so it is likely that the movies you were so offended by were ones created by white people. Something to think about…
For once I wish that this type of attention would be directed at the real issues… The fact is Imus was a relatively washed up radio DJ whose days were numbered anyway. The hate he spewed on a regular basis was indicative of the inherent cultural acceptance of institionalized racism in this country. Let’s look at that real issue…How are we as an American people going to change the institution?

Posted by: DR H | April 14, 2007, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

My name is Chris I am 16 years old and a California native. I heard the comments by Imus and wasn’t offended by It, I didn’t think much of it but he still didn’t have any business saying it. Rap is my favorite genre of music and I find it upseting when adults or news analysts speak about it like it has grown legs and killed people. Those people who speak like that are miss informed and have a misunderstanding about wat we call rap today. Rap is an art form, an expression of the artists feelings to the audience about however they’re feeling at the time or whatever may be going on in the world at the time. it can be very influential, many artists you “experts” look down upon are very prestigious, have won countless awards and most have had to come from nothing at all, the slums. So how can you take away their gift, their talent just because you feel offended. I understand when they speak about women or whatever else the uproar is about, however they’re not speaking to every woman in america, these artists know that there are hardworking women out there, some are married or were born by a woman. They’re speaking to those women who choose to be portrayed as “hoes” not to say it’s a rappers job to determine what a woman amounts to in this world but we all know some women who are a little too open or revealing. So if you take offense to those lyrics then you’re probably the one that these artists are speking about. Another thing that gets me heated is how everyone can pin point rap but seem to forget all of the other genre’s mainly those who don’t involve African-American artists, Rap seems to be the scape goat for every problem that arises in these different communities and that’s wrong whoever this Imus dude is said what he said that’s that, there’s no reason to include what rappers say and do, he needs to man up and worry about himself. stop trying to save himself by sacrificing others.
Signed,
The worlds only hope FB’s up

Posted by: Chris | April 14, 2007, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

The people who will miss Imus the most are the talking heads like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. They have made a fortune out of denouncing anyone who is not black.If racism goes away they will need to get a real job.If they really want to get hate off the air , they should go after the rappers and HBO et al.

Posted by: flash | April 14, 2007, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

I have a real problem with Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. Not because they pushed the issue that Imus deserved to be fired. Hey, Imus has been a racist since he recorded the comedy album “This Honky’s Nuts” in the mid-70′s, and got canned for going too far.
My issue with the ministers is with their refusal to come down on other performers and artists who use words to denigrate others.
I was taught that words like n****r, ho and bitch are shameful, hateful words, and should have nothing to do with the discourse of a society. At the same time, I hear it in the music of the day and in the way many young black people greet each other. Frankly, I cringe when I hear those words.
The words are ugly, and they are not needed in our society.
I do not want to hear, “Well, it’s a black thing; you wouldn’t understand.” That’s bogus. Whether it’s someone like Imus calling the Rutgers basketball team what he did, or a rapper like Snoop Dogg refering to the women in his neighborhood as bitches and hoes is immaterial. It’s vile, hateful language, and Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson need to be more public in criticizing the use of the language. There is a double standard in this country, and it needs to stop.

Posted by: horacewimp | April 14, 2007, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

What Imus said was not at all POLITICALLY CORRECT but I have seen many episodes of HBO’s Russell Simons Def Comedy Jam in wich many derogatory statements are made towards whites.

Posted by: ronman402002 | April 14, 2007, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Was it Sharpton or Jackson who referred to Jews as “Hymies” and NYC as “Hymie Town”? Didn’t one cause one of their own to enter a jewish shop and shoot 4 people and then burn the store down? Both of them are so full of themselves, it is sad that anyone even listens to them at all!
And, why not go after the “ho” that screamed rape against the Duke players? She has a history of this type of thing.
Anyone offended by this type of BS needs to spend time elsewhere in the world, and see what other citizens have to put up with. Anyone hear of Darfur? How about tribal violence in Africa for almost of all their history.
So many people claim to admire our troops serving in combat. Do you really think they care what color their fellow soldiers are? NO!If they have a US flag on their shoulder and a uniform on, then they trust each other with their lives.
The bleeding heart civilians need to learn priorities! We should be more concerned about our own govt manipulating our national security, health care, energy resources, and the very basis for our monetary system and lying to us the entire time.
You don’t like what is on tv or radio, turn it off! If parents would teach their children to be responsible for their own actions and to think for themselves, imagine how much better off this nation would be. Instead of trying to keep up with the Joneses with toys and crap teach your kids contentment with what they have, but to have the drive to continually improve their in lives.

Posted by: American | April 14, 2007, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

There is no double standard regarding free speech in these United States. Many differences exist between the targeted, hate-filled speech of Don Imus and the ignorant, vile speech of many rappers.
It’s no stretch to say that many of those who have posted to this message board or who will read these comments have heard the comments of Don Imus. If you compare his comments to the lyrics of your favorite rap song, there is a small but significant difference.
Most rappers don’t specify a particular group of people as the target of their lyrics. Rappers are equal opportunity misogynists. Those who espouse hate are generally referring to people they dislike within their individual communities (men and women, often referred to in the same terms, who wish to do harm to their interests or who do not share a common belief). A particular song of reference that has been used and misused repeatedly is “Area Codes” by Ludacris, a song where he describes the abundance of women at his disposal around the country. Suffice it to say that a large number if not the majority of U.S. Area Codes do not house an abundance of African American people. Though negative and abusive towards women, the meaning of the song is not the same as the statement by Don Imus as it doesn’t single out a particular group.
The mischaracterization of the Rutgers women’s basketball team by Don Imus, which is majority black, in his selected terms elicits images of the great American atrocity, the enslavement of people of African descent, during a time where black people in the Unites States were often referred to in those negative terms and worse, and treated as less than human. Don Imus spoke in a manner more reflective of a 19th century slave auctioneer, or a reconstruction-era former slave-owning, southern farmer, as opposed to a nationally syndicated radio personality in the year 2007.
We’re not talking about a double standard of free speech. To argue that Don Imus and popular rappers are equal is simply an attempt to remove the focus from, Don Imus, the only person at fault in this instance. He is white and he has used his freedom of speech at times responsibly and at other times, as in this instance, negatively. If the person using the airwaves were black, Hispanic or Asian and used this platform similarly, I’d expect to see nothing less than a public stoning. If you have access to public airwaves, you have a responsibility to behave responsibly. Don Imus was irresponsible and he paid the price for it.

Posted by: Rob | April 14, 2007, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

HOPE YOU’VE BEEN READING ALL THESE FINE COMMENTS TERRY!
YOU MORON!

Posted by: floyd, pink | April 14, 2007, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Like Snoop Dog Said. It is very important to remember that ALL cultures have vernacular that is unique to that culture. when you extract pieces of that vernacular to fit what you think is an appropriate comment, you run the risk that because you have no idea of the context of the vernacular, you offend that culture.
Tarentino is able to use nigger and other ‘black’ vernacular and get away doing it because he uses the vernacular in context. A great many ‘non-black folks have been able to use those term because they understand the context and that understanding is that the language is not a color thing but a class thing.
Those ‘black’ who see rap as derogatory to black people need to get their head out of their ‘white’ butts and get back to their own culture not just the ‘respectable’ one.
There are people, of all cultures, whose actions, behaviour and attitude command dissrespect. Respect is an earned attribute not a right. Just because a rapper uses the term does not mean that he or she is ‘dissing’ a culture, just those in it who have earned it.
Language is different for each race and culture, all of it. Even though may seem offensive, no one, but no one has the right to dictate how it is to be used. At the same time it is the obligation of those who wish to use it to learn of proper use and application.
Don and those who support apparently don’t want to understand that fundamental responsibility. There is a heavy price to pay for that arrogance, or ignorance. The one thing that any minority can tell you is that one single aspect of being in America is the most damaging aspect of being in America. As the saying goes, if tyou can’t speak the language, stay the f#@# out of the country!

Posted by: B. Alexander | April 14, 2007, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

I agree with you 100%, Terry. I’m a huge fan of rap music, but I would like to see it change so women like me don’t get offended (I’m 18).
BTW, I don’t know why everyone thinks you’re an idiot, Terry. The comments are supposed to be about the article, not about you. And to everyone who say sh*t about Terry, leave it to the Nightline forum, thanks. It seems that no one has a purpose for the comments feature.
And to Terry:
Disable it if it gets too bad to handle.

Posted by: DZB | April 14, 2007, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Terry;
I’m glad you came out in defense of fairness and even-handedness over an issue that is so unfairly biased (racism – biased on behalf of minorities, mind you!) in a venue that is so hopelessly left-driven (the media). The only reason individuals like “the reverend” Al Sharpton and “the reverend” Jesse Jackson are so deftly silent in denouncing hip hop artists and their culture of subversive de-humanization of black women is because that would be bad business for the TWO of THEM.
As some of our more conscientious African-Americans have already started to point out (e.g. Bill Cosby, Shelby Steele), replacing the flashy signs and incendiary rhetoric of victim-hood in favor of equal RESPONSIBILITY – which should be indivisible from “equal opportunity,” though apparently (and shamefully) not in this case – would, in all practicality, extinguish the “cause” so dearly promoted by the aforementioned “reverends:” that if you are black and you live in the United States then you are a victim of a well-orchestrated, carefully implemented, and silently upheld plan by a nation-wide network of white co-conspirators to maintain African-Americans culturally segregated, financially challenged, and intellectually handicapped.
And if their “cause” were de-mystified by, say, factual data revealing unprecedented accomplishments in all areas of culture, business and the arts by African-Americans who choose to live by their God-given merits and abilities (rather than by the empty mantra of professional profiteers-turned-pseudo-Civil Rights activists), then there’s a small chance we might start to see the same “outrage” that was (appropriately) unleashed against Imus also being unleashed against those who – for now – perpetrate the same outrageous and derogatory actions against black women in their mega-million dollar hip-hop recordings.
Equally appreciated, will be the fact that on that day, the “reverends” will also be required to look for REAL gainful employment like all the rest of us, Americans.

Posted by: AZS | April 14, 2007, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

You may not realize the worst of black rap has been exported globally and here in New Zealand at the other end of the world my 12 year old white son sings to lyrics about the words Imus used and even the n word while brown natives down the road are fighting each other viciously calling their gangs Crips and Bloods. None of these kids have no idea of the significance of the words or the origin of the gangs. Thanks US rap artists and the corporations that profit from it. Talk about double standards.

Posted by: Mike | April 14, 2007, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Oh, and by the way, Terry:
God bless your daughter, I hope one day she will find a man who would never say nothing like what others say. (I think all men act the same)

Posted by: DZB | April 14, 2007, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Excellent article!!! There is certainly a double-standard in this Imus issue. I agree that these foul-mouthed rappers don’t get a free pass to use slurs just because they are black. And for them to call it their “art” or an expression of their “mind and soul” is plain ridiculous and idiotic. I think society in general has to learn the virtue of treating others with respect and stop being good-for-nothing nincompoops.

Posted by: Traveler88 | April 14, 2007, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Anyone who thinks CBS fired Imus because they were appalled by what Imus said is a fool. CBS fired Imus because adverti$er$ jumped ship.

Posted by: Edwin | April 14, 2007, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Oh, and by the way, didn’t I hear that Snoop Dog is going to be locked up again in jail? I think that is definitely good for society!

Posted by: Gil | April 14, 2007, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

I didnt listen to the “infamous” Imus broadcast myself, so I cannot really judge whether he deserved to be fired or not.
On the other hand, I feel that all folks have a responsility for cleaning up their acts–music artists, African-Americans, and Caucasians. I dont think the “N” word, “Ho” or other language should be condoned by anybody.

Posted by: amy | April 15, 2007, 12:40 am 12:40 am

This isn’t really that deep. You make your bed, and sleep in it. Doesn’t matter if that bed involves unseen consequences of hiring a stripper (those fine upstanding pillar of society Dukies…) or making racist comments. Everyone’s responsible for what they do, and racist terms are always unacceptable – regardless of who says them.

Posted by: Meit | April 15, 2007, 5:39 am 5:39 am

He didn’t make it up. He was simply repeating a phrase he had heard elsewhere. GET OVER IT.

Posted by: K | April 15, 2007, 7:22 am 7:22 am

Imus messed up, that’s for sure, but as you point out there certainly is a double standard. It’s not right for anybody to use that kind of language against any other people. It’s repugnant to see the “freedom of speech” argument raised in this regard. What happened to the *responsibility* and *accountability* we have in using that right? What has happened to common decency? The boundaries are being pushed back. It’s not good for any of us. Show me the use of vulgarities, epithets, and insults to show artistic expression, and I’ll see an “artist” who is too lazy or too inarticulate to do it the right way.

Posted by: JB | April 15, 2007, 8:48 am 8:48 am

Not a bad article, though I don’t think the President of Sony is a white man, nor the heads of most rap labels. You would do well to clarify that.
You do a much better job than your previous entry on the Duke case.
In end I feel bad for the women from Rutgers. I feel worse for the children and beneficiaries of the charities that Imus will probably not be able to continue funding at previous levels. They’re the ones who will really suffer because Imus was taken to task over his comments.

Posted by: Jim | April 15, 2007, 8:52 am 8:52 am

WoW!
Mr. Author: Who are you and what did you do with Terry!!
It is very difficult to believe that the Terry who signed his name to the Imus story, and the one who signed his name to the Duke story are the same men [ should I have said, person?].
I see no pandering to left, or right by the Imus Terry, while it is so obvious, that when the “Duke Terry” calls the Duke students “Dukies”, he is indeed pandering to a specific group of folks, and even advancing their agenda – there is bias in Duke Terry!
I feel for you , Terry, all of you. It is not easy reconciling being a schitzo and having to make a living as a REPORTER in Internet Age.
To quote the philosopher and deep- thinker, Forest Gump, or was it his mother who said it first? Well, no matter – the quote; “…Life is like a box of chocolates. You never know what you are going to get!’.
Ditto, when TERRY writes an article.
Well, maybe sometimes; depending on the subject matter we can guess which Terry’s ideas might creep in, but it makes for better reading when we toss in the Gump thing. Don’t you think so, Terry?
Sal

Posted by: sal | April 15, 2007, 11:21 am 11:21 am

While this is actually a coherent post, Comrade Moran, I don’t believe one word of it is what you really think.
Your arrogant, elitist, racist, Marxist BS about the Dukies is the real you. If it weren’t, you never would have made it in our intolerant, America-hating, Israel-bashing, Christian-bashing MSM.

Posted by: Eric R. | April 15, 2007, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Stop listening to Johnny Hodges. You are not smart enough to understand his “sopistication” You listening to Johnny Hodges is insulting. Ewwww

Posted by: Jazz Man | April 15, 2007, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

I can’t wait to read Moran’s commentary on slave restitution.

Posted by: Dave R | April 15, 2007, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Dave R said:
“I can’t wait to read Moran’s commentary on slave restitution.”
Given his Duke post, his far-left views, and his obvious sycophancy to Sharpton, Jackson and other black radicals, Moran will probably advocate that Jews controlled the slave trade.

Posted by: Eric R. | April 15, 2007, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

It hardly requires that of the astutely minded to discern Moran’s clumsy strategy of psychological diversion here. By way of introducing irrelevant and self deprecating clauses like, “So, I’m an old fogey” or “But I’m hopeless in that regard”, we can’t but assume an intellection born from some kind of ulterior motive, on the part of Moran. As another example, consider his attempt to render an association between himself and the Waltons. These are the herrings, the nosequitors, the ostensibly immaterial particles of grist we’re expected to digest, without question…are we? Somehow, I’m reminded of a corrupt executive administration (perhaps the most corrupt in US history) whose members stood before all the media, the American people, and took an vow, an oath of honesty and integrity. Are we to accept by default, Moran’s (not so subtle) implication of self virtue, of chastity? Why the distraction Mr. Moran? You have something to hide? Is your lack of sympathy no more that a cheap ruse.

Posted by: art | April 15, 2007, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

The main reason the black and white issue is still maintaining a gigantic gap in American society is because Jackson and Sharpton are keeping it alive. Bringing any reasonable conclusion to the problem would not serve their interests and if they are to survive they must continue to pit black against white. This Imus thing was a perfect example of an incident that may have served in a positive way but that was not to be. Why not, because it was not to the benefit of the race baiting twins. They are two “reverends” who have no notion of kindness or forgiveness only echoes of the distant past sins of the white society. In the case of Imus, sure it was a dumb insensitive thing to say, it was not said out of malice or contempt nor was it said to degrade anyone. It was simply a thoughtless comment, can’t we move on? If the two “reverends” did half as much for the Afro American society as Imus has done for both then perhaps we wouldn’t continue this hatfield and McCoy nonsense.
Sure we have bigots and racists in the white society, we also have them in the Afro American society. Like the poor they will always be with us, it’s the nature of the beast. Sharpton and Jackson are more transparent than they can imagine, we can all see through the rhetoric, the poison they spew, unfortuneately they have believers and followers and more power than they should be allowed. They intimidate they don’t lead or provide examples like Martin Luther
King provided. They may well be the architects of a horrendous white backlash, the double standard can not endure forever.

Posted by: kondor26 | April 15, 2007, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

When I moved from Pittsburgh to Philly in 1970 I listened to Imus In the Morning often. He made me laugh and he made me mad. A few years later I meandered south and forgot about his show. Thirty years passed and during my treadmill routine at 6 AM in Houston I rediscovered Imus on WNBC. He made me laugh and he made me mad all over again.
He took it in the chin and he took it well. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. And where are his pals…Tim Russert, John Meacham, Jim Nance, Brian Williams? Don, you made me laugh and you made me mad and I will miss you. You deserved better.

Posted by: Geo | April 15, 2007, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Regarding your entry on the Dukies, and this entry on Imus/rappers..Terry, you should really up your meds!

Posted by: Akubra | April 15, 2007, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

I believe that the decision to remove Imus from the airways was a good start to an over due problem. We have to remember 2 things. While everyone is only focusing on one issue, Imus made 2 remarks in one sentence. He made a racist slur and disrespected women at the same time. The term “Nappy Headded” refers to a race of people (black people) and in the same breath he called them “hoes”. His term is both racist and sexist.
Although I don’t condone the use of any derogatory term to describe women in the “rap world”. You NEVER hear any rap artist refering to black women as “nappy headed hoes”. In the terms of Ebonics one word have different meanings from race to race and are interpreted differently outside of the that race. The reaction would have been the same even if he had said, chinks, spics, slanted eyed, vanilla or yellow people, trailor trash or guedos. They are all racist terms to describe a race of people. And it has to stop somewhere. Mind you, I am African- American.
Thank you

Posted by: Passion | April 15, 2007, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Guys like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are nothing but rabble-rousers. Are they trying to starting another Civil War? One between blacks and whites?
If the situations are reversed (i.e.) a black man saying something like Imus did, about white women, absolutely NOTHING would have been said. And I’m tired of the “double standard” that exists.
If a white cop has to shoot a black man, it’s a “hate crime” by a prejudiced cop. If a black cop has to shoot a white man, nothing. Nothing, whatsoever.
Stop trying to make a race issue about everything that occurs. There are are bad people in every race, of every gender, of every religion, of every political belief, of every sexual persuasion. Stop trying to make something out of nothing!
Yeah, Don Imus said something that everyone considers objectionable. Except for the people who are making money from the same words on video, on hip-hop (or rap) music sites, and black comedy shows every day.
How very HYPOCRITICAL of all of those involved!

Posted by: Anne Rankin | April 15, 2007, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

It is a double standard you moron. How can you be so dense that you can’t figure this out. I’ll help you figure this out…
I suggest you try reading transcripts (speeches, song lyrics, etc..) without knowing the race or sex of the speaker or audience. Then judge whether the language is racist or sexist. Then go back and figure out who said the things you thought were racist and sexist. This will make it abundantly clear that there is a double standard. You will wonder how you missed it.

Posted by: fred | April 15, 2007, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

casuistry as an art form… what a self righteous ass.

Posted by: marianne | April 15, 2007, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

I am seeing a lot of names of posters are the same as frequent posters to right-wing blogs. You must be thrilled they have now decided to increase ABC News net ratings.
You might also try searching the hate-speech on blogs with your girl out of the room. Little Green Footballs and Free Republic and Red State comments come to mind. The big Rightie blogs don’t allow comments, they know the class of people they appeal to.

Posted by: Gary Denton | April 16, 2007, 1:48 am 1:48 am

nobody ever remembers the losers of the championship game, only the winners are glorified. rutgers however, will now have their place since they keep pushing into the limelite with their debate over imus’ comments. though i don’t believe in his comments, i do believe in freedom of speech. he has already been released by his employers…what else do they want? also, is there any one player on rutgers that actually take his comments personally? i don’t even like basketball. i don’t watch it…i don’t even know who won. however, i do know who lost…..don’t stop with imus….take rap out as well!

Posted by: michael | April 16, 2007, 9:33 am 9:33 am

I really was surprised that Imus received any disciplinary action, and was amazed that he was fired over a comment that millions probably agree with.
I believe that comparing his comment to hip-hop and rappers is ridiculous. Most people listen to that kind of music because they want to. Personally, I don’t!
In reference to the reverse discrimination comparison, most Caucasians refuse to endure for a month or year what they perceive as discrimination. Imagine this as a way of life. Amazing how it’s not “whining” when the situation affects you personally.
Imus should take responsibility for his words–he was made to do so anyway! Maybe others will learn from this incident–nah!

Posted by: Mo | April 16, 2007, 11:27 am 11:27 am

previous post by Dick belongs on “Dukies” article, not here.

Posted by: Dick | April 16, 2007, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Dick,
Your post’s reasoning sounds pretty good right here too (it would probably be at home under most of Mr. Moran’s other blog entries here that–somehow, always come down to race and/or religion… ;)
-Bill

Posted by: BfC | April 16, 2007, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Oh for Pete’s sake! Can we all just get over it? Freedom of speech…Hello? If you don’t want to hear what Imus has to say (whether it’s derogatory OR uplifting), don’t tune in. Each of us is in charge of our own environments, and we choose what and who we lend an ear to. You don’t like what he’s saying? Don’t listen. Fascism will reign if we all start barring what can and can’t be said in America.
One more thing, why don’t we let the listenership speak for itself? If the majority of Imus’s listeners were offended, they’d stop listening. And if they stopped listening, advertisers would stop sponsoring…end result? END OF DON IMUS! There’s something to be said about thinking before you speak, but to fire him is certainly jumping the gun.

Posted by: Tina | April 16, 2007, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

The Rutgers women were minding their own business, doing their best to win a basketball game when out-of-the blue a national talk show host called them a racist, sexist slur. The only person who brought race into the picture was Don Imus.
While what happened to the Duke players was tragic, there was no time when they were called a racist slur on broadcast television (or radio for that matter). Let’s stop mixing apples and oranges.
No amount of complaining about rap music diminishes the fact that Imus’s hateful words were offensive and had no place on a national broadcast. If that’s not the case, let’s let a black national talk show host call group of white college women “red-neck, trailer trash sluts,” call it free speech and then blame heavy metal music and Jeff Foxworthy.

Posted by: BMW | April 16, 2007, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Terry you fairy… You can run from the ‘Dukies’ but you can’t hide….

Posted by: A Rosario | April 17, 2007, 12:37 am 12:37 am

To Mr. Moran
There are many entertainers whose product is indeed worthy of admiration, Patti LaBelle, who is absolutely peerless, Tuck and Patty, taking guitar and voice to new levels, Al Jarreau, Brian McKnight, Gino Vanelli, Tower of Power, I could go on, but the point is that these performers do not get the “push”, because they don’t conform to the new stereotypes, they don’t scare people.
The physical nature of rapper’s performances are nothing special, it is not hard to speak, it doesn’t even require training, but it serves the purpose of portraying an entire group as somehow less “civilized” than another.
The rap “artist” is most often taken from neglected and dangerous inner city environs, so the product is more “realistic”, for the “artist” it is escape from of hell, they will say and do whatever it takes to better their situation. I don’t blame the artist, I fault the distributors and gatekeepers of the music industry, who have put Amos and Andy in a new disguise, and would have you believe that this is how “those people” are. Remember the politician who joked of “loose shoes, tight p***y, and a warm place to sleep”?
To those who don’t know the music business, it is easy to produce music, cut and paste, anyone can do this, it’s not even expensive anymore. The hard part is getting distribution, airplay and marketing. Those networks are still in the hands of
“whites”, who pick and choose what you will see, hear, or buy.
In LA there used to be many places where “real” artists could perform for a living, some legendary places like the Parisian Room, now a post office, and the Lighthouse, now long gone. In fact, there are now no places between North Hollywood and Long Beach where musicians can make a living.
To those who complain, put your money where your words are, go see and support live music, take your kids, demand quality, don’t just sit on your duffs and complain, the only language the gatekeepers speak is $$$

Posted by: brian | April 17, 2007, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Mr Brian your posting was Spot-on Mr Moran would kill to get that level of insight. Years from now todays Rap artist will be looked upon as some pervese Minstrial show. It’s tragic that we have this in our time. And more so that a vapid collectivist like our friend Terry here could post for a million years and not scry the truth in your observation…

Posted by: A Rosario | April 17, 2007, 2:35 am 2:35 am

To A. Rosario
Don’t totally blame Mr. Moran, he is posting a subject that seems to be the common opinion of those still brainwashed by the artificial construct called “racism”. Check all related blogs, Don Imus is excused by his more right-wing fanboys using the same non-excuse, “they do it, so why can’t we”. Mr. Moran’s hands are most likely tied by his bosses, who seem to ignore the truly important issues either out of fear, or collusion.
The journalism industry is also made up of a lot of brainwashed people, they write stories from a perspective of being unable or unwilling to see the complete picture. No amount of education can become true wisdom if it is bent to serve unwise purposes.
Ask yourself, why aren’t the media exposing the corruption of the Bush administration, that has resulted in the murder of countless innocent victims in illegal wars, started on the premises of lies, and knowing what we do now, what to do about it? Instead we speak of Don Imus, who, while indeed an idiot, is nothing next to what Bush has perpetrated.

Posted by: brian | April 17, 2007, 3:40 am 3:40 am

To Mr. Moran
Politician Gus Savage once said that it is not prejudice to know that fire is hot.
This is why the term “black racism” is a misnomer, if not altogether fallacious. We speak not, as lesser enlightened “whites” often do, from misinformed ignorance, but from generations of real and continuing experience.
“White” racism is not only alive and well, but prospering and growing, witness the resurgence of KKK chapters around the US, the growing disparity in wages and expenses, actuarial data from insurance companies, unequal access to capital, and many other real indicators.
Is it racist if I recognize these facts, and rebel against those who cause them to persist?
If Snoop Dogg calls me a ni**er, it definitely has a different meaning than if Kramer does it, but I won’t support a ban on the word, rather, let everyone use it as they will, by their words we will know the face of the enemy…

Posted by: brian | April 17, 2007, 7:58 am 7:58 am

Hugh ?

Posted by: S. Dog | April 17, 2007, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

everyone shut up already

Posted by: some guy | April 17, 2007, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

It seems nobody understand the real problem. Some people just can’t be expected to know an better. right? But an old white man in public knew better and did it anyway. Stupid! This all boils down to dirty mouthed little boys being allowed to say anything they want. We need somebody with a strap and a bar of soap to clean up the filthy stuff before it poisons us all.

Posted by: Jeane | April 17, 2007, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

to Jeane
Perhaps he doesn’t know better. He was in a position, where he could not only insult minorities on the air, but actually be paid well for it, as he has done many times. The fact that his supporters seem mostly to be right wing white racists is not important to his producers and sponsors, its the numbers that count.
The same principle is valid for the “rap artists”, they are paid to generate numbers, and also provide the extra “benefit” of the negative stereotyping of an entire ethnic group.
It’s almost funny, you might remember after the Rodney King incident, Ice-T made a song called “Cop Killer” that expressed anger over continued LA police brutality. None other than Charlton Heston went on TV to try to deny the right of free speech to the brother. The right wing seems however to have no problem with Imus, or Richards (Kramer), or David Duke, Pat Robertson, or that joke who is paid to represent the “right” on CNN’s “Crossfire” any of a long list of people whose hatred for “those people” takes form in words on the air.

Posted by: brian | April 18, 2007, 12:28 am 12:28 am

okay, I’ve not been following too close the Don Imus mess.But, late night TV, daytime TV, they talk all kind of trash about everybody and everything, from Michael Jackson to the president,to the war between Rosie and Trump.Jokes, insults, etc. It’s all in fun or entertainment, I guess. What was racial about that remark, “nappy” or “ho’s”? It looked to me like there were also some white girls on that team. When I was growing up in W.Va.,we had the saying “ooh, nappy”. But it meant nasty, dirty etc.Were the team members sweaty? And as for “ho’s”, we called all loose girls, sluts, tramps and whores.(thus-the term whoring around) I moved to N.C. and went to work for a Taxi Company.I was told early on, that whores or “ho’s” were prostitutes or hookers.If you were just loose, then you was called sluts. So, if it’s just the name calling, get a grip.(everybody gets their 15 minutes of fame) Living in this world, if that’s the only thing that you get called in your life, then you better kiss the ground and thank the Lord! But here’s one last thing to think about….How many of those girls are virgins? And if they are not virgins, then how many of them are married? And if they are not married…..

Posted by: Teresa | April 18, 2007, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Dopey Moran had his Duke case story backward. They never WOULD have been arrested had they not been “rich” (they’re not all rich, though) white males. Nor would they have had the lynch mobs at their door. The girl’s basketball team only had to deal with a nasty insult (which they never would have heard anyway had the media not run to them to tattle on what Imus said). Who hires these illogical goofs like Moran?!

Posted by: MJ | April 18, 2007, 2:34 am 2:34 am

P.S. Moran is, unbelievably, due to be sent to the scene at Virginia Tech. Being an obviously high I.Q. school that just went through a horrible tragedy, the last thing they need is a visitor like Moran. Send them someone genuine, with character and sympathy.

Posted by: MJ | April 18, 2007, 3:12 am 3:12 am

To Theresa
The three dots at the end of your train of thought are interesting, was the next supposition going to be that if they were not married and also not virgins, that they are indeed whores?
Look up the definition of prostitute (or whore), it is a female paid for sexual services, in the most literal definition.
If you can prove that the girls are, or were involved in an occupation illegal in most states, then present said evidence to the proper authorities, who will then charge them with prostitution, if you have no proof, then your statement approaches libel, and defamation of character, and you expose yourself to civil and possibly criminal action.
Mr. Imus defamed these girls without evidence, calling them “hos”, which is in fact a southern accented variation of the word “whore”, is indeed calling them prostitutes. The possibility that their lifestyle or appearance doesn’t conform to your own “ideal” does not excuse this, neither does your hearing Snoop Dogg calling an imaginary figure in a lyric the same.
This is precisely what Imus has done

Posted by: brian | April 18, 2007, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Well said. The I-Man knew the rules and purposely broke them. Well now he’s paying the price. He’s been shunned. My heart and soul tell me that Snoop Doggy is one sleazy character. I was raised (in the 60′s) to see how a man treated women as an important indication of his character. It may seem quaint now, but I’m sticking with it.

Posted by: 2040worldview | April 18, 2007, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

All this Imus situation shows is that a radio host can be fired if enough people protest. It seems like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson were really the ones who fired Imus. We’ve seen this scenario before with people like Senator Trent Lott and Pat Robertson. When you are in the public eye there are people who don’t like you and sometimes you say something dumb and those people are right there to take you down.

Posted by: Matt Modrich | April 18, 2007, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

It’s funny that Terry Morgan is willing to write about sexism, when he is (in my opinion) the biggest perpetrator of it. After all, why didn’t he have compassion for that happen to the duke MEN falsely accused by a woman, and why did he have such compassion for the ones that Imus insulted? Clearly, Terry Morgan’s views are based on empathy for women and apathy for men. Terry Morgan’s views are typical of liberal male-feminism. That is, all males are supposed to be ashamed of being male, and at all times they should view women in the best light and suspect man of wrong doing. His views are more offensive than Imus, and I think he should do the right thing and resign.

Posted by: Jason Smith | April 19, 2007, 12:22 am 12:22 am

In my opinion, Terry Morgan doesn’t have a clue about how much MEN are being violated by the very law that is suppose to protect them.Women have cried out for equal rights for years, but is the law equal? NO,it is NOT.Freedom of speech,freedom to vote as an equal,freedom to be able to fight for this great country,but even with all the changes men have been left out in the cold.When a woman can murder her children and only get probation or molest an under-aged child with only a smack on the wrist then the law is truly flawed.If a man were to commit such crimes he would be in jail or on death row.So,for Terry Morgan to take such an unjustly stand makes me ill.The laws of today are so unjust and to see someone like Terry Morgan only creates more minds like himself and as they say, “A mind is a terrible thing to waste.” I am a female who wants equality,but at what expense? It seems reason has been expelled within the law system.How about instead of trying to kiss political “behind” you try to look beyond your own nose and see just how the world truly is and actually report on TRUTH.For Terry Morgan Ignorance is truly “bliss”.

Posted by: ponchita | April 19, 2007, 2:01 am 2:01 am

Will you please address the feedback to your assinine Duke post?
As a reporter would say, you are refusing to deny the allegations against you…

Posted by: clara | April 19, 2007, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

To Mr. Moran
Amazing, isn’t it how the same people who call for your resignation for your post about Duke, are at the same time defending Mr. Imus? They are so angry that they cannot confine their postings to the Duke topic, nor can they present a consistant policy on what free speech is about.
In your duke article, did you falsely accuse the players of being prostitutes? Or cast aspersions on the group morality of their “race” by using a peripheral physical attribute usually associated with that particular group?
If you did, then I would also call for your resignation by the same standard I use for Imus, If you did not, then invite your detractors to STFU.
As for the “communist” rant, this is, after all a “free” country, there is no crime in being a communist, and no wrong in saying something they agree with, if what was said was truth…

Posted by: brian | April 20, 2007, 3:02 am 3:02 am

Okay first of all I agree with Mr.Moran and quite a few bloggers.There is a double standard here.Blacks can say and do what they want but a white person has to deal with the whole race card should he say or do something objectionalble to the black population.Also one of the biggest music companies putting out rappers “art” is owned by a black man,it’s name I can’t recall.

Posted by: sarah | April 20, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Don Immus is a strong man who believes in freedom of speech. I do agree that his content is rather raw and insensitive, but people DO have a choice to listen to him or not. I don’t agree with what he said about a preacher’s black daughter and her basketball team, but at the same time, how many times have black people male or female trash white people? “honky”, “dirty white trash”, “prejudice,” “intolerant,” “discriminitory,” “nieve,” “sucker,” are all terms hypocritically used by black people to describe white people. Truly, the pot calling the kettle black. Furthermore, black males, in small groups, target young white women and their children, and often turning teenage girls below the age of 16 into prostitutes. You see them walking down the street with their black pimps, expecting people buy a couple of hours of “love” time, and people pay not her, but HIM on the spot. I am not prejudice, but I’m fast becoming that way because they are destroying the moral fabric of the United States and family values. Mexicans, both legal and illegal are NO better, while crossing the border with drugs, guns, and human cargo. I don’t understand why Americans just let it go on. Don Immus, your feeding them their own medicine. I say, “Buy your own radio station and air time. Then WHO can tell you what to say?” Suggested reading: The Afrikan Posta, published by Babatunde at “Under One Roof,” in Killeen, TX. This is a revolution waiting to happen. His watchword? “Freedom of Speech belongs to those who OWN THE PRESS!” He can say whatever he wants to include racial remarks, twisted interpretations of Malcolm X and Dr. Martin Luther King. So, what is wrong with US? Fight fire with fire. We’ve done everything else but that. It’s time for us to fight.

Posted by: William Pittenger | April 21, 2007, 12:03 am 12:03 am

to Mr. Pittinger
Please explain your “moral and family values” as this phrase has never been used for anything other than a code for racial and cultural intolerance, please explain how you claim to not be prejudiced, and then say,”Mexicans, both legal and illegal are NO better, while crossing the border with drugs, guns, and human cargo.”

Posted by: brian | April 22, 2007, 1:36 am 1:36 am

and to all who refer to a “white backlash” we have endured the worst of what is in your nature for almost half a millenium. Those words don’t scare anyone, if it comes to that, we can and will give as we get…

Posted by: brian | April 22, 2007, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Did Moran ever go to Va. Tech? Wonder if he espoused the idea that we shouldn’t feel too badly for the parents of the Caucasian victims? (After all, other people without all that privilege and money get shot too).

Posted by: MJ | April 23, 2007, 8:39 am 8:39 am

Pittenger: I’m sure the backlash has already taken effect. Nothing dramatic. The Duke case, etc., just cemented in the minds of most white and Asian Americans that the black culture is resentful and dysfunctional. Most believe that ever since their crime rate against themselves tripled since the 1960′s.

Posted by: MJ | April 23, 2007, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Mr. Moran,
Bravo! A very intelligent and well written piece on the verbal abuse that has been directed towards women for the past decade. With verbal abuse often comes physical and emotional abuse and low self esteem on the part of the victim. ALL of the races must stop this degrading torture of women and children and bring back respect and kindness to all no matter what race or income level the person has.
Thank you for opening many eyes with your article. Maybe a lot of good will come from all of this discussion.

Posted by: Jane and John Doe | April 23, 2007, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Switching the subject. We should not let the “Dukies” thing go. Sqeaky wheels get the oil, Right? Terry, will you ask why there is no apology from Jesse and Al? Saw a picture of Al with Obama, with an embrace. Do you think Obama thinks the “Dukies” need an apology, Presidential candidate hanging with a racist. Tsk Tsk.

Posted by: Fillit | April 24, 2007, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Fillit: In defense of Obama, politicians have to snuggle up publicly to all kinds of despicable people. Obama, privately, might despise Sharpton. Also, Obama was the only major Democrat candidate who called for an investigation of Nifong. (Hilary and N.C.’s own John Edwards were dead silent about the travesty).

Posted by: MJ | April 24, 2007, 2:34 am 2:34 am

I definitely think a double standard has taken place as to Imus, being fired. I’m not saying he was right, but can a black person say it’s ok, because it’s art? WHAT?? Imus needs to be put back on the air. He contributes more than hard rock artist.

Posted by: LEE Haygood | April 24, 2007, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Terry,
You missed the ball on this one. Imus wasn’t blasted because he was white, he was blasted because he was a journalist, and authority figure with an international audience taking a cheap and ugly shot at at young black female athletes who had accomplished an amazing feat. If he was Howard Stern, nothing would have happened, but he was Don Imus, who has Brian Williams and Tim Russert reporting news on his show. If he wants his credibility, he needs to save his barbs for people who earn it, and he needs to follow the same social rules he would on his ranch with the sick kids with their parents present.

Posted by: Devorah | April 25, 2007, 9:11 am 9:11 am

How do you fire a Rapper?
I find it odd that everyone and there mother draws an comparison to Snoop Dogg and Imus. If this story never breaks, are we still talking about Snoop and other Rapper? NO. Reason why is because Imus is on a platform that a large number of people of power hear and see. If these same people of power were not pushed to do something about Imus then nothing would have been done. So all of you out there riding that high and mighty horse, please just relax, you are not changing the world. Rap has been like this for the past ten years and the only reason why outrage is felt about Rappers is because Imus was fired, and he has no recourse.
Easy way to solve this problem your having, spend time with your kids, maybe try to be a parent from time to time, and your child will grow up with values that will make them turn the station or channel when this type of music is played. Or you can just blame Rappers and movies for all the bad things that happen today in this world. Maybe its time to look within our selves and ask this question.
Why would my child want to hear this music? After you find the answer to this question, you might be able to understand the values you teach weigh more than music on a CD or some video on TV. But I guess that means Americans would have to be accountable, and well we all know we don’t want that. So, blame the Rapper!!
Sure, I’m all for it.

Posted by: Lee | April 25, 2007, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

I am overwhelmed by those who read this article and totally missed the point. It doesn’t matter if Snoop Dog is saying it or Imus. Its an insult to all intelligent and self-respecting women who have to hear it, as well as to the men in their lives who love and respect them.

Posted by: tricia | April 26, 2007, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

I recently took my daughter to a Woodbridge, VA high school to take a test for an on-line course she was participating in. Tiring of waiting for her in the car, I decided to get some excercise and walk a lap around the high school. As I walked around to the front of the building, I approached a group of 8-10 young black students laughing and talking. They were well-groomed young men, handsome and impressive, one and all, in their Army ROTC uniforms. I couldn’t help but think to myself, these are fine young men, men to be respected. Then I began catch some of their conversation, of which every other word seemed to be “nigger.” Sadly, the initial respect I had felt for them evaporated almost instantly. If only they hadn’t opened their mouths.

Posted by: LMM | April 27, 2007, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Who among us does not think it strange that at the last moment the so called victim changes her story. She was taken to a hospital and given a rape kit test which turned out to be positive, At no time did I think these scions of an irresponsible economic class would go to jail. I believe these young humans paid for something they did not get and rather than accept their loss they decided to get even and chose the dancer whom they picked as sub par and vented it was not about sex. Why did they take this action? They are of a privileged class and had disdain for the the law. Money purchased expensive lawyers and a inexpensive strippers testimony. Who is the victim we are. This is not about race but economics

Posted by: riddelup | April 27, 2007, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

I agree Terry,,
Music can be the living soul..but then there are those that tempt the devil too be one w/them..and in tis day&age its all about the money..the actual “definitions” of the words are meaningless as much as the absurd/seems to offer a place on the playing field..I think Don Imus’s time was up..like an ol’ elephant he was heading for the graveyard and needed to “wail” one more time..from the stories of the Rutger’s basketball girls..I think most difinitive acts fall right inline..this really is a load of BULL-oney..over others successes..getting the words out as Imus did seemed to take some 15-seconds..(as the excerpt)revealed..Only it a Racial-Sexist-slurr against the Rutger’s girls..pure baloney..in the aftermath..these girls acually came to bear that they are the Speakers For All Girls..<<–there's one big Hang Nail..Girls can truly be idiots..especially when some guy points them in a direction they would never percieve.

Posted by: MarkSM | April 27, 2007, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

this is one of the best articles I’ve read about this incindent. i went on youtube the other day expecting to hear imus rudely talking about these girls, putting them down. he was laughing, not at them, joking, they lost to a bunch of preppy, probuly snoby looking white girls, i don’t know…..he was only ignorant not to realize someone would make such a ridiculas fit about this. and who else was he talking to when this incident occured, he wasn’t the only one talking????????????? i’ve never treated anyone with prejudice, but its funny that i can name quite a few times i’ve been discrimanted against cause i was white, i almost dies one time. no one really cares about that now do they..

Posted by: amberAQ | April 28, 2007, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Dear Mr. Moran,
I must admit that I have not read the plethora of responses posted for this topic (I admittedly tire of the grammatical mistakes littering the majority of these blogs), but I do essentially agree with your contentions. While it is a good idea for all humans to view their fellow conspecifics through a lens of cultural relativity, we need to set some limits on behaviors that define cultural norms. Rap and hip-hop are examples of phenomena that need to be revised in order to be less offensive.
At State College High School in PA, I recall hearing a fellow student (a white, female, middle class honor student) remark that she liked the music of a certain rapper, even though she knew that this affinity was “wrong” (It would have helped if she had defined “wrong”, but one can see her point sans the definition). She is an example of those white, privileged youths you mentioned who are exposed to the rhetoric of a lifestyle about which they know nothing. While references to “hos” and “bitches” may be used with regard to actual inner-city prostitutes who are just out to make a buck, the sheltered individuals (regardless of their race or locality) who hear these lyrics will be affected by them and start using them in everyday speech. One is no longer the girl next door, but the “bitch” next door. A sinister form of language conditioning occurs–hear a word often enough, and you’ll probably begin using it.
A street-wise friend of mine once explained that rap’s ostensible misogyny is inherent in its style, just as country music (an equally appaling “art form”) has its swooning tendencies. Sorry, friend, but that is not a sufficient explanation.
Misogyny has grown considerably over these past few years, thanks primarily to popular culture and those mindless organisms who wish to conform to it. It seems like all those heroic efforts espoused by women’s lib have been unravelled. You are correct in asserting our need for a revolution, hell, any revolution would do in this lackadaisical society of automatons. As you once stated on Nightline: “The hardest thing to do in America these days? Think for yourself.” Thank you for having the courage to write this article that probably sparked a great deal of debate.

Posted by: JAW | May 2, 2007, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Perhaps particular races in American society are being held to a higher standard and suffer severe consequences when not meeting those higher standards.
It would appear the element within American society that holds others to such a higher standard suffers from a very low self-esteem.

Posted by: XLCH | May 3, 2007, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Hip-hop is not misogynist. Young men, of all colors, are misogynist. Hip-hop does not make you racist, nor does it make you stupidly spout racist remarks. The real tragedy here is that hip-hop is being graded based on its worst sub-genre which is unfortunately also its most lucrative. Why is stupid music amazingly popular? For the answer to this question I need look no further than my own teen years during the late-80s and early-90s. I had a fairly discerning interest in music but there was always a thrill associated with music that was considered off-limits. Not that my parents could care less what I listened to, though I don’t mean that to say they were negligent, just very liberal. There was a naturally male, thrill-seeking impulse that drove me toward anything that society deemed too hot to touch, like N.W.A. Years later, “Straight Outta Compton” is a record that still holds up, but at the time the musical chops rode backseat to the brazen, outlaw quality of it. To be fair, another video riding the high wave of MTV success at the time was “Cherry Pie” by a lousy hair band called Warrant, featuring a scantily clad floozie wobbling around on stiletto heels. But N.W.A. wrote good music, so I listened to them, as well as Ice T, Too Short and numerous other rappers who glamorized the harcore, F-bomb laden gangsta life.
Over the years I’ve grown out of this phase and have more mature tastes, which is normal. That doesn’t mean I never pop in that N.W.A. album from time to time, but more often I’d listen to something like De La Soul, Mos Def or Lupe Fiasco. That is, when I’m listening to hip-hop. Many people have suggested on this topic that the times are getting more misogynist. To that I would ask: “Compared to what?” The 1950s? The 19th century? Remember when Limp Bizkit was all the rage? I know, I hated them too, but they sold a bazillion records to a bunch of dumb kids. Kids who grew up and stared in shocked distaste at that CD in their collection, wondering how it got there, like waking up in bed next to a stranger after a wild party. Mainstream hip-hop has become the feeding trough of the primary album purchasing demographic: young men, specifically young white men. Record companies know what sells and will continue this practice because teenagers will continue to like bad music.
As to why black people get to say the N-word and white people can’t, that’s such a stupid debate I can’t understand why people still have it. For one black person to call another black person the N-word is absurd, that’s why it’s either meant to be funny or meant to mean nothing at all, like “man” or “dude”. I’m white, so naturally I’ve used both “man” and “dude” more times than I can count. When I say “man” I’m not reinforcing the fact that who I’m talking to is a man. And when I say “dude” I’m not a cowboy talking city-slicker. But if I were to call a black person the N-word, regardless of who I was or who I was saying it to, that would automatically take on a different connotation because the absolute root of that word’s negative power resides in it emanating from my white mouth. The thing that I don’t understand is how apparently there are legions of white people out there itching to somehow call black people n in a nice way and are feeling left out. Who the hell are these people? Hip-hop does not make you call people n more than it makes you call people b, (although it does lead to “homey” or “dawg” on occasion). Stupid people will be stupid and spout stupid crap out of their stupid mouths whether hip-hop lives on for a million years or gets wiped off the face of the earth tomorrow. This is no different than saying Marilyn Manson made kids shoot up a school or Judas Priest made kids shoot themselves.
You can fire Don Imus, you can’t “fire” hip-hop. Imus’ show had direct sponsers who didn’t want their brand associated with his rhetoric(at least to the degree that the risk exceeded the profits, as someone earlier pointed out), but the record companies who make billions off mainstream hip-hop don’t have the same trouble. Disney can sell you wholesome family goodness one moment and mind-rotting trash the next; just see Dimension Films, Disney’s tap into the PG-13 slasher market. Anybody calling for hip-hop to “clean up its act” is missing the point. Someone earlier commented that she can’t believe what she hears when her young children describe the raunchy videos they’ve watched all day. It seems the problem here is the mother who sits crocheting while her young children watch Lil’ Jon videos. Believe me, I agree that the answer is for better music to dominate the airwaves, but what about this American Idol culture makes you think that’s happening anytime soon?

Posted by: DustinB | May 15, 2007, 3:52 am 3:52 am

Good god, the man’s a shock jock- Imus’ is (was) paid to say these irreverent things and get the public riled up. If this were some esteemed source, attack him all you want. But he’s a freakin’ radio personality. If there is such an issue, don’t listen. For real, everyone all up-in-arms should grow a thicker skin and let the market decide what content remains and what content goes…

Posted by: JP | May 22, 2007, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Dear Mr. Moran—
As someone who works in the fashion/entertainment industry, I am keenly aware of this “double standard” and hypocriical mindset that pervades young pop/hip-hop culture today.
There has been a positive side to the African American/Latino influence as far as helping to promote a healthier body image for young women i.e: Jennifer Lopez, Beyonce, Shakira et al), where it has allowed girls that are not “model thin” to feel beautiful with their “curves”–this has been a positive for young women.
But—the negative stereotypes that are promoted-mostly through hip-hop/rap are extremely unhealthy for a young girls sense of self and self-esteem.
I agree wholeheartedly with your opinions and reactions to the hypocrisy of artists such as “Snoop Dog”–whom, if you look up the word “mysoginist” in Websters Dictionary, it says “see Snoop Dogg”….
It is ironic that I came upon this blog of yours on misogyny, as I had just sent a now ex paramour of mine articles on mysogyny and how he fit the definitions.
But more interestingly, I came across an astounding article on MYSOGYNY and the TALIBAN and it’s relation to the abuse by the Taliban of young boys and it’s being( under certain guidlines set by the Taliban themselves mind you-dispicable)
accepted under the laws of the Taliban!!!!
And these are those who fight for God??
I had the unique experience growing up to have my father be an ultra WASP Blue Blood, my first step father an Israeli Jew, and my second step father an Egyptian Muslim ( what can I say, my mother should have worked for the U.N!).
It gave me, from a very early age a special understanding of the dynamics of the “themes in variation” that have turned the world into a witches brew of ignorance, intolerance and idolatry.
All of these issues that you have spoken of and I have mentioned here are do in large part to the lack of proper education in much of the world.
Fundamentalism, no matter what religion or ideology–is a combination of lack of education, poverty and religion–desperation and frustration.
If Yasser Arafat gave his ill gotten billions in part to build schools, playgrounds, housing etc…maybe SOME of the children would not be in the streets throwing stones at Israeli soldiers.
But it was in HIS and his heinous backers best interests to keep their people desperate and angry as it served their purpose—but they were angry at the wrong people–which is why, in the end, the HAMAS party was so successful in toppling the Fatah party.
The same goes for the Israeli Government–rather than doing sooo much to support exclusion and destruction of the right of the Palestinians to exist–they should make even stronger efforts to support inclusion and the understanding that EVERYONE has the right to exist and no one person has the right to tell one or the other that they don’t.
And we as Americans should put triple the effort into educating third world and the middle east’s impoverished as we do on War.
Thank you for taking the time to hear my thoughts.
See below for the article on the Taliban, Mysogyny and the abuse of young boys. It is an eye opener and a great subject to bring to light.
Sincerely,
Gail Simon Chafik NYC
Shining a psychological spotlight on a few of the insanities of life
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
A VICIOUS MISOGYNY
In “The Boys of the Taliban”, Jamie Glazov writes about one particular rule (rule 19) of the new Taliban “code of conduct” for its fighters in Afghanistan:
But there is a curious rule that the Western media has typically ignored. Rule No. 19 instructs that Taliban fighters must not take young boys without facial hair into their private quarters….
Aside from the question of what is permitted if a young boy does happen to have facial hair, this new Taliban commandment brings light to a taboo pathology that underlies the structures of militant Islam. And it is crucial to deconstruct the meaning of this rule — and the horrid reality that it represents — because it serves as a gateway to understanding the primary causes of Islamic rage and terror.
Rule No. 19 obviously indicates that the sexual abuse of young boys is a prevalent and institutionalized phenomenon among the Taliban and that, for one reason or another, its widespread practice has become a problem.
The fact that Taliban militants’ spare time involves sodomizing young boys should by no means be any kind of surprise or eyebrow raiser. That a mass pathology such as this occurs in a culture which demonizes the female and her sexuality — and puts her out of mind and sight — is only to be expected. To be sure, it is a simple given that the religious male fanatic who flies into a violent rage even at the thought of an exposed woman’s ankle will also be, in some other dysfunctional and dark secret compartment of his fractured life, the person who leads some poor helpless young boy into his private chambers.
The key issue here is that the demented sickness that underlies Rule No. 19 is by no means exclusive to the Taliban; it is a widespread phenomenon throughout Islamic-Arab culture and it lies, among other factors, at the root of that culture’s addiction to rage and its lust for violence, terror and suicide.
There is a basic and common sense empirical human reality: wherever humans construct and perpetuate an environment in which females and their sexuality are demonized and are pushed into invisibility, homosexual behaviour among men and the sexual abuse of young boys by older men always increases. Islamic-Arab culture serves as a perfect example of this paradigm, seeing that gender apartheid, fear of female sexuality and a vicious misogyny are the structures on which the whole society functions.
Glazov goes on to argue that Islamist terror can be thought of in part, at least, as a response to sexual rage, frustration, and the humiliation of being connected to a “degraded mother.” Thus the men in the culture must constantly assert their masculinity, defend their masculine “honor”, and strike out in rage against any who “shame” them.

Posted by: Gail Simon Chafik | May 24, 2007, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Terry, Thank you for all you do at ABC and your candor, integrity in reporting events.
I plan on bookmarking this site to get your updates all the time.
Maybe you could possibly grant me the favor of passing along this info to one of your editors.
Did you know Saddam Hussein ADMITTED his responsibility for terrorism? He did, please check this http://regimeofterror.com/archives/2007/05/in_last_months_saddam_hussein/

Posted by: Mark Eichenlaub | June 1, 2007, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Did the hack, leftist, idiot Moran decide that the internet was too rough for him?
It’s always easier for these communists to spout their one sided views on TV then to be confronted with FACTS and the way that MOST people think in this country.
That’s what commies like Moran get for surrounding themselves with other coffee shop commies. They actually think that most Americans are leftists when actually the country is right wing. Suck it up!

Posted by: NRB | June 15, 2007, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Many long years ago, I took a course in theatre history at Baylor University Graduate School of Theatre. It may have been taught by the wonderful actress, Mary Sue Fridge. I still remember the most important thing she shared with us. She pointed out that the original dramatists strove by theatrical means to uplift their audience, not degrade them. This positive motive was, in the beginning, the heart of theatre and all the arts.
Since then, the purpose of entertainment has increasingly become reversed as it’s purpose is now often to degrade rather than uplift, and that usually by foul and insulting language. The current crop of “entertainers” worship at the shrine of linguistic shock value. They have no artistic motive, only a wild rush for fame at the cost of real artistry and beauty in the lives of their childish listeners.
These rap and hip-hop people who use filthy, insulting language in their “music” have not the slightest understanding of what philosophically constitutes the principles of the various types of art, so, they are in no valid sense of the word “artists” and should not be referred to as such. They, by their very existence, are a profound insult to legitimate entertainers everywhere and to the world of true art in general. As a singer, actor, writer, dancer, painter and sculptor, I am appalled that they are considered by anyone to be in any way connected with what I do and what others like me do. It is high time that we expose these cynical imposters for what they are and stop financing and promoting their mindless destruction of our civilization.

Posted by: Colin Cody | June 23, 2007, 3:34 am 3:34 am

terry,
i don’t care what anyone says: you’ve got spot-on insights and as ever, an amazingly curious mind. as for your musical tastes, have you heard renee olstead? perfection.

Posted by: beatrice | July 8, 2007, 10:57 am 10:57 am

It is black American’s rappers’ obligation and responsibility to enlighten and elevate the consciousness of its own race. On the other hand, white people can never understand what these labels mean and how they affect the black psyche.. that’s not an insult, it’s a fact.
Black women throughout decades have been made to feel ashamed of their hair, skin tone, body proportions, lips & on and on…. Magazines do not normally reflect black women as the standard of beauty, therefore this belief of “ugly” seeps into their core beliefs and sub-conscious minds ultimately affecting self-esteem, self-love and appreciation etc. For someone like Imus to make that “nappy headed” remark, which to most whites may not seem that bad, but in reality… is a further cementing of a belief that was planted centuries ago and hits a very painful and self-hating chord buried deep within the black psyche. Words like those become “triggers” to an indoctrination of inferiority fed to blacks for so long. We all need to be sensitive to how things affect each other if we are ever to transcend beyond our hurt and pain.

Posted by: nerakami | April 21, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.