Document: Iran Caught Red-Handed Shipping Arms to Taliban
NATO officials say they have caught Iran red-handed, shipping heavy arms, C4 explosives and advanced roadside bombs to the Taliban for use against NATO forces, in what the officials say is a dramatic escalation of Iran’s proxy war against the United States and Great Britain. "It is inconceivable that it is anyone other than the Iranian government that’s doing it," said former White House counterterrorism official Richard Clarke, an ABC News consultant. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stopped short earlier this week of blaming Iran, saying the U.S. did not have evidence "of the involvement of the Iranian government in support of the Taliban." But an analysis by a senior coalition official, obtained by the Blotter on ABCNews.com, concludes there is clear evidence of Iran’s involvement. "This is part of a considered policy," says the analysis, "rather than the result of low-level corruption and weapons smuggling." Iran and the Taliban had been fierce enemies when the Taliban was in power in Afghanistan, and their apparent collaboration came as a surprise to some in the intelligence community. "I think their goal is to make it very clear that Iran has the capability to make life worse for the United States on a variety of fronts," said Seth Jones of the Rand Institute, "even if they have to do some business with a group that has historically been their enemy." The coalition analysis says munitions recovered in two Iranian convoys, on April 11 and May 3, had "clear indications that they originated in Iran. Some were identical to Iranian supplied goods previously discovered in Iraq." The April convoy was tracked from Iran into Helmand province and led a fierce firefight that destroyed one vehicle, according to the official analysis. A second vehicle was reportedly found to contain small arms ammunition, mortar rounds and more than 650 pounds of C4 demolition charges. A second convoy of two vehicles was spotted on May 3 and led to the capture of five occupants and the seizure of RPG-7mm rockets and more than 1,000 pounds of C4, the analysis says. Also among the munitions are components for the lethal EFPs, or explosive formed projectiles, the roadside bombs that U.S. officials say Iran has provided to Iraqi insurgents with deadly results. "These clearly have the hallmarks of the Iranian Revolution Guards’ Quds force," said Jones. The coalition diplomatic message says the demolition charges "contained the same fake U.S. markings found on explosives recovered from insurgents operating in the Baghdad area." "We believe these intercepted munitions are part of a much bigger flow of support from Iran to the Taliban," the message says. The Taliban receives larger supplies of weapons through profits from opium dealing, officials say, but the Iranian presence could be significant. "It means the insurgency in Afghanistan is likely to be prolonged," said Jones. "It would be a much more potent force."
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
so, Iran is supplying sophosticated weapons to Afghanistan….and the US do not fly F-18′s and F15′s and laser-guided missiles…!
Be real please!
Posted by: max2424 | June 6, 2007, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Please don’t become part of the new neo con push for a new war in Iran. Check and double check your sources. We had far too much of the media serving as the mouthpiece for this administration leading up to the Iraq war. We don’t need another media encouraged disaster.
Here’s a fact to consider: the Iranian government is Shi’a. The Taliban are Sunni – hard core Sunnis. These people do not have a common cause. They have been at odds with each other since the 7th century.
Please check your sources!!
Posted by: John Hubers | June 6, 2007, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
max2424 don’t be silly. If the Iranians would use their sophisicated weapons against the US in the open battlefield…they would be destroyed. It’s tough to fight an enemy that won’t declare war against you. The Iranian’s lie and then fund terrorists and they know that until we have hard evidence against them…there is not much we can do to retaliate. That is why they are so sneeky.
Posted by: Chris | June 6, 2007, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Doesnt anyone remember that we supplied Iraq during its war with Iran? That when we went back we left a lot of explosives ungarded after we found them. “We have seen the enemy and they is us”.
Posted by: Tim Simpson | June 6, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Remember the saying “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”
Posted by: steve salter | June 6, 2007, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
As soon as I see this reported by a reputable source that is not a member of the United States corporate media, I’ll start believing it. ABC News, like the rest of the American media, helped the Bush Administration lie us into the quagmire in Iraq. The RAND Corporation, who they quote so freely, is run by people who stand to make BILLIONS off of the next war that we are lied into. Let me hear this from someone who doesn’t stand to make a profit off of the next military misadventure.
Posted by: Tom | June 6, 2007, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
The way this story is written, it gives absolute authority to the analysis of one senior coalition official. (unnamed!)
His analysis may be dead on, but to present one unknown official’s opinion as absolute truth without providing the evidence behind his analysis is deceptive reporting.
I find it perfectly plausible that the Iranian government may be behind these shipments, (it also could be someone at a lower level or smugglers,) but to write this story in the somewhat sensationalist way you did offers alot more weight (without evidence) than this report should receive.
If the report has evidence that the Iranian government is behind it, then, sure, make that headline, but hiding behind “Report says” and analysis of unnamed official without evidence should no longer be acceptable reporting in this country.
Not after similar reporting contributed to the war in Iraq.
Posted by: mikevotes | June 6, 2007, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Read the article three or four times. You will see that both sources are SPECULATING that the Iranian government is inolved. COMPLETELY SPECULATING. So why does ABCNEWS say Iran was caught ‘red handed’? Why is this disinformation being used on the American public? For what purpose are we being lied to? Why are the powers that be trying so hard to get another diastrous war started?
Posted by: Eric | June 6, 2007, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
So…. the secret is out huh?I guess the small army that we “indirectly” fund against Iran isn’t a big problem huh?
Lets look at history….
We supplied the afgans during the Afgan-Russia war. Now they are using that weapons against us.
We helped the Iraqis during the Iraq Iran war. Now they are using that weapons against us.
We supplied funds to overthrough governments. Now those people and govt. are against us.
So on and so on…. Tell me who is spreading terrorism… us or them?
I guess this is what our elders mean when they say “Your digging your own Ditch” Hmmmm…
Posted by: the one who sees | June 6, 2007, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Mr. Hubers,
Even your own US government (whose current policies you seem to have contempt for) has made deals with devils to protect more pressing politcal priorities and goals. “The enemy of my enemy is also my friend.”
Have you ever pointed out to anyone that the United States in the past provided assistance to Bin Laden and Saddam? If so, then you are well aware of such tactics and are likely too wrapped up in your own political viewpoint to consider the story on the merits of the facts which have been cited.
“Please check your souces!!”?
Alas, if only you had posted your sage advice to Dan Rather before it was too late.
It’s cute that you think it matters.
Also, if you know anything about Mr. Richard Clarke, you’ll know he is no fan of the current administration or it’s foreign policies.
Posted by: Tyler Durden | June 6, 2007, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
If you don’t think Iran is supplying anything to anyone that opposes the US, you live in a dream world. Get real.
Posted by: Robert Hicks | June 6, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
This message board is evidence of the chit chat that will occur among liberals after Iran supplies terrorists with a nuclear weapon that goes off in a U.S. port city.
“We really don’t know who’s to blame” the liberals will whine.
“After all, we brought it on ourselves because we are so unkind to other people in the world” the liberals will add.
It’s time to use some bunker busters on Iranian nuclear sites. We need to slow down this bunch of renegades.
Posted by: Robert L. Barney | June 6, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Here’s what it’s come to:
The conservatives see a liberal media, and the bias that comes with it, and the liberals see a ‘corporate media’ and think they’re in league with the Bush Administration.
Meanwhile – what’s the truth? Let me ask all of you this: Do you honestly think that Iran’s government isn’t doing this? This has been Iran’s behavior since 1979. When haven’t they been supplying arms to someone? This hasn’t changed whether the administration has been Republican or Democrat.
At what point is taking on Iran the right thing to do instead of liberal or conservative, Republican or Democrat?
How many more have to die – do we wait until Iran takes out Israel w/a nuke?
Posted by: Brian | June 6, 2007, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
To the utopians and Bush-haters who believe Iran is not a threat and not supplying arms; please, WAKE UP! Hating Bush is one thing, but closing your eyes is another.
Iran won’t supply to the Taliban because they are Shiite and the Taliban are Sunni? Iran is supplying the Sunni resistance in Iraq too! Why? Simple – the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Once we are gone, they can control the Taliban who wouldn’t be worth spit if not for their help. They want to be the super-power in the Mid-East and the world and they’ll do anything to accomplish it.
They didn’t do anything to us so why should we bother them? Germany and Italy didn’t do anything to us either. Nor did Bosnia. Didn’t stop us then. The truth is we must stop them before they become too entrenched and then decide to attack Israel and steal the oil of Iraq and other Gulf states. Think oil is expensive now? How about $200 a barrel meaning $10 a gallon!?
WAKE UP! We must draw a LITERAL line in the sand!
Posted by: boB | June 6, 2007, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
“Red-handed” in Babylon,
or, “China Bats Last”
Is “the U.S.”, the world’s biggest arms dealer, also determined to be the planet’s ONLY source for implements of self-defense?
How it looks to me, remembering all the blabla about U.S. “daisycutters” and bunker-busters, and shock and awe, is that anything the Afghanis can get hold of to throw back at “the U.S.” is just A-OK.
It’s not a crime to fight back against Cheney-Bush. On the contrary: it’s starting to look kind of heroic.
Something tells me the next target of neo-con weapons-wrath will be … Russia.
Posted by: @T | June 6, 2007, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
just look at the iranian presidents comments about israel. “wiped-off the map” “its destruction is nearing”.
these are not comments of a nation seeking nuclear energy, but nuclear bombs!
Bush its time to go in n start the bombing! THE WHOLE USA is behind you.
Posted by: Jeff Pimple | June 6, 2007, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
THESE PEOPLE, even though they don’t have a common relgious cause (sunni/shiit3), they have a very COMMON cause – to wipe out the USA and the WEST
Posted by: ripetid | June 6, 2007, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
If not from Iran, Syria, or North Korea, where else could this be coming from?
Mordor?
Only complete morons could so flippantly dismiss the Iranian threat.
(Not the people of Iran but the regime in power there)
Time for some JDAAMS in Iran?
Posted by: Roy R | June 6, 2007, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
It amazes me how quick people are to bash the current administration and cry fowl on the war. You clowns just don’t get the fact that these people want all of us DEAD. They hate our way of life, they hate our democracy, they hate our religious beliefs. Don’t ever forget the fact that these radical muslim regimes that you so defend, would not think one second about cutting your throat………..and the throat’s of all in your family.
Posted by: Jugdish | June 6, 2007, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
This story is about as true as all the other stories that have reported the success of the US military within Iraq since Sadam was removed from power. You liberals are funny. You have to deny any evidence that suggests otherwise.
Besides, the US should have already taken out the Iranian leadership. As someone who has lived in Iran for the last 3 years, the new neo con’s in Iran want it anyway.
Posted by: Chad Splat | June 6, 2007, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Keep your head stuck in the dirt, lefties. If you do not think Iran is an enemy to the US and Europe, you have been “stuck on stupid” since the 1979 revolution. Iran is responsible for the empowerment of all terrorism in the Middle East. Hamas and Hezbollah keep the Palestinians from any real chance at peace and a homeland, all fed with weapons and financing from Iran. Syria is kept as one big terrorist training camp by Iranian command. If Iraq is not allowed to be set free by the Coalition forces, Iran will control the whole region and Europe will then be the next target. Of course, the EU will raise the white flag immediately.
Posted by: Dwight Nave | June 6, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Absolutely dead on -mikevotes-:
“but hiding behind ‘Report says’ and analysis of unnamed official without evidence should no longer be acceptable reporting in this country.
Not after similar reporting contributed to the war in Iraq.”
Reporters have abused the so called “unnamed source/official” for the basis of their stories for far to long.
Reporters should report the details/fact of the story without personal agenda’s
Posted by: VoteTheBumsOut | June 6, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Isn’t that the Mexican flag!?
Posted by: keith | June 6, 2007, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
I don’t think the people claiming “lies” would ever believe any fact that did not support their agenda. News is now a waste of time it seems because no source will ever be good enough for the anti war crowd. I thought Nato was an international force for the most part. You folks would not believe it if ackmedidhisdad came out and claimed it himself. Not every news outlet is part of some grand theorized conspiracy to enslave the world with democracy.
Posted by: vforge | June 6, 2007, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Hey steve salter, is that the same media that only reports on the negative aspects of the Iraq war? The same media that won’t report that the troops want to finish what they started and help liberate the oppressed Iraqis? The same media that fails to report on Feintsein’s graft? The same media that organized a joke of a Republican debate? Yeah, that must be it. There is a conservative bias in the media. That’s as big a joke as you Mr. Salter.
Posted by: Greg | June 6, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
I have to chuckle. Most of the folks that have commented here have talked about how the US is lying.. NATO is lying.. the media is LYING…. when a truck drives out of Iran with the weapons on board and you catch them in the act.. what is that exactly?.. more lies?… we have destroyed tons and tons of munitions in Iraq.. and in Afghan.. so where is the new stuff coming from?.. are the Afghanis crapping it out? Use some logic.
Posted by: Blog Curmudgeon | June 6, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Long past time to break the welds of the wheels of Enola Gay.
Posted by: willy | June 6, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Well said Brian… I don’t think we are there yet, but it sure looks like an inevitable showdown is coming.
Posted by: Al | June 6, 2007, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
“my enemy’s enemy is my friend”
“Here’s a fact to consider: the Iranian government is Shi’a. The Taliban are Sunni – hard core Sunnis. These people do not have a common cause”
Other than the USA being both of their enemy’s?
Mitch
Posted by: Mitch | June 6, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
We need to give Iran 48 hours notice that the next time we find weapons going into Iraq or Afganistan we will take out all airports, bridges,highways connecting to contiguous countries, Naval facilities and radio towers. If they don’t get it then, take out all government buildings and known residences of government officials. If they don’t get that then we can get tough with them.
Posted by: dave | June 6, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
How quickly the lefties must monitor all these sites to be the first to blame a political back door deal for wanting to attack Iran. Hey, those guys want to play ball we’ll knock them out of the park. Shia’ or Sunni doesn’t matter. They are criminal and should be destroyed. Bring a bomb, meet your maker I always say. If Iran wants to get involved … then let’s involve them. To defeat force, use force. Any US citizen who thinks it’s ok to stand by and let our enemy bring weapons and explosives into another country to kill our soldiers is no friend of the US and must be French.
Posted by: Al | June 6, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Why do you think the way you do and why am I asking you?
Posted by: SilentGhost | June 6, 2007, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
to Robert L. Barney – well said !!!! i wish all of these people who rush to Irans defense in al cases would just move there , these idiots have an agenda to hate on the U.S. at all cost while living here and enjoying the freedom they don’t deserve.
Posted by: craig | June 6, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Some of you need to go to your local socialist liberal bazaar and get your free ostrich bonnet so you can go stick your head in the sand. God I have never ever in my life seen so many people who are opposed to the people trying to stop the throat cutters. “Convert or Die.” What kind of religion is that? Not one that I subscribe to and one that needs to be wiped of the face of this earth.
Posted by: David | June 6, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
“The enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
“Keep you friends close, and your enemies closer.”
Sunni and Shi’a are mortal enemies indeed…at least until they are fighting Isreal or the United States.
Be well,
Huckleberry
Posted by: Huckleberry | June 6, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
We did 1000 times worse to the Russians when they were in Afghanistan. We have no right now to complain.
Posted by: Prof Watson | June 6, 2007, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
oh my this must be the “liberal media” hard at work again… even though i wish the media in general was bit more liberal I just have to laugh when i read crap articles like this one… abc you are losing credibility every time someone reads this junk.. (and my personal feeling is that we should bomb Iran just for their speeches on the world stage)
Posted by: Steve | June 6, 2007, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
It has to be obvious to any objective observer that Iran has ambitions to be the leading power in their corner of the world. Iran may have helped the US defeat the Taliban when the country first went to war in Afghanistan, but since then, the Iranians have other fish to fry. They want to expand their nuclear capabilities and with the destruction of the Saddam regime in Iraq, they smell an opportunity. If the US withdraws from the region before stabililizing Iraq, there will be a vaccuum, that Iran hopes to fill. A nuclear armed Iran without much counterweight to their ambitions would be a disaster for the Western World. This is why they are arming the Taliban and most likely arming the insurgents in Iraq.
Scott C.
Posted by: Scott Chrimes | June 6, 2007, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
The Liberals love and praise Iran as their great Saviours.
They’re Dangerous and sick people – they deserve each other.
Posted by: A.J. | June 6, 2007, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Its a shame people are still on the side of our enemy…. Regardless of the above story.. The Iranians blatently state “we will wipe israel of the map” two days ago.. “the countdown has begun” To all of the Nevil Chamberlains… whos side are you on?
War with Iran is inevitable… the Iranian population is the most pro USA in the middle east.. yeah.. lets leave Iraq.. and let Iran take over.. “Those who dont know history are doomed to repeat it” “Those who do know history are surrounded by those doomed to repeat it”
Man.. that war mongering Bush.. how dare he be the first president in 26 YEARS TO HOLD DIRECT TALKS WITH IRAN!!!!! North Korea is coming around.. (clinton handed NK nuclear power) Venezuala is collapsing…
We now have conservatives in Mexico, Canada, Germany, FRANCE, Britain, Australia, Poland, most of the former Soviet Union sub states… coincedence that the free-est counties are the wealthiest and our allies?
Posted by: Red Blood | June 6, 2007, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
First, let’s start ringing our hands, and then let’s not speak too harshly about our Iranian brothers and sisters and then let’s talk this over with that understanding beneveolent dictator and I’m sure that he’ll see the error of his ways, and together, nation to nation, we can resolve our differences and live happily ever after.
Posted by: orivon110 | June 6, 2007, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Prof Watson, ever have a real job? oh that’s right, your too smart for that. HAHA!
Posted by: Bill | June 6, 2007, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Iran is manufacturing high grade uranium. It only take a ball the size of a marble mixed with lower grade filling to make a dirty bomb able to cause alot of destruction on its own and more so, cause enough radioactive fallout to drive citizens from a city. Wake Up Liberals and smell the world you live in and get out of your dreamland!!!
Posted by: Mike K | June 6, 2007, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Eric,
“The Iranian people want us dead? Are you INSANE? Have you ever been to Iran? Do you know that Iran is one of the most affluent and educated countries in all of the middle east?”
So chanting “Death to America” is just what affluent and educated Middle Easterners do for fun, I guess. They don’t really mean it. Just a charming cultural tradition, like drinking sweet tea and hanging teenagers who get laid.
Good rule of thumb: When someone says he wants you dead, believe him. And govern yourself accordingly.
Posted by: TheProudDuck | June 6, 2007, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Red Blood-awesome view-thanks
Posted by: Bill | June 6, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Alex: For your information, Palastinians were nomads and were kicked out of several places before they “settled” in the lands of Israel. It isn’t their land in the first place. Israel was willing to offer them their own, but Arafat turned that down. Get your facts straight and stop making excuses for Iran’s crazy prez. You and Eric need a history lesson and a reality check. I think the war in Iraq is BS, but Iran is a whole other ball game
Posted by: je po | June 6, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
First, let’s start ringing our hands, and then let’s not speak too harshly about our Iranian brothers and sisters and then let’s talk this over with that understanding beneveolent dictator and I’m sure that he’ll see the error of his ways, and together, nation to nation, we can resolve our differences and live happily ever after.
Posted by: orivon110 | June 6, 2007, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
It’s obvious that Iran is already at war with the US whether we like it or not. A series of strikes when they least expect it on their nuclear and conventional weapons capabilities and against the revolutionary guard and government in Tehran would be a good start. Giving the CIA the green light to fund and train the opposition movement within Iran wouldn’t hurt either. We can play the same game if only the worthless politicians in DC would let the CIA and the military do the jobs for which they’ve been trained.
Posted by: Roy | June 6, 2007, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
the sad thing is people don’t realize that emperialism has helped to further the cause of technology, economics, cross-culturism, etc…and there sure will be haters out there who want to retain their own level of control over there own ignorant peoples…we shouldn’t be playing nice to anyone in the middle east, or anywhere else for that matter. we should just take over and force freedom down their EFP loving throats. I want a manned mission to friggin’ MARS already!!!! we need another world war to end all wars!!! Let history keep repeating itself!!! that which does not kill you makes you stronger!!! so if we don’t kill some hot heads over there now, then they will keep fighting…look at Japan! What you got Putin!?
Posted by: Keith | June 6, 2007, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
The left wing wackos are about as funny as the media is. The comics section now covers the whole paper.
As for Iran let’s nuke em.
Posted by: Jeff | June 6, 2007, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
How is it so difficult to accept the evidence of Iran’s sinister efforts, yet so easy to believe the US is somehow manipulating the situation to its own benefit? Hateful, partisan politics has blinded too many to machinations of the misogynisitc, extremist, anti-Israel, anti-US, anti-democratic, fundamentalist, terror sponsoring Islamo-fascist regimes. When the first EFP hits the bus or train that a loved one (or one’s self) is riding on, most will ironically blame Bush, or Blair, or anyone else instead of taking the moral responsibility to halt totalitarianism in its tracks. And Ahmadinejad? He laughs as he deceives and manipulates soft westerners in preparation for the Hidden Imam’s imminent arrival and eventual world conquest.
Posted by: Jeff T. | June 6, 2007, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Arlington,
“Iran has NO reason to supply the Taliban”
Just like the Nazis had no reason to ally with the Soviets in 1939 — and yet they did. Go figure.
I think I’ll go hang with some drooling young-earth creationists to get a breath of critical thinking. At least there I can get unreason straight up, without any pretentions at being reasonable.
Posted by: TheProudDuck | June 6, 2007, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
So many of you lazy, cowardly people sit in/on your soft seats and vomit your trash while the American Soldier, Marine, Sailor, & Airmen/Airwomen defend your right to do so with their blood. While you lounge in comfort they watch for the safety of each other, because you will not. You would have let Hussein get Nukes then trash the Military for letting it happen. Now that he is gone the next threat to your sweet way of life is in the next desert over from the current defenders of your freedom. No one wants more war, neither does anyone want to allow a murderous pyschopath to have unlimited power. If Iran is not stopped now the same Military fighting in Iraq will be fighting the enemy right here at home. Then you will have to get off your lazy ass and hide under your bed while real men and women preserve your freedom.
Posted by: rick | June 6, 2007, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
If we start fighting this as a real war rather than the PC joke that is getting our people and many more Iragi and Afghani people killed it would end a lot sooner. Throw out the rule book and give notice through areas that anything left inside dies. Tell the world to either help end it of stay out of the way.
Posted by: R.D. | June 6, 2007, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
i think you want more war, pal. in fact i’m sure of it.
Posted by: literalapse | June 6, 2007, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Set mines and booby-traps on every road between Afghanistand and Northern Iran. Checkmate!
Posted by: Bulldog 1 | June 6, 2007, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Wow. Virtually 100% of you are more wiling to give Iran the benefit of the doubt over your own country. The web is filled with sniveling little Neville Chamberlains’.
Posted by: GonzoBabs | June 6, 2007, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
One explanation is that Iranian Leaders purposefully smuggle small shipments of weapons to those fighting foreign occupation, I mean islamojihadists, in the middle east. Another explanation is that they’re not
too hard to come by. How many people in the U.S. have large caches of illegal weapons? How much illegal weapons trafficking goes on in the U.S.? How many millions of dollars of steel disappeared illegally from the wreckage of the WTC to be sold for scrap? How many truck loads of cigarettes are smuggled illegally from Panama to the U.S. to Canada every week?
How many truck loads of drugs crosses our borders every day.
Unless I’m missing something, you can’t ascribe culpability to a government because it is stamped in big black english letters, Made in Iran. But hey, it is post 9/11, so just bomb them.
Posted by: hedge | June 6, 2007, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
as much as people want to bellieve otherwise, Iran.. is categorically a threat to all western culture. It is not the fault of the republicans or democrats, but a culture of hatred of anyone not like them(islam)
Abc.. in my opinion is left bias,though not deceptively so like,say, nbc or cnn, yet they publish this report.. why? because you can be ideologically opposed to certain things, and yet not be IDIOTS!!!!
Saying we deserve it or we caused it or whatever damn game of moral justification that delights you, is your right… but make no mistake.. they want to kill millions of americans if they can, is your ideology worth that cause im pretty damn sure a thermonuclear device does not obliterate down party lines.
Posted by: samuel | June 6, 2007, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
If we caught the Iranians delivering the
goods with Ah-ma-dingaling driving the
truck, the lefties would claim it was actually GW driving in a disguise.
If the Dems can’t stand up to FOX News, they can’t stand up to Iran.
Sad and EXTREMELY frightening!
Posted by: Common Sense | June 6, 2007, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
just look at the iranian presidents comments about israel. “wiped-off the map” “its destruction is nearing”.
…
you see, this crap is what is going to lead us to ww3. The iranian president comments NEVER SAY ‘ISRAEL’. He says ‘Zionist Regime..’ Now before any wingnut says they are one in the same.. I ask you this.. Is the Soviet Regime still around? no. Is the South African apartheid regime still around? no. Are all the Russian people DEAD? no. Are all the south african people dead, and washed into the sea? no. THIS IS WHAT HE MEANS. End the apartheid ‘Zionist Regime’, and have an actual solution to the problem. It is the media and the wingnuts that spin it to make it look like another holocaust is about to happen. You war mongers should rot in hell.
Posted by: sakul | June 6, 2007, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Literalapse,
We don’t need to live in Israel to understand the turmoil they have suffered. Are you a Muslim or Lib? The US will NOT allow Iran or another violent Muslim nation to plan or start aggressions towards our brothers.
Posted by: Bill | June 6, 2007, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
Man, you people are crazy. You have no idea the Vipers Nest we live in on this planet. Wake up.
Posted by: gonzobabs | June 6, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
I say bomb Iran, anyone of you too cowardly to see the destruction of evil probably is too liberal to even recognize evil, I mean heck you guys don’t even belive in evil.
But meanwhile true patriots like Bush and Cheney have the guts to stand up to terror and see and end to it.
Posted by: Byron | June 6, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Eric Are you kidding. The Iran Government, and the Iranian people say they want to destroy the United States of America and Israel. Based on that alone, let’s destroy them, the enemy, first. Wouldn’t you say that they are our enemy if they want to kill us?
Now for all of you who do not like this country, I have one big question. If you don’t like America, why is it that you do not leave? This honest question may get this post removed.
Posted by: Richard Cross | June 6, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Some people like to stick their heads in the sand. Maybe when they get kicked in the butt they will stand up and see the reality they are so willing to deny. Only those who are looking for any excuse possible would refuse to believe that Iran is not actively supplying weapons to terrorists.
I refuse to call these terrorists “insurgents” or rebels or patriots. They are murders who deliberately kill innocent women, children and old men. It is one thing to attack the military it is another to just kill non-combatants just to instill terror.
If we used the same tactics with our superior weapons there wouldn’t be a Terran. Only America has possessed the power to destroy other countries with virtual impugnity and yet has had the grace not to act as the tyrant that other countries would have except for the presence of America.
It is only by God’s grace that America had the nuclear weapons before Hitler and Stalin or Mao. The world would have been a different place.
I am just so fed up with the wimpy whinners that seem to populate America today. Freedom is not free and will never be retained by just simply sitting back and expecting other countries to do the right thing. There are a lot of people who have died in the past 30 years because of the liberal mindset of non-intervention. Probably on the low end 30 million.
Reporting is not the issue in this case. This is about the foolishness of those who will not pay attention to the reality of wicked men who profess a belief in the form of Islam that is seeking the subjugation of everyone to their belief system or the killing of anyone who disagrees.
I fear the only solution is to wait until a catastrophic nuclear explosion happens in the West. Then maybe just maybe the reality will hit home as it did for England after watching Hitler destroy other nations and slaughter thousands and hundreds of thousands of innocent people.
Solution, give a single warning to Iran to stop supplying arms and support to our enemies or consider it an act of war and then destroy all their military installations, sea going navy, and air power and nuclear development facilities. No need to invade just leave them powerless to attack or defend themselves from others.
Then extend the same warning to Syria and other countries that might consider prolonging the Iraq war.
Posted by: Lance Keith | June 6, 2007, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Judith Miller? Is that you darling?
Posted by: Allen | June 6, 2007, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Anyone who claims Iran is not supplying weapons to our enemies is a fool or a liar. Iran has to start paying a price for killing American troops. Strike Iranian Revolution Guards’ Quds HQ and then deny that we did it. Let them see that two can play that game.
Posted by: Doug | June 6, 2007, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
As a agree with the prior stated historical background on Iran and the taliban, you need to consider this. In the past 7 years the taliban has been recruiting massivly and have sided with enemies before. Osama was an enemy of the taliban but through his emense financial resources they accepted him in. So as we all need to check sources and validate info keep that in mind that in history these groups have banded together for a common cause. The entire region has a history of that.
I have no doubt that Iran is arming the terrorists in Iraq and in Afganistan it would be naive to think otherwise. Does this type of action require all out war? No there are many other things that the US and its allies can do. But if those fail we must not take war completly off the table.
Posted by: RICHARD | June 6, 2007, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
The moveon type liberals proved with their comments here that hate makes an “idiot on purpose” out of otherwise an intelligent person.
Posted by: Michael | June 6, 2007, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
The enemy must be crushed and humiliated, never to mount up again on the horse of Islam – just as the Nazi’s are gone along with their ideology (although America has some pretty eerie parallels to it). George W. Kumbayah wants to fight an altruistic, sacrifice based evangelical Christian war. It’s not a sacrifice for Americans, it is a sacrifice of Americans. It is not a sacrifice of Iraqis or Afghanis, its a sacrifice for Iraqis and Afghanis.
The Islamists laugh at us…
We need less religion, less “understanding,” and far more humiliation in this world.
Crush and humiliate – it is the only way to end this madness.
Posted by: FLASH | June 6, 2007, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Oh, Gee! If NATO said it, it must be true, just as true as all those statements that NATO bombed insurgents and not civilians time after time after time, and then we see the village funeral for men, women and children on the news the next day, time after time after time.
Posted by: Mac McKinney | June 6, 2007, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
DOh! i meant Daniel Pearl…sorry for the disinformation…heheh
seriously…we need to bust the death star out on these idiots…
GULIANI for ’08!!!
Posted by: keith | June 6, 2007, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Eric, you glittering jewel of ignorance. No one country had anything to do with 9-11. These countries breed little islamo terrorists. These countries created safe haven for them.
You don’t apoligize for them, you fight and defeat them.
Posted by: Byron | June 6, 2007, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
hey literalapse,
i have been to war. i hated it. i would do it again, though if my country called me. anywhere, anytime, anyhow. once a soldier, always a soldier. you wouln’t understand.
Posted by: rick | June 6, 2007, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Has the education system in America produced this level of stupidity as displayed by most of the comments?
Iran declared war on the USA in 1979 by invading our embassy. That is an ACT OF WAR. over the next 28 years Iran has funded terrorists cells all over the war with the intention of attacking us and our friends in the Middle East and elsewhere in the world.
Now for the past couple of years we have found increasing evidence of Iran involvement in the chaos that is Iraq. On top of this we now hear of increased involvement in Afghanistan by Iran against Nato.
And with all this evidence the people still think it is a Bush lie.
ANY other President in the history of America would have bombed the hell out of Iran by now. The anti-war movement should be happy that Bush is in power.
He is their best friend right now. I hope he wakes up and defends the troops better then he is defending the border of the USA
Posted by: Bill | June 6, 2007, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Nuke Iran now and stop wasting time. Kill them all.
Posted by: RH | June 6, 2007, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
God bless the United States military.
Posted by: gman | June 6, 2007, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
so amazing declan.. here is a fact what american had given to the world.. is more than it has taken.. but of course their our so many better examples of how to be in the world. we can learn to beat wemon, blow ourselfs up to kill others and decapitate innocent people in the name of god… yes.. i dontknow why i did not see i sooner.
Posted by: samuel | June 6, 2007, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
a FEW WELL PLACED NUKES on middle eastern cities is whats called for. The sooner the better.
Posted by: jACK | June 6, 2007, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
How many times in the past 5 years has the media happily aided in carrying this sort of story, only to have their sources be proven in out and out lies? NOTHING that supposedly justifies our current domestic or foreign policies has turned out to be true. ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, CNBC, MSNBC–they are not “News” organizations by any stretch of the imagination. No independent research, no serious fact-checking, and no confrontations when blatant lies are later discovered.
This is the kind of garbage story that is going to see another half-million people killed.
Posted by: Jay | June 6, 2007, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
These countries created safe haven for them.
You don’t apoligize for them, you fight and defeat them.
…
OPEN QUESTION TO WINGNUTS!
After 911 happened, and Bush blamed Osama, the taliban actually said that they WOULD HAND OVER BIN LADEN TO THE USA if the USA could provide proof that he was involved. No dice. The USA wants war, and always wants war.
Why didn’t bush just hand over the evidence, and bin laden would be in a us jail by now?
Hmmm?
Posted by: sakul | June 6, 2007, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Is it going to take a nuke going off in New York or Los Angeles to wake us out of this stupor we’re in? I can’t believe all the people who are defending Iran. I’m sure these are the same people who think the U.S. is the true evil in the world and has caused all the hatred toward us. You poor pathetic fools.
Posted by: Steve Hollar | June 6, 2007, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Waah….Waah… it’s our fault people don’t like us… I…I… mean it’s the foreign policy of George Bush to blame. You babies step off your “war for oil” soap box long enough to get your feet on the terra firma of reality and realize these people want to kill us. They were killing Americans when your beloved “salamander in cheif” had the con. We’re just not chasing killers with indictments and subpeonas any more. God bless George Bush and his cabinet……Don’t you guys have an owl to save?
Posted by: Mason | June 6, 2007, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Max2424, it is true that Sunnis and Shiites are at odds. True until they perceive some common non-Muslim enemy. They hate the West and will cooperate to destroy it.
Posted by: Russell | June 6, 2007, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Is it going to take a nuke going off in New York or Los Angeles to wake us out of this stupor we’re in
….
The only stupor we are in is watching you war mongers talk up another bs war. How about this solution to nuclear problems in the middle east, suggested by syria… Let’s have a NUCLEAR FREE middle east? How bout that?
Posted by: sakul | June 6, 2007, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
(correction)post & prev directed to
‘@T’
“”i think….. anything the Afghanis can get hold of to throw back at “the U.S.” is just A-OK. “”
does that also apply to a loose (or newly manufactured) nuke (compliments of NKorea or Isfahan)
set off over your hometown?
Posted by: ian | June 6, 2007, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Waah….Waah… it’s our fault people don’t like us
…
Yeah, it is. If the chinese helped overthrough our elected government, installed their own IN OUR COUNTRY that was looking after the best interests of China, and not the citizens… and then china just decided to apply sanctions to us and it killed thousands of kids… and finally they invade and occupy us..
Well, I would probably hate the chinese then too. Wouldn’t you?
Posted by: sakul | June 6, 2007, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Let’s have a NUCLEAR FREE middle east? How bout that?
…………..
Great idea. Why don’t you go tell that to Iran. You can be our envoy.
Posted by: Steve Hollar | June 6, 2007, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
It is so funny how quickly the MoveOn.org and MichealMooreBurgers crowd turns on their own liberal media when they print an article like this. ABC, MSNBC, CNN, CBS are all tools and mouthpieces of the liberal establishment. But, let them post ONE article that shows what is REALLY going on in the world, and the ‘Blame ourselves first’ crowd goes wild and starts faoming at the mouth blaming conservatives for the story. This story is on ABC for crying out load, a beloved liberal media outlet. Shows how deluded with their own words these sad people are.
Posted by: SlipSter01 | June 6, 2007, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
“”contained the same fake U.S. markings found on explosives recovered from insurgents operating in the Baghdad area.”" Ha this is good! Fake U.S markings…hum
Anyone with half a brain can see through this stupid propaganda.
Posted by: Jake | June 6, 2007, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
This whole ordeal is absurd. And, if we really wanted to put this to rest. I believe we should carry out the same tactics as what God did to Sodom, and Gommorah, and just level the entire middle east. Covering the perimeter from Egypt to Syria, and from Israel to India, and that would include every country within the middle east. Turn it to glass! And then, we wouldn’t have worry about Global warming for a while.
Posted by: Geeebs | June 6, 2007, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Great idea. Why don’t you go tell that to Iran. You can be our envoy.
…
Let’s start with Israel. You see they have nukes, illegally, and the won’t sign on to the non-proliferation treaty…
Iran has signed that treaty, and under international law, has every right to nuclear power.
Posted by: sakul | June 6, 2007, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
Iran has been at war against the United States since 1979.
Yet the first reaction of so many of the left-leaning contributors is “We must not start a war against Iran.”
I can’t tell if they are Taliban sympathizers or Iran sympathizers. Either way, they don’t seem to care about what may be in our national interest. Do they want an uninterrupted flow of weapons and munitions across Iran’s border into Afghanistan?
Posted by: J Baustian | June 6, 2007, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
I love the excuses for Islamic hatred. But I still haven’t seen a single Islamic country that would put up with any of the liberal garbage that we put up with in America. Even Turkey the most non-Islamic Islamic country cannot allow freedom of religion or thought. A Christian or Jew or Athiest proclaiming his views or printing his beliefs publicly would result in a riot and probably his death because of the “peace loving” Islamic people around him. Witness the murder of several recently because they were printing Bibles in Turkey.
Tolerance and freedom are a Western Cultural phenomena born in the Judeo-Christian heritage. Not a perfect record but the best ever seen in this world of woes.
Secularism does not win any prizes for tolerance or freedom either. Witness the slaughter of millions by Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Hitler and other advocates of Atheism.
I invite all the nay sayers to migrate to an Islamic country and start criticizing their host country. It will be a short visit with probably no return flight.
Posted by: Lance Keith | June 6, 2007, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
not again please!
Posted by: PETER | June 6, 2007, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Sakul,
Your analogy is faulty in so many ways, let me just point out ONE.
The ssanctions against Iraq did not kill ANY children. The UN Oil-for-Food progam bribery debacle, and Saddam building palace after palace instead of purchasing food for his people is what killed them. They would even keep dead babies for months in refrigerated trucks and warehouses, to pull out and put in coffins whenever they wanted to stage a ‘media event’ to show the sanctions where killing children. Then put them right back into cold storage for the next media circus event.
Posted by: SlipSter01 | June 6, 2007, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Interesting how so many posters are so quick to discredit this story as adminstration propaganda because of “unnamed sources” in the defense department. I would wager these same people were happy to believe the same “unnamed sources” who confirmed the so-called Quran flushing incident at Guantanamo, or any number of other supposed monstrous acts committed by the US government against our enemies. Open your eyes, people.
Posted by: Carr X | June 6, 2007, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Inconceivable that it’s anyone other than Iran? Really?
Wouldn’t the Russians like to get their own back for US backing of the Afghan Mujahadeen against USSR forces?
Wouldn’t China like to roll back US influence in the region?
Are Saudis who are not actual members of the royal family completely happy with US meddling in the Middle East?
America’s problem right now is that, due to their recent behaviour, there are just too many people with a motive.
But, no, it MUST be Iran, because they’re the next ones on the list!! Wow, they must really think people are stupid.
Posted by: Stephen Coulson | June 6, 2007, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Anyone who advocates using nuclear weapons in a first-strike scenario must be mad. First, the foundation of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) still applies. Any large explosion anywhere on the planet can trigger our defensive nukes, as well as the nukes of Russia and China. After that, lets talk about fallout…it could blow over to poor little Israel, you know…
The Republicans that are calling for the nuclear destruction of another country without real or proven cause are simply out of their minds. Is Armageddon really what you want? Do you really think that Russia and China are going to sit still for this? You’re just praying for some sort of new attack on our soil so that you can justify another insane attack on another Islamic country. It’s genocide, fool…those that advocate it are SICK! What has happened to this country’s moral center?
“Kill them all”?! Maybe I should move to another country…the folks here seem to have gone off the deep end.
(Nah, I’m going to stay here and fight them to the last idiot…)!
Posted by: A rope leash | June 6, 2007, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
OMG! What a bunch of morons. What a world we live in when West (US)=Bad, Islamofascists=Good.
I suppose ya’ll would rather live under islamic law then eh?
Remember, nobody said anything when the Nazis were on the rise. You’d do yourself good to read “The Terrible Things” by Eve Bunting.
Posted by: james | June 6, 2007, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
They would even keep dead babies for months in refrigerated trucks and warehouses, to pull out and put in coffins whenever they wanted to stage a ‘media event’ to show the sanctions where killing children
…
Yeah, right. Kinda like in Kuwait the Iraqis supposedly went into a hospital and ripped babies out incubators and threw them on the floor right?
Show some proof of that.
Posted by: sakul | June 6, 2007, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Also, let anyone flame me as anti-American (a favorite immediate response of the far right), I volunteered to serve in Iraq and did so for 16 months with the 172d Stryker Brigade. I served with every ounce of energy I could muster, because right or wrong, we are at war. But that does not remove from me the inherent demand as the citizen of a great Democracy that I look to the truth, be informed, and avoid the easy snare of jingoism.
My country has contributed mightily to much of its current predicament, and I hope to see it wake up about that so that it can begin to make the intelligent decisions necessary to restore security, peace and prosperity.
Republicans don’t see it, and there will be no peace and no security with them at the helm.
I am not sure if Democrats do either, to be honest, but at least with them there is a small chance that the road might become more visible.
Posted by: Ryan | June 6, 2007, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
Iran was caught. That happens in war against the infidels. I doubt the americans have the war gameplay to attack Iran for this (Wii).
Posted by: Omar Shari | June 6, 2007, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Amazing that the media is always referred to as the “Liberal Media” and they pat themselves on the back claiming they have silenced Bush. But when a story that benefits Bush shows up those same liberals then claim that it is Neo-Con media and influence. So which is it Libs?
Posted by: Patriot 2007 | June 6, 2007, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
So its our fault, all of it. Period.
Yeah, the world would just be peachy if it were like all those wonderfully free and open Islamic countries that never had American influence.
Posted by: Luke Moonwalker | June 6, 2007, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
It is time for the United States to attack Iran and protect Israel. Tactical nuclear weapons should be used against the Iranians, so that we don’t get a repetition of the Iraqi insurgency there.
Posted by: Barry | June 6, 2007, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
P.S.
Having read now more of the comments posted I can see that “they” who must think people are stupid, are on average more than half right.
Posted by: Stephen Coulson | June 6, 2007, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
It is time for the United States to attack Iran and protect Israel.
…
Why? Why should we protect Israel?
Posted by: sakul | June 6, 2007, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Well we’ll see, won’t we? One way or another. If we roll in to Iran hootin and hollerin and we find out that they were in fact using their nuclear plants for energy or if we withdraw troops now and if some radical entity starts to gather support, Osama comes out of hiding and sets up shop in Iraq, and we start locking down the US because of multiple threats of terrorist attacks or if nothing happens at all. We will discover the absolute truth sooner or later, won’t we?
Posted by: TK | June 6, 2007, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
Luke Moonwalker, look at our “influence” in Iran prior to the islamic revolution and compare that to our “influence” in other middle eastern nations. It is quite different. The people suffered under the Shah, but we profited. That’s the bottom line. If the Shah had been in power in Egypt or Jordan we might be facing Egyptian or Jordanian terrorism right now.
Yes we must face our present reality, and combat terror. But it does NOBODY any good to pretend the past doesn’t exist.
And that is what a lot of people would like to do, just pretend that our history is spotless. It is not spotless. Ignoring this puts us in greater danger than acknowledging it.
Posted by: Ryan | June 6, 2007, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
WHY should we protect Israel, you ask?
Because they are the ONLY decent people in the middle east.
They do not demand the head chopping of their opponents, the clitorectomies of women and most importantly, are the only people in the region who do not live under the tents of the 7th century.
They are a superior people as evidenced by the hatred of their lessor foes.
Jon Ogrey
Posted by: Jon Ogrey | June 6, 2007, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
I remember when the REPUBLICANS in power and took Iraq off the US terror watchlist. Then sent them WMD including anthrax and posion gas. Past Republican administrations provided material support for the use and deployment of posion gas. So why wasn’t Rumsfield put trial with Saddam? Does the Bush administration have a secret agreement not to proscute US war crimes when they supported Saddam? after all SADDAM WAS A REPUBLICAN ALLIE!!!
Posted by: MItchB | June 6, 2007, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Robert Hicks said: If you don’t think Iran is supplying anything to anyone that opposes the US, you live in a dream world. Get real.
Liberals DO live in a dream world and they’ll never “get real”.
Sadly, this is cause enough to launch a nice air raid to stop Iran’s capability of doing stuff like this. Is that going to happen? No. This administration is gutless because of these cowardly liberal types they pander to.
When Iran is hit, the first anti-war liberal I see marching in support of Iran is going to get my fist in their face.
Posted by: Fed Up With Libs | June 6, 2007, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
We (the USA) may end up taking out the Iranian Nuke sites, but only with CONVENTIONAL weapons. First use of nuclear weapons is almost certainly NOT on the table.
Posted by: Luke Moonwalker | June 6, 2007, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
This blog is comrised of idealists and realists. Idealists are admittedly the optimists, while realists are more pragmatists than pessimists. The realism of the situation boils down to this. Israel, Afghanistan and Iraq stand as the only freely elected governments in the Middle East. It is no coincidence that Iran, Syria and others want those democracies rebooted and loaded with Iranian manufactured political software.
Here’s a surprise: Bush is actually still following Clinton’s national security strategy, officially titled: “Engagement and Enlargement.” Engage non-democracies and barter economies to eventually enlarge global democracy and cooperative capitalism, thereby decreasing the likelihood of regonal conflict or global war. Iran reject this today just as it did in 1993 when Clinton adopted the straegy. Abandon Iraq, let Afghanistan fall, and Israel is the ultimate prize. With 60-100 ‘rumored’ nukes, does anyone think they will go quietly if Iran threatens to nuke them into the stone age?
Posted by: Jeff T. | June 6, 2007, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Max2424 is a dope. Do your history man.
Western Afghanistan is Shia.
The Hazari shia are a minority group INSIDE Afghanistan. The Hazari are central and south western Afghanistan – you know near the Persian (Iranian) Border. Hazari have long been opportunistic heroin transporters; the Hazari are one of the reasons why Iran has a big heroin problem. Hazari do not like the Tajiks very much – due to Tajik centralizing power out of Kabul. Taliban are Southern Pastun. Connect the dots.
V-
Posted by: vigilaro | June 6, 2007, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Sadly, this is cause enough to launch a nice air raid to stop Iran’s capability of doing stuff like this.
…
One that same note, is the fact that the USA supplies Israel with weapons to indescrimately kill muslims give, let’s say China the right for airstrikes against the usa?
Posted by: sakul | June 6, 2007, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Always good to see calm and rational argument. I suppose one should ask:
1. From where is the Taliban/Iraqi insurgents obtaining its munitions?
2. Why is the Middle East fixated on the destruction of Israel (and their own self destruction) with so much money and land so easily available to many governments?
If it is at all possible to see a sensible answer without words such as bunghole and moron that would be preferred.
Posted by: Rick | June 6, 2007, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Curious comments from some who disbelieve that the same Iranian govt that openly supports terrorist organizations would send weaponry,explosives to the Taliban and those fighting in Iraq. Iran’s support includes funding, providing safe haven, training, and weapons to a wide variety of terrorist groups including Lebanese Hizballah, HAMAS, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, al-Aksa Martyrs and the Popular Liberation Front for Palestine-General Command. The list of Hezballah related murders of Americans is long (241 during the marine barracks in Lebanon alone).
In addition, this is the same govt that thinks it is okay to kill authors who write offensive things or stone women and girls who are said to have committed adultry. Iran denies its citizens free speech and assembly while Iran and Syria both conspire to weaken Lebonon so they can control southern Lebanon for its proxy war with Israel.
As Afghanistan and Iraq are Iranian neighbors with Shiite populations, why is it so strange to think that Iran would seek to drive out a country for which they hold a messianic hatred of?? Keep in mind, nearly 1/4 of Afghanistan is Shiite and Iran supported the mujahadeen and Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. In Iraq, Shiites constitute a clear majority. Iranian/Taliban involvement fits their modus operandi, is consistent with previous desires of increasing their regional influence, is supported by the detainment of iranian quds special forces in Iraq and is lastly consistent with their religious world view. So people who think Iran is not involved are only fooling themselves. Folks should not be blinded by their hatred of George Bush or US foreign policy to the extent to which they deny simple facts and deductions that are staring them in the face. ockham’s razor: “Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate”, which translates as “entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily” or put another way, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one.
Posted by: craig | June 6, 2007, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Who,s winning the propagada war? It,s not us. Conspiracy lovers unite.
Posted by: David Dees | June 6, 2007, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
if Iran threatens to nuke them into the stone age?
…
so when did Iran threaten to nuke them into the stone age?
Posted by: sakul | June 6, 2007, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
The Iranian government up to the highest echelon is indirectly responsible (though approaching directly) for the deaths of coalition troops. It doesn’t take a genius to realize that killing troops of a foreign nation is an act of war.
Thus the question arises: What are we going to do about it?
Posted by: G | June 6, 2007, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
It would hav been helpful to know if your source was American or from another country.
Posted by: brb | June 6, 2007, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
So despite any evidence that Iran is killing our troops the left blames us and excuses Iran. Who cares if this is a outright act of war? Cowards, the lot of you.
Also, this enemy combatant stuff makes me sick. The rules apply to UNIFORMED members of a nation that is a declared hostile. It does not apply to terrorist cowards who wear civilian dress and kill and torture innocents and US troops like the useless animals they are. Do you think they treat our troops like we treat them?
Oh, I forgot, our troops are just imperialist strom troopers so they got what coming right lefties? What, one mans enemy is another mans freedom fighter you say? Might be true IF THEY BELIEVED IN FREEDOM. By this lame argument the Nazis were just freedom fighters to right? Fighting for all that neat stuff like Islamic World Rule? Shite my XYZ.
So eventually Iran gets Nukes and the left, heck, no worries. Despite 30 years of anti-western threats they are really just a peaceful nation that is only defending itself agains the US bully right?
Pathetic, utterly pathetic.
Posted by: Dave T | June 6, 2007, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
The logic of the arguments used here are interesting to me – it can’t be valid because its liberal. Rather than speaking to the issue – that in this particular case an alarm is being sounded on the basis of one unconfirmed source – the response is to dismiss the validity of the charge based on a political bias.
It is well established that the media did, in fact, help make the case for the Iraq war and only now are beginning to question the wisdom of simply quoting administration sources which turned out to be erroneous. Then, too, the fact that al Qaeda had no ties to the Iraqi government which those who understood the antipathy of extremist Islamist movements to the secular government of Saddam Hussayn, was completely disregarded. My point remains well taken – that any source that suggests that the anti Shi’a Taliban are receiving help from the only Shi’a government in the world needs to be checked and double checked. The only people who disregard this are those who known little if anything about religious communities in the Middle East. This is clearly the case here.
Posted by: John Hubers | June 6, 2007, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
the post by samuel makes no sense.
I never said we need a century without the us..
get some reading glasses..
Posted by: sakul | June 6, 2007, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
The radical left in the US should be treated as terrorist collaborators. They should be sent to special investigative centers, where their ties to the Islamofascists would be analyzed.
Posted by: Barry | June 6, 2007, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
This can not come as a surprise to anyone. Russia did this to us in Veitnam and we returned the favor in Afghanistan. WAR with IRAN is not plausible, so we need to keep a tight rein on Israel. The best way to go to war with Iran is to step up support to the the democracy activists inside the country. Is wierd as it is, were both Ayrian nations after all.
Posted by: Chris | June 6, 2007, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Lets look at the timeline:
#1 Iran democratically elects its own President, who wants Iran’s oil wealth to uplift and benefit… the people of Iran. This majorly upsets the United States, which thinks Iran’s oil is intended to benefit… the people of America.
#2 The US deposes the popularly elected President of Iran and installs the Shah, who spends 27 years brutalizing the Iranian people.
#3 That whole thing in 1979 happens, when an extremist islamic revolution coopts the seething anger of the average Iranian into an islamic nationalist movement. The Ayatollah replaces the Shah.
#4 We spend the next 28 years in a hate-hate relationship with the government of Iran. However, while the average Iranian generally admires America, the average (especially Red State) American hates and would like to nuke Iran. Not a lot of opportunity for positive relations there.
Its called blowback, people. Americans have a hard time understanding it for some reason. But its kind of the “every action has an equal and opposite reaction” thing in the world of foreign affairs.
If we had left Iran alone in the 60′s and 70′s, perhaps the Iranians would be helping us in Iraq and Afghanistan instead of the unfortunate situation we now find ourselves.
Perhaps Iraq and Afghanistan would never have happened.
Posted by: Ryan | June 6, 2007, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
Eric and the test of you terrorist apologist haters shake the sand out of your ears and spit out the Kool Aide it is being handed to you and you still deny it because you hate this president and this country Don’t lie and say you love it. I read your post. your word spew hatred if this had been a democrat in office your feelings would have been just the opposite I take that back if a democrat was in office Saddam would still be raping and killing children. Get a life people and dont blame the messenger
Posted by: Robert Curtis | June 6, 2007, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Did the media help President Kennedy get public support for intervening in Vietnam?
Posted by: Luke Moonwalker | June 6, 2007, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
It looks like all the people who are the most scared are the ones who yell “coward” the loudest.
“Oooooh… help. Iran scares me. I wish someone would nuke them out of existance!!!”
Yup. That would make Iran go away alright, but it wouldn’t stop you from being pants-wettingly scared of the next boogy man Dick Cheney points at.
Children are so easily manipulated by scary stories.
Posted by: Stephen Coulson | June 6, 2007, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
I hope we nuke them befor they nuke us..and any of you bitttchy little people that believe digging a hole and sticking your head in it will make the bad people go away, sure just leave them alone and they will leave you alone, you cant really believe that…they have hated us for centuries you will be to blame for lives lost when an iranian nuke blooms over the skyline of a major us city
Posted by: brian | June 6, 2007, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Does this really surprise anyone? After all, didn’t Hitler and Stalin, avowed ideological enemies, establish a pact to divide Poland and extend the reach of both empires? Tehran has always been about killing Americans and Jews. Move along, people. Nothing to see here.
Posted by: JohnnyT | June 6, 2007, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Barry said, “The radical left in the US should be treated as terrorist collaborators. They should be sent to special investigative centers, where their ties to the Islamofascists would be analyzed.”
Fellow Americans, this is what the neo-conservative agenda wants to do with 72%+ of the American population. Be warned, my friends.
Posted by: Eric | June 6, 2007, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Hey SlipSter 01,
In response to your “sources”
I looked at the results of your simple Google search. I’m not impressed. I saw nothing on the first page that contained any credible evidence of the of the Iranian government’s involvement in shipping arms to the Taliban. Check them yourself. he most damning evidence turned up in your search was about a Russian arms dealer selling arms to the Taliban. Evrything else was just more supposition by unnamed sources. I don’t have time to spare talking to people whose “minds” have already been made up by Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh. Those of you who love to bash “liberals” and “lefties” need to stop that 3rd grade name-calling nonsense and open your eyes to the lies that you have been fed since 9/11. By the way, do you recall any of the reasons that we were told that we had to take action on Iraq, something about a mushroom cloud?
Posted by: tom | June 6, 2007, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Stephen said: Children are so easily manipulated by scary stories.
What do you tell your children about global warming?
Posted by: Luke Moonwalker | June 6, 2007, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
FOR JOHN HUBER
– hows this for a source; I have a friend serving in Iraq flying predators. he knows first hand (has physically seen the evidence and the bodies) that Iran is also sending in their own special forces, dressed in US military uniforms and driving US marked vehicles. The event I am referring to was a sneak attack on US forces by these special forces from Iran. We know this is true because the deceased attacking forces were identified as Iranian.
Believe the truth and hold on to your liberal thoughts a while longer.
Posted by: dennis parker | June 6, 2007, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Some of the left wing America haters on this board are not very bright. First of all Iraq is MAJORITY SHIA. Iran would like to take over and then go after Sunni Saudi an Egypt.
Of course Iran is supplying weapons. They know if they can breed a civil war in Iraq American liberals will eventually get their way and force a full surrender by the United States. Hillary and obama have promised as much.
If you hockey pucks were around during World War II you would say Hitler isn’t such a bad guy and he really doesn’t mean what he says about wiping out the Jewish race. You would blame FDR saying Pearl Harbor was an inside job like Rosie and Charlie Sheen. what morons.
Hey lefties, EVIL EXISTS and it isn’t Bush or the oil companies. Tell me how is your food grown, how does it get to market, how do you earn the money to buy it, how do you get to the store to buy it? Energy. Imagine life wihtout it while you starve to death and freeze to death during the winter.
And I have to left as you blame the All Bill Clinton netowrk of a conservative bias. BWAAHAHAHAHA The Liberl New York Times buried the JFK terror plot on page 30. I guess terrorism on our shores is bad business for democrats.
It’s sad when you can’t tell speeches by Chavez, Putin, MyMoodIamInaJihad, Castro and most Demcorats apart.
We have found America’s enemies and half of them live here. 25% of American Muslims said it is OK to do suicide bombs killing innocents in the name of their religion. You hate Christians but seem to have no problems with extreme Islamo-Fascists.
And before the left wing name calling begains I am NOT registered as a Republican. Oh no, what can you argue now.
Posted by: Marcus Shelby | June 6, 2007, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
There’s no question that Iran is supporting the Taliban, numerous terrorist groups, and is behind much of the unrest in the Middle-east. (Other than what we caused ourselves by invading Iraq.)Personally, I don’t believe their nuclear program is entirely peaceful – but for now, until we elect another President, step-back and deal with Iran as best we can without resorting to military force.
Bush has mismanaged everything, and now is causing a serious rift between the US and Russia. Yes – Iran is a huge issue, and anyone that read the NIE would have handled Iran instead of Iraq – but the Bush Neo-cons couldn’t pass-up the huge defense contracts and prospect of dividing-up Iraq’s oil, so we attacked a nation that had nothing to do with 911.
Iran eventually will have to be dealt with, hopefully led by a multi-national coalition in conjunction with the UN and our next President – but to even think of allowing the Bush administration to escalate the situation in the Middle-east is suicide, both for them and us – especially with Russia and China both growling over Bush’s imperialism.
Let’s face it America, this time we’re on the wrong side of what is right – and until we rectify a government that is bent on destroying our friends and allies all over the world – and is obviously out of control, we would be best served by hoping that Bush can’t mess up things too much more before 2008 and bide our time…
Look at what he’s already done with our country. If we attack Iran, we ain’t seen nothing yet – and Bush will be permanent; This administration has left the southern border open, so Iran’s QUD’s force could have smuggled anything and everything into this country – and they will retaliate if attacked, then Bush will have an excuse to declare Martial Law and assume complete control of our country.
Don’t play into his hands…
Posted by: Mr. Skeptic | June 6, 2007, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
So, lets look at this, Iran “apparently” supplies the legitimate resistance fighters in Iraq and Afghanistan and thats a big no-no yet the US supplies groups within Iran with weapons and funding and thats OK?
It seems its OK for the US to supply anyone they like from the IRA to groups in darkest Peru… its OK because America does it!
Sending special forces into Iran is also an acceptable thing yet if Iran does the same allegedly back, its crime of the century… Iran is making it up the White House says, a day after announcing it had sent SF into that country.
But hey, lets forget diplomacy as well, it seems all US personnel have diplomatic immunity but when it comes to accredited diplomats, lets kidnap them and keep them for several months and then hope no-one says anything because its America…
Its strange that Iran enters with Iraq’s approval but for some reason its forgotten that the US and Britain are there illegally…
The Palestinians, the Iraqi and Afghanistan “insurgents” are acting within the law as legitiemately resisting an illegal occupation.
All the time that the US supplies terrorist organisations then they cannot bleat on about other nations doing so too.
There will be a new world order but not with America running it.
Posted by: Ian Watson | June 6, 2007, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Eric why did you join? Just curious.
I just want to make a point. There is no diplomacy with the bin ladens of this world. There is no peace deals. It is imperative we eliminate each and every terrorist on this planet. It is critical we punish those who harbor and supply the terrorists. It is important that we spread freedom to those who have never experienced it in these countries and to spoil the dead terrorists children a sufficent education.
“I will bleed to death to make those stripes stay red”
Posted by: Sgt.Mcquaid | June 6, 2007, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
oooooo!
Look at me! I’m arguing about a news article and how it relates to my personal politics!
“ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US”
Posted by: Tyler Durden | June 6, 2007, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
SlipSter01
Did you just Heil me? I didn’t see you crawling through Iraqi mud as a combat infantryman for 420 days like I did, as a volunteer, because we are at war. So quietly go and f&*$ yourself you fascist sympathizer. You just heil me again. I was out there fighting for America while you were sitting on forums like these. I’m due my right to wish Americans would take responsibility for this country, nationally, as I did personally. And that means honesty, something right wingers find very painful.
Idiot.
Posted by: Ryan | June 6, 2007, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Iran has demonstrated a penchant for supplying terrorists with training, safehaven and weapons. Moreover, the current Iranian leaderships, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, appears to be an adherent to a messianic view of the world. Does anyone really believe that he and others within the Iranian govt/religious order, would hesitate to provide training to terrorists who would seek to use a bomb against the US. The US is damned if they do and damned if they don’t. Failure to act results in an Iranian bomb with a pro jihadists/terrorist state opening the doors to global terrorists in clandestine ways. Acting confirms the islamic view that the US does the beck and call of the Jewish lobby.
The unfortunate truth is that the nuclear genie is out of the bottle and radical jihadists will eventually gain access to nuclear technology. Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan (AQ Khan) with the help of his pre 9/11 Pakistani govt has done at least as much damage. We live in a world in which jihadists think it is a good idea to kill themselves and as many others as they can. It is therefore reasonable to deduce that a would be suicide pilot or bomber would be willing to go to great lengths to access technology, weaponry and expertise to kill hundreds of thousands or millions at a time. I encourage all to read Lawrence Wright’s book, “the Looming Tower” as a good primmer on Sayyid Qutb and future jihad, as well as getting a read on the current state of affairs.
Posted by: craig | June 6, 2007, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Eric, I lived under both the shah and the ayatollah khomeini. i’ve got a news flash for you. khomeini was the one who set that country on a path of state sponser of terrorism, and its not because they supported the shah. we were subjected to a daily dosage of hate in the state media against everything under the sun that was not their brand of fanatical islam. incidentally, i never heard ‘death to the sunni’s’ in their propoganda. the reason they kill eachother is the same reason why mobsters kill eachother. to corner the market on terrorism. its really sad that a great number of americans are absolutely oblivious to the fact that the Islamic Republic by nature is a terrorist govnerment. it starts with terrorising its people, to every country it deals with, including its trade partners like britian and germany.
most of you here truly live in la la land. you have a lot of opinions, but zero knowledge about what really goes on in the world. thats why you blame the U.S. first and foremost. its all battered wife syndrome.
Posted by: mark | June 6, 2007, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
For all of you far left idiots who have no idea what is going on in Iraq or Afghanistan, I give you this piece of education. Iran IS supplying weapons and fighting a war by proxy against us. I know this because I know many honorable, courageous, and REAL Americans who are actually sacrificing something in this war who’s job it is to go out and investigate what is killing our troops in Iraq. One of those weapons we magically pulled from our butts are what is known as an Explosive Formed Penetrator (EFP). My good friend was killed by one of these things last February in Baghdad. It’s real people! I don’t want to go to war with Iran anymore than you do, but you have to realize we are in a fight to preserve our way of life. It’s not a cliche, it’s the facts. Get on board and start sacrificing something instead of sitting there in your birkenstocks and complaining about GWB and start worrying about the possibility that a man who has stated he wants to wipe whole nations off of the planet just might obtain the means to do it. Scary? I think some of the American people’s thoughts and ideas about what is going on might be even scarier. Good night and God (sorry…I said God!) Bless.
Posted by: Steve S | June 6, 2007, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
In a clever manner to add pretended objectivity to refute General Gates who said the U.S. had “no evidence” the arms were being supplied from Iran, you quote the outed propagandist Richard Clark, who claimed:
“It is inconceivable that it is anyone other than the Iranian government that’s doing it.”
To the contrary! IT IS QUITE CONCONCEIVABLE that someone else is fronting this fake evidence for the purpose of escalating war against Iran, and that would be ISRAEL! (Yes, they have done, and would do that).
The unnamed, mystery “senior administration coalition official” is no doubt someone from the rogue Fifth Column called the Office of Special Plans which reports to the Secret Government (as Bill Moyers termed it) headed by Dick Cheney!
Why not produce the document and name the official so we may examine them both, instead of saying “coalition” when you know the semantics is for propaganda? Why not, Mr. Ross, simply let the PNAC war-mongers like James Woolsey and William Kristol (who called for invasion of Syria and Iran during Israel’s bombing of Lebanon’s civilian infrastructure) write your news scripts for you? Powell’s Chief of Staff Wilkerson called them and the rest of the neocons “the crazies”! IT IS QUITE CONCEIVABLE THIS IS THEIR PROPAGANDA, AND AMERICANS THAT READ (INSTEAD OF WATCH TV) ARE NOT BELIEVING IT ANYMORE.
ABC is part of the propaganda machine, or they would reveal these sources and documents and do some real investigative reporting instead of being mouthpieces for the “powers that be”. Brian Ross proves himself to be another Neocon sycophant.
Posted by: B Williams | June 6, 2007, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
I have read pretty much all of the comments thus far and one of the repeated themes is:
‘The United States supported the Taliban at one point, they put the Shaw in power, they supported Saddam at one point, etc.’
I think any reasonable person would understand that yes the United States has contributed to the mess that exists in that region. However, the obvious point is, we can’t change the past.
We have to deal with the situtaion and possible situations in the “now”. And unfortunately that means Diplomacy can not be the only option on the table.
Don’t get me wrong at all costs, to absolute exertion, Diplomacy (world united)should be used. But what I don’t know is (for lack of better words) the “now”, what needs to be done now?
And also remembering to think with foresight when trying to answer this question!
It is what is right now, can’ go back, only forward and unfortunately the use of force has to stay on the table of options.
Posted by: Joe | June 6, 2007, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
Ian Watson said: The Palestinians, the Iraqi and Afghanistan “insurgents” are acting within the law as legitiemately resisting an illegal occupation.
Possibly, but what are the “insuregents” offering? Burkas and oppression of Women, intolerance of Jews and Christians and Theological dictatorship. Liberals used to be against such things. What happened?
Posted by: Luke Moonwalker | June 6, 2007, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
I would say the Liberals must be racists.
Don’t this so, answer me this. Why do Liberals want America to use our military force in Darfur? Answer: because people are dying, several thousand so far.
Answer me this, Saddam had murdered more than one million Arabs. Why didn’t Liberals want us to intervene there?
Becasue Liberals are rascist against brown skin Arabs. What other answer could there be?
Posted by: Marcus Shelby | June 6, 2007, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
time to bomb Iran now before it too late. The world is better off without Iran.
Posted by: thai P | June 6, 2007, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
The radical left represents no less of a threat to the US than the Islamofascists. Radical leftists and domestic sympathizers of foreign terrorists should face the same tactics as the terrorists. Verbal assault on freedom is also a form of terrorism. It is time to start treating it as such.
Posted by: Barry | June 6, 2007, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
You left-wing nutjob conspiracy theorists crack me up.
Posted by: Allen | June 6, 2007, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
As usual, head up behind.
I want me one of those 7mm RPGs….
Give me a break, indeed.
lightfighter
Posted by: Kemp | June 6, 2007, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
We’ve needed a good excuse to take Tehran out and bomb every mosque there. I say we have it now. Let’s do something about this and be done with it. They think we’re the great Satan, let’s finally give them some fodder for that argument.
Posted by: dave | June 6, 2007, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Mark:
Great post about your life in Iran. The left in the US lives in denial and the media will not report the facts.
Liberals deny, people die.
Posted by: Dave T | June 6, 2007, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran! It is time to invade and free Iran from the Nazi tyrants who control their people and create terror all over the world. Though it is preferable to have it thrown over from the inside.
Posted by: Josh | June 6, 2007, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
I have been to Iraq… Iran is supplying weapons, technical support and even soldiers to fight with and advise Iraqi insurgents (Sunni and Shia) so it doesn’t surprise me they are supporting the Talaban. They know we are not long for Iraq and want us tied up in Afghanistan just as bad as Iraq.
Everyone who says “But Iran is Shia and ‘so-and-so’ is Sunni, blah blah” is parroting the anti-war line. There is a saying they take very seriously in the Middle East: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”. The Talaban may be sunni… but we are Kuffars (infidels/nonmuslims) and are preceived as a greater threat than the Talaban. Tell me we never supported an enemy against a bigger enemy… (hint: Osama, Saddam).
Don’t deny it because you don’t want to go to war. Invanding Iran is dumb and noone ever said to. I do believe we should make it hurt for them (bomb a few specific targets… like their ONLY oil refinery or the mullahs house like we did with Omar in libya). Soldiers are dying every day because of Iran and we have known it for quite some time. I don’t know about you, but I’d like to stabilize Afghanistan and get the hell out. Maybe politics is just more important than soldiers lives to you… or maybe you all just don’t care. To me, it’s not and I do.
Posted by: CPT T. | June 6, 2007, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
LET PUT THIS NONSENSE TO REST RIGHT NOW:
1. Iran had nothing to do with 9/11.
2. Iran is allowed to enrich uranium to 5% for the nuclear fuel cycle according to the NNPT that they signed in concert with the United States.
3. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said just this week that there’s absolutely no evidence that Iran is supplying the Taliban with weapons.
4. The ‘facts’ of this story was given to ABCNEWS by anonymous sources whose aim is to plant disinformation into the American press and sway public opinion towards supporting a military strike on Iran. The ‘facts’ of this story are in direct opposition to the US government’s public position as relayed by defense secretary Gates, and that is quite simply how one knows this is neo-conservative propaganda.
Posted by: Eric | June 6, 2007, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Some Liberal conspiracy fool just said Bush is promoting fear and then in the next breath said the whole world wants us gone.
Which is it dummy.
Posted by: Marcus Shelby | June 6, 2007, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Why is nothing said about Saudi Arabia for supplying money and personal to the Iraq’s Sunni in Iraq.
They have been funneling funds through their religious organizations forever. If you remember Saudi Arabia summons Cheney there a while back to most likely to tell Cheney want they wish to happen in Iraq….
Posted by: Pete Sea | June 6, 2007, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
How can they tell it was from Iran if everything is made in china? But I wouldnt hold it past them. In America you can get arrested for threatning to kill someone. I say Iran has done plenty of threatning! I will give them credit they are willing to blow themselves up like good sheep. Now thats dedication! Sick but dedicated. Thats who the enemy are.
Posted by: ftec | June 6, 2007, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Let’s take the war to iran if they want to fight.
Posted by: happydayz | June 6, 2007, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
The affluence or education of a country as a whole does not automatically make them peaceful; just more dangerous. There is so much hatred in the middle east toward each other and the rest of the world that it seems they are still a long way away from coexisting peacefully and tolerantly with anyone. That to me is what defines a barbarian. The United States is the most wonderful nation in the world. It is so desirable that we now need an “iron curtain” to slow down the numbers of people trying to get in illegally and encourage them to come legally. I don’t hear of vast numbers of people trying to get out. In a time of war, as we are in now, care needs to be taken that speech and action does not appear treasonous. The “enemy” is monitoring and watching us constantly for any sign of weakness so they can strike. We are the United States and we need to stand united or we will fall. I hope no American citizen would have such profound hatred for us as to wish for our downfall. Who would take our place if such a thing came about? It would be a very unpleasant world indeed if democracy and freedom were to be overthrown.
Posted by: Susie | June 6, 2007, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Hey Marcus Shelby, why is there not a single African-American elected in the Republican Party right now? Not in Congress or the Senate or in the Whitehouse or in any statehouse?
How come the allegedly “racist” Democratic Party have dozens and dozens of African-Americans and Latinos and Asians and Jews and Muslims and Gays and all that?
Yeah, must be the darn racist liberals.
How come Conservatives want to bomb nations full of dark people? Iraq. Afghanistan. Pakistan. Somalia. Lebanon. Yemen?
Why does the conservative party love to bomb dark skinned people?
-GSD
Also, George W. Bush and Mitt Romney have “messianic world-views” too.
Posted by: GSD | June 6, 2007, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
re:Josh | Jun 6, 2007 9:09:59 PM
“Soldiers are dying every day because of Iran and we have known it for quite some time.”
Iran is sending US soldiers to Iraq where they can be killed? What cunning devils the mullahs must be.
Posted by: Stephen Coulson | June 6, 2007, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
“…I take that back if a democrat was in office Saddam would still be raping and killing children.”
As opposed to US forces doing it now?
Oh, I forgot, its OK to gangrape 14 year old kids, carptet bomb the civilians and rob and plunder the place… cos its America doing it?
Posted by: Ian Watson | June 6, 2007, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Iran is a hole that should be made larger by B-52′s
Posted by: happydayz | June 6, 2007, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
HEY REMEMBER THE chemical & BIO WEAPONS WE FOUND IN IRAQ? HEY WHAT ABOUT THE EVIDENCE WE GOT OF IRAQ AFGAN TIES, OH YEH IRAQS INVOLVMENT IN 911, BUT ABOVE ALL I STILL REMEMBER THE BUSH ELECTION AND HOW HE REALLY WON FLORIDA, IM SICK OF THE LIES ARENT YOU!
Posted by: BOOM | June 6, 2007, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
I love ABC News. Article Title says, “Caught Red-Handed” but when you read it the “red-handed” turns into “analysis concluded”. Sheesh. What sensationalism and sad reporting. Of course the “new journalists” aren’t, they’re just marketing majors. Iran may indeed be supplying arms but there’s still no clear evidence. Its a shame that the irrelevant news annexes to Entertainment Corporations have become sensationalizers instead of serious journalists.
Posted by: TomBob | June 6, 2007, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Liberal thinking: If you did not plan 9/11 than you must not be evil.
So Iran did not plan 9/11. So what?
Do you think for one second that Iran would not break their agreement? If so you are a fool.
Iran would smuggle a nuclear weapon into the United States and detonate it as soon as they get a chance. Hope it’s not in your neighborhood lefty fool.
Posted by: Marcus Shelby | June 6, 2007, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Let’s give Iran an atomic bomb. They seem to crave one so much.
Posted by: iranian | June 6, 2007, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Let’s give Iran an atomic bomb. They seem to crave one so much.
Posted by: iranian | June 6, 2007, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Good thing all of you are busy posting and not procreating.
Me?
I’m doing both.
gigity gig
Posted by: Tyler Durden | June 6, 2007, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
So the Iranians are supplying their enemies with weapons? The only government that would be that stupid is the one led by George, the commander guy, Bush.
Posted by: skyreader7 | June 6, 2007, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
And… what about the vast network of tunnels and bunkers that Bin Laden had in the mountains of Afghanistan… Wait… there WERE NO vast network of tunnels and bunkers. Those turned out to be… a lie. I wonder how that idea ever caught hold in the American psyche?
Posted by: Eric | June 6, 2007, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
There should be tactical nuclear strikes against major Iranian population centers, ports, nuclear, military and communications facilities. If millions of Iranians perish and their infrastructure is destroyed, it will be a lesson to ALL who raise their finger at Israel.
Posted by: Barry | June 6, 2007, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
I’m doing both at the same time gigity. I am talented and would like to see iran no more.
Posted by: whiskey | June 6, 2007, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
WHAT MARCUS SAID. HE BE RIGHT.
Posted by: gary | June 6, 2007, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Get rid of Israel then this problem pretty much goes away.
Posted by: TomBob | June 6, 2007, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Iran would smuggle a nuclear weapon into the United States and detonate it as soon as they get a chance
…
Why would they do that? That would ensure their destruction? What is in it for them? If anything, a nuke for Iran would make them safer.. look at North Korea, before they ‘had the bomb’ there was all these threats and rhetoric, then they detonated it, and hey, let’s talk…
Posted by: sakul | June 6, 2007, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Barry said, “There should be tactical nuclear strikes against major Iranian population centers, ports, nuclear, military and communications facilities. If millions of Iranians perish and their infrastructure is destroyed, it will be a lesson to ALL who raise their finger at Israel.”
Barry, I am beginning to think you are a provocateur in disguise. Becuase even the most neo-conservative of neo-conservatives would not advocate the killing of ‘millions of Iranians’ just to prove a point. Or would they? Your point of view is quite disgusting.
Posted by: Eric | June 6, 2007, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
I would let Taliban go free if we could eliminate liberals from the US
Posted by: Sick0fLiberals | June 6, 2007, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
Personally,
I blame God.
Posted by: Tyler Durden | June 6, 2007, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
Sorry, sakul, Barry is right.
War is mean and America can be pretty mean in war too.
I see nothing wrong with killing the enemy.
Posted by: jjj | June 6, 2007, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
I would let the Taliban go free if we could eliminate NeoCons from the US
Posted by: TomBob | June 6, 2007, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
The US economy will collapse after we start bombing Iran.
We are spending 8 billion dollars a month in Iraq and Afghanistan now.
If we bomb Iran, that will be the START of a war, not the end of a war.
We simply cannot afford the cost of another war.
Also, if we start to drop nukes willy-nilly do you think that will push Russia and China closer together? Perhaps they could respond in kind?
The more the warmongers push for war, the weaker America becomes. It is quite the paradox.
-GSD
Posted by: GSD | June 6, 2007, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
I would let Taliban go free if we could eliminate liberals
…
I am so curious about what is so wrong and ‘unamerican’ to actually care about other human beings, and care about right and wrong without the racist goggles on…
Posted by: sakul | June 6, 2007, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
I believe it was the French philospher Voltaire who first said: “I disagree with what you are saying, but I will die for your right to say it.” Patrick Henry restated this quote to the VA legislature as they considered a state constitution and one of his colleagues dissented. So it is today in the main of the free world.
But the Islamo-fascism does not hold this view. You have no right to say anything that does not fit the agenda of the all knowing Grand Mullah. You have only the right to die for Islam, or by Islam. The Mullah will tell you what you can say and when to say it. So it becomes Voltaire’s enlightenment versus Iran’s repressive intellectual slavery.
In the west, you can call Bush an idiot or denegrate Cheney. Try that in iran, Syria or N. Korea. Not!
Posted by: Jeff T. | June 6, 2007, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
The belief that the only evil in the world is America in general and George Bush in particular has reached the point of religious conviction for some of our friends on the left.
Thus any discovery that is reported supporting Iranian involvement in attacks must be suppressed since it doesn’t match deeply held beliefs.
It has become a cult.
Posted by: Peter I. | June 6, 2007, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
I’m sure this was all a case of mistaken identification. If they re-analyzed the evidence closely, there is no doubt they would see that the Iranians were shipping baby formula to those nice people throwing those pineapple look’n thingy’s
Posted by: Homer Simpson | June 6, 2007, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
TomBob….you would let the Taliban go free period! That’s why your type are more dangerous than the Taliban
Posted by: SickOfLiberals | June 6, 2007, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Until the Hitlerian regime in Iran is taken out, terror world wide will flourish, and efforts to stabilize Iraq and Afghanistan will not succeed. So the world and the US in particular needs to make a reckoning do we wait for terrible catastrophe world wide to occur or do we really commit ourselves to destroying this evil Nazi regime, which might include, a draft and getting all the democracies to commit troops, taking off the gloves really fighting and crushing radical Islam once and for all!
Posted by: Josh | June 6, 2007, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
WHAT WILL WE DO WHEN WE WAKE UP IN THE MORNING AND ONE OF OUR CITIES IS GONE. I THINK THE ARGUING WILL BE OVER.AMERICA WON’T WANT TO HEAR ABOUT PLAME OR ABU GRAIB OR HOW MUCH AMERICA SUCKS.
Posted by: GARY | June 6, 2007, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
MOreliberal bombing would correct the price tag. We spend too much money to try and be nice.
It’s time to cheapen this war and use some bigger bombs on larger targets.
Posted by: laugh | June 6, 2007, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Its like the article said, there’s no evidence, it was “analysis concluded”. Sort of like “We know Saddam has WMD”
Posted by: TomBob | June 6, 2007, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
AMERICA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT. THERE IS NO MIDDLE GROUND FOR TRAITORS. HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN, WE ARE AT WAR YOU BOZOS?
Posted by: elgraz | June 6, 2007, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Obviously, Saddam’s apologists and supporters have had to switch their allegiance to the mad mullahs of Iran. Blinded by partisan claptrap, they misuse history to support the killing of Americans and NATO soldiers in Afghanistan. These same people say use the UN instead. Well, the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan are there fighting Iran’s proxies under UN resolutions. So you only want to back the UN when it helps to keep the world safe for dictators. Shame on you. And the Democrats and the Left wonder why their patriotism is questioned.
Posted by: Chuck | June 6, 2007, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Josh said, “Until the Hitlerian regime in Iran is taken out, terror world wide will flourish, and efforts to stabilize Iraq and Afghanistan will not succeed. ”
So why didn’t the US attack IRAN in 2002, instead of Iraq?
Posted by: Eric | June 6, 2007, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
SickOfLiberal, its was the NeoCons under Reagan that armed and trained the Taliban so they could turn on us. O, wait a minute, it was Reagan that sold Arms to Iran too. O wait, who supported Saddam against the Iranians in the Iran Iraq War? I wonder? O, yeah, a NeoCon. Too Ric.
Posted by: TomBob | June 6, 2007, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Barry makes sense. He should advise the president.
Posted by: Fan | June 6, 2007, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
elgraz — No, actually we are not ‘at war’. Congress hasn’t declared ‘war’, as they are only government body capable of doing so, according to the constitution. What is happening in Iraq right now is the result of a unilateral invasion by the United States upon a sovereign nation. If you are going to discuss politics, at least get your facts straight.
Posted by: Eric | June 6, 2007, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
This piece is a sorry excuse for journalism …. no identifiable sources and no specific details of the allegation being made for us to make an informed decision as to it’s seriousness or credibilty. Sounds like another Bush WMD-like ploy.
Posted by: Rey | June 6, 2007, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Rey, that’s what I sad. There’s no “red-handed” evidence, the article say “analysis concluded” which means some NeoCon said so therefore it must be true! HAHAHAHA!!
Posted by: TomBob | June 6, 2007, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
God forbid any nation should meddle in the affairs of another…oh, I’m sorry, I forgot about the U.S. in Iraq (thrice), Afghanistan (twice), Iran, Sudan, Philippines, Somalia, Kosovo, Cuba, shall I go on? The U.S. gubmint isn’t always on the side of right folks. Deal with it.
Posted by: Philodemos | June 6, 2007, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
If Iran was, or is, such a threat
a) Why didn’t the US invade IRAN instead of Iraq?
b) Why did Col. Oliver North sell arms to Iran during the Iran Contra affair in the 1980′s? He did this, by the way, without authorization from any level of government. Col. North didn’t believe Iran was a threat (quite obviously, or else he would be selling arms to them under the table), so why should anyone else believe it?
Posted by: Eric | June 6, 2007, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
If the Republicans were “hoping and praying for a massive attack on American soil”, they’d have followed the Democrats advice on national security since 9/11, which would have assured that thousands would be dead by now.
Posted by: Brook | June 6, 2007, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
That prez of Iran is one of the guys who took our hostages in 1979. Left wing terrorist appeaser Jimmy, i’m a fool Carter was prez back then. Why did Iran do it. Bush wasn’t prez than.
You are a fool to believe that this evil man in Iran would not ship weapons to Iraq. And to the other fool Iraq is MAJORITY SHIA.
Pick up a decent newspaper once in a while LIBS
Posted by: Marcus Shelby | June 6, 2007, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
Josh said, “Saddam was also more directly involved in 9/11 than Iran”
Josh, thank you for confirming you know absolutely nothing about history, even recent history. How can Saddam be ‘more’ involved in 9/11 than ‘Iran’, when both parties had absolutely nothing (i.e. 0) to do with the event? 0 is not more than 0.
Instead of studying history, however, you neo-conservatives sure do know how to re-write it!
Posted by: Eric | June 6, 2007, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
Everybody talking and nobodys listening. Everybodys yelling and nobody hears….Tower of Babel 2007
Posted by: Joan | June 6, 2007, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
I’ve wasted so much time reading all the comments here. Everyone is so mad that the conversation has grown absolutely nonsensical. It’s almost an argument against democracy, given that people get so passionate and hateful, and can’t seem to understand one another even a little bit. This is real polarization here, and this is the way that nothing gets accomplished. Each side just fuels the other until it gets so extreme that everyone’s voice is diluted. What really have I accomplished reading your views? What have you accomplished posting them? No one’s mind has been changed even a little bit, people are only more entrenched. It occurs to me that this is what America’s enemies want, a country completely divided into lunatic-fringe camps that despise one another. Perhaps we need another world war, to help us all remember what’s serious and for real in this life. With no serious, immediate threat around, all Americans have to do is sit around and fight on the internet.
Posted by: G Scottolus | June 6, 2007, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
That prez of Iran is one of the guys who took our hostages in 1979. Left wing terrorist appeaser Jimmy, i’m a fool Carter was prez back then. Why did Iran do it. Bush wasn’t prez than
…
Look up the shah of iran, and the cia coup in the 50s.. That is why they did it.
Posted by: sakul | June 6, 2007, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
More bad facts.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad(The Iranian Pres.) may be many things but he wasn’t someone who captured American hostages, or held them back in 1979.
Look it up.
-GSD
Hey Brook:
Apparently you don’t even care to consider the sacrifices of the US armed forces because you don’t even know that they have died in service to our country at the behest of their misguided President. Because here’s your “thousands of dead” right here.
US troop death toll in Iraq is: *3503
In Afghanistan: *398
That doesn’t include the media and the civilian workers as well as the mercenary contractors.
Posted by: GSD | June 6, 2007, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
We had a CIA agent in Iran working on WMDs to make sure our country was safe. But, the VP of the US outed her–to get even politically.
You guys are claming that Iran is our enemy. Why aren’t you doing something about your VP committing treason that emboldened the enemy you fear so greatly?
Posted by: EmmyG | June 6, 2007, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
On the other hand, attacking Iran could have some positive outcomes. It would be fun to watch George W. Bush become the first president to lose three wars.
Posted by: David Blomstrom | June 6, 2007, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Eric:
What we do know is that Saddam had affiliations with Al-Queda i.e. training camps in Iraq at Salamn Haq with a BOEING 747 TRAINING TO TAKE OVER AN AIRPLANE WITH KNIVES. Yet we are so damn PC as to say there could never have been a connection of Saddam to 9/11. Regarding Iran many intelligence reports stated that key Al-Quida members are and were hiding out in Iran and that Iran is currently arming Al-Quidas operations in Iraq. But of course we could never dare accuse Iran of involvement in 9/11. Knowing history is not by picking and choosing what you want to know.
Posted by: Josh | June 6, 2007, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Folks need to look beyond Iran and realize that China, and to a lesser extent, Russia are backing them. Wherever we look that we in America have problems these days, China is lurking behind the scense. North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Sudan, even in Pakistan, the Chinese are pressing their strategy of influence expansion. They are encouraging countries and gruops to involve the US in 100 little brush wars to sap our strength and distract us from their expansionist aims. Yes, Iran is a problem, but who supplied them with uranium hexaflouride gas necessary for their enrichment activities, and missle technology through their proxies, the North Koreans? And who is supplying Iran with sophisticated air defense capabilities and a nuclear reactor? The Russiand. This is bigger than Iran, and it’s time we called a spade a spade.
Posted by: David | June 6, 2007, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Bush wants war with Iran like a baby wants a red wowwypop.
Posted by: festerous | June 6, 2007, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
GSD you are an appologist for the terrorists.
Fool, the Amercians taht were held hostage CONFIRMED the Iran Prez WAS one of the leaders pof the hostage takers.
Posted by: Marcus Shelby | June 6, 2007, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Why don’t this country (USA) if we want to win in this battle against all the bad guys just put our whole county on a war footing, like happened for world war 11
Posted by: Farancis Shean | June 6, 2007, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
… and in other news, the USA is still the biggest supplier of arms in the history of all civilization.
pot meet kettle, kettle meet pot
Posted by: Robert | June 6, 2007, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
If any nation attacked America on 9/11 it was Saudi Arabia…but the Bush family is friends with the Saud family so they will never ever ever ruin their financial relationships.
That is why I find it interesting that supposed conservatives are so easily duped.
The Saudis are funding Al Qaeda and Sunni militants in Iraq to this day.
Open your eyes.
-GSD
P.S. Yes, China is buying up the US debt and is laughing all the way to the bank. The US is getting outgamed by everyone because we think we know everything.
Posted by: GSD | June 6, 2007, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Saddam and Iraq gave SANCTUARY to one of the first world trade center bombers.
A terrorists training camp taught how to take over planes with box cutter knives. I fogot the name of the place.
Saddam’s agents met with Al Qeada agents in Yugoslavia.
Posted by: Marcus Shelby | June 6, 2007, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
I’m so proud of what must be so many
U.S. soldier/sailors/airmen/marines responding to this piece. Fear not, we the people of the U.S.(most of us stockholders in arms/munitions companies)will not let you down, we will continue to encourage our leadership to fight every country in the world
disagreeing with us in any way. Your careers are secure, you will be able to finish your 20, or more if you so desire.
Posted by: didmy20 | June 6, 2007, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
David: We are living in Alice-in-Wonderland where up-is-down and wrong-is-right and Marines consider those who send them in harms way with no plans to win, with insufficient protection, with unacceptable medical upon return, “supporting the troops.” And conversely, those who are trying desperately to take them out of the Chaos that is Iraq to safety, you consider your enemy and “un-American.” I don’t understand you. You are through the looking glass.
Posted by: EmmyG | June 6, 2007, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
By then we will all be dead.
Posted by: JJ
Some are already (brain) dead.
Posted by: skyreader7 | June 6, 2007, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Oh . . . My . . . God!!!
How much more stupid can you people possibly get? The Taliban murdered thousands of Afghan Shiites when they were trying to claw their way into power (just run a Google search on “Taliban massacre Hazaras”), and nearly started a war with Iran in the process.
This sort of neocon BS relies on people like you being lazy and stupid. Keep it up and you’ll have another war to cover, one against yet another country which had nothing to do with 9/11.
Posted by: Bill in Chicago | June 6, 2007, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
didmy20, maybe some people like killing terrorists. I don’t think that is wrong.
Posted by: Soldier | June 6, 2007, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
If the U.S. is loosing in Iraq why the hell would they want to extend them selfs to Iran?
Posted by: Doc | June 6, 2007, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
The United States of America will attack Iran when the President of the United States decides he wants to attack Iran. All the bickering in the world is not going to change that, neither in this chat room or in the halls of Congress. George has, for better or for worse, seized political control of the entire U.S. government and has made it clear that he plans on establishing a global Capitalistic hegemony by whatever means he sees fit; that is the nature of our current situation. You can rage against it or accept it… either way, the decision is not in your hands. Bleat all you like…
Posted by: Occasionally Correct | June 6, 2007, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Too bad Americans are too busy scoring political points instead of noticing that the world is getting mighty scary right now.
Posted by: US Cavalry | June 6, 2007, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Anyone cheering on attacking Iran better be prepared to take on Russia, China, Pakistan and India.
Posted by: Robert | June 6, 2007, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
Some people mentioning China here… I have to say, that is a much more serious threat than anyone else out there right now. Iran doesn’t have the power to do anything at this point. All they do is talk tough, but they know as well as we do that, given a reason, we would crush them. The US was wide-eyed and naive the first time they invaded a Mid-East power, but we’ve learned from that experience now, and the planning would be much more effective. Not perfect, but more effective. China, on the other hand– now there is a real threat. Every country in the world pours their money into The People’s Republic in exchange for cheap, low-quality garbage merchandise, and China takes a nice chunk of that money and puts it into their ever-growing, very modern (even futuristic) military. And they have millions upon millions more people to burn through there, if it came to a war with the US. What about the new long-range nuclear subs they’ve commissioned? Anyone on this forum concerned about that at all? Ask yourself– what could those subs be for? Why long-range nuclear subs? And those facts don’t come from anonymous sources. Plus, they have military hackers that are practicing against US military web systems every day. The people who think they are happy getting along with us because we’ve made their economy strong are very silly. If they’re so damn happy with us, why is their military buildup centered on a US defense/offense strategy? And what about Russia? Focusing on the fear of Iran is akin to the US primarily targeting Mexico during WWII. They are the bit player, they are full of meaningless threats and talk. The real dangers in the world keep their lips shut and try to act casual.
Posted by: G Scottolus | June 6, 2007, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
For those you “blame-America first” types out there that think this report is concocted by the current US administration… Learn something about the Middle East first before spoutng nonsensical gibberish. Iranian influence in the region is real and so is their goal of keeping the US/NATO influence in Afghanistan off-balance. The enemy of my enemy is my friend is alive and well.
Posted by: Pat Reagan | June 6, 2007, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Shelby, I try to answer your inanities as fast as you spew them out.
The Saudis, elements within the government, were the chief funders of Bin Laden. The Pakistanis, the country that has a dictator named Musharraff as the leader was the chief political sponsor of the Taliban.
Musharraff just signed a peace treaty with Taliban elements in Pakistan.
Saddam had no operational relationships with Al Qaeda.
P.S. Dick Cheney’s company, Halliburton just finished up working on contracts in Iran THIS YEAR! That’s right, Vice President Dick Cheney has been making money off the the “chief sponsor” of worldwide terrorism.
Heckuva job Dick.
-GSD
Posted by: GSD | June 6, 2007, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
I can’t believe some of the comments here.
Afghans are using our own weapons against us that we supplied? …what?
The US does not manufacture AK-47′s and RPG’s, or the variety of weapons found in use by the Taliban. These are weapons that are massively produced by the Russians and the Chinese, and then flooded throughout the 3rd world by the hundreds of millions.
The article clearly states that NATO forces tracked a convoy that traveled from Iran to an Afghan province before it was intercepted. Why are all these leftist anti-any-war-waged-by-a-capitalist country defeatists insisting that NATO is an unreliable source?
Posted by: Jon D. | June 6, 2007, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Bush, in his infinite “talking to God” wisdom, has Iran in his nuclear cross-hairs. Comforting, isn’t it?
Posted by: skyreader7 | June 6, 2007, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Oi, Robert– India’s on our side, mate. Pakistan is… Kind of, at least. Their government is (mostly), thought the people are not– lots of anti-US sentiment. China wouldn’t necessarily come to Iran’s defense, though the idea they are covertly aiding Iran is not an idea that would surprise me at all. If it’s true, its a major secret, and I don’t think they would formally go to war with us over Iran, even if they are helping them now. Russia doesn’t care if we bomb Iran, they are just using Iran right now for their own benefit.
Look at me— I’ve got sucked into all this, too. But I’m not bickering and arguing, at least. Just harmlessly sharing what I think.
Posted by: G Scottolus | June 6, 2007, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Jon D. wrote, “Why are all these leftist anti-any-war-waged-by-a-capitalist country defeatists insisting that NATO is an unreliable source?”
Maybe because NATO is led by the United States, which is in turn led by the most infamous liar on the planet???
Posted by: David Blomstrom | June 6, 2007, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
To Jack US Marine
People like you and your men bring a lump to my throat and make me feel proud to be an American. I thank you wholeheartedly for your courage and sacrifices to keep the rest of us safe. It does my heart good to know that there are true patriots out there defending us and our children. Thank you.
Posted by: Susie | June 6, 2007, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Pat Reagan: Cheney hasn’t been associated with Halliburton for SEVEN YEARS. Stop showing your stupidity.
Posted by: Cyrus Bear | June 6, 2007, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
THOU SHALT NOT KILL. Bush signing statement: Unless you want their oil.
Posted by: skyreader7 | June 6, 2007, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
So Iran is supplying explosives, weaponry, and aid to two nations we are at war with and we are not dropping 1 ton bombs on them daily because…??
Posted by: Joe | June 6, 2007, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
The US is blowing the game. Weakening our US military in the Mesopotamian sands of Iraq while the real geo-political war is being played behind our back.
Russia is sealing up “Stans” for energy and they’ll throw their lot in with China.
While the nitwits in America are making Bin Laden into a 10 foot tall giant–he is indeed a threat and needs to be found and killed no doubt, but we’ve swamped our military in the fools errand in Iraq.
China and Russia are forming the SCO, Shanghai Cooperation Organization…..the members Include Russia, China, the ‘Stans’, India and Iran is getting on board.
Yep, and Bush is pushing Russia into a defensive position too.
If someone were to try to destroy America more thoroughly I don’t think they could do a better job than Bush has done so far.
Weakened militarily, strained financially and divided within. Bin Laden is laughing out loud.
-GSD
Posted by: GSD | June 6, 2007, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Doesnt anyone remember that we supplied Iraq during its war with Iran?
Yea, less than $300M worth grand total over three years, and it stopped completely after the war ended. Whooptie do.
Here’s a newsflash for you — BRAZIL sold Saddam more military gear than the USA ever did. The French and Russians sold him billions worth.
Posted by: Ploof | June 6, 2007, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
“… and in other news, the USA is still the biggest supplier of arms in the history of all civilization.”
Wrong, liar. The US is the largest supplier of expensive high tech weapons to countries like Israel, and the western European nations. The most expensive does not equal the highest amount. Russia and China are the world’s largest suppliers of small arms, grenades, mines, etc, which kill far more people than 8 or 10 jets parked on Israeli runways.
Russia and China have flooded the middle east, east Asia, and the African continent with hundreds of millions of tons of land mines, AK-47′s, and rocket propelled grenades. The above listed locales are the most poverty addled, miserable, war torn places in the world, and the Russians and Chinese continue to cash in on it.
Posted by: Jon D. | June 6, 2007, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
“Maybe because NATO is led by the United States, which is in turn led by the most infamous liar on the planet???”
Except when a democrat is in charge, and we’re bombing Bosnians from several miles up, then they were the good guys right?
Posted by: Jon D. | June 6, 2007, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Gee I thought the war on terror was just a bumper sticker according to John Edwards, I guess its real and they want to kill our troops no matter how many liberals try to stick their heads in the sand. This of course is why the dems wont be taking the white house in 08.
Posted by: Dean Ayer | June 6, 2007, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Hey Bob, you run’n for president, you have my vote.
Posted by: Dave | June 6, 2007, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
India just purchased almost one billion dollars worth of tanks from….ta…da…Russia.
India is also going wobbly on their nuclear deal with ta..da…The US.
-GSD
Shelby, I didn’t say that Musharraff “created” the Taliban. I said that the Taliban were the client-state of Pakistan. Musharraff is a dictator and he’ll sell the US out if it saves his ass.
Posted by: GSD | June 6, 2007, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Pat Reagan: Cheney hasn’t been associated with Halliburton for SEVEN YEARS. Stop showing your stupidity.
Except that his stock options valued at $400,000 when he left Halliburton are now worth $5 million. Pretty good little profitable war. Go Cheney. Nuke Iraq. Maybe they’ll be worth $10 million.
Posted by: skyreader7 | June 6, 2007, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Time to declare war on Iran! Put the Shah’s son back on the throne, and give him Iraq, too.
Posted by: Mark | June 6, 2007, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
did anyone really believe they weren’t supplying weapons? Iran has gone nuts. They WANT Armageddon. They want to provoke a war with us to bring about the 12th imam. I don’t want to go to war with Iran either but I’m not going to be intellectually dishonest with myself either. Iran is run by a madman who openly admits he wants to wipe Israel off the map and that god is directing him to cause chaos to pave the way for the 12th imam. All you who think Iran is full of peace love and flowers need to wake up
Posted by: Keli | June 6, 2007, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
That is one of the saddest and funniest things I have ever read:
“Israel better start dropping nuclear bombs before the Middle East goes up in flames”!
Damn…..
-GSD
Posted by: GSD | June 6, 2007, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
God. The military has not been ‘weakend in the Mesopotamian sands of Iraq’. It appears to have been weakened b/c we have such a weak force over there.
It’s like Somalia. The US military is alarmingly small…true. The US military has always been alarmingly small…true.
You have ppl that know nothing of military history talking about “modern war”. Modern war began in the late 1400s. “Modern War” does not mean fewer men needed.
It may mean smaller actions, but that only means that the wars will be longer. No shorter. There will be very few cataclysmic battles. But, 140,000 men is not enough to do the job. The generals told Rumsfeld they needed 250,000 for the invasion.
If you need 250,000 for the invasion, how are you going to hold it with 140,000? This is no the defeat or weakening of the US. It’s simply the defeat of a stupid strategy that’s been defeated numerous times through history. For some reason civilians are in love with the idea of “small, fast moving, hard striking military units”.
Sorry, real wars don’t work that way. Smaller actions yes, but you still need the masses of men. Now we have a new strategy, and we’re trying to get the men over there.
Alright, say you bumped the troop strength up to 500,000 troops. That does not mean you have 500,000 men spraying at once. It means you set up rotations. Instead of guys spending 12-15 months all in one hot spot, they can spend 3 months, rotate out for a month, 3 more months, rotate out for a month.
This is why armies are large. This is what we are unable to do. You know, in WWI and WWII they were aware of what we call PTSD (they called it shell-shock). Guys rotate out, morale stays up, and all these ‘mental disorders’ will go away.
But what do I know, right?
Posted by: Jack-US Marine | June 6, 2007, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Sounds like more planting of evidence to me… We can’t get into war the old legit way.. Is Iran a possible threat? You bet… Is it our place to police the world? HELL NO! Until our yard is clean, lets stay out of our neighbors yard or even worse, our neighbors neighbor yard… Democracy isn’t for everyone…
Posted by: LHHGBH | June 6, 2007, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Brian Ross – Richard Clark,,, Ummm, these guys are trustworthy? OK, assume they are. Iran is digging their grave and I think it is about deep enough. Al-Sadr goes to Iran and he is the one causing most of the trouble in Iraq. We have evidence the roadside bombs in Iraq used to kill our troops are from Iran. This new info is the last straw… and it should be.
Posted by: Bill | June 6, 2007, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Iran will have to be dealt with sooner or later….might as well start helping with a little insurgency action inside Iran and give them a little back.
Posted by: John | June 6, 2007, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Remember: “The Enemy of my Enemy, is my FRIEND”
Posted by: Joe | June 6, 2007, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Jack,
I beg to differ.
By subjecting too small a force to too big a job and not replacing equipment it is indeed grinding the US military into the dirt.
Sure, the Air-force and the Navy are in top shape, but the Army is getting ground down and weakened.
It also doesn’t make America appear to be “strong” when we have the former Sec. of Defense telling the world that the US is dealing with a “handful of dead-enders” and the US military hasn’t dispatched said “handful” yet and the conflict is running into its fifth year.
The Generals wanted hundreds of thousands of troops to topple Saddam, but Rumsfeld and his neo-con nitwits like Doug Feith and Richard Perle wanted to topple Saddam with 50,000 troops. General Tommy Franks pushed and pushed to get the troop levels higher…but not high enough to topple Saddam and then pacify Iraq.
That’s what happens when ideological armchair warriors play war.
-GSD
Posted by: GSD | June 6, 2007, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Afghanistan is on Iran’s border. Mexico is on our border. So if Russia invades Mexico I guess it would not be fair for us to supply the Mexican resistance.
Posted by: joe | June 6, 2007, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
And suddenly, I realized it’s all about hate. Nobody’s listening. Isolationism (which is what a lot are supporting) no longer works. Sorry.
Alright, good night.
Posted by: Jack-US Marine | June 6, 2007, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
Dave,
I was quoting that other guy, then responding to him. Re-read what I said and scroll up a ways.
Posted by: Jon D. | June 6, 2007, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
Hey Joe: Ever heard of the Monroe Doctrine??? Oh I forgot, a liberal democrat repealed it (Jimmy Carter)
Posted by: todkahdohs | June 6, 2007, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Philodemus wrote:
“God forbid any nation should meddle in the affairs of another…oh, I’m sorry, I forgot about the U.S. in Iraq (thrice), Afghanistan (twice), Iran, Sudan, Philippines, Somalia, Kosovo, Cuba, shall I go on? The U.S. gubmint isn’t always on the side of right folks. Deal with it.
Posted by: Philodemos | Jun 6, 2007 9:36:17 PM
Yes, Phi.
God forbid that the USofA gather their resources and help the next muslim nation, wrought by a typhoon or tsunami or volcano.
In ’78 a typhoon did some serious damage to some areas of Luzon.
I and 12 other local, US MILITARY SOLDIERS, volunteered to bring ‘survival rations’ and clean water to these people.
Would you believe that some of the people we encountered actually STILL lived in HUTS, with none of the amenities that you would whine about not having..’cause it’s your RIGHT, as an American..yet they were ‘content’?
Hmm?
Posted by: Jon Ogrey | June 6, 2007, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
To David Blomstrom
The troops serving our country, as a whole, are courageous. They weren’t forced to go to battle. They chose to enlist knowing that they could lose their lives defending the rights of the rest of us. At the very least they have earned and deserve our gratitude. There are always going to be individuals on either side behaving dishonorably. That’s one of the things that make war so terrible.
My mother and her family survived the invasion of her country by American forces and saw and endured atrocities.
She, however, was intelligent enough to know that the actions of an individual or individuals did not make all Americans “bad”.
She even married one of the “enemy” and said that the coming of America to Japan was one of the best things to ever happen to her former country. She was proud of the day that she officially became an American citizen.
Posted by: Susie | June 6, 2007, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
GSD,
Exactly my point. You are seeing the defeat of a stupid strategy. Not the defeat of the US military.
And one can make the weak image work for them.
War is deception.
Posted by: Jack-US Marine | June 6, 2007, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
ian, you’re an idiot. The Iraqis DIDN’T have an elected government. Saddam was only called president hussein because he was the dictator and could call himself whatever he wanted.
Posted by: Russell | June 6, 2007, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Well, I just read Jack the Marine’s post, so before that beer I’ve got to say to him this:
The problem is politics, as I know you know. As you are aware, you are right about the numbers. It seems to me that Americans really don’t like to fight, despite what the Europeans think. If you poke us in the eye with a stick enough, then, yeah– we’ll fight. But we didn’t want to fight in WWI, or WWII. We were weak at the start of both of those wars, and went back to being weak immediately afterward. Since the 50′s, all we ever muster up is half-assed commitments. It’s like the politicos send the military into war, but don’t want them to actually win. Why is that? In Vietnam there were so many damn restrictions that all the odds were against us. The politicians might as well have just taken all those soldiers and shot them into space, it might have been cheaper. All these rules that restricted what they could do, were they could go, etc. And the same thing over and over. Then we get to the modern day where they won’t green-light enough soldiers to get a job done. Every soldier I’ve heard from in Iraq has complained about this because they know. Why doesn’t this go up the chain of command? Why doesn’t anything change? Why do they send you to fight and then fetter your feet? Its bleeding national suicide. Why go to war this way? I’m so PO’d just thinking about it. I’ll drink a beer in your honor, Jack. Not that this means anything, but its the least I can do.
Good night.
Posted by: G Scottolus | June 6, 2007, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Anyone who thinks we have the manpower to start fighting another country is really foolish. We are not bullet proof. Our soldiers are not bullet proof. Not only that, we haven’t even started paying for our current predicament. In every age there is one country that has a time to be supreme. In the past, what has brought down every single dominant civilization is overreaching. If we hope for there to be a country for our children and grandchildren we are going to have to face some facts.
1) We cannot afford to fight the entire middle east
2) Iran may very well be supplying arms to our enemies but short of taking another step towards world war III we cannot bomb them. Nobody in the world would sit still for that. Really, nobody would.
3) We have already angered a good portion of the next generation of Arab men. When the twelve and thirteen year old boys in the Middle East grow up and start running those countries, we might very well be screwed anyway.
4) As long as the oil we need is under their feet, there will be chaos in that region.
5) I find it interesting that some of the people who yell the loudest about Islam don’t realize that Fundamentalist Christians have also perpetrated terrorist type attacks here in Amreica. Oklahoma City was not carried out by a God fearing Christian. Maybe we should go into the countryside and round up all of the Militias. They are armed and they don’t recognize the American govenment…Oh wait, they’re not really a threat to anyone. Are you kidding me?
6) America is a great country founded with great hope, but it is a work in progress. We have done some amazing things, screwed up some things in a big way and come out even in other arenas. WE are not gods. The people of the middle east are not devils. This is not a struggle between ultimate right and ultimate wrong. Anyone who believes they have all the answers is scary and should not be in power…no matter what they espouse. Leave infalibility to the Pope. He doesn’t actually have the power to make anybody do anything.
Posted by: Donna | June 6, 2007, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
My god I can’t believe the state of paranoia in this country. Yes we’ve made mistakes and will make them again until hindsight becomes foresight. But a statement like ” These people do not have a common cause. They have been at odds with each other since the 7th century.” is just the kind of apathy they are counting on by the American voters. The “common cause” is they want to kill Americans and Jews and anyone that wants to bring democracy to their regions. Oh well lets just bury our heads in the sand and enjoy our liberties as long as we can cause it’s gonna change if we don’t. Call me paranoid or a realist. I choose for us to fight the war there instead of here and IT IS A WAR for freedom from the likes of what we have never known. Have at it boys.
Posted by: David K | June 6, 2007, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Bush and his vice president are trying to create another false report and ….
to bring the world another WAR.
congratulation to bush and his adminstration.
Posted by: yordoshbek | June 6, 2007, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
The Iranians are killing our troops and have declared war on the US yet the libs and there Defeatocrat friends in Congress refuse to do ANYTHING about it. Are the Libs afraid of Iran??? If you don’t think the US Air Force can lay a world of hurt on Iran in a matter of days, then you don’t know much about the power of the US Military. The problem is the Dems and their Allies refuse to fight.
Posted by: Ed Stanowicz | June 6, 2007, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
How do we know the Iranians aren’t working for us MEK proxies trying to start neo-con war for warmongers
Posted by: truthfool | June 6, 2007, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Thanks for the beer.
Abu Ghraib. Stupid army jerks pull stupid crap, and the war turns PC. The American public now eats up any allegation of American torture. White Phosphorous (by the way, have you seen WP? It doesn’t char your entire body like the ‘victims’ they show)
Americans will fall for anybody else’s propaganda just so they can say they didn’t fall for America’s. And then these people want to clap me on the back and tell me how proud they are of my service?
What do you know?
Posted by: Jack-US Marine | June 6, 2007, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Ed,
Maybe the Iranians will use some of the missiles that Fox News reporter and noted Republican Senate Candidate Oliver North sent to Iran by the planeloads.
-GSD
Posted by: GSD | June 6, 2007, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
The clock it ticking on the Iranians – let’s face it with us out of the way they will inherit superpower status in the Middle East – forget that we made this Frankenstein through a failed and blind sided foreign policy that dates back 50 years. We are dealing in the now and we all better realize that until we have a deliverable alternative energy source (which we don’t) we have to make the best of a bad situation. It may sound crude but this is our reality. Yes, I was once young and idealist but now I’m a freethinking realist.
Iran has to be neutralized there is no other choice. We will use cruise missiles and take out their air defenses and the Israelis and USAF will take out their nuclear program perhaps {Israel)covertly. Both borders should be sealed off in the meantime – this would help stabilize Lebanon, assist in defanging Hamas who if they really wanted a piece of the pie should be talking peace (whether they mean it or not – it works for Israel) instead of acting so militant.
The media storm will build up over the next 12 months and this should happen sometime in the spring. Just in time to help the downtrodden Republican party win the election. Watch how this make Rudy the man to stop in November.
This time the media won’t make the same mistakes that they did in the buildup to the Iraqi fiasco. These people learn from their mistakes believe me.
Posted by: Peter from NJ | June 6, 2007, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
“5) I find it interesting that some of the people who yell the loudest about Islam don’t realize that Fundamentalist Christians have also perpetrated terrorist type attacks here in Amreica.”
Seriously, I’m scratching my head here trying to figure out when the last time was a Christian, Mormon, Baptist, etc beheaded someone on tv, or crashed airplanes into skyscrapers and killed thousands of people.
Tim McVeigh was a disgruntled American ex-vet, but not a Christian.Yes I’m sure we have so much to fear from all those rhubarb pie eating Christians in the midwest, don’t we?
Posted by: Jon D. | June 6, 2007, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Has anyone heard anything about the G8 summit meetings? I was wondering if Bush has launched any backrubs yet.
Posted by: skyreader7 | June 6, 2007, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Unfortunately a direct attack on Tehran WILL be perceived as a direct attack on Islam as a whole. Even more unfortunate is that BOTH countries have a religious zealot in the seat of power. If we go in, we had better be prepared for WW III/Armageddon, which may very well be what the zealots on both sides want.
Even if their side happens to worship the “right” god, if I were them I wouldn’t want to have to answer to that god for my earthly actions. It doesn’t take a genius to think that this is not what any god would want for the children said god is purported to love like a parent loves their child.
Posted by: kyodz | June 6, 2007, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
“Gunny we’re doing right, ain’t we?”
“I don’t know, son.”
“Our people are with us, right?”
“Nope, we’re on our own again, son.”
“Why, Gunny?”
“Hell, look on the bright side son. At least they won’t get in the way.”
Posted by: Jack-US Marine | June 6, 2007, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Hey CB: You forget a liberal democrat outlawed Tactical Nukes, especially the Neutron variety that would leave the oil fields intact………(Jimmy Carter again)
Posted by: Todkahdohs | June 6, 2007, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Wow? I’ll bet this same headline appeared in the Russian newspapers in the early 80′s except that it was the USA sending the weapons to what we called “freedom fighters”. What a joke!
The more things change, the more they remain the same.
Posted by: Steve Fitter | June 6, 2007, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
To Canadian Friend
You seem to have gotten my meaning very clearly. The things you mentioned are what I was subtly implying. Yes, there are atrocities committed from all camps.
Some of our own have committed horrors.
The Japanese committed horrors. The Germans committed horrors. The British committed horrors. The Italians committed horrors. It goes on and on and on. War is terrible but sometimes we are forced to fight.
My reason for sharing with you what my mother said was to give an example of why we should not judge the whole by the actions of the few (comparatively). I hope this clears up my meaning for you.
Posted by: Susie | June 6, 2007, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Here’s the BIG PROBLEM: The Bush admin couldn’t defeat and occupy New Jersey.
Posted by: skyreader7 | June 6, 2007, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Oh and by the way, any of you out there who think that there aren’t any “Christian terrorists” I’ve got two words for you…Eric Rudolph. Here’s a few more…Ku Klux Klan.
Posted by: kyodz | June 6, 2007, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Yeah, Big Lib! Let’s elect a democrat, then we can start paying more taxes and stop this major economic boom.
Good
Posted by: GW | June 6, 2007, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
this must be BS:
1- a good friend in Basrah emailed that “the war with Iran will be founght in basrah”–NOT Afghanistan;
2- al qaeda =sunni iran=shia no go!!
3-remember that saddam=secular alqaeda=wacko sunni again no go
(but didnt the clinton admin document several linkages in aug 98 beteween al qaeda & iraq in the chem weapons facility in sudan–as reported in the neocon NYT–and to my knowledge NEVER discredited!)
so…may…just maybe Iran is upping the ante in their proxy war against us??
nah….its just a Huffpo conspiracy!!!
Posted by: marbiol | June 6, 2007, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Lets see: The Iranians have bombed three embassies (proven)
they have taken hostages (held for 444 days)
They have attacked and taken territory of the United States (and continue to hold it) and have made it the headquarters of their Revolutionary Guards. (anybody remember that a US Embassy is part and parcel if the US just like New York , well maybe not New York)
What more reason do we need? They declared war on us in 1979
Posted by: Todkahdohs | June 6, 2007, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
“as reported in the neo-con NYT”
…Hahahahaaaaaaa! Neo-con NYT, hahahahhaaa!
I can’t believe someone actually said that!
I guess if you’re far enough to the left, then everything looks right to you. Congratulations, you win the Ted Rall/Danny Glover/Alec Baldwin/Fidel Castro award! Very much good, comrade! Viva La Revolucion!
And on that note I shall go to bed, if I laugh any harder I won’t be able to sleep.
Posted by: Jon D. | June 6, 2007, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Completely BS article … smells worse than the lead up to Iraq. Post-Iraq, named sources are required for any allegation against a sovereign nation.
Sick to my stomach … neither Dem nor Repub.
Posted by: moderate outrage | June 6, 2007, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
“contained the same fake U.S. markings found on explosives recovered from insurgents operating in the Baghdad area.” ….contained the same fake U.S. markings…..the same fake U.S. markings…. same fake U.S. markings….same U.S. markings….U.S. markings…..U.S…………and who is behind this again????
Posted by: JAS | June 6, 2007, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Hey Jon D! How do you define a terrorist? What’s the difference between a car bomb and a laser guided bomb when both kill civilians? Oh? I guess it is the “I must have made a mistake” wink, wink.
War is a waste. It is a waste of money, a waste of lives, a simple waste of everything involved. It accomplishes nothing.
America has probably 3 to 6 Muslims living here. If Muslims were violent by nature, something would have happened. Ironically, it is the Muslims that have been the victims in this country.
Posted by: Steve Fitter | June 6, 2007, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
The problem with the article is that it automatically assumes that the Iranian government is behind the arms shipments. That bias is like assuming the Columbian and Peruvian governments are behind all the marijuana and cocaine shipments flooding the United States.
Undoubtedly, there are many freelance arms dealers in the Middle East. Most of the arms listed in the article are pretty common in the black markets of that region and Africa.
Posted by: s.n.b. | June 6, 2007, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
I’m addicted to this forum like a fiend on crack!
But I had to absolutely finalize my posting by stating that it is pretty obvious that Iran is supplying arms to Iraq. I don’t see why that is hard for anyone– even a self-brainwashed person– to believe. If you are an innocent enough person to trust Ahmadinejad.. Well, give me your number because I want you to invest in a fund I’ve set up to help… Uh… The Venezuelan Palestinian people… For real, some people would trust any dictator’s lies, even the really bad ones that are easily disprove. Ahmadinejad is a brilliant mind, he is a much more formidable opponent that Hussein ever was, and he is driven by an ideology of religious extremism that his American sycophants can’t begin to start to even vaguely imagine. He is so extreme that some of the Imams are turning against him because he’s acting a fool. His people (especially the youth) don’t care for him, either. But, besides this, there is the fact that, even if the Iranian government is not directly responsible for arms imports, Iran is a country chock full o’ nuts– this type or the other. Firstly you have people who don’t care about sides, they just care about money. These people smuggle weapons partially for cash, partially because some people enjoy smuggling things because it’s a rush. Then you’ve got all the radical fundamentalists who do it because they think its the holy thing to do because they are fighting evil. And then you have the people who aren’t as fundamentalist, they just despise the Allies because we’re in their country and, for better or worse, they don’t like this presence. There’s a giant border that’s easier to pass through than the Rio Grande (well…). And, even if it comes out conclusively with ultimate, de facto proof that Iran is smuggling munitions, the US isn’t going to start a war. If we absolutely need to, we will stage some air strikes. The US is in no mood for another ground war. So get your knickers out of the knots they are in. No matter how many people pop on to this forum and yell “Nuke Iran”, we’re not actually going to do this. Now everyone should log off and have a smoke. Because I can’t keep sitting here reading your comments all night!
Posted by: G Scottolus | June 6, 2007, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
I love how this story pops up right after last night’s presidential debates which turned into a hypothetical war debate, with twelve individuals discussing how they would invade Iran and with what type of weaponry. Now that we’ve discussed how we’ll be invading Iran, hypothically of course, the media can flood us with news stories about Iran’s malicious intents..sounds like what occurred directly after september 11th, doesn’t it?
Posted by: A disgusted citizen | June 6, 2007, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Funny how abc is bashed for supporting conservative causes in one comments section while being criticized as ultra liberal in another. We were all to blame for what led up to the iraq war.
Posted by: abacab | June 6, 2007, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
“War is a waste. It is a waste of money, a waste of lives, a simple waste of everything involved. It accomplishes nothing.”
Posted by: Steve Fitter | Jun 6, 2007 11:07:12 PM
“War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.” – John Stewart Mill
Posted by: harpo | June 6, 2007, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
To John Ogrey
I thought it was very clear which side I’m on. Well, I suppose some people need it spelled out clearly so here it is: I’m an American and I’m proud of it. If that marks me as an easier target then have at it. I’ll be proud to take the hit for the
the American cause.
Posted by: Susie | June 6, 2007, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
surprise.
Posted by: sjl127 | June 6, 2007, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
It’s howlingly funny to see how many half-wits here are screaming about how Iran is a threat to Western civilization! They want nothing more than to be left alone, which they would be if they were fortunate enough to have no oil under their land. I can only hope that they have enough sense to fill their wells with cement when they’re attacked, making the entire enterprise pointless and leaving the US empty handed! For the amount of money that the US has wasted attempting to steal the oil of the world, they could’ve built and installed enough PV’s to make us an oil EXPORTER!! Then again, Bush and his entire administration are OIL people, not PV people, right?
Posted by: More American Than You! | June 6, 2007, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Well you know that they were going to do something or be set up doing something so we can take military action! Could have been a country of small innocent woodland creatures but since they have the 3rd biggest oil supply in the world and would not buy U.S. debt like the saudis, they were always going to get it but Bush and co. People wake up—this has never been about terrorism!
Posted by: Bill Hicks | June 6, 2007, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Dear Jack:
Thank you for your informed opinion. It’s glaringly apparent that yours is the only authoritative opinion on this board, AEB the facts you have witnessed first hand or have received from first hand witnesses. If you were to give your permission, I would submit a copy of this to the Letter to the Editor section of my local paper, here in the mountains beyond broadband. Also, you have got to be the most articulate Marine I have ever encountered, and I worked with many. Wish I could be there with my Unit One, but Uncle Sammy told me no dice, my running days are over. God bless all of you, and Semper Fi!
(A computer tech remembering his days as a Field Corpsman.)
Posted by: Maccabee | June 6, 2007, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
If anyone thinks Iran is not involved in any process which will at least be a thorn in the side of the US military and help them achieve their goal as the dominant force in the region they are not aware of geo-politics in this part of the world. It sounds like everyone wants to blame the problems of the worlds nations on things we have done and this is not true. Iran wants us as a nation to fail in this struggle because they then come in and fill the power vacuum. The fact that anyone can write these blogs is what this country is all about.Go to china and see if anyone in the goverment will tell you anything about what happened to the young man in front of the tank in Teinamen square or what is Putin so afraid of today with his clamp down on democracy. If the left wingers don’t like things in this country so much like Mr. Baldwin why don’t they leave?? Oh yeh Baldwin is still here but why didn’t he do what he said he would do and do us all a big favor and those who think this country is so bad should go and live in one of those nations ,(maybe with alec Baldwin),where people are without simple basic human rights.
Posted by: TD | June 6, 2007, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
A Country sooo divided. It has come to this.. The only way we can collectively
become one nation again is to have a
horrible act of war delt to us on our homeland. So if this is what it’s going to take.. I hate to say that I hope it comes soon. When it does, I pray the target is missed and it effects a low populated area. God bless those we will lose, they will be lost, but our country will be ours again.
Posted by: troy | June 6, 2007, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
you guys ust be nuts to not think that Iran is not supplying terrorist with weapons(any weapons) they are killing anyone who does not follow there rules open your EYES
Posted by: simon | June 6, 2007, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Bomb THE AXIS OF EVIL NOW…..
Posted by: BigDog | June 6, 2007, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Humans are a contentious lot. Always fighting and bickering. Countries do it… people posting blogs do it.
Perhaps if we get rid of the people, we can finally get some Peace.
Posted by: Darn | June 6, 2007, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Thanks, Doc.
You have my permission.
Semper Fi.
Posted by: Jack-US Marine | June 6, 2007, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
The U.S. government has always been able to trick the American Public into supporting them for their own motives. What hard evidence suggests that two ancient enemies are in cahoots with fighting the U.S. ? The government tells us what we want to hear.
Posted by: Q | June 6, 2007, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
I find myself appalled reading these comments. ABC is reporting that Iran is funnelling weapons to a declared enemy of the United States, and fully half the commenters here are outraged at those dagnabbed neocons.
The truth is the truth. It is not pretty, it is not hopeful, it is not fearsome. It does not care whether you know it or not. It simply is.
Right now, the truth, if you believe this article, is that Iran is waging a committed-but-covert war against the United States. What you think about that is up to you, but denying that it’s happening and offering a neocon/media conspiracy as an alternative scenario is a crime against your own intelligence.
Posted by: HitNRun | June 6, 2007, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Iran would never do this . . . Iran loves the world, Iran wants peace for all.
The US is Evil while Iran is love and peace for all.
Posted by: Wes | June 6, 2007, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
The more I watch ABC the more disgusted I become with it, especially with Brian Ross, it has to do with STYLE, like the headline not in par with story and another example “DC Madam tells all”, Tells what? Your STYLE sucks, and let’s not forget about telling our enemies our secrets!
Posted by: john | June 6, 2007, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Bush bashers, America elected him twice. We did so because he is a man who does what he thinks is right. You call him stupid but he had better grades then Kerry in college. He was smart enough to be elected president twicw and Gore,Kerry,and Edwards were not. 3,000 dead americans in 5 yrs well the battle of the Bulge took 90,000 americans in thirty days and we won that war! No liberals back then just Americans.
Posted by: ScottUSArocks! | June 6, 2007, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
All we did was destroy Iran’s two main enimies and give rise to a huge Persian Empire. Thatcher and Ron are my heroes…am no lefty…but this administration has just mucked it up. We should never have gone to Iraq is point one. Point two is even if you think it was the right move, the execution is a joke. There are basic rules on fighting limited war in the 20th century that has been ignored and those who spoke up are toast.
Posted by: cws | June 6, 2007, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
This sounds an awful lot like the kind of cooked info which got us into Iraq, now being uncrated to get hostilities going in time for the Bush adminstration to use a war to elect a new republican administration with a hsyteria of patriotic fervor next year.
Posted by: Randy Phillips | June 6, 2007, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
I’ve served in both Iraq and the ‘Stan. I’ve heard those on the left give hope to the enemies I faced with their expressions of retreat, withdrawal, call it what you will; it all serves to fulfill Bin Laden’s predictions. He says we have a glass jaw as a nation…that the US is morally weak in the face of adversity. Well, by pulling every political stunt possible to limit our efforts in these wars, the left is playing straight into those very predictions.
And the bottom line is: The enemy is heartened by this. A successful effort to end our involvement will spark a terror recruiting drive that will dwarf the one alleged to have occured by our wars…watch.
Now I believe in the bill of rights far more than most. Freedom of speach is a wonderful thing. But all too often those who use this freedom the most refuse any and all responsibility for their words. The retreat-at-all-costs crowd is a classic example of this utter lack of a sense of responsibility for the spoken word. Newsflash: You can say anything you want, but those listening have the right to take it, leave it, or plan wars against us with it. You are responsible for your words…like it or not.
To hear these folks wrap themselves in “care for the troops” makes me sick to my stomach…that is not as ridiculous as it is repulsive for a fantastical rationalization.
In the end, I fear that the drumbeat of the left will eventually hold sway. In an ironic turn, those who will bleat the loudest for our defeat also reside in the most lucrative target areas.
I also fear that one day I will say “told ya so…” to a smoldering blue county turned crater…
Yuck it up lefties. I wish you well in the aftermath of those who will surely follow your beloved forces home from the “not the war terror.”
And, yes, Sunni and Sh’ia have worked together. In Najaf, there is a Hezbollah office open and running with ties to sunni insurgents. Odd that, eh?
Posted by: Joe | June 6, 2007, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
Bag sniper, I owe you a beer! God bless there are still real people out there!
Posted by: ScottUSArocks! | June 6, 2007, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
This all sounds like a job for Nancy Pelosi. Having flown to Syria and spoken with Asad, she has the foreign policy experience to make real headway with the Iranians. She needs only put on her headscarf and go talk with the folks in Iran and explain that not everyone in the US is a war monger like GW Bush. That should due the trick. If for some strange reason they are not pacified, we could also send a larger Democratic contingent to make the case. Once we have dialog and understanding the misunderstanding will be cleared up and all will sweetness and light!
Posted by: craig | June 7, 2007, 12:00 am 12:00 am
To Jon Ogrey: I don’t know how this turned from a debate about attacking sovereign countries to providing humanitarian relief. Anyway, my point was that our gubmint can’t very well admonish (read: attack) Iran for doing the same thing our gubmint has been doing for over 50 years. Did I mention Afghanistan and how our CIA was there with their check books and Stinger missles when Russia invaded? And who did we write those checks to?…
wait for it…
Osama bin Laden!
One man’s, err, nations’ freedom fighter is another nations’ terrorist.
Posted by: Philodemos | June 7, 2007, 12:01 am 12:01 am
“It is inconceivable that someone else is doing it” does not constitute proof. Remember the WMD? Remember the Condi Lies? DON’T BELIEVE THESE PEOPLE. All they can do is lie.
Posted by: jpowalski | June 7, 2007, 12:04 am 12:04 am
It’s amazing how much more people think they know than we who have been there. Did you ever read All Quiet on the Western Front?
Remember the scene where the old men are talking about how to win the war, and then they ask the soldier. He tells them and they tell him he doesn’t know what he’s talking about?
Ya’ll are the old men. You’d be surprised what Sunni and Sh’ia have done together. But I keep forgetting all of you know everything. You’ve read books and internet sites.
Never can tell what will happen, and what won’t get reported. As my previous post states, all of you know Iraq is a failure, and yet none of you know anything about Iraq.
Posted by: Jack-US Marine | June 7, 2007, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Irans terrorist government is the terrorist funding source. They fund proxies everywhere, including Europe (Kosovo), Chechnya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Africa, and South America. In war, you destroy the sources of strength of the enemy. Irans government must be defeated. We must support those freedom-loving Iranians that don’t want to live in the 7th century. To those who think America doesn’t have support, your wrong. There are millions of people out there who support the ideals that America was founded on: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. We will support them after we destroy tyranny.
Posted by: Ron Y. | June 7, 2007, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Maybe the US should start sponsoring a couple insurgent groups in Iran. I am sure there is plenty of surplus explosives in iraq that can be used to blow up ahmedenejads palaces in tehran
Posted by: Gary | June 7, 2007, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Philodemos, as someone who was tangentially involved with the effort to support/supply the mujahadeen against the Soviets, you’re dead wrong on the claim that the US was funding Osama Bin Laden. If you want to understand the process a little better there are many sources available. I think Lawrence Wright’s book “the Looming Tower” does a great job of detailing Bin Ladens role in Afghanistan. Truth be told he was a bit player of minimal import. Arabs were basically non-entities in Afghanistan and were largely disliked and looked down upon by the Afghans who held them in contempt for their lack of toughness and military value. Bin Laden’s support was almost exclussively valuable for sending arabs to afghanistan for which they tended to perform terribly. The US did not give money or material support to OBL (while the Saudis did). Contrary to the post Soviet/Afghan mythology, Arabs were poor soldiers and played only a very minimal role in the conflict. The CIA funneled stingers largely through “offices” in peshawar pakistan and tactical officers did go into Afghanistan for training.
OBL was a non-entity, a hanger on of Shaikh Azzam, a wannabe.
If you’d like to get a good read on the truth, read Wright’s book, he nails it on the head or ask me and if I know, I’ll tell you and if not I’ll tell you as well.
Posted by: craig | June 7, 2007, 12:18 am 12:18 am
Yes the war is messy! Is it George Bush’s fault? No that lie’s on the media and the democrats who embolden our enemies. The truth is, when the time is right and we go after Iran we already have 150,000 troops in Iraq. Bases in Afganistan and Bases in UAE,Saudi Arabia,Kuwait,Oman,Bahrain Turkey and Quatar. I like My Presidents’s Strategy so far, the Generals need to clean up their execution of the war. With no support from congress or the media my President and the U.S. Military are doing the best they can!
Posted by: ScottUSArocks! | June 7, 2007, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Curious comments from some who disbelieve that the same Iranian govt that openly supports terrorist organizations would send weaponry,explosives to the Taliban and those fighting in Iraq. Iran’s support includes funding, providing safe haven, training, and weapons to a wide variety of terrorist groups including Lebanese Hizballah, HAMAS, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, al-Aksa Martyrs and the Popular Liberation Front for Palestine-General Command. The list of Hezballah related murders of Americans is long (241 during the marine barracks in Lebanon alone).
In addition, this is the same govt that thinks it is okay to kill authors who write offensive things or stone women and girls who are said to have committed adultry. Iran denies its citizens free speech and assembly while Iran and Syria both conspire to weaken Lebonon so they can control southern Lebanon for its proxy war with Israel.
As Afghanistan and Iraq are Iranian neighbors with Shiite populations, why is it so strange to think that Iran would seek to drive out a country for which they hold a messianic hatred of?? Keep in mind, nearly 1/4 of Afghanistan is Shiite and Iran supported the mujahadeen and Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. In Iraq, Shiites constitute a clear majority. Iranian/Taliban involvement fits their modus operandi, is consistent with previous desires of increasing their regional influence, is supported by the detainment of iranian quds special forces in Iraq and is lastly consistent with their religious world view. So people who think Iran is not involved are only fooling themselves. Folks should not be blinded by their hatred of George Bush or US foreign policy to the extent to which they deny simple facts and deductions that are staring them in the face. ockham’s razor: “Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate”, which translates as “entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily” or put another way, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one.
Posted by: craig | June 7, 2007, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Uh huh… right
Posted by: OcalaPatriot | June 7, 2007, 12:25 am 12:25 am
I think I am getting the hang of this anti American movement.
That damn United States is always causing trouble because their freedoms make them arrogant. Iran supplies weapons to the Teliban and Al-Quada and the USA is at fault. The US gets attacked and it is a US foreign policy matter. Bush is to blame for every terrible act committed against humanity. Those poor homicide bombers blow themselves up because Bush and his evil empire have forced them into poverty and they have no other choice. Iran’s statements to destroy Israel and non-Muslims are a problem the US started and even North Korea is a poor victim of the USA.
Opps almost forgot:
Our Government blew up WTC7 even if an independent and extensive investigation proved otherwise. (Never believe official documents since Bush can possibly create them.)
I believe every Anti-American (American) here thinks it is their god given right to blame Bush and Blame the USA for >everything<. If blaming the USA makes you sleep better at night then so be it. I for one will not be the victim you want me to be. I am an American, I am proud of who I am and I will stand for my people and people who cannot stand for themselves.
An eye for an eye makes the week and unarmed blind.
Posted by: Martin | June 7, 2007, 12:33 am 12:33 am
How many Americans realize that a war begun by a Republican Presidency is nothing other than a thinly veiled attack on the American treasury–ie. tax monies?
Posted by: peter stark | June 7, 2007, 12:49 am 12:49 am
The enemy of my enemy, is my friend.
Posted by: Richard | June 7, 2007, 12:53 am 12:53 am
People should know that the genocide in darfur is being done with our weapons.That is why no steps in because that would tarnish the u.s image.But heaven forbid that other countries do the same thing than they are called the”axis of evil” how hypocritical.
Posted by: derekj | June 7, 2007, 12:53 am 12:53 am
More fact-free Cheney porn from the conservative mainstream media.
Posted by: Marc Valdez | June 7, 2007, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Feel proud to be an American? Feel like the image we present the world is one to feel good about? Wonder why Oprah has a show talking about anorexia and why it is such a mystery only to cut to a commercial of skinny beautiful women? Wonder why we talk about abortion being about a women’s right to choose a life unencumbered by the responsibility of a child, but we don’t talk about men needing to be responsible for the act of creating a human life? What do you see in our culture that doesn’t make sense? To be clear, I do not believe we have brought these attacks on ourselves or that we deserve it. However it does not mean there is not truth in what some critics say.
Posted by: Jeremy | June 7, 2007, 12:59 am 12:59 am
Ayatollah you so.
Armageddon ready. Are you?
Posted by: Joseph Spammolino | June 7, 2007, 1:02 am 1:02 am
Hard to believe you can be this shameless after the Iraq adventure.
Whatever happened to investigative journalism? Or just journalism, for that matter…
Posted by: redstaterenegade | June 7, 2007, 1:05 am 1:05 am
US troops should be fighting and good at fighting, en masses. Having them engaged in nation building and guerrilla warfare in Iraq is misuse, underuse and abuse of their capabilities- like launching a Tomahawk to kill mosquitoes. It’s not work. While we still are there,let’s march on Tehran, topple its Mullah government, eviserate its Revolutionary Guard troops and destroy its nascent nuclear capability. Thus we turn Afghanistan, Iran and Iraq into a contiguous stage. Then we pull our troops to the perimeter, let these three peoeple sort things out in self determination -rock, scissors and paper, Sunni, Shi’ite and Persian.
Posted by: Kevin | June 7, 2007, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Gee Wayne, I never realized how uninformed I was until the bright shinning light of your post illuminated the deep dark recess of my white matter. If I’d only read more, admit my collective guilt and seek the forgiveness of my friends and enemies…maybe…just maybe we can all get along.
Seriously, like any massive star, the sheer weight and gravity of our country does cause others to rotate in our orbit and sometimes with dire consequences (some intended and unintended).
Sometimes the perceived political necessities of the time have resulted in bad results. It is a simple fact of nature that powerful countries have a disproportionate influence on the world around them, economically, politically and culturally. Moreover, we and our elected representatives are imperfect creatures. Sometimes we get it right and sometimes we get it wrong.
Having said that, we have largely been a force of good and from an historical perspective, the US has been fairly good natured and benign.
I, like millions of others, have served in a military capacity for the US. The military as a whole is fairly reflective of the society from which they are drawn. By and large American service men and women are good people who generally go the extra mile to try and do well by others.
Posted by: craig | June 7, 2007, 1:07 am 1:07 am
Most of you people, taught by the American education system, don’t have a clue. All you know is “America bad…everyone else good..”. Time to grow up, look around and learn that the rest of the world, even some of our allies, would like to see us dead. Why? Simply because we are who we are and they aren’t. And soon, unless there is a real attitude adjustment by my fellow countrymen, they may just get their wish. Thank God I am old and won’t be around to see the results of the foolish idiocy that is put forward as “right” thinking by an ill informed and self hating group of very foolish people. Good luck.
Posted by: Richard | June 7, 2007, 1:10 am 1:10 am
The fact the Iranian intelligence agents have been caught in both Iraq and Iran seems to have escaped your minds. If that wasn’t enough, the tactics that have been used by fighters in both Iraq and Iran have been linked to Iranian doctrine and training.
Instead of using insults and half ass jokes to base your argument, how about you calm down, take a breath, and do some research. Not just research from writers on the left, or just from writers on the right. Read them both. Throw in some independent research studies. When your done with that, take the information you read and look for some intelligence gaps. Use what you’ve learned to fill those gaps with educated assessments, and then form your opinions.
Posted by: Seven | June 7, 2007, 1:10 am 1:10 am
Graet point Ziggy and as I said before …the people being killed with our weapons in darfur are Muslims.What a country we live in.
Posted by: derekj | June 7, 2007, 1:14 am 1:14 am
is this a surprise
Posted by: trueprogressive | June 7, 2007, 1:14 am 1:14 am
The thing is not to worry too much. Im a Brit living in the US of A so I cant really be bothered mashing on about the left v the right who just bitch about each other anyway.
We all know this countrys people have grown far too fat, is not that well politically informed, bothered or indeed affected by any of the traumas that occur in the world today where there is US involvement. But be rest assured having already fought for England there are still enough chaps like me well up for fighting any of these muppets anyday of the week anytime Im called to do so. It doesnt bode well for types that terror innocents who think they’re all that and have only got bold after old laws have passed.
Wheres Osama Bin Hidin preaching his level of worth handing out the money for a beloved suicide son to pop some easy target Humvee. Cowards.
England will never surrender and will never be defeated and neither will America.
Posted by: Exsoldja | June 7, 2007, 1:25 am 1:25 am
We can’t leave Viet Nam. Countries will fall like lined up dominoes. Pretty soon the United States will be surrounded. If we don’t fight them over there, we’ll have to fight them over here. That was the 60s and 70s. So far, 30 odd years later, haven’t seen a communist yet. Maybe we should nuke Viet Nam just in case.
Posted by: skyreader7 | June 7, 2007, 1:28 am 1:28 am
Iran was caught red-handed. The US requires to convey a message to the Iranians that aiding terrorists will not be tolerated. Those blasted Iranians just sit there and thumb there noses at us, it’s time to man-up and seriously get in Iran’s face. Let’s warn them this time. However, it they are repeatedly caught aid terrorists we will have NO choice but to drop the hammer.
It’s really a shame a hell of a lot of money has been squandered fighting in Iraq, because when I say drop the hammer I’m thinking something along the lines of this: 1) Sending more Carrier Task Forces to the Gulf, obtain air superiority over Iran, use stealth technology to neutralize SAM sites (casualties may be high, but necessary) 2) While air superiority is maintained, send large squadrons of B-52 Stratofortresses, B-2 bombers, and B-1′s over the cities of Iran…locating strategic targets such as military infrastructure and obliterating them with carpet bombing runs. These carpet bombing runs must sustained around the clock, giving the enemy no chance to recover.
A solid month of steady, relentless bombing runs would send such a message.
Posted by: Adrian | June 7, 2007, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Brian Ross is being “used” yet again by neocon “intel” leaks, intended to fabricate a war with Iran. Give him a “judy” award — in honor of Judith Miller (for whom the phrase, “Judy’s War” will ring a bell)
Posted by: will | June 7, 2007, 1:30 am 1:30 am
Why am I not surprised to see such comments on a network blog of a network that told its ‘journalists’ in the last Presidential election that they do not owe both parties equal treatment?
Posted by: Cowboy | June 7, 2007, 1:32 am 1:32 am
when a finger points at the moon, the idiot looks at the finger.
Posted by: j.deleon | June 7, 2007, 1:32 am 1:32 am
Jcarter, if a scenario like that was to occur, 7 major cities getting nuked, even by a dirty bomb, the American response would be heavy. The US would have to find a target, somebody to blame. And unfortunately, I hate to say it, I believe we would have no choice but to obliterate Iran, Syria, and Lebanon. They’re one bomb countries anyway.
Posted by: Adrian | June 7, 2007, 1:42 am 1:42 am
ADRIAN, ADRIAN . . . .
Great military tactics my man – but do you think Russia and China would sit by for month while we bomb and grab their number one supplier of gas and oil, let alone the international energy corporations . . . and how would we deal with a world scramble for oil? . . another armchair warrior showing the closest he’s gotten to a uniform was standing next to a crossing guard . . .
Posted by: Jess Wonderin | June 7, 2007, 1:45 am 1:45 am
Joseph, the UN is impotent as the League of Nations before World War 2!
Posted by: Adrian | June 7, 2007, 1:45 am 1:45 am
If the Iranian government is supplying arms to the Taliban it may be much worse than it appears on the surface. Let me restate the situation simply to make the point:
The Shi’ite Islamic revolution in Iran and the Salifi fundamentalists like the Taliban are bitter natural enimies; the Salifi fundamentalists consider all Shi’ite apostate, non-Muslim, and fit only to be killed.
We have about 20,000 – 30,000 troops in Afghanistan, a country that hosted the terrorists that attacked us 9/11. Their hosts, the Taliban are making a comeback and we are struggling to keep them contained.
We have around 150,000 troops in Iraq, a country that had no terrorists until we invaded. Now there is a growing Salifi fundamentalist movement, some of whom are associated with Al Quida, fighting us and the Shi’ite majority. We are barely containing that situation.
Now one has to wonder why the Salifi fundamentalists in Iraq and in Afghanistan do not coordinate their efforts and perhaps use our weakness in Afghanistan against us in Iraq. Well, between Afghanistan and Iraq sits Iran, the natural enemy. In other words, the necessary lines of communication between Salifi Islamist factions fighting us is denied them because it runs through their enemy; and this is the sleeping bear we keep poking. All Iran has to do is allow those lines of communication and we are in a really bad situation. If Iran is angry enough at us that they will arm people who’s natural instinct is use those arms to kill them, they may be angry enough to allow them to communicate through Iranian territory; as a matter of fact, those arms were traced through Iran, but perhaps the lines of communication have been opened already and this is Salifi arming Salifi across those lines.
Posted by: Fred | June 7, 2007, 1:49 am 1:49 am
The first line of this says “NATO officials say they have caught Iran red-handed”, but then never goes on to actually QUOTE any of these supposed NATO officials…even anonymously.
It seems as though a good chunk of this story is based upon “an analysis by a senior coalition official”. And then the comments by the others (Clarke and Jones) are added on top to provide additional weight EVEN THOUGH this all seems to boil down to the WORD of this senior coalition official.
Come on…give us something real.
Posted by: shingles | June 7, 2007, 1:49 am 1:49 am
Fred – well thought out and would explain why Iran was so willing in the early 9/11 “Bliss” to help the US in the war on terrorists . . . until Dumbya took international diplomacy to new low of bombastic ignorance . . .
Posted by: Jess Wonderin | June 7, 2007, 1:58 am 1:58 am
The Whitehouse has ordered the CIA to destablize the Iranian government, it’s what they do.
They framed other governments, what makes everyone think this is different?
Let’s look at Iraq, guerilla warfare is one of the most historically successful types of warfare, and unless you are willing to destroy every man woman and child, what makes us think we can “win”? The best we can hope for against an enemy that blends into the local population, and has a culture thousands of years older than ours, is not to “lose”.
Posted by: James | June 7, 2007, 1:59 am 1:59 am
Wow.
The self-loathing and conspiracy theorists really are all over this one. I always thought the OJ jurors were buffoons. Now I realize the U.S. is filled with such people.
This story isn’t exactly breaking news. Anyone who’s been paying attention has seen it covered quite thoroughly already.
Iran will continue to kill U.S. soldiers and make a mockery of American foreign policy (not Republican foreign policy) because a good number of people hate so much they can no longer rationally evaluate information. I don’t know whether the media, global socialist propaganda, ivory tower professors, or Big Bird is the most responsible, but regardless, ABCNews, this is the monster of deception that’s been created. A population unwilling to deal with the realities of the world around them.
Posted by: LB | June 7, 2007, 2:02 am 2:02 am
Fred, good point but as I understand your post, I take issue with a couple of quick points.
Namely, the Taliban are not of the same stripe as the salafists found among the arabs. Afghanistan is largely divided among 7 larger tribes and then a dozen or so smaller tribes, then smaller regional areas and then the mix of 1/4 shiites (shia) and 3/4 sunni then throw in warlords who historically have limited and flexible loyalties. It is a real mish-mash.
On the whole I agree with you over-arching theme that Iran wishes to cause problems for the US and Afghanistan has been a political football for its neighbors for many many years. Each neighbor siding with Afghan Pashtuns, Uzbeks, Tajiks or others as a tool to influence what happens on the ground.
Posted by: craig | June 7, 2007, 2:02 am 2:02 am
This kind of “reporting” is just another attempt to ensure that second career as a White House stenographer. The US media makes me ill. Note that I say “media”–there are NO journalists left here.
Posted by: who said wha???? | June 7, 2007, 2:03 am 2:03 am
Man – I see this steaming pile has made the Drudge Report. Assertions by a “senior coalition official” somehow becomes “caught red handed”. Did you know that most people only read the headlines?
Here we have people of the largest arms dealing nation in the world aghast that somebody may actually be supplying arms for use against them. Not only for use against them – but use against the warlords who were installed into government by the US. These are the people who raped, tortured, and killed from ’92-’96. The only difference between the Northern Alliance and the Taliban is the names.
The United States has placed ultra fundamentalists into power in Afghanistan – directly against the wishes of the majority of the Afghan people – because they can work with them – they’ll do the US’s bidding. Ask the participants of the Loya Jirgas in 2002, they’ll tell you how the initial meeting was stalled for two days while the US and the UN pressured the former King not to stand for nomination for the interim President. This, even though the majority were there to vote for him – a man who would have been a strong force for secularism and human rights, especially women’s rights. Now we have the most powerful offices in Afghanistan run by men who have their own armies, terrorize the people, and rape women who do not conform to ultra orthodox practices.
All this under the noses of the corporate press, like the two tools that regurgitated this government gruel.
Iran doesn’t have to do a bloody thing – they just have to wait for the pompous, spoiled, egotistical, and brainwashed children that are known as politicians here in the West hang themselves.
Posted by: Neil From the Empire's Fringe | June 7, 2007, 2:04 am 2:04 am
In Canada and in Tehran recently, there were friendship meetings between socialists and jihadists.
It is hard to understand where the ideology matches between the two movements, but it is clear there are great efforts to forge alliances.
This is the only bit of news that fits in with why the arguments that are left-of-center that focus on the failings of the western powers rather than on the failings of preaching islamist extremist states and non-state entities.
The most ironic thing about this is that once the islamists would have their way — they would immediately proceed to eliminate the leftists with extreme prejudice.
Those who sing “Fair’s fair” and
“Let’s give it back.” appear not to know that they are talking about “giving back” everything, including their own life and freedom to pursue happiness.
I like open discussions and gaining enlightenment from the broadest possible spectrum, but the statesmanship these people advocate is state-suicide and I can’t find any way to accept their counsel.
Posted by: Cantanker | June 7, 2007, 2:05 am 2:05 am
It is amazing how little you care that these Iranian supplied weapons are being used to kill American soldiers risking their lives to protect you from fanatical murders who want to incerate you, your wife and your children as soon as they can. I guess you really believe evil neo cons, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush incinerated 3000 people in one morning in New York City.
Posted by: Ernest A Miller | June 7, 2007, 2:10 am 2:10 am
Heres my answer to the problem….hydrogen fuel cells =D
Posted by: Bush Is A Loser | June 7, 2007, 2:18 am 2:18 am
Jess, the reason Iran appeared to assist in the early days post 9/11 was out of concern for their own necks. Keep in mind that immediately after 9/11 we invaded one country, started killing bad guys all over the world, tracking down financial networks and a whole host of other things. Needless to say, Iran was concerned that some of their own dirty laundry (funding terrorist organizations) might be embarassing and result in a strong US response (keep in mind the large number of Americans killed by hezbollah).
In addition, the global jihadist ilk (salafist) tend to come from the sunni strain of islam. We’re all familiar with the basic split between the two branches of islam and the desire of Iran to increase its influence throughout the region. As a result, it makes perfectly good sense for Iran to keep its head down and offer minimal support. Iran is very happy to detain and question the other teams jihadists. However, I don’t think there is any doubt that Iran has become emboldened as the Iraqi war drags on, US congressmen/women rail against the president and call for immediate or a schedule for withdrawl and Europe lacks the will power to stand up against its own islamofacists.
Posted by: Craig | June 7, 2007, 2:19 am 2:19 am
Give war a chance.
Let’s hope we invade Iran. They’ve got it coming. I don’t care who we supplied with what. Kill the enemy is the best strategy.
Posted by: Pinkoslayer | June 7, 2007, 2:25 am 2:25 am
Signing off…goodnight my fellow Americans
Posted by: Adrian | June 7, 2007, 2:31 am 2:31 am
dt,
there were no WMDs, we attacked a country that was no threat
Posted by: Rusty | June 7, 2007, 2:39 am 2:39 am
ah, i sorta give up. we are all doomed, i just hope when the nukes start detonating it’s during halftime of the OU/Texas game or something, that way the news cast won’t cut into too much of the game, I can go back to my nachos and dr. pepper and continue to watch the game cause crap I’m clueless that Houston’s only a few miles away from me and doesn’t exist anymore after the nuke levels it. just leave me alone and let me continue to get fat and not give a rat’s ass.
after all i am an average american, and i might even vote for Hillary in 08 if we are still around!
Posted by: carter | June 7, 2007, 2:41 am 2:41 am
Hey John Huber,
there is no neo-con agenda on Iran. Just for the record. Iran is Shia and Hamas is Sunni, but Iran supplies Hamas with weapons, finance, and training.
Not convinced. Iran is Shia and Syria is Sunni, but yet they have both signed treaties to defend each other and supply each other with weaponry.
Not convinced. Hezbollah is Shia and Syria is Sunni, but yet Hezbollah receives weapons, finance, safe-haven, from Syria.
Not convinced. Iran is Shia and Taleban is Sunni, but yet Iran is sending weapons to Taleban.
Iran History -
IAEA, EU, NATO, US all agree that Iran is secretly working on Nuclear Weapons programs.
Iran supplies, trains, and finances Hezbollah, terrorist organization.
Iran supplies, trains, and finances Hamas, terrorist Organization.
Iran supplies, trains, and finances the Mahdi Army and Moktader el-Sadr, a main destabilizing and death squad force in Iraq
Iran supplies IED weaponry to insurgents in Iraq to kill Coalition, Iraqi, and US forces.
Iran kidnaps 13 British Sailors
Iran kidnaps 3 Finns
Iran crushes and free speech or pro-democracy rallies in Tehran and throughout the country.
Iran has arrested and killed thousands of Iranian students demonstrating for more rights and democracy.
Iran encourages Hezbollah to attack Israel and kidnap Israeli soliders.
Iran is building Shahab-3 missles with a range of hitting Germany and can carry a nuclear tip warhead, chemical, or biological warheads. Iran is building thousands of Shahab-3. Question is Iran is not pursueing Nuclear Weapons WHY ARE THEY BUILDING MISSLES THAT CARRY A NUCLEAR WARHEAD.
Posted by: John Cocozza | June 7, 2007, 2:44 am 2:44 am
I always find it amusing that the people who criticize the US for funding and supplying nations and paramilitary organizations never criticize the former Soviet Union for doing the same (in most cases, US actions were a response to this). I also find it quite hilarious that they’re generally the same people who’d have had a fit if we’d sent in actual US troops to take on any of the Soviet-funded states, which is why it became necessary to fund opposing groups/nations in the first place.
Posted by: Shinta Gomes | June 7, 2007, 2:44 am 2:44 am
I am tired of intellectuals saying Shia and Sunni Muslims would never ally themselves against the west. “They have been bitter enemies since the 7th century”. But isn’t the quote “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” an Arabic/Muslim phrase?
Muslims have come to realize they fight each other and the west wins. So they call an uneasy truce and unite in their common cause in an attempt to destroy the west.
Iran has been at war with the US since 1979 but we have never engaged. The time to strike is now.
Posted by: J. Chavez | June 7, 2007, 2:47 am 2:47 am
If I fear my neighbor, can I kill him?
Only a fool would attack the US first with all the nukes we have.. Retaliation would be swift.
Attacking Iran out of fear would be idiotic.
Posted by: Rusty | June 7, 2007, 2:58 am 2:58 am
James,
Relax, everyone thoughr the same thing in the 60′s too. Remember the LBJ political ads with the nushroom cloud? Even these suicidal zealots want their side to win.
Posted by: Rusty | June 7, 2007, 3:11 am 3:11 am
Rusty ,
Have you every seen a million dollars in one place? Does that mean it does not exist! Oh and for the record after the US military went into Iraq there was this one article (of course not on the front page)of a major east coast newspaper which indicated that they had found about 500 or so artillery shells with some kind of decomposed nerve gas from the era of the Iran-Iraq war. That you might say are of no concern but if you remember good old Sadam said he destroyed everything!So knowing that little fact maybe you should reconsider the “Possibility” they are somewhere hidden in the vast desert or as satellite images did show prior to the war large convoys of military trucks moving into Syria. What might they have been moving into that peacful country ran by another troublemaker in the middle east.Don’t kid yourself that wasn’t the only reason we went in other things like a terrorist training camp called Salman Park, papers indicating Sadam was in bed with the these guys and I only wish the UN would have stepped up to the plate and enforced UN policy after 12 years of Sadams playing cat and mouse. Who knows maybe Nancy Pelosi got some answers on her recent visit to the showcase dicatorship in Syria.
Posted by: dt | June 7, 2007, 3:11 am 3:11 am
Hey Jess, we invaded Afghanistan on October 7, 2001, then immediately started killing people all over the world, in such as places in the Phillipines, and elsewhere. I was not refering to Iraq, that is why I said all over the world. The CIA, special forces and other organizations did indeed start killing and capturing people all over the world. I meant what I said. If I had meant Iraq I would have said Iraq.
You assume that someone who doesn’t adhere to your point of view is a dolt.
I don’t need to be lectured by you with mundane trivia such as the country of origin of the 9/11 hijackers.
If Iran were concerned about “enhancing their international standing” as a cooperating country with regard to terrorism doesn’t it stand to reason that they would stop aiding and abetting terrorists? Your circular logic is baffling. Since when has Iran given a damn about enhancing their international standing as it pertains to stopping terrorists?
With regard to the US being a paper tiger, I’m not sure what that means given the fact that the US was able to swiftly enter and overthrow two countries with minimal force and minimal loss of life. We should have used a much larger force for the asymetrical warfare that flared after normal combat operations, but I suspect you don’t have much of a perspective on this.
And b/c GW Bush is not a member of MENSA and you feel we have a corrupt administration the Iranians were emboldened? That is another curious assertion. Since when does the raw intelligence of a president of any leader for that matter, provide some sort of predictive quality over how they might respond to a terrorist attack. Arguably Jimmy Carter was one of the smartest presidents we’ve had and yet he was clearly had a failed presidency and was inept.
Save the lessons for someone else. Judging from your retort you probably should spend more time reading than responding.
Posted by: craig | June 7, 2007, 3:13 am 3:13 am
What’s all this “friends” stuff I’m seeing? Ha! Old Charlie’s right…
“No nation has friends, only interests.”
Charles de Gaulle
Posted by: Sam | June 7, 2007, 3:25 am 3:25 am
dt,
Anything is possible. But, the question remains, how could they have made nukes with no facilities to make them with? Did they buy them somewhere, and, if they had them, why didn’t they use them. DT, we had no right to attack, no evidence. Scott Ritter knew they had nada. I cant believe that some neocons still believe things are hidden in the dessert.. get real
Posted by: Rusty | June 7, 2007, 3:26 am 3:26 am
who cares about what is or is not in the sand. the fact is that the UN violations were enough to dethrone the dearly departed king
Posted by: stp | June 7, 2007, 3:28 am 3:28 am
derekj-what a tierd response “if you’re so (fill in the blank) why don’t you enlist!
of perhaps a personal favorite “You chicken hawks/armchair warrior…..”
So to favor military action one must be a currently serving member of the US military otherwise you’re (fill in the blank)?
I’m a vet as are many in my and my wife’s family. We have also lost friends, family and colleagues in combat related (KIA) engagements. But I think it is silly to suggest that only veterans or currently serving personnel are somehow the only ones who deserve to say how our professional military is used or military force is applied.
Posted by: craig | June 7, 2007, 3:31 am 3:31 am
So let me get this straight: its Iraq’s fault that they can’t get the situation under control after they’ve been bombed to hell and “democratized”. So lets go after Iran and change the subject. This is democracy forced down your throat with a gun barrel: Iraqis can’t even own firearms under coalition rules. Their own doors get busted down in the middle of the night, scaring the living daylights out of their children, for firearms searches by US troops . This must truly be democracy 2nd amendment style amended for the PNAC’s ludicrous ideals. Now Iran’s supplying weapons to the Taliban… A likely scenario. What about the Russians? The Chinese? Heck, there’s a lot of money to be made in arms trading and there are no morals there regarding convential weapons. The US is the world leader in this field. Is it a surprise? No. Is it normal? It’s money and humans are greedy. Heck this whole entire mess is about greed and its being sold to the US people as a fight for freedom and democracy. Its really pablum for sheep. This entire farce can well be the downfall of this great nation. I hope its not . In the meantime, let the military industrial complex with the govt’s complicity reap in the cash…
Posted by: Jack | June 7, 2007, 3:32 am 3:32 am
“who cares about what is or is not in the sand. the fact is that the UN violations were enough to dethrone the dearly departed king”
Posted by: stp
Well said. As far as I’m concerned, when they attempt to assasinate a former president of the united states I think that provides just cause as well.
Posted by: craig | June 7, 2007, 3:35 am 3:35 am
The sad thing is that we are so divided on anything we do in the USA. Sooner or later we will have to wake up and realize it’s a losing battle…these people don’t want our help.
Let’s just let them implode.
Further…people understand that our government appreciates the fact we are so divided in this country…that way there are no effective checks and balances to keep those in power honest. Ask yourself..Is the government acting in the PEOPLES best interests at all times? You know they are not.
When are we going to wake up and understand WE the people run things…how long will it take to affect the type of real change that is desperately needed here? Come on people…stop bickering at each other and make an effort to unite…only THEN can WE THE PEOPLE…take back what was ours to begin with.
Remember…a little revolution every 200 years is a GOOD thing.
Posted by: TrueBlue | June 7, 2007, 3:36 am 3:36 am
all the iraqis need to do is point a finger (rather than a gun) at the insurgents and we could take care of the rest.
Posted by: stp | June 7, 2007, 3:37 am 3:37 am
stp,
I bring it up to make a point. Now I only wish the liberal media and all its deep seated hate for the current administration would stop. Just think if good old Bill spent more time dealing with Osama when Somolia was ready to hand the US his head on a plate the cuurnet state of affairs might be very different. Oh yah rusty for the record WMD’s are not only nukes and did you every read any new articles about the small portable nukes that were missing from The USSR after the fall of communism (of course they never really gave up their ideals ) and I subscibe to the belief “ONCE A COMMUNIST ALWAYS A COMMUNIST” and recent events with Putin prove that.
Posted by: dt | June 7, 2007, 3:40 am 3:40 am
Craig – Touchy about being called on you BS? The fact is after 9/11 we had World Wide support to go after those involved. WE concentrated on a third rate contained dictator, violating civilized international agreements to avenge “my daddy” not those responsible. My “Paper Tiger” remark had nothing to do with any might or force, we have spent the greatest fortune in world history creating the greatest equipped and trained military force known. Bubba may be able to go into any bar in Mayfield and kick everyones ass, but he still can’t read. It means that with this great ability on every diplomatic front we fail – Israeli Peace, Africa, Russia,Dufar, Latin America, trade, et al. There is no doubt we can defeat ANY nation but how about decent health care, veterans benefits (for those that DID what few do), world leadership. “Smart” has nothing to do with intelligence, it the application to achieve positive results that matters. And you boy has failed all tests, and if weren’t for Daddy and the Saudis, he’d be divorced living in a single wide in Dallas washing dishes, three month behind on child support . . .
Posted by: Jess Wonderin | June 7, 2007, 3:41 am 3:41 am
Craig
i meant no harm by that but why is it when people denounce this war they are thought of as non-christian or anti-christian instead of people who want to raise there kids in an enviroment where you dont have to explain to them what war is and why it is fought.War over fear is not a reason.
Posted by: derekj | June 7, 2007, 3:43 am 3:43 am
yeah, europeans are the only people in the world to ever divide people up along ethnic lines. if you said it well it must be true.
c world history for an opposing view – oh and most people in the middle east
Posted by: stp | June 7, 2007, 3:46 am 3:46 am
wow another step toward destruction by Bush. why not go after China next then north korea, then saudi arabia and continue.
Posted by: Jony | June 7, 2007, 3:52 am 3:52 am
yes, ur right – open forum where people can express their thoughts / view /ideas are bad – my bad
Posted by: stp | June 7, 2007, 3:54 am 3:54 am
Jess my comments were not BS though you may not be sufficiently nimble to appreciate this fact. I don’t think we probably should have gone into Iraq but there was reason to believe that WMDs did in fact exist and more to the point, Iraq went to great lengths to deny investigators the unfettered access that were the terms of the original cease fire. It is easy to look back and have 20/20 hind sight.
With regard to diplomatic efforts to design peace when clearly one or both sides do not desire a diplomatic solution…it is simply farce. What do you suppose Bush could have done in any of these troubled spots that previous presidents could have done? I don’t think Clinton could have shed a tear and politely asked the Janjaweed to please stop practising genocide. Clinton did nothing while 800,000 were masacred in Rwanda. Yet somehow it is Bush’s fault that Iran and Syria are assasinating Lebanese presidents and attempting a terrorist led coupe or firing rockets into Israel. What do you suggest???
And how might Bush have intervened in Russia to ensure journalists and critics of the Putin govt were not murdered or that civil liberties were not erroded??
Give me a break! Take a look in the history books and pick out your most prized liberal president and then see what was going on in the world at the time. Are all of those calamities the result of a failed diplomatic mission. Jess, last time I checked we had terrorists to track down and kill or apprehend and wars to fight. I really don’t want to see our president engaged in shuttle diplomacy in an attempt to make peace with folks that can’t play well together.
Posted by: craig | June 7, 2007, 4:04 am 4:04 am
Jess, I don’t know if you noticed but the article is actually about Iranian weapons in Afghanistan. This is part of the war which you allege the “world” gave us permission to start. So get off your high horse about Bush and Iraq. There are plenty of liberals quoted from the pre-Iraq war period asking for war with Saddam. Had Bush not invaded Iraq then he would have been lambasted by the left as “not doing anything” or “leaving the worst terrorist to do as he wished”.
We actually spent the greatest fortune ever amassed on a failed social welfare system. 20% of the GDP goes to worthless social programs, only 3.8% of the GDP goes to defense of the entire nation. It’s estimated that American citizens lose more money each year by being forced to “donate” to social security than the entire defense budget.
America isn’t perfect but it is a far shot better than you give it credit for. There is a reason why new immigrants to this country love it, but rich white kids that were born here don’t: basis of comparison. Spend 30 minutes in Manila and you will know exactly what I’m talking about.
You realize that any president that went against the Saudi Royals would be thrown out of office? We can’t live without Saudi oil. That keyboard you’re typing on: made out of petroleum products, transported by the combustion of diesel, and you used gasoline to get it from the store. This very second you are consuming fuel oil from Saudi Arabia. Bush’s sweet connections are all thats between you and European gas prices.
Posted by: HippyHunter | June 7, 2007, 4:06 am 4:06 am
Listen ! As an Iranian -American let me educate you folks a little bit . The Mullahs ( Clerics with turbons ) religious leaders that have` taken over the iranian government by force and are not popular at all with the iranian people are in charge of the revolutionary guards ( Quds force ) in Iran and Quds force does not make any move unless `authorized by these Mullahs and their supreme leader ( Khamenei) So stop this non-sense of saying we don’t know if the Iranian leadership ( Khamenei ) and his thugs are aware of all these weapons being shiped to Iraq or Afghanistan. Let me tell you as an Iranian and many other Iranians also agree with me that there is no doubt about it and the Iranian leadership, supreme leader , Ahmadinejad and all the other clerics are fully aware of this policy by Iran and are doing it to prevent USA to succeed in creating a Democracy in the region next to the Mullahas because if this happens they know that they will be next to go because if Iraq becomes stable the USA will help the Iranian people to throw out these nasty radical out of Iran and make Iran a true Democracy also ,so the Mullahs ( clerrgy ) is afraid of this and therefore they are trying to do everything to Stop the USA from succeeding in their neighborhood. Now the westwern world realizes what kind of radical fanatics the Iranian people have been puting up with for the last 29 years since the stupid revolution in Iran brought them to power in 1978. If they can put their own citizens in jail and torture them for no reason, imagine what they will do with foreigners, anyway, they are a very dangerous bunch that can cause a lot of harm to Iran and the rest of the world, the only solution for international community is to help the iranian democratic forces inside and outside of iran to get rid of the Mullahs by the hand of Iranians themselves and not by any type of military action . I hope I have educated some people by this writing.
An Iranian who wants Democracy for Iran and freedom for its people.
Posted by: Ali BaBa | June 7, 2007, 4:07 am 4:07 am
touche, HippyHunter!
I think you nailed that quite well.
No one thinks much about Johnson’s war and poverty and what a disaster that has been.
Posted by: craig | June 7, 2007, 4:12 am 4:12 am
Ali BaBa your thoughtful post confirms many of the things that I and others have been suggesting here this AM about Iran.
Iran was a wonderful country at one time and I hope that it can return to its grandeur as a free nation.
Posted by: craig | June 7, 2007, 4:17 am 4:17 am
Just remember that the Dems will always be waiting in the wings to deny the obvious once they agree that we should attack. It is of course purely political, and Dems never hold their own people to anything like high standards so it’s okay for them to say “we were tricked by Bush”. Dems are truly fools, and someday we will pay the price for allowing fools to trick us. Dems should be in Gitmo, not the Whitehouse.
Posted by: Video Eddie | June 7, 2007, 4:23 am 4:23 am
we need to be very careful in the way we report issues like this. for the sake of the usually unpleasant aftermath of crises/wars, ABC and other media organisations should stop offending the sensibility of the people of the world- who unfortunately always bear the brunt of a decision that isn’t theirs. please report issues that will calm and not fray nerves. what about balance reporting and objectivity?
Posted by: adesile muheeb | June 7, 2007, 4:32 am 4:32 am
So Ali Baba – as an Iranian American – I’m assuming that your family were supporters of the Shah.
You don’t care that the United States destroyed your former country’s fledgling democracy in 1953? You don’t care that the US trained and funded the Savak (the Shah’s secret police) who jailed, tortured, and killed almost all political opposition in Iran? I say almost because the one group they were unable to touch was the fundamentalists – and who was left to take power when the populace finally had enough?
Now you hope that the US will drop bombs on your wonderful people – in order to “save them” yet again? I have many friends who are Iranian Ali – none of them complain to me about their lives back home. They live their lives around the system – despite the system – to them it’s a hindrance. You can find instances of evil within every country. You can choose to use this as an example of “tyranny” if you wish – but you really want them to kill tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands of the wonderful people of Iran to bring “freedom and democracy”? My friends always tell me that they will deal with it – in their time – in their way. However, they also tell me that the one issue in which the government has overwhelming support is – you guessed it – Iran’s right to develop peaceful nuclear technology – one opinion the Iranian people share in common with Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger strangely enough.
Is this really your position Ali?
Posted by: Neil From The Empire's Fringe | June 7, 2007, 4:34 am 4:34 am
go ahead and say it – the fascists are truely nazis and the non-fascists are only trying to build an “organic state” (think italian fascism v. german fascism). either way you look at it, it’s still fascism. And the jews, muslims, and christians have lived at war for centuries as well. the peace and war have both been political. the areas problems are its own. uncle sam, 3B/yr or not, is not to blame.
Posted by: stp | June 7, 2007, 4:39 am 4:39 am
Thanks hassan for the complement.But yes Ali Baba does mean thief even though it a slang term used by u.s forces for someone suspected of looting or other crimes.But thanks again…im going to start calling myself mullah.
Posted by: derekj | June 7, 2007, 4:43 am 4:43 am
Normally, I’m an advocate of the concept of MAD. However, when dealing with radical Muslim terrorists, it doesn’t likely apply. They believe that when they die, 72 virgins will be waiting for them; in fact, it’s IF they die in the process of killing their enemies.
In other words, they don’t care if they die, they just want to see us dead beforehand. Hence, nuclear weaponry. IF they had such weaponry, truly, I’m certain they would have already attacked.
Posted by: Michael | June 7, 2007, 4:49 am 4:49 am
No use talking deplomacy to this people, whose minds are blinded by hatred & false sense of religiosity. But they’re terribly cunning, they say one thing but do another, so I say we give them a dose of their own medicine, after all their prophet did the same to their enemies centuries and terrorism is no new thing for them, it runs in their veins, even in biblical times.
Posted by: hugh | June 7, 2007, 5:03 am 5:03 am
Neil from Empire’s fringe,
listen and read carefully, you either don’t read carefully or you are a Mullah also, Ali Baba did not say that there should be any military action by America or any one else to bring Democracy for Iran , The Iranian people are brave enough and smart enough to acheive democracy by themselves and throw out these Mullahs ( clergy like Khamenei and Ahmadinejad out of the beautiful Iran , As you have seen the brave students in Iran and the brave iranian journalist ,iranian teachers, industrial workers have scared the Mullah’s regime and have made it ready for a soft overthrow by the people of Iran, the way you talk in your comments you sound like one of the communists that keep repeating the past history like the 53 coup in iran etc. to justify their arguments, no, the Iranians dont want communists or fanatical/Radical islamists , they just want Democracy and freedom and they will achieve it by themselves but because of the nasty mullahs control over the revolutionary guards that beat up and torture inocent iranians they will need the help of the international community to succeed in throwing out the Mullahs, neil, go back and read the article one more time, by the way the people of Iran are not happy as you said , people in Iran are in a big prison that are being tourtured everyday, no my friend it’s not like what you have described , look at the iranians that go back to visit their homeland and are being put in Evin prison, thousands of students are currently in Mullahs jails in Iran for just wanting to be free and have a say in their government, Neil apparently you have been brainwashed by the Mullahs of Iran or your friends work for the Mullahs if they are having fun in Iran.
Iranian who wants Democracy for Iran and its people.
Posted by: Ali Baba | June 7, 2007, 5:03 am 5:03 am
Here is the bottom line!!! Iran has been attacking us “the west, USA” for 35+ yrs. since the islamic revolution…the world is a mean, mean place. DO YOU WANT TO PRESERVE YOUR WAY OF LIFE?? Women w/o birkas? Your right to be wrong and narrow minded and organize a good old self gratifying protest!!!!! THEY WANT TO KILL US!!!! FREEDOM?? BOTTOM LINE?? QUIT FEELING GUILTY!!! Roles reversed; they would have done the same thing. Do your research…with emotionless, factual, prudence!!!!! Don’t get in the way of civilizations! It is not all pretty but that is the way the WORLD “HUMANS” work!!!! some people smarter than you. said something to the effect of: “those who do not study history are condemned to repeat it”…&…”if you are young and conservative, you don’t have a heart…if you are old and liberal, you don’t have a brain!” WAKE UP!!!
Posted by: informed | June 7, 2007, 5:08 am 5:08 am
“give me freedom or give me death”
peace
out
Posted by: stp | June 7, 2007, 5:09 am 5:09 am
ill take liberty too
Posted by: stp | June 7, 2007, 5:14 am 5:14 am
No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the house. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question before the house is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at the truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.
Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the numbers of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.
I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received?
Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlement assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation.
There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free–if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending–if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained–we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us! They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength but irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable–and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.
It is in vain, sir, to extentuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace–but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
March 23, 1775 – Patrick Henry
Posted by: stp | June 7, 2007, 5:19 am 5:19 am
Everyone gets to voice their opinion. God bless America. Grow up children. NeoCons? Conservatives? Liberals? Biblical times?
You folks better wake up and smell the coffee. Anything that’s threatens freedom needs to be destroyed. Try voicing these ideas in Iran or possibly China.
Posted by: Dave Chapman | June 7, 2007, 5:22 am 5:22 am
I hope that all the people banging the drum for yet another invasion have already gone out & signed up in the military. Or that they plan to do so shortly. And, by the way, sign up your friends and family that agree with you too. And then go invade another country. Permanently.
War begets war. Violence begets violence. I believe there is a biblical passage Christians should recognize: You reap what you sow.
Sidebar:
I find interesting the recent court decision that says the Gitmo detainees cannot be prosecuted under the military commission process. Why? The current administration has described them as enemy combatants. The judge said only UNLAWFUL enemy combatants can be held like the Gitmo detainees. The administration’s retort? “That they are unlawful is implied.”
Apparently not so good with the understanding of laws and the like, Bush, Scooter, Dickie and the rest of the gangster posse running the US into the ground. Me-thinks perhaps THEY are the unlawful combatants. Lucky thing the George had the brains to withdraw the US from International Criminal Court treatises.
Posted by: Tim | June 7, 2007, 5:33 am 5:33 am
I have a solution to the whole problem. Nuke the hell out of the entire Middle East. Instant world peace. Just a few decades of radioactive half-life to worry about, but who wants to go to a desert anyway?
Posted by: John | June 7, 2007, 5:36 am 5:36 am
Wake up, America! Iran is copying what China did in the Vietnam War-assisting the insurgents…Is history repeating itself with different enemies for the USA?
Posted by: Bozo | June 7, 2007, 5:36 am 5:36 am
Being an American, the United States is my home wher my familiy and friends abide. I would be nothing more than a fool to let my homeland be threatened or damaged. To sit idle just because the opposing party is in power is like an osterich with its head in the sand. United We Stand is fundemental to the foundation this country resides on. When we wander from this fundemental, we risk our much valued freedom.
The quote of Patrick Henry is right on; and it is time you start putting differences aside and seriously worrying about your homeland.
Posted by: Dick | June 7, 2007, 5:37 am 5:37 am
The Children posting the anti-Bush/neocon/crusader babble don’t need to face reality. They fully expect Jack Bauer to ride to the rescue. Isn’t that the Clinton/Obama ticket foreign policy after all?
Posted by: steve | June 7, 2007, 5:44 am 5:44 am
Ali Baba
Thank you for your comments. But when you say that you did not call for military action – I must remind you that you are posting in support of people who are calling for just that. Go back and read their posts – many of them are calling for your former country to be nuked – and you don’t seem to blink. Instead – you appear to support their position.
One BIG problem we have in the West is our inability to think in the long term. Ali Baba, you seem to have been stricken with this affliction when you speak of the 1953 overthrow of your democracy by the United States. How can you defend the actions of a country who – sucked in by the British who sold them on a “communist threat” when they were actually trying to save the British oil company – sent in the CIA to destroy the people’s government in order to install a dictator? I agree that the Iranian government is guilty of widespread human rights abuses – and I believe that the people will eventually rise up against it – but it won’t happen while the US is threatening the people of Iran. This said – the human rights abuses of the Mullahs are a fraction of those committed by the Shah – and the US was going to sell him a hard water reactor.
Mossadegh wasn’t a communist Ali Babba – he just wanted to nationalize your oil – so that your people would get the money for their resource – instead of the multinational oil companies.
And no Ali Baba – again – it IS like I say. Iranians live their lives like anyone else on the face of this earth – they love their family and friends, they shop in malls, the young people go to night clubs, etc, etc.
There are people in jail in Iran – many unjustly to be sure – but they come nowhere close to the country with the largest percentage of its people in prison – that country would be Russ…no…Chin….no….North Kor….no….ahh yes…it’s “the land of the free”.
You are right that the Iranian people need the support of the international community. However, that support should come in the form of diplomacy, advocacy, and trade leverage. It should also come in the form of a complete pullout of all foreign forces from the Middle East, gradual withdrawal of economic and military support to Israel (resulting in a settlement of the Israeli/Arab dispute), and international trade agreements that promote social and economic development.
Posted by: Neil From The Empire's Fringe | June 7, 2007, 5:46 am 5:46 am
And the question SHOULD be then…Where does Iran get their arms? Same place that Saddam did? HELLO! Wake up folks.
Posted by: Tumbleweedin | June 7, 2007, 5:53 am 5:53 am
SO many foolish comments here! Feel free to bash America but remember we are talking about the TALIBAN! Islam at it’s WORST! They are fighting to return to the SLAVERY and ignorance they believe is the TRUE Islam! They do all this nice “religion” at the end of a gun! Iran ONLY wants to screw the US as they are in Iraq by giving IDIOTS lots of guns & explosives. IRAN is the enemy of peace in the Islamic world. They care NOTHING about what the people want or how many die as long as a few americans die amongst the thousands of muslims….
Posted by: Rasdebol | June 7, 2007, 5:55 am 5:55 am
You’re right the Talibs are nice people and so are the Iranians. they wouldn’t chop your head off if we weren’t so mean and nasty towards them. We should send them a herd of virgin ewes to make amends and then everything would be OK, heck, send them two herds and then we could trust them with nukes!
Posted by: Mr X | June 7, 2007, 6:04 am 6:04 am
to Tim Simpson
Common misinformation. While the US did supply some arms to Iraq, it was very small in nature. A quick look at their arsnel would reveal T-72′s, Exocet and Scud missiles, AK-47′s and Mirage fighter jets. All those weapons are French and Russian with the exceptions of Scuds, which were Iraqi made. After 1984 the Russians stop supplying small arms to the Iraqis and that market was soon picked up by the Chinese.
If anything, Iran had more American equipment because they were allies with us under the Shah. Claims that we supplied them with biological weapons is dubious at best. What we did supply them was a small amount of technology for their radar and guidance systems.
Posted by: Bentley | June 7, 2007, 6:04 am 6:04 am
*YAWN*
An “unnamed” “coalition official”. Can you say “US Military Industrial Complex Propaganda”?
I can.
Posted by: Jerry T. | June 7, 2007, 6:09 am 6:09 am
Yes, ues and America supplied genocidal socialist dictator Joe Stalin with a whole bunch of munitions during WW2. So obviously the Cold War was our own damn fault! In fact, objectively speaking, if the commies hads nuked us in the 1950s, the reality would have been that we had nuked ourselves. So logically speaking, we should retaliate by attacking ourselves.
Good thing the Commies didn’t nuke us, huh?
Posted by: Mr X | June 7, 2007, 6:09 am 6:09 am
Someday the Democrats who still believe today’s date is 9/10 will hopefully realize that Iran and Islamofascism are far bigger threats to the world than gender issues and theories about “global warming.”
Posted by: Zephyr | June 7, 2007, 6:21 am 6:21 am
NATO has been pretty clear about this: while the weapons are clearly Iranian, there is no evidence that they have been supplied by the Iranian government.
This is not yet the smoking gun the administration needs to go to war against Iran, but it’s a small step towards making that case.
Iran has a sure-fire alibi at this point in time, however: it can simply claim that it has no control over its own weapons caches (or no control over al Quds). No one believes this, but it can be spun as plausible in the current climate due to the perception that
western intelligence was wrong on Iraq.
Posted by: Fabio Escobar | June 7, 2007, 6:25 am 6:25 am
I agree with the intelligent people that we (the united states) are the problem and Iran is a better country and we (the united states) should try to be more like Iran where people who say anything their GOVERNMENT are killed or jailed.That means all of us would be killed or jailed. I love that.
Posted by: STUPID | June 7, 2007, 6:46 am 6:46 am
Islamaphobia is not an answer!
The repression of women, beheadings, torture, terrorism, nuclear threats, jihads are simply imaginary! Can’t we all just get along?
Posted by: AL | June 7, 2007, 6:57 am 6:57 am
Only a fool would claim the media is non biased left wingers. The CNN ” Faith” debate for Dems was clearly planned to aid Dems look more religious. Did anyone ask Hillary or Obama about the issue of evolution? America no longer has a free press.
Posted by: Dennis D | June 7, 2007, 6:59 am 6:59 am
craig, I’ve read plenty about, and during, that time and am convinced that bin Laden was not the bit player you suggest he was. Regardless of the details on the who though, my larger point was simply that the U.S. gubmint can NOT cry foul when Iran meddles, as it apparently is, when the history of the U.S. is full of this same type of thing. The gubmint (and from some of these posts, many Americans) had better start looking in the mirror and doing a little self-assessing before we go throwing stones (or nukes) around. We’ve lost the moral and ethical high ground when it comes to screwing around in other nations’ affairs and just end up looking stupid and hypocritical when we try to point fingers. Yes, it’s our men and women who are dying this time as a result of Iran’s apparent influence, and that is truly tragic, but what could we really expect?
BTW,
“I’m a vet as are many in my and my wife’s family. We have also lost friends, family and colleagues in combat related (KIA) engagements. But I think it is silly to suggest that only veterans or currently serving personnel are somehow the only ones who deserve to say how our professional military is used or military force is applied.”
Excellent point!
Posted by: Philodemos | June 7, 2007, 7:02 am 7:02 am
“A Christian or Jew or Athiest proclaiming his views or printing his beliefs publicly would result in a riot and probably his death because of the “peace loving” Islamic people around him.”
And here in the U.S., existing external expressions of faith — that have become city landmarks — are now considered some imposition of state-sponsored religion.
Posted by: FlyingTigress | June 7, 2007, 7:03 am 7:03 am
It is indeed difficult to believe that there are people so inflamed against the Republican administration in power that they would prefer to see our military hit with massive weapons from Iran than believe forensic evidence that would win in court.
I can but wonder if they want the USS Arizona dredged up and the torpdeoes and bombs which sunk it investigated to determine if in fact they were actually made in the Nippon empire.
The world is full of a lot of dumb people and these lefties prove it.
Posted by: Trailboss49 | June 7, 2007, 7:04 am 7:04 am
Brian Ross is no investigative anything. Time after time he uses his Yellow Journalism techniques to miss represent the facts. Some times it seems his search for facts consists of turning on FOX News.
Posted by: M | June 7, 2007, 7:05 am 7:05 am
Like how Rumsfeld supplied Saddam with chemical weapons in the ’80s? ABC News? Don’t make me laugh. More like CIA News, amirite?
Posted by: Herbie, man. | June 7, 2007, 7:22 am 7:22 am
Suggestion for new US policy: redeploy all troops to the US-Mexico border and sell low-tech weapons to BOTH Shi’a and Sunni extremists in the Middle East.
Posted by: tadchem | June 7, 2007, 7:24 am 7:24 am
“Our Country won’t go on forever, if we stay soft as we are now. There won’t be any AMERICA because some foreign soldiery will invade us and take our women and breed a hardier race!” -LT. GEN. LEWIS “CHESTY” PULLER, USMC
Posted by: Rick | June 7, 2007, 7:24 am 7:24 am
Has anyone figured out the way these people think yet?
Here is a clue: They are only being consistent.
Commie Libs can go back to protesting now (Liberalism is a mental disorder). The children in Washington can go back to debating funding.
Posted by: Cam | June 7, 2007, 7:28 am 7:28 am
Iran’s radical government represents a clear and present danger to the region and the world. Iran’s political establishment must snuff out democracy and freedom in Afghanistan and Iraq, otherwise Iran may find itself subject to the winds of change by its own restless population. If the radicals in Iran prevail and impose their will on their immediate neighbors as well as fulfill their nuclear ambitions, they will not stop there. The threats to wipe Israel off the map and humiliate the West had better be taken seriously. Personally I don’t think we should have went into Iraq. However, we are there now. Given the stakes, it’s in the free world’s interests that we ultimately prevail in our aims.
Posted by: Patrick | June 7, 2007, 7:30 am 7:30 am
I love that these ultra-liberal bloggers REFUSE to admit there is a war on terrorism and that Iran has been a major player in this fight (since the 80s). When will you “softees” “grow a brain”. We’re already at war with Iran as evidence of their presence in BOTH Iraq and Afghanistan.
Posted by: Peter | June 7, 2007, 7:31 am 7:31 am
tadchem,
I thought from the start that we got rid of Sadam Ho-sen because he was an organizing force. Left to themselves, the tribes will fight amongst themselves like baby rats…until the next strong-man steps up. (If one does not understand their culture, one will sound like a Commie Liberal clueless idgout)
Posted by: Cam | June 7, 2007, 7:33 am 7:33 am
Meddling has been going on throughout the history of civilization. As long as our enemies were at war with each other for the most part they left us alone. What’s going on now in Iraq and Afghanistan is no different. The news media like to tell us Iraq is in the middle of a civil war but this civil war isn’t being fought by Iraqis, it’s being fought by outsiders. Syria and Iran have a vested interest in the failure of Iraq. Whether the Sunni and Shia are enemies is irrelevant. Victory for them is not the destruction of the other. Chaos is the goal they both seek. Bin Laden did not attack the United States in order to destroy it, because that would be rediculous. Every attack on US interests overseas is not an attempt to hurt us, but to anger us in order to draw us into war with them. As long as we ignored their attacks and offered up mild retaliations their efforts were ineffectual, insignificant, and they were without power. They were just crazy kooks living in caves. But now that we are at war with them their power and respect has grown. The Sunni and Shia now have a common enemy, a common goal, and they will work together in any way as long as it causes pain to us. We could go back to ignoring them and accept the losses that come every few months or years in terrorist attacks, or we can destroy them, but in this age of political correctness I don’t think any country including the United States has the guts to do it.
Posted by: James Wolfe | June 7, 2007, 7:34 am 7:34 am
I don’t know who to believe anymore. Is this story about Iran supplying weapons to the Taliban merely a media hype? It’s possible. Is it possible that Iran IS supplying weapons to the Taliban. It’s possible. When you can’t even depend on your president to tell you the truth, well……… I DO believe this though: If we hadn’t invaded Iraq in the first place, we probably wouldn’t be dealing with issue at all. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: By invading Iraq, we have started something that I don’t believe we’re going to be able to stop for a very, very long time, if ever. So…sit back, pop a can of soda, and just watch the number of casualties continue to grow…day after day, after day, after day, etc.
Posted by: Dean E. Sizemore | June 7, 2007, 7:38 am 7:38 am
The comments on this story are amazing! Iran has been actively killing Americans since 1983. I refer to the 1983 bombings of the US embassy and Marine barracks in Beirut. It’s no wonder they think they can continue to get away with it.
Iran will continue to kill Americans until we confront them. One day Iran will cross a line that will convince even the left wing kooks, I mean “doves” posting comments here that action against Iran is required. At that time no one will whine and spew blame and hate more than they.
Posted by: Paul | June 7, 2007, 7:39 am 7:39 am
How could the U.S. intelligence (questionable) services be so surprised and naive?
…….”the enemy of my enemy is my friend”. DUH.
Posted by: robert | June 7, 2007, 7:41 am 7:41 am
The official policy of ABC News is to support the killing of NATA troops by Iran by providing public disclosure of covert US operations in Iran.
According to ABC officials, providing Iran intelligence on US covert operations may place our agents and special forces troops in grave danger, but is justified because “hey – we’re the media”. When asked why their actions were justified while the outing of Valerie Plame resulted in jail time, ABC responed, “commiting treason by compromising covert ops in Iran is a decision we took very seriously. After careful review we decided to run the story after we determined that we are not Republicans or members of the Bush Administration. Scooter Libby is TOTALLY different”.
The nut who posted that ABC news supports the Bush Administration is…well nuts!
Posted by: ubipetros | June 7, 2007, 7:44 am 7:44 am
To all you left wingers: If Iran is not supplying the arms, then who is?
Posted by: JackP | June 7, 2007, 7:54 am 7:54 am
Wouldn’t it be nice if we could just all hug trees, save whales, never use our tongues to be critical, had no possessions, no religion and everyone lived in peace!
Wake up and smell the jihad people.
Don’t break the 11th commandment: Thou Shall Not Fake Thyself Out.
The main problem with the USA is that the Govt Schools have brainwashed and drugged(ADHD) so many of our youth the previous 2 or 3 generations that the Country is turning into a bunch of passive pansies that seem to have lost all sense of self and reason.
At this rate we won’t have to worry about Jihad and having our throats slit by some Religious Ideology we will simply implode from shear stupidity.
Posted by: Daddy-O | June 7, 2007, 7:57 am 7:57 am
Remember to tell all of your Democrat friends that there is no war on terror. We can resolve everything through negotiation and the criminal courts. Good luck, you idiots. Please commit suicide on your own. Leave me out of your mental illness.
Posted by: Mike Jones | June 7, 2007, 8:02 am 8:02 am
Do we really believe that we’re going to be able to stop terrorism? Not in my lifetime, and I’m in my 40′s. Terrorism has been around for centuries. We will be about as successful at that endeavor as we have been with the “War on Drugs.” We’re never going to win that war either. When you are attacked by terrorists, you find out who attacked you, and you go after that specific group of people, and destroy THEM; You don’t invade an entire nation of people. The Iraqi people did not attack us, the Taliban did. HELLO!!! And I’m still not convinced that our government knew absolutely nothing about the attacks on the twin towers and the pentagon prior to their occurrence. That’s why we have SPIES!!!
Posted by: Dean E. Sizemore | June 7, 2007, 8:02 am 8:02 am
Here we go again. White House Officials leak “official” documents to the US Media who gobble it up and check its authenticity through the White House. Here’s to buying us another war!
Posted by: Janet Elliott | June 7, 2007, 8:04 am 8:04 am
I can’t believe all this crying about the media. You think the US Media is in President Bush’s corner? WAKE UP!
Do you not remember the countless times the Media has sought defemation of Bush with false stories that they blindingly aired?
And you think the Administration has some kind of hand in America Media? Don’t be stupid. Look carefully and you’ll see that these powerhouse media conglomerates are owned by the rich… democrats.
Here’s a couple of examples:
ABC News political director Mark Halperin supports the concept of a liberal media bias, saying that as individuals most journalists, and news producers, hold liberal political views and that these views affect their reporting. In a survey conducted by the American Society of Newspaper Editors in 1997, 61% of reporters stated that they were members of or shared the beliefs of the Democratic Party. Only 15% say their beliefs were best represented by the Republican Party.
A 2002 study by Jim A. Kuypers of Dartmouth College, Press Bias and Politics, investigated the issue of media bias. In this study of 116 mainstream US papers, including The New York Times, the Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and the San Francisco Chronicle, Kuypers found that the mainstream press in America tends to favor liberal viewpoints. They found that reporters expressed moderate or conservative points of view were often labeled as holding a minority point of view. Kuypers said he found liberal bias in reporting a variety of issues including race, welfare reform, environmental protection, and gun control.
You don’t want to believe the story until you’ve got more sources, great, good for you. But don’t try turning every story that you don’t want to be true into hogwash from the Aministration.
God help the sensible people in the UK, I’m starting to believe they’re few and far between.
Posted by: BlindManSees | June 7, 2007, 8:04 am 8:04 am
Another bush/cheney planted lie.
These terrorists who brought us
9/11 (bush and cheney) are stepping
up their campaign of fiction to
excuse their planned attack on
Iran.
Posted by: Knowinso Jones | June 7, 2007, 8:07 am 8:07 am
There is an old saying “All Politicians Lie, there are Liberal Lies and Conservative Lies, I prefer to ere on the side of Conservative Lies. Mark Twain”
Posted by: Daddy-O | June 7, 2007, 8:14 am 8:14 am
What is reasonable about attacking a nation of people that didn’t attack YOU? “Let’s see….Osama’s operatives attacked us, and they are in Afghanistan, so….I know!…let’s invade Iraq. Yeah, let’s do that!” If you can explain that one to me, YOU should be in politics.
Posted by: Dean E. Sizemore | June 7, 2007, 8:17 am 8:17 am
So what if Iran is supplying arms to the the Afgans. When the Russians were in Afgan, did we supply weapons to the Afgans to fight Russia?
This what wild beast do!
Posted by: John Hoskins | June 7, 2007, 8:24 am 8:24 am
What? An Islamist regime funding America’s enemies? Why is this so hard for stupid liberals to understand? Do you really think it would all go away if we tucked tail and ran home?
Posted by: The Great Hater | June 7, 2007, 8:24 am 8:24 am
If the fact is true, which is still not yet confirmed.. fly B-52 bombers and shell 1 million pounds of explosives is Taliban area. They will never ever speak. Atleast one war will be WON for god sake.
Posted by: Bobby | June 7, 2007, 8:25 am 8:25 am
A few comments:
1. Anyone that thinks ABC is supporting President Bush is NUTS!!!
2. I keep seeing you mental midgets saying “the US supplied arms to the Afghans and they are used against us, we supplied arms to Iraq and they are used against us…” You idiots!!! Do you think bullets last for ever? That was nearly 30 years ago. Every thing that was given to the middle eastern countries has rusted or stopped running. The arm are coming from Iran and North Korea, trust me I know first hand.
3. And finally, if you don’t see the big picture and the plan for radical Islam to take over the world then just keep you head up you butt where is belongs. Just keep bowing at the alter of Al Gores church of man-made global warming and those of us who understand the dangers of the enemy we face will keep you safe and die to protect your rights so you have the freedom to be stupid.
Posted by: American soldier and Proud | June 7, 2007, 8:26 am 8:26 am
You should be ashamed to print such slanted crap. YOU the media are part of the problem today. When the world is filled with hate and ruin you guys get to be proud of the fact that you contributed to it. Why don’t you stick to FACTS instead of all this sensationalism. Media is getting notorious for trying to manipulate the gullible. I like the one you have on Russia suppling them with WWII grenades. So what? Just because Bush wants to start trying to make them look bad to the US now? Or is the US upset because our agents selling out all our old warehoused weapons didn’t get there first?
Posted by: tired of propaganda | June 7, 2007, 8:28 am 8:28 am
This is certainly some very disturbing news if proven to be true. However, before we all go throwing around ad hominem attacks (especially the neocons and Wilsonians) consider this: When the United States began the war to remove the Taliban, it was Iran that was involved in secret meetings with our intelligence and special ops guys to help us do it (See Flynt Leverett). For Iran to turn around and support these folks with weapons and logistics is quite a journey indeed. Remember, the Taliban was the product of Pakistani intelligence, and had been viewed as a threat to the Shi’a state since it began ruling in the 1990s.
While I am certainly open to the reality that what is being reported is indeed what is actually happening on the ground, I remain troubled by the lack of historical support for this partnership and the recent push in Washington to conduct a PR campaign to “take-out” Iran’s nuclear program (a change from the standard line of Iran being a threat). If I were a neocon or a Wilsonian, rather than focusing my attention towards childish oneupsmanship, I’d instead demand more CONCRETE evidence to support these charges. After all, despite both sides best efforts, we still live in a Republic that should not be undermined by the jealous guarding of secrets that impact us all.
When Secretary Gates (who’s no slouch) comes out and says that government involvement in these acts is unproven–that undermines this entire argument that the mullahs are in cahoots with their historical enemies. Thus, do our country a favor and demand that the government release the evidence so that the citizens (and their elected representatives) of this country can make an informed decision. Anything less is unAmerican.
Posted by: Edward Nashton | June 7, 2007, 8:31 am 8:31 am
Where is another George Patton?
Find him quick, he will stop the Jihad!
Oh I forgot the PC Police would just handcuff him and render him impotent like so many others today.
Nevermind, I was just thinking out loud.
Posted by: Daddy-O | June 7, 2007, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Yes Im for climate control in Tehren, Iran. I would like make the temp. rise to about 1400 degs. That should stop all arms smuggling ….
Posted by: davis | June 7, 2007, 8:35 am 8:35 am
I see the DemocraticUnderground folks have chimed in under the guise of ‘American Soldier’ and other names
Posted by: Keith | June 7, 2007, 8:36 am 8:36 am
We, as a nation, are never going to be able to fix many of our problems if we don’t start working together to address issues using our collective common sense, instead of party affiliations. I’m so tired of hearing, “Liberals this, Conservatives that.” WHO CARES!! As soon as you start labeling someone, you automatically put them on the defensive, and you get nowhere. There is a difference between talking TO someone, and talking AT someone. The latter is pointless.
Posted by: Dean E. Sizemore | June 7, 2007, 8:38 am 8:38 am
conservatives point out how easy the left is to put blame on the usa..
“typical liberal..etc”
but i say
how easy it is for conservatives to say
lets blow it up
“nuke the place.”
-yea nuke the place… very smart idea genius.
like little school kids with gunpowder
Posted by: kashif | June 7, 2007, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Romans 8:29, only time will tell …..
Posted by: Mike T. II | June 7, 2007, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Want to put the brakes on the middle east countries that fund and support terrorists? Stop buying new cars until the auto industry gives us vehicles that do not run on gas. What do those countries produce that we want other than gas? I’m sure if new car sales came to a halt, the auto industry would get serious about dropping thier support of the oil industry by way of gas guzzlers. Without gas powered vehicles on the roads of the world, the middle east would have a tough time funding/supplying terrorists.
Posted by: Mitch | June 7, 2007, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Seth Jones works for the RAND Corporation, not the Rand Institute.
Posted by: Daniel | June 7, 2007, 8:42 am 8:42 am
This isn’t about conservative vs liberal. This is about reality. I’m personally liberal in my views. However, the reality is that Iran seeks to consolidate power in the gulf region. Had they taken Iraq (which we first sought to prevent by supplying Saddam with training/weapons), the rest of the middle east would have fallen rapidly. Controlling 40% of the worlds oil exports (through the gulf straights) would give Iran immense economic and political power. Their nuclear capability would increase exponentially, and instead of talking about how to prevent a nuclear Iran we would be talking about how to stop the second Holocaust in Israel and genocide elsewhere in the middle east.
Posted by: aron | June 7, 2007, 8:43 am 8:43 am
I wish there were a way to make all of you liberal bashers move to Russia, Iran, or North Korea. You despise the democratic lifestyle so much, you should be forced to enjoy what you wish we had! Your ignorance is appalling, and your hatred of the U.S. and Britain is treasonous, but we know you are just plain “dumb bastards” who ignore the truth and the facts not matter how they are presented. You hate Bush? In his heart I know he hates you too! Pigs!
Posted by: El gato | June 7, 2007, 8:45 am 8:45 am
This just in liberals…Bush did not lie about anything. “Bush lied about WMD” is a liberal myth. But it has been repeated over and over again until you brainwashed on the left believe it.Sort of like “global warming”…the true bumper sticker bs slogan. 37% of democrats believe Bush knew about the 911 attacks and did nothing. What % of you defenders of the first ammendment believe in Bigfoot? Nessy? Bush Lied? Global Warming? The DNC is happy that all you stupid people believe all the left lies. The dems love stupid dumb asses that believe class warfare lies. The dems recruit all societies misfits for their vote only then dump them.(felons, blacks, gays, fems, and their future… illegal mexicans)Its probably going to take a civil war to clean the vile left from the dept of state, from the legal profession, from our school systems, and especially from the “news”.
Posted by: David | June 7, 2007, 8:45 am 8:45 am
The USA is doomed I tell ya!
Between the ILLEGAL Mexican Invasion, the Drunk with their own Power Politicians
the Jihad against the West, the Politically Correct Ideology and the drugged-up so-called Educated Fools we are doomed.
Lord God have mercy on our souls
Posted by: Daddy-O | June 7, 2007, 8:46 am 8:46 am
I agree with you totally Dean. Same with slinging insults and empty or slanted accusations.
Posted by: tired of propaganda | June 7, 2007, 8:46 am 8:46 am
I understand the cynicism after large, specially marked, separate caches of WMDs manufactured after 1991 were not found in Iraq. (We did find hundreds of unmarked chemical munitions mixed in with others, made before the first Gulf War, which, by the way, breaks the treaty and proves Iraq lying about WMDs. But the so-called corporate media supposedly in bed with Bush has buried that literally explosive story).
But to claim that Bush et al lied is ridiculous. Why would Bush lie, state that there are WMDs in Iraq while knowing that none were there, if he knew that a war launched to find and intercept them would find none? That’s setting yourself up to be proven as a liar in a matter of weeks or months at most. Playground insults aside, he’s not that stupid, and Cheney and the others have certainly never been accused of stupidity.
Nor given the worldwide media hate festival against Bush since Florida 2000 at least, can it plausibly be argued that Bush expected the media to give him a break and ignore the story.
So obviously Bush believed there were WMDs in Iraq. So he did not lie.
So the constant relentless chorus of LIE LIE LIE LIE is itself a lie, a smear and a calumny.
You can argue that he was incompetent and made a mistake. But that means he should have given Saddam, a man caught before with a WMD program he had loudly denied pursuing, a three-time aggressor against his neighbors, an attempted assasin against a former US president, an open sponsor of terrorists including Abu Nidal (who killed Americans), the benefit of a doubt in the face of seemingly damning evidence. What responsible president could have done that, especially after 9/11 showed the danger of passivity?
Posted by: Leo | June 7, 2007, 8:49 am 8:49 am
I’d say its pretty hard to dispute thier role in this war, when you have the iranian president getting on live television calling for the destruction of isreal and the united states, you people have all your facts so twisted its no wonder the iranians think they can get away with this. at home the only message we portray to the rest of the world is we are weak. thanks to you moon bats and our beloved anti american mainstream media
Posted by: Dan | June 7, 2007, 8:50 am 8:50 am
As we all should know by now, Mr. Bush has been conducting operation against Iran for some time. Is it out of the relm of possibility that our good ole CIA wouldn’t contract with persons in Iran to move weapons over the border? Everytime one of these stories comes out, there is always the missing evidence that the gov’t of Iran is directly responsible, not that that will matter.
I hope all you backwards cap wearing, young college republicans are ready for the draft. We got Turkey preparing to attack the Iraqis Kurds, the Saudis ready to move in to aid the Iraqi Sunnis, Iran ready to move in of behalf of the Iraqi Shia, Isreal ready to nuke them all….ya see Mr. Bush is going to set up the next Pres. to make all the tough decisions, including a draft. Hey, why don’t we ever hear about all the weapons the Saudis have move into Iraq, you no, the Saudis, the people who attacked us on 9/11.
Posted by: mark | June 7, 2007, 8:54 am 8:54 am
It is about time Iran learns they cannot kill American troops without being heavily punished. I am sick and tired of people who claim to American, yet support anyone but America. Takes the handcuffs off of the US Military and unleash the power. It is time to destroy with Military power the entire Iranian leadership. If the Middle East turns into a giant battle ground, then so be it. Better now than have 3 to 6 nuclear weapons going off all over the middle east. Unleash the power. Why the US government is afraid to call it what it is. Iran is KILLING US TROOPS. It is time we end this childish game of PC. Evil needs to be destroyed NOW, not tomorrow.
Posted by: Dave | June 7, 2007, 8:56 am 8:56 am
Bush did lie about the certainty of Irag having WMD’s. The neocon crap exaggerated evidence in the face of military & intelligence officials. When they were confronted, they lied harder & attacked the voices of moderation. And the sorriest part about this story is – Bush’s lack of integrity has thrown doubt over every piece of intelligence the US will ever come up with. There was a day when Richard Clarke’s statement would have been 24-karat enough, but not any more. Iran probably is supplying the Taliban, particularly since Bush & Cheney have targeted them. But we can’t just accept & believe anything anymore. It makes me sick.
Posted by: nomorelies | June 7, 2007, 8:56 am 8:56 am
I just wanted to say to the Social Progressives here do you remember what happened to that liberal reporter Dan Pearl with the terrorists. Or that poor guy who was in Iraq who was beheaded by that terrorist Zaquari. Thats an indication of how westerners will be treated if the religious fanatics of Islam come out of these rogue states will treat us. THEY WANT TO KILL US….SO WAKE UP!!
Posted by: brad | June 7, 2007, 8:56 am 8:56 am
Didn’t the US supply the chemical weapons to Iraq, that they then used on Iran ???
Posted by: adam | June 7, 2007, 8:57 am 8:57 am
The God we supposedly trust has already begun the beginning of the end of all evil. Time to duck and cover, right?
Posted by: Mitch | June 7, 2007, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Is Taliban al-qaida?
Posted by: reader | June 7, 2007, 8:59 am 8:59 am
A few headless liberals might make a point?!
Posted by: Daddy-O | June 7, 2007, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Good morning Americans.
Tomorrow morning at 4.00 am American and Allied forces will be landing in force on the beaches of Normandy in Northern France. We believe the beaches include Gold, Juno and Utah. Our sources say that about 400,000 men will storm the beaches from landing craft and start the liberation of France from the NAZI held forces. We do know the 8th infantry and 4th infantry regiment along with the USS LCT 855 and the USS Bayfield (APA 33) which is the flagship for Utah Beach landings.
General Eisenhower did ask us NOT to publish this information but we felt it was in the best interest of our nation. The President did not get a warrant to start this aggression against the German army so we must inform you about this transgression. We also found out that the U.S. and allied air campaign which is now in progress involves a three phase plan including the destruction of the Luftwaffe, isolation of key battlefields beyond the beaches and the allied airforce concentration of air power on rail and road networks.
When you wake up tomorrow our boys will be on the beaches of Normandy so we must publish this information today to let you know. The President should have requested permission from a judge to invade France with a phiser warrant. If any of your son’s die during this attack don’t blame us, blame the President. It’s his war, he started it after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. The Germans did not attack us, so why are we invading France. We say impeachment is the only solution and let the boys stick to fighting the Japanese and re deploy our forces to Tulsa OK. I know, we are weak and we are liberal but we will do anything to undermine the President during war. ( Even at the expense of liberating France)
Have a great day. Best regards
Editor of the New York Times
June 5th 1944.
Posted by: Senior Chief Ross | June 7, 2007, 9:02 am 9:02 am
Wow, the liberal bashing is really getting ugly. Look at the records Clinton vs. Bush you neo-cons really have somthing to brag about don’t you?
All we have to do is quit buying middle eastern oil and we don’t have a problem anymore we can leave them along to kill each other, and they will. Now if I were your boss I would fire everyone of you for blogging so much and not working.
Posted by: mickey | June 7, 2007, 9:03 am 9:03 am
I think some of the positions the libs take are nothing short of dangerous. We try and keep this country safe and whether we take action of not, they bitch. Why don’t they drag their asses to France–the land of inaction?
Posted by: Mark M | June 7, 2007, 9:03 am 9:03 am
Stupid Liberal tricks… Ignore the fact that the Taliban murdered school teachers and hung women from goal posts at a UN-built soccer field during a brutal, oppressive rule in which ALL human rights were violated. Forget the fact that the Taliban sheltered Bin Laden while he plotted MANY terrorists acts against the U.S. (including 9/11) – all while Bill Clinton was trying to pressure Israel to give into Palestinian demands. Let’s just fool ourselves into thinking that these murdering bastards are “freedom fighters”. Oh, and let’s ignore the fact that Iran has been an active sponsor of terrorism around the globe since 1979. Oh, and let’s also ignore the fact that 99% of terror victims are muslim, because it’s all the fault of the U.S., isn’t it? Why, we won’t sign Kyoto or experiment on embryonic stem cells. We’re the terrorists!!!!
Posted by: Mike | June 7, 2007, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Why have we not turned Iran into a parking lot yet is beyond me. They do not need Nuclear plants to produce power. If they get Nuclear weapons they will hold the world and Middle East Hostage. We need to take these plants out soon.
Posted by: AJM | June 7, 2007, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Instead of sitting here and blogging why don’t the neo-cons drag their asses to the middle east and fight for what they belive in, and quit putting magnets on their cars, in other words shut your mouth and fight.
Posted by: mickey | June 7, 2007, 9:08 am 9:08 am
LOL Mike…totally.
There is not doubt Iran is fighting us in a proxy war in both Iraq and Afghanistan; terrorists in both places don’t have the sophistication to rig the EFPs that have been killing our soldiers in both places; the spike in deaths in Iraq are directly attributable to these Iranian-made bombs. By the way, if you doubt that, you’re a moron.
Proxy wars are nothing new, but in the past WE were allowed to fight back through a proxy. Not so now. The question is, in the face of repeated instances of American blood on the hands of the lunatic Mullahs in Iran, now what do we do? Go through the U.N.? What a joke.
Posted by: Kyle Coppola | June 7, 2007, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Park a couple of bombs in Ahmadined’s yard and see if that problem isn’t cured really fast. Ask Quaddafi about that.
Posted by: Jose Antonio Lopez | June 7, 2007, 9:11 am 9:11 am
War in Iran may be avoidable. But it’s probably inevitable.
While there’s a good chance that Iran is really supplying the Taliban with materials, who’s supplying Iran and the other self-declared enemies of the west? China and Russia are (as well as France).
It’s Chinese and Russian nuke-tech, MIGs, and guns. Oh yeah, there’s some German and French made stuff as well, remember Iraq’s French-made anti aircraft systems and the German-made bunkers. So our international economic competitors are supplying our enemies with weapons, including nuke-tech.
Maybe at some point, the anti-America nuts will realize that it’s not the US that’s stirring the war kettle.
Posted by: NickDaytona | June 7, 2007, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Oh I forgot, 9-11 or the USS Cole or the first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993 or the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 or Libyan attack of flight 93 in 1986 or Achille Lauro Cruise ship attack of 1983 or Iran Hostage Crisis of 1979 or the Munich Olympic Massacre of 1973? THEY WANT TO KILL US!
Posted by: brad | June 7, 2007, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Trust me Mickey, civil war is coming soon enough. Give it time. You can see the hate Americans have for each other right here in this forum.
Posted by: Mitch | June 7, 2007, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Wow you people really are something else. I love the way the uneducated “Jerry Springer” crowd comes out in droves to blog on these websites. How can anyone with just an inkling of intelligence post this crap, right wing this and left wing that. I will be so glad when our generation takes over and we get this 40 to 70 year old crowd we have now out of the picture and into retirement homes. To say the media and the whitehouse brought you 9/11 and the war in Iraqi is just ridiclous. Saddam lead us to believe he had WMD, not Bush. How and why? Because his regime of terror was falling apart and he needed his people to think he had WMD to keep them in line. Yes, we were wrong to invade Iraqi, but hind sight is always 20/20. Worst case secenario we liberated a people from a tyrant. But have hope people, most of the educated people are at work right now, not blogging out of boredom or from lack of knowledge or preconcieved notions.
Posted by: Josh | June 7, 2007, 9:13 am 9:13 am
This is so silly.
Iran HATES the Taliban. They nearly went to open war with the Taliban in 1999 and 2000 over border disputes, and went to far as to have a 10,000 man military exercise near the Afghan border in order to signal to the Taliban that Iran would take no more crap from them.
Taliban is Sunni, Iran is shiite.
This is pure propaganda pushed by the United States. Remember that NATO is an American construct.
Posted by: Steve Savage | June 7, 2007, 9:13 am 9:13 am
“By invading Iraq, we have started something that I don’t believe we’re going to be able to stop for a very, very long time, if ever. ”
Were there not attacks on America before we went to war with Iraq?
Barbary Pirates in 1783
American Embassay in Iran 1979
Bombing of U.S. Embassy in Beirut 1983
Bombing of Marine barracks in Beirut 1983
Bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Kuwait 1983
Bombing of U.S. Embassy annex northeast of Beirut 1984
Bombing of La Belle Discotheque 1986
Bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 1988
World Trade Center Bombed 1993
Iraqi intelligence service attempt to assassinate former US President, George Bush, during a visit to Kuwait. 1993
Two unidentified gunmen killed two U.S. diplomats and wounded a third in Karachi, Pakistan. 1995
A rocket-propelled grenade was fired through the window of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, as an apparent retaliation for U.S. strikes on Serb positions in Bosnia. 1995
Seven foreigners, including a number of US servicemen, are killed in bomb attack on National Guard training center at Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 1995
Bombing of USAF housing area at Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 19 American servicemen and 385 injuring more. 1996
A Palestinian gunman opened fire on tourists at an observation deck atop the Empire State Building in New York City, killing a Danish national and wounding visitors from the United States, Argentina, Switzerland, and France before turning the gun on himself. A handwritten note carried by the gunman claimed this was a punishment attack against the “enemies of Palestine.” 1997
US Embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar-es-Salem, Tanzania, heavily damaged by massive bomb attacks. US intelligence blames Islamic groups linked to Saudi dissident Osama Bin Laden. 1998
In the Kara-Su Valley, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan took four U.S. citizens hostage. The Americans escaped on August 12. 2000
In Aden, Yemen, a small dingy carrying explosives rammed the destroyer U.S.S. Cole, killing 17 sailors and injuring 39 others. Supporters of Usama Bin Ladin were suspected. 2000
A bomb exploded in a plaza across the street from the U.S. embassy in Manila, injuring nine persons. The Moro Islamic Liberation Front is allegedly responsible 2000
The list goes on and on, the notion that our war with Iraq created the threat from radical islam is quite an ignorant one.
I am sure there are many more examples of attacks agains America but these were easily identified.
Posted by: Rick | June 7, 2007, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Just bomb Iran already and get it over with. Isn’t that what all this rhetoric is leading up to? And conveniently just in time for the election. Watch the situation in the Middle East escalate exponentially right before voters go to the polls in 2008. The atmosphere will be “Vote Republican, we can’t afford to switch partys in the middle of this chaos.”
Posted by: Tony | June 7, 2007, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Good Job Gentlemen!
Nice work. Sorry for all the liberal bias in most of these comments. As for me keep up the good work.
Posted by: Will | June 7, 2007, 9:17 am 9:17 am
If you are assuming Iran is supplying the opposition with weapons just because they are using Iran-made weapons, then the Russia must be supplying them grenades, as one of your previous articles mentions how they are being used by the enemy.
Posted by: Frankie | June 7, 2007, 9:19 am 9:19 am
“The coalition diplomatic message says the demolition charges “contained the same fake U.S. markings found on explosives recovered from insurgents operating in the Baghdad area.”"
The identity markers in the explosives trace its manufacture to the US… so it must be fake??? It could be real too. What eveidence is there?
Also, why would Iran do anything that might give Dick Cheney a wet dream? This report is exaclty what he has been looking for and last thing in the world that Iran would want.
Posted by: onyx | June 7, 2007, 9:20 am 9:20 am
With Iran giving weapones to the Teliban only shows that it may be very true that they indeed are developing nukes. Why is are government taking so long to do some thing about Iran? They need to take action now before it’s too late. All there has been is nothing but talk. I hope I won’t see the day when things are completely out of control. I don’t like wars any better than any one but if it needs to be, then be it! We got to do our best to protect our selfs.
Posted by: Sweet Nothings | June 7, 2007, 9:20 am 9:20 am
The world will never see peace until we finally send ahmaweeniejob and the rest of the islamofascists back to the stone age. I simply do not understand those who think we can somehow come to a settlement with people who believe they have been commanded to convert us all and kill any who resist. Look at GB. Second most given name is now mohammed? These people figure that eventually they will win no matter what happens on the battlefield. Mathematics is on their side. We are dooming ourselves with our self-imposed population control. In fifty years, you “enlightened” socialist atheists in the EU will be commonly known as “dhimmi”. Us westerners no longer have enough patience to win this. We expect all victories to come in a one-hour prime-time episode. Our enemies will outlast us, unless we control their population for them. If this sounds harsh, then you have no knowledge of history. The enemy is prepared to fight us for as many centuries as it takes to beat us into submission, and impose sharia law on the world. That is the end goal, and they will not stop until it is achieved.
Posted by: supportthemission | June 7, 2007, 9:20 am 9:20 am
What’s that old Islamic saying???? Oh yeah “THE ENEMY OF MY ENEMY IS MY FRIEND”.
Sunnis will provide Shias with weapons to fight the Crusaders until that battle is finished. Then they will go back to killing each other.
Iran is part of the Axis of Evil and has been a pain in the worlds butt for a long time. Time for a little street justice. In the form of a mushroom cloud.
Posted by: Big Al | June 7, 2007, 9:24 am 9:24 am
Liberals are never happy. If they had their way, the only place they would believe and get their news source would be a hut dwelling mystic with dread locks. Finally a balanced, fair, undistorted news piece that doesn’t point fingers in a subversive tone. This is an important and serious subject that needs unity to address.
Posted by: DocMurphy | June 7, 2007, 9:25 am 9:25 am
I think what some of you aren’t understanding is that there ARE weapons and supplies coming in to Afghanistan FROM Iran, that are coming TO various insurgent groups. The only SPECULATION is whether or not it’s SANCTIONED by Iranian POLICY. It’s the same on the other side of Afghanistan with Pakistani Intelligence. It’s interesting that you liberals give the benefit of the doubt to foreign leaders for the behavior of the agencies under them, but how leaneant would you be on Bush if, oh, I don’t know, a soldier killed a civilian? But you’re right, the media is SOOOOOOO right wing….it must make you sick every day to see all the positive coverage that bush gets. You’re all tool boxes.
Posted by: Locke | June 7, 2007, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Iran was the start of the Islamic fundamentalist movement. They started with Beruit, Hezbollah, Hi-Jackings. Yes it is time we act on Iran. When their bombs change from suicide vests and I.e.d s and become nuclear, everyone will have wished they did something. Iran is pure evil, time is on their side act now
Posted by: mike Santelli | June 7, 2007, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Well I think why WWII was a winning war for the Allies without Nazi insurgents in Europe was due to the dumb bombs and massive destruction of civilian infrastructure that the US helped to rebuild after the war. Something to say about carpet bombing of towns and massive civilian loss. The terrorists dont care about civilian deaths. Hey someone here in this war is going to play for keeps and it doesnt seem to be us with this PC war we have been doing.
Posted by: brad | June 7, 2007, 9:27 am 9:27 am
It great to see how liberals
don’t think;
that after step 1 there is a response
that might not have been expected
..and they’ve been schooled…where?
Proof of more wasted Gov. finds
Posted by: Ken | June 7, 2007, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Thank you Jimmy Carter.
Posted by: Tom Kozel | June 7, 2007, 9:29 am 9:29 am
For those of you who mentioned:
“Please check your facts”
and those who also said
“the Iranian government is Shi’a. The Taliban are Sunni – hard core Sunnis. These people do not have a common cause.”
Please keep this in mind…Richard Clarke is a DEMOCRAT…he does not support the Bush administration in any way shape or form. (Democrats and Republicans do not get along…sort of lie Shites and Sunnis).
If Clark is saying that Iran is involved I would tend to believe him. As for those who said the Media were involved in getting us into the war in Iraq…Hey…nobody is perfect. You are correct to make them double check their facts…BUT…please keep an open mind to what facts are being presented and who is presenting those facts.
Iran is trying to drive the United States from the Persian Gulf. They have motive to ship arms to the enemies of the United States.
Posted by: TheseAreTheFacts | June 7, 2007, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Some of us have fought for what we believe in. My question for you mickey is this: Is there anything worth fighting for?
If you are more concerned about your own personal safety, or the “image of America around the world” than the protection of your fellow citizens, and Nation — I pity you.
For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.
“Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. Marines don’t have that problem.” President Ronald Reagan, 1983.
Posted by: Rick | June 7, 2007, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Onyx you moron! Do you think that fake serial numbers and markings can’t be identified with about a half dozen keystrokes on a computer by a field commander. Because of ITAR restrictions arms from the US are identified using a three tier process one that Iran and other haven’t learned to fake, yet!
Posted by: mutt | June 7, 2007, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Isn’t it time Europe got of their butts and started handling some of the load in the Mid-East. It is ALWAYS American kids doing the dying. The despots and tyrants represent a much greater threat to Europe than us.
Posted by: Ben Humphries | June 7, 2007, 9:32 am 9:32 am
It’s funny when liberals insist that Shi’ites and Sunnis would never be allies, then in the very next breath they complain that America and Osama once worked together.
Posted by: A. Trueba | June 7, 2007, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Oh…one more thing. Before the next word slips from anyone’s mouth about how we should deal with Islamic Extremists, or what Sunni’s and Shia’s will or won’t do for one another. Do some research so you can hide the fact that you’re an uneducated opinionist who genuinelly enjoys wallowing in your self endulged ingnorance. Because the long and short of it is, as much as the extremists on both sides of the Muslim fence hate each other, they hate YOU even more. They just struggle for power, it’s you infidels (and believe me you all fit into that catagory, just for living in America, Canada, Europe, or anywhere that isn’t an Arabic Theocracy) that they whole heartedly believe should be purged from the earth. So…who else is for just pulling out because “terrorism” isn’t a big deal in the middle east?
Posted by: Locke | June 7, 2007, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Nothing gets the hawks in this country more fired up than to find that other countries are covertly providing arms and weapons to someone else.
Just like we do!
Posted by: Zach | June 7, 2007, 9:37 am 9:37 am
To those who doubt everything the Bush Administration says, I will give you a story every sensible person will believe. It is not Iran supplying the arms to the Taliban and the insurgents in Iran, it is none other than the DNC!!! Now that is a credible story, isn’t it?
Posted by: Richard Manning | June 7, 2007, 9:37 am 9:37 am
I see someone posted here that the cost of a war with Iran would be too great.
What of cost??? The cost has been in American blood. Dollars I would gladly pay more taxes….I know insane… if the money could be verified and went to more bullets bombs and protective gear for the troops. Instead it goes to these librial progressive law suits and pork barrel politics. If we dont win this war we are going to be dead so damm the costs.
Posted by: brad | June 7, 2007, 9:38 am 9:38 am
While our mission in Iraq is failing, Brian Ross, the ultimate grandstander, wants to instigate a war with Iran. Apparently, we haven’t shed enough blood in Iraq. Suddenly, the media, tripping over itself amidst the frenzy and looking for another war to cover, is salivating over the possibility. President Bush is doing everything possible to aleienate Russia, the only nation that has persuasive influence over Iran on America’s behalf. And of course, the Congress will go along and later claim it was misled.
Posted by: mongo100 | June 7, 2007, 9:40 am 9:40 am
WOW! Some of you blame America for everything folks are scary. So simple minded.
Don’t forget why we were funding Afghanistan during the 70′s. We were trying to stop the influence of the Soviet Union from expanding into the region. The reason for providing weapons to Iraq was to fight Iran.
The world situation is not always so cut & dry. Many times we have to make decisions that keep things in our favor for the time being and deal with the ramifications later down the road. Our goverment does not have a crystal ball to help dictate foreign policy decisions.
Please stop being so simple minded. Stop looking for haw you can blame America for all the worlds woes. God bless America.
Posted by: Jack | June 7, 2007, 9:41 am 9:41 am
GSD posted: “Mahmoud Ahmadinejad(The Iranian Pres.) may be many things but he wasn’t someone who captured American hostages, or held them back in 1979
Look it up.
~~~~~
Well, sorry – did look it up. This is what WIKI says on old Mahmoud:
“Ahmadinejad was politically active as a student during the 1979 Iran hostage crisis, and represented the University of Science and Technology in the Students Movement at the Central Committee for the “Office of Growth of Unity of the Students” where the plan for the embassy takeover was presented. Reportedly, he first opposed the take-over or supported a larger plan that included the simultaneous take-over of the Soviet Union embassy until the Ayatollah Khomeni gave his approval of the US embassy take-over. Several former hostages and the former President of Iran have identified Ahmadinejad as one of the key individuals holding Americans inside the embassy.” [footnote references deleted to save space]
See:
Posted by: Jeff T. | June 7, 2007, 9:41 am 9:41 am
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. This is a prime example. Iran is funding every organization that hates America.
Posted by: Jeff | June 7, 2007, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Richard, you may have something there. Al Gore is try force the world back to the stone age like the Islamic terrorists want to prevent global warming so he has his friends at the DNC sending weapons to Iran to arm the terrorists. Yes, I like it.
Posted by: mutt | June 7, 2007, 9:41 am 9:41 am
You bunch of spineless liberals. You judge everything by the failures of Bush. You are incapable of standing up for anything and do not deserve freedom.
According to you filthy scum,Hitler
didin’t kill any jews until we found out
he slaughtered millions of them.
Go have another latte and let real men
take care of bussiness.
Posted by: denny | June 7, 2007, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Look there are even Iranians at GTMO. The entire world thought that Saddam had WMD including the Clinton Administration. The UN still has a WMD team in Iraq. That is not a neo con argument. Iran has made no bones about their agenda. This is not a neo con issue…an American one.
Posted by: NavyDog | June 7, 2007, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Great, liberals are still stuck in a lost election 7 years ago….oh you stole it….oh Bush lied people died….the great democratic party still laments about losses and things that went wrong years ago instead of doing something about what confronts us now…..the party of vision seems to be out of focus as usual focused on how to gain political seats instead of helping the nation….blooming same old junk they always speak….sickening……wake up we are americans….not Dem Vs Rep
Posted by: B | June 7, 2007, 9:44 am 9:44 am
“even if they have to do some business with a group that has historically been their enemy.”
I think I have heard that somewhere before… Like Sadaam was secular…and wouldn’t work with jihadists…
Posted by: Eron | June 7, 2007, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Earth to libs: hindsight, piling on, and whining doesn’t impress islam extremists. Their mission statement is simple … “kill the infidels”.
The notion of “further inflaming” muslim sensitivities is a bit ridiculous, when just the existence of infidels is unacceptable to them.
As Machiavelli said, it is best to be feared and loved, but if you have to choose, choose fear. Islamic extremists don’t have any problem with the “fear” part of this guidance.
So understand that when Iran gets 100 pounds of highly enriched U-235, it will be the fissile core of their gun-type nuclear weapon, that they will try out in the Port of Baltimore.
Hitler really wasn’t subtle when he single-handedly started WWII. Saddam wasn’t subtle when he invaded Kuwait.
Iran isn’t subtle about their nuclear bomb. Their grand ayatollah poo-bah said they were going nuclear, and their president said Israel is going extinct. As far as Iran is concerned, the issue is settled.
Announcements about their nuclear progress show they know exactly what they are doing, U-235 enrichment (not plutonium), the quantities of UF6 they will convert, etc. and all in your face.
So when watch the news, and when Iran brags to the IAEA and the world they are nearing 100 pounds of HEU, something is going to happen.
Posted by: William Wallace | June 7, 2007, 9:54 am 9:54 am
It stinks that aggression will have to be the means to thwart the Iranian government with the Iraqi mess next door, but we have little alternative. Note: Iranians export their petro but import their gas (no refineries).
Posted by: NavyDog | June 7, 2007, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Hey Ed! Ed the talking horse had more sense than you! Do you even know what AWOL means?
Posted by: J. Alejandro | June 7, 2007, 9:55 am 9:55 am
The number of terror appologists that comment here is sad.
Posted by: Jerry | June 7, 2007, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Ha, ha, ha!
President Bush will bomb Iran sometime before Jan. 2009 and there is NOTHING you liberal kooks can do about it. Go ahead and vent on message boards like this, carry signs and shout, or throw yourself under a redneck’s pickup truck. I’m not sure what will sound better: air raid sirens over Tehran or your hate filled rants. I’m loving it already!
Posted by: Paul | June 7, 2007, 9:56 am 9:56 am
The world according to liberals: There are no enemies, unless Bush has created them. The only real enemy of humanity is Bush. I’m sure if they dig long enough they will find out that Cain’s last name was Bush.
Posted by: J. Alejandro | June 7, 2007, 9:58 am 9:58 am
The fact that Iran would be supplying the Taliban is not surprising, any more than the fact they are also supportive of the Iraqi government against us. It would be far more surprising to find they were NOT supporting both regimes against “American interests”, given the stakes involved. That is because both our ‘interests’ are in what the British have called “the biggest prize in history”– Middle East oil reserves. Whoever controls that region can literally do whatever they want on a worldwide basis. For those clamoring at us to “do the research”, try checking into the concept of petro-dollars to see how that plays into all this. Coincidentally, all of the “Axxis of Evil” countries have, or are now considering, to swap their oil transactions from US dollars to other currencies, leading to a devastating plunge in the US dollar and untold havoc on US prestige.
Posted by: Mark | June 7, 2007, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Go! Jeff the Gore thing makes as much sense as dome of the posted BS.
Amazing how These folks have NO personal experience with any of this.
Have you heard about Osama finding a lantern with a Genie inside? And, the Genie granted each one wish. For his wish Osama wanted a mile high wall built around Iraq, Iran, & Afganistan. The Genie built it. Ole “mammood” wanted all infidels thrown out. Done. The Lone American, a Cajun, for his wish asked that the whole thing be filled with water.
Instant World Peace………
Posted by: Ken | June 7, 2007, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Forget Iran – let’s attack Saudi Arabia at once! Then we’ll take Italy, cause it looks like a boot – and the good ol’ USofA is gonna be putting its boot up some arses, ya know what I mean? HaHA! WOOO! After that, we conquer the rest of Europe, and we establish Fortress Europa Americana. Let Freedom Ring, baby! Next, Russia. Adios, Russia! Then carpet-bomb The People’s Republic of China. Nukes for all!
Let’s just kill everyone. Who cares if they hate us or not, no way to be sure, right? Let’s obliterate every country in the world.
And then, when its all done, and the US has killed everyone and everything, let’s turn on each other, just for fun.
…
Some of you people are just ridiculous.
Posted by: NJCommand | June 7, 2007, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Some naive left wing idiots in here huh?
These reports are coming from NATO, not the US government.
Its also funny how you libs say the media is right when besides foxnews which is impartial is silly. This media is more left wing then Howard frigging Dean.
All libs should be shipped out of here to Canada or China.
Posted by: D Fanelli | June 7, 2007, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Is this the same John Hubers who wrote slanderous articles that have appeard on Al Jazeera’s website?? So who has an agenda and propoganda to sell? And hey if the shoe fits, Iran should wear it. They are threatened by US presence on the other side of two of their borders. But to deny that they are fascilitating violence against American Troops? That’s not just ignorance, it’s your own anti-American propoganda. Luckily, most Americans have common sense and see beyond your smoke screen.
Posted by: To: John Hubers | June 7, 2007, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Here’s the kicker. Why dont the moderate muslims do anything about the extremist element in there mists. They say and do nothing and leave it on our door to clean up the mess. Or they elect the fundimentalists to power????Thats just as bad as the terrorists.
Posted by: brad | June 7, 2007, 10:03 am 10:03 am
It is interesting that various bloggers point out the Sh’ia/Sunni relationship. While it is true that both groups would just as much kill one another than coexist, you [the collective group denying this story] fail to acknowledge one crucial point. Those Muslim groups catering to radical imams see the West and especially the US and Britain as infadels. This Sunni/Sh’iate conflict is analogus to the Protestant/Catholic conflicts of the 15, 16, and 17th Centuries. Like modern Christian denominations, both groups will eventually wise up and unite against a common foe, i.e. the US.
It makes perfect sense that Iran would aid the Taliban. If democracy thrives in either Afghanistan and/or Iraq then Atollayh Khomeini and/or Aahmadinejad’s time is up. That is why Syria and Iran are constrantly meddling in US affairs in the Mid-east. If democracy has at least a partial of success, then it threatens the faboric of despotic regimes who will do anything to hinder it success. After all, if all men [women too] are created equal, then why do we need a state that limits our God-given rights. Just for clarification, I am not a rank-and-file Bush supporter. I do not agree with every policy choice made by this adminstration, but if we needlessly ignore Iran or label their efforts as the laborous efforts of warmongering neo cons, then we will have a parallel situation to that of Nazi Germany. Worse even. For religious wars are always more brutal and/or everlasting than political or territorial disputes.
Posted by: Jason | June 7, 2007, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Every Govt gives spins to media report in there favor so does this govt.
core issue is that most of afghan people think US as imperialist so they fight against them they will find weapons from black market , even US suppliers in black market will be ready to sell them weapons if they got the money.
it is US foreign policy taht is dictated by economic banefits rather than values.it is hurting US global image very badly there is a urgent need of damage control to fix image in outside world.
Posted by: nadeem. aslam | June 7, 2007, 10:06 am 10:06 am
There is no common ground between America’s Left and Right, anymore. Iran is stepping into the void between us and, expoiting it to their advantage.
The battle is not in the middle east, it’s here in America. America should settle it’s differences, here at home, rather than on foreign soil, with foreign lives.
Let Americans bleed for America, rather than the rest of the world.
Posted by: DaBunny | June 7, 2007, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Let’s send Paris Hilton over to Iran to smooth things out with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad .
Posted by: Paul | June 7, 2007, 10:09 am 10:09 am
I guess no one remembers when the USA gave arms to the Taliban, but they were called freedom fighters then. Iran is nto our friend thus would do what it can to protect themselves.
We did it to get Russia out in the 80′s
Posted by: john | June 7, 2007, 10:11 am 10:11 am
I for one am all for bombing these SAVAGES back to the 5th century where they are still living anyways …. Kill em all , let Allah sort them out … Never forget this is all about Radical Islam vs the free world ….They hate us cause we are christian and support isreal…so lets just get this on and over with …time to ramp it up and Fight
Posted by: RedWhite&Blue | June 7, 2007, 10:16 am 10:16 am
I guess I may be a bit old fashioned, but I can’t help but be depressed by what I am reading here. At some point in the last 50 years, American dads stopped teaching their sons to be men. Perhaps it’s a result of single family parents, or Hollywood. I don’t know, I’ll let the sociologists figure it out. But from the border issue to the war against terrorism, I’m seeing more and more people tend to want to roll over and play dead. More and more men are actually considering pulling out of Iraq and losing that fight. What a croc. for the sake of my country, please step aside, drink your latte, and let the men sort out the mess we let you get us into.
Posted by: Blaine M | June 7, 2007, 10:17 am 10:17 am
All you people who just can[]t believe Iran would assist the Taliban are the ones fooling yourselves. And for those of you who want “hard evidence” from a “non-corporate media” source, what exactly do you want? A picture of President Tom (Aminnijaad sp??)loading a truck. Or perhaps a signed credit card receipt showing the Republican Guard of Iran paid for the weapons. You people will never be satisfied. You hate any use of our military power
Posted by: Mike | June 7, 2007, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Liberals are a joke. If anyone wants to understand this whole situation in a sum: It’s politics. These sadistic leaders and their countries/organizations (Iran, North Korea, Venezuala, Taliban) use the political scheme of putting the blame on someone else (the U.S.) to keep any blame pointed away from them. It’s proven that if you keep blame on someone else, you stay in power. They will use this tactic against us because they know we are a kind people and we will do nothing until they cause a catastrophy like 9/11 again. They will not do it though yet, because they are playing the game long enough so that they can take Iraq. These leaders are not honorable “Presidents” (a term they use so often now it makes me sick), they are dictators and criminal regime leaders playing the underdog so to feed on the sympathy of liberal idiots everywhere and poorer nations around the world. They are jealous of the United States and hate its people. They will not show mercy and we therefore CANNOT show them any. Unfortunately we have to be politcally correct and wait until they do something to us so that we are not “pre-emptive.” Support the United States and its Military. Take it from a former Marine, they mean well.
Posted by: Joe | June 7, 2007, 10:23 am 10:23 am
The cynicism and overintellectualizing that permeates these comments is just what the Taliban, Iranian government, and Al Qaeda hope for and depend upon in order to defeat us. Congratulations to the FINAL American Generation.
Posted by: Donald Tatum, MD | June 7, 2007, 10:24 am 10:24 am
The biggest mistake the Bush administration committed in the war on terror was not the invasion of Iraq, but rather in our not hitting Iran first – our main and most potent enemy. When these people gather in the hundreds of thousands every Friday to scream, “Death to America,” they mean it. These people are actively engaged in murdering Americans – end of story.
Posted by: M. Bright | June 7, 2007, 10:24 am 10:24 am
By the amount of posts here that say we should nuke Iran, it has become clear that there are too many Americans who are blood thirsty (even if in reality this is still a minority). NUKING Iran would have extraordinary repurcussions. Especially because our excuse for NUKING them would be to preempt the possibility of nuclear proliferation (and saying, “you are fool to believe Iran would not proliferate is NOT proof”). This would encourage nuclear proliferation more in the long run because it would tell all the people in the world that the US is willing to NUKE you for next to no reason.
Iran is not a threat to us if we don’t want them to be. Don’t forget that to the best of their knowledge we have been planning regime change for a long time. Why would they not try to bog us down in the two conflicts right over their borders. They have no reason to believe we are not coming for them no matter what they do. Especially since they helped us take our the Taliban in 2001 and we thanked them by calling them “evil”.
What if we were a relatively weak nation like Iran (they would not even stand a chance against Israel or Turkey), and China invaded Canada and Mexico and occupied them for the last five years? And what if some leaders in China made not so subtle comments about their also invading us. How would you feel about that? Would you sit back a let it happen,or would you try to prevent it somehow?
There is no cause and effect here, only circular logic. The inability for the a large number of people to put themselves in the shoes of others is what causes conflict. We are only concerned with retribution (and now preemptive retribution) rather than reconsiliation. If you take the time to understand and critically look at yourself and your own actions from the point of view of another, you may learn something about yourself. If the other person is able to do the same thing, then you may become friends (again).
In this Iranian situation I would spend the time understanding Iranian culture and history from unbiased sources (that means not Republican or Democrat) befor you make sweeping proclamations about whether the country is collectively “evil” or not.
Posted by: Realizing Resonance | June 7, 2007, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Not only Iran but Pakistan too sends weapons and other supplies to Taleban, Hekmayar, Haqani or whoever is willing to take up the gun against Western forces in Afghanistan.
The Miltary Dictatorship of Pakistan and the totalitarian clergy of Iran are both afraid of democracy and democratic aspirations in their neighborhood, particularly in Afghanistan. A successful democratic trasition in Afghanistan would encourage the populations of Iran, Pakistan and Central Asia to demand democracy in their countries.
No doubt, there is a strong understanding between the regimes of Iran and Pakistan to do everything in their power to make the democratic process and transition a failure.
As the president of Afghanistan Hamed Karzai has so wiesly pointed out several times: “Terrorism won’t stop unless you destroy the sources of international terrorism”. By now it is clearly eivdent who are the sources and supporters of international terrorism.
Mirwais
Posted by: mirwais | June 7, 2007, 10:27 am 10:27 am
We armed the Taliban (Freedom Fighters) in the 80′s because Reagan saw that was a key to the destruction on Communism in Russia and maybe across the world. It worked. What we didn’t know was what Bin Laden would become today. The biggest mistake was when Reagan armed Saddam with bio-weapons to use on Iran. There is no doubt that Iran has had a big influence in this war. I forget the exact numbers but Iran owns something like 9 of the 14 media companies in Iraq. Somehow we have to shut Iran out without starting a new war. I don’t know if that is possible. Between their weapons/funding and our whippy war techniques (thanks to the libs during the Vietnam) they have cost us all this time and the war so far. This thing could be over.
Posted by: Matt | June 7, 2007, 10:27 am 10:27 am
The West is weak and stupid. We should use as much violence as we need to and kill every man, woman and child until they stop.
Posted by: Chi Vikos | June 7, 2007, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Wake up people. Richard Clarke, who cannot stand Bush, Rice or anyone else in that administration said this above:
“It is inconceivable that it is anyone other than the Iranian government that’s doing it,” said former White House counterterrorism official Richard Clarke, an ABC News consultant.
A guy who testifies against Bush about 9-11 in front of millions doesn’t have an ax to grind. THINK! WHERE ARE TERRORISTS WHO HAVE NO MONEY GETTING THEIR WEAPONS FROM? THEY AREN’T MAKING THEM. A STATE HAS TO BE PROVIDING THEM!
Posted by: chris | June 7, 2007, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Crying Fowl
Wow… some great gems or rightwing nonsense here.
So.. it’s ok when we Americans supply weapons and explosives to the Taliban, but not for Iran to do the same thing? The Bush Administration is not our friend; the Iranian government is not our friend. The Israeli Government is not our friend.
The bulk of the American people aren’t your enemy, despite the vociferous examples blathering on above. The Iranian people aren’t our enemy, and the bulk of Israeli people are not our enemy.
Most of us have incomes to earn, homes to pay for, jobs to do. We aren’t threats to people But each culture has is vociferous wingnuts who represent the largest affront to world peace, more than any one particular nation.
It’s like “wingnut” is a form of cognitive birth defect that simply affect X% of the human population despite all other cultural and racial factors.
Posted by: xxdr_zombiexx | June 7, 2007, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Simple Fix to the Roadside bombs… Make an announcement…From Here on out.. our artillery and Bombers will level 4 city blocks around every IED that goes off.. Period. no warning no clearing of the area, It just ceases to exist…. since this is an Insurgency…let the population control it…Start placing Snipers on roofs of buildings.. and taking out anyone seen w/ a weapon… Period. no warnings NO getting “clearance to shoot” just dead. If it is a War.. Fight it like one
Posted by: CFree | June 7, 2007, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Iranians need to be treated with the respect they deserve — which is none for these evil, Godless and corrupt, nowhere individuals! The sooner we bring their foolish retoric to a stop by killing each and every last one of them in the God-forsaken evil land they live, the better off the whole world and we, both during our mortality and immortality we’ll be! Gee: Hope I didn’t mince my words.
Posted by: rickh | June 7, 2007, 10:34 am 10:34 am
max2424, I can tell you are not familiar with history. Does the quote “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” mean anything to you? Does the USA/Russia coalotion fighting the Germans in WWII mean anything to you? My country is suffering because of people like you and their over civilized lifes. I pray i don’t become so civilized I fail to recognize evil.
Posted by: 2doggs | June 7, 2007, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Hey Dave, you say: “Convert or Die.” What kind of religion is that? Not one that I subscribe to and one that needs to be wiped of the face of this earth”.
How do you think Cristianity spread all over Europe, India, Africa, and North and South America? I’ll give you a hint, it wasn’t Billy Graham.
Posted by: wayne | June 7, 2007, 10:41 am 10:41 am
The United States cannot allow this sort of crap to continue. We were the laughing stock of the world during the Iranian Hostage Crisis. It’s time for the US Military to use our superior weaponry and strike the Iranians hard & heavy in an attack they will never forget. Freedom through military strength and the will to utilize it when necessary. If only Patton was still alive and still in the service.
Posted by: Steve W | June 7, 2007, 10:41 am 10:41 am
You may not believe this report, but think: where are terrorists in Iraq getting sophisticated weapons from? Explosive roadside bombs, carbombs, all the guns…where do they come from? Do they have factories churning them out? Simply put, there are no manufacturing facilities the size that would be required to make the number of weapons showing up.
The media are quick to report the number of bombs, attacks, etc., but why don’t they give equal weight to where these things come from. Why? THIS IS NOT A TV SHOW, WHERE YOU SEE “FRIENDS” SITTING AROUND ALL DAY NEVER WORKING BUT LIVING IN AN EXPENSIVE CITY. THE TERRORISTS IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN HAVE TO HAVE SOURCES OF FINANCING AND SUPPORT. WHO IS SUPPLYING IT?
Posted by: Chris | June 7, 2007, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Yeah, don’t believe this article. If it’s not on the DailyKos it’s crap! Idiots!
Posted by: Christopher | June 7, 2007, 10:43 am 10:43 am
ABCNEWS should be ashamed of itself, promoting war with Iran.
Posted by: kravencarver | June 7, 2007, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Here we go again does anyone pay attention to history and I mean recent history like what has happened in the last 5 years.
Posted by: ant | June 7, 2007, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Reading these lib posts makes me wish they would pull debate club out of school, because seriously, all it managed to do is help these folks fit there heads up their wazoos.
Opera should be the world dictator, because she’ll sit with everyone and ‘talk’ right? Maybe have a good cry with them?
Posted by: Jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 10:48 am 10:48 am
The only people we should be pointing at reference the Iraq war is the politicians that voted to support it because of political reasons. These people where handed a copy of a CIA report outlining the information our intelligence community compiled on Iraq.
Keep an eye on the news, many have now admitted they DID NOT READ THE REPORT.
Hillary said “I was thoroughly and frequently briefed and I didn’t feel the need to read the report. WOW she is definitely presidential material.
Posted by: Lee | June 7, 2007, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Yeah, the US has done some bad things in the past. It’s true. Every country has its own “skeletons.” But there comes a point when one must simply say:
GET OVER IT!
Blah blah we supported Osama, blah blah we ousted the Shah…WHO CARES?!? It’s all in the past! To borrow a phrase from the left wing: MOVE ON!
We did some pretty crappy things to Native Americans and African Americans in this country at one point, too. What if their decendants decided to start killing innocent people on the street? Would the left just say, “Well, we brought this upon ourselves. It’s our fault.”
Sadly, I believe they would.
These religious morons want to live and fight like it’s the 7th century? I say we give them that. The US has HELD BACK far too long. A politically-correct war is not a “war” in any sense of the word; it’s an exercise in futility. Until we fully defend ourselves, these fascists will see weakness, and they will continue to attack and provoke. Yamamoto understood the strength of America when, after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, he said “We have awakened a sleeping giant and have instilled in him a terrible resolve.”
It’s time for us to wake up again!
Posted by: Greg8898 | June 7, 2007, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Iran IS arming, feeding, funding and training anyone in Afghanistan and Iraq – Shia or Sunni or Wahabbi – who could disrupt or derail the Mullah’s worst nightmare – the attempted creation of tolerant, egalitarian societies without the secret police or the religious police, a free, uncensored press, open transparent elections, judiciary based on the rule of law, public treasuries open to public scrutiny. These things are like kryptonite to the Islamic Republic’s intolerant, murderous, corrupt, gender apartheiding, honor killing regime.
Seymour Hersch may have stumbled onto the idea of a ‘Fig Leaf’ Coalition (remember all that hardware America sold Saudi last year? Or the Arab Leagues’s condemnation of Hiz’B'allah’s chicanery in Lebanon last year?) to launch ‘Operation Great Satan’ – the massive, decapitating blitz on the top 20% of Iran’s ruling clerics and minions, their allies, their precious assets. And to quote General Clark in “Winning Modern Wars” “…and there’s nothing they can do about it…”
Posted by: courtneyme109 | June 7, 2007, 10:51 am 10:51 am
To ‘Common Sense’: Actually, you’re wrong, as a persian american who knows my history and language, I can tell you when he says “zionist regime” he IS meaning “Israel”, it’s not just a “characteristic” he’s referring to. And, what’s more, he’s paraphrasing Khomeinni’s statement 25 yrs ago in which he did use name “isreal” when he said “it should be wiped off the map”.
Posted by: Palangi | June 7, 2007, 10:53 am 10:53 am
To you liberal conspiracy freaks that love to bash the US. And our reputation, saying stupid things likes “911 was an inside job”. Why do you not pursue the Russian convoy that was aloud to leave Iraq just prior to US troops pulling into Bagdad winding its way into Syria? Why do you not ask, why has Bush not said a word about the mobile missile interceptors Russia sold to Iran 8 months ago or the shoulder fired Russian anti tank anti aircraft weapons used in Lebanon against the Israelis’? Poor Putin, crying about our planned missile shield, is trying to get his face on every news paper fighting his own proxy war in the Middle East and Bush refuses to bring it to light. Could it be that some of the Hard line KGB is still upset about Afghanistan, which Bush refuses to make this a war Russia keeping it a war with radical Islam that attacked us on 911? Oh I am sorry this dose not fit with your, “hate Bush, hate conservatives, hate Christians, hate Jews, hate democracy, and love Marx ideology.
One more thing to you liberal American hating freaks I never hear you crying for all the innocent Muslims that have died at the hands of the Nazi like Muslim extremist, but hey, I guess they like watching there kids get blown up plus its all Americas fault?
A note to Europe and Asia get off your butts and start protecting your own hemisphere with your own blood and tax dollars and quit letting America carry your water. You get the best of both worlds. On one hand you Have America fight your war and get to criticize us knowing you benefit from a stable oil market more than the US…….
God Bless America and Are troops!
Edward
Posted by: Edward | June 7, 2007, 10:59 am 10:59 am
The wars of the 20th century were the result of misunderstanding, paranoia, and the fact that world powers assumed war was inevitable, which led to the start of WWI. Starting a war because of the belief war is inevitable will only throw fuel on the fire and is obviously a logical inconsistancy
Posted by: conservative for peace | June 7, 2007, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Brian Ross is not a real journalist. The blotter is junk. No more wars for oil or religion.
Posted by: ble | June 7, 2007, 11:01 am 11:01 am
ABC – the new FOX entertainmentchannel!
Posted by: Sean | June 7, 2007, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Geeez.. the only time anyone believes the media is when it reinforces your own “cherished beliefs”.
Yes, Iran is supplying arms to Iraq and Afghanistan. My brother Marines who have served in both those venues have told me that. The only question has been whether it’s sanctioned by the government or just “black market” trade. Best bet is both.
If you can’t figure out why Iran’s government would be sanctioning it you are an excellent justification for banning internet posting until you pass a basic IQ test..
Posted by: Steeley | June 7, 2007, 11:08 am 11:08 am
It is already too late. These folks will nuke the west soon. We’ve let them do it. We are fools.
Posted by: Fred | June 7, 2007, 11:09 am 11:09 am
And my apologies for being in a rush, I had every intention of saying Oprah and instead blindly typed out Opera. Hehe.
Maybe Oprah can listen to Opera during her sit down feel good sessions with world leaders in her new position of Benevolent World Dictator. Cause that’s all the world needs really, to chit chat…maybe Ahmahdingdong can reveal his father’s abuses and let it out with all of us together? Yes? Then we can sprinkle flower seeds all over the world.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 11:10 am 11:10 am
WHY CAN’T THE U.S. STOP THE PRODUCTION OF OPIUM IN AFGANISTAN, WHO ARE THEY APPEASING BY ALLOWING THIS TO CONTINUE, ESPECIALLY IF THE PROFIT IS GOING TO THE TALIBAN, IN ESSENCE WE’RE PROCTECTING A DRUG CARTEL HELL BENT ON THE DISTRUCTION OF ALL OF OUR EFFORTS, WHY NOT SUPPORT HUGO CHAVEZ AS WELL?
Posted by: TM | June 7, 2007, 11:10 am 11:10 am
I think Iranian nukes will need to rain down on New York and Jerusalem before some of the liberal Queens of Denial on this comment thread will come around to recognize the serious threat that Iran poses, and even then they will excuse their behavior and blame it on Bush-Cheney.
Posted by: Patrick | June 7, 2007, 11:12 am 11:12 am
What is a matter with you people? Are you totally brain dead? It doesn’t seem at all remotely possible that Iran could be actively promoting and supplying explosives and weapons? For people who tout open-mindedness and unity you sure are very single-minded and closed off from the realm of reality. Maybe it is just that it interferes with your daily life to take such a serious look at the way things are shaping up in the world. I believe this very much the problem in general. If we have to start investing something beside doubt, distrust, and ignorance into this present conflict we would be more united. Right now it costs the average person nothing….only the soldier and his family. The rest of us get to quietly sit down on our couches at night and watch information that validates our desire to save our energy to persue our own interests. The reason wars such as WWII were looked at with so much respect is that the most all people willingly sacrificed something in order to support those giving the ultimate sacrifice. Our country has become self-interested, self-absorbed, self-prompting idiots and most of the dribble above proves it.
Posted by: Luxy | June 7, 2007, 11:18 am 11:18 am
So what are we gonna do about it? Are we finally gonna check this regime or do we wanna give them Iraq and Afghan… it is ’39 all over again and nothing has changed.
Posted by: JWM | June 7, 2007, 11:19 am 11:19 am
xxdr_zombiexx I think is probably a zombie in real life. And thank goodness you left-wing are so fringe and will never be taken seriously. Somehow in your fantasy world you manage to absolve the people living in a country from the government they choose.
When the allies entered Nazi Germany and found the death camps, they forced locals to bury the dead inmates. Why? Because they knew that the people knew. Here we are 70 years later and few people doubt that German citizens knew what was happening to those people.
If Iranians permit their government to call for the destruction of their neighbors and in fact the government strives to do it themselves, that is the citizens’ responsibility. Our ancestors overthrew a government they saw as oppressive — one that had the most powerful military on earth at the time. Why can’t others do it, too?
Posted by: cooks95 | June 7, 2007, 11:22 am 11:22 am
If there were a Black Market for arms in Iran then Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would have been blown to smithereens by now.
Under a regime such as his, where there is not even a Black Market for free thought, there is no Black Market for anything.
It continues to amaze me how naive and ignorant Neo-Socialists (liberal useful idiots) are to Real-Politik. They simply become the mouthpeice tools of the coniving enemy.
Posted by: Tian | June 7, 2007, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Iran’s government should fit Chris and max2424 well when they decide to move there. They don’t know their history as well as they thinks they do. Does ignorance run rampant? Most deaths that have occurred during mankind’s existence did not occur fighting wars against other countries. Religious or otherwise but by the hands of their own government.
Posted by: T.Charlie | June 7, 2007, 11:27 am 11:27 am
This Bush Lied mantra is getting real old. I have a question for those who say there were no WMD’s. Where did they go? Saddam admitted he had them and there were stock piles (tons)of it before the first Gulf War. He threatened to use it against us and we went into battle fully expecting to be hit with it. ALL the news networks were reporting we would have tens of thousands of casualties if he used them, but he did not use them. The issue, for those who choose not to remember, was that Saddam could not account for what happened to them, hence the need for inspectors to search for it. How many years did we see reporting of inspectors showing up at certain sites and being turned away or let in later? The satellite immages of truck loads of stuff being moved from those sites while the inspectors waited to get in were published. We then found out that a member of the inpection team was a spy and telling Iraq where the team was heading. If there were no WMD’s, what did it matter where the team went and why not let them in? Why were truck removing materiels? Saddam agreed to report it to inpectors as part of the cease fire of GW1, which he violated. Either the “Bush lied” crowd is lying or they are ignorant of history…you choose.
Posted by: Dr. Michael Williams | June 7, 2007, 11:27 am 11:27 am
The bottom line is that you have a country declaring it will wipe another country off the face of the Earth. they defy the sanctions imposed on them and dare us to do more. Are we going to wait until they follow through on their threat and then say I guess or sources were right this time? Come on people WAKE UP!!! Quit blaming the different parties and realize we are in a religious holy war. Even the terrorists call it that. What is sad is that nothing will become of this until we are nuked by someone. Fight the war over there and save this country. Survival of the fittest!! GOD BLESS THE USA!!
Posted by: Kevin | June 7, 2007, 11:28 am 11:28 am
I thought toppling the Taliban was the ‘good’ war that the Left supported after 9/11, going after Bin Laden and all that? So if Iran is funding these guys – who directly supported 9/11 – shouldn’t the Left be really, really pissed?
I mean, if this was the war the Left could actually support (rememeber, they criticize Bush for the Iraq war in part because it supposedly “took our eye off the ball” in Afghanistan), and which even the Europeans woudl support, then they should all rally to this cause and prepare for what might be inevitable action against Iran.
Somehow I doubt the Left or Europe has the stomach for a real fight, though. They would prefer to sit back and snipe. Typical.
Posted by: MD | June 7, 2007, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Greg said: “Yeah, the US has done some bad things in the past.”
You mean like when Fox News Contributor Col. Oliver North sold WEAPONS to Iran in the 1980′s without the knowledge or approval of anyone in formal government? North didn’t think Iran was a threat (or else he wouldn’t have sold them weapons under the table), so why should anyone else?
Posted by: Eric | June 7, 2007, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Michael Williams said, “This Bush Lied mantra is getting real old.”
And he’s lying again, through this propaganda piece. The ‘anonymous’ source used in this story to convey false information to the American press, and by extention to sway public opinion in the US towards a strike on Iran, was born & raised right there in the ouskirts of Washington DC.
Posted by: Eric | June 7, 2007, 11:39 am 11:39 am
WoW..
To Chi Vikos – You call the west weak?
….Research your history. Just because you say something doesn’t make it true. Only a coward would suggest killing women and children.
Why not put on a real military uniform, Officially Declare war under a governments flag, and then face us?
..oh, nevermind.. you would rather kill defensless women and children in a terror attack, blowing yourselves up so you don’t have to face us on the battlefield. Cowards.
pfft..
To all the America haters who blame america first for EVERYTHING.. leave. If you don’t like it here, just go.
To Everyone Else.. See all these America haters? This is what happens when Hippies have children.
Posted by: Scott K | June 7, 2007, 11:40 am 11:40 am
If you are not willing to fight for your freedom then you don’t deserve it. If we don’t handle the problem now who knows how bad it will be later.
Posted by: chris | June 7, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am
If you want peace in the middle east, you have to look at Iran. They are the source of arms to the Taliban, the Iraq insurgents (on both sides: Sunni and Shia), the Hezbollah, and to Hamas. To settle the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the answer is deal with Iran. In the process, you will process you will also settle much of the fighting in Lebanon and Isreal. If you don’t stop Iran and leave all of these areas unsettled (bring the troops home), you will be dealing with an Iran in 15 years that controls Iran, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Lebanon directly in an all out war to destroy Isreal. Then they will attack Saudi Arabia to gain complete control over middle eastern oil. By that time, you are facing another World War. This time against an enemy that will be nuclear armed and very willing to use it.
Posted by: Russell | June 7, 2007, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Everyone needs to GOOGLE “Iran Contra Affair”.
Wiki:
“[Iran Contra Affair] involved several members of the Reagan Administration who in 1986 helped to illegally sell arms to Iran, an avowed enemy”
Selling weapons to ‘avowed’ enemies is a clear indication that those in the know don’t think their ‘enemy’ is very dangerous in the first place.
Posted by: Eric | June 7, 2007, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Yeah, right. This is as likely as the whole fiction of Saddam’s massive aerial WMD drone fleet. Notice how there is no actual evidence given in the form of photographs, captured material or prisoners given. You’re supposed to take the word of bunch of proven liars and blood profiteers as law. I’ll believe it when I see it.
As for all you pinheads who think it’s cool to start more wars of world domination, sign up or shut up. You have no right to expect others to do your fighting for you. Get your pathetic, crispy-creme eating posteriors moving to the rectuiting office and put your money where your mouth is. I’m more worried about MS-13 running amok in American neighborhoods than I’ll EVER be about the Iranians.
Posted by: A. Magnus | June 7, 2007, 11:46 am 11:46 am
GOod going Dr. Williams. I too am tired of those who say Bush lied about the WMD’s that Sadam claimed to be present and then couldn’t account for their whereabouts when we destroyed them in this last “war”. Bush based his decision on the information at hand which was there were WMD’s in Iraq and they threatened us with their use. TO wait for a WMD to make it’s way to our side of the world is idiotic. If wrong, and we aren’t certain of that we can heg forgiveness later. I’d rather that than bury potentially thousands of Amreicans killed on our soil and then seek revenge. Iran should be next if they continue on their present course. Diplomacy first but these people have a history of appearing to agree to diplomatic agreements including inspections then object and don’t allow inspections as agreed. Isn’t there film of them using trucks away from the locatiosn to be inspected days before an inspection was to take place. What does evryinie think they were moving, parasols for peace? The spy in the inspection unit is well documented as well. If they were living up to the agreement why do they need to move anything. The answer is obvious. They’re liars and can’t be trusted. If we’re sure Iran is developing nuclear weapons then a tactical strike is called for and should be done immediately. How many suitcased sized nuclear weapons do we want on American soil? We could end up a distant glow on the Iranian western sky that they can bask in and talk about what fools we were in allowing them to delay our actions while they plotted our destruction. As a rule I believe in diplomacy but for it to work both involved parties have to be as committed to working out an mutually satisfying agreement and not use the diplomatic process as a stall to enhance the ability to destroy what they truthfully consider their mortal enemy. I’m for making them all martyrs if that is what they think will bring them the most honor in the next life. Let’s just make them martyrs before they send thousands and maybe millions of Americans to their maker.
Posted by: Jim G | June 7, 2007, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Magnus said, “This is as likely as the whole fiction of Saddam’s massive aerial WMD drone fleet. Notice how there is no actual evidence given in the form of photographs, captured material or prisoners given. You’re supposed to take the word of bunch of proven liars and blood profiteers as law”
Yes indeed. Remember in the leadup to the Iraq war Donald Rumsfeld going on every Sunday monring news show to tell the American people about a VAST network of tunnels and bunkers DEEP undergound in Iraq, and in the mountains of Afghanistan? Remember those? Rumsfeld even showed DETAILED drawings of what the bunkers ‘look like’. Well, my friends, we come to find, THEY DON’T EXIST! They NEVER DID EXIST!
The propaganda of these bunkers was used to scare the paranoid among us, which quite unfortunately is at least 28% of the population. The end result was just another piece of ‘information’ created by agents for the purposes of allowing us to justify a war that would NEVER have otherwise been justified. There was (and is) even talk of the need to develop ‘bunker busting nuclear weapons’ to destroy these non-existent bunkers. Here again, propaganda is being used for something even more dangerous, and that is the continued profileration of nuclear weapons. And all of this is being executed and controlled by a HANDFUL of neo-conservative, paranoid schizophrenics that somehow found their way to the top of the power eschelons of US government. The enemy IS within, my friends.
Posted by: Eric | June 7, 2007, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Yes, how soon we forget. For all of you bleeding heart idiots, why not pack up and move over to Iran and notify your relatives.
Take a vacation over there and you’ll change your attitude, these Jack_sses have so much hatred for Americans period. Look at the beheadings of American civilians in Iraq. Don’t think for a minute that they won’t unite to fight us that at the big picture they want world dommination for Muslins.
Posted by: TF | June 7, 2007, 11:58 am 11:58 am
All you fools who buy the line that our gov. is worried about Iran’s nuclear ambitions need to research whats really going on.
Even if Iran got nukes, the U.S. has at least 1000 times more and great abilities to take out missiles before they hit anything.
We’re surrounding Iran right now, they are contained and 5 years from even one nuke by the most optomistic estimates.
Look, if Iran wanted to do something with a nuke, they would have bought one from a corrupt Russian officer by now, get real!
RUSSIA AND CHINA are the big upcoming threats as seen by the gov.
Thats what the missile shield in Eastern Europe is about.
This Iran cat-and-mouse is just a sideshow to mislead the rubes and to score some permanent strategic bases and oil in the M.E.
I’m even beginning to wonder if Iran is in with the US playing this show.
Posted by: salvadordali | June 7, 2007, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Will someone ask this question at the next Democratic debate in place of the “what role will Bill Clinton fill for your administration? softball?
Posted by: Joe A | June 7, 2007, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
It’s real sad that Iran has been at war with us for 30 years and liberals still deny this. You would rather blame us for everything Iran does than admit these people are trying to KILL AMERICANS. Wake up libs, they hate our way of life not Republicans. They would make all of you convert to Islam by the sword or die. Why can’t you all get this in your thick skulls?
Posted by: TxBueller | June 7, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Maybe you all should focus on the fact that Iran is sending weapons to an enemy that is killing our soldiers, and maybe if they didn’t… just maybe, life would be a lot better…
Posted by: Who Cares | June 7, 2007, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
jabbadu said, “What we have (and yes, even the Russians) that the Iranians do not is CIVILITY and a sense of HUMANITY far deeper than what the nut jobs running that country have.”
Are you referring to the civility that allows the US to invade a sovereign nation, and kill 100-200 thousand people in the process? I don’t recall Iran ever doing that, but then again, I have a different definition of ‘civility’ than you do.
It’s also funny that you included Russia on the ‘civil’ list. You mean the same Russia that is threatening to target nuclear weapons at Europe in response to the US violation of the space-based weapons treaty? You neo-conservatives really are a comedy of errors.
Posted by: Eric | June 7, 2007, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Craig – ““Convert or Die.” What kind of religion is that? Not one that I subscribe to and one that needs to be wiped of the face of this earth.”
That sounds like an oxymoron. Kinda like “Death to all extremists”.
Posted by: jimbo | June 7, 2007, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Soon the Neo-Socialists (liberal useful idiots) are going to start a massive propaganda effort to erase 9/11 from our memories – repeat after me:
“There were no WMD”
“9/11 never happened”
“9/11 never happened”
“9/11 never happened”
.
.
.
“Hiel Hitler!”
“Hiel Hitler!”
…
Posted by: Tian | June 7, 2007, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
To Myron – Consider: Iran IS arming, feeding, funding and training anyone in Afghanistan and Iraq – Shia or Sunni or Wahabbi – who could disrupt or derail the Mullah’s worst nightmare – the attempted creation of tolerant, egalitarian societies without the secret police or the religious police, a free, uncensored press, open transparent elections, judiciary based on the rule of law, public treasuries open to public scrutiny right on their doorstep! These things are like kryptonite to the Islamic Republic’s intolerant, murderous, corrupt, gender apartheiding, honor killing regime.
Hope this helps.
Posted by: courtneyme109 | June 7, 2007, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Iran is only one of several countries sending military support to Iraq and Afghanistan “resistance”.
The issue is more about what are they resisting? Simple……they are resisting any restriction of the imposition of stringent Islamic law on any and every government, anywhere in the Middle East.
They do NOT want a democracy in their midst. Pure and simple. They want a religious dictatorship, and they want it for the entire world…..not just the Middle East.
This is religious fanaticism in its most hideous form.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | June 7, 2007, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Only one explanation: Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy!
Posted by: chris | June 7, 2007, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
No I’m referring to the same Iran that had hundreds of thousands of their children run into mine fields to detonate a path for their soldiers. And yes, I feel the Russians have a legitimate claim to defend themselves, Bush is overstepping his bounds. But while we came close many times to annihilating each other, we both held back for the sake of the future. That same future that the mullahs feel is ripe for the return of Allah. So yes, that is what I refer too.
Try using logic instead of emotion when you think dude.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
It’s irnoic that Killeveryoneneocon calls for peace with the Iranians — whose government calls for the death of others and us — yet his name says to kills Americans.
Are you stupid. Actually, yes you are. Talk with Iran? Would you talk with the local murderer who wants to kill your wife and children? I CAN SEE IT NOW:
Killeveryoneneocon: Hello Mr. Murderer, I wanted to get to know you better and your concerns — what you really feel.
Mr. Murderer: I hate you and want to kill, that’s how I feel.
Killeveryoneneocon: Great, so we’re opening up a dialogue. How can I help you with your objectives? Let’s try to find some common ground.
Mr. Murderer: I have nothing in commn with you as long as you keep your friends (Israel). End your relationship with them and i will say that we can get along. But then after we collectively destroy them, we will turn on you,too. Do you know why? Because if you give in to us, we will know you are weak and just want peace.You are pathetic.
Killeveryneocon: Ok, whatever you want. I’m sure that if we just give in to your demands now we can somehow find common ground in the future.I want you to know that I’m committed, no matter how many times appeasment fails, to believing you will somehow like me. I want to be liked, and I’m afraid of reality. My fantasies are very important to me.
Posted by: cooks95 | June 7, 2007, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
BOMB BOMB BOMB, BOMB BOMB IRAN
BOMB BOMB BOMB, BOMB BOMB IRAN
BOMB BOMB BOMB, BOMB BOMB IRAN
BOMB BOMB BOMB, BOMB BOMB IRAN
BOMB BOMB BOMB, BOMB BOMB IRAN
BOMB BOMB BOMB, BOMB BOMB IRAN
BOMB BOMB BOMB, BOMB BOMB IRAN
BOMB BOMB BOMB, BOMB BOMB IRAN
Posted by: Curtis | June 7, 2007, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Its a shame that people actually doubt that Iran is helping kill US soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. What are you smoking? And all these “facts” sited are no more than liberal presuppositions. Get some common sense!
Posted by: Dan | June 7, 2007, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Oh please, a few thoughts are in order, at least ones that fall between the “it’s all lies” and the
nuke em” ends of the spectrum. Are the Iranians supplying arms to the Taliban, most likely. Why not help your enemy against your bigger enemy, especially if your “little” enemy is one who is far less of a threat to you then your big one. History is full of examples of enemies uniting against a larger common enemy. So for those of you who say this can’t happen, I’d recommend a good history book. You can start with the alliance of Sparta and other Greek cities and move forward through Germany and Russia in pre WWII. To the “nuke em” group, be serious..I’m certain it makes you feel good to say it but it isn’t going to happen unless there is some catastrophic event, so to offer that up as a response is no more then idiotic.
I also find it unlikely they “hate us for our freedom”, no they hate us for our policies and actions. That is not to say that those policies or actions are always incorrect and shouldn’t be in place, but some of them are at best counter productive. So let’s not reduce what should be a serious subject to a bumper sticker slogan. I certainly am not wise enough to know how to solve the problems of the Mid East, but I am smart enough to know that the best approach is somewhere between the extremes of it’s “our fault” and “nuke em”
Posted by: Jon | June 7, 2007, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Where do these people get their information? Neo-cons, radical christianity? people please!?! We liberate people! We don’t suppress them. We spread freedom and opportunity to the areas of the world where there was none; don’t these people deserve the ability to enjoy life as we have here? All of you crazies need to come back to Earth and take a look at the reality of our purpose, not the picture your politicians paint for you. The liberals in this country have so many people brainwashed by these constant repetitive accusations and name callings against our president, against our country, and against our purpose! We are defending ourselves from a very real threat, while at the same time protecting the unprotected, where is the evil in that? Tell the people of New York, 9/11 is a bumper sticker. Tell the people of Iraq, the war is a political scandal! How can people be so naive? These are very scary times when the traitors in our country belong to the most respectable positions in our government, and run our mainstream media. We have nobody else to blame but ourselves, after all we put them there, and allow them to continue their treachery. Its time for a change and the only way that’s going to happen is by force. I hope my generation isn’t so full of these delusional people who fail to see the world for what it really is. We are the most powerful nation in the world as it is today. It’s time we started acting like it before that changes. Our enemies are ready to die for their beliefs, so let’s help them along their way.
GOD BLESS AMERICA
GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS
AND GOOD BLESS OUR CAUSE
Posted by: DanInDaytona | June 7, 2007, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Yes the Taliban are Sunnis and yes, the Iranian gov’t is Shia. That has nothing to do with the goal of Iran, which is to create as much havoc for the US and Britain as possible. In Iraq, Iran supports both the Shiites and the Sunnis with weapons. Why? Because they want a civil war. Why? Because a civil war would be terrible for the US. There is no need for media encouragement, you want the media to suppress the facts so the US won’t attack Iran. I say the best way to put an end to much of the trouble is to take on Iran NOW. Better for us, better for Iraq and better for Afghanistan and better for the world.
Posted by: Damian | June 7, 2007, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Jabbadu: link please to claim of ‘hundreds of thousands of Iranian children running into a mine field to clear path for soldiers’?
While it’s certainly possible that the radical element of Iran would support such a move, it still is not the majority of the sentiment of that country.
Posted by: IMMIensaMind | June 7, 2007, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
we owe our soldiers so so much. they are professionals in what probably is their chosen career. they’re fighting over there so people like you can spat you liberal lack of love and respect for the country you are so blessed to be living in…
Posted by: sebastian | June 7, 2007, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
My experience has always been: you ignore the enemy and they go away. Come back home. The enemy is drawing us in to a ‘major’, stragetic disaster; of which, they will find to be the greatest source of entertainment.
Posted by: Mary | June 7, 2007, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
The U.S. supported Iraq against Iran years ago during a totally different situation. Liberal logic states that we can not be against Iran due to something we did years ago under a completely different scenario? Should we still be enemies with Germany and Japan?
Iran is causing 99% of the problems in Iraq.
Posted by: Otto Skorzeny | June 7, 2007, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Hey Mary: tell that to Neville Chamberlain, who historically proved you incorrect.
Had we ignored Hitler, you would be speaking German and this time.
Posted by: IMMensaMind | June 7, 2007, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
are you that naive mary? radical muslims are killing/murdering people of the world one reason and one reason only – they are not muslim.
with that said, the usa is not a muslim nation. do you really that if we left they would just leave us alone? as the world super power, are we not obligated to help those being suppressed? do you like the way women are treated in muslim nations?
radical islam is a religion of pure hatred, nothing more…
Posted by: sebastian | June 7, 2007, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
DEAR IMMensaMind | Jun 7, 2007 12:17:35 PM,
YOU ARE AN IDIOT. I THINK IT IS GREAT THAT WE LIVE IN A COUNTRY FOR WHICH YOU ARE ABLE TO HAVE YOUR OWN OPINION AND I THIS IS YOUR OPIONION THAT YOU WROTE ABOUT.
HOWEVER, THEY DID NOT SNEEK INTO POWER, THEY WERE VOTED IN AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC VOTED THEM IN. IF THE PUBLIC WANTS THEM OUT THEN THEY WILL BE VOTED OUT.
HAVE YOU BEEN TO THE FRONT? I HAVE AN YOU MAKE ME SICK BECAUSE OF THE MEN I FOUGHT WITH WOULD SAY THE SAME ABOUT YOUR OPINION, YOU HAVE NOT BEEN THERE, YOU MY FRIEND HAVE BEEN THE IGNORANT FOOL WHO HAS WATCHED TOO MUCH PROPAGANDA.
Posted by: JIM SMITH | June 7, 2007, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Otto Skorzeny said, “The U.S. supported Iraq against Iran years ago during a totally different situation. Liberal logic states that we can not be against Iran due to something we did years ago under a completely different scenario?”
During the 1980′s, the US was officially supporting Iraq in their war against Iran. However, during that SAME period, current Fox News Contributor Col. Oliver North was supporting IRAN, an avowed enemy of the United States, by selling them weapons as part of the ‘Iran Contra Affair’. So North was in effect at direct odds with President Reagan’s official policy, and was furthermore supporting the targeted enemy of that policy.
When you ask yourself why the perpetrators of the Iran Contra Affair are not rotting away in prison, the answer comes quite easily. The government knows Iran was not, and is not a threat, or else there would have been no weapons sales to them. The ‘actors’ on the American side operate with this knoweldge privately even though they tell the American public something totally different. This basic ploy is how the war machine keeps its profit margins at full throttle.
Posted by: Eric | June 7, 2007, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Wow it amazes me the comments on here. People do not just hate Bush they hate America. if this country is so bad then leave and go to one of these great countries like Iran and let me know how things are going for you. Please stop with the hate America and just leave you are free to do so but once you leave do not come back whining because you had a taste of the life of being in Iran or North Korea. For those who say look at History and you can see America is the threat and terrorist need to actually read a history book instead of conspiracy websites. America has freed more people on this earth then any other civilization in world history. Ask South Korea if they would prefer being part of of the North Korean life and economy. Ask France, Germany, Poland , Italy and most every other European country if they would prefer being part of a Nazi empire. Ask the pacific island counties and Australia if they prefer their current lives or would enjoy being part of a japan empire ruled by a emperor. What about East Germany i am sure they would prefer to live under the rule of Soviet Union. South Africa would love to still be in apartheid, but of course people will say it was Nelson Mandela. Yea ok read history he was a leader of a movement but we backed him with money and political power to make a change. America feeds and gives more humanitarian aid to the world at a rate of 75% more then all other industrialize nations in the world. We give and give and give and what do we get in return our own people saying we are the evil in the world. Please read your history instead of listening to crazys on the left who have no ideas on making things better or imploring the lives of others in the world other then themselves. Tell me what ideas or plans left has, other then run from Iraq and go after everything Republican. If you want to jump on the socialist left then move to France as they are in that life style oh wait the socialist lost the election because the country has been going to hell in a hand basket because they give their people everything with there socialized programs. Watch how France changes and only thing the left socialist will have left is Canada which is a loose socialist society. Not the extreme socialist society the left wants to have. Give me stuf through programs and make them dependate on the government nad the left wing party. They is what they want to do and if you can not see that again read history. Very few socialist societies are still around and those that are, are not working to well. Learn your history of not just America and US but the History of governments in the world and show me where a left winged socialist society is thriving in this world.
Stop complaining about America and leave. I am not here to support Bush but i am here to bring reality to this so called Evil America. If it is so bad then go to another country were life is so much better for. Again we are so Evil that we are the country that most people would prefer to live in. Makes sine does it not that people from around the world would risk dying to get to this country for a better life and the people that are here can only talk about how bad we are. Wake up and think before you write your crazy thoughts down that you are copy and paste from your left websites.
Posted by: Brian | June 7, 2007, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
You guys have too many opinions. I’d rather live in a place like North Korea where they only get the news from one source and you just accept it. Things would just be simpler! Wouldn’t it?
p.s. nobody (pinko-commie malcontents or right wing blood lusters) is allowed to twist my words
Posted by: CL | June 7, 2007, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
TM:”I think Iranian nukes will need to rain down on New York and Jerusalem before some of the liberal Queens of Denial….”
I don’t think it will happen even then! Somehow we will have brought this on ourselves and SOMEHOW, we will have *MADE THEM DO IT* … somehow.
Keep in mind that in the liberal view, it is never the fault of the person who actually did something violent. It was their upbringing, their environment or they were picked on, abused, etc (Well, unless you are a conservative, THEN and only then is it truly your fault.)
Come on folks! Wake up! Failing to look at the bigger picture is seriously ignorant and limiting. Do you really think that anyone in the Iranian government is going to step up and say “YEP! We shipped those munitions! We’re really sticking it to you infidels!”
If you believe that then the prisons are full of innocent people. We all know that no one there will fess up to what they did!
What do you really have to gain by sticking your head in the sand? Just because you scream louder doesn’t make it any more true.
I guess you liberal guys/gals want Ahmadinejad to publicly confess and give a signed confession AND pass a polygraph?
Keep ignoring the evidence and facts and keep going with those “feelings” since we know that is the basis of truth *cough cough*
Do I think we should rush to war? NO. I think we should build our case and make it iron clad and do what is needed.
The bottom line is that Iran does not need to get nukes! It will not be good for the rest of the world!
Posted by: Hawk | June 7, 2007, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Warm up the B52s boys, we’ve got strike coordinates in place and American firepower to deliver those crazy Holocaust Denying Islamofascist Nuky wannabees. Courtesy of Good Ol’ Uncle Sam…..You CIA boys get your infiltrators ready….We’re off the liberal “it’s our fault bandwagon” and gettin’ a ride to Nuke Town Iran.
Posted by: Hank | June 7, 2007, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Eric — “Are you referring to the civility that allows the US to invade a sovereign nation, and kill 100-200 thousand people in the process? I don’t recall Iran ever doing that, but then again, I have a different definition of ‘civility’ than you do. ”
How about the Greco Persian War from 499 BC to 448 BC? (and forget the movie 300 read Herodotus.)
Why raise the issue of national sovereignty? The bombing of the US Embassies in Africa was a direct attack on our soverignty. As was the bombing of the USS Cole. Why is our national soverignty of less importance?
If these radical islamic jihadis were not engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan, where do you suppose the battle would be taking place?
Posted by: Rick | June 7, 2007, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
SEND THE BILL TO PEANUT BOY.
Posted by: Jimmy Crater, Liberal Genius | June 7, 2007, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Democrats are hilarious, ignorance sure does sound like bliss. Bush Lied, Iran is our friend, Hillary has a shot at the White House. I love the one dude who said he’d trust a foreign media source before an American one. I wonder how many 9/11′s we need before Democrats see the big picture. Democrats may be worse for this country than Al-Qaeda, at least most terrorists aren’t registered to vote. Good Lord.
Posted by: Troup | June 7, 2007, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
If the above is at all representative of the mentality of the citizens of the US, then God save them.
I’m certain that on this aniversary of D-Day FDR is surely rolling over in his grave. The Great American society has fallen so far, so fast. What took centuries to build is crumbling in mere decades.
As clearly on of the great American leaders, FDR had the qualities that America once cherished.
Some of FDR’s address to the nation upon the D-Day invassion:
“Almighty God: Our sons, pride of our nation, this day have set upon a mighty endeavor, a struggle to preserve our Republic, our religion, and our civilization, and to set free a suffering humanity.
“Lead them straight and true; give strength to their arms, stoutness to their hearts, steadfastness in their faith.
“They will need Thy blessings. Their road will be long and hard. For the enemy is strong. He may hurl back our forces. Success may not come with rushing speed, but we shall return again and again; and we know that by Thy grace, and by the righteousness of our cause, our sons will triumph.”
Posted by: Dan | June 7, 2007, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Brian said, “People do not just hate Bush they hate America. if this country is so bad then leave and go to one of these great countries like Iran and let me know how things are going for you. ”
No Brian, the 72%+ of us love America, and we are in the process of taking it back from the fools that stole it from us in 2000, ran up a nearly $500 billion war bill, alienated our most important allies, and eroded our civil liberties back to where they were pre-WWII.
Posted by: Eric | June 7, 2007, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
To: Tian, lol!!!!!x10. I love it, that was a great post : )
Posted by: Edward | June 7, 2007, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
All of the America-haters on here that are spouting about US supplying IRAQ against IRAN are completely off base. Their good buddies, the French, Russians, and Germans, as well as several other nations, all far, far out-stripped the US in supplying arms to Iraq. Just because we supplied a shipment of this or that is meaningless when you take it out of context.
Furthermore, the story does in fact provide more information than the critics are implying. When the trucks are actually being tracked travelling out of Iran, and contain the exact same munition designs with the exact same faked US markings that are showing up in Iraq, then anyone with even sub-par intelligence can see that Iran is involved.
Posted by: Jay | June 7, 2007, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Ahm-Ah-Nutjob, glorious leader of Iran, will lead the religion of peace into a fatal mistake involving large civilian casualties. The rest will be history. Unfortunately, at this point we are waiting for the next 9-11 before we can act.
Posted by: Phish Head | June 7, 2007, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Jay said, “When the trucks are actually being tracked travelling out of Iran, and contain the exact same munition designs with the exact same faked US markings that are showing up in Iraq, then anyone with even sub-par intelligence can see that Iran is involved.”
US markings proves Iran is involved? That is quite a concept you have there.
Posted by: Eric | June 7, 2007, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
All you bleeding hearts better get your heads out of the sand! Or better yet, keep them there so we can’t hear you!
Posted by: Kevin | June 7, 2007, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Why does nobody get this?
Iran is doing this because it’s good for them financially. The conflict in Iraq raises the price of oil by suppressing Iraq’s output and, more importantly, by raising the uncertainty premium in global oil prices.
It’s also precisely why Iran acts as crazy as possible in the nuclear standoff – it makes them money. They’re a broke, backwards nation – they need oil above $60/barrel to keep funding their “bread and circuses” at home.
Iran doesn’t fear US invasion because they’re certain that we don’t have the political will.
The only thing they DO fear is losing their oil money.
The solution is simple: Make it unprofitable for them. If they continue to supply weapons to the Taliban, attack their oil infrastucture. It’s the only thing that would make them regret their behavior.
And nobody has to be killed.
The big downside? $100 oil.
It’s worth it.
Posted by: JG | June 7, 2007, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
AS for our peaceful Muslim friends in Iran, how about a quote from Komeini, made before Isreal was even a nation:
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini
ISLAM IS NOT A RELIGION OF PACIFISTS (1942)
“Islam’s jihad is a struggle against idolatry, sexual deviation, plunder, repression and cruelty. The war waged by [non-Islamic] conquerors, however, aims at promoting lust and animal pleasures. They care not if whole countries are wiped out and many families left homeless. But those who study jihad will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world. All the countries conquered by Islam or to be conquered in the future will be marked for everlasting salvation. For they shall live under [God's Law] . . . .”
“Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless. Islam says: Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Does this mean that Muslims should sit back untill they are devoured by [the unbelievers]? Islam says: Kill them [the non-Muslims], put them to the sword and scatter [their armies]. Does this mean sitting back until [non Muslims] overcome us? Islam says: Kill in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you! Does this mean that we should surrender to [the enemy]? Islam says: Whatever good there is exists that to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to paradise, which can be opened only for holy warriors!”
“There are hundreds of other [Koranic] psalms and hadiths [sayings of the prophet] urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.”
Quoted in Bostom, ” The Legacy of Jihad and the Fate of the Non-Muslims” Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY 2005
Note: This statement was made before the US invaded Iraq for the second time, or the first time. It was made before the US, at the request of the government of Saudi Arabia stationed US troops in Saudi Arabia to defend it against Saddam Hussein. It was made before the ouster of Mohammed Mossadegh as Prime Minister of Iran in 1953. It was made before the Declaration of the State of Israel of its independence in 1948. Therefore, one must ask, what is it that the US did, which was responsible for Khomeini’s statement? Fight against the Barbary Pirates?
What about now? As Gary Sick has said: “Ahamdinejad sees himself as emulating his great mentor Khomeini.”
Posted by: Shrillery Clinton | June 7, 2007, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
WOW! liberal communists at their best!! derail the United States no matter what!!! Pelosi guilty of treason by the “logan act” but thats allright! I can’t take the communist infiltration of the democratic party any more!! who ever believes we can appease these Jihadists needs their heads cut off first!! read your history, its the third Jihad people wake up!!!! your grandchildren will be bowing to mecca 5 times a day!! if we don’t make them glass now!!!
Posted by: carl | June 7, 2007, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Yeah, eric. You know….stickers?
Spraypaint? Ordinance coding formats. Yeah. So that if they were found on the field they wouldn’t be traced back to Iran? Only, they are in Iranian convoys. I’m sure it’s a bit too simple a concept.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
I see the editor removed my post about the manure pile of un-informed opinions. Maybe because I mistakenly posted it three times. I don’t come here often and maybe that’s why I can still smell something rotten.
When I see so many people arrogantly spouting off and wasting time when they could be doing something constructive, I hang my head at the state of our society. Why not spend the time helping someone in need, and not trying got convince hard-headed people they’re wrong.
Posted by: Myron | June 7, 2007, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
we are the keepers – without the usa the individualism and freedom do not exist – the iranian leader and those that oppose one’s God given right to choose has NO place in this world.
Posted by: sebastian | June 7, 2007, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will soon suffer the same fate as Saddam Hussein.
Posted by: Tian | June 7, 2007, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
What is really sad to see is the people who automoatically take the side of our enemies. Iran, Iraq, Palistine, Syria and all of the terrorist countries want to kill us and every free person. Yet, all of these people take their side whenever there is a question of right and wrong. When will you start taking the side of the country that protects you from this evil and most of the time has the best interests of the owrld in mind. It’s just sad.
Posted by: SDBoreel | June 7, 2007, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
it is true. i secretly worked there last year ( i was forced to work). iran leaders doing so many things you would not believe.
Posted by: ZAID ABDUL AZIZ | June 7, 2007, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Get real, people. At some stage you have to trust someone. When Bush is gone, we will still have to put some faith in a government comment. Our government types are already scaling back on “definitive statments” looking for a level of evidence above what is expected of governments of other nations. The convoys are easily trackable from Iran (there aren’t that many highways) and bombers leave telltale “signatures” in their bomb construction. It isn’t brain surgery to figure out who is sending what to whom. (And yes, under Jihad, Sunni and Shia will team up against Western Civilization.) And we as civilians don’t need to know everything. Clinton never made such a guarantee and no democrat president would demand that we act only when every detail is proven. Enough with the conspiracy theories.
Posted by: Chris K. | June 7, 2007, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
What’s all this liberal spank about international law? When the ’91 cease fire with Iraq was signed it was just that…a cease fire. Iraq since that time violated the cease fire agreement 1000′s of times by shooting at coalition aircraft who, again according to the cease fire agreement, where allowed to patrol the no fly zone. Iraq broke international law thousands of times and by international law reinstated hostilities…you liberal freaks need to be consistent.
Posted by: infocyde | June 7, 2007, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
OH COME ON! The same “fake US markings?” In other words the US is arming the Taliban AND the Iraqi insurgents.
Only a republican would be gullible enough to believe that Iran is arming the Taliban AND Iraq.
Posted by: Radwriter055 | June 7, 2007, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that Iran is spreading weapons around the region. Those who blame the USA for everything are just a bunch of whiners. Maybe if Iran wants nuclear weapons we should give them all they want from the air! Turn Iran into a glass parking lot.
Posted by: Kendrick | June 7, 2007, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
We can only hope that one day soon Zaid, the Iranian people can finally overthrow their overlords, and regardless of what the discount hippie pseudo intellectual left thinks, America will be there when the need arises.
God Bless
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
So now even ABC lies when the libs (secular socialists) disagree? Get over it. Evil exists overseas and its not us. Ever heard of WW1 and 2? Communist killing by the millions? The modern liberal much prefers all govt money go to expand socialism thus buying votes to gain liberal political power. Defend freedom anywhere is just too expensive. The Cult of Allah wants you dead because you are an infidel… end of story. I agree its going to take a nuc from the Cult of Allah to convince (most) libs… they just are not reality-based, they are hate and fantasy-based.
Posted by: Doug | June 7, 2007, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Wow, go propeganda machine, shall we start calling each other COMRADES. ABC News is no longer a credible neutral news station in my opinion.
Posted by: mohammad | June 7, 2007, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
“If you want to have good relations with the Iranian people in the future, you should acknowledge the right and the might of the Iranian people, and you should bow and surrender to the might of the Iranian people. If you do not accept this, the Iranian people will force you to bow and surrender.” – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iranian News Channel (IRINN) on August 15, 2006
Sounds rather friendly…
Posted by: Rick | June 7, 2007, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
When I read comments that state we should remove all US interests from the middle east it always depresses me a bit. Isn’t this isolationism? Haven’t we been there before?
Furthermore, I think there is a pretty good case to be made for the US making common cause with adversaries in order to further common interests. Think Soviet/US in WW2, US/Afghan US/Iraq, in the 80′s and now US/Pakistan. In all cases there was a real pressing need for these alliances.
Also note, we weren’t shooting down F-15s and F-16s and battling US tanks in the first gulf war. They were all of Soviet origin. And today, our troops aren’t getting killed by US arms in the hands of terrorists. They’re of Iranian and European origin.
Posted by: tom a | June 7, 2007, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Can you imagine if all the “blame America first” crown actually had to live in some of these countries they are so quick to defend? Talking to your neighbors while criticizing your leaders is enough to get you the long dirt nap in many of them. Just having to do what many in people in those countries do to survive everyday would cause most of them to kill themselves, because their pampered, easy existence would vanish like icy roads in Wisconsin in July. And their gratitude for not having to live a life of filth and squalor somewhere else? Dump on the nation that allows them their freedom to become “the useful idiots” Stalin loved. They must all lead some pretty pathetic lives, to act the way they do. Of course, I’m sure in their heads it’s all Bush’s fault. If we can only hold on until the queen assumes power, maybe she’ll give us what we need, with somebody else’s money of course. Remind me of whining children, all of them. Here’s a clue for you, your struggle is not with your nation, but with yourselves.
Posted by: Shrillery Clinton | June 7, 2007, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Can we stop all the chit-chat and bomb Iran now??
NOW, please!! Bonb Iran!! NOW!!!!
I’ve been waiting for this since 1979. I’m salivating at the thought!
I may even sell tickets!
Let the FUN begin!!
“…Anticipation…is making me wait.”
- Carly Simon
Posted by: Nukem Now | June 7, 2007, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Folks,
Understand something, the reason we’re in Iraq and Afghanistan is to maintain an impressive force within the heart of the Middle East. If you look at a map, you will see that these two countries are the most centralized boarder-countries in their region, separated by Iran (Gee, will ya look at that! US forces control the two largest boarders for Iran. We don’t need permission for a fly-over strike or any other sorties. Seems rather smart to me. See ya, UN!!). Winning any “war” requires the tactical acquisition and control of land or “the hi-ground”, which in this case is Iraq and Afghanistan. Let me be clear, the reason we went to Iraq had nothing to do with oil or WMD’s, and everything to do with gaining the most tactical positions militarily in the Middle East.
Is there any doubt that the “War on Terror” will continue, as long as there are regimes in power who continue to teach younger generations to hate and kill Jews, Christians, Westerners, and any no-conforming Muslims? This is the
Evil that needs to change over there, which unfortunately, must come at the end of a sword.
For those of you who think Terrorism will go away if we leave, please do us all a favor and stick your head in a plastic bag for a few minutes. Maybe loosing some brain-cells will help your condition, or at least shut you up so work can get done!!
Wndrtch
“do something, even if it’s right!”
Posted by: wndrtch | June 7, 2007, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
“Posted by: Rick – Sounds rather friendly…”
Yes it does – Hitler, Stalin, Hirohito…
Don’t forget that Putin’s Russia also benifits from high oil prices. On an exponential order.
The Cold War isn’t dead. The Demon-crates would not, could not, have it.
Posted by: Tian | June 7, 2007, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
I sincerely hope that I don’t see the day when all of those that want to appease Islamic fanatics for whatever reason (Bush hate, fear, pacifism) are rounded up first by a triumphant Islamic world order and beheaded.
You are trying to find ways to keep from fighting an enemy that is diametrically opposed to every liberal cause and thought you have.
Need proof?
Show me the liberals and progressives in Iran or Syria. I don’t hear or seem them speaking too loudly.
Posted by: jawjajim | June 7, 2007, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Oh how we have forgotten our founders and what real patriotism is.
in the words of Thomas Jefferson, “Free trade with all nations, and entangling alliances with none.”
Posted by: Wayne | June 7, 2007, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
BLAME BUSH BLAME BUSH BLAME BUSH!!!!!
If only most of you on these message boards took the time to re-evaluate your position and the half-truths which you’ve laid as the foundation for their childish arguments, we might just get the job done quicker (war on terror). Ironically, these are many of the same people who want to ACT NOW regarding climate change due to the fear of what might come 500 yrs. from now. If only they showed the same resolve in addressing terrorism which has already affected them in THIS LIFETIME and promises to get even worse if gone unchallenged. Apparently, they’re content just complaining. Maybe it’s out of fear? If so, that’s fine. Just stay out of the way of those willing to step up and stand up to these Islamic fanatics. What many critics fail to realize is that this country is split 50/50 and while many may disagree w/ some of the Bush policies, most do not HATE Bush (the person, the man). He’s a likable person which many in America relate to. They don’t hate him. I believe the critics need to find a way to rid themselves of all that hate before they ever have a chance to actually “GET IT”. In a way, they are victims of a relentless media which has bombarded them w/ daily negative stories, many half truths, rumor or just straight up lies since 2000. The daily pounding by the media towards Bush, the man and the war have unfortunately left a large # of people severely mis-informed and living in an alternate reality. They almost seem more eager to win a silly online debate w/ witty comebacks or catchy phrases than w/ actually addressing the problem Islamic fanatics pose to the world. Maybe they choose to do so out of fear given that it’s easier to bitch and whine than to actually try to tackle the problem? Who knows? Just count our lucky stars that we have tremendous volunteers like you marine who don’t judge these folks by their twisted logic, rather just see them as Americans! Same for Bush, I believe history will ultimately prove him right regarding the threat of Islamo-fanatics and I don’t see that as a stretch….I just listen to what the terrorist say and do. They’re not hiding their intentions to anyone. Yet for some strange reason, the critics refuse to acknowledge this threat?
We find the Iranians supplying weapons to the Taliban and the first thing that comes out of the liberals is ….it’s false, it’s Bush’s fault, lada lada lada.
Cry me a river while we true Americans protect ourselves from thse who have straight up stated they will not rest untill the west is destroyed.
Posted by: SOTU | June 7, 2007, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
First: why does a nation that sits on vast underground supplies of OIL, even need Nuclear power? Secondly: Are all Democrats as mindlessly stupid as some of these postings show? Do they all think if we just bury our heads in the sand the Iranian problem will go away?
I say – NUKE THEM!
Maybe if the “fantasy Dems” watch Al Gore’s fairy tale “An inconvenient Truth” enough times, they will fall asleep and dream of the carefree world they seem to think we live in
Posted by: Steve | June 7, 2007, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
I have always found it funny how a lib can watch footage of a baby gazelle having it’s throat torn out by a lion see it as ‘natural’ and strangely ‘beautiful’ or something…then somehow conjure this strange notion that somehow mankind is not a violent animal in his own right. When those who wish to do violence upon others rears his head…they want to ‘reason’ with him…because clearly it’s his daddy’s fault. Yes, violence is bad, but like in nature, it’s a part of life, and necessary when needed.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Andy said, “Personally, I think we should nuke Iran & Iraq and then point a few at Russia just in case”
Andy, do you want to pull US troops out of Iraq first before you nuke it, or are you implying we leave them there for added effect? I mean, you have quite a plan there. Please expand on it, and enlighten us all to the glory of your neo-conservative vision for the deaths of millions of innocent people.
Posted by: Eric | June 7, 2007, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
some of you liberals are just down right unamerican – th slam your commander & chief, slam your country – at a time when we are at war is disgusting & to be honesty with you we should remove your freedom of speech and you should be hyng for treason – you thing American is so bad, leave, get out, go live some place nice like Cuba (with Michael Moore), Iraq, Iran, Columbia – you know those places where people are killed for speaking out against their government. You hairy armpitted, tree huggin, berkinstock wearin, michael moore/clinton lovin liberals are a joke – I BEG YOU, PLEASE LEAVE THE USA – There are illegal aliens who are more american than jokers are – I hope Bush levels Iran. Remember the axis of evil, if your not with us your against us – back bone, grit, values is what this administration is all about
Posted by: robbieb | June 7, 2007, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Someone earlier said that these two groups do not havea common cause… I think they do. To expell the United States from the Middle East. They both hate us and want us dead. I think that is a common cause.
Posted by: nick gebbs | June 7, 2007, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
The left needs to understand that the terrorists will kill them just the same as they would someone on the right. Some lefties say the media was on bush’s side to help with starting the war. You gotta be kidding me. Everyone who does’nt have his head buried in the sand knows the network news abc,cbs etc…are leftist. Clinton had the same info as Bush. Clinton even had two chances to get ben laden but passed it up. He was to busy with the chicks under his desk.Cigars anyone? I admitt that Bush has not fought this war correctly. You can not fight a war and not have colatteral damage. The left would go crazy if he started bombing Irag and Iran out of existance. But that is what you have to do to win a war. Strike fast and hard.Show the world that we can not be messed with or consequeces would follow. unfortunately now a days no one has the guts to do it.
Posted by: Gary | June 7, 2007, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
With this information and Iran’s repeated statement about destroying Israel it shows now is the time to begin a MASSIVE bombing campaign and destroy Iran’s nuclear program and its military capabilities!!!
Posted by: Bob O | June 7, 2007, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Nuke the entire Middle East….problems solved. Who wants ice cream?
Posted by: DaimondDog | June 7, 2007, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
now you talking my language
We should have a ticket counter like at the deli – Next – Bomb, Next Bomb etc…..
Posted by: robbieb | June 7, 2007, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Eric- Pleaqse specify what propoganda that led us here you are talking about. The people posting about “nuking” Iraq are speaking figuratively, not literally. I guess you don’t see that. Just what is the 72% you are referring to? If it is support for Bush, which at 28% is still higher than the Democrat Congress is getting from the American people, you should stop giving yourself so much credit. That is based on the fact that Conservatives don’t support him. With our support, we have made him President twice. Any other poll from the Democrat Misinformation Media Machine is a joke, considering their history of exit polling and calling states in elections. If it is anti-Conservative, they’ll manipulate it any way they can. If you ast only registered democrats “Would you prefer we continue in Iraq, or a $100 bill, I guess you would view the results as proper. I want to know the question asked, and of whom, before I ever buy into their manipulative crap again.
Posted by: Shrillery Clinton | June 7, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
we should just drop Hillary on the Middle East – That Should do it!
Posted by: robbieb | June 7, 2007, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
I see the ‘Nukem’ comments being tossed around a little frivolously. I for one think that Nukes are canned suicide. But with that said, what needs to happen in Iran is a CIA backed popular uprising coupled with American Special Forces advisers smuggled in along with backup by air support against key infrastructure and loyalist military units. When the dusts settles offer to provide stability for rebuilding efforts such as in Iraq…minus the prolific supply of IED’s and improvised munitions….cause the manufacturers will then be out of business.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
John Hubers:
You are factually fractured.
The Media is pro Lib and they do not support the conservative ideals. Thus they would be far more inclined to avoid mentioning anything that could give good cause for a U.S. intervention in Iran.
Go back to your beer bottle and take a sip.
Tell em’ Ron Ernie said it.
Posted by: Ron Ernie | June 7, 2007, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Why is it any time someone does something against us, or they get caught red handed trying to do something to us, all of you small minded libs blame Bush or the US. When a country perceives a clear threat to its people or military, it must destroy the threat!!!!!!! We are going to have to take out Iran!!!!! Either now or after they kill 3,000 Americans! I just hope it isn’t those of us that WANT to protect our country that perish. But when that happens, you mindless drones will continue to blame us. One quick question…..what are you going to when Bush is no longer in office???? I sure hope there are support groups for your misguided anger. Dopes!!!
Posted by: dmc | June 7, 2007, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb bomb Iran. Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb bomb BOMB IRAN. Come on, sing it with me!
Terrorists will never be short in supply, but cutting the throat of their suppliers would stop terrorists from getting as all those numerous supplies. Watch your steps carefully, Iran… unless a democrat gets the presidency, then you can nuke whomever you like with no consequences whatsoever:)
Posted by: R.B. | June 7, 2007, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
dmc saic, “We are going to have to take out Iran!!!!! Either now or after they kill 3,000 Americans!”
No, we are not going to have to take our Iran, and no, Iran is not going to kill “3,000 Americans”. I know that disappoints you, but it is the truth. It really is interesting that nobody was talking about ‘having to take out Iran’ back in 2002 when we were being fed the lies about ‘having to take out Iraq’.
Posted by: Eric | June 7, 2007, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
I think my G.I Joe had 7mm rockets.
Posted by: agitprop | June 7, 2007, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
His name was Bazooka agitprop. :P
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Eric, Eric, Eric…..”No Mom, I didn’t get an F in history! You aren’t reading the report card right!! I’m doing fine in school. Besides, it’s the governemnts fault I don’t pay attention in class. They should subsidize my education and get rid of grades so I ‘feel’ better.”
Put your helmet back on!
Posted by: dmc | June 7, 2007, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Iran is nothing infront of Pakistan. Iran, is still trying to build nuclear weapons. Pakistan has had them for ages. Infact, Pakistan is primarily responsible for all the nuke technology going to Iran. I don’t know why Bush is so fond of Musharraf. Pakistan is the biggest hotbed of Islamic terrorism, despite its supposed moderate image. Even if you bomb Iran, Pakistan will just help make another one!
BOMB PAKISTAN!
Posted by: Dave | June 7, 2007, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
The “war on terror” is a sham until the Iranians are dealt with. I hope Israel doesn’t have to be nuked before it’s too late to deal with them.
Posted by: Shamus Cawley | June 7, 2007, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
The U.S. has been hated by the middel east ever since we put a military base with a puppet government in the middle east and called it Israel.
Posted by: Frankie | June 7, 2007, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Eric,
Of that 72% you reference, I’m sure most people who want to nuke Iran are speaking metaphorically, not literally as you imply. Please, don’t go wacko on us. Thanks.
Posted by: Jimmy | June 7, 2007, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
America does kick ass.
And I believe your notion of bully problems is a bit misplaced sakul…you know…the whole fighting back concept. Seems to be entirely a ‘wingnut’ notion.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Jimmy said, “Of that 72% you reference, I’m sure most people who want to nuke Iran are speaking metaphorically, not literally as you imply. ”
First of all, the 72% I reference are sane and logical. It is the minority 28% ilk that supports the neo-conservative agenda, and the detonation of nuclear weapons in a first-strike pre-emptive manner that needs to be silenced.
Posted by: Eric | June 7, 2007, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Iran needs to be dealt with and dealt with harshly.
This is all the evidence that any nation should need to go ahead and take our the current Iranian regime.
On what grounds can Iran possibly justify supplying the Taliban weapons?
Iran is the #1 threat to world peace and the most likely to cause massive international instability.
They need to be dealt with yesterday.
Posted by: Jack McDermott | June 7, 2007, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
On what grounds can Iran possibly justify supplying the Taliban weapons?
..
The same reason the US supplies Israel and Fatah weapons. To use against the people they are fighting with.
So Iran doing everything it has the right to, and legally exercising it’s rights, is a threat to world peace?
Talk about ‘not thinkin..’
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
I completely fail to understand why we don’t just GIVE Iran reactor-grade uranium in exchange for them stopping their enrichment project. They claim they’re only enriching it for use in reactors? Fine, we’ll give it to you already enriched if you stop your project. Reactor-grade uranium can’t be used to create nuclear weapons (weapons-grade uranium is much more enriched), so what’s the problem?
Posted by: jim collins | June 7, 2007, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Good stuff Eric! First “no WMD”, now it’s “no bunkers”, next you’ll tell us there were no statues of your daddy, Saddam.
Posted by: sams | June 7, 2007, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Finish the job! Iran is the nest that must be cleaned out! Iran is the final battlefield in the war on terror! Do a gut check and win the war! Waht a bunch of wusses!
Posted by: Dante | June 7, 2007, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Finish the job! Iran is the nest that must be cleaned out! Iran is the final battlefield in the war on terror
…
good thinking… then we can deal with china which doesn’t want their energy supply messed with… and also russia, who doesn’t want their iranian business interests affected..
what a bunch of brilliant foreign policy makers you all are…
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Let me clear something up for you Eric. I spent the last 4 years in the U.S. Marines looking at those “imaginary” bunkers with my own eyes. My best friends looked at those “imaginary” tunnels with their own eyes. You can’t pretend things didn’t happen. Wars are faught for many reasons. The fact remains that the general public (including you) are NEVER told the real reasons behind them. It is called classified information. It protects both our people and our interests. So I am sorry you aren’t that important to be “clued in” to what is really going on. Leave that to the people with the guts to make those decisions! Like I said before, put your helmet back on before you bump your head again!!!
Posted by: dmc | June 7, 2007, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
The US and the western world must stand firm with sanctions, regardless of the impact on oil prices. Iran has much to loose and does not really want a confrontation with the west. The western powers need to cut off support for terrorists any place they find it or risk the consequences at home. History consistently confirms that terrorists can not be reasoned with but must be starved out. Those that support terrorists do so at their own risk. If Iran assumes the US is too distracted to take action then they are making a fatal error.
Posted by: EV | June 7, 2007, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Most of you chicken hawk cowards who are advocating the bombing of Iran will sit back on your fat asses when the war starts, too afraid to join the military and fight the fight yourselves.
Its easy to bleat “bomb bomb!” from the safety of your own home, but when it comes down to it, most of you warmongers are too afraid to put your own sorry butts on the line.
Hypocrites, all of you.
Posted by: Shinkicker | June 7, 2007, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Jackie: No one sayin’ Iran can’t sell their weaapons to our enemies, they just need to know we’ll be giving them a spanking for it. You’ll see, even Hillary will become Mrs. Hen Hawk if she gets her finger on the button, and her gal pal Nancy will grow a pair and suddenly discover a danger to her very own Amerika.
Posted by: Supination | June 7, 2007, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Iran is the most terroristic nation in the world along with N Korea. The world should wipe tham out just because they cause EVERYONE trouble! We need a Wal Mart over there anyhow!
Posted by: Chris | June 7, 2007, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Sakul said: ‘Guess what… Iran never once said that ISRAEL should be wiped off the map…”
OK…..and you accuse me of spouting spoon fed propoganda? HAHAHAHAHA. Oh, that’s a hoot.
In the words of Mr. Ahmadingdongjohnabduldumdum
# “Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation’s fury.”
# “Remove Israel before it is too late and save yourself from the fury of regional nations.”
# “The skirmishes in the occupied land are part of a war of destiny. The outcome of hundreds of years of war will be defined in Palestinian land. As the Imam said, Israel must be wiped off the map.”
# “If the West does not support Israel, this regime will be toppled. As it has lost its raison d’ tre, Israel will be annihilated.”
# “Israel is a tyrannical regime that will one day will be destroyed.”
# “Israel is a rotten, dried tree that will be annihilated in one storm.”
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
to all the Koolaid drinkers who doubt Iran is funneling weapons or other assistance to Irag and Afganistan, think again. Just listen to what Amadinajad says every time he gives a speach. He talks about the end is near for the Infidels and Jews blah blah blah!! Thats the US and Isreal! Pull your heads out of the sand and look at reality. We don’t need to go to war with Iran but we do NEED to criple them Economically and promote a new Regime. Otherwise we will be at war with Iran in a few years.
Posted by: tom | June 7, 2007, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Read posts that are not anti war nor anti U.S. policy. Just blind hatred for America. Leftists are useless esp. in crisis.
Posted by: Charles Parsons | June 7, 2007, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Well I would try to provide you with a link Sakul, but you see in your world every media outlet is controlled by the dirty stinking Jews and the webwork of conspiracy networks that are in the end controlled by aliens on the dark side of the moon. So, unfortunately, I cannot provide.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
It wasn’t bunkers that made me want to go to war in Iraq, it was the fact that they violated the cease fire we had hundreds of times, trying to kill your neighbors flying over the country, as they agreed. It was the fact that their leader was a phycopath. It was the fact that they were violating the cease fire agreement by using the oil for food program as their personal slush fund to subvert the U.N., and buy off Russia, France, and Germany to support them.Are you proposing, after 9/11, that we should have sent them cupcakes, since the sanctions were obviously failing, and allow them to use the world’s second highest proven oil reserves to fund the people who killed 3,000 of your fellow citizens, and every other Islamofascist group that wanted to attack us? Are you so blind as to see that, as our sworn enemy, they would have been the rallying point for the Jihadists, and would have had the land, money and resources to kill, what, maybe 3,000,000 this time? If you think no war was the best course, you are delusional. We are now on the border of Iran and Syria, two more “friends.” This is strategically brilliant. Now, you propose, what, we leave? You really need to think things through, don’t you think? Just because your media maSSters want you to be a parrot doesn’t mean you have to give up your critical thinking skills for their sake, and actually become one. There only interest is that your queen be coronated in ’08. They could care less if your throat gets cut in the process of making that happen, because, in spite of what they tell you, they’re not really all that bright. The bright people stay out of journalism classes.
Posted by: Shrillery Clinton | June 7, 2007, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Shrillery Clinton, the folks talking about nuking them…”The people posting about “nuking” Iraq are speaking figuratively, not literally”
I think they ARE speaking LITERALLY. I agree, nuke’em. Anyone else jumps in the fight, go in, kill ‘em all, let GOD not Allah sort them out. Then wait for the next barking dog. the USA gives so much to so many, WE should be and are the world police and saving grace.
Posted by: Kansas | June 7, 2007, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
It’s about time that ABC News has caught up to what we’ve known for several years.
The question is will the gutless Democrats continue to deny that Iran is sponsoring terrorism? Will they take action or look for excuses to run away from terrorism like they want to do in Iraq?
So, in summation, the Iranians are supplying weapons to foster terrorism in both Iraq and Afghanistan and so create a lot of human right abuses along the way.
Though the left-wing posters to this web site will want to run away from both countries, let’s hope this revelation will show the Democrats in Congress that the greatest danger is to let Iran get away with it.
Posted by: John Karpiscak | June 7, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
I would suggest everyone at leased read what Joel Rosenberg has to say about Ezekiel 38 and 39 relating to Iran. For those of you who hate Israel, you’re going to be seriously disapointed as Israel kicks butt again. US, secure the boarders, the Iraqi, Afghan, and US border.
Posted by: Joe | June 7, 2007, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Forget it Jimy….your source can’t be trusted.
It’s controlled by JEWS!!!!
And Elvis.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Its clear that troublemakers like Iran and Russia are taking advantage of the current weakness of the Bush Administration.
The opportunity to do so results from our country’s media and its constant hype and push to discredit Bush in all ways and by all means. The media push has distracted the liberal politicians who now are only concerned with their desire to weaken the Republican Party and obtain power.
The lousy liberal politicians will eventually succeed in placing blame on Bush for everything but while they fiddle with that, the world will be backing America into a dangerous corner. The war that will result will make what is happening in Iraq look like childs play.
Posted by: Bud | June 7, 2007, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
John Karpiscak said, “So, in summation, the Iranians are supplying weapons to foster terrorism in both Iraq and Afghanistan and so create a lot of human right abuses along the way”
No, Iran is not supplying weapons to the Taliban. There is absolutely no proof of this, and Defense Secretary Robert Gates confirmed there is no proof of it just this very week. The single story you read above, which quotes one ANONYMOUS source, is being used to try to CONVINCE you that Iran is doing this in a weak attempt to change public opinion to support a military strike on Iran.
Posted by: Eric | June 7, 2007, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
I think the ageing peaceniks are just trying to run out the clock until Charlie Wrangel’s call for reinstating the draft won’t effect them. “Iran is no threat.” “Give peace a chance.” “Can’t we all just get along?” “Let’s have a dialog.” “We need to try diplomacy.” “Drop acid, not bombs.”
Look at the ten year old children you come across and thank them in advance for the war they’ll fight, compliments of today’s leftist whimps, the same as those who would have kissed Hitler’s a$$ 70 years ago.
Posted by: WaltherP99 | June 7, 2007, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Imagine how you would feel towards the person that horrifically and brutally murdered your young son or daughter, your beautiful child who never hurt anyone.
Now imagine 5,000,000 of this person plotting daily to make that a reailty for you and everybody you know because you are simply not a muslim and live in America. This is an indisputable reality and, while it means that we must sadly live in a time of war when many of us are taken from our families and dying overseas, it is a pittance compared to what they will do if they are not stopped NOW. We are very much performing cancer surgery on the world, and the earlier we detect and remove it, the lesser the chance it overcomes us.
Posted by: dave | June 7, 2007, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
America does kick ass.
And I believe your notion of bully problems is a bit misplaced sakul…you know…the whole fighting back concept.
…
That’s the problem. And Yeah, my notion of bully problems is there because I was a bully. Didn’t do me much good and I lost a lot of friends during that time in grade school. But, I grew out of it in ‘grade school’. It’s time you wingnuts do the same.
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Bob and Gary both need to read history. Did you see Ron Paul the other night talking about nation building and its out come? The Iran problem started in 1953. The actions of the US and the UK caused this problem you see today. Yes Iran is supplying weapons and Sandi Arabia is also supplying funds to buy weapons that are killing our troops. Plus Sandi Arabia was supplying money first. Want country did the funds come from too knock down the towels? Sandi Arabia. Yes you better blame Bush because if we were not occupied with Iraq you better believe Iran would not be a problem. The only reason you hear a tactical nuclear mentioned is because we are week because of the war in Iraq. Bob and Gary if we hit Iran and not have 1 million troops or a tactical nucleus option you would put our troops in Iraq in danger.
Posted by: joesnopy | June 7, 2007, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Sakul….you amaze me. You see, I wasn’t a bully….people tried to bully me from time to time.
And they paid dearly.
Hence, I was no longer bullied. So, the concept of fighting back is wrong in the opinion of someone who admits they were a bully…an act usually directed towards the children perceived weak and who do not fight back.
What’s the name of the planet you’re from?
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
And they paid dearly.
Hence, I was no longer bullied. So, the concept of fighting back is wrong in the opinion of someone who admits they were a bully..
..
fighting back against what? When did Iran attack us (leeme guess, beriut, in 82.. well we got em back by shooting down an iranian civilian aircraft with missiles) and remember, there is no PROOF of this article, just one anonymous source!? Hell, when did Iraq attack us? You see, we are the bullies. Not them. And that is where you are blinded. Are you suggesting that it is ok for them to fight back?
gotcha.. ;-)
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
All you ridiculous republicans: First you want us to listen to what Amadinajad says and then you want us to listen to the conservatives who hate Amadinajad and call him a liar? And that’s how you find the truth?
This article is bogus and I can’t believe that abc would give any credence to anything which favors conservatives. The only real news is coming from sites like Huffington, KOS, Media Matters, and Democrat Underground. Ignore everything else. Its all lies based on ratings.
Posted by: Real Boost | June 7, 2007, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
The statement, “the intelligence community was taken by surprize,” causes one to question their intelligence. You idiots, Iran’s ruling mullahs are against us… the US.
If they keep on telling us that they are going to annhilate us and Israel, we are going to start believeing them.
When we were being confronted and if not defeated, at least frustrated, by proxy wars, we threw Jimmy Carter out of office and elected Ronald Wilson Reagan. He turned it around on them and beat them at their on game.
Posted by: PhillipMichael | June 7, 2007, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
So Iran is allegedly supplying weapons to Iraq and Afghanistan? I encourage those unfamiliar with the geography of the region to consult a map. With the US occupying countries to the east and west of Iran, you think maybe Iran is feeling a bit nervous? Apparently they are not only sweating bullets, they are sweating RPG’s and C4.
But now imagine that some country (Russia, China, Madagascar, whatever) had invaded and occupied Mexico and Canada. You think maybe, just maybe, the US would do whatever it found necessary to help Canada and Mexico fight its invaders? Maybe?
Posted by: Tim | June 7, 2007, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
My solution for the Guantanamo Bay Situation:
1.Move all US forces 1 mile off shore
2. Drop napalm on the bad guys and melt them all the way to allah and his precious virgins
3. Bring our soldiers back.
4. Re-fill the prison.
5. Repeat steps 1 and 2.
Have a nice day!!
Posted by: Steve B | June 7, 2007, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
I’m suggesting that as Iran positions itself via proxy wars against us, it in effect is being a bully. The kind that sneaks up behind you and tries to push you over. If they wish to fight us then bring them out and fight in the open.
They have managed to be far more subtle than Iraq was during it’s decade stint of thumbing it’s nose at the UN and funding martyr attacks against Israel. You know, the attacks on aircraft flying in the no fly zone mandated by the cease fire?
;-)
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
There is no doubt that alot of countries in the middle east hate us, and are supplying arms to guerilla and terrorist groups. What we must understand is the reason why? Our government and the CIA have brought this on the good people of the U.S. throughout the years. The CIA and MI6 supported a coup in the 1950′s that put the Shah or Iran in charge until the late 1970′s. During his time in charge the U.S. government supplied him and Iran with military training, nuclear technology, and all sorts of arms. During his reign lots of Iranians went hungry and the social issues in the country went unheeded. The country overthrew the Shah in 1979 and the Ayotollah took charge and started terrorists groups and wanted to make the whole middle east a cleric run islamic society. During this time of a weakened military Sadaam Hussein say his chance and attacked Iran to gain control of the country and it’s recources. The U.S. government backed Hussein during this long drawn out war which killed approximately 2 million Iranians. Our government also supplied Hussein with chemical weapons, Afghanistan with weapons and training during their war with Russia. Our government is also the only one in history that has used atomic weapons on another country. I am not saying that the people here in the U.S. are bad, as a matter of fact they are some of the most generous and giving people in the world! We need to realize why people in the middle east hate us and try and build a global understanding and concensus with the international community on how to improve relations and trade. Bush’s whole speech on the axis of evil should have also included the U.S. present and past governments. We need true leadership in this country and to truely return to the great democratic society that we once were.
Posted by: Jay | June 7, 2007, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
But now imagine that some country (Russia, China, Madagascar, whatever) had invaded and occupied Mexico and Canada. You think maybe, just maybe, the US would do whatever it found necessary to help Canada and Mexico fight its invaders? Maybe?
…
this kind of outright logic escapes wingnuts. Thus me laughing and slapping my knee at the sugestion that liberals don’t think. Right wingers think they rule the world, and they expect the brown people to feel the same way.
Here folks, a telling quote from a very right wing commentator…
“the West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do.”
———-
Samuel P. Huntington
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
I’m suggesting that as Iran positions itself via proxy wars against us, it in effect is being a bully.
….
What a joke. Are you serious? How about invading a sovereign country that NEVER attacked us or was a THREAT to us and by using ‘shock and awe’ (which is meant to scare AKA ‘terrorize’ the unlucky recipients of said bombing).
Cmon, you aren’t that simple are you?
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
This shouldn’t be an argument of republican or democrat, liberal or conservative. What it should be is an argument of justice. Does the US Government have enough presentable evidence to say without a doubt that Iran is behind these munitions. Sure does look like they are, but this article falls short of definitive. As many have already said, the US media played a significant role in deceiving the people of this nation (and the world might I add) in the months leading up to the second Iraq war with articles very similar in nature to this one; passing off extremely good speculation as fact.
I for one will not be tricked into supporting another debacle the likes of the second Iraq war on false pretenses. I’m all for keeping our nation safe and dealing out intense punishment to our enemies… but it has to be based in fact… concrete evidence. I’m sorry, but, “analysis by a senior coalition official, obtained by the Blotter on ABCNews.com” is not concrete enough for me. I want names, pictures, maps diagramming who, what, where, why, when. The US Government needs to present a case with no-holes to the American people… and until they do, no one should be jumping on the bomb Iran bandwagon. I can only pray they (the US Government) do their job before the warnings of more terrorist attacks on US soil end up coming true.
Michael
St. Paul, MN
Posted by: Michael | June 7, 2007, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Jay… your post…
YOUR KIDDING RIGHT! THEY HATE US FOR OUR FREEDOMS! THEY HATE US BECAUSE OUR WOMEN WEAR MINISKIRTS.. THEY HATE US BECAUSE WE SELL ALCOHOL.. THEY HATE US BECAUSE WE ARE PROSPEROUS AND CIVILIZED! We can’t possibly have done anything to them…
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
…and “NonZionist” beleives every slogan Mao Tse Dung said.
ROTFLMAO!
Posted by: Tian | June 7, 2007, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Again, you must refer to oh…the entire decade of the 90′s and Iraq’s activities and attitude under Saddam. That sovereign country violated UN mandates time and again along with funding terrorism in Palestine (and this is proven.) So, maybe Saddam kinda put Iraq in the crosshairs, ya think?
Also refer to the talk from the left in regards to the threat of Saddam during said decade as well.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
We should make that area the biggest parking lot on earth. Or just fence that region of the world off let them kill there self’s off like they have been doing for the last thousands of years. They have been barbarians for thousand of years. They need to Evolve or be eliminated!
Posted by: Mark | June 7, 2007, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
If it is true the U.S. military must nuke Iran’s nuclear site immediately. True power must be revealed from time to time just like in nagasaki. It will put an end to many questions and ensure our enemies fear us.
Posted by: Unamed | June 7, 2007, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Ok, let me see if I follow the liberal logic… Premise: US intelligence on Iraq’s WMD program was faulty, flawed, or manufactured. Conclusion: Therefore all future US intelligence on enemies and potential enemies is faulty, flawed or manufactured. Do you people actually THINK about your arguments before you throw them out for public consumption?
If a police officer suspects someone of criminal activity, and while questioning the suspect, orders him to take his hand out of his coat pocket, because he is concerned that the pocket might contain a weapon, and the suspect refuses to comply with the order. The police officer doesn’t know conclusively and beyond doubt that there is a weapon in the pocket, but has reason to believe there is a strong possibility that it does contain a wepaon. What should the police officer do? Should he use force to make the suspect comply with his legal order? Or, should he allow the suspect to keep his hand in his pocket, and taking no action to enforce compliance with his legal order. Will one of you liberals please provide a serious answer to this dilemna? Then, just for fun, substitute the terms police officer and suspect, with United Nations Security Council and Saddam Hussein. You won’t give a serious answer though will you – you’ll just keep spouting your anti-Bush vitriol. But that’s the liberal way – attack the President, ignore the issues that lead us here.
Posted by: Bill | June 7, 2007, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
So we’ve once again got the conservative media unquestioningly repeating whatever claims the government makes in order to drum up support for a war. Did you people learn NOTHING from Iraq? Or do you just not CARE about factual reporting anymore?
Posted by: Cal | June 7, 2007, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
When you are #1, nobody likes you, unless your willing to buy their loyalty, or you have common interests. So it is with the U.S. today. You “deep thinkers” who think this will change if we “quit being a bully,” etc.- It’s not going to happen. We are like a Buffalo surrounded by jackels trying to pull us down. When we go, it will be the next #1′s turn. So, we must remain strong. We must act in our own self interest. Sorry if this is the price of our living well here, but it is reality.
Posted by: ABC NEWS | June 7, 2007, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Please Michael, explains to all of us how defending ourselves and our allies makes us terrorists?
Posted by: Tian | June 7, 2007, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Therefore all future US intelligence on enemies and potential enemies is faulty, flawed or manufactured.
…
No, just suspect.
Also, what the hell are you talking about? Saddam WAS complying with the inspections and the security council. Don’t you remember the Iraqi ambassador producing a 14,000 page document, documenting all the WMD activity (that ceased to exist in the early 90s by the way) that Iraq had been involved in. That was ignored. BUSH pulled the inspectors out, Saddam did NOT expel them.
And your little story would be more relevant if the suspect emptied his pockets, the cop didn’t find what he was looking for, so he wrote a misleading report to frame the suspect. Now that makes more sense.
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
in Iraq that were constantly strong armed and stalled…while truck loads of who know’s what were viewed leaving the premises of areas about to be inspected Sakul.
…
Provide verifiable links for these.. AND INSPECTIONS IN 1990s don’t count now do they? We are talking about George Bush and his deal.. Saddam was COMPLYING with the UN when Bushie started his crusade.
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Well I must admit, when you cannot view WHAT is being transported out of an area about to be inspected, only that tractor trailers are being viewed via satellite LEAVING said area, you can’t really put your thumb on what was in his pockets.
But he’s given us ideas before. You know, the Kurds and the poor pitiful Iranians that are our friends and peaceloving now?
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
The problem, son, is that we’re not acting in our own self interest. What we’re doing is akin to fighting hornets by walking up to their nest and hitting it with a stick. Those of us who are capable of rational thought recognize that doing this will accomplish nothing other than getting stung, but you wingnuts insist that we should keep swinging the stick.
Posted by: Cal | June 7, 2007, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
The lefties that said it is good that afghanistan getting weapons to defending itself from our agression, apparently only champion women and minority rights when it is a tidy business, or within our own borders?
Posted by: irannext | June 7, 2007, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Again Sakul, no matter what links I do provide you will not believe it…cause the media is controlled by dirty stinking zionist jews following the orders of the mothership.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Iran’s new President has openly endorsed the destruction of “Zionist Regimes”, any friend of such a regime is subject to the same sentiment.
Iran is not an ally, and while we are not fighting with them, our failure serves part of the Arab Fundamentalist Extremists’ purpose. Supplying weapons to a different “tribe”, such as the Sunnis, within the Arab world to facilitate own destruction or failure SERVES their purpose!!
It is not unrealisitc to think this is possible! Fundamentalist Extremists look at our Military Mission in the Middle East as a War against ARABS (hence the term EXTREMIST), and Fundamentalist Extremist Arabs will unite with other Arabs, fight and die for they see as “Arab” causes, then they’ll go back to fighting each other as they have for centuries.
The point is that it doesn’t have to be obvious to be POSSIBLE, with or without the evidence!
Posted by: ConservativeBrotha | June 7, 2007, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
The lefties that said it is good that afghanistan getting weapons to defending itself from our agression, apparently only champion women and minority rights when it is a tidy business, or within our own borders?
..
where do I begin deconstructing this one. First off, if our troops weren’t there, there would be no attacking our troops with these weapons.
And regarding women and childrens rights! Go and check how much rights women have LOST since Saddam was toppled. Guess what, Iraq didn’t have burkas.. but they sure are coming back.. Thanks to our invasion.
And nobody ever said it was good that the taliban is getting weapons to fight back, just obvious.
One last question… And this boggles my mind..
HOW IS NOT SUPPORTING THE TROOPS BY WANTING THEM TO COME HOME TO THEIR FAMILIES AND NOT GET THEIR HEAD OR ASS BLOWN OFF IN SOME SAND PILE IN IRAQ?
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Sadam Hussein HAD WMD. How do we know this? Because he slaughtered his own people with them. That has been documented and verified.
Posted by: irannext | June 7, 2007, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
so it has been decided. It was really the united states that supplied the taliban with these weapons. We are the real terrorists. We in the united states should just execute ourselves because we are the problem with this world.
Posted by: josh | June 7, 2007, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Sadam Hussein HAD WMD. How do we know this? Because he slaughtered his own people with them. That has been documented and verified.
..
that was in the 1980s, when we were supporting him and supplying him with the crap. We were all for him slaughtering Iranians. Why didn’t macho man Reagan invade Iraq then, for using wmds?
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
***Please Michael, explains to all of us how defending ourselves and our allies makes us terrorists?***
I can only assume that you are referring to this statement, “I can only pray they (the US Government) do their job before the warnings of more terrorist attacks on US soil end up coming true,” as I think it was my only use of the word terrorist. I did not mean that the US are terrorist (though that may make an interesting debate that I won’t have with you). What I meant is, I hope the US Government can produce indisputable evidence that high ranking Iranian officials are supplying weapons to our enemies in Iraq… before another terrorist attack is carried out on US soil (which is a frequent threat in support of attacking our enemies and “suspected” enemies).
Michael
St. Paul, MN
Posted by: Michael | June 7, 2007, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
ABC NEWS – Exactly.
I would be the first American to call for a complete withdrawal and isolation of the entire gulf region, were it not for one little problem: oil. Oil is why we’re engaged there. Our countries appetite for oil is enormous. Liberals AND Conservatives rely and depend on it every second of every day. Without it our country would shut down and we’d starve. Whatever political strip you are, you must admit this. I would take the liberals much more seriously if they said 1) Our dependency on gulf oil is why our soldiers are there and 2) in order to get us out of there quickly, were going to let the big bad US oil companies drill Alaska and build refineries. I shake my head at the hypocrisy of both the Cons and Libs as they tool from strip mall to strip mall in their Expeditions and Navigators, the Cons with their yellow ribbon magnets and the libs with their impeach bush bumper stickers…. YOURE the problem and YOURE why our troops are there – to feed your insatiable appetite for oil. If everyone who wants us out of Iraq were to park their cars, turn off their lights and walk to work tomorrow (not that your employer would be able to open their doors) we would need to have our army on the other side of the world defending and dying for your oil. Unless and until you’re willing to do that, get used to being the “brown man’s bully”.
Posted by: Bill | June 7, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Ah. That was a while back now lol.
And just to point out, way back when I said that I think nukes are canned suicide.
And yes, there are times I think that an IQ test should be required lol. At least for driver’s licenses.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Sadam Hussein HAD WMD. How do we know this? Because he slaughtered his own people with them.
…
Why didn’t Saddam get hung for THIS atrocity. Why was the ‘gassing of the kurds’ never mentioned in the court. Why did they want him strung up in a tree asap after this verdict? Because the powers that be didn’t want it coming out as to where Saddam got the gas from.
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Wow, what a naive lot of posters we have here.
Seriously, how could anybody be surprised that Iran is providing weapons to Iraq and the Taliban? That regime is the biggest sponsor of terror the world has ever seen. Their president is a volatile lunatic who wants to wipe Israel from the face of the earth. They are working on developing nuclear weapons. You’d have to be a buffoon on the order of thinking 9/11 was an inside job to think Iran isn’t undermining our every move in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Posted by: John | June 7, 2007, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
POOLS CLOSED
Posted by: Bixnood | June 7, 2007, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
So now a bona fide picture is considered a lie if it supports what half the world already knew…just because it actually makes the President of the United States look correct?
I now firmly believe that the following should be in the Webster’s dictionary and Wikipedia entries for the definition of a blog:
Blog (n) – (1)Short for Web Log. (2)Digital forum for open communication on specific topics of discussion. Usually infested with the voluntarily retarded who attempt to display strength and truth by merely whining loudly in unison, vulgar language, poor grammar, and terrible spelling.
(3)Acronym for Bawling Liberals Online Group
Posted by: sinclaj1 | June 7, 2007, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
He did not so much as come right out and say it Sakul, that would be ignorant. He’s too smart to do that. However, he has implied this. Implications are polispeak…only Khrushchev was so dumb to come right out and say “we will bury you.”
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
FUNNY THING CONDI SAID..
Did anyone here see Condi replying to a question about getting stability in Iraq…
She said the solution was, and get this…
“To remove all foreign troops and weaponry” ..
I just about fell out of my chair. But yes, that really is the solution… Isn’t it?
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
“the West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do.”
“In Eurasia the great historic fault lines between civilizations are once more aflame. This is particularly true along the boundaries of the crescent-shaped Islamic bloc of nations from the bulge of Africa to central Asia. Violence also occurs between Muslims, on the one hand, and Orthodox Serbs in the Balkans, Jews in Israel, Hindus in India, Buddhists in Burma and Catholics in the Philippines. Islam has bloody borders.”
“Islam’s borders are bloody and so are its innards. The fundamental problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of their power.”
Samuel P. Huntington
Posted by: Tian | June 7, 2007, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Violence also occurs between Muslims, on the one hand, and Orthodox Serbs in the Balkans, Jews in Israel, Hindus in India, Buddhists in Burma and Catholics in the Philippines
…
Someone who didn’t do any research would be led to believe from this that the Muslims are always the agressors… Take Israel for example. It is the Palestinians who are the victims there, not the Israelis.
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
I’m so weary of hearing this “we supported Iraq in the 80′s” argument. Maybe I can educate at least one person here.
Yes – we most certainly did support Iraq in the 80′s after the Iranian Islamic Revolution. And before we supported Iraq, we supported the Shah of Iran. We have played both sides against each other since the Gulf became a strategic national interest due to the discovery of the worlds largest proven oil reserves. US policy on the Gulf states was (and is) to promote a controlled and manageable amount of instability, and to not allow any one Gulf state to become powerful to the point of dominating the region. Why, to keep the oil flowing. Is it fair? Nope. Is it moral, maybe, maybe not. But it is REALITY. You want to drive a Hummer and heat your swimming pool, then people are going to have to die for you to live that lifestyle. Stop blaming, and start taking some responsibility!
I fought in the first Gulf War, was an intelligence analyst attached to Task Force Ripper – Marine Expeditionary Force and took part in the re-taking of Kuwait from the Iraqi Army. I had not illusions as to why I was there in 1991 and I have no illusions as to why the next generation is there today.
Posted by: Bill | June 7, 2007, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Given the number of wars involving Muslims are currently going on in the world Sakul, it doesn’t paint the religion in a very good light.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
sakul, as I said above, these religious zealots need to GET OVER IT! France helped America in its war for independence from Britain. Does Britain hold a grudge against France? Does Britain export terrorism into the streets of Paris?
Ummm…not quite. Why? Because the West is, dare I say it, MORE ENLIGHTENED. The Middle East, excluding Israel, operates with a junior-high-schoolgirl mentality. “So-and-so did such-and-such to me in 4th grade; God I hate her!” GROW UP ALREADY!
These people have an irrational hatred of the West, a hatred rooted in an archaic, misogynistic, anti-intellectual religion–that’s the problem. It might not be politically-correct, but there it is. To quote Jonathon Swift: It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into.
So you just keep handing your lunch money over to the bully, hoping he goes away and leaves you alone. Let me know how that works out for you…
Posted by: Greg8898 | June 7, 2007, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Isn’t that the Mexican flag!?
Posted by: keith | Jun 6, 2007 7:27:49 PM
Pictured is Iranian flag. embbbblem in middle hard to see but it is there if you look closelty.
Mexico flag has vertical stripes. Same colors.
Posted by: wiki fan | June 7, 2007, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
TommyD- Hell,they’re living in the 15th century now- How far back do you want to send them?
Posted by: Diffuse | June 7, 2007, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Huh. How is this “red handed” if they haven’t even established direct involvement by Iran? I mean, “red handed” means something, but it doesn’t mean “we suspect…”
Nevertheless, it seems plausible, and therefore we should bomb the heck out of everyone who threatens America or Americans, until the entire world agrees to stop hating us and goes back to buying our cars.
Posted by: DK | June 7, 2007, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
What stikes me as odd is that with about 90& of their population living in eight cities, the Iranians would threaten the destruction of Israel. Israel could easily destroy those cities and associated military sites if the Iranians ever present a real threat to thier survival.
Posted by: Mike C | June 7, 2007, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
So your sources are “Nato officials” (unnamed) an “analysis by a senior coalition official” and Statements by Jones, Gates, and Clark, none of whom have any first hand knowledge of the accuracy of the information. In fact, it’s not clear that “NATO officials” had any first hand information either.
Honestly I’ll believe this when people making these claims present their evidence publicly and without concealing thier identity. Remember when we “knew” Saddam had WMDs?
No one deserves the benefit of the doubt on this.
Posted by: IMU | June 7, 2007, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
This goes to show hindsight is 20/20. When we defeated (yes libs, defeated) the Iraqi Army, early on in the war, our Mission Accomplished moment, the President should have authorized the units to turn east and the units in Afghanistan to turn west. Iran has been formenting Islamic terrorism across the globe and the government, ayatollahs, and generals of this nation need to be given a quick kick to let them know who they are messing with.
I don’t need to see “proven” reports from the mainstream media, the Euro press or underground blogs; I knew from day one that Iran and Syria were involved in providing material support to terrorists and insurgent forces in Iraq.
Get those B2′s flying again over Tehran and Damascus!
Posted by: Hard Corps | June 7, 2007, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
The argument, ‘We supplied them in the past, so we should bend over and take it’ is as dumb an argument as there is for two reasons.
First, the REASON we supplied them is because we had a foreign policy of, not preemption, but containment. If we had had a policy of preemption, then we might NOT have had to resort to supplying our enemies enemy, but instead taken care of it ourselves. This MAY or MAYNOT have been a viable solution. The point is, that because of our foreign policy at the time, a foreign policy that many want to return to despite its failures, we didn’t have a choice.
Second, what’s your point? Are you suggesting that it’s OK to protect ourselves from new weapons, but any weapon that we gave to our enemies enemy we should allow to attack us?
Dumb, dumb, dumb
Posted by: Jon | June 7, 2007, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
My complaint isn’t that we went to war but that we went so unprepared. 500,000 troops went to the Gulf war and there was no question about how it would come out from the beginning to the end and no-one in the region was about to challenge what we did. The same could have been the outcome in Iraq if we would have taken the trouble to determine the right order of priorities. To go there while leaving the Afgan situation unfinished was wrong and there was plenty of evidence to warn us of the folly of going into Iraq as we did.
Posted by: broomshaker | June 7, 2007, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
The only reason the fools on the Left even watch events in the Middle East is because they hope we lose the War just to spite Bush. They don’t realize that the liberal Left has the most to lose from Islamofascism.
Posted by: Zephyr | June 7, 2007, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Another reason you close and guard all areas of borders,in Iraq,and even more in the place the so called Terorrist want to kill us the United States. As long as we have an impearialist government, faciast idiots in Washington, that dont live by the law of our land, you can see why we have no trust in these fools.
If in fact Iran did get caught,with what they say, then again, why hasent GW done anything to stop it period! and make Dame sure our fighting men and women, are assured, our government is protecting them or NOT! Weapons of Mass Confusion, have been found, in the oval office
Posted by: JB | June 7, 2007, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Greg8898 – You’re correct but you fail to mention one very critical dynamic, and that is the fact that the Muslims in the Gulf states are sitting on top of a proverbial gold mine (oil) yet living in poverty. The vast majority of the population is uneducated, unskilled and impoverished. Their countries wealth is controlled by a ruling elite and they have little or no political voice. US policy, in an attempt to keep the oil flowing, perpetuates these conditions. The ruling class quashes any move towards democracy by the people. That same ruling class is kept in power by us. When is the last time you heard the US call for the spread of democracy in Saudi Arabia or Kuwait? Radical Islam is the only entity that is “listening” to the common people in these countries. It’s a nearly identical economic-social-political atmosphere as that of Germany during the inter-bellum period. With the stage set by these conditions, it should be no wonder that we’re seeing the radical islamic political movement stepping in.
Once again – oil is the only thing that’s tying us to this region of the world. Talk terror and nukes all you want, but we wouldn’t be talking at all here, were it not for their oil. Pakistan and India have nukes, and we didn’t care about it with them. There has been global terror (and domestic) of various flavors for centuries, and we only care about it now. It’s all b.s. meant to push your buttoms and get you onboard. The root of it all is US policy in the Gulf, and as ugly as it is, it’s a necessary evil. In order for us to survive, and prosper, we have to assert our national interests, and those interests begin and end with oil. The only “freedom” we’re fighting for is our freedom to prosper. The Taliban isn’t on it’s way to put our women in bur’qa’s and make you grow a beard. Those hillbillies couldn’t find the US on a map if they wanted to. Let’s all face the fact that we’re there because we need to put gas in our cars, and take responsibility for the way we’ve made things for ourselves and others. This didn’t start with any one president and it won’t end with one – regardless of political party. It will end when we find another source of, or replacement for, that light sweet Gulf crude.
Posted by: Bill | June 7, 2007, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Don’t get me wrong… the Iranians are the mischievous brother that’s running amok because he thinks that Mom and Dad have their hands full with the other kids. A swift kick in the ass will set him straight, for the time being at least. And by swift kick, I mean knock out a few of his nuclear “research” reactors, and smoke a few divisions of his beloved Revolutionary Guard. And no, we don’t need to nuke them or annihlate them – did’nt you guys learn anything from this Iraq mess? We “remove” their army, and all the other knuckleheads in the neighborhood will start showing up to see what sort of trouble they can stir up.
Posted by: Bill | June 7, 2007, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Wow… thanks for that spot on analysis Bill. You reminded me of how messed up we are as humans, and that we are on a path for inevitable destruction no matter what side you sit on.
Enjoy it while you can folks! ;-)
Michael
St. Paul, MN
Posted by: Michael | June 7, 2007, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Here is a problem solver, pull out all troops in middle east and from all bases all over the world and send tanks and jets to our borders of mexico and canada and dare people to cross the borders. If they try to cross mow them down! takes care of immigration for the future. Tell all the other countries to deal with their own problems. If anyone tries to do terroism in this country shoot him/her on White House lawn on national tv. Oh yeah about Iran NUKE THEM BACK TO THE STONE AGES!
Posted by: matt | June 7, 2007, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
RAND Corporation is a non-profit organization. There is no one in RAND who makes billions or even millions off of analysis.
Posted by: Tom | June 7, 2007, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Bill, I agree with you 100%. Wars are always fought for the procurement of resources. Watch 2001: A Space Odyssey…the “fight” between the primate clans over the drinking hole was no doubt how the first wars would have looked. War itself was crucial in the formation of structured society…to best protect and defend…and attack when necessary. I can’t stand the peaceniks of the world who choose to ignore this fundamental side of humanity, in that we are capable of violence…and at times applied violence is necessary. But would you agree that to establish the cornerstones of a freer society in an effort to slowly rid the world of tyranny (or push it back into it’s hole at least) is not a noble task to undertake? Not criticizing here, just want your take.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
I we we give them Nukes ( drop them) that is!
Posted by: walnuts55 | June 7, 2007, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Brilliant Matt. Then we can all walk to the soup line together and talk about the good old days when we owned cars and had jobs.
Posted by: Bill | June 7, 2007, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
George Washington was the one who said to stay out of foreign affairs! look where that has gotten us Bill!
Posted by: matt | June 7, 2007, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
A swift kick in the ass will set him straight, for the time being at least
..
Yeah, kinda like ‘shock and awe’ set those pesky iraqis straight eh…
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
But would you agree that to establish the cornerstones of a freer society in an effort to slowly rid the world of tyranny (or push it back into it’s hole at least) is not a noble task to undertake?
…
So as bill said, why aren’t we calling for democracy in saudi arabia, or kuwait, or pakistan, or mozambique, or sudan, or why do we not allow true democracy to happen, such as in palestine… because it ain’t about tyranny at all.. it is about control and profit.
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Before we believe anything the neo-cons are promoting, may we please have a NAMED source for this information?
Posted by: mgm | June 7, 2007, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Maybe this will lead to USA and Russia working together to squash the Middle East and all of the troubles that they cause. World would be better without them.
Posted by: Robert | June 7, 2007, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
The vast majority of fighters in Iraq are foreign nationals that crossed a border that was not sealed Sakul. A common theme it seems with Bush. This is one of my grievances with the handling of a few things over there. But the mission is just in my mind.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
I said I agreed with him Sakul. But the regional war that would surely cure all ills would send the naysayers into conniption fits.
Part of the problem is the UN itself. The fact that China has interests in Sudan AND has a permanent seat in the security council kinda explains why Darfur is still an issue.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
All these, “Americans”? who hate this country so much, need to leave and go to the country of their choice.
I LOVE AMERICA, WARTS AND ALL!!!!
Posted by: STANLEY WOOTEN | June 7, 2007, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
You are all fools , Me and my boss Khamenei are providing all the weapons to Iraq and afghanistan and there is not a damn thing anyone can do !
we are going to get nuclear weapons too and there is not a damn thing anyone can do . iranian military is so strong now that there is not a damn thing anyone can do to us and our thugs in Iran . don’t fool yourselves and don’t keep saying Bomb iran because you can’t do it.and for Mccain who started this saying Bomb Bomb Bomb iran and you fools follow him , let me and ayatolah khamenei and our thugs give you a news we have sat in our leadership meeting and wrote a song for maccain and have instructed all iranians in iran sing this with us and it goes like this ,
Hell, hell,hell, Mccain go to hell
Hell, Hell, Hell, mccain go to Hell,
hell, hell, Hell ,Mccain go to Hell,
Come on you fools ,sing along with us.
You are all fools and there is not a damn thing you can do to us.
Ahmadinejad & Khamenei
Posted by: ahmadinejad & Khamenei | June 7, 2007, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
JB- Please scan and post your Ivy League Diploma and authorization to fly military jet aircraft. If you have neither, then the “imperial, fascist, idiot” in Washington is at least twice as smart as you, be virtue of his having both. Therefore, if he is truly an idiot, as you claim, that would make you either a moron or a parrot for your media maSSters.
Posted by: Diffuse | June 7, 2007, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Ahh but what of their hardware? And how to use it? I’ll concede that maybe the insurgency isn’t so heavily comprised of foreign nationals, but then from the same article:
Extremists in Iraq are “exposed to international networks from around the world,” said Sanderson, who has been briefed by German security agencies. “They are returning with bomb-making skills, perhaps stolen explosives, vastly increased knowledge. If they are succeeding in a hostile environment, avoiding … US Special Forces, then to go back to Europe, my God, it’s kid’s play.”
ie. the point of this discussion about Iran.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
What a joke this article is.
Starting first with Iraq, the Iran backed Shites are firmly in charge. We suppor them. So why, on God’s green Earth, would Iran arm radical Sunnis knowing they will use those arms to kill the Iran backed Shites?
They would NOT. The whole story is too stupid to believe. Yet, now we are to believe Iran is arming radical Sunnis in Afganistan, too. Why would the Iranian government arm its mortal enemies?
But, I guess that people who don’t think at all will believe this B/S. And the U.S media will keep selling propaganda to us all.
Posted by: Tim B | June 7, 2007, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Keep Telling it like it is BILL. So, the solution is to keep using Oil or with the Technology we have now start using it to reduce the use of oil. After fighting this war for 4 years why has it taken a scare of the Earth warming to start looking at other means of energy. Because OLD MONEY HAS NOT INVESTED IN THE NEW FORMS OF ENEGRY SO THEY KEEP SENDING YOUR SONS OVER TO DIE SO THEY CAN MAKE MONEY.
Posted by: JOESNOPY | June 7, 2007, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
I’ll concede that maybe the insurgency isn’t so heavily comprised of foreign nationals, but then from the same article:
Missed that part Sakul. Can’t take compliments can we?
And yet again we dive into the guilt trip that the US must feel for everything period. Many nations sell weapons to Israel Sakul, they even develop some of their own. Fancy that, a trade almost as old as prostitution. Who Israel gets their weapons from is inconsequential to me, at least Israel focuses on military targets. Your precious suffering masses of Palestinians use the hardware they are given from Iran to you know, fire rockets at random and blow up buses and bazaars.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Sakul – Our “Shock & Awe” campaign saved a lot of American lives. It’s standard military doctrine to “prep the battlefield” prior to sending in ground forces. We’ve been doing this since 1775, this was just the first time you’ve been able to watch it live on TV from the lazyboy in your doublewide.
Posted by: Bill | June 7, 2007, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
If I hate America so much, why don’t I just leave?
Simple. America does not equal George W. Bush. Bush has done more to corrupt the concept of American democracy in six years than any terrorist could ever possibly achieve. By telling me I “hate America”, you’re telling me that in your version of America, dissent is not allowed. Which is, quite frankly, unamerican.
Or to put it another way, if you’re so eager to shut me up by asking me to leave, you’re the one who needs to find an authoritarian dictatorship to move to, not me.
Posted by: queridobobo | June 7, 2007, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
“elgraz — No, actually we are not ‘at war’. Congress hasn’t declared ‘war’, as they are only government body capable of doing so, according to the constitution. What is happening in Iraq right now is the result of a unilateral invasion by the United States upon a sovereign nation. If you are going to discuss politics, at least get your facts straight.”
Posted by: Eric | Jun 6, 2007 9:32:32 PM
Eric, kinda reminds me of the time Bill Clinton unilaterally bombed the hell out of Serbia, huh? That’s right he is a liberal so it was ok for him to do it w/o any backing of the UN!
Posted by: KFED | June 7, 2007, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
ABC is owned by Disney
NBC is owned by GE
CBS is owned by Viacom
Those of you who call the mass media liberal are idiots, please stop, it is embarrassing.
Posted by: ozymandius | June 7, 2007, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Funny thing is Eric, the last time congress has EVER declared war was in WWII. We’ve been a little busy since then me thinks.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
No Sakul. He simply read from the Constitution. It’s kinda the basis for all the justice the left loves to whine about.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
ozymandius- Interestingly enough, I never see any false or misleading exit polling data that would support a Conservative candidacy. I never see states “called” two hours before the polling ends, to support a Conservative. I never see forged documents that support a Conservative at election time. I have never seen a Conservative on any news program where they’re aren’t at least two, and usually three, liberals. The “experts” chosen by news programs rarely if ever are Conservatives. The moderators, Stephanopolous, Russert “Kokie”, et.al are ALL Democrat operatives, who walk out of positions as Democrat spokesman, and take anchor chairs with the Democrat Misinformation Media Machine. Yeah, no liberal bias in the media, if you keep your eyes and ears closed, along with your mind.
Posted by: Diffuse | June 7, 2007, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
as could and should be expected the same division weaves in and out of the comments regarding this “issue” and accusation. who needs an enemy when we’re already clawing the eyes out of ourselves. YES!, Rand Halliburton and all the rest are wet down there in hoping for an escalated conflict and they’ve got the perfect doop team to follow through on the very worst and unbelievabley incompetent responses and inflaming provocations, and as a result we take another step into the hypocrisy and self-doubt that has led us this far into “having to throw in together” seein’ as we wont have any direction option soon enough other than fight or annihilation because “someone’ insisted we shouldnt be proud and an outside governmental organization was more than happy to facilitate and accommodate that misdirective. Short version of a solution … take juniors toys and make him eat his vegetables or throw in for an economy size bag of pretzels and hope for the best.
Posted by: kazoonheight | June 7, 2007, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Kazoo…you might get your point across better if you break that first sentence up into five. Imagine each should take the length of a breath to read, and try again.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
When will the conspiracy crap die? Why is everything a big damn conspiracy…everything….every facet from the janitor up is part of a big damned conspiracy? I tell you, the world is run by elvis.
He’s still alive you know.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Sakul- I won’t get into the fact that your use of the term “Neo-Con” belays the extent of your ignorance. Neo-Cons are a very small part of the Conservative movement, although people like you like to throw the term around, not knowing the definition, because it makes you SOUND intelligent, I guess. That being said, name me one Conservative that ever advocated anything in the list I provided. This is the point where I assume you have nothing intelligent to reply, so I’m awaiting the typical Liberal insult. Just another way you folks try to silence the people.
Posted by: Diffuse | June 7, 2007, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Congress could stop the war very quickly. The problem is, they are really not anti-war. Pelosi, Reid, Murtha, Kennedy, etc. just use that line to win votes. With a majority in the Senate and house, and with Republicans’ resolve all but gone, one simple vote to cut off funds for the war would bring the troops home. You can’t fight a war without money. Bush would be forced to bring them home. Congress controls the purse, the purse controls everything.
Posted by: Ahmed | June 7, 2007, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Bill, you are also correct. Oil is a major problem. And I do my part everyday to lessen our dependence on oil. I recycle (EVERYTHING–plastic, glass, paper, cardboard, electronics), I use florescent bulbs, I work at home, I do my shopping (and, therefore, my car-driving) about every two weeks. I do more than most lefties…
I do all this because I want to keep this planet lookin’ purty. I also do it because I hate the fact that we’re beholden to a bunch of backward, inbred morons whose only qualification for power is the fact that they were lucky enough to be born over a bunch of oil.
We need to figure out a way to not be dependent on Middle East oil (and fossil fuels in general). Then we need to give these backwater countries an ultimatum: You no longer “own” us. Treat your women and minority citizens right, stop exporting terrorism, and start living in the g*ddamn 21st century, or we’ll erase you. I think it’s a good plan…
Posted by: Greg8898 | June 7, 2007, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Part of the way to do that Greg is in what we are doing now in Iraq and Afghanistan. Those people live in the tribal state of mind to this day….sept they have cell phones now. Howl as the left may, I support what we are doing to this day. There have been screw ups…but nothings perfect. We just need some marbles in the pouch and some poise.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Ahmed we have been the most benevolent “empire” in history.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
A careful reading of this article shows not one verifiable fact to prove its claims. It is the same type of kinda-true-but-not type of story that gave us the aluminum tubes, WMDs, the balsa wood drone of death, ect. This is propaganda, not journalism.
BTW Iran was our ally when we first invaded Afghanistan.
Posted by: John Gillnitz | June 7, 2007, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Shortly before the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, Tehran made some swift policy changes in the region, which were evidenced by comments said by the top political and religious leader in Iran, Ayatollah Khamenei. In his televised speech on September 26, Khamenei said, “The Islamic Republic of Iran will not offer any assistance to America and its alliance in their attacks [on Afghanistan].” He also accused the United States of seeking to establish itself in Central Asia—Afghanistan, Pakistan and the subcontinent—under the pretext of “establishing security.” (BTW)
Posted by: Ahmed | June 7, 2007, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Iran was not so much our ally John as they gave a nod in our general direction. Remember, the talks the diplomats recently had was the first time we’ve had direct dialog since peanut man was in office.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Show me the proof. We won’t be fooled again.
Posted by: gumby | June 7, 2007, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Iran did not offer any help or support, and was not an “ally” in any way. When I went to Bagram in Feb of 2002, we flew from Kuwait to Afghanistan over Pakistani airspace along the SE border of Iran. True alliance or cooperation from Iran would have allowed us to fly over the country, not all the way around.
Posted by: Ahmed | June 7, 2007, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
I have never seen a Conservative on any news program where they’re aren’t at least two, and usually three, liberals.
..
guess you don’t watch fox.
Posted by: dale | June 7, 2007, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
I’m tired of this “American Imperialism” BS. If we were imperialist, we would simply take the oil.
…
It’s corporate imperialism. And we will just take the oil, you wait. They are trying to ram an unfair oil law down the iraqis throats where foreign companies get 70% of the booty for the next 30 years, not the iraqi people. You see, in the 1700s, flat out inceration and stealing of a people/resources were in vogue and acceptable… take North America for example. We live in a somewhat more civilized society, where that isn’t really acceptable. Well, so long as people are looking. From the sounds of most of the rambo-wannabes here, they wish the world STILL worked that way.
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
did someone mention a point? lol this is a joke right?
Posted by: yer mother | June 7, 2007, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Fox is not a part of the Democrat Misinformation Media Machine I am alluding to. It was created so not all of us would live like mushrooms. You know, fed crap and living in the dark.
Posted by: Diffuse | June 7, 2007, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Only 70% and for only 30 years. They should have at least required 100 years. That still wouldn’t cover the price of Iraqi liberation/Overthrowing of Sadam/Democratically elected government/3500 American lives/ Thousands of American wounded. We ought to itemize our services and charge them more…
Posted by: Ahmed | June 7, 2007, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
*sigh* The caricature of the big fat white CEO smoking the stogie and snatching the food from baby’s mouths.
It’s like the people that tried to sell Coca Cola trade secrets to Pepsi…I can see what was going on in their mind.
That big fat white CEO gloating over said secrets saying to himself “I have you now Coke….MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.” Then lightening flashes with a peal of thunder.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Once again, the “We stole the land” B.S. So, tell me the nations of the world that haven’t been conquered at one time or another in world history. And please, no garbage about the “peaceful” Indians, that warred against each other incessantly, or garbage about our “genocide,” since most of them died because they had no natural immunity from diseases that we brought from Europe with us. The history of the world is the history of conquered nations.
Posted by: Diffuse | June 7, 2007, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
We caught Iran red-handed in an act of war in 1979. We did nothing.
We caught Iran red-handed at least three times in the killing of our military and civilian personnel in Beirut in the early 1980′s.
And the US did what in return or in retaliation? El zippo.
Iranian policy has been dictated by one islamofascist Ayatollah or another since 1978 – and that policy has been one of war against America. Period.
Which of these facts does any red-blooded American not comprehend??
Posted by: Sean Osborne | June 7, 2007, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
The history of the world is the history of conquered nations.
…
yeah, isn’t that getting a little old and worn out?
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
No. It’s simple reality Sakul.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
That can be changed Ahmed, as the Declaration of Independence stipulates…and Diffuse alluded to earlier.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Sad but true, jabbadu. They sure are some sore losers.
Posted by: Diffuse | June 7, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
As you can read above the left’s response to the article is:
1. No, it is not happening – a) because ABC is part of the fascist corporate media b) Sunni and Shi’a don’t get along
2. Yes, it is happening – a) so what? b) they have the right to oppose the imperialist USA
Don’t you just love it?
Posted by: observer | June 7, 2007, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Anyone want to discuss the recent reports of the west funding ‘terro…ahem, I mean freedom fighters’ inside Iran to try and destabilize the government there?
Posted by: sakul72 | June 7, 2007, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Want to laugh?
Osama rails against “American vices” the left has long touted as “god given rights.”
The left sits in the middle of the floor and whines at us as “racists,” “facists,” “religious zealots” for finding such lifestyles and hedonism unacceptable.
We begin a campaign to rid the world of this ideology espoused by Osama.
The left sits in the middle of the floor and whines that “the war on terror is like a war on dandruff”, however, it’s to protect our freedoms that let weeny libs live the same lifestyles Osama hates.
What’s it gonna be?
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
+(
…and “NonZionist” beleives every slogan Mao Tse Dung said.
ROTFLMAO!
)+
– Tian | Jun 7, 2007 3:15:37 PM
Where do you get that from? Mao, Cheney, and the neo-cons all believe that “power comes out of the barrel of a gun (or nuke)”. I believe just the opposite, and I regard the neo-cons as the nazis of the 21st century.
I believe in the power of example, the power of truth, the power of reason and logic.
I believe in the primacy of the individual, the rule of law, and limited government — all things that the neo-cons are trying to destroy here in America today. I believe in national sovereignty, reciprocity, equal rights, and the Golden Rule. My heros are Jefferson and Christ. (I suppose that explains why most of my messages here get deleted.) If America still had free elections, I would be voting for Kucinich, Gravel, or Ron Paul.
Enjoy your nuclear apocalypse. Even if you drop your nukes right on my head, it won’t be enough to change my mind. If you want to do that, you will have to learn how to treat me like a human being.
Posted by: NonZionist | June 7, 2007, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
All of this mess is a headache. I think we should just nuke the whole goddamn middle east and be done with it! Forget racism. Forget religon. Just nuke them and be done with it.
Posted by: NoneYa | June 7, 2007, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
The left sits in the middle of the floor and whines at us as “racists,” “facists,” “religious zealots” for finding such lifestyles and hedonism unacceptable.
…
Not exactly. I and many others I know think those lifestyles and hedonism is unacceptable.. geez, they cut your damn hand off for stealing, a woman gets stoned for cheating, etc.. its sick..
But, I say let em be like that all they want.. savages.. OVER THERE. That’s the point their over there and they just want us to leave. They aren’t over here trying to take us over. And they don’t want to.
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
I donot beleive in USA any more.It has killed more humans than any history in the world ,in the name of God.
Do people kill each other in name of God and Lords of Lords.
Usa was first to drop Nuclear Weapon on Hiroshima , Nagashiki and it is now stopping silent country like Iran which has not fought war in 150 Years.
Posted by: Democracy | June 7, 2007, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
I haven’t seen this “news” any where else.Yup we sure can trust it. Nothing on bbc,reuters,cnn not even fox. If this is true and this offical did say this then why havent other media outlets picked it up?
Posted by: joe | June 7, 2007, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
We have a professional army…we are the greatest nation in the world, folks from other countries want to become citizens because we have the highest standard of living! Why are Americans not willing to stand up and fight for our freedoms? Some of your readers would rather watch Rosie and get their news from late night TV than read what radical muslim’s have in store for their sorry butts!
Posted by: Mike Rocco | June 7, 2007, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Democracy, one more thing. The greatest killers in history were NOT Americans. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot were all athiests, so this “more people have died in the name of religion” B.S. is just that. B.S.
Posted by: Diffuse | June 7, 2007, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
God bless the USA Diffuse. Take care dude.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
well, if you read about the latest wars between Afghanistan and Iran beginning in early 1700 and continuing up to 1920s, you would realize Iran’s futile quest for influence in Afghanistan. In fact, it was an Afghan King named Shah Ashraf who defeated both the Svavids of Iran and Ottomans of Turkey in 1724. He actually saved Iran against the Turks after the disintegration of the Savavid Dynasti.
Now to the present situation and Iran sending arms to their not so old enemies who were willing to go to war (almost) in 1998. Ironically the desperados in Tehran are now arming their own enemies just to confirm the old saying of “My Enemy’s Enemy Is My Friend”.
Let’s remember that only superpowers can invade Afghanistan. Getting in to Afghanistan is easy than you can imagine but you can’t be sure about your exit unless you play your cards carefully.
It is too late for the clergy in Iran to save the taliban or themselves. Iran must halt its support for Taleban, al-Qaeda and other terror outfits or face the consequences, which will be much bigger than the Ayatollahs’ imagination and fantasies.
Iran must be stopped in Afghanistan and Iraq!!!
The terror regime in Iran MUST be prevented from getting the “Bomb”!!!
In fact, many Iranian had hoped that the Bush admin would go after the terror clergy of Iran after the successful toppling of Taleban regime in Afghanistan, but unfortunately and admittedly all resources were diverted to an unnecessary and disastrous war in Iraq.
Let’s not forget that even Vice Presidents in Afghanistan are long time time Iranian agents, not to mention the speaker of the parliament and so on.
But Iran will regret its meddling in Afghanistan, which is not Iraq, Lebanon or Palestine. Rest assured!!!
Mirwais
Posted by: mirwais | June 7, 2007, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Mirwais…..
your Kool-Aid cup runneth over…
til next time y’all..
sakul
;)
Posted by: sakul | June 7, 2007, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Lol take it easy Sakul.
Was fun.
Posted by: jabbadu | June 7, 2007, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
You lost me at NATO officials said………like they have any credibility.
Thanks for the heads up but I’ll go find the real details in the alternative news sources on the internet. You know…the ones that aren’t bought and paid for by the government.
We are sick of you promoting fear-mongering and the Governments False Flag Terrorism. Your all about as reputable as snake oil salemen these days.
Get a clue ABC.
Posted by: Patriot | June 7, 2007, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stopped short earlier this week of blaming Iran, saying the U.S. did not have evidence “of the involvement of the Iranian government in support of the Taliban.”
But an analysis by a senior coalition official, obtained by the Blotter on ABCNews.com, concludes there is clear evidence of Iran’s involvement.”
Oh so ABC news is now our New intelligence apparatus? Your kidding right?
Posted by: Tim | June 8, 2007, 1:17 am 1:17 am
Gary: Maybe the US should start sponsoring a couple insurgent groups in Iran.
–
They already are and have been for several years. The PKK and MEK spring to mind. Both are listed as terrorist groups by the US and both are receiving US aid in operating within Iran to destabilize the regime.
Posted by: Stephen Coulson | June 8, 2007, 2:05 am 2:05 am
So, after reading most ofthe right wing comments here… It would be alright for the UK to nuke the US of A for supplying arms and money to the IRA for decades??? After all, they were killing a lot of UK servicemen and civilians.
All of you people calling for a nuke on Tehran make me sick. And this from the country supposedly full of Christians!!!
How many of you have ever visited Iran??? How many of you know that the public in Tehran held a candlelight vigil after 9-11??? Sounds like they are baying for your blood!!!
Also… If your so keen to see Iran nuked, better break out you horse and buggy… Irradiated oil fields are not too productive.
Posted by: runningdog | June 8, 2007, 2:25 am 2:25 am
builderburg,cfr….
your u.s leaders worship a 40 foot owl and kill kids to it!
u fools u have lost your country by default!
arm chair cowboys screaming bomb iran…
first it was one country then another now its iran then who????? wake up and smell the nazi’s that run your country!
the u.s drops wmd on kids and mothers!
your sons are full of tumors from the depleted uranium they are given to use on people!
ask why the u.s didnt get out of iraq after they got saddam and why are they still there if that is all they wanted to do??? wake up!
Posted by: able | June 8, 2007, 4:03 am 4:03 am
I’m waiting for some names. And what leads these people to come to one conclusion while other people come to another.
It would also be a big help if we could see the analysis.
Posted by: Joe | June 8, 2007, 4:51 am 4:51 am
Boy, I hope noone is flying those laser guided missiles, would be pretty kamikaze like!
Posted by: Chuck | June 8, 2007, 4:55 am 4:55 am
ABC, sheesh, “analysis concluded” is now headlined as “caught red-handed”. These guys are “journalists”?! Edward R. Murrow is spinning in his grave. Probably a wasted reference, all these “community college” tots writing typo-filled “news stories” now probably can’t even spell “accurate investigative reporting”….too funny, too sad.
Posted by: TomBob | June 8, 2007, 5:59 am 5:59 am
I had one of those damn EFP things kill my boss, literally minutes after he left a FOB. He was given a purple heart, like most EFP attack surviors, because you rarely are wounded enough for a typical purple heart injury. You either are dead or you’re not.
Posted by: CR Soldier | June 8, 2007, 7:09 am 7:09 am
Wow, if most of the posters here are Americans, I am just blown away at how simple-minded, 2-dimensional, and stupid this segment of the American population is…whatever your perspective or views on the matter of the middle east.
You guys resort to second grade name-calling and childish back-and-forth pointless ranting…there seems to be no ability whatsoever to simply discuss the matter at hand, to debate the issues or to even grasp the concept that perhaps there are two sides to a story…
Why would anyone NOT want to crush you?
Posted by: Jazz | June 8, 2007, 7:29 am 7:29 am
I don’t pretend to have all the answers, and I certainly don’t believe that Iran has any warm feeling toward the U.S. but this administration has been so deceitful, so manipulative, so BLIND to everything but their own desires….that it makes it very difficult not to be skeptical. They use such fear tactics and such bluster and false info that I’m afraid no one will believe our government when they should. I’m undecided about this – and isn’t that a shame? We really should be able to trust our government. If we can’t then we’re no better than these countries that we “liberate”. I miss America.
Posted by: luckyduck63 | June 8, 2007, 7:31 am 7:31 am
Islamaphobia and world police mania is very evident by the ignorance of many of the posts here. No more wars for resources, haliburton, bush, or whatever. We are not the worlds policeman, we do not have a mandate to make everyone living somewhere on the earth do exactly what we want them to do. Wake up and live peace.
Posted by: ble | June 8, 2007, 9:01 am 9:01 am
That’s a great sentiment, ble, but until you are no longer dependent on petroleum from the middle east (and you are), these issues will not go away. At it’s core, this is all about natural resources and the global demand for them; nothing else.
Posted by: Jazz | June 8, 2007, 9:38 am 9:38 am
What do you call an intelligent man in America?
A tourist.
Posted by: Sid | June 8, 2007, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Sid, some of the most “intelligent” men (and women) in history were/are American. The competitive drive and innovative spirit that has helped the world in so many ways is very much American. I’ve been taught by incredibly smart business strategists and have learned much from Americans who by the propulsion of their own determination, have created their own life’s fulfillment. This is no secret to the world.
Please do not twist what I wrote into a broad, inaccuarate generalization, because that is wrong.
I pointed out very specifically, and in concise terms, how I feel about the level (or lack) of intelligent debate and conversation on these boards. I’d like to engage people in adult, mature discourse on news topics ranging from the middle east to domestic issues that may or may not impact any or all of us. That’s all…
Posted by: Jazz | June 8, 2007, 10:50 am 10:50 am
While I would not be a bit surprised, I would expect much more proof, before accepting the word of the government on this subject. Obviously we have been led down the primrose path, before.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | June 8, 2007, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Jazz,
I’m in complete agreement about what you said. Many an entrepreneur have made a mark in the world, following the “American Dream”. I’m all in for engaging people in an intelligent debate.
But after going through the comments posted here, a large majority seem to be hellbent on bombing Iran off the face of the map of the Earth. Resorting to bombs to solve all troubles, what makes Americans different from these terrorists who seem to have pretty much the same idea?
America, first and foremost should stop its policing of the world. Its not going to win it many friends. The Arab world was very pro West not too long back (Remember Stallone fighting alongside the same Jehadis now labeled as terrorists in Rambo?).
And think beyond pro war Conservatives and anti war Liberals. America should really make way for a multi-polar Congress. War is a necessary evil, and one has to engage in it sometimes. Gulf War in 1992 was necessary. So was the action against Milosevic in Serbia/Kosovo. And then the one in Afghanistan after 9/11 to wipe out the Taliban. Bush was very much in track then. But Iraq II just screwed up everything totally beyond repair. And the repercussions are being felt now and shall continue to be felt in the future.
Posted by: Sid | June 8, 2007, 11:33 am 11:33 am
BOOGA, BOOGA ! BE AFRAID! – If I hear another person put forth the same old tired explanation ” they hate us because we are free” I think I am going to puke.
Why don’t some of you look up Operation AJAX – Were the CIA successfully overthrew Mohammed Mossadegh of Iran using “staged false flag” terrorist attacks.
Or how about Operation Northwoods, the USS liberty, the Bay of Pigs – the list goes on and on
Even BOGUS 9/11 commission report makes mention of ‘Blowback’.
Tell me if this makes since Bush is invading Middle Eastern countries all in the name of “spreading democracy”, or was it “WMD”, no, wait it was “Regime change”.. no that can’t be it must be “because we’re free”.
while at the same time curtailing American freedoms at home via the Patriot act 1&2, Military commissions act, illegal wiretapping, RealID-National id…ect.
The ‘war on terror’ is a SCAM!
Posted by: Justin | June 8, 2007, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
“The ‘war on terror’ is a SCAM!”
Tell that to the 3000 families that lost
a loved one in the Towers on 9/11!
It’ll be a scam to all you Liberals till
the one day when yours or one of your loved ones ass is blown off the planet by a Terrorist.
You all make me sick.
You should feel privileged to be a citizen in a Country that allows you to voice your opinions!
NUFF SAID!
Posted by: Patriot | June 8, 2007, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Finally – thanks…
Posted by: Jazz | June 8, 2007, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
NOT one report of this on any other media source!!!!!!!!!!!! This cannot be trusted.
Posted by: Mash | June 8, 2007, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Your welcome, Jazz. Gee, got kind of quiet over here, didn’t it?
Posted by: Diffuse | June 8, 2007, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
We should have settled our problems with Iran in 1979, Mash. They are a cancer that we have allowed to spread since then. I don’t CARE if the reports are true or not, there is plenty of evidence they are killing your neighbors in Iraq, by supplying IED’s. Iranian citizens AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS are being captured there, where they have no business being. You morons who are fronting for them are no different than the isolationists we had prior to W.W. 2. There is only one way to deal with a bully, especially one who believes he has been “chosen” to start the confliguration that will lead to “the lost Imam’s” coming out of the well, to usher in an Islamic world.
Posted by: Diffuse | June 8, 2007, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
@Diffuse:
There is something known as a conventional war, and an unconventional war. American forces and other armies of the world are well prepared to fight a conventional war, but totally unprepared to fight the unconventional war. Defeating and conquering a visible enemy, like Saddam Hussein and his Iraqi army, is conventional war. Which is something US managed with relative ease. But fighting the hidden enemy, who can be anyone, coming from any direction, at any given time is a totally different ballgame. If our world was just a group of nations living independently in seclusion, you could bomb Iran and forget about it. But today’s world is a global village, with people of all nationalities and ethnic origins living together. Something happening in one part of the world will affect the rest of the world, in a small or large way. Civil war in a tiny African country would have close to negligible global repercussions. But bombing Iran will have aftershocks which will affect the entire world, as it would affect the Muslim sentiment in general and Iranian sentiment in specific. The war from remote Iran may have effects in your neighbourhood high school, where an American born or naturalized Iranian youth may go in on a Monday morning, with a couple of semi automatics in his bag (Thanks to the NRA), and shoot everyone in sight. Not a pretty sight, eh? This is just a small example.
I’m not anti war, as I stated earlier.
But I believe a wise man always uses his head before pulling the trigger. Which was unfortunately not the case in Iraq II. If Iran is found guilty, go out against it in full strength and decimate it.
My only fear is, what happens after the war. Talibans are returning to power in Afghanistan. Iraq, previously free from terrorists, is now a hotbed for Al Qayeda. An Iran would split the American attention in three directions. And I’m sure there will be a #4 waiting to appear on the cross-hair after Iran.
Its always very easy to break something. Its the re-building thats the tough part.
Posted by: Sid | June 8, 2007, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Patriot, Please re-read my posts. I am definitely not a Muslim, support the troops and the current war in Iraq, and am a believer in Christ. Don’t know your beliefs. If you CAREFULLY reread my posts, I am only attacking ignorance, not people.
Posted by: Diffuse | June 8, 2007, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
and let the men fighting for YOU finish the job.
THAT is the crux of the matter. The job in Afghanistan was never finished, and Iraq happened. And while Iraq is getting messy, Iran is coming into the picture.
Its like a little kid on a beach, trying to make sand castles. He first makes one, doesn’t like it, so leaves it. Then makes another. Then another, and another…and so on. In the end, he gets tired, and still no sand castle. If he had shown patience and dedication on building the first one well, he would have succeeded.
Posted by: Sid | June 8, 2007, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Sid, As my father use to say to me, any fool can tear down a house, but it takes a carpenter to build one. No where in my post do I mention bombing Iran, I simply state that we are going to have to deal with them, one way or another. I have read your criticisms, but don’t see any possible solutions discussed. I’m quite confident that, after Vietnam, our military has been studying insurgencies, and how best to deal with them, for decades. I know some military people who are well versed in unconventional warfare, and are well trained in accomplishing the same. Have some faith in what we’re doing, give it till September, as Gen Petraeus recommends, and then re-evaluate. Do you have a better solution?
Posted by: Diffuse | June 8, 2007, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
I guess I should clarify – I’m neither pro-republican nor pro-democrat. I really am not a big fan of either party (somebody posted earlier that we should have a multi-polar system – I agree with that).
I’m just glad that one of UBL’s mandates to the west (if that’s what it is) has been posted here, so at least people can read it and make up their own minds as to what his agenda is…
Posted by: Jazz | June 8, 2007, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
I see it more like a house of cards. When you pull out the one at the bottom of it all, the rest come down fairly easily.
Posted by: Diffuse | June 8, 2007, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Diffuse, I guess we’re on agreement on that then. I was just echoing my thoughts on the general sentiment which I perceived from this thread, that bombing Iran is the solution.
I feel, the focus should not be lost on the War on Terror. Afghanistan was totally justified. Ouster of Saddam from Iraq was important too, even though the premise of WMD’s was based on shaky grounds. But the timing was very bad. And its turned out to be a very bad roadblock on the path to fight terrorism. There was no Al Qayeda in Iraq earlier, but there is now.
In the same way, do you hear about Iranian terrorists anywhere? Iranian suicide bombers? Iranian plane hijackers? True, one may say Islamic terrorism had its roots in Iran (Hezbollah). But Iran is not indulging in active terrorism at present, they’re more like behind the scenes operators. If Iran is attacked now, post war anarchy is inevitable. And with it, you’ll have millions of more zealots added to the army of terrorists. Another problem to deal with.
The issue here is to attack the real perpetrators of terrorism, those supposedly hiding in the tribal, mountainous border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Islamic youth believes in Osama Bin Laden’s invincibility all the more, since the most powerful nation in the world, the USA has still not been able to trace him. This makes more and more youth join his terror training camps, where they’re brainwashed with fanaticism and trained in guerrilla warfare, and then exported across the world.
At the moment, USA has given this responsibility to General Musharraf, supposed ally in the war on terror, who has actually made pacts with the Taliban. And has terror camps developing right under his nose, in Islamabad!
Posted by: Sid | June 8, 2007, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Sid, both parties, including a former President, believed there were WMD’s in Iraq. Clinton’s foreign policy called for the end of the Iraqi government. Even without them, we did not need that country to become a staging point for the Islamofascists, backed by their petrodollars. Secondly, Iran does not need terrorists. They fund surrogates like Hamas and Hezbullah, and others, and admit openly to it. Hezbullah, remember, blew up the Marine barracks in Lebanon that killed hundreds of Americans.
Posted by: Diffuse | June 8, 2007, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Like I said, had we dealt with Iran in 1979, when Jimmy Carter allowed them to get away with what international law say’s is an act of war, after he was directly responsible for putting their Islamofascist government in place, we would not have lost these Marines, and the middle east would be a lot more stable today.
Posted by: Diffuse | June 8, 2007, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
The downside to NUKING IRAN is that would tick off the Chinese and Russians. They are trading partners with IRAN… OIL mostly.. Iranians are in the middle of both wars and the US has yet to stand up and take action.. We have enough firepower in the gULF to level all their bases and Uranium enrichment plants..
Posted by: Jerry M | June 8, 2007, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Has any one here ever heard of M.A.D, Mutually Assured Destruction? Iran would never allow it’s nuclear material to be used by anyone as a means of attacking the United States. We can track plutonium directly to the reactor where it was created.In the event of an attack using Iranian plutonium The United States would then be justifies to completely obliterate the Republic of Iran. Do you think Iran really wants that?
Posted by: Justin | June 8, 2007, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Justin, have you ever heard of a MADman? That’s what Ahmedinijad is. He wants to bring about the end of the world so the “hidden imam” can return. He would have no problem using nuclear weapons as a way to facilitate his religious agenda.
He’s a loony!
Posted by: Greg8898 | June 8, 2007, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Sure.
And Iraq was an imminent threat too, remember? They were “capable of attacking within 45 minutes”.
These voices declaring Iran an imminent threat and advocating all out war are the same folks who bought into the lies about Iraq.
You and the administration were wrong then. The administration has been wrong about almost everything ever since. What makes any of you right now?
Posted by: Zach | June 8, 2007, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
If that genius Bush didn’t start a war with an imagined enemy, Iraq, the U.S. could have taken care of a real enemy, Iran.
Posted by: Wise One | June 8, 2007, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
It’s is highly unlikely that Iran will supply and support Taliban now, when it had been helping the northern alliance all along the war at the time when US chose to ignore the Taliban (Old Allies). Now the NA is in power and it is not antagonistic towards Iran so helping the taliban and antagonizing the friendly Northern Alliance doesn’t make any strategic sense at all. It is no secret how biased aome of the american media has become.
Posted by: Shantanu Bhadoria | June 8, 2007, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Believing that Iran is supporting Shia Militants in Iraq is much more believable than this piece of crap about Taliban.
ABC sucks . . .
Posted by: Shantanu Bhadoria | June 8, 2007, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
So once again, unnamed NATO officials are the “sources” of this sensational news? Why? To cover up a failure of biblical magnitude in Afghanistan?
For over 6 years the “liberators” of Afghanistan looked the other way to the production of Opium and distribution of Heroin in Afghanistan, where production went from a few hundred tons during the Taliban regime, to over 6000 tons in the past year. A simple calculation gives the drug benefits of up to $2 billion dollars per year. Something that the US and their allies were warned before the attacks against Afghanistan and CHOOSE not to do anything about.
The Islamic republic (as brutal and as un-humane as it is) is not stupid, they have learned their lesson many times that one should not support the enemy of their enemies. Because (unlike the “NATO officials” and “The coalition analysis”) they have learned the lesson from the history and they know a loose canon will be turned over and haunt them.
The Taliban (which is a plural word and should be referred to that way too that way) are Sunni Muslims, any weapons they receive will be shared with their other Sunni brothers like the Al-Qaida linked CIA and ISI supported Jundullah movement in Iranian Baluchestan.
If IRI is as stupid as these anonymous analyzers want us to believe, then they are arming indirectly the Jundullah who is fighting a brutal and bloody war against the Islamic Republic.
Are the writers of this article even aware of this? Do you care?
Best regards,
Farhad Abdolian
An Iranian IRI “hater” in Exile
Posted by: Farhad Abdolian | June 9, 2007, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Jesus…
having read these comments I can only come to one conclusion. The average American really is as stupid as the rest of The World believes.
The sooner you stop invading countries, loose the arrogance and elect a President who isn’t retarded, the sooner The World will be a safer place.
Morons!
Posted by: mcph | June 9, 2007, 5:00 am 5:00 am
All above comments show us one conclution regarding the US led war on terrorism and that is that US has made a big strategic mistake by removing Sadam first and thereby giving the Mullahs ( Clergy with turbons on their heads ) of Iran more power to spread their fanatical /exterimist ideas in the form of terrorism all over the world , therefore by USA’s strategic mistake again not only terrorism has not decreased but it has increased now that sadam is removed and iran with the Mullahs in control of it has become the only super power in the region and can do whatever it damn pleases. US should have got rid of the Mullahs of Iran before it had weakened Iraq ,because the Mullahs of Iran are the roots of terrorism and the root has become stronger and can spread faster,still it’s not too late for US to come up with a policy to weaken the Mullahs in iran by putting pressure on them at all levels such as Human rights abuses in Iran , Lack of freedoms in iran, support of terrorism by Mullahs , etc. and also US needs to support the opposition forces to the Mullahs inside and outside of iran so that the Mullahs regime can fall by the action of the Iranian democratic forces and not by any military action, at this point military action against Iran is the biggest mistake that US can make because it will play into the hands of the hardline Mullahs and the crazy Ahmadinejad and will therefore damage the democratic forces in Iran, Majority of iranian people are against the Mullahs in Iran and want good relations with the west so don’t make a mistake between the Mullahs and the iranian people , they are two separate parts of Iran , even a lot of Iranian Military forces are against what the Mullahs and hardline exterimists are doing in Iran, the biggest mistake that US made in 1978 at the hands of that peanut farmer Jimmy carter was to let khomeini come to power in Iran, since that time Radical islam and terrorism has spread all around the world , now is the time that US not cut another deal with the Mullahs regime of iran and in opposite try to change the Mullahs regime by helping and supporting Iranian opposition forces to the Mullahs. The Europeans are trying to cut deals with the Mullahs in their own interest and US must be carefull about European deals with the Mullahs, American people need to support Iranian opposition forces everywhere to bring a change of regime in Iran , that’s the only way to be successfull in the fight against terrorism otherwise as long as the Mullahs are in control of government in Iran the world will not see peace and terrorism will not go away, Americans must get more involved in their politics and put pressure on their politicians to devise a solid Iran policy which will include support of iranian democratics forces that can bring about a change of regime in Tehran, this is the only way folks, end of story.
Iranian Americans for regime change in Iran.
Posted by: Free Iran | June 9, 2007, 6:44 am 6:44 am
I am no friend of the mollahs in Iran, but honestly there is reasonable doubt now about whether any “smoking gun” that we find is indeed a “smoking gun” or “cherry-picked” reports.
Posted by: political forum | June 9, 2007, 7:25 am 7:25 am
Bomb the out of them..
Posted by: sarah | June 9, 2007, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Here comes another dimwit!
Posted by: Dave | June 9, 2007, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Oh Noez!! The sky is falling !!
Posted by: Neil Czerno | June 9, 2007, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
>Iranian Americans for regime change in Iran.
The Ahmad Chalabis of the Iran!
Sad to see that those so called Iranians in the US have no comments about the sad state of Iraq, the 100s of thousands of innocent people who dies in a meaningless and illegal war based on lies and in the name of democracy and the only “strategic” error they see is that IRI’s role in the region has increased.
someone should remind them that the international terrorism that is spreading around the world is not sponsored by the IRI, but mainly by US friendly nations like Saudi Arabia, UAE, Pakistan and Kuwait. Even thought IRI is providing support to anti-israeli organizations, their support to international groups like Al-Qaida or others is like a drop in the ocean compare to the amount of support these groups receive from “friendly” dictatorship in the Persian Gulf.
Posted by: Farhad Abdolian | June 10, 2007, 5:38 am 5:38 am
In America they don’t send you to jail for disagreeing with the government or commenting on who controls the media, they just delete your post. What’s the point of posting on here if ABC is going to control what is on the comment board?
Posted by: Ernest | June 10, 2007, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Come on Mr. Hubers. Were you asleep in history class? Did not the UK and US align themselves with their enemy Stalin to go after a bigger and mutual enemy the Nazis? The Sunni and Shi’a see the US as the greater enemy and are cooperating. I bet your one of those people who say, “we should not have attacked Iraq because they never attached us”. Hmmm using that logic we never should have attached Germany in WWII because they never attacked us. Wake up.
Posted by: gthebull | June 10, 2007, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
>>Sad state of Iraq and friends of Sadam Husseins,
Iranian American for regime change in Tehran.
Firstly, this article is about the terrorist regime of Mullahs in Iran supplying Arms to the Taliban and not Iraq, Secondly, The US war on in Iraq was as a result of the Dictator such as Sadam who was killing and torturing more iraqi people than imaginable, not only that Sadam was a terrorist who supported Fanatic/Radical Sunnis not only against Israel but also against Iranians, Americans and everyone else, These`are not lies by Bush, these were facts , he DID have WMD’s such as Chem. and Bio weaponds and was in the process of developing Nuclear weapons, Sadam used his Chem. Weapons against Iranians for sure in Iran-Iraq War, so he did have them and was using them. Thirdly, the Iranians in the US love their mother country Iran and want good relations between Iran and the rest of the world including the USA therefore they are urging the Bush Adminstration and Israel not to make a major mistake by attacking Iran because this way a lot of inocent people may get killed in the process,we don’t care if the Mullahs ( Clergy in Iran ) get their heads cut off by Iranians opposition forces themselves, so we can conclude that Iranian-Americans are not like Chalabis at all, They will get rid of the Mullahs of Iran by themselves and of course by the Moral support of the International community, Please don’t compare the tiny Iraq with the power of Iran and it’s people , besides Iranians have already been struggling for Democracy in their country for a long time and have the bases of Democractic institutions unlike Iraq. hopefully Friends of Sadam and chalabis of Iraq have learned from this writing, it’s not like what you have thought my friend, be factual and realistic .Finally ,any Dictatorship regime in middle east should be changed to by the will of its people and replaced by democracies if we want to see a peacefull and stable middle east, therefore what Bush has started is just the begining of the road please fasten your seat belts everybody.
Iranian American for regime change in Tehran and freedom for people of Iran,
Believe me that time is not too far . Iranian people inside and outside of Iran are sick and tired of The Mullahs in Iran such as Khamenei, Ahmadinejad, Rafsanjani, Khatami, janati , Khomeini, etc. Viva to brave Iranian students , Iranian Journalists, Iranian Teachers, Iranian Industrial workers, etc.
Posted by: Iranian soldier | June 10, 2007, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
> Iranian soldier
Are you sure you are Iranian? Or you are one of those American conservatives hiding behind an Iranian “alias”?
Vatan forshi darde bozorge mellate mast, az mollaha gerefte ta iraniane amrika.
(being a traitor to our nation is a national sickness in Iran, form the Mullahs of Iran to the so called Iranian Americans).
/Farhad
Posted by: Farhad Abdolian | June 11, 2007, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Responding to ‘Patriot’s’ response on June 8;
Patriot I appreciate you ‘cherry picking’ the last 7 words of my comments “the war on terror is a scam”
I was actually referrring to the popular coinage of the phrase of “the war on terrorism”.
If you recall 9/11 was an ACT of terrorism – there is a difference.
If you would put down your coloring book for a second, you would realize that Terrorism has been around since the dawn of man in some form or fashion and has even been used by Nation-states to forward their own agenda.
Besides who the hell are you to spout off some “Guilt Trip” about 9/11 -
I have nothing but humble respect for those that perished on that day. I would tell the 9/11 families that I support a “Truly Independent” re-investigation as to what happened on that day, instead of the FARCE that was passed off.
Are you telling me you cannot be a patriot and question your Govt’s motives at the same time? if so then I think you have ‘blind nationalism’ and ‘Patriotism’ confused.
I would welcome any intelligent comment other than some emotional knee-jerk-name calling response.
In the words of — James Madison (father of the US Constitution)
‘If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is perhaps the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few.
The loss of liberty at home is to be charged to the provisions against danger, real or imagined, from abroad.’
Posted by: Justin | June 11, 2007, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Nearly every incredulous comment following this article, every anti-Bush comment, and perhaps indeed every comment that uses the term “neo-con” has some grammatical mistake or improper use of English. Either these are uneducated fools or they are part of Iranian-sympathetic propaganda mills, for whom English is no first language.
Posted by: Andrew | June 11, 2007, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
we are too scared to engage the Iranian’s as they slowly slaughter American G.I.s with thier IED bombs shipped to Iraq and Afghanistan.
We need new leadership on the battle the field and at the Pentagon. We need leaders willing to fight to win. Kill the bad guys even in Iran. Maybe then we can win this war.
Posted by: NavySEAL | June 11, 2007, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Iran is the first Muslim theocracy in the Islamists goal of achieving a worldwide caliphate. They are the front in the war. Does anyone need to review their history of murdering Americans, not to mention their stated intentions? The tragedy of the Bush administration is that it is held to be too aggresive because Bush won’t quit Iraq; but he doesn’t carry the fight to the enemy either he has not prosecuted the war intelligently or with much courage. He needs to be much more aggressive and target the right enemy – Iran.
Posted by: Richard Winkler | June 12, 2007, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Listen Abdooool>>>
Iranian Americans are true Iranians who want to get rid of the Mullahs in Iran .
Iranian soldier is a true Iranian who wants to get rid of the terrorist Mullahs. Abdoool are you Aghazade? ( Meaning the son of a Mullah ) If not then you would agree with the goal of getting rid of the Mullahs in Iran. Don’t be such anegative force against true Iranians such as Iranian soldier if you are not Aghazade ? Bache Mullah,
Abdolian is an Armenian name or atrue Iranian ? if you are true Iranian then you should join the Opposition forces to the Mullahs and get rid of all of the for afree and democratic Iran.
Iranian Americans for regime change in Iran.
Posted by: iranian American | June 12, 2007, 3:26 am 3:26 am
This is a bunch of cr@p. More government propaganda so we’ll be all for bombing Iran. All you right-wing freaks just remember that our own government is arming Sunni radicals in Iraq and Lebanon.
Posted by: Rocky | June 12, 2007, 8:47 am 8:47 am
I’m not too sure about the use of the term “radicals” here in this context above, Rocky.
In an-Bar, Iraq, the US is arming and providing support to Sunni tribal chiefs, who are starting to fight against AQI forces…a completely bad thing?
In Lebanon, the US (and other parties) are providing material support for the Lebanese government to fight certain anti-government factions, such as the Fatah al-Islam who are holed up in the Nahr el-Bared camp oustide of Tripoli. I think that many or most of the Lebanese population is pro-government, meaning they’re pretty much in favor of ridding their country of these elements. Of course there is an anti-Syrian coalition of Sunni Muslim, Druze and Christian parties in Lebanon that the US supports. Fouad Siniora was nominated to Prime Minisister on an anti-Syrian platform. Is it a bad thing to give them a hand?
…And while I’m not in the middle east right now and don’t have first hand knowledge, I don’t think that it’s all that unlikely that Iran is shipping arms to anti-US forces on either side of it’s borders. Do you really not agree, Rocky?
Posted by: Jazz | June 12, 2007, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Patriot– Show us the hard, empirically scientific evidence that exclusively points out who and what exactly caused the fall of the WTC.
Not the circumstantial stuff. Not the “magic, single bullet” theories.
But the evidence that is supported by physics and exhibited proof.
Then perhaps the questions of all of us “conspiracy theorists”, wackos, and nay sayers will stop once and for all.
Posted by: Zach | June 12, 2007, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Back in the day of Ronnie, this headline could have read: “The US Caught Red-Handed Shipping Arms to Iran”…and Iraq….and later Al Queda…
Why is it everything Iran does to mirror historic policies of the US is looked on as evil, yet when we were doing them, it was considered the right thing to do???
Oh yeah. God’s on our side.
It can’t get any more fundamentalist or religiously extreme than that, can it?
Posted by: Zach | June 12, 2007, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Wow, I read about 75% of the postings. I had a hard time believing people could be so spineless and not look at the big, simple picture right in front of their air suckers. I say spineless because they want to jump on the wagon and say “we got ourselves into this. ‘We’ sold them the weapons. If we weren’t sticking our noses in, it goes on..”
A lot of posting were really good though!
I spent a tour of duty in Afghanistan fighting these guys and I know they were getting better weapons just in the time I was there. It’s not left over weapons. Read the article which is very believable and you’ll see. They are supplying shaped IEDs, etc. Nato has been watching all borders and I’m happy to say they know what is going on. Now comes the hard part of convincing the tail tucking dreamers back here that there is a big bad world out there. It has been said before in many postings, but let me re-emphasize. If you do not believe in their religion they believe you should be killed. “spread the word by the sword” is the saying???
I know that here in N. America I have the freedom to believe in what I want to and protection just in case someone doesn’t like it.
I’m glad we are getting out there and sorting them out before it’s at our gates.
Posted by: Cal | June 13, 2007, 9:28 am 9:28 am
We really need to stop going to war on behalf of Israel, do what is right for the USA for a change.
Iran is a dangerous country but with Israel having nuclear weapons, Iran wants it to.
Let them go to war, ancient tribal warfare not involve us.
Posted by: JNCC1701 | June 13, 2007, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
That’s right, m (and common knowledge) that the Clinton administration attempted to “be friendly” with them. Foreign powers, including the United States, were at first supportive of the Taliban in hopes it would serve as a force to restore order in Afghanistan after years of division into corrupt, lawless warlord fiefdoms.
Slowly, they lost US support as they began rocketing unarmed civilians, targeting ethnic groups (primarily of Hazaras) and restricting the rights of women. In late 1997, Madeleine Albright began to distance the U.S. from the Taliban and the next year the American-based Unocal oil company withdrew from a major deal with the Taliban regime concerning an oil pipeline…
Posted by: Jazz | June 13, 2007, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Cal,
If you got 75% of the people here spouting similar rhetoric and it isn’t in line with your own, it’s not “spineless”. It’s a majority.
And either “spineless” or violently aggressive in a democracy, the majority represents the voice of the people.
Sorry mate.
Those are the rules of the game even when they don’t turn portray your particular take on things.
Posted by: Zach | June 14, 2007, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
That same “rule of the game” should apply when speaking about elections then, no?
Posted by: Jazz | June 15, 2007, 9:39 am 9:39 am
To the writer. Do some research, Canadian Forces are also engaging in combat operations in Afghanistan.
Posted by: Keith | June 16, 2007, 2:24 am 2:24 am
As soon as I see this reported by a reputable source that is not a member of the United States corporate media, I’ll start believing it.
Amen Tom,, How did Bush know other countries had weapons of mass destruction?? Because HE had the RECIEPT!
Posted by: Jenn | June 16, 2007, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Richard Clarke’s various assesments aren’t usually credible?
Posted by: Jazz | June 17, 2007, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Its not question of shia or sunni .If this was the case then Hammas is being supported by Iran and Hizbullah. I think be real. Its about new Iranian hegemony in the region which will make things worse for US and her allies. USA needs to wake up from self defeating thinking that Iranian Mullahs are going relinquish their new found power easily. The most problematic countries are India, Russia and China who despite the western sanctions havent broken their economic ties.Thus allowing Mullahs to break their isolation.
Posted by: Joakim | June 17, 2007, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers decided that a fellow black panther named Alex Rackley needed to die. Rackley was suspected of disloyalty.
Rackley was first tied to a chair. Once safely immobilized his “friends” tortured him for hours by, among other things, pouring boiling water on him.
When they got tired of torturing him, Black Panther member Warren Kimbo took Rackley outside and put a bullet in his
head. His body was later found floating in a river about 25 miles north of New Haven, Conn. Perhaps at this point you’re curious as to what happened to
these Black Panthers. In 1977, that’s only eight years later, only one of the
killers was still in jail. The shooter, Warren Kimbo, managed to get a scholarship to Harvard. He later became
assistant dean at Eastern Connecticut state College. Isn’t that something? As a 60′s radical you can pump a bullet into someone’s head and a few years later, in the same state, you
can become an assistant college dean! Only in America. Erica Huggins was the lady who served the panthers by
boiling the water for Rackley’s torture.
Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a California School Board.
How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy. Maybe it was in some part due to two people who came to the Panthers defense. These two people went so far as to shut down Yale University with demonstrations in the defense of the accused Black Panthers during their trial. One of these people was none other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr.
Lee, or Mr. Lan Lee, as the case may be, isn’t a college dean. He isn’t a member of the California School Board. He is now the head of the US Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.
O.K., so who is the other Panther defender? Is this notable
Panther defender now a school board member? Is this other
Panther apologist now an assistant college dean? No,
neither!
The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical law
student at Yale University at the time. She is now know as
“The smartest woman in the world” She is none other than
the Democratic candidate for the US Senate from the State of
New York—-our lovely First Lady, the incredible Hillary
Rodham Clinton.
And now; as Paul Harvey says; you know the rest of the
story.
Pass this on! She deserves the press………………….
Posted by: Black panther | June 20, 2007, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
support freedom for Iran
Posted by: Winston | July 9, 2007, 4:19 am 4:19 am
Here’s a liberal’s opinion for all you lib-bashers to chew on: Iran probably is our enemy and a threat, but Bush is still an idiot.
In fact, by focusing on Iraq first, he a) spread our military too thin, b) made it tough to be our ally in the region, and c) lost the distraction Saddam provided against Iran.
He should’ve finished the job swiftly and decisively in Afghanistan (the Powell doctrine), and then massed troops along the Iranian and Pakistani (Waziristan) borders. Iran would’ve been held in check and the world might still respect us…
Posted by: Dave E | January 7, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Wht guarantee we have that these were not sent in by Bush or Dick Chenny to fund Al Quida Taliban through Pakistan.After all Taliban was foster child of Pakistan nurtured by US funding thru Pakistan to fight erstwhile USSR occupation of Afghanistan.
Posted by: youneverknow | January 11, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am
You believe this story. I think Pentagon has more story writers with them that hollywood could use. It is all american arms. You give these terrorists arms when you want them and they keep it safe for so long only to through it on your face at alater date.USA has spoiled the world terrorist group to such an extent in the name of supporting freedom movement, now all are holding US arms.American policies past and present are totally sickening
Posted by: sivasaiva | January 11, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
Why wouldn’t Iran supply the Taliban and Iraq. It is in their interests to remove the USA and increase their power in the region. They do no believe that America has the military power or political will to invade them. There goal is to remove America from the region and become the dominate reginal power.
Neither Iran or America are entirely good or bad. They are both looking after their own interests which happen to be in conflict.
Who you support is who’s interests more closely effect your own.
Does this article help build popular support for War with Iran?
As much as the comments of other support the interests of Iran.
Posted by: me | March 6, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
I did see a cop at the 2:37 mark he is right in middle of track. He has billy club in hand, yet did not try to use it on the person filming him. That is why you missed him. This is SF Earthquake stuff folks.
Posted by: Palmer Tennon | October 21, 2011, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm