May 4, 2007 2:04pm

‘D.C. Madam’ Client Ready to Testify About Sex

One of the prominent Washington men named as an escort service customer of the so-called "D.C. Madam" is apparently ready to testify he had sex with a woman or women from the madam’s now-infamous Pamela Martin and Associates. A lawyer for Harlan Ullman, a renowned military analyst and Washington Times columnist, says his client won’t back down if he is called to testify by Jeane Palfrey, who prosecutors say ran an illegal prostitution ring for 13 years. Palfrey maintains her service did nothing illegal and only provided "fantasy, legal sex," which does not include intercourse of any kind or oral sex. THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS Photos D.C. Madam Affair Unfolds in Pictures Blotter ‘Miz Julia’ Speaks: Inside D.C.’s Most Notorious Escort Service Blotter D.C. Law Firm Suspends Woman Who Worked as Escort Blotter D.C. Madam Wants Washington Clients to Testify Blotter Senior Official Linked to Escort Service Resigns Click Here to Check Out Brian Ross Slideshows "Any notion that Ms. Palfrey has that Mr. Ullman will help her in any way is incorrect," said Ullman’s lawyer, Mark Mukasey, in a statement to the Blotter on ABCNews.com. Previously, Ullman had told reporters that the allegation he used Palfrey’s service was "beneath the dignity of comment." Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage. When informed of Ullman’s new stance, Palfrey told ABC News the former Rumsfeld colleague could be prosecuted along with her. "If Mr. Ullman committed illegal acts, he can be charged with racketeering as well, since he would be a part of the overall conspiracy the government is alleging," Palfrey said. "It takes two to tango." Ullman was named by Palfrey in court papers and in public statements outside the courthouse earlier this week. Phone records provided to ABC News by Palfrey show Ullman was a repeat customer, who Palfrey says was known by her women as "Mr. U" and is well-remembered. "He was a disagreeable character," Palfrey says, "and there were some complaints about him." She said some of the women refused to service him a second time "because he was an unpleasant person." Palfrey has rejected an offer from federal prosecutors to plead guilty to reduced charges in return for a four-month prison term. "I told them to go to hell with their deal," Palfrey said, "and instead will call my clients to testify in my defense."

User Comments

What a shame, maybe would have been better
if they all had been neutered.
Could have saved we taxpayers a lot of
money since the judicial system does
seem to be overfed to begin with.

Posted by: V. Smith | May 4, 2007, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Well Mixon, you seem to be missing the point here: Ullman admits it. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. But apparently “shock and awe” doesn’t go over well with the high priced call girls.

Posted by: cervantes | May 4, 2007, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

mixon,
let me get this straight.All these men that are being outed in hiring prostitutes and you’re calling this madam a “loony tunes character”? Could it be that these hypocrites are all turning out to be CONservatives from the party of “family values” is why you came to this conclusion?
The GOP party is being outed everyday for their phoney “morality” they love to claim,and I am loving it!! These men are not being forced to hire prostitutes so I feel it’s nobody’s fault but THEIRS. I hope they all see Karma real soon.
CON-servatives…….wave the flag and claim to own it…talk about God and claim to own him…claim to be the only people on this planet who are patriotic.Well,now they can RIGHTFULLY claim they are the most corrupt,immoral hypocrites world wide.

Posted by: ihbwap3 | May 4, 2007, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Enough with the double standards!
Why should Palfrey need to plead guilty to reduced charges and serve 4 mos, let alone even one day.
I don’t see the “Johns” having to plead guilty and serve any time.
All charges should be dropped against Palfrey — UNLESS — charges are brought against “all” of the clients.

Posted by: bac | May 4, 2007, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

the GOP perverts? Con-servatives? Funny how your memory is lacking from the Clinton administration and his free call girl service with his own interns there, don’t ya think? Perhaps if you would take that plank out of your eye and address the issue, instead of the party, you just might have an awakening of sorts.

Posted by: Sooner | May 4, 2007, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

I am in full disagreement with this “Madam”. Of course it is wrong for these men to have called in for services, but, she was offering, and I highly doubt her “no sex” rule was enforced. She is breaking the confidentiality she had established and guaranteed to her clients, as a business woman. She takes on a business name that looks more like a law firm, than what she was running, and of course she can say she filed her taxes legally, because she was “fooling” the IRS into thinking her business was something other than what it really was. So if she’s saying she was running her business legally, then why hide and have to open all the clients’ records up? Is that necessary?? 2 + 2 is What??

Posted by: Janda | May 4, 2007, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

It’s interesting that everyone seems to assume that all the clients will be Republicans. Don’t Democrats have sex too! I assume that there will be men from both parties and that no group, liberal or conservetive, will be able to say they weren’t involved.

Posted by: Cyndi | May 4, 2007, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Clinton didn’t pay, these guys paid. BIG difference as far as the law is concerned. Look it up if you don’t believe me.
BTW I love how Neo-cons are quick to change topic. What des Clinton have to do witht his incident? (Unless his name is actually on the list.)

Posted by: Tony | May 4, 2007, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

I hope every single one of these double standard, hypocritical, bible-thumping, lying, con-men called politician not only have their careers ruined, but are ruined financially too.
After all, money and power is all their pay reverence too. They make me physically sick.
Oh and as for Monica and Clinton – last time I checked she wasn’t working for an Escort service, nothing was ‘paid for’ and she was a stupidly starry-eye young woman that should have known better. And I mean not only in the whole affair but in the Linda Tripp debacle too.

Posted by: Ann | May 4, 2007, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Both parties are corrupt. Democrats lie about it when caught because they buy into the Republican moral authority. Republicans would do well to drop the act.

Posted by: Michael | May 4, 2007, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Hey Tony, what does the GOP or “conservatives” have to do with it either? From the information provided, her services included a broad sprectrum of influencial figures. Blinders dude; they impede vision.

Posted by: Sooner | May 4, 2007, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Re: the “looney-tunes” comment. Ms. Palfrey like far too many women was hoodwinked by a married man years, ago. From what I understand, the piece of #$@%& lied to her about his marital status. The guy, Tom Czech is a former marine and apparently a fairly dishonest character; a real player. He just didn’t like the fact Palfrey eventually found out the real truth about him. After all, no one likes getting busted!

Posted by: Lezah | May 4, 2007, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Hmm, what are some of the unpleasant things The Ullman did that the Escort girls said were so unpleasnt that they wouldn’t see him a second time? Or would that, too, be beneath his dignity to comment on–until otherwise revealed?

Posted by: Zolo | May 4, 2007, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

I can’t say I either respect the guy anymore or any less for paying for sex. All I know is, I am way too good looking for that.
She needs to release the list to a file sharing network like Gnutella.

Posted by: Steve | May 4, 2007, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Ulman’s gotta be an idiot. this kinda squeeze play might have worked in private – but ABC has got the records. He’s screwed.

Posted by: Thom | May 4, 2007, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

If we really want to get into politics, this may actually be a welcome distraction for the administration. Is it worse to lie and cheat Americans into a needless war costing Trillions, 3300 deaths, and 30,000+ lives?

Posted by: Michael | May 4, 2007, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Dawn, how do you know what most conservatives do regarding their sex life?

Posted by: Sooner | May 4, 2007, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

No she shouldn’t go to jail…
Especially if the (Johns) are allowed to say “Yeah I had sex with the call girls”…The (Johns)knew it was illegal…hell are they not lawmakers themselves….LOL….but yet they go free….I am a Democrat….and frankly I dont care if its a Repub or Demo on the list…. Post ALL of the names… Our Men and Women are dying in a senseless war everyday… and these dirt bags are spending most tax dollars on so-called massages. Our Soldiers, Sailors, Troops, Marines and America deserve better representation…than these scum bags….no matter what party they represent… If there name is on the list, send them home if not to jail… and let the lady go free….

Posted by: R U Stupid | May 4, 2007, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

I’m just wondering when the LWF’s will start calling for the next Salem Witch Hunt. Burn them at the stake they say. Hypocrites.

Posted by: Sooner | May 4, 2007, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Sooner,
Just watch the news! They say it is immoral out of one side of their mouth and woo homosexual sex out of their interns.

Posted by: Michael | May 4, 2007, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

I kind of thought this was about prostitution and well extortion. 4 months seems rather paltry and yer all being taken for a ride…
The “johns” are paying left and right and this dame will no doubt write a book a make a chunk of change off of the public’s and law enforcement’s stupidity.
THROW THE BOOK AT HER!

Posted by: Bill | May 4, 2007, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

yeah, why does eveyone think ABC news has the only copy? ABC news is just a test run. They have a COPY of the list. This guy Ullman, is a complete moron thinking he can pull a Jason Giambi to the public trying to keep the other names quite (probably has some friends hes trying to save)

Posted by: Steve | May 4, 2007, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

I think the central reason why no one is interested in the Dems is b/c they are already being accused of ‘destroying the moral fabric of America.’ Where’s the fun in seeing a person who is already being told that they have no morals being outed?
We want to see the hypocritical conservatives eat some crow meat when it comes out that they wake up Sunday morning to go to Church- they wake up next to a call girl!

Posted by: Ian | May 4, 2007, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

The only moral government is a TRANSPARENT government. But we are too busy playing spy games instead of talking much less negotiating with our enemies.

Posted by: Michael | May 4, 2007, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

The underlying issue here is the ‘World’s Oldest Profession.’ The fact that prostitution is illegal in this day and age is ridiculous. Whether you agree with it or not, there’s no way in this world or any other you’re going to stop it.
Do what they’ve done in Nevada – legalize it, regulate it (mandatory condoms, periodic free health checks for the girls) and leave it be. If you support it, fine – if you don’t, and it’s against your morals, then don’t patronize it.
Sex isn’t going away, people. It’s a part of life, and the fact that we attempt to make laws to regulate how, when, and where it’s right or wrong (outside of child abuse and rape) for consenting adults is a mentality that should have died with the Crusades.

Posted by: Scott F. | May 4, 2007, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Walk away from it and don’t look back
Lot

Posted by: Lot | May 4, 2007, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

This is too funny….
You always hear the Rep talking about how marriage is a blessed union only to be shared and taken seriously between men and women. But they so HELL NO to same sex couples who only want to be acknowledged as a legal spouse. But yet here are the REPS…cheating on their wives, cheating on their BLESSED UNION. The HOMOSEXUALS should march on Washington, demanding whats only fair.
I love my family….but yet I am secretly calling the escort service for a massage…Can’t your wife rub your back and give you a happy ending….FOR FREE…. STOP SPENDING TAX DOLLARS…..

Posted by: Huh... | May 4, 2007, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

I think having an affair is wrong. I also think using a prostitution service is also wrong. So, I don’t really care if someone is liberal or conservative. Wrong is wrong.
The most moronic argument I’ve seen is “see, the conservatives do it to!!” As if, A.) liberals don’t try to tout themselves as good people (what, they just openly admit that they will have affairs and illicit sex and people should vote for them anyway?) or B.) just because one group does it, it makes it right?
Most importantly, the list hasn’t even been released in entirity, so liberals AND conservatives alike are probably on this list.
Although the GOP is known to be more about family values and religion, it’s as if democrat fans are claiming democrats care nothing about those things. THEY DON’T?? Well, I thought I was split ticket, but forget that if a dem isn’t even going to pretend for a second that they care about morals and family values. Which, btw, I don’t think is true.
So, dems out there should shut their trap so they don’t make their party look so bad. I was hoping to vote for Obama. . . but maybe not if he openly could care less about family values. I would like to believe otherwise.

Posted by: Zamura | May 4, 2007, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

I guess my point being is that Clinton was also a hypocrite to have an affair. Just as any person on that list likely will be. Democrat or Republican.

Posted by: Zamura | May 4, 2007, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Since it’s out of the closet that he was a John……………he’s had time to consult with his cronies and will probably tell the prosecution what they WANT to hear…..whether truth, or not. Seems like he originally “only” had massages. Now he’s had sex. What happened between then & now? Did he return for more?

Posted by: Dave | May 4, 2007, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

First of all, to whoever, mentioned it, it is highly unlikely that Ullman could be charged with soliciting — the statute of limitations on any possible solicitiation is long passed. It would be like someone saying “yeah, I bought weed off that guy a couple years ago.” You’re not going to be charged with anything.
Second, Palfrey is delusional if she thinks solicitation is the same as violating RICO laws, which is what she’s charged with. Sorry, Jeane, you’re in this by yourself.
Finally, she and her whackjob attorney overreached on this. If I were one of these guys whose name she leaked, like Ullman I’d say, “So, you thought you could leak my name, ruin my career and then I’d help you by testifying that nothing happened. Well, guess what — I got nothing to lose and I’m going to testify against you.” I’ll bet she feels pretty ill right now.

Posted by: LMAO | May 4, 2007, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

These guys were not pay for sex….they were paying the women to shut up and LEAVE! That’s not illegal!
Let her go!

Posted by: dean | May 4, 2007, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Zamura, finally someone that gets it. I agree with you 100%

Posted by: Sooner | May 4, 2007, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Who honestly feels shocked and offended if senior Beltway people are paying for sex from willing, adult professional sex workers? Yes, it’s hypocritical and on that point, disturbing. But other than that, so what? These women were willing, adult professionals. This list will ruin careers of perhaps at least a few, talented, capable people. In Europe, this would be a mild scandal at most. But lives would not be ruined over it.

Posted by: Josh | May 4, 2007, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Enough is now known to turn this sex scandal into a sting that nets all the hookers and all the politicians. One and all have broken the law and each must be required to serve time in a federal pen or be executed. The madam and her crew can go to jail, her republican supporters should be juiced on the gurney.

Posted by: MaryLou Harper | May 4, 2007, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Bravo Scott F, BRAVO!!!!

Posted by: Mike W | May 4, 2007, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

A politican/washington d.c. insider caught lying and paying for sex. Nope, I just don’t believe that could EVER happen, not with our good, wholesome, family loving politicians.
Last time I checked you can’t pay for sex, unless you’re married, then you pay it all, save half and get divorced.

Posted by: slovak | May 4, 2007, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

what?!? no one has blamed George Bush for this yet?!?!
Can’t you see this is all his fault! If he didn’t bring us into the illegal…ZZZ….

Posted by: abba dabba | May 4, 2007, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Michael’s the only one who gets it. Make prostitution legal and free up law enforcement for ‘real’ crimes, like felonies, murders, drug busts. Sheesh. A lotta hullaballoo over nuttin. Ain’t much different than a guy taking a girl out to an expensive restaurant and expecting to be compensated in the bedroom. Like the fella said, sex is never going away

Posted by: Piece of Class | May 4, 2007, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

In every single city in this country there are dozens of escorts services. The police could easily bust any of them at any time BUT THEY DON’T.
So why this woman? Why only her?
If I was her I’d do the same thing by releasing the names of the Johns.
This country is full of hypocrites! Most of the Johns would be the 1st ones to vote against the legalization of prostitution.
The sexual repression in this country is frightening.
If you wanna prosecute escorts then prosecute them all. They are in the yellow pages.

Posted by: James | May 4, 2007, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

There’s something unseemly about going on a nookie hunt to uncover who got their pitards hoisted over the past thirteen years. It’s only news if the the preponderance of clients include many of the right wing neocon hypocrits
who are morally bankrupt. But, I’m willing to bet that the nookie sales to Dems and Repubs balance out over the thirteen history of the enterprise.
Ronniebeans

Posted by: Ronniebeans | May 4, 2007, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Gee wasn’t it Clinton who had a double extra sized bible made just so the cameras could be sure to pick it up during his church visits? Can’t say ONLY republicans are phony bible pounders .

Posted by: Lee | May 4, 2007, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Mary Lou – you make my point!

Posted by: Deep-Thought | May 4, 2007, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

To all of you Democrat libs that are attempting to make the point that republicans and conservatives had him impeached because of the Monica Lewinsky affair, you need to educate yourselves. Following is the actual reason:
WASHINGTON, Dec. 19 – William Jefferson Clinton was impeached on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice today by a divided House of Representatives, which recommended virtually along party lines that the Senate remove the nation’s 42d President from office.
So you can stop salivating at the prospect of Republicans being named in the DC Madam case.
It appears that Clinton will only be judged for his adulterous actions by the one true judge and his sentance handed down through enternity

Posted by: jeff | May 4, 2007, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Like T.I. said, “Bring em out, bring em out!” Palfrey is no heroine, and is dragging this out for revenge, but if you we’re stupid enough to use her service, you had to know in the back of your head that you might get caught. If you thought you were above it, you were playing yourself.
Wonder how many calls ABC News is taking from friends and cronies on the list. They say they’re under legal pressue and whatnot, but you can truthfully say someone’s office number shows up on a list, if in fact, someone’s office number shows up on a list. Someone might say, “Well, you’re making an accusation.” You’re not. You’re just reporting that someone’s number showed up on the list. It’s not the press’ job to explain how it got there. It’s there. Report what’s in front of you. You report, we decide. I know my number’s not on the list … if Congressman X’s is, we have the right to ask how it got there.

Posted by: LAX | May 4, 2007, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

What is the big deal? There are far more important issues this country should be dealing with, namely homeless men, women and children, child abuse, drug abuse, etc., etc. The money, time and effort spent digging and dragging this D.C. Madam issue over and over again could be put to better use. Wake-up!

Posted by: Kathy | May 4, 2007, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

I love the comment that Bill Clinton didn’t pay for it so that’s the difference. Hmmm…let’s see…Bill Clinton uses Monica as his semen dumping ground during work hours. If I do recall, the taxpayers paid both Bill and Monica’s salary at the time. I don’t remember requesting them to engage in sex on my dime. I guess that is the difference…WE paid for Bills follies.

Posted by: Matt | May 4, 2007, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Fred: You say “Clinton didn’t pay, these guys paid. BIG difference as far as the law is concerned.”
Clinton had sex in the workplace with an employee. BIG difference. Look up sexual harassment law.

Posted by: Tom | May 4, 2007, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

It’s funny. Dems are just as hypocrites just like Repubs. However Dems dont say we are about bringing morality back. then you find out evangilicals who supported them are having relationships with transvestites while smoking meth together, gop party members are trying to have sex with underage pages, now they paying for nookie. Wow this gets more and more ridiculous. not that dems are not about morals but we are also about being human which means you make mistakes in judgement. Repubs pass it off as if they do not make bad judgements, then when they get caught they say hey look at the dems they did it too.

Posted by: dre | May 4, 2007, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Jeff,
In MOST marriages in this country at least one of the people involved has at least a slight transgression: whether it be flirting, kissing, making out, or sex. Hell, half the marriages in this country end in divorce.
For you to proclaim, Clinton, who did not even have sex and managed to keep his marriage together “will only be judged for his adulterous actions by the one true judge and his sentance handed down through enternity”
makes you appear self righteous since you are proclaiming eternal sentences are handed out by your God to most of the people in this country for making even slight transgressions in their marriage.

Posted by: James | May 4, 2007, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

DC chatter has it that many of these, ahem, massages, took place as payoffs by the Rep/K Street lobby cartel to pliant power brokers. If true, the action was certainly top heavy with bible thumping wingnuts. As for the notion that Dems will be equally represnted because ‘..they have sex too’, yes we do, but we have it granted to us willingly, GOPers have to pay for it!

Posted by: Bill D. | May 4, 2007, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Don’t know, but I wonder if Chandra Levy was involved with that service somehow? Seemed to be a coverup there.
On another note, Now I know why I couldn’t get a legitimate job in DC despite great work resume. Not enough extracurricular activites.

Posted by: Jane Doe 2 | May 4, 2007, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

OOOPS..I forgot..Clinton NEVER had sex with that woman..how sillllly of me!

Posted by: Eric | May 4, 2007, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Lezah said — “The madam, the escorts and the clients are all conspirators here. ALL OR NONE, I SAY!”
It doesn’t really matter what you say. It’s what the law says that counts. And, as they say, ignorance of the law is no excuse (for ignorance).

Posted by: LMAO | May 4, 2007, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

This is a non-story about adults who had no gripe about any aspect of their private transaction until the government got involved and it became a legal proceeding.
Some of the posters perhaps need a more measured response to a limited issue.

Posted by: Bob | May 4, 2007, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

pretty bad “Mr. U” – when even the ladies of the evening don’t want to be with you …guess everyone earned their money those night…..other than amusing, this whole matter is not worth anyone’s time……yet alone money!

Posted by: claudette | May 4, 2007, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

The bottom line is it doesn’t matter what party you belong to. Republicans and Democrats are all human and we make mistakes. Clinton cheated on his wife and so did these other men if they were married. If the ladies and guys involved are found guilty they should pay for the crime. I will give the person more credit if they come clean and admit their mistake. Most won’t because those in Washington can’t ever seem to find the word truth in a dictionary to understand what the definition means.

Posted by: Ben | May 4, 2007, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Come on, people. Illicit sex is not a bipartisan issue. It’s an issue of men in power and women who resort to the sex trade to make money. Personally, I don’t like either one.

Posted by: Lisa | May 4, 2007, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

The leftists here shriek about Republican hypocracy, yet Clinton claimed to be pro feminist while being accussed by young single women (friends and associatites, not ‘right wingers’)of two rapes (one, Juanita Broderick, was aggravated rape) and approximately eight other sexual assaults, including acts committed while he was president. Hillary effectively served as his ‘get away driver’, working from the gutter to intimidate her husband’s victims into not going to authorities when the crimes were committed. These were real, voilent sexual predations, not consenting acts between john and escort. And, by the way, as someone who dabbles in the world of high end escorts, many of their clients are well known, Hollywood types (e.g., Charlie Sheen), most of whom are leftists. So get off the high horse.

Posted by: DrP | May 4, 2007, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

“ihabwap3″ says of the conservatives,
“Well, now they can RIGHTFULLY claim they are the most corrupt,immoral hypocrites world wide.I hope they ALL go down in flames. ”
–How lovely. And rather an exageration, wouldn’t you say?! I hope you aren’t that blinded by your vitriole.

Posted by: Duncan | May 4, 2007, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

I find it interesting that there is this big assumption that all of Palfrey’s clients were Republicans. She turned over more than 10,000 phone numbers and so far only two identities have been disclosed. Remember that Dick Morris was using an escort service when he was working in the White House for Clinton. Toe sucking was his fetish.
Now lets get equal here. I want not only the names of the clients but the whores as well. If it’s time to ruin names and careers then lets ruin all. These “ladies’ of the evening have gone on to higher profile jobs to include one who is a legal secretary for Vernon Jordan and Bob Schrum. Both staunch Democrats.

Posted by: Ric | May 4, 2007, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

This is entire conversation is one very good way to do a gut check on the moral qualities of the participants. We regulate everything in this country already by establising laws regarding how individuals perform in relationships and positions of trust.
Currently, our laws are based on morals and traditions that involve fidelity in business, marriage, and performance of duties….why…because trustworthiness is a character trait ….either a person is trustworthy, or they are not.
If we are going to change the way we work with, live with, and govern each other…then please show me the better alternative and we can move toward that newer level of living…but this whole “prostitution is okay” argument is really the wrong argument. If the trust of a spouse, an employer or a country is extended to a person who is fundamentally dishonest…then that person ought to be removed from the position of trust ala Gingrich, Clinton, Jesse Jackson, Martin Luther King Jr., the many disgraced televangelists…and any person who professes a worthiness of trust through an oath and then breaks it….and their penance ought to be open and conspicuous so we can witness either a change of heart, or a declaration of continuity….
This isn’t sensational because the left of the right are good or bad…
This is sensational because all of us have been lied to in the past by someone in a key position in our lives……and we’d like to see these folks get nailed to the wall so there can be some sence that “not everybody gets away with it..”
Elevate the conversation above hate for the left, the right or the current administration…and talk about change….either we change the system to accept adulterers, whores and liars in the open…or we search for people who can actually honor the public trust.
Screaming at each other is just a sign that we are poorly educated fools behaving in predictable patterns allowing the status quo to be maintained…and the guilty keep laughing all the way to the bank.

Posted by: Chris | May 4, 2007, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

So far, the only names ABC has ‘hinted’ at are Republicans.
Can’t you all realize that the full list will never be released by ABC?
If they out the Democrats on the list, they will lose the trust of all their ‘anonynous’ contacts and leakers who get them ‘scoops’.

Posted by: Slip | May 4, 2007, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Jeff,
Allow me to proclaim your eternal sentence for judging others and claiming to speak for God.

Posted by: James | May 4, 2007, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Bob — Regardless of the merits of the law, prostitution is illegal, and soliticiting prostitution is illegal. The public has a compelling interest to know which of our leaders feel they’re above the law. (That includes private citizens who become public figures by advocating for particular issues of public concern — i.e., lobbyists.) If they dislike the law, they can change it. That’s one debate. But in theory in this country, you’re not allowed to break the law selectively, regardless of whether it’s a private transaction. It’s far from a non-issue.

Posted by: LAX | May 4, 2007, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Adultery is not illegal. Prostitution is. So don’t compare Clinton to the guys who hired the prostitutes.
And this really is a partisan issue, because the Republicans consistently and continuously advertise themselves as the “family values” party, even going so far in some cases to imply or explicitly state that Democrats lack morals. If Republicans have been hiring the prostitutes, it just proves what liars they are. It’s like the molesting and gay priests, or the self-proclaimed Christians who bomb abortion clinics and murder abortion providers … act all pious and tell us to follow religion’s rules, but blatantly disregard them yourselves ? Freaking makes me sick.

Posted by: Amanda | May 4, 2007, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Slip, ABC is protecting both Dems and R’s. You need friends on both sides.

Posted by: LAX | May 4, 2007, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

This has little to do w/ a double standard at this point. In fact, it’s comparable to punishing a drug dealer vs a drug user. Dealers go down harder. Get the big fish. In this case, they’re going for the big smelly fish (something’s rotten at her core, remember?). I’m laughing. Her plan is backfiring. She’s being seen for what she truly is… a vindictive, desperate woman w/ too much makeup on her bloated face.

Posted by: Sandra | May 4, 2007, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

I’ve been waiting a long time for
a juicy sex scandal like this. Thank
you abc

Posted by: Jake | May 4, 2007, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

The Clinton thing wasn’t about sex. It was about lying under oath in front of a Federal Grand Jury and convincing someone to sign a false afadavit. These were felony offenses that robbed a citizen of the U.S. their day in court. That is why he was impeached.
That aside, legalize prostitution and tax it. All client’s names have to be submitted to the IRS. ]
Palfrey is a madam who ran a prostitution business. She can deny that their company policy would allow prostitution all she wants.
If she outs her Johns, she outs them. That would be a violation of client confidentiality. It doesn’t change the fact that she was running hookers. I think she feels she can threaten her high profile, powerfully influencial political clients with being outed in the hopes that they will convince the government to drop charges against her.

Posted by: RUFREAKINGKIDDING | May 4, 2007, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Repubs caught in DC sex scandal..
CLINTON!
US Prosecutors fired for GOP politics
CLINTON!!
Iraq quagmire and lies
CLINTON!!
White House outs CIA agent
CLINTON!!
The GOP, out of ideas and excuses.

Posted by: Bill D. | May 4, 2007, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

I agree with Lot’s comment — but I can’t stop looking ba—-
Lot’s Wife

Posted by: Lot's Wife | May 4, 2007, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

I bet that list ends up being 50/50 GOP & Dem – with small number of ladies on it too…..

Posted by: Will Ublowme | May 4, 2007, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Let me see Sooner, unless “my” memory is lacking . . .the entire Republican Party opened impeachment procedures against Clinton for this! So, why don’t we at least prosecute and call for these people to be removed from office as well?–Stormtec
Moron Clinton was impeached for lying to a grand jury, which is considered a high crime and misdemeanor. Had nothing to do about having sex it was the fact that he lied about having sex.

Posted by: Allen | May 4, 2007, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Allow me to say, that ALL men pay for sex one way or the other. Dinner and a movie, jewelry, if we aren’t getting the goods neither are the men. So judge how you please, I say if you’ve got it flaunt it sister. I was told once that I should use my talents and abilities and do what I love for a living well now we know where that would get me – on the stand with Palfrey

Posted by: Lesa | May 4, 2007, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Ever think of how many names may be WOMEN on this list? nothing suprising any more.

Posted by: h t conger | May 4, 2007, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

This is a country that was founded under rule of law. Law breakers should be judged all the same. The well placed
elite if a law breaker should be judged the same as common people. I exceptions are made for one group or class, then the law should be abolished for all.

Posted by: Eugene | May 4, 2007, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Lesa- false dilemma, but go with it if that’s what you think. There’s a difference between respectable, polite courtesy (getting to know someone first) and outright bribery for sex, don’t you think?

Posted by: LAX | May 4, 2007, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Left/Right, Liberal/Conservative, Democrat/Republican. Most here could find a way, however convoluted, to turn just about any news story in to a juvenile, partisan talking points forum (see above). We’re a few hours away from hearing a small fraction of a very long list but most Democrats posting here swear all the Johns are likely to be Republicans because the first to be named, was a Republican. Will the same Lefties be back here to apologize when it’s revealed there are just as many or more of their liberal friends on the list? Not likely. Ain’t the anonymity of the web great (if your a partisan hack)?
My name is Joseph Crowley, I’m a card-carrying Republican and damn proud of both!

Posted by: Joseph Crowley | May 4, 2007, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Amanda — what about those Republicans who are conservative on fiscal issues, but “family values” issues? Or what about Democrats who are strong “family values” supporters (a lot of them beat Republicans in November)? I’m confused. Are you just looking for anyone with an R next to their names?

Posted by: LMAO | May 4, 2007, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

All of you need to get the significance of the statement by professional hookers that this man was an “unpleasant person” as they refused to service him a second time. Most of the bush and cheney cabal of losers like this cat are as unpleasant as this world has ever produced. And the MAINSCREAM media like the Rev.Moons’ WHITEWASHINGTON TIMES SHILL RAG supped on this mans fruition, eh?????

Posted by: frodaddy | May 4, 2007, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Joseph,
As many have already pointed out Democrats don’t go around high fiving Jesus everytime they speak. Also the Democratic party is made up of intelligent forgiving people who wouldn’t judge our leaders for transgressions most of us are guilty of.
The Republicans will hang their own leaders because it’s a party made up of judgemental hypocrits.

Posted by: James | May 4, 2007, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Amanda — what about those Republicans who are conservative on fiscal issues, but not on “family values” issues? Or what about Democrats who are strong “family values” supporters (a lot of them beat Republicans in November)? I’m confused. Are you just looking for anyone with an R next to their names?

Posted by: LMAO | May 4, 2007, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

To the ONES who are ranting about Republicans. Barney Fwank lived with a male hooker who ran a gay prostitution ring out of Fwank’s condo. Garry Studds,(there’s a misnomer, if there ever was one) admitted to having sex with a male page. Studds was given a standing ovation by the House when he returned after his censure. And yes, Bubba was a rapist, and sexual harrasser by any stretch of the term. These two liberal fairies from Massachusetts got a mere slap on the wrist for their gay sex. And it is worth noting, the slap was on “the limp wrist”, for symbolic reasons.

Posted by: bob woods | May 4, 2007, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Adultery is a crime…..
Misdemeanor
DC Code Citation: §22-201
Former Code Citation: §22-301
Charge Elements: The elements of this offense are:
1. The defendant was married;
2. The defendant had sexual intercourse with a person other than his or her spouse;
3. The intercourse was voluntary.

Posted by: chief | May 4, 2007, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

The following is excerp from The San Francisco Chronicle which appeared in the paper on April 1.
Please do not call me names just because I am trying to educate readers.
I am and have been a registered Democrat for 36 years. I actively campaigned for McGovern. I do not think you can call me a CON-servative.
Palfrey was arrested by San Diego police Dec. 28, 1990, on charges of pimping, pandering and extortion. She did not show up for her scheduled trial date in August 1991 and instead sent a handwritten letter to the judge accusing the police vice squad of having a vendetta against her.
“If taken into custody, my physical safety and most probably my very life would be jeopardized,” she wrote. “Rape, beating, maiming, disfigurement and more than likely murder disguised in the form of just another jailhouse accident or suicide would await me.”
She was captured Oct. 14, 1991, crossing the Canadian border in Montana. She pleaded guilty May 28, 1992, to one count of attempted felony pimping and was sentenced on June 25 that year to 18 months in prison.
Describing herself as a “spiritual,” teetotaling “cat person,” she wrote in her sentencing memorandum that “there is no intent on my part to re-enter the escort business.” Instead, she said she intended to start a brokerage firm concentrating on American Western and Indian art when she was released from prison, in part to alleviate some of the “grief and suffering” she said she had brought to her parents.
“If I say something, it’s to be believed,” she wrote to the court. “I am a trustworthy and conscientious woman, who considers living by the Golden Rule to be the one true law we all must abide.”
Her parents stood behind her, writing, “We just comfort each other everyday and pray that Debbie will be released real soon and get on with a good life.”
Palfrey had barely tasted freedom before she jumped back into the profession she had declared she intended to avoid. She started Pamela Martin and Associates in 1993 and was soon employing 132 college-educated women who engaged in “prostitution, debauchery, or other immoral acts,” according to federal authorities.

Posted by: mixon,m | May 4, 2007, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

I’d doo herrrr!!!

Posted by: MeDoHerrrrr | May 4, 2007, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Just to be clear. I want everyone to be exposed and face the consequences. IF she goes down, they all should go down.
On a side note we need to just Legalize, regulate and tax Prostitution. It’s not going away folks.
There will be dems and reps on the list so I’ll refrain from bashing cons on this even though it will be nice to see them exposed.

Posted by: Tony | May 4, 2007, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Repulicans partaking in activities that cause young women to need birth control and abortion. Personally, I’m starting to believe that it’s too bad that the Republicans didn’t eliminate reproductive freedoms for women. Can you just imagine how much you could soak these guys in child support?

Posted by: kellamd | May 4, 2007, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Finally, a good Washington scandel. It was getting kind of dull for awhile….

Posted by: BB | May 4, 2007, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

The difference between conservatives and liberals is that when the conservative frauds are found out we want them to out and punished, the liberals make excuses. I hope all the conservative johns are found out. We deserve ethical leaders, there is no reason to settle for these bottom dwellers. Liberals have low expectations, and therefore get what they deserve. Conservatives have high expectations and won’t accept less.

Posted by: Brett | May 4, 2007, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

I’m so so so so SO very pleased that so many “holier-than-thou”, pious, bigoted, hypocritical, closed-minded GOP’ers are getting caught up in this net. Virtually every day now something horrible the Republicans have done is unearthed in the news. VERY very satisfying after the past years of non stop Dem bashing. It’s like a feast after a very long famine. Sadly, I’m sure there are some Dems on her list, probably more than I would be happy to know about. But the Dems aren’t the one’s perched so very high up on the “Religious/Morality/Family Values/Evangelical” platform as the GOP, so this is ESPECIALLY tasty to watch them fall. Long ways down eh? More desert please! This just gets better every day. I can’t wait until they are back to being marginalized again.

Posted by: Dustin | May 4, 2007, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Here we are.
May 4, 2007.
Having a discussion about hookers and their johns. About Republicans and Democrats. About whether Paris Hilton should do time for driving without a license. About an angry phone call from some half-baked actor to his daughter.
Why isn’t someone going after Osama Bin Laden????

Posted by: Ken | May 4, 2007, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

James said — “As many have already pointed out Democrats don’t go around high fiving Jesus everytime they speak.”
Oh yeah? How about Harold Ford,Jr.? Or Heath Schuler? Or Hillary when she stumps in churches? Or even, most recently, Nancy Pelosi?
“Also the Democratic party is made up of intelligent forgiving people wouldn’t judge our leaders for transgressions most of us are guilty of.”
Oh I see. You forgive your own, but your vaunted forgiveness doesn’t extend to those who aren’t your people, even though, as you point out, most of us are guilty of transgressions. How very noble of you.
That. Makes. No. Sense. Whatsoever.

Posted by: Moderation | May 4, 2007, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Who is ‘D.C. Madam’? Vallejo woman is enigmaWyatt Buchanan, John Coté, Henry K. Lee and Peter Fimrite, Chronicle Staff WritersSunday, April 1, 2007
Jeane Palfrey, as most people know her, is a woman with strong convictions who is full of contradictions. She describes herself as an honest, trustworthy teetotaler who cares about women, but she went to jail in the 1990s for “attempted pimping.” She once said her childhood was idyllic, but blasted her high school classmates for driving her close to a nervous breakdown.
She is, depending on who is talking, boastful or shy, generous or vindictive. She says she believes in the Golden Rule, but once vowed to show “no mercy” in a legal battle with a former lover and his new wife.
Palfrey holds a grudge and acts on her passions, whether it means tirelessly pursuing that former lover, building an escort empire or placing the blame for her troubles on a law enforcement conspiracy.

Posted by: mixon,m | May 4, 2007, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

hey sooner, clinton didnt pay. he wasnt buying women because he can get it on his own.

Posted by: realist | May 4, 2007, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Palfrey’s senior photo in the Charleroi Area High School’s 1974 yearbook shows a pretty, smiling brunette, described as someone who “likes sewing and dancing … enjoys being with friendly, outgoing people” and plans to go to “airline school.”
But she never finished her senior year. She explained later that she fled to Florida and graduated from a high school there because she was “close to a nervous breakdown after years of psychological abuse,” the result of being “incessantly bullied” by 17-year-old “jackasses.”
Palfrey re-emerged on the Charleroi scene about four years ago, when she launched an alumni Web site and later began urging city leaders to use local graduates as a resource to help revitalize the town.
Her former classmates were astounded when she used the site for a tirade against her high school tormenters. They were, she wrote, “the cruelest, meanest and most horrid creatures any of us probably will ever encounter in our lifetimes.”
“Karma can be a real ass-kicker when it comes to injustice,” she wrote. “And believe me, they got whooped. Every last one of them.”
None of Palfrey’s classmates interviewed recently remembered her being bullied or mistreated.
“Her diatribe, that stuff there, that’s borderline,” said Donn Henderson, an alumnus who helped organize a joint reunion in 2005 for all the high school’s classes from the 1970s. “She had told some people that she was going to come back and tell people how she felt about them. People were starting to get concerned.”
Henderson said he had a dust-up with Palfrey over the school reunion and downtown Charleroi’s revitalization efforts, two projects he was in charge of coordinating. “She came up with some ideas about how we could promote Charleroi and I didn’t agree with it,” Henderson said. “She called for my head, saying I should resign.”
Palfrey, Henderson said, had boasted of connections to “people with millions and millions of dollars,” but the money never materialized.
It wasn’t the only time her pronouncements lacked solid footing. Until recently, her resume on the alumni Web site stated that she was “affiliated” with the National and California Innocence Projects and the Berkeley-based Life After Exoneration Program, organizations that represent and provide support for wrongly convicted inmates. Officials at the groups said she was never involved in any of the projects except when she once proposed a case, which was rejected, and donated money.
This article appeared on page A – 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle
Paterra, who lost touch with Palfrey after high school, said his former prom date now seems more conflicted than the “sweet girl” who danced with him to “Summer Breeze.”
“There must be two sides to her,” Paterra said. “I think there are two personalities to Debbie.”

Posted by: mixon,m | May 4, 2007, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Brett,
If you condemn every person who has ever had a sexual transgression then yours will be an empty party indeed and it’s sad that you can’t look past your self righteousness and see that everyone makes mistakes and deserves forgiveness.

Posted by: James | May 4, 2007, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

OK, Legal strategy coming:
In the case of Mr. Shock and Awe I am of the understanding that his little equipment falls well short of both Shock and Awe. So there is the legal position: the hottie shows up for a little dancing and a massage. Ding Dong she comes into the abode of old gieser Mr. Shock and Awe. He excuses himself and uses one of the many male enhancement concoctions on the market (well in his case he double-ups) and returns for the dance show.
Now, 15 minutes later he starts the massage and the chemicals are activating – unknown to the hired hottie. Now, the old gieser Mr. Shock and Awe is feeling the power of the chemicals and like many in Washington DC understand there is now an unauthorized contract over-run and the hottie, like most Women-Owned Small Business entities she is a sever disadvantage to the all powerful Mr. Shock and Awe
She call outs seeking Federal Contract Assistance but none arrives and like all Small Business entities she suffers at the hands of a Washington DC insider – she gets screwed.
Pamela Martin and Associates told her not to have sex and she agreed and signed a contract to the same. Unknown to her Mr. Shock and Awe had an unauthorized chemical advantage and she was a at a sever disadvantage to Mr. Shock and Awe’s over powering chemical induced power.

Posted by: Brad Holem | May 4, 2007, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

As a conservative myself, I’m happy to see anybody who breaks the law swing…Repub or Dem. I can say one thing about Repubs, they do eat their own when their own are exposed, and they cut them out – even if it is by duress.
Dems fight tooth and nail to save their people, no matter how heinous the action or crime…the last person I remember stepping down was Gary Condit, and he had a soft landing by comparison with say, Trent Lott or Packard.
Anyway – the truth of a position isn’t made untrue by virtue of actions of people. For instance, if it is right to honor God and keep the Commandments, but some pastor or politician screws up and fails in that – he/she should be rightly chastised, exposed as a hypocrite, and taken down from their pulpit. Liberals love that part…
Then…the church takes over, like Ted haggard’s old congregation, and without the media coverage forgive, restore, and pray for that person and their family..attempting to rebuild and heal. Libs hate that part…and therefore never cover it.
But the point is that the TRUTH of the matter…that adultery and prostitution are morally wrong things doesn’t change, despite the actions of anyone in that book. Liberals hate that part, because it is a moral judgement, and unless they are the ones doing it nobody else can. Then they use the opportunity to bash the Christians (of course, like we’re surprised) I would say shame to every liberal posting on here who is rejoicing in the downfall of the Republicans sure to be on this list, and not doing the same for Dems we KNOW will be on the list too.

Posted by: MW | May 4, 2007, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

I am an idependent, so I can comment about both sides of the isle. To the Democrats, you are to disorganized to have a network in the field of prostitution. Any Democrats on the list will surely be sole contributors. Maybe you will soon be called “Connies.”

Posted by: Mike | May 4, 2007, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Moderation,
My forgiveness and understanding certainly does include Republicans as I said earlier it is the Republicans themselves that will eat their own over this.
But thanks for trying.

Posted by: James | May 4, 2007, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

James — thanks for clarifying.
M.

Posted by: Moderation | May 4, 2007, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

NW,
To claim prostitution is morally wrong is your opinion yet you state it as fact. I for one am for the legalization of it so it can be regulated and safe and lots of people in this country agree. Women have the right to do WHATEVER they want with their bodies! Who are you to control what women choose to do?
Keep your moral certianty to yourself the people of this country don’t need your judgement.

Posted by: James | May 4, 2007, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Too bad we have to get all up in an uproar over voluntary sex…we need a cabinet position created for this… just so more of these low life politicians can get l-a-i-d…more nookie, less agression..that’s why Clinton was so passive about Osama, the bombing of the Cole, the embassy bombings, the first world trade center bombing, etc…he was getting it regularly.

Posted by: common sense | May 4, 2007, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

I didn’t have sex…I didn’t inhale. Yeah, right…hahaha!

Posted by: Jawnee | May 4, 2007, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

wow, if people could only focus and put these energies where they are needed than we might fuction better as a nation.
Than again, look at how many people here cant agree. As the late james brown would say “aaaaaaahhh Living in America”

Posted by: crazy place | May 4, 2007, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

When the names are out I would expect that the Johns will be from the whole ideological spectrum. As others have noted it is not shocking when liberal Dems are involved as that is the morality(or lack thereof) they have been promoting for years.The Hollywood left injects this into “entertainment” whenever possible. The point that is being missed is that this whole prosecution is unconstitutional. Roe v. Wade clearly held that a woman has a right to do what she wants with her body. So if she wants to share it with some guy she has that right. If she has some other lady help her excercise that right, no different than a doctor helping with her right to an abortion.

Posted by: David FeHill | May 4, 2007, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

This 80 year old grandpa thinks, “What has happened to this world and to these people who think so very much of sex and so little about the serious domestic and worldwide unresolved problems this country faces! This is 2007 ????

Posted by: Charles Share | May 4, 2007, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

David- You sound like a legal mind. Can you show me where in the Roe v. Wade decision the Court said a woman has an absolute right to do anything she wishes with her body?
And I’m not sure that a majority of liberals approve of prositution, so it’s interesting how that fallacy is thrown around. Libertarians are the ones who tend to favor prostitution.

Posted by: LAX | May 4, 2007, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Prostitution is only illegal if the payment is made on a per sexual act basis. I don’t see anyone prosecuting professional trophy wives and gold diggers. The entire law is hypocritical. Either prosecute both parties, prosecute gold diggers and giggilos, or get government entirely out of our bedrooms.

Posted by: Greg | May 4, 2007, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Arthur — every purveyer of porn is leftist? You have some serious assumptions there. Are you sure about that? Because out here in Southern Cal — porn central — I think we can definitely refute that, even if common sense fails ya.

Posted by: LAX | May 4, 2007, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Slick Willy Clinton pretended he was Bon Govi and his groupies were interns. People who hire escort services pay for their entertainment good or bad. “He who is without sin cast the first stone”. That’s biblical for those of you who have forgotten. We’re defending a country that still stones teenagers for not associating with the right tribe

Posted by: Tim Himes | May 4, 2007, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Good, Excellent. I trust they will be throwing his ass in jail for breaking the law after he admits to it???
meanwhile, it will be interesting to see what other political washington types are on that list. i think the ultimate goal here is to just not have this whole process end up an excersize in hypocracy, if theres lawbreaking, then punish everyone who broke it.

Posted by: Kess | May 4, 2007, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

i wonder how many ppl ABC will deliberately protect? Well we know they will definitely oust any and all conservatives, but the question is how many libs will they protect?

Posted by: fred | May 4, 2007, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Let me get this straight, “Clinton didn’t pay so that means it was perfectly legal”?? Seems to me that he was in a pretty powerful position of authority over a very young and impressionable intern. (Can you think of a more contrasting set of positions?).
Compared to two mature adults consenting to have sex for money, which is the more ethically reprehensible act?

Posted by: Jacque Bauer | May 4, 2007, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

clinton was ABSOLUTELY illegal and reprehensible. That is sexual harrasment of the highest order. A boss who has sexual connections with a subordinate is bad enough….but the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES with an intern? Oh man how utterly disgraceful. Clinton is a disgrace to this country.

Posted by: Arthur Hunter | May 4, 2007, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

In regards to prosecuting the johns, there probally is not enough evidence to do so. Other than their name on a list, which they can claim ignorance to, there is nothing to tie them to illegal activity. This is why the Madam is being prosecuted, because she is the one who provided the service, benifited financially from it, and has extensive records to tie her to the activities. Sure, I would like to the the clients prosecuted, but I doubt it would hold up in court.

Posted by: bill | May 4, 2007, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I am a convinced Roman Catholic Christian, and am about as socially and politically conservative as you will find. I have never in my forty-eight years on this earth partaken of a prostitute’s services or been unfaithful to my wife. I cannot understand why, in a country founded on principles of personal freedom and personal responsibility, we insist on criminalizing behavior I deem immoral and self destructive, but which involves consenting adults and which directly injures no one but the participants. The same goes for criminalizing gambling or the sale and use by competent adults of recreational drugs, and a host of other so-called “moral” crimes. If the morally/socially/psychologically deviant behavior leads to conduct that injures or seriously endangers others, punish the dangerous conduct directly, just as, in most places, we don’t punish alcohol consumption per se, but do punish driving while intoxicated, or beating one’s spouse or children while in a drunken stupor.
By the way, Clinton is an arrested adolescent and a cad and his having been elected to two presidential terms remains a national disgrace, but I would not have impeached or convicted him for having consensual sex with an adult intern. I would have impeached him and removed him from office for committing clear perjury in a deposition taken by his adversary in a lawsuit, after the judge had specifically ordered him to answer the questions at issue. I would also have fined him heavily, as the judge in the Jones case ultimately did. I read the deposition (including the definition of “sex”) and, as a litigation lawyer, I could have convicted him of perjury with my eyes closed. It wasn’t “just about sex.” It was about a conscious effort illegally to deprive an opposing litigant of evidence to which the judge had expressly ruled she was entitled.

Posted by: Paul Veazey | May 4, 2007, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Just so the liberals will shut up, I can say only two words…….
Barney Frank.

Posted by: Steve | May 4, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

I think this whole debacle is outrageous- prostitution should be legal in this country and they should have their own union just like the Netherlands. Monica Lewinsky was 23-24 when she was having an affair with Bill, hardly a “young impressionable” intern- everyone knows what they are doing at that age, you must think she was under 18 or something.

Posted by: Dana | May 4, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Dem or Rep, who cares? This should be great fun! If they are cheating on their spouses it should be known. I can understand why someone looking like Karl Rove or Dennis Kucinich may have to pay for sex.

Posted by: Yurdik Stiney | May 4, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Johns are like drug addicts, while Madams like Pelrey are like Drug Pushers. I think we know who is going to get the book thrown at them.

Posted by: Roger | May 4, 2007, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

People: this is not about right and left, it’s about right and wrong! The service this woman provided is wrong. The men who used the service are wrong. This has nothing to do with the political leanings of her customers. There will be all flavors of people who come to light in this. Jumping on the anti-{the other guy’s party} bandwagon is intellectual dishonesty at its ugliest by everyone who has done it here. We’re going to see liberals, conservatives, religious, agnostics, married, single, etc. all caught in her little black book. Anyone here who attacks one group or the other at this point is only showing their own intellectual stupidity and political biases. There’s enough mud to get everyone dirty, so why not stop throwing it around? Geez Louise!

Posted by: SingerGuy | May 4, 2007, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Sooo..Did Bill, or for that matter, Hillary, enjoy these services?

Posted by: emby | May 4, 2007, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

All this proves that prostitution is the world’s oldest profession…with politics a very close second. I mean…what other 2 professions are there where people are screwed for money?

Posted by: LT | May 4, 2007, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Cool it,, everybody!! Just watch 20/20 tonight to get the “skinny”.

Posted by: harry 48 | May 4, 2007, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

LEZAH,
Where did you go? I was hoping to hear your vindication of Miz. Julia regarding the information contained in the SF Chronicle articles.

Posted by: mixon,m | May 4, 2007, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Janda-
Of course, Dems have sex, they just don’t have to buy it!
JT

Posted by: JT | May 4, 2007, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

I agree, let’s get the lowdown tonight.

Posted by: JT | May 4, 2007, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

More from Allen, who said that all porn purveyors are leftist (where’s that guy at?): from the New York Times-
“The General Motors Corporation, the world’s largest company, now sells more graphic sex films every year than does Larry Flynt, owner of the Hustler empire. The 8.7 million Americans who subscribe to DirecTV, a General Motors subsidiary, buy nearly $200 million a year in pay-per-view sex films from satellite, according to estimates provided by distributors of the films, estimates the company did not dispute.
“EchoStar Communications Corporation, the No. 2 satellite provider, whose chief financial backers include Mr. Murdoch, makes more money selling graphic adult films through its satellite subsidiary than Playboy, the oldest and best-known company in the sex business, does with its magazine, cable and Internet businesses combined, according to public and private revenue accounts by the companies.
“AT&T Corporation, the nation’s biggest communications company, offers a hard-core sex channel called the Hot Network to subscribers to its broadband cable service. It also owns a company that sells sex videos to nearly a million hotel rooms. Nearly one in five of AT&T’s broadband cable customers pay an average of $10 a film to see what the distributor calls ‘real, live all-American sex — not simulated by actors.’”

Posted by: LAX | May 4, 2007, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

I think we are all hypocrites at one time or another. Just because we believe in our hearts that certain things are right and wrong doesn’t mean that sometimes we don’t still fall. It is the human condition. I still think it is better to aspire to certain types of behavior because it brings good to our souls and good to the civilization at large. At this time in our history I think it would be wise for us all to learn to be kind to the weak and encourage them to do better and pray that each of us will succeed in our aspirations. We worry to much about what others are doing instead of looking at ourselves. No one is totally good or bad unless they strive to live by a certain code of conduct. whether it is good or bad will be proved in our actions.

Posted by: Nan | May 4, 2007, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

What profession is prostitution, the best for YOUR daughter, right, as much respected as lets say a medical doctor.
Every women wants to be a ho therefore, including your daughter? :-)

Posted by: Schmuckes | May 4, 2007, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

I want the Republicans out of my Bedroom.
I want the Democrats out of my Gun Locker.
And I want the both of them to get the Hell out of my wallet.

Posted by: The Professor | May 4, 2007, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

You think it’s only the republicans that screw around? Hell, come on and fess up and be proud of it. It didn’t hurt Sheen and his careeer is bigger than ever.

Posted by: fay | May 4, 2007, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Hey, many of the escort ladies are possibly mentionel at the local escort review boards. Their performance is
evaluated there. In fact, it might be nice to do an evestigative report on escort review boards right across the board covering the entire USA and World.
Read some of the escort reviews for your own enjoyment. Your female audience will mildly be entertaint. Some of the reviews, however, are also a work of art and worthy for puplication.

Posted by: Finkelsnazzle | May 4, 2007, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

No doubt the list will contain members of both political parties, but I think the comments about the Republicans getting shown to be hypocrites are well deserved. I mean which party has held itself up as the only true defenders of our way or life and family values? Which party produces people like Newt who could prosecute an impeachment at the same time he carried own his own affair in a closet? In addition, Republicans do in fact have this nasty habit of labeling anyone who disagrees with their views as being a commie, pinko queer. McCarthyism? They’ve put Senator McCarthy to shame by perfecting his smear tactics into an artform. Yes, it will be most amusing to see how many neo-con cockroaches crawl out of this woodwork, and I will be watching for them eagerly.

Posted by: DesertDweller | May 4, 2007, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Cory … I think you missed my sense of irony. Even more impressive, you counted my posts. Want an autograph?

Posted by: LAX | May 4, 2007, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Who cares? So someone paid for sex?!
Should the vendor or buyer be prosecuted? Maybe both?
And who pays for that?
At least somebody beside us was getting f****d besides us.
Decriminalize this type of thing.
To penalize them is like watching that poor girl in Iraq get stoned to death by the moral police for liking a boy of another religion.
That is the real crime.

Posted by: Dan | May 4, 2007, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

“It’s interesting that everyone seems to assume that all the clients will be Republicans. Don’t Democrats have sex too! I assume that there will be men from both parties and that no group, liberal or conservetive, will be able to say they weren’t involved.”
The drive-by media and the Democrat Party are probably now strategerizing about how it will “be a Republican scandal”. But dead Democrats know better.

Posted by: KStorm | May 4, 2007, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

The fact that someone would step forward and testify just blows me away.

Posted by: Germanized | May 4, 2007, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

With liberty and justice for all….what’s the big deal about. In Nevada everybody would be legal and off the hook. …What’s difference in legal prostitution and politicians… They’re both Ho’s. Oops only Santa Claus can say that word.

Posted by: Doug | May 4, 2007, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Cory is right. We are all the “losers”.
AND THE WINNERS IS…..ABC NEWS for taking us all for a ride.
Honorable mention goes to Ms. Palfrey who will now be able to retire from the pimping profession and become the author of a “soon-to-be-made-movie” book.
As usual, we are ones getting the proverbial shaft.
Unfortunately, the biggest losers will be the families of the johns. They are after all, the only innocent victims here.
By the way. Has anyone else taken any time to crunch figure. If this service only made $2million in 13 years, do you rally believe it had between 10000 & 15000 clients (depending on which article you read) and 132 employees (er, excuse me, SUBCONTRACTORS.)
If the business had 132 contractors providing services 3 nites per week at a rate of a conservative $200 per hour for 13 years, the amount should be in excess of $50million.
I really would like to know why the federal prosecutors are spending our money to chase a business that they claim was grossing $154,000 per year?
Oh, not that I am personally knowlegable in these matters, but $200 to $300 per hour seems awefully cheap to me for the kind of services and the touted clientele.

Posted by: mixon, m | May 4, 2007, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Let me tell you I would not go down by myself I am in throuble so are the JOHNS. It is way past time, she offered it and they took it.
There is an old saying THE BIGGER THEY ARE THE HARDER THEY FALL.
I will not be shocked to hear who used her services because they think that they are perfect but they are not. I hope President Bush is one of them just maybe he will be booted out of office.
That will not help the UNITED STATES but at least we will get rid of person that has no heart at all.

Posted by: Myawen | May 4, 2007, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

We live in a society that tells us North is up and South is down, East is to the right and West is to the left. Who is to say where the Earth is placed in stellar reference? Do you realize that it takes 3 RIGHTS to make 1 LEFT? Sex IS the oldest profession, no one can refute that. The only reson sex for sale is illegal is because of people with little or no self confidence. If you are everything your mate needs, you have no worries, and if you aren’t you better start learning. Quit dangling the prospect of sex over you partners head It isn’t a political thing if you don’t make it that, just good old energy which needs to be releived. Most sex starts at partys, which is all the more reason to abandon the two party system, hell let’s put no limit on the partys and be totally human!

Posted by: bob graham | May 4, 2007, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

How is it that so many of you stereotype whole political parties of millions of people based on the failings of individuals who are part of those parties? Moral standards are just that, standards. Standards that most people strive to live up to, understanding that everyone fails, some big failures, some small failures. We shouldn’t throw out moral standards altogether because some do not live up to them any of the time, and others do not live up to them some of the time. Why such anger at those who would have standards, even if they can not always live up to them? No one has to judge others on moral failings, usually, those who live without regard to any moral standards reap the pain and suffering that such a lifestyle causes: broken marriages, unwanted pregnancies, depression, anxiety, ruined reputations and careers. . . eventually, you have to ask yourself, how is this way of living/thinking really working out for you. When people are ready to answer that question honestly, then we may be able to have a discussion/debate about the benefits of having high moral standards.

Posted by: John | May 4, 2007, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Group, everyone has pent up feelings. We can fix it , we just need to vote.
If you don’t vote, don’t bitch. Pogo said we have met the enemy and he is us.
The silent majority is getting screwed everyday – not the rich – not the poor -just the suckers like us.
Oh, HUH – the topic is sex in the city not war – hello!?

Posted by: Deep-Thought | May 4, 2007, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Deep-Thought,
Hey I like your style. Haven’t seen POGO quouted in a long time.
But, I do think the poor are getting screwed just as bad or worst than we are.

Posted by: mixon, m | May 4, 2007, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

I howled with laughter over these dignified men who think they are above all the rest of us, getting caught with their pants down, literally. It made me really angry, however, to hear TV pundits blame it all on the madame and her girls. If there wasn’t a market for these services they would not exist. I guess the neocons are more kinky than we thought…we already know they are insane with power.

Posted by: RevG | May 4, 2007, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Cliton did do worse!!! He used his position to have an employee give him a blow @#$. So he did pay for it, just in a different way. The thing that made it worse was that he then asked the young lady to lie (commit perjury) by filling out an affidavit that was sent before a grand jury . And then He lied to you and me on national TV!!!! You see they both Rep/Dems are wrong an if they did lie they all are hypocritical…my guy and your guy. Now how liberal are you? can you at least admit that your guy lied or is a hypocrit? I can.

Posted by: Dan | May 4, 2007, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

ihbwap3 writes:
“Well,now they can RIGHTFULLY claim they are the most corrupt,immoral hypocrites world wide”
uhmm, perhaps you were drunk back when it happened but that would have been the administration of Bill Clinton. You rad lib Democrats should know a thing or two about that, eh?

Posted by: PeteJ | May 4, 2007, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

I can’t believe that I live in a country filled with so many fools. Newsflash: Corruption exists on both sides of the street.

Posted by: Steve Q | May 4, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

what Clinton did was worse
preying on an intern over whom he held sway

Posted by: wazoo | May 4, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

just another ploy to direct attention away from the war on iraq, works every time.

Posted by: debra | May 4, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

How stupid when people say GWB lied. He used the same intelligent reports Bill Clinton used. The same reports that his wife read as First Lady and as a Senator. Listen to Hilary in he own words!
“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.
It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security.
Now this much is undisputed.”— Floor Speech of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton
on S.J. Res. 45, A Resolution to Authorize the Use of
United States Armed Forces Against Iraq

Posted by: Dan | May 4, 2007, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Sex is much like an addiction and just the thought of it stimulates the same areas of the brain as controlled drugs. It is simply a by product of ensuring our survival. It is in our nature to spread our genes. Humanity is the consolidated effort to rise above your genes. So it boils down to liberty vs. personal responsibility: Whether we should protect people or legalize behavior. Legislating morality is always a controversial poposition. And Republicans like doing it. (This is why people are watching them so closely.)
Family values? This is just a catch phrase for religious zealots trying to impose their will on others. Can there be such a thing as Gay Family Values? Do they want less for their children? Of course not.

Posted by: Michael | May 4, 2007, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Only a few names have been released to date. They are, to be sure, of imperialists. So far. Do not be surprised if the vast right wing conspiracy has fabricated evidence to falsely implicate some of our beloved leaders, our comrades in the struggle.
Be on guard against any attempt by the imperialists to to besmirch the reputations of our heros. They will try!
Just look at how they distorted the selfless efforts of President Clinton (peace be upon him) to counsel a young woman entrusted to his care!
Take note of the attempt to smear our brother from New Orleans when, after Dick Cheney torpedoed the levies from a mini-sub, he placed a few thousand dollars in his freezer for the sole purpose of helping the displaced brothers and sister should the president attempt, as he did, to exterminate them.
Any imperialist republican who took advantage of this desperate woman should be held to strict account! How wonderful that a few of our comrades in the struggle were trying to help her, and how sad that the imperialist press will pretend that they were no different from the republican exploiters.

Posted by: Bill Blythe | May 4, 2007, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Do the republican supporters have so little faith in their party that they are assuming that it is only republicans that have to pay for sex? Boy, with friends like this, who needs enemies. I’m sure not all reps need to pay for sex. Do you think Rush pays for sex when he goes to foreign lands with someone elses Viagra? I do.

Posted by: Blossom | May 4, 2007, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Doesn’t Our Country have bigger problems than busting people for having sex…. who cares if they paid for it. People pay for it everyday…oh, maybe not in cash but in a diamond ring for your girlfriend or a dinner for your boyfriend…. same thing just different payment. Let’s focus on the big issue of this war that we should never have been fighting in cause we were lied too.

Posted by: Patrick | May 4, 2007, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

So Patrick, tell me about this war WE have been fighting.(The one we were lied to about). My unit went to Iraq AND Afghanistan.
You were where?

Posted by: Bill Blythe | May 4, 2007, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

No…the topic is about the DC Madam and the corruption it exposed of Rep/Dems. And if you were honest you would admit that there are some that take great pride on the fall of one party over another and then tout thaT their party can do no wrong! I just show that both parties can do wrong and that one party seems to at least strive for a greater level of honesty!

Posted by: Dan | May 4, 2007, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Unfortunately this *is* a politcal issue. But the thread got off topic. We should be debating the implications of the case, not falling victim to them.

Posted by: Michael | May 4, 2007, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

If a citzen in the private sector had sex with a subordinate (a la Monica /Bill), that citzen would be terminated immediately.

Posted by: Jon Dokes | May 4, 2007, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Dan,
Thank you. Yes we all know that Democrats do it, Republicans do it, even educated fleas do it.
And, they do it with lots of escort services in lots of cities in lots of countries all over the world.
My question is why, out of all the escort services in this country, and in
DC did federal prosecutors pick this one that they say made $154,000 gross per year for the last 13 years (pretty small potatoes I think) and why are they wasting our money.
We already know they all do it.
Also, why is ABC making this into such a ratings grabber? Oh, well I know that one.

Posted by: mixon, m | May 4, 2007, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Great, prosecute them all and move on. This should not take so long to figure out and make convictions and jail. Bring in all the customers and everyone involved.
LOCK THEM ALL UP! AT LEAST PALFREY

Posted by: Don | May 4, 2007, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

If this idiot Ullman had sex with his escort then he should be prosecuted. He takes advantage of someone he hired to keep his ugly a** company that he could never even dream of spending time with unless he paid for the time, then sells her out when she decided as a consenting adult to take pity on his sorry a** and become intimate. He is a disgrace and a cad.

Posted by: jhnmacd | May 4, 2007, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Since when is sex for money a FEDERAL crime? All the Feds need to do is visit Nevada.
CALL THIS WHAT IT IS- A POLITICAL CRIME.

Posted by: john | May 4, 2007, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

I think ABC is being pretty selfish and should have a responsability to wives and children of these men. Everyone will forget about this event and these men in about a year. But because of such publicity the children and wives will have to live with it for a life time. I’m not defending these individuals actions, but this could be handled in a more humane fashion.

Posted by: me or you | May 4, 2007, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Wow. The whole “victimeless crime” scenario. Has anyone bothered looked at the facts of the “sex industry”
Nationally, the average age of entry into prostitution is 14.
Even younger than the soldiers the pig boomers are sending to IRAQ.
Why don’t the middle aged profiteers go fight their own war and screw each other?

Posted by: joyce | May 4, 2007, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

The GOP is shaking simply because Republicans have to buy their sex. Most women wouldn’t touch your average Washington GOPer. Hell, apparently most of them won’t even do it for money twice.
Democrats, by contrast, are attractive and intelligent enough to get it for free…and take care of the nation’s business while they’re getting a hummer too.
It’s called ‘competence.’
You won’t find much of it right of center.

Posted by: atlas spanked | May 4, 2007, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

What does the sex industry have to do with prostitution? Underage prostitution is a product of drugs and bad parenting.

Posted by: me or you | May 4, 2007, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

One question. When you watch “Cops” & they are doing stings on “johns”, they arrest them and they are quick to point out that the “johns” are the problem. Also, the undercover police have no sympathy for the “johns”.

Posted by: bill | May 4, 2007, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Talk about “An Inconvenient Truth………..This little escapade may add explosive gasses to DC!

Posted by: Chukkal | May 4, 2007, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

To DRE – rep folley (republican congressman) didn’t have sex with an under-aged male page. That was actually Democratic congressman gerry studs. Folley only exchanged text messages.

Posted by: steve434 | May 4, 2007, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

to steve434…rep folly? Where was chris hansen when we needed him? Folley is the one who chaired when Jessicas law was put into affect. Helped write the law! The creator gets a pardon.

Posted by: me or you | May 4, 2007, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Sean Hannity seems to be VERY upset about all of this. He keeps saying that innocent people could have accidentally called the escort service, or only wanted “legal” companionship, so the phone records don’t prove there was any wrongdoing.
It sure sounds like he’s preparing his case for when HIS name is exposed as a “client”!
LMAO

Posted by: SheilaNoya | May 4, 2007, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

WOW…sex sure brings out the best in us! Don’t know what’s more entertaining…the story or the posts!

Posted by: gonemad | May 4, 2007, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

There is a lot good hearted people can learn from this self-focused clown, IMHO.

Posted by: John | May 4, 2007, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

I don’t care for the hypocrisy that characterizes the GOP, but outing someone for having sex with a prostitute is a private and personal matter, regardless of poltical affiliation. A wholesale outing is quite reprehensible, unless, of course, it concerns some public figure whose moral preachings about private conduct are inconsistent with prostitution.

Posted by: fibonacci | May 4, 2007, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Rut Ro Rarl Rove!

Posted by: Tony | May 4, 2007, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

ihbwap3 – Karma is a word that simply means actions. Karma can be good or it can be bad. Everyone sees karma.
To Buddhists, at death our karma is weighed, the relationship between good actions (good karma) and bad actions in one’s life determines his next.
To revel in the suffering of others, be they right (or left I guess ;-)) or wrong is simply, to me, “bad karma.”
Anger Blinds Wisdom – His Holiness, the Dalai Lama

Posted by: dablueshound | May 4, 2007, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Family values by the Conservatives means sending young men off to fight and die in a useless war that was started on the basis of lies. Paying for sex by these immoral jerks is fine

Posted by: No Stupid | May 4, 2007, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

If there any big-shot Dem names on the list, you can be sure they won’t be broadcast on 20/20.

Posted by: Monkeybone | May 4, 2007, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

John has a good point. The Feds cannot charge her for sex crimes. But they are charging her with federal racketeering and money laundering. Someone in the DOJ is singling her out because of her prominence or connections politically.

Posted by: Michael | May 4, 2007, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Didn’t the Washington Times also have an HR director resign because he was soliciting 13 year olds on Craigslist? What is Moonie putting in the water over there?

Posted by: pbandj | May 4, 2007, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Republican said ——- IT WAS THE GLOBAL WARMING THAT ME ME DO IT.
Works for the liberals, its their excuse for everything, got to work for me. Or could it be — LIBERAL HYPOCRISY.
Yea, thats it, thats the ticket.

Posted by: M algore | May 4, 2007, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

I’m very relieved that there are still
some Republican heterosexuals. I would
strongly advise Carl to exploit this
Madame to our best advantage.

Posted by: Tom | May 4, 2007, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

How depressing that this gets us all so angry and abusive so quickly. She sounds like a poor sad desperate woman, they sound like lonely sad old men and we sound like fools arguing about this and making the personal political.
Politics lately reminds me of the mean kids in high school. Not as cool as they think and not having much fun. Instead of taking everything as an excuse to get up in arms and abusive why can’t we ignore the dramatics and deal with some of the real and very human problems that every citizen in the world has to deal with.
The bible I grew up with talked about a God of love and also says that there is nothing new under the sun which this seems to prove true.

Posted by: Jack Bishop | May 4, 2007, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

I wonder when the complete client list is going to be revealed.

Posted by: Kevin | May 4, 2007, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Does anyone think it odd that the madam has given her info to ABC? Does anyone think that the names listed could be carefully selected by this liberal organization? For example: lets say Harry Reid, Dennis Kucinich and Newt Gigrich were all on the list. Which one of the three would make the headlines?

Posted by: Roger | May 4, 2007, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Talk about “All hat, no cattle” What a disappointment that was.

Posted by: s brough | May 4, 2007, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

This is just liberal MSM protecting their own and burning the conservatives.
Anybody with a little brains knows the propaganda. routine.
Senator – What do you hate about America? — Good liberal MSM question.

Posted by: M algore | May 4, 2007, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

What a disappointment! Was ABC afraid to “name names”? Publish the “non-newsworthy” list!

Posted by: Tom | May 4, 2007, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

John has a good point. The Feds cannot charge her for sex crimes. But they are charging her with federal racketeering and money laundering. Someone in the DOJ is singling her out because of her prominence or connections politically.
======================
They said there is a justice department prosecutor on the list. I wonder who that could be? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm The plot thickens.

Posted by: LMAO ROTF | May 4, 2007, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

This is all so ridiculous it would be laughable if so many people were not rotting away in torture chambers called the prison system, tortured every minute of their lives for victimless crimes manufactured by our lovely bloodstained GOP. GOP hypocrites and their sharia law…issuing faquas ad infinitum to choler the folks of this country who long for freedom from big brother (again GOP idiots). The GOP stands and is synonymous with hypocrisy, duplicity, greed, evil, stupidity, did i say hypocrisy…I have come to the conclusion that the reason they are so vicious and evil is because they can’t see themselves in the mirror…pure evil has always had that problem.

Posted by: johnyblue | May 4, 2007, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

This has been going on since the beginning of time. These John’s want this service. They solicit this service. So when is the ‘law’ going to go after the ones who are paying to do this illegal act? If they were buying drugs these John’s would be arrested-drugs are illegal. So solicited sex is illegal, yet they only arrest the women.
Justice is truly blind.

Posted by: A. Henry | May 4, 2007, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

Now, might this “client” Harlan Ullman be a Democrat? The idea with this all too ready and willing testimony would be to show that any Republican is a liar if he says her services were just for “massages,” plus a nice payoff from the DNC.

Posted by: scott crest | May 4, 2007, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Why isn’t ABCNEWS making the list public?

Posted by: Eric | May 4, 2007, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Perhaps the high-profile names are in Al Capone’s vault. What a bust.

Posted by: Brad | May 4, 2007, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

She is breaking the confidentiality she had established and guaranteed to her clients, as a business woman.
Posted by: Janda | May 4, 2007 2:49:53 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++
As far as I know, there is no hooker-client confidentiality.
With all my love,
Aunty Em

Posted by: A | May 4, 2007, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Prostitution, regulated and health inspected, and heavily taxed is practiced across Western Europe, Canada and Japan. The sex trade workers are adults, and protected from exploitation from pimps and from abuse by johns by working in legal brothels under Police protection. Why not in the US. You Americans are so messed up when it comes to sex you put these people in jail. The rest of the civilized world is laughing at you.

Posted by: TruthParty | May 4, 2007, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

lol

Posted by: jakfulasofy | May 5, 2007, 12:40 am 12:40 am

i have alot more to say…but they are scrubbing it…lol…i guess thats how real journalism works…you take the constructive criticism and push delete…all i am saying is that the head of a conservative think tank is newsworthy…

Posted by: jakfulasofy | May 5, 2007, 12:46 am 12:46 am

I don’t think prostitution is cool, but criminalizing it is like waging the “war on drugs” – stupid and ineffective.
My soapbox address: Supporting relationships through “better communication and better sex” training would take steps towards minimizing the need for prostitution.

Posted by: David | May 5, 2007, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Now, what do you think ‘unpleasant’ means, and why would a girl refuse to ‘service’ him again?
There’s only one explanation:POOR TIPS!
He is a repub, after all. They keep only 2 things zipped-their minds and their wallets.

Posted by: CHERYL | May 5, 2007, 1:09 am 1:09 am

You know, I was just wondering if Condi could have been one of the Madam’s customers, and if so, will she testify on her behalf?

Posted by: kevo | May 5, 2007, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Aunty Em,
If there is Catholic Priest-parishoner confidentiality in Confession shouldn’t there be hooker-client confidentiality too as a professional ethic?
Hey! “Shock and Awe” sounds like a good name for a brothel franchise if Nevada ever opens up the flood gates in a new capitalist Gold Rush. These think tank guys inside the Beltway really have a nack for catchy phrases.

Posted by: Captain Fantastic | May 5, 2007, 1:22 am 1:22 am

The smugness of libs. Greedy pigs… Ted Kennedy, murderer who has all his money tied up in trust as not to be touched by government. Feinstein, appropriating millions to her husband in Iraqi construction contracts. Pelosi, millionaire who exploits illegal aliens picking grapes for her vineyard. William Jefferson… thief. Hillary, well the people she’s diapatched is to long to list. They feed you crap they don’t even buy yet you protect their behavior and actually revere it. Moderate republicans EXPECT more, which is why they resign from things like this. I guess the difference is no matter how a democrat is elected is okay with the party. This from the party that thinks a racial slur is the worst crime one could possibly commit, yet can call anyone else anything they chose no matter who and what it hurts and that is ok. Republicans bad, Dems…. worse.

Posted by: jb | May 5, 2007, 1:45 am 1:45 am

I don’t mind if she goes down in her case…. as long as she takes some of these beasts down with her… it will be all worth it.

Posted by: The Angry Independent | May 5, 2007, 2:09 am 2:09 am

PROSTITUTION IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!
You can argue about whether it should be illegal, but when they all created the crime, it was illegal.
So why is ABC hiding the names of criminals? especially government officials who committed crimes – crimes that could leave them open to, say, blackmail!
There are only two reasons -
1. the johns lawyers got to ABC.
2. ABC management saw their friends names on the list and decided not to hurt and embarass their families.
Either way, the good old boys are covering up for each other with just a few scapegoats released for media feeding purposes.
You really let us down, ABC. I gess I shouldn’t have expected anything else, but for just one minute I thought you would do the right thing for all the women who have been used by these guys.
You blew it.
Shame on you.

Posted by: for | May 5, 2007, 2:11 am 2:11 am

You can go to church without being self-righteous, sanctimonious, holier-than-thou. You can go to church without accusing the other party of destroying the moral fiber of the country through it’s decadent debased lifestyle. In fact going to church should induce humility in a person. If I recall, it was the republicans who started the culture wars. Hypocrisy, thy name is republican.

Posted by: blog | May 5, 2007, 2:14 am 2:14 am

All the Clinton-whiners on this thread should get a life. The man was exposed, impeached, and acquitted in the Senate. Through the whole idiotic episode, he never registered less than 60% approval in the polls. End of story.
Conservatives: yes, we know there will likely be Liberals on the escort list. That doesn’t take away from the rank hypocrisy of the self-appointed party of family values and morality.
Too much GOP corruption has been exposed for any Republican to point fingers at Bill Clinton, or any other Democrat. Surely Delay, Cunningham, Abramoff, Libby and Foley have ended all pretense of conservative morality, once and for all.

Posted by: Donna Trump | May 5, 2007, 2:25 am 2:25 am

If republicans are so in tune with God why do they keep electing these minions of Beelzebub?

Posted by: blog | May 5, 2007, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Why does the period that has seen the rise of the self-righteous republican culture warrior correspond to the period of the greatest public corruption in the replican party in a hundred years? There is a damning correlation there.

Posted by: blog | May 5, 2007, 2:53 am 2:53 am

If those lists of phone numbers were turned over to a resource like Talking Points Memo, there would be hundreds of people digging through them overnight.
Names would be attached to those numbers, cross-checked, and posted within 24 hours.

Posted by: LimaBN | May 5, 2007, 3:09 am 3:09 am

Well it seems that everyone has a view. I for one have my own view. I enlisted in the military on my own. I also joined that national guard on my own. After 65 years on this planet I have come to some conclusions . As far as the DC Madam thing, if the (johns) really wanted to have good time (on our dime) they could have went to Nevada. They didn’t. Another thing for every comment that is placed here there is probably another young man or woman in Irag that has died. The one thing that I have learned over the years is if a politican is saying something the only thing I can be very sure of is that their mouth is open. Do they Lie? Someone please expain to me the difference between rhetoric and lies. (I did not have sex with that woman). (Hi My name is Mark Foley). politicains are lawyers=Lawyers are not to the best our country has to offer=most don’t know there a$$ from a hole in the ground. (Take umbrage if you want but I do speak from some sort of experience). Most of these (so called leaders want us to think that they know of our hardships and trials and tribulations. They have NO clue. None of them have had to decide on whether to spend the little money that they have on food or medicine. If all of you that speak of whether the GOP or the DEM’S are the bad guys then you just need to get a life. The bottom line is there are people (young men and women, joe blow, the tax payer, and many, many, more who are being fed cr^p by those who think they know best. (schummer, spector, rommeny, obama, and the rest who have no clue as the real problems facing the average citizen. So that is my stance. If my neighbor down the street would ask me I would go in a heatbeat. Just an old man’s view

Posted by: old_codger | May 5, 2007, 3:12 am 3:12 am

May I suggest that prostitution should simply be legalized? Certainly it is a disgusting line of work and, I believe, a sinful one. But who am I to physically coerce a person from sinning? Alas, even Christ himself did not coerce people to not sin; He never forced people to stop sinning by threatening their lives, well-being, or property. On the other hand, Jesus spoke out against prostitution as a choice an individual had to make. It seems to me He was very effective: Mary Magdalene was, after all, a prostitute. Let’s not get so involved in righteous dogma and glory theology; such always lead to sin. How much does each tax-payer spend on prosecuting this case when 99.999% of us are unaffected by this case? Those who are affected obviously mutually gained through the transaction. It is therefore not even a crime. Get rid of this idiocy, now.

Posted by: Andrew E | May 5, 2007, 3:21 am 3:21 am

What is criminal is republicans exalting their own corrupt will as God’s will. One could say that is even a more serious crime than violations of man’s laws.

Posted by: blog | May 5, 2007, 4:02 am 4:02 am

Lets remember that private consenting adult prostitution is legal in almost all the world except the U.S., with no negative issues. It is not like street hookers, its professional women making a choice without the sex negative attitude of our culture.
Worldwide there are no medical issues with women running their own businesses or working with agencies. In my view sexual options benefit a culture as studies have shown the more sexually repressed a culture the more violent.
Probably 90% of prostitution is in private between consenting adults but all folks usually hear about is the desperate drugged out street hooker with a pimp which is a public nuisance and should not be legal – and isn’t in most of the world.
But in private sexual pleasure sharing is legal and valuable in most of the world as a legitimate choice. But in the U.S. in the land of the free we do not have the same legal choices most of the rest of the world enjoys. Canada is a good close by example where prostitution has always been legal and no big issue with zillions of gals choosing it. Technically only outcall is legal in Canada but the 1800′s bawdy house law is rarely enforced unless real crime going on and penalties are minor – no one goes to jail.
We need to demand the same sexual freedoms for in private consenting adult sexual options that the rest of the world enjoys and benefits from.

Posted by: Dave in Phoenix | May 5, 2007, 4:08 am 4:08 am

Brian,
Shame on you and ABC for a nothing report. If you have names, name them! You all pumped this story for a week, and then named no one…

Posted by: Scott in Saline | May 5, 2007, 4:33 am 4:33 am

Again one must laugh at you con supporters. You defend these guys with the claim that “Clinton did it” yet you wanted him impeached. I personally couldn’t care less who is having sex with who. I won’t call those guys hypocrits, I reserve that for you people who choose to defend them!!!

Posted by: Skippy | May 5, 2007, 4:35 am 4:35 am

My side scroll went for about sixty seconds to get to the bottom of this. I’m a known policy analyst and journalist. I can’t make myself fully known here, but you see me every night if you surf. All I want to ask is this. Why does a country at war care who each other %#%s? We do have problems on our table, but is this really one of them?
Any insight here will help my job, and be sighted.

Posted by: Anarkhos | May 5, 2007, 5:02 am 5:02 am

There is no greater sin than exalting one’s own will as God’s will. That is what the republican party has foisted on this country:the ultimate sin. Bush says that God told him to invade Iraq. Delay claims to be persecuted like Christ. These are deadly delusions.

Posted by: blog | May 5, 2007, 5:38 am 5:38 am

If this was the Democrat’s that was involed you would say very little!
HYPOCRITS HYPOCRITS HYPOCRITS

Posted by: Robert black | May 5, 2007, 5:42 am 5:42 am

If a citzen in the private sector had sex with a subordinate (a la Monica /Bill), that citzen would be terminated immediately.
no. My boss coerced me into having sex with him. I finally rebelled 13 years later. I left the field of research I loved. He was promoted. And later, was part of an ethics panel. I was apalled.

Posted by: diane | May 5, 2007, 6:10 am 6:10 am

Republicans admits he partook in activities that cause young women to need birth control and abortion. Hmmm…I wonder if our stressed troops returning from war will also look to partake in activities that cause young women to need birth control and abortion. Hmmm….maybe sex is as natural as rain and maybe the so is birth control and abortion. Or maybe these Republicans need a $2,000/month for 18 years reminder of the sanctity of life.

Posted by: kellamd | May 5, 2007, 6:24 am 6:24 am

It’s not the sex stupid, it’s the HYPOCRISY of course! These holier than though Republican utter hypocrites are beyond belief. How anyone on this earth could even THINK of voting for them is beyond me. They are corruption ad nauseum. They want abstinence for all except them. What utter garbage. Read my lips: NO ONE but NO ONE can have an easy time denying sexuality. Just ask a few thousand priests if abstinence worked for them. God, if there is one, must shake his head in utter disgust. Of course Democrats commit their own sexual indiscretions but at least that party does not base its very foundation on sexual morality. The Republican party needs to think very seriously about just what morality is. How about feeding the poor and, clothing the naked and the meek inheriting the earth. How about clean government not dedicated to running rough shod over the little guy and not giving tax breaks to billionaires. Oh yes, and how about not bombing the living hell out of countries which did not attack us. Maybe that would gain us some friends and actually prevent another God forbid a million times, 9/11. Did ja ever think of that? I hope all these Republicans who have committed sexual hypocrisy not to mention the scads of other scandals within the administration, get their due. Maybe then I will REALLY believe there is a God!

Posted by: Natalie Rosen | May 5, 2007, 6:57 am 6:57 am

An absolute disgrace to this country and to themselves! And get this, folks. We’re paying these politicians to do these ‘dastardly’ acts. And now we’re probably the laughing stock of the world.

Posted by: Linda | May 5, 2007, 7:52 am 7:52 am

I don’t get” roller coasters; I don’t “get” religious faith; I don’t “get” gambling. I’m nearly 60, heterosexual, male, and even during four years in the military during Vietnam never paid for sex – not due to lack of sex drive but to the obvious imbalance of power and unfairness of such “relationships.”
The Republican dilemma here is clear: It’s the Republicans and religious right who believe they have a right, even an obligation, to stick their noses into other peoples’ sexuality – unless it’s their guys caught paying for sex.
You who can’t see how closely connected “shock and awe” and being the diplomat from the Bush administration working on “abstinence,” “fidelity,” and again “human trafficking” (of which prostitution is a subset) are, well, nuts. But, then, most of you do see it – you’re just trying to drown it out. :)

Posted by: SplendidOne | May 5, 2007, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Doesn’t Brian Ross remember the film, “The Apartment” where the Jack Lemmon character gives his key to his boss, the Fred MacMurray character so the latter can romance the Shirley MacLaine character?
Which means Mr. Ross’ statement — as he flipped the pages of the Palfrey phone records — that there are no phone numbers relating to the White House or Congress is misleading and meaningless. Is Mr. Ross positive that no really BIG fish used a cooperative underling as a go-between and might have obtained “the key” to an underling’s apartment or hotel room for a tryst ?

Posted by: Dave | May 5, 2007, 9:49 am 9:49 am

I’m fairly conservative on some issues, but what a man and a woman do together is there business. Whether they pay money or not. It doesn’t sound like any of these women were harmed at least anymore than any person working in the capitalist system. Can’t live with it, can’t live without it. They broke the law, so there are consequences. If only they all lived in Nevada this wouldn’t even be an issue. Religion, spirituality, G-d have nothing to do with this.

Posted by: Bberke | May 5, 2007, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Democrats don’t claim to be the sole, true manisfestation of God’s will on earth, and that everyone else is a reprobate heathen against whom any immoral action whatsoever is justified. It came to pass that when these replicans finally came to power they acted out their heinous religious delusions without restraint. So-called Christians unleashing their will to power has been a sight to behold.

Posted by: blog | May 5, 2007, 10:33 am 10:33 am

I too think the Clintons are fairly nasty. Unfortunately nothing has ever been proven against them. They did engage in some very unethical business practices, but the serious allegations against them are just smears and nasty innuendo without any proof. However doing evil in the name of God is a distinctly republican trait that adds an extremely appaling dimension to their crimes.

Posted by: blog | May 5, 2007, 10:45 am 10:45 am

prostituion is illegal, lying is a sign of serious character flaws and character weakness. and to all of the finger pointers: there are plenty of sex scandals to go around amongst male democrats and conservatives who are bi, bi-curious, gay, or hetero. and to those of you who take this opportunity to get on your soapboxes about legalizing prostitution, would you want to see your own daughters, sisters or mothers entering in to demoralizing sex trade as viable way of “legally” supporting themselves? Would you? Or would it just be someone else’s daughter, sister No doubt the human beings you propose to legally exploit would come from a so-called “subclass” of women who are already discounted by society–poor women, uneducated women, women who are victims of sexual abuse, or drug abuse. Just guessing here, but most women would not write down “being a prostitute” in their grade school or harvard business school essay of what they want to be when they grow up. Your comments also seem to presume, as well, that men themselves would not engage in legal sex trade if it were legal. How would you feel if your girlfriend, wife, or mother was partaking of the services of a male prostitute on the side? You’re all hypocrites.

Posted by: androniki | May 5, 2007, 10:47 am 10:47 am

I wonder, could this all be political. Why is she only outing Republicans. Anyone with an ounce of brains knows it is not only Republicans seeking these services from prostitutes. Remember the infamous blue, stained dress.

Posted by: Frances | May 5, 2007, 11:20 am 11:20 am

A pimp without a moral code? What is the world coming to? Im shocked! Shocked. The national pimp acadamy should teach higher standards, including pimp-whore-pervert confidentiality remedial courses! Next let’s get serial killers to promise they wont litter.

Posted by: memyself | May 5, 2007, 11:47 am 11:47 am

God has a book (a list) also.

Posted by: 666 | May 5, 2007, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Who cares is these people had sex or not. They are adults, and that makes it consentual. This is america, we live free, Stop trying to change this!!!

Posted by: S.Keele | May 5, 2007, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Don’t pull that curtain open Toto, we don’t want to know about what is happening in Iraq right now, why we can’t find Osama, why the government lied about how Pat Tillman was killed, why drowning black people in New Orleans received less presidential attention than Terri Shiavo, why we won’t distribute condoms in Africa, why we are building military bases throughout Africa, why are oil companies drilling more in Africa, why Iraq is of such strategic importance, why . . . should I go on.

Posted by: TheNewEnglandPatriot | May 5, 2007, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Republicans try to pass off their will as God’s will. When they came to power they crossed or crucified their own God by violating practically every aspect of the knowledge they profess to have of his will. Christ said-”Woe unto you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, for having compassed heaven and earth to make one convert, you make him fourfold the sinner that you are.” Ecce Republican.

Posted by: blog | May 5, 2007, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

“Democrats don’t claim to be the sole, true manisfestation of God’s will on earth, and that everyone else is a reprobate heathen against whom any immoral action whatsoever is justified.
The rhetoric here is disgusting. Democrats don’t look to invest God’s will… just their own will. Substitute God, and replace it with what they themselves to be righteous is the only difference. Republicans use God as a base for moral judgement, Dems on this site use their own compass which has no structure or reason. Instead of being involved in the bedroom, it’s how you talk, how much you make, slandering anyone who disagrees with their degrees of worthless study. Going to school reciting facts does not mean that you are educated. I have a MBA from Wharton and have met many older people with no college education much wiser. Calling people names that you deem unofffensive by rules you alone set up is not educated. The difference is Republicans try to use God as the higher power for answers, Democrats believe that they themselves are the allmighty and need to just look in the mirror for and force feed their truth to the world. With regards to the war… the difference between the parties is… I’m sure most Republicans although not as displeased with going into Iraq are extremely dissapointed with the execution and lack of thought. They don’t berate what’s going on, because sometimes you just need to shut up to do what’s right. Have a problem, call your leaders, and in another 1 1/2 years, boot them out. Jumping up and screaming like a two year old because the President won’t do what you want is pathetic. The country wants leaders, and as unhappy as I am with the Republicans, I could never vote for most Democrats. This isn’t the 90′s anymore, and there are very serious issues at hand. Stop whining when you don’t get your way and learn to lead. Yelling and hyperbole isn’t leading, telling other countries your leader is a moran isn’t leading. Whatever said, Bush and Clinton, from whichever side your hate comes from are still better than Chavez, Castro, Putin, etc. Time to wake up people.

Posted by: jb | May 5, 2007, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Republicans do their evil in God’s name. Many Democrats are Christians. This is the problem with the Republican party.They lie in God’s name. Democrats just don’t claim to be the sole arbiters of God’s will. When the Pharisees accused Christ of doing good in the name of evil, what sin did Christ call that?

Posted by: blog | May 5, 2007, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

I find it very interesting that this, like every other thing in the whole world, devolves into politics and the war. Our side is good and pure and if we appear to be impure, it is probably a mistake. Your side is bad and evil, and even if we appear to be good, there must be something missing. It’s ridiculous. Politics have turned into LESS than a spectator sport. There is absolutely no such thing as “debate” in this country.
As to this case, if this woman is telling the truth, and her employees performed only legal acts, she’s going to walk – and she should. And the people who hired her employees for legal services and who were assured confidentiality, should sue her if she released their names.
On the other hand, if the madame’s employees performed illegal acts, they should be prosecuted along with the people who hired them.
Cheering because the criminals are from one party or the other is just plain stupid.

Posted by: Ron | May 5, 2007, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

The sad truth is that ABC and 20/20 hyped this segment heavily, knowing the voyeur in all of us would tune in to find out who had been implicated. The earlier print blurb for the report made it sound as if news had been found, including the head of a conservative think tank. In Washington, that would be newsworthy. Instead, we got a few minutes of reheated news, then on to a rather pedestrian piece that essentially shilled one correspondent’s book.
Large sale, no goods delivered. Infotainment.

Posted by: dennis | May 5, 2007, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Jeane Palfrey tells us she’s not like Prof.Brandy Britton who committed suicide when she was discovered she was a “call gal”. You say you something is in you she didn’t have. If what you have isn’t from God, you either will end up in jail, or commit suicide. To escape all these, repent your sins to God and He might have mercy on you.

Posted by: johnnjuu | May 5, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Prostitution has been here since the beginning of man and woman. It is really about time to legalize it and make everyone get tested to keep it safe. There will be no one person or government in this world will that will ever be able to stop the natural and human sex drive. All this is doing is wasting taxpayer dollars when this could actually be a revenue stream for the government in the way of taxes.

Posted by: Steve | May 5, 2007, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Dennis, Blaming Fox is a joke, did you see the questions Chris Matthews asked in a debate. Two whole minutes on immigration. The problem is, the Democrats will overcorrect and thus nothing gets accomplished. The most prosperous times in this country in the last 25 years, Reagan with Democrats to check, Clinton with Republicans to check. How to stop this mess…. term limits. The offices weren’t designed for life and that is the problem. Voting to make money and stay in power i.e. Kennedy is a joke. The republicans have many issues, but they ARE ticked at Bush and want someone else, although not a Dem. Democrats never EVER admit that their people are wrong and ask for their head and that is a problem. To actually think Reid and Pelosi are moderate thinkers is a problem as much to think Falwell is. Rational people have been squeezed out of the equation on both sides. You can believe in the war and not be a nut (Lieberman), but he just got castrated, good for him he survived. I guess the difference is thr rational Repub’s think Bush messed up, rational Dems… I think they actually believe in Reid, Murtha, and Pelosi which is scary.

Posted by: jb | May 5, 2007, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Boy was that show lame yesterday on 20/20. Anyway, I feel it’s slightly more interesting than the news about Anna Nicole, which is not newsworthy either.
I bet any of these Johns is more news worthy than Anna Nicole.
It’s funny how she says that she wants to bring the Johns down with her. Hey, nobody is interested in them. They are boring luckily.
Still, the double standard is not boring and if she gets into jail so should the Johns, or better legalize the deal and
just make all the money in the world.
Or better create decent paying jobs for the people, especially women, living in the US. See who still will feel “the call” for the oldest “profession”.
And, ah…, they all just cuddle in that profession ;-o
Well, cuddling does not give STD’s, right?

Posted by: Scratchy | May 5, 2007, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Did anyone really think ABC would name names? Think about it, all ABC had was the phone records and maybe a few names – not enough to prove anything. If ABC released names with no evidence of a crime, the law suits would start immediately and ABC is smart enough to know this. Note how the only names released did NOT come from ABC first – it was the madame who released the names. So for those of you bad mouthing ABC for not releasing the names, ask yourself, “would I be willing to suffer million dollar law suits just for a prostitution story? – I think not.

Posted by: Cowboy | May 5, 2007, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

It is tragic that Brandy Britton killed herself. The johns should have their pictures, names and addresses posted on the internet just like they do with the other sex offenders. Their wives/girlfriends have a right to know. It is so one-sided to expose the women and not the men. They have committed a crime too. Why should only the men be allowed to go for anonymous counseling and have their records expunged afterward?

Posted by: Kay | May 5, 2007, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

I think I’m in Love with Miss Palfrey !

Posted by: stevex47 | May 6, 2007, 12:37 am 12:37 am

I do feel a little sorry for her.
However, she knew she was servicing hypocritical, corrupt, and some perverted, backstabbing nut job snakes.
Doing anyone for a dollar…it was only a matter of time.

Posted by: stevex47 | May 6, 2007, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Guessing the only reason the list has not hit the air yet is the fact that there are probably alot of Democrats on the list. If the list contained only high level Republicans, they would have posted it asap without any confirmation. Since the list has not been published, am guessing it must show some dirt on Democrats, so it must not be news worthy.

Posted by: John Collins | May 6, 2007, 4:11 am 4:11 am

So who exactly made the decision not to release the names?
Can someone at ABC tell us who decided?

Posted by: sothen | May 6, 2007, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Republicans. Don’t Democrats have sex too!”
Yes of course Dems have sex too, anyone who is human does. The point is it’s far more fun to catch the Rebs with their pants down since they are the ones always waving the morality flag. Picture Newt (loser) at the height of GOP hipocracey cheating on his wife standing on the House for pointing his boney little finger at President Clinton.. Give me a break!!

Posted by: Mark Maxwell | May 6, 2007, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

This article is garbage. The subject is garbage. If u have intercourse with a prostitute, and the condom breaks, you’re screwed. The men and women involved are playing Russian roulette. It would be better if all of us would concentrate on more important things … like ending world poverty.

Posted by: Dave Radmore | May 6, 2007, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

I think its pretty funny how on one hand we can make so big a deal out of something so mondain as a callgirl service and then on the other go home and watch “Cathouse” on HBO which if you didnt know is a documentary type show about a “Legal” brothel located outside of Reno.
Legalize…Legalize..Legalize
Money is much better spent on real issues.

Posted by: John | May 7, 2007, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Hey Skippy,
I don’t care about the sex. Consenting adults can do what they like. If you bothered to read the mass of comments, what makes the majority of folks crazy is the hypocracy.
If you are indeed on the news every day, I’m hoping that you will wake up and understand how evil it is to yap about morality while you yourself perform acts that you have denounced as immoral acts. Need I bring up Rev. Haggard? Rep. Foley?
It is about being a hypocrite Skippy, and how dangerous it is when our government is run by such types. Please tell that to the masses next time you are on tv.

Posted by: Lulu | May 8, 2007, 10:44 am 10:44 am

So what do you suppose Palfrey meant when she said Ullman was a “disagreeable” character and the prostitutes wouldn’t go back to him?
Memo to ABC: even “high-end” clients can be abusive to “high-end” prostitutes. Most likely it was verbal and emotional abuse (practicing his shock and awe skills.)
But now that ABC seems to have decided that it will ignore the “sex crimes” of the high and mighty in D.C., he can probably do anything he wants to prostitutes. As long as he pays “high-end” prices ABC will cover up for him and his ilk.

Posted by: trevor | May 8, 2007, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Probably the only people who are complaining are the people not getting any. These are consenting adults doing what consenting adults do. If they are married, then it should be an issue between spouses but not with the general public or courts.

Posted by: Bob | May 9, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Bob: these individuals want a set of rules for themselves, and another for us. That’s not a system that has the “rule of law” at all, but one that more closely resembles one with an aristocracy. Sky-high hypocricy is the real issue. “Not getting any” is not a very good diversion from the real issues-at-hand, try again.

Posted by: Matt Janovic | May 9, 2007, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Where does the code of ethics come into play here? The madam should be jailed and the people whom used the service should be arrested and punished according to the law. Government employees and Officials should be fired and replaced with some good Americans. People with this morality have no place in our public services. This type of business is against the Law, now enforce the laws of this Great Nation.

Posted by: George Matteson | May 11, 2007, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Okay it’s official. American politicians are PERVERTS! Does everyone get that? I don’t want them charged or arrested. I’d much prefer that the tabloids list the details of their sexual preferences. I think they should be humiliated just like they humiliated their wives and the unfortunate women who were paid to service them.

Posted by: Jeanie | March 11, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

When will we learn that you cannot legislate morals? The oldest profession should be legalized and regulated as any other business. If you do not want to purchase the services, do not. Why can tobacco products that cause cancer and premature death be sold whereas sex services cannot. Tobacco kills more people than does sex, either legal or illegal. Why can McDonalds sell products that clog your arteries legally?
On Long Binh Post there was a “massage parlor” that everyone knew about. The army took GI’s to Vung Tau weekly to eneable them to get drunk and get a “massage” to prevent them from going AWOL to Saigon.
Bet no one knew that except us viet nam vets.

Posted by: vietnam vet | March 12, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

What is it with folks saying that we should legalize prostitution? Just because people do it doesn’t mean it should be legalized. There are alot of things that people will always do which includes steal, kill, molest children, do drugs, lie and more. But can you imagine what would happen if stealing was legalized and molesting children? I can hear the screams and fighting now!!!

Posted by: Life | May 1, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.