Jul 18, 2007 6:32pm

U.S.: ‘No Options off the Table’ to Target AQ in Pakistan

U.S. officials are mapping out new options of how to deal with what appears to be the gravest threat facing the United States: the resurgence of al Qaeda in Pakistan. President Bush’s top counterterrorism advisor told Diane Sawyer on "Good Morning America" today that the U.S. does not rule out sending in American soldiers if Pakistan allows the safe haven to continue. "The answer…is what we want to do is work with our Pakistani partners," Frances Townsend said in response to Diane Sawyer’s question about sending U.S. troops into the tribal areas. "But the president’s been very clear. There are no options off the table because job No. 1 is protecting the American people, and nothing will get in our way." But Pakistani officials reiterated today that U.S. troops are not and would not be welcome there. And U.S. officials say they have little confidence that the Pakistani army will do the job. Click Here for Full Blotter Coverage. "It’s gone in half-hearted, and it’s been ineffective," said Bruce Riedel, a former CIA officer who now works at The Brookings Institution. "I think part of the problem is that a good part of the army and the intelligence services are actually sympathetic to the Islamic extremists." The options for U.S. military action are limited in Pakistan, which boasts the same vast, rugged areas that have bogged down U.S. troops in Afghanistan. But U.S. analysts do not rule out a pinpoint strike if there was hard intelligence on the location of Osama bin Laden or his top deputies. "There are obviously certain risks you take if you undertake that kind of operation," Bob Grenier, a former CIA official who now works with the global security firm Kroll, said, "but that is something which is quite feasible. If we’re talking about denying a safe haven, that’s a very different thing." Officials say hundreds of terrorists have been trained and dispatched for attacks against the U.S. and Europe from that safe haven. As the Blotter on ABCNews.com reported last week, senior law enforcement and intelligence officials had "multiple and credible" reports that an al Qaeda terror cell may be on its way to the United States or could already be in the country. Do you have a tip for Brian Ross and the Investigative Team?

User Comments

That’s life…you gotta do what you gotta do…

Posted by: Jazz | July 18, 2007, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

So Bruce Riedel, a former CIA officer says about the Pakistani army “It’s gone in half-hearted, and it’s been ineffective,” ? So what about the American army/navy and airforce etc… who went in full-hearted and armed to the teeth against Al-Qaeda? Has IT been effective?

Posted by: Saeb | July 19, 2007, 7:54 am 7:54 am

Saeb-
I guarantee you we are killing Al Qaeda guys at a 20-1 ratio over our guys. They dont fight – they use our respect for life against us, because they have none. The only way they kill anyone is by blowing something up. If they ever do conquer a country (unlikely) they will get crushed. If the US ever decides that it should fight the same way as Al Qaeda does – AQ will be smushed.

Posted by: Duhize | July 19, 2007, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Of course there are scumbags in the Pakistani army and intelligence services that are sympathetic to Islamic fanatics. Those people need to start being assassinated.

Posted by: rightone | July 19, 2007, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

The kill ratio in Afghanistan is probably higher than 20-1, but anyway, something in Pakistan is going to pop soon, good or bad…

Posted by: Jazz | July 19, 2007, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

The only way to kill al Qaeda is to just do it. If the Pakistani army wishes to take part in defending their AQ extremist brothers, then send them all to meet Allah.

Posted by: JP | July 19, 2007, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

[From ISLAMABAD*/PakistaN]
U know that after in these days suicide bombing in PAKISTAN is growing & grwoing everyday u know y? becuase musharraf send a big amount army to trible areas (waziristan & now swat & others) of pakistan & in these areas u cant send the army ,if u wud they ppl wud kill ur army becuase they r different ppl & they have their own rules & thats y they r bombing into pakistan’s other areas & want musharraf to send army back ..
If i were in the place of President Musharraf u know wat i wud send back the army from tible & northern areas of pakistan cuz that dont makes us any damage & no bombing but now u know soo many pple killing in bombing ….
so my advise for pakistan saftey is that send army back from northern areas .

Posted by: UmAR-89 | July 19, 2007, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

If the US army(The strongest army in the world) can not defeat the Taliban, then how is the Pakistan army going to do it?

Posted by: Chris | July 19, 2007, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

By getting out a gigantic can of Raid and spraying the entire Waziristan frontier region…

Posted by: Jazz | July 19, 2007, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

…then spray a case of Raid on Washington, DC and watch democracy really flourish in America.

Posted by: Jack Twist | July 19, 2007, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Pakistan could have had the situation under control by now. But does it really want to?
Time the US did things alittle differently.
Go in and get them even in Pakistan. It would save lives.

Posted by: Kottaras | July 19, 2007, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Eliminate the AQ from the world mape . No permission from any quarter is necessary . It is the call of the time.

Posted by: bajo | July 20, 2007, 2:25 am 2:25 am

Imagine… It’s 1947. Tojo is alive and well, since the US responded to the Japanese attack by invading Spain.
President Truman’s top counter-Imperial Japan advisor says: “The answer…is what we want to do is work with our Filipino partners…”
What a sad, sick joke we’re all living through.

Posted by: Logan Waters | July 20, 2007, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Obliterate the tribal regions. If they want to live amongst terrorists and harbor them, they can die along side them. If the Pakistani Army fires on US troops, kill them too. Why is it that Bush’s bravado is nowhere to be found when, for perhaps the first time, it could actually be useful instead of harmful.

Posted by: TJ | July 20, 2007, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

What happens if Musharraf falls? Who would take over? Who would control Pakistan’s nuclear weapons? Would the ‘sympathizers’ of the extremists distribute these nuke weapons to Al-Qaeda? We could be in a pre-WW III phase if that nightmare scenario comes to pass

Posted by: Yohanes | July 21, 2007, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

US must go into the tribal areas of Pakistan and root out AQ and Talibaan from there. Pakistani army and Pakistani Intelligence Service ISI, will help AQ and Talibaan but US must confront them as well. If US keeps on “outsourcing” the job of root outing AQ and Talibaan to Pakistani army, then US will never ever get AQ and Talibaan. US must be prepared to accept heavy casualties as well, since that region is rugged, harsh terrain and full of mountains and hideouts perfect for gurrilla warfare and for AQ and Talibaan it’s their home, they know each and every terrain there. They are well trained in gurrilla warfare, well prepared, well equipped by Dubai, UAE, Quatar and Saudi’s oil money. They are masters in gurrilla warfare so US must be very cautious in confronting them. Let Pakistani army do the heavy job of actually fighting on the ground and let US provide the material, technological logistical and tactical, support. Let AQ and Talibaan kill Pakistani army soldeirs and let Pakistani army soldires kill AQ and Talibaan. US must provide all sorts of logistical, technical and tactical support but US must go in there and let Pakistani army do the heavy lifting job. Same should be appiled to Lebanon as well. Let Lebanese army kill Hesbollah terrorists and let Hesbollah terrorists kill Lebanese army soldiers. US and Sovereign Jewish State of Israel, keep a watch from sidelines and provide all support.

Posted by: Tom Weisman | July 22, 2007, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Yet again, the USA is threatening to violste the sovereignty of another nation. This is what got the USA into the mess it is in and all the other messes – the inability to mind its own business. Let’s say that USA troops go into Pakistan. Thst will motivate the radicals to attack the US forces with the same devices as are being used to kill them in Iraq. So there will be another bloodbath and a war of attrition and more body bags sent home to the USA. Furthermore, Musharraf is on shaky ground at the moment and if he consents to the USA putting troops onto Pakistani soil, he could be deposed and a radical loony could become President and be in control of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons. Just imagine Islamic radicals in charge of a nuclear arsenal. You can almost be guaranteed that Al Qaeda will get some of them then. The USA never ever learns – it stumbles from one catastrophe to another. However the ramifications from a US attack on Pakistani soil could open up a can of worms that will possibly result in a nuclear device being exploded in New York or Los Angeles.

Posted by: Ziggy | July 24, 2007, 5:26 am 5:26 am

So, the US should never have attacked Japan to protect it’s security? Anyway, if the US takes action inside Pakistan, it will be with the “cooperation” of Mooshie…

Posted by: Jazz | July 24, 2007, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Intel reports that are deemed “unclassifed” are filled with conjecture and now much meat. If the US Public was made aware of more of the intel reports there would be wide spread panic in a lot of cities. Remember afetr 9-11 people started buying gums and wanted to take up arms agains Al Qaeda? What happened to those supporters? Maybe they have forgotten?
Sending troops to Pakistan is NOT ENOUGH!!! We need to send Bombers and Cruise Missiles

Posted by: Jerry M | July 24, 2007, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

US Intellegence agencies’ inaccurate and pliable(read as directed by the US government Policy)reports have by now become legendary, What with WMD etc in Iraq and all. I often wonder about following:-
a. If they the whereabouts of AQ leadership in Pakistan, why dont they tell the Pakistani government and then see what is done about it? if these are mere speculations then, they better shut up.
b. What has US forces achieved in Afghanistan (beyond muncipal limits of Kabul) that they claim to want to achieve on Pakistani side of border?
c. If they really want to limit supposed infiltration of AQ elements from Pakistan, then why dont they agree to the most obvious way to do it,i.e. seal the border with a fence? Remember India has already done that along the length of Pakistani border and, Israel is in the course of building a wall to keep out Palestinians. Or is it that the US wants to keep the door open for their eventual assault on a sovereign nation?

Posted by: khanzada | July 25, 2007, 3:01 am 3:01 am

We could put boots on the ground in Pakistan tomorrow and four years from now, we’ll still be in both Afghanistan AND Pakistan trying futilely to eradicate the terrorists. What makes anyone think we know how to do this yet after so much time being unsuccessful at it?

Posted by: Kid Charlemagne | July 25, 2007, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Duhize,
Your post makes a lie out of the popular myth that terrorists (more specifically radical Muslim extremists) want to kill every American and “slit our throats”. How can that be if as you say, “They don’t fight”.

Posted by: Kid Charlemagne | July 25, 2007, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Ziggy,
To use the convoluted logic of some, the argument for or against anything is to bring up any other non related incident and ask you to use the same weights and measures to qualify and quantify both events though one may have absolutely nothing in common with the other.
For example: You say something about invading or entering Pakistan and my reply might be to justify doing so by pointing out that after being strafed and bombed by another country we must surely have the right to invade any country that is a hide out for the resistance against us in a totally separate country that we invaded wrongly and have occupied militarily for years. If you don’t see the correlation,…it’s because there is none. Beware the dreaded bait and switch. Some people will stoop to any level just to reward their ego with a win in a debate.

Posted by: Kid Charlemagne | July 25, 2007, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Chris
The US army is the strongest in the world but no the smartest. Wars now-a-days aren’t fought based on brute force but rather on cunningness and your brains. When you are dressed like a soldier in a villiage full of people dressed traditionally, your are asking for trouble. You are just a moving target. When a soldier gets close to a terroist he moves back as the soldier dosen’t know how he looks. At the same time if it was the other way around the soldier wouldn’t move as everyone around him are dressed alike. AQ isn’t telling people to get off their ass and kill people. THey are telling them to train themselves and formulate a plan that does not involve using military fatigue, guns or RPGs but rather household item that when combined are deadly.
Understand this parable from the Bible…. Daivd used a stone to kill Goliath, a man stronger, taller and well armed than him. You will never win this way,never.

Posted by: kilroy | July 26, 2007, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

kilroy, AQ doesn’t use guns or rpg’s? Earth to Kilroy…Earth to Kilroy…

Posted by: Jazz | July 27, 2007, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Kid Charlemagne, you make some excellent points, however my point about the USA’s actions is its despicable history over the past 50 years of interfering in nations that were no threat to the USA and its threat to interfere again in Pakistan without the consent of the Pakistanis. Just to name a few, North Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua, Chile, Cuba (Bay of Pigs), Dominican Republic, Grenada are nations where the USA either invaded, deposed elected leaders or waged clandestine war. Iraq is the current shining example of a sovereign nation being invaded and destroyed by the USA, yet Iraq has never been a threat to the Americans. These are all related incidents to the Pakistan situation because it shows an ongoing course of conduct by the USA, which considers itself to have the right to invade, depose, attack or undermine any nation it chooses and also break or abrogate every international treaty it has signed. Just a quickie about that – the USA has been breaching the NPT since the day it signed, but the current nuclear deal with India is an amazing and flagrant breach of the NPT. But the USA expects Iran to stick by the NPT to the letter and also forgo its legal rights to enrich uranium, but the USA continues to develop nuclear weapons and do deals with a non-NPT nation. This is the basis of my arguments, Kid Charlemagne – it’s not just Pakistan, it’s almost EVERYTHING that the USA does in the international sphere that is offensive and illegal. This is why the USA is not only hated by the majority of the planet, but motivates people to attack it.

Posted by: Ziggy | July 28, 2007, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

“it’s almost EVERYTHING that the USA does in the international sphere that is offensive and illegal.” – Ziggy
I understand what your point is, but this statement is so off from the truth and just incorrect to an nth degree, man…

Posted by: Jazz | July 30, 2007, 9:50 am 9:50 am

This biased report needs to show the number of Pakistani Army officials who have died in Waziristan, Wana and in other Pak/Afghan Border areas. Not only that hundreds of officials have died in the past three weeks! What more do you want them to do? Sending US troops will make the locals loose faith in the Pakistani Govt and a civil war will result just like the situation In Iraq which was worsened way more due to the presence of the US troops! You can say all you want about the US troops being martyrs and trying to help..there’s no denying that! But the people at the conference table need to keep in mind the possibilities of all that can happen because of their action! Clean up your mess in Iraq and Afghanistan rather than adding more countries in your menu list.

Posted by: misty | July 31, 2007, 5:09 am 5:09 am

Jazz, you say that my statement about the USA committing illegal and offensive acts in the international spehere is incorrect. I don’t have unlimited time to point out the litany of illegal acts or the flouting of international treaties by the USA, but here are a few. The current nuclear deal with India completely violates the NPT, yet the USA demands that Iran not only complies to the letter with the NPT but also gives up its legal rights to uranium enrichment under threat of attack – utter hypocrisy, but typical. The US funding of terrorist group Jundullah to launch attacks on Iran. The $75 million allocated by the USA for “regime change” in Iran, completely illegal under the UN Charter. The illegal war and occupation of Iraq. The abrogation of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. The continued flouting of the NPT by the USA continuing to upgrade nuclear weapons and develop new ones. The two failed attempts by the CIA to assassinate or depose Hugo Chavez of Venezuela. This are just a few current events – don’t get me started on previous US illegal activity and interference in sovereign nations. I still remember Iran-Contra, the mining of Managua Harbour, Salvador Allende, Grenada, a litany of other crimes. Don’t you DARE accuse me of making statements that are not truthful, because history backs me to the hilt. Just because your government and newspapers whitewash the history of illegal and criminal acts by your nation will not insulate the world from the truth. Most of this planet does not fall for the spin-doctoring and blatant lying that the Americans swallow as “news” – the history books have the facts and those are what I have stated here – like it or lump it, Jazz.

Posted by: Ziggy | August 4, 2007, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.