By Maddy Sauer

Apr 25, 2007 11:19am

Veterans’ Health Care, Disaster Relief and Avian Flu Funds Also Subject to Veto

While the debate in Congress this week focuses on troop withdrawals and timetables, more than $20 billion of the $124 billion of funds provided in the hotly debated supplemental war funding bill will not be going to Iraq. Funding for veterans’ health care, Hurricane Katrina relief, agricultural disaster relief as well as the majority of this year’s avian flu preparedness funds will all also be subject to the president’s expected veto. One leading advocate for veterans says that vets are caught in the middle. "We need the money for veterans’ health care," said Paul Rieckhoff, the executive director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. "This situation is a perfect example of how the troops and the American people are caught in the crossfire of partisan bickering." Also on the bill are funds to help continue the recovery process from Hurricane Katrina. Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage. "Unfortunately, the president has threatened to veto the bill because of ‘excessive and extraneous non-emergency spending.’ But I do not view the $2.38 billion for Louisiana and the Gulf Coast in this bill to be excessive or extraneous," said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La. About three-quarters of this year’s avian flu preparedness funds, more than $600 million, is also included in the supplemental bill. Those funds would go to increasing antiviral stockpiles and vaccine development. Without the funds, those orders will have to be placed on hold. "We can’t make the order until we get the funding," said Bill Hall, spokesperson at the Department of Health and Human Services. Hall stressed that the goals of the HHS avian flu plan will remain the same, and when a funding bill is passed, those antiviral orders will be placed and contracts with vaccine developers will proceed. Some argue that these items are worthy of funding, but that they do not belong in a war supplemental bill. "While many of these are much needed projects," said Rep. Jo Bonner, R-Ala., "they do not belong in an emergency supplemental for our soldiers engaged in the War on Terror." Previous war supplemental bills passed under Republican leadership also included funds for hurricane recovery and bird flu preparations. Rieckhoff says that while each side attempts to frame the debate on their own terms, veterans’ health care and the other programs become political hostages. "Republicans want to paint the Democrats as undermining the troops, and the Democrats want to paint the president as continuing to mismanage the war and endanger the troops in his own way," he said. "It’s a dangerous way to do things."

User Comments

We should hold the Administration’s AND Congress’ pay (including perks and benefits) until they can get this settled. I bet that might get them to cooperate a bit more.

Posted by: skidog | April 25, 2007, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Outrageous headline on abcnews.com front page: “Partisan Bickering May Block Critical Funds”. To describe the congress’s attempt to end the war — and the president’s threatened veto — as “partisan bickering” is worse than outrageous. It trivializes one of the most important political moves of recent times. Shame!

Posted by: HangInThere | April 25, 2007, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

ABCNews engaging in sensational headlines? Noo…say it isn’t so.
ABC News lends agreement to talking points so easily you’d think they’ve got no mind of their own. What happened to critical thinking?
ABCNews the lapdogs of a failed policy.

Posted by: chris | April 25, 2007, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Democrats say that its time for the Iraqi people to step up and take control themselves. While I agree in part, I cant help but see the hyprocracy involving additional federal funds for hurricane katrina relief. When should Louisianna step up and make their fate by the state, local, and individual contributions. Far too much of the federal funds are unaccounted for already. But, then again, the democrats cant buy Iraqi votes.

Posted by: Nick | April 25, 2007, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

With this idiot Bush you never getting anything settled. He is so hellbent on this stupid war that it consumes him and takes away valuable financial resources from this country. We have even cut FDA Food inspectors because of a lack of funding and now our food isn’t even safe. This adminstration has put this country in such a mess it will be years before we recover.

Posted by: Dave | April 26, 2007, 9:02 am 9:02 am

Is anyone really surprised? G.W. Bush does not have a rubber stamp Congress anymore. Wa Wa Wa, and this piggy ran all the way home. However, Bush has time for “Boogie fever,” which is disgusting and who cooked up this “Man of the people” moment? In the Bush’s New World Order there is no room for such trivialities as clean water, {in his first week in office he neutered the Clean Water Act}. Our food supply, health care, Veterans health care, Katrina victims, etc. are meaningless to G.W. Bush and his cronies.

Posted by: sandra l | April 26, 2007, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Wow, I wodered what all that “pork” was that the hate radio guys were ranting about.
Vaccines. Health care for our Vets.
Assistance to disaster victims who are predominantly black.

Posted by: emma | April 28, 2007, 12:02 am 12:02 am

It’s time to lock all parties of Congress, both houses along with the President and the V.P. in a big room and explain to these creeps there will be no bathroom breaks or food until they deside to past bills that free the American Taxpayers from the war in Iraq, and give the Veterans something besides the crap we have to put up with each year.

Posted by: Gregory A. Young | April 29, 2007, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.